Abstract
Objectives
Nanocarriers can greatly enhance the cellular uptake of therapeutic agents to regulate cell proliferation and metabolism. Nevertheless, further application of nanocarriers is often limited by insufficient understanding of the mechanisms of their uptake and intracellular behaviour.
Materials and methods
Fluorescent polymer dots (Pdots) are coated with synthetic octaarginine peptides (R8) and are analysed for cellular uptake and intracellular transportation in HeLa cervical cancer cells via single particle tracking.
Results
Surface modification with the R8 peptide efficiently improves both cellular uptake and endosomal escape of Pdots. With single particle tracking, we capture the dynamic process of internalization and intracellular trafficking of R8‐Pdots, providing new insights into the mechanism of R8 in facilitating nanostructure‐based cellular delivery. Furthermore, our results reveal R8‐Pdots as a novel type of autophagy inducer.
Conclusions
This study provides new insights into R8‐mediated cellular uptake and endosomal escape of nanocarriers. It potentiates biological applications of Pdots in targeted cell imaging, drug delivery and gene regulation.
Keywords: endosomal escape, live‐cell imaging, octaarginine peptide, polymer dots, single particle tracking
1. INTRODUCTION
Nanotechnology has shown great potential in biomedical applications.1, 2, 3, 4 Numerous nanoparticles are developed and exploited as biosensors, diagnostic imaging probes or vehicles of various therapeutic reagents.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Fluorescent semiconducting polymer dots (Pdots) attract growing attention as ideal theranostic agents because of their good biocompatibility and outstanding optical properties, including high quantum yield and extraordinary photostability.11 Pdots have been broadly applied in cell labelling, super‐resolution cell imaging and single particle tracking.12, 13 More recently, near‐infrared fluorescent Pdots are investigated for long‐term tracking of engrafted MSCs in vivo.14 In addition to bioimaging, hydrophilic Pdots can form stable complexes with small interfering RNA (siRNA) and regulate gene expression in cancer cells.15 Insights into the intracellular behaviour and mechanism of nanoparticles are important for the design and improvement of nanocarriers and imaging probes for biomedical applications.16, 17, 18 Our recent work demonstrates that Pdots adopt distinct routes for endocytosis and intracellular trafficking in epithelial cells and macrophages. Although Pdots can be ingested in large amount by macrophages rapidly, the amount and speed of Pdots uptake by epithelial cells are much more limited. Moreover, following endocytosis, majority of Pdots are transported and destined into lysosomes, implying that bioactive cargos, such as DNA, RNA and proteins, are unlikely to keep their intracellular functionality.19
Many strategies have been developed to improve cellular uptake of nanoparticles and to avoid lysosomal degradation.20, 21 Coating with cationic lipids or attaching with specific targeting ligands can both increase the interaction with cell surface and enhance cellular uptake.22, 23 Another intensively studied strategy for endosomal escape of NPs is “proton sponge effect” based on cationic polymers that cause endosome osmotic swelling and disruption of the endosome membrane.24 However, these approaches are often deleterious to cells. Therefore, a simple and effective method to enhance the cellular uptake and to avoid lysosomal degradation of nanocarriers without producing cytotoxicity is highly required. Previous studies have used biomimetic cell‐penetrating peptides (CPPs) such as TAT, polylysine or polyarginine to deliver nanoparticles into living cells.25, 26 CPPs are often derived from viral proteins and possess the ability to cross cell membranes.27, 28 Nevertheless, further application of CPPs is limited by insufficient understanding of the mechanisms of their uptake and intracellular behaviour.29 Live‐cell imaging provides visible evidence of the trafficking and functionality of delivered therapeutics.30 In this study, we coat fluorescent Pdots with synthetic octaarginine peptides (R8) to analyse R8‐mediated cellular uptake and intracellular transportation in living HeLa human cervical cancer cells. Compared to unmodified Pdots that take hours to enter epithelial cells, significant amount of R8‐Pdots enter cells with minutes. Interestingly, R8 modification does not change the endocytic route of Pdots. Single particle tracking reveals that the process of R8‐Pdots internalization can be divided into several stages. Our results also show that R8‐Pdots avoid lysosomal localization with increased cytoplasmic distribution, which helps to retain the functionality of biomolecules. Moreover, we identify Pdots‐induced upregulation of autophagy in HeLa cells for the first time. Importantly, R8‐Pdots also increase autophagy levels in HeLa cells, implying that R8‐Pdots have potential to regulate cellular homeostasis directly in addition to function as imaging probes and carriers of therapeutic agents.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Materials
Poly (styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (PSMA, Mn = 1700) and anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF, 99.9%) were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich. Poly [(9,9‐dioctylfluorenyl‐2,7‐diyl)‐co‐(1,4‐benzo‐{2,1,3}‐thiadiazole)] (PFBT, MW = 10 000, polydispersity 1.7) was obtained from ADS Dyes (Quebec, Canada). Octaarginine peptides were purchased from Jie Li Bio. HeLa cell lines were purchased from Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai). Minimum essential media (MEM), Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) and foetal bovine serum (FBS) were from Gibco, Invitrogen. Chlorpromazine (CPZ), methyl‐β‐cyclodextrin (mβCD) and EIPA were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). RFP‐LAMP1 plasmid was acquired from Addgene (plasmid # 1817).
2.2. Preparation and characterization of Pdots
Pdots were synthesized using a modified precipitation method. THF solution (5 mL) containing conjugated polymers (0.5 mg) and PSMA (0.2 mg) was quickly injected into 10 mL deionized water, and the mixture was subsequently sonicated for 2 minutes. THF was removed by partial vacuum evaporation. The resulting solution was concentrated by continuous heating, followed by filtration through a 0.22‐μm filter to remove fraction of aggregates.
For R8 modification, the as‐prepared Pdots were diluted to a concentration of 20 μg/mL before mixed with R8 at a molar ratio of 1:1000 in HEPES buffer before adding 2 × MEM media of the same volume.
The apparent hydrodynamic size and the zeta potential of nanoparticles were measured using a Zetasizer (nano ZS90, Malvern Instruments). For transmission electron microscopy, solution containing Pdots was dropped onto carbon‐coated copper grids to evaporate excess solvent and examined with TEM (Jeol 2010, 200 KV). Fluorescence spectra were obtained by an Edinburgh FS920 fluorescence spectrometer.
2.3. Cell culture and treatment
HeLa cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat‐inactivated FBS and antibiotics (100 g/mL of streptomycin and 100 g/mL of penicillin) at 37°C with humidified atmosphere (5% CO2). Cells were seeded one day before Pdots incubation. The concentration was 5 μg/mL for R8‐Pdots and 20 μg/mL for unmodified Pdots. For inhibitor treatment, cells were pre‐treated for 1 hour with low temperature (4°C, 5 μg/mL CPZ, 10 μg/mL EIPA and 7 mM mβCD, respectively. For lysosome and autophagosome labelling, HeLa cells (1 × 106) were transfected with 1 μg of the RFP‐LAMP1 or LC3‐RFP plasmids using lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
2.4. Flow cytometry
Before measurements, cell media was removed and cells were washed for three times with PBS. Next, 0.2 mL trypsin (Invitrogen) was added to each sample and incubated for 1 minute at 37°C before 0.5 mL MEM was added. Cell suspensions were transferred into tubes before analysed using a FACS Calibur flow cytometer (Amnis ImageStream Mark II; MERCK MILLIPORE, Burlington, MA, USA). Consistent gating based on cell size and granularity (forward and side scatter) was applied to select the fluorescence signals of counted cells. At least 10 000 cells were counted for each sample, and experiments were performed in triplicates.
2.5. Western blotting
Cells were harvested using the SDS‐loading sample buffer and boiled. Protein samples were then analysed by 12% SDS‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and blotted to PVDF membranes. The blots were blocked for 30 minutes using 5% non‐fat milk in phosphate‐buffered saline with 1% Tween 20 (PBST) buffer (0.1% Tween 20) and then incubated overnight at 4°C with the indicated primary antibodies anti‐LC3 (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA). After washing three times with PBST, the blots were probed with a goat anti‐rabbit HRP secondary antibody. The membranes were developed using the chemiluminescent HRP substrate (Millipore) and visualized by the bioimaging system (Syngene G: Box).
2.6. Live‐cell imaging and single particle tracking
After incubation with R8‐Pdots for indicated time, images were acquired using a laser confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP8, Germany) equipped with a live‐cell incubator and collected with a HC × PL APO 63×, 1.4 NA oil‐immersion objective. R8‐Pdots was excited with a 488 nm Ar‐Kr laser, RFP was excited with a 561 nm helium‐neon laser, and Hoechst 33258‐labelled nuclei were excited with a 405 nm diode laser, respectively. The imaging channels were set at 500‐550, 570‐620 and 450‐500 nm, respectively. Three‐dimensional single particle tracking was performed using a DeltaVision Elite deconvolution scanning fluorescence microscope.31 Z‐stacks were collected at 0.2‐μm intervals over 2 μm. The images were deconvolved and superimposed.
2.7. Image analysis
Fluorescence images were analysed using ImageJ software (US National Institutes of Health). To quantify the colocalization ratio of two fluorescent signals, tMr values (the thresholded Mander's coefficients) indicating the percentage of green signals colocalized with red signals in merged images were calculated. Values represent mean ± SE based on analysis of randomly selected 20 cells. To measure the signal distribution inside cells, we divided the image into 9*9 squares and counted the average fluorescence intensity in each square using ImageJ scripts. For single particle tracking, the trajectories of red signals and green signals were built by pairing spots in each frame using single particle tracking plug‐in of ImageJ.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Preparation of R8‐modified Pdots
Cell‐penetrating peptides (CPPs) are short peptides that can facilitate cellular uptake of a broad range of targets. R8 is a type of representative cationic CPPs and has been utilized to enhance the delivery of various nanocarriers, including liposomes, gold nanoparticles, quantum dots and near‐infrared Polymer dots.32, 33, 34 R8 is chosen for Pdots modification in this study. We have recently confirmed the biocompatibility of poly (9,9‐dioctylfluorenyl‐2,7‐diyl)‐co‐(1,4‐benzo‐{2,1′,3}‐thiadiazole) PFBT Pdots. PFBT‐conjugated Pdots are incubated with R8 peptides that can adsorb onto the surface through electrostatic interactions (Figure 1A). According to the results of transmission electron microscopy (TEM), most particles possess diameters in the range of 25 ± 10 nm and are uniformly spherical (Figure 1B). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis shows the average hydrodynamic diameter is 85 nm, which is similar to unmodified Pdots (Figure 1C). Also, R8 modification does not change the fluorescent spectrum of Pdots: an adsorption peak around 460 nm and a maximum fluorescence emission around 540 nm are detected (Figure 1D). Significantly, Figure 1E shows R8‐Pdots have a positive zeta potential of +29 mV, indicating that negatively charged Pdots that have a zeta potential of −35 mV (Figure S1) are successfully modified by R8 through electrostatic adsorption.35
3.2. Cellular uptake of Pdots is enhanced by R8 modification
We firstly inspect whether R8‐Pdots can efficiently enter HeLa cells. According to our previous observation, Pdots can be ingested rapidly by macrophages, whereasHeLa cells have a relatively slow intake process. Fluorescent signals are hardly detectable in HeLa cells in the first 6 hours of incubation.19 Strikingly, cellular uptake of R8‐Pdots by HeLa cells happens within minutes. Fluorescent signal appears on the cell membrane within 5 minutes, and intracellular signals increase quickly over time. At 60 minutes, bright fluorescent signals can be observed inside the cell (Figure 2A). In contrast, cells incubated with unmodified Pdots show neglectable fluorescence, indicating that coating with R8 peptides significantly accelerated the rate of cellular uptake of Pdots. We further monitor the dynamics of R8‐Pdots uptake of for 48 hours using both confocal fluorescent microscope and flow cytometer. The fluorescent intensity increases with time until it reaches the maximum at 24 hours and remains stable (Figure 2B,C). These results confirm that R8 modification enhances both the amount and speed of Pdots internalization by HeLa cells. Notably, the intracellular distribution of fluorescent signals shows different pattern at the early and late stage following cellular uptake. At 2 hours, majority of the fluorescent puncta located close to the cell membrane, while they concentrate around the nucleus at 48 hours (Figure 4D). These data indicate R8‐Pdots are transported gradually from the cell membrane to the perinuclear region, most likely along the microtubule, which is consistent with our previous observation that transportation of endocytic vesicles depends on intact microtubules.36
3.3. Single particle tracking of endocytic R8‐Pdots
Since R8‐Pdots show much faster uptake rate than their unmodified counterpart, we set out to determine the endocytic mechanisms of R8‐Pdots. Currently, the mechanism of CPP‐facilitated endocytosis is controversially discussed and poorly understood.25, 37 Nanoparticles can enter cells through multiple endocytic pathways, including phagocytosis, macropinocytosis, clathrin‐dependent endocytosis, caveolin‐dependent endocytosis, clathrin‐ and caveolin‐independent pathways (Figure 3A).38 We examine R8‐Pdots uptake by HeLa cells in the presence of selective inhibitors of distinct endocytic routes. No significant intracellular fluorescence is undetectable when HeLa cells are incubated with R8‐Pdots at 4°C, indicating that R8‐Pdots are internalized through energy‐dependent endocytosis (Figure 3B). Methyl‐β‐cyclodextrin (mβCD) could specifically inhibit caveolin‐dependent endocytosis by depleting cholesterol and disrupting the structures of lipid raft on the cell membrane. 5‐(N‐Ethyl‐N‐isopropyl)‐amiloride (EIPA) is an inhibitor of macropinocytosis. Chlorpromazine (CPZ) is commonly utilized to block clathrin‐dependent endocytosis.39 Compared to untreated cells, pre‐treatment of HeLa cells with EIPA or CPZ causes no obvious reduction of intracellular fluorescence intensity, whereas mβCD treatment results in 80% reduction of internalized R8‐Pdots (Figure 3B,C). These results are confirmed by the quantitative analysis of flow cytometer, where mβCD treatment causes strong reduction of R8‐Pdots uptake (Figure S2). Taken together, these results indicate that although R8 modification accelerates and enhances the uptake of Pdots, it does not change the endocytosis pathway.
To have a detailed look of the whole internalization process of R8‐Pdots, we perform real‐time imaging to trace the dynamic movement of R8‐Pdots at single particle level. Cell membrane is labelled with a hydrophilic fluorescent dye 1, 1′‐dioctadecyl‐3,3,3′,3′‐tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (Dil) to monitor the interaction with Pdots. Time‐lapse movie is acquired using confocal microscope (Figure 4A,B; Video S1, Δt = 2 seconds, total time = 140 seconds). It shows clearly the whole process of a representative R8‐Pdots particle moving towards the cell and attaching to the membrane. We also record the dynamic process of internalization of R8‐Pdots via time‐lapse three‐dimensional live‐cell imaging. The whole process can be divided into three stages: R8‐Pdots moves on the edge of cell membrane before crosses the membrane, and moves in the cytoplasm (Figure 4C; Video S2, Δt = 28 seconds, total time = 840 seconds). Trajectories of the representative particle (indicated by a yellow circle) are shown (Figure 4D,E). Before crossing the cell membrane, the R8‐Pdots particle moves with a velocity between 0 and 0.1 μm/s (Figure 4F). After the particle comes into contact with the cell membrane, its moving velocity slowed down significantly. The retention of R8‐Pdots particle on the cell membrane lasts for more than 300 seconds before it moves into the cytoplasm, suggesting that R8‐Pdots interact with specific proteins on cell surface before internalization (Figure 4F).
3.4. Endosomal escape of R8‐modified Pdots
Having elucidated the endocytic pathway and process of R8‐Pdots, we set out to investigate their intracellular behaviour. Unmodified Pdots enter endo‐lysosomal pathway and end up in lysosomes, which greatly restricts their potential in delivery of bioactive cargos like nucleic acids and proteins. Multiple CPPs, including R8 peptides, have been previously reported to facilitate escape of conjugated cargos from lysosomes.40 We examined the colocalization between R8‐Pdots and acidic endo‐lysosomal organelles in HeLa cells. Lysosomes are labelled by expression of red fluorescent protein (RFP)‐fused marker protein lysosomal‐associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP‐1). After transfection of the LAMP1‐RFP plasmid for 24 hours, HeLa cells are incubated with R8‐Pdots for 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours, respectively, and examined using a confocal microscope. Colocalization between R8‐Pdots and LAMP1‐RFP is less than 10% after 6‐hour incubation and the ratio reaches the maximum value of 25% after 24 hours (Figure 5A,B). In comparison, more than 50% of unmodified Pdots colocalize with LAMP1‐RFP in 6 hours and the ratio increase to 80% with prolonged incubation (Figures S3 and S4). These data demonstrate clearly that R8 peptides efficiently change the intracellular fate of Pdots in HeLa cells by preventing their trafficking into lysosomes (Figure 5C). Notably, R8‐modified liposomes also exhibit increased endosomal escape and enhanced expression levels of encapsulated DNA plasmids.41 However, different endocytic mechanisms have been reported for R8‐liposomes, including clathrin‐mediated endocytosis and macropinocytosis. CPP‐facilitated endocytosis and intracellular trafficking processes are complicated and can be regulated by multiple aspects including types of CPPs, density and conformation of CPPs on the surface of nanoparticles, and targeting cell types.37 Our results suggest that modification with high‐density R8 peptides via electrostatic adsorption can accelerate Pdots uptake in HeLa cells without changing the endocytic route, presumably by promoting their interaction with certain membrane receptors. Furthermore, following caveolin‐dependent endocytosis, endocytic vesicles containing R8‐Pdots are not destined to lysosomes. This property will greatly benefit Pdots‐based delivery of bioactive cargos into cytosol and keep their functionality.
3.5. R8‐Pdots induces autophagy
R8‐modification appears to be a simple but effective strategy to enhance Pdots‐mediated delivery and maintain the functionality of bioactive cargos in epithelial cells. Nevertheless, it remains unknown whether Pdots themselves interfere with the intracellular membrane trafficking system and affect the homeostatic status. The endocytosis and intracellular trafficking of other nanoparticles have been reported to regulate various cellular pathways including Wnt and TGF‐β pathways, hypoxia and autophagy.42, 43, 44 Particularly, autophagy plays critical pathophysiological roles and is a common cellular stress response.45, 46, 47 The whole autophagic flux is closely related to the formation, transportation and fusion of intracellular membrane bound structures. Therefore, it is likely to be regulated by fluctuations of the trafficking process. Several nanomaterials have been reported to elicit autophagy.48, 49 We examine the autophagic phenotype in Pdots‐treated HeLa cells. During the formation of autophagosomes, microtubule‐associated protein light chain 3 (LC3) is converted from a cytoplasmic form (LC3‐I) to a phosphatidylethanolamine (PE)‐conjugated form (LC3‐II), which is then localized onto the outer membrane of autophagosomes. Hence, the conversion and the punctuated distribution of LC3‐II protein are commonly used as a marker for autophagy.50, 51 HeLa cells ectopically expressing LC3‐RFP are incubated with 20 μg/mL Pdots and examined by confocal microscope at various time points. Increased number of punctuated LC3‐RFP is observed after 4 hours. Colocalization analysis reveals that more Pdots are targeted to autophagosomes with prolonged incubation time (Figure 6A). Immunoblotting assay indicates gradually accumulation of LC3‐II within 24 hours (Figure S5A). Importantly, R8‐Pdots incubation at lower concentration (5 μg/mL) also significantly increases LC3‐II levels. Furthermore, the amount of ingested Pdots is directly related with upregulation of autophagy since R8‐Pdots‐induced LC3‐II appears after only 1‐hour incubation (Figure 6B). Since R8‐Pdots are not destined for lysosomal degradation, they may not directly enter the double‐membraned vesicles for autophagy induction. We hypothesize that R8‐Pdots‐induced autophagy is the result of active endocytosis and accompanying ROS stress. Further study is needed to illustrate the mechanism and physiological relevance of Pdots‐induced autophagy. Nanoparticles‐induced autophagy has been exploited for synergetic treatment of tumours and neurodegenerative diseases.52, 53 Therefore, our results identify R8‐Pdots as novel autophagy inducer for the first time, which opens new routes to design Pdots‐based theranostic reagents.
4. DISCUSSION
We report the use of R8‐conjugated Pdots to investigate the complicated behaviour of nanoparticles in live cells, which is important for developing advanced cellular imaging probes and nanocarriers. Single particle tracking indicates that R8 modification promotes immediate binding of Pdots to negatively charged cell membranes and triggers caveolin‐dependent endocytosis, with increased amount and accelerated speed. Following endocytosis, the internalized R8‐Pdots are actively transported towards the perinuclear region. We also find that majority of R8‐Pdots avoid to be destined to the lysosomes. The enhanced cellular uptake, as well as effective endosomal escape of R8‐Pdots, makes them an ideal candidate for the delivery of bioactive cargos into epithelial cells. Furthermore, we identify Pdots as a novel autophagy inducer in HeLa cells and R8 modification does not compromise this activity. To our knowledge, this is the first report of autophagy induced by Pdots. Considering the critical role of autophagy in maintaining cellular homeostasis and its connection with various diseases, our results shed new light on the development of Pdots‐based nanoreagents that combine cellular imaging, targeted delivery and manipulation of cellular metabolism.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31771102, 31470970, 21505148), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association from Chinese Academy of Sciences (2015211) and the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS (QYZDJ‐SSW‐SLH019 and QYZDJ‐SSW‐SLH031).
Luo Y, Han Y, Hu X, et al. Live‐cell imaging of octaarginine‐modified polymer dots via single particle tracking. Cell Prolif. 2019;52:e12556 10.1111/cpr.12556
Luo and Han should be considered joint first author.
Contributor Information
Qian Li, Email: liqian@sinap.ac.cn.
Nan Chen, Email: chennan@sinap.ac.cn.
Yun Zhao, Email: zhaoyun@scu.edu.cn.
REFERENCES
- 1. Li J, Song S, Liu X, et al. Enzyme‐based multi‐component optical nanoprobes for sequence‐specific detection of DNA hybridization. Adv Mater. 2008;20(3):497‐500. [Google Scholar]
- 2. He Y, Zhong Y, Su Y, et al. Water‐dispersed near‐infrared‐emitting quantum dots of ultrasmall sizes for in vitro and in vivo imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011;50(25):5695‐5698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lin M, Wang J, Zhou G, et al. Programmable engineering of a biosensing interface with tetrahedral DNA nanostructures for ultrasensitive DNA detection. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015;54(7):2151‐2155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ma W, Xie X, Shao X, et al. Tetrahedral DNA nanostructures facilitate neural stem cell migration via activating RHOA/ROCK2 signalling pathway. Cell Prolif. 2018;e12503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kim D, Shin K, Kwon SG, Hyeon T. Synthesis and biomedical applications of multifunctional nanoparticles. Adv Mater. 2018;e1802309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wang Z, Fu Y, Kang Z, et al. Organelle‐specific triggered release of immunostimulatory oligonucleotides from intrinsically coordinated DNA‐metal‐organic frameworks with soluble exoskeleton. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139(44):15784‐15791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Pei H, Liang L, Yao G, Li J, Huang Q, Fan C. Reconfigurable three‐dimensional DNA nanostructures for the construction of intracellular logic sensors. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012;51(36):9020‐9024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zhong R, Tang Q, Wang S, et al. Self‐assembly of enzyme‐like nanofibrous G‐molecular hydrogel for printed flexible electrochemical sensors. Adv Mater. 2018;30(12):e1706887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Chen L, Chao J, Qu X, et al. Probing cellular molecules with PolyA‐based engineered aptamer nanobeacon. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(9):8014‐8020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lai W, Ren L, Tang Q, et al. Programming chemical reaction networks using intramolecular conformational motions of DNA. ACS Nano. 2018;12(7):7093‐7099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Chen H, Fang X, Jin Y, et al. Semiconducting polymer nanocavities: porogenic synthesis, tunable host‐guest interactions, and enhanced drug/siRNA delivery. Small. 2018;14(21):e1800239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Yu J, Wu C, Sahu SP, Fernando LP, Szymanski C, McNeill J. Nanoscale 3D tracking with conjugated polymer nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131(51):18410‐18414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wu C, Chiu DT. Highly fluorescent semiconducting polymer dots for biology and medicine. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2013;52(11):3086‐3109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Chen D, Li Q, Meng Z, et al. Bright polymer dots tracking stem cell engraftment and migration to injured mouse liver. Theranostics. 2017;7(7):1820‐1834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Liu Y, Gunda V, Zhu X, et al. Theranostic near‐infrared fluorescent nanoplatform for imaging and systemic siRNA delivery to metastatic anaplastic thyroid cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(28):7750‐7755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Chen N, Wei M, Sun Y, et al. Self‐assembly of poly‐adenine‐tailed CpG oligonucleotide‐gold nanoparticle nanoconjugates with immunostimulatory activity. Small. 2014;10(2):368‐375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Gao Z, Deng S, Li J, et al. Sub‐diffraction‐limit cell imaging using a super‐resolution microscope with simplified pulse synchronization. Sci Chi Chem. 2017;60(10):1305‐1309. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Su Y, Peng T, Xing F, Li D, Fan C. Nanoplasmonic biological sensing and imaging. Acta Chim Sinica. 2017;75(11):1036‐1046. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Han Y, Li X, Chen H, et al. Real‐time imaging of endocytosis and intracellular trafficking of semiconducting polymer dots. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(25):21200‐21208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Varkouhi AK, Scholte M, Storm G, Haisma HJ. Endosomal escape pathways for delivery of biologicals. J Control Release. 2011;151(3):220‐228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Sahay G, Querbes W, Alabi C, et al. Efficiency of siRNA delivery by lipid nanoparticles is limited by endocytic recycling. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(7):653‐658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Canton I, Battaglia G. Endocytosis at the nanoscale. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41(7):2718‐2739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Semple SC, Akinc A, Chen J, et al. Rational design of cationic lipids for siRNA delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(2):172‐176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Vermeulen L, Brans T, Samal SK, et al. Endosomal size and membrane leakiness influence proton sponge‐based rupture of endosomal vesicles. ACS Nano. 2018;12(3):2332‐2345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Lee JH, Zhang A, You SS, Lieber CM. Spontaneous internalization of cell penetrating peptide‐modified nanowires into primary neurons. Nano Lett. 2016;16(2):1509‐1513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Folini M, Bandiera R, Millo E, et al. Photochemically enhanced delivery of a cell‐penetrating peptide nucleic acid conjugate targeting human telomerase reverse transcriptase: effects on telomere status and proliferative potential of human prostate cancer cells. Cell Prolif. 2007;40(6):905‐920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Copolovici DM, Langel K, Eriste E, Langel U. Cell‐penetrating peptides: design, synthesis, and applications. ACS Nano. 2014;8(3):1972‐1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Bernkop‐Schnurch A. Strategies to overcome the polycation dilemma in drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018; 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ruan G, Agrawal A, Marcus AI, Nie S. Imaging and tracking of tat peptide‐conjugated quantum dots in living cells: new insights into nanoparticle uptake, intracellular transport, and vesicle shedding. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129(47):14759‐14766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Seitz G, Warmann SW, Fuchs J, et al. Imaging of cell trafficking and metastases of paediatric rhabdomyosarcoma. Cell Prolif. 2008;41(2):365‐374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Qu X, Zhu D, Yao G, et al. An exonuclease III‐powered, on‐particle stochastic DNA walker. Angew Chem. 2017;56(7):1855‐1858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Khalil IA, Kogure K, Futaki S, Harashima H. Octaarginine‐modified liposomes: enhanced cellular uptake and controlled intracellular trafficking. Int J Pharm. 2008;354(1–2):39‐48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Nakase I, Akita H, Kogure K, et al. Efficient intracellular delivery of nucleic acid pharmaceuticals using cell‐penetrating peptides. Acc Chem Res. 2012;45(7):1132‐1139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Meng Z, Guo L, Li Q. Peptide‐coated semiconductor polymer dots for stem cells labeling and tracking. Chemistry. 2017;23(28):6836‐6844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Shao X‐R, Wei X‐Q, Song X, et al. Independent effect of polymeric nanoparticle zeta potential/surface charge, on their cytotoxicity and affinity to cells. Cell Prolif. 2015;48(4):465‐474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Wang T, Wang L, Li X, et al. Size‐dependent regulation of intracellular trafficking of polystyrene nanoparticle‐based drug‐delivery systems. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(22):18619‐18625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Foerg C, Ziegler U, Fernandez‐Carneado J, et al. Decoding the entry of two novel cell‐penetrating peptides in HeLa cells: lipid raft‐mediated endocytosis and endosomal escape. Biochemistry. 2005;44(1):72‐81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Oh N, Park JH. Endocytosis and exocytosis of nanoparticles in mammalian cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9(suppl 1):51‐63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Liu M, Li Q, Liang L, et al. Real‐time visualization of clustering and intracellular transport of gold nanoparticles by correlative imaging. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Toriyabe N, Hayashi Y, Harashima H. The transfection activity of R8‐modified nanoparticles and siRNA condensation using pH sensitive stearylated‐octahistidine. Biomaterials. 2013;34(4):1337‐1343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Song L, Liang X, Yang S, et al. Novel polyethyleneimine‐R8‐heparin nanogel for high‐efficiency gene delivery in vitro and in vivo. Drug Deliv. 2018;25(1):122‐131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Yi H, Wang Z, Li X, et al. Silica nanoparticles target a Wnt signal transducer for degradation and impair embryonic development in zebrafish. Theranostics. 2016;6(11):1810‐1820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Li X, Song L, Hu X, et al. Inhibition of epithelial‐mesenchymal transition and tissue regeneration by waterborne titanium dioxide nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(4):3449‐3458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Wang L, Wang Z, Li X, et al. Deciphering active biocompatibility of iron oxide nanoparticles from their intrinsic antagonism. Nano Res. 2018;11(5):2746‐2755. [Google Scholar]
- 45. Popp L, Segatori L. Differential autophagic responses to nano‐sized materials. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015;36:129‐136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Deng Y, Zhu L, Cai H, Wang G, Liu B. Autophagic compound database: a resource connecting autophagy‐modulating compounds, their potential targets and relevant diseases. Cell Prolif. 2018;51(3):e12403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Xie T, Li SJ, Guo MR, et al. Untangling knots between autophagic targets and candidate drugs, in cancer therapy. Cell Prolif. 2015;48(2):119‐139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Stern ST, Adiseshaiah PP, Crist RM. Autophagy and lysosomal dysfunction as emerging mechanisms of nanomaterial toxicity. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2012;9:20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Song W, Soo Lee S, Savini M, Popp L, Colvin VL, Segatori L. Ceria nanoparticles stabilized by organic surface coatings activate the lysosome‐autophagy system and enhance autophagic clearance. ACS Nano. 2014;8(10):10328‐10342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Li X, Chen N, Su Y, et al. Autophagy‐sensitized cytotoxicity of quantum dots in PC12 cells. Adv Healthc Mater. 2014;3(3):354‐359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Wang Z, Luo Y, Han Y, Chen N, Fan C. Nanoparticle‐based regulation and imaging of cell autophagy. Sci Chi Chem. 2017;47(6):778‐786. [Google Scholar]
- 52. Peynshaert K, Manshian BB, Joris F, et al. Exploiting intrinsic nanoparticle toxicity: the pros and cons of nanoparticle‐induced autophagy in biomedical research. Chem Rev. 2014;114(15):7581‐7609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Wang L, Li X, Han Y, et al. Quantum dots protect against MPP+‐induced neurotoxicity in a cell model of Parkinson’s disease through autophagy induction. Sci Chi Chem. 2016;59(11):1486‐1491. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.