Abstract
Background
The intracellular accommodation of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi involves a profound molecular reprogramming of the host cell architecture and metabolism, based on the activation of a symbiotic signaling pathway. In analogy with other plant biotrophs, AM fungi are reported to trigger cell cycle reactivation in their host tissues, possibly in support of the enhanced metabolic demand required for the symbiosis.
Results
We here compare the efficiency of three Fiji/ImageJ image analysis plugins in localizing and quantifying the increase in nuclear size - a hallmark of recursive events of endoreduplication - in M. truncatula roots colonized by the AM fungus Gigaspora margarita.
All three approaches proved to be versatile and upgradeable, allowing the investigation of nuclear changes in a complex tissue; 3D Object Counter provided more detailed information than both TrackMate and Round Surface Detector plugins.
On this base we challenged 3D Object Counter with two case studies: verifying the lack of endoreduplication-triggering responses in Medicago truncatula mutants with a known non-symbiotic phenotype; and analysing the correlation in space and time between the induction of cortical cell division and endoreduplication upon AM colonization.
Both case studies revealed important biological aspects. Mutant phenotype analyses have demonstrated that the knock-out mutation of different key genes in the symbiotic signaling pathway block AM-associated endoreduplication. Furthermore, our data show that cell divisions occur during initial stages of root colonization and are followed by recursive activation of the endocycle in preparation for arbuscule accommodation.
Conclusions
In conclusion, our results indicate 3D Object Counter as the best performing Fiji/ImageJ image analysis script in plant root thick sections and its application highlighted endoreduplication as a major feature of the AM pre-penetration response in root cortical cells.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1186/s12870-019-1791-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Endoreduplication, Ploidy, Arbuscular mycorrhiza, Confocal imaging, Image analysis
Background
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are the most widespread plant symbionts [1, 2], belonging to subphylum Glomeromycotina, and colonize more than 80% of all terrestrial plant species, from liverworts to angiosperms [3]. The symbiotic interaction brings benefits to both partners: mycorrhizal fungi enhance their host plant fitness by facilitating water and mineral absorption [4], while plants feed their fungal symbionts with simple sugars (exoses) and lipids, derived from photosynthesis [5]. In response to reciprocal chemical exchanges between symbionts, a fungal hypha adheres to the root epidermis forming an hyphopodium. The signal-transduction pathway that prepares the host plant root to the correct association with AM fungi is known as Common Symbiotic Signalling Pathway (CSSP). In response to CSSP activation, at least one epidermal cell develops an intracellular accommodation structure, called the prepenetration apparatus (PPA), which anticipates hyphal colonization of both epidermal and cortical cells [6], where highly branched fungal structures - called arbuscules - develop [7]. As hyphae penetrate each host cell, an extension of the plant cell membrane assembles inside the PPA, creating a new cell compartment, the symbiotic interface [8], where intracellular hyphae and arbuscules are hosted [9].
In this scenario, where fungal development must coordinate with host cell responses, PPA assembly is associated with complex activities of the plant cell nucleus, including its movement towards and away from the penetrating hyphal tip [6, 10]. In cortical cells, the eventual nuclear positioning at the cell center associates with a marked increase in size (Fig. 1) [11–16], representative of increased transcriptional, metabolic activities [10, 17] but also and above all endoreduplication onset, indicating host cell cycle machinery involvement. In fact, cell cycle reactivation in the root cortex in advance of fungal colonization is also demonstrated by the appearance of anticlinal cell divisions [18]. The resulting isolated couples of divided cells (here referred to as split cells) persist and are evident in longitudinal sections of the colonized area (Fig. 1 c, e) [19]. Indirect confirmation that ploidy increases are part of the AM accommodation program comes from gene expression increases in all major endoreduplication markers (such as MtCCS52A and MtAPC subunit 2) and from the analysis of mutant plant lines that cannot be colonized by AM fungi, where no change in nuclear size and ploidy are recorded [19].
In short, AM fungal accommodation associates with recursive activation of the cell cycle in the root cortex, leading to both cell division and multiple rounds of endoreduplication that eventually generate a mixed pattern of colonized and uncolonized cells displaying nuclei with diverse ploidy levels (ranging between 4 and 256C) and sizes [19].
The need to describe this cellular context prompted us to complement flow cytometry analyses of ploidy levels with different image analysis techniques, to get a more accurate picture of the relation between nuclear size and AM colonization in thick longitudinal sections of 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained Medicago truncatula roots, imaged through confocal microscopy. To this aim, manual measurement of nuclear cross sections in confocal images has been used in the past [19], but the process is extremely time consuming. Scientific literature is rich in analogous cases, where the diameter, area or volume of discrete fluorescent objects has been estimated by automated or semi-automated image analysis methods [20–25]. Our images of plant root sections hosting fungal structures represented a challenging ground for image analysis software, mostly related to z-axis decrease in fluorescence intensity (due to sample thickness) and the additional staining of fungal nuclei and part of the plant cell walls. We therefore decided to test the effectiveness of three Fiji/ImageJ (http://imagej.nih.gov/;http://fiji.sc/Fiji) plugins in estimating nuclear cross section area and volume: TrackMate; 3D Object Counter; and a customized version of Fiji/ImageJ macros used for area estimation (here referred as Round Surface Detector). Our comparative analyses highlighted advantages and limitations of each approach, compared to manual measurement and indicated 3D Object counter as the most reliable automated method. We therefore decided to test it with two challenging case studies. Our results outline a remarkable correlation between calculated nuclear volumes and ploidy, and shed light on key aspects of fungal accommodation responses in AM interactions.
Results
Three-dimensional confocal images are suitable for the analysis of nuclear morphology
Our nuclear staining method was based on a protocol developed for analogous analyses of nuclear morphology in nematode-infected roots of Arabidopsis thaliana [22, 26] and modified according to Carotenuto et al. (2019) - to analyse M. truncatula root tissues engaged in AM. In particular, the use of DAPI staining on 100-μm thick Vibratome sections had previously proven successful in preserving root nuclei [22] and allowing detailed measurements of their areas, volumes and spatial distribution. In our samples (Fig. 1), plant nuclei were marked very brightly, with a high signal/noise ratio and weak non-specific labelling of cell walls. Importantly, DAPI also stained Gigaspora margarita nuclei (easy to discriminate from the plant nuclei based on their small size) in intraradical and extraradical hyphae.
In order to validate the results obtained through automated image analysis, the size of equatorial nuclear sections was first measured manually, as described in Carotenuto et al. (2019), by outlining each DAPI-stained nucleus in single optical sections from six z-stacks recorded in uninoculated and colonized roots. We measured an amount of 1020 and 1150 nuclei in uninoculated and colonized root sections respectively (Additional files 1, 9). Quantitative analysis showed that the average area of equatorial nuclear sections was significantly smaller (independent sample’s median test, P < 0.05) in uninoculated (32.7 ± 0.33 μm2) compared to mycorrhizal root segments (35.9 ± 0.48 μm2). In addition, the curve distribution of nuclear areas (Fig. 2a; Additional file 1) showed significantly higher values of skewness (P < 0.001) and kurtosis (P < 0.01) in mycorrhizal (ske = 1.14 ± 0.16; kur = 1.52 ± 0.49) compared to uninoculated root segments (ske = 0.74 ± 0.20; kur = 0.75 ± 0.56), due to the wider range of values observed in the former treatment (15–142 μm2) compared to the uninoculated one (15–62 μm2).
In conclusion, the manual measurement of nuclear cross sections in z-stacks from chemically fixed and DAPI-stained root segments highlighted a marked increase in nuclear size upon AM colonization, in line with our previous studies [19]. The image data set was therefore considered suitable for determining nuclear morphology by automated image analysis.
TrackMate analysis of nuclear diameters proved limitations in estimation of cross section areas and volumes
TrackMate is a plugin originally designed to track cytoskeletal elements within time-lapse imaging of living cells [27]. In order to apply this software to our dataset, we chose to swap the time-axis with the z-axis, therefore forcing TrackMate to trace the selected objects (optical sections of DAPI-stained nuclei) across a confocal z-stack. The TrackMate detector automatically identified nuclear sections with coincident centroids, tagging them with a univocal ID and detecting their diameters, which were then used to calculate the cross-section area of individual nuclei. The resulting frequency distribution of nuclear cross-section areas showed an overall range increase between uninoculated (15–114 μm2) and mycorrhizal root sections (15–149 μm2), although no statistically significant difference between skewness and kurtosis values of the two curves was observed (Fig. 2c; Additional files 1, 9).
As a second step, assuming that nuclear sections could be approximated to circular objects, we used the TrackMate output data to estimate nuclear volumes based on confocal z-step and the diameters of all optical sections with the same ID tag (see Methods and Additional file 2).
Also in this case, the distribution curve of nuclear volumes (Fig. 3a; Additional file 1) showed no significant difference in skewness and kurtosis values between uninoculated (23–624 μm3) and mycorrhizal samples (23–891 μm3), although the occurring overall range increased.
Compared to manual measurements, our application of TrackMate to automatically detect and measure nuclear section diameters across z-stacks revealed critical limitations. In particular, our use of the TrackMate proved unreliable for nuclear size estimation from confocal z-stacks. Furthermore, the TrackMate analysis showed a low detection efficiency compared to the manual method: a marked number of cell nuclei remained undetected in both colonized (> 44%) and uninoculated (> 38%) roots.
A customized plugin (round surface detector) efficiently identifies and measures nuclear cross-section
As an alternative to the previous approach, we wrote an image analysis algorithm using the Fiji embedded macro language (see Methods; Additional file 3; Additional file 4). The resulting plugin allowed automated nuclear tagging and identification based on roundness and the size range of the detected objects.
The detection efficiency of this Round Surface Detector plugin (Additional files 1, 9) produced results comparable to that achieved by manual measurement, identifying 1001 and 1147 nuclei in uninoculated and colonized root segments, respectively. In contrast to the manual method, no significant increase in average nuclear area between uninoculated and mycorrhizal root sections was detected by the Round Surface Detector, although the distribution range of nuclear cross section areas was considerably larger in mycorrhizal (15–142 μm2) than uninoculated roots (15–68 μm2). However, the curve distribution of nuclear areas (Fig. 2b) showed significantly higher values of skewness (P < 0.001) and kurtosis (P < 0.01) in mycorrhizal (ske = 1.37 ± 0.20; kur = 2.83 ± 0.91) compared to uninoculated root segments (ske = 1.04 ± 0.10; kur = 1.62 ± 0.52).
Using 3D object counter for nuclear volume measurements
As the last method, we analysed our confocal datasets using 3D Object Counter, a Fiji plugin dedicated to 3D image analysis (see Methods; Additional file 5). This approach detected 594 and 893 nuclei in uninoculated and mycorrhizal roots, respectively, with a larger frequency distribution range (Additional files 1, 9) in mycorrhizal (20–220 μm3) than uninoculated roots (15–118 μm3). Compared to the manual approach, nuclear detection was less efficient (from 33% in colonized to 40% in uninoculated roots). This was probably caused by two problems within the algorithm. First, the selection of a single intensity threshold separating all nuclei from the background was difficult due to variations in staining intensity across the z-stack. Second, clustered nuclei - that were identified as a single lobed object - had to be manually deleted, thus reducing the total number of measurements.
Nevertheless, 3D Object Counter analysis highlighted a significant 1.25-fold increase (independent sample’s median test, P < 0.05) in average nuclear volume (Additional file 1) between uninoculated (40.3 ± 0.68 μm3) and mycorrhizal roots (50.7 ± 1.13 μm3), in line with manual measurements and previous studies [19]. The analysis of the distribution curve (Fig. 3b) confirmed this difference, showing significant higher values of skewness (P < 0.01) in mycorrhizal (1.47 ± 0.15) compared to uninoculated root segments (1.14 ± 0.22), whereas kurtosis value did not show any significant difference mainly because of the high variance.
In short 3D Object Counter resulted to be the most reliable method to automatically detect and measure nuclear size in mycorrhizal and uninoculated M. truncatula roots, representing a valid alternative to manual measurements. On this basis, we decided to apply this method to two specific and potentially challenging case studies.
Case study 1: analysis of nuclear morphology in two mutant phenotypes
Based on our previous tests, we decided to use 3D Object Counter to compare nuclear volumes in the cortical tissue of uninoculated and inoculated roots from wild type and two mutants of M. truncatula (dmi2–2 and dmi3–1). Such mutants are impaired for key CSSP genes: the receptor-like kinase DMI2 (for Does not Make Infection) and the nuclear calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (DMI3). Both strongly affect the development of functional AM symbiosis [28, 29], with an arrest of fungal colonization at the root epidermis, and a lack of cell cycle and endoreduplication reactivation in cortical cells [18, 19]. On this basis - and to prevent the abovementioned limitations of the 3D Object Counter algorithm - we restricted our measurements to the cortical tissue by cropping the original z-stacks (Additional files 6, 9).
A total of 440 and 690 nuclei were detected in uninoculated and mycorrhizal wild-type samples; 497 and 477 nuclei in uninoculated and inoculated dmi2–2; 623 and 511 nuclei, respectively, in dmi3–1 (Fig. 4). The analysis indicated an average nuclear volume of 58.6 μm3 for cortical cells in colonized wild-type roots. By contrast, uninoculated wild-type and both uninoculated and inoculated dmi2–2 and dmi3–1 mutants displayed nuclei of approximatively 44 μm3 (Fig. 4).
While demonstrating the efficiency of the 3D Object Counter approach, this significant difference has relevant biological implications. The enlargement of cortical cell nuclei, recorded through manual measurement, had previously been related to AM colonization [19]. The present results - based on the use of an automated image analysis method and intrinsically excluding any possible bias related to manual measuring - confirm that this is a hallmark of AM fungal accommodation and is dependent on the functionality of the CSSP where DMI2 and DMI3 play key roles.
Relationship between nuclear volume and endoreduplication
Increase in nuclear volume is the most obvious consequence of increments in ploidy [25, 30–32]. We therefore decided to check whether the population of nuclear volumes could be internally subdivided into a number of coherent classes, possibly reflecting progressive rounds of ploidy increase. To this aim, we applied the Sturges rule [33] to our dataset. The analysis, as reported in Additional file 7, indicated 25 μm3 as the optimal class width and identified four classes in the population of nuclear volumes from uninoculated wild-type roots, with average volumes of 30.3 μm3 for class I, 54.6 μm3 (class II), 77.6 μm3 (class III), 107 μm3 (class IV). By contrast, eight such classes were identified in mycorrhizal wild-type with average volumes of 29.6 μm3 (class I), 55.2 μm3 (class II), 81 μm3 (class III), 105.9 μm3 (class IV), 131.8 μm3 (class V), 155.3 μm3 (class VI), 181 μm3 (class VII) and 210.2 μm3 (class VIII).
Notably, the two populations of nuclear volumes – identified by applying descriptive statistics [33] to our dataset of measurements – matched with the corresponding ploidy levels and population of nuclear areas described by Carotenuto et al. (2019). On this basis, we used this clustering as an indication of putative ploidy levels, as shown in Additional file 8.
Case study 2: cortical cell division vs ploidy increase in AM
In addition to the onset of diffuse and recursive endoreduplication events [19], the triggering of ectopic cell divisions, leading to the appearance of split cells (Fig. 1), has also been described in the AM colonized area of the root [18]. Such split cells are easily recognized for their roughly square shape [18], which is maintained over time due to the limited capability of wall extension of the fully differentiated surrounding tissue.
Using the clustering of nuclear volumes into Sturges classes as an indication of putative ploidy levels, we focussed our analysis on all split cells found in our dataset of confocal z-stacks from uninoculated and mycorrhizal samples at progressive stages of fungal colonization (Fig. 5). Our aim here was to clarify how endoreduplication and cell division events combine during AM colonization. In fact, the progressive colonization of the root cortex from a single penetration point - characteristic of AM interactions [10] - allowed the observation of cell responses at different distances from intraradical hyphae, and provided a range of images depicting the whole progression of cell responses related to fungal accommodation.
Thus, nuclear volume measurements were extended to 10 uninoculated and 10 inoculated independent root sections of wild-type root organ culture (ROC) line (Fig. 5, Additional file 9). A total of 51 undivided and 8 split cortical cells were analyzed in uninoculated roots. The average nuclear volume in such undivided cells from uninoculated roots was 61 μm3 (Fig. 5a), corresponding to a putative 4C ploidy (Fig. 5b), as expected for this tissue, based on literature data [34, 35]. The few split cells observed in uninoculated samples displayed an average nuclear volume of about 36 μm3 (Fig. 5a, b), corresponding to putative 2C ploidy and suggesting that such cells originated from the division of a regular cortical cell.
In mycorrhizal M. truncatula roots we analyzed 129 undivided and 89 split cells (Fig. 5a). Among undivided cortical cells, 30 contained arbuscules (arbusculated), 35 were located next to an arbuscule (neighbouring) and 64 were at a distance of at least two cells from any arbuscule (far). Among split cells, we identified 27 arbusculated, 36 neighbouring and 26 far cells.
Far from the arbuscules (Fig. 5c), the situation was very similar to that of uninoculated roots: undivided far cells contained putative 4C nuclei (average nuclear volume of 61.1 μm3; Fig. 5a) while the nuclei of far split cells had an average volume of 38.9 μm3 (putative 2C ploidy).
By contrast, neighbouring cells displayed enlarged nuclei, with putative 16C nuclei (average of 110.1 μm3) in undivided cells and 8C nuclei (70.7 μm3 on average) in split cells (Fig. 5d). This suggested the occurrence of two endoreduplication rounds in each daughter cell.
Lastly, both undivided and split arbusculated cells (Fig. 5e-g) had nuclear volumes ranging between 8C and 128C (with an average nuclear volume of 157 μm3 for undivided and 143.7 μm3 for split cells; Fig. 5a). Remarkably, 13 cases (in a total of 81 z-stacks) were observed where only one of the split cells was hosting an arbuscule. Such images (exemplified in Fig. 5e, f) clearly show that the colonized cell hosts the largest nucleus. This provides convincing support to our current model of arbuscule accommodation (Carotenuto et al., 2019), where root colonization by AM fungi reactivates the cell cycle in the root cortex, initially leading to ectopic cell divisions and later to the onset of repeated endoreduplication rounds as cortical cells prepare to host an arbuscule.
Discussion
Validation of a reliable method to estimate nuclear size variations
Several methods have been developed to measure nuclear size during plant development [20, 23, 25] and biotrophic interactions [22, 36, 37]. Our previous analyses [19] showed how manual measurement of nuclear size in AM-colonized roots is laborious and strongly influenced by the staining method, prompting us to search for a sensitive, reliable and time saving alternative. By comparing the results of three automated or semi-automated image analysis methods based on Fiji software plugins and macros, we were able to select the algorithm that best matched the results obtained by manual analysis.
The “TrackMate” plugin was chosen for the versatility it showed when applied to protein dynamics, cell and organelle tracking [38–41]. After rerouting the TrackMate algorithm from time to z-axis in our confocal z-stacks, we were not able to detect the expected increase in nuclear area and volume in AM-colonized compared to uninoculated roots. The lack of any significant change in curve skewness and kurtosis, nor sample median, suggested that the geometrical approximation used to calculate nuclear area and volume from tracked diameters in serial optical sections was not reliable. TrackMate’s poor performance was likely due to the reduced fluorescence intensity in deeper optical sections and the progressive introduction of errors at each step of the formula used to estimate nuclear areas and volumes.
We therefore revised the TrackMate macro routines, using them to design the Round Surface Detector plugin for performing direct estimation of nuclear cross-section areas through different steps of image processing. The key requirement of this approach was the sectioning of each z-stack into thinner series of optical sections, to prevent the overlap of multiple nuclei with the same x-y coordinates. The Round Surface Detector plugin also involved a pre-emptive 3D rendering to more precisely outline the fluorescence halo of each nucleus. This approach revealed less error-prone and more performing that TrackMate, achieving a sensitivity in both nuclear tracking and surface estimation that was comparable to the manual method. In conclusion, the Round Surface Detector method is a promising replacement of the manual approach, even if an improvement of its 3D detection algorithm is advisable [21].
The best performance was obtained with the 3D Object Counter plugin. Even if the overall number of detected nuclei was lower than with Round Surface Detector plugin, the combination of thresholding, morphological segmentation and validation of the resulting map versus the original image allowed a very precise estimation of nuclear sizes. In fact, this method confirmed nuclear volume increase in AM-colonized compared to uninoculated and mutant root segments (case study 1), providing convincing indications that AM-associated ploidy changes are restricted to the root cortex [10, 19]. Furthermore, 3D Object Counter-based analyses shed new light on the relationship between cell division, nuclear size/ploidy increase and the progress of AM colonization (case study 2). It will now be interesting to test if a combination of algorithms can be designed to implement RDS detection efficiency (comparable to the manual method) with 3D Object Counter precision in volume estimation.
A novel insight on host nuclear responses to AM colonization
Cell cycle is a central process in growth and development of multicellular organisms, including plants [42–44]. Following an initial phase of coordinated mitotic cycles, endoreduplication events are common in plant tissue differentiation, and are often essential for cell expansion and development of seeds, roots, hypocotyls and leaves [32, 45–48]. Furthermore, endoreduplication is also involved in physiological responses [45, 48], and responses to abiotic [34, 49–51] and biotic stimuli, such as pathogenic or symbiotic interactions [52, 53]. For instance, the occurrence of DNA double-strand breaks [49, 50] or gibberellin and ethylene biosynthesis [54, 55] can trigger endocycle activation. An increased ploidy level yields apparent advantages also under water [56] and light [57] deficient conditions. Lastly, endoreduplication can be triggered at pathogen infection sites, e.g. by nematodes [58], and upon the symbiotic interactions. Such manipulations of the host cell cycle have been thoroughly described in the mutualistic interaction between nitrogen-fixing rhizobia and legumes. Rhizobia have been shown to induce both mitosis and endoreduplication as a part of their infection process, enabling the development of new specialized organs (the root nodules) devoted to symbiotic nitrogen fixation [52, 53].
In AM, light microscopy, electron microscopy and morphometry have been employed to describe nuclear morphology in arbusculated cells [10, 11, 14] and our recent data indicate that fungal accommodation involves cell cycle reactivation in fully differentiated root cells, leading to localized cell divisions and endoreduplication [18, 19].
Conclusions
Confocal microscopy and image analysis can be very helpful to interpret plant cell cycle reactivation during AM colonization. Nevertheless, such responses are particularly challenging to investigate, mostly due to the progressive and asynchronous process of root colonization by AM fungi, and none of the previous studies provided a detailed picture of the correlation between nuclear changes, cell divisions and progressive AM development.
Our application of an automated method to perform detailed image analysis of nuclear size, now extends our understanding of the relationship between cell division, nuclear ploidy and the progress of AM colonization in the cortical tissue. The necessity to clarify this elusive aspect had emerged in our previous studies, which documented how a combination of isolated cell divisions and ploidy increases in AM colonized areas results in a complex pattern of undivided and divided cells with different ploidy levels [18, 19]. Our novel results suggest that cell cycle reactivation during early root colonization by AM fungi triggers cell division in some cortical cells. Sustained cell cycle stimulation during later colonization of the inner root tissues leads to repeated rounds of endoreduplication, a cortical cell response that is now considered part of the arbuscule accommodation program and takes place in both undivided and split cortical cells (Carotenuto et al., 2019).
Methods
Plant and fungal materials
All experiments were done using explants of Agrobacterium rhizogenes-transformed root organ cultures (ROCs), derived from M. truncatula plants (genotype Jemalong A17). One ROC was derived from the wild-type cultivar and two from CSSP mutants dmi2–2 and dmi3–1, [28, 29]. The ROC lines, available in the lab [59, 60], were prepared according to Russo et al. (2019) and Carotenuto et al. (2019).
The AM fungus G. margarita isolate BEG34 (International Bank for the Glomeromycota, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK) was used to colonize M. truncatula ROCs.
The targeted AM inoculation technique [61] was chosen to collect 1 cm-long root segments from uninoculated and early colonized roots (3 days after hyphopodium formation), as described in Carotenuto et al. (2019). Six independent samples were collected from independent uncolonized or colonized ROCs of wild-type and mutant lines, and prepared for confocal imaging.
Confocal microscopy
Root segments were fixed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2, containing 1% formaldehyde and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for 24 h at 4 °C, and treated as described in Carotenuto et al. (2019). In brief, after sectioning into 100 μm-thick sections using a Vibratome (Oxford Vibratome® sectioning system), nuclear staining was performed using the DNA-specific marker 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Imaging was then performed with an upright Leica TCS SP2 confocal microscope fitted with a long distance 40X water-immersion objective (HCX Apo 0.80), using the 405 nm diode for DAPI excitation. All root sections were scanned at 400 Hz and 2X line averaged, generating 375 × 375x45μm z stacks (z step = 1.5 μm) to be used for image analyses. Nuclear coss-section areas and volumes were measured using each of the following methods in a set of confocal images recorded from six independent root samples harvested for each experimental condition. Maximum brightness projections were generated for illustrative figures.
Nuclear cross-section area and volume measurements using TrackMate
Image z-stacks of DAPI-stained root sections of M. truncatula were analysed with TrackMate, an interactive Fiji plugin including a wizard-like graphical user interface, originally developed for detecting and tracking objects in time-lapse image stacks [62]. For our image dataset, tracking was carried out by swapping the detection from time-axis to z-axis. Firstly, a spatial calibration of the z-stack was made, based on pixel size (1024 × 1024 pixels = 375 × 375 μm) and z step (1.5 μm) between optical sections.
The TrackMate detector was then programmed to use the ‘Laplacian of Gaussian’ filter with a ‘blob estimated diameter’ set to 10 μm, fitting with the maximum size of M. truncatula nuclei; the Trackmate ‘quality feature’ was set to select only the brightest nuclei among the detected blobs; lastly, the ‘simple lap tracker’ was configured to tag with univocal IDs all nuclear spots sharing the same x-y centroid position across the z-stack. Diameters of all selected blobs were then calculated in each optical section.
The resulting dataset of ID-tagged nuclear diameters was exported to SQL to identify the largest diameter (dMAX) for each ID and use it to estimate the equatorial plane area for each nucleus (cross-section area) as π•(dMAX/2)2. Secondly, the same approach was used to approximately estimate nuclear volumes: the areas of all nuclear sections with the same ID tag was calculated, multiplied by the z-step (1.5 μm) to obtain partial volumes per each optical section (Additional file 2), and summed as . Only nuclear IDs recorded in at least three optical sections were used to estimate nuclear volumes, in order to exclude incompletely-scanned nuclei at the top or bottom ends of the z-stack.
Nuclear cross-section area measurements using round surface detector
Using the Fiji macro language, we designed a plugin to automatically measure nuclear cross-section areas (Additional file 4). This plugin operates on confocal z-stacks through a routine of image analysis steps (Additional file 3).
First, z-stacks are calibrated based on pixel dimensions and z-step, as described for the TrackMate method. Optical sections from each z-stack are then rendered into a single 3D image using the ‘3D project’ function with the ‘brightest point’ method. The resulting 3D image is corrected for brightness and contrast to achieve maximal dynamic range, cleaned by ‘subtraction of background’, thresholded and masked using the ‘convert to mask’ function. The mask is then adjusted with ‘smooth’, ‘fill holes’ and ‘watershed’ operations to precisely map the three-dimensional outline of each identified object (nuclei and cell wall clusters). The mapped 3D image is further elaborated using the ‘analyse particles’ function with a high circularity index (ranging from 0.7 to 1) to exclude wall clusters and tag each nucleus with a univocal ID. The size of detected objects is conditioned by a user-selected range (from 15 to 150 μm2), in order to exclude smaller fungal nuclei and non-specific staining of plant cell walls. The final output can be viewed on screen and manually inspected to check for and discard possible mismatches.
Nuclear volume evaluation using 3D object counter
The same image dataset was also analysed using the Fiji 3D Object Counter plugin for volume estimation from confocal z-stacks [63]. In addition, 3D Object Counter analysis was extended to six uninoculated and six inoculated independent root sections from both dmi2–2 and dmi3–1 mutants. Following spatial calibration and brightness/contrast adjustment, a threshold was applied to discriminate between the brighter nuclear voxels and the darker background [21]. The 3D Object Counter plugin was then used to generate a 3D surface map containing only nuclear voxels and sum them to estimate the volume of each nucleus.
Lastly, we merged the original z-stacks with the 3D Object Counter-generated surface maps to identify and tag each nucleus (Additional file 5) for a final visual control.
Statistics and data analysis
Since the data did not fit a normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test, P < 0.05), the differences in the median values and frequency distributions between uninoculated and colonized wild-type root segments were compared using the non-parametric independent sample median test. Moreover, data distribution across the dimensional range was investigated separately for nuclear area and volume, prior to test the differences among treatments. Gamma and lognormal distribution were selected as best candidates to describe nuclear dimension distribution, and thus tested for their goodness of fit. Lognormal distribution showed the highest fit for all the data-samples, according to both Anderson-Darling statistics and Akaike’s Information Criterion. In order to homogenise the sample size of our dataset and make the comparison among treatments and methods more robust, a bootstrap resampling method with 1000 iterations was performed for each sample. The sample size was set to 500, and a lognormal curve was fitted to every re-sampled dataset to obtain the density values. Finally 500 random points were generated for each starting sample according to the density values obtained in the previous step, and the first moment-statistics of the new data-sample were estimated (i.e. mean, standard deviation, CV, skewness, and kurtosis). Generalised Linear Models (GLMs) of skewness and kurtosis statistics were used to investigate the differences between controls and mycorrhized samples detected with the abovementioned methods (i.e. Manual, TrackMate, Round Surface Detector, 3D Object Counter). Indeed, these moment-statistics, rather than mean and standard deviation, allowed us to focus on the effects of different probability density occurring at the curve tails, by describing the curve symmetry (i.e. skewness) and ‘tailedness’ (i.e. kurtosis). Pairwise comparisons were performed with Tukey’s post-hoc test. Before fitting the GLMs, response variables were tested for normality with Shapiro-Wilk test [64], and transformed when necessary (square root transformation). All the statistical analyses and plots were performed using both Past multivariate statistics software package v3.0 [63] and the computing environment R 3.5.1 (R Development Core Team, 2005) with the following packages: ‘dplyr’, ‘fitdistrplus’, ‘ggplot2’, ‘logspline’, ‘multcomp’, ‘nsRFA’, and ‘Rmisc’.
Regarding the cases of study, the statistical differences in the average nuclear volumes between uninoculated and inoculated roots of different ROC lines (i.e. wild-type, dmi2–2 and dmi3–1) were evaluated with Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric analysis of variance followed by Dunn’s post-hoc test (using Bonferroni-corrected p-values) for pairwise multiple comparisons, accepting significant differences at P < 0.05 (Figs. 4 and 5). The volume dataset was further analysed using the Sturges rule [19, 33], a statistical method that allocates data into an optimal number of classes calculated with the following formula based on population characteristics:
where R is the range of a statistical series and N the number of items in the dataset (Additional file 7). These analyses were performed using both Past software package v3.0 and Excel.
Additional files
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Mara Politi for her assistance with G. margarita cultures. We also express our gratitude to the anonymous reviewers who provided useful suggestions to improve our original manuscript.
Funding
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca: PhD fellowship to GC
Università degli Studi di Torino: Ricerca Locale 2016–2017 to AG
None of the above funding bodies played any role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
The dataset used for this study is provided in the additional file 9.
Abbreviations
- AM
Arbuscular mycorrhiza
- CSSP
Common symbiotic signalling pathway
- DAPI
4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
- PPA
Prepenetration apparatus
- ROC
Root organ culture
Authors’ contributions
GC designed the experiments and the image analysis approach, performed biological sample preparation and image analysis, and wrote the text; IS contributed to design the image analysis approach, image analyses and statistical analyses; LO contributed to the statistical analyses and writing of the text; VV contributed to sample preparation; AG contributed to the experimental design and rationale, and wrote the text. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press, London, New York. 1997:1–605.
- 2.Salvioli A, Bonfante P. Systems biology and “omics” tools: a cooperation for next-generation mycorrhizal studies. Plant Sci. 2013;203:107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Spatafora JW, Chang Y, Benny GL, Lazarus K, Smith ME, Berbee ML, et al. A phylum-level phylogenetic classification of zygomycete fungi based on genome-scale data. Mycologia. 2016;108:1028–1046. doi: 10.3852/16-042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gutjahr C, Parniske M. Cell and developmental biology of the arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2013;29:593–617. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101512-122413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McLean AM, Bravo A, Harrison MJ. Plant signaling and metabolic pathways enabling arbuscular mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Plant Cell. 2017;29:2319–2335. doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Genre A, Chabaud M, Timmers T, Bonfante P, Barker DG. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi elicit a novel intracellular apparatus in Medicago truncatula root epidermal cells before infection. Plant Cell. 2005;17:3489–3499. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.035410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Harrison M. Signaling in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2005;59:19–42. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pumplin N, Harrison MJ. Live-cell imaging reveals periarbuscular membrane domains and organelle location in Medicago truncatula roots during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Physiol. 2009;151:809–819. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.141879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Harrison MJ. Cellular programs for arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012;15(6):691–698. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Genre A, Chabaud M, Faccio A, Barker DG, Bonfante P. Prepenetration apparatus assembly precedes and predicts the colonization patterns of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi within the root cortex of both Medicago truncatula and Daucus carota. Plant Cell. 2008;20:1407–1420. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.059014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Balestrini R, Berta G, Bonfante P. The plant nucleus in mycorrhizal roots: positional and structural modifications. Biol Cell. 1992;75:235–243. doi: 10.1016/0248-4900(92)90145-Q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lingua G, Fusconi A, Berta G. The nucleus of differentiated root plant cells: modifications induced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Eur J Histochem. 2001;45(1):9–20. doi: 10.4081/1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lingua G, Trotta A, Prigione V, Ugoccioni R, Berta G. Nucleus size in the host cells of an arbuscular mycorrhizal system: a mathematical approach to estimate the role of ploidy and chromatin condensation. Caryologia. 2005;58:112–121. doi: 10.1080/00087114.2005.10589441. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Berta G, Fusconi A, Sampò S, Lingua G, Perticone S, Repetto O. Polyploidy in tomato roots as affected by arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization. Plant Soil. 2000;226:37–44. doi: 10.1023/A:1026468810886. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Repetto O, Massa N, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Dumas-Gaudot E, Berta G. Cadmium effects on populations of root nuclei in two pea genotypes inoculated or not with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. Mycorrhiza. 2007;17:111–120. doi: 10.1007/s00572-006-0082-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bainard LD, Bainard JD, Newmaster SG, Klironomos JN. Mycorrhizal symbiosis stimulates endoreduplication in angiosperms. Plant Cell Environ. 2011;34:1577–1585. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02354.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gaude N, Bortfeld S, Duensing N, Lohse M, Krajinski F. Arbuscule-containing and non-colonized cortical cells of mycorrhizal roots undergo extensive and specific reprogramming during arbuscular mycorrhizal development. Plant J. 2012;69:510–528. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04810.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Russo G, Carotenuto G, Fiorilli V, Volpe V, Chiapello M, Van Damme D, et al. Ectopic activation of cortical cell division during the accommodation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 2019;221(2):1036–1048. doi: 10.1111/nph.15398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Carotenuto G, Volpe V, Russo G, Politi M, Sciascia I, de Almeida-Engler J, et al. Local endoreduplication as a feature of intracellular fungal accommodation in arbuscular mycorrhizas. New Phytol. 2019; in press. 10.1111/nph.15763. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 20.Bourdon M, Coriton O, Pirrello J, Cheniclet C, Brown SC, Poujol C, et al. In planta quantification of endoreduplication using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) Plant J. 2011;66:1089–1099. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04568.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schmitz C, Eastwood BS, Tappan SJ, Glaser JR, Peterson DA, Hof PR. Current automated 3D cell detection methods are not a suitable replacement for manual stereologic cell counting. Front Neuroanat. 2014;8:27. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.de Souza Junior JD, Pierre O, Coelho RR, Grossi-de-Sa MF, Engler G, de Almeida Engler J. Application of nuclear volume measurements to comprehend the cell cycle in root-knot nematode-induced Giant. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:961. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pasternak T, Haser T, Falk T, Ronneberger O, Palme K, Otten L. A 3D digital atlas of the Nicotiana tabacum root tip and its use to investigate changes in the root apical meristem induced by the agrobacterium 6b oncogene. Plant J. 2017;92(1):31–42. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhou Z, Pons MN, Raskin L, Zilles JL. Automated image analysis for quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization with environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;73:2956–2962. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02954-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Robinson Dana O., Coate Jeremy E., Singh Abhyudai, Hong Lilan, Bush Max, Doyle Jeff J., Roeder Adrienne H.K. Ploidy and Size at Multiple Scales in the Arabidopsis Sepal. The Plant Cell. 2018;30(10):2308–2329. doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vieira P, Engler G, de Almeida Engler J. Whole-mount confocal imaging of nuclei in giant feeding-cells induced by root-knot nematodes in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2012;195:488–496. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04175.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Owen LM, Adhikarib AS, Patel M, Grimmer P, Leijnse N, Kim MC, et al. A cytoskeletal clutch mediates cellular force transmission in a soft, three-dimensional extracellular matrix. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28:1959–1974. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e17-02-0102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Catoira R, Galera C, de Billy F, Penmetsa RV, Journet EP, Maillet F, et al. Four genes of Medicago truncatula controlling components of a nod factor transduction pathway. Plant Cell. 2000;12:1647–1666. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.9.1647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Morandi D, Prado E, Sagan M, Duc G. Characterisation of new symbiotic Medicago truncatula (Gaertn.) mutants, and phenotypic or genotypic complementary information on previously described mutants. Mycorrhiza. 2005;15:283–289. doi: 10.1007/s00572-004-0331-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jovtchev G, Schubert V, Meister A, Barow M, Schubert I. Nuclear DNA content and nuclear and cell volume are positively correlated in angiosperms. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006;114:77–82. doi: 10.1159/000091932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Roeder Adrienne H. K., Chickarmane Vijay, Cunha Alexandre, Obara Boguslaw, Manjunath B. S., Meyerowitz Elliot M. Variability in the Control of Cell Division Underlies Sepal Epidermal Patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Biology. 2010;8(5):e1000367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bourdon M, Pirrello J, Cheniclet C, Coriton O, Bourge M, Brown S, et al. Evidence for karyoplasmic homeostasis during endoreduplication and a ploidy-dependent increase in gene transcription during tomato fruit growth. Development. 2012;139:3817–3826. doi: 10.1242/dev.084053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sturges HA. Choice of a class interval. J Am Stat Assoc. 1926;21:65–66. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1926.10502161. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Barow M, Meister A. Endopolyploidy in seed plants is differently correlated to systematics, organ, life strategy and genome size. Plant Cell Environ. 2003;26:571–584. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00988.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kocová V, Kolarèik V, Straková N, Mártonfi P. Endopolyploidy patterns in organs of Trifolium species (Fabaceae) Acta Biol Cracov Ser Bot. 2014;56(1):111–120. doi: 10.2478/abcsb-2014-0011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vieira P, Escudero C, Rodiuc N, Boruc J, Russinova E, Glab N, et al. Ectopic expression of kip-related proteins restrains root-knot nematode-feeding site expansion. New Phytol. 2013;199:505–519. doi: 10.1111/nph.12255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vieira P, De Clercq A, Stals H, Van Leene J, Van De Slijke E, Van Isterdael G, et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor KRP6 induces mitosis and impairs cytokinesis in giant cells induced by plant-parasitic nematodes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2014;26:2633–2647. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.126425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mossuto MF, Sannino S, Mazza D, Fagioli C, Vitale M, Yoboue ED, et al. A dynamic study of protein secretion and aggregation in the secretory pathway. PLoS One. 2014;9:e108496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pauli A, Norris ML, Valen E, Chew GL, Gagnon JA, Zimmerman S, et al. Toddler: an embryonic signal that promotes cell movement via Apelin receptors. Science. 2014;343:1248636. doi: 10.1126/science.1248636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Campbell K, Casanova J. A role for E-cadherin in ensuring cohesive migration of a heterogeneous population of non-epithelial cells. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7998. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sporsheim B, Øverby A, Bones AM. Allyl isothiocyanate inhibits actindependent intracellular transport in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:29134–29147. doi: 10.3390/ijms161226154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Inzé D, De Veylder L. Cell cycle regulation in plant development. Annu Rev Genet. 2006;40:77–105. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Scofield S, Jones A, Murray JAH. The plant cell cycle in context. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:2557–2562. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hoang PTN, Schubert V, Meister A, Fuchs J, Schubert I. Variation in genome size, cell and nucleus volume, chromosome number and rDNA loci among duckweeds. Sci Rep. 2019;9:3234. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39332-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kondorosi E, Kondorosi A. Endoreduplication and activation of the anaphase-promoting complex during symbiotic cell development. FEBS Lett. 2004;567:152–157. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.04.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lee HO, Davidson JM, Duronio RJ. Endoreplication: polyploidy with purpose. Genes Dev. 2009;23:2461–2477. doi: 10.1101/gad.1829209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sabelli PA, Larkins BA. The contribution of cell cycle regulation to endosperm development. Sex Plant Reprod. 2009;22:207–219. doi: 10.1007/s00497-009-0105-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.de Veylder L, Larkin JC, Schnittger A. Molecular control and function of endoreplication in development and physiology. Trends Plant Sci. 2011;16:624–634. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ramirez-Parra E, Gutiérrez C. E2F regulates FASCIATA1, a chromatin assembly gene whose loss switches on the endocycle and activates gene expression by changing the epigenetic status. Plant Physiol. 2007;144:105–120. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.094979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Adachi S, Minamisawa K, Okushima Y, Inagaki S, Yoshiyama K, Kondou Y, et al. Programmed induction of endoreduplication by DNA double-strand breaks in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:10004–10009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103584108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Radziejwoski A, Vlieghe K, Lammens T, Berckmans B, Maes S, Jansen MA, et al. Atypical E2F activity coordinates PHR1 photolyase gene transcription with endoreduplication onset. EMBO J. 2011;30:355–363. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chandran DC, Wildermuth M. Modulation of host endocycle during plant biotroph interactions. In: Lin C, Luan S, editors. The Enzymes. Burlington, MA: Academic; 2016. pp. 65–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wildermuth MC, Steinwand MA, McRae AG, Jaenisch J, Chandran D. Adapted Biotroph manipulation of plant cell ploidy. AnnuRev Phytopathol. 2017;55:537–564. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ishida T, Adachi S, Yoshimura M, Shimizu K, Umeda M, Sugimoto K. Auxin modulates the transition from the mitotic cycle to the endocycle in Arabidopsis. Development. 2010;137:63–71. doi: 10.1242/dev.035840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yamasaki S, Shimada E, Kuwano T, Kawano T, Noguchi N. Continuous UV-B irradiation induces Endoreduplication and peroxidase activity in epidermal cells surrounding Trichomes on cucumber cotyledons. J Radiat Res. 2010;51:187–196. doi: 10.1269/jrr.09101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cookson SJ, Granier C. A dynamic analysis of the shadeinduced plasticity in Arabidopsis thaliana rosette leaf development reveals new components of the shade-adaptative response. Ann Bot. 2006;97:443–452. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcj047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kudo N, Mii M. Endoreduplication cycles during hypocotyl growth of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) under light and dark conditions. Plant Biotechnol. 2004;21:295–298. doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.21.295. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Engler Janice de Almeida, Engler Gilbert, Gheysen Godelieve. Genomics and Molecular Genetics of Plant-Nematode Interactions. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2011. Unravelling the Plant Cell Cycle in Nematode Induced Feeding Sites; pp. 349–368. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chabaud M, Genre A, Sieberer BJ, Faccio A, Fournier J, Novero M, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphopodia and germinated spore exudates trigger Ca2+ spiking in the legume and nonlegume root epidermis. New Phytol. 2011;189:347–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03464.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Genre A, Chabaud M, Balzergue C, Puech-Page’s V, Novero M, Rey T, et al. Short-chain chitin oligomers from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi trigger nuclear Ca2+ spiking in Medicago truncatula roots and their production is enhanced by strigolactone. New Phytol. 2013;198:190–202. doi: 10.1111/nph.12146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chabaud M, Venard C, Defaux-Petras A, Bécard G, Barker DG. Targeted inoculation of Medicago truncatula in vitro root cultures reveals MtENOD11 expression during early stages of infection by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 2002;156:265–273. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00508.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Tinevez JY, Perry N, Schindelin J, Hoopes GM, Reynolds GD, Laplantine E, et al. Trackmate: an open and extensible platform for single-particle tracking. Methods. 2017;115:80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bolte S, Cordelieres FP. A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J Microsc. 2006;224:213–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01706.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Shapiro LG, Stockman GC. Computer vision. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2001. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The dataset used for this study is provided in the additional file 9.