Abstract
External control of oscillation dynamics in the Belousov–Zhabotinsky (BZ) reaction is important for many applications including encoding computing schemes. When considering the BZ reaction, there are limited studies dealing with thermal cycling, particularly cooling, for external control. Recently, liquid marbles (LMs) have been demonstrated as a means of confining the BZ reaction in a system containing a solid–liquid interface. BZ LMs were prepared by rolling 50 μl droplets in polyethylene (PE) powder. Oscillations of electrical potential differences within the marble were recorded by inserting a pair of electrodes through the LM powder coating into the BZ solution core. Electrical potential differences of up to 100 mV were observed with an average period of oscillation ca 44 s. BZ LMs were subsequently frozen to −1°C to observe changes in the frequency of electrical potential oscillations. The frequency of oscillations reduced upon freezing to 11 mHz cf. 23 mHz at ambient temperature. The oscillation frequency of the frozen BZ LM returned to 23 mHz upon warming to ambient temperature. Several cycles of frequency fluctuations were able to be achieved.
Keywords: Belousov–Zhabotinsky reaction, oscillations, temperature-controlled, particle-coated droplets
1. Introduction
Space–time dynamics of oxidation wavefronts, including target waves, spiral waves, localized wave-fragments and combinations of these, in a non-stirred Belousov–Zhabotinsky (BZ) medium [1,2] have been used to implement information processing since seminal papers by Kuhnert and co-workers [3,4]. The spectrum of unconventional computing devices prototyped with BZ reaction is rich. Examples include image processing and memory [5], diodes [6], geometrically constrained logical gates [7], controllers for robots [8], wave-based counters [9], neuromorphic architectures [10–13] and binary arithmetical circuits [14–16].
While most of BZ computing devices use the presence of a wavefront in a selected locus of space as a manifestation of logical True, there is a body of works on information coding with frequencies of oscillations. Thus, Gorecki et al. [17] proposed to encode True as high frequency and False as low frequency: or gates, not gates and a diode have been realized in numerical models. Other results in BZ frequency-based information processing include frequency transformation with a passive barrier [18], frequency band filter [19] and memory [20]. Using frequencies is in line with current developments in oscillatory logic [21], fuzzy logic [11], oscillatory associated memory [22] and computing in arrays of coupled oscillators [23,24]. Therefore, frequencies of oscillations in BZ media will be the focus of this paper.
Most prototypes of BZ computers involve some kind of geometrical constraining of the reaction: a computation requires a compartmentalization. An efficient way to compartmentalize BZ medium is to encapsulate it in a lipid membrane [25,26]. This encapsulation enables the arrangement of elementary computing units into elaborate computing circuits and massive-parallel information processing arrays [27–30]. BZ vesicles have a lipid membrane and therefore have to reside in a solution phase, typically oil, and they are susceptible to disruption of the lipid vesicles through natural ageing and mechanical damage. Thus, potential application domains of the BZ vesicles are limited. This is why in the present paper we focus on liquid marbles (LMs), which offer us capability for ‘dry manipulation’ of the compartmentalized oscillatory medium. LMs also provide the possibility for active transport processes [31] which is not easily possible with vesicles, e.g. manipulating LMs with magnets [32,33], mechanically [34], electrostatically [35], pressure gradients [36], change in pH [37].
The LMs, proposed by Aussillous and Quéré in 2001 [38], are liquid droplets coated by hydrophobic particles at the liquid/air interface. The LMs do not wet surface and therefore can be manipulated by a variety of means [34], including rolling, mechanical lifting and dropping, sliding and floating [39–41]. The range of applications of LMs is huge and spans most fields of life sciences, chemistry, physics and engineering [31,42–45]. Recently, we demonstrated that the BZ reaction is compatible with typical LM chemistry: BZ–LMs support localized excitation waves, and non-trivial patterns of oscillations are evidenced in ensembles of the BZ LMs [46].
Oscillations in the BZ reaction media can be controlled by varying the concentrations of chemical species involved in the reaction, and with light [47,48], mechanical strain [49] and temperature [50–54]. While a number of high-impact results on the thermal sensitivity have been published, the topic still remains open and of utmost interest. Moreover, in LMs we might have difficulties in controlling the reaction with illumination because most types of hydrophobic coating are not perfectly transparent and absorb wavelengths of light important for exerting control over the BZ reaction. This is why in the present manuscript we focus on thermal control and tuning of the oscillations.
Temperature sensitivity of the BZ reaction was initially substantially analysed by Blandamer & Morris [50] who, in 1975, showed a dependence of the frequency of oscillations of a redox potential in a stirred BZ reaction with a change in temperature. Periods of oscillations reported were 190 s at 25°C, 70 s at 35°C, and 40 s at 45°C. In 1988, Vajda et al. [51] demonstrated that temporal oscillations of a BZ mixture persist in a frozen aqueous solution at −10°C to −15°C. By tracing Mn2+ ion signal amplitude, they showed that the frozen BZ solutions oscillate three times, at −10°C, and 11 times, at −15°C, faster than liquid phase BZ. The oscillation frequency increase has been explained by the formation of crystals and interfacial phenomena during freezing. This might be partly supported by experiments with chlorite–thiosulphate system frozen to −34°C [55]. There, a velocity of wavefronts is increased because en route to total freezing the reaction occurs only in the thin liquid layer, at the periphery of the solid domain, where concentrations of chemicals are temporarily higher. In 2001, Masia et al. [52] monitored oscillations in non-stirred BZ in a batch reactor of 4 cm3 by the solution absorbency at 320 nm. The reactor was kept at various temperatures through thermostatic control. They reported periodic oscillation at temperatures 0°C–3°C, quasi-periodic at 4°C–6°C and chaotic at 7°C–8°C. Bánsági et al. [54] experimentally demonstrated that by increasing temperature from 40°C to 80°C it is possible to obtain oscillations of frequency over 10 Hz; they also showed that the frequency of oscillations grows proportionally to temperature (in the range studied). Ito et al. [53] reported linear dependence of an oscillation period—of polymers impregnated with BZ—from temperature in the range 5°C–25°C.
We establish an electrical interface with BZ LMs by piercing them with a pair of electrodes. This is done for two reasons. First, the coating of LMs is usually non-transparent, therefore conventional optical means of recording oxidation dynamics would not be sufficient. In addition, marbles are three-dimensional structures and there is evidence that they support complex three-dimensional waves, therefore, electrodes positioned within the marble potentially allow the three-dimensional oscillation dynamics to be mapped, whereas imaging is difficult to interpret from a three-dimensional standpoint. Second, our ultimate goal is to implement an unconventional computing device with BZ LMs. Such devices rarely stand alone but are usually interfaced with conventional electronics, thus electrical recording seemed to be most appropriate.
2. Methods
BZ LMs were produced by coating droplets of BZ solution with ultra high-density polyethylene (PE) powder (Sigma Aldrich, CAS 9002-88-4, Product Code 1002018483, particle size 150 μm). The BZ solution was prepared using the method reported by Field & Winfree [56], omitting the surfactant Triton X. The 18 M Sulfuric acid H2SO4 (Fischer Scientific), sodium bromate NaBrO3, malonic acid CH2(COOH)2, sodium bromide NaBr and 0.025 M ferroin indicator (Sigma Aldrich) were used as received. Sulfuric acid (2 ml) was added to deionized water (67 ml), to produce 0.5 M H2SO4; NaBrO3 (5 g) was added to the acid to yield 70 ml of stock solution (0.48 M).
Stock solutions of 1 M malonic acid and 1 M NaBr were prepared by dissolving 1 g in 10 ml of deionized water. In a 50 ml beaker, 0.5 ml of 1 M malonic acid was added to 3 ml of the acidic NaBrO3 solution; 0.25 ml of 1 M NaBr was then added to the beaker, which produced bromine. The solution was set aside until it was clear and colourless (ca 3 min) before adding 0.5 ml of 0.025 M ferroin indicator.
BZ LMs were prepared by pipetting a 75 μl droplet of BZ solution, from a height of ca 2 mm onto a powder bed of PE, using a method reported previously [46]. The BZ droplet was rolled on the powder bed for ca. 10 s until it was fully coated with powder.
A scheme of experimental set-up is shown in figure 1a. An LM was placed in a Petri dish (35 mm diameter) and pierced with two iridium-coated stainless steel electrodes (sub-dermal needle electrodes with twisted cables (SPES MEDICA SRL Via Buccari 21 16153 Genova, Italy). Electrical potential difference between electrodes was recorded with a Pico ADC-24 high-resolution data logger (Pico Technology, St Neots, Cambridgeshire, UK), sampling rate 25 ms.
Figure 1.
Experimental set-up. (a) A scheme of the set-up: A, BZ LM; B, a pair of electrodes; C, Pico ADC-24 logger; D, Peltier element; E, fans; F, power supply for fans; G, power supply for the Peltier element; H, thermocouple; I, TC-08 thermocouple data logger. (b) Dynamics of temperature on the surface of the Petri dish when the Peltier element is powered by 7 V. The moment of power on is shown by ‘*’ and off by ‘#’.
A Petri dish with LM was mounted to a Peltier element (100 W, 8.5 A, 20 V, 40 × 40 mm, RS Components Ltd, UK ), which in turn was fixed to an aluminium heat sink, with Silver CPU Thermal Compound, cooled by two 12 V fans (powered separately from the Peltier element). Temperature at the Peltier element was controlled via RS PRO Bench Power Supply Digital (RS Components Ltd, Corby, Northants, UK). Temperature at the bottom of the Petri dish was monitored using TC-08 thermocouple data logger (Pico Technology, St Neots, Cambridgeshire, UK), sampling rate 100 ms. A typical cooling rate was −1°C per 10 s, and warming rate +1°C per 20 s, exact shape of the functions is shown in figure 1b.
3. Results
Temperatures on the surface of the Petri dish below −2°C usually result in a burst LM. Two examples are illustrated in figure 2. An intact LM (figure 2a) shows oscillations with average period 26 s (between ‘A’ and ‘B’ in figure 2c). When cooling is started (‘B’ in figure 2c) oscillations quickly become low-frequency low-amplitude irregular, average period 49 s. Eventually, the LM bursts (‘C’ in figure 2c) and its cargo is relocated away from the electrodes (figure 2b). In the scenario shown in figure 2d–g, LM undergoes two instances of freezing. First time, marked ‘B’ in figure 2g the LM (figure 2d) survives being cooled down with just slight change in shape (figure 2e). Period of oscillations increases from 28 s in intact LM to 162 s in cooled-down LM (period between ‘B’ and ‘C’ in figure 2g). After Peltier is switched off (moment ‘C’ in figure 2g), the LM resumes high-frequency oscillations, frequency 42 s, but with lower amplitude. The LM does not survive second round of freezing (‘D’ in figure 2g) and bursts, while still wetting the electrodes (figure 2f). More examples of electrical potential dynamics for temperatures causing LM bursting are shown in figure 3. The temperature of −2°C is critical, in that over 70% of LMs burst and did not survive second round of freezing. Therefore, in further experiments the LMs were cooled down to −1°C.
Figure 2.
(a–c) LM bursts at first freezing. (d–g) LM burst at second freezing. (a) Marble at the beginning of experiment. (b) Marble burst at some point of freezing. (c) Plot of oscillations: A, the marble is stimulated with a silver wire; B, oscillations started, Peltier element is switched on; C, marbles cools downs, eventually the marbles bursts. (d) LM at the beginning of experiment. (e) Cooled-down LM. (f) LM bursts and spreads at the second round of freezing. (g) Dynamics of electrical potential: A, marble is stimulated by a silver wire for 2–3 s; B, Peltier element is switched on; C, Peltier is switched off; D, Peltier is switched on again.
Figure 3.
Dynamics of electrical potential of LM cooled, temperature at the bottom of the Petri dish, down to (a) −4°C, (c) −3°C, (d) −2°C. Moment when Peltier element is switched on is shown by ‘*’ and off by ‘#’. (d) Temperature log corresponding to experiments (a).
Patterns of oscillations of LM cooled down to −1°C show a high degree of polymorphism (figure 4) in amplitudes. Changes in frequencies are in table 1. If we ignore the first example (figure 4a), then we have average p = 44.4 (σ(p) = 12.5), average p* = 92 (σ(p*) = 28.6) average p*/p = 2.1 (σ(p*/p) = 0.5).
Figure 4.
Dynamics of electrical potential of BZ LM subjected to cooling down to −1°C and warming up. Moments when the Peltier element was switched on are shown by ‘*’ and off by ‘#’. Moments when electrodes are inserted in the LM are shown by ‘!’.
Table 1.
Effect of cooling to −1°C on a period of electrical potential oscillations of BZ LM: p is a period of electrical potential oscillation of an LM at ambient temperature, p* is a period of electrical potential oscillations of the cooled LM.
In the experiments shown in figure 4a–e, LMs were kept cooled until the end of the experiments. In the experiment shown in figure 4f, cooling was started after 1310 s of the experiment, the Peltier was switched off after 2254 s, and cooling was repeated at 2690 s. Intact LM oscillated with average period 47 s at first phase of the experiment. Cooled LM oscillated with period 74 s. The period became 29 s after the warming. Second cooling increased the period to 67 s. Thus, we have an increase of 1.6 times during first cooling cycle and by 2.3 times during the second cooling cycle. In the experiment illustrated in figure 4g, oscillations were arrested by cooling yet restarted when the LM was warmed. Period of oscillations before cooling was 47 s, and after oscillations restarted after cooling was 39 s. Repeated cooling did not arrest oscillations yet increased the oscillation period 2.2 times to 86 s. In the experiment shown in figure 4h, we cooled an LM for short periods of time (199 and 288 s) and did not observe any substantial changes in periods of oscillation, after the first freezing cycle. The average periods were changing as follows 46 s → 92 s → 98 s → 98 s → 98 s.
To summarize, average period of oscillations of a BZ LM doubles from 44 s to 92 s when the LM is cooled down to −1°C. The frequency of oscillations is restored after cooling is stopped. The amplitude of oscillations may increase or decrease as a result of cooling. Sometimes the oscillations can be completely arrested yet resume after warming.
4. Discussion
Why are oscillations of electrical potential observed? The oxidation of malonic acid by bromate ions in acidified solution is catalysed by ferroin ions. Ferroin ions [Fe(ox− phen)3]2+ are oxidized to their ferric derivatives [Fe(o− phen)3]3+. The ratios of ferroin to ferric ions and bromide ions oscillate in time. This is reflected in the oscillations of the electrical potential recorded from the LM. If the BZ solution in an LM was mixed, then global oscillations would occur, resulting in the potential at both electrodes being the same and therefore no electrical oscillations could be observed. However, the solution is not mixed, therefore waves of oxidation emerge spontaneously, or are induced when the LM is pierced by electrodes, or induced by piercing with a silver wire (the silver catalyses a local reduction in bromate concentration, initiating the reaction). Therefore, the ratio of ferroin to ferric ions (and bromide ions) are changing only at the wavefront. Thus, when the wavefront passes the electrodes the electrical potential difference is observed.
Why are patterns of oscillations not always regular? This is because several oxidation waves, and even several generators/sources of oxidation waves, can coexist in a single LM. These waves can superimpose with each other, collide and annihilate in the result of the collisions, or produce localized wave-fragments. This rich dynamic of wavefronts is reflected in, sometimes, irregular patterns of oscillation. Let us illustrate further discussions with two-variable Oregonator equations [57,58],
| 4.1 |
The variables u and v represent local concentrations of an activator, or an excitatory component of BZ system, and an inhibitor, or a refractory component. Parameter ε sets up a ratio of the time scale of variables u and v, q is a scaling parameter depending on rates of activation/propagation and inhibition, and f is a stoichiometric coefficient. We integrated the system using Euler method with five-node Laplace operator, time step Δt = 0.001 and grid point spacing Δx = 0.25, ε = 0.02, f = 1.4, q = 0.002. We varied value of ϕ from the interval Φ = [0.05, 0.08], where constant ϕ is a rate of inhibitor production. ϕ represents the rate of inhibitor; this rate can be dependent on light, temperature or the presence of other chemical species. The parameter ϕ characterizes excitability of the simulated medium, i.e. the larger ϕ the less excitable the medium is. We represent BZ LM as a disc with a radius of 185 nodes. We represent electrodes as rectangular domains of the discs (see figure 5a and figure 7a) and . We calculate the potential difference at each iteration t as .
Figure 5.
Time-lapse snapshots (a,c,e) and corresponding potential recorded at the electrodes (b,d,f) of a single wave initiated at southern edge of the droplet (a,b), eastern edge of the droplet (c,d), northeastern edge of the droplet (e,f). The time-lapse snapshots were recorded at every 150th time step. We display sites with u > 0.04. Domains corresponding to the electrodes are shown by white rectangles in (a).
Figure 7.
Modelling wavefront propagation and frequency of wave generation for various values of excitability ϕ. (a) Position of electrodes, auto-excitation loci is shown by star. (b–e) Snapshots of the medium showing trains of the wavefronts. (f–i) Potential difference recorded on the electrodes. (j) Period of the potential oscillations versus excitability ϕ. (a) ϕ = 0.01, t = 104, (b) ϕ = 0.01, t = 104, (c) ϕ = 0.03, t = 104, (d) ϕ = 0.05, t = 104, (e) ϕ = 0.07, t = 3 × 104, (f) ϕ = 0.01, (g) ϕ = 0.03, (h) ϕ = 0.05, (i) ϕ = 0.07.
Orientation of the wavefront passing the electrodes determines exact shape of the impulse recorded (figure 5). Assume a droplet is excitable everywhere. If a wavefront is perpendicular to the electrodes, e.g. a wave is generated at the southern edge of the droplet (figure 5a), the potential difference between electrodes at any moment of time will be near zero, a part of some noise (figure 5b). A wave originated at the eastern edge of a droplet enters electrodes at an obtuse angle (figure 5c). This is reflected in two spikes—one is positive potential and another is negative potential (figure 5d), there is a substantial distance between the spikes. If the wavefront propagates nearly parallel to the electrodes, e.g. when a wave is generated at northeast edge of the droplet (figure 5e), the action-like potential is recorded (figure 5f), which shape imitates distinctive depolarization, repolarization and hyperpolarization phases of a biological action potential. In experiments, we always observed oscillation. The shape of the impulses was nearly the same—subject to deviations—in all experiments. This implies that the wavefront travels not in the volume of BZ LM but along the surface of the LM. Thus, the wavefront passes electrodes being nearly parallel to them.
Why does the frequency of oscillations decrease on cooling? Temperature changes the rate of the reaction which consumes the inhibitor of the auto-catalytic Br− [50] species. When the temperature decreases, the rate of consumption of Br− also decreases, which increases the time necessary for the reaction to enter its auto-catalytic step. The enlargement of the refractory tail reduces the number of wavefronts that can be fitted in a limited space. Thus less waves pass electrodes in a given period of time. This is reflected in a reduced frequency of oscillations. The mechanism is illustrated in experiments with a thin-layer BZ medium shown in figure 6 and simulation with Oregonator model in figure 7. A 35 mm Petri dish was placed on the freezing set-up (figure 1), and the element was chilled to −7°C. The BZ medium did not freeze but its temperature dropped to near 0°C. The cooling was reflected in the enlarged tail of the excitation wavefront, it doubled in width from 2.5 mm (figure 6a) to 4.7 mm (figure 6e) in just over 3 min. In modelling the BZ medium (figure 7), we position electrodes in the north of the droplet and assume a self-excitation loci near the edge at the east of the droplet (figure 7a) and that waves propagate only near the surface (i.e. only part of 370-nodes-wide disc with r > 150 is excitable). The excitable loci have values ux = 1, , at every iteration of the numerical integration; however, waves are generated only with some intervals. Distance between wavefronts increases with decrease of excitability, increase of ϕ from 0.01 (figure 7b) to 0.07 (figure 7e). This is reflected in decreasing of oscillation frequency of the potential difference recorded at the electrodes (figure 7f–i). The shapes of impulses in figure 7i strikingly resemble shapes of experimentally recorded impulses in figure 4a. The dependence of oscillation period on excitability ϕ is linear for ϕ ∈ [0.01, 0.05] and cubic for ϕ ∈ [0.05, 0.07] (figure 7j).
Figure 6.
Time lapse photos of the propagation of an oxidation wavefront in a thin layer of BZ medium on the freezing Peltier element. Time from the start of recording is (a) 90 s, (b) 126 s, (c) 150 s, (d) 174 s, (e) 198 s and (f) 246 s.
How long can the oscillations last? In our experiments, the oscillations in a 50 μl LM lasted up to an hour. The amplitude decreases with time due to exhaustion of catalyst in the droplet; however, the most typical cause of oscillations ceasing was breakage of the LMs. Generally, repeated cycles of freezing and warming caused disruption of the hydrophobic particle ‘skin’ of an LM, resulting in the cargo being spilled.
How can the observed phenomena be used in unconventional computing? As Horowitz and Hill mention in their famous ‘The Art of Electronics’—‘A device without an oscillator either does not do anything or expects to be driven by something else (which probably contains an oscillator)’ [59]. We produced a chemical analogue of an electronic temperature-sensitive oscillator: an oscillator circuit for sensing and indicating temperature by changing oscillator frequency with temperature [60,61]. Future BZ computing devices will be hybrid chemical-electronic devices, needing components to generate waveforms. The BZ LMs per se are sources of (relatively) regular space pulses. We experimentally demonstrated that the frequency of the pulses can be switched from high to low by freezing the BZ LMs. This realization could be used in future large-scale ensembles of BZ LMs which approximate fuzzy-logic many-argument functions, where inputs are represented by temperature gradients, and outputs are dominating frequencies of the oscillations in the ensembles. To control frequencies in an ensemble of BZ LMs [46], we can use small Peltier elements, the size of which is enough just to fit a single marble, e.g. Peltier Module, 1.3 W, 2.2 A, 0.9 V, 6 × 6 mm (each of the modules can be automatically controlled via Arduino device). Additional future challenges would include a comparison between a surface simulation and the surface reconstruction, implementation of experiments on freezing microdroplets, as inspired by Wang et al. [62], freezing of photo-sensitive BZ LMs in combination with intermittent illumination.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
A.A. thanks Jitka Čejková (University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Czech Republic) for introducing him to liquid marbles in 2016.
Data accessibility
The data supporting the findings of this study are available at http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2533350.
Authors' contributions
A.A., C.F., T.C.D., N.P. and B.D.L.C. undertook the research and wrote the manuscript.
Competing interests
We declare we have no competing interests.
Funding
This research was supported by the EPSRC with grant EP/P016677/1 ‘Computing with Liquid Marbles’.
References
- 1.Belousov BP. 1959. A periodic reaction and its mechanism. Compilation Abstracts Radiat. Med. 147, 1. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhabotinsky A. 1964. Periodic processes of malonic acid oxidation in a liquid phase. Biofizika 9, 11. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kuhnert L. 1986. A new optical photochemical memory device in a light-sensitive chemical active medium. Nature 319, 393–394. ( 10.1038/319393a0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kuhnert L, Agladze K, Krinsky V. 1989. Image processing using light-sensitive chemical waves. Nature 337, 244–247. ( 10.1038/337244a0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kaminaga A, Vanag VK, Epstein IR. 2006. A reaction–diffusion memory device. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 3087–3089. ( 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3773) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Igarashi Y, Gorecki J. 2011. Chemical diodes built with controlled excitable media. Int. J. Unconv. Comput. 7, 141–158. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Steinbock O, Kettunen P, Showalter K. 1996. Chemical wave logic gates. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 18 970–18 975. ( 10.1021/jp961209v) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Adamatzky A, de Lacy Costello B, Melhuish C, Ratcliffe N. 2004. Experimental implementation of mobile robot taxis with onboard Belousov–Zhabotinsky chemical medium. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 24, 541–548. ( 10.1016/j.msec.2004.02.002) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gorecki J, Yoshikawa K, Igarashi Y. 2003. On chemical reactors that can count. J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 1664–1669. ( 10.1021/jp021041f) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gorecki J, Gorecka JN. 2006. Information processing with chemical excitations—from instant machines to an artificial chemical brain. Int. J. Unconv. Comput. 2, 321–336. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gentili PL, Horvath V, Vanag VK, Epstein IR. 2012. Belousov–Zhabotinsky ‘chemical neuron’ as a binary and fuzzy logic processor. Int. J. Unconv. Comput. 8, 177–192. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gruenert G, Gizynski K, Escuela G, Ibrahim B, Gorecki J, Dittrich P. 2015. Understanding networks of computing chemical droplet neurons based on information flow. Int. J. Neural Syst. 25, 1450032 ( 10.1142/S0129065714500324) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stovold J, O’Keefe S. 2017. Associative memory in reaction-diffusion chemistry. In Advances in unconventional computing (ed. A Adamatzky), pp. 141–167. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
- 14.Adamatzky A. 2010. Slime mould logical gates: exploring ballistic approach. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2301).
- 15.Sun M-Z, Zhao X. 2015. Crossover structures for logical computations in excitable chemical medium. Int. J. Unconv. Comput. 11, 165–184. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stevens WM, Adamatzky A, Jahan I, de Lacy Costello B. 2012. Time-dependent wave selection for information processing in excitable media. Phys. Rev. E 85, 066129 ( 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.066129) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gorecki J, Gorecka J, Adamatzky A. 2014. Information coding with frequency of oscillations in Belousov–Zhabotinsky encapsulated disks. Phys. Rev. E 89, 042910 ( 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042910) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sielewiesiuk J, Górecki J. 2002. Passive barrier as a transformer of ‘chemical signal’ frequency. J. Phys. Chem. A 106, 4068–4076. ( 10.1021/jp013844t) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gorecka J, Gorecki J. 2003. T-shaped coincidence detector as a band filter of chemical signal frequency. Phys. Rev. E 67, 067203 ( 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.067203) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gizynski K, Gorecki J. 2017. Chemical memory with states coded in light controlled oscillations of interacting Belousov–Zhabotinsky droplets. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 6519–6531. ( 10.1039/C6CP07492H) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Borresen J, Lynch S. 2012. Oscillatory threshold logic. PLoS ONE 7, e48498 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0048498) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Calayir V, Pileggi L. 2013. Fully-digital oscillatory associative memories enabled by non-volatile logic. In The 2013 Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Dallas, TX, 4–9 August ( 10.1109/IJCNN.2013.6706925) [DOI]
- 23.Baldi P, Meir R. 1990. Computing with arrays of coupled oscillators: an application to preattentive texture discrimination. Neural Comput. 2, 458–471. ( 10.1162/neco.1990.2.4.458) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nikonov DE, Csaba G, Porod W, Shibata T, Voils D, Hammerstrom D, Young IA, Bourianoff GI. 2015. Coupled-oscillator associative memory array operation for pattern recognition. IEEE J. Explor. Solid-State Computat. Devices Circuits 1, 85–93. ( 10.1109/JXCDC.2015.2504049) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jones G, King PH, Morgan H, de Planque MR, Zauner K-P. 2015. Autonomous droplet architectures. Artif. Life 21, 195–204. ( 10.1162/ARTL_a_00156) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tomasi R, Noël J-M, Zenati A, Ristori S, Rossi F, Cabuil V, Kanoufi F, Abou-Hassan A. 2014. Chemical communication between liposomes encapsulating a chemical oscillatory reaction. Chem. Sci. 5, 1854–1859. ( 10.1039/C3SC53227E) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Adamatzky A, Holley J, Dittrich P, Gorecki J, Costello BDL, Zauner K-P, Bull L. 2012. On architectures of circuits implemented in simulated Belousov–Zhabotinsky droplets. BioSystems 109, 72–77. ( 10.1016/j.biosystems.2011.12.007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Holley J, Jahan I, de Lacy Costello B, Bull L, Adamatzky A. 2011. Logical and arithmetic circuits in Belousov–Zhabotinsky encapsulated disks. Phys. Rev. E 84, 056110 ( 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.056110) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Adamatzky A, de Lacy Costello B, Bull L. 2011. On polymorphic logical gates in subexcitable chemical medium. Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 21, 1977–1986. ( 10.1142/S0218127411029574) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gizynski K, Gruenert G, Dittrich P, Gorecki J. 2017. Evolutionary design of classifiers made of droplets containing a nonlinear chemical medium. Evol. Comput. 25, 643–671. ( 10.1162/evco_a_00197) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bormashenko E. 2011. Liquid marbles: properties and applications. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 16, 266–271. ( 10.1016/j.cocis.2010.12.002) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhao Y, Fang J, Wang H, Wang X, Lin T. 2010. Magnetic liquid marbles: manipulation of liquid droplets using highly hydrophobic Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 22, 707–710. ( 10.1002/adma.v22:6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang L, Cha D, Wang P. 2012. Remotely controllable liquid marbles. Adv. Mater. 24, 4756–4760. ( 10.1002/adma.201201885) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ooi CH, Nguyen N-T. 2015. Manipulation of liquid marbles. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 19, 483–495. ( 10.1007/s10404-015-1595-z) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bormashenko E, Pogreb R, Stein T, Whyman G, Schiffer M, Aurbach D. 2011. Electrically deformable liquid marbles. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 25, 1371–1377. ( 10.1163/016942411X555953) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bormashenko E, Balter R, Aurbach D. 2010. Micropump based on liquid marbles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 091908 ( 10.1063/1.3487936) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fujii S, Kameyama S, Armes SP, Dupin D, Suzaki M, Nakamura Y. 2010. pH-responsive liquid marbles stabilized with poly (2-vinylpyridine) particles. Soft Matter 6, 635–640. ( 10.1039/B914997J) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Aussillous P, Quéré D. 2001. Liquid marbles. Nature 411, 924–927. ( 10.1038/35082026) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bormashenko E, Bormashenko Y, Musin A, Barkay Z. 2009. On the mechanism of floating and sliding of liquid marbles. ChemPhysChem 10, 654–656. ( 10.1002/cphc.v10:4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Draper TC, Fullarton C, Phillips N, de Lacy Costello BPJ, Adamatzky A. 2018. Liquid marble actuator for microfluidic logic systems. Sci. Rep. 8, 14153 ( 10.1038/s41598-018-32540-w) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Celestini F, Bormashenko E. 2018. Propulsion of liquid marbles: a tool to measure their effective surface tension and viscosity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 532, 32–36. ( 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.091) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.McHale G, Newton MI. 2011. Liquid marbles: principles and applications. Soft Matter 7, 5473–5481. ( 10.1039/c1sm05066d) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Draper TC, Fullarton C, Phillips N, de Lacy Costello BP, Adamatzky A. 2017. Liquid marble interaction gate for collision-based computing. Mater. Today 20, 561–568. ( 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.09.004) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Avrămescu R-E, Ghica M-V, Dinu-Pîrvu C, Udeanu D, Popa L. 2018. Liquid marbles: from industrial to medical applications. Molecules 23, 1120 ( 10.3390/molecules23051120) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Daeneke T, Khoshmanesh K, Mahmood N, de Castro I, Esrafilzadeh D, Barrow S, Dickey M, Kalantar-Zadeh K. 2018. Liquid metals: fundamentals and applications in chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 4073–4111. ( 10.1039/C7CS00043J) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fullarton C, Draper TC, Phillips N, de Lacy Costello BPJ, Adamatzky A. 2018. Belousov–Zhabotinsky reaction in liquid marbles. J. Phys. Mater. 2, 015005 ( 10.1088/2515-7639/aaed4c) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Petrov V, Gaspar V, Masere J, Showalter K. 1993. Controlling chaos in the Belousov–Zhabotinsky reaction. Nature 361, 240 ( 10.1038/361240a0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kádár S, Amemiya T, Showalter K. 1997. Reaction mechanism for light sensitivity of the Ru(bpy)3 2+-catalyzed Belousov–Zhabotinsky reaction. J. Phys. Chem. A 101, 8200–8206. ( 10.1021/jp971937y) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yashin VV, Van Vliet KJ, Balazs AC. 2009. Controlling chemical oscillations in heterogeneous Belousov–Zhabotinsky gels via mechanical strain. Phys. Rev. E 79, 046214 ( 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.046214) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Blandamer MJ, Morris SH. 1975. Investigation into the effect of temperature and added t-butyl alcohol on the dynamic properties of the Belousov reaction. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1: Phys. Chem. Condens. Phases 71, 2319–2330. ( 10.1039/f19757102319) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Vajda T, Rockenbauer A, Győr M. 1988. Cryo-oscillations: Belousov-Zhabotinskii (BZ) oscillations in frozen and undercooled solution. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 20, 661–665. ( 10.1002/kin.550200807) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Masia M, Marchettini N, Zambrano V, Rustici M. 2001. Effect of temperature in a closed unstirred Belousov–Zhabotinsky system. Chem. Phys. Lett. 341, 285–291. ( 10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00474-2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ito Y, Nogawa M, Yoshida R. 2003. Temperature control of the Belousov–Zhabotinsky reaction using a thermoresponsive polymer. Langmuir 19, 9577–9579. ( 10.1021/la0355242) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bánsági T Jr, Leda M, Toiya M, Zhabotinsky AM, Epstein IR. 2009. High-frequency oscillations in the Belousov–Zhabotinsky reaction. J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 5644–5648. ( 10.1021/jp901318z) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Szirovicza L, Nagypál I, Bárdi I. 1991. Propagating reaction front in ‘frozen’ phase. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 23, 99–101. ( 10.1002/kin.550230109) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Field RJ, Winfree AT. 1979. Travelling waves of chemical activity in the Zaikin-Zhabotinskii-Winfree reagent. J. Chem. Educ. 56, 754 ( 10.1021/ed056p754) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Field RJ, Noyes RM. 1974. Oscillations in chemical systems. IV. Limit cycle behavior in a model of a real chemical reaction. J. Chem. Phys. 60, 1877–1884. ( 10.1063/1.1681288) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Beato V, Engel H. 2003. Pulse propagation in a model for the photosensitive Belousov–Zhabotinsky reaction with external noise. In SPIE’s 1st Int. Symp. on Fluctuations and Noise, Santa Fe, NM (eds L Schimansky-Geier, D Abbott, A Neiman), pp. 112–119. ( 10.1117/12.490183) [DOI]
- 59.Horowitz P, Hill W, Robinson I. 1980. The art of electronics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kleinberg LL. 1986. Temperature sensitive oscillator. US Patent 4,603,306.
- 61.Blodgett GA. 1999. Temperature sensitive oscillator circuit. US Patent 5,963,103.
- 62.Wang A, Gold J, Tompkins N, Heymann M, Harrington K, Fraden S. 2016. Configurable NOR gate arrays from Belousov–Zhabotinsky micro-droplets. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 225, 211–227. ( 10.1140/epjst/e2016-02622-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available at http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2533350.







