Skip to main content
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity logoLink to Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity
. 2019 Apr 26;12:545–552. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S180597

Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes: optimizing care with a multidisciplinary approach

Freddy Frost 1,, Paula Dyce 2, Alicja Ochota 3, Sejal Pandya 3, Thomas Clarke 3, Martin J Walshaw 1, Dilip S Nazareth 1
PMCID: PMC6499442  PMID: 31118718

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) is a common complication of cystic fibrosis and can be present in over 50% of adults with the disease. CFRD is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, including accelerated pulmonary function decline and excess morbidity. The management of CFRD is complex and differs from that of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus such that clinicians responsible for the care of people with CFRD must work closely with colleagues across a number of different specialities and disciplines. This review aims to discuss why a multi-disciplinary approach is important and how it can be harnessed to optimize the care of people with CFRD.

Keywords: insulin, cystic fibrosis, hyperglycemia, nursing, diagnostics, teamwork

Introduction

Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) is a common complication of cystic fibrosis (CF), first recognized in 1955 when Shwachman described glucose handling abnormalities in a young child with CF.1 Despite not being associated with some of the classic macrovascular complications of type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 (T2DM) diabetes, CFRD causes excess morbidity and mortality in people with CF and hence presents unique challenges for clinicians, patients and families alike.24 Given the complexities of CFRD, a multi-disciplinary team approach is paramount to optimize outcomes. This review highlights the unique nature of the disease and the need for a multi-disciplinary approach to optimize care and outcomes in people with CF.

Epidemiology

Life expectancy in people with CF has improved by over 40 years since the first report of CFRD.1 With improving survival comes an array of comorbidities as a result of the prolonged disease process. CFRD is one such complication that already affects over one-third of all adults with CF in the UK and since prevalence increases with age, half of those over 40 years of age have the diagnosis.5,6 Guidelines now recommend screening from 10 years of age and as such, diagnosis in the 10–16 age-groups has increased by 25%.69 In addition to age, risk factors for CFRD include female sex, pancreatic insufficiency and Class I–II mutations,10,11 with female sex and poor lung function identified as predictors of poorer outcomes in CFRD.3,12

Pathophysiology and clinical implications

People with CFRD die from progressive respiratory failure rather than the macrovascular complications seen in T1DM and T2DM. In the 1980s, Finkelstein et al reported significantly reduced survival in CFRD and also observed deterioration in clinical status for up to 24 months prior to the diagnosis of CFRD being made.13 It is now well recognized that CFRD is associated with accelerated pulmonary function decline and subsequent excess morbidity and mortality.3,4,1418

Accelerated pulmonary function decline is thought to be related to a combination of metabolic and mechanical changes leading to the introduction of the term “diabetic pulmonopathy”.19,20 The precise mechanisms underlying diabetic pulmonopathy remain incompletely understood but are likely multi-factorial. Firstly, diabetes is known to be associated with increased infection and non-CF subjects with impaired glucose handling at diabetic thresholds have been shown to have higher morbidity and mortality from pulmonary infection than those with normal blood glucose levels.2123 In normal health, glucose in the airway surface liquid (ASL) is tightly regulated at extremely low levels24 but in disease airway glucose rises: increased ASL levels occur in both diabetes and chronic lung disease,24,25 and this is also true in CF where those with CFRD have higher ASL glucose than their non-diabetic comparators.26 Increased ASL glucose may provide an additional substrate for bacteria and increase bacterial growth and/or infection.2730 Most workers have used exhaled breath condensate to estimate ASL but the only study to date measuring sputum glucose directly in people with CF found the highest levels in subjects with normal glucose tolerance and the lowest in CFRD.17 This may be explained by increased glucose consumption by florid bacteria in the lungs of people with CFRD or by differences in glucose kinetics in their mucus-filled lungs, however regardless it confirms that the dynamics of airway glucose control in CF are more complex than previously thought.31

Hyperglycemia causes reduced lung interstitium elasticity such that the lungs become stiffer and harder to inflate resulting in a decrease in FEV1 and FVC: furthermore thickening of the alveolar epithelium and the pulmonary capillary basal lamina results in diminished diffusion across the alveolar/capillary membrane. These changes culminate in a greater rate of age-related decline in lung function32,33 in those with diabetes. Additionally, changes similar to those in the diabetic kidney, although less marked34 also occur in the arterioles and capillaries of the lung. It seems likely that these changes, taken together, all contribute to diabetic pulmonopathy in CF.

Screening and diagnosis

The diagnosis of CFRD can be difficult to detect biochemically and clinically. The classical symptoms of “polyuria, polydipsia and poor weight gain” seen in conventional diabetes occur in only one-third of patients with CFRD35 and subsequently, relying on symptoms to make the diagnosis would fail to recognize the vast majority of CFRD. Routine annual screening is therefore advocated from the age of 10 years by both the American Diabetic Association and National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the UK.8,36 A lack of identifiable endocrine support has previously been identified as a barrier to optimizing screening programmes,37 and a combined collaborative approach to screening involving respiratory and endocrine teams has previously been found to improve screening rates.38 Hence close cooperation and communication between respiratory and diabetic teams is required to facilitate effective screening programmes so that CFRD can be diagnosed at the earliest opportunity.

In addition to annual screening, unexplained lung function decline, weight loss or increased exacerbation rate may all trigger CF MDTs to look for CFRD in more detail. Screening is also particularly important in people with CF who have received solid organ transplantation as posttransplant diabetes mellitus is common and can be independently associated with increased infections and mortality.39

Several screening tests have been proposed for CFRD: 50 g glucose challenge test, 75 g OGTT, 60 minute glucose level, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, serial capillary blood glucose monitoring or any combination of the above.40However, in the UK the recent NICE guidelines suggest OGTT or CGM as the preferred screening methods, where if OGTT is used the diagnosis is confirmed with CGM.8

Management

Principles of an MDT approach

Effective CFRD management relies on the coordination of many specialist CF health care professionals, including the doctor, diabetologist, nurses, physiotherapists, psychologists, pharmacists and dieticians. Prevention of cross infection, a cornerstone of CF care, makes the management of CFRD by the conventional approach unfeasible. For example, unsegregated communal clinics and group educational sessions are not appropriate in CFRD due to the risk of cross infection. Services must therefore be tailored in a more individualized bespoke manner. As a consequence, many CF centers have now developed dedicated joint-care clinics for diabetes, or even in-house CFRD specialist nurses. The CF annual review; a comprehensive, individualized assessment of each patient’s health and treatment regimens, includes either a screen for CFRD or, in those already diagnosed, a thorough assessment of glycaemic control, treatment adherence and complications.

The principles of management of CFRD also differ from that of T1DM and T2DM. Treatment of T1 and T2DM is tailored toward the prevention of vascular complications and although microvascular complications are reported in CFRD, they occur late and are less frequent than in other forms of diabetes.41 Instead, the management of CFRD aims to stabilize and improve lung function and nutritional status.

Pharmacological treatment of CFRD

Insulin deficiency is the primary defect of CFRD and insulin treatment is associated not only with improved nutritional status and lung function4245 but also reduced pulmonary exacerbations, a key determinant of morbidity and mortality in people with CF.46 Hence all guidelines agree that insulin replacement is the only recommended therapy.7,8,40

Although the benefits of insulin are well established, there remains uncertainty as to when treatment should be initiated. Conventional diabetic thresholds on OGTT and HbA1c are validated for the long-term outcomes of people with T1 and T2DM. In CF, the deleterious clinical effects associated with CFRD often manifest themselves before dysglycaemia reaches conventional thresholds for diabetes and hence earlier intervention has been advocated by some guidelines, particularly where early dysglycaemia is seen concurrently with nutritional and/or pulmonary decline.47 A handful of small studies have explored this strategy and although positive results were reported by some, a systematic review found the overall evidence base remains poor.48 Large prospective studies are underway and will provide more evidence in the coming years (“CF-IDEA Trial” clinicaltrials.gov: CT01100892 and “The Impact of Insulin Therapy on Protein Turnover in Pre-Diabetic Cystic Fibrosis Patients” clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02496780).

Commonly used insulin regimes include a long-acting insulin monotherapy regime or a bolus-only regime using rapid-acting insulin at mealtimes. Basal-bolus regimes can be reserved for those with fasting hyperglycemia, a relatively late sequel.49 There is little evidence to support one regime over another, and treatment should instead be tailored to the individual’s needs, taking their dysglycaemia into account but also considering treatment burden, lifestyle and psychological factors. Given the anabolic effects of insulin, insulin doses should be uptitrated to the maximum dose safely tolerated by each patient.

The role of the CF diabetes specialist nurse

Education and training of the person with CFRD is important for successful management and is best provided by the specialist CF nurse who has an understanding of all aspects of the CF disease state, including that related to diabetes. The nurse specialist plays a pivotal role in any disciplinary team, acting not only as a first point of access but also by coordinating the input provided by other members of the CFRD MDT. Liaison with multidisciplinary teams both external and internal is important and part of the nurse’s role is to ensure that all stakeholders are aware of the differences and requirements of a patient with CFRD. Such advocacy includes providing support outside the hospital setting, for example visits within the community when required.

More recently, advanced nurse practitioner roles in CFRD have been developed and include non-medical prescribing, instigation and titration of insulin, and nurse-led CFRD clinics and ward rounds. As part of this, ongoing monitoring of those with CFRD through the use of CGM has been developed, and a tripartite approach in conjunction with the CF dietician and person with CF to devise a plan of care based on CGM feedback seems likely to become gold standard. Although there is little evidence for or against different care models for people with CFRD, lessons from other forms of diabetes suggest involving the person with CFRD in the MDT approach helps develop a more realistic and achievable CFRD care plan.50,51

The advent of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) may help people with CFRD better manage their diabetes. Whilst no trials of FGM in CFRD have been performed, the demographics of people with CF and experience managing chronic conditions mean many are likely suitable candidates for FGM. FGM can be used as a short-term “troubleshooting” strategy or as a longer term tool for improved overall glycaemic control.52 While FGM enables self-management, liaison with the diabetic nurse over the practicalities of access and initiation of the technology is needed and, similarly to other forms of diabetes, revised education for patients/caregivers is often needed.53 The ability for sharing of measurements for remote review gives the potentials for health care- professionals to reassure, advise or intervene in a more timely and patient-centered manner.

Nutritional recommendations – the CF specialist dietician

Individually tailored dietetic advice based on an understanding of CFRD and also its interaction with other CF-related complications is essential to help meet the nutritional needs of the person with CF whilst optimizing blood glucose control. However, there are no randomized controlled trials dictating best practice for the dietary management of people with CFRD, including the use of a low glycaemic index diet which is currently under review.54,55 As such, recommendations for CFRD are based predominantly on observational data and clinical consensus guidelines.7,8,40,56

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency is present in nearly all people with CFRD and pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) is a cornerstone of treatment. Specialist CF dietetic advice to adjust and optimize PERT is essential along with cooperation between nutrition and diabetic teams particularly in the formulation of enteral feeding, where unique insulin regimes are sometimes required.

Since insulin deficiency in CFRD potentiates the catabolic state, dietary recommendations differ significantly from those of T1 and T2DM (Table 1), and increased calorific intake is necessary to meet the metabolic demands associated with CF. Type of carbohydrate intake is also important in CFRD57 demanding detailed education around the main foods groups. Complete restriction of simple sugars is often not appropriate due to the calorific requirements needed for people with CF to remain nutritionally replete. Dietary advice is therefore carefully structured to ensure calorific needs are met, alongside guidance for macronutrients.

Table 1.

Comparison of dietary recommendation between CFRD and other types of diabetes. Adapted from ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines 201840

Type 1 and type 2 Diabetes CFRD
Calories ≤100% of normal calorific intake for age and gender. Often have to watch or restrict calories to prevent overweight Require >120% of normal calorific intake for age and gender to prevent underweight
Fat <35% of total energy 40% of total energy
Total carbohydrate 40–60% total energy 45–50% total energy
Fibre Encouraged Encouraged in nutritionally replete individuals, but in poorly nourished patients it may compromise energy intake
Protein 10–20% of total energy; not > g per kg body weight 200% of reference nutrient intake
Salt Low intake, <6 g/day Increased requirement

Ongoing management of CFRD and nutritional status requires regular follow-up and assessment. Serial glucose monitoring, by conventional methods or modern “flash” monitoring, can be used in conjunction with food and activity diaries to identify how specific foods or circumstances, such as stress, illness, medications and time of day, affect individuals glycaemic control. This approach can empower individuals with CFRD to tailor their treatment according to lifestyle such that outcomes are optimized whilst disruption to life is minimized.

Role of the CF pharmacist

CF is a multisystem disease with a large treatment burden and adherence can be problematic, further complicated in those with CFRD. The specialist CF pharmacist plays a pivotal role in the MDT in regard to medicines management and supporting adherence.58,59 Minimizing treatment burden is key to improving adherence and pharmacists are well placed to identify barriers to improving adherence in diabetes.60,61 The pharmacist also plays a role in vigilance and monitoring of drug–drug interactions. Whilst insulin is a relatively inert medication, other medications commonly used in CF can impact glycaemic control, eg, corticosteroids and fluoroquinolones.62

Role of CF physiotherapist

CFRD is associated with increased bacterial colonization as well as increased pulmonary exacerbation rate and optimization of chest clearance is therefore vital.63,64 Physiotherapists and exercise physiologists also play a role in collaborating with patients to provide individualized exercise programmes. The International Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Diabetes advise that people with CFRD should do at least 150 mins of moderate aerobic exercise a week.49

Screening for complications

Whilst macrovascular complications of CFRD are rare, microvascular complications are more common: neuropathy has been reported in up to 50% of people with CFRD, retinopathy in approximately 40% of those diagnosed with CFRD for >10 years and CFRD is associated with a fourfold increase in chronic kidney disease.41,65 Annual screening for microvascular complications is therefore recommended although attendance rates for screening schemes eg, annual retinopathy screening remain poor.66 Complications of CFRD are likely to increase in parallel with overall increased survival and robust screening programmes must therefore be integrated within the CF MDT.

Psychological

CFRD carries a considerable treatment burden, and requires patients to adapt their lifestyles to accommodate new and potentially daunting treatment regimes. It is of note that CFRD diagnoses typically occur between 18 and 21 years of age,67 thereby occurring in parallel to a number of other life transitional and developmental stages, all of which pose their own challenges and the potential to exacerbate any CFRD-specific psychosocial stressors as they navigate these new life experiences.

It is logical that a diagnosis of CFRD could have repercussions for patients’ mental health; indeed meta-analyses of the prevalence of psychological distress in type 1 and 2 diabetes suggest that rates of comorbid depression and anxiety are notably higher.68,69 In CF, psychological distress (anxiety and depression) is already elevated across child, adolescent and adult populations.70 A number of psychosocial stressors are shared between type 1 and 2 diabetes with CFRD, eg, adjustment to disease, dietary management, body image, needle anxiety, etc.. It seems reasonable, therefore, to expect psychological distress is higher for those with a diagnosis of CFRD.

Psychological interventions, such as cognitive behavioral, psychodynamic and systemic therapies, have been suggested to be effective across the wider diabetic literature in terms of improving glycaemic control whilst simultaneously reducing distress.71,72 However, they have yet to be specifically explored within the CFRD population and any intervention must take into consideration the multifactorial nature of managing such a complex chronic life-limiting disease.

Future perspectives

The CF horizon is dominated by CFTR modulators, but how these treatments will impact on CFRD is unclear. There is some evidence from small studies that insulin secretion improves with the use of ivacaftor, a CFTR corrector, yet similar effects have not been observed for the ivacaftor/lumacaftor combination licensed for people with the more common F508D mutation.7375 Excitingly, an observational post-marketing follow-up study of ivacaftor use in the UK and the US found an approximately 30% reduced relative risk for CFRD in those using ivacaftor compared to matched controls, although it is not known whether this was a result of reduced incidence of new CFRD diagnoses or improvement in glucose handling in those with a previously diagnosed.76

As life expectancy increases in CF, macrovascular complications may become more prevalent. To date, macrovascular complications related to atherosclerotic disease are exceedingly rare in CF, with only one case, to our knowledge, in the literature.77 In a future setting where CFTR modulators may improve survival, nutrition and pulmonary status, CF MDTs may need to reconfigure dietary advice to mitigate cardiovascular complications.

Although insulin is currently the mainstay of treatment for CFRD, a recent clinical trial of oral repaglinide reported similar efficacy and safety as subcutaneous insulin78 and the use of non-insulin therapies warrants further exploration in the coming years. Incretin axis-targeted therapies are now routinely used in the treatment of T2DM and interest in their use is growing in CF. Concerns that some agents may be associated with weight loss and/or pancreatitis have led to initial caution, however some of these fears have been assuaged.79 Incretin axis abnormalities have been reported in people with CF and investigation of incretin-targeted therapies are therefore warranted.8082

Summary

CF is a complex multi-system disease, and CFRD remains one of its most important comorbidities with deleterious nutritional and pulmonary outcomes if left untreated. Optimal management of CFRD relies on timely diagnosis, insulin initiation and vigilance for diabetic complications. Achieving best care relies on a coordinated, proactive approach from many different health care professionals across a number of specialities. Importantly, the MDT must include the patient themselves and treatment must be tailored to the individual in order to minimize treatment burden, maximize adherence and improve long-term outcomes.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Shwachman H, Leubner H, Catzel P. Mucoviscidosis. Adv Pediatr. 1955;7:249–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gatti A, Maranghi M, Bacci S, et al. Poor glycemic control is an independent risk factor for low HDL cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(8):1550–1552. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tong C, England P, de Crespigny PC, Millar R, Conn J. Diabetes mellitus as the only manifestation of occult phaeochromocytoma prior to acute haemorrhage in pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;45(1):91–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00344.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Milla CE, Warwick WJ, Moran A. Trends in pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis correlate with the degree of glucose intolerance at baseline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(3 Pt 1):891–895. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.3.9904075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Moran A, Dunitz J, Nathan B, Saeed A, Holme B, Thomas W. Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes: current trends in prevalence, incidence, and mortality. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(9):1626–1631. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.UK Cystic Fibrosis Registry Annual Data Report 2017. Cystic Fibrosis Trust; August 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moran A, Brunzell C, Cohen RC, et al. Clinical care guidelines for cystic fibrosis-related diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and a clinical practice guideline of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, endorsed by the pediatric endocrine society. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(12):2697–2708. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.NICE. Cystic fibrosis: diagnosis and management (NICE guidance NG78). Cystic fibrosis related diabetes: Section 1. 7.232017.
  • 9.Annual data report 2013. UK Cystic Fibrosis Registry; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Marshall BC, Butler SM, Stoddard M, Moran AM, Liou TG, Morgan WJ. Epidemiology of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes. J Pediatr. 2005;146(5):681–687. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.12.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Adler AI, Shine BS, Chamnan P, Haworth CS, Bilton D. Genetic determinants and epidemiology of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes: results from a British cohort of children and adults. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(9):1789–1794. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kolouskova S, Zemkova D, Bartosova J, et al. Low-dose insulin therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis and early-stage insulinopenia prevents deterioration of lung function: a 3-year prospective study. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2011;24(7–8):449–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Finkelstein SM, Wielinski CL, Elliott GR, et al. Diabetes mellitus associated with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 1988;112(3):373–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Goswami R, Kochupillai N, Gupta N, Kukreja A, Lan M, Maclaren NK. Islet cell autoimmunity in youth onset diabetes mellitus in Northern India. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2001;53(1):47–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rosenecker J, Hofler R, Steinkamp G, et al. Diabetes mellitus in patients with cystic fibrosis: the impact of diabetes mellitus on pulmonary function and clinical outcome. Eur J Med Res. 2001;6(8):345–350. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hameed S, Morton JR, Jaffe A, et al. Early glucose abnormalities in cystic fibrosis are preceded by poor weight gain. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(2):221–226. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Van Sambeek L, Cowley ES, Newman DK, Kato R, Kostikas K. Sputum glucose and glycemic control in cystic fibrosis-related diabetes: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Andersen HU, Lanng S, Pressler T, Laugesen CS, Mathiesen ER. Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes: the presence of microvascular diabetes complications. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(12):2660–2663. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Waugh N, Royle P, Craigie I, et al. Screening for cystic fibrosis-related diabetes: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(24):iii-iv, 1–179. doi: 10.3310/hta16240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kumar S, Gupta A, Sameja PI, Gupta S. Study of correlation between diabetic pulmonopathy with serum adiponectin levels in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Assoc Physicians India. 2018;66:31–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Koziel H, Koziel MJ. Pulmonary complications of diabetes mellitus. Pneumonia. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1995;9(1):65–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kornum JB, Thomsen RW, Riis A, Lervang HH, Schonheyder HC, Sorensen HT. Diabetes, glycemic control, and risk of hospitalization with pneumonia: a population-based case-control study. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(8):1541–1545. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ardigo D, Valtuena S, Zavaroni I, Baroni MC, Delsignore R. Pulmonary complications in diabetes mellitus: the role of glycemic control. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy. 2004;3(4):455–458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Baker EH, Clark N, Brennan AL, et al. Hyperglycemia and cystic fibrosis alter respiratory fluid glucose concentrations estimated by breath condensate analysis. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007;102(5):1969–1975. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01425.2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gill SK, Hui K, Farne H, et al. Increased airway glucose increases airway bacterial load in hyperglycaemia. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27636. doi: 10.1038/srep27636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brennan AL, Gyi KM, Clark N, et al. Detection of increased glucose concentrations in lower airway secretions from people with cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 2005;60(Suppl 2):93.15681492 [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Baker EH, Wood DM, Brennan AL, Clark N, Baines DL, Philips BJ. Hyperglycaemia and pulmonary infection. Proc Nutr Soc. 2006;65(3):227–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Garnett JP, Baker EH, Naik S, et al. Metformin reduces airway glucose permeability and hyperglycaemia-induced staphylococcus aureus load independently of effects on blood glucose. Thorax. 2013;68(9):835–845. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-203178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mallia P, Webber J, Gill SK, et al. Role of airway glucose in bacterial infections in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(3):815–823.e816. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.10.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Brennan AL, Gyi KM, Wood DM, et al. Airway glucose concentrations and effect on growth of respiratory pathogens in cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2007;6(2):101–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2006.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Saumon G, Martet G, Loiseau P. Glucose transport and equilibrium across alveolar-airway barrier of rat. Am J Physiol. 1996;270(2 Pt 1):L183–190. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1996.270.2.L183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schuyler MR, Niewoehner DE, Inkley SR, Kohn R. Abnormal lung elasticity in juvenile diabetes mellitus. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1976;113(1):37–41. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1976.113.1.37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pitocco D, Fuso L, Conte EG, et al. The diabetic lung–a new target organ? Rev Diabet Stud. 2012;9(1):23–35. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2012.9.23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Black C, Cummins E, Royle P, Philip S, Waugh N. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of inhaled insulin in diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(33):1–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lanng S, Hansen A, Thorsteinsson B, Nerup J, Koch C. Glucose tolerance in patients with cystic fibrosis: five year prospective study. BMJ. 1995;311(7006):655–659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Moran A, Hardin D, Rodman D, et al. Diagnosis, screening and management of cystic fibrosis related diabetes mellitus: a consensus conference report. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1999;45(1):61–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liou TG, Jensen JL, Allen SE, et al. Improving performance in the detection and management of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes in the mountain west cystic fibrosis consortium. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016;4(1):e000183. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rayas MS, Willey-Courand DB, Lynch JL, Guajardo JR. Improved screening for cystic fibrosis-related diabetes by an integrated care team using an algorithm. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014;49(10):971–977. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shivaswamy V, Boerner B, Larsen J. Post-transplant diabetes mellitus: causes, treatment, and impact on outcomes. Endocr Rev. 2016;37(1):37–61. doi: 10.1210/er.2015-1084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Moran A, Pillay K, Becker D, Granados A, Hameed S, Acerini CL. ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines 2018: management of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19(Suppl 27):64–74. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Schwarzenberg SJ, Thomas W, Olsen TW, et al. Microvascular complications in cystic fibrosis-related diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(5):1056–1061. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Moran A, Pekow P, Grover P, et al; Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes Therapy Study Group. Insulin therapy to improve BMI in cystic fibrosis-related diabetes without fasting hyperglycaemia: results of the cystic fibrosis related diabetes therapy trial. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1783-1788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Frost F, Dyce P, Nazareth D, Malone V, Walshaw MJ. Continuous glucose monitoring guided insulin therapy is associated with improved clinical outcomes in cystic fibrosis-related diabetes. J Cyst Fibros. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2018.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hameed S, Morton JR, Field PI, et al. Once daily insulin detemir in cystic fibrosis with insulin deficiency. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(5):464–467. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.204636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mohan K, Israel KL, Miller H, Grainger R, Ledson MJ, Walshaw MJ. Long-term effect of insulin treatment in cystic fibrosis-related diabetes. Respiration. 2008;76(2):181–186. doi: 10.1159/000110206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Franzese A, Spagnuolo MI, Sepe A, Valerio G, Mozzillo E, Raia V. Can glargine reduce the number of lung infections in patients with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes? Diabetes Care. 2005;28(9):2333. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.9.2333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Littlewood JBD, Bridges N. Management of Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes Mellitus. London: Cystic Fibrosis Trust; June 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pu MZ, Christensen-Adad FC, Goncalves AC, Minicucci WJ, Ribeiro JD, Ribeiro AF. Insulin therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis in the pre-diabetes stage: a systematic review. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2016;34(3):367–373. doi: 10.1016/j.rpped.2015.12.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Moran A, Pillay K, Becker DJ, Acerini CL. International society for P, adolescent D. ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines 2014. Management of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2014;15(Suppl 20):65–76. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Titchener J. A patient-centred clinical approach to diabetes care assists long-term reduction in HbA1c. J Prim Health Care. 2014;6(3):195–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Williams JS, Walker RJ, Smalls BL, Hill R, Egede LE. Patient-centered care, glycemic control, diabetes self-care, and quality of life in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;18(10):644–649. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Palylyk-Colwell E, Ford C. Flash glucose monitoring system for diabetes In: Issues in Emerging Health Technologies . Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Healt; 2016: 1–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hansen EA, Klee P, Dirlewanger M, et al. Accuracy, satisfaction and usability of a flash glucose monitoring system among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes attending a summer camp. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19(7):1276–1284. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Birch L, Lithander FE, Hewer SL, Harriman K, Hamilton-Shield J, Perry R. Dietary interventions for managing glucose abnormalities in cystic fibrosis: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0757-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Balzer BW, Graham CL, Craig ME, et al. Low glycaemic index dietary interventions in youth with cystic fibrosis: a systematic review and discussion of the clinical implications. Nutrients. 2012;4(4):286–296. doi: 10.3390/nu4040286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gregg EW, Inzucchi SE, Molitch ME, et al. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2015: summary of revisions. Diabetes. Care. 2015. 38 (Suppl.1):S4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yen J, Lai KK. Emerging Financial Derivatives: Understanding Exotic Options and Structured Products. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zobell JT, Schwab E, Collingridge DS, Ball C, Nohavec R, Asfour F. Impact of pharmacy services on cystic fibrosis medication adherence. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52(8):1006–1012. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zobell JT, Collingridge DS, Asfour F. Impact of pharmacy services on cystic fibrosis medication adherence: update. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2018;53(6):694–695. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gatwood JD, Chisholm-Burns M, Davis R, et al. Impact of pharmacy services on initial clinical outcomes and medication adherence among veterans with uncontrolled diabetes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):855. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3665-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Erku DA, Ayele AA, Mekuria AB, Belachew SA, Hailemeskel B, Tegegn HG. The impact of pharmacist-led medication therapy management on medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled study. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2017;15(3):1026. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2017.03.1026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rehman A, Setter SM, Vue MH. Drug-induced glucose alterations part 2: drug-induced hyperglycemia. Diabetes Spectr. 2011;24(4):234. doi: 10.2337/diaspect.24.4.234 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lehoux Dubois C, Boudreau V, Tremblay F, et al. Association between glucose intolerance and bacterial colonisation in an adult population with cystic fibrosis, emergence of stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J Cyst Fibros. 2017;16(3):418–424. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2017.01.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Limoli DH, Yang J, Khansaheb MK, et al. Staphylococcus aureus and pseudomonas aeruginosa co-infection is associated with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes and poor clinical outcomes. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35(6):947–953. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2621-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Quon BS, Mayer-Hamblett N, Aitken ML, Smyth AR, Goss CH. Risk factors for chronic kidney disease in adults with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(10):1147–1152. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201105-0932OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Roberts R, Speight L, Lee J, et al. Retinal screening of patients with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes in Wales – a real eye opener. J Cyst Fibros. 2015;14(2):282–284. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2014.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Moran A, Doherty L, Wang X, Thomas W. Abnormal glucose metabolism in cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 1998;133(1):10–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, Clouse RE, Lustman PJ. The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(6):1069–1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Smith KJ, Beland M, Clyde M, et al. Association of diabetes with anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2013;74(2):89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Barker AF, O‘Donnell AE, Flume P, et al. Aztreonam for inhalation solution in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (AIR-BX1 and AIR-BX2): two randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(9):738–749. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70165-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ismail K, Winkley K, Rabe-Hesketh S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2004;363(9421):1589–1597. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16202-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Winkley K, Ismail K, Landau S, Eisler I. Psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2006;333(7558):65. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38874.652569.55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Thomassen JC, Mueller MI, Alejandre Alcazar MA, Rietschel E, van Koningsbruggen-Rietschel S. Effect of lumacaftor/ivacaftor on glucose metabolism and insulin secretion in Phe508del homozygous cystic fibrosis patients. J Cyst Fibros. 2018;17(2):271–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2017.11.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bellin MD, Laguna T, Leschyshyn J, et al. Insulin secretion improves in cystic fibrosis following ivacaftor correction of CFTR: a small pilot study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2013;14(6):417–421. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kelly A, De Leon DD, Sheikh S, et al. Islet hormone and incretin secretion in cystic fibrosis following 4-months of ivacaftor therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;199(3):342–351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Bessonova L, Volkova N, Higgins M, et al. Data from the US and UK cystic fibrosis registries support disease modification by CFTR modulation with ivacaftor. Thorax. 2018. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hussain N, Hussain F, Malik A, Rizvi M, Patel P, Chittivelu S. A devastating cardiovascular event in an adult cystic fibrosis patient: an unforeseen outcome of increasing life expectancy. Respir Med Case Rep. 2018;25:233–234. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2018.09.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ballmann M, Hubert D, Assael BM, et al. Repaglinide versus insulin for newly diagnosed diabetes in patients with cystic fibrosis: a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(2):114–121. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30400-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Li L, Shen J, Bala MM, et al. Incretin treatment and risk of pancreatitis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies. BMJ. 2014;348:g2366. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lanng S, Thorsteinsson B, Roder ME, et al. Pancreas and gut hormone responses to oral glucose and intravenous glucagon in cystic fibrosis patients with normal, impaired, and diabetic glucose tolerance. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1993;128(3):207–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Ratkiewicz M, Pastore M, McCoy KS, Thompson R, Hayes D Jr., Sheikh SI. Role of CFTR mutation analysis in the diagnostic algorithm for cystic fibrosis. World J Pediatr. 2017;13(2):129–135. doi: 10.1007/s12519-017-0015-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ross SA, Morrison D, McArthur RG. Hypersecretion of gastric inhibitory polypeptide in nondiabetic children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatrics. 1981;67(2):252–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES