Abstract
Objectives
The aim of study was to investigate the anticancer activities of Ivermectin (IVM) and the possible mechanisms in cells level via cell proliferation inhibition, apoptosis and migration inhibition in model cancer cell HeLa.
Materials and methods
The MTT assay was used to study the inhibitory effect of IVM on the proliferation of Hela cells, and the cell cycle was analysed by flow cytometry. The neutral comet assay was used to study the DNA damage. The presence of apoptosis was confirmed by DAPI nuclear staining and flow cytometry. Changes in mitochondrial membrane potential and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels were determined using Rhodamine 123 staining and DCFH‐DA staining. Western blot analysis for apoptosis‐related proteins was carried out. We use scratch test to analyse the antimigration potential of IVM.
Results
Ivermectin can inhibit the viability of HeLa cells significantly. In addition, treatment with IVM resulted in cell cycle arrest at the G1/S phase which partly account for the suppressed proliferation. Typical apoptosis morphological changes were shown in IVM treatment cells including DNA fragmentation and chromatin condensation. At the same time, the results of flow cytometry analysis showed that the number of apoptotic cells increased significantly with the increase of IVM concentration. Moreover, we observed that the mitochondrial membrane potential collapses and the ratio of Bax/Bcl‐2 in the cytoplasm increases, which induces cytochrome c release from the mitochondria to the cytoplasm, activates caspase‐9/‐3 and finally induces apoptosis. We also found that IVM can significantly increase intracellular ROS content. At the same time, we determined that IVM can significantly inhibit the migration of HeLa cells.
Conclusions
Our experimental results show that IVM might be a new potential anticancer drug for therapy of human cancer.
Keywords: antimigratory effects, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, cervical cancer, ivermectin, mitochondrial pathway
1. INTRODUCTION
Ivermectin (IVM) is the 22,23‐dihydro derivative of avermectin B1 and is an important member of the avermectin family of 16‐membered macrocyclic lactones evolve from the actinomycete Streptomyces avermectinius. 1 IVM was originally used as a veterinary drug and was very effective for a variety of parasites, such as gastrointestinal roundworms, lungworms and mites.2
It is believed that IVMacts on gamma‐amino butyric acid (GABA) receptor and glutamate‐gated chloride channels.3 Due to the low affinity for other mammalian ligand‐gated channels, IVM hardly crosses the blood‐brain barrier. Consequently, IVM has been generally supposed to be of low toxicity for the health of adults and approved for use in humans worldwide.4 For example, IVM was widely used for the treatment of river blindness in the form of a free drug, saving countless people’s eyesight.5 The discoverers of IVM were awarded the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine due to it has a very successful therapeutic effect on many parasitic diseases.6 In the recent years, IVM has been reported to exert anticancer activities. However, the specific roles of IVM in cancer remain unclear.
Cancer is a group of diseases with characteristics involving abnormal and uncontrolled cell growth, the potential for penetration and diffusion to other parts of body, considered as the leading cause of death in the world.7 Therefore, the research of antitumour drugs with high efficiency and low toxicity has been the focus of drug discovery.8 The HeLa cell line derived from cervical cancer cells was the first successful attempt to immortalize human‐derived cells in vitro and has served a role analogous to that of a model organism due to its robust growth and unrestricted distribution.9 Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignancy throughout the world which has become the second female malignant tumour, and has a serious threat to the health and safety of women.10 Based on these two points above, we chose to use HeLa cells for our study.
Ivermectin has been demonstrated to have anticancer activities on various types of cancer including glioblastoma, chronic myelogenous leukaemia and breast cancer.11, 12, 13 Because of the lack of systematic research on the anticancer activity of IVM in HeLa cells, the aim of this study was to investigate the activity and underlying mechanism of IVM against HeLa cells, and to provide experimental basis and theoretical foundation for further research on theory and clinical study.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Chemicals and antibodies
Ivermectin (95.9% purity) was purchased from (Cato Research Chemicals Inc., Eugene, OR, USA) 3‐(4,5‐Dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyl‐tetrazolium bromide (MTT), Rhodamine123 (Rh‐123), 4′6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI), N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylenediamine, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 2′,7′‐Dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH‐DA), propidium iodide (PI), RIPA lysis buffer were purchased from Sigma (Beverly, MA, USA). IVM is dissolved in DMSO and diluted to the appropriate concentration in using cell culture medium. It should be noted that the final concentration of DMSO in the cell culture medium should be less than one thousandth. Antibodies such as cytochrome c, caspase‐9, caspase‐3 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). Bax, Bcl‐2, PARP, p53, CDK4 and CyclinE were brought from Sangon (Shanghai, China). Secondary anti‐rabbit antibody was from Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd. Other common chemicals and reagents were purchased from Shanghai Titan‐chem Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
2.2. Cell culture
HeLa cell line (Human cervical carcinoma) was acquired from ATCC and grown in DMEM medium (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Hyclone) in an incubator with a humidified air atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C.
2.3. Cell viability assay
The MTT colorimetric method is a method that can quickly quantify the number and the value‐added state of living cells.14 It is widely used for cytotoxicity detection due to its advantages such as small workload, easy operation, rapidity and good repeatability.15 The HeLa cells (5 × 103 cells/well) were seeded onto 96‐well plates. After 24 hours of incubation, cells were treated with the corresponding concentration (0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 and 20 μmol/L) of IVM for 24 and 48 hours. Complete DMEM medium was used as a blank. Four hours prior to the assay, MTT reagent (20 μL/well, 5 mg/mL) was added to cells. We replaced the medium with DMSO (200 μL/well), and then we read the absorbances at 492 and 630 nm by a microplate reader (Bio‐Teck, Winooski, VT, USA).
2.4. Cell cycle analysis
The HeLa cells (1 × 106 cells/well) were seeded onto 9.6 cm2 plates overnight and treated with specified concentrations (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 μmol/L) of IVM. Then, the cells were harvested and resuspended in PBS and fixed with 70% ethanol and left at − 20°C overnight. After 12 hours of fixation, cells were centrifuged at 600 g for 5 minutes, washed and resuspended in PBS (200 μL). Then, we added 100 μL propidium iodide solution (500 μg/mL) to the cells and incubated for 15 minutes in the dark.16 The cell cycle was then analysed by flow cytometry (BD FACS Calibur). Data were analysed by the flowjo software.
2.5. DNA damage assay
The neutral comet assay was used to study the DNA damage induced by IVM.17 Briefly, HeLa cells (1 × 105 cells/well) were incubated overnight, and treated with different concentration (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 μmol/L) of IVM for 12 hours. Then, the cells were harvested and suspended in PBS. Subsequently, the cell suspension was mixed with 1% normal melting agarose and rapidly added to a previously prepared 0.8% normal melting agarose slide. After solidification, the slides were immersed into the lysis buffer for 2 hour at 4°C in the dark. The slides were immersed in electrophoresis buffer (1 × TAE [Tris base, Acetic acid and EDTA]) in the electrophoresis tank. After 10 minutes, we applied 20 V or 300 mA electric field for 10 minutes. After the slide was washed twice with ddH2O, 20 μL PI solution was added. Cell images were captured with a fluorescence microscope (Lecois, DM3000, GER) and analysed using the imagej software.
2.6. Chromatin condensation detection
HeLa cells were seeded (1 × 105 cells/well) in a 12‐well plate and incubated overnight. Then, the cells were exposed to IVM (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 μmol/L) for 24 hours. After fixed with paraformaldehyde, the cells were stained by DAPI (1 μL/well, 1 μg/mL) for 15 minutes at 37°C. Changes in nuclear morphology induced by IVM were observed using fluorescent microscopy.
2.7. Flow cytometry analysis of cell apoptosis
Apoptosis rate was determined using the Alexa Fluor 488 Annexin V/DeadCell Apoptosis Kit. Briefly, after HeLa cells (1 × 106 cells/well) were exposed to IVM (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 μmol/L) for 24 hours, cells were centrifuged at 100 g for 5 minutes, washed and suspended in PBS. Then, cells were labelled with Annexin V‐FITC and PI for 20 minutes. Finally, apoptosis rate was determined by flow cytometer (FACS Calibur, BD, San Jose, CA, USA) and flowjo software.
2.8. Mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) analysis
The effect of IVM on mitochondrial membrane potential was assessed using fluorescence microscopy. HeLa cells were seeded (1 × 105 cells/well) in a 12‐well plate and incubated overnight. After HeLa cells were treated with 0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 μmol/L IVM for 6 hours, cells were stained with Rhodamine123 for 30 minutes at 37°C. The phenomenon of cells was photographed by fluorescence microscopy. The images were measured using imagej software.
2.9. Western blotting
After treating HeLa cells (1 × 106 cells/well) with 0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 μmol/L IVM for 6 hours, the cells were collected, washed with PBS and lysed with RIPA buffer. Protein quantification was performed using BCA Protein Assay Kit. Equal amounts of protein were loaded onto an SDS‐PAGE gel for electrophoresis and transferred to polypropylene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. After blocking with 5% nonfat milk for 2 hours, the membranes were incubated with the primary antibody for 12‐16 hours. The membranes were then incubated with secondary antibody for 2 hours at room temperature. And the change in target protein expression was detected by a chemiluminescent gel imaging system (Tanon, Shanghai, China).
2.10. Intracellular ROS measurement
The effect of IVM on intracellular reactive oxygen species was evaluated by fluorescence microscopy.18 HeLa cells were seeded (1 × 105 cells/well) in a 12‐well plate and incubated overnight. After HeLa cells were treated with 0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 μmol/L IVM for 6 hours, cells were tinted with oxidation of DCFH‐DA for 30 minutes at 37°C. The phenomenon of cells was photographed by fluorescence microscopy. The images were measured using imagej software.
2.11. Antimigration assay
We use scratch test to analyse the antimigration potential of IVM. HeLa cells (1 × 105 cells/well) were seeded in 6‐well plate. When the cell density reaches about 70%, we use a 200 μl yellow pipette tip to draw a straight line in the cell culture plate.19 Since antimetastatic agents usually require long‐term use by patients, they should have low cytotoxicity. Therefore, in the current study, we have used IVM at lower concentrations than that used for other assays (2.5, 5, 10, 15 μmol/L). After scratching, HeLa cells were exposed to different concentrations of IVM for 48 hours. The images of cell migration were captured using fluorescence microscopy. The data analysis was performed using imagej soft‐ware.
2.12. Data analyses
At least three independent biological replicates were performed in all experiments. Data were shown as mean ± standard deviation. To determine differences between groups, we performed the Dunnett test using ANOVA (P < 0.05 indicates statistical significance). spss 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Inhibition of HeLa cells viability by IVM
To evaluate the cytotoxic of IVM on HeLa cells, we analysed the cell viability using the MTT assay. IVM can significantly inhibit the activity of HeLa cells in a time‐ and dose‐dependent manner (Figure 1). The proliferation inhibitory ratios of HeLa cells were 5.67% ± 1.83%, 16.39% ± 2.75%, 48.37% ± 4.25%, 61.15% ± 3.82%, 89.52% ± 4.47%, 95.35% ± 3.12% after 24 hours of treatment with IVM at the different concentrations of 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20 μmol/L. After 48 hours treatments, the proliferation inhibitory ratio reached to 18.64% ± 1.61%, 32.73% ± 4.35%, 55.36% ± 3.67%, 71.45% ± 3.92%, 95.9707% ± 3.28%, 99.049 88% ± 2.18%. IC50 values for IVM are provided in Table 1.
Table 1.
Cell lines | Treatment time (h) | a (intercept) | b (slope) | IC50 (μmol/L) | 95% (confidence limits) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||||
HeLa | 24 | 2.42 | 1.19 | 7.87 a | 7.16 | 8.51 |
48 | 2.28 | 2.08 | 5.78 b | 5.13 | 6.95 |
IVM, ivermectin.
Small alphabet indicated statistically significant differences between two groups in the same column (P < 0.05).
3.2. IVM‐induced cell cycle arrest at G1/S phase
Flow cytometry of propidium iodide staining was performed to analyse the cell cycle distribution. As is shown in Figure 2A, cells treated with different concentrations of IVM for 24 hours showed a significant increase in the number of cells in the G0/G1 phase, which corresponds to a significant decrease in the number of cells in the S and G2/M phases (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). Further Western Blot results showed that Cyclin D and CDK4 expressions were significantly reduced (Figure 2B).
3.3. IVM‐induced DNA damage in HeLa cells
We used single‐cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) to evaluate the DNA damage induced by IVM. During electrophoresis, the broken DNA fragments move towards the positive electrode by carrying a negative charge, and the unbroken DNA does not move. After staining, the nucleus forms a bright head, and the DNA fragments form a tail, which resembles a comet‐like shape. The more severe the DNA damage, the longer the tail length. It can be seen from the Figure 3A that the nuclear chromatin DNA of the untreated control group of IVM is basically not broken, the nucleus is intact, and it is round, and no obvious comet‐like tail is observed. However, the nuclear chromatin DNA of the treatment group is obviously broken and formed a long comet‐like tail, the "tailing" phenomenon. The percentages of comet‐positive cells of HeLa increased significantly after treated by IVM in a dose‐dependent way (Figure 3B). The distributions of IVM‐treatment HeLa cells, with respect to comet assay parameters including tail lengths and tail DNA are presented in Table 2 (**P < 0.01). The results showed that there was no obvious DNA damage in the untreated control group, and the DNA damage of HeLa cells was significantly improved after IVM treatment.
Table 2.
Concentrations (μmol/L) | Comet assay parameters | |
---|---|---|
Tail DNA (%) | Tail length (μm) | |
0 | 1.78 ± 0.15 e | 1.39 ± 0.57 d |
2.5 | 10.27 ± 3.255 d | 3.96 ± 1.49 d |
5 | 25.48 ± 4.57 c | 11.75 ± 3.43 c |
10 | 47.32 ± 5.18 b | 21.16 ± 5.31 b |
20 | 70.12 ± 5.36 a | 30.46 ± 3.92 a |
IVM, ivermectin.
The data are shown as the means ± SD of three independent experiments.
Small alphabet indicated statistically significant differences between any two groups in the same column (P < 0.05).
3.4. IVM‐induced apoptosis in HeLa cells
After treatment with different concentrations of IVM for 24 hours, IVM‐induced apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry (Figure 4A). The different labelling patterns in the annexin V/PI analysis were used to identify the different cell populations where FITC‐negative and PI‐negative cells were designated as viable cells. FITC‐positive and PI‐negative cells were identified as early apoptotic cells. FITC‐positive and PI‐positive cells were identified as late apoptotic cells. FITC‐negative and PI‐positive cells were identified as necrotic cells. The results showed that the proportion of early apoptosis cells increased from 0.231% ± 0.15% in the control cells to 0.818% ± 0.24%, 1.19% ± 0.37%, 3.46% ± 0.35% and 7.81% ± 0.63% and the proportion of late apoptosis cells added from 0.231% ± 0.33% in the control cells to 1.97% ± 0.42%, 3.38% ± 0.65%, 10.5% ± 1.15% and 22.1% ± 1.27% in 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 μmol/L. IVM‐treated cells, separately (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). The results showed that IVM had a concentration‐dependent effect on apoptosis effect of HeLa cells (Figure 4B). In order to further verify the effect of IVM on the nucleus of cervical cancer cells, the nuclear dye DAPI was used for staining observation. As the concentration of IVM increases, the nucleus of HeLa cells undergoes typical morphological changes such as nuclei condensing, fragmentation (Figure 4C).
3.5. IVM‐induced mitochondrial membrane potential collapse in HeLa cells
Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) is one of the important indicators for maintaining normal mitochondrial configuration and function.20 Decreased MMP is one of the important factors leading to apoptosis and is considered to be the first step of the apoptosis cascade.21 Therefore, we tried to evaluate the influence of IVM on MMP in HeLa cells. We found that exposure of HeLa cells to different concentrations (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 μmol/L) of IVM for 6 hours resulted in a gradual decrease in green fluorescence intensity (Figure 5A,B). The study shows that the decrease of MMP was brought about by IVM treatment in HeLa cells (**P < 0.01).
3.6. Effect of IVM on the expression of apoptosis‐related proteins in HeLa cells
The role of mitochondria in the mechanism of apoptosis has attracted more and more attention. On the one hand, cytochrome c released into the cytoplasm of the mitochondrial membrane gap triggers the caspase cascade, leading to cell death; on the other hand, the Bcl‐2 protein family regulates the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria. Therefore, cytochrome c is a key factor in the apoptosis signalling process in mammals. To determine the underlying mechanism of IVM‐induced apoptosis, we tested the expression of apoptosis‐related proteins such as cytochrome c, Bax and Bcl‐2 in HeLa cell. Cytochrome c content in cytoplasm was increased in a dose‐dependent manner in IVM‐induced HeLa cells (Figure 6A,B). Meanwhile, the expression level of anti‐apoptosis protein Bcl‐2 was down‐regulated and pro‐apoptotic protein Bax was elevated in a dose‐dependent manner (Figure 6C,D; **P < 0.01).
3.7. Effect of IVM on caspase‐3, caspase‐9,P53 and PARP in HeLa cells
The process of apoptosis involves a complex cascade of proteolytic hydrolysis.22 The Caspase family plays an extremely important role in the process of apoptosis.23 P53 is a tumour suppressor protein that plays an important role in the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway.24 To further investigate the apoptosis of HeLa cells caused by IVM, we examined the activity of caspase‐3, caspase‐9, p53 and PARP by Western blot assay. As shown in Figure 7, caspase‐3 and caspase‐9 were both activated while cleaved PARP increased and P53 protein expression was significantly increased.
3.8. IVM‐induced generation of intracellular ROS in HeLa cells
We analysed the intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) level using fluorescence microscopy after DCFH‐DA being hatched in cells. Intracellular ROS of HeLa cells were significantly increased after treatment with different concentrations of IVM (2.5, 5, 10 and 20 μmol/L) compared to the 0 μmol/L IVM group (Figure 8A). The studies suggested ROS increases in a dose‐dependent way in IVM‐treated HeLa cells (Figure 8B; **P < 0.01).
3.9. Migration of HeLa Cells was Inhibited by IVM
We further verified the inhibitory effect of IVM on HeLa cell migration using antimigration assay (Figure 9A). Since higher concentrations of IVM may cause apoptosis, this study was performed at lower concentrations to confirm the antimigratory potential. After 48 hours of incubation, the cells in the control group gradually began to heal and grow into dense cell clusters, and in cells treated with IVM (2.5, 5, 10 and 15 μmol/L), we observed that only a few cells grew to the internal space of the wound as the concentration of IVM was increased (**P < 0.01).
4. DISCUSSION
In recent years, the use of bacterial or fungal fermentation to prevent and treat cancer is attracting more and more attention.25 IVM is a semi‐synthetic macrocyclic lactone derivative of the avermectin family.26 Nowadays, because of it has no side effects on human safety, IVM has been approved for use in humans to treat on chocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis.27 Accumulating evidence suggests that IVM has anticancer activities against breast cancer, ovarian cancer, neurofibromatosis and chronic myeloid leukaemia. In our study, we investigated the effects of IVM on cervical cancer (HeLa) cell line and explored the underlying mechanisms.
To evaluate the cytotoxicity of IVM on HeLa cells, we used the MTT assay to assess the effects of different concentrations of IVM on the viability of HeLa cells. The results showed that IVM has a significant inhibitory effect on theproliferation of HeLa cells. Meanwhile, the result of alkaline comet assay analysis indicated that IVM inducing DNA fragmentation in HeLa cells. As we all know, DNA damage can induce inactivation of the CDK‐Cyclin complex, resulting in cell cycle arrest.28 Cell cycle progression is one of a pivotal signalling mechanisms of homoeostasis maintenance in healthy tissues and normal cells.29 Therefore, induction of cell arrest in cancer cells is one of the useful strategies for anticancer drug development.30 Cell cycle analysis shows that IVM induces G1/S cycle arrest in HeLa cells, which means that IVM inhibits proliferation of HeLa cells via cell cycle arrest resulting from DNA damage.
It is well known that three pathways can lead to cell death, namely apoptosis, autophagy and cell necrosis.31 At present, targeting apoptosis is the most successful way to treat cancer in addition to surgery. We further designed experiments to explore whether IVM can cause apoptosis in HeLa cells. Through DAPI staining, we clearly observed the obvious morphological features of apoptosis such as cell shrinkage, chromatin condensation and DNA fragmentation.32 As shown in the flow cytometry, IVM could induce the increase of apoptosis rate of HeLa cells in a dose‐dependent manner which further confirmed the apoptosis effect of IVM.
As we all know, the apoptosis pathway is divided into two major types: intrinsic pathway (mediated by mitochondria) and the extrinsic pathway (mediated by death receptors).33 In order to identify the type of IVM‐induced apoptosis effect, we observed the change of intracellular mitochondrial membrane potential by rhodamine 123 staining. The results showed that IVM caused the collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential. Moreover, the Western blot experiment shows that the content of cytochrome c in cytoplasm increases obviously. Cytochrome c released from mitochondria to the cytoplasm is the most important event in mitochondrial mediated apoptosis signal transduction pathway.34 Therefore, we have determined that IVM induces apoptosis in HeLa cells through mitochondrial pathways. We also examined the expression levels of Bcl‐2 family proteins and caspase‐3/‐9 proteins. The activated caspase cleaves PARP, a substrate protein of caspase‐3, which is one of the hallmarks of apoptosis. Results as we expected, IVM inhibited the expression of apoptosis protein Bcl‐2, increased the expression of apoptosis protein Bax. And further activated the downstream apoptosis‐inducing caspase‐3/‐9, and cleaved PARP which eventually led to apoptosis. It is well known that intracellular ROS are involved in the regulation of apoptosis, cell cycle and participate in various signal transduction pathways in cells. We found that IVM can significantly increase intracellular ROS content.
Rapid metastasis is one of the biggest malignant features of cancer cells.35 The invasion and metastasis of malignant tumours are a series of complex and multi‐step interactions.36 It involves the malignant proliferation of cancer cells, the adhesion of tumour cells, movement, invasiveness and the ability to metastasize. Tumour invasion is the premise of cancer metastasis.37 Invasion does not mean that metastasis must occur. However, tumour metastasis must invade.38 We determined that IVM can significantly inhibit the migration of HeLa cells by the scratch test.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that IVM can significantly inhibit the proliferation of HeLa cells via cell cycle arrest resulting from DNA damage, and induced apoptosis of HeLa cells through the mitochondrial pathway. At the same time, we found that IVM can inhibit its migration activity significantly. Through these studies, we determined that IVM has significant anticancer activity against HeLa cells. However, the study of the effect of IVM on cancer in vivo has not yet been carried out. This will be the focus of our future work.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was financially supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (NO. 2017M621393), Exploration and Research Fund for Excellent Youth Scholars (NO. 222201814050) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 31501674).
Zhang P, Zhang Y, Liu K, et al. Ivermectin induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of HeLa cells via mitochondrial pathway. Cell Prolif. 2019;52:e12543 10.1111/cpr.12543
REFERENCES
- 1. Munoz J, Ballester MR, Antonijoan RM, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetic profile of fixed‐dose ivermectin with an innovative 18mg tablet in healthy adult volunteers. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(1):e0006020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Campbell WC. Ivermectin: a reflection on simplicity (nobel lecture). Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2016;55(35):10184‐10189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Parri HR, Djamgoz M, Holden‐Dye L, Walker RJ. An ion‐sensitive microelectrode study on the effect of a high concentration of ivermectin on chloride balance in the somatic muscle bag cells of Ascaris suum . Parasitology. 2009;106(04):421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Assaife‐Lopes N, Sousa VC, Pereira DB, Ribeiro JA, Sebastiao AM. Regulation of TrkB receptor translocation to lipid rafts by adenosine A(2A) receptors and its functional implications for BDNF‐induced regulation of synaptic plasticity. Purinergic Signal. 2014;10(2):251‐267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Omondi EO, Nyabadza F, Smith RJ, Rogovchenko Y. Modelling the impact of mass administration of ivermectin in the treatment of onchocerciasis (river blindness). Cogent Math Stat. 2018;5(1):1429700. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Chen WJ. Honoring antiparasitics: the 2015 nobel prize in physiology or medicine. Biomed J. 2016;39(2):93‐97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hansen JM, Coleman RL, Sood AK. Targeting the tumour microenvironment in ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2016;56:131‐143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bannas P, Hambach J, Koch‐Nolte F. Nanobodies and nanobody‐based human heavy chain antibodies as antitumor therapeutics. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Zhao Y, Yao R, Ouyang L, et al. Three‐dimensional printing of Hela cells for cervical tumor model in vitro. Biofabrication. 2014;6(3):035001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Xu JY, Meng QH, Chong Y, et al. Sanguinarine inhibits growth of human cervical cancer cells through the induction of apoptosis. Oncol Rep. 2012;28(6):2264‐2270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Wang J, Xu Y, Wan H, Hu J. Antibiotic ivermectin selectively induces apoptosis in chronic myeloid leukemia through inducing mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;497(1):241‐247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Sharmeen S, Skrtic M, Sukhai MA, et al. The antiparasitic agent ivermectin induces chloride‐dependent membrane hyperpolarization and cell death in leukemia cells. Blood. 2010;116(18):3593‐3603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Dou Q, Chen HN, Wang K, et al. Ivermectin induces cytostatic autophagy by blocking the PAK1/Akt axis in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2016;76(15):4457‐4469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Zhang Y, Luo M, Xu W, et al. Avermectin confers its cytotoxic effects by inducing DNA damage and mitochondria‐associated apoptosis. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64(36):6895‐6902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Berridge MV, Tan AS. Characterization of the cellular reduction of 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT): subcellular localization, substrate dependence, and involvement of mitochondrial electron transport in MTT reduction. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1993;303(2):474‐482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Gao S, Li X, Ding X, Qi W, Yang Q. Cepharanthine induces autophagy, apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in breast cancer cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;41(4):1633‐1648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Yang M, Wang B, Gao J, Zhang Y, Xu W, Tao L. Spinosad induces programmed cell death involves mitochondrial dysfunction and cytochrome C release in Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 cells. Chemosphere. 2017;169:155‐161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Yang Y, Zong M, Xu W, et al. Natural pyrethrins induces apoptosis in human hepatocyte cells via Bax‐ and Bcl‐2‐mediated mitochondrial pathway. Chem Biol Interact. 2017;262:38‐45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Sithara T, Dhanya BP, Arun KB, et al. Zerumbone, a cyclic sesquiterpene from Zingiber zerumbet induces apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and antimigratory effects in SW480 colorectal cancer cells. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(3):602‐612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Pacelli C, Latorre D, Cocco T, et al. Tight control of mitochondrial membrane potential by cytochrome c oxidase. Mitochondrion. 2011;11(2):334‐341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Yao C, Jiang J, Tu Y, Ye S, Du H, Zhang Y. Beta‐elemene reverses the drug resistance of A549/DDP lung cancer cells by activating intracellular redox system, decreasing mitochondrial membrane potential and P‐glycoprotein expression, and inducing apoptosis. Thorac Cancer. 2014;5(4):304‐312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Larsen BD, Sorensen CS. The caspase‐activated DNase: apoptosis and beyond. FEBS J. 2017;284(8):1160‐1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Wu CY, Tang ZH, Jiang L, Li XF, Jiang ZS, Liu LS. PCSK9 siRNA inhibits HUVEC apoptosis induced by ox‐LDL via Bcl/Bax‐caspase9‐caspase3 pathway. Mol Cell Biochem. 2012;359(1–2):347‐358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ramakrishnan G, Lo Muzio L, Elinos‐Baez CM, et al. Silymarin inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis in hepatic cancer cells. Cell Prolif. 2009;42(2):229‐240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Therapeutics LI. Bacterial treatment for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(10):648–648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Molinari G, Soloneski S, Larramendy ML. New ventures in the genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of macrocyclic lactones, abamectin and ivermectin. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2010;128(1–3):37‐45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Ouedraogo AL, Bastiaens GJ, Tiono AB, et al. Efficacy and safety of the mosquitocidal drug ivermectin to prevent malaria transmission after treatment: a double‐blind, randomized, clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(3):357‐365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wei J, Zhang L, Ren L, et al. Endosulfan induces cell dysfunction through cycle arrest resulting from DNA damage and DNA damage response signaling pathways. Sci Total Environ. 2017;589:97‐106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Zhang J, Wang L, Zhang Y. Downregulation of NIMA‐related kinase‐7 inhibits cell proliferation by inducing cell cycle arrest in human retinoblastoma cells. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15(2):1360‐1366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Sherr CJ, Bartek J. Cell cycle‐targeted cancer therapies. Annu Rev Cancer Biol. 2017;1(1):41‐57. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Zhang Y, Wu J, Xu W, et al. Cytotoxic effects of Avermectin on human HepG2 cells in vitro bioassays. Environ Pollut. 2017;220(Pt B):1127‐1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Lin Y, Huang JJ, Dahms HU, Zhen JJ, Ying XP. Cell damage and apoptosis in the hepatopancreas of Eriocheir sinensis induced by cadmium. Aquat Toxicol. 2017;190:190‐198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Letai A. Apoptosis and cancer. Annu Rev Cancer Biol. 2017;1(1):275‐294. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Liu K‐Y, Yang H, Peng J‐X, Hong H‐Z. Cytochrome c and insect cell apoptosis. Insect Sci. 2012;19(1):30‐40. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Abaza M, Luqmani YA. The influence of pH and hypoxia on tumor metastasis. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2013;13(10):1229‐1242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Lu KW, Chen JC, Lai TY, et al. Gypenosides inhibits migration and invasion of human oral cancer SAS cells through the inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase‐2 ‐9 and urokinase‐plasminogen by ERK1/2 and NF‐kappa B signaling pathways. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2011;30(5):406‐415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Zhao H, Wang J, Kong X, et al. CD47 promotes tumor invasion and metastasis in non‐small cell lung cancer. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Fu L, Qin YR, Ming XY, et al. RNA editing of SLC22A3 drives early tumor invasion and metastasis in familial esophageal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(23):E4631‐E4640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]