Skip to main content
Journal of Pediatric Genetics logoLink to Journal of Pediatric Genetics
. 2018 Oct 26;8(2):73–80. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675339

First Report of Congenital Short Bowel Syndrome in an Iranian Patient Caused by a Mutation in the CLMP Gene

Jalal Gharesouran 1,2,3, Behnaz Salek Esfahani 1, Saeed Farajzadeh Valilou 1, Mohsen Moradi 1, Mir Hadi Mousavi 4, Maryam Rezazadeh 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6499612  PMID: 31061750

Abstract

Congenital short bowel syndrome (CSBS) is a rare congenital neonatal disorder. CSBS results from intestinal impairment during embryogenesis. Mutated CXADR-like membrane protein ( CLMP ) and Filamin A genes are involved in the cause of CSBS. In this study, due to our misdiagnosis, we had to perform whole exome sequencing on the patient, and also we implemented cosegregation analysis on his parents with consanguineous marriage and also parents' mothers. We identified a homozygous loss of function mutation in the CLMP gene in exon 5 (c.664C > T, p.R222X). Also, both parents and grandmothers of the proband were heterozygous for this mutation. Loss of function mutation in CLMP causes CSBS, leading to impaired intestinal development.

Keywords: congenital short bowel syndrome, CXADR-like membrane protein, whole exome sequencing

Introduction

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is characterized by a sum of functional alternations that are the consequence of a critical loss in the small bowel length. In neonates, SBS is generally known as an acquired disorder and leads to surgical resection of the small intestine due to intestinal atresia or enterocolitis. In a small minority of cases, the SBS can be congenital. The etiopathogenesis of congenital SBS (CSBS) is poorly identified. 1 CSBS is a heritable, complex, clinical disorder of the newborn with a high mortality rate. In addition, this feature is characterized by malabsorption and diarrhea as a result of the shortened small intestine with a mean length of 50 cm in comparison with the normal length (190–280 cm). 2 3 In several cases, the colon is affected too. 4 5 6 Malabsorption may lead to nutritional deficiencies. Also, the short bowel results in poor growth, fatty stools, malnutrition, abdominal pain, and dehydration. 7 The developmental defect can cause malrotation of the intestine, which is always present in these patients. They usually have normal mental ability. 8 9 Patients with CSBS are born with functional or anatomical loss of adequate small bowel length that is a consequence of a developmental problem of the small intestine. 10 Moreover, receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) as a life-saving therapy is required for patients with SBS, whether it is congenital or acquired and this strategy should be continued for the first 2 years of life. 8 11 PN might lead to fatal and acute complications including liver disease and sepsis. 12 SBS in children could be improved by surgical interventions through intestinal lengthening or transplantation to increase intestinal area and minimize the complications of PN therapy. Intestinal adaptation and pharmaceutical therapies are other therapeutic methods to ameliorate the performance of remnant bowel. 13 As time passes, length and absorption capacity of the small intestine improve causing better absorption of nutrients. In spite of significant efforts in dealing with the disease, great numbers of patients die of starvation in the early stage of life.

Regarding genetics studies on the basis of disease have shown that CSBS is frequently observed in consanguineous families. In previous studies, CLMP and Filamin A ( FLNA ) were reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of the recessive and X-linked form of CSBS, respectively. 14 15 16 Here, we present the first case of CSBS in a family without the history of SBS in Iran.

Case Presentations

The patient (IV-5) was a Turkish boy born at 38 weeks of gestation from consanguineous parents (III-8 and III-9) ( Fig. 1 ). The patient was the first child of a first cousin marriage without a familial history of the specific disease and there was no family history of CSBS ( Fig. 2 ). The body weight was 3 kg, and body length was 50 cm at birth. He was referred to our center 50 days after birth with acute symptoms including vomit and diarrhea. Clinical examinations and checkup revealed intestinal atresia, dehydration, paralysis, metabolic acidosis, and protein intolerance. The patient has no dysfunction in the ureteral system. At laparotomy, the small intestine of the patient was measured to be 70 cm in length. After 32 days of hospitalization, bilious vomiting, intestinal malrotation, and abdominal distention were observed and the baby was treated with serum therapy. During 5 months, the patient had only 300 g weight gain regarding minimum weight (3.09 kg). At first, the patient was suspected to be suffering from Hirschsprung and Noonan disease, and surgical resection of the short intestine was performed. After the operation, the patient had sepsis symptoms that represent the possibility of necrotizing enterocolitis. About 2 months after hospitalization, different signs such as hepatosplenomegaly, parathyroid malfunction, thrombocytopenia, hypocalcemia, and reduction in Na + and K + levels were detected. Abdominal radiography indicated the absence of gaseous dilation in intestine lobes and pneumoperitoneum. In addition, increased opacity in the upper part of the abdomen showed the probability of fluid existence in the abdomen. Thorax radiography indicated slight opacity in the right parahilar, paracardiac area, and atrophic thymus. No brain lesion was detected in brain computed tomography scan. The patient condition got worse and failed to be treated. Therefore, clinician's pediatricians suspected CSBS and the patient has been referred to our medical genetic division for genetic counseling.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Family pedigree after genetic counseling.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Affected child at 7 months of age.

Materials and Methods

Whole Exome Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from 200 μL peripheral blood lymphocytes from the proband (IV-5) and his parents (III-8 and III-9) as well as the patient's grandmothers (II-4 and II-6) using Geneall kit. Proband genomic DNA was subjected to whole exome sequencing (WES). The exome library of the proband was prepared using the Agilent SureSelect V6-Post kit (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, California, United States), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Subsequently, the sample was sequenced via Illumina HiSeq4000 instrument. Sequence reads were then aligned to the reference human genome (hg19 from UCSC) using the Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool (BWA-0.7.12).

In Silico Analysis of Whole Exome Data

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) duplicates were excluded using Picard (picard-tools-1.130). Variant calling was done by using the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATKv3.4.0), and local realignment and quality recalibration were performed. Finally, annotation of variants was performed using wANNOVAR ( http://wannovar.wglab.org/ ). Minor allele frequencies greater than 1% were considered as common and unlikely to be pathogenic variants and these variants were removed by using 1000 Genomes Project, Exome Aggregation Consortium, Genome Aggregation Database, and Exome Sequencing Project. Variant prioritization followed the use of multiple prediction algorithms such as SIFT, MutationTaster, PolyPhen-2, CADD, GERP + +, and ClinVar.

Sanger Sequencing Validation and Segregation Analysis

Validation and segregation testing of the CLMP (c.664C > T, p.R222X) variant in exon 5 of the gene was performed using PCR on the proband (IV-5) and his parents and grandmothers (II-4 and II-6) using standard cycling conditions with a forward (5′-TTGTGCAGACTACAACCACCC-3′) and reverse (5′-GGTGATAGCCATATCCTTCTGG-3) primer. Primers were designed using Primer3 and PCR was done using Taq DNA Polymerase Master Mix RED 2x (AMPLIQON Company, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark). Then, amplicons proceeded Sanger sequencing and the data were aligned against human reference genome UCSC build GRCh37 (hg19) and analyzed using CodonCode Aligner software (v 6.0.2).

Results

We performed WES to find the genetic cause of the disease in the patient (IV-5). A mutation in CLMP was detected in the affected infant. Precisely, we identified a substitution of thymine to cytosine in the first nucleotide of codon 222 (c.664C > T) in exon 5 of the gene, which predicts the transition of arginine to a premature stop codon (p.R222X). According to MutationTaster, this frame-shift mutation causes a stop codon which is known as pathogenic and deleterious mutation. This variant has been confirmed by Sanger sequencing in the affected boy of the family. We also implemented cosegregation analysis to see whether this variant was inherited or not. The Sanger sequencing results showed that both parents (III-8 and III-9) are heterozygous for this variant. In addition, regarding consanguineous marriage, heterozygous patterns were observed in both grandmothers (II-4 and II-6) ( Fig. 3 ).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Tracing ancestry mutation by Sanger sequencing in affected child ( A ), father ( B ), mother ( C ), paternal grandmother ( D ), and maternal grandmother ( E ), respectively.

Discussion

In the current study, a homozygous mutation in CLMP gene, p.R222X, was identified in a 2-month-old infant from a Turkish family in Iran, who is suffering from specific symptoms of CSBS and this mutation has also been reported before in two CSBS patients from a Canadian family. 15 The mutant allele was present in all unaffected family members in a Mendelian recessive manner. Furthermore, an in-silico analysis of the structural and functional impact of R222X in the CLMP gene revealed that it causes an in-frame nonsense mutation which created premature stop codon in mRNA copies. Arginine residue at position 222 in CLMP protein locates in the immunoglobulin (Ig)-like C2-type 2 domain is similar to the antibody constant domain. Changing of the arginine to a stop codon at this position disrupts the Ig-like domain. These domains might be involved in a variety of cellular processes, including cell-cell recognition, muscle structure, cell-surface receptors, and the immune system. 17 It is suggested that this single specific ancestral mutation can disturb gene function and can be responsible for clinical symptoms revealed in the affected patient with congenital SBS.

According to reports of both, congenital and acquired SBS, this complex clinical condition has overlapping features with other disorders. In our case, at first, the patient was misdiagnosed with Noonan syndrome and Hirschsprung disease. Based on our knowledge, no study has been performed about the relation between Noonan syndrome and short intestine. 18 On the other hand, Hirschsprung disease and SBS seem to have common characteristics. Lien et al, in 2012, described a case with Hirschsprung disease with SBS and malnutrition. 19 SBS is a consequence of necrotizing enterocolitis and Hirschsprung disease. 20 Enterocolitis is also observed in patients with Hirschsprung disease. 21 Necrotizing enterocolitis is caused by intestinal tissue damage. Typical symptoms include abdominal distention, feeding intolerance, and bloody stool. 22 Vomiting, abdominal distention, and enterocolitis are common features of these two phenomena. 23 24 However, there is no study about direct relation of CSBS and Hirschsprung disease. They just share some common characteristics which misled the physicians ( Table 1 ).

Table 1. Prevalence and featured symptoms of short bowel syndrome, Hirschsprung disease, and Noonan syndrome.

Syndromes Prevalence Key features References
Short bowel syndrome 1 in million Shortened small intestine
Diarrhea and steatorrhea
Fluid depletion
Necrotizing enterocolitis
Abdominal pain
Weight loss and malnutrition
Malabsorption
Fatigue
Intestinal atresias
13
Hirschsprung disease 1:5000 Delayed of passage of meconium
Abdominal distension
Fecal retention
Constipation
Vomiting
Neonatal enterocolitis.
37 38
Noonan syndrome 1:1000–1:2500 Craniofacial dysmorphia
Pulmonary valvular stenosis
Restrictive lung function
Chest deformities
Failure to thrive
Intestinal malrotation
Postnatal growth retardation
Lymphatic dysplasias
Developmental and cognitive delay
Congenital hypotonia
39 40

CSBS is a malabsorption syndrome caused by shortened small bowel length with approximately high morbidity and mortality. 24 The severity depends highly on the length and function of the remaining portion of the small intestine. It is also important to know, which part of the small bowel has been shortened in these patients, since different parts have different function and histology, as a result, the residual length determines the outcome of disease. 25 26 Neonates with short bowel usually present electrolyte deficiency, nutrient deficiency, weight loss, and osmotic diarrhea. The main cause of a short bowel in newborns is not fully understood. 1

Hamilton et al described CSBS for the first time in 1969. 7 The genes CLMP and FLNA were recently identified as causes of CSBS. CLMP encodes CXADR-like membrane protein that acts as an adhesion molecule and colocalizes with tight junction-associated proteins. CLMP, a 373 amino acids protein, is a member of cortical thymocyte marker in Xenopus (CTX) family and shares a similar overall structure as the other family members with an extracellular region, a transmembrane part, and a cytoplasmic tail. Several other homologues members of this protein have been identified in human and mouse orthologues to the CTX (CTH/CTM), the junctional adhesion molecule-1, 2, and 3, the A33 antigen, and the coxsackie and adenovirus receptor. 27 CLMP mRNA is expressed in several cells, generally in epithelial cells in different tissues. 28 CLMP expression has also been confirmed in intestinal epithelial cells and hence, loss of function of this gene may cause proliferation defects in the small intestine. 15

The role of FLNA in intestinal development is still unclear. CSBS patients with loss of function mutations in FLNA presented multiple congenital abnormalities in addition to a shortened small bowel, while patients with a mutation in CLMP have phenotypes mostly limited to the intestinal failure. 26 These genes were observed in the recessive and X-linked form of CSBS, respectively. In some cases, the small intestine in patients with CLMP mutations is longer and diagnosis is performed earlier in life in comparison to patients with FLNA mutations. 26 29 30 Actin-binding domain of FLNA protein is located in the terminal region. A study showed that a deletion in its region could cause abnormal actin arrangement in the lymphoblastic cell line of a CSBS case. 31 CLMP interacts with actin filaments with the assistance of interacting proteins such as ZO-1 which is involved in cell proliferation. 32 33 Therefore, both gene products are involved in the same protein network. This interaction is crucial for intestinal development ( Fig. 4A ).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

( A ) Schematic picture of CXADR-like membrane protein (CLMP) showing a signal sequence and two Ig loops (the V and C2 domains), an extracellular region of 233 amino acids (aa), a transmembrane portion (22 aa), and a cytoplasmic tail (118 aa). The site effect of CLMP mutations is also shown. Position of previously reported mutations and p.R222X mutation identified in this study is indicated in the figure. Co-localization of CLMP with the tight junction marker ZO-1 and actin is also shown. ( B ) Schematic representation of CLMP variants that have been detected to date. Previously reported variants and p.R222x mutation are shown in the figure.

The CLMP and FLNA knockout animal models can shed light on the underlying pathophysiology of CSBS. While knock-down of zebrafish ortholog ( CLMPa ) causes a considerable reduction in intestinal length and approved the importance of CLMP in intestinal embryogenesis, recalculation of length of intestine versus body length shows that there is no difference between knock-down zebrafish and controls. 15 In addition, mutant mice are frequently used to examine the function of a protein. CLMP-deficient mice display a delay in body growth and inability to absorb nutrients and consequently show dehydration and starvation. However, the intestinal length is not reduced in mutant mice in comparison to wild-type mice as shown for the human CLMP gene. 34

Recently, Gonnaud et al described a CSBS patient with intestinal malrotation and short intestine with 35 cm length and also chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction syndrome. They identified two previously unreported mutations in the CLMP gene. The patient had a compound heterozygous genotype for (c.28 + 1G > C) in intron 1 and (c502C > T, p.R168X) in exon 4 inherited paternally and maternally, respectively. 35 In another study, Alves et al have identified novel CLMP variants in three female patients. Two of them were siblings of a consanguineous family and displayed a homozygous nonsense variant (c.508C > T) in exon 4 that was inherited from their parents. The third one was found to be heterozygous for two variants c.410G > A and c.29–2A4G located in exons 4 and 2 ( Fig. 4B ), respectively. 36

Conclusion

In sum, the patient presented here has different clinical manifestations related to CSBS and we report this for the first time in Iran. The genetic test, using WES, identified a homozygous nonsense mutation in the CLMP gene in this patient. Our further analysis exhibited the inherited pattern of the mutation in the family.

Acknowledgment

The authors are deeply grateful to the family for their participation in this investigation.

Conflict of Interest None declared.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from parents of participant included in the study.

Both authors contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Hasosah M, Lemberg D A, Skarsgard E, Schreiber R. Congenital short bowel syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. Can J Gastroenterol. 2008;22(01):71–74. doi: 10.1155/2008/590143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Siebert J R. Small-intestine length in infants and children. Am J Dis Child. 1980;134(06):593–595. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1980.02130180051015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Reiquam C W, Allen R P, Akers D R. Normal and abnormal small bowel lengths: an analysis of 389 autopsy cases in infants and children. Am J Dis Child. 1965;109(05):447–451. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1965.02090020449013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sabharwal G, Strouse P J, Islam S, Zoubi N. Congenital short-gut syndrome. Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34(05):424–427. doi: 10.1007/s00247-003-1087-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sarimurat N, Celayir S, Elicevik M, Dervisoglu S, Yeker D. Congenital short bowel syndrome associated with appendiceal agenesis and functional intestinal obstruction. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33(04):666–667. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90343-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Iwai N, Yanagihara J, Tsuto T, Taniguchi H, Takahashi T. Congenital short small bowel with malrotation in a neonate. Z Kinderchir. 1985;40(06):371–373. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1059753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hamilton J R, Reilly B J, Morecki R. Short small intestine associated with malrotation: a newly described congenital cause of intestinal malabsorption. Gastroenterology. 1969;56(01):124–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ordonez P, Sondheimer J M, Fidanza S, Wilkening G, Hoffenberg E J. Long-term outcome of a patient with congenital short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;42(05):576–580. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000189360.84169.da. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schalamon J, Schober P H, Gallippi P, Matthyssens L, Höllwarth M E. Congenital short-bowel; a case study and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1999;9(04):248–250. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1072255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Erez I, Reish O, Kovalivker M, Lazar L, Raz A, Katz S. Congenital short-bowel and malrotation: clinical presentation and outcome of six affected offspring in three related families. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2001;11(05):331–334. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dorney S F, Byrne W J, Ament M E. Case of congenital short small intestine: survival with use of long-term parenteral feeding. Pediatrics. 1986;77(03):386–389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sansaricq C, Chen W J, Manka M, Davis D, Snyderman S. Familial congenital short small bowel with associated defects. A long-term survival. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1984;23(08):453–455. doi: 10.1177/000992288402300809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kelly D G, Tappenden K A, Winkler M F. Short bowel syndrome: highlights of patient management, quality of life, and survival. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014;38(04):427–437. doi: 10.1177/0148607113512678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.van der Werf C S, Hsiao N H, Conroy S et al. CLMP is essential for intestinal development, but does not play a key role in cellular processes involved in intestinal epithelial development. PLoS One. 2013;8(02):e54649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Van Der Werf C S, Wabbersen T D, Hsiao N H et al. CLMP is required for intestinal development, and loss-of-function mutations cause congenital short-bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(03):453–462000. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.11.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.van der Werf C S, Sribudiani Y, Verheij J B et al. Congenital short bowel syndrome as the presenting symptom in male patients with FLNA mutations. Genet Med. 2013;15(04):310–313. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Teichmann S A, Chothia C. Immunoglobulin superfamily proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Biol. 2000;296(05):1367–1383. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Krysiak R, Gdula-Dymek A, Bednarska-Czerwińska A, Okopień B. Growth hormone therapy in children and adults. Pharmacol Rep. 2007;59(05):500–516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lien C H, Lin Y L, Li S T, Lin C Y. Skin lesion in a patient with Hirschsprung's disease complicated with short bowel syndrome: what is your diagnosis? BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012:201. doi: 10.1136/bcr-03-2012-6078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Reddy V S, Patole S K, Rao S. Role of probiotics in short bowel syndrome in infants and children--a systematic review. Nutrients. 2013;5(03):679–699. doi: 10.3390/nu5030679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Frykman P K, Short S S. Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis: prevention and therapy. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2012;21(04):328–335. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2012.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Neu J, Walker W A. Necrotizing enterocolitis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(03):255–264. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1005408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Elhalaby E A, Teitelbaum D H, Coran A G, Heidelberger K P.Enterocolitis associated with Hirschsprung's disease: a clinical histopathological correlative study J Pediatr Surg 199530071023–1026., discussion 1026–1027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mandal K C, Halder P, Barman S, Mukhopadhyay B. Congenital short bowel syndrome due to absent midgut. Indian J Pediatr. 2016;83(09):1041–1042. doi: 10.1007/s12098-016-2112-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Koffeman G I, van Gemert W G, George E K, Veenendaal R A. Classification, epidemiology and aetiology. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;17(06):879–893. doi: 10.1016/s1521-6918(03)00099-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.van der Werf C S, Halim D, Verheij J B, Alves M M, Hofstra R M. Congenital short bowel syndrome: from clinical and genetic diagnosis to the molecular mechanisms involved in intestinal elongation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1852(11):2352–2361. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Raschperger E, Engstrom U, Pettersson R F, Fuxe J. CLMP, a novel member of the CTX family and a new component of epithelial tight junctions. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(01):796–804. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308249200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sze K L, Lui W Y, Lee W M. Post-transcriptional regulation of CLMP mRNA is controlled by tristetraprolin in response to TNFalpha via c-Jun N-terminal kinase signalling. Biochem J. 2008;410(03):575–583. doi: 10.1042/BJ20070901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Siva C, Brasington R, Totty W, Sotelo A, Atkinson J. Synovial lipomatosis (lipoma arborescens) affecting multiple joints in a patient with congenital short bowel syndrome. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(05):1088–1092. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kern I B, Leece A, Bohane T. Congenital short gut, malrotation, and dysmotility of the small bowel. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1990;11(03):411–415. doi: 10.1097/00005176-199010000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nakamura F, Stossel T P, Hartwig J H. The filamins: organizers of cell structure and function. Cell Adhes Migr. 2011;5(02):160–169. doi: 10.4161/cam.5.2.14401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Matter K, Balda M S.Epithelial tight junctions, gene expression and nucleo-junctional interplay J Cell Sci 2007120(Pt 9):1505–1511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Balda M S, Matter K. The tight junction protein ZO-1 and an interacting transcription factor regulate ErbB-2 expression. EMBO J. 2000;19(09):2024–2033. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.9.2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Langhorst H, Jüttner R, Groneberg D et al. The IgCAM CLMP regulates expression of Connexin43 and Connexin45 in intestinal and ureteral smooth muscle contraction in mice. Dis Model Mech. 2018;11(02):dmm032128. doi: 10.1242/dmm.032128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gonnaud L, Alves M M, Cremillieux C et al. Two new mutations of the CLMP gene identified in a newborn presenting congenital short-bowel syndrome. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2016;40(06):e65–e67. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2015.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Alves M M, Halim D, Maroofian R et al. Genetic screening of congenital short bowel syndrome patients confirms CLMP as the major gene involved in the recessive form of this disorder. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24(11):1627–1629. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Amiel J, Sproat-Emison E, Garcia-Barcelo M et al. Hirschsprung disease, associated syndromes and genetics: a review. J Med Genet. 2008;45(01):1–14. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2007.053959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Till H, Castellani C, Moissl-Eichinger C, Gorkiewicz G, Singer G. Disruptions of the intestinal microbiome in necrotizing enterocolitis, short bowel syndrome, and Hirschsprung's associated enterocolitis. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1154. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Turner A M. Noonan syndrome. J Paediatr Child Health. 2014;50(10):E14–E20. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01970.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Smpokou P, Zand D J, Rosenbaum K N, Summar M L. Malignancy in Noonan syndrome and related disorders. Clin Genet. 2015;88(06):516–522. doi: 10.1111/cge.12568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Pediatric Genetics are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES