Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 27;58:67–70. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2019.03.005

National Study of Emergency Department Disposition for High Suicide Risk Geriatric Patients

Timothy Schmutte a, Mark Olfson b, Ming Xie c, Steven C Marcus d
PMCID: PMC6500465  NIHMSID: NIHMS1525881  PMID: 30933688

Abstract

Objective:

To examine predictors of hospitalization among older adults at high risk for suicide treated in emergency departments (EDs).

Methods:

This retrospective cohort analysis used national 2015 Medicare claims for adults ≥65 years with ED visits for suicide ideation or deliberate self-harm (N=50,472) merged with data from the Area Health Resource File. Rates and adjusted risk ratios (ARR) of hospital admission were assessed.

Results:

A majority of ED episodes resulted in hospital admission (81.9%) with most being admitted to a psychiatric unit (62.8%). Visits for self-harm with suicide ideation were most likely to result in hospitalization (94.7%) compared to suicide ideation alone (84.0%) or self-harm alone (73.1%). Current diagnosis of depression, bipolar, anxiety, cognitive, and personality disorder were associated with hospitalization. Co-occurring mental and substance use disorders was the most predictive mental health condition of admission. Overall, severity of current medical comorbidity was the strongest predictor of hospital admission.

Conclusions:

Most older adults treated in EDs for suicide ideation or self-harm are hospitalized. Medical morbidity plays a more prominent role than other patient factors in admission status.

Keywords: suicide, older adults, emergency department


The rapidly growing U.S. geriatric population1 and greater risk of suicide in later life2,3 underscore the importance of understanding health care delivery patterns to older adults at high risk for suicide. Emergency departments (EDs) have on opportunity to play an important role in suicide prevention by identifying high risk patients and determining who requires hospitalization.4,5 Approximately 1.4 million annual ED visits in the U.S. are for suicide ideation (SI) or deliberate self-harm (DSH),6,7 which includes intentional self-injury and self-poisoning irrespective of suicidal intent. DSH is the most powerful known risk factor for suicide mortality,8,9 particularly in older adults.1012 Most geriatric DSH events (75%−85%) are suicide attempts, as opposed to non-suicidal self-injury which is more prevalent in younger age groups.1316

Major risk factors for late-life suicide include demographic characteristics (i.e., white race, male gender, increasing age),3 depression and other mental health conditions, and physical morbidity.1721 Geriatric suicide risk is also associated with regional shortages in healthcare providers.22,23 Although recent annual increases in ED visits for suicide ideation are highest in geriatric patients7 and age-related disparities in ED care for suicide risk have been observed,2426 limited information exists for ED outcomes of suicide-related visits in older adults. To address this gap, we examined predictors of hospitalization in a national cohort of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65+ years who received ED care for DSH or SI.

METHOD

Data Sources

The cohort was extracted from 2015 national Medicare claims (i.e., Medicare Provider Analysis and Review file and institutional outpatient files) merged with county-level service provider characteristics from Area Health Resource File.27

Sample Selection

ED visits were selected for a diagnosis of suicide ideation (ICD-9 code V62.84; ICD-10 code R45.851) or deliberate self-harm (ICD-9 codes E950 – 958; ICD-10 codes; T36*X2A - T65*X2A; T71*2A and T14.91; X71 - X83) in any position on the claim.

Independent Variables

Patient-level independent variables included patient age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Based on claims from the 30 days prior to the index ED visit, recent health care was defined as inpatient and ED episodes that contained mental disorder diagnoses (see Appendix for ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes) as well as inpatient and ED visits without mental health codes. Current mental disorders were defined by the presence of a mental disorder diagnosis in any position on the claim during the index ED visit for depression, bipolar, anxiety, psychosis, cognitive, or personality disorder. Similar steps were used to identify substance use disorder and co-occurring mental and substance use disorder diagnoses. Current medical comorbidity severity was determined by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Scale based on ICD codes from the index ED episode.28 Suicide-related behaviors were defined as either: 1) suicide ideation alone, 2) self-harm with suicide ideation, or 3) self-harm alone. Lethality of DSH method was classified based on method into high, low, or unknown lethality.29 Geographic accessibility of primary care and mental health providers was determined by Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) scores.27

Outcomes

The outcome variable was discharge disposition (hospital admission vs. discharge to community or another residential facility). Admissions were categorized as either psychiatric or non-psychiatric.

Analytic Plan

Adjusted risk ratios (ARR) were calculated for discharge disposition controlling for patient age, sex, and race/ethnicity using the SAS GENMOD procedure with the log-link function. Because approximately 10% of patients contributed more than one treatment episode, the observations are non-independent. Accordingly, generalized estimating equations were used to adjust the confidence intervals to accommodate clustering of observations with the individual subject as a random effects variable. To compensate for the large number of comparisons, results are presented as risk ratios (RR) with associated 99% confidence intervals with significance set at p<.01. Group differences with a risk ratio of ≥ 1.15 or ≤ 0.85 were considered potentially substantial from a clinical and policy perspective.

RESULTS

Of the 50,472 treatment episodes for DSH or SI, 81.9% resulted in hospitalization (Table 1) with more admissions being to psychiatric care (62.8%) than non-psychiatric units (37.2%). Admission rates were highest for DSH with SI (94.7%) followed by SI alone (84.0%) and DSH alone (73.1%). Predictors of hospitalization included any current mental disorder (compared to no mental disorder) and a diagnosis of depressive, bipolar, anxiety, cognitive, or personality disorder. Of the mental health conditions, co-occurring mental and substance use disorders was the predictive of hospitalization. Overall, the strongest predictor of hospital admission was increasing severity of medical comorbidity.

Table 1.

Percent of Patients Hospitalized in 50,472 Emergency Department Visits for Suicide Ideation or Deliberate Self-harm in Older Adult Medicare Beneficiaries, Stratified by Admission Status and Patient Characteristics

Characteristics Admitted
Patient
Visits, %
(n=41,335)
Discharged
Patient
Visits, %
(n=9,137)
Admission
Rate
(%)
Unadjusted
Risk Ratio
(99% CI)
Adjusted
Risk Ratio
(99% CI)
Total (n=50,472) 81.9 18.1
Age (years)
 65–69 (n=19,652) 38.2 42.5 80.3 0.97(0.94,1.00) 0.97(0.94,1.01)
 70–74 (n=11,806) 23.7 22.1 82.9 1.00(0.96,1.04) 1.00(0.96,1.04)
 75–79 (n=7,813) 15.7 14.4 83.1 1.00(0.96,1.04) 1.00(0.96,1.05)
 80 + (n=11,201) 22.4 21.0 82.9 -- -- -- --
Sex
 Male (n=23,248) 45.5 48.5 81.0 0.98(0.95,1.00) 0.98(0.96,1.01)
 Female (n=27,224) 54.5 51.5 82.7 -- -- -- --
Race/Ethnicity
 African American (n=4,215) 8.0 10.2 77.9 0.95(0.90,0.99) 0.95(0.91,0.97)
 Hispanic (n=869) 1.8 1.6 83.2 1.01(0.92,1.11) 1.01(0.92,1.11)
 Other (n=1,770) 3.2 4.3 77.9 0.94(0.88,1.01) 0.94(0.88,1.02)
 White (n=43,618) 87.0 83.9 82.4 -- -- -- --
Any current mental disorder diagnosis (n=42,989)a 90.7 60.25 85.2 1.69(1.62,1.77) 1.70(1.62,1.77)
 Depression (n=32,869) 70.1 42.5 88.2 1.25(1.22,1.29) 1.25(1.22,1.29)
 Bipolar (n=6,911) 15.4 5.8 92.3 1.15(1.11,1.19) 1.16(1.12,1.20)
 Anxiety (n=19,358) 41.9 19.4 90.7 1.18(1.15,1.22) 1.19(1.16,1.22)
 Psychosis (n=7,558) 16.5 7.9 90.5 1.13(1.09,1.16) 1.13(1.09,1.17)
 Cognitive (n=7,760) 17.7 4.7 94.5 1.19(1.15,1.23) 1.19(1.15,1.23)
 Adjustment (n=4,605) 9.9 5.7 88.8 1.09(1.05,1.14) 1.10(1.05,1.14)
 Personality (n=2,541) 5.8 1.5 94.8 1.17(1.11,1.23) 1.17(1.11,1.23)
Any current substance use disorder (n=17,702)a 36.4 28.9 85.1 1.06(1.03,1.09) 1.08(1.05,1.11)
 Co-occurring substance use and mental disorder (n=45,247) 94.0 70.2 85.8 1.79(1.70,1.89) 1.81(1.72,1.91)
Self-harm or suicide ideation
 Suicide ideation only (n=34,912) 71.0 61.1 84.0 1.14(1.11,1.18) 1.15(1.11,1.19)
 Self-harm with suicide ideation (n=2,898) 6.6 1.7 94.7 1.29(1.22,1.37) 1.29(1.22,1.37)
 Self-harm only (n=12,662) 22.4 37.2 73.1 -- -- -- --
Recent hospital treatmentb
 Emergency medical (n=11,337) 21.4 27.3 78.0 0.94(0.91,0.97) 0.94(0.91,0.97)
 Emergency mental health (n=9,949) 19.5 20.6 81.1 0.99(0.96,1.02) 0.99(0.96,1.02)
 Inpatient medical (n=1,538) 3.1 2.6 84.5 1.03(0.96,1.11) 1.03(0.96,1.11)
 Inpatient mental health (n=5,874) 12.4 8.0 87.5 1.08(1.04,1.12) 1.08(1.04,1.12)
Number of current medical comorbiditiesc
 0 (n=1,317) 0.4 12.6 12.8 0.13(0.11,0.16) 0.13(0.11,0.16)
 1 (n=3,979) 4.1 25.0 42.5 0.44(0.41,0.47) 0.44(0.41,0.47)
 2–3 (n=16,648) 30.4 42.6 76.3 0.79(0.76,0.81) 0.79(0.76,0.81)
 4–5 (n=16,648) 36.8 15.7 91.4 0.94(0.91,0.97) 0.94(0.91,0.97)
 6 or more (n=12,052) 28.3 4.1 96.9 -- -- -- --
Lethality of current self-harm methodd
 Low lethality (n=14,279) 91.8 91.7 77.1 -- -- -- --
 High lethality (n=507) 3.4 2.7 80.9 1.05(0.92,1.19) 1.06(0.93,1.21)
 Other/Unknown (n=774) 4.8 5.4 74.5 0.97(0.87,1.08) 0.97(0.87,1.08)
County-level characteristics
 Mental health coverage
  No shortage (n=4,084) 8.2 8.0 82.4 -- -- -- --
  Partial county shortage (n=12,861) 24.9 28.3 79.9 0.97(0.92,1.02) 0.97(0.96,1.02)
  Whole county shortage (n=33,470) 66.9 63.7 82.6 1.00(0.97,1.05) 1.01(0.96,1.06)
 Primary care coverage
  No shortage (n=694) 8.9 8.6 82.3 -- -- -- --
  Partial county shortage (n=6,788) 4.2 4.8 80.5 0.98(0.97,1.05) 0.98(0.91,1.06)
  Whole county shortage (n=371) 86.9 86.6 81.9 1.00(0.95,1.04) 100(0.96,1.04)

Adjusted models controlled for age, sex, and race/ethnicity.

Values in bold indicate significant risks ratios at p ≤ .01.

a

For mental and substance use disorder variables, the reference group consists of treatment episodes without the mental, substance use, or co-occurring disorders diagnosis coded during the emergency department visit.

b

Based on 30 days before the emergency department visit with the reference group being treatment episodes with no prior 30-day healthcare visit.

c

Number of current medical comorbidities coded during the index emergency department visit as determined by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Scale.

d

High lethality methods include firearms, drowning, suffocation, fall, fire, and motor vehicle; low lethality methods include cutting and poisoning; unknown includes unspecified or poorly specified.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first national study focused on the emergency management of suicide ideation and deliberate self-harm in the U.S. geriatric population. The admission rate in this high suicide risk cohort (81.9%) is roughly comparable to the base rate of hospitalization for all ED visits related to suicide ideation (71.8%).7 Conversely, admission rates for self-harm (73.1%) where higher than national studies of pediatric and younger adult ED visits for self-harm (27.1%−56.1%).3134 These results suggest that ED staff may be more responsive to the greater risk of suicide following self-harm in older adults compared to younger patients.12,35

The strongest associations with hospitalization were increased medical comorbidity and co-occurring mental and substance use disorders. ED staff may be aware of the independent association between several common physical illnesses and suicide risk among older adults.19 This finding is also consistent with the general observation that physical frailty plays a prominent role in disposition decisions and the tendency for “complex” geriatric patients with multiple treatment and social service needs to be hospitalized.3537

To date, no U.S. studies have examined the short-term risk of self-harm and mortality following geriatric ED visits for suicide-related concerns. However, results from a U.K. prospective cohort study of ED patients treated for self-harm suggest that admission to inpatient psychiatric care lowers 12-month suicide and all-cause mortality risk in older adults.38

Limitations to the this study include unavailability of data for suicidal intent among self-harm intent,15 which may influence discharge disposition. Without more detailed information on whether the self-harm occurred with or without a suicidal intent, it is possible that some of the discharged patients with self-harm codes were at relatively low suicide risk. Second, the claims data contains aggregated information for individual hospital stays, therefore transfers to different units during hospitalizations in unavailable. Third, concerns exist over the validity and completeness of ICD codes to measure self-harm.39,40 Third, mental health diagnoses were based on clinician judgment rather than structured assessments. Fourth, the mental status and medication regimens of patients were unknown. Fifth, the present analyses are restricted to a 30-day look-back period, which reduced the sensitivity of the counts of recent health care visits.

These limitations notwithstanding, the results provide data concerning the ED management of high suicide risk in older adults. Our findings that emergency physicians appear to reserve the most intensive level of treatment for patients at the highest suicide risk is reassuring. Future research is needed to examine short-term outcomes for geriatric ED patients treated for suicide risk, including receipt of timely follow-up outpatient mental health care, linkage to community-based services, and mortality outcomes.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgments

Potential Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Marcus has received grant support from Ortho-McNeil Janssen and has served as a consultant to AstraZeneca. The other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests

Funding/Support: This research was supported by grant R101MH107452–02S1 from the National Institutes of Health.

Role of the sponsors: The supporters had no role in the design, analysis, interpretation, or publication of this study.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Administration on Aging, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. A Profile of Older Americans: 2016. Rockville, MD. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hedegaard H, Curtin SC, Warner M. Suicide rates in the United States continue to increase. NCHS Data Brief, no 309. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; ;2018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.CDC. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Office of the Surgeon General National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention. (2012). National Strategy for Suicide Prevention: goals and objectives for action: a report of the US Surgeon General and of the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention: Research Prioritization Task Force. (2014). A prioritized research agenda for suicide prevention: An action plan to save lives. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health and the Research Prioritization Task Force. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ambulatory and Hospital Care Statistics Branch, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2015. Emergency Department Summary Tables, Table 15: Injury-related emergency department visits, by intent: United States, 2015. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhamcs/web_tables/2015_ed_web_tables.pdf. Accessed October 26, 2017.
  • 7.Owens P, Fingar K, Heslin K, Mutter R, Booth C. Emergency Department Visits Related to Suicidal Ideation: 2006–2013. HCUP Statistical Brief #220. 2017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Franklin JC, Ribeiro JD, Fox KR, et al. Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Psychol. Bull. 2016;143(2):187–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Olfson M, Wall M, Wang S, Crystal S, Gerhard T, Blanco C. Suicide following deliberate self-harm. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2017;174(8):765–774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Murphy E, Kapur N, Webb R, et al. Risk factors for repetition and suicide following self-harm in older adults: multicentre cohort study. Br. J. Psychiatry. 2012;200(5):399–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Morgan C, Webb RT, Carr MJ, et al. Self-harm in a primary care cohort of older people: incidence, clinical management, and risk of suicide and other causes of death. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bostwick JM, Pabbati C, Geske JR, McKean AJ. Suicide attempt as a risk factor for completed suicide: even more lethal than we knew. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2016;173(11):1094–1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cheung G, Foster G, de Beer W, et al. Predictors for repeat self-harm and suicide among older people within 12 months of a self-harm presentation. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2017;29(8):1237–1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hawton K, Harriss L. Deliberate self-harm in people aged 60 years and over: characteristics and outcome of a 20-year cohort. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2006;21(6):572–581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Choi NG, DiNitto DM, Marti CN, Choi BY. Nonsuicidal self-injury and suicide attempts among ED patients older than 50 years: comparison of risk factors and ED visit outcomes. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2016;34(6):1016–1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Segal DL, Connella A, Miller T, Coolidge FL. Deliberate self-harm among younger and older adults. Death Stud. 2016;40(7):440–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fässberg MM, Cheung G, Canetto SS, et al. A systematic review of physical illness, functional disability, and suicidal behaviour among older adults. Aging & mental health. 2016;20(2):166–194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Szücs A, Szanto K, Aubry J-M, Dombrovski AY. Personality and suicidal behavior in old age: a systematic literature review. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2018;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Erlangsen A, Stenager E, Conwell Y. Physical diseases as predictors of suicide in older adults: a nationwide, register-based cohort study. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2015;50(9):1427–1439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Crump C, Sundquist K, Sundquist J, Winkleby MA. Sociodemographic, psychiatric and somatic risk factors for suicide: a Swedish national cohort study. Psychol. Med. 2014;44(2):279–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Darvishi N, Farhadi M, Haghtalab T, Poorolajal J. Alcohol-related risk of suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and completed suicide: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ngui AN, Vasiliadis H-M, Préville M. Individual and area-level factors correlated with death by suicide in older adults. Prev. Med. 2015;75:44–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fontanella CA, Saman DM, Campo JV, et al. Mapping suicide mortality in Ohio: A spatial epidemiological analysis of suicide clusters and area level correlates. Prev. Med. 2018;106:177–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Betz ME, Arias SA, Segal DL, Miller I, Camargo CA, Boudreaux ED. Screening for suicidal thoughts and behaviors in older adults in the emergency department. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2016;64(10). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Betz ME, Kautzman M, Segal DL, et al. Frequency of lethal means assessment among emergency department patients with a positive suicide risk screen. Psychiatry Res. 2018;260:30–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Urban C, Arias SA, Segal DL, et al. Emergency department patients with suicide risk: differences in care by acute alcohol use. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.US Department of Health and Human Services: Health Resources and Services Administration. Area Health Resource File (AHRF). Fairfax, VA: Quality Resource Systems; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med. Care. 1998;36(1):8–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Spicer RS, Miller TR. Suicide acts in 8 states: incidence and case fatality rates by demographics and method. Am. J. Public Health. 2000;90(12):1885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Marcus SC, Bridge JA, Olfson M. Payment source and emergency management of deliberate self-harm. Am. J. Public Health. 2012;102(6):1145–1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Olfson M, Marcus SC, Bridge JA. Emergency department recognition of mental disorders and short-term outcome of deliberate self-harm. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2013;170(12):1442–1450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Olfson M, Gameroff MJ, Marcus SC, Greenberg T, Shaffer D. Emergency treatment of young people following deliberate self-harm. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2005;62(10):1122–1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bridge JA, Marcus SC, Olfson M. Outpatient care of young people after emergency treatment of deliberate self-harm. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 2012;51(2):213–222. e211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Finkelstein Y, Macdonald EM, Hollands S, et al. Risk of suicide following deliberate self-poisoning. JAMA psychiatry. 2015;72(6):570–575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vermeiren S, Vella-Azzopardi R, Beckwée D, et al. Frailty and the prediction of negative health outcomes: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2016;17(12):1163 e1161–1163. e1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zdradzinski MJ, Phelan MP, Mace SE. Impact of frailty and sociodemographic factors on hospital admission from an emergency department observation unit. Am. J. Med. Qual. 2017;32(3):299–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lo AX, Flood KL, Biese K, Platts-Mills TF, Donnelly JP, Carpenter CR. Factors associated with hospital admission for older adults receiving care in US emergency departments. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biomedical Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2016;72(8):1105–1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kapur N, Steeg S, Turnbull P, et al. Hospital management of suicidal behaviour and subsequent mortality: a prospective cohort study. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(9):809–816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Randall JR, Roos LL, Lix LM, Katz LY, Bolton JM. Emergency department and inpatient coding for self-harm and suicide attempts: Validation using clinician assessment data. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 2017;26(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Walkup JT, Townsend L, Crystal S, Olfson M. A systematic review of validated methods for identifying suicide or suicidal ideation using administrative or claims data. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2012;21(S1):174–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES