Abstract
The salivary gland of hard ticks is a highly innervated tissue where multiple intertwined axonal projections enter each individual acini. In the present study, we investigated the ultrastructural architecture of axonal projections within granular salivary gland type II and III acini of Ixodes ricinus female. Using immunogold labeling, we specifically examined the associations of SIFamide neuropeptide, SIFamide receptor (SIFa_R), neuropeptide pigment dispersing factor (PDF), and the invertebrate-specific D1-like dopamine receptor (InvD1L), with acinar cells. In both acini types, SIFamide-positive axons were found to be in direct contact with either basal epithelial cells or a single adlumenal myoepithelial cell in close proximity to the either the acinar duct or its valve, respectively. Accordingly, SIFa_R staining correlated with SIFamide-positive axons in both basal epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Immunoreactivity for both InvD1L and PDF (type II acini exclusively) revealed positive axons radiating along the acinar lumen. These axons were primarily enclosed by the adlumenal myoepithelial cell plasma membrane and interstitial projections of ablumenal epithelial cells. Our study has revealed the detailed ultrastructure of I. ricinus salivary glands, and provides a solid baseline for a comprehensive understanding of the cell-axon interactions and their functions in this essential tick organ.
Subject terms: Neuroscience, Cryoelectron microscopy
Introduction
Tick salivary gland (SG) secretions eliminate excess water and ions from tick bodies to maintain homeostasis1 and simultaneously compromise the host’s defense system to ensure long-term feeding success2,3. The SG of hard female ticks is composed of three distinct types of acini that differ both morphologically and functionally4,5. The agranular type I acini are known to aid tick homeostatic maintenance during both on- and off-host periods by absorbing atmospheric water and ions6,7, while granular type II and III SG acini share similar structural characteristics, and form highly complex secretory units that secret either biologically active molecules or fluids8–10. The complex acinar cell configuration11–13 required to secrete the various different substances2 is what characterizes the precise and dynamic control mechanisms of this highly versatile organ. Neural control of the tick SG has been extensively studied in various tick species14–17, and the most detailed information to date has been demonstrated in the North American black-legged tick Ixodes scapularis18–21. Previously, using specific antibodies, numerous axonal processes arborizing within type II and III acini have been identified (Fig. 1): (i) neuropeptidergic axon terminals co-expressing myoinhibitory peptide (MIP), SIFamide and elevenin (Elv) terminate at the basal regions in both type II and III acini18,21; (ii) neuropeptidergic axon terminals positively immunoreacting to antibodies against both pigment dispersing factor (PDF) and orcokinin only reach the apical parts of type II acini17,22; and (iii) axonal projections expressing invertebrate-specific D1-like dopamine receptor (InvD1L) reaching the apical regions of both type II and III acini were identifed19. Surprisingly, the InvD1L dopamine receptor antibody also recognized basal MIP/SIFamide/Elv axons in both type II and III acini in a previous study19. In addition, SIFamide receptor (SIFa_R) was detected in the basal region of both type II and III acini, in close association with the SIFamide-releasing axon terminals (Fig. 1)20.
Recent in vitro physiological experiments demonstrated that dopamine-activated expulsions of acinar content to the adjacent ducts is mediated via the contractile myoepithelial cell (MC)23. The single adlumenal MC lines the entire acinar lumen—including the region above the acinar valve—in a web-like fashion13,19,24. Combining both morphological and physiological data, we have suggested that the MC is a target for downstream signals of InvD1L-positive axons, whereas basally located MIP/SIFamide/Elv-releasing axon terminals may play a role in the modulation of paracrine/autocrine dopamine actions in the acini and/or control the acinar valve via the MC19,20,25. Although it appears that the MC is controlled by different axonal projections19,20,25, detailed knowledge about the specific cell(s)-axon(s) connections remains enigmatic, mainly due to difficulties in distinguishing clear acinar cell boundaries via wholemount immunohistochemistry (IHC) approaches.
Therefore, we used immunogold labeling and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to investigate SIFamide, SIFa_R, InvD1L, and PDF, to further our understanding of type II and III SG acini innervations in unfed Ixodes ricinus females. Taking advantage of the high contrast TEM image generated by en bloc hafnium chloride staining during the freeze substitution technique26,27 we were able to trace the borders of distinct acinar cells near the acinar duct and valve and recognize associated axons with this highly complex region. The 3D reconstructions of double-immunogold-stained structures identified distinct innervations, thus revealing their relationship with specific acinar cells for the first time.
Material and Methods
Ticks
Adult I. ricinus females were obtained from the tick rearing facility at the Institute of Parasitology of the Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic. Ticks were maintained in plastic vials containing sterile wood shavings and covered by cotton at >90% relative humidity and 22 °C. All ticks used in the study were unfed I. ricinus females.
High pressure freezing and freeze substitution
For ultrastructural studies, SG of unfed I. ricinus females were dissected in 0.1 M HEPES and immediately frozen using the Leica EM PACT high pressure freezing (HPF) system in the presence of 20% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich). Freeze substitution was performed in 2% OsO4 (EMS) in 100% acetone (−90 °C, 96 h). Then temperature was increased to −60 °C (1.9 °C/1 h) and after 24 h up to −30 °C (1.3 °C/h). At −30 °C, OsO4 was replaced with 1% thiocarbohydrazide (Sigma); then with 2% OsO4; and finally with either 1% uranyl acetate (EMS) or 1% HfCl4 (Sigma). All solutions were diluted in 100% acetone with a 24 h incubation period at each step. After increasing the temperature to 4 °C (1.4 °C/h) the samples were washed three times for 15 minutes in 100% acetone, infiltrated and embedded in EMBed 812 resin (EMS). Ultrathin sections were subsequently counterstained in ethanolic uranyl acetate for 30 minutes and lead citrate for 20 minutes.
Antibodies and immunoreactive epitopes
The antibodies used in this study are listed in Table 1. The neuropeptide antibodies were well characterized in wholemount immunohistochemistry of various tick species16,21,22. The InvD1L and SIFa-R receptor antibodies were raised against the last 20 amino acids in the C-terminal I. scapularis protein sequence19,20. While the C-terminal sequences of the G-protein coupled receptors often diverge among the different arthropod taxa, we examined whether I. ricinus and I. scapularis share the same SIFa_R and InvD1L C-terminal protein sequences. SIFa_R and InvD1L selected regions were amplified from cDNA obtained from the SG of partially-fed I. ricinus females. PCR products were cloned into the pGMTeasy vector (Promega) and sequenced. For the sequence analyses, see Supplementary Fig. S1.
Table 1.
Antibody name | Host | Source/characterization | Dilution for TEM | Immunogen | Secondary probe conjugated to gold nanoparticles (nm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Drome SIFamide | Rabbit polyclonal | 35 | 1:30 | AYRKPPFNGSIFamide | protein A (5) or goat α-rabbit IgG (15 nm) |
Ucapu PDH* | Rabbit polyclonal | 36 | 1:20 | NSELINSILGLPKVMNDAamide | goat α-rabbit IgG (6 nm or 15 nm) |
Ixosc SIFa_R | Chicken polyclonal, affinity purified | 20 | 1:20 | CTRGLSRYDTQCEYLSTSAV | goat α-chicken IgY (6 nm) |
Ixosc InvD1L | Chicken polyclonal, affinity purified | 19 | 1:30 | CRIIKEDASMRSQSLEEAVL | goat α-chicken IgY (6 nm or 15 nm) |
*The antibody against Uca pugilator pigment dispersing hormone (PDH)36 has been shown to recognize various neurons in Drosophila melanogaster37 and in different tick species16,17,22. Because there is no evidence about hormonal actions of PDH in insect neither in ticks we use the term pigment dispersing factor (PDF) for ours immunoreactivities with this antibody. GenBank accession numbers for: D. melanogaster SIFamide, NM_001259567; U. pugilator PDH, 1109281A; I. scapularis SIFa_R, AGE11606; I. scapularis InvD1L, XM_002399612.1.
Immunogold labeling of thawed cryosections (Tokuyasu technique)
Dissected SGs were fixed in a mixture of 4% formaldehyde + 0.1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M HEPES (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at room temperature. After washing in HEPES containing 0.02 M glycine, the tissues were embedded into 10% gelatin (Serva Electrophoresis) and cryoprotected in 2.1 M sucrose solution for 24–72 h at 4 °C and then frozen in liquid nitrogen. Ultrathin cryosections were cut using the cryo-ultramicrotome LEICA EM UC-6/FC-6 at temperatures ranging from −120 °C to −100 °C. The sections were picked up using a drop of 1% methyl cellulose/1.05 M sucrose mixture28 and transferred onto Formvar-carbon coated grids. The sections were treated with blocking buffer (BB) composed of 1% fish skin gelatin and 0.05% Tween 20 (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in HEPES, and then incubated in antibodies diluted in BB (Table 1) for 1–2 h. After washing in BB, the sections were incubated with various secondary probes conjugated to different sized gold nanoparticles (Table 1): e.g. protein A, 5 nm (UMC, Utrecht); goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated either to 6 nm (BBI) or 15 nm (Aurion); and goat anti-chicken IgY, 6 nm or 15 nm (Aurion) particles. Conjugates were diluted 1:50 in BB and incubated with samples for 1 hour at room temperature. Controls for nonspecific binding of the secondary antibody were performed by omitting the primary antibody. Finally, sections were washed in HEPES, dH2O, and then contrasted/embedded using a mixture of 2% methylcellulose and 3% aq. uranyl acetate solution (9:1). Samples were observed using a JEOL 1010 TEM or a JEOL 2100-F TEM equipped with a high-tilt stage and a Gatan camera (Orius SC 1000), controlled with SerialEM automated acquisition software. Tilt series images were collected in the range of ±60° to 65°, with 0.6° to 1° increments. Electron tomograms were reconstructed with the IMOD software package. Manual masking of the area of interest was employed to generate 3D models. 3D model visualizations were performed in IMOD and Amira (ThermoFisher Scientific) software packages respectively. Coloring of cell types/structures from TEM images was performed in Adobe Photoshop.
Results
Ultrastructure of acinar cells and associated axonal projections
The spatial organization of acinar cells, including associated axons containing neurosecretory vesicles, is revealed with low-magnification TEM imaging of a type III acinus (Fig. 2A). The basally located epithelial cells (ECs), tightly surround the entire chitinous acinar duct and also overlay the arms of the acinar valve (Fig. 2A–G). These cells possess a relatively large nuclei close to the apex of the acinar duct and abundant bundles of microtubules are evident at valve-adjoining regions (Fig. 2A,B). Highly labyrinthine EC plasma membranes form numerous septate junctions, which are primarily evident on the sides of the acinar duct (Fig. 2B,F,G). Basal canaliculi formed by EC membranes are mainly apparent at the apex of the acinar duct (Fig. 2B). Multiple axons containing neurosecretory vesicles were found adjacent to the acinar duct. In very basal region of the acini, axons were exclusively encapsulated by convoluted EC plasma membranes (Fig. 2A,B), effectively separating axons from direct contact with chitinous acinar ducts. Axons—running at or around the level of the acinar valve—were enclosed between interdigitated EC plasma membranes and interstitial extensions of ablumenal epithelial cells (AECs), which extend between the granular cells towards the acinar duct (Fig. 2C–E). Occasionally, these axons made contact with large basal granular cells (Fig. 2E).
A single ablumenal MC lined the entire acinar lumen, and its finger-like projections radiated between the individual granular cells towards the basement membrane, where they formed intimate connections with AEC terminal extensions (Fig. 2A,H–J). The nucleus of this cell, which is often difficult to locate in TEM sections, was recognized at approximately one-third length of the acinus closest to the lumen (Fig. 2J). The basal regions of the MC overlay approximately half the length of the EC extensions directly covering the acinar valve (Fig. 2A,B,G). Copious microvilli were detected on the MC’s lumenal side (Fig. 2J). The microtubule bundles were identified across the entire body of the MC, and were more densely packed at contact zones between basal parts of the MC in the region above the acinar valve (Fig. 2B). Scattered axonal projections enclosed by MC and AEC plasma membranes were frequently detected (Fig. 2A,H–J), but axons possessing direct contact with granular cells (type F) were less common (Fig. 2H).
In type II acini, up to eight axonal projections in close alignment to the acinar duct have been observed (Fig. 3A). AECs extend very fine projections throughout the extracellular matrix between basal granular cells and towards the acinar duct to form intercellular connections between axons and their surrounding ECs (Fig. 3A–L). Near the acinar basement membrane, AEC projections can be seen to invaginate the cytoplasm of granular cells (Fig. 3H–J). A 3D model reconstructed from serial ultrathin resin sections reveals further insights into the spatial organization of the type II acinus basal region, including the different acinar cells encapsulating axons surrounding the acinar duct/valve (Fig. 4, Video 1). Similar to type III acini, axons adjacent to the apex of the acinar duct make direct contact with ECs, terminal extensions of AECs, and basal granular cells. In unfed I. ricinus females, the lumen in type II acini is proportionally larger compared to type III. Morphological features of the MC lining the lumen and part of the acinar valve region are shared between these two acini types (see Fig. 2A,B,G–J).
For ultrastructural studies, we used osmium-thiocarbohydrazide-osmium methods followed by en-bloc staining with either uranyl acetate (Fig. 2C–G) or hafnium chloride (Figs 2A,B,H–J and 3) to enhance contrast of membranes and microtubules. In comparison to uranyl acetate (Fig. 2G), hafnium staining repeatedly and significantly enhanced the contrast of microtubules (Fig. 2B) and, in several acini, increased the cytoplasm density of both ECs and AECs (Fig. 3).
SIFamide and SIFamide receptor
In both type II and III acini, immunogold labeling revealed direct associations of SIFamide and its receptor within both ECs and the MC, in the vicinity of the acinar duct and its valve, respectively (Fig. 5, Supplementary Fig. S2). In type III acini large caliber (~5 μm) SIFamide-positive axons (SIFa-axons) accompanied by four proportionally smaller diameter (~500 nm) SIFamide-negative axons were detected near the acinar duct basal region. SIFa-axons contained electron-dense neurosecretory vesicles, while electron-lucent vesicles were more frequently observed in the smaller accompanying axons (Fig. 5A,B). All identified axons in this region were surrounded by convoluted EC plasma membranes containing microtubule bundles and abundant mitochondria (Video 2). Mitochondria were also observed in SIFa-axons and two of the associated axons (Fig. 5B). In numerous TEM sections, we noted that septate junctions between individual ECs appeared to be more abundant in zones between axons and the acinar duct (Fig. 5B,C). In addition, the EC basal plasma membranes form a labyrinth of canaliculi where ECs directly contact the apical region of valvular arms. Interestingly, these structures were positive for SIFa_R-immunogold labeling in both type of acini (Fig. 5D,E, Supplementary Fig. S2), predominantly at the extracellular membranes as observed with electron tomography (Fig. 5E). Furthermore, the MC (predominantly in acini type III) was also associated with both SIFamide and SIFa_R together (Fig. 5F–M). This co-labeling revealed positive immunoreactions in the region just above the acinar valve, where highly labyrinthine MC plasma membrane encloses large-caliber (~2.5 μm) SIFa-axons, accompanied by three smaller-diameter (~400 nm) axons with electron-lucent vesicles (Fig. 5F–K). In type III acini, positive SIFa_R staining was observed within two of these electron-lucent axons (Fig. 5H,L,M). In the MC cytoplasm, small vesicle-like structures were also SIFa_R positive (Fig. 5I). In addition, MC plasma membranes enclosing the SIFa-axon were positive for SIFa_R staining (Fig. 5H) as revealed by virtual electron tomography Z- slices.
Invertebrate-specific D1-like dopamine receptor and SIFamide
The InvD1L-positive axons (InvD1L-axons) containing electron-lucent neurosecretory vesicles were the most abundant axons in both type II and III acini (Figs. 6 and 7). Double staining of InvD1L and SIFamide in type II acini distinguished seven axonal projections scattered around the acinar lumen: five InvD1L-axons, one SIFa-axon, and one axon that was negative for both antibodies (Fig. 6A–F). The InvD1L- and the SIFa-axons often ran alongside each other (Fig. 6E,F), while solitary InvD1L-labeled axons (Fig. 6B,C), or InvD1L-axons (Fig. 6A,D) associated with unlabeled axons were also observed. InvD1L-axons appeared to have smaller diameter (~1–2 μm) along their whole length than SIFa-axons (~2–5 μm) (Fig. 6E,F). All detected axons were predominantly enclosed by the ablumenal plasma membrane of MC, and frequent contacts with the fine AEC projections were also identified. No axons were observed to directly contact the acinar lumen.
In the basal region of type III acini, three distinct axons running in parallel along the acinar duct were identified: an InvD1L-axon, a non-labeled axon, and an SIFa-axon (Fig. 6G–I). In this region all three axons ran in close contact, and were enclosed by convoluted EC plasma membranes. Axons differed in the electron density of their secretory vesicles; both the unlabeled and the InvD1L-axon were electron-lucent, whereas the SIFa-axon was electron-dense. Surrounding ECs contained multiple mitochondria while these organelles were also observed in the InvD1L-axon (Fig. 6H,I).
Pigment dispersing factor and invertebrate-specific D1-like dopamine receptor
The antibody against PDF recognized distinct axonal projections adjoining the acinar lumen exclusively in type II acini (Fig. 7). Double labeling of PDF and InvD1L distinguished seven axonal projections on the cross section of the acinus: a single large-caliber (~2 μm) PDF-positive axon (PDF-axon) containing electron-dense vesicles (Fig. 7B), five proportionally smaller diameter (~1 μm) InvD1L-axons containing electron-lucent vesicles (Fig. C–E) and one axon that was negative for both PDF and InvD1L and which contained electron-dense vesicles, presumed to be the SIF-axon (Fig. 7B,F,G). The axons often ran alongside each other in the basal region of the acinus (Fig. 7F,G), whereas more distant separation was observed in the region surrounding the acinar lumen (Fig. 7A). Serial TEM sectioning revealed that PDF-axons, along with the other axons surrounding the acinar lumen, were primarily enclosed by the ablumenal plasma membrane of MC (Fig. 7A,F), and that direct contact with AEC terminal extensions was also detected.
Results summary
The current study reveals several novel ultrastructural architectural features of SG type II and III acini from unfed I. ricinus females. Significant attention has been paid to specific axonal projections and their associations with acinar cells (Fig. 8).
Both type II and III acini comprise various combinations of four common cell types able to form highly complex secretory units. (1) ECs closely surround the acinar duct and its valve. (2) A single mesh-like MC lines the entire acinar lumen and extends its finger-like projections between granular cells toward the basement membrane. (3) Various granular cell types surround the acinar lumen and make direct contact with it via the mesh-like openings in the MC. (4) AEC interstitial extensions radiate between the granular cells toward the acinar lumen to make contact with the MC and/or ECs. AECs are never in direct contact with the acinar lumen. The MC is in contact with all acinar cells.
The acinar valve is covered by two layers of cells: apical EC extensions line the entire length of the valvular arms, while the MC cell overlays nearly half of these extensions. Both the MC and ECs possess abundant microtubules, primarily located near the acinar valve.
All axonal projections enter the acini via their neck regions and run adjacent to the acinar lumen. At the very base of the acini, axons are encapsulated by convoluted plasma membranes of interdigitated ECs often specialized in septate junctions. Axons located closer to the apex of the acinar duct are enclosed by ECs and fine AEC terminal extensions. In the apical acinar region, axons are enclosed by the MC and terminal AEC extensions. The axons may come into occasional contact with acinar granular cells.
SIFamide and SIFa_R are associated with both ECs and the MC. Large SIFa-axons are encapsulated by EC plasma membranes around the acinar duct or the MC cell adjoining the region above the acinar valve. Accordingly, SIFa_R reactions were also detected, always in close proximity to SIFa-axons. Specifically, SIFa_R is expressed on EC canaliculi and the MC plasma membrane, both near the apex of the acinar duct and its valve. In addition, SIFa-R-positive axons surrounding the SIFa-axon are encapsulated by the MC plasma membrane.
InvD1L-axons run the entire length of the acinus, in close proximity to its lumen. These axons are primarily enclosed by the ablumenal membrane of MC and terminal AEC extensions. These axons are occasionally in contact with apical granular cells.
PDF-axons surround the lumen of type II acini only. These axons reach the apical region of the acini, and are in direct contact with the MC plasma membrane and terminal AEC extensions.
In type III acini, the axon expressing unknown substance(s) and containing electron-lucent vesicles runs along the SIFa- and InvD1L-axons, and is likely only specific to this type of acini.
Discussion
Numerous earlier studies have described the presence of axonal projections in hard tick SG11,15–19,21,24 and it has since been suggested that neuronal commands are the primary regulatory factors involved in tick salivary secretions10,14,23,25. Over the last decade, the use of specific antibodies in wholemount immunohistochemistry has led to the identification of several different specific innervations expressing either neuropeptides or neurotransmitter receptors in hard tick SGs16,18–22. Our in-depth ultrastructural investigations have clarified previous findings and have also enabled the generation of new insights about the organization of SG acinar cells in I. ricinus, the primary Lyme disease vector in Europe29.
Although the ultrastructure of hard ticks SGs has been extensively studied11–13,24,30,31, very little is understood about the distribution of axonal processes in specific acini types. In our study, all axonal projections of type II and III acini enter via acini neck regions and run together along acinar ducts toward the apex. In this region, apparent varicosities of some of the axons (see below) suggest a presynaptic-release of signaling molecules to the surrounding target effector cells, while other axons may use this zone exclusively as a passageway to the apical acinar regions. Basal ECs have been found to be rich in mitochondria, indicating an active energy supply for transcellular transport in this region. This assumption is also supported by the presence of numerous septate junctions between ECs, probably regulating paracellular transport across the epithelial layers. The close proximity of septate junctions to basal axons indicate that these structures may be targets for the axonal products, but more in-depth investigation is necessary to confirm this assumption. In invertebrates, numerous different functions have been recently ascribed to these highly specialized membrane domains32, and although septate junctions have been observed in SG of various tick species13,31, their molecular organization in this tissue requires further examination. The use of hafnium staining instead of conventional uranyl acetate in our experiment greatly enhanced EC and AEC cytoplasmic contrast. We hypothesize here that improved hafnium staining of EC—and possibly AEC—cytoplasm is caused by ionic diffusion facilitated by the presence of septate junctions between ECs. This assumption is supported by previous reports that invertebrate septate junctions serve as passages for different ionic probes33 and in ticks nervous system these structures have been shown freely permeable to lanthanum electron-dense tracer34.
A single adlumenal MC, also called a cap cell, has been identified in previous reports12,19,24, but the intact nature of this cell has now been shown for the first time in this study via TEM sections. The spatial organization of this cell in combination with abundant cytoplasmic microtubules, supports a role whereby the MC mediates acini contractions, thus expulsing their contents into the adjacent ducts19,23,25. In addition, we reveal here that the basal portion of the MC covers the acinar valve arms, again supporting our prior hypothesis19,23,25 of MC-mediated valve control. Based on our observations, the interconnected MC is in contact with all acinar cells as well as all axonal projections within the acinus. We showed that apical MC projections along AEC terminals often enclose axons to form MC-axon-AEC features. Similarly, ECs along AEC terminals enclose axon clusters near the acinar duct. These observations indicate that a common neural mechanism controls two different cell types by one or more axonal projections, but at this point, further studies are essential to fully understand the physiological role(s) of their synaptic interactions. In a few of our TEM slices, we occasionally observed axon connections with granular cells. These connections were the exception rather than the rule, and were only noted at locations were axons were already in contact with either ECs/AECs, MC/AECs or the MC. Based on this observation, it appears that different axons may selectively control ECs, AECs, and the MC (see below), while direct neuronal commands for granular cell activities need to be further investigated.
The large-caliber SIFa-axons containing electron-dense vesicles were the most prominent axons in the acinar basal region in both acini types II and III. These axons are typical by the large varicosities abundant along the whole length of their terminals in tick SG21. Large electron-dense axons, neighboring the acinar duct, were identified in previous ultrastructural studies11,13 and along with the SIFa-axons identified in numerous hard tick species17,21,22, suggest a common neuropeptidergic control of the SG in the hard tick lineage. Wholemount IHC of acini type II and III in our previous report showed SIFa_R expression at both the region surrounding the acinar duct and on apically-spreading fiber-like structures on the lumenal acini surface20. Immunogold staining of SIFa_R in the current study appears to confirm previous findings, however it has also generated a much more detailed picture of the receptor’s spatial expression in the basal region of the acini. Specifically, SIFa_R expression was detected at the basal canaliculi of ECs (in both acini types), as well as on the MC plasma membrane (in type III acini), both in close proximity to the acinar valve. Here the SIFa_R-positive vesicle-like structures observed in MC may belong to the Golgi apparatus or the endoplasmic reticulum, where synthesized receptor is being transported to the MC plasma membrane. Considering that both ECs and the MC overlay the valvular arms, we propose that SIFamide/SIFa_R play a joint role in regulating these structures by activating downstream effector proteins in these two cell types. At this point it is difficult to predict whether ECs and MC control the acinar valve in an agonistic or antagonistic fashion, but is reasonable to believe that their downstream cellular responses are regulated by different antagonistic/agonistic neuropeptides. This assumption is supported by the fact that in addition to SIFamide, these axons are also known to co-express MIP and elevenin neuropeptides in both type II and III acini18,21, although the ultrastructural receptor localization remains to be established. Furthermore, identifying fine SIFa_R-positive axons surrounding the prominent SIFa-axon is an interesting finding suggesting another physiological role for SIFamide in tick SGs. The SIFa_R-positive axon, containing electron-lucent vesicles, likely corresponds to the fiber-like structures previously identified with IHC20. Here, we speculate that electron-lucent InvD1L-axons, often found to run alongside SIFa-axons, may also co-express SIFa_R, although double staining of InvD1L and SIFa_R is not currently possible due to the antibodies’ common host species. Thus, in addition to controlling acinar valve activities, SIFamide may also play a role in the neuromodulation of adjoining axonal projections to inhibit or facilitate the release of unknown neurotransmitter(s).
In our earlier wholemount IHC of I. scapularis SG, the InvD1L receptor antibody recognized specific axonal processes but also cross-reacted with SIFa-axons in both type II and III acini19. Interestingly, double immunogold labeling with anti-SIFamide and -InvD1L dopamine receptor antibodies in the current study recognized individual axons exclusively expressing either SIFamide or InvD1L dopamine receptor, in both acini types. These discrepancies could be explained by the different epitopes retrieved by these two techniques, which may lead to non-specific binding of InvD1L receptor antibody to an unknown protein in SIFa-axons. InvD1L-axons were the most abundant in both type II and III acini and their termini reached the most apical acinar regions. Direct associations of InvD1L-axons with the numerous MC zones support a proposed model where InvD1L activation triggers Ca++-mediated MC contraction and expulsion of acinar contents19,23,25. In addition to the MC, for which it is always the case, we found that InvD1L-axons frequently contacted AEC projections and also occasionally granular cells. During tick feeding, the AECs, also called “water cells” in earlier studies4,8, and granular cells undergo remarkable transformation4, likely as a direct response to the acute needs of massive saliva production in order to meet the challenge of the host defense systems2,3. As a result of this process, the type II and III acini dramatically increase their overall volume and form a specialized glandular epithelium for active fluid transport from the surrounding haemolymph4,8,31. Considering that InvD1L axons are in intimate contact with the majority—if not all—acinar cells, we speculate that in addition to directly controlling MC contractions, InvD1L-axons may also regulate SG acini development during feeding via an unknown neurotransmitter/neuromodulator. This assumption is supported by the complete absence of immunoreactive InvD1L-axons during tick feeding in type III acini19, that are known to undergo more dramatic transformations than type II acini30.
The presence of PDF-axons found exclusively in type II acini confirmed previous IHC findings16,17,22. Similarly to InvD1L-axons, we observed that PDF-axons directly contacted the MC and AEC terminal extensions. We speculate that in type II acini, PDF-axons mediate the activity of the MC, and possibly AECs, to ensure the temporal secretory needs of type II acini during tick feeding. The PDF gene has not yet been identified in any tick species, thus further studies are required to identify the specific neuropeptides being released from these axonal projections. In addition, the anti-orcokinin antibody, known to recognize PDF-axons in wholemount IHC approaches22, failed in our TEM staining. To date, there has been no evidence that the axonal projections specifically and exclusively target type III acini, thus SIFa/MIP/Elv- and IvD1L-axons remain the only candidates for neural control of these structures18,19,21. Interestingly, in the current study, double staining with SIFamide and InvD1L antibodies uncovered an additional electron-lucent axon that failed to react with either of these antibodies, indicating a novel axonal projection only identified in type III acini. This finding, along with the identification of type II acini-specific PDF-axons, indicates that ticks could selectively regulate the activities of specific type of acini in direct response to their physiological needs.
In the present study, we have described for the first time the ultrastructure of specific axonal processes reaching type II and III SG acini in I. ricinus, a major European disease vector. Our results indicate that a rich network of various axon types, differing in their lengths, thicknesses, and expressed substances, form intimate contacts with multiple different acinar cell types, highlighting the complexity of the neural regulatory mechanisms in hard tick SGs.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr. Jan Veenstra, University of Bordeaux, France, for providing the SIFamide antibody, and Dr. Heinrich Dircksen, Stockholm University, Sweden, for providing the PDH antibody. The project was supported by the TACR (TE01020118), and MEYS CR (Czech BioImaging LM2015062 and CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001775) grants. L. Šimo and S. Bonnet were supported by the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA).
Author Contributions
M.V. and L.S. designed the experiments. M.V. and T.B. performed all the TEM experimental work including 3D animations. L.S. performed the molecular cloning experiments. J.N., L.G., S.B. and Y.P. provided the resources and expertise to the experiments. M.V. and L.S. wrote the main manuscript text and prepared final figures and T.B., J.N., L.G., S.B. and Y.P. contributed to the minor corrections. All authors reviewed the final version of the manuscript.
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-43284-6.
References
- 1.Kaufman WR, Phillips JE. Ion and water balance in the Ixodid tick Dermacentor andersoni: III. Influence of monovalent ions and osmotic pressure on salivary secretion. Journal of Experimental Biology. 1973;58:549–564. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Šimo, L., Kazimírova, M., Richardson, J. & Bonnet, S. I. The essential role of tick salivary glands and saliva in tick feeding and pathogen transmission. Front Cell Infect Microbiol7 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 3.Bonnet, S., Kazimírová, M., Richardson, J. & Šimo, L. Chapter 5 - Tick saliva and its role in pathogen transmission. In Skin and Arthropod Vectors (ed. Boulanger, N.). Academic Press, 121–191 (2018).
- 4.Binnington KC. Sequential changes in salivary gland structure during attachment and feeding of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. Int. J. Parasitol. 1978;8:97–115. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(78)90004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fawcett, D. W., Binnington, K. & Voigt, W. P. The cell biology of the ixodid tick salivary gland. (Ellis Horwood, 1986).
- 6.Kim, D., Maldonado-Ruiz, P., Zurek, L. & Park, Y. Water absorption through salivary gland type I acini in the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis. PeerJ5 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Gaede K, Knülle W. On the mechanism of water vapour sorption from unsaturated atmospheres by ticks. J. Exp. Biol. 1997;200:1491–1498. doi: 10.1242/jeb.200.10.1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Meredith J, Kaufman WR. A proposed site of fluid secretion in the salivary gland of the ixodid tick Dermacentor andersoni. Parasitology. 1973;67:205–217. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000046424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fawcett DW, Doxsey S, Büscher G. Salivary gland of the tick vector (R. appendiculatus) of East Coast fever. II. Cellular basis for fluid secretion in the type III acinus. Tissue Cell. 1981;13:231–253. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(81)90003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sauer JR, Essenberg RC, Bowman AS. Salivary glands in ixodid ticks: control and mechanism of secretion. J. Insect Physiol. 2000;46:1069–1078. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1910(99)00210-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Coons LB, Roshdy MA. Fine structure of the salivary glands of unfed male Dermacentor variabilis (Say) (Ixodoidea: Ixodidae) J. Parasitol. 1973;59:900–912. doi: 10.2307/3278433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fawcett DW, Doxsey S, Büscher G. Salivary gland of the tick vector (R. appendiculatus) of East Coast fever. I. Ultrastructure of the type III acinus. Tissue Cell. 1981;13:209–230. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(81)90002-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Krolak JM, Ownby CL, Sauer JR. Alveolar structure of salivary glands of the lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum (L.): unfed females. J. Parasitol. 1982;68:61–82. doi: 10.2307/3281326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kaufman WR. Actions of some transmitters and their antagonists on salivary secretion in a tick. Am. J. Physiol. 1978;235:R76–81. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1978.235.1.R76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Megaw MW. The innervation of the salivary gland of the tick, Boophilus microplus. Cell Tissue Res. 1977;184:551–558. doi: 10.1007/BF00220978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Šimo L, Slovák M, Park Y, Žitňan D. Identification of a complex peptidergic neuroendocrine network in the hard tick, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus. Cell Tissue Res. 2008;335:639–655. doi: 10.1007/s00441-008-0731-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Šimo L, Žitňan D, Park Y. Neural control of salivary glands in ixodid ticks. J. Insect Physiol. 2012;58:459–466. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim D, Šimo L, Park Y. Molecular characterization of neuropeptide elevenin and two elevenin receptors, IsElevR1 and IsElevR2, from the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018;101:66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2018.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Šimo L, Koči J, Kim D, Park Y. Invertebrate specific D1-like dopamine receptor in control of salivary glands in the black-legged tick Ixodes scapularis. J. Comp. Neurol. 2014;522:2038–2052. doi: 10.1002/cne.23515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Šimo L, Koči J, Park Y. Receptors for the neuropeptides, myoinhibitory peptide and SIFamide, in control of the salivary glands of the blacklegged tick Ixodes scapularis. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013;43:376–387. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2013.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Šimo L, Žitňan D, Park Y. Two novel neuropeptides in innervation of the salivary glands of the black-legged tick, Ixodes scapularis: myoinhibitory peptide and SIFamide. J. Comp. Neurol. 2009;517:551–563. doi: 10.1002/cne.22182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Roller L, et al. Orcokinin-like immunoreactivity in central neurons innervating the salivary glands and hindgut of ixodid ticks. Cell Tissue Res. 2015;360:209–222. doi: 10.1007/s00441-015-2121-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim D, Šimo L, Park Y. Orchestration of salivary secretion mediated by two different dopamine receptors in the blacklegged tick Ixodes scapularis. J. Exp. Biol. 2014;217:3656–3663. doi: 10.1242/jeb.109462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Coons LB, Lessman CA, Ward MW, Berg RH, Lamoreaux WJ. Evidence of a myoepithelial cell in tick salivary glands. Int. J. Parasitol. 1994;24:551–562. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(94)90147-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kim, D., Šimo, L., Vancová, M., Urban, J. & Park, Y. Neural and endocrine regulation of osmoregulatory organs in tick: Recent discoveries and implications. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol., 10.1016/j.ygcen.2018.08.004 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 26.Hatae T, Okuyama K, Fujita M. Visualization of the cytoskeletal elements in tissue culture cells by bloc-staining with hafnium chloride after rapid freezing and freeze-substitution fixation. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 1984;33:186–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kakimoto T, Shibaoka H. A new method for preservation of actin filaments in higher plant cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 1987;28:1581–1585. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liou W, Geuze HJ, Slot JW. Improving structural integrity of cryosections for immunogold labeling. Histochem. Cell Biol. 1996;106:41–58. doi: 10.1007/BF02473201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rizzoli, A. et al. Ixodes ricinus and its transmitted pathogens in urban and peri-urban areas in Europe: New hazards and relevance for public health. Front Public Health2 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Fawcett, D. W., Binnington, K. & Voigt, W. P. The cell biology of the ixodid tick salivary gland. Morpology Physiology and Behavioral biology Of Ticks 22–45 (1986).
- 31.Fawcett, D. W., Doxsey, S. J. & Buscher, G. Salivary gland of the tick vector (R. appendiculatus) of East Coast Fever. II. Cellular basis for fluid secretion in the type III acinus. Tissue & Cell13, 231–253 (1981). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 32.Banerjee S, Sousa AD, Bhat MA. Organization and function of septate junctions: an evolutionary perspective. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2006;46:65–77. doi: 10.1385/CBB:46:1:65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lane, N. J. & Skaer, H. C. B. Intercellular junctions in insect tissues. In Advances in Insect Physiology15, 35–213 (1980).
- 34.Bennington KC, Lane NJ. Perineural and glial cells in the tick Boophilus microplus (Acarina: Ixodidae): freeze-fracture and tracer studies. Journal of Neurocytology. 1980;9:343–362. doi: 10.1007/BF01181541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Terhzaz S, Rosay P, Goodwin SF, Veenstra JA. The neuropeptide SIFamide modulates sexual behavior in Drosophila. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007;352:305–310. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dircksen H, et al. The ultrastructure of nerve endings containing pigment-dispersing hormone (PDH) in crustacean sinus glands: Identification by an antiserum against a synthetic PDH. Cell Tissue Res. 1987;250:377–387. doi: 10.1007/BF00219082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Helfrich‐Förster C, Homberg U. Pigment-dispersing hormone-immunoreactive neurons in the nervous system of wild-type Drosophila melanogaster and of several mutants with altered circadian rhythmicity. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1993;337:177–190. doi: 10.1002/cne.903370202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).