Abstract
Androgenetic alopecia is the most common form of hair loss in males. It is a multifactorial condition involving genetic predisposition and hormonal changes. The role of microflora during hair loss remains to be understood. We therefore analyzed the microbiome of hair follicles from hair loss patients and the healthy. Hair follicles were extracted from occipital and vertex region of hair loss patients and healthy volunteers and further dissected into middle and lower compartments. The microbiome was then characterized by 16S rRNA sequencing. Distinct microbial population were found in the middle and lower compartment of hair follicles. Middle hair compartment was predominated by Burkholderia spp. and less diverse; while higher bacterial diversity was observed in the lower hair portion. Occipital and vertex hair follicles did not show significant differences. In hair loss patients, miniaturized vertex hair houses elevated Propionibacterium acnes in the middle and lower compartments while non-miniaturized hair of other regions were comparable to the healthy. Increased abundance of P. acnes in miniaturized hair follicles could be associated to elevated immune response gene expression in the hair follicle.
Introduction
Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) features progressive miniaturization of scalp hair, forming a distinct patterned baldness in males [1]. It is the most common form of hair loss in men and is caused by genetic predisposition with elevated androgen activity. Blood-circulating testosterone is metabolized into a more potent form, dihydrotestosterone which acts on the dermal papilla of the hair, inhibiting the duration of hair growth. Hair miniaturization is often accompanied with destruction of the erector muscle and sebaceous gland hyperplasia [2], resulting in an oily surface and often scalp inflammation in form of seborrheic dermatitis [3]. Concomitantly, presence of lymphocyte infiltration, activated T cells in the balding scalp and degranulation of follicular mast cells suggests micro-inflammation or immune response as a cause or consequence of the hair miniaturization process [4, 5]. Micro-inflammation has been speculated to be caused by UV radiation, microbial presence, IL-6 and androgen signaling activity [6].
Human skin and hair play host to a vast diversity of microorganisms and the establishment of an equilibrium is crucial for health and disease state of skin and hair. Microbiome on human skin surface has been extensively studied as reviewed previously [7, 8]; while less work has covered those in the dermis and hair follicle [9, 10]. By culturing bacterial colonies, it was found that hair follicles house 25% of cutaneous microbial population [11]. Sequencing studies revealed existence of microorganisms down to within the dermis, while hair follicles and eccrine glands house distinct compartmentalized microbial communities. Therefore there is much potential in studying the hair microbiome including the hair structures.
The skin microbiome comprises of commensal microbes and opportunistic pathogens, constantly interacting with the host, eliciting and evading host immune responses. Involvement of microbial activity in skin and hair disorders have been shown in a few instances. Staphylococcus aureus is commonly found in skin lesions [12], and its over-representation has been implicated in atopic dermatitis, chronic diabetic wounds and psoriasis [13–15]. Fungal invasion in the hair follicle bulge results in irreversible hair loss and scarring for example in Tinea Capitis. Presence of yeasts, such as Malassezia species is associated with increased hair shedding [16], dandruff formation [17] and as well one of the causes for aggravation of atopic dermatitis (as reviewed in [18]). Prevalence of Propionibacterium acnes is associated with the pathogenesis of acnes vulgaris [19], and has been reported in cases of hair casts and alopecia [20]. The role of microorganisms in AGA remains unknown. We report the first study characterizing microbiome in the middle and lower hair compartment in healthy and AGA patients to understand the possible link with AGA progression.
Results
Follicular biopsy structures from patient and controls
Using 16S shotgun sequencing, we determined the microbiome in the middle and lower portions of occipital and vertex hair follicles from 20 patients and 10 controls. Healthy hair samples were harvested from occipital and vertex regions of healthy volunteers and in non-balding occipital area of patients by 1mm punches (Fig 1A). Samples taken from patients’ balding vertex regions displayed signs of “miniaturization”, with an altered morphology of a shortened and thinned hair shaft measuring less than 3cm in length (Fig 1B and S1 Fig) [21]. Therefore hair follicles shorter than 3.2cm were classified as miniaturized in this study. Dissection of a follicular unit was performed to obtain microbiome from the lower, middle and upper follicular portions. In non-miniaturized samples, the lower portion contains the hair bulb and small amounts of surrounding subcutaneous and dermal tissues; while miniaturized samples yielded greater biomass including surrounding tissues of blood vessels, nerve endings and sweat glands due to the biopsy sampling method. The middle portion biopsies contained the hair bulge, adipose tissues and connective tissues of the dermis (Fig 1C–1F).
Microbiome profile from sampling population
Skin microbiome can vary significantly in different body sites within an individual and across individuals [10, 22]. Using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity analysis, we found relatively low level of dissimilarity in the microbial profile inter and intra-individually, implicating low variation within our patient and control groups, and across hair follicles in the occipital and vertex regions (Fig 2A). Using Shannon’s and Simpson’s indices, alpha diversity was significantly greater in samples from the lower portion than samples from the middle portion (p < 0.005; Fig 2B). Analyses for phylogenetic distances with unweighted Unifrac revealed unique and separate clusters between follicular samples from the lower and middle portions, suggesting distinct microbial populations in the two (Fig 2C).
To observe for microbiota differences in patient and control hair, we performed PCoA on the middle and lower portion samples respectively. In samples from the middle portion, a majority of non-miniaturized samples formed a tight, distinct cluster from miniaturized samples (Fig 2D), indicating a consistent and uniformed colonization in the middle follicular portion regardless of its vertex or occipital origin. Samples from the lower portion display a higher degree of variation between patients and healthy controls, while miniaturized samples consistently clustered independently from non-miniaturized samples (Fig 2E), indicating differences between their respective microbial communities (Fig 2D and 2E). Consistently, classifying samples according to their origin showed close clustering of control occipital, vertex with patient occipital samples while a number of patient vertex samples as outliers (S2A Fig). However, classification by patient age and AGA severity yielded no distinct clustering pattern (S2B and S2C Fig).
Members of the microbial community in middle, lower and miniaturized samples were similar. However, relative abundances of each member, and their respective colonization genera, differed between each group and individual (Fig 3, S1 Table). Middle portion of non-miniaturized patients and controls were predominantly colonized by Burkholderia spp. (68.1–87.9%) (Fig 3A, Table 1A) Within the Burkholderia genera, B. contaminans (GenBank ID: CP013390.1) and B. cepacia (GenBank ID: AB211225.1) were the main species identified, along with B. cenocepacia, B. kururiensis and they were mutually exclusive in each hair follicle, and we did not find obvious correlation with AGA severity, region or hair follicle compartment for the distribution of different species (S2 Table). A more diverse microbiome resides in the lower portion with predominant genera Brevibacterium (34.5–41.0%), Methylobacterium komagatae (20.7–25.5%), Sphingomonas (3.5–6.6%) (Fig 3B, Table 1B).
Table 1. Representative bacterial genera abundance in middle and lower sample portions from patients and controls.
A | ||||
Middle portion | CO | CV | PO | PV |
g:Burkholderia | 82.49% | 87.89% | 79.26% | 68.08% |
s:Propionibacterium_acnes | 4.59% | 2.80% | 11.29% | 18.89% |
g:Brevibacterium | 3.70% | 3.56% | 2.35% | 2.44% |
f:Burkholderiaceae | 1.43% | 0.98% | 1.60% | 1.65% |
k:Bacteria | 1.37% | 0.82% | 0.62% | 0.34% |
g:Corynebacterium | 1.32% | 0.35% | 0.88% | 0.17% |
g:Pseudomonas | 0.95% | 0.36% | 0.03% | 0.31% |
o:Burkholderiales | 0.76% | 0.08% | 0.34% | 0.79% |
g:Brachybacterium | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.26% | 0.24% |
g:Dietzia | 0.33% | 0.32% | 0.20% | 0.25% |
B | ||||
Middle portion | CO | CV | PO | PV |
g:Burkholderia | 82.49% | 87.89% | 79.26% | 68.08% |
s:Propionibacterium_acnes | 4.59% | 2.80% | 11.29% | 18.89% |
g:Brevibacterium | 3.70% | 3.56% | 2.35% | 2.44% |
f:Burkholderiaceae | 1.43% | 0.98% | 1.60% | 1.65% |
k:Bacteria | 1.37% | 0.82% | 0.62% | 0.34% |
g:Corynebacterium | 1.32% | 0.35% | 0.88% | 0.17% |
g:Pseudomonas | 0.95% | 0.36% | 0.03% | 0.31% |
o:Burkholderiales | 0.76% | 0.08% | 0.34% | 0.79% |
g:Brachybacterium | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.26% | 0.24% |
g:Dietzia | 0.33% | 0.32% | 0.20% | 0.25% |
Relative abundance of highly prevalent genera in (A) middle and (B) lower portions from Control Occipital (CO), Control Vertex (CV), Patient Occipital (PO) and Patient Vertex (PV) regions. Values are presented as mean across samples. Taxonomic order is represented as f: family, g: genre and s: species.
The distinct balding pattern in AGA is formed by progressive follicular miniaturization and subsequent balding on the vertex, while hair follicles on the occipital region remains typical. To investigate the association of microbiota with phenotype, PERMANOVA pairwise comparisons were performed between the occipital and vertex regions on patients and controls (Table 2). Overall, relative abundances of various genera in patient vertex (PV) were significantly different from control occipital (CO) and control vertex (CV) samples in middle and lower portions (P-value < 0.05) (Table 2A). We repeated PERMANOVA with the miniaturized samples removed, which resulted in no significant difference in the comparisons (Table 2B), suggesting that the change in microbiota is mainly associated with hair miniaturization. Comparison between the microbiota in miniaturized and non-miniaturized patient vertex samples showed that, in the middle portion, P. acnes abundance was increased with decreased Burkholderia spp. abundance; while M. komagatae, Sphingomonadaceae and Brevibacterium were decreased in the lower portion (Table 3A and 3B, Figs 3 and 4). In addition, PO lower portion was significantly different from CO; we found that P. acnes abundance increased with significance while Brevibacterium abundance decreased (Table 3C, Figs 3 and 4).
Table 2. Pairwise comparisons for PERMANOVA between samples across different compartments, regions and AGA occurrence.
A | Miniaturized included | F.Model | R2 | p.value | ||
middle | patient vertex | vs | patient occipital | 1.654 | 0.051 | 0.191 |
patient vertex | vs | control vertex | 4.752 | 0.165 | 0.016* | |
patient vertex | vs | control occipital | 3.183 | 0.117 | 0.046* | |
patient occipital | vs | control occipital | 0.995 | 0.038 | 0.379 | |
patient occipital | vs | control vertex | 1.897 | 0.071 | 0.123 | |
control occipital | vs | control vertex | 1.212 | 0.063 | 0.262 | |
lower | patient vertex | vs | patient occipital | 1.749 | 0.074 | 0.126 |
patient vertex | vs | control vertex | 2.844 | 0.151 | 0.033* | |
patient vertex | vs | control occipital | 2.660 | 0.143 | 0.043* | |
patient occipital | vs | control occipital | 2.367 | 0.129 | 0.045* | |
patient occipital | vs | control vertex | 2.114 | 0.117 | 0.058 | |
control occipital | vs | control vertex | 0.825 | 0.076 | 0.563 | |
B | Miniaturized removed | F.Model | R2 | p.value | ||
middle | patient vertex | vs | patient occipital | 0.818 | 0.032 | 0.512 |
patient vertex | vs | control occipital | 0.699 | 0.035 | 0.668 | |
patient vertex | vs | control vertex | 1.513 | 0.074 | 0.147 | |
patient occipital | vs | control occipital | 2.162 | 0.083 | 0.112 | |
patient occipital | vs | control vertex | 0.863 | 0.035 | 0.443 | |
control occipital | vs | control vertex | 1.212 | 0.063 | 0.258 | |
lower | patient vertex | vs | patient occipital | 1.014 | 0.063 | 0.409 |
patient vertex | vs | control occipital | 1.660 | 0.156 | 0.116 | |
patient vertex | vs | control vertex | 1.250 | 0.122 | 0.296 | |
patient occipital | vs | control occipital | 2.367 | 0.129 | 0.06 | |
patient occipital | vs | control vertex | 2.114 | 0.117 | 0.039* | |
control occipital | vs | control vertex | 0.825 | 0.076 | 0.568 |
Pairwise comparisons between (A) Middle and lower portion of all CO, CV, PO and PV samples. (B) Middle and lower portion PV samples versus other samples with miniaturized samples removed. P-value < 0.05 is significant.
Table 3. Representative comparisons for bacteria abundance between middle portion hair samples.
A | |||||
mini vs non-mini (mid) | mini | non-mini | mini (stdev) | non-mini (stdev) | t-test |
s:Propionibacterium_acnes | 43.30% | 7.79% | 14.99% | 16.75% | 0.001* |
g:Propionibacterium | 0.47% | 0.08% | 0.29% | 0.17% | 0.004* |
g:Burkholderia | 49.26% | 76.64% | 13.48% | 19.51% | 0.014* |
f:Propionibacteriaceae | 0.92% | 0.29% | 0.56% | 0.51% | 0.042* |
B | |||||
mini vs non-mini (low) | mini | non-mini | mini (stdev) | non-mini (stdev) | t-test |
s:Bifidobacterium_breve | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.015* |
s:Methylobacterium_komagatae | 18.67% | 23.59% | 1.22% | 1.03% | 0.015* |
s:Propionibacterium_acnes | 18.08% | 3.74% | 4.22% | 0.70% | 0.018* |
f:Sphingomonadaceae | 5.77% | 10.09% | 1.41% | 1.51% | 0.067 |
g:Brevibacterium | 31.79% | 38.30% | 3.39% | 0.99% | 0.148 |
C | |||||
CO vs PO (low) | CO | PO | CO (stdev) | PO (stdev) | t-test |
s:Propionibacterium_acnes | 2.96% | 6.38% | 3.40% | 1.84% | 0.013* |
g:Cellulomonas | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.01% | 0.014* |
g:Brevibacterium | 41.01% | 37.18% | 3.21% | 3.11% | 0.027* |
f:Rhizobiaceae | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.01% | 0.032* |
o:Sphingomonadales | 0.49% | 0.10% | 0.58% | 0.11% | 0.036* |
f:Brevibacteriaceae | 0.34% | 0.87% | 0.08% | 0.60% | 0.049* |
Taxonomic order represented as f: family, g: genre and s: species. Bacteria abundance comparisons between miniaturized and non-miniaturized in (A) middle portion and (B) lower portion. (C) Comparisons between lower portion PO and CO. Data presented as mean and standard deviation across samples, P-value < 0.05 is significant.
It has been reported that P. acnes and residential microflora of the hair and skin can elicit innate immune responses through toll like receptor 2 (TLR2) and up-regulation of anti-microbial peptides including β-defensin (DEFB1) [23, 24]. Through RNA sequencing of lower portion subset samples, several genes in antigen presentation and Th-1, Th-2 inflammatory pathways were found to be elevated in miniaturized hair follicles [25, 26]. Hence, we analyzed transcriptomic expression for genes involved in microbial response, the expression level of genes involved in responses to microbes such as Toll Like Receptor-2 (TLR2), DEFB1, Interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1), monocyte marker CD14, and Langerhans cell marker CD1a/CD207 were increased in miniaturized compared to non-miniaturized hair follicles [27–29] (Fig 5). These changes suggest that elevated immune responses and immune cell infiltration corresponded with increased P. acnes abundance.
Discussion
Microbial community on the skin surface has been well characterized while less is understood about the hair follicle micro-environment. In literature, microbiota from plucked hair samples or entire hair follicles from skin sections has been analyzed [9, 10]. These studies provide an insight regarding the follicular microbiota profile in an Asian male cohort in Singapore (n = 30). Concordant with the literature, a diverse microbial community and formation of bacterial biofilms can be detected in the dermis and dermal sections of the hair follicle [10, 30]. Bacterial abundance in the middle portion may be due to the close proximity to the skin surface with rich microflora. Higher bacterial diversity in the lower portion is unexpected but may play a more important role in hair pathogenesis due to the dense vascular network around the hair papilla and therefore more potential interactions with the host immune system. It may implicate a complex interaction with the host immune response. Interestingly, unlike previous reports, we did not observe significant inter-individual variation of microbiota in our study [10, 31]. We also report a slightly different bacterial population from other studies, such differences may originate from the method of sample collection; for the hair follicle is extracted under sterile conditions with a biopsy punch of the hair follicle with adjacent tissue (blood vessels, nerve fibers, connective tissue and sebaceous glands) while others utilized laser-capture microscopy or plucked hair.
Multiple steps from sample collection to result analysis are integral in studies of the skin microbiome [32]. During sample collection, patient scalps have undergone disinfection prior to follicular unit extraction, thereby removing potential contamination by bacteria on the skin surface. Additionally, the choice of primer may influence sequencing results. The difference in the representation of Propionibacterium and Staphylococcus with primers targeting the hypervariable V1-V3 region and the V3-V4 region has been reported [33]. Other studies have suggested that the V3-V4 region can accurately represent the skin microbiome [34, 35]. We employed primers amplifying the V3-V6 regions on the 16S rRNA to improve taxonomic resolution with longer amplicons and expect biases toward specific genera to be minimal [36]. The impact of reagent contamination on microbiome analysis has been noted to distort the distributions and frequencies of identified bacterial species [33, 37]. To address this issue, we included template free controls in the sequencing analysis. It yielded read counts less than the cutoff for subsequent analysis, thus ensuring the quality of study outcomes.
Concordant with studies using scalp and plucked hair samples, members from the Burkholderia genera were found to be highly abundant in follicular samples from the middle portion [9, 10]. Burkholderia cepacia and Burkholderia contaminans have been isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis and pneumonia, however, it was not known to be associated with skin-related disorders [38, 39]. Dominant species on the skin surface such as Propionibacterium, Corynebacterium and Staphylococcus occurred in this study at a low frequency, which may reflect a preference for inhabiting the skin surface over deeper layers within the skin. The skin microbiome has demonstrated topographic variability by skin physiology of sampling sites including moisture, temperature and pH; while remaining relatively stable over time [31, 40–42]. The occipital and vertex scalp may present different skin micro-environment to the microbiome as they originate from different embryonic developmental plates and are exposed to varying degrees of solar irradiation. AGA patients typically feature a patterned baldness whereby lower hair density, hair thinning and yellow dots depicting enlarged sebaceous glands in response to androgen are evident in the vertex scalp area [43, 44]. Despite the changes, the microbiome in AGA patients did not differ significantly between different sites on the scalp; nor was it significantly unique according to individual age and AGA severity. Rather, distinct microbial profiles from miniaturized hair samples were observed in this study. The data suggests that changes specific to hair miniaturization can cause disruptions to the microbiome. In addition, the lower portions of non-miniaturized samples contain clean hair bulbs while miniaturized samples would include surrounding tissues including sweat glands and blood vessels which may house significantly different microbial populations. However, increased abundance of P. acnes could be observed in the middle portion of miniaturized and non-miniaturized samples where they shared similar histology with sebaceous glands and adipose tissues. Further study has to be performed to investigate specific changes in miniaturized hair associated with P. acnes abundance.
It has long been speculated that P. acnes is involved in AGA pathogenesis [6, 45, 46]. In our study we report for the first time such striking increase in abundance in miniaturized hair. P. acnes is a common opportunistic pathogen found on the skin surface, and is prevalent in the hair follicle and the associated pilosebaceous unit [47, 48]. P. acnes predominance is also identified in non-lesional scalp of patients with seborrheic dermatitis [49]; providing further support for the development in sebaceous gland hyperplasia in AGA may attract the proliferation of P. acnes; for lipids and fatty acids are its main nutrient sources [50]. Alternatively, as in the case of acnes vulgaris, another testosterone metabolism-related disease, altered sebum composition with an increase in peroxidized squalene has been suggested to result in P. acnes proliferation [51–53], and such changes may occur in AGA. P. acnes induces inflammatory responses and is known as one of the causative factors for acnes vulgaris. Virulence in the hair follicle is demonstrated to cause hair casts and hair loss as a consequence [20]. Additionally, it is interesting to note the increase in P. acnes abundance in occipital samples, suggesting the possibility that increased sebum on scalp environment may result in changes in the microbiome over the scalp. Additionally, phylogenetic analysis revealed that P. acnes comprises of four distinct lineages; each displaying differences in inducing inflammatory responses and virulence determinants [54, 55]. Further characterization to the strain level will be essential to decipher its role in AGA pathogenesis.
Evidence of micro-inflammation such as perifollicular inflammatory infiltration, prostaglandin and cytokine elevation have been observed in hair follicles of AGA patients and is suggested to cause hair miniaturization [6, 56, 57]. A combination of environmental factors including UV radiation, allergen exposure and porphyrin production have been considered to elicit inflammation [46, 58], whereby inflammatory factors are believed to hinder hair growth. Our data on the presence of P. acnes adds to the contributing factors for micro-inflammation in hair loss. Recent studies investigating microbiome-host immune interactions suggest that the microbiome induces inflammatory cytokine production in host gut and moderates T lymphocyte function in mouse skin [59, 60]. The presence of Langerhans cells also indicate induction of the innate immune response as they are majorly involved in antigen presentation. These evidence indicate that the microbiome may play a more important and complex role than previously imagined. Interestingly, reports of effective AGA treatments by anti-microbial solutions and Ketoconazole [61, 62] has been suggestive of the involvement of microorganisms in AGA besides its anti-androgen properties. In addition to the genetic causes of AGA, P. acnes may act as an environmental factor for AGA pathogenesis and presents a novel candidate in treating AGA. Future studies on the impact of changes in other bacterial species and the imbalance are equally important in deciphering the pathogenesis of AGA. Since hair follicles can be compartmentalized into the bulge, matrix and dermal papilla, it will be essential to visualize the distribution of hair follicle microbiome with higher clarity to the compartments. Further information will aid understanding the association between microbiome and hair conditions.
Conclusion
We reported distinct microbial population in the middle and lower portion of the hair follicle. Burkholderia genera predominates the middle portion while higher microbial diversity was observed in the lower portion. In AGA patients, miniaturized patient vertex hair houses elevated P. acnes while hair from other regions were comparable. This is the first study characterizing the microbiome in AGA and provides new insight into the condition.
Methods
Sample collection, DNA extraction and sequencing
Twenty AGA patients and 10 healthy volunteers were recruited in the study previously described [25]. Ethics approval and consent to participate were obtained through the National Healthcare Group Review Board (NHG-DSRB “2012/00488 Transcriptome and genome analysis of human scalp biopsies of androgenetic alopecia before and after topical laser treatment”). All methods were carried out in accordance with the approved protocol. After thorough local disinfection with 70% isopropanol, follicular unit extractions were performed in the vertex and occipital areas with a punch of 1.1mm diameter. The extracted follicular units were imaged using a dissection microscope (Zeiss) with mounted digital camera and then divided into 3 parts (hair papilla, middle piece with sebaceous gland and upper piece with ostium and epidermis) and immediately snap frozen in liquid nitrogen.
To assess any alterations of the microbiome population in the hair follicle, DNA was extracted from the lower (hair bulb) and middle (with sebaceous glands) piece of the follicular unit. Follicular unit sample were subjected to bead beating (MP Biomedicals) and gDNA extraction using AllPrep RNA/DNA extraction kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen). 16S rRNA PCR was performed on samples and duplicate template-free controls using primers spanning V3-V6 regions with PCR conditions described previously [36, 63]. DNA sequencing libraries were constructed with QIAseq FX DNA library kit (96) (Qiagen). DNA libraries were paired-end sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq Rapid (2x76bp). Following demultiplexing (using Illumina bcl2fastq 2.17.1.14 software) and removal of reads that failed Illumina’s purity filters (PF = 0), reads were converted to FASTQ. 16S rRNA sequencing of the samples yielded an average of 452,193 read counts, while 4 samples and template-free control libraries which yielded less than 50,000 read counts were subsequently discarded. Trimming of reads was done by removing trailing bases with quality score ≤ 2; read pairs with reads shorter than 60bp were also removed.
16S rRNA amplicon sequence reconstruction
To reconstruct 16S amplicon sequences, we utilized the processing methods described in Ong et al [18). Trimmed reads were input into EMIRGE (GIT version 98787b5). EMIRGE performs template-guided “assembly” based on a modified SILVA SSU (version 102) database, and utilises an expectation-maximization algorithm for iteration, alignment, and classification of reads to candidate 16S sequences [64]. Iterative mapping of paired-end reads also prevents chimeric sequences from mapping. This reconstruction methodology has been compared against RTAX and modQIIME, and was able to robustly produce highly concordant estimates of taxonomic OTU abundance [18].
We applied EMIRGE to the top (in terms of average quality) 500,000 reads in each sample; we had previously found this number to be robust enough to accurately reflect the 16S composition in each sample [18]. Sequences with relative abundance below 0.1% were removed. Finally, the reconstructed amplicon sequences were searched using BLAST against the Greengenes 16S rRNA database [65] BLAST hits were sorted in consecutive order, smallest E-value, highest bit score, highest percent identity, and longest alignment length; only the top hit after this sorting was used for classification. Percentage identities for phylum, family, and genus levels were 75%, 86.5%, and 94.5% respectively.
Abundance determination of microbial community
Abundance estimates were assigned to reconstructed sequences using EMIRGE, for generation of abundance profile of OTUs for each sample. A data matrix containing relative abundances, with each sample as a row and each genus as a column, was used to generate the relative abundance barplots and alpha diversity boxplots using the R software, version 3.4.0. The Principal Coordinate Analyses (PCoA) with Bray–Curtis distance was applied using the “vegan” package in R.
Sample processing and histology
Dissected follicular units were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Samples were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin for sectioning at 5μm thick. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed on hair sections and imaged by Zeiss AxioImager (Zeiss).
Supporting information
Abbreviations
- PV
Patient vertex
- PO
patient occipital
- CV
control vertex
- CO
control occipital
- AGA
Androgenetic alopecia
- PCoA
Principal Coordinate analysis
Data Availability
Data are available via European Nucleotide Archive with accession number PRJEB22473.
Funding Statement
The study is supported by Agency for Science, Technology and Research in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
References
- 1.Hamilton JB. Patterned loss of hair in man: Types and incidence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1951;53(3):708–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Torkamani N, Rufaut NW, Jones L, Sinclair R. Destruction of the arrector pili muscle and fat infiltration in androgenic alopecia. British Journal of Dermatology. 2014;170(6):1291–8. 10.1111/bjd.12921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kibar M, Aktan Ş, Bilgin M. Scalp dermatoscopic findings in androgenetic alopecia and their relations with disease severity. Annals of dermatology. 2014;26(4):478–84. 10.5021/ad.2014.26.4.478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lattanand A, Johnson WC. Male pattern alopecia a histopathologic and histochemical study. Journal of cutaneous pathology. 1975;2(2):58–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jaworsky C, Kligman AM, Murphy GF. Characterization of inflammatory infiltrates in male pattern alopecia: implications for pathogenesis. The British journal of dermatology. 1992;127(3):239–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mahé YF, Michelet JF, Billoni N, Jarrousse F, Buan B, Commo S, et al. Androgenetic alopecia and microinflammation. International journal of dermatology. 2000;39(8):576–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Grice EA, Segre JA. The skin microbiome. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2011;9(4):244 10.1038/nrmicro2537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kong HH. Skin microbiome: genomics-based insights into the diversity and role of skin microbes. Trends in Molecular Medicine. 2011;17(6):320–8. 10.1016/j.molmed.2011.01.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tridico SR, Murray DC, Addison J, Kirkbride KP, Bunce M. Metagenomic analyses of bacteria on human hairs: a qualitative assessment for applications in forensic science. Investigative genetics. 2014;5(1):16 10.1186/s13323-014-0016-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nakatsuji T, Chiang H-I, Jiang SB, Nagarajan H, Zengler K, Gallo RL. The microbiome extends to subepidermal compartments of normal skin. Nature communications. 2013;4:1431 10.1038/ncomms2441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lange-Asschenfeldt B, Marenbach D, Lang C, Patzelt A, Ulrich M, Maltusch A, et al. Distribution of bacteria in the epidermal layers and hair follicles of the human skin. Skin pharmacology and physiology. 2011;24(6):305–11. 10.1159/000328728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.LEYDEN JJ, MARPLES RR, KLIGMAN AM. Staphylococcus aureus in the lesions of atopic dermatitis. British Journal of Dermatology. 1974;90(5):525–. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kong HH, Oh J, Deming C, Conlan S, Grice EA, Beatson MA, et al. Temporal shifts in the skin microbiome associated with disease flares and treatment in children with atopic dermatitis. Genome research. 2012;22(5):850–9. 10.1101/gr.131029.111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gao Z, Tseng C-h, Strober BE, Pei Z, Blaser MJ. Substantial alterations of the cutaneous bacterial biota in psoriatic lesions. PloS one. 2008;3(7):e2719 10.1371/journal.pone.0002719 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Grice EA, Snitkin ES, Yockey LJ, Bermudez DM, Liechty KW, Segre JA, et al. Longitudinal shift in diabetic wound microbiota correlates with prolonged skin defense response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107(33):14799–804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nematian J, Ravaghi M, Gholamrezanezhad A, Nematian E. Increased hair shedding may be associated with the presence of Pityrosporum ovale. American journal of clinical dermatology. 2006;7(4):263–6. 10.2165/00128071-200607040-00008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gupta AK, Batra R, Bluhm R, Boekhout T, Dawson TL. Skin diseases associated with Malassezia species. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2004;51(5):785–98. 10.1016/j.jaad.2003.12.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Glatz M, Bosshard PP, Hoetzenecker W, Schmid-Grendelmeier P. The role of Malassezia spp. in atopic dermatitis. Journal of clinical medicine. 2015;4(6):1217–28. 10.3390/jcm4061217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Leyden JJ, McGinley KJ, Mills OH, Kligman AM. Propionibacterium levels in patients with and without acne vulgaris. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1975;65(4):382–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang E, Lee JS-S, Hee TH. Is Propionibacterium acnes associated with hair casts and alopecia? International journal of trichology. 2012;4(2):93 10.4103/0974-7753.96907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chew E, Ho BY, Ramasamy S, Dawson T, Tennakoon C, Liu X, et al. Comparative transcriptome profiling provides new insights into mechanisms of androgenetic alopecia progression. British Journal of Dermatology. 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Oh J, Byrd AL, Deming C, Conlan S, Program NCS, Kong HH, et al. Biogeography and individuality shape function in the human skin metagenome. Nature. 2014;514(7520):59–64. 10.1038/nature13786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chronnell CM, Ghali LR, Quinn AG, Bull JJ, McKay IA, Philpott MP, et al. Human β defensin-1 and-2 expression in human pilosebaceous units: upregulation in acne vulgaris lesions. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2001;117(5):1120–5. 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01569.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kim J, Ochoa M-T, Krutzik SR, Takeuchi O, Uematsu S, Legaspi AJ, et al. Activation of toll-like receptor 2 in acne triggers inflammatory cytokine responses. The Journal of Immunology. 2002;169(3):1535–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chew EG, Ho BS, Ramasamy S, Dawson T, Tennakoon C, Liu X, et al. Comparative transcriptome profiling provides new insights into mechanisms of androgenetic alopecia progression. The British journal of dermatology. 2017;176(1):265–9. 10.1111/bjd.14767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ho BS, Vaz C, Ramasamy S, Chew EG, Mohammed JS, Tanavde V, et al. Progressive expression of Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator gene (PPARGC1α) induce hair miniaturization in androgenetic alopecia Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (manuscript submitted). 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lai Y, Cogen AL, Radek KA, Park HJ, MacLeod DT, Leichtle A, et al. Activation of TLR2 by a small molecule produced by Staphylococcus epidermidis increases antimicrobial defense against bacterial skin infections. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2010;130(9):2211–21. 10.1038/jid.2010.123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nakatsuji T, Kao MC, Zhang L, Zouboulis CC, Gallo RL, Huang C-M. Sebum free fatty acids enhance the innate immune defense of human sebocytes by upregulating β-defensin-2 expression. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2010;130(4):985–94. 10.1038/jid.2009.384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ong PY, Leung DY. Bacterial and viral infections in atopic dermatitis: a comprehensive review. Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology. 2016;51(3):329–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Matard B, Meylheuc T, Briandet R, Casin I, Assouly P, Cavelier–balloy B, et al. First evidence of bacterial biofilms in the anaerobe part of scalp hair follicles: a pilot comparative study in folliculitis decalvans. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2013;27(7):853–60. 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04591.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Costello EK, Lauber CL, Hamady M, Fierer N, Gordon JI, Knight R. Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science. 2009;326(5960):1694–7. 10.1126/science.1177486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kong HH, Andersson B, Clavel T, Common JE, Jackson SA, Olson ND, et al. Performing skin microbiome research: a method to the madness. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2017;137(3):561–8. 10.1016/j.jid.2016.10.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Meisel JS, Hannigan GD, Tyldsley AS, SanMiguel AJ, Hodkinson BP, Zheng Q, et al. Skin Microbiome Surveys Are Strongly Influenced by Experimental Design. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2016;136(5):947–56. 10.1016/j.jid.2016.01.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Castelino M, Eyre S, Moat J, Fox G, Martin P, Ho P, et al. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform. BMC microbiology. 2017;17(1):23 10.1186/s12866-017-0927-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ross AA, Müller KM, Weese JS, Neufeld JD. Comprehensive skin microbiome analysis reveals the uniqueness of human skin and evidence for phylosymbiosis within the class Mammalia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ong SH, Kukkillaya VU, Wilm A, Lay C, Ho EXP, Low L, et al. Species identification and profiling of complex microbial communities using shotgun Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicon sequences. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60811 10.1371/journal.pone.0060811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Salter SJ, Cox MJ, Turek EM, Calus ST, Cookson WO, Moffatt MF, et al. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC biology. 2014;12(1):87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Martina P, Bettiol M, Vescina C, Montanaro P, Mannino MC, Prieto CI, et al. Genetic diversity of Burkholderia contaminans isolates from cystic fibrosis patients in Argentina. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2013;51(1):339–44. 10.1128/JCM.02500-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Govan JR, Deretic V. Microbial pathogenesis in cystic fibrosis: mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia. Microbiological reviews. 1996;60(3):539–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Grice EA, Kong HH, Renaud G, Young AC, Bouffard GG, Blakesley RW, et al. A diversity profile of the human skin microbiota. Genome research. 2008;18(7):1043–50. 10.1101/gr.075549.107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Oh J, Byrd AL, Park M, Kong HH, Segre JA, Program NCS. Temporal stability of the human skin microbiome. Cell. 2016;165(4):854–66. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Findley K, Oh J, Yang J, Conlan S, Deming C, Meyer JA, et al. Topographic diversity of fungal and bacterial communities in human skin. Nature. 2013;498(7454):367–70. 10.1038/nature12171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Han SS, Park YT, Yoo JH, Park TH, Kim KJ. Comparative evaluation of hair density and grouped hair unit pattern between androgenetic alopecia and normal scalp. Annals of Dermatology. 2004;16(1):1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Inui S, Nakajima T, Itami S. Scalp dermoscopy of androgenetic alopecia in Asian people. The Journal of dermatology. 2009;36(2):82–5. 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2009.00593.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Trüeb RM. Molecular mechanisms of androgenetic alopecia. Experimental gerontology. 2002;37(8):981–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Young JW, Conte E, Leavitt M, Nafz M, Schroeter A. Cutaneous immunopathology of androgenetic alopecia. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 1991;91(8):765–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Perry A, Lambert P. Propionibacterium acnes: infection beyond the skin. Expert review of anti-infective therapy. 2011;9(12):1149–56. 10.1586/eri.11.137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bojar RA, Holland KT. Acne and Propionibacterium acnes. Clinics in dermatology. 2004;22(5):375–9. 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2004.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tanaka A, Cho O, Saito C, Saito M, Tsuboi R, Sugita T. Comprehensive pyrosequencing analysis of the bacterial microbiota of the skin of patients with seborrheic dermatitis. Microbiology and immunology. 2016;60(8):521–6. 10.1111/1348-0421.12398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Holland K, Greenman J, Cunliffe W. Growth of cutaneous propionibacteria on synthetic medium; growth yields and exoenzyme production. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 1979;47(3):383–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kiraly CL, Alen M, Korvola J, Horsmanheimo M. The effect of testosterone and anabolic steroids on the skin surface lipids and the population of Propionibacteria acnes in young postpubertal men. Acta dermato-venereologica. 1988;68(1):21–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Saint-Leger D, Bague A, Lefebvre E, Cohen E, Chivot M. A possible role for squalene in the pathogenesis of acne. II. In vivo study of squalene oxides in skin surface and intra-comedonal lipids of acne patients. The British journal of dermatology. 1986;114(5):543–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ottaviani M, Alestas T, Flori E, Mastrofrancesco A, Zouboulis CC, Picardo M. Peroxidated squalene induces the production of inflammatory mediators in HaCaT keratinocytes: a possible role in acne vulgaris. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126(11):2430–7. 10.1038/sj.jid.5700434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.McDowell A, Barnard E, Nagy I, Gao A, Tomida S, Li H, et al. An expanded multilocus sequence typing scheme for Propionibacterium acnes: investigation of ‘pathogenic’,‘commensal’and antibiotic resistant strains. PloS one. 2012;7(7):e41480 10.1371/journal.pone.0041480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Fitz-Gibbon S, Tomida S, Chiu B-H, Nguyen L, Du C, Liu M, et al. Propionibacterium acnes Strain Populations in the Human Skin Microbiome Associated with Acne. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(9):2152–60. 10.1038/jid.2013.21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kwack MH, Ahn JS, Kim MK, Kim JC, Sung YK. Dihydrotestosterone-Inducible IL-6 Inhibits Elongation of Human Hair Shafts by Suppressing Matrix Cell Proliferation and Promotes Regression of Hair Follicles in Mice. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(1):43–9. 10.1038/jid.2011.274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Garza LA, Liu Y, Yang Z, Alagesan B, Lawson JA, Norberg SM, et al. Prostaglandin D2 Inhibits Hair Growth and Is Elevated in Bald Scalp of Men with Androgenetic Alopecia. Science Translational Medicine. 2012;4(126):126ra34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hruza LL, Pentland AP. Mechanisms of UV-induced inflammation. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1993;100(1):S35–S41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Schirmer M, Smeekens SP, Vlamakis H, Jaeger M, Oosting M, Franzosa EA, et al. Linking the human gut microbiome to inflammatory cytokine production capacity. Cell. 2016;167(4):1125–36. e8. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Naik S, Bouladoux N, Wilhelm C, Molloy MJ, Salcedo R, Kastenmuller W, et al. Compartmentalized control of skin immunity by resident commensals. Science. 2012;337(6098):1115–9. 10.1126/science.1225152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pierard-Franchimont C, De Doncker P, Cauwenbergh G, Pierard G. Ketoconazole shampoo: effect of long-term use in androgenic alopecia. Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland). 1998;196(4):474–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Piérard G, Pierard-Franchimont C, Nikkels-Tassoudji N, Nikkels A, Léger DS. Improvement in the inflammatory aspect of androgenetic alopecia. A pilot study with an antimicrobial lotion. Journal of dermatological treatment. 1996;7(3):153–7. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ho EXP, Cheung CMG, Sim S, Chu CW, Wilm A, Lin CB, et al. Human pharyngeal microbiota in age-related macular degeneration. PloS one. 2018;13(8):e0201768 10.1371/journal.pone.0201768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Miller CS, Baker BJ, Thomas BC, Singer SW, Banfield JF. EMIRGE: reconstruction of full-length ribosomal genes from microbial community short read sequencing data. Genome biology. 2011;12(5):R44 10.1186/gb-2011-12-5-r44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2006;72(7):5069–72. 10.1128/AEM.03006-05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data are available via European Nucleotide Archive with accession number PRJEB22473.