Skip to main content
Cell Proliferation logoLink to Cell Proliferation
. 2010 Apr 14;43(3):287–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2010.00681.x

Proliferation of myofibroblasts in the stroma of renal oncocytoma

T‐H Yen 1,4, Y Chen 2,4, J‐F Fu 3,4, C‐H Weng 1,4, Y‐C Tian 1,4, C‐C Hung 1,4, J‐L Lin 1,4, C‐W Yang 1,4
PMCID: PMC6496508  PMID: 20412129

Abstract

Objectives:  Myofibroblasts are a vital component of stroma of many malignant neoplasms, but it is not yet established whether stromal myofibroblasts also exist in benign tumours such as oncocytoma of the kidney.

Materials and methods:  Histomorphological and immunohistochemical analysis of 16 renal oncocytomas diagnosed at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, has been performed.

Results:  Renal oncocytomas were composed of oncocytes, large cells with granular eosinophilic cytoplasm, arranged mostly in sheets, in tubulocystic or combined pattern. Few oncocytes appeared to be undergoing proliferation or apoptosis. MIB‐1 and active caspase 3 indices were low, but higher in tumour than in surrounding non‐tumour parenchyma (MIB‐1: 0.93 ± 0.09 versus 0.46 ± 0.07, P < 0.001 and active caspase 3: 0.76 ± 0.08 versus 0.41 ± 0.09, P < 0.001). Wnt/β‐catenin signalling was not implicated in this neoplasm, as there was no loss of E‐cadherin membranous localization or expression of intranuclear β‐catenin in the cells. Clumps of oncocytes were stained with periodic acid Schiff and had collagen I‐, collagen III‐ and fibronectin‐positive, but desmin‐ and human caldesmon‐negative stromas. Importantly, α‐smooth muscle actin (SMA)‐immunostaining established the myofibroblastic nature of many of the stromal cells. Some of the myofibroblasts were also positive for MIB‐1, indicating a proliferative role for them in the stroma.

Conclusions:  Renal oncocytomas were composed of two independent compartments: benign oncocytes and pronounced fibrotic stroma, which consisted of proliferating myofibroblasts (SMA‐ and MIB‐1‐positive) which were associated with excessive deposition of extracellular matrix (periodic acid Schiff‐component, collagen I‐, collagen III‐ and fibronectin‐positive, and desmin‐ and human caldesmon‐negative).

Introduction

Oncocytoma, a rare benign kidney tumour of collecting duct cell origin, was first described by Zippel in 1942 (1). This tumour has been subsequently identified in thyroid, parathyroid, salivary and adrenal glands. In 1976, Klein and Valensi (2) suggested that renal oncocytoma was a distinct clinicopathological entity and since then, renal oncocytoma has been diagnosed more frequently. Macroscopically, renal oncocytoma is typified by its well‐circumscribed, frequently encapsulated appearance, its uniform tan colour and a lack of evidence of necrosis or haemorrhage (3). On cross‐sectioning, a central satellite scar is often observed. Microscopically, renal oncocytoma is characterized by predominance of eosinophilic epithelial cells called oncocytes, with prominent mitochondria‐rich cytoplasm arranged in a solid trabecular or tubular pattern (3); other organelles are sparse. Mitotic activity is usually absent, and nuclear pleomorphism is rare.

Malignant solid tumours are composed of two interdependent compartments: malignant cells and the stroma that they induce around themselves and in which they are dispersed (4). Tumour stroma is a complex medium in which a variety of interactions takes place between tumour and normal tissue cells. Tumour cells proliferate and invade the stroma whereas immune cells congregate around tumour nests and from where tumour angiogenesis is promoted (5). Dynamic changes in cancer‐associated tissue stroma are collectively termed a desmoplastic reaction as they resemble wound‐healing (4). The desmoplastic reaction is supported mainly by activation of local fibroblasts as myofibroblast type (6). These myofibroblasts have differentiated from fibroblasts and now express SMA as cytoplasmic microfilaments, and desmin to a limited extent, whereas quiescent host‐resident fibroblasts express vimentin as intermediate filament proteins (7).

Myofibroblasts are associated with tumour cells at all stages of cancer progression (8). In various malignancies, tumour‐dependent differentiation of fibroblasts toward myofibroblasts further promotes neoplastic progression (9). It is known that collagen I, the major extracellular matrix component produced by myofibroblasts, not only functions as a scaffold for the tissue but also regulates expression of genes associated with cell signalling and metabolism and gene transcription and translation, thus affecting fundamental cellular processes that are essential for tumour progression. For example, collagen I expression has been found to be a signal for invasion, and its intratumoral expression level has been associated with tumour invasiveness (10).

Myofibroblasts have been described in fibrocontractive disease (11) and in tumours such as cancers of the colon (12), liver (13), lung (14), prostate (15), pancreas (16) and breast (17). It has been proposed that appearance of myofibroblasts precedes onset of metastatic cell invasion and contributes to tumour growth and progression (18). Their pro‐invasive activity is dependent on capacity to secrete extracellular matrix degrading proteases (19) and to participate in synthesis of extracellular matrix components, which alter adhesive and migratory properties of epithelial cancer cells (20).

The aim of this study was to examine whether stromal myofibroblasts also exist in benign neoplasms such as oncocytoma of the kidney.

Materials and methods

Clinical data

This analysis included 16 consecutive oncocytomas, from 1667 patients with renal neoplasms, diagnosed between 1987 and 2002 at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Table 1 shows the summary of clinical courses of the patients, eight men and eight women, age range 47–79 years (mean, 54.5 years). Tumours varied in size from 3–15 cm diameter (mean, 6.6 cm), ten were in the right kidney, six in the left, none found bilaterally. Approximately 38% (6 of 16) were discovered incidentally during diagnostic evaluation for complaints unrelated to kidney disease or to renal neoplasia. In addition, three patients (or 18.8%) reported abdominal pain, four (25%) reported flank pain, two (12.5%) reported gross haematuria and one (6.2%) had recent‐onset hypertension. Neither weight loss nor fever was a symptom in any patient; all were examined thoroughly before surgery, by a range of radiological examinations. However, pre‐operatively, all patients were tentatively diagnosed as having renal cell carcinoma. Perioperatively, frozen sections from three patients revealed renal oncocytoma in two of them and renal cell carcinoma in one. Accordingly, surgeons were uncertain about accuracy of diagnosis after frozen section examination. The preliminary diagnosis had been renal cell carcinoma; thus, they performed only unilateral nephrectomy. Hence, 10 patients received right radical nephrectomy and six patients received left radical nephrectomy. Post‐operatively, all 16 patients were followed up from 12 to 189 months, mean 58.7 months. All patients survived with no evidence of tumour recurrence.

Table 1.

 Course and outcome of 16 oncocytomas, among 1667 cases of renal neoplasms diagnosed between 1987 and 2002 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. (N = 16)

Case Age/sex Tumour size (cm)/location/presentation Pre‐operative diagnosis Perioperative frozen section Post‐operative diagnosis Surgery Months after surgery/tumour recurrence
1 59/M 12 × 7 × 4/left/incidental Renal cell carcinoma Not performed Renal oncocytoma Left nephrectomy 20/no
2 56/M 11 × 10 × 7/right/abdominal pain Renal cell carcinoma Not performed Renal oncocytoma Right nephrectomy 51/no
3 66/F 5 × 4 × 4/left/incidental Renal cell carcinoma Not performed Renal oncocytoma Left nephrectomy 40/no
4 51/F 11 × 9 × 6/right/flank pain Renal cell carcinoma Not performed Renal oncocytoma Right nephrectomy 80/no
5 54/F 4 × 4 × 3/right/abdominal pain Renal cell carcinoma Not performed Renal oncocytoma Right nephrectomy 39/no
6 65/F 11 × 8 × 5/right/flank pain Renal cell carcinoma Not performed Renal oncocytoma Right nephrectomy 121/no
7 70/M 4 × 3 × 3/right/flank pain Renal cell carcinoma Renal oncocytoma Renal oncocytoma Right nephrectomy 13/no
8 52/F 5 × 4 × 4/left/high blood pressure Renal cell carcinoma Not performed Renal oncocytoma Left nephrectomy 13/no
9 79/M 5 × 4 × 3/right/incidental Renal cell carcinoma Not performed Renal oncocytoma Right nephrectomy 68/no
10 47/M 3 × 3 × 2/left/incidental Renal cell carcinoma Renal cell carcinoma Renal oncocytoma Left nephrectomy 12/no
11 54/F 4 × 4 × 3/left/abdominal pain Renal cell carcinoma Renal oncocytoma Renal oncocytoma Left nephrectomy 16/no
12 69/M 4 × 4 × 3/right/incidental Renal cell carcinoma Not performed Renal oncocytoma Right nephrectomy 44/no
13 52/F 8 × 7 × 6/right/gross haematuria Renal cell carcinoma Not performed Renal oncocytoma Right nephrectomy 70/no
14 49/M 4 × 3 × 3/right/gross haematuria Renal cell carcinoma Not performed Renal oncocytoma Right nephrectomy 88/no
15 49/F 15 × 8 × 8/left/incidental Renal cell carcinoma Not performed Renal oncocytoma Left nephrectomy 189/no
16 49/M 4 × 3.5 × 2/right/flank pain Renal cell carcinoma Not performed Renal oncocytoma Right nephrectomy 75/no

Immunostaining

Sections cut at 4 μm were dewaxed and incubated in hydrogen peroxide (2.4 ml, 30%) in methanol (400 ml) to block endogenous peroxidases, and rehydrated through graded alcohols with water, then with phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) (21, 22, 23) (Table 2). Sections were also incubated for 2 min in acetic acid (20%) in methanol to block endogenous alkaline phosphatase. For antigen retrieval of MIB‐1, active caspase 3, β‐catenin and E‐cadherin, collagen I, collagen III, fibronectin, desmin, human‐caldesmon immunostaining, sections were subjected to microwaving (700 W) in 0.01 m citrate buffer at pH 6 for 20 min. For SMA immunostaining, antigen retrieval was performed initially by incubation with trypsin at pH 7.8 for 15 min, but it was found later that the immunostaining also worked well without trypsin pre‐treatment (24). To reduce non‐specific background staining, sections were pre‐incubated with either (i) normal rabbit (X0902; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) or swine serum (X0901; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) at dilution of 1:25 for 15 min, or (ii) 3% bovine serum albumin (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) at dilution of 1:25 for 15 min. After washing in PBS, sections were incubated for 35 min with primary antibodies against: (i) MIB‐1 (M7240; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) at 1:100 dilution, (ii) active caspase 3 (AF835; R&D, Minneapolis, MN, USA) at 1:100 dilution, (iii) SMA (A2547; Sigma) 1:2000 dilution, (iv) β‐catenin (610154; BD, San Jose, CA, USA) 1:100 dilution, (v) E‐cadherin (SC8426; Santa‐Cruz, CA, USA) 1:30 dilution, (vi) collagen I (1310‐01; Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA) 1:300 dilution, (vii) collagen III (ab6310; ABcam, Cambridge, UK) 1:600 dilution, (viii) fibronectin (ab2413; ABcam, Cambridge, UK) 1:300 dilution, (ix) desmin (M0760; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) 1:50 dilution and (x) human caldesmon (M3557; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) 1:200 dilution. For the second layer following PBS washing, sections were incubated with either: (i) biotinylated swine anti‐rabbit (E353, Dako) 1:500 dilution, 35 min for rabbit antibodies, (ii) biotinylated rabbit anti‐mouse (E354, Dako) 1:300 dilution for 35 min for mouse antibodies, (iii) biotinylated rabbit anti‐goat (E466, Dako) 1:500 dilution, 35 min for goat antibodies. For the third layer following PBS washing, streptavidin–peroxidase (P397; Dako) at 1:500 dilution or streptavidin–alkaline phosphatase (D396, Dako) at 1:50 dilution was applied to sections for 35 min. Slides were developed in 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine (DAB) (D5637, Sigma) plus 0.3% hydrogen peroxide or Vector Red Alkaline Phosphatase Kit (SK‐5100, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 20 min, counterstained with light haematoxylin counterstaining, dehydrated, and mounted with DPX‐type mountant. For each immunostaining protocol a known positive and a negative control was included to assure proper functioning of the staining system as well as for valid interpretation of results. Positive controls used were archival human tissues, which were known to contain the desired antigen and had provided positive staining previously, using these components. For negative controls, the primary antibody was omitted.

Table 2.

 Protocols for immunostaining

Proliferation Apoptosis Myofibroblasts Wnt/β‐catenin signalling Tumour stroma
Antigen retrieval Microwaving in 0.01 m citrate buffer at pH 6 for 20 min Microwaving in 0.01 m citrate buffer at pH 6 for 20 min Not necessary Microwaving in 0.01 m citrate buffer at pH 6 for 20 min Microwaving in 0.01 m citrate buffer at pH 6 for 20 min Microwaving in 0.01 m citrate buffer at pH 6 for 20 min Microwaving in 0.01 m citrate buffer at pH 6 for 20 min Proteinase K working solution at 37 °C for 20 min Microwaving in 0.01 m citrate buffer at pH 6 for 20 min Microwaving in 0.01 m citrate buffer at pH 6 for 20 min
Primary antibody MIB‐1 Active caspase 3 α‐smooth muscle actin β‐catenin E‐cadherin Collagen I Collagen III Fibronectin Desmin Human‐Caldesmon
Species Mouse Rabbit Mouse Mouse Mouse Goat Mouse Rabbit Mouse Mouse
Dilution 1:100 1:100 1:2000 1:100 1:30 1:300 1:600 1:300 1:50 1:200
Source Dako R&D System Sigma BD Santa‐Cruz SouthernBiotech ABcam ABcam Dako Dako
Secondary antibody Biotinylated rabbit anti‐mouse Biotinylated swine anti‐rabbit Biotinylated rabbit anti‐mouse Biotinylated rabbit anti‐mouse Biotinylated rabbit anti‐mouse Biotinylated rabbit anti‐goat Biotinylated swine anti‐rabbit Biotinylated rabbit anti‐mouse Biotinylated rabbit anti‐mouse Biotinylated rabbit anti‐mouse
Dilution 1:300 1:500 1:300 1:300 1:300 1:300 1:500 1:300 1:300 1:300
Source Dako Dako Dako Dako Dako Dako Dako Dako Dako Dako
Tertiary antibody Streptavidin‐peroxidase Streptavidin‐peroxidase Steptavidin‐alkaline phosphatase Streptavidin‐peroxidase Streptavidin‐peroxidase Streptavidin‐peroxidase Streptavidin‐peroxidase Steptavidin‐alkaline phosphatase Streptavidin‐peroxidase Streptavidin‐peroxidase
Dilution 1:500 1:500 1:50 1:500 1:500 1:500 1:500 1:50 1:500 1:500
Source Dako Dako Vector Laboratories Dako Dako Dako Dako Vector Laboratories Dako Dako
Colour developer DAB DAB Vector Red DAB DAB DAB DAB Vector Red DAB DAB

Double immunostaining for smooth muscle actin and for cell proliferation status

Sections were initially stained for SMA immunostaining using a steptavidin‐alkaline phosphatase method, followed by MIB‐1 immunostaining using the streptavidin‐peroxidase method, then counterstained very lightly with haematoxylin. Finally, specimens were dehydrated and mounted, as above.

Cell counting

Stained sections were examined using a standard light microscope (Nikon Eclipse ME600, Tokyo, Japan). For cell counting after immunostaining, 20 consecutive non‐overlapping fields per slide were examined under ×400 magnification. To assess cell proliferation (MIB‐1 index), number of MIB‐1‐positive oncocytes was counted as a fraction of the total number of oncocytes in the same area. Similarly, to assess apoptosis (active caspase 3 index), number of active caspase 3‐positive oncocytes was counted as a fraction of total number of oncocytes in the same area. Results are expressed as percentages (%).

Statistical analysis

All values described below are expressed as mean and standard deviation, per number of observations. Statistical analysis was conducted using the SPSS 11.0.4 for Mac (Chicago, IL, USA). Data were compared and analysed using Student’s t‐test. P‐values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Haematoxylin and eosin and periodic acid‐Schiff staining

Tumours consisted of uniform, non‐anaplastic tumour cells (oncocytes) with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, growing in a nested fashion. No tumour haemorrhage nor necrosis was observed. Cells were mostly arranged in sheets, or in tubulocystic or combined patterns. Nuclei appeared smooth and round, with minimal degree of mitotic activity or nuclear atypia. No capsular invasion nor renal vein thrombosis was observed, furthermore, tumour cells were negative for Hale’s colloidal iron staining. Finally, clumps of oncocytes were separated by periodic acid Schiff‐positive tumour stroma (Fig. 1a).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Analysis of tumour stroma of oncocytomas of the kidney. Renal oncocytomas were composed of two independent compartments, benign oncocytes and a pronounced fibrotic stroma (desmoplasia) and were associated with excessive deposition of extracellular matrix, which was periodic acid Schiff‐positive (a, pink, asterisk), collagen I‐positive (b, brown, asterisk), fibronectin‐positive (c, brown, asterisk) and collagen III‐positive (d, brown, asterisk), but negative for desmin (e) and human caldesmon (g) immunostaining. Archival smooth muscle tissue was used as positive control for desmin (f, brown, asterisk) and human caldesmon immunostaining (h, brown, asterisk) (magnification, ×400).

Collagen I, collagen III, fibronectin, desmin and human‐caldesmon immunostaining

Tumour stromas were positive for collagen I (Fig. 1b), collagen III (Fig. 1d), and fibronectin (Fig. 1c), but negative for desmin (Fig. 1e) and human‐caldesmon (Fig. 1h). Here, archival smooth muscle tissue was used as positive control for desmin (Fig. 1f) and human‐caldesmon immunostaining (Fig. 1h).

MIB‐1 and active caspase 3 immunostaining

Figure 2 shows analysis of cell proliferation and apoptosis in tumours and surrounding non‐tumour parenchyma by MIB‐1 (Fig. 2a,b) and active caspase 3 (Fig. 2e) immunostaining. As shown in Table 3, MIB‐1 indices were low, but were higher in tumours than in non‐tumour parenchyma (0.93 ± 0.09 versus 0.46 ± 0.07, P < 0.001). Similarly, active caspase 3 indices were low, but were higher in tumour than in non‐tumour parenchyma (0.76 ± 0.08 versus 0.41 ± 0.09, P < 0.001). Similarly, archival colonic tissue was used as positive control for MIB‐1 immunostaining (Fig. 2d). For negative controls, primary antibodies for MIB‐1 (Fig. 2c) and active caspase 3 (Fig. 2f) were omitted.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Analysis of cell proliferation and apoptosis in renal oncocytomas. Just few oncocytes were positive for MIB‐1 (a, brown, asterisk) or active caspase 3 immunostaining (e, brown, asterisk). There were occasional MIB‐1‐positive cells (b, brown, asterisk) found in the stroma. Archival colonic tissue was used as a positive control for MIB‐1 immunostaining (d, brown, asterisk). For negative controls, primary antibodies for MIB‐1 (c) and active caspase 3 (f) were omitted (magnification, ×400).

Table 3.

 Analysis of cell proliferation and apoptotic indices in tumour and surrounding non‐tumour parenchyma in renal oncocytomas (N = 16)

Tumour parenchyma Non‐tumour parenchyma P
MIB‐1‐positive cells, % 0.93 ± 0.09 0.46 ± 0.07 ***
Active caspase 3‐positive cells, % 0.76 ± 0.08 0.41 ± 0.09 ***

***P < 0.001.

Wnt/β‐catenin signalling

Figure 3 illustrates analysis of the Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway by E‐catenin and β‐catenin immunostaining. It seems that canonical Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway was not involved in this benign neoplasm, as there was no evidence of loss of membranous localization of E‐cadherin (Fig. 3e) or intranuclear expression of β‐catenin in the oncocytes (Fig. 3a,b). Likewise, archival colonic signet ring cell carcinoma tissue was used as positive control for intranuclear expression of β‐catenin immunostaining (Fig. 3d). For negative controls, the primary antibodies for β‐catenin (Fig. 3c) and E‐cadherin (Fig. 3f) were omitted.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Analysis of Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway in renal oncocytomas. There were no pieces of evidence of loss of membrane localization of E‐cadherin (e, brown, asterisk) or intranuclear expression of β‐catenin (a and b, brown, asterisk) immunostaining in the oncocytes. Archival colonic signet ring cell carcinoma tissue was used as positive control for intranuclear expression of β‐catenin immunostaining (d, brown, asterisk). For negative controls, primary antibodies for β‐catenin (c) and E‐cadherin (f) were omitted (magnification, ×400).

Double immunostaining, α‐smooth muscle actin and MIB‐1

Figure 4 illustrates that both SMA immunostaining (Fig. 4a) or SMA and MIB‐1 double immunostaining (Fig. 4c–f) established the myofibroblastic nature of many of the stromal cells. As shown in Fig. 4d–f, some SMA‐positive myofibroblasts were also positive for MIB‐1 after double immunostaining with this antibody, indicating a proliferative role for myofibroblasts in the stromas of renal oncocytomas. Again, archival smooth muscle and urinary bladder carcinoma tissues were used as positive controls for SMA (Fig. 4g) and MIB‐1 (Fig. 4h) immunostaining. For negative controls, primary antibodies for SMA (Fig. 4b) and MIB‐1 were omitted.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Analysis of proliferating myofibroblasts in stromas of oncocytomas of the kidney. Both SMA immunostaining (a) or SMA/MIB‐1 double immunostaining (c–f) established the myofibroblastic nature (pink, asterisk) of many of the stromal cells. (d–f) show some SMA‐positive myofibroblasts (pink, asterisk) were also positive for MIB‐1 (brown, asterisk) after double immunostaining with this antibody, indicating a proliferative role of myofibroblasts in stromas of renal oncocytomas. Archival smooth muscle and urinary bladder carcinoma were used as positive controls for SMA (g, pink, asterisk) and MIB‐1 (h, brown, asterisk) immunostaining. As negative control, primary antibody for SMA (b) was omitted (magnification, a–d, g, h ×400; magnification, e, f ×600).

Discussion

These data reveal that the kidney oncocytomas were composed of two independent compartments, benign oncocytes and a pronounced fibrotic stroma (desmoplasia) consisting of proliferating myofibroblasts (MIB‐1 and SMA‐positive) which were associated with excessive deposition of extracellular matrix (periodic acid Schiff‐, collagen I‐, collagen III‐ and fibronectin‐positive, and desmin‐ and human caldesmon‐negative). In this study, the SMA‐positive cells were defined as myofibroblasts as reported elsewhere (24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33). Interestingly, although SMA is the usual marker for the myofibroblast, it is also recognized as an imprecise one and that mesenchymal spindled cells containing SMA can include myofibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, pericytes and endothelial cells. Nevertheless, mesenchymal cells positive for collagen I, collagen III and fibronectin and negative for H‐caldesmon and desmin are very probably myofibroblastic.

The exact mechanisms of myofibroblast formation, as well as cells of their origin, have not yet been fully elucidated. The traditional view has been that myofibroblasts arise from quiescent resident mesenchymal cells in surrounding tissues – fibroblasts being the mainly implicated progenitor, but also pericytes, smooth muscle cells and even endothelium (34). Increasingly however, attention is being focused on two other mechanisms, derivation from bone marrow‐derived circulating mesenchymal fibrocytes and an origin from epithelial–mesenchymal transformation.

Bone marrow‐derived circulating mesenchymal cells or fibrocytes have been demonstrated to have the ability to localize at and populate tissue sites. These include normal tissues (33, 35), granulation tissue (25), fibrosing conditions (30, 32) and tumour stroma (26, 28). Direkze et al. (26) employed green fluorescent protein (GFP) staining of transplanted male cells into female GFP‐negative recipients, to show how bone marrow‐derived cells can populate tumour stroma. Furthermore, not all lesions involve repair by circulating cells; in atherosclerosis, while there is evidence that circulating progenitor cells regenerate endothelium (36), other data suggest that smooth muscle cells that heal atherosclerotic plaques are of local tissue origin (37). Finally, Kojc et al. (38) demonstrated that the stroma of normal mucosa and squamous intraepithelial lesions contain scattered CD34‐positive cells or fibrocytes, but there no SMA‐positive myofibroblasts. In contrast, stroma of squamous cell carcinoma was shown to contain SMA‐positive myofibroblasts, but no CD34‐positive stromal cells. These results suggest that disappearance of CD34‐positive stromal cells and appearance of stromal myofibroblasts are associated with transformation of laryngeal squamous intraepithelial lesions to squamous cell carcinoma, in those tissues. Similar results have been reported in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast (39), invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix uteri (40) and pancreatic neoplasms (41); normal stroma harbours CD34‐positive stromal cells, whereas tumour‐associated desmoplastic stroma was characterized by presence of myofibroblasts. Complete disappearance of CD34‐positive stromal cells in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma suggests that they might have been transformed into SMA‐positive myofibroblasts (38).

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition or transformation is the second major mechanism suggested to explain the origin of myofibroblasts in fibrosing conditions (29) and tumour stroma (42). The proposed mechanism is based on findings of the kind typified in tubulointerstitial fibrosis. In the study by Liu (31), stromal cells in the interstitium are SMA positive and are, therefore, interpreted as being myofibroblasts; the tubular epithelium concomitantly loses some of its cells of epithelial phenotype, which assume some mesenchymal features (for example, expression of SMA) and is hypothesized as perhaps developing into myofibroblasts.

The benign nature of oncocytomas is compatible with low MIB‐1 index that we found. By pathological examination, we saw that MIB‐1 indices were low, but were higher in tumours than in surrounding non‐tumour parenchyma (0.93 ± 0.09 versus 0.46 ± 0.07, P < 0.001), and clinically, all 16 of our patients remained free of tumour recurrence at follow‐up. Rather than proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), this study used immunostaining for MIB‐1 as a marker to identify tubular cell proliferation. MIB‐1 is a nuclear antigen expressed in all phases of the cell cycle, with the exception of the G0 and early G1 phases (43). Expression of MIB‐1 increases over cell cycle progression, and peaks during late S and G2 phases. PCNA is a polymerase delta accessory molecule involved in nucleotide excision repair, and its maximum concentration occurs during the S and late G1 phases. PCNA is a marker of G1, S, G2 and M phases of the cell cycle, however, because of its relatively long half‐life, PCNA is also detectable in cells that are in G0 (44). Results obtained using PCNA must be treated sceptically, as number of positive cells is highly dependent on fixation time and tissue pre‐treatment. In addition, even if these are standardized, PCNA is unreliable since large quantities of PCNA are visible in tissue around tumours or in tissue of animals fed growth factors, even in the absence of tritiated thymidine uptake (45). Thus, MIB‐1 is a more accurate marker of cell proliferation.

Clinical and experimental data (18) support the hypothesis that myofibroblastic tumour stroma regulates metastatic invasion and spread. Therefore, an emerging question from this study concerns, how the benign status of renal oncocytoma is compatible with myofibroblastic stroma that is being recognized as a driver of invasive cancer growth? One possibility is that the morphologically identifiable myofibroblastic population might lack one or more critical molecules for promoting invasion – an area for future work on this group of tumours.

In summary, our data demonstrate for the first time that there was a proliferation of myofibroblasts in the stroma of oncocytomas of the kidney, which might serve as a novel target for treatment in future. In this regard, drugs that inhibit differentiation of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts, such as PPAR‐γ agonists, might have potential not only as anti‐fibrotic, but also as anti‐oncocytoma therapies in the future. Finally, this study is limited by small tissue samples and the lack of ultrastructural analysis, which can be addressed in the future.

Acknowledgements

Parts of this study have been presented at the annual meeting of the Taiwan Society of Nephrology (12‐13 December 2008, Taipei, Taiwan). Tzung‐Hai Yen was funded by research grants from the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CMRP G370601 and G370602) and National Science Council of Taiwan (NMRP G370601).

References

  • 1. Zippel L (1942) Zur Kenntnis der Onkocyten. Virchow Arch. Pathol. Anat. Zur Kenntnis der Onkocyten. 308, 360–382. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Klein MJ, Valensi QJ (1976) Proximal tubular adenomas of kidney with so‐called oncocytic features. A clinicopathologic study of 13 cases of a rarely reported neoplasm. Cancer 38, 906–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Morra MN, Das S (1993) Renal oncocytoma: a review of histogenesis, histopathology, diagnosis and treatment. J. Urol. 150, 295–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Dvorak HF (1986) Tumors: wounds that do not heal. Similarities between tumor stroma generation and wound healing. N. Engl. J. Med. 315, 1650–1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bissell MJ, Radisky D (2001) Putting tumours in context. Nat. Rev. Cancer 1, 46–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Barsky SH, Green WR, Grotendorst GR, Liotta LA (1984) Desmoplastic breast carcinoma as a source of human myofibroblasts. Am. J. Pathol. 115, 329–333. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Sappino AP, Schurch W, Gabbiani G (1990) Differentiation repertoire of fibroblastic cells: expression of cytoskeletal proteins as marker of phenotypic modulations. Lab. Invest. 63, 144–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kalluri R, Zeisberg M (2006) Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 6, 392–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Tuxhorn JA, Ayala GE, Smith MJ, Smith VC, Dang TD, Rowley DR (2002) Reactive stroma in human prostate cancer: induction of myofibroblast phenotype and extracellular matrix remodeling. Clin. Cancer Res. 8, 2912–2923. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Van Hoorde L, Van Aken E, Mareel M (2000) Collagen type I: a substrate and a signal for invasion. Prog. Mol. Subcell. Biol. 25, 105–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gabbiani G (2003) The myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases. J. Pathol. 200, 500–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Miura S, Kodaira S, Hosoda Y (1993) Immunohistologic analysis of the extracellular matrix components of the fibrous stroma of human colon cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 53, 36–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Neaud V, Faouzi S, Guirouilh J, Le Bail B, Balabaud C, Bioulac‐Sage P et al. (1997) Human hepatic myofibroblasts increase invasiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma cells: evidence for a role of hepatocyte growth factor. Hepatology 26, 1458–1466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Doucet C, Jasmin C, Azzarone B (2000) Unusual interleukin‐4 and ‐13 signaling in human normal and tumor lung fibroblasts. Oncogene 19, 5898–5905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Rowley DR (1998) What might a stromal response mean to prostate cancer progression? Cancer Metastasis Rev. 17, 411–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lohr M, Schmidt C, Ringel J, Kluth M, Muller P, Nizze H et al. (2001) Transforming growth factor‐beta1 induces desmoplasia in an experimental model of human pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer Res. 61, 550–555. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Sappino AP, Skalli O, Jackson B, Schurch W, Gabbiani G (1988) Smooth‐muscle differentiation in stromal cells of malignant and non‐malignant breast tissues. Int. J. Cancer 41, 707–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. De Wever O, Demetter P, Mareel M, Bracke M (2008) Stromal myofibroblasts are drivers of invasive cancer growth. Int. J. Cancer 123, 2229–2238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Park JE, Lenter MC, Zimmermann RN, Garin‐Chesa P, Old LJ, Rettig WJ (1999) Fibroblast activation protein, a dual specificity serine protease expressed in reactive human tumor stromal fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 36505–36512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Martin M, Pujuguet P, Martin F (1996) Role of stromal myofibroblasts infiltrating colon cancer in tumor invasion. Pathol. Res. Pract. 192, 712–717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Fang TC, Otto WR, Jeffery R, Hunt T, Alison MR, Cook HT et al. (2008a) Exogenous bone marrow cells do not rescue non‐irradiated mice from acute renal tubular damage caused by HgCl2, despite establishment of chimaerism and cell proliferation in bone marrow and spleen. Cell Prolif. 41, 592–606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Fang TC, Otto WR, Rao J, Jeffery R, Hunt T, Alison MR et al. (2008b) Haematopoietic lineage‐committed bone marrow cells, but not cloned cultured mesenchymal stem cells, contribute to regeneration of renal tubular epithelium after HgCl2 ‐induced acute tubular injury. Cell Prolif. 41, 575–591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Yen TH, Alison MR, Cook HT, Jeffery R, Otto WR, Wright NA et al. (2007) The cellular origin and proliferative status of regenerating renal parenchyma after mercuric chloride damage and erythropoietin treatment. Cell Prolif. 40, 143–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Brittan M, Chance V, Elia G, Poulsom R, Alison MR, Macdonald TT et al. (2005) A regenerative role for bone marrow following experimental colitis: contribution to neovasculogenesis and myofibroblasts. Gastroenterology 128, 1984–1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Abe R, Donnelly SC, Peng T, Bucala R, Metz CN (2001) Peripheral blood fibrocytes: differentiation pathway and migration to wound sites. J. Immunol. 166, 7556–7562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Direkze NC, Hodivala‐Dilke K, Jeffery R, Hunt T, Poulsom R, Oukrif D et al. (2004) Bone marrow contribution to tumor‐associated myofibroblasts and fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 64, 8492–8495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Guarino M (2007) Epithelial‐mesenchymal transition and tumour invasion. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 39, 2153–2160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Gupta PB, Proia D, Cingoz O, Weremowicz J, Naber SP, Weinberg RA et al. (2007) Systemic stromal effects of estrogen promote the growth of estrogen receptor‐negative cancers. Cancer Res. 67, 2062–2071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kalluri R, Neilson EG (2003) Epithelial‐mesenchymal transition and its implications for fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 112, 1776–1784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kisseleva T, Uchinami H, Feirt N, Quintana‐Bustamante O, Segovia JC, Schwabe RF et al. (2006) Bone marrow‐derived fibrocytes participate in pathogenesis of liver fibrosis. J. Hepatol. 45, 429–438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Liu Y (2004) Epithelial to mesenchymal transition in renal fibrogenesis: pathologic significance, molecular mechanism, and therapeutic intervention. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 15, 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Mollmann H, Nef HM, Kostin S, Von Kalle C, Pilz I, Weber M et al. (2006) Bone marrow‐derived cells contribute to infarct remodelling. Cardiovasc. Res. 71, 661–671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Yen TH, Wright NA (2006) The gastrointestinal tract stem cell niche. Stem Cell Rev. 2, 203–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ronnov‐Jessen L, Petersen OW, Koteliansky VE, Bissell MJ (1995) The origin of the myofibroblasts in breast cancer. Recapitulation of tumor environment in culture unravels diversity and implicates converted fibroblasts and recruited smooth muscle cells. J. Clin. Invest. 95, 859–873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Iwano M, Plieth D, Danoff TM, Xue C, Okada H, Neilson EG (2002) Evidence that fibroblasts derive from epithelium during tissue fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 110, 341–350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Xu Q, Zhang Z, Davison F, Hu Y (2003) Circulating progenitor cells regenerate endothelium of vein graft atherosclerosis, which is diminished in ApoE‐deficient mice. Circ. Res. 93, e76–e86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Bentzon JF, Sondergaard CS, Kassem M, Falk E (2007) Smooth muscle cells healing atherosclerotic plaque disruptions are of local, not blood, origin in apolipoprotein E knockout mice. Circulation 116, 2053–2061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kojc N, Zidar N, Vodopivec B, Gale N (2005) Expression of CD34, alpha‐smooth muscle actin, and transforming growth factor beta1 in squamous intraepithelial lesions and squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. Hum. Pathol. 36, 16–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Barth PJ, Ebrahimsade S, Ramaswamy A, Moll R (2002b) CD34+ fibrocytes in invasive ductal carcinoma, ductal carcinoma in situ, and benign breast lesions. Virchows Arch. 440, 298–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Barth PJ, Ramaswamy A, Moll R (2002c) CD34(+) fibrocytes in normal cervical stroma, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III, and invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Virchows Arch. 441, 564–568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Barth PJ, Ebrahimsade S, Hellinger A, Moll R, Ramaswamy A (2002a) CD34+ fibrocytes in neoplastic and inflammatory pancreatic lesions. Virchows Arch. 440, 128–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Guarino M, Rubino B, Ballabio G (2007) The role of epithelial‐mesenchymal transition in cancer pathology. Pathology 39, 305–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Alison MR (1995) Assessing cellular proliferation: what’s worth measuring? Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 14, 935–944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Kaaijk P, Kaspers GJ, Van Wering ER, Broekema GJ, Loonen AH, Hahlen K et al. (2003) Cell proliferation is related to in vitro drug resistance in childhood acute leukaemia. Br. J. Cancer 88, 775–781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Hall PA, Coates PJ, Goodlad RA, Hart IR, Lane DP (1994) Proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression in non‐cycling cells may be induced by growth factors in vivo. Br. J. Cancer 70, 244–247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cell Proliferation are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES