Abstract
The design of active and durable catalysts for the H2O/O2 interconversion is one of the major challenges of electrocatalysis for renewable energy. The oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is catalyzed by SrRuO3 with low potentials (ca. 1.35 VRHE), but the catalyst’s durability is insufficient. Here we show that Na doping enhances both activity and durability in acid media. DFT reveals that whereas SrRuO3 binds reaction intermediates too strongly, Na doping of ~0.125 leads to nearly optimal OER activity. Na doping increases the oxidation state of Ru, thereby displacing positively O p-band and Ru d-band centers, weakening Ru-adsorbate bonds. The enhanced durability of Na-doped perovskites is concomitant with the stabilization of Ru centers with slightly higher oxidation states, higher dissolution potentials, lower surface energy and less distorted RuO6 octahedra. These results illustrate how high OER activity and durability can be simultaneously engineered by chemical doping of perovskites.
Subject terms: Solid-state chemistry, Renewable energy, Electrocatalysis
While water splitting may afford a renewable means to store energy in chemical bonds, water oxidation catalysts suffer from poor stabilities in acidic media. Here, authors show sodium doping of strontium ruthenate to improve the catalytic durability while maintaining a high O2 evolution activity.
Introduction
Electrochemical technologies promise the efficient and versatile storage and use of renewable energy in cycles that do not generate harmful by-products1. Therefore, they are expected to become major players in the shift towards circular economy and energy systems, once their present problems are solved2. For instance, the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in which H2O is oxidized to O2 is crucial in electrolyzers and in the charging of metal-air batteries. To compensate the sluggish kinetics of the OER, high overpotentials are needed in practical applications, causing severe energy losses3. Ir-based materials are the state-of-the-art OER catalysts4,5, which owing to their high price and scarcity must be replaced to facilitate wider implementation of electrolyzers. Functional oxides such as perovskites are promising OER electrocatalysts, especially in alkaline media6–10. Recently, high OER activities in alkaline electrolyte have been reported for thin films of SrRuO3 (0.1 mA cm−2 at 1.33 V vs. RHE)11. However, this material loses its activity after only two cycles. The lack of stability of Ru-based oxides appears to be related to the transformation of Ru4+ into Ru>4+ at high voltages (above 1.3–1.4 V)12,13 leading to the decomposition of the perovskite, which starts with Sr dissolution followed by the collapse of the mixed-oxide structure11. Very few examples of perovskites with high OER activity in acid exist. For instance, SrRuO3 nanopowders13 (initial 30 Ag−1 at 1.37 V), bulk iridium-based double perovskites14 (10 mAcm−2oxide at 1.6 V), SrIrO3/IrOx thin films15 (10 mA cm−2oxide at 1.5 V). On the other hand, Ir, Ru, IrO2 and RuO2 nanoparticles show high OER activity, Ru-based compounds present 2 mA cm−2 at 1.42 V and IrOx ~ 10 mA cm−2oxide at 1.52 V16,17. A grand challenge in electrocatalysis is, therefore, the design of perovskites with high and long-lasting OER activities in acid media.
Here we show that the OER activity and durability in acid of bulk SrRuO3 can be enhanced by Na+ doping in the Sr2+ position. Thus, Sr0.95Na0.05RuO3 and S0.90Na0.10RuO3 exhibit very high specific OER activity, with a potential of ~1.35 V (an overpotential of only 120 mV) at 0.5 mA cm−2geo. Thorough physical and chemical studies of fresh and used perovskites reveal that substituting Sr by Na increases the stability of the perovskite structure, thus preventing deactivation during repeated cycling. This result is also supported by DFT, demonstrating lower surface energy and higher dissolution potentials for Na-doped perovskites, which slows down the collapse of the perovskite structure.
Results and discussion
Composition, structure, and oxidation state
SrRuO3, Sr0.95Na0.05RuO3, and Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3 were prepared by sol–gel chemistry followed by thermal treatment in air, with an increase of the synthesis temperature as the content of Na increases (Methods section). The chemical composition of the samples was analyzed by PND, EDX, and ICP-OES (see Supplementary Note 1). Sr and Na contents of Sr0.936(7)/Na0.064(7) for x = 0.05 and Sr0.906(1)/Na0.094(1) for x = 0.10 were obtained from PND. As discussed below, STEM-EDX mappings confirm that Na is homogeneously distributed into the perovskites. Attempts to introduce higher Na, e.g., Sr0.85Na0.15RuO3 and Sr0.80Na0.20RuO3 were not successful. Thus, the actual content of Na in Sr0.85Na0.15RuO3 is x ~ 0.08, lower than the nominal value. This is probably because the higher synthesis temperature results in a partial evaporation of Na. In fact, Sr0.80Na0.20RuO3 could not be prepared. For what is worth, characterization details for Sr0.85Na0.15RuO3 are presented in the Supplementary Note 2, Supplementary Fig. 1, and Supplementary Tables 1, 2 and 3.
SrRuO3, Sr0.95Na0.05RuO3, and Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3 display perovskite structure (see x-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns, Supplementary Fig. 2). The cell volume decreases upon Na incorporation (Inset of Supplementary Fig. 2), justified by the smaller radii of Na+ and Ru>4+ compared to Sr2+ and Ru4+, respectively18, and in good agreement with previous literature19 and our DFT calculations (see the Computational Methods section).
Powder neutron diffraction (PND) is the most suitable technique to assess oxygen vacancies, atomic occupancies, structural distortions, atomic positions, bond distances, and angles of oxides. SrRuO3 and Na-doped samples adopt an orthorhombic perovskite structure with space group Pbnm, with Sr2+/Na+ located randomly at A sites and Run+ at B sites, as previously reported19. Fig. 1a shows good agreement between calculated and experimental PND data. The structural results obtained from PND Rietveld refinements are shown in Supplementary Table 4. First, we verified the lack of vacancies in A-sites and then we refined the Na occupancy into Sr-sites. The refined Na contents are close to the nominal values, in agreement with the values obtained by ICP-OES and the cell volume observed with XRD (Supplementary Note 1, Supplementary Fig. 2, and Supplementary Table 5). Figure 1b and Supplementary Fig. 3 show the Ru–O distances on the RuO6 octahedra. RuO6 octahedra in SrRuO3 are more distorted than in Sr0.95Na0.05RuO3 and Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3, with large ab in-plane deformation, shortened Ru-O1 distances (1.950(2) Å) and elongated Ru-O1 distances (2.006(2) Å). Note that this deformation has been previously reported for SrRuO320,21. Conversely, Na-doped samples show very similar Ru–O distances (of ca. 1.98 Å) on the RuO6 octahedra, indicating that the octahedra are regular and not distorted as in SrRuO3 (Fig. 1c). The different octahedra distortion of SrRuO3 and Na-doped samples could be a consequence of the slight change of Ru oxidation states in Na-doped perovskites, as confirmed from XAS (see below). SrRuO3 contains Ru4+ cations (4d4) with relatively extended d orbitals. Ru4+ adopts a low spin configuration (t2g3↑t2g1↓eg0)20, favouring Jahn–Teller distortions that split the threefold t2g into one lower dxz orbital and two higher dyz and dxy orbitals. Such Jahn–Teller distortion causes the aforementioned elongated and shortened Ru–O distances. However, upon Na doping, a slight over-oxidation to Ru>4+ occurs resulting in the partial elimination of the fourth spin of the t2g, which could prevent the Jahn–Teller effect (or produce a switch to a high spin configuration) resulting in more regular octahedra. In addition, the higher temperatures used for the synthesis of the Na-doped perovskites could affect the different distortions. The implications of the actual structure of the perovskite for the OER performance are discussed below.
PND results also show that, within the error, the perovskites lack cationic and oxygen vacancies (Supplementary Table 4). Further experimental evidences of the absence of short- or long-range ordered oxygen vacancies were attained from HRTEM and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns (Supplementary Fig. 4) in which diffraction spots for stoichiometric perovskites are the only ones observed. Moreover, DFT reveals large energies of formation of oxygen vacancies (bulk and surface), confirming the unlikely formation of such vacancies (Supplementary Note 3, Supplementary Fig. 5, and Supplementary Table 6). The lack of oxygen vacancies implies that Na incorporation is compensated by partial oxidation of Ru atoms.
The effect of Na doping in the structure and oxidation state of Ru was analyzed by x-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). We performed XAS in different energy ranges, soft and hard x-rays, to study the K-edge of Na, and the K-edges and M2,3-edges of Ru. The spectra of the Na K-edge confirm the presence of Na in the Na-doped perovskites (Supplementary Fig. 6). The strong overlap with the Sr L-edge background signal prevents an accurate estimation of the actual Na-content in each perovskite by this technique. In addition, the analysis of the Ru K-edge further confirms the incorporation of Na into the perovskites (Supplementary Note 4, and Supplementary Figs. 6b and 7). The Fourier transforms from the Ru K-edge EXAFS signals (phase non-corrected) shown in Supplementary Fig. 6b reveal that the signals for SrRuO3 are less intense than the ones of the Na-doped samples, indicating a higher distortion of the RuO6 octahedra in SrRuO3, in agreement with PND data.
The oxidation state of Ru was determined by the analysis of the Ru M2,3-edge. This edge is associated with the promotion of 3p to 4d orbitals in Ru and is more sensitive to changes in the d-states than the K-edge. As observed in Fig. 1d, the XANES signals of Sr0.95Na0.05RuO3 and Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3 appear at higher energies than SrRuO3. In addition, a slight broadening to the low energy region of the peaks of the Na-doped is observed. Both features are indicative of a higher oxidation state of Ru atoms in the Na-containing perovskites22.
Electrochemical performance
The OER activity of SrRuO3, Sr0.95Na0.05RuO3, and Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3 was evaluated in O2-saturated 0.1 M HClO4 at 1600 rpm. The catalysts were deposited onto a glassy carbon electrode using an ink (Methods section). High surface area carbon was mixed with the perovskites (1:5 in weight) to improve the conductivity23.
Figure 2a shows the current densities (j) normalized by the geometric area (0.196 cm2). Na-doped samples present similar current densities than SrRuO3 in the whole polarization range. The potential to reach a current density of j = 0.5 mA cm−2geo is ~1.35 V for the three samples, equivalent to an overpotential (η) of only 120 mV. In comparison, the potential to achieve j = 0.5 mAcm−2geo with RuO2 is ~1.4 V16. The low overpotentials of Sr1-xNaxRuO3 are in line with the potential reported to achieve the same current density for thin films of SrRuO3 in alkaline media of 1.35–1.40 V (the actual value depending on the exposed plane)11 and Ru metal in acid media (~1.32 V)5. However, the latter catalysts transform into RuOx already in the first reaction cycle losing most of their initial activity.
As reported in Supplementary Table 7, the Na-containing perovskites have larger particle sizes than SrRuO3. Although it is well accepted that the OER is a structure sensitive reaction, the actual effect of particle size is not clear. Krtil et al.24 reported that the onset for the oxygen evolution current is particle-size independent for RuO2 electrodes, but not for Ru0.8Co0.2O2−x. By contrast, Reier et al.25 reported that nanosized Pt, Ru, and Ir particles are more active than the corresponding bulk phases. Shao–Horn et al.26 found that the OER activity of La0.1(Ba0.5Sr0.5)0.9Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ perovskites does not follow a linear relationship with particle size, and Schmidt et al.27 indicated that the OER activity of IrOx does not increase monotonically with the surface area and suggest that morphology can also play a key role. In this sense, Matsumoto et al.28,29 reported that OER activity of mixed oxides could be related to the exposed facets, but failed to identify the most active ones. Recently, by using thin films of SrRuO3, Markovic et al.11 reported that the (111) face is more active for the OER than (001). Shao-Horn et al.30 reported that (100) facets of RuO2 and IrO2 are more active in alkaline media than the thermodynamically stable (110). We have found no evidences of preferential surface termination in our samples, but as shown in Supplementary Table 7, particle size increases with Na doping. Therefore, and in order to assess intrinsic catalytic activities (is), the OER currents have been normalized to the oxide surface area, using BET, mass-specific surface areas (AS)31, or electrochemical surface areas (ECSA);32,33 see Supplementary Note 5 and Supplementary Table 7. The promotional effect of Na doping is clearly observed in Supplementary Fig. 8, where is follows the order Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3 ≥ Sr0.95Na0.05RuO3 > SrRuO3. Recently, a protocol to account for the effect of bubbles in the active area during the OER has been reported34.
In Fig. 2b we report the OER intrinsic activities vs. AS. Na-doped perovskites show higher current densities than SrRuO3. For comparison, the potential to reach 10 mA cm−2oxide with Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3 is 1.4 V; less positive than those reported for state-of-the-art perovskites of 1.5 V for SrIrO3/IrOx15 or 1.5–1.6 V for Ir-based double perovskites14. The actual production of O2 during the OER has been confirmed by using a RRDE (rotating ring disk electrode, see Supplementary Note 6 and Supplementary Fig. 9) and by following O2 evolution during the OER, using a mass spectrometer probe immersed in the electrolyte (Supplementary Note 7 and Supplementary Fig. 10).
Figure 2b compares the Tafel plots of the intrinsic activities of the catalysts under study with the best catalysts in acid electrolyte reported in the literature. The initial activities of Sr1−xNaxRuO3 are higher than the ones reported for similar catalysts. Currents similar to Ir double perovskites or SrIrO3/IrOx (~5–10 mA cm−2oxide)14,15 are achieved by Sr1-xNaxRuO3 at significantly lower overpotentials.
The catalytic activity enhancement of SrRuO3 upon Na doping is analyzed in Fig. 2c using a DFT-based screening study in which the OER mechanism on all materials is assumed to proceed as: H2O → *OH → *O → *OOH → O2. This analysis outlines clear activity trends, namely that progressive Na doping weakens the adsorption energies because the surface oxygen p-band center and the Ru d-band center are positively displaced (see Supplementary Note 8 and Supplementary Fig. 11)35. The combinatorial model in Supplementary Note 9 and Supplementary Figs. 12 and 13 shows that doping is beneficial for moderate Na doping (0 < x < 0.125) but becomes deleterious at larger Na doping (x > 0.125); see Supplementary Figs. 12 and 13. Figure 2c shows that Sr0.875Na0.125RuO3 is at the top of the volcano and that its decomposition into RuO2 decreases the activity. The activity of various defective surfaces (Sr0.875RuO3, Sr0.750Na0.125RuO3, and Sr0.625Na0.250RuO3, RuOx/SrRuO3, see Supplementary Fig. 14c) is always lower than that of Sr0.875Na0.125RuO3 but generally higher than that of RuO2. These results show that as the pristine Na-doped perovskite decomposes (via Sr dissolution, Na dissolution or both, see Supplementary Note 10 and Supplementary Figs. 14b and 15), the activity decreases until it reaches that of RuO2, in agreement with our durability experiments (see below).
Although there is no one-to-one connection between theoretical and experimental overpotentials (Fig. 2b, c); Jaramillo et al.36 noted that the two overpotentials agree well when the experimental ones are taken at a current density of 1 mA·cm−2oxide. Thus, Fig. 2c contains suitable data from the literature showing good agreement between theory and experiments and confirms the high activity of Na-doped SrRuO3. The differences between Fig. 2b, c are probably due to DFT-based errors37, which in view of their intrinsic nature (because they are present in all data), translate into error bands around the volcano lines in Fig. 2c. In particular, the use of scaling relations (Supplementary Fig. 14a) and GGA exchange-correlation functionals set those errors at approximately ±0.2 eV for adsorption energies (±0.2 V for (over)potentials). See Supplementary Notes 11 and 12.
We stress here that screening analyses are not intended to elucidate the exact OER mechanism, which is the subject of different types of studies38, but rather to enable the simultaneous comparison of several different materials that clarify the role of Na incorporation and dissolution on the activity. Further discussion on this subject is provided in Supplementary Note 11. Note in passing that Govindarajan et al.39 recently proposed a descriptor called electrochemical-step symmetry index (ESSI) for OER catalysts (see Supplementary Note 11 and Supplementary Fig. 14b). Although the descriptor is based on the departures of OER reaction energies from the ideal value of 1.23 V, it does not depend on scaling relations, unlike the volcano plot in Fig. 2c. The conclusions drawn using ESSI are analogous to those of Fig. 2c, which substantiates our analysis. Furthermore, the ESSI analysis in Supplementary Fig. 14b suggests that Sr0.875Na0.125RuO3 could be further improved by strengthening its *OH adsorption energy by 0.16 eV.
Stability during OER
Durability is a major concern when considering the actual implementation of an active OER catalyst in an electrolyzer, especially in acid electrolyte. As observed in Fig. 2d, replacing Sr by Na significantly improves the catalyst’s stability. After 20 consecutive cycles of reaction, SrRuO3 loses more than 85% of its initial activity. This is in line with the observation that SrRuO3 loses its activity after few cycles11,13. Remarkably, Na-doped perovskites only lose ca. 15% of their initial activity after 20 cycles. In other words, to lose 65% of initial activity, SrRuO3 needs only ~7 cycles while Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3 needs ~80 (Supplementary Note 13 and Supplementary Figs. 16 and 17). The voltammograms recorded during the OER (Supplementary Fig. 16) are in line with those of Ru-based perovskites13. Contrary to what is observed for Ir-based perovskites40, features due to the formation of oxides (RuOx) are not observed in the capacitive region of the voltammograms, probably because the expected features for the oxides overlap with the current due to the OER13. We emphasize the durability obtained for Sr0.95Na0.05RuO3 and Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3, first because most mixed oxides are not stable in acid, so finding a catalyst with such high activity, low overpotential, and durability over several cycles is already a noteworthy result. Second, because the high activities obtained are only met by Ru or Ir metals, which are rather unstable41. For instance, Ru metal in acid media loses most of its activity after the first cycle of reaction and completely dissolves within the first 10 cycles, due to metal oxidation when the potential rises42. RuO2 also presents high OER activity but suffers from corrosion after the first cycle; it should be noted, however, that RuO2's performance for the OER is influenced by its morphology43. Finally, the number of perovskites reported as OER catalysts in acid is limited and those with high activity are SrIrO3 and SrRuO3. In SrIrO3, Sr dissolves after the first cycles and it is suggested that IrOx oxides at the catalyst’s surface are responsible for the catalytic activity15. In SrRuO3, Sr dissolves decreasing the activity dramatically11,13. Durability studies of powder La2LiIrO6 in acid and alkaline conditions concluded that during the OER, IrO2 nanoparticles segregate to the perovskite surface, resulting in an oxidized surface with high OER activity40. In summary, most reports indicate that metal oxides are prone to severe degradation issues under oxygen evolution conditions11,44.
Evolution of structure and composition during OER
Insights into deactivation of representative SrRuO3 and Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3 were obtained by analyzing fresh and used samples (after 20 OER cycles) and from the evolution of the composition of the electrolyte after 10, 40, and 80 OER cycles by ICP-OES (see also Supplementary Note 14).
As observed from the micrographs in Fig. 3a, SrRuO3 consists of particles between ca. 200 and 800 nm with perovskite structure, see HRTEM/Digital Diffraction Pattern (DDP) in Fig. 3b and HRTEM/SAED in Supplementary Fig. 4. STEM-EDX mappings (Fig. 3c) reveal a homogeneous distribution of Sr and Ru along the particle with an atomic Sr/Ru ratio close to 1. After 20 cycles in the OER, significant changes in the morphology and composition of SrRuO3 are observed. Figure 3d shows a HRTEM/DDP image of used SrRuO3. The DDP shows spots that can be ascribed to two different phases: the original perovskite in the [201] zone axis and spots of d = 3.2 Å attributed to the (110) interplanar distances in rutile RuO2. Compositional analyses of the used SrRuO3 (Fig. 3e–g) reveal the loss of Sr during the OER (voids are observed in the STEM image in Fig. 3e) leading to regions with high (~3) Ru/Sr ratio (Fig. 3e, f) along with segregated RuOx particles as shown in Fig. 3g. This observation is consistent with the analysis of the composition of the electrolyte during OER with SrRuO3. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 17, the concentration of Sr in the electrolyte during OER cycles increases faster than that of Ru. HRTEM images in Supplementary Fig. 18 reveal an evident loss of crystallinity of used SrRuO3.
Representative TEM and HRTEM/DDP images of Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3 are shown in Fig. 4a, b, respectively. The sample consists of particles of ~2.8 (±0.5) μm with perovskite structure; see DDP (inset of Fig. 4b and SAED in Supplementary Fig. 4). STEM-EDX mapping (Fig. 4c) reveals the homogeneous distribution of Sr, Ru, and Na in the perovskite. Figure 4d shows a representative HRTEM/DDP image for used Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3. Contrary to SrRuO3, used Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3 still presents the perovskite structure (inset of Fig. 4d). As shown in Fig. 4e, the size and Sr/Ru atomic ratio (~0.95) of used Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3 is similar to that of the fresh one. STEM-EDX mapping in Fig. 4f shows a homogeneous distribution of Sr, Ru, and Na in the used sample. These observations clearly indicate that neither the composition nor the structure of Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3 are affected after 20 cycles in the OER. HRTEM/DDP images (Supplementary Fig. 19) also reveal the high crystallinity of used Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3. However, note that the incipient formation of RuOx is evidenced in the FFT filtered image shown in Supplementary Fig. 19b. Again, this observation is in good agreement with the ICP results shown in Supplementary Fig. 17b revealing small concentrations of Sr and Ru in the electrolyte after the OER, significantly lower than those found for SrRuO3. In fact, Supplementary Fig. 17b confirms that the Na-doped perovskite is more stable than SrRuO3 during the OER in acid electrolyte.
The structure of the used samples (20 cycles in the OER) has also been studied by XRD and XAS. The x-ray diffractograms of the fresh and used samples are similar and only show diffraction lines for the perovskite phase (Supplementary Fig. 20). The analysis of the Ru K-edge of fresh and used SrRuO3 and Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3 are shown in Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. 21. The intensity of the FT-EXAFS signals of the used SrRuO3 sample is significantly lower than that of the fresh one, especially for the higher shells (Fig. 5a). This result reveals severe degradation (loss of crystallinity) of the SrRuO3 structure after the OER. Conversely, the FT-EXAFS signals of both fresh and used Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3 are similar (Fig. 5b), indicating that the perovskite structure remains stable during the OER. It is possible to estimate the composition of the used samples by a linear combination fit on the EXAFS signals of the fresh perovskites and RuO2. An approximate ratio of 20:80 SrRuO3:RuO2 is obtained for SrRuO3 (Supplementary Fig. 21c) being of 80:20 Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3:RuO2 for the Na-doped one (Supplementary Fig. 21d). These results are in excellent agreement with the microscopy results, and indicate that Na doping enhances the structural stability (and hence durability) of the perovskites during the OER. These conclusions also result from the evolution of the pre-edge features of the XANES Ru K-edge and the decrease in the white line (Supplementary Fig. 21a).
Finally, the surface composition of the fresh and used perovskites was analyzed by XPS. Figures 5c, d depict the spectra of the Sr 3d core-level regions of the fresh and used samples. The two Sr 3d doublets are associated to carbonate (high binging energy) and Sr–O–M (lower binding energy) moieties. According to Supplementary Table 8, the surface atomic Ru/Sr ratio of both SrRuO3 and Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3 increases after the OER. Nevertheless, Ru enrichment is more pronounced in SrRuO3 (2.7) than in Sr0.90Na0.10RuO3 (1.8) indicating a more severe decomposition of SrRuO3.
The results above clearly indicate that Sr dissolves from the perovskite structure during the OER, especially from SrRuO3. Upon Sr dissolution, the perovskite structure becomes ill-defined, as observed by TEM and XAS. At some point, Ru segregates from the perovskite and forms nanosized RuOx phases, which in some cases are deposited at the surface of the perovskites, but are mostly found as isolated particles (Supplementary Fig. 18). As predicted by DFT (Fig. 2c), the collapse of the perovskite and the formation of RuOx lead to a significant loss in OER activity. The higher durability of Na-doped samples is due to their higher structural stability and lower dissolution rates of Sr and Ru compared with SrRuO3, not to the formation of different phases during the OER. Several features can explain the enhanced durability of Na-doped perovskites. On the one hand, it is known that Ru centers oxidize to Ru>4+ during potential excursions above ~1.4 V45. These highly oxidized Ru atoms are not stable within undoped SrRuO39. Na incorporation permits the stabilization of Ru>4+ ions within the lattice, resulting in versatile Ru catalytic centers that can easily increase or decrease their charge depending on the adsorbates, which is advantageous for the OER. Our results show that Na incorporation results in less distorted RuO6 octahedra and higher durability. This observation is in line with previous reports indicating that less distorted structures are more susceptible to suffer structural variations without being destroyed when subjected to voltage changes6. Finally, DFT calculations indicate that (i) the surface energies of Sr1−xNaxRuO3 are considerably lower compared with SrRuO3; (ii) the dissolution potentials of the cations in the A site of the perovskites are shifted toward more positive values in presence of Na; and (iii) the stability at low pH is also enhanced upon Na doping. Such observations, described in detail in the Supplementary Note 10, attest to more stable perovskite structures upon doping.
To summarize and conclude, we have synthesized a series of active catalysts (Sr1−xNaxRuO3) for the OER in acid media with extraordinary features. The measured activities are comparable to or surpass those of other remarkable OER catalysts in the literature. Na incorporation in the lattice also grants these compounds high electrochemical and structural stability, so as to keep up to 85% of their initial activity after 20 cycles. Na locally changes the oxidation state of Ru from +4 to +5, resulting in a convenient weakening of the adsorption energies of the OER intermediates, because SrRuO3 binds those too strongly. Our conclusions could help in guiding future research in several ways: (a) other monovalent cations such as Li+, K+, and Cs+ can be tested to ascertain whether they also enhance the activity and/or the stability. (b) If Ru5+ sites are instrumental for the enhancement of SrRuO3, then B-site doping with e.g., trivalent cations might as well enhance the activity. (c) Since Sr0.875Na0.125RuO3 is the most active compound in Fig. 2c, we used the ESSI to determine that its activity can be further optimized if the *OH binding energy is strengthened by −0.16 eV. This is an interesting hypothesis to be verified experimentally in subsequent studies.
Methods
Synthesis
Sr1-xNaxRuO3 (x = 0.00, 0.05, 0.10) perovskites were synthesized in polycrystalline form by a wet-chemistry procedure to obtain very reactive precursors and reduce the final synthesis temperature. Stoichiometric amounts of Sr(NO3)2 (Sigma Aldrich 99.99% trace metals basis), Na2CO3 anhydrous (Sigma Aldrich 99.999% trace metals basis), and RuO2 (Sigma Aldrich 99.9% trace metals basis) were dissolved in 150 mL of 0.1 M citric acid (Sigma Aldrich assay ≥ 99.5%) and 20 mL of nitric acid (Panreac 65%), to ensure complete dissolution of the starting materials. We added 5% excess of Na2CO3 to compensate the possible partial evaporation at high temperatures. The mixture was stirred at ~120 °C until complete evaporation, leading to the formation of resins containing a homogeneous distribution of the metal cations. The resins were dried afterwards at 500 °C for 12 h, to eliminate organic material and nitrates. Finally, the samples were subjected to different temperatures in air during 12 h: 800 °C for x = 0.00, 900 °C for x = 0.05 and 1000 °C for x = 0.10. If SrRuO3 is calcined at higher temperatures, other competitive phases appear.
Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES)
An ICP-OES Analytik Jena PQ 9000 spectrometer was used for the analyses. Specimens for analysis were subjected to acid digestion in a mixture of 3 mL of HNO3, 2 mL HCl, 3 mL HF, and 3 mL H3PO4, in a pressurized microwave.
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD)
The phases and their purity were determined by XRD in Bragg–Brentano reflection geometry with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å).
Powder neutron diffraction (PND)
PND was carried out in the high-resolution powder diffractometer D2B at ILL (Grenoble, France). The data were collected at room temperature and λ = 1.594 Å. For the refinement of the crystal structures, we used the Rietveld method and the Fullprof crystallographic program46,47. The function selected to generate the diffraction peaks shape was pseudo-Voigt. The parameters refined in the final run were the scale factor, linear interpolation between a set of background points, zero-point error, pseudo-Voigt parameters, positional coordinates, isotropic thermal factors an occupancy factors.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
TEM data was recorded on a JEOL 2100 field emission gun transmission electron microscope operating at 200 kV and equipped with an EDX spectrometer Oxford INCA Energy 2000 system. Specimens were prepared by depositing small portions of the samples on top of a Cu grid supporting a lacey carbon film. Deposition was achieved by preparing a suspension of the material in ethanol.
BET method
The measurements were performed in a Micromeritics ASAP 2000 apparatus. Surface areas were evaluated by purging with nitrogen the samples within the relative pressure range P/P0 = 0.05–0.30. The amount of adsorbed nitrogen is related to the total surface area of the samples. The volume of gas adsorbed on the surface is measured at −196 °C (nitrogen boiling point). The samples are finally degassed at 140 °C under vacuum for 24 h. Specific areas were calculated by applying the BET method.
X-Ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS)
XAS measurements were performed at room temperature at Diamond Light Source (UK) on the B18 and I10 beamlines48. In the case of I10 measurements, data were collected at Na K-edge (E = 1070.8 eV) and Ru M2,3-edge (E = 461 and 483 eV) in fluorescence mode with a photodiode sited to measure by back-scattering geometry. The Sr L3 and L2-edges appear at the half energy (1940 eV and 2007 eV, respectively) as the undulator second harmonic is mostly absorbed but it partially passes through the monochromator at the energy of the first harmonic as a contamination. On the B18 beamline, data were collected at Ru K-edge (E = 22117 eV) in the transmission mode using a double crystal Si111 monochromator and Pt-coated branch. Data treatment was performed with the ATHENA software49 and XANES simulations were performed with the FEFF 8.4 code50.
X-Ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS)
X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were acquired with a VG ESCALAB 200 R at a pass energy of 50 eV using a Mg Kα X-ray source. The kinetic energies of the photoelectrons were measured using a hemispherical electron analyzer working in the constant-pass energy mode. The background pressure in the analysis chamber was kept below 3 × 10–8 mbar during data acquisition. At least 200 scans were collected in increments of 0.1 eV with dwell times of 50 ms in order to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. The binding energies (±0.2 eV) were determined by setting the C 1s peak at 284.8 eV.
Electrochemical characterization
The electrochemical performance was tested in a computer-controlled Autolab PGstat 302 N potentiostat/galvanostat. A standard three-compartment glass cell and a rotating disk electrode (RDE) (Pine Research Instruments) were used. A graphite rod and a homemade Reversible Hydrogen Electrode (RHE) were used as counter and reference electrodes, respectively. Sr1−xNaxRuO3 samples were deposited on the electrode as inks. The powdered samples were mixed in a 5:1 mass ratio with carbon black (Vulcan-XC-72R) to improve the electrical conductivity. Then the solvents were added, Tetrahydrofuran (THF) and Nafion, to yield final concentrations of 5 mgoxide mL−1ink, 1 mgcarbon mL−1ink, 0.03 mLNafion mL−1ink, and 0.97 mLTHF mL−1ink. We sonicated the ink with an Ultrasonic Processor UP50H (Hielscher) and dispersed 20 μL of ink onto a glassy carbon electrode (0.196 cm2 area), with a final loading of catalyst on the electrode of 0.1 mg. We performed cyclic voltammetry between 1.1 V and 1.5 V or 1.1 V and 1.7 V at 10 mV/s and 1 mV/s. The measurements were corrected under O2 saturated electrolyte to assure the O2/H2O equilibrium at 1.23 V, and with an electrode rotation of 1600 rpm. The OER kinetic curves were capacitance-corrected by taking the average of the anodic and cathodic curves. The curves were also iR-corrected using the formula E-iRcorrected = Eapplied–iR, where i is the current and R is the ohmic electrolyte resistance (R ~29 Ω) obtained from Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) at open voltage. The OER electrocatalytic measurement methodology follows the one established by Shao-Horn and coworkers7,23. As stated above, we used a catalyst loading of 0.1 mg, the same reported in previous works. Such high loading could result in film diffusion resistance that prevents the determination of kinetic parameters from non-corrected K-L analyses51. However, the absence of mass transfer effects has been confirmed by conducting the OER at different scan and rotation rates, and by using different catalyst loadings, as detailed in Supplementary Note 15 and Supplementary Fig. 22. We have measured catalytic activity and durability at least five times for each catalyst. Errors are reported as relative standard deviation (RSD).
Computational methods
The spin-unrestricted DFT calculations of SrXNa1−xRuO3 were performed with VASP52, using the RPBE exchange-correlation functional53, the projector augmented wave (PAW) method54, and Dudarev’s DFT + U formalism55. The simulated slabs were 4-layer thick: the atoms in the two topmost layers and the adsorbates could move in all directions, whereas those in the two bottommost layers were fixed at the converged bulk distances. The relaxations were performed with the conjugate-gradient scheme, using as convergence criterion for the ionic loops a maximal force on any atom of 0.05 eV Å−1. We used 2 × 2 (001) perovskite slabs, which contained eight SrRuO3 formula units. When one of the Sr atoms was replaced by Na, the slab was Sr7Na1Ru8O24, equivalent to Sr0.875Na0.125RuO3. We used a 4 × 4 × 1 k-point mesh and a plane-wave cutoff of 400 eV to ensure convergence of the adsorption energies within 0.05 eV. We added ~15 Å of vacuum between periodical images in the z direction and applied dipole corrections. We used Gaussian smearing with kBT = 0.2 eV, and extrapolated all energies to 0 K. The gas-phase molecules (H2, H2O) were calculated in boxes of 15 Å × 15 Å × 15 Å, with kBT = 0.001 eV and a 1 × 1 × 1 k-point mesh. The value of U for Ru was 6.7 eV, found by Kitchin and coworkers for RuO2 through a linear-response methodology56. Such value is applicable to the Ru perovskites under study in view of the identical oxidation state of Ru (+4) in RuO2 and SrRuO3 and its similar coordination to oxygen in the form of octahedral RuO6 complexes. RuO2 in Fig. 2c was also calculated using the DFT + U formalism with the same value of U. Supplementary Note 12 discusses the inaccuracies of standard DFT for the evaluation of adsorption energies of RuO2(110)56 and plausible solutions56,57. The lattice constant found for SrRuO3 was 4.033 Å and that of Sr0.875Na0.125RuO3 was 4.018 Å. As a first approximation, the former was used for all slab calculations. The free energies were approximated as: G = EDFT + ZPE−TS, where EDFT and ZPE are the DFT total and zero-point electronic energies, and TS are entropic contributions (only taken into account for gas-phase species). The TS corrections for H2 and H2O(l) are 0.40 and 0.67 eV58,59. The ZPEs for H2, H2O, *O, *OH and *OOH are 0.27, 0.56, 0.07, 0.35, and 0.40 eV, respectively. To describe the energetics of (H+ + e−) and estimate overpotentials we used the computational hydrogen electrode58. The procedure for estimating the free energies of adsorption of the oxygen evolution intermediates, and details of the construction of the volcano plots making use of the scaling relations between the adsorption energies of the adsorbates (see Supplementary Note 11) appear elsewhere58,60,61. We included total adsorbate coverages of 0.5 ML in all cases, so that *O, *OH, and *OOH were co-adsorbed with *O. Such co-adsorption accounts for the fact that at OER potentials at least part of the active Ru sites are likely covered with *O. The assessment of the ESSI is described in the Supplementary Note 11 and elsewhere39.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the ENE2013–42322-R and ENE2016-77055-C3-3-R projects from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO). M.R. thanks MINECO’s Juan de la Cierva program for a grant (FPDI-2013-17582). F.C.V. thanks the Spanish MICIU for a Ramón y Cajal research contract (RYC-2015-18996) and financial support through the program “Units of Excellence María de Maeztu” (grant MDM-2017–0767). We thank G. Cibin for useful discussions on XAS data treatment and analysis from experiments on beamline B18 Diamond Light Source. We also thank A. Figueroa for helping with data acquisition on beamline I10 and discussions on data interpretation. We thank Diamond Light Source for access to beamlines B18 and I10 that contributed to the results presented here. We thank D. Arroyo and N. López for ICP-OES analyses.
Author contributions
M.R. and S.R. conceived and developed the idea of the project; M.R., A.G., and A.E. prepared the samples; M.R., A.E., A.G., J.T., J.L.G.F., and M.A.P. made the electrochemical and physico-chemical characterization; L.P. obtained the electron microscopy measurements; F.C.V. performed the DFT calculations and discussion; P.F., D.G., and P.B. did the synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy measurements and analysis; M.R. and M.T.F. collected the powder neutron diffraction data; M.R. refined the powder neutron diffraction data; M.R., F.C.V., and S.R. co-wrote the paper; all authors commented on the manuscript; S.R. coordinated the project.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. All other relevant data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Journal peer review information: Nature Communications would like to thank the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
María Retuerto, Email: m.retuerto@csic.es.
Federico Calle-Vallejo, Email: f.calle.vallejo@ub.edu.
Sergio Rojas, Email: srojas@icp.csic.es.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-019-09791-w.
References
- 1.Steele BCH, Heinzel A. Materials for fuel-cell technologies. Nature. 2001;414:345–352. doi: 10.1038/35104620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wysokińska Z. The “New” environmental policy of the European Union: a path to development of a circular economy and mitigation of the negative effects of climate change. Comp. Econ. Res. 2016;19:57–73. doi: 10.1515/cer-2016-0013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Katsounaros I, Cherevko S, Zeradjanin AR, Mayrhofer KJ. Oxygen electrochemistry as a cornerstone for sustainable energy conversion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:102–121. doi: 10.1002/anie.201306588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lee Y, Suntivich J, May KJ, Perry EE, Shao-Horn Y. Synthesis and activities of rutile IrO2 and RuO2 nanoparticles for oxygen evolution in acid and alkaline solutions. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012;3:399–404. doi: 10.1021/jz2016507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cherevko S, et al. Oxygen and hydrogen evolution reactions on Ru, RuO2, Ir, and IrO2 thin film electrodes in acidic and alkaline electrolytes: A comparative study on activity and stability. Catal. Today. 2016;262:170–180. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.08.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hong WT, et al. Toward the rational design of non-precious transition metal oxides for oxygen electrocatalysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015;8:1404–1427. doi: 10.1039/C4EE03869J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Suntivich J, May KJ, Gasteiger HA, Goodenough JB, Shao-Horn Y. A perovskite oxide optimized for oxygen evolution catalysis from molecular orbital principles. Science. 2011;334:1383–1385. doi: 10.1126/science.1212858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vojvodic A, Norskov JK. Optimizing perovskites for the water-splitting reaction. Science. 2011;334:1355–1356. doi: 10.1126/science.1215081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tang R, et al. Oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis on SrIrO3 grown using molecular beam epitaxy. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016;4:6831–6836. doi: 10.1039/C5TA09530A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Retuerto M, et al. Structural effects of LaNiO3 as electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. Appl. Catal. B. 2017;203:363–371. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.10.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chang SH, et al. Functional links between stability and reactivity of strontium ruthenate single crystals during oxygen evolution. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:4191. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Montiel M, Hernández-Fernández P, Fierro JLG, Rojas S, Ocón P. Promotional effect of upper Ru oxides as methanol tolerant electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Power Sources. 2009;191:280–288. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.02.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kim BJ, et al. Unraveling thermodynamics, stability, and oxygen evolution activity of strontium ruthenium perovskite oxide. ACS Catal. 2017;7:3245–3256. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Diaz-Morales O, et al. Iridium-based double perovskites for efficient water oxidation in acid media. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12363. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Seitz LC, et al. A highly active and stable IrOx/SrIrO3 catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction. Science. 2016;353:1011–1014. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf5050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kibsgaard J, Hellstern TR, Choi SJ, Reinecke BN, Jaramillo TF. Mesoporous ruthenium/ruthenium oxide thin films: active electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. ChemElectroChem. 2017;4:2480–2485. doi: 10.1002/celc.201700334. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Park SA, Kim KS, Kim YT. Electrochemically activated iridium oxide black as promising electrocatalyst having high activity and stability for oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Energy Lett. 2018;3:1110–1115. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00368. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shannon R. D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallographica Section A. 1976;32(5):751–767. doi: 10.1107/S0567739476001551. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Petr T, Karel K, Anke W, Jiří H. On the physical properties of Sr1−xNaxRuO3 (x = 0–0.19) Solid State Sci. 2010;12:1112–1120. doi: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2010.04.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jeng HT, Lin SH, Hsue CS. Orbital ordering and Jahn-Teller distortion in Perovskite ruthenate SrRuO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;97:067002–067001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lee S, et al. Large in-plane deformation of RuO6 octahedron and ferromagnetism of bulk SrRuO3. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2013;25:465601. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/25/46/465601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harano T, et al. Role of doped Ru in coercivity-enhanced La0.6Sr0.4MnO3 thin film studied by x-ray magnetic circular dichroism. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013;102:222404. doi: 10.1063/1.4808090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Suntivich J, Gasteiger HA, Yabuuchi N, Shao-Horn Y. Electrocatalytic measurement methodology of oxide catalysts using a thin-film rotating disk electrode. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2010;157:B1263. doi: 10.1149/1.3456630. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jirkovský J, Makarova M, Krtil P. Particle size dependence of oxygen evolution reaction on nanocrystalline RuO2 and Ru0.8Co0.2O2−x. Electrochem. Commun. 2006;8:1417–1422. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.06.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Reier T, Oezaslan M, Strasser P. Electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) on Ru, Ir, and Pt catalysts: a comparative study of nanoparticles and bulk materials. ACS Catal. 2012;2:1765–1772. doi: 10.1021/cs3003098. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jung JI, et al. Optimizing nanoparticle perovskite for bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016;9:176–183. doi: 10.1039/C5EE03124A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Abbott DF, et al. Iridium oxide for the oxygen evolution reaction: correlation between particle size, morphology, and the surface hydroxo layer from operando XAS. Chem. Mater. 2016;28:6591–6604. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02625. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Matsumoto Y, Yoneyama H, Tamura H. Influence of the nature of the conduction band of transition metal oxides on catalytic activity for oxygen reduction. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1977;83:237–243. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(77)80169-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Matsumoto Y, Sato E. Electrocatalytic propeties of transition metal oxides for oxygen evolution reaction. Mater. Chem. Phys. 1986;I4:397–426. doi: 10.1016/0254-0584(86)90045-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stoerzinger KA, Qiao L, Biegalski MD, Shao-Horn Y. Orientation-dependent oxygen evolution activities of rutile IrO2 and RuO2. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014;5:1636–1641. doi: 10.1021/jz500610u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.May KJ, et al. Influence of oxygen evolution during water oxidation on the surface of perovskite oxide catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012;3:3264–3270. doi: 10.1021/jz301414z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.McCrory CC, Jung S, Peters JC, Jaramillo TF. Benchmarking heterogeneous electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:16977–16987. doi: 10.1021/ja407115p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Trasatti S, Petri OA. Real surface area measurements in electrochemistry. Pure Appl. Chern. 1991;63:71–734. doi: 10.1351/pac199163050711. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zeradjanin AR, Ventosa E, Bondarenko AS, Schuhmann W. Evaluation of the catalytic performance of gas-evolving electrodes using local electrochemical noise measurements. ChemSusChem. 2012;5:1905–1911. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201200262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Grimaud A, et al. Double perovskites as a family of highly active catalysts for oxygen evolution in alkaline solution. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:2439. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Seh Zhi Wei, Kibsgaard Jakob, Dickens Colin F., Chorkendorff Ib, Nørskov Jens K., Jaramillo Thomas F. Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design. Science. 2017;355(6321):eaad4998. doi: 10.1126/science.aad4998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Medford AJ, et al. Assessing the reliability of calculated catalytic ammonia synthesis rates. Science. 2014;345:197–200. doi: 10.1126/science.1253486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kuo DY, et al. Influence of surface adsorption on the oxygen evolution reaction on IrO2(110) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:3473–3479. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b11932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Govindarajan, N., García-Lastra, J. M., Meijer, E. J. & Calle-Vallejo, F. Does the breaking of adsorption-energy scaling relations guarantee enhanced electrocatalysis? Curr. Opin. Electrochem.8, 110–117 (2018).
- 40.Grimaud A, et al. Activation of surface oxygen sites on an iridium-based model catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction. Nat. Energy. 2016;2:16189. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.189. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Burke LD, O’Meara TO. Oxygen electrode reaction. Part 2.-behaviour at ruthenium black electrodes. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1972;68:839–848. doi: 10.1039/f19726800839. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hodnik N, et al. New Insights into corrosion of ruthenium and ruthenium oxide nanoparticles in acidic media. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2015;119:10140–10147. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01832. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zeradjanin Aleksandar R., Topalov Angel A., Van Overmeere Quentin, Cherevko Serhiy, Chen XingXing, Ventosa Edgar, Schuhmann Wolfgang, Mayrhofer Karl J. J. Rational design of the electrode morphology for oxygen evolution – enhancing the performance for catalytic water oxidation. RSC Advances. 2014;4(19):9579. doi: 10.1039/c3ra45998e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Binninger T, et al. Thermodynamic explanation of the universal correlation between oxygen evolution activity and corrosion of oxide catalysts. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:12167. doi: 10.1038/srep12167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Goodenough JB, Manoharan R, Paranthaman M. Surface protonation and electrochemical activity of oxides in aqueous solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990;112:2016–2082. doi: 10.1021/ja00162a006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rietveld HM. A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J. Appl. Cryst. 1969;2:65–71. doi: 10.1107/S0021889869006558. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rodriguez Carvajal J. Recent advances in magnetic-structure determination by neutron powder diffraction. Phys. B. 1993;192:55–69. doi: 10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-I. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dent AJ, et al. Performance of B18, the core EXAFS bending magnet beamline at diamond. J. Phys. 2013;430:012023. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ravel B, Newville M. Athena, Artemis, Hephaestus: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2005;12:537–541. doi: 10.1107/S0909049505012719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ankudinov AL, Ravel B, Rehr JJ, Conradson SD. Real-space multiple-scattering calculation and interpretation of x-ray-absorption near-edge structure. Phys. Rev. B. 1998;52:7565. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.7565. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Paulus UA, Schmidt TJ, Gasteiger HA, Behm RJ. Oxygen reduction on a high-surface area Pt/Vulcan carbon catalyst: a thin-film rotating ring-disk electrode study. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2001;495:134–145. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(00)00407-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B. 1996;54:11169–11186. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hammer B, Hansen LB, Nørskov JK. Improved adsorption energetics within density-functional theory using revised Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof functionals. Phys. Rev. B. 1999;59:7413–7421. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.7413. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Vanderbilt D. Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism. Phys. Rev. B. 1990;41:7892–7895. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dudarev SL, Botton GA, Savrasov SY, Humphreys CJ, Sutton AP. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA + U study. Phys. Rev. B. 1998;57:1505–1509. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Xu Z, Rossmeisl J, Kitchin JR. A linear response DFT + U study of trends in the oxygen evolution activity of transition metal rutile dioxides. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2015;119:4827–4833. doi: 10.1021/jp511426q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Briquet LGV, Sarwar M, Mugo J, Jones G, Calle-Vallejo F. A new type of scaling relations to assess the accuracy of computational predictions of catalytic activities applied to the oxygen evolution reaction. ChemCatChem. 2017;9:1261–1268. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201601662. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Calle-Vallejo F, Koper MTM. First-principles computational electrochemistry: achievements and challenges. Electrochim. Acta. 2012;84:3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nørskov JK, et al. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2004;108:17886–17892. doi: 10.1021/jp047349j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Man IC, et al. Universality in oxygen evolution electrocatalysis on oxide surfaces. ChemCatChem. 2011;3:1159–1165. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201000397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Calle-Vallejo F, Díaz-Morales OA, Kolb MJ, Koper MTM. Why is bulk thermochemistry a good descriptor for the electrocatalytic activity of transition metal oxides? ACS Catal. 2015;5:869–873. doi: 10.1021/cs5016657. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. All other relevant data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.