Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
. 2019 Apr 26;12:108. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00108

SIRT2, ERK and Nrf2 Mediate NAD+ Treatment-Induced Increase in the Antioxidant Capacity of PC12 Cells Under Basal Conditions

Jie Zhang 1,2,†, Yunyi Hong 1,†, Wei Cao 1, Shankai Yin 1,2, Haibo Shi 1,2,*, Weihai Ying 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC6497790  PMID: 31080405

Abstract

NAD+ (oxidized form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) administration is highly beneficial in numerous models of diseases and aging. It is becoming increasingly important to determine if NAD+ treatment may directly increase the antioxidant capacity of cells under basal conditions. In the current study, we tested our hypothesis that NAD+ can directly enhance the antioxidant capacity of cells under basal conditions by using PC12 cells as a cellular model. We found that NAD+ treatment can increase the GSH/GSSG ratios in the cells under basal conditions. NAD+ can also increase both the mRNA and protein level of γ-glutamylcysteine ligase (γ-GCL)—a key enzyme for glutathione synthesis, which appears to be mediated by the NAD+-induced increase in Nrf2 activity. These NAD+-induced changes can be prevented by both SIRT2 siRNA and the SIRT2 inhibitor AGK2. The NAD+-induced changes can also be blocked by the ERK signaling inhibitor U0126. Moreover, the NAD+-induced ERK activation can be blocked by both SIRT2 siRNA and AGK2. Collectively, our study has provided the first evidence that NAD+ can enhance directly the antioxidant capacity of the cells under basal conditions, which is mediated by SIRT2, ERK, and Nrf2. These findings have suggested not only the great nutritional potential of NAD+, but also a novel mechanism underlying the protective effects of the NAD+ administration in the disease models: the NAD+ administration can enhance the resistance of the normal cells to oxidative insults by increasing the antioxidant capacity of the cells.

Keywords: NAD+, GSH, Nrf2, SIRT2, ERK

Introduction

NAD+ (oxidized form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) plays critical roles in energy metabolism, mitochondrial functions, calcium homeostasis and immune functions (Ying, 2005, 2008; Ma et al., 2012). A number of studies have shown that NAD+ administration is highly beneficial in multiple models of major diseases (Ma et al., 2012). Moreover, NAD+ and its precursors such as nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) can produce significant anti-aging effects (Scheibye-Knudsen et al., 2014; Fang et al., 2016). Cumulating evidence has suggested that NAD+ deficiency is a common pathological factor of a number of diseases and aging (Ma et al., 2012). It becomes increasingly important to further elucidate the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of NAD+ administration in diseases and aging, which is necessary for not only elucidation of the roles of NAD+ administration in diseases and aging, but also clinical and nutritional applications of NAD+.

Oxidative stress plays critical pathological roles in numerous diseases and aging (Halliwell, 2005; Lin and Beal, 2006). Multiple studies have shown that NAD+ treatment can decrease oxidative stress-induced death of several cell types including neurons, astrocytes and myocytes (Ying et al., 2003; Alano et al., 2004, 2010). Several studies have suggested that NAD+ treatment can indirectly decrease oxidative cell death by such mechanisms as enhancement of SIRT1 activity and prevention of glycolytic inhibition, mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT), mitochondrial depolarization and nuclear translocation of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF; Alano et al., 2004, 2010; Araki et al., 2004; Hong et al., 2014).

We proposed a hypothesis regarding the new mechanism underlying the protective effects of NAD+ administration in the disease models: NAD+ may enhance the antioxidant capacity of normal cells, which would increase the resistance of the cells to oxidative insults in the disease models. In our current study, we tested our hypothesis that NAD+ could enhance directly the antioxidant capacity of cells under basal conditions by using PC12 cells as a cellular model. Demonstration of this hypothesis would also provide valuable information indicating the nutritional potential of NAD+. Our study has indicated that NAD+ can increase directly the GSH/GSSG ratio of PC12 cells by a γ-glutamylcysteine ligase (γ-GCL)-dependent mechanism, which is mediated by SIRT2, ERK, and Nrf2.

Materials and Methods

Cell Cultures

PC12 cells (TCR 9) were purchased from the Cell Resource Center of Shanghai Institute of Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The cells were plated onto 6-well or 24-well cell culture plates at the initial density of 1 × 105 cells/ml in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing 4,500 mg/L D-glucose, 584 mg/L L-glutamine, 110 mg/L sodium pyruvate (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), which also contains 1% penicillin and streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Melbourne, VIC Australia). The cells were used when the density of the cell cultures reached 60%–80%.

Primary rat cortical astrocyte cultures were prepared as described previously (Chen et al., 2013). This protocol was approved by the Animal Study Committee of the School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Briefly, cortices were separated from 1-day-old SD rat (SLAC, Shanghai, China), dissociated in trypsin, and seeded in 24-well plates in DMEM containing 1% penicillin and streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco). After 10 days, the cells were confluent and treated with cytosine arabinoside (10 μM) for 2 days to inhibit the proliferation of microglia. After replacing the culture medium, the cells were cultured for 2 days and ready to be used.

Experimental Procedures

Experiments were initiated by replacing the cell culture medium with medium containing various concentrations of drugs. The cells were left in an incubator with 5% CO2 at 37°C for various durations.

SIRT2 RNA Silencing

The density of PC12 cells was approximately 50% at the time of transfection. Three small interfering RNA (siRNA) duplexes against rat SIRT2 (NM_001008368) at nucleotides 754–772 (CC UUGCUAAGGAGCUCUAUTT), 843–862 (GCUGC UACACGCAGA AUAUTT), and 1,393–1,411 (GGAGCAUGCCAACAUAGAUTT) were commercially synthesized (Genepharma, Shanghai, China). Scrambled RNA oligonucleotides were used for control cells. The transfection was conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each well, 600 μl serum-free media containing 33.33 nM of each of the three SIRT2 siRNA oligos and 4 μl lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were added. After incubation for 6 h, the media was replaced by DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum.

Determinations of GSH, GSSG, and GSH/GSSG Ratios

The levels of total glutathione (GSH + GSSG) and GSSG were determined by using a commercially available kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China), which was conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, cells were washed with PBS for three times and lysed, then frozen at −80°C and thawed at room temperature for three times. The levels of total glutathione were assessed by the 5,5′-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid; DTNB)-oxidized glutathione (GSSG) reductase-recycling assay. In brief, 700 μl of 0.33 mg/ml NADPH in 0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer containing 10 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (pH 7.2), 100 μl of 6 mM DTNB, and 190 μl of distilled water were added and mixed in an eppendorf tube. The reaction was initiated by addition of 10 μl of 250 IU/ml glutathione reductase. With readings recorded every 30 s, the absorbance was monitored at 412 nm by a plate reader for 15 min. To determine the levels of GSSG, 10 μl samples were vigorously mixed with 0.2 μl of 2-vinylpyridine and 0.6 μl triethanolamine. After 1 h, the sample was assayed as described above in the DTNB-GSSG reductase-recycling assay. According to the methods described above, standards (0.01, 0.02, 0.1, 0.2, and 1.0 mM) of total glutathione or GSSG were also assessed. The amount of total glutathione and GSSG in each sample was normalized by the protein concentration of the sample that was determined by BCA Protein Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The GSH concentrations were calculated from the differences between the concentrations of total glutathione and the concentrations of GSSG.

Nuclear Protein Extraction

All procedures were carried out at 4°C. Nuclear fractions were isolated using the Nuclear Protein Extraction Kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Briefly, cells were collected and incubated with the extraction buffer A for 20 min. Then extraction buffer B was added into the suspension at the ratio of 1:20. The samples were centrifuged at 12,000 g for 5 min and the pellets were collected and resuspended in nuclear extraction buffer. The suspension was vortexed for 15–30 s every 2 min for a duration of 30 min and centrifuged for 10 min. Subsequently, the supernatant was collected as the nuclear protein lysates.

Western Blots

Western blot assays were conducted as described previously (Nie et al., 2014). Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA) containing Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) as well as 1 mM PMSF. Thirty microgram of protein was loaded for each sample, which were electrophoresed through a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and then transferred to 0.45 μm nitrocellulose membranes (Millipore, CA, USA) on a semi-dry electro transferring unit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Membranes were blocked in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in TBST for 2 h at room temperature and then incubated with GCLc antibody (1:1,000 dilution, 12601-1-AP; Proteintech Group, Chicago, IL, USA), GCLm antibody (1:1,000 dilution, 14241-1-AP; ProteinTech Group, Chicago, IL, USA), or Nrf2 antibody (1:1,000, C-20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany), p-ERK antibody (1:2,000 dilution, 4,370; CST, Boston, MA, USA), ERK antibody (1:2,000 dilution, 4,695; CST), SIRT2 antibody (1:1,000 dilution, sc-20966; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), β-tubulin (1:2,000 dilution, M20005; Abmart, Shanghai, China) or Lamin A/C (1:1,000 dilution, 2,032; CST) overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, the membranes were incubated with appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Epitomics, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China). The protein signals were visualized by using an ECL detection system (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA). β-tubulin levels were used to normalize sample loading and transfer and Lamin A/C levels were used to normalize nuclear protein samples. Gel-Pro Analyzer was used to quantify the bands.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assays of the mRNA Levels of GCLc, GCLm and Nrf2

Quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assays were performed as described previously (Xie et al., 2013). After total RNA was extracted (TaKaRa MiniBEST Universal RNA Extraction Kit, Takara Bio, Dalian, China) from PC12 cells, 500 ng total RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA (Prime-Script RT reagent kit, Takara Bio, Dalian, China). The parameters set for reverse transcription were as follows: 37°C for 15 min, then 85°C for 15 s. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed by using SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara Bio, Dalian, China) and the following primers: Nrf2 (sense 5′-GACCTAAAGCACAGCCAACACAT-3’ and anti-sense 5′-CTCAATCGGCTTGAATGTTTGTC-3′); GCLc (sense 5′-ATGGAGGTACAGTTGACAG AC-3′ and anti-sense 5′-ACGGCGTTGCCACCTTTGCA-3′); GCLm (sense 5′-GCTGTACCAGTGGGCACAG-3′ and anti-sense 5′-GGCTTCAATGTCAGGGATGC-3′); GAPDH (sense 5′-AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG-3′ and anti-sense 5′- TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGA GGTCA-3′). PCRs were performed according to the following procedure: after denatured at 95°C for 10 s, 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 30 s. The data were analyzed by using the comparative threshold cycle method, and results were expressed as fold difference normalized to the level of GAPDH mRNA.

Determinations of Intracellular NAD+ Concentrations

As previously described (Ying et al., 2003), NAD+ concentrations were determined by the recycling assay. Briefly, samples were extracted in 0.5 N perchloric acid. After centrifugation at 12,000 g for 5 min, the supernatant was obtained, which was neutralized to pH 7.2 by using 3 N potassium hydroxide and 1 M potassium phosphate buffer. After centrifugation at 12,000 g for 5 min, the supernatants were mixed with a reaction media containing 1.7 mg 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT), 1.3 mg alcohol dehydrogenase, 488.4 mg nicotinamide, 10.6 mg phenazine methosulfate, and 2.4 mL ethanol in 37.6 mL Gly-Gly buffer (65 mM, pH 7.4). After 10 min, the A560 nm was determined by a plate reader, and the readings were calibrated with NAD+ standards. The protein concentrations were assessed by BCA Protein Assay (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Statistical Analyses

All data are analyzed by Graphpad Prism and presented as mean ± SE. For comparisons between two groups, unpaired t-test was used. For single-factor analysis, one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett post hoc test was used. For multi-factor analysis, two way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test was used. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

NAD+ Treatment Enhances the GSH/GSSG Ratio and Glutathione Levels of PC12 Cells and Primary Astrocyte Cultures

GSH/GSSG ratio is a major index of antioxidant capacity of cells (Dickinson and Forman, 2002). Our study determined the effects of NAD+ on the GSH/GSSG ratio and the levels of GSH, GSSG and total glutathione (GSH + GSSG) in the PC12 cells under basal conditions: treatment of the cells with 0.01, 0.1 and 1 mM NAD+ dose-dependently increased the GSH levels of the cells (Figure 1A), while only 1 mM NAD+ was capable of mildly increasing the GSSG levels (Figure 1B). One mM NAD+ significantly increased the GSH/GSSG ratio (Figure 1C), while both 0.1 and 1 mM NAD+ significantly increased the total glutathione levels (Figure 1D). We have further investigated the effects of 1 mM NAD+ treatment on the glutathione levels in primary rat astrocyte cultures. We found that NAD+ treatment also significantly increased the GSH level, total glutathione level and GSH/GSSG ratio of the cells (Figures 1E–H).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

NAD+ treatment increased the glutathione levels and GSH/GSSG ratio in PC12 cells. (A) NAD+ treatment dose-dependently increased the GSH level in PC12 cells. Analysis of variance (ANOVA: F = 3.695, p = 0.0234). (B) One millimolar NAD+ slightly increased the GSSG level in the cells, while lower concentrations of NAD+ did not affect the GSSG level (ANOVA: F = 3.115, p = 0.434). (C) One millimolar NAD+ significantly increased the GSH/GSSG ratio in the cells, while lower concentrations of NAD+ did not affect the GSH/GSSG ratio (ANOVA: F = 7.325, p = 0.001). (D) NAD+ treatment dose-dependently increased the total glutathione level in the cells (ANOVA: F = 8.338, p = 0.0004). For (A–D), the assays on GSH and GSSG were conducted, after the cells were treated with NAD+ for 24 h. N = 12. (E) NAD+ treatment increased the GSH level in primary astrocytes. (F) NAD+ treatment did not affect the GSSG level in primary astrocytes. (G) NAD+ treatment increased the GSH/GSSG ratio in primary astrocytes. (H) NAD+ treatment increased total glutathione levels in primary astrocytes. For (E–H), primary astrocytes were treated with 1 mM NAD+ for 24 h before the assays were conducted. N = 9. The data were pooled from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

NAD+ Treatment Enhances the GSH/GSSG Ratio and Total Glutathione Levels by Increasing Both GCL Levels and Nrf2 Activity of PC12 Cells

GCL is the key enzyme for GSH synthesis (Dickinson and Forman, 2002), while GSSG is originated from consumption of GSH in various antioxidant processes (Stryer, 1995). Our finding that NAD+ treatment can increase the total glutathione levels has suggested that the GCL activity may be increased in the NAD+-treated cells. GCL has two major subunits—GCLc and GCLm, both of which are important for GCL activity (Meister, 1991; Huang et al., 1993). Our RT-PCR assay showed that NAD+ significantly increased the mRNA levels of both GCLc and GCLm (Figures 2A,B). Our Western blot assays also showed that NAD+ significantly increased the protein levels of both GCLc and GCLm (Figures 2C–E).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

NAD+ treatment increased the gene expression and protein levels of GCLc and GCLm in PC12 cells. (A) Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assays showed that NAD+ treatment led to a significant increase in the GCLc mRNA level, assessed at 6 h after the NAD+ treatment. (B) RT-PCR assays showed that NAD+ treatment led to significant increases in the GCLm mRNA levels, assessed at 6 h after the NAD+ treatment. (C) Western blot assays showed that NAD+ treatment led to increased protein levels of GCLc and GCLm in PC12 cells, assessed at 12 h after the NAD+ treatment. (D) Quantifications of the Western blots showed that NAD+ treatment led to a significant increase in the protein levels of GCLc. (E) Quantifications of the Western blots showed that NAD+ treatment led to a significant increase in the protein level of GCLm. N = 16. The data were pooled from four independent experiments. ***p < 0.001.

Because induction of GCL expression has been reported to be dependent on Nrf2 (Chan and Kwong, 2000; Suh et al., 2004), we also determined the effects of NAD+ treatment on the Nrf2 mRNA levels and the level of nuclear translocation of Nrf2. Our study showed that NAD+ significantly increased not only the Nrf2 mRNA levels but also the nuclear Nrf2 levels of the cells (Figures 3A–C).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

NAD+ treatment led to a significant increase in the mRNA levels and nuclear levels of Nrf2 of PC12 cells. (A) RT-PCR assays showed that NAD+ treatment led to a significant increase in the Nrf2 mRNA level, assessed at 6 h after the NAD+ treatment. (B) Western blot assays showed that NAD+ treatment led to an increased level of nuclear Nrf2 in the cells, assessed at 1 h after the NAD+ treatment. (C) Quantifications of the Western blots showed that NAD+ treatment led to a significant increase in the nuclear levels of Nrf2. N = 12. ***p < 0.01.

SIRT2 Mediates the NAD+-Induced Increase in GSH/GSSG Ratio by Regulating the Nrf2 and GCL in PC12 Cells

It has been reported that NAD+-dependent enzymes SIRT1 and SIRT2 can affect the gene expression of antioxidant enzymes such as mitochondrial superoxide dismutase (SOD2) by affecting the transcriptional factors of FOXO family (Wang et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2013). Therefore, we investigated the roles of SIRT1 and SIRT2 in the NAD+-produced increase in the GSH/GSSG ratio. Our study did not observe any significant effects of the SIRT1 inhibitor Ex 527 (Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX, USA) on the NAD+-produced increase in the GSH/GSSG ratio and the levels of GSH, GSSG, and total glutathione (Supplementary Figure S1), thus arguing against the possibility that SIRT1 plays a major role in the NAD+-induced increases in the antioxidant capacity. In contrast, we found that SIRT2 inhibitor AGK2 was capable of abolishing the effects of NAD+ on the GSH/GSSG ratio and the levels of GSH, GSSG, and total glutathione of the cells (Figures 4A–D). AGK2 was also shown to block the NAD+-induced increases in both mRNA and protein levels of GCLc and GCLm (Figures 4E–I). Moreover, AGK2 treatment attenuated the NAD+-induced increases in the Nrf2 mRNA levels and the nuclear Nrf2 levels (Figures 4J–L).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The SIRT2 inhibitor AGK2 prevented the NAD+-induced increases in the glutathione levels, GSH/GSSG ratio, glutamylcysteine ligase (GCL) level and nuclear Nrf2 level of PC12 cells. (A) AGK2 prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH levels (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,36) = 15.91, p = 0.0003; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,36) = 4.282, p = 0.0457; effect of AGK2 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,36) = 6.875, p = 0.0127). (B) AGK2 prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the GSSG levels (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,36) = 25.84, p < 0.0001; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,36) = 2.402, p = 0.1299; effect of AGK2 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,36) = 7.422, p = 0.0099). (C) AGK2 prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH/GSSG ratio (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,36) = 20.21, p < 0.0001; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,36) = 8.883, p = 0.0051; effect of AGK2 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,36) = 5.841, p = 0.0209). (D) AGK2 prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the total glutathione level (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,36) = 4.292, p = 0.0455; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,36) = 0.1002, p = 0.7534; effect of AGK2 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,36) = 1.769, p = 0.1919). For (A–D), the assays were conducted after the cells were treated with 1 mM NAD+ and 5 μM AGK2 for 24 h. (E) AGK2 prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the GCLc mRNA level of the cells, assessed at 6 h after the NAD+ treatment (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 15.46, p = 0.0003; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,44) = 10.24, p = 0.0026; effect of AGK2 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 15.59, p = 0.0003). (F) AGK2 prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the GCLm mRNA level of the cells, assessed at 6 h after the NAD+ treatment (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 52.53, p < 0.0001; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,44) = 9.449, p = 0.0036; effect of AGK2 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 20.06, p < 0.0001). (G) Representative western blot bands of GCLc and GCLm. (H) AGK2 prevented the NAD+-induced increases in the protein levels of GCLc in PC12 cells, assessed at 12 h after the NAD+ treatment (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,36) = 9.982, p = 0.0032; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,36) = 5.051, p = 0.0245; effect of AGK2 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,36) = 3.86, p = 0.0572). (I) AGK2 prevented the NAD+-induced increases in the protein levels of GCLm in PC12 cells, assessed at 12 h after the NAD+ treatment (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,36) = 9.831, p = 0.0034; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,36) = 2.646, p = 0.1125; effect of AGK2 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,36) = 5.171, p = 0.029). (J) AGK2 prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the Nrf2 mRNA level of the cells, assessed at 6 h after the NAD+ treatment (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,36) = 9.982, p = 0.0032; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,36) = 5051, p = 0.0245; effect of AGK2 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,36) = 3.86, p = 0.0572). (K) Representative western blot bands of nuclear Nrf2. (L) AGK2 prevented the NAD+-induced nuclear translocation of Nrf2, assessed at 1 h after the cells were treated with 1 mM NAD+ and 5 μM AGK2 (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 3.753, p = 0.0616; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,32) = 7.13, p = 0.0118; effect of AGK2 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 10.28, p = 0.0030). The data were pooled from four independent experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

We further applied SIRT2 siRNA to investigate the role of SIRT2 in the NAD+-induced increases in glutathione synthesis. SIRT2 siRNA significantly decreased the expression of SIRT2 (Figure 5A). SIRT2 siRNA was also capable of preventing the NAD+-induced increases in the GSH/GSSG ratio and the levels of GSH, GSSG, and total glutathione (Figures 5B–E). We further applied RT-PCR assays to determine the effects of SIRT2 siRNA on the NAD+-induced increases in the mRNA levels of GCLc, GCLm and Nrf2, showing that SIRT2 silencing significantly decreased the NAD+-induced elevations of the mRNA levels of GCLc, GCLm and Nrf2 (Figures 5F–H).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

SIRT2 silencing prevented NAD+-induced increases in the glutathione levels, GSH/GSSG ratio, GCL level, and Nrf2 level of PC12 cells. (A) SIRT2 siRNA decreased the protein levels of SIRT2 in PC12 cells. (B) SIRT2 silencing prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 105.2, p < 0.0001; effect of SIRT2 siRNA, F(1,44) = 16.01, p = 0.0002; effect of SIRT2 siRNA * NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 50.4, p < 0.0001). (C) Effects of SIRT2 siRNA and NAD+ on GSSG levels (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 1.544, p = 0.2206; effect of SIRT2 siRNA, F(1,44) = 0.0108, p = 9177; effect of SIRT2 siRNA * NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 3.279, p = 0.077). (D) SIRT2 silencing prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH/GSSG ratio of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 12.21, p = 0.0011; effect of SIRT2 siRNA, F(1,44) = 4.623, p = 0.0371; effect of SIRT2 siRNA * NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 3.336, p = 0.0746). (E) SIRT2 silencing prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the total glutathione level of the cells. (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 123.6, p < 0.0001; effect of SIRT2 siRNA, F(1,44) = 13.73, p = 0.0006; effect of SIRT2 siRNA * NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 56.69, p < 0.0001). (F) SIRT2 silencing prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the GCLc mRNA level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 5.452, p = 0.0242; effect of SIRT2 siRNA, F(1,44) = 8.229, p = 0.0063; effect of SIRT2 siRNA * NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 10.69, p = 0.0021). (G) SIRT2 silencing prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the GCLm mRNA level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 32.68, p < 0.0001; effect of SIRT2 siRNA, F(1,44) = 10.09, p = 0.0027; effect of SIRT2 siRNA * NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 4.664, p = 0.0363). (H) SIRT2 silencing prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the Nrf2 mRNA level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 305, p < 0.0001; effect of SIRT2 siRNA, F(1,44) = 178.7, p < 0.0001; effect of SIRT2 siRNA * NAD+ treatment, F(1,44) = 178.7, p < 0.0001). The cells were treated with SIRT2 siRNA for 6 h. After the media was replaced with Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum, the cells were treated with NAD+. RT-PCR assays were conducted at 6 h after the NAD+ treatment, while glutathione assays were conducted at 24 h after the NAD+ treatment. The data were pooled from four independent experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

ERK Activation Plays a Crucial Role in the NAD+-Induced Increases in the GSH/GSSG Ratio and Nrf2 Activity of PC12 Cells

It has been reported that pERK can induce Nrf2 activation by promoting its phosphorylation (Zipper and Mulcahy, 2000; Yang et al., 2011). Therefore, we determined if ERK phosphorylation plays a role in the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH/GSSG ratio. Our study showed that U0126, an inhibitor of the ERK pathway, attenuated the NAD+-induced increases in the GSH/GSSG ratio and the levels of GSH, GSSG, and total glutathione (Figures 6A–D). U0126 also blocked the NAD+-induced increases in the mRNA levels of GCLc, GCLm and Nrf2 (Figures 6E–G). Our Western blot assay showed that NAD+-induced nuclear translocation of Nrf2 was also blocked by U0126 (Figure 6H).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Inhibition of ERK signaling prevented NAD+-induced increases in the glutathione levels, GSH/GSSG ratio, GCL level, and Nrf2 levels of PC12 cells. (A) The MEK/ERK pathway inhibitor U0126 prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 9.854, p = 0.0036; effect of U0126 treatment, F(1,32) = 6.019, p = 0.0198; effect of U0126 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 2.844, p = 0.1015). (B) Effects of U0216 and NAD+ on GSSG levels (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 2.162, p = 0.1512; effect of U0126 treatment, F(1,32) = 4.908, p = 0.0340; effect of U0126 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.6915, p = 0.4118). (C) U0126 prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH/GSSG ratio of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 12.93, p = 0.0011; effect of U0126 treatment, F(1,32) = 3.603, p = 0.0667; effect of U0126 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 5.902, p = 0.0209). (D) U0126 prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the total glutathione level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 11.9, p = 0.0016; effect of U0126 treatment, F(1,32) = 8.2, p = 0.0073; effect of U0126 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 3.11, p = 0.0873). (E) U0126 prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the GCLc mRNA level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 12.82, p = 0.0011; effect of U0126 treatment, F(1,32) = 3.367, p = 0.0758; effect of U0126 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 4.912, p = 0.0339). (F) U0126 prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the GCLm mRNA level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 4.155, p = 0.0499; effect of U0126 treatment, F(1,32) = 3.098, p = 0.0879; effect of U0126 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 5.738, p = 0.0226). (G) U0126 prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the Nrf2 mRNA level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 4.155, p = 0.0499; effect of U0126 treatment, F(1,32) = 3.098, p = 0.0879; effect of U0126 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 5.738, p = 0.0226). (H) U0126 prevented the NAD+-induced increase in the nuclear Nrf2 protein level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 9.22, p = 0.0047; effect of U0126 treatment, F(1,32) = 2.17, p = 0.1505; effect of U0126 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 8.781, p = 0.0057). The cells were treated with 1 mM NAD+ and 20 μM U0126. Glutathione assays were conducted at 24 h after the drug treatment. RT-PCR assays were conducted at 6 h after the drug treatment. Western blot assays were conducted at 1 h after the drug treatment. The data were pooled from four independent experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

We further found that NAD+ treatment induced a significant increase in the pERK protein level in PC12 cells, which was attenuated by either SIRT2 siRNA or AGK2 (Figures 7A,B), suggesting that ERK was a downstream target of SIRT2 in the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH/GSSG ratio.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Both the SIRT2 inhibitor AGK2 and SIRT2 silencing prevented the NAD+-induced increase in phosphorylated ERK in PC12 cells. (A) AGK2 prevented the NAD+-induced increase in phosphorylated ERK. The cells were treated with 5 μM AGK2 and 1 mM NAD+ for 0.5 h (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 15.89, p = 0.0004; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,32) = 2.462, p = 0.1265; effect of AGK2 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 7.258, p = 0.0111). (B) SIRT2 silencing prevented the NAD+-induced increase in phosphorylated ERK. After the cells were treated with SIRT2 siRNA for 6 h, the media was replaced with DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 6.415, p = 0.0164; effect of SIRT2 siRNA, F(1,32) = 8.138, p = 0.0075; effect of SIRT2 siRNA * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 2.114, p = 0.1557). Then the cells were treated with 1 mM NAD+ for 0.5 h. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

NAD+ Promoted the GSH Synthesis in an Adenosine-Independent Way

Our latest study reported that NAD+ induced increases in the intracellular ATP levels of PC12 cells under basal conditions through its degradation into adenosine (Zhang et al., 2018). Therefore, we investigated the role of adenosine in the NAD+-induced increases in the GSH synthesis and GSH/GSSG ratio. We found that NAD+ significantly increased the extracellular adenosine level, but only slightly increased the intracellular adenosine levels (Supplementary Figures S2A,B). Consistent with the findings of Ramkumar et al. (1995), our study showed that adenosine increased the GSH levels and GSH/GSSG ratios (Supplementary Figures S3A–D).

Our current study has indicated that SIRT2 mediates the NAD+-induced increases in GSH synthesis. However, the mechanism underlying the adenosine-produced changes of GSH metabolism appears to be different from that underlying the NAD+-produced changes of GSH metabolism: the SIRT2 inhibitor AGK2 could not block the adenosine-produced changes of the glutathione metabolism (Supplementary Figures S3E–H).

Discussion

The major findings of our current study include: first, NAD+ treatment can increase the GSH/GSSG ratio of PC12 cells under basal conditions, suggesting that NAD+ treatment can increase directly the antioxidant capacity of the cells; second, NAD+ treatment can increase both the mRNA and protein levels of GCL; third, NAD+ treatment can increase both the Nrf2 mRNA level and nuclear Nrf2 levels; fourth, SIRT2 mediates the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH/GSSG ratio, GCL levels and Nrf2 activity; fifth, ERK mediates the increases in the GSH/GSSG ratio and Nrf2 activity; and sixth, ERK is a downstream target of SIRT2 in the NAD+-produced changes of the glutathione metabolism. Collectively, our study has indicated that NAD+ can enhance directly the antioxidant capacity of the cells, which is mediated by SIRT2, ERK, and Nrf2 (Figure 8).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Diagrammatic presentation of the mechanisms underlying the relationships among NAD+, ERK, SIRT2, Nrf2, GCL, glutathione metabolism, and antioxidant capacity of cells.

Oxidative stress is a major pathological factor in numerous diseases and aging (Halliwell, 2005; Lin and Beal, 2006). Previous studies have suggested that NAD+ treatment can decrease oxidative cell death indirectly by such mechanisms as enhancement of SIRT1 activity and prevention of glycolytic inhibition, MPT, mitochondrial depolarization and nuclear translocation of AIF (Alano et al., 2004, 2010; Hong et al., 2014). However, it remains unclear if NAD+ may attenuate oxidative damage by increasing directly the antioxidant capacity of normal cells. Our current study has provided the first evidence suggesting that NAD+ treatment can enhance directly the antioxidant capacity of cells under basal conditions: NAD+ treatment can significantly increase the GSH/GSSG ratio of the cells. Our findings have suggested that NAD+ administration may produce its profound protective effects by increasing directly the antioxidant capacity of normal cells in the models of various diseases and aging, which can lead to increased resistance of the normal cells to oxidative insults.

Our study has indicated that NAD+ can significantly increase the mRNA levels and the protein levels of both GCLc and GCLm of the cells. These observations have suggested that NAD+ treatment leads to increased GSH synthesis by enhancing the mRNA levels and the protein levels of GCL. Previous studies have suggested that Nrf2 is a transcriptional factor for the gene expression of GCL (Chan and Kwong, 2000; Suh et al., 2004). Our current study has shown that NAD+ can increase both Nrf2 mRNA level and the nuclear Nrf2 levels, which have suggested that NAD+ treatment leads to increased GCL levels at least partially by activating Nrf2.

Our current study has also indicated that SIRT2, rather than SIRT1, mediates the NAD+-induced increase in the antioxidant capacity: both SIRT2 silencing and the SIRT2 inhibitor AGK2 can virtually abolish the effects of NAD+ on the GSH/GSSG ratio, the GCL levels and the Nrf2 activity. This finding, together with the previous studies indicating the capacity of SIRT2 to modulate the gene expression of SOD2 by affecting the activity of FOXO3a (Wang et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2013), has suggested that SIRT2 is an important modulator of antioxidant capacity of cells.

SIRT2 is a NAD+-dependent enzyme (Schemies et al., 2010). A recent study has shown that decreased NAD+ levels can produce decreased SIRT2 activity (Skoge et al., 2014). Therefore, in our current study, the NAD+ treatment-induced increases in the intracellular NAD+ levels could lead to increased SIRT2 activity, resulting in the increases in the Nrf2 activity, GCL levels and GSH/GSSG ratios. It is seemingly puzzling that SIRT2, but not SIRT1, mediates the NAD+-induced changes of the glutathione metabolism. We propose the following mechanisms for accounting for this finding: SIRT2 is a cytosolic enzyme, while SIRT1 is mainly a nuclear enzyme (Houtkooper et al., 2012). NAD+ treatment may selectively increase cytosolic NAD+ levels, leading to a selective increase in SIRT2 activity. Future studies are warranted to further elucidate the mechanisms underlying this finding.

Our study has indicated that ERK links SIRT2 and the NAD+ treatment-produced changes of the GSH/GSSG ratio, the GCL levels and the Nrf2 activity in our experimental model: first, both SIRT2 siRNA and AGK2 can prevent the NAD+-induced increase in ERK phosphorylation, indicating that SIRT2 mediates the NAD+-induced ERK phosphorylation; and second, ERK inhibition can also significantly attenuate the NAD+-induced increases in the GSH/GSSG ratio and the Nrf2 activity. These findings are consistent with previous reports regarding the regulatory effect of SIRT2 on ERK: SIRT2 overexpression regulated type II collagen expression by activating ERK signaling in rabbit articular chondrocytes (Eo et al., 2016); and SIRT2 modulated neuronal differentiation by enhancing ERK/CREB pathway in mesenchymal stem cells (Jeong and Cho, 2017). There are also studies suggesting that SIRT2 and ERK are mutually regulated: ERK can bind to SIRT2, leading to increased protein levels, stability and activity of SIRT2, while SIRT2 inhibition can also block ERK phosphorylation in HEK 293 cells (Choi et al., 2013). Future studies are warranted to further investigate the mechanisms underlying the relationships between SIRT2 and ERK.

Our recent study reported that NAD+ induced increases in intracellular ATP levels under basal conditions through its degradation into adenosine (Zhang et al., 2018). Our current study has suggested that NAD+ increases the GSH synthesis of the cells under basal conditions by an adenosine-independent pathway: while both NAD+ and adenosine can increase GSH synthesis, AGK2 can reverse only the NAD+ treatment-produced changes of the glutathione metabolism. Moreover, the concentrations of adenosine generated from the degradation of 1 mM NAD+ are much lower than 0.01 mM, which is not sufficient to increase GSH synthesis.

Our previous study has suggested that NADH can significantly increase the levels of GSH and GSSG of PC12 cells (Cao et al., 2016). However, it is noteworthy that NAD+, but not NADH, can increase GSH/GSSG ratio—a major index of antioxidant capacity of cells. These observations have suggested that NAD+ is superior over NADH at least in enhancing antioxidant capacity of normal cells, which may account for the following important observations regarding the biological effects of NAD+ and NADH: compared with NADH, NAD+ has shown profound protective effects in much more models of diseases and aging (Ying, 2008). Moreover, our current study has indicated that the NAD+-induced increase in glutathione synthesis is Akt-independent (Supplementary Figure S4), while the NADH-induced increase in glutathione synthesis is Akt-dependent (Cao et al., 2016).

It is of significance to know if i.v. or i.p. NAD+ administration is capable of increasing the NAD+ levels in the brain under normal conditions, considering the presence of the blood brain barrier (BBB) that can block of the entrance of numerous molecules (Abbott et al., 2010). There have been two studies suggesting that NAD+ can pass through BBB to enter the brain under normal conditions: Roh et al. (2018) reported that exogenous NAD+ crossed the BBB through the Connexin 43 gap junction and entered the hypothalamus in its intact form; and Huang et al. (2018) reported that intravenous injection of NAD+ significantly increased the NAD+ level in the brain under physiological conditions, which has further suggested that NAD+ can cross the BBB under normal conditions. Future studies are warranted to solidly demonstrate that NAD+ is capable of passing through BBB under normal conditions.

Author Contributions

WY and HS has provided general design of the project and general management of project. They have also played a major role in revising the article. JZ and YH played the major role in conducting the experiments, designing the details of experiments, and writing of the draft of the article. WC has been involved in conducting some experiments of the study. SY has helped to revise the article.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Funding. We would like to acknowledge the financial support by a Major Research Grant from the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality #16JC1400500 and #16JC1400502 (to WY) and a Major Special Program Grant of Shanghai Municipality (Grant # 2017SHZDZX01; to WY).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnmol.2019.00108/full#supplementary-material

FIGURE S1

EX 527, a SIRT1 inhibitor, did not prevent the NAD+-induced increases in the GSH level, total glutathione level, and GSH/GSSG ratio in PC12 cells. (A) EX 527 did not prevent the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 27.53, p < 0.0001; effect of EX527 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.7361, p = 0.3973; effect of EX527 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.2272, p = 0.6369). (B) Effects of EX 527 and NAD+ on GSSG levels (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 2.853, p = 0.1009; effect of EX527 treatment, F(1,32) = 2.364, p = 0.1340; effect of EX527 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.2706, p = 0.6065). (C) EX 527 did not prevent the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH/GSSG ratio of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 21.13, p < 0.0001; effect of EX527 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.09369, p = 0.7615; effect of EX527 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.07047, p = 0.7924). (D) EX 527 did not prevent the NAD+-induced increase in the total glutathione level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 13.66, p = 0.0008; effect of EX527 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.06223, p = 0.8046; effect of EX527 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.3151, p = 0.5785). The assays were conducted after the cells were treated with 1 mM NAD+ and 5 μM EX 527 for 24 h. The data were pooled from four independent experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

Click here for additional data file. (99KB, TIF)
FIGURE S2

NAD+ treatment led to a significant increase in the intracellular and extracellular adenosine levels in PC12 cells. After the cells were treated with 1 mM NAD+ for 24 h, the intracellular and extracellular adenosine levels were determined. (A) NAD+ treatment significantly increased the extracellular adenosine level in PC12 cells. (B) NAD+ treatment significantly increased the extracellular adenosine level in PC12 cells. The data were pooled from four independent experiments. ***p < 0.001.

Click here for additional data file. (47.3KB, TIF)
FIGURE S3

AGK2 could not block the adenosine-produced increases in the glutathione level and GSH/GSSG ratio. (A) Adenosine treatment increased the GSH levels in the cells. (ANOVA: F = 15.33, p < 0.0001). (B) Adenosine did not affect the GSSG levels (ANOVA: F = 2.902, p = 0.0499). (C) Adenosine significantly increased the GSH/GSSG ratio in the cells (ANOVA: F = 5.663, p = 0.0031). (D) Adenosine treatment dose-dependently increased the total glutathione level of the cells (ANOVA: F = 11.8, p < 0.0001). (E) AGK2 did not prevent the adenosine-induced increase in the GSH level of the cells (effect of adenosine treatment, F(1,32) = 75.71, p < 0.0001; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,32) = 1.24, p = 0.2738; effect of AGK2 * adenosine treatment, F(1,32) = 0.4104, p = 0.5263). (F) The GSSG level was not affected by AGK2 or adenosine (effect of adenosine treatment, F(1,32) = 2.528, p = 0.1217; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.002108, p = 0.9637; effect of AGK2 * adenosine treatment, F(1,32) = 0.08424, p = 0.7735). (G) AGK2 did not prevent the adenosine-induced increase in the GSH/GSSG ratio of the cells (effect of adenosine treatment, F(1,32) = 23.93, p < 0.0001; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.6463, p = 0.4274; effect of AGK2* adenosine treatment, F(1,32) = 0.00351, p = 0.9531). (H) AGK2 did not prevent the adenosine-induced increase in the total glutathione level of the cells (effect of adenosine treatment, F(1,32) = 69.45, p < 0.0001; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,32) = 1.994, p = 0.1676; effect of AGK2 * adenosine treatment, F(1,32) = 0.9088, p = 0.3476). The cells were treated with 1 mM adenosine with or without 5 μM AGK2 for 24 h. The data were pooled from four independent experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Click here for additional data file. (250.7KB, TIF)
FIGURE S4

LY294002, a PI3K/Akt pathway inhibitor, did not prevent the NAD+-induced increases in the glutathione levels and GSH/GSSG ratio in PC12 cells. (A) LY294002 did not prevent the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 20.74, p < 0.0001; effect of LY294002 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.1793, p = 0.6748; effect of LY294002 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.1216, p = 0.7296). (B) Effects of LY294002 and NAD+ on GSSG levels (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.8547, p = 0.3621; effect of LY294002 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.2553, p = 0.6168; effect of LY294002* NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 1.035, p = 0.3167). (C) LY294002 did not prevent the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH/GSSG ratio of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 25.27, p < 0.0001; effect of LY294002 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.5421, p = 0.4669; effect of LY294002 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.01279, p = 0.9107). (D) LY294002 did not prevent the NAD+-induced increase in the total glutathione level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 20.24, p < 0.0001; effect of LY294002 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.1071, p = 0.7456; effect of LY294002 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.008013, p = 0.9292). The assays were conducted, after the cells were treated with 1 μM LY294002 and 1 mM NAD+ for 24 h. The data were pooled from four independent experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

Click here for additional data file. (109.7KB, TIF)

References

  1. Abbott N. J., Patabendige A. A., Dolman D. E., Yusof S. R., Begley D. J. (2010). Structure and function of the blood-brain barrier. Neurobiol. Dis. 37, 13–25. 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alano C. C., Garnier P., Ying W., Higashi Y., Kauppinen T. M., Swanson R. A. (2010). NAD+ depletion is necessary and sufficient forPoly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1-mediated neuronal death. J. Neurosci. 30, 2967–2978. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5552-09.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alano C. C., Ying W., Swanson R. A. (2004). Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1-mediated cell death in astrocytes requires NAD+ depletion and mitochondrial permeability transition. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 18895–18902. 10.1074/jbc.m313329200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Araki T., Sasaki Y., Milbrandt J. (2004). Increased nuclear NAD biosynthesis and SIRT1 activation prevent axonal degeneration. Science 305, 1010–1013. 10.1126/science.1098014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cao W., Hong Y., Chen H., Wu F., Wei X., Ying W. (2016). SIRT2 mediates NADH-induced increases in Nrf2, GCL, and glutathione by modulating Akt phosphorylation in PC12 cells. FEBS Lett. 590, 2241–2255. 10.1002/1873-3468.12236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chan J. Y., Kwong M. (2000). Impaired expression of glutathione synthetic enzyme genes in mice with targeted deletion of the Nrf2 basic-leucine zipper protein. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1517, 19–26. 10.1016/s0167-4781(00)00238-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen H., Wang Y., Zhang J., Ma Y., Wang C., Zhou Y., et al. (2013). NAD+-carrying mesoporous silica nanoparticles can prevent oxidative stress-induced energy failures of both rodent astrocytes and PC12 cells. PLoS One 8:e74100. 10.1371/journal.pone.0074100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Choi Y. H., Kim H., Lee S. H., Jin Y.-H., Lee K. Y. (2013). ERK1/2 regulates SIRT2 deacetylase activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 437, 245–249. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.06.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dickinson D. A., Forman H. J. (2002). Cellular glutathione and thiols metabolism. Biochem. Pharmacol. 64, 1019–1026. 10.1016/s0006-2952(02)01172-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eo S. H., Choi S. Y., Kim S. J. (2016). PEP-1-SIRT2-induced matrix metalloproteinase-1 and -13 modulates type II collagen expression via ERK signaling in rabbit articular chondrocytes. Exp. Cell Res. 348, 201–208. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.09.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fang E. F., Kassahun H., Croteau D. L., Scheibye-Knudsen M., Marosi K., Lu H., et al. (2016). NAD+ replenishment improves lifespan and healthspan in ataxia telangiectasia models via mitophagy and DNA repair. Cell Metab. 24, 566–581. 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Halliwell B. (2005). Free Radicals and Other Reactive Species in Disease. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Online Library. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hong Y., Nie H., Wu D., Wei X., Ding X., Ying W. (2014). NAD+ treatment prevents rotenone-induced apoptosis and necrosis of differentiated PC12 cells. Neurosci. Lett. 560, 46–50. 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.11.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Houtkooper R. H., Pirinen E., Auwerx J. (2012). Sirtuins as regulators of metabolism and healthspan. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 225–238. 10.1038/nrm3293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang C.-S., Chang L.-S., Anderson M. E., Meister A. (1993). Catalytic and regulatory properties of the heavy subunit of rat kidney γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 19675–19680. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang Q., Sun M., Li M., Zhang D., Han F., Wu J. C., et al. (2018). Combination of NAD+ and NADPH offers greater neuroprotection in ischemic stroke models by relieving metabolic stress. Mol. Neurobio. 55, 6063–6075. 10.1007/s12035-017-0809-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jeong S. G., Cho G. W. (2017). The tubulin deacetylase sirtuin-2 regulates neuronal differentiation through the ERK/CREB signaling pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 482, 182–187. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.11.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lin M. T., Beal M. F. (2006). Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature 443, 787–795. 10.1038/nature05292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu J., Wu X., Wang X., Zhang Y., Bu P., Zhang Q., et al. (2013). Global gene expression profiling reveals functional importance of SIRT2 in endothelial cells under oxidative stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 5633–5649. 10.3390/ijms14035633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ma Y., Chen H., He X., Nie H., Hong Y., Sheng C., et al. (2012). NAD+ metabolism and NAD+-dependent enzymes: promising therapeutic targets for neurological diseases. Curr. Drug Targets 13, 222–229. 10.2174/138945012799201711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Meister A. (1991). Glutathione deficiency produced by inhibition of its synthesis and its reversal; applications in research and therapy. Pharmacol. Ther. 51, 155–194. 10.1016/0163-7258(91)90076-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nie H., Hong Y., Lu X., Zhang J., Chen H., Li Y., et al. (2014). SIRT2 mediates oxidative stress-induced apoptosis of differentiated PC12 cells. Neuroreport 25, 838–842. 10.1097/wnr.0000000000000192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ramkumar V., Nie Z., Rybak L. P., Maggirwar S. B. (1995). Adenosine, antioxidant enzymes and cytoprotection. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 16, 283–285. 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)89051-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Roh E., Park J. W., Kang G. M., Lee C. H., Dugu H., Gil S. Y., et al. (2018). Exogenous nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide regulates energy metabolism via hypothalamic connexin 43. Metabolism 88, 51–60. 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Scheibye-Knudsen M., Mitchell S. J., Fang E. F., Iyama T., Ward T., Wang J., et al. (2014). A high-fat diet and NAD+ activate Sirt1 to rescue premature aging in cockayne syndrome. Cell Metab. 20, 840–855. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schemies J., Uciechowska U., Sippl W., Jung M. (2010). NAD+-dependent histone deacetylases (sirtuins) as novel therapeutic targets. Med. Res. Rev. 30, 861–889. 10.1002/med.20178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Skoge R. H., Dölle C., Ziegler M. (2014). Regulation of SIRT2-dependent α-tubulin deacetylation by cellular NAD levels. DNA Repair 23, 33–38. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Stryer L. (1995). Biochemistry, 1995. New York, NY: H Freeman and Co. [Google Scholar]
  29. Suh J. H., Shenvi S. V., Dixon B. M., Liu H., Jaiswal A. K., Liu R.-M., et al. (2004). Decline in transcriptional activity of Nrf2 causes age-related loss of glutathione synthesis, which is reversible with lipoic acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 101, 3381–3386. 10.1073/pnas.0400282101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang F., Nguyen M., Qin F., Tong Q. (2007). SIRT2 deacetylates FOXO3a in response to oxidative stress and caloric restriction. Aging Cell 6, 505–514. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00304.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Xie Q. R., Liu Y., Shao J., Yang J., Liu T., Zhang T., et al. (2013). Male contraceptive Adjudin is a potential anti-cancer drug. Biochem. Pharmacol. 85, 345–355. 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.11.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yang Y. C., Lii C. K., Lin A. H., Yeh Y. W., Yao H. T., Li C. C., et al. (2011). Induction of glutathione synthesis and heme oxygenase 1 by the flavonoids butein and phloretin is mediated through the ERK/Nrf2 pathway and protects against oxidative stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 51, 2073–2081. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.09.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ying W. (2005). NAD+ and NADH in cellular functions and cell death. Front. Biosci. 11, 3129–3148. 10.2741/2038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ying W. (2008). NAD+/NADH and NADP+/NADPH in cellular functions and cell death: regulation and biological consequences. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 10, 179–206. 10.1089/ars.2007.1672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ying W., Garnier P., Swanson R. A. (2003). NAD+ repletion prevents PARP-1-induced glycolytic blockade and cell death in cultured mouse astrocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 308, 809–813. 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)01483-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang J., Wang C., Shi H., Wu D., Ying W. (2018). Extracellular degradation into adenosine and the activities of adenosine kinase and AMPK mediate extracellular NAD+-produced increases in the adenylate pool of BV2 microglia under basal conditions. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12:343. 10.3389/fncel.2018.00343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zipper L. M., Mulcahy R. T. (2000). Inhibition of ERK and p38 MAP kinases inhibits binding of Nrf2 and induction of GCS genes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 278, 484–492. 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIGURE S1

EX 527, a SIRT1 inhibitor, did not prevent the NAD+-induced increases in the GSH level, total glutathione level, and GSH/GSSG ratio in PC12 cells. (A) EX 527 did not prevent the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 27.53, p < 0.0001; effect of EX527 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.7361, p = 0.3973; effect of EX527 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.2272, p = 0.6369). (B) Effects of EX 527 and NAD+ on GSSG levels (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 2.853, p = 0.1009; effect of EX527 treatment, F(1,32) = 2.364, p = 0.1340; effect of EX527 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.2706, p = 0.6065). (C) EX 527 did not prevent the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH/GSSG ratio of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 21.13, p < 0.0001; effect of EX527 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.09369, p = 0.7615; effect of EX527 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.07047, p = 0.7924). (D) EX 527 did not prevent the NAD+-induced increase in the total glutathione level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 13.66, p = 0.0008; effect of EX527 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.06223, p = 0.8046; effect of EX527 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.3151, p = 0.5785). The assays were conducted after the cells were treated with 1 mM NAD+ and 5 μM EX 527 for 24 h. The data were pooled from four independent experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

Click here for additional data file. (99KB, TIF)
FIGURE S2

NAD+ treatment led to a significant increase in the intracellular and extracellular adenosine levels in PC12 cells. After the cells were treated with 1 mM NAD+ for 24 h, the intracellular and extracellular adenosine levels were determined. (A) NAD+ treatment significantly increased the extracellular adenosine level in PC12 cells. (B) NAD+ treatment significantly increased the extracellular adenosine level in PC12 cells. The data were pooled from four independent experiments. ***p < 0.001.

Click here for additional data file. (47.3KB, TIF)
FIGURE S3

AGK2 could not block the adenosine-produced increases in the glutathione level and GSH/GSSG ratio. (A) Adenosine treatment increased the GSH levels in the cells. (ANOVA: F = 15.33, p < 0.0001). (B) Adenosine did not affect the GSSG levels (ANOVA: F = 2.902, p = 0.0499). (C) Adenosine significantly increased the GSH/GSSG ratio in the cells (ANOVA: F = 5.663, p = 0.0031). (D) Adenosine treatment dose-dependently increased the total glutathione level of the cells (ANOVA: F = 11.8, p < 0.0001). (E) AGK2 did not prevent the adenosine-induced increase in the GSH level of the cells (effect of adenosine treatment, F(1,32) = 75.71, p < 0.0001; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,32) = 1.24, p = 0.2738; effect of AGK2 * adenosine treatment, F(1,32) = 0.4104, p = 0.5263). (F) The GSSG level was not affected by AGK2 or adenosine (effect of adenosine treatment, F(1,32) = 2.528, p = 0.1217; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.002108, p = 0.9637; effect of AGK2 * adenosine treatment, F(1,32) = 0.08424, p = 0.7735). (G) AGK2 did not prevent the adenosine-induced increase in the GSH/GSSG ratio of the cells (effect of adenosine treatment, F(1,32) = 23.93, p < 0.0001; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.6463, p = 0.4274; effect of AGK2* adenosine treatment, F(1,32) = 0.00351, p = 0.9531). (H) AGK2 did not prevent the adenosine-induced increase in the total glutathione level of the cells (effect of adenosine treatment, F(1,32) = 69.45, p < 0.0001; effect of AGK2 treatment, F(1,32) = 1.994, p = 0.1676; effect of AGK2 * adenosine treatment, F(1,32) = 0.9088, p = 0.3476). The cells were treated with 1 mM adenosine with or without 5 μM AGK2 for 24 h. The data were pooled from four independent experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Click here for additional data file. (250.7KB, TIF)
FIGURE S4

LY294002, a PI3K/Akt pathway inhibitor, did not prevent the NAD+-induced increases in the glutathione levels and GSH/GSSG ratio in PC12 cells. (A) LY294002 did not prevent the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 20.74, p < 0.0001; effect of LY294002 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.1793, p = 0.6748; effect of LY294002 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.1216, p = 0.7296). (B) Effects of LY294002 and NAD+ on GSSG levels (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.8547, p = 0.3621; effect of LY294002 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.2553, p = 0.6168; effect of LY294002* NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 1.035, p = 0.3167). (C) LY294002 did not prevent the NAD+-induced increase in the GSH/GSSG ratio of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 25.27, p < 0.0001; effect of LY294002 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.5421, p = 0.4669; effect of LY294002 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.01279, p = 0.9107). (D) LY294002 did not prevent the NAD+-induced increase in the total glutathione level of the cells (effect of NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 20.24, p < 0.0001; effect of LY294002 treatment, F(1,32) = 0.1071, p = 0.7456; effect of LY294002 * NAD+ treatment, F(1,32) = 0.008013, p = 0.9292). The assays were conducted, after the cells were treated with 1 μM LY294002 and 1 mM NAD+ for 24 h. The data were pooled from four independent experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

Click here for additional data file. (109.7KB, TIF)

Articles from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES