Abstract
Nonhost resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana against Phytophthora infestans, a filamentous eukaryotic microbe and the causal agent of potato late blight, is based on a multilayered defense system. Arabidopsis thaliana controls pathogen entry through the penetration-resistance genes PEN2 and PEN3, encoding an atypical myrosinase and an ABC transporter, respectively, required for synthesis and export of unknown indole compounds. To identify pathogen-elicited leaf surface metabolites and further unravel nonhost resistance in Arabidopsis, we performed untargeted metabolite profiling by incubating a P. infestans zoospore suspension on leaves of WT or pen3 mutant Arabidopsis plants. Among the plant-secreted metabolites, 4-methoxyindol-3-yl-methanol and S-(4-methoxy-indol-3-yl-methyl) cysteine were detected in spore suspensions recollected from WT plants, but at reduced levels from the pen3 mutant plants. In both whole-cell and microsome-based assays, 4-methoxyindol-3-yl-methanol was transported in a PEN3-dependent manner, suggesting that this compound is a PEN3 substrate. The syntheses of both compounds were dependent on functional PEN2 and phytochelatin synthase 1. None of these compounds inhibited mycelial growth of P. infestans in vitro. Of note, exogenous application of 4-methoxyindol-3-yl methanol slightly elevated cytosolic Ca2+ levels and enhanced callose deposition in hydathodes of seedlings treated with a bacterial pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP), flagellin (flg22). Loss of flg22-induced callose deposition in leaves of pen3 seedlings was partially reverted by the addition of 4-methoxyindol-3-yl methanol. In conclusion, we have identified a specific indole compound that is a substrate for PEN3 and contributes to the plant defense response against microbial pathogens.
Keywords: ABC transporter, host-pathogen interaction, Arabidopsis thaliana, calcium, plant, metabolomics, flagellin, indole glucosinolates, nonhost resistance, oomycete, Phytophthora infestans
Introduction
Phytophthora infestans is the causal agent of late blight, economically the most important potato disease. In an attempt to understand resistance against infection by this oomycete, attention has turned to nonhost pathosystems, such as the interaction of Arabidopsis thaliana and P. infestans (1). Nonhost resistance involves multiple layers of defense, including pre- and postinvasion resistance (2). In addition to constitutive barriers, induced defense mechanisms contribute to nonhost resistance, which are activated in the plant upon recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs)3 (3). Moreover, recognition of pathogen effectors, which suppress plant immunity, by plant resistance gene products has an impact on nonhost resistance in a number of pathosystems (2). The relative contribution of PAMP-triggered immunity or effector-triggered immunity to nonhost resistance differs according to the evolutionary distance of host and nonhost plants (4).
The identification of penetration (pen) mutants in genetic screens with the nonadapted barley pathogen Blumeria graminis f.sp. hordei (Bgh) provided the first insights into defense strategies at the cell periphery in the nonhost resistance response. PEN2 encodes a myrosinase that catalyzes the degradation of indole glucosinolates (IGs) (5–7). Products of the PEN2 reaction are postulated to be transported to the apoplast by the ABC transporter PEN3/ABCG36/PDR8 (hereafter referred to as PEN3) (8). Loss of PEN2 or PEN3 function results in enhanced penetration of nonadapted filamentous pathogens (5, 8, 9), emphasizing the importance of defense at the cell periphery for pathogen entry control.
Glucosinolates are secondary metabolites specific for the order Capparales and act as insect deterrents. As phytoanticipins, IGs accumulate constitutively in plant tissue and are synthesized from tryptophan with indol-3-ylacetaldoxime and indole-3-ylacetothiohydroximic acid as intermediates (reviewed in Ref. 10). Modifications of the indole ring such as hydroxylation and subsequent methylation, leading to the formation of 4-hydroxyindol-3-ylmethyl glucosinolate (4OHI3G) and 4-methoxyindol-3-ylmethyl glucosinolate (4MeOI3G), respectively, require the enzymes CYP81F2 and the indole glucosinolate O-methyltransferases IGMT1 or IGMT2 (11). Whereas heterologously expressed PEN2 protein cleaves both indol-3-ylmethyl glucosinolate (I3G) and 4MeOI3G in vitro, mutant analyses point to the importance of 4MeOI3G-derived metabolites for pathogen defense (6). Recently, the GSH-S-transferase GSTU13 was shown to be required for PEN2-dependent metabolism of IGs, with preference for 4-O-substituted IGs (12).
The observation that pen2 and pen3 mutants are also impaired in callose formation in response to treatment with the bacterial PAMP flg22 suggested that a PEN2 product, exported by the transporter PEN3, acts as a signaling molecule or a coactivator (7). On the other hand, it has been hypothesized that the compounds exported by PEN3 have toxicity to invading pathogens (8, 13, 14).
In search for small molecules that are transported by PEN3, indole compounds hyperaccumulating in pen3 mutant plants inoculated with Bgh have been identified. In addition to the PEN2 substrate 4MeOI3G (6, 7), 4-β-d-glucosyloxy-indol-3-yl formamide (4GlcOI3F) accumulated in several mutants with different pen3 alleles (15). Here, we report the identification of two novel indole derivatives from the surface of P. infestans-inoculated Arabidopsis plants, which are present at significantly lower levels on pen3 plants. None of the compounds inhibited mycelial growth of P. infestans in vitro. Rather, the ability of 4-methoxyindole-3-methanol (4MeOI3M) to enhance flg22-induced callose formation suggests that this PEN3-dependently exported compound acts as a modulator of defense.
Results
Identification of secondary metabolites accumulating extracellularly in response to P. infestans inoculation
To assess the extent of extracellular chemical defense in the nonhost resistance response of Arabidopsis to P. infestans infection, untargeted metabolite profiling was performed. Leaves of Col-0 Arabidopsis plants were drop-inoculated with water or a P. infestans zoospore suspension. The inoculum was removed after 24 h, concentrated, dissolved in 30% methanol, and subjected to UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS (16). Comparative analyses of the metabolic profiles revealed the presence of more than 1000 features significantly increased in zoospore suspension droplets recollected from Col-0 plants compared with the control. Up to 25% of these features could also be detected in a spore suspension without contact to plant leaves. Some of the spore suspension–derived compounds were tentatively annotated using an in-house analyte list as metabolites from the primary metabolism (sugars, phosphosugars, organic acids, amino acids, polyamines, purine derivatives and degradation products, and pipecolic acid (Table S1)). They could originate from the germinating spores, but also from the medium used for P. infestans cultivation. From the exclusively plant-derived features significantly increased in the treatment group, 18 recurring features could be annotated by accurate tandem MS analyses (Table 1 and Fig. 2A).
Table 1.
Annotation | Elemental composition | Retention time | Quantifier ion |
Annotation level | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type | m/z | Type | m/z | ||||
min | |||||||
Camalexin | C11H8N2S | 6.6 | [M + H] + | 201.0481 | [M − H] − | 199.0335 | 1 |
Dihydrocamalexic acid (DHCA) | C12H10N2O2S | 3.8 | [M + H] + | 247.0536 | [M − H] − | 245.0390 | 1* |
2-Foramidophenyl-2′-thiazolylketone | C11H8N2O2S | 6.0 | [M + H] + | 233.0379 | 1* | ||
Indol-3-ylmethyl amine (I3MA) | C9H10N2 | 1.9 | [M + H-NH3] + | 130.0651 | 1 | ||
Indol-3-carboxylic acid (I3COOH) | C9H7NO2 | 4.7 | [M + H] + | 162.0550 | [M − H] − | 160.0404 | 1 |
Methyl indole-3-carboxylate (I3COOMe) | C10H9NO2 | 6.6 | [M − H] − | 174.056 | 1 | ||
1-Methyl-indole-3-carboxylic acid (1MeI3COOH) | C10H9NO2 | 5.9 | [M + H] + | 176.0706 | 1 | ||
Indole-3-carbaldehyde (I3CHO) | C9H7NO | 4.8 | [M + H] + | 146.0600 | [M − H] − | 144.0450 | 1 |
4-Hydroxyindole-3-carbaldehyde (4OHI3CHO) | C9H7NO2 | 5.1 | [M + H] + | 162.0550 | [M − H] − | 160.0404 | 1 |
p-Coumaroylagmatine (cis/trans) | C14H20N4O2 | 2.9/3.3 | [M + H] + | 277.1659 | 1 | ||
Kaempferol 3,7-di-O-α-Rha (K 3,7-Rha2) | C27H30O14 | 4.7 | [M + H] + | 579.1708 | [M − H] − | 577.1562 | 2 |
Kaempferol 3-O-β-Glc-7-O-α-Rha (K 3-Glc-7-Rha) | C27H30O15 | 4.3 | [M + H] + | 595.1658 | [M − H] − | 593.1511 | 2 |
Sinapoylmalate | C15H16O9 | 4.6 | [M + H − C4H6O5] + | 207.0652 | [M − H] − | 339.0720 | 2 |
Scopoletin | C10H8O4 | 4.5 | [M + H] + | 193.0495 | [M − H] − | 191.0350 | 1 |
S-(4-Methoxyindol-3-ylmethyl)cysteine | C13H17N2O3S | 4.2 | [M + H] + | 281.09 | 1* | ||
4-Methoxyindol-3-ylmethanol | C10H11NO2 | 5.0 | [M + Na] + | 200.06 | 1* | ||
8-Methylsulphinyloctyl (NHCOSMe) | C11H23NO2S2 | 5.9 | [M + Na] + | 288.1062 | - | 2 | |
Leucyl-proline (H-Leu-Pro-OH) | C11H20N2O3 | 2.5 | [M + H] + | 229.1546 | [M − H] − | 227.1390 | 1* |
The extracellular occurrence of camalexin, 2-formamidophenyl-2′-thiazolylketone, and two unknown camalexin compounds was reported before (16). These compounds accumulated in a PAD3 (phytoalexin-deficient 3)-dependent manner (16). Here, additional compounds were detected and identified, which accumulated in P. infestans droplets but not in water controls (Table 1). Among these was the hydroxycinnamic acid amide coumaroylagmatine, exported by the MATE transporter DTX18 (17). In addition, indolic compounds, such as indol-3-ylmethyl amine (I3MA), indole-3-carbaldehyde (I3CHO), indole-3-carboxylic acid (I3COOH), indole-3-carboxyl-methyl ester (I3COOMe), 1-methyl indole-3-carboxylic acid (1MeI3COOH) and 4-hydroxyindole-3-carbaldehyde (4OHI3CHO) were detectable. Importantly, two novel compounds were identified as substances exported in response to P. infestans challenge (Table 1). Based on comparison of chromatographic and mass spectral properties (Fig. S1) with synthetic standards that have been authenticated by 1H and 13C NMR, these were identified as S-(4-methoxy-indol-3-ylmethyl) cysteine (4MeOI3Cys) and 4MeOI3M.
A hypothetical pathway leading to the synthesis of the various indole compounds (Fig. 1) was generated based on data from the literature (6, 7, 16, 18, 19). Central to the synthesis of camalexin, as well as I3CHO and I3COOH, is indoleacetonitrile (IAN), which is formed from tryptophan through the action of CYP79B2/B3 and CYP71A13 (20). As proposed by Böttcher et al. (16), camalexin synthesis proceeds via oxidation of IAN followed by the addition of GSH to IAN, possibly by a GSH-S-transferase, and removal of glycine and glutamic acid by peptidases or GSH γ-glutamylcysteinyltransferase 1 (CAD1, PCS1) to yield Cys(IAN), which is converted by CYP71B15 (PAD3) to dihydrocamalexic acid (DHCA) and camalexin. IAN is also one possible precursor for I3CHO and I3COOH, which are synthesized by CYP71B6/CYP71A12 and AAO1 (18) or CYP71A12 and FOX1 followed by hydrolysis or, for I3COOMe, methanolysis during sample preparation (19).
Indole compounds derived from the PEN2 pathway are degradation products of indole glucosinolates. PEN2 has been shown to cleave both I3G and 4MeOI3G in vitro (6). The newly discovered compounds 4MeOI3Cys and 4MeOI3M are hypothesized to be derived from the primary PEN2 product, 4-methoxyindol-3-ylmethyl isothiocyanate. Due to its reactivity, this isothiocyanate can be directly hydrolyzed to give 4MeOI3M or, by yet unidentified enzymes, converted to 4MeOI3Cys. Because the pcs1 mutant cad1-3 shows enhanced penetration of P. infestans (21), involvement of the phytochelatin synthase 1 (PCS1) in proteolytic processing of an intermediate can be hypothesized.
Identification of secondary metabolites accumulating extracellularly in response to P. infestans inoculation in a PEN3-dependent manner
To identify PEN2-derived metabolites that accumulate extracellularly in a PEN3-dependent manner, untargeted metabolite profiling was performed using P. infestans-inoculated pen2-1 mutant plants and the respective WT gl1, as well as pen3-1 (8) and cad1-3 (22) (pcs1) plants and their WT Col-0. Metabolite profiling was performed of the inoculum incubated on leaves for 24 h and of methanolic extracts of the infected leaf tissue below the inoculum, to detect extracellular and tissue-associated metabolites, respectively. For each feature delivered by the peak picking algorithm, a Student's t test was calculated comparing each mutant to its respective WT. Several compounds increased more than 2-fold in the mutants (Fig. 2B and Table S2), whereas the number of features with a significantly higher accumulation in the WT, which may comprise the PEN3 substrates, was very low (Fig. 2B).
To avoid false positive results, only features were considered that differentially accumulated in the same manner throughout several experimental repetitions. For the potential PEN3 substrates, these were only seven metabolites (Table 2).
Table 2.
Annotation | Elemental composition | Retention time | Change pen3/Col-0 | Quantifier ion m/z type | Quantifier ion m/z | Annotation level | Present in pen2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
min | -fold | ||||||
(E)-p-Coumaroylagmatine | C14H20N4O2 | 3.3 | −9.6 | [M + H] + | 277.16547 | 1* | Reduced |
S-(4-Methoxyindol-3-ylmethyl) cysteine | C13H17N2O3S | 4.22 | −3.2 | [M + H] + | 281.0942 | 1* | No |
4-Methoxyindol-3-yl methanol | C10H11NO2 | 5.03 | −3.7 | [M + H] + | 160.07499 | 1* | No |
4-Hydroxyindole-3-carbaldehyde (4OHI3CHO) | C9H7NO2 | 5.1 | −3.0 | [M + H] + | 162.05519 | 1 | No |
Unknown indole 1 | C10H9NO2 | 5.57 | −2.5 | [M + H] + | 176.07116 | 3 | No |
Unknown indole 2 | C10H9NO | 6.01 | −4.1 | [M + H] + | 160.07534 | 3 | No |
Unknown indole 3 | C10H9NO2 | 6.68 | −3.6 | [M + H] + | 176.07054 | 3 | Reduced |
Candidates for possible PEN3 substrates and further identified compounds involved in the defense against P. infestans (Tables 1 and 2) were quantified in targeted LC-MS analyses in WTs and mutants. Both intra- and extracellularly, camalexin was present in significantly higher amounts in all mutants analyzed, pen3-1, cad1-3, and pen2-1, compared with their respective WTs (Figs. 3 and S2). DHCA levels were also enhanced in methanolic extracts of pen3-1, cad1-3, and pen2-1 and in the inoculum of cad1-3 and pen2-1, but not pen3-1 (Figs. 3 and S2).
There were no differences in the levels of I3G (data not shown). I3CHO was present at very low amounts in methanolic extracts of P. infestans-inoculated leaves of all lines analyzed (Figs. 3A and S2A). In contrast, extracellular levels of I3CHO were significantly reduced in pen3-1 but not in cad1-3 and pen2-1 plants (Figs. 3B and S2B). Enhanced levels of I3COOH were detected in all mutant leaves. Extracellular levels were drastically enhanced in cad1-3 and pen2-1 plants, but not significantly different in pen3-1 and WT plants. These observations do not suggest a clear dependence of synthesis and secretion of I3CHO and I3COOH on PEN genes.
The reduced levels of I3MA and raphanusamic acid in pen2-1 plants suggested that these compounds are downstream products of the PEN2-mediated reaction (6). In accordance with this, P. infestans-infected leaves of cad1-3 and pen2-1 plants contain lower levels of these substances (Figs. 3A and S2A). Moreover, I3MA was not detectable in the inoculum collected from cad1-3 and pen2-1 leaves. However, in P. infestans inoculum collected from pen3-1 plants, I3MA levels were not significantly different from those on Col-0 plants, suggesting that the export of I3MA to the apoplast is independent of PEN3. Thus, there is no correlation between decreased I3MA levels and the phenotype of enhanced penetration, which is observed in pen2-1, cad1-3, and pen3-1 plants.
Compounds accumulating on the leaf surface in a PEN2-, PCS1-, and PEN3-dependent manner included 4OHI3CHO (Figs. 3B and S2B) and three unidentified indole compounds (Table 2). These compounds might possibly be substrates of the ABC transporter PEN3. In addition, two compounds derived from 4MeOI3G, 4MeOI3Cys and 4MeOI3M, were identified as metabolites that accumulated in the inoculum of WT, but not of pen2-1, cad1-3, or pen3-1 plants. In methanolic extracts, both compounds were present at very low and variable amounts, whereas their precursor, 4MeOI3G, accumulated to higher levels in mutant compared with WT leaves (Figs. 4A and S3A). Extracellular levels of both 4MeOI3Cys and 4MeOI3M were highly reduced in all three mutants compared with the respective WTs (Figs. 4B and S3B). Moreover, decreased levels of both compounds were observed on the surface of two additional mutants, pen3-3 and pen3-4 (Figs. 4C and S3C).
The highly decreased levels of 4MeOI3Cys and 4MeOI3M in pen2-1 and cad1-3 mutants indicate that the encoded enzymes are required for the synthesis of these compounds. Importantly, the significantly reduced levels of 4MeOI3Cys and 4MeOI3M in the inoculum of pen3 mutants suggest a requirement of a functional PEN3 transporter for the export of these compounds.
4MeOI3M is transported in a PEN3-dependent manner
Based on previous work it was suggested that PEN3/ABCG36/PDR8, like its close homolog PIS1/ABCG37/PDR9 (23), apparently has a wider substrate specificity toward a few structurally unrelated substrates (15, 24, 25). These include indole compounds (such as indole butyric acid (IBA)), although convincing transport data for PEN3 were only provided for cadmium (24). Direct transport analyses were performed using custom-synthesized, radiolabeled 4MeOI3M as a substrate. In single-cell transport assays using protoplasts prepared from transgenic Arabidopsis leaf material, constitutive overexpression of PEN3 led to significantly enhanced 4MeOI3M export, whereas loss of PEN3 function in pen3-1 did not result in significantly reduced export (Fig. 5A). As expected, export of closely related indole-3 acetic acid (IAA), quantified in parallel in double-labeling assays, was not affected by the presence of PEN3 as was already shown for ABCG37 (23). Microsome-based transport assays verified whole-cell assays; both loss and gain of PEN3 function resulted in significantly reduced and enhanced 4MeOI3M uptake, respectively, whereas again IAA transport was not significantly disturbed (Fig. 5B). In the absence of ATP, uptake of 4MeOI3M by microsomes from PEN3-overexpressing but not from pen3-4 plants was significantly reduced, as would be expected for an ATP-driven transport catalyzed by an ABC transporter (Fig. 5B). Importantly, in competition experiments, uptake of radioactively labeled 4MeOI3M into PEN3-overexpressing microsomes was significantly inhibited in the presence of an excess of unlabeled 4MeIO3M and 4MeOI3Cys (Fig. 5C). In summary, direct transport and competition data support the conclusion that 4MeOI3M, and likely also 4MeOI3Cys, are PEN3 substrates.
4MeOI3Cys and 4MeOI3M are exported early after P. infestans inoculation
To elucidate the kinetics of export of specific compounds, time course experiments were performed with the P. infestans inoculum incubated on the surface of leaves of WT and mutant plants. Camalexin and DHCA started to accumulate between 4 and 6 h, with the highest levels in pen2-1 and cad1-3 (Fig. 6). The accumulation of I3CHO between 2 and 4 h after inoculation was similar in all plant lines analyzed, whereas I3COOH accumulation occurred later and was more pronounced in pen2-1 and cad1-3. I3MA was not detectable in the biosynthesis mutants pen2-1 and cad1-3, but it started to accumulate extracellularly in the WTs and in pen3-1 4 h postinoculation. 4MeOI3M and 4MeOI3Cys were hardly detectable in the inoculum incubated for 2 h, but their levels were significantly increased after 4 h in WT plants (Fig. 6). Thus, 4MeOI3M, 4MeOI3Cys, I3MA, and I3CHO are exported earlier than camalexin, DHCA, and I3COOH.
4MeOI3Cys and 4MeOI3M do not inhibit P. infestans growth
The absence of 4MeOI3M and 4MeOI3Cys on the leaf surface correlates with enhanced penetration of epidermal cells by P. infestans. To analyze whether these substances have antimicrobial activity, their impact on P. infestans growth was tested in in vitro inhibition assays using a GFP-expressing P. infestans isolate (26) (Fig. 7A). In contrast to known anti-oomycotic compounds, such as azoxystrobin and γ-oxocrotonate ((2E)-4-oxohexadec-2-enoic acid) (27), no significant differences in mycelial growth of P. infestans were observed in the presence of 100 μm 4MeOI3M or 4MeOI3Cys, suggesting that these substances do not act as anti-oomycotic compounds at physiological concentrations.
4MeOI3M induces elevations in cytosolic Ca2+ levels
The observation that none of the PEN3-dependently exported compounds acted against P. infestans at physiological concentrations suggested that they might act as modulators of plant defense. Therefore, elicitation of defense responses by the newly identified compounds were addressed in Arabidopsis seedlings.
4MeOI3M was assayed in a luminescence-based Ca2+ reporter assay (28, 29). Using aequorin-expressing plants allows to monitor the calcium fluxes, which are the hallmark of early biotic and abiotic stress responses. The addition of 10 μm 4MeOI3M elicited a significant transient increase in cytoplasmic Ca2+, albeit lower than that activated by Pep1 (Fig. 7B), suggesting that 4MeOI3M acts as an activator of the Ca2+ response. The addition of 4MeOI3CHO did not lead to changes in the Ca2+ response. Similarly, neither 4MeOI3Cys nor I3MA elicited an elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ concentration (Fig. 7C).
To address possible effects of 4MeOI3M on early receptor-mediated signaling responses, activation of defense-related MAPKs was monitored by Western blotting using an antibody specific for phosphorylated MAPK-pTEpY motifs. In contrast to flg22, the addition of 4MeOI3M to Arabidopsis protoplasts did not lead to MAPK activation (Fig. 7D). Because Arabidopsis protoplasts did not tolerate higher DMSO concentrations, 4MeOI3Cys could not be tested in this system due to its low water solubility.
Extracellular 4MeOI3M restores flg22-induced callose deposition in pen3-1 seedlings
In addition to enhanced penetration frequencies after inoculation of nonadapted pathogens, pen mutants also show defects in callose deposition in response to flg22 treatment (7). To address the question whether extracellular 4MeOI3M can alter this phenotype, Col-0 and pen3-1 seedlings were treated with flg22 in the presence and absence of 4MeOI3M. Leaves were stained for callose with aniline blue. Microscopic analyses showed callose deposition in WT plants in response to flg22, but not to 4MeOI3M treatment (Fig. 8, A and B). In pen3-1 plants, callose deposition in response to flg22 treatment was highly reduced compared with that of flg22-treated WT plants (Fig. 8C). As for Col-0, exogenous application of 4MeOI3M alone did not induce callose deposition in pen3-1 (Fig. 8D). Treatment of pen3-1 mutant seedlings with both flg22 and 4MeOI3M resulted in enhanced callose staining (Fig. 8E). Quantification of the staining revealed significantly reduced callose depositions in flg22-treated pen3-1 compared with Col-0 plants (Fig. 8F). Application of 4MeOI3M to flg22-treated pen3-1 plants resulted in significantly enhanced callose depositions, albeit not to WT levels, suggesting that 4MeOI3M is able to partially rescue the pen3 phenotype.
Callose depositions were also observed at hydathodes of cotyledons in response to flg22 treatment compared with control treatment. Application of both flg22 and 4MeOI3M resulted in enhanced labeling of callose, as exemplified for Col-0 in Fig. 8G. Quantification of the intensity of callose staining revealed that, in response to flg22 and 4MeOI3M co-treatment, all genotypes showed significantly enhanced callose staining compared with flg22 treatment alone (Fig. 8H), suggesting that 4MeOI3M enhances flg22-induced callose formation in hydathodes.
Discussion
4MeOI3M and 4MeOI3Cys synthesis requires PEN2 and PCS1
Using untargeted profiling of extracellular metabolites, potential substrates of the PEN3 transporter were identified. Secretion of metabolites into the inoculum of P. infestans was first described by Böttcher et al. (16), and this subsequently enabled the identification of a MATE transporter required for export of phenylpropanoid defense compounds during the nonhost resistance response of Arabidopsis against P. infestans (17). Here, 4MeOI3Cys and 4MeOI3M were identified as substances that are synthesized, and exported, in a PEN2- and PCS1- as well as PEN3-dependent manner, respectively. The proposed pathway of synthesis of 4MeOI3Cys and 4MeOI3M postulates the PEN2-mediated catabolism of 4MeOI3G to 4-methoxyindol-3-ylmethyl isothiocyanate. PEN2 hydrolyzes both I3G and 4MeOI3G (6). Increased 4MeOI3G levels are observed in P. infestans-inoculated pen2-1 mutants, similar to those reported for Bgh inoculation (6), suggesting that the loss of conversion results in substrate accumulation. The product of the reaction is converted by yet unidentified enzymes. Recent genetic data suggest the involvement of the GSH-S-transferase GSTU13 in the synthesis of PEN2-derived metabolites (12). In accordance with the pathway proposed by these authors, GSH could be attached to 4-methoxyindol-3-ylmethyl isothiocyanate, resulting in the loss of thiocyanate (12). Glycine and glutamic acid would have to be removed from the resulting metabolite by peptidases. We propose that PCS1 is involved in this step, because this enzyme has been shown to catalyze the removal of glycine from GSH conjugates in vitro (30) and in planta (31). PCS1 catalyzes the formation of phytochelatins, (γ-Glu-Cys)n-Gly, which are required for heavy metal tolerance. In addition to metal hypersensitivity, pcs1 mutants, such as cad1-3, are less responsive to flg22 (7) and display reduced penetration resistance to P. infestans (21). These two functions are separate, because cadmium sensitivity, but not the P. infestans-induced phenotype of cad1-3 mutants is rescued by the expression of Caenorhabditis elegans PCS. CePCS is able to synthesize phytochelatins (32) and is, thus, able to restore heavy metal tolerance to pcs1 mutants (21). The inability of CePCS1 to rescue the P. infestans-related phenotype of cad1-3 might correlate with the inability to produce extracellular 4MeOI3M und 4MeOI3Cys. Because CePCS lacks a plant-specific C-terminal domain, it can be speculated that this C-terminal domain is involved in converting plant secondary metabolites. We thus hypothesize that this domain is required for the formation of 4MeOI3Cys.
4MeOI3M is transported in a PEN3-dependent manner
The PEN3-dependent extracellular occurrence of 4MeOI3M und 4MeOI3Cys suggested that these compounds are substrates of the ABC transporter or metabolites of the transported substrate. Using Arabidopsis protoplast and microsome transport assays, we were able to demonstrate that 4MeOI3M is transported by PEN3. Like other PDR-type ABC transporters, PEN3 is able to transport several structurally loosely related substrates. However, despite accepting various compounds like IBA and 4MeOI3M, PEN3 still displays a high specificity for these few substrates, which is also reflected by the finding that IBA, but not closely related IAA, is transported by PEN3 (25, 23). A recently identified allele of pen3, pen3-5, shows differential effects on IBA and pathogen responses (15), providing a molecular rationale for substrate uncoupling.
Interestingly, partial conversion of 4MeOI3Cys into 4MeOI3M was observed in vitro (data not shown), suggesting the possibility that metabolism of PEN3-transported 4MeOI3Cys contributes to the overall levels of 4MeOI3M that we detected on the leaf surface of P. infestans-inoculated plants.
Based on the overaccumulation of 4GlcOI3F in Bgh-inoculated pen3 leaves, a precursor of this compound was proposed to be the substrate of PEN3 (15). However, we were unable to detect 4GlcOI3F in methanolic extracts of P. infestans-inoculated pen3-1 leaves, suggesting that different pathogens might induce distinct branches of the PEN2 hydrolytic pathway. Interestingly, in pen3-1, loss of PEN3 function does not result in a pronounced accumulation of the transported substrate. In fact, only very low and variable levels of 4MeOI3M and 4MeOI3Cys are detectable in methanolic extracts of P. infestans-inoculated leaves. This observation points to the possibility of the formation of a metabolon to achieve metabolite channeling. Metabolon formation has been postulated for enzymes of other secondary metabolites, such as sporopollenin in Arabidopsis (33) and soybean isoflavonoids (34). Moreover, the cyanogenic glucoside dhurrin of Sorghum bicolor is synthesized by interacting enzymes (35). The efficient formation of this defense compound requires a metabolon consisting of four enzymes and a negatively charged lipid surface (36). In our proposed pathway, 4MeOI3G is catabolized by PEN2, a GSH-S-transferase, and a peptidase, as well as by PCS1. Because other intermediates of this postulated pathway were not detectable either, degradation of 4MeOI3G and subsequent formation and export of 4MeOI3Cys and 4MeOI3M might occur in a metabolon, in which cooperating enzymes are brought together (37). Recently, Fuchs et al. (14) reported on the close proximity of CYP81F2, the enzyme catalyzing the formation of 4OHI3G from I3G, to PEN2 in immobilized mitochondria at the site of attempted penetration of Bgh. Thus, formation of a microcompartment consisting of the different enzymes and of the transporter PEN3 might also be responsible for the efficient production and export of 4MeOI3M und 4MeOI3Cys.
4MeOI3M induces Ca2+ transients and enhances flg22-induced callose deposition
The loss of penetration resistance against P. infestans in pen3-1 correlates with highly reduced extracellular levels of 4MeOI3M and 4MeOI3Cys. Possible functions of extracellular metabolites in pathogen resistance include antimicrobial activity or the activation of plant defense. In other pathosystems, the hydrolysis products of 4MeOI3G are considered to contribute to penetration resistance against filamentous pathogens due to antimicrobial activity (6, 8, 14). The inability of 4MeOI3M and 4MeOI3Cys to inhibit mycelial growth of P. infestans in vitro, however, does not support a direct antimicrobial effect as the basis for penetration resistance against the oomycete.
Genetic analyses had suggested that 4MeOI3G hydrolysis products are required for flg22-induced callose formation (7). In contrast to chitin, flg22 requires functional PEN2, PCS1, and PEN3 genes for the induction of callose depositions (38). The PEN2 substrate 4MeOI3G can restore callose deposition in IG biosynthesis mutants, but not in mutants affected in genes involved in IG hydrolysis, such as pen2 and pcs1, nor in the transport mutant pen3 (7). Based on these results, a hydrolysis product of 4MeOI3G was postulated to act as a signaling molecule or a potential coactivator of callose formation (7, 38).
The observation that 4MeOI3M induces Ca2+ transients could suggest a signaling function for this PEN2/PCS1- and PEN3-dependently synthesized and exported compound. However, because 4MeOI3M does not activate MAPKs, it does not appear to be a general inducer of defense responses. In addition to Ca2+ transients, flg22-induced callose deposition is enhanced in the presence of exogenous 4MeOI3M. Mechanistically, a direct effect of 4MeOI3M on callose formation can be envisaged, because early studies report a Ca2+ dependence of callose synthases of cultured plant cells (39). Thus, the small, but highly significant, increase in cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations induced by exogenous 4MeOI3M might lead to the local activation of a callose synthase.
Stomata and hydathodes are bacterial entry sites and represent a first barrier to pathogen invasion (40). It is interesting to note that both PEN3 and the flg22 receptor–encoding gene FLS2 are highest expressed in stomata and hydathodes (41, 42). Our observation that 4MeOI3M contributes to callose formation in hydathodes and, thus, to the structural barrier against bacterial invasion, might therefore indicate a positive role for PEN3 in defense against bacterial pathogens. This is in accordance with data showing reduced callose formation and enhanced susceptibility of pen3 to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (43). However, there are also reports of enhanced resistance of pen3 to PstDC3000 (13, 41). Different bacterial titers and inoculation methods may account for these divergent results. At this point, these data indicate that our knowledge of mechanisms involved in defense at the cell periphery is not advanced enough to explain all observed phenomena. The identification of a 4MeOI3G hydrolysis product, which (i) is synthesized in a PEN2-dependent manner, (ii) is transported by PEN3 in vitro, and (iii) contributes to flg22-induced callose formation, adds to our understanding of these early regulatory networks important for proper defense at the cell periphery.
Experimental procedures
Plant growth conditions
Arabidopsis mutants pen2-1 (5), pen3-1, pen3-3, and pen3-4 (8); cad1-3 (22); and the corresponding WTs gl1 and Col-0 were grown in a phytochamber at 22 °C with a light/dark cycle of 8/16 h (∼120 microeinsteins m−2 s−1, metal halide lamp HQI®-T, Osram).
Sample preparation for metabolite profiling
Rosette leaves of 5-week-old A. thaliana plants were drop-inoculated with a zoospore suspension of P. infestans Cra208m2 (26) by applying 10-μl drops onto the adaxial leaf surface (5 × 105 spores ml−1). Drops and the leaf tissue below the inoculation sites were collected separately. Recollected inoculation drops (300 μl) were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for storage. For extraction, the frozen drops were thawed and evaporated to dryness. Samples were dissolved in 60 μl of 30% methanol (LC-MS CHROMASOLV® Fluka Analytical) and sonicated for 15 min. Following centrifugation at 19,000 × g (4 °C) for 10 min, the residue-free samples were transferred to Qsert Vials (Waters Corp.). Leaf material (∼100 mg) was frozen in liquid nitrogen. Methanolic extracts were prepared as described (16, 17).
LC/MS measurements
Untargeted metabolite profiling was performed as described (16, 17) with the following modifications. The binary gradient was applied at a flow rate of 150 μl/min with 0–1 min, isocratic 95% A (water/formic acid, 99.9:0.1 (v/v)), 5% B (acetonitrile/formic acid, 99.9:0.1 (v/v)); 1–5 min, linear from 5 to 25% B; 5–10 min, linear to 95% B; 10–12 min, isocratic 95% B; 12–15 min, isocratic 5% B.
Eluting compounds were detected from m/z 80 to 1000 using a micrOTOF-Q II hybrid quadrupole TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) equipped with an Apollo II electrospray ion source in positive and negative-ion mode using the following instrument settings: nebulizer gas, nitrogen, 1.4 bar; dry gas, nitrogen, 6 liters/min, 190 °C; capillary, −5000 V; end plate offset, −500 V; funnel 1 RF, 200 V; funnel 2 RF, 200 V; in-source CID energy, 0 V; hexapole RF, 100 V; quadrupole ion energy, 5 eV; collision gas, nitrogen; collision energy, 7 eV; collision RF 150/350 V (timing 50/50); transfer time, 70 μs; prepulse storage, 5 μs; pulser frequency, 10 kHz; spectra rate, 3 Hz. Mass spectra were acquired in centroid mode. Mass calibration of individual raw data files was performed on lithium formate cluster ions obtained by automatic infusion of 20 μl of 10 mm lithium hydroxide in isopropyl alcohol/water/formic acid, 49.9:49.9:0.2 (v/v/v) at a gradient time of 12 min using a diverter valve.
Raw data files were converted to mzData format using the vendor-specific software CompassXport and processed using the XCMS package (http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/xcms.html)4 (52). XCMS settings for processing LC/MS data with findPeaks.centWave were as follows: prefilter = (3, 200); snthr = 5; ppm = 25; peak width = (5, 12); scan range (50, 1020). For alignment, group density function with parameters minfrac = 0.75 and bw = 5, mzwid = 0.05, max = 20 was used.
Differentially accumulating compounds were determined using Student's t test with p < 0.05 and a -fold change of ≥ 2. Each mutant-WT comparison was performed at least four times in independent experimental repetitions with five biological replicates in each experiment (for pen3-1, pen3-3, and pen3-4 also using MetaboScape 3.0 Service Release 1 (T-ReX® 3D algorithm (Bruker) with the following settings: peak detection: intensity threshold 1000 counts, minimum peak length 7 spectra, feature signal = intensity; recursive feature extraction: minimum peak length (recursive) 3 spectra. Differentially accumulated features between the lines and treatments were detected with Student's t test or with Welch's t test if equal variances could not be assumed, with missing value substitution with the lowest-intensity value in the whole data set.
Identification of the compounds was based on manual interpretation of MS/MS spectra. For comparison with different mass spectra databases, the open source metabolite identification software MetFrag was used.
Additional LC-MS measurements for targeted metabolite analysis were performed on a micrOTOF-Q quadrupole TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) in positive mode with the same setup as above. Targeted relative quantification of metabolites was performed using peak areas of extracted ion chromatograms in Bruker's QuantAnalysis software. Figures were created with MetaboScape 3.0 Service Release 1 (Bruker) and with GraphPad Prism 7.04.
Synthesis of 4MeOI3M and 4MeOI3Cys
Column chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 (Merck, 40–63-μm particle size) and Sephadex LH 20 (Fluka) using cylindrical glass columns with glass frits or plugged with cotton wool, whereas analytical TLC was performed on precoated silica gel F254 plates (Merck). The compound spots were detected by their UV absorbance at λ 254 nm and/or by spraying of the TLC plates with vanillin-sulfuric acid reagent followed by heating in a hot air stream. One-dimensional (1H, 13C) NMR spectra were obtained from an Agilent DD2 400 system. The spectra were recorded at 400 MHz (1H) and 100 MHz (13C), respectively. Chemical shifts were referenced to internal TMS (δH 0, 1H) or CDCl3 (δC 77.0, 13C).
The positive-ion high-resolution ESI mass spectra were obtained from an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with an HESI electrospray ion source (spray voltage 3.5 kV, capillary temperature 275 °C, source heater temperature 40 °C, Fourier transform MS resolution 60,000). Nitrogen was used as sheath gas. The sample solutions were introduced continuously via a 500-μl Hamilton syringe pump with a flow rate of 5 μl min−1. The instrument was externally calibrated by the Pierce LTQ Velos ESI calibration solution from Thermo Fisher Scientific. The data were evaluated by the Xcalibur software 2.7 SP1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
4-Methoxyindol-3-yl methanol (44) was synthesized by the addition of 4-methoxy-indole-3-carbaldehyde (2.80 g, 16.0 mmol) to 50 ml of a solvent mixture consisting of methanol/ethanol/chloroform (1:8:5, v/v/v), upon which NaBH4 (0.60 g, 16.0 mmol) was added at room temperature. After stirring for 6 h, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and NaOH (28 ml, 0.1 m) was added to the residue. Upon extraction with diethyl ether (3 × 60 ml), the combined organic extracts were dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated. The remaining light brown oil was purified by chromatography on silica gel (methylene chloride/methanol, 95:5) to yield 1.9 g (67%) of pale yellow oily product. The analytical data were identical to the reported data (44).
For synthesis of S-((4-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)methyl) cysteine (45), a solution of l-cysteine (0.87 g, 7.2 mmol) in water (200 ml) was brought to pH 13 by titration with NaOH (10 n), upon which 4MeOI3M (0.64 g, 3.6 mmol) was added at room temperature under vigorous stirring. Stirring was continued for 12 h at 60 °C. After cooling, the solids were filtered off. The remaining solution was neutralized (pH 7) with HCl (0.2 n), and the precipitate formed was again filtered off and carefully washed with ice-cold water. After drying in vacuo, a colorless powder (553 mg, 56%) remained.
TLC Rf = 0.81 (ethyl acetate/ethanol/water, 70:15:8). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 7.13 (s, 1H, H-2), 6.98–7.02 (m, 1H), 6.93 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.46 (d, J = 7.45 Hz, 1H,), 4.11 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 2H, H-3′), 3.89 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.68 (dd, J = 4.0, 9.2 Hz, 1H, H-1), 3.14 (dd, J = 4.0,14.4 Hz, 1H, H2a), 2.83 (dd, J = 8.8, 14.5 Hz, 1H, H2b). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 168.8, 154.3, 138.0, 123,1, 122.1, 116.2, 110.9, 105.0, 99.2, 55.1, 53.5, 32.1, 27.4. ESI-MS m/z: 281.2 [M + H]+, 303.2 [M + Na]+. [3H]4MeOI3M, labeled at the aromatic core, was provided by Hartmann Analytics.
PEN3 transport experiments
Intact Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts from Col-0 (WT), pen3-4, and 35S::PEN3 were prepared from rosette leaves of plants grown on soil under a 100-μmol m−2 s−1 white light, 8-h light/16-h dark cycle at 22 °C as described (46). Protoplasts were loaded by incubation with 1 μl ml−1 of a mixture of [3H]4MeOI3M (custom-synthesized by Hartman Analytics, specific activity 5.7 Ci/mmol) and [14C]IAA (specific activity 55 Ci mmol−1; American Radiolabeled Chemicals). External radioactivity was removed by separating protoplasts using a 50–30-5% Percoll gradient. Transport was initiated by incubation at 25 °C and halted by silicon oil centrifugation. Effluxed radioactivity was determined by scintillation counting of aqueous phases and is presented as the relative efflux of the initial efflux (efflux prior to temperature incubation), which was set to zero.
For microsomal uptake experiments, Col-0 (WT), pen3-4, and 35S::PEN3 total microsomes were prepared from mixotrophic liquid cultures as described elsewhere (46). Combinations of labeled [3H]4MeOI3M and [14C]IAA, respectively, were diluted into transport buffer (10 mm Tris-HCl, 10 mm MgCl2, 1 mm EDTA, 1 mm DTT, 10% sucrose, pH 7.6, with 5 mm ATP) and added to 300 μg of microsomes to yield a final concentration of 1 μm each. After 10 s and 2 min of incubation at 20 °C, four aliquots of 100 μl were vacuum-filtered on Whatman NC45 filters (GE Healthcare) and washed three times with 1 ml of cold double-distilled H2O. Air-dried filters were subjected to scintillation counting. Indicated relative uptake was calculated as the radioactivity normalized to the first time point (10 s). For substrate competition assays, unlabeled substrate was included in the transport buffer at a 100-fold excess. Means and S.E. values of at least four independent experiments with four technical replicates each are presented.
P. infestans inhibition assays
Mycelial growth inhibition assays were performed with P. infestans Cra208m2 (26) as described (27, 47).
Ca2+ and MAPK assays
Col-0 plants expressing cytosolic p35S:Apoaequorin were used for aequorin luminescence-based Ca2+ measurements (pMAQ2; 28). Ca2+ measurements, protoplast transformation, and MAPK assays were performed as described (29).
Callose staining of hydathodes
Eleven-day-old seedlings grown in microtiter plates were treated with 1% DMSO, 1 μm flg22 in 1% DMSO or 100 μm 4MeOI3M in 1% DMSO for 24 h. Staining of callose with aniline blue was performed as described (7, 48). Quantification was performed using the image processing package Fiji (ImageJ) (49) for primary leaves as described (50). Intensity of callose staining in hydathodes was determined as the mean gray value in photographs taken with identical settings.
Accession numbers
Sequence data from this article can be found in the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative or GenBankTM/EMBL databases under the following accession numbers: At2g44490 (PEN2), At5g44070 (PCS1), and At1g59870 (PEN3).
Author contributions
A. M., C. B., L. E.-L., U. S., S. D., and F. T. formal analysis; A. M., C. B., L. E.-L., B. W., U. S., S. D., F. T., and B. A. investigation; A. M., L. E.-L., B. W., S. D., B. A., and D. S. methodology; C. B., U. S., S. D., and B. A. data curation; D. S. and M. G. resources; D. S. software; M. G. and S. R. conceptualization; M. G. supervision; M. G. and S. R. project administration; D. S. and S. R. funding acquisition; S. R. writing-original draft.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The technical assistance of Angela Schaks and Laurence Charrier is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Steffen Neumann (IPB Halle) for help with bioinformatic analyses.
This work was supported by the DFG (SPP1212 Microbial Reprogramming of Plant Development, SCHE 235/14-3). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
This article contains Tables S1 and S2 and Figs. S1–S3.
Please note that the JBC is not responsible for the long-term archiving and maintenance of this site or any other third party hosted site.
- PAMP
- pathogen-associated molecular pattern
- IAN
- indoleacetonitrile
- Bgh
- Blumeria graminis f.sp. hordei
- Cys(IAN)
- cysteine-indole-3-acetonitrile conjugate
- DHCA
- dihydrocamalexic acid
- I3CHO
- indole-3-carbaldehyde
- I3COOH
- indole-3-carboxylic acid
- 1MeI3COOH
- 1-methyl indole-3-carboxylic acid
- I3COOMe
- indole-3-carboxyl-methyl ester
- I3G
- indol-3-ylmethyl glucosinolate
- I3MA
- indol-3-ylmethyl amine
- 4MeOI3G
- 4-methoxyindol-3-yl methyl glucosinolate
- 4MeOI3M
- 4-methoxyindole-3-methanol
- 4MeOI3Cys
- S-(4-methoxy-indol-3-ylmethyl) cysteine
- IG
- indole glucosinolate
- 4GlcOI3F
- 4-β-d-glucosyloxy-indol-3-yl formamide
- 4OHI3CHO
- 4-hydroxyindole-3-carbaldehyde
- IBA
- indole butyric acid
- IAA
- indole-3 acetic acid
- CID
- collision-induced dissociation
- MAPK
- mitogen-activated protein kinase
- ESI
- electrospray ionization.
References
- 1. Kamoun S. (2001) Nonhost resistance to Phytophthora: novel prospects for a classical problem. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4, 295–300 10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00176-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Fan J., and Doerner P. (2012) Genetic and molecular basis of nonhost disease resistance: complex, yes; silver bullet, no. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15, 400–406 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Stam R., Mantelin S., McLellan H., and Thilliez G. (2014) The role of effectors in nonhost resistance to filamentous plant pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 582 10.3389/fpls.2014.00582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Schulze-Lefert P., and Panstruga R. (2011) A molecular evolutionary concept connecting nonhost resistance, pathogen host range, and pathogen speciation. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 117–125 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lipka V., Dittgen J., Bednarek P., Bhat R., Wiermer M., Stein M., Landtag J., Brandt W., Rosahl S., Scheel D., Llorente F., Molina A., Parker J., Somerville S., and Schulze-Lefert P. (2005) Pre- and postinvasion defenses both contribute to nonhost resistance in Arabidopsis. Science 310, 1180–1183 10.1126/science.1119409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bednarek P., Pislewska-Bednarek M., Svatos A., Schneider B., Doubsky J., Mansurova M., Humphry M., Consonni C., Panstruga R., Sanchez-Vallet A., Molina A., and Schulze-Lefert P. (2009) A glucosinolate metabolism pathway in living plant cells mediates broad-spectrum antifungal defense. Science 323, 101–106 10.1126/science.1163732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Clay N. K., Adio A. M., Denoux C., Jander G., and Ausubel F. M. (2009) Glucosinolate metabolites required for an Arabidopsis innate immune response. Science 323, 95–101 10.1126/science.1164627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Stein M., Dittgen J., Sánchez-Rodriguez C., Hou B. H., Molina A., Schulze-Lefert P., Lipka V., and Somerville S. (2006) Arabidopsis PEN3/PDR8, an ATP binding cassette transporter, contributes to nonhost resistance to inappropriate pathogens that enter by direct penetration. Plant Cell 18, 731–746 10.1105/tpc.105.038372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Westphal L., Scheel D., and Rosahl S. (2008) The coi1–16 mutant harbors a second site mutation rendering PEN2 nonfunctional. Plant Cell 20, 824–826 10.1105/tpc.107.056895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Halkier B. A., and Gershenzon J. (2006) Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57, 303–333 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Pfalz M., Mikkelsen M. D., Bednarek P., Olsen C. E., Halkier B. A., and Kroymann J. (2011) Metabolic engineering in Nicotiana benthamiana reveals key enzyme functions in Arabidopsis indole glucosinolate modification. Plant Cell 23, 716–729 10.1105/tpc.110.081711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Piślewska-Bednarek M., Nakano R. T., Hiruma K., Pastorczyk M., Sanchez-Vallet A., Singkaravanit-Ogawa S., Ciesiołka D., Takano Y., Molina A., Schulze-Lefert P., and Bednarek P. (2018) Glutathione transferase U13 functions in pathogen-triggered glucosinolate metabolism. Plant Physiol. 176, 538–551 10.1104/pp.17.01455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Johansson O. N., Fantozzi E., Fahlberg P., Nilsson A. K., Buhot N., Tör M., and Andersson M. X. (2014) Role of the penetration-resistance genes PEN1, PEN2 and PEN3 in the hypersensitive response and race-specific resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 79, 466–476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Fuchs R., Kopischke M., Klapprodt C., Hause G., Meyer A. J., Schwarzländer M., Fricker M. D., and Lipka V. (2016) Immobilized subpopulations of leaf epidermal mitochondria mediate PENETRATION2-dependent pathogen entry control in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 28, 130–145 10.1105/tpc.15.00887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lu X., Dittgen J., Piślewska-Bednarek M., Molina A., Schneider B., Svatoš A., Doubský J., Schneeberger K., Weigel D., Bednarek P., and Schulze-Lefert P. (2015) Mutant allele-specific uncoupling of PENETRATION3 functions reveals engagement of the ATP-binding cassette transporter in dstinct tryptophan metabolic pathways. Plant Physiol. 168, 814–827 10.1104/pp.15.00182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Böttcher C., Westphal L., Schmotz C., Prade E., Scheel D., and Glawischnig E. (2009) The multifunctional enzyme CYP71B15 (PHYTOALEXIN DEFICIENT3) converts cysteine-indole-3-acetonitrile to camalexin in the indole-3-acetonitrile metabolic network of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 21, 1830–1845 10.1105/tpc.109.066670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Dobritzsch M., Lübken T., Eschen-Lippold L., Gorzolka K., Blum E., Matern A., Marillonnet S., Böttcher C., Dräger B., and Rosahl S. (2016) MATE transporter-dependent export of hydroxycinnamic acid amides. Plant Cell 28, 583–596 10.1105/tpc.15.00706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Böttcher C., Chapman A., Fellermeier F., Choudhary M., Scheel D., and Glawischnig E. (2014) The biosynthetic pathway of indole-3-carbaldehyde and indole-3-carboxylic acid derivatives in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 165, 841–853 10.1104/pp.114.235630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Rajniak J., Barco B., Clay N. K., and Sattely E. S. (2015) A new cyanogenic metabolite in Arabidopsis required for inducible pathogen defence. Nature 525, 376–379 10.1038/nature14907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Nafisi M., Goregaoker S., Botanga C. J., Glawischnig E., Olsen C. E., Halkier B. A., and Glazebrook J. (2007) Arabidopsis cytochrome P450 monooxygenase 71A13 catalyzes the conversion of indole-3-acetaldoxime in camalexin synthesis. Plant Cell 19, 2039–2052 10.1105/tpc.107.051383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kühnlenz T., Westphal L., Schmidt H., Scheel D., and Clemens S. (2015) Expression of Caenorhabditis elegans PCS in the AtPCS1-deficient Arabidopsis thaliana cad1-3 mutant separates the metal tolerance and non-host resistance functions of phytochelatin synthases. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 2239–2247 10.1111/pce.12534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Howden R., Goldsbrough P. B., Andersen C. R., and Cobbett C. S. (1995) Cadmium-sensitive, cad1 mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana are phytochelatin deficient. Plant Physiol. 107, 1059–1066 10.1104/pp.107.4.1059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ruzicka K., Strader L. C., Bailly A., Yang H., Blakeslee J., Langowski L., Nejedlá E., Fujita H., Itoh H., Syono K., Hejátko J., Gray W. M., Martinoia E., Geisler M., Bartel B., et al. (2010) Arabidopsis PIS1 encodes the ABCG37 transporter of auxinic compounds including the auxin precursor indole-3-butyric acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 10749–10753 10.1073/pnas.1005878107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kim D. Y., Bovet L., Maeshima M., Martinoia E., and Lee Y. (2007) The ABC transporter AtPDR8 is a cadmium extrusion pump conferring heavy metal resistance. Plant J. 50, 207–218 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03044.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Strader L. C., and Bartel B. (2009) The Arabidopsis PLEIOTROPIC DRUG RESISTANCE8/ABCG36 ATP binding cassette transporter modulates sensitivity to the auxin precursor indole-3-butyric acid. Plant Cell 21, 1992–2007 10.1105/tpc.109.065821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Si-Ammour A., Mauch-Mani B., and Mauch F. (2003) Quantification of induced resistance against Phytophthora species expressing GFP as a vital marker: β-aminobutyric acid but not BTH protects potato and Arabidopsis from infection. Mol. Plant Pathol. 4, 237–248 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00168.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Eschen-Lippold L., Draeger T., Teichert A., Wessjohann L., Westermann B., Rosahl S., and Arnold N. (2009) Anti-oomycete activity of γ-oxocrotonate fatty acids against P. infestans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57, 9607–9612 10.1021/jf902067k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Knight M. R., Campbell A. K., Smith S. M., and Trewavas A. J. (1991) Transgenic plant aequorin reports the effects of touch and cold-shock and elicitors on cytoplasmic calcium. Nature 352, 524–526 10.1038/352524a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ranf S., Eschen-Lippold L., Pecher P., Lee J., and Scheel D. (2011) Interplay between calcium signalling and early signalling elements during defence responses to microbe- or damage-associated molecular patterns. Plant J. 68, 100–113 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04671.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Beck A., Lendzian K., Oven M., Christmann A., and Grill E. (2003) Phytochelatin synthase catalyzes key step in turnover of glutathione conjugates. Phytochemistry 62, 423–431 10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00565-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Blum R., Beck A., Korte A., Stengel A., Letzel T., Lendzian K., and Grill E. (2007) Function of phytochelatin synthase in catabolism of glutathione-conjugates. Plant J. 49, 740–749 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02993.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Clemens S., Schroeder J. I., and Degenkolb T. (2001) Caenorhabditis elegans expresses a functional phytochelatin synthase. Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 3640–3643 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.02293.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Lallemand B., Erhardt M., Heitz T., and Legrand M. (2013) Sporopollenin biosynthetic enzymes interact and constitute a metabolon localized to the endoplasmic reticulum of tapetum cells. Plant Physiol. 162, 616–625 10.1104/pp.112.213124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Dastmalchi M., Bernards M. A., and Dhaubhadel S. (2016) Twin anchors of the soybean isoflavonoid metabolon: evidence for tethering of the complex to the endoplasmic reticulum by IFS and C4H. Plant J. 85, 689–706 10.1111/tpj.13137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Nielsen K. A., Tattersall D. B., Jones P. R., and Møller B. L. (2008) Metabolon formation in dhurrin biosynthesis. Phytochemistry 69, 88–98 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.06.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Laursen T., Borch J., Knudsen C., Bavishi K., Torta F., Martens H. J., Silvestro D., Hatzakis N. S., Wenk M. R., Dafforn T. R., Olsen C. E., Motawia M. S., Hamberger B., Møller B. L., and Bassard J. E. (2016) Characterization of a dynamic metabolon producing the defense compound dhurrin in sorghum. Science 354, 890–893 10.1126/science.aag2347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Sweetlove L. J., and Fernie A. R. (2013) The spatial organization of metabolism within the plant cell. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 723–746 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Luna E., Pastor V., Robert J., Flors V., Mauch-Mani B., and Ton J. (2011) Callose deposition: a multifaceted plant defense response. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 24, 183–193 10.1094/MPMI-07-10-0149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Waldmann T., Jeblick W., and Kauss H. (1988) Induced net Ca2+ uptake and callose biosynthesis in suspension-cultured plant cells. Planta 173, 88–95 10.1007/BF00394492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Cerutti A., Jauneau A., Auriac M. C., Lauber E., Martinez Y., Chiarenza S., Leonhardt N., Berthomé R., and Noël L. D. (2017) Immunity at cauliflower hydathodes controls systemic infection by Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris. Plant Physiol. 174, 700–716 10.1104/pp.16.01852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kobae Y., Sekino T., Yoshioka H., Nakagawa T., Martinoia E., and Maeshima M. (2006) Loss of AtPDR8, a plasma membrane ABC transporter of Arabidopsis thaliana, causes hypersensitive cell death upon pathogen infection. Plant Cell Physiol. 47, 309–318 10.1093/pcp/pcj001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Beck M., Wyrsch I., Strutt J., Wimalasekera R., Webb A., Boller T., and Robatzek S. (2014) Expression patterns of flagellin sensing 2 map to bacterial entry sites in plant shoots and roots. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 6487–6498 10.1093/jxb/eru366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Xin X. F., Nomura K., Underwood W., and He S. Y. (2013) Induction and suppression of PEN3 focal accumulation during Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 infection of Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 26, 861–867 10.1094/MPMI-11-12-0262-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Kronbak R., Duus F., and Vang O. (2010) Effect of 4-methoxyindole-3-carbinol on the proliferation of colon cancer cells in vitro, when treated alone or in combination with indole-3-carbinol. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 8453–8459 10.1021/jf101806t [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Ruangyuttikarn W., Skiles G. L., and Yost G. S. (1992) Identification of a cysteinyl adduct of oxidized 3-methylindole from goat lung and human liver microsomal proteins. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 5, 713–719 10.1021/tx00029a019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Henrichs S., Wang B., Fukao Y., Zhu J., Charrier L., Bailly A., Oehring S. C., Linnert M., Weiwad M., Endler A., Nanni P., Pollmann S., Mancuso S., Schulz A., and Geisler M. (2012) Regulation of ABCB1/PGP1-catalysed auxin transport by linker phosphorylation. EMBO J. 31, 2965–2980 10.1038/emboj.2012.120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Prost I., Dhondt S., Rothe G., Vicente J., Rodriguez M. J., Kift N., Carbonne F., Griffiths G., Esquerré-Tugayé M. T., Rosahl S., Castresana C., Hamberg M., and Fournier J. (2005) Evaluation of the antimicrobial activities of plant oxylipins supports their involvement in defense against pathogens. Plant Physiol. 139, 1902–1913 10.1104/pp.105.066274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Adam L., and Somerville S. C. (1996) Genetic characterization of five powdery mildew disease resistance loci in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 9, 341–356 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.09030341.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., Frise E., Kaynig V., Longair M., Pietzsch T., Preibisch S., Rueden C., Saalfeld S., Schmid B., Tinevez J. Y., White D. J., Hartenstein V., Eliceiri K., Tomancak P., and Cardona A. (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Albert I., Böhm H., Albert M., Feiler C. E., Imkampe J., Wallmeroth N., Brancato C., Raaymakers T. M., Oome S., Zhang H., Krol E., Grefen C., Gust A. A., Chai J., Hedrich R., Van den Ackerveken G., and Nürnberger T. (2015) An RLP23-SOBIR1-BAK1 complex mediates NLP-triggered immunity. Nat. Plants 1, 15140 10.1038/nplants.2015.140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Sumner L. W., Amberg A., Barrett D., Beale M. H., Beger R., Daykin C. A., Fan T. W., Fiehn O., Goodacre R., Griffin J. L., Hankemeier T., Hardy N., Harnly J., Higashi R., Kopka J., et al. (2007) Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis. Metabolomics 3, 211–221 10.1007/s11306-007-0082-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Smith C. A., Want E. J., O'Maille G., Abagyan R., and Siuzdak G. (2006) XCMS: processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching and identification. Anal. Chem. 78, 779–787 10.1021/ac051437y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.