Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2001 Dec 18;98(26):15215–15220. doi: 10.1073/pnas.221292098

Oxygen radical inhibition of nitric oxide-dependent vascular function in sickle cell disease

Mutay Aslan *,†,‡,§, Thomas M Ryan †,§, Brian Adler ¶,‖, Tim M Townes †,§, Dale A Parks *,‡, J Anthony Thompson †,**, Albert Tousson ‡‡, Mark T Gladwin ††,§§, Rakesh P Patel ‡,¶, Margaret M Tarpey *,‡, Ines Batinic-Haberle ¶¶, C Roger White ‡,‖, Bruce A Freeman *,†,‡,§,‖‖
PMCID: PMC65009  PMID: 11752464

Abstract

Plasma xanthine oxidase (XO) activity was defined as a source of enhanced vascular superoxide (OInline graphic) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production in both sickle cell disease (SCD) patients and knockout-transgenic SCD mice. There was a significant increase in the plasma XO activity of SCD patients that was similarly reflected in the SCD mouse model. Western blot and enzymatic analysis of liver tissue from SCD mice revealed decreased XO content. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of liver tissue of knockout-transgenic SCD mice indicated extensive hepatocellular injury that was accompanied by increased plasma content of the liver enzyme alanine aminotransferase. Immunocytochemical and enzymatic analysis of XO in thoracic aorta and liver tissue of SCD mice showed increased vessel wall and decreased liver XO, with XO concentrated on and in vascular luminal cells. Steady-state rates of vascular OInline graphic production, as indicated by coelenterazine chemiluminescence, were significantly increased, and nitric oxide (NO)-dependent vasorelaxation of aortic ring segments was severely impaired in SCD mice, implying oxidative inactivation of NO. Pretreatment of aortic vessels with the superoxide dismutase mimetic manganese 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N-ethylpyridinium-2-yl)porphyrin markedly decreased OInline graphic levels and significantly restored acetylcholine-dependent relaxation, whereas catalase had no effect. These data reveal that episodes of intrahepatic hypoxia-reoxygenation associated with SCD can induce the release of XO into the circulation from the liver. This circulating XO can then bind avidly to vessel luminal cells and impair vascular function by creating an oxidative milieu and catalytically consuming NO via OInline graphic-dependent mechanisms.


The β-globin mutation in sickle cell disease (SCD) is manifested by a glutamic acid to valine substitution and, ultimately, vascular dysfunction. Upon deoxygenation, intracellular polymerization of HbS occurs, and sickle erythrocytes acquire altered rheological properties (1). Even though the capillary transit time of red cells is brief in comparison to the kinetics of HbS polymerization, increased blood cell interactions with vascular endothelium will occur as a consequence of altered red cell membrane properties and increased vessel wall adhesiveness. Incompletely described signaling mechanisms also induce an inflammatory-like activation state in vascular endothelium indicated by elevated endothelial expression of Fc receptor and the integrins ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and P-selectin (25). There are also increased plasma levels of leukocytes (6), “activated” circulating endothelial cells, proinflammatory cytokines, platelet-activating factor, C-reactive protein, and angiogenic stimuli (7, 8).

The mechanisms underlying regional blood flow deprivation during sickle cell crises, as well as the associated pain with consequent tissue injury, remain poorly understood. If tissue ischemia in SCD patients resulted solely from Hb polymerization and red cell deformation, occlusion of small blood vessels such as terminal arterioles would predominate. Whereas this phenomenon certainly contributes to tissue injury in the liver, lungs, kidney, and spleen, it is not sufficient to explain large vessel vasculopathies. For example, stroke in SCD patients occurs in large and medium-sized arteries (internal carotid and middle cerebral arteries; refs. 9 and 10). Importantly, the quantity or proportion of sickled or dense red cells in the circulation does not correlate with the incidence of painful episodes or other manifestations of vascular occlusion (11, 12). This implies that much of the morbidity and mortality of SCD is caused by alterations in vascular function that occur secondary to red cell sickling, rather than as a consequence of direct vaso-occlusive actions of sickled red cells.

Multiple features of SCD strongly infer a pathogenic role for impaired NO-dependent vascular regulation. For example, vascular production of NO seems to be chronically activated to maintain vasodilation, as indicated by low baseline blood pressure (13) and decreased plasma arginine levels (14). Also, decreased pressor responses to angiotensin II (15), renal hyperfiltration (16), a tendency for priapism (17), and elevated plasma nitrite and nitrate (NOInline graphic + NOInline graphic) levels occur in SCD (18). During vaso-occlusive crisis, an increased metabolic demand for arginine and an inverse relationship between subjective pain scores and plasma NOInline graphic + NOInline graphic levels has been reported (18, 19). Finally, therapeutic benefit has been observed in SCD patients receiving inhaled NO and hydroxyurea, a drug frequently used to treat SCD that not only induces fetal Hb levels in SCD patients but also is metabolized to NO (20, 21).

Another hallmark of SCD, increased tissue rates of production of reactive oxygen species, may also contribute to impaired NO signaling. Compared with HbA red cells, HbS red cells have been reported to generate ≈2-fold greater extents of OInline graphic, H2O2, hydroxyl radical (OH), and lipid oxidation products (LOOH, LOO) (22, 23). Also, decompartmentalization of redox-active transition metals such as iron has been observed in HbS red cells (23). Finally, mice expressing human βS-hemoglobin displayed indices of increased lipid oxidation and aromatic hydroxylation reactions and, upon exposure to hypoxia, had ≈10% increase in the conversion of liver and kidney xanthine oxidoreductase to the OInline graphic and H2O2-producing oxidase form (24). Appreciating that NO reacts at diffusion-limited rates with OInline graphic and lipid peroxyl radicals (LOO) to produce secondary products such as peroxynitrite (ONOO) and nitrated lipids [LNO2, L(O)NO2] (2527), it is proposed that the impaired vascular function and inflammatory activation of SCD vessels could be a consequence of oxygen radical-dependent consumption of NO and production of secondary reactive species (e.g., H2O2 or ONOO) that can also impair vascular function. In support of this precept, a combination of clinical and knockout-transgenic SCD mouse studies are reported herein that show increased rates of xanthine oxidase (XO)-dependent vessel wall production of NO-inactivating OInline graphic in SCD. The increased rates of vessel wall oxidant production caused impairment of NO-dependent vascular relaxation in SCD mouse vessels that were corrected by a catalytic metalloporphyrin superoxide dismutase (SOD) mimetic. Finally, multiple lines of evidence showed that the vessel wall, not red cells, was the primary source of NO-consuming free radical species in SCD.

Materials and Methods

Erythrocyte Superoxide, Hydrogen Peroxide, and Lipid Hydroperoxide Production.

Blood was collected from healthy HbA adult volunteers and homozygous HbS patients in anticoagulated (EDTA) vacutainers as approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Use at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. All individuals were evaluated for cytochrome b5 reductase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity, and none were reported deficient. After centrifugation, plasma and buffy coat was discarded, and cells were washed and filtered through a cellulose column (Sigma, type 50 and α cellulose) to remove neutrophils and platelets. Packed RBCs were diluted to a hematocrit of 2.5% (vol/vol) hemoglobin concentration determined with Drabkin's reagent at 540 nm (28), and rates of OInline graphic release over 2 h were quantified spectrophotometrically by CuZn SOD-inhibitable (100 units ml−1, equivalent to ≈33 μg ml−1 SOD) reduction of cytochrome c (50 μM) at 550 nm (ɛM = 21 mM−1⋅cm−1). In some experiments, OInline graphic release was measured in cells pretreated with 2,3-dimethoxy-1-napthoquinone (DMNQ; Oxis, 100 μM), 3hydroxy-1,2-dimethyl-4-pyridone (Aldrich, 0.5 mM), and 4,4-diisothiocyano-2,2 disulfonic acid stilbene (Sigma, 200 μM). Possible Hb interference in determination of rates of cytochrome c reduction was evaluated by performing a singular value decomposition analysis (Matlab, Mathworks, Natick, MA). Intracellular H2O2 concentrations were calculated from aminotriazole (AT)-mediated inactivation of catalase activity as described (29). Red cells were incubated with 10 mM AT at 37°C, and intracellular catalase activity was determined at 1-h intervals for 4 h. Catalase activity was measured spectrophotometrically based on the consumption of 10 mM H2O2 at 240 nm (ɛM = 43.6 M−1⋅cm−1). For determining the extent of membrane lipid oxidation, packed RBCs were lysed in hypotonic phosphate buffer (20 mosM, pH 7.4, 4°C), centrifuged at 30,000 × g for 20 min, and the supernatant was discarded. Membrane ghosts were washed eight times to minimize Hb contamination and stored at −20°C. For use as a stimulus of lipid oxidation, ONOO was synthesized as described (25), and its concentration was determined spectrophotometrically at 302 nm (ɛM = 1670 M−1⋅cm−1). Lipid hydroperoxide (LOOH) content was measured via N-benzoyl leucomethylene blue oxidation and quantitated against a t-butyl hydroperoxide standard. Protein concentrations were measured at 595 nm by a modified Bradford assay by using Coomassie Plus reagent with BSA as a standard.

NO Consumption.

Anaerobic solutions of 1.9 mM NO were prepared by equilibrating NO gas (Matheson) in argon-saturated deionized water. Contaminating nitrogen dioxide (NO2) or nitrous oxide (N2O) was removed by first passing the NO gas through 5 M NaOH. NO (2.5–15 μM) was added to diluted RBCs (Hb = 3 × 10−5 g/ml−1; 0.5 μM), and rates of NO consumption were measured electrochemically (Iso-NO, WPI Instruments, Waltham, MA) under normoxic and hypoxic (20–40 mmHg O2 tension) conditions in a closed, thermally regulated (37°C) and stirred polarographic cell. Hypoxic conditions were established in the reaction chamber by partially equilibrating buffers with nitrogen gas and quantified by using a Clark model YSI 5300 oxygen electrode (Yellow Springs Instruments).

XO and Alanine Aminotransferase Analysis.

All animal procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Plasma and tissue XO activity was measured by reversed-phase HPLC with electrochemical detection of uric acid as described (30). For biochemical analysis of liver tissue, isolated livers were weighed and homogenized in ice-cold homogenizing buffer (50 mM K2HPO4/80 μM leupeptin/2.1 mM Pefabloc SC/1 mM PMSF/1 μg ml−1 aprotinin, pH 7.4). Homogenates were centrifuged (40,000 × g, 30 min, 4°C), and supernatants were stored at −80°C. Plasma alanine aminotransferase activity was measured on an automated spectrofluorometer (Cobas-Fara II, Roche Diagnostic Systems). A rabbit polyclonal antibody against recombinant human xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) fragment was used (1:1,000 dilution) for immunoblot analysis (32). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000) was used as a secondary antibody, and immunoreactive proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (SuperSignal West Pico Substrate, Pierce).

Fluorescence Microscopy.

Frozen aortic sections and paraffin-embedded liver sections from C57BL/6J or knockout-transgenic SCD mouse were processed for immunofluorescence. Primary antibody incubations were carried out for 60 min at 25°C by using a rabbit polyclonal antibody against XO (1:50). The secondary antibody was Alexa-594 conjugated goat anti-rabbit (1:100, Molecular Probes). For control studies, the primary anti-XO was preabsorbed with excess (1 unit ml−1) bovine XO. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33258 (20 μg ml−1, Sigma). Images were acquired through a Leitz Orthoplan microscope and analyzed with ip lab spectrum software (Scanalytics, Billerica, MA).

Vessel Relaxation and Superoxide Production.

Isometric tension was measured in aortic segments from mice as described (33). Aortic segments were exposed in some cases to various mediators and inhibitors for 1 h, submaximally contracted with phenylephrine (10−8–10−7 M), and acetylcholine (ACh; 1 × 10−9 to 3 × 10−6 M) was added in a cumulative manner to induce relaxation. Vessel OInline graphic production was monitored in aortic segments by coelenterazine-enhanced chemiluminescence (34) by using an automated microplate luminescence reader (Lumistar Galaxy, BMG Lab Technologies). Previous studies have shown coelenterazine to reflect both tissue OInline graphic and ONOO production, differentiable by selective use of SOD and NO synthase inhibitors (34). Isolated vessels were equilibrated in Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS) for 30 min at 37°C, and coelenterazine (10 μM, Calbiochem) was added. In some experiments, OInline graphic was measured in vessels that were pretreated with xanthine (50 μM, Sigma), allopurinol (100 μM, Sigma), CuZn SOD (30 units ml−1, Oxis), manganese 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N-ethylpyridinium-2-yl)-porphyrin (MnTE-2-PyP; 50 μM), catalase (20 units ml−1, Worthington), BOF-4272 [sodium-8-(3-methoxy-4-phenylsulfinylphenyl)pyrazolol(1,5α)-1,3,5-triazine-4-olate-monohydrate] a gift from Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Tokushima, Japan (25 μM), and DMNQ (100 μM). The assay system was calibrated by using 0.1–0.5 mU XO plus 50 μM xanthine, generating known rates of OInline graphic-dependent cytochrome c reduction.

Results

Red Cell Production of Reactive Oxygen Species.

Endogenous rates of OInline graphic release under normoxic (150 mmHg O2, pH 7.4) conditions were not significantly different in human HbA (1.60 ± 0.25 μmol gmHb−1⋅h−1) vs. homozygous HbS (1.84 ± 0.2 μmol gmHb−1⋅h−1) red cells (Fig. 1A). The mean Hb content of HbA and HbS red cell preparations was 0.36 and 0.39 gmHb ml−1 packed cells, respectively. Potential interference of lysed cell-derived Hb in the analysis of cytochrome c reduction was ruled out by singular value decomposition analysis, which separated the spectral components of the reaction system and identified the elements contributing to the recorded absorbance. The singular value decomposition analysis of red cell-dependent cytochrome c reduction showed a time-dependent increase at 550 nm in the absence of SOD, with only one significant spectral component, reduced cytochrome c (not shown). To elucidate the nature of OInline graphic release and verify the specificity of the assay system, DMNQ (100 μM) was added to stimulate red cell OInline graphic production. Preincubation of cells with the metal chelator 3-hydroxy-1,2-dimethyl-4-pyridone (0.5 mM) induced ≈36% decrease in OInline graphic, suggesting that cellular Fe-dependent reactions partially contributed to cell OInline graphic production. When cells were pretreated with a stilbene sulfonate chloride-bicarbonate exchange protein inhibitor (4,4-diisothiocyano-2,2 disulfonic acid stilbene, 200 μM), both HbA and HbS red cells showed ≈35% decrease in rates of cytochrome c reduction, indicating that some extracellular OInline graphic was released through anion channels.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Red cell production of reactive oxygen species. (A) Rates of superoxide release by HbA and HbS red cells. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 3–9). Statistical analysis was by two-way ANOVA with the Tukey post hoc test. *, P < 0.05. (B) Aminotriazole-mediated catalase inactivation by HbA and HbS red cells. Values at each time point represent mean ± SD with n = 5. (C) Rates of HbA and HbS red cell NO consumption. Values represent mean ± SEM (n = 4–14). Statistical analysis was by two-way ANOVA with the Tukey post hoc test. *, P < 0.05 compared with basal.

The similar slopes of the time course of aminotriazole-dependent red cell catalase inactivation in HbA and HbS red cells revealed that steady-state H2O2 levels were not significantly different, with calculated H2O2 concentrations of 3.11 ± 2.61 pM and 4.9 ± 2.25 pM, respectively, at 150 mmHg O2, pH 7.4 (Fig. 1B). This occurred despite the 36% lower catalase specific activity in HbS red cells, suggesting other compensatory mechanisms for intracellular H2O2 scavenging, e.g., glutathione peroxidase. Accepting that NO reacts at almost diffusion-limited rates with OInline graphic (25), the relative rates of red cell NO consumption was determined as probe for differences in intracellular and extracellular OInline graphic production by HbA and HbS red cells. NO consumption, measured during both normoxic (150 mmHg O2) and sickling-inducing hypoxic (20–40 mmHg O2) conditions, was not significantly different in HbA vs. HbS red cells, with normoxic values of 0.053 ± 0.016 and 0.047 ± 0.003 mmol gmHb−1⋅min−1, respectively (Fig. 1C). Addition of extracellular CuZn SOD (100 units ml−1) did not impact the rate of NO consumption, whereas stimulation of cell OInline graphic generation by DMNQ (100 μM) added as a positive control significantly increased rates of red cell NO consumption. The presence of endogenous LOOH was undetectable in both HbA and HbS RBC membranes. When membrane oxidation was stimulated by the addition of OONO, HbS red cell membranes showed greater tendency to undergo lipid peroxidation (not shown).

Plasma XO and Alanine Aminotransferase Activities.

The catalytic activity of XO was significantly increased in the plasma of SCD patients vs. controls (Table 1). This also occurred in the plasma of a knockout-transgenic mouse model of SCD that synthesizes exclusively human Hb in the murine RBCs (31). The observed increase in plasma XO activity in the knockout-transgenic SCD mouse was accompanied by a decrease in liver XO activity and an increase in plasma alanine aminotransferase activity (Table 1). Western blot analysis of plasma and liver XOR revealed increased plasma and decreased liver XOR protein content in knockout-transgenic SCD mice compared with control or knockout-transgenic sickle cell trait mice, which synthesize both human βS and βA (Fig. 2A). XOR, which is rapidly converted to the oxidase form (XO) in plasma, revealed immunoreactive 20-kDa, 40-kDa, and 85-kDa proteolytic fragments upon Western blot analysis. Knockout-transgenic sickle cell trait (heterozygous for HbS) mice were also not significantly different from control C57BL/6J mice in plasma and liver XO and plasma alanine aminotransferase activities (not shown). Immunocytochemical localization of XO in aorta and liver (Fig. 2B) of SCD mice showed increased vessel wall and decreased liver XO immunoreactivity, with XO concentrated on and in vascular luminal cells. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of liver of knockout-transgenic SCD mice revealed extensive hepatocellular injury associated with pericentral necrosis. Sickled erythrocytes were also observed in intrahepatic sinusoids (Fig. 2C) (31).

Table 1.

Activity of XO and ALT in sickle cell disease

Measurement Enzyme activity
Control SCD*
Human
 Plasma XO (μU/ml) 0.89  ± 0.3 (15) 3.30  ± 0.9 (18)
Mouse
 Plasma XO (mU/ml) 2.2  ± 0.26 (13) 5.6  ± 1.5 (15)
  ALT (mU/ml) 24.2  ± 2.3 (10) 270.5  ± 24.5 (12)
 Liver XO (mU/g tissue) 53.9  ± 7.8 (6) 18.6  ± 4.4 (6)
 Aortic XO (mU/mg protein) 0.29  ± 0.01 (3) 0.46  ± 0.03 (4)
*

, P < 0.05 from control. n for each measurement is italicized in parentheses. 

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Immunocytochemical analysis of XOR in C57BL/6J control and sickle cell mouse tissues. (A) Western blot analysis of plasma and liver XO in SCD mice. (B) Descending thoracic aortic segments from knockout-transgenic SC mice display intense immunofluorescent staining for XO (red) that is associated with the endothelium and, to a lesser extent, smooth muscle cells (L, lumen). Liver sections from SC mice show decreased XOR staining in the pericentral hepatocytes when compared with controls (CV, central vein). Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst in all experiments. (C) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of liver sections from control and sickle cell mouse tissues.

Superoxide Production and Endothelial-Dependent Relaxation of Vessels.

The catalytic activity of XO was significantly increased in the aorta of SCD mice (Table 1) with a parallel increase in XOR protein observed by Western blot analysis as well (not shown). Basal rates of OInline graphic production were significantly increased in the aorta of SCD mice vs. controls, with rates of 0.41 ± 0.04 and 0.33 ± 0.04 nmol⋅mg dry weight−1⋅min−1, respectively (Fig. 3). In SCD, but not wild-type mouse vessels, rates of OInline graphic production were enhanced by addition of xanthine and returned to basal rates when vessels were pretreated with CuZn SOD (30 units ml−1), allopurinol (100 μM), or the XO inhibitor BOF-4272 (25 μM). Pretreatment of aorta with the SOD mimetic MnTE-2-PyP (50 μM) significantly decreased rates of detectable OInline graphic production, whereas DMNQ (100 μM) addition significantly enhanced rates of OInline graphic production by both control and SCD mouse vessels. NO-dependent vessel relaxation, elicited by ACh, was severely impaired in SCD mice (Fig. 4). The NO-dependent stimulus of smooth muscle cell guanylate cyclase activity, sodium nitroprusside (100 nM), induced maximal vessel relaxation in SCD mouse vessels, whereas addition of arginine (3 mM) had no effect (not shown). Treatment of SCD mouse vessels with the SOD mimetic MnTE-2-PyP (10 μM) significantly restored ACh-dependent relaxation, whereas addition of catalase had no effect (Fig. 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Superoxide production by C57BL/6J control and sickle cell mouse vessels. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 4). Statistical analysis was by two-way ANOVA with the Duncan's post hoc test. *, P < 0.05 compared with control. +, P < 0.05 compared with xanthine-treated sickle cell vessels. **, P < 0.05 compared with control and all treated vessel groups.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

ACh-dependent vascular relaxation in C57BL/6J control and sickle cell mouse vessels. Values represent mean ± SEM (n = 4–8). All statistical analyses were by one-way ANOVA with Student–Newman Keuls pairwise multiple comparison. *, P < 0.05 compared with sickle cell mouse vessel response.

Discussion

Insight into the mechanisms underlying impaired vascular function in SCD is important for guiding the design of more effective therapies to limit vaso-occlusive crisis, acute chest syndrome, stroke, and other circulatory manifestations of this hemoglobinopathy. In contrast to previous reports (22, 23), there is not a significant difference in rates of OInline graphic and H2O2 production and basal levels of membrane LOOH content in HbA vs. HbS red cells (Fig. 1 A and B). Also, HbA vs. HbS red cells display similar rates of NO consumption under both normoxic and sickling-inducing hypoxic conditions (Fig. 1C). This rules out the possibility that unique oxidative or free radical metabolic properties of HbS red cells contribute to enhanced rates of vascular NO scavenging and in turn initiate pathogenic signal transduction events in SCD vessels, due to suppression of the anti-inflammatory properties of NO. Although the inherent instability of sickle Hb and the possible impairment of tissue free radical defense mechanisms in SCD may render red cells more susceptible to oxidative damage (23, 35), a well-integrated network of oxidant defense mechanisms evidently prevents HbS red cells from becoming significant loci of reactive species production and oxygen radical-dependent inactivation of vascular NO signaling.

The observation that XO activity is elevated in the plasma of SCD patients is recapitulated in the SCD mouse (Table 1), suggesting that this enzyme may serve as a significant source of reactive oxygen species production in SCD. There is only trace XO activity in the plasma and vascular endothelium of healthy humans (36, 37). During pathological conditions such as hepatocellular damage (38, 39), ischemia-reperfusion (40), atherosclerosis (41), adult respiratory distress syndrome (36), alcoholic liver disease (42), and now SCD, in which organs replete in XOR can release this proinflammatory enzyme into the circulation, plasma XO levels increase. This can lead to an enhancement of vascular oxidant production, often in tissue compartments having minimal defense against oxidative injury.

XOR is found mainly in the splanchnic system, where it exists predominantly as a dehydrogenase (XDH/XO; EC 1.1.1.204/1.1.3.22) (43). The hepatic localization of XOR is zonally distributed, with higher activity in pericentral, compared with periportal, hepatocytes (44). The zonal distribution of XOR corresponds to regions where ischemia and hypoxia would be most severe, as oxygen is extracted as blood flows from the portal triad to the central vein branches. During ischemia, XOR can be converted to XO by either proteolytic cleavage of the amino terminus or more rapidly by intramolecular and mixed disulfide formation (45, 46). Significant irreversible proteolytic conversion of cellular XOR to XO is slow, requiring 4–6 h of ischemia (47). However, XOR can be released from ischemic hepatocytes into the circulation before detectable intracellular XOR to XO conversion (48), whereupon either proteolytic cleavage or thiol oxidation may occur rapidly. Repeated interruption of blood flow and the resultant transient ischemia associated with SCD can thus provide the basis for ischemic liver injury and elevated plasma XO levels. During experimental hypoxia, XOR to XO conversion has been shown to be significantly greater in the liver and kidneys of a sickle cell mice model that had a mixture of human HbS and murine Hb (24). In the knockout-transgenic mouse model of SCD used herein, extensive hepatocellular injury (Fig. 2C), accompanied by increased plasma alanine aminotransferase levels (Table 1) and decreased liver XO immunoreactivity (Fig. 2B) and catalytic activity (Table 1), was observed even under normoxic conditions. Even though rodents have much greater XOR-specific activities in plasma than humans (49), release of this enzyme from XOR-replete human splanchnic tissues can still have potent pathophysiologic effects. Present evidence supports that not only the extent of XO-dependent tissue OInline graphic production, but also its anatomic location, will determine whether or not vascular NO-dependent signaling is adversely affected (50).

The immunohistochemical localization of increased XO in the vessel wall of SCD mice could be a manifestation of either the binding and uptake of circulating XO by vascular endothelial cells (33, 50, 51) or the increased expression of XOR by activated vascular endothelium (52). Considering the high association constant of XO for binding to vascular endothelium (Kd = 6 nM; ref. 53), the presence of XO in the systemic circulation of both SCD mice and humans with SCD implies that a significant deposition of XO can occur in the vessel wall, even when considering the typically low expression of vascular cell XOR in humans (53).

The ability of endothelial-bound XO to remain catalytically active and generate OInline graphic and H2O2 at anatomic sites remote from the locus of XO release (50) is consistent with the increased basal rates of OInline graphic production quantified in SCD mouse aorta (Fig. 3). Addition of xanthine enhanced rates of OInline graphic release that were normalized with the XO inhibitors allopurinol and BOF-4272, confirming the XO-mediated increase of vascular OInline graphic and H2O2 production in sickle vessels (Fig. 3). The preincubation of control and SCD mouse vessels with CuZn SOD caused a 10% and 32% reduction in rates of detectable OInline graphic, respectively. The modest inhibition of detectable rates of OInline graphic generation by CuZn SOD supports the concept that size exclusion and charge repulsion of this enzyme from the intracellular milieu impedes its ability to scavenge OInline graphic generated by cell-associated XO (50). Pretreatment of aortic vessels with the more cell-avid and membrane-permeable SOD mimetic MnTE-2-PyP (54, 55) had a greater impact on scavenging OInline graphic, giving a 33% and 50% reduction in rates of OInline graphic release in control and sickle vessels, respectively.

XO-derived OInline graphic will react with NO at diffusion-limited rates to impair NO signaling and concomitantly yield secondary oxidizing species, such as ONOO, that can further propagate tissue injury (25, 56, 57). A challenge for the future is the delineation of acute versus chronic actions of XO on vascular function in SCD. Although no restorative effects of catalase on vessel relaxation were observed (Fig. 4), XO-derived H2O2 can serve as a peroxidase substrate (e.g., for neutrophil myeloperoxidase) that in turn stimulates the catalytic consumption of NO and the formation of secondary oxidizing and nitrating species, possibly leading to more chronic forms of vessel injury (58). A precedent for these phenomena exists in animal models and clinical studies of atherosclerosis. In a hypercholesterolemic rabbit model of atherosclerosis, a 2.5-fold increase in plasma XO severely impairs ACh-mediated relaxation of the thoracic aorta (33, 59). Heparin-induced dissociation of XO from vessel wall binding sites and allopurinol-mediated XO inhibition partially restores ACh-dependent relaxation and decreases vessel OInline graphic production (33). In atherosclerotic and diabetic humans, the XO inhibitors allopurinol and oxypurinol increase forearm blood flow and decrease blood pressure (60, 61). Thus, increased circulating and vessel wall XO in SCD can account for hemodynamic instability and contribute to the pathogenesis of a broader systemic vascular dysfunction. This is exemplified by the observation of impaired NO-dependent vasorelaxation in SCD mice (Fig. 4) and affirms the blunted vascular relaxation that occurs in SCD mouse vessels in response to a calcium ionophore and the NO donor DEA-NONOate (62). This impaired vessel relaxation was restored by denudation of endothelium (62), supporting the presently observed generation of NO-inactivating species by the endothelium of SCD vessels. Importantly, the inhibition of vessel relaxation observed herein was completely restored by sodium nitroprusside (not shown). Because sodium nitroprusside is metabolized by smooth muscle cells (63), this excludes the existence of an end-organ defect in NO signaling and further confirms that NO is being consumed by endothelial-derived free radical reactions in SCD vessels. This impairment of NO-dependent vascular relaxation by increased rates of reactive oxygen species generation was underscored by the observation that the SOD mimetic MnTE-2-PyP restored ACh-dependent relaxation of SCD mouse vessels.

Plasma uric acid and XO levels are strongly predictive of hypertension in normotensive subjects (64). Although hypertension is not associated with SCD, sickle patients with high blood pressure have an increased risk of stroke and death (65). Systolic blood pressure is not increased in an SCD mouse model compared with the background strain (62); however, a 5-fold greater increase in systolic blood pressure is observed in SCD mice when the NO synthase inhibitor l-NAME is administered, again affirming the concept of enhanced NO consumption and impaired vascular NO signaling in SCD.

In summary, episodes of hypoxia-reoxygenation associated with SCD lead to the release of XO into the circulation from hepatic cells replete in the activity of this source of OInline graphic and H2O2. Increased circulating XO can then bind avidly to vessel luminal cells and impair vascular function by creating an oxidative milieu and catalytically consuming NO via diffusion-limited reaction with OInline graphic. Considering the critical role of endothelial NO production in regulating endothelial adhesion molecule expression, platelet aggregation, and both basal and stress-mediated vasodilation, the OInline graphic-mediated reduction in NO bioavailability reported herein can significantly contribute to the vascular disease that is the hallmark of sickle cell anemia.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate insights and assistance provided by Denyse Thornley-Brown, MD, Elizabeth Lowenthal, MD, Phil Chumley, and Scott Sweeney. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants RO1-HL64937, RO1-HL58115, and P6-HL58418 and by Aeolus, Inc.

Abbreviations

ACh

acetylcholine

DMNQ

2,3-dimethoxy-1-napthoquinone

MnTE-2-PyP

manganese 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N-ethylpyridinium-2-yl)-porphyrin

SCD

sickle cell disease

SOD

superoxide dismutase

XO

xanthine oxidase

XOR

xanthine oxidoreductase

Footnotes

This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

References

  • 1.Embury S H, Mohandas N, Paszty C, Cooper P, Cheung A T. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:915–920. doi: 10.1172/JCI5977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Belcher J D, Marker P H, Weber J P, Hebbel R P, Vercellotti G M. Blood. 2000;96:2451–2459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hebbel R P, Visser M R, Goodman J L, Jacob H S, Vercellotti G M. J Clin Invest. 1987;80:1503–1506. doi: 10.1172/JCI113233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shiu Y T, Udden M M, McIntire L V. Blood. 2000;95:3232–3241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stuart M J, Setty B N. Blood. 1999;94:1555–1560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kaul D K, Hebbel R P. Clin Invest. 2000;106:411–420. doi: 10.1172/JCI9225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Solovey A A, Solovey A N, Harkness J, Hebbel R P. Blood. 2001;97:1937–1941. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.7.1937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Solovey A, Gui L, Key N S, Hebbel R P. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:1899–1904. doi: 10.1172/JCI1932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stockman J A, Nigro M A, Mishkin M M, Oski F A. N Engl J Med. 1972;287:846–849. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197210262871703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Merkel K H, Ginsberg P L, Parker J C, Jr, Post M J. Stroke. 1978;9:45–52. doi: 10.1161/01.str.9.1.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ballas S K, Larner J, Smith E D, Surrey S, Schwartz E, Rappaport E F. Blood. 1988;72:1216–1223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lande W M, Andrews D L, Clark M R, Braham N V, Black D M, Embury S H, Mentzer W C. Blood. 1988;72:2056–2059. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Johnson C S, Giorgio A J. Arch Intern Med. 1981;141:891–893. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Enwonwu C O. Med Sci Res. 1989;17:997–998. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hatch F E, Crowe L R, Miles D E, Young J P, Portner M E. Am J Hypertens. 1989;2:2–8. doi: 10.1093/ajh/2.1.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Allon M. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:501–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mantadakis E, Cavender J D, Rogers Z R, Ewalt D H, Buchanan G R. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1999;21:518–522. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rees D C, Cervi P, Grimwade D, O'Driscoll A, Hamilton M, Parker N E, Porter J B. Br J Haematol. 1995;91:834–837. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1995.tb05397.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Morris C R, Kuypers F A, Larkin S, Sweeters N, Simon J, Vichinsky E P, Styles L A. Br J Haematol. 2000;111:498–500. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.02403.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Atz A M, Wessel D L. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:988–990. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199710000-00037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Glover R E, Ivy E D, Orringer E P, Maeda H, Mason R P. Mol Pharmacol. 1999;55:1006–1010. doi: 10.1124/mol.55.6.1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hebbel R P, Eaton J W, Balasingam M, Steinberg M H. J Clin Invest. 1982;70:1253–1259. doi: 10.1172/JCI110724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kuross S A, Hebbel R P. Blood. 1988;72:1278–1285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Osarogiagbon U R, Choong S, Belcher J D, Vercellotti G M, Paller M S, Hebbel R P. Blood. 2000;1:314–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Beckman J S, Beckman T W, Chan J, Marshall P S, Freeman B A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:1620–1624. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.4.1620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Radi R, Beckman J S, Bush K M, Freeman B A. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1991;228:481–487. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(91)90224-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rubbo H, Radi R, Trujillo M, Telleri R, Kalyanaraman B, Barnes S, Kirk M, Freeman B A. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:26066–26075. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Beutler E R, editor. Cell Metabolism: A Manual of Biochemical Methods. 3rd Ed. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton; 1984. pp. 8–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Royall J A, Gwin P D, Parks D A, Freeman B A. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1992;294:686–694. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(92)90742-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tan S, Radi R, Gaudier F, Evans R A, Rivera A, Kirk K A, Parks D A. Pediatr Res. 1993;34:303–307. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199309000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ryan T M, Ciavatta D J, Townes T M. Science. 1997;278:873–876. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5339.873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Parks D. In: Reactive Oxygen Species in Biological Systems. Gilbert D L, Colton C, editors. New York: Plenum; 1998. pp. 397–420. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.White R C, Darley-Usmar V, Berrington R W, McAdams M, Gore Z J, Thomson A J, Parks A D, Tarpey M M, Freeman B A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:8745–8749. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tarpey M M, White C R, Suarez E, Richardson G, Radi R, Freeman B A. Circ Res. 1999;84:1203–1211. doi: 10.1161/01.res.84.10.1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Aslan M, Thornley-Brown D, Freeman B A. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2000;899:375–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06201.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Grum C M, Ragsdale R A, Ketai L H, Simon R H. J Crit Care. 1987;2:22–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Giler S, Sperling O, Brosh S, Urca I, De Vries A. Clin Chim Acta. 1975;63:37–40. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(75)90375-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Giler S, Sperling O, Brosh S, Urca I, De Vries A. Isr J Med Sci. 1975;11:1225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wolko K, Krawczynski J. Mater Med Pol. 1974;6:95–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Parks D A, Granger D N. Am J Physiol. 1983;245:G285–G289. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1983.245.2.G285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mohacsi A, Kozlovszky B, Kiss I, Seres I, Fulop T., Jr Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1316:210–216. doi: 10.1016/0925-4439(96)00027-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Parks D A, Skinner K A, Skinner H B, Tan S. Pathophysiology. 1998;5:49–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kooij A, Schijns M, Frederiks W M, Van Noorden C J, James J. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol. 1992;63:17–23. doi: 10.1007/BF02899240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kooij A. Histochem J. 1994;26:889–915. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Enroth C, Eger B T, Okamoto K, Nishino T, Nishino T, Pai E F. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:10723–10728. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.20.10723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Amaya Y, Yamazaki K, Sato M, Noda K, Nishino T. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:14170–14175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Engerson T D, McKelvey T G, Rhyne D B, Boggio E B, Snyder S J, Jones H P. J Clin Invest. 1987;6:1564–1570. doi: 10.1172/JCI112990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yokoyama Y, Beckman J S, Beckman T K, Wheat J K, Cash T G, Freeman B A, Parks D A. Am J Physiol. 1990;258:G564–G570. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1990.258.4.G564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Al-Khalidi A S, Chaglassian T H. Biochem J. 1965;97:318–320. doi: 10.1042/bj0970318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Houston M, Estevez A, Chumley P, Aslan M, Marklund S, Parks D A, Freeman B. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:4985–4994. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.8.4985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Radi R, Rubbo H, Bush K, Freeman B A. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997;339:125–135. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1996.9844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dupont G P, Huecksteadt T P, Marshall B C, Ryan U S, Michael J R, Hoidal J R. J Clin Invest. 1992;1:197–202. doi: 10.1172/JCI115563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Paler-Martinez A, Panus P C, Chumley P H, Ryan U, Hardy M M, Freeman B A. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1994;311:79–85. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1994.1211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Patel M, Day B J. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1999;9:359–364. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(99)01336-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Spasojevic I, Batinic-Haberle I, Fridovich I. Nitric Oxide. 2000;5:526–533. doi: 10.1006/niox.2000.0303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kissner R, Nauser T, Bugnon P, Lye P G, Koppenol W H. Chem Res Toxicol. 1997;10:1285–1292. doi: 10.1021/tx970160x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Villa L M, Salas E, Darley-Usmar V M, Radomski M W, Moncada S. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:12383–12387. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.26.12383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.van der Vliet A, Eiserich J P, Halliwell B, Cross C E. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:7617–7625. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.12.7617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.White C R, Brock T A, Chang L Y, Crapo J, Briscoe P, Ku D, Bradley W A, Gianturco S H, Gore J, Freeman B A, Tarpey M M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:1044–1048. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.3.1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cardillo C, Kilcoyne C M, Cannon R O, III, Quyyumi A A, Panza J A. Hypertension. 1997;30:57–63. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.30.1.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Butler R, Morris A D, Belch J J, Hill A, Struthers A D. Hypertension. 2000;35:746–751. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.35.3.746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Nath K A, Shah V, Haggard J J, Croatt A J, Smith L A, Hebbel R P, Katusic Z S. Am J Physiol. 2000;279:R1949–R1955. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.2000.279.6.R1949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kowaluk E A, Seth P, Fung H L. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992;262:916–922. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Newaz M A, Adeeb N N, Muslim N, Razak T A, Htut N N. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1996;8:1035–1050. doi: 10.3109/10641969609081033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pegelow C H, Colangelo L, Steinberg M, Wright E C, Smith J, Phillips G, Vichinsky E. Am J Med. 1997;2:171–177. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(96)00407-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES