Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2019 Apr 4;58(20):6654–6658. doi: 10.1002/anie.201901927

Catalytic Conjunctive Coupling of Carboxylic Acid Derivatives with 9-BBN-Derived Ate Complexes

Chunyin Law 1, Yan Meng 1, Seung Moh Koo 1, James P Morken 1
PMCID: PMC6502666  NIHMSID: NIHMS1019645  PMID: 30893498

Abstract

β-Boryl carbonyl compounds are produced by a Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling of vinylboron “ate” complexes and acid chloride or acid anhydride electrophiles. Reactions are efficient, being complete in as little as two minutes, and apply to a broad range of substrates.

Keywords: Boron, Cross-Coupling, Nickel, Catalysis

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1019645-f0001.jpg

Conjunctive Coupling: A new route to synthetically useful β-boryl carbonyls is enabled by the Ni-catalyzed addition of alkenyl boron “ate” complexes to activated carboxylic acids.


Organoboron compounds can be prepared by transition-metal-catalyzed conjunctive cross-coupling reactions between alkenylboron-derived “ate” complexes and organic electrophiles (eq. 1).1,2,3 These reactions can be accomplished in an enantioselective and diastereoselective fashion, but so far have been restricted to hydrocarbon (aryl, alkenyl, alkyl) electrophiles. To extend conjunctive coupling reactions to the preparation of alternatively functionalized motifs, we considered the use of carbonyl-derived electrophiles. Herein, we describe a process that employs carboxylic acid derivatives as the electrophile in conjunctive couplings and produces β-boryl carbonyls as the reaction product.4 Considering the synthesis utility of β−boryl carbonyls, compounds that are generally prepared by boron conjugate addition5, the alternate route to these materials that is presented herein may have value.

Our preliminary direction in developing a conjunctive-coupling reaction with carbonyl electrophiles was largely inspired by the body of work by Rovis6, Gong7, Weix8, Reisman9, Doyle10, and Yamamoto11 who determined that Ni complexes could undergo oxidative addition with activated carboxylic acid derivatives thereby enabling either catalytic cross-coupling with nucleophiles or, in the presence of stoichiometric reductant, catalytic cross-electrophile coupling. Importantly, 13C labeling experiments conducted by Rovis and Coates 12 established that (bipyridine)Ni(acyl) complexes were prone to undergo direct transmetalation reaction with alkylzinc reagents; this observation provided optimism that such a system might facilitate catalytic acyl conjunctive coupling reactions, as well.

To develop the conjunctive coupling between carbonyl electrophiles and boron “ate” complexes, we investigated the reaction between butanoyl chloride and various in situ-generated vinylboron ate complexes. Whereas preliminary experiments with pinacolatoboron-derived reagents were not fruitful, use of 9-BBN borate complex 1 as a coupling partner furnished the coupling product: as depicted in Table 1, it was observed that after one hour of reaction in the presence of 5 mol% NiBr2●glyme and 6 mol% bipyridine (L1), followed by oxidation, β-hydroxy carbonyl 2 could be obtained in 65% yield (Table1, entry 1). Importantly, under these conditions, background reaction between the acid chloride and the “ate” complex was minimal. Extensive ligand analysis (see Supporting Information) revealed that the most generally applicable reaction conditions employ 5,5’-bis(trifluoromethyl)-2,2’-bipyridine (L3) as the ligand (Table 1, entry 7). While the more readily available ligand bipyridine (L1) operates effectively with aliphatic acid chloride electrophiles, markedly diminished yield was obtained when this ligand was employed with aromatic acid chloride electrophiles. Thus, ligand L3 was employed for subsequent studies. It was determined that reactions in the presence of L3 can proceed with very good efficiency, achieving complete conversion of the probe reaction within two minutes at room temperature (entry 8).

Table 1.

Effect of Ligand on Conjunctive Coupling with Acid Chloride Electrophiles.[a]

graphic file with name nihms-1019645-t0006.jpg

Entry R Time Temp (°C) Ligand Yield (%)
1 propyl 1 h 22 L1 65
2 propyl 1 h 22 none <5
3 propyl 1 h 40 L1 48
4 propyl 1 h 22 L2 72
5 Ph 1 h 22 L1 40
6 Ph 1 h 22 L3 75
7 propyl 1 h 22 L3 78
8 propyl 2 min 22 L3 75
9 propyl 1 h 22 L4 32
10 propyl 1 h 22 L5 40
[a]

See text and Supporting Information for experimental details. Yields refer to isolated yield of purified material and are an average of two experiments.

To survey the scope of this reaction, a range of 9-BBN derived borate complexes were prepared by hydroboration 13 of the corresponding alkenes in THF, followed by addition of vinyllithium.14 The so-formed “ate” complex was treated with pre-mixed NiBr2●glyme and L3 in the presence of acid chloride electrophiles, followed by stirring at room temperature for 1 h and oxidative workup. As seen in Table 2, the reaction with aliphatic unbranched (i.e., 3, 6, 8) and branched (4, 5, 7) acyl chlorides afforded products in good yields, although only moderate yield was observed when the sterically demanding pivaloyl chloride (7) was employed in the reaction. Acyl chloride derived from TBS-protected lithocholic acid (20) was also subjected to the reaction conditions and afforded the desired product in reasonable yield. Regarding the functional group tolerance with respect to aroyl chloride electrophiles, whereas benzoyl chloride (10) as well as substrates bearing electron-donating substituents in the para-position (11, 14) resulted in good yields, diminished yield was observed with an electron-withdrawing group (13) in the same position. Migrating groups derived from various alkenes were also examined in the reaction. Secondary migrating groups such as cyclohexyl group (16) provided the desired product in reasonable yield with no observation of byproducts derived from the migration of the bicyclooctyl ligand of 9-BBN.15 Migrating groups with appended alkene (21), and acetal (22), as well as silyl ether (18) were also tolerated. It was also shown that the 9-BBN borate complex derived from Ph-9-BBN (prepared from phenylmagnesium bromide and 9-BBN-OMe) can be employed in the reaction to give the corresponding product (23) in good yield. Lastly, under the current reaction conditions, propenyllithium-derived ‘ate’ complexes have not furnished coupling products.

Table 2.

Ni-Catalyzed Conjunctive Coupling with Various Alkenes and Acid Chlorides.[a]

graphic file with name nihms-1019645-t0007.jpg
[a]

See text and Supporting Information for experimental details. Yields refer to isolated yield of purified material and are an average of two experiments.

[b]

Starting material prepared from 9-BBN-OMe and PhMgBr.

The compatibility of other classes of acyl electrophiles in conjunctive cross-coupling was also explored. When anhydrides were subjected to the coupling under the conditions of Table 2, only trace quantities of coupled product were observed. We reasoned that the oxidative addition of Ni to less electrophilic anhydrides may be less facile as compared to the reaction with acid chloride counterparts 16, and this process might be facilitated with a more electron-rich metal center. In line with this hypothesis, the use of unsubstituted bipyridine (L1) in place of the bis(trifluoromethyl) version resulted in a much more efficient coupling (Scheme 2). Of note, this reaction extended to a mixed anhydride with coupling occurring with the less hindered carbonyl (inset, Scheme 2).17

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Ni-Catalyzed Conjunctive Coupling with Anhydride Electrophiles.

While mechanistic aspects of this process remain under study, preliminary experiments shed light on the rudiments of the underlying features. By subjecting isotopically-labelled boron “ate” complex (25) 18 to the reaction conditions (eq. 1, Scheme 3), it was found that the Ni-catalyzed coupling reaction occurs stereospecifically and with anti addition of the migrating group and the electrophile to the alkene, giving 26. This observation is consistent with a mechanism involving nickel-induced metallate shift as opposed to alternate one-electron processes that might involve acyl radical addition to the alkene.19 To probe whether a Ni0-NiII redox cycle might represent the operative mechanism, the oxidative addition adduct 27 was independently synthesized using the method reported by Gong7, and treated with allylbenzene-derived borate complex 1. As depicted in equations (2) and (3), the stoichiometric experiment furnished the conjunctive coupling product in 43% yield, suggesting that the NiII oxidative addition adduct is a competent intermediate in the conjunctive cross-coupling reaction. Lastly, as depicted in equation (4), with a chiral, enantiomerically-enriched bis(oxazoline) ligand (L6), a modest dependence of reaction enantioselectivity on the identities of electrophile was observed. This observation is suggestive of a scenario in which the electrophile is associated with the metal center before a stereochemistry-determining, and likely irreversible, 1,2-metallate-shift. Thus, observations about the described cross coupling support a mechanism involving oxidative addition of the carbonyl electrophile to a Ni(0) complex 20 (AB, Scheme 3, box), followed by binding of the ate complex, metallate shift, and reductive elimination to deliver the product.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3.

Experimental observations about conjuctive coupling with acyl electrophiles and proposed mechanism.

Although β-(pinacolato)boryl ketones have received ample study in the chemical synthesis community, β-trialkyl(boryl) ketones are novel species and a study of their structure and chemistry was of interest. The 11B NMR resonance of β−boryl ketone 28 (δ 22.0 ppm) exhibits a significant upfield shift relative to a non-functionalized trialkylborane (δ 70–80 ppm).21 This feature is consistent with tight coordination between the boron and carbonyl oxygen atom. Reasoning that this chelation would enhance the acidity of the carbonyl α-protons and allow for the formation of a rigid cyclic enolate structure, we examined deprotonation/alkylation reactions of 28 (Scheme 4). Initial attempts with LDA or (i-Pr)2NEt (see SI) provided no evidence of productive deprotonation; however, when 28 was treated with methyllithium followed by iodomethane, alkylation product 29 was obtained with a high level of anti diastereomeric purity.22 Remarkably, products derived from nucleophilic addition of CH3Li to the internally-activated ketone were not detected. To understand the origin of reactivity and stereoselectivity in the deprotonation/alkylation reaction, we attempted to obtain a crystal structure of 28. While these attempts were unsuccessful, x-ray quality crystals of the methylamine-derived Schiff base were obtained (31) and these reveal internal chelation between boron and the heteroatom. Of note, due to the steric demands of the bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane framework, the substituent (Cy) at the stereogenic carbon atom is directed in an axial orientation and appears to block access to one face of the prochiral α-carbon atom. It appears plausible that an enolate derived from 28 would have a similar conformation and this would allow an electrophile to approach only from the less hindered face, thereby accounting for the excellent anti diastereoselectivity.23

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4.

Structure and reactivity of a β-trialkylboryl carbonyl

In conclusion, we have described a catalytic cross-coupling between four-coordinate boron “ate” complexes and carbonyl electrophiles. This process provides a simple route to β-trialkylboryl carbonyls which exhibit uncommon and synthetically useful reactivity.

Supplementary Material

Supp info

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Catalytic Synthesis of β-Boryl Carbonyls by Conjunctive Coupling.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the US National Institutes of Health (NIGMS GM-R35-127140).

Footnotes

Dedicated to Professor Amir Hoveyda on the occasion of his 60th birthday.

Supporting information for this article is given via a link at the end of the document.

References

  • [1].For reports from these labs, see a)Zhang L, Lovinger GJ, Edelstein EK, Szymaniak AA, Chierchia MP, Morken JP, Science 2016, 351, 70; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b)Lovinger GJ, Aparece MD, Morken JP, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 3153; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c)Edelstein EK, Namirembe S, Morken JP, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 5027; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d)Chierchia MP, Law C, Morken JP, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 11870; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e)Lovinger GJ, Morken JP, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 17293; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f)Myhill JA, Zhang L, Lovinger GA, Morken JP, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 12799; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g)Myhill JA, Whilhelmsen CA, Zhang L, Morken JP, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 15181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].For related catalytic reactions involving a metallate shift, see a)Ishida N, Narumi M, Murakami M, Org. Lett 2008, 10 ,1279; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b)Ishida  N, Shimamoto Y, Murakami M, Org. Lett 2009, 11, 5434; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c)Ishida N , Shinmoto T, Sawano S, Miura T, Murakami M, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn 2010, 83, 1380; [Google Scholar]; d)Ishida N, Shimamoto Y, Murakami M, Org. Lett 2010, 12, 3179; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e)Ishida N, Ikemoto W, Narumi M, Murakami M, Org. Lett 2011, 13, 3008; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f)i) Panda S, Ready JM, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 6038; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g)Panda S, Ready JM, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 13242; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h)Tao Z, Robb KA, Panger JL, Denmark SE, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 15621; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i)Fawcett A  , Biberger T , Aggarwal VK, Nat. Chem 2019, 11, 117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].For non-catalytic electrophile-induced metallate shifts, see a)Zweifel G, Arzoumanian H, Whitney CC, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1967, 89, 3652; [Google Scholar]; b)Evans DA, Crawford TC, Thomas RC, Walker JA, J. Org. Chem 1976, 41, 3947; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c)Utimoto K, Uchida K, Nozaki H, Tetrahedron Lett 1973, 45, 4527; [Google Scholar]; d)Armstrong RJ, Sandford C, García-Ruiz C, Aggarwal VK, Chem. Commun 2017, 53, 4922; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e)Armstrong RJ, García-Ruiz C, Myers EL, Aggarwal VK, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 786; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f)Silvi M, Sandford C, Aggarwal VK, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 5736; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g)Kischkewitz M, Okamoto K, Mück-Lichtenfeld C, Studer A, Science 2017, 355, 936 For recent related processes, see [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h)Wilson CM, Ganesh V, Noble A, Aggarwal VK, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 16318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i)Ganesh V, Odachowski M, Aggarwal VK, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 9752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j)Wang Y, Noble A, Sandford C, Aggarwal VK, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 1810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].For non-catalyzed metallate shifts with carbonyl electrophiles, see a)Utimoto K, Uchida K, Nozaki H, Chemistry Lett 1974, 1493; [Google Scholar]; b)Utimoto K, Uchida K, Nozaki H, Tetrahedron 1977, 33, 1949; [Google Scholar]; c)Deng M-Z, Lu D-A, Xu W-H, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun 1985, 1478 [Google Scholar]
  • [5].For reports of catalytic enantioselective boron conjugate addition, see a)Lee J-E, Yun J, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2008, 47, 145; [Google Scholar]; b)Chea H, Sim H-S, Yun J, Adv. Synth. Catal 2009, 351, 855; [Google Scholar]; c)Chen I-H, Yin L, Itano W, Kanai M, Shibasaki M, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2009, 131, 11664; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d)Lillo V, Prieto A, Bonet A, Diáz-Requejo MM, Ramírez P J. Pérez J, Fernández E, Organometallics 2009, 28, 659; [Google Scholar]; e)Chen I-H, Kanai M, Shibasaki M, Org. Lett 2010, 12, 4098; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f)O’ Brien JM, Lee K-S, Hoveyda AH, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 10630; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g)Park JK, Lackey HH, Rexford MD, Kovnir K, Shatruk M, McQuade DT, Org. Lett 2010, 12, 5008; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h)Schiffner J A, Müther K, Oestreich M, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2010, 49, 1194; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i)Kobayashi S, Xu P, Endo T, Ueno M, Kitanosono T, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2012, 51, 12763; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j)Zhao L, Ma Y, He F, Duan W, Chen J, Song C, J. Org. Chem 2013, 78, 1677; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; k)Wu H, Garcia JM, Haeffner F, Radomkit S, Zhugralin AR, Hoveyda AH, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137 ,10585 For a comprehensive review on boron conjugate addition see: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; l)Collins BSL, Wilson CM, Myers EL, Aggarwal VK, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 11700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Zhang Y, Rovis T, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2004, 126, 15964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Zhao C, Jia X, Wang X, Gong H, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 17645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].a)Wotal AC, Weix DJ, Org. Lett 2012, 14, 1476; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b)Wotal AC, Ribson RD, Weix DJ, Organometallics 2014, 33, 5874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Cherney AH, Kadunce NT, Reisman SE, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 7442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Joe CL, Doyle AG, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 4040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Sano K, Yamamoto T, Yamamoto A, Chem. Lett 1983, 12, 115. [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Johnson JB, Bercot EA, Rowley JM, Coates GW, Rovis T, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 2718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].For detailed studies on hydroboration using 9-BBN, see: Brown HC, Chen JC, J. Org. Chem 1981, 46, 3978. [Google Scholar]
  • [14]. Vinyllithium was prepared from n-BuLi and tetravinylstannane according to the reported procedure from ref. [1a].
  • [15].Similar chemoselectivity was observed in ref. [1d]. For a discussion of factors affecting the selectivity in migration with mixed borates, see a)Aggarwal VK, Fang GY, Ginesta X, Howells DM, Zaja M, Pure Appl. Chem 2006, 78, 215 [Google Scholar]; b)Bottoni A, Lombardo M, Neri A, Trombini C, J. Org. Chem 2003, 68, 3397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].For an example that suggests a correlation between oxidative addition rates and carbonyl electrophilicity, see a)Meng G; Szostak M, Org. Biomol. Chem 2016, 14, 5690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17]. For a similar example of selective oxidative addition of mixed anhydride with nickel catalyst, see ref. 10.
  • [18]. Deuterium-labelled vinyllithium was prepared according to the reported procedure from Ref. [1a]. See Supplementary Material for details.
  • [19]. For reactions involving radical addition to an alkenyl boron “ate” complex: See ref [3f], [3g].
  • [20].Fahey DR, Mahan JE, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1977, 99, 2501. [Google Scholar]
  • [21].For a comprehensive list of 11 BNMR chemical shifts, see: Wrackmeyer B, Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc, 1988, 20, 61. [Google Scholar]
  • [22]. The relative stereochemistry was determined by comparison of 1HNMR spectrum with the anti diasteremer prepared through independent synthesis. See Supplementary Material for details.
  • [23].For mechanistically related chelation-controlled enolate alkylations, see a)Fráter G, Müller U, Günther W, Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 1269 [Google Scholar]; b)Seebach D, Wasmuth D, Helv. Chim. Acta 1980, 63, 197. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp info

RESOURCES