Skip to main content
Alzheimer's & Dementia : Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring logoLink to Alzheimer's & Dementia : Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
. 2019 May 2;11:368–373. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2019.03.005

Associations between rare microglia-linked Alzheimer's disease risk variants and subcortical brain volumes in young individuals

Thomas M Lancaster a,b,
PMCID: PMC6501059  PMID: 31080872

Abstract

Introduction

Recent exome sequencing studies have identified three novel risk variants associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the mechanisms by which these variants confer risk are largely unknown.

Methods

In the present study, the impact of these rare coding variants (in ABI3, PLCG2, and TREM2) on all subcortical volumes is determined in a large sample of young healthy individuals (N = 756–765; aged 22–35 years).

Results

After multiple testing correction (PCORRECTED < .05), rare variants were associated with basal ganglia volumes (TREM2 and PLCG2 effects within the putamen and pallidum, respectively). Nominal associations between TREM2 and reduced hippocampal and thalamic volumes were also observed.

Discussion

Our observations suggest that rare variants in microglia-mediated immunity pathway may contribute to the subcortical alterations observed in AD cases. These observations provide further evidence that genetic risk for AD may influence the volume of subcortical volumes and increase AD risk in early life processes.

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging, Freesurfer, Alzheimer's disease, Microglia, Exome-sequencing, TREM2

1. Background

A recent exome sequencing study has revealed that risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is partly explained by rare (minor allele frequency <1%) single nucleotide variants within ABI3, PLCG2, and TREM2, genes with known roles in microglia-mediated innate immunity [1]. These variations confer amino acid substitutions, which are likely to influence protein function and or/expression. However, the neurobiological mechanisms by which these variants confer susceptibility are relatively unknown.

Preclinical studies suggest that AD is preceded by a progressive pattern of cortical/subcortical atrophy, where the earliest evidence of histopathologic changes occurs in the medial temporal lobe [2]. These alterations have been explored via magnetic resonance imaging and broadly suggest that AD risk variants may contribute to the progressive atrophy that manifests in preclinical markers such the volume (cubic millimeters) of subcortical structures such as the hippocampus and amygdala. Briefly, early work implicated the strongest known common genetic risk factor for AD (APOE locus) with alterations in the volume of these structures, in early and later life processes [3]. More recent work has adopted a multivariate approach to cumulatively assess the impact of all common genome-wide association studies–identified AD risk alleles [4] (as assessed via a polygenic risk scores) on brain structures such as the hippocampus, suggesting that the combined influence of common risk alleles for AD may confer risk in early life process [3], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Together, these neuroimaging genetic studies provide insight into the mechanisms by which common risk alleles for AD may increase risk and suggest that AD risk alleles may shape the medial temporal lobe volumetry, making them more vulnerable to atrophy in later life.

However, little is known about rare coding variants' influence on the AD-susceptible regions of the brain. The preliminary evidence suggests that comparable to the combined effects of common AD risk alleles, rare AD variants within TREM2 are also associated with reduced hippocampal volume, in older individuals [7], [11]. Together, these studies suggest that both common and rare risk alleles for AD may confer susceptibility by common pathways. However, the impact of recently identified variants within ABI3 and PLCG2 on neuroimaging markers such as subcortical volume has not been assessed. On the basis of the common biological function by which these locus operate (microglia-mediated innate immunity), it is anticipated that these rare risk alleles will also contribute to the volumetric alterations that precede AD symptomology.

In the present study, the subcortical volumes of carriers of minor alleles within ABI3, PLCG2, and TREM2 with noncarriers are compared, in a large population of young, healthy individuals. The impact of these risk alleles is explored in a young cohort to minimize the confounding impact of orthogonal, interactive environmental AD risk factors that also influence subcortical brain volumes such as age and lifestyle factors [12], [13], [14]. On the basis of the prior evidence suggesting that subcortical volume alterations may be a common mechanism by which common and rare AD risk allele may confer susceptibility [7], it is anticipated that the individuals that possess the risk alleles at these loci will have alterations in subcortical volumetry, specifically within the medial temporal lobe (hippocampus, amygdala).

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Participants

Data were drawn from the publicly available repository of the WU-Minn Young Adult Human Connectome Project; (http://www.humanconnectome.org/). The scanning protocol was approved by the Washington University in the St. Louis's Human Research Protection Office, Institional Review Board no. 201204036. No experimental activity with any involvement of human subjects took place at the author's institutions. Participants were drawn from the March 2017 public data release from the Human Connectome Project, a cross-sectional, multimodal genetic-neuroimaging cohort of young adults (N = 1206). All participants were aged from 22 to 35 years, for all inclusion/exclusion criteria, see Van Essen et al. [15]. Briefly, the study excluded individuals with a personal history of psychiatric disorder, substance abuse, neurologic or cardiovascular disease, and associated hospitalization or long-term (>12 months) pharmacologic/behavioral treatment. For a full brief of inclusion/exclusion criteria, please see Supplemental Table 1 of Van Essen et al. [15]. Participants were excluded from the current analyses if they lacked good-quality structural magnetic resonance imaging data, or had missing relevant genetic, interview/questionnaire data. Further information about the HCP kinship structure is available at http://www.humanconnectome.org/storage/app/media/documentation/s1200/HCP_S1200_Release_Reference_Manual.pdf. To control for population bias, the sample was further restricted to individuals of Caucasian descent. Each of the three variant groupings (ABI3, PLCG2, and TREM2) were equally represented across gender and APOE ɛ4 status (χ2 test, P > .1, in all cases) and did not differ in age, handedness, body mass index, education, and employment (independent sample t test, P > .1, in all cases). See Table 1 for complete description of the demographic data.

Table 1.

Demographic details for the final sample, stratified by ABI3, PLCG2, and TREM2 genotypes

N = 766 ABI3: rs616338 (minor allele = A)
PLCG2: rs72824905 (minor allele = G)
TREM2: rs143332484 (minor allele = T)
GG
N = 748
AG
N = 18
CC
N = 743
GC
N = 23
CC
N = 752
TC
N = 14
Age 29.024 3.590 29.167 3.714 29.046 3.588 28.435 3.691 29.013 3.594 29.786 3.468
Gender (F/M) 394/354 10/8 394/349 10/13 394/358 10/5
Handedness 68.242 41.390 66.944 34.816 68.082 41.345 72.391 37.865 68.351 41.034 60.714 51.882
APOEɛ4 (−/+) 568/180 12/6 561/182 19/4 571/181 9/5
Body mass index 26.229 4.928 28.910 5.374 26.298 4.980 26.113 4.039 26.287 4.963 26.553 4.500
Education 15.082 1.699 14.722 1.873 15.078 1.700 14.913 1.832 15.072 1.704 15.143 1.703
Employment 1.588 0.695 1.444 0.784 1.585 0.697 1.565 0.728 1.584 0.697 1.643 0.745

NOTE. Mean ± standard deviation. APOE ɛ4 (−/+) represent individuals who possessed at least one copy of the APOE ɛ4 allele. Handedness was assessed via the Edinburgh handedness scale. Education and employment were assessed via SSAGA_Education and SSAGA_Employment, respectively, as described in the Young Adult Human Connectome Project data dictionary: https://wiki.humanconnectome.org/display/PublicData/HCP+Data+Dictionary+Public-+Updated+for+the+1200+Subject+Release.

2.2. Genotyping

All Young Adult Human Connectome Project data are publicly available, including genome-wide genotype data to be distributed through the database of genotypes and phenotypes. From this data set, 1141 subjects were genotyped, and 1,580,642 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) passed initial quality control. Quality control was implemented in PLINK v1.9 [16]. Briefly, SNPs were excluded if the call rate was less than 98%, or if the χ2 test for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium had a P value less than 1 × 10−4. Individuals were excluded for ambiguous sex (genotypic sex and phenotypic sex) not aligning or genotyping completeness less than 97%. The candidate variants within ABI3 (rs616338), PLCG2 (rs72824905), and TREM2 (rs143332484) passed quality control. No individual in the sample possessed two copies of the minor allele at any of the three loci. Variation in the sample kinship structure was further controlled in all analysis (see Section 2.4). Individual APOE status was also determined by the absence/presence of a ɛ4 allele (rs7412; rs429358).

2.3. Data acquisition, preprocessing, and quality control

Human Connectome Project sample: Images were acquired using a customized Siemens Skyra 3-T scanner with a 32-channel head coil. For details on data acquisition and preprocessing, see Glasser et al. [17]. Subcortical and intracranial volumes (cubic millimeters) were estimated with Freesurfer v5.2 [18], which were subsequently used for the Young Adult Human Connectome Project minimal processing pipeline [17]. Seven subcortical volumes (accumbens, amygdala, caudate, globus pallidus, hippocampus, putamen, and thalamus) were averaged across hemisphere and adjusted for intracranial volume, a method previously established by recent genomic studies part of the Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis consortium [19], [20]. After all complete data (N = 766) were considered and the statistical outliers for each subcortical volume were determined, the final sample size range was N = 756–765).

2.4. Statistical inferences

Linear mixed-effects (LME) models were estimated in R (https://www.r-project.org/) using the ‘lmer’ package, as a previously recommended solution for regression models with latent familial correlation structure [21]. Briefly, each of the seven corrected subcortical volumes was entered into mixed-effects models with ABI3, PLCG2, and TREM2 as fixed effects, age, sex, APOE status (absence/presence of an APOE ɛ4 allele), handedness, body mass index, education, and employment covariates of no interest. To account for the familial structure in the sample, a sparse kinship matrix was included in each of the seven LME models using the “lme4qt” extension package [22] (see Equation 1). Subcortical volumes that were statistical outliers were removed using the interquartile range outlier labeling rule (1.5 × interquartile range (Q3–Q1)) as previously described [23]. P values were adjusted by corrected for the number of LME models (PCORRECTED = .05/7). To further establish potential confounding from the kinship structure, we split the sample into “twin” and “nontwin” samples and re-estimated the effects using the “metafor” package [24].

γ=Χβ+Ζυ+ε (1)

Equation 1 is taken from [22]. When n equals the sample size, X[n × p] and Z[n × n] are incidence matrices and p is the number of fixed effects (SNPs and covariates). β[p × 1] is a vector of fixed effects, n × 1 is a vector of a random polygenic effect, and ε[n × 1] reflects the residual error.

3. Results

There were no associations (corrected/uncorrected) between ABI3 variant and subcortical structures. After controlling for the multiple testing, the minor allele at the PLCG2 locus was associated with reduced volume (cubic millimeters) in the pallidum (PCORRECTED = .035) and the TREM2 locus and volume in the putamen (PCORRECTED = .028). We observed nominal associations between (1) PLCG2 and the putamen (PUNCORRECTED = .026) and (2) between TREM2 and the hippocampus (PUNCORRECTED = .026) and thalamus (PUNCORRECTED = .042). See Table 2 and Fig. 1 for all estimated effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals.

Table 2.

Standardized beta estimate of each variant on the seven subcortical volumes. Effect estimate reflects the impact of the minor allele at each of the three variants

Variant Volume (mm3) Standard β Std. Error P
ABI3_rs616338 Accumbens area −0.06729 0.215404 .754754
Amygdala 0.059058 0.193288 .759951
Caudate 0.114756 0.215069 .593634
Hippo 0.121099 0.209561 .563353
Pallidum 0.134907 0.21283 .526165
Putamen 0.214194 0.210183 .308164
Thalamus proper 0.127384 0.188806 .499878
PLCG2_rs72824905 Accumbens area −0.23319 0.195503 .23296
Amygdala −0.24926 0.171324 .145704
Caudate −0.18399 0.198696 .354459
Hippo −0.12729 0.186125 .494059
Pallidum −0.52205 0.192925 .00681
Putamen −0.42581 0.190697 .025554
Thalamus proper −0.20704 0.171346 .226934
TREM2_rs143332484 Accumbens area −0.2366 0.267889 .377128
Amygdala −0.28245 0.235478 .23034
Caudate 0.019829 0.273673 .942241
Hippo −0.56729 0.255265 .02626
Pallidum −0.23682 0.276474 .391683
Putamen −0.76972 0.265246 .003709
Thalamus proper −0.47425 0.233696 .042423

NOTE. Bold represents significant associations after multiple testing correction.

Abbreviations: β = Standardized beta estimate; Std. Error = standard error of effect estimate.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

X-axis = corrected volumes (adjusted for all covariates) across seven subcortical volumes (Y-axis) for the three variants. Abbreviations: Black = minor allele; gray = major allele. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

To further control for variation in the kinship structure, we then proceeded to split the sample into twins and nontwin groups. The pooled effects remained largely unchanged: PLCG2-pallidum, P = .01; PLCG2-putamen, P = .009; TREM2-hippocampus, P = .011; and TREM2-putamen, P = .039. See Fig. 2 for estimated effects and 95% confidence intervals.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

X-axis = Standardized beta coefficient (adjusted for all covariates) across seven subcortical volumes (Y-axis) for the three variants. Abbreviations: Black (circle) = twin sample; gray (circle) = nontwin sample. Black (diamond) = pooled estimate. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

4. General discussion

The association between three rare microglia-linked AD risk alleles on subcortical volumes was assessed in a large sample of young individuals. Consistent prior reports [7], [11], the rare AD-associated variation within TREM2 was nominally associated with reduced hippocampal volume. Here, these prior observations are expanded on to show that these alterations are also present in early life process. Together, accumulating evidence now suggests that both common and rare variations that confer risk for AD may converge on pathophysiological mechanisms such as alterations in subcortical volumetry in early life [6], [8]. Furthermore, there was a negative association between the TREM2 risk allele and volume of putamen. This adds to evidence from previous studies have also shown that common AD risk loci such as BIN1 and ABCA7 are also associated with alterations in putamen volumes [25]. We further observed negative associations between the PLCG2 protective locus and pallidum/putamen volumes. The observations between PLCG2/TREM2 and basal ganglia volume provide novel insight into mechanisms by which microglia-mediated innate immunity may confer risk for AD. It is of interest that the minor allele at PLCG2 (protective allele) and TREM2 (risk allele) were both associated with a reduction in putamen volume. This suggests that although putamen volume may be a common mechanism by which rare AD genetic risk is conferred, the precise molecular mechanisms that lead to opposing phenotypes should be explored. The ABI3, PLCG2, and TREM2 transcripts have a common expression pattern in human brain cortex, with high expression in microglia cells and limited expression in neurons, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, and endothelial cells, suggesting that future imaging genetic studies of AD-related risk would benefit from imaging measures sensitive to microglia function [26], [27], [28].

Together, these observations suggest that rare AD risk alleles may also confer susceptibility via alterations in subcortical volumes, specifically in the medial temporal lobe and basal ganglia. The AD-associated risk loci within PLGC2 and TREM2 confer protein changes, these variants may influence subcortical volumetry via alteration in protein function and/or expression, which have yet to be elucidated. Our observation is also supported by recent histologic evidence showing that AD genetic risk (with and without APOE) is associated microglia density exclusively within temporal lobe structures [29]. Innate immunity represents a significant component in the broad genetic architecture of AD [29]; however, the relationship between neuroimaging markers of AD risk and immune function remains limited. Initial imaging studies have shown that marker of inflammation such as C-reactive protein are associated with cortical volume loss [30], [31].

Our observations should be interpreted with several considerations. First, as these three variants considered in this analysis are uncommon (minor allele frequency <1%), these sample sizes for the respective minor alleles were small (NRANGE: 14–23). However, as our observations are consistent with prior associations [7], [11], [32], we suggest that this work may add important insight into rare AD variants across the lifespan. Second, as the effects of these variants were assessed in a cross-sectional sample, it is unknown how variants affect brain structure across the lifespan. Furthermore, large imaging consortia projects such the lifespan development and aging projects will be instrumental in assessing the impact of common and rare AD risk alleles in early and later-life processes [33]. Finally, it is of note that the rare variants were largely contained within families. Our (A) mixed-effects models and (B) split-half analysis provide support in the findings, providing further evidence for associations between hippocampal volume and TREM2 [7], [11]. There is also evidence that rare variation in TREM2 may also influence basal ganglia volumes [32] and altered markers of brain health (such as cerebral blood flow/ventricular expansion) in animal models [34], [35]. However, observations between PLCG2 and putamen volume should be interpreted with caution until replicated in independent samples. Nevertheless, the associations between the PLCG2 and TREM2 loci and putamen/globus pallidus broadly suggest that the volumetric reductions in basal ganglia may reflect a immunogenic mechanism of AD-linked susceptibility that manifests in early life process and a potential target for detection, prevention, and intervention.

5. Conclusion

This study demonstrates associations between subcortical volumes (basal ganglia) and rare AD genetic risk in locus with known functions in microglia-mediated innate immunity (PLCG2 and TREM2). These observations contribute to a growing body of evidence suggesting that genetic variation (rare and common) may contribute to AD risk in early life by influencing the volume of subcortical structures. Future bioinformatics research will help to refine and uncover the principle biological gradients (such as microglia-mediated innate immunity) that underpin AD genetic risk and neuroimaging correlates [36]. Future in vivo neuroimaging measures that map immunity/microglia function in the brain will elucidate unknown mechanisms of AD risk and aid in the understanding of the pathophysiology preceding clinical symptomology.

Research in Context.

  • 1.

    Systematic review: Recent exome sequencing studies have identified rare variants in AIB3, PLCG2, and TREM2 that influence risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the mechanisms by which these loci confer risk are largely unknown. This study explores the relationship between these risk variants and brain volumes (via magnetic resonance imaging) in early life process.

  • 2.

    Interpretation: TREM2 risk was associated with smaller putamen volumes. The PLCG2 variant was further associated with reduced pallidum volume. These variants may influence subcortical volumetry at an early age, which may confer risk for AD in later life.

  • 3.

    Future directions: Microglia–mediated innate immunity may be a key component of AD genetic risk that influences brain health. Future neuroimaging studies that map immunity/microglia function in the brain will elucidate unknown mechanisms of AD risk and aid in the understanding of the pathophysiology preceding clinical symptomology.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a Ser Cyrmu II Fellowship (European Regional Development Funds: CU149: “Imaging immunity in the genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease) at the Dementia Research Institute at Cardiff University; Wellcome Trust Intuitional Strategic Support Funds (513688); Medical Research Centre (MRC) Centre grant (G0801418), MRC program grant (G0800509). Data were provided by the Human Connectome Project, WU-Minn Consortium (Principal Investigators: David Van Essen and Kamil Ugurbil; 1U54MH091657) funded by the 16 NIH Institutes and Centers that support the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research; and by the McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

References

  • 1.Sims R., van der Lee S.J., Naj A.C., Bellenguez C., Badarinarayan N., Jakobsdottir J. Rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3, and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer's disease. Nat Genet. 2017;49:1373–1384. doi: 10.1038/ng.3916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Braak H., Braak E. Evolution of neuronal changes in the course of Alzheimer's disease. J Neural Transm Suppl. 1998;53:127–140. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6467-9_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Biffi A., Anderson C.D., Desikan R.S., Sabuncu M., Cortellini L., Schmansky N. Genetic variation and neuroimaging measures in Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:677–685. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lambert J.C., Ibrahim-Verbaas C.A., Harold D., Naj A.C., Sims R., Bellenguez C. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer's disease. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1452–1458. doi: 10.1038/ng.2802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Harrison T.M., Mahmood Z., Lau E.P., Karacozoff A.M., Burggren A.C., Small G.W. An Alzheimer's disease genetic risk score predicts longitudinal thinning of hippocampal complex subregions in healthy older adults. eNeuro. 2016;3 doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0098-16.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Foley S.F., Tansey K.E., Caseras X., Lancaster T., Bracht T., Parker G. Multimodal brain imaging reveals structural differences in Alzheimer's disease polygenic risk carriers: a study in healthy young adults. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;81:154–161. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.02.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lupton M.K., Strike L., Hansell N.K., Wen W., Mather K.A., Armstrong N.J. The effect of increased genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease on hippocampal and amygdala volume. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;40:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.12.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mormino E.C., Sperling R.A., Holmes A.J., Buckner R.L., De Jager P.L., Smoller J.W. Polygenic risk of Alzheimer disease is associated with early- and late-life processes. Neurology. 2016;87:481–488. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chauhan G., Adams H.H.H., Bis J.C., Weinstein G., Yu L., Toglhofer A.M. Association of Alzheimer's disease GWAS loci with MRI markers of brain aging. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36:1765.e7–1765.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.12.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Axelrud L.K., Santoro M.L., Pine D.S., Talarico F., Gadelha A., Manfro G.G. Polygenic risk score for Alzheimer's disease: implications for memory performance and hippocampal volumes in early life. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175:555–563. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17050529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rajagopalan P., Hibar D.P., Thompson P.M. TREM2 and neurodegenerative disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1565–1567. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1306509#SA3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hawkins K.A., Emadi N., Pearlson G.D., Taylor B., Khadka S., King D. The effect of age and smoking on the hippocampus and memory in late middle age. Hippocampus. 2018;28:846–849. doi: 10.1002/hipo.23014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Akbaraly T., Sexton C., Zsoldos E., Mahmood A., Filippini N., Kerleau C. Association of long-term diet quality with hippocampal volume: longitudinal cohort study. Am J Med. 2018;131:1372–13781 e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Elcombe E.L., Lagopoulos J., Duffy S.L., Lewis S.J., Norrie L., Hickie I.B. Hippocampal volume in older adults at risk of cognitive decline: the role of sleep, vascular risk, and depression. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;44:1279–1290. doi: 10.3233/JAD-142016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Van Essen D.C., Smith S.M., Barch D.M., Behrens T.E., Yacoub E., Ugurbil K. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview. Neuroimage. 2013;80:62–79. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Corlier F., Hafzalla G., Faskowitz J., Kuller L.H., Becker J.T., Lopez O.L. Systemic inflammation as a predictor of brain aging: contributions of physical activity, metabolic risk, and genetic risk. Neuroimage. 2018;172:118–129. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Glasser M.F., Sotiropoulos S.N., Wilson J.A., Coalson T.S., Fischl B., Andersson J.L. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage. 2013;80:105–124. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fischl B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage. 2012;62:774–781. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hibar D.P., Westlye L.T., van Erp T.G., Rasmussen J., Leonardo C.D., Faskowitz J. Subcortical volumetric abnormalities in bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:1710–1716. doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hibar D.P., Stein J.L., Renteria M.E., Arias-Vasquez A., Desrivieres S., Jahanshad N. Common genetic variants influence human subcortical brain structures. Nature. 2015;520:224–229. doi: 10.1038/nature14101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Carlin J.B., Gurrin L.C., Sterne J.A., Morley R., Dwyer T. Regression models for twin studies: a critical review. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:1089–1099. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ziyatdinov A., Vazquez-Santiago M., Brunel H., Martinez-Perez A., Aschard H., Soria J.M. lme4qtl: linear mixed models with flexible covariance structure for genetic studies of related individuals. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018;19:68. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2057-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hoaglin D.C., Iglewicz B. Fine-tuning some resistant rules for outlier labeling. J Am Stat Assoc. 1987;82:1147–1149. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor Package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36:1–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wachinger C., Nho K., Saykin A.J., Reuter M., Rieckmann A., Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging I A longitudinal imaging genetics study of neuroanatomical asymmetry in Alzheimer's disease. Biol Psychiatry. 2018;84:522–530. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.04.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Edison P., Donat C.K., Sastre M. In vivo imaging of glial activation in Alzheimer's disease. Front Neurol. 2018;9:625. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dani M., Wood M., Mizoguchi R., Fan Z., Walker Z., Morgan R. Microglial activation correlates in vivo with both tau and amyloid in Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2018;141:2740–2754. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fan Z., Brooks D.J., Okello A., Edison P. An early and late peak in microglial activation in Alzheimer's disease trajectory. Brain. 2017;140:792–803. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Felsky D., Patrick E., Schneider J.A., Mostafavi S., Gaiteri C., Patsopoulos N. Polygenic analysis of inflammatory disease variants and effects on microglia in the aging brain. Mol Neurodegener. 2018;13:38. doi: 10.1186/s13024-018-0272-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.International Genomics of Alzheimer's Disease C Convergent genetic and expression data implicate immunity in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11:658–671. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.05.1757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hilal S., Ikram M.A., Verbeek M.M., Franco O.H., Stoops E., Vanderstichele H. C-reactive protein, plasma amyloid-beta levels, and their interaction with magnetic resonance imaging markers. Stroke. 2018;49:2692–2698. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Luis E.O., Ortega-Cubero S., Lamet I., Razquin C., Cruchaga C., Benitez B.A. Frontobasal gray matter loss is associated with the TREM2 p.R47H variant. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35:2681–2690. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Harms M.P., Somerville L.H., Ances B.M., Andersson J., Barch D.M., Bastiani M. Extending the Human Connectome Project across ages: imaging protocols for the lifespan development and aging projects. Neuroimage. 2018;183:972–984. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kleinberger G., Brendel M., Mracsko E., Wefers B., Groeneweg L., Xiang X. The FTD-like syndrome causing TREM2 T66M mutation impairs microglia function, brain perfusion, and glucose metabolism. EMBO J. 2017;36:1837–1853. doi: 10.15252/embj.201796516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Leyns C.E.G., Ulrich J.D., Finn M.B., Stewart F.R., Koscal L.J., Remolina Serrano J. TREM2 deficiency attenuates neuroinflammation and protects against neurodegeneration in a mouse model of tauopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:11524–11529. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710311114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tansey K.E., Cameron D., Hill M.J. Genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease is concentrated in specific macrophage and microglial transcriptional networks. Genome Med. 2018;10:14. doi: 10.1186/s13073-018-0523-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Alzheimer's & Dementia : Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES