Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2019 Mar 6;212(1):75–91. doi: 10.1534/genetics.119.302047

Depletion of Limiting rDNA Structural Complexes Triggers Chromosomal Instability and Replicative Aging of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Ryan D Fine *, Nazif Maqani *, Mingguang Li *,, Elizabeth Franck *, Jeffrey S Smith *,1
PMCID: PMC6499517  PMID: 30842210

Abstract

Sir2 is a highly conserved NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase that functions in heterochromatin formation and promotes replicative life span (RLS) in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Within the yeast rDNA locus, Sir2 is required for efficient cohesin recruitment and maintaining the stability of the tandem array. In addition to the previously reported depletion of Sir2 in replicatively aged cells, we discovered that subunits of the Sir2-containing complexes silent information regulator (SIR) and regulator of nucleolar silencing and telophase (RENT) were depleted. Several other rDNA structural protein complexes also exhibited age-related depletion, most notably the cohesin complex. We hypothesized that mitotic chromosome instability (CIN) due to cohesin depletion could be a driver of replicative aging. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays of the residual cohesin (Mcd1-Myc) in moderately aged cells showed strong depletion from the rDNA and initial redistribution to the point centromeres, which was then lost in older cells. Despite the shift in cohesin distribution, sister chromatid cohesion was partially attenuated in aged cells and the frequency of chromosome loss was increased. This age-induced CIN was exacerbated in strains lacking Sir2 and its paralog, Hst1, but suppressed in strains that stabilize the rDNA array due to deletion of FOB1 or through caloric restriction. Furthermore, ectopic expression of MCD1 from a doxycycline-inducible promoter was sufficient to suppress rDNA instability in aged cells and to extend RLS. Taken together, we conclude that age-induced depletion of cohesin and multiple other nucleolar chromatin factors destabilize the rDNA locus, which then results in general CIN and aneuploidy that shortens RLS.

Keywords: Sir2, cohesin, Mcd1, RENT, monopolin, yeast, replicative life span, aging, rDNA


BUDDING yeast replicative life span (RLS) was originally described decades ago as the number of times a mother cell divides before losing viability (Mortimer and Johnston 1959), and has been an effective model system for the identification, and/or characterization, of several conserved aging-related genes and pathways, including SIR2, AMPK (Snf1), and TOR signaling (Wasko and Kaeberlein 2014). SIR2 is possibly the most famous yeast gene associated with replicative aging and encodes the founding family member of the NAD+-dependent histone/protein deacetylases, commonly known as sirtuins [reviewed in Buck et al. (2004)]. The NAD+-dependence of sirtuins provides a direct link between metabolism and cellular processes regulated by these enzymes. In fact, recent evidence points to depletion of cellular NAD+ pools as a potential mechanism for aging-associated disease, which could be mediated by impairment of sirtuins or other NAD+-consuming enzymes (Gomes et al. 2013). Therefore, understanding how sirtuins are impacted by aging and how they regulate age-altered cellular processes is of intense interest.

Eukaryotic genomes generally encode for several sirtuin homologs. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome, for example, encodes SIR2 and four additional Homologs of Sir Two (HST1HST4) (Brachmann et al. 1995; Derbyshire et al. 1996). Sir2 and its fellow silent information regulator (SIR) proteins–Sir1, Sir3, and Sir4–were originally shown to establish and maintain silencing of the silent mating loci HML and HMR (Rine and Herskowitz 1987). These proteins form the so-called SIR complex that is recruited to, and then spreads across, the HM loci and telomeres to form hypoacetylated heterochromatin-like domains [reviewed in Gartenberg and Smith (2016)]. Sir2 is required for replicative longevity and its abundance is significantly reduced in replicatively aged yeast cells (Dang et al. 2009), presenting a possible mechanism for the decline of Sir2-dependent processes during aging, including gene silencing. Indeed, the depletion of Sir2 in aged cells causes hyperacetylated H4K16 and silencing defects at subtelomeric loci (Dang et al. 2009). It has been reported that aged cells become sterile (mating-incompetent) due to loss of silencing at HML and HMR (Smeal et al. 1996), which results in coexpression of the normally repressed α1/α2 and a1/a2 transcription factor genes encoded at these loci. In theory, this should induce a diploid-like, or “pseudodiploid,” gene expression pattern and sterility, as is observed for a silencing-defective sir2∆ mutant (Rine and Herskowitz 1987). However, more recent experiments point toward a silencing-independent mechanism of sterility, whereby aggregation of the Whi3 protein in aged cells makes them insensitive to pheromones (Schlissel et al. 2017).

Alternative models for Sir2 control of RLS have focused on the rDNA tandem array where Sir2 is important for cohesin recruitment (Kobayashi et al. 2004; Ganley and Kobayashi 2014). Cohesin association with the rDNA also requires Tof2 and the Lrs4/Csm1 (cohibin) complex (Huang et al. 2006). Sir2 silences RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription at the rDNA locus via a nucleolar histone deacetylase complex called regulator of nucleolar silencing and telophase (RENT) (Bryk et al. 1997; Smith and Boeke 1997), consisting of Sir2, Net1, and Cdc14 subunits (Shou et al. 1999; Straight et al. 1999). Specifically, RENT represses the transcription of endogenous noncoding RNAs from the intergenic spacer (IGS) regions (Li et al. 2006). Derepression of the bidirectional promoter (E-pro) within IGS1 in sir2∆ cells displaces cohesin from the rDNA, thus destabilizing the array by making it more susceptible to unequal sister chromatid exchange (Kobayashi and Ganley 2005). Mild Sir2 overexpression, on the other hand, enhances silencing, suppresses recombination between repeats, and extends RLS (Smith et al. 1998; Kaeberlein et al. 1999).

Extrachromosomal rDNA circles (ERCs) derived from these unequal recombination events specifically accumulate to high levels in old mother cells (Sinclair and Guarente 1997), where they can interfere with G1 cyclin expression (Neurohr et al. 2018). Such an ERC-centric model is supported by RLS extension of fob1∆ strains (Defossez et al. 1999). Fob1 binds to the rDNA at IGS1 to block DNA replication forks from colliding with elongating RNA polymerase I molecules (Kobayashi and Horiuchi 1996). The blocked forks can collapse, resulting in DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that trigger unequal sister chromatid exchange (Takeuchi et al. 2003). The frequency of rDNA recombination and ERC production is reduced in a fob1∆ mutant due to loss of the fork block, thus extending RLS (Defossez et al. 1999). More recently, this rDNA-centric model of aging has been extended to include general rDNA instability having negative effects on genome integrity, including ERC accumulation, and is also considered a critical contributor to aging (Ganley and Kobayashi 2014).

In addition to promoting cohesin recruitment to the rDNA, Sir2 is also required to establish sister chromatid cohesion (SCC) at HML and HMR (Chang et al. 2005; Wu et al. 2011). Moreover, we previously observed significant overlap between Sir2 and cohesin at additional binding sites throughout the genome (Li et al. 2013). Outside heterochromatin, the cohesin loading complex (Scc2/Scc4) deposits cohesin (Mcd1, Irr1, Smc1, and Smc3) onto centromeres and other cohesion-associated regions (CARs) (Ciosk et al. 2000; Kogut et al. 2009) to maintain SCC until anaphase, when Mcd1 is cleaved by separase to facilitate sister chromatid separation [reviewed in Marston (2014)]. Cohesin defects therefore result in chromosome instability (CIN) due to improper chromosome segregation [reviewed in Wood et al. (2010)]. A previous study found that cells deleted for SIR2 have a CIN phenotype related to hyperacetylation of H4K16 (Choy et al. 2011), though the functional relationship to cohesin was not considered. Given the natural depletion of Sir2 from replicatively aging yeast cells (Dang et al. 2009), we hypothesized that the frequency of CIN should increase with age. Here, we establish that CIN is indeed more frequent in aged cells and is associated with SCC defects. We go on to show that, like Sir2, cohesin subunits are depleted from aged mother cells, providing a likely reason for problems with SCC. Interestingly, despite the overall reduction in cohesin protein levels, the chromosomal distribution of cohesin enrichment was not uniform. In moderately aged mother cells, enrichment at the rDNA was drastically reduced, while binding at centromeres was not, suggesting a mechanism by which SCC is preferentially maintained at centromeres to ensure cell viability. However, this comes at the expense of chronic rDNA instability, which is exacerbated by additional age-induced reductions in the RENT and cohibin/monopolin complexes. The defects in rDNA stability can be suppressed by overexpressing the Mcd1 subunit of cohesin, which also extends RLS, thus making cohesin a dose-dependent longevity factor. Lastly, the age-associated CIN phenotype is suppressed by deleting FOB1 or by caloric restriction (CR) growth conditions, suggesting a model whereby rDNA instability on chromosome XII caused by RENT, cohibin, and cohesin depletion drives the mitotic segregation defects of other chromosomes during replicative aging.

Materials and Methods

Yeast strains, plasmids, and media

Yeast strains were grown at 30° in yeast peptone dextrose (YPD) or synthetic complete (SC) medium for strains bearing plasmids (Matecic et al. 2010). SIR2, HST1, or FOB1 open reading frames were disrupted with one-step PCR-mediated gene replacement using kanMX4, natMX4, or hphMX4 drug-resistance markers, respectively. The HMR deletion made by replacement with hphMX4 spans sacCer3 genome chromosome III coordinates 293170–294330. All C-terminally 13xMyc (EQKLISEEDL)-tagged proteins were targeted at endogenous loci in the Mother Enrichment Program (MEP) strains UCC5181 and UCC5179 (Lindstrom and Gottschling 2009), followed by mating to generate homozygous diploids. All deletions and fusions were confirmed by colony PCR, western blotting, or both. pRF4 was constructed by PCR amplifying the MCD1 open reading frame from ML1 genomic DNA, and ligating into PstI and NotI sites of pCM252 (Bellí et al. 1998), a tetracycline-inducible overexpression vector (Euroscarf). pRF10 and pRF11 were constructed by removing the expression cassette by PvuII blunt-end digestion of pCM252 and pRF4, respectively, and ligating it between the PvuII sites of pRS405 bearing LEU2, thus replacing the TRP1 marker with LEU2. pRF10 and 11 were then digested with EcoRV and integrated into the genome at leu2Δ1. pJSB186 was constructed by ligating a XhoI and SpeI fragment from pSB766 containing SIR2 and its promoter into the MCS of pRS306 using the same enzymes (Buck et al. 2002). pJSB186 was then integrated into ura3-52 by digesting with BstBI. All strains used in this work are listed in Supplemental Material, Table S1 and all primers are listed in Table S2.

Isolation of aged yeast cells

Aged yeast cell enrichment was based on the MEP strain background (Lindstrom and Gottschling 2009; Lindstrom et al. 2011). For all assays, 1 μl of an overnight culture was inoculated into 100 ml of YPD medium and then grown into log phase. Approximately 1 × 108 cells were harvested, and centrifuged cell pellets washed three times with 1× phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Cells were then resuspended in 1 ml PBS and mixed with 5 mg of Sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotin (Pierce Chemical, Rockford, MA) per 1 × 108 cells for 30 min at room temperature. After biotin labeling, 5 × 107 cells were added to 1.5-liter YPD cultures, containing 1 μM estradiol and 100 μg/ml ampicillin to prevent bacterial contamination. These cultures were allowed to grow for 24–36 hr before processing in an assay-specific manner (see below). For non-MEP strain backgrounds, estradiol was not added to the cultures.

Western blotting

Two 1.5-liter cultures were used for each western blot experiment, corresponding to ∼2 × 107 total aged cells after purification for each biological replicate. Cells were pelleted using a Sorvall RC-5B Plus centrifuge with an SLA-3000 rotor at 2000 rpm, then resuspended at a density of 6 × 108 cells/ml in RNAlater (Ambion) for 45 min in two separate conical tubes. Following fixation, cells were pelleted and resuspended in 45 ml of cold PBS and 2 mM EDTA in 50 ml conical tubes. The mixture was incubated at 4° for 30 min with 800 μl of Streptavidin MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec), which were then purified through an autoMACS Pro Cell Separator using the posseld2 program (University of Virginia Flow Cytometry Core Facility). A 20-μl aliquot of each output was used for bud-scar counting using calcofluor white staining, before combining the isolated samples into a single microfuge tube. Samples were frozen at −80° before protein extraction. Thawed cells were vortexed twice for 1 min in 20% TCA (trichloroacetic acid) with ∼100 μl of acid-washed glass beads, with a brief cooling period in between vortexing. Beads were allowed to settle before transferring the supernatant to a fresh microfuge tube. A 250 μl wash of 5% TCA was applied twice to the beads and pooled with the initial lysis sample. Proteins were precipitated at 10,000 rpm in a microfuge for 5 min at 4°. Pellets were then resuspended in 50 μl of 1× SDS sample buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, and 0.7 M 2-mercaptoethanol) and neutralized with 30 μl of 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. Samples were run on a 9% (w/v) SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to an Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Membranes were incubated for 1 hr at room temperature in 1× TBST + 5% nonfat milk with primary antibodies 1:2000 α-Myc 9E10 or 1:5000 α-Vma2 (Life Technologies), 1:5000 α-Sir2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), 1:1000 α-Sir4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or 1:1000 α-Sir3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Promega, Madison, WI) were diluted 1:5000 and detected using chemiluminescence with HyGLO (Denville Scientific). Quantitation was performed with ImageJ by using the rectangle tool to outline protein bands and an equivalent-sized box for background. After subtraction of background, the signal of the aged cell band was divided by the signal of the Vma2 loading control, and finally normalized to the quantity of the Vma2-normalized young cell band, which was arbitrarily set at 1.0.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays with aged and young cell populations

Two 1.5-liter cultures were used for each biological replicate. After centrifugation, cells were washed with 1× PBS, then resuspended with 45 ml of PBS and incubated with 800 μl of streptavidin microbeads, followed by sorting with an autoMACS Pro Cell Separator. Sorted cells were immediately cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature, then transferred to screw cap microcentrifuge tubes and the pellets flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cells were thawed and lysed in 600 μl FA140 lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, 140 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, 0.1 mM PMSF, and 1× protease inhibitor cocktail; Sigma [Sigma Chemical], St. Louis, MO) by shaking with acid-washed glass beads in a Mini-Bead beater (Biospec Products). Cell lysates were recovered and sonicated for 30 cycles of 30 sec “on” and 30 sec “off” in a Diagenode Bioruptor, followed by centrifugation at 16,000 × g. A 1/10th supernatant volume input was taken for each sample and cross-linking reversed by incubating overnight at 65° in 150 μl elution buffer (TE and 1% SDS). The remaining supernatant was used for immunoprecipitation overnight at 4° with 5 μg of primary antibody and 30 μl of protein G magnetic beads (Pierce Chemical), followed by washing 1× with FA-140 buffer, 2× with FA-500 buffer (FA-140 with 500 mM NaCl), and 2× with LiCl solution (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 250 mM LiCl, 0.5% NP-40, 0.5% SDS, and 1 mM EDTA). DNA was eluted twice with 75 μl of elution buffer in a 65° water bath for 15 min. The eluates were combined and cross-linking reversed. Input and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) DNA samples were purified by an Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA) PureLink PCR purification kit. Finally, ChIP DNA was quantified by real-time PCR and normalized to the input DNA signal. Young cells were collected as flow-through from the autoMACS cell sorter and then processed as described for the aged cells.

SCC assay

From 50 ml log-phase SC cultures of strains 3349-1B, 3312-7A, 3460-2A, RF258, RF278, and RF290, 5 × 107 cells were washed and biotinylated as described in the Isolation of aged yeast cells section. This population was transferred into a 1.5-liter SC culture and allowed to grow for 14 hr. The original biotinylated cells were then purified by incubation with 300 μl of streptavidin micro beads followed by gravity filtration through a Miltenyi LS column. The column was washed twice with 5 ml of PBS and then processed as described below for young cells.

From the original log-phase culture, 5 × 107 cells were transferred to a fresh 50-ml SC culture and arrested in mitosis with 10 μg/ml nocodazole for 1.5 hr. For the mcd1-1 strain 3312-7A, cells were also shifted to 37° at this time. For bud-scar staining, 5 mg of calcofluor white was dissolved in 1 ml of PBS and any remaining aggregate removed by centrifugation. The 1 ml of soluble calcofluor was then added to the 50-ml SC culture. Nonarrested cells were directly stained with calcofluor. Cells were then pelleted and washed in PBS. Following staining, 200 μl of 4% paraformaldehyde was added directly to the cell pellet and allowed to cross-link for 15 min at room temperature. The cell pellet was washed once with PBS and resuspended in ∼100–200 μl of 0.1M KPO4/1 M sorbitol, pH 6.5. Images were captured with a Zeiss ([Carl Zeiss],Thornwood, NY) Axio Observer z1 wide-field microscope using a 64× oil objective lens.

Replicative life span assays

Life span assays were carried out as previously described (Steffen et al. 2009). Briefly, small aliquots of log-phase cultures were dripped in a straight line onto solid agar YPD with 2% glucose. From the initial populations, a minimum of 32 virgin daughter cells were picked for life span assays, with daughter cells being selectively pulled away from mother cells using a fiberoptic dissection needle and on a Nikon (Garden City, NY) Eclipse 400 microscope. All virgin daughters were required to bud at least once to be included in the experiment, and dissection was carried out over the course of several days with temporary incubation at 4° in between dissection periods to stop division. Cells were considered dead when they stopped dividing for a minimum of two generation times (180 min). For P-values indicated in the text, a Wilcoxon rank-sum test was conducted for respective life span assays using the basic wilcox.test function in R.

Mini-chromosome loss (sectoring) assay

The colony sectoring assay was performed on SC plates with adenine limited to 80 μM. Frequency of mini-chromosome loss represents the number of 1/2 red/white-sectored colonies divided by the sum of sectored and white colonies. Cells were plated to an approximate density of 500 cells/plate based on counts from a Brightline hemocytometer. Any plates bearing > 1000 cells were discarded. Three biological replicates of each strain were performed, with at least 10 plates counted per replicate. For aged cell populations, ∼5 × 106 biotinylated cells were aged in 1.5 liters of YPD for 24 hr. Cells were incubated with 300 μl of streptavidin magnetic beads [New England Biolabs (NEB), Beverly, MA] and manually washed four times with PBS on a magnetic stand, then plated onto the limiting adenine SC plates such that ∼500 colonies appeared. Bud scars were not counted because the size of the beads prohibited visualization.

RT-qPCR measurement of MCD1 overexpression

Doxycycline was added to log-phase cultures at a concentration of 2 μg/ml for 4 hr to induce expression of MCD1. Total RNA was extracted using a standard acid phenol extraction protocol (Ausubel et al. 2000). cDNA was created from 1 μg of RNA using a Verso cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher). MCD1 expression levels were quantified on an Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA) StepOne real time PCR machine with primers JS2844 and JS2949, and normalized to actin transcript levels (primers JS1146 and JS1147).

Hi-C library construction

Log-phase cultures were cross-linked with 3% formaldehyde for 20 min and quenched with a 2× volume of 2.5 M glycine. Cell pellets were washed with dH2O and stored at −80°. Thawed cells were resuspended in 5 ml of 1× NEB2 restriction enzyme buffer (NEB) and poured into a prechilled mortar containing liquid N2. Nitrogen grinding was performed twice as previously described (Belton and Dekker 2015), and the lysates were then diluted to an OD600 of 12 in 1× NEB2 buffer. Next, 500 µl of cell lysate were used for each Hi-C library as follows. Lysates were solubilized by the addition of 50 μl 1% SDS and incubation at 65° for 10 min. Then, 55 µl of 10% Triton X-100 were added to quench the SDS, followed by 10 μl of 10× NEB2 buffer and 15 μl of HindIII (20 U/µl; NEB) to digest at 37° for 2 hr. An additional 10 μl of HindIII was added for digestion overnight. The remainder of the protocol was based on previously published work with minor exceptions (Burton et al. 2014). In short, ends were filled in with dNTPs and biotinylated dCTP at 0.4 mM concentration using Klenow Exo- (NEB) for 1 hr at 37°. After brief heat inactivation, blunt ends were ligated together in 3-ml reaction volumes with T4 DNA ligase for 6 hr at 16° with a minimum DNA concentration of 0.5 ng/μl. Following ligation, cross-links were reversed at 70° overnight, and DNA was purified by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Unligated biotinylated ends were removed using T4 DNA polymerase (NEB). DNA was purified one final time with two Zymogen DNA Clean and Concentrate-5 kit columns per ligation reaction and eluted with 65 µl TE (130 μl in total). Chromatin was quantitated with a Qubit fluorometer and then sheared using a Diagenode Bioruptor. Hi-C sequencing libraries were prepared with reagents from an Illumina Nextera Mate Pair Kit (FC-132-1001) using the standard Illumina protocol of end repair, A-tailing, adapter ligation, and 12 cycles of PCR. PCR products were size-selected and purified with AMPure XP beads, before sequencing with an Illumina Miseq or Hiseq.

Hi-C data analysis

Iteratively corrected heatmaps appearing in this manuscript were produced using python scripts from the Mirny laboratory hiclib library, publicly available at: http://mirnylab.bitbucket.org/hiclib/index.html. Briefly, reads were mapped using the iterative mapping program and then run through the fragment filtering program using the default parameters. Raw heat maps were further filtered to remove diagonal reads and iteratively corrected. Finally, the iteratively corrected heatmaps were normalized for read-count differences to make them comparable. The cdc15-2 sample data were pulled from the Sequence Read Archive database at SRP094582 (Lazar-Stefanita et al. 2017) and our data are available from the Gene Expression Omnibus at GSE117037.

Data availability

Strains and plasmids are available upon request. Tables S1 and S2, containing lists of all strains and oligodeoxynucleotides used in the study, are included in the Supplemental Information file. Figures S1 through S7 are also included in the same file. Supplemental material available at https://doi.org/10.25386/genetics.7766783.

Results

Sir2-binding partners are depleted in aged yeast cells

Sir2 is a dosage-dependent longevity factor, such that strains with one extra SIR2 gene copy have an extended RLS (Kaeberlein et al. 1999). Mother cells experience a progressive reduction of Sir2 protein during normal replicative aging that presumably contributes to the aging process (Dang et al. 2009). Sir2 does not function in isolation, so we hypothesized that protein levels of key Sir2-interacting partners could also be depleted with age. To isolate sufficient quantities of aged cells for western blot assays, we turned to MEP strains developed by the Gottschling laboratory (Lindstrom and Gottschling 2009). The aged cell-purification procedure was validated by increased average bud-scar counts with calcofluor white and the expected reduction of Sir2 protein (Figure 1A). The vacuolar protein Vma2, used as a loading control for these western blots, does not deplete with age (Lindstrom et al. 2011). Since Sir2 is the catalytic subunit of both SIR and RENT (Figure 1B), it was important to know which complexes were impacted by age. As shown in Figure 1, C and D, Sir4 was strongly depleted in aged cells while Sir3 was actually enriched. Sir3 enrichment in aged cells was also observed in an earlier proteomics screen (Janssens et al. 2015). Such a stark difference was considered relevant because Sir2 and Sir4 interact as a heterodimer that associates with the acetylated H4 N-terminal tail (Moazed et al. 1997), while Sir3 is subsequently recruited following H4K16 deacetylation to complete SIR holocomplex formation on heterochromatin (Oppikofer et al. 2011). Myc-tagged Net1 (RENT complex) was also strongly depleted from aged cells (Figure 1E), indicating that Sir2/Sir4 and the nucleolar RENT complex are both depleted during aging. It should be noted that the Sir2 paralog Hst1, which has the capacity to compensate for loss of Sir2 (Hickman and Rusche 2007; Li et al. 2010), was also partially depleted from aged cells (Figure 1F). Detailed bud-scar and protein quantitation from triplicate biological samples is reported in Table S3.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Depletion of Sir2 complexes and elevated chromosome instability in replicatively aging cells. (A) Western blot of Sir2 protein levels in young and aged cells. Vma2 serves as a loading control. (B) Depiction of the SIR and RENT complexes, which share Sir2 as a catalytic subunit. (C and D) Western blots of native Sir4 and Sir3. (E and F) Western blots of Myc-tagged Sir2 paralog Hst1 and the Net1 subunit of RENT. (G) Schematic of artificial chromosome loss assay for half-sectored colonies. (H) Quantification of sectoring frequency for young or aged cell populations. Approximately 10,000 colonies were analyzed for each strain across several biological replicates. *P < 0.05, two-tailed Student’s t-test. Bud-scar counts are an average for each enriched population. Qty: indicates the mean western signal of each protein relative to Vma2, with the ratio for young cells set at 1.0 (n = three biological replicates). Avg, average; WT, wild-type.

CIN increases during replicative aging

Considering the observed depletion of multiple heterochromatin factors in aged yeast cells, as well as the CIN phenotype of a sir2∆ mutant (Choy et al. 2011), we next tested whether aged cells had a CIN phenotype that was exacerbated by complete loss of SIR2 and/or HST1. Strains utilized for this experiment have an artificial chromosome III bearing a suppressor tRNA gene, SUP11 (Spencer et al. 1990). Loss of the chromosome prevents suppression of an ochre stop codon in ade2-101, resulting in the classic ade2 red colony phenotype. The frequency of nondisjunction events was measured by counting half-sectored red/white colonies from young and aged cell populations (Figure 1G). Sectoring was elevated in young populations of sir2∆ and hst1∆ mutants, and additively increased in a sir2hst1∆ double mutant (Figure 1H, black bars, left side of panel). Interestingly, sectoring was significantly higher for aged populations of each strain (Figure 1H, gray bars, left side of panel), suggesting that additional age-associated factors were involved. We next tested whether the sir2∆ effect on sectoring was related to a pseudodiploid phenotype caused by derepression of the HM loci. This reporter strain background was MATα, so we deleted HMR (chromosome III 293170–294330) to eliminate the a1/a2 transcription factors. Reversal of the pseudodiploid phenotype was confirmed by restoration of mating to the sir2hmr∆ strains (data not shown). Importantly, this manipulation significantly suppressed sectoring of the young sir2∆ and sir2hst1∆ mutants, but not the hst1∆ mutant (Figure 1H, middle of panel), indicating that there was indeed a sir2∆-induced pseudodiploid effect that contributed to mini-chromosome loss (Figure 1H, black bars, middle of panel). However, aging still increased sectoring in each strain even when HMR was deleted (Figure 1H, gray bars, middle of panel), suggesting that the aging-associated CIN factor was unrelated to mating-type control.

Because of the observed Net1 depletion (Figure 1E), we hypothesized that age-induced mini-chromosome loss could be related to rDNA instability caused by loss of the RENT complex. To address this idea, FOB1 was deleted from wild-type (WT), sir2∆, hst1∆, and sir2hst1∆ reporter strains to stabilize the rDNA, followed by retesting the sectoring phenotypes. As shown in Figure 1H (right side of panel), the frequency of sectoring observed for each aged fob1∆ strain was generally similar to that observed with young FOB1+ versions of the strains (Figure 1H, black bars, left side of panel), suggesting that destabilization of the rDNA during aging does contribute to the instability of other chromosomes. The hmr∆ and fob1∆ mutations were potentially suppressing chromosome loss through independent mechanisms, thus begging the question of whether combining them would fully suppress CIN in a sir2hst1hmrfob1∆ quadruple mutant. Remarkably, aged cells from this mutant combination lost the mini-chromosome marker at a very low rate comparable to young WT cells, with no statistical difference (Figure 1H, one-way ANOVA).

Cohesin levels are depleted in aged yeast cells

The above results raised the question of what factor(s) related to rDNA stability, chromosome segregation, and Sir2 was becoming defective in aged cells. Cohesin perfectly fitted this profile and was earlier shown in mammalian oocytes to become depleted with age [reviewed in Jessberger (2012)]. To test whether cohesin was another Sir2-linked factor depleted during yeast aging, we C-terminally Myc-tagged the Mcd1 or Smc1 subunits (Figure 2A) in the MEP strain background. Western blotting demonstrated that both subunits were significantly depleted from aged cells (Figure 2B), implying depletion of the whole cohesin complex. We also observed depletion of the cohibin/monopolin subunit Lrs4 (Figure S2), which can function as a cohesin clamp at the rDNA (Huang et al. 2006). Furthermore, a Myc-tagged Scc2 subunit of the Scc2/Scc4 cohesin loading complex was age-depleted (Figure 2C), though not as severely as the cohesin complex, predicting that the remaining cohesin complex could still be loaded onto chromatin in aged cells. ChIP assays for Mcd1-Myc in MEP cells aged for 24 hr demonstrated strong depletion from the rDNA IGS (IGS1) (Figure 2D), but was surprisingly enriched at the centromeres of chromosomes XI and III. This effect did not appear to significantly extend into the pericentric region of chromosome III (Figure 2E). To rule out primer specificity or chromosome size effects, we tested three centromeres from other chromosomes and observed the same trend for each of them (Figure 2F). To confirm that the enrichment was centromere-specific, we tested two additional sites on chromosome IV that were 15- and 200-kb away from the centromere, and observed no increase in the aged compared to young samples (Figure 2G). To test if the enrichment of Mcd1-Myc at centromeres in aged cells was specific to cohesin and not a ChIP artifact, we next tested the distribution of Sir4-Myc, which was also depleted from aged cells (Figure 1C). In this case, Sir4-Myc was depleted from TELXV in aged cells (one of its normal targets) without any apparent redistribution to centromeres (CEN4) or the rDNA (Figure 2H), indicating that not all age-depleted proteins become enriched at centromeres. Based on these results, we hypothesized that as cohesin starts depleting during replicative aging, its association with the rDNA is severely affected, while a significant portion of the remaining complex is retained and potentially redistributed to centromeres. This is consistent with an earlier finding that cohesin preferentially associates with pericentromeric regions instead of chromosome arms when Mcd1 expression is artificially reduced below 30% of normal (Heidinger-Pauli et al. 2010). We next asked if the centromere enrichment would be lost in an older cell population by extending growth of the MEP culture time course to 36 hr. As shown in Figure 2I, the Mcd1-Myc association with CEN4 and CEN14 returned to the original levels observed in young cells, while remaining depleted at the rDNA array (Figure 2J). It is important to note that in a recent report (Pal et al. 2018), cohesin enrichment at centromeres was actually reduced in very old yeast cells (> 25 generations). Combined with our findings, a model emerges whereby cohesin enrichment at centromeres is initially enhanced during aging, but is then catastrophically lost as cells approach the end of their life span.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Chromosome instability is linked to rDNA stability and cohesin redistribution. (A) Schematic of the cohesin complex subunits. (B) Western blot of Mcd1-Myc and Smc1-Myc from young and aged cells. (C) Western blot of Myc-tagged Scc2. (D–G) ChIP-qPCR of Mcd1-Myc in young (black bars) and aged cells (gray bars) at the indicated loci normalized to background signal in the STE2 ORF. (H) ChIP-qPCR of Sir4-Myc in young and aged cells normalized to an intergenic PDC1 site that shows SIR complex association (Li et al. 2013). (I and J) ChIP-qPCR of Mcd1-Myc from a time course of young, and 24- and 36-hr aged cells at indicated loci normalized to STE2 background signal. Asterisks indicate significant differences between young and aged cells (P < 0.05). Avg, average; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; qPCR, quantitative PCR; Qty, quantity.

SCC is compromised in aged yeast cells

Previous work found that SCC was surprisingly normal despite the forced reduction (< 30%) of Mcd1 protein levels (Heidinger-Pauli et al. 2010), leading us to ask whether cohesion would be maintained in our moderately aged yeast cells that were also depleted for cohesin, yet still showed enrichment at centromeres. To this end, we utilized strains with a LacO array located ∼10-kb away from centromere IV (CEN4) as a proxy for centromeric cohesion, or at the LYS4 locus on chromosome IV, located ∼400-kb away from the centromere, as a proxy for arm cohesion (Unal et al. 2008; Guacci and Koshland 2012). Differential positioning of the array had no significant impact on RLS (Figure S3). SCC was monitored by LacI-GFP appearing either as one dot in the case of cohesion maintenance or two dots in the case of cohesion loss. Using an mcd1-1 temperature-sensitive mutant as a positive control (Guacci et al. 1997), we observed a large increase in two dots when cells were synchronized in mitosis with nocodazole and shifted to 37° (Figure 3, A and B). WT cells for the equivalent reporter strain were next biotinylated and aged for 24 hr, followed by purification with magnetic streptavidin beads and arrest with nocodazole. Analyzing cells with more than seven bud scars, which is older than the average bud-scar count of our western blot experiments, revealed a mild loss of cohesion (Figure 3, C and D). A similar analysis was then performed without the use of nocodazole to rule out any side effects related to triggering the mitotic spindle checkpoint. To avoid misinterpreting anaphase events as lost SCC, we C-terminally tagged the spindle pole body subunit Spc42 with dsRED, and only counted GFP dots from large-budded cells where the spindle pole bodies had not separated between the mother and daughter cell. With this analysis, the fold-change of SCC defect between young and aged cells was more pronounced (Figure 3, E and F), but the absolute frequency of loss was still much weaker than observed with the mcd1-1 mutant, which was not surprising given that the mean life span of this strain background is ∼16 generations (Figure S3). In very old cells (> 25 bud scars) of a different strain background, an independent study observed SCC loss on chromosome XII at a frequency that approached 50% (Pal et al. 2018), suggesting that CIN may become most severe in the oldest cells where cohesin is not only depleted from the rDNA but also from centromeres.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Sister chromatid cohesion is weakened in aged yeast cells. (A) Representative control images of arm cohesion in an mcd1-1 mutant at permissive (25°) and nonpermissive (37°) temperatures. (B) Quantification of cohesion maintenance (one dot) or loss (two dots) from 100 mcd1-1 cells. (C) Representative images of young (log-phase) or aged cells arrested with Nz, and monitored for centromere or arm cohesion. (D) Quantifying cohesion loss (two dots) in cells with at least seven bud scars. *P < 0.05, two-tailed Student’s t-test (n > 50 cells). (E) Quantification of cohesion loss for young and aged cells in the absence of Nz. (F) Representative images of Nz-untreated cells. White scale bar represents 2 μm. Cal. white, calcofluor white; Cen, centromere; Chr, chromosome; Nz, nocodazole; SPB, spindle pole body.

RLS is modulated by Mcd1 expression levels

Since Sir2 and cohesin are both naturally depleted from replicatively aging yeast cells (Figure 1A and Figure 2B), and mild Sir2 overexpression extends RLS (Kaeberlein et al. 1999), we hypothesized that manipulating cohesin expression levels would also impact CIN and RLS in a dose-dependent manner. We initially attempted to overexpress the Mcd1 subunit from a galactose-inducible GAL1 promoter and then measure mini-chromosome loss frequency by counting half-sectored colonies. However, simply growing the reporter strain in galactose-containing medium, even with an empty expression cassette, resulted in severe mini-chromosome loss compared to glucose-containing medium (Figure 4, A and B). This effect was specific to galactose, as growth with another nonpreferred carbon source (raffinose) had no effect on sectoring (Figure 4, A and B). Though not useful for assaying the effects of MCD1 overexpression, it was still possible that the unexpectedly high CIN phenotype would correlate with reduced RLS. Therefore, we measured RLS with the mini-chromosome reporter strain on YEP plates with 2% glucose, galactose, or raffinose. As shown in Figure 4C, galactose strongly decreased the mean RLS by ∼50% compared to glucose (9.2 vs. 18.9 divisions, P < 1.0 × 10−15), while raffinose only had a marginal effect (15.5 divisions, P < 0.01). To confirm that the galactose effect on RLS was not specific to the mini-chromosome strain, life span assays were repeated with the commonly used strains BY4741 (MATa) and BY4742 (MATα). Again, a significant decrease in mean life span was observed for BY4741 (17.7 divisions) and BY4742 (18.9 divisions) on galactose as compared to glucose (24.3 and 24.2 divisions, respectively) (Figure S4, P < 0.001), suggesting that galactose triggers a high rate of CIN through an unknown mechanism that also shortens RLS.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Modulation of RLS and CIN by manipulating MCD1 and SIR2 expression levels. (A) Representative images of chromosome loss (sectoring) for WT (YPH278) cells grown continuously in 2% glucose, galactose, or raffinose. (B) Quantification of half-sector colonies shown in (A). *P < 0.001, two-tailed Student’s t-test. (C) RLS assay of YPH278 cells growing on rich YEP agar plates containing either 2% Glu, Gal, or Raf. (n = 64, each condition; mean RLS = 18.9, 9.2, and 15.5, respectively). (D) Quantification of chromosome loss (1/2 sectors) for strains with an integrated tetOn empty (pRF10) or MCD1 (pRF11) construct. (E) RLS assays of WT (MCD1+) and mcd1L12STOP strains with integrated pRF10 or pRF11 constructs [mean RLS = 16.2 (diamonds), 10.3 (squares), 19.2 (triangles), and 15.6 (crosses)]. (F) RLS assay of WT and mcd1L12STOP strains with integrated empty pRS306 or SIR2-containing plasmid pJSB186 [n = 40 cells each; mean RLS = 21.5 (diamonds), 9.9 (squares), 30.4 (triangles), and 14.8 (crosses)]. (G) RLS assay with MCD1 OE, or fob1hmr∆ rescue of sir2∆ or sir2hst1∆ mutants [mean RLS = 16.5 (diamonds), 10.1 (squares), 9.7 (triangles), 10.7 (crosses), 10.25 (stars), and 16.7 (circles)]. (H) rDNA recombination (marker loss, 1/2 sector) assay with rDNA marker loss reporter strain W303AR bearing ADE2 within the rDNA array. (*P < 0.05, two-tailed Student’s t-test). CIN, chromosome instability; Gal, galactose; Glu, glucose; OE, overexpression; Raf, raffinose; RLS, replicative life span; WT, wild-type.

To circumvent the use of galactose for MCD1 overexpression, we turned to an inducible “Tet-On” promoter that is activated by doxycycline (Bellí et al. 1998). Strains harboring this integrated cassette transcriptionally overexpressed MCD1 ∼two- to sevenfold compared to the empty vector control (Figure S5, A and B). In the mini-chromosome reporter strain, MCD1 overexpression significantly reduced the frequency of half-sectored colonies in both young and aged populations (Figure 4D), in agreement with MCD1 being isolated as a high-copy suppressor of CIN using a different reporter system (Zhu et al. 2015). Next, MCD1 was overexpressed in a strain containing an ochre stop codon in the MCD1 open reading frame (mcd1L12STOP) that reduces Mcd1 protein to ∼30% of normal (Heidinger-Pauli et al. 2010). With an empty pCM252 control CEN vector, mcd1L12STOP exhibited a 40% reduction in mean RLS (9.9 divisions) compared to an isogenic WT control (16.5 divisions), indicating that Mcd1 depletion shortens RLS (Figure 4E, P < 0.001). Overexpressing MCD1 almost fully restored longevity to the mutant (14.7 divisions) and, remarkably, also extended the RLS of the control WT strain to 19.6 divisions (P < 1.0 × 10−7), which was primarily due to improved survival during the first ∼15 divisions and then followed by a steeper decline in viability (Figure 4E). This biphasic pattern was highly reproducible and suggested that the CEN MCD1 overexpression (OE) plasmid was being lost around midlife due to increased chromosome loss, as previously seen in aged cells of our CIN assay (Figure 1H). To account for this potential variable, we also integrated the empty and MCD1 OE vectors into a different FY834 strain background related to the long-lived BY4741/42 background (Winston et al. 1995; Brachmann et al. 1998). Not only did MCD1 OE extend the mean RLS (28.0 divisions) in this background compared to the control (21.0 divisions), but the maximum number of divisions was also increased by 25% (Figure S6, P < 1.0 × 10−7). Therefore, we conclude that similar to Sir2, Mcd1 is a strong dose-dependent longevity factor.

Sir2 functions upstream of cohesin for RLS (Kobayashi et al. 2004; Kobayashi and Ganley 2005) and for SCC at HMR (Wu et al. 2011), implying that Sir2 is upstream of cohesin loading and function. However, this relationship could potentially be more complex since both factors are depleted with age. To explore this further, we next tested if SIR2 overexpression could rescue the short RLS of an Mcd1-depleted mcd1L12STOP strain by integrating a second copy of SIR2 (2xSIR2) at the LEU2 locus. As shown in Figure 4F, 2xSIR2 partially rescued the mean RLS of the mcd1L12STOP strain (14.1 vs. 9.9 divisions, P < 1.0 × 10−4) and also increased the maximum RLS of the WT strain. Reciprocally, we asked if MCD1 overexpression would suppress the short RLS of a sir2∆ or sir2hst1∆ mutant. The double mutant was included to rule out any redundancy between the two sirtuins. Mean RLS was clearly not increased by MCD1 overexpression as compared to empty vector for either the single (10.7 vs. 10.2) or double mutant (10.1 vs. 9.7 divisions, Figure 4G), confirming that SIR2 was required for MCD1 in regulating RLS. Interestingly, the sir2hst1fob1hmr∆ quadruple mutant combination, which suppressed CIN in aged cells (Figure 1H), fully restored the RLS of the short-lived sir2hst1∆ combination to WT levels (Figure 4G, P = not significant), suggesting that CIN is a key driver of replicative aging downstream of Sir2 and Hst1.

Considering the strong depletion of cohesin from rDNA in aged cells (Figure 2D) and the extended RLS when MCD1 was overexpressed (Figure 4E), we next tested if age-induced rDNA instability was suppressed by MCD1 overexpression using a reporter strain harboring ADE2 in the rDNA array (Kaeberlein et al. 1999). There was a large increase of red/white 1/2 sectoring (marker loss) from aged cells that was suppressed upon MCD1 overexpression (Figure 4H). In the absence of SIR2, 1/2 sectoring was high from young and aged cells when the empty vector (pRF10) was integrated, and MCD1 overexpression did not significantly reduce rDNA instability in either population (Figure 4H), indicating that at least some Sir2 was required for Mcd1 to impact rDNA stability. We conclude that loss of Sir2 and cohesin in aging cells causes rDNA array instability that generally exacerbates CIN.

RLS extension by CR correlates with improved chromosome stability

Reducing glucose concentration in the growth medium is effective at extending RLS and is considered a form of CR for yeast (Jiang et al. 2000; Lin et al. 2002). There have been several hypotheses put forth for the underlying mechanisms, including stabilization of the rDNA, as CR suppresses recombination within the rDNA (Lamming et al. 2005; Riesen and Morgan 2009; Smith et al. 2009). Since MCD1 overexpression suppressed rDNA recombination and extended RLS, we hypothesized that CR may suppress the abbreviated RLS of a cohesin-depleted mcd1L12STOP mutant strain. Indeed, CR extended the RLS of both the WT and mcd1L12STOP strains (Figure 5A, P < 0.01 and P < 1.0 × 10−7, respectively). However, the suppression was apparently not due to maintenance of global cohesin levels because steady-state Mcd1-Myc was still depleted in glucose-restricted aged cells (Figure 5B). CR also strongly suppressed mini-chromosome loss in young and aged cells, even in the sir2hst1∆ double mutant (Figure 5C). Importantly, this CR effect also correlated with almost complete rescue of RLS for the sir2hst1∆ mutant (Figure 5D, P = not significant). Taken together, the results support a mechanism for RLS extension by CR, whereby stabilization of the rDNA locus helps maintain general mitotic chromosome stability to protect against aneuploidy.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

CR suppresses the CIN and RLS defects of sir2∆ and mcd1 mutants. (A) RLS assay of WT (JH5275b) and mcd1L12STOP (JH5276b) strains under normal 2% Glu and CR (0.5% Glu) conditions [n = 32 cells; mean RLS = 21.3 (diamonds), 8.1 (squares), 24.1 (triangles), and 13.8 (crosses)]. (B) Western blot of Mcd1-Myc for cultures grown in YEP media containing 0.5% Glu. (C) Chromosome loss (sectoring) assay of strains grown in media containing 0.5% Glu. Data from Figure 1H included for reference. *P < 0.05, two-tailed Student’s t-test. (D) RLS assay of WT and sir2Δ hst1Δ mutant strains under normal and CR conditions [n = 32 cells; mean RLS = 19.6 (diamonds), 9.3 (squares), 23.5 (triangles), and 17.1 (crosses)]. Avg, average; CIN, chromosome instability; CR, caloric restriction; Glu, glucose; Qty, quantity; RLS, replicative life span; WT, wild-type.

The rDNA array has an opportunity to interact with centromeres during anaphase

To conclude this study, we asked whether there is any mechanistic connection between the rDNA and centromeres that could cause CIN. If rDNA instability has a direct effect on SCC during aging, then we should observe elevated dissociation of sister chromatids in a sir2∆ mutant and improved SCC in a fob1∆ mutant. However, as shown in Figure S7, the frequency of two GFP dots in the SCC assay for these two mutants in aged populations was comparable to WT (see Figure 3, E and F). Alternatively, the rDNA could potentially affect centromere function through direct contacts. Previous Hi-C analysis of the yeast genome and fluorescence microscopy of nucleolar proteins positioned the rDNA off to one side of the nucleus, apparently secluded from the rest of the genome (Gotta et al. 1997; Duan et al. 2010). The repetitive nature of rDNA precludes it from appearing in Hi-C contact maps, but closer inspection of iteratively corrected chromosome XII contact maps at 10-kb resolution indicated a clear interaction between unique sequences flanking the centromere-proximal (left) edge of the array and CEN12 (Figure 6A, yellow arrow). We hypothesized that this contact was regulated by Sir2 since it is in the vicinity of a known tRNA boundary [tQ(UUG)L] for rDNA silencing (Biswas et al. 2009), but deletion of SIR2 had no effect on the contact (data not shown). Interestingly, all centromeres of the yeast genome, including CEN12, cluster together in asynchronous cell population Hi-C data (Figure 6B, yellow arrows; Duan et al. 2010), which potentially places them in proximity with the rDNA given the association of CEN12 with sequences flanking the rDNA. During anaphase, the rDNA is thought to be separated from centromeres, but analysis of Hi-C data for cell cycle-synchronized cdc15-2, which arrests cells in anaphase, revealed that the rDNA-proximal/CEN12 contact specifically occurs during anaphase (Figure 6C; Lazar-Stefanita et al. 2017), during which time the centromeres are still clustered together by the spindle pole body (Figure 6D). Taken together, these results suggest that the rDNA may transiently contact the centromeres during mitosis, providing a potential window of time for a destabilized rDNA array to negatively impact the integrity of general chromosome segregation during mitosis (Figure 6E).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Chromosomal instability during replicative aging is linked to the rDNA. (A) Iteratively corrected and read-normalized heatmap of Chr XII Hi-C contact data at 10-kb resolution in WT cells growing asynchronously, revealing an interaction between CEN12 (bin 15) and a unique sequence adjacent to the rDNA (bin 45), indicated by yellow arrow. (B) Contact heatmap of Chr XI, XII, and XIII showing centromere clustering in asynchronously growing WT cells. Yellow arrows indicate examples of centromere alignment with CEN12 and sequence adjacent to the rDNA. (C) Iteratively corrected Chr XII heatmap from cdc15 cells arrested in anaphase. Yellow arrow indicates the interaction between CEN12 and the rDNA-adjacent bin. (D) Contact map showing interactions between centromeres in the anaphase-arrested cdc15 mutant. (E) Model for cohesin and Sir2 depletion from the rDNA of aged mother cells. Cohesin is initially retained at centromeres (middle age, black arrow), and then ultimately lost in the oldest cells. ERCs begin to form during middle age and may contribute in a self-perpetuating cycle resulting in chronic destabilization of the rDNA array due to loss of cohesin, RENT, and the cohibin complex (red). Chr, chromosome; ERC, extrachromosomal rDNA circle; WT, wild-type.

Discussion

Nuclear protein depletion during replicative aging as a paradigm for aging pathologies

During this study, the majority of chromatin-associated proteins that we analyzed by western blotting were depleted in replicatively aged yeast cells. The only protein unaffected by age that we tested, other than the vacuolar Vma2 control, was Sir3 (Figure 1D). A similar proportion of homologous recombination proteins were depleted in an independent analysis of aged cells, with Rad52 the only one tested that was not affected (Pal et al. 2018). These results suggest that there is at least some selectivity to the depletion of nuclear proteins in aged cells. However, the large number of depleted factors also makes it likely that targeted nuclear protein deficiency could lead to multiple age-associated phenotypes. Replicatively aging yeast cells appear especially susceptible to this phenomenon, as even total core histone levels are depleted (Hu et al. 2014). Evidence also exists for histone depletion during the aging of metazoan organisms, including mammals [reviewed in Song and Johnson (2018)]. More generally, global protein turnover is elevated in cells from prematurely aging progeria patients, which may trigger higher translation rates (Buchwalter and Hetzer 2017). This is significant because reducing translation is a means of extending life span in multiple organisms (Mehta et al. 2010). The mechanism(s) driving nuclear protein depletion in aged yeast mother cells or other organisms remain unclear.

The specificity for Sir2/Sir4 depletion over Sir3 is intriguing, given that Sir2 and Sir4 form a tight complex that allosterically stimulates the deacetylase activity of Sir2 (Hsu et al. 2013), while Sir3 is a subunit of the SIR holocomplex (Oppikofer et al. 2011). Since Sir3 levels are elevated in aged cells (Figure 1D; Janssens et al. 2015), it is likely to have a function independent of the SIR complex during aging. The mechanism for Sir2/Sir4 depletion from aged cells remains uncharacterized, though in nonaging cell populations the stability/turnover of Sir4, but not Sir2, is mediated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase San1 (Dasgupta et al. 2004), which has also been implicated as a quality control E3 ligase for mutated/unfolded nuclear proteins (Gardner et al. 2005). Whether San1 controls Sir4 stability during aging remains unknown, but since Sir4 is more severely depleted than Sir2 in aged cells (Figure 1A and Figure 2C), Sir4 could be selectively depleted from the SIR complex, thus leaving Sir2 unprotected and subject to turnover through a different mechanism. Consistent with this idea, we note that Sir4 is depleted independently of Sir2 during extended G1 arrest (Larin et al. 2015). Alternatively, Sir2/Sir4 could be equally depleted as a complex from telomeres and the HM loci (not necessarily via San1), leaving the nucleolar pool of Sir2/RENT more resistant to aging. Under this scenario, protecting the integrity of the rDNA array could take precedence over other heterochromatic domains. Interestingly, the Schizosaccharomyces pombe San1 ortholog has also been implicated in a chaperone-assisted degradation pathway that functions in quality control of kinetochores to promote chromosome stability (Kriegenburg et al. 2014).

Sir2 depletion in replicatively aged yeast cells is reminiscent of Sirt1 depletion in serially passaged mouse embryonic fibroblasts, which correlates with declining mitotic activity (Sasaki et al. 2006). Sir2 and Sirt1 are both known to function in regulating DNA replication origins (Hoggard et al. 2018; Utani and Aladjem 2018), and the effect of deleting SIR2 on early origin firing is thought to be mediated by competition for limiting factors with the repeated rDNA origins (Yoshida et al. 2014). Furthermore, CR has been proposed to extend RLS by reducing rDNA origin firing, which improves overall genome replication (Kwan et al. 2013). This may help explain why CR can extend RLS and suppress CIN, even when SIR2 and HST1 are deleted. Conversely, depleted cohesin in old cells could potentially cause rDNA instability by impacting DNA replication and repair.

A precarious balance between rDNA and centromeric cohesin

SCC ensures that chromosomes are not segregated until the Mcd1/Scc1 cohesin subunit is cleaved, in response to a mitotic spindle checkpoint signal that all chromosomes are properly attached to microtubules and aligned at the metaphase plate [reviewed in Marston (2014)]. Cohesin is also critical during meiosis, and it is well established in mammals that SCC defects occur in the oocytes of older mothers, causing meiotic chromosome missegregation events during both anaphase I and II (Jessberger 2012). This phenomenon is believed to be a major mechanism for increased aneuploidy risk that usually results in embryonic lethality or, in the case of chromosome 21 trisomy, Down’s syndrome. The meiotic cohesin subunit Rec8 is depleted in the oocytes of older mice, as is Shugoshin (Sgo2), which normally protects/maintains centromeric cohesin (Lister et al. 2010). More recent experiments in Drosophila suggest that oxidative stress in aged oocytes contributes to the SCC defects (Perkins et al. 2016). Our results in replicatively aging yeast cells reveal that aging-induced cohesin depletion and the resulting chromosome missegregation can extend to mitotic cells. Though cohesin depletion or defects have not been reported for aging mammalian somatic cells, the mitotic spindle checkpoint protein BubR1 is depleted in dynamic somatic tissues such as the spleen in aged mice (Baker et al. 2004). Deficiency of this protein results in premature aging phenotypes (Baker et al. 2004), while overexpression extends life span (Baker et al. 2013). This is similar to the effects we observe with Mcd1 depletion and overexpression on yeast RLS. Interestingly, BubR1 is also a deacetylation target of Sirt2, which appears to stabilize the protein and extend life span, thus linking mitotic spindle checkpoint regulation to NAD+ metabolism (North et al. 2014). It remains unclear if Sir2, Hst1, or other sirtuins regulate the yeast BubR1 ortholog, Mad3, or additional checkpoint and kinetochore proteins.

SCC is the canonical function for cohesin, though the complex also functions in establishing and regulating genome organization at the level of chromatin structure, gene regulation, and DSB repair [reviewed in Uhlmann (2016)]. Among these various processes, SCC at centromeres appears the most critical, because artificial depletion of Mcd1 to < 30% of normal levels results in preferential cohesin binding to pericentromeric regions rather than CARs on chromosome arms (Heidinger-Pauli et al. 2010). SCC was also well maintained in these strains at the expense of normal chromosome condensation, DNA repair, and rDNA stability (Heidinger-Pauli et al. 2010). In aged yeast cells, we observed relative enrichment of Mcd1-Myc at centromeres as compared to loss at the rDNA (IGS1) locus (Figure 2, D and E), consistent with pericentromeric cohesin retention in the artificially depleted system. Despite maintaining the cohesin complex at centromeres, SCC was still slightly impaired in the aged cells, but only if we analyzed cells more than 7 generations old. We suspect that cohesin was reduced at centromeres in these older cells, which would be consistent with the loss of centromeric Mcd1 enrichment when cells were aged longer (for 36 hr), but it was also likely that some of the centromere-localized Mcd1 was nonfunctional. These results are in line with an independent study that analyzed significantly older mother cells (∼25 generations), and observed reduced cohesin enrichment at centromeres and severe loss of SCC (Pal et al. 2018). Another recent study using single-cell microfluidics found that chromosome loss was very common just prior to the last cell division (Neurohr et al. 2018). Collectively, the results suggest that centromere-associated cohesin is preferentially retained during the initial stages of replicative aging, but then eventually breaks down below a critical threshold in the oldest cells.

Numerous nuclear proteins are depleted in aged yeast cells, not just cohesin subunits, so we hypothesize that defects in other nuclear processes mediated by such factors also contribute to SCC defects and CIN, either directly or indirectly. The depleted cohesin loading complex (Scc2/4) is an obvious candidate due to its role in loading cohesin at centromeres and CARs. Similarly, the depleted cohibin complex (Figure S2) is proposed to act as a cohesin clamp onto rDNA chromatin (Huang et al. 2006), and also functions at centromeres to maintain mitotic integrity (Bitto et al. 2015). Sir2 and Hst1 are also obvious candidates given the earlier finding that H4K16 deacetylation at centromeres by Sir2 helps maintain chromosome stability (Choy et al. 2011). Part of this effect is apparently due to the pseudodiploid phenotype of a sir2∆ mutation, which has been previously shown to impact RLS (Kaeberlein et al. 1999). Hst1 also binds centromeric DNA in vitro and in vivo (Ohkuni and Kitagawa 2011), though the functional relevance of that association remains uncharacterized. The suppression of age-associated mini-chromosome loss in the absence of FOB1 clearly points to rDNA instability as an unexpected source of general CIN. Such a relationship is reinforced by the observed depletion of nucleolar proteins Net1 and Lrs4 in aged cells (Figure 2E and Figure S2), both of which are required for normal rDNA/nucleolar integrity and stable cohesin association with the rDNA (Smith et al. 1999; Straight et al. 1999; Huang et al. 2006).

How could destabilization of the rDNA locus result in general CIN and shortened RLS? As depicted in Figure 6, a unique sequence flanking the rDNA contacts the centromere of chromosome XII, thus placing it in proximity to other centromeres during anaphase. Whether the actual rDNA genes contact centromeres remains unclear due to the current limitations of Hi-C analysis with repetitive DNA. However, specific regions of the rDNA were previously shown to associate with various non-rDNA chromosomal regions using a circularized chromosome conformation capture (4C) approach (O’Sullivan et al. 2009). Furthermore, multiple nucleolar-associated domains have been identified in metazoan cells that copurify with nucleoli (Matheson and Kaufman 2016). Loss of cohesin from the rDNA could potentially disrupt long-range interactions with centromeres or noncentromeric regions of cohesin association that influence chromosome integrity. One potential mechanism could be significant disruption of overall chromosome condensation during mitosis, as cohesin appears to play a larger role in the DNA looping associated with chromosome condensation in budding yeast than previously thought (Schalbetter et al. 2017).

Interestingly, another class of nuclear factors depleted in aged yeast cells are several DNA repair proteins (Pal et al. 2018). Consequently, the lack of proper DNA repair while the rDNA becomes destabilized correlates with fragmentation of chromosome XII and the other chromosomes (Pal et al. 2018). Rad52 foci also appear in aged cells, indicating persistent DNA damage (Neurohr et al. 2018). It was proposed that the accumulation of breaks and rearrangements ultimately causes cell death during replicative aging. Such cells were significantly older (> 25 divisions) compared to the cells in our study, which exhibited a maximum of 13 divisions after 24 hr. Alternatively, it is possible that these presumably random rearrangements disrupt normal SCC, leading to CIN.

Aneuploidy as an aging mechanism

All 16 S. cerevisiae chromosomes harbor essential genes, so if a single chromosome is lost from a haploid yeast cell, then the affected mother or daughter cell should become inviable, and no longer divide. Given the elevated frequency of chromosome loss during replicative aging, the chances of generating an inviable mother cell during a replicative aging assay increases after each subsequent division. Therefore, at least a portion of the replicative life span in haploid yeast cells is controlled by the ability to maintain all 16 chromosomes. However, complete loss of a chromosome would not be an immediate viability issue for diploid cells, due to the chances of losing both homologs in a single mitosis being exceedingly rare. On the other hand, haploid strains that are disomic for individual chromosomes are often short-lived, with longer chromosomes typically having larger effects (Sunshine et al. 2016). It was hypothesized that such strains suffer from proteotoxic stress due to inappropriate protein expression levels. Therefore, a similar mechanism could shorten RLS in a diploid strain that is trisomic for an individual chromosome, though this has not yet been tested. Aneuploidy is also a hallmark of aging in the germline (Nagaoka et al. 2012) and somatic tissues of mammals (Lushnikova et al. 2011; Baker et al. 2013), making it a conserved feature of aging from yeast to humans.

Another exciting feature of this study is the suppression of CIN by CR growth conditions that extend RLS. This effect was independent of the reduced cohesin levels in aged cells, and even improved the RLS of the cohesin-depleted strains. Since SCC is normal in the cohesin-depleted strain (Heidinger-Pauli et al. 2010), we hypothesize that CR reinforces other processes that are defective due to reduced cohesin or other depleted factors that promote rDNA stability. Indeed, CR is known to suppress rDNA instability in yeast cells (Riesen and Morgan 2009; Smith et al. 2009) and improve overall genome replication efficiency (Kwan et al. 2013). Hi-C analysis also suggests that there could be direct effects of rDNA structure on centromere function, which will be a focus of future investigation.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dan Gottschling and all laboratory members for kindly providing yeast strains, and initial advice on the Mother Enrichment Program system; Stefan Bekiranov, Job Dekker, Jon Belton, Maitreya Dunham, Ivan Liachko, Maxim Imakev, and Anton Goloborodko for valuable advice on Hi-C protocols and analysis methods; Doug Koshland for providing the Mcd1 reduction and cohesion assay strains; Matt Kaeberlein for rDNA marker loss strains; Jef Boeke, Marc Gartenberg, and Dan Gottschling for providing antibodies; Todd Stukenberg for microscopy assistance; and David Auble for critically reading the manuscript and providing comments prior to submission. This work was supported by NIH grants GM075240 and GM127394 to J.S.S., and R.D.F was supported in part by NIH Training Grant T32GM008136. We declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Supplemental material available at https://doi.org/10.25386/genetics.7766783.

Communicating editor: D. Bishop

Literature Cited

  1. Ausubel F. M., Brent R., Kingston R. E., Moore D. D., Seidman J. G., et al. (Editors), 2000.  Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker D. J., Jeganathan K. B., Cameron J. D., Thompson M., Juneja S., et al. , 2004.  BubR1 insufficiency causes early onset of aging-associated phenotypes and infertility in mice. Nat. Genet. 36: 744–749. 10.1038/ng1382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker D. J., Dawlaty M. M., Wijshake T., Jeganathan K. B., Malureanu L., et al. , 2013.  Increased expression of BubR1 protects against aneuploidy and cancer and extends healthy lifespan. Nat. Cell Biol. 15: 96–102. 10.1038/ncb2643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bellí G., Garí E., Piedrafita L., Aldea M., Herrero E., 1998.  An activator/repressor dual system allows tight tetracycline-regulated gene expression in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 26: 942–947 (erratum: Nucleic Acids Res. 26: following 1855). 10.1093/nar/26.4.942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Belton J. M., Dekker J., 2015.  Measuring chromatin structure in budding yeast. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2015: 614–618. 10.1101/pdb.top077552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Biswas M., Maqani N., Rai R., Kumaran S. P., Iyer K. R., et al. , 2009.  Limiting the extent of the RDN1 heterochromatin domain by a silencing barrier and Sir2 protein levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29: 2889–2898. 10.1128/MCB.00728-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bitto A., Wang A. M., Bennett C. F., Kaeberlein M., 2015.  Biochemical genetic pathways that modulate aging in multiple species. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 5: a025114. 10.1101/cshperspect.a025114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brachmann C. B., Sherman J. M., Devine S. E., Cameron E. E., Pillus L., et al. , 1995.  The SIR2 gene family, conserved from bacteria to humans, functions in silencing, cell cycle progression, and chromosome stability. Genes Dev. 9: 2888–2902. 10.1101/gad.9.23.2888 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brachmann C. B., Davies A., Cost G. J., Caputo E., Li J., et al. , 1998.  Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14: 115–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bryk M., Banerjee M., Murphy M., Knudsen K. E., Garfinkel D. J., et al. , 1997.  Transcriptional silencing of Ty1 elements in the RDN1 locus of yeast. Genes Dev. 11: 255–269. 10.1101/gad.11.2.255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Buchwalter A., Hetzer M. W., 2017.  Nucleolar expansion and elevated protein translation in premature aging. Nat. Commun. 8: 328 10.1038/s41467-017-00322-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Buck S. W., Sandmeier J. J., Smith J. S., 2002.  RNA polymerase I propagates unidirectional spreading of rDNA silent chromatin. Cell 111: 1003–1014. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01193-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Buck S. W., Gallo C. M., Smith J. S., 2004.  Diversity in the Sir2 family of protein deacetylases. J. Leukoc. Biol. 75: 939–950. 10.1189/jlb.0903424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Burton J. N., Liachko I., Dunham M. J., Shendure J., 2014.  Species-level deconvolution of metagenome assemblies with Hi-C-based contact probability maps. G3 (Bethesda) 4: 1339–1346. 10.1534/g3.114.011825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chang C. R., Wu C. S., Hom Y., Gartenberg M. R., 2005.  Targeting of cohesin by transcriptionally silent chromatin. Genes Dev. 19: 3031–3042. 10.1101/gad.1356305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Choy J. S., Acuna R., Au W. C., Basrai M. A., 2011.  A role for histone H4K16 hypoacetylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochore function. Genetics 189: 11–21. 10.1534/genetics.111.130781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ciosk R., Shirayama M., Shevchenko A., Tanaka T., Toth A., et al. , 2000.  Cohesin’s binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol. Cell 5: 243–254. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80420-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dang W., Steffen K. K., Perry R., Dorsey J. A., Johnson F. B., et al. , 2009.  Histone H4 lysine 16 acetylation regulates cellular lifespan. Nature 459: 802–807. 10.1038/nature08085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dasgupta A., Ramsey K. L., Smith J. S., Auble D. T., 2004.  Sir Antagonist 1 (San1) is a ubiquitin ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 26830–26838. 10.1074/jbc.M400894200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Defossez P. A., Prusty R., Kaeberlein M., Lin S. J., Ferrigno P., et al. , 1999.  Elimination of replication block protein Fob1 extends the life span of yeast mother cells. Mol. Cell 3: 447–455. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80472-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Derbyshire M. K., Weinstock K. G., Strathern J. N., 1996.  HST1, a new member of the SIR2 family of genes. Yeast 12: 631–640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Duan Z., Andronescu M., Schutz K., McIlwain S., Kim Y. J., et al. , 2010.  A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome. Nature 465: 363–367. 10.1038/nature08973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ganley A. R., Kobayashi T., 2014.  Ribosomal DNA and cellular senescence: new evidence supporting the connection between rDNA and aging. FEMS Yeast Res. 14: 49–59. 10.1111/1567-1364.12133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gardner R. G., Nelson Z. W., Gottschling D. E., 2005.  Degradation-mediated protein quality control in the nucleus. Cell 120: 803–815. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gartenberg M. R., Smith J. S., 2016.  The nuts and bolts of transcriptionally silent chromatin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 203: 1563–1599. 10.1534/genetics.112.145243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gomes A. P., Price N. L., Ling A. J., Moslehi J. J., Montgomery M. K., et al. , 2013.  Declining NAD+ induces a pseudohypoxic state disrupting nuclear-mitochondrial communication during aging. Cell 155: 1624–1638. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gotta M., Strahl-Bolsinger S., Renauld H., Laroche T., Kennedy B. K., et al. , 1997.  Localization of Sir2p: the nucleolus as a compartment for silent information regulators. EMBO J. 16: 3243–3255. 10.1093/emboj/16.11.3243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Guacci V., Koshland D., 2012.  Cohesin-independent segregation of sister chromatids in budding yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 23: 729–739. 10.1091/mbc.e11-08-0696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Guacci V., Koshland D., Strunnikov A., 1997.  A direct link between sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation revealed through the analysis of MCD1 in S. cerevisiae. Cell 91: 47–57. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)80008-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Heidinger-Pauli J. M., Mert O., Davenport C., Guacci V., Koshland D., 2010.  Systematic reduction of cohesin differentially affects chromosome segregation, condensation, and DNA repair. Curr. Biol. 20: 957–963. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hickman M. A., Rusche L. N., 2007.  Substitution as a mechanism for genetic robustness: the duplicated deacetylases Hst1p and Sir2p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 3: e126 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hoggard T. A., Chang F., Perry K. R., Subramanian S., Kenworthy J., et al. , 2018.  Yeast heterochromatin regulators Sir2 and Sir3 act directly at euchromatic DNA replication origins. PLoS Genet. 14: e1007418 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hsu H. C., Wang C. L., Wang M., Yang N., Chen Z., et al. , 2013.  Structural basis for allosteric stimulation of Sir2 activity by Sir4 binding. Genes Dev. 27: 64–73. 10.1101/gad.208140.112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hu Z., Chen K., Xia Z., Chavez M., Pal S., et al. , 2014.  Nucleosome loss leads to global transcriptional up-regulation and genomic instability during yeast aging. Genes Dev. 28: 396–408. 10.1101/gad.233221.113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Huang J., Brito I. L., Villen J., Gygi S. P., Amon A., et al. , 2006.  Inhibition of homologous recombination by a cohesin-associated clamp complex recruited to the rDNA recombination enhancer. Genes Dev. 20: 2887–2901. 10.1101/gad.1472706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Janssens G. E., Meinema A. C., González J., Wolters J. C., Schmidt A., et al. , 2015.  Protein biogenesis machinery is a driver of replicative aging in yeast. Elife 4: e08527 10.7554/eLife.08527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jessberger R., 2012.  Age-related aneuploidy through cohesion exhaustion. EMBO Rep. 13: 539–546. 10.1038/embor.2012.54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jiang J. C., Jaruga E., Repnevskaya M. V., Jazwinski S. M., 2000.  An intervention resembling caloric restriction prolongs life span and retards aging in yeast. FASEB J. 14: 2135–2137. 10.1096/fj.00-0242fje [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kaeberlein M., McVey M., Guarente L., 1999.  The SIR2/3/4 complex and SIR2 alone promote longevity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by two different mechanisms. Genes Dev. 13: 2570–2580. 10.1101/gad.13.19.2570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kobayashi T., Ganley A. R., 2005.  Recombination regulation by transcription-induced cohesin dissociation in rDNA repeats. Science 309: 1581–1584. 10.1126/science.1116102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kobayashi T., Horiuchi T., 1996.  A yeast gene product, Fob1 protein, required for both replication fork blocking and recombinational hotspot activities. Genes Cells 1: 465–474. 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1996.d01-256.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kobayashi T., Horiuchi T., Tongaonkar P., Vu L., Nomura M., 2004.  SIR2 regulates recombination between different rDNA repeats, but not recombination within individual rRNA genes in yeast. Cell 117: 441–453. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00414-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kogut I., Wang J., Guacci V., Mistry R. K., Megee P. C., 2009.  The Scc2/Scc4 cohesin loader determines the distribution of cohesin on budding yeast chromosomes. Genes Dev. 23: 2345–2357. 10.1101/gad.1819409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kriegenburg F., Jakopec V., Poulsen E. G., Nielsen S. V., Roguev A., et al. , 2014.  A chaperone-assisted degradation pathway targets kinetochore proteins to ensure genome stability. PLoS Genet. 10: e1004140 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kwan E. X., Foss E. J., Tsuchiyama S., Alvino G. M., Kruglyak L., et al. , 2013.  A natural polymorphism in rDNA replication origins links origin activation with calorie restriction and lifespan. PLoS Genet. 9: e1003329 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lamming D. W., Latorre-Esteves M., Medvedik O., Wong S. N., Tsang F. A., et al. , 2005.  HST2 mediates SIR2-independent life-span extension by calorie restriction. Science 309: 1861–1864. 10.1126/science.1113611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Larin M. L., Harding K., Williams E. C., Lianga N., Dore C., et al. , 2015.  Competition between heterochromatic loci allows the abundance of the silencing protein, Sir4, to regulate de novo assembly of heterochromatin. PLoS Genet. 11: e1005425 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lazar-Stefanita L., Scolari V. F., Mercy G., Muller H., Guerin T. M., et al. , 2017.  Cohesins and condensins orchestrate the 4D dynamics of yeast chromosomes during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 36: 2684–2697. 10.15252/embj.201797342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Li C., Mueller J. E., Bryk M., 2006.  Sir2 represses endogenous polymerase II transcription units in the ribosomal DNA nontranscribed spacer. Mol. Biol. Cell 17: 3848–3859. 10.1091/mbc.e06-03-0205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Li M., Petteys B. J., McClure J. M., Valsakumar V., Bekiranov S., et al. , 2010.  Thiamine biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is regulated by the NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase Hst1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30: 3329–3341. 10.1128/MCB.01590-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Li M., Valsakumar V., Poorey K., Bekiranov S., Smith J. S., 2013.  Genome-wide analysis of functional sirtuin chromatin targets in yeast. Genome Biol. 14: R48 10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-r48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lin S. J., Kaeberlein M., Andalis A. A., Sturtz L. A., Defossez P. A., et al. , 2002.  Calorie restriction extends Saccharomyces cerevisiae lifespan by increasing respiration. Nature 418: 344–348. 10.1038/nature00829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lindstrom, D. L., and D. E. Gottschling, 2009 The mother enrichment program a genetic system for facile replicative life span analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 183 413–422, 1SI-13SI. 10.1534/genetics.109.106229 10.1534/genetics.109.106229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  54. Lindstrom D. L., Leverich C. K., Henderson K. A., Gottschling D. E., 2011.  Replicative age induces mitotic recombination in the ribosomal RNA gene cluster of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 7: e1002015 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Lister L. M., Kouznetsova A., Hyslop L. A., Kalleas D., Pace S. L., et al. , 2010.  Age-related meiotic segregation errors in mammalian oocytes are preceded by depletion of cohesin and Sgo2. Curr. Biol. 20: 1511–1521. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Lushnikova T., Bouska A., Odvody J., Dupont W. D., Eischen C. M., 2011.  Aging mice have increased chromosome instability that is exacerbated by elevated Mdm2 expression. Oncogene 30: 4622–4631. 10.1038/onc.2011.172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Marston A. L., 2014.  Chromosome segregation in budding yeast: sister chromatid cohesion and related mechanisms. Genetics 196: 31–63. 10.1534/genetics.112.145144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Matecic M., Smith D. L., Pan X., Maqani N., Bekiranov S., et al. , 2010.  A microarray-based genetic screen for yeast chronological aging factors. PLoS Genet. 6: e1000921 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Matheson T. D., Kaufman P. D., 2016.  Grabbing the genome by the NADs. Chromosoma 125: 361–371. 10.1007/s00412-015-0527-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Mehta R., Chandler-Brown D., Ramos F. J., Shamieh L. S., Kaeberlein M., 2010.  Regulation of mRNA translation as a conserved mechanism of longevity control. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 694: 14–29. 10.1007/978-1-4419-7002-2_2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Moazed D., Kistler A., Axelrod A., Rine J., Johnson A. D., 1997.  Silent information regulator protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a SIR2/SIR4 complex and evidence for a regulatory domain in SIR4 that inhibits its interaction with SIR3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 2186–2191. 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Mortimer R. K., Johnston J. R., 1959.  Life span of individual yeast cells. Nature 183: 1751–1752. 10.1038/1831751a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Nagaoka S. I., Hassold T. J., Hunt P. A., 2012.  Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13: 493–504. 10.1038/nrg3245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Neurohr G. E., Terry R. L., Sandikci A., Zou K., Li H., et al. , 2018.  Deregulation of the G1/S-phase transition is the proximal cause of mortality in old yeast mother cells. Genes Dev. 32: 1075–1084. 10.1101/gad.312140.118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. North B. J., Rosenberg M. A., Jeganathan K. B., Hafner A. V., Michan S., et al. , 2014.  SIRT2 induces the checkpoint kinase BubR1 to increase lifespan. EMBO J. 33: 1438–1453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ohkuni K., Kitagawa K., 2011.  Endogenous transcription at the centromere facilitates centromere activity in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 21: 1695–1703. 10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Oppikofer M., Kueng S., Martino F., Soeroes S., Hancock S. M., et al. , 2011.  A dual role of H4K16 acetylation in the establishment of yeast silent chromatin. EMBO J. 30: 2610–2621. 10.1038/emboj.2011.170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. O’Sullivan J. M., Sontam D. M., Grierson R., Jones B., 2009.  Repeated elements coordinate the spatial organization of the yeast genome. Yeast 26: 125–138. 10.1002/yea.1657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Pal S., Postnikoff S. D., Chavez M., Tyler J. K., 2018.  Impaired cohesion and homologous recombination during replicative aging in budding yeast. Sci. Adv. 4: eaaq0236 10.1126/sciadv.aaq0236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Perkins A. T., Das T. M., Panzera L. C., Bickel S. E., 2016.  Oxidative stress in oocytes during midprophase induces premature loss of cohesion and chromosome segregation errors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113: E6823–E6830. 10.1073/pnas.1612047113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Riesen M., Morgan A., 2009.  Calorie restriction reduces rDNA recombination independently of rDNA silencing. Aging Cell 8: 624–632. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00514.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Rine J., Herskowitz I., 1987.  Four genes responsible for a position effect on expression from HML and HMR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 116: 9–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Sasaki T., Maier B., Bartke A., Scrable H., 2006.  Progressive loss of SIRT1 with cell cycle withdrawal. Aging Cell 5: 413–422. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00235.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Schalbetter S. A., Goloborodko A., Fudenberg G., Belton J. M., Miles C., et al. , 2017.  SMC complexes differentially compact mitotic chromosomes according to genomic context. Nat. Cell Biol. 19: 1071–1080. 10.1038/ncb3594 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Schlissel G., Krzyzanowski M. K., Caudron F., Barral Y., Rine J., 2017.  Aggregation of the Whi3 protein, not loss of heterochromatin, causes sterility in old yeast cells. Science 355: 1184–1187. 10.1126/science.aaj2103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Shou W., Seol J. H., Shevchenko A., Baskerville C., Moazed D., et al. , 1999.  Exit from mitosis is triggered by Tem1-dependent release of the protein phosphatase Cdc14 from nucleolar RENT complex. Cell 97: 233–244. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80733-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Sinclair D. A., Guarente L., 1997.  Extrachromosomal rDNA circles–a cause of aging in yeast. Cell 91: 1033–1042. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80493-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Smeal T., Claus J., Kennedy B., Cole F., Guarente L., 1996.  Loss of transcriptional silencing causes sterility in old mother cells of S. cerevisiae. Cell 84: 633–642. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81038-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Smith D. L., Jr., Li C., Matecic M., Maqani N., Bryk M., et al. , 2009.  Calorie restriction effects on silencing and recombination at the yeast rDNA. Aging Cell 8: 633–642. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00516.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Smith J. S., Boeke J. D., 1997.  An unusual form of transcriptional silencing in yeast ribosomal DNA. Genes Dev. 11: 241–254. 10.1101/gad.11.2.241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Smith J. S., Brachmann C. B., Pillus L., Boeke J. D., 1998.  Distribution of a limited Sir2 protein pool regulates the strength of yeast rDNA silencing and is modulated by Sir4p. Genetics 149: 1205–1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Smith J. S., Caputo E., Boeke J. D., 1999.  A genetic screen for ribosomal DNA silencing defects identifies multiple DNA replication and chromatin-modulating factors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 3184–3197. 10.1128/MCB.19.4.3184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Song S., Johnson F. B., 2018.  Epigenetic mechanisms impacting aging: a focus on histone levels and telomeres. Genes (Basel) 9: 201 10.3390/genes9040201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Spencer F., Gerring S. L., Connelly C., Hieter P., 1990.  Mitotic chromosome transmission fidelity mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 124: 237–249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Steffen K. K., Kennedy B. K., Kaeberlein M., 2009.  Measuring replicative life span in the budding yeast. J. Vis. Exp. 28: e1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Straight A. F., Shou W., Dowd G. J., Turck C. W., Deshaies R. J., et al. , 1999.  Net1, a Sir2-associated nucleolar protein required for rDNA silencing and nucleolar integrity. Cell 97: 245–256. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80734-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Sunshine A. B., Ong G. T., Nickerson D. P., Carr D., Murakami C. J., et al. , 2016.  Aneuploidy shortens replicative lifespan in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Aging Cell 15: 317–324. 10.1111/acel.12443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Takeuchi Y., Horiuchi T., Kobayashi T., 2003.  Transcription-dependent recombination and the role of fork collision in yeast rDNA. Genes Dev. 17: 1497–1506. 10.1101/gad.1085403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Uhlmann F., 2016.  SMC complexes: from DNA to chromosomes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17: 399–412. 10.1038/nrm.2016.30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Unal E., Heidinger-Pauli J. M., Kim W., Guacci V., Onn I., et al. , 2008.  A molecular determinant for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 321: 566–569. 10.1126/science.1157880 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Utani K., Aladjem M. I., 2018.  Extra view: Sirt1 acts as a gatekeeper of replication initiation to preserve genomic stability. Nucleus 9: 261–267. 10.1080/19491034.2018.1456218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Wasko B. M., Kaeberlein M., 2014.  Yeast replicative aging: a paradigm for defining conserved longevity interventions. FEMS Yeast Res. 14: 148–159. 10.1111/1567-1364.12104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Winston F., Dollard C., Ricupero-Hovasse S. L., 1995.  Construction of a set of convenient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C. Yeast 11: 53–55. 10.1002/yea.320110107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Wood A. J., Severson A. F., Meyer B. J., 2010.  Condensin and cohesin complexity: the expanding repertoire of functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11: 391–404. 10.1038/nrg2794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Wu C. S., Chen Y. F., Gartenberg M. R., 2011.  Targeted sister chromatid cohesion by Sir2. PLoS Genet. 7: e1002000 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Yoshida K., Bacal J., Desmarais D., Padioleau I., Tsaponina O., et al. , 2014.  The histone deacetylases Sir2 and Rpd3 act on ribosomal DNA to control the replication program in budding yeast. Mol. Cell 54: 691–697. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.04.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Zhu J., Heinecke D., Mulla W. A., Bradford W. D., Rubinstein B., et al. , 2015.  Single-cell based quantitative assay of chromosome transmission fidelity. G3 (Bethesda) 5: 1043–1056. 10.1534/g3.115.017913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Strains and plasmids are available upon request. Tables S1 and S2, containing lists of all strains and oligodeoxynucleotides used in the study, are included in the Supplemental Information file. Figures S1 through S7 are also included in the same file. Supplemental material available at https://doi.org/10.25386/genetics.7766783.


Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES