Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 Apr 18;43(5):822–832. doi: 10.1111/acer.14015

Chronic Ethanol Exposure and Withdrawal Impairs Synaptic GABAA Receptor-Mediated Neurotransmission in Deep Layer Prefrontal Cortex

Benjamin A Hughes 1,2,3, John Peyton Bohnsack 2,3,4, Todd K O’Buckley 3, Melissa A Herman 2,3, A Leslie Morrow 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC6502689  NIHMSID: NIHMS1017438  PMID: 30860602

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) acts as an integrative hub for the processing of cortical and sub-cortical input into meaningful efferent signaling, permitting complex associative behaviors. PFC dysfunction is consistently observed with ethanol dependence and is a core component of the pathology of alcohol use disorders in current models of addiction. While intracortical GABAergic neurotransmission is understood to be essential for maintaining coordinated network activity within the cortex, relatively little is known regarding functional GABAergic adaptations in PFC during ethanol dependence.

METHODS:

In the present study, male and female (>PN60) Sprague-Dawley rats were administered ethanol (5.0 g/kg; intragastric gavage) for 14–15 consecutive days. 24 hours after the final administration, animals were sacrificed and brains extracted for electrophysiological recordings of isolated GABAA receptor-mediated currents or analysis of GABAA receptor subunit protein expression in deep layer prefrontal cortical neurons.

RESULTS:

Chronic ethanol exposure significantly attenuated activity-dependent spontaneous GABAA receptor-mediated inhibitory post-synaptic current (IPSC) frequency with no effect on amplitude. Furthermore, analysis of IPSC decay kinetics revealed a significant enhancement of IPSC decay time that was associated with decrements in expression of the α1 GABAA receptor subunit, indicative of further impaired phasic inhibition. These phenomena occurred irrespective of neuron projection destination and sex. Based on previous observations by our laboratory of an epigenetic mechanism for ethanol-induced changes in cortical GABAA receptor subunit expression, the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor Trichostatin A (TSA) was administered to water- and ethanol-exposed animals, and prevented ethanol-induced changes in sIPSC frequency, IPSC decay kinetics, and GABAA receptor subunit expression.

CONCLUSIONS:

Taken together, these results demonstrate that chronic ethanol exposure impairs synaptic inhibitory neurotransmission in deep layer pyramidal neurons of the medial prefrontal cortex in both male and female rats. These maladaptations occur in neurons projecting to numerous regions implicated in the sequelae of ethanol dependence, offering a mechanistic link between the manifestation of PFC dysfunction and negative affective states observed with extended consumption.

Keywords: Alcohol dependence, prelimbic mPFC, slice electrophysiology

Introduction

Alcohol use disorders (AUDs) represent a major public health hazard with current estimates indicating nearly 6% of preventable fatalities worldwide are alcohol-related and costing nearly 3% of gross domestic product in high income countries (Rehm, 2011, World Health Organization, 2014). Curbing the prevalence of AUDs has proven to be an intractable problem due in part to an incomplete understanding of the alcohol-induced neurobiological mechanisms that drive maladaptive behaviors characteristic of AUDs. Chief among these behaviors is a loss of inhibitory control that is strongly associated with dysregulation in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). The PFC acts as a nexus that integrates sensory, motivational, and hedonic stimuli into meaningful efferent signaling across the brain, and is critical for the manifestation of complex goal-directed behaviors. Impaired activity within this region is linked to a variety of cognitive and behavioral deficits including impaired working memory and response inhibition (Unterrainer and Owen, 2006, Bokura et al., 2001). For these reasons, PFC dysfunction has become a core component in the pathophysiology of current models of alcohol addiction (Goldstein and Volkow, 2002, Koob, 2013).

The PFC is composed of stratified layers of excitatory pyramidal neurons and GABAergic inhibitory interneurons that collectively assemble into networks that permit the integration of cortical and sub-cortical input into meaningful efferent signaling to downstream brain areas including the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA). Deep-layer pyramidal neurons (e.g. Layers IV/V/VI) are generally understood to constitute the primary source of efferent signaling in these networks, with locally nested interneurons serving to tune their excitability (Kubota et al., 2015, Hattori et al., 2017). Indeed, reports demonstrate that cortical interneurons are essential for maintaining network activity (Roux and Buzsaki, 2015), and clinical studies have observed significant correlations between chronic alcohol use and impaired PFC network coherence that conform to preclinical observations showing elevated PFC activity with extended drug use (Kamarajan et al., 2004, Seo et al., 2013). Collectively, these studies implicate dysregulated GABAergic inhibition within the PFC after extended alcohol intake, meriting further investigation.

Consistent with these findings are converging reports from our laboratory and others that demonstrate substantial changes in the transcription, translation, and trafficking of GABAA receptor subunits in both cortical neuronal cultures and hippocampal slices after chronic ethanol exposure. Specifically, chronic ethanol exposure reduces transcription and promotes internalization of α1-containing receptors while enhancing transcription and surface expression of α4-containing receptors, resulting in diminished phasic inhibition indicated by faster current decay and reduced charge transfer (Kumar et al., 2003, Kumar et al., 2010, Werner et al., 2011, Olsen and Liang, 2017). Additional studies using knockout mice lacking the α1 subunit observed behavioral phenotypes consistent with alcohol dependence including tremor, elevated seizure susceptibility, and diminished zolpidem loss of righting reflex (Kralic et al., 2005, Kralic et al., 2002). Likewise, elevated synaptic enrichment of α4-containing receptors has been linked to these behaviors, specifically seizure susceptibility (Gonzalez and Brooks-Kayal, 2011). More recently, we have also shown that such alterations in GABAA subunit expression are at least partially governed by epigenetic mechanisms, as chronic ethanol treatment results in diminished Gabra1 expression that correlates with diminished acetylation of the Gabra1 promoter. Further, treatment with histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors has been shown effective at preventing these ethanol-induced phenomena (Bohnsack et al., 2018). While compelling, a number of questions remain, namely: 1. Do these changes manifest functionally in the medial PFC, specifically in the deep-layer, predominantly efferent-projecting neurons? 2. Are these changes sex- or circuit-specific? 3. Can HDAC inhibition preclude these alcohol-induced effects within the medial PFC?

To address this, male and female (>PN60) Sprague-Dawley rats were administered water or ethanol (5.0 g/kg, 25% v/v; intragastric gavage) for 14–15 consecutive days, as has previously been shown to reliably elicit neurobiological adaptations consistent with ethanol dependence (Devaud et al., 1997, Cagetti et al., 2003, Patten et al., 2014). We then performed whole-cell electrophysiological recordings and protein expression analysis to determine the effects of chronic ethanol exposure on deep-layer inhibitory signaling in the prelimbic aspect of the medial PFC, a region particularly important for alcohol relapse and drug reinstatement (Willcocks and McNally, 2013, McGlinchey et al., 2016). We hypothesized that chronic alcohol-exposed rats would exhibit significantly attenuated GABAA receptor-mediated signaling, allowing for investigation of the synaptic mechanisms underlying the loss of GABA inhibition, the sex-dependency of these effects, the specificity of these phenomena in a model mPFC-to-CeA projection, as well as the efficacy of the HDAC inhibitor Trichostatin A in preventing alcohol-induced GABAergic adaptations.

Materials and Methods

Animal Use and Treatment

Male and female (>PN60) Sprague-Dawley rats were used for all experiments, ranging in weight from 319–418g for males and 213–276 g for females with a mean weight of 358.8±4.75g and 247.6±3.21 g respectively, and all procedures were performed in accordance with guidelines specified by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Animals were pair housed in a temperature and humidity controlled facility under a 12hr light/dark cycle and given ad libitum access to food and water. For chronic ethanol treatment, rats were given a single water or ethanol dose (5 g/kg, 25% v/v) via intragastric gavage once daily during the light cycle for 14–15 days. As shown in Supplementary Figure 3, this method of administration elicits peak blood ethanol concentrations of ~250 mg/dL in both males and females of comparable age, consistent with binge-like intoxication levels (Patten et al., 2014). 24 hours after the final exposure, animals were sacrificed by rapid decapitation for electrophysiological and biochemical experiments. To determine the effect of TSA on ethanol-induced adaptations, animals received an injection of vehicle (10% DMSO in 0.9% saline, i.p.) or TSA (2 mg/kg, in 10% DMSO in 0.9% saline i.p.; Selleck Chem Inc.) 2 hours prior to gavage on the last 2 days of treatment as well as a third injection two hours prior to sacrifice, consistent with previously described methods (Pandey et al., 2008, Sakharkar et al., 2012, Bohnsack et al., 2018). While any potential effect of TSA on ethanol metabolism or clearance was not explicitly evaluated in this study, the fact that all recordings occurred 24 hours post-administration and that total ethanol clearance is typically observed 8–10 hours after administration with the gavage model make it unlikely that residual ethanol was present during recordings.

Stereotaxic Surgery

To determine whether ethanol-induced changes in GABAergic signaling were projection-dependent, animals underwent stereotaxic surgery using isoflurane anaesthesia for implantation of retrogradely-transported red fluorescent microspheres (Lumafluor Inc.; Durham, NC). A 300 nL volume of retrobeads was bilaterally injected using coordinates approximating the CeA (posterior from bregma: −2.3 mm; lateral ±3.8 mm; ventral −8.2 mm: adapted from atlas coordinates) (Paxinos and Watson, 1998). Subjects were given 7–10 days of post-surgery recovery before beginning water/ethanol treatment. Injection sites were inspected following completion of electrophysiological experiments, and only recordings from tissue with verified “hits” were included for analysis of labeled neurons (approximate injection sites shown in Figure 2D).

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Chronic ethanol exposure attenuates synaptic GABAA signaling onto deep-layer CeA-projecting cortical pyramidal neurons. A–C) Schematic demonstrates approximate injection site of retrogradely-transported fluorescent microspheres, subsequent location of recordings from labeled pyramidal neurons, and general morphology of labeled neurons (red = fluorescent microspheres, blue = DAPI). D) Approximate sites and spread of retrobead injections for data shown in E–G. E) sIPSC frequency is significantly attenuated in labeled neurons from ethanol exposed animals [F(1,14) = 4.61, p = 0.0499; n = 8–11 cells]. F) Ethanol treatment did not significantly alter sIPSC amplitude in labeled neurons [F(1,14.6) = 0.82, p = 0.3802; n = 8–11 cells]. G) tau1 was significantly reduced following chronic ethanol treatment, with no significant change observed on tau2 [tau1 F(1,17) = 6.00, p = 0.0254; tau2 F(1,12.9) = 3.18, p = 0.0982].

Electrophysiology

Following brain extraction, 300 µM thick coronal slices containing mPFC were prepared using a Leica VT1000S vibratome (Buffalo Grove, IL) containing oxygenated ice-cold sucrose cutting solution (in mM: 200 sucrose, 1.9 KCl, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 6 MgCl2, 0.5 CaCl2, 0.4 ascorbate, 10 glucose, 25 NaHCO3, osmolarity adjusted to ~310 mOsm) to minimize cell death. Slices were then transferred to a continuously oxygenated (95% O2, 5% CO2) holding chamber containing artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) (in mM: 125 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.5 NaH2PO4, 1.3 MgCl2, 2.6 CaCl2, 10 Glucose, 25 NaHCO3, 0.4 Ascorbate, osmolarity adjusted to ~310 mOsm with sucrose) warmed to 37° Celsius for 30 min. Following incubation, the holding chamber was allowed to cool to room temperature for 1 hour, after which recordings were conducted. Whole-cell recordings were performed using an Axon Instruments Multiclamp 700A amplifier (San Jose, CA) sampling at 10 kHz and filtered at 2 kHz. Deep-layer (Layer V) pyramidal neurons were visually selected using an Olympus BX50WI microscope (Center Valley, PA) equipped with infrared differential interference contrast imaging. GABAA receptor-mediated currents were isolated by supplementing the aCSF solution with 10 µM CNQX, 50 µM dl-AP5, and 10 µM CGP-52432 to block AMPA, NMDA, and GABAB receptor activity respectively. A number of studies have previously reported non-canonical excitatory effects of CNQX on interneuron function due in part to interactions of AMPA receptors with TARP accessory proteins (Menuz et al., 2007, Maclean and Bowie, 2011). To rule out a potential confounding effect of CNQX in our studies, we therefore performed control recordings with NBQX in lieu of CNQX (data not shown) to block AMPA receptor activity. Similar sIPSC frequencies and amplitudes were observed between the two conditions, suggesting this phenomenon is minimal or absent in cortex and do not underlie our findings. Nevertheless, explicit investigation of AMPA/TARP association after ethanol exposure could be of value. Recordings were obtained using thin-walled (OD = 1.5 mm, ID = 1.17 mm) borosilicate glass electrodes with tip resistances ranging from 2–5 MΩ filled with a cesium chloride-based internal solution (in mM: 140 CsCl, 2 MgCl2, 1 EGTA, 10 HEPES, 2 Na-ATP, 0.3 Na-GTP, 5 Phosphocreatine, 3 QX-314, pH 7.4, osmolarity adjusted to ~290 mOsm with sucrose). Cells were held at −70 mV and spontaneous inhibitory post synaptic currents (sIPSC) were recorded. Miniature IPSC recordings were obtained by supplementing aCSF with 1 µM tetrodotoxin (TTX; Tocris; Minneapolis, MN). Spontaneous and miniature IPSC kinetics were analyzed offline using MiniAnalysis software (v6.0.7, Synaptosoft, Decatur, GA). In brief, 30–40 IPSC events per recording were visually selected for capture that exhibited a sharp downward falling phase, single peak, and decay back to baseline. Captured events were then used to construct a scaled average composite trace to which a double exponential curve was fit to determine total and component IPSC decay kinetics (i.e. – τ1 = decay time from peak to 50%, τ2 = decay time from 50% to baseline). Kinetic values were subsequently pooled for statistical analysis. Any recordings in which access resistance exceeded 25 MΩ were excluded from analysis.

Western Blotting

Sub-cellular fractionation and western blot procedures were adapted from previously-described methods (Devaud et al., 1997, Bohnsack et al., 2018). Briefly, animals were sacrificed 24 hours after final exposure by rapid decapitation and brains extracted and snap frozen. Tissue was then microdissected by hand for prelimbic mPFC and hand homogenized and sonicated in ice-cold hypotonic lysis buffer composed of the following (in mM): 50 Tris-HCl, 50 NaCl, 5 EDTA, 320 Sucrose, 1x HALT protease inhibitor (ThermoScientific; Waltham, MA), pH to 7.4 with NaOH. Cell and nuclear debris were removed by centrifugation at 1,000xg for 10 minutes at 4°C, and the supernatant retained for an additional centrifugation at 12,000xg for 30 minutes at 4°C. The resulting pellet containing the enriched membrane fraction was washed once with ice-cold PBS, resuspended in ice-cold lysis buffer containing 0.5% (v/v) Triton-X100, and protein concentration determined using a Pierce BCA assay (ThermoScientific; Waltham, MA).

18 µg of protein was electrophoresed using 4–12% Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitro-cellulose membranes (Invitrogen; ThermoScientific; Waltham, MA). Membranes were blocked for 1–1.5 hours with 1:1 PBS/Odyssey Blocking Buffer (LI-COR; Lincoln, NE), then incubated overnight at 4°C with one of the following antibodies: anti-GABAA α1 (Millipore; AB5592–200; 1:2,000), anti-GABAA α4 (Abcam; ab117080; 1:500), or anti-β-actin (Novus; NB600–501; 1:10,000). Bands corresponding to previously established molecular weights (52 kDa, 64 kDa, and 42 kDa for α1, α4, and β-actin respectively) were subsequently visualized using the Odyssey Classic Imaging System and band intensity quantified using ImageStudio Lite (LI-COR; Lincoln, NE). Results were normalized to β-actin and all values expressed as percent of control.

Statistics

Statistical analyses including Student’s t-test and standard two-factor ANOVA (with Tukey’s post-hoc test) were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (San Diego, CA). For electrophysiological experiments, multiple neurons were typically recorded from each animal, with 6–9 animals generally comprising each group. Standard analysis using either individual neurons or averaged values for each animal as the unit of determination both require an untenable assumption regarding variance, precluding use of ANOVA for statistical testing. Specifically, defining an n as a neuron assumes independence between observations within an animal, while defining an n as the average of responses from an animal ignores potentially important between-neuron variation. We therefore opted to employ a linear mixed model for these analyses using the “proc mixed” procedure in SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute; Cary, NC). This model is well suited to incorporate multiple levels of variation to address these limitations (e.g. between-neuron and between-animal) and furthermore has substantial capacity for modification that makes it well suited for analysis of slice electrophysiological data (see (DeHart and Kaplan, 2019) for recent discussion). For our purposes, fixed effects were evaluated according to traditional two-factor designs using individual neuron values as the unit of determination and inter-animal variance modeled as a random subject effect with variance component covariance matrix. Solutions for linear mixed models were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood (REML) and effective degrees of freedom determined by Satterthwaite’s estimation method. Reported F values and approximate p values were evaluated using Type 1 tests of fixed effects, followed by post-hoc testing when appropriate. Initial ethanol effects shown in Figure 1 were analyzed with sex as a factor, and after observing no effect of sex on any of the metrics tested, male and female data were subsequently combined for analysis. For statistical analyses shown in Supplementary Figures 1 and 2, changes in holding current were assessed by a previously-described method wherein a normalized all-points histogram was constructed for baseline and treatment time periods (20–30 sec) and a Gaussian function was fit (Glykys and Mody, 2007, Herman et al., 2012). Bin center values corresponding to mean holding current for baseline and THIP/TTX treatment periods of individual cells were pooled and statistically compared using the linear mixed model procedure with THIP/TTX treatment as an added repeated effect. For all figures, a p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant (* < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001).

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Chronic ethanol exposure attenuates GABA release on deep-layer medial prefrontal cortical pyramidal neurons. A) Schematic depicts alcohol exposure paradigm, in which animals are administered ethanol (5 g/kg, 25% ethanol) via intragastric gavage (i.g.), followed by a 24 hour withdrawal (adapted from (Bohnsack et al., 2018)). B) Recordings were conducted from deep-layer pyramidal neurons in the superior aspect of the prelimbic mPFC. C) Chronic alcohol treatment induced a significant reduction in spontaneous inhibitory post-synaptic currents in both male and female animals [F(1,29.1) interaction = 0.44, p = 0.5104; F(1,27.6) treatment = 8.01, p = 0.0086; F(1,28.6) sex = 0.13, p = 0.7214]. D) Chronic ethanol exposure did not significantly alter sIPSC amplitude. E) Chronic ethanol exposure significantly reduced total sIPSC decay time [F(1,29.2) interaction = 0.01, p = 0.9358; F(1,27.5) treatment = 8.55, p = 0.0068; F(1,28.7) sex = 0.07, p = 0.7977]. F) Representative scaled composite traces demonstrating effect of chronic ethanol on sIPSC decay. G-H) Weighted analysis of decay time revealed that ethanol predominantly attenuated the “fast” tau1 decay component with no discernable effect on tau2 [tau1 F(1,24.4) interaction = 2.33, p = 0.1395; F(1,23) treatment = 16.93, p = 0.0004; F(1,23.9) sex = 0.87, p = 0.3613].

Results

Chronic ethanol exposure decreases GABAergic inhibition of deep-layer prelimbic mPFC pyramidal neurons.

Voltage-clamp recordings (Vm = −70mV) of baseline spontaneous inhibitory post-synaptic currents (sIPSC) revealed a significant attenuation (Figure 1C) of event frequency following chronic ethanol exposure that occurred independent of the sex of the animal (water-exposed = 2.914 ± 0.15 Hz; ethanol-exposed = 2.366 ± 0.12 Hz: F(1,29.1) interaction = 0.44, p = 0.5104; F(1,27.6) treatment = 8.401, p = 0.0086; F(1,28.6) sex = 0.13, p = 0.7214: n = 18–23 cells from 8–9 animals per group). Chronic alcohol exposure did not, however, alter sIPSC amplitude in male or female rats (water-exposed = 89.19 ± 5.24 pA; ethanol-exposed = 89.14 ± 4.12 pA: F(1,33.4) interaction = 0.13, p = 0.7184; F(1,31) treatment = 0.01, p = 0.9335; F(1,32.9) sex = 1.63, p = 0.2108: n = 18–23 cells from 8–9 animals per group). Summary values of sIPSC frequency, amplitude, decay time, and membrane characteristics between groups are shown in Table 1. Analysis of sIPSC kinetics revealed a significant reduction in current decay time (Figure 1E) in ethanol-exposed animals compared to controls indicative of reduced charge transfer per event. Weighted analysis (Figure 1GH) further revealed that this observation was largely driven by reductions in the “fast” tau1 component (water-exposed = 11.19 ± 0.45 ms; ethanol-exposed = 8.64 ± 0.39 ms: F(1,24.4) interaction = 2.33, p = 0.1395; F(1,23) treatment = 16.93, p = 0.0004; F(1,23.9) sex = 0.87, p = 0.3613: n = 18–23 cells from 8–9 animals per group). No significant change in the tau2 component was observed (water-exposed = 23.14 ± 0.91 ms; ethanol-exposed = 21.0 ± 0.76 ms F(1,29.2) interaction = 0.92, p = 0.3462; F(1,27.9) treatment = 3.05, p = 0.0918; F(1,28.7) sex = 0.02, p = 0.8812: n = 18–23 cells from 8–9 animals per group). We note that in all analyses, no effect of sex was observed between water- or ethanol-exposed animals.

Table 1:

Summary of functional characteristics of deep-layer medial prefrontal cortical pyramidal neurons.

Treatment sIPSC Frequency (Hz) sIPSC Amplitude (pA) Membrane Capacitance (pF) Membrane Resistance (MΩ)
Water - Male 3.029 ± 0.239 82.83 ± 5.09 95.58 ± 2.77 75.68 ± 3.74
Water - Female 2.82 ± 0.202 94.44 ± 8.55 93.57 ± 3.80 81.04 ± 3.09
Ethanol - Male 2.294 ± 0.186** 86.35 ± 5.04 92.11 ± 3.63 87.83 ± 4.12
Ethanol - Female 2.366 ± 0.171** 91.93 ± 6.60 93.89 ± 8.18 92.28 ± 8.75

Preliminary experiments investigating ethanol-induced changes in GABAA tonic current shown in Supplementary Figures 1 and 2 did not yield any significant effects. Specifically, bath application of the δ subunit-containing selective GABAA agonist 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxadolo(5,4-c)pyridine-3-ol (THIP; 1 µM) (S1) elicited robust enhancement of GABAA receptor-mediated current that did not differ significantly between water- and alcohol-exposed groups (F(1,52.9) interaction = 0.01, p = 0.9183; F(1,52.9) THIP treatment = 5.63, p = 0.0213; F(1,14.7) treatment = 0.02, p = 0.8867: n = 13–16 cells from 8–10 animals per group). Additionally, noise after THIP application (S1 D) did not differ between water and ethanol exposed animals (F(1,50.2) interaction = 0.30, p = 0.589; F(1,50.2) THIP treatment = 1.17, p = 0.2839; F(1,12.3) treatment = 0.04, p = 0.8423: n = 13–16 cells from 8–10 animals per group). S1 E and F respectively show representative histograms with overlaid Gaussian functions from water- and alcohol-exposed neurons before and after THIP. We similarly measured the effect of TTX on holding current (S2), and while TTX significantly reduced holding current and noise, there was no apparent difference between animals administered water or alcohol (holding current; F(1,27.4) interaction = 0.04, p = 0.8417; F(1,27.4) TTX treatment = 4.28, p = 0.0482; F(1,10.4) treatment = 1.51, p = 0.246: noise two-way repeated measures ANOVA; noise; F(1,26.4) interaction = 1.31, p = 0.2633; F(1,26.4) TTX treatment = 20.76, p = 0.0001; F(1,10.8) treatment = 0.01, p = 0.9725: n = 10–13 cells from 7–9 animals per group). Representative histograms with overlaid Gaussian functions from water- and alcohol-exposed neurons before and after TTX application are shown in S2 B and C respectively.

As shown in Figure 2, recordings conducted in pyramidal neurons projecting to the CeA recapitulated observations shown in Figure 1, suggesting that ethanol-induced impairments of GABAA receptor-mediated neurotransmission onto deep-layer cortical pyramidal neurons occur irrespective of projection destination in the prelimbic mPFC. Figures 2EF demonstrate that ethanol blunts spontaneous IPSC frequency onto these neurons with no significant effect on IPSC amplitude (sIPSC frequency F(1,14) = 4.61, p = 0.0499, n = 8–11 cells; sIPSC amplitude F(1,14.6) = 0.82, p = 0.3802: n = 8–11 cells from 7 animals per group). As shown in Figure 2G, the tau1 decay component was similarly attenuated with no concomitant reduction in tau2 as observed in Figures 1GH (tau1 F(1,17) = 6.00, p = 0.0254; tau2 F(1,12.9) = 3.18, p = 0.0982). Furthermore, we also note that GABAA receptor-mediated neurotransmission on CeA-projecting pyramidal neurons displayed characteristics (e.g., event frequency, amplitude, and kinetics) similar to the broader population of deep layer pyramidal neurons, indicating that projection-specific subpopulations do not exhibit apparent innate differences in GABAergic tone.

In order to determine whether the reduction in spontaneous IPSC frequency was due to a change in excitability or action potential-dependent release probability of the presynaptic neuron, we recorded IPSCs before and after application of TTX (1 µM). We again observed a significantly reduced IPSC frequency on deep-layer pyramidal neurons following chronic ethanol administration (Figure 3A); however, after application of TTX there was no significant difference in IPSC frequency, indicative of an activity-dependent change in presynaptic neuron excitability following alcohol exposure (Linear Mixed Model with Type 1 test of fixed effects and Tukey’s post-test: F(1, 48) interaction = 1.29, p = 0.2622; F(1,48) TTX treatment = 32.17, p < 0.0001; F(1,48) treatment = 8.10, p = 0.0065: n = 12–14 cells from 7–10 animals per group: % change in frequency by TTX (mean ± SEM); water = −44.63 ± 6.29, ethanol = −39.09 ± 7.77). As shown in Figure 3B, we did not observe any significant ethanol-induced change in IPSC amplitude pre- or post-TTX application (% change in amplitude by TTX (mean ± SEM); water = −28.27 ± 5.72, ethanol = −22.68 ± 6.67). While we observed a significant reduction in total miniature IPSC decay time (Figure 3C; unpaired one-tailed t-test; t(24) = 1.712, p = 0.0499), weighted analysis could not resolve the underlying component governing this observation (Figure 3DE; unpaired one-tailed t-test: tau1 t(24) = 1.302, p = 0.103; tau2 t(24) = 1.644, p = 0.0567). Miniature IPSC kinetic values are shown in Table 2.

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Effect of tetrodotoxin (1 µM) on GABAA receptor-mediated neurotransmission. A–B) A main effect of TTX application was observed on both frequency and amplitude. Post-hoc analysis revealed that post-TTX frequency did not differ significantly between water and ethanol exposed groups, indicative of an activity-dependent mechanism underlying ethanol attenuation of baseline frequency [Linear Mixed Model with Type 1 test of fixed effects and Tukey’s post-hoc test; F(1,48) Interaction = 1.29, p = 0.2622; F(1,48) TTX treatment = 32.17, p < 0.0001; F(1,48) treatment = 8.10, p = 0.0065: % change in frequency by TTX (mean ± SEM); water = −44.63 ± 6.29, ethanol = −39.09 ± 7.77]. C) Reduced decay time after chronic ethanol administration was similarly observed in miniature IPSCs, consistent with spontaneous IPSC observations [unpaired one-tailed t-test; df = 24, t = 1.712, p = 0.0499]. D–E) Weighted analysis of decay kinetics could not resolve the underlying component governing this attenuation [tau1 unpaired one-tailed t-test; df = 24, t = 1.302, p = 0.103; tau2 unpaired one-tailed t-test; df = 24, t = 1.644, p = 0.0567].

Table 2:

Summary of miniature IPSC kinetics between water and ethanol exposed groups.

Treatment mIPSC Amplitude (pA) mIPSC Rise Time (ms) mIPSC Unweighted Decay (ms) mIPSC Decay tau1 (ms) mIPSC Decay tau2 (ms)
Water Treated
(n = 14)
68.14 ± 3.20 0.843 ± 0.05 41.42 ± 3.76 9.53 ± 0.67 31.89 ± 3.42
Ethanol Treated
(n = 12)
72.99 ± 2.05 0.836 ± 0.05 32.91 ± 2.87* 8.27 ± 0.66 24.64 ± 2.37

Effects of chronic ethanol exposure on GABAA receptor mediated-neurotransmission are prevented by the HDAC inhibitor Trichostatin A.

As we and others have consistently observed ethanol-induced changes in GABAA receptor subunits α1 and α4 following chronic ethanol exposure (Kumar et al., 2003, Kumar et al., 2010, Cagetti et al., 2003), we next probed the mPFC for changes in protein expression of these subunits. Furthermore, we similarly sought to determine if administration of TSA, an HDAC inhibitor, could prevent changes in expression as has previously been reported (Bohnsack et al., 2018). As shown in Figures 4A and 4C, ethanol exposure significantly reduces tau1 decay time and α1 subunit expression, and these changes are prevented by administration of TSA (tau1; Linear Mixed Model with Type 1 test of fixed effects and Tukey’s post-hoc test: F(1,51.4) interaction = 2.71, p = 0.106; F(1,51) TSA treatment = 5.19, p = 0.0269; F(1,51.7) treatment = 9.19, p = 0.0038: n = 29–42 cells from 13–18 animals per group: α1 expression; two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test: F(1,39) interaction = 3.694, p = 0.0619; F(1,39) TSA treatment = 4.861, p = 0.0334; F(1,39) treatment = 3.762, p = 0.0597: n = 10–12 animals). No significant effects of TSA or water/ethanol treatment were observed on tau2 (Figure 4B) ( (Linear Mixed Model with Type 1 test of fixed effects and Tukey’s post-hoc test: F(1,55) interaction = 0.59, p = 0.4472; F(1,54.5) TSA treatment = 3.48, p = 0.0674; F(1,55.3) treatment = 0.24, p = 0.6226: n = 29–42 cells from 13–18 animals per group). In addition, we did not observe any significant effect of alcohol administration or TSA treatment on α4 subunit expression (Figure 4D; two-way ANOVA: F(1, 40) interaction = 0.188, p = 0.667; F(1, 40) TSA treatment = 0.236, p = 0.63; F(1, 40) treatment = 1.013, p = 0.3201: n = 10–12 animals). Representative blots of α1 and α4 subunit expression between groups are shown in Figure 4E and 4F respectively.

Figure 4:

Figure 4:

Treatment with the HDAC inhibitor Trichostatin-A prevents ethanol-induced deficits in synaptic GABAA-mediated neurotransmission. A) Diminished decay tau1 time by ethanol treatment is rescued by TSA (2 mg/kg) [F(1.51.4) interaction = 2.71, p = 0.106; F(1,51) TSA treatment = 5.19, p = 0.0269; F(1,51.7) treatment = 9.19, p = 0.0038; Tukey’s post-hoc test]. B) No significant effects of TSA or water/ethanol treatment were observed on tau2 [F(1,55) interaction = 0.59, p = 0.4472; F(1,54.5) TSA treatment = 3.48, p = 0.0674; F(1,55.3) treatment = 0.24, p = 0.6226; Tukey’s post-hoc test]. C) TSA treatment rescues ethanol-induced decreases in alpha1 subunit protein expression [two-way ANOVA; F(1.39) interaction = 3.694, p = 0.0619; F(1,39) TSA treatment = 4.861, p = 0.0334; F(1,39) treatment = 3.762, p = 0.0597; Tukey’s post-hoc test]. D) Neither alcohol exposure nor TSA treatment significantly altered alpha4 subunit protein expression. E-F) Images show representative immunoblots for alpha1 and alpha4 respectively (green = α1/α4, red = β-Actin).

Discussion

In the present study we examined whether chronic ethanol exposure and withdrawal elicit GABAergic adaptations within the medial PFC, and furthermore whether such adaptations occur in a specific CeA-projecting neuronal population. The data demonstrate that GABAA receptor-mediated neurotransmission within the prelimbic mPFC onto deep layer pyramidal neurons is significantly impaired after chronic ethanol exposure via both pre- and post-synaptic mechanisms in both male and female rats. These findings indicate a broad adaptation within deep-layer mPFC that promotes enhanced efferent excitatory signaling and are consistent with clinical reports of elevated prefrontal cortical activity in human alcoholics (Kamarajan et al., 2004, Seo et al., 2013). Our observations of diminished post-synaptic GABAA receptor function and attenuated presynaptic GABA release join a growing body of preclinical evidence implicating altered GABAA receptor-mediated neurotransmission in the pathophysiology of alcohol use disorders.

Among our findings, we observed that chronic alcohol exposure significantly blunted basal spontaneous IPSC frequency onto deep-layer pyramidal neurons (Figure 1), indicative of decreased presynaptic release. Spontaneous vesicular release from presynaptic boutons is governed by a variety of mechanisms including stochastic fusion of ready-release vesicles, spontaneous calcium influx through voltage-gated calcium channels, as well as spontaneous action potential-driven vesicular release. As shown in Figure 3, application of the sodium channel blocker TTX resulted in significant reductions in frequency and amplitude of IPSCs to equivalent levels between alcohol and water exposed animals, indicating that ethanol-induced impairments in spontaneous IPSC frequency reflect altered action potential-dependent vesicular release (Figure 3). This phenomenon is consistent with previous work from (Pleil et al., 2015) showing that mice that received chronic intermittent ethanol exposure displayed similar decrements in sIPSC frequency onto Layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons of mPFC. While the discrete mechanism(s) governing our observations remains under investigation, the recording conditions employed in this study (i.e. in the presence of the NMDAR and AMPAR antagonists DL-AP5 and CNQX, respectively) argue this adaptation is likely not driven by altered glutamatergic signaling.

Cortical interneurons are known to exhibit vast heterogeneity both in their intrinsic properties as well as projection targets, and efforts are currently underway to localize our observations to a specific interneuron sub-population (Hattori et al., 2017). In the deep layers of cortex, parvalbumin-positive basket/chandelier interneurons and somatostatin-positive Martinotti cells appear to predominate, comprising >80% of total interneurons in approximately equal frequency (Rudy et al., 2011). While Martinotti interneurons generally distribute their projections back into the superficial cortical layers, basket/chandelier interneurons preferentially target the soma/peri-soma of cis-layer pyramidal neurons and for this reason are the most likely source of GABAergic events recorded in this study (Holmgren et al., 2003, Rudy et al., 2011, Hattori et al., 2017). Importantly, basket/chandelier interneurons typically innervate 100’s to 1000’s of different pyramidal neurons; thus, while ethanol’s effects on spontaneous release (~20% reduction) may appear modest, the aggregate effect on cortical function can be substantial (Holmgren et al., 2003, Hattori et al., 2017).

The post-synaptic GABAA receptor adaptations presented herein after chronic alcohol exposure generally conform to previous findings in the literature across a number of brain regions including whole cortex, cultured cortical neurons, and hippocampus (Kumar et al., 2003, Kumar et al., 2010, Cagetti et al., 2003). Consistent among all these studies are reliable decrements in α1 subunit expression following chronic ethanol exposure that correlate with enhanced IPSC decay kinetics. We extend these observations by demonstrating similar adaptations in the medial PFC as well as showing that the adaptations occur irrespective of the sex of the animal. Functionally, the loss of α1 subunit expression and resultant enhancement of IPSC decay kinetics diminishes charge transfer per event, thereby blunting the efficacy of released GABA to shunt excitatory current. This phenomenon in tandem with diminished GABA release frequency reflects a state biased toward excitation, permitting heightened excitatory output to downstream targets. While we did not observe an effect of alcohol treatment on current injection-evoked spiking in deep-layer pyramidal neurons (data not shown), consistent with other reports (Trantham-Davidson et al., 2017), this does not necessarily conflict with the above interpretation. A prominent feature of the neocortex is relatively quiescent synaptic activity at rest, such that spontaneous depolarizations of pyramidal neurons are uncommon (Waters and Helmchen, 2006). As the electrode is generally placed on the soma near the axon initial segment, current- injection evoked spiking poorly models local network activity-induced neuronal firing when coordinated phasic GABAergic activity would likely be most efficacious. Thus, this method is likely insufficient to resolve the true impact of diminished GABA inhibition on excitability. Additional studies explicitly investigating how blunted phasic GABA tone impacts deep-layer pyramidal neuron excitability during network activity is therefore warranted.

Although tonic extrasynaptic GABAA signaling can exert much more profound inhibitory tone relative to phasic signaling, null results from preliminary experiments investigating tonic GABAA receptor-mediated current shown in Supplementary Figures 1 and 2 lead us to conclude that alcohol preferentially impairs phasic GABA inhibition. Given the critical role of cortex in processes like pattern recognition and signal integration that require the exquisite temporal precision phasic signaling offers, observing selective effects of ethanol on synaptic GABAA neurotransmission is perhaps unsurprising. Nevertheless, others have shown that adolescent alcohol exposure can alter THIP-sensitive tonic current in mPFC, however these observations did not correlate with any apparent change in δ subunit protein expression (Centanni et al., 2017). It is worth noting as well that in contrast to other reports we did not observe any compensatory increase in α4 subunit expression as observed by others (Bohnsack et al., 2016, Bohnsack et al., 2018). Given that α4 subunits seem to exhibit widespread extrasynaptic distribution this supports our conclusion of minimal effects of chronic ethanol exposure on tonic GABAA-mediated currents (Bohnsack et al., 2016). Nevertheless, attenuated α1 subunit expression with no concomitant reduction in overall IPSC amplitude argues for compensatory upregulation of another GABAA receptor subunit(s), and a more complete survey of α subunit expression would therefore be of value.

The clinical relevance of our findings becomes further apparent when one considers that models of alcoholism and alcohol dependence are increasingly integrating the concept of the “dark side” of addiction, in which negative affective states experienced during withdrawal drive continued consumption (Koob, 2013). As shown in Figure 2, we observed a robust sub-population of deep-layer pyramidal neurons that project to the CeA, a brain region critical for the expression of stress and anxiety-like behaviors that is significantly dysregulated following alcohol exposure (Roberto et al., 2004, Gilpin et al., 2015, Herman and Roberto, 2016). Recordings from these neurons displayed similar decrements in pre- and post-synaptic GABAA receptor-mediated neurotransmission following chronic ethanol exposure as the general population of deep-layer pyramidal neurons. That these results are consistent with other reports showing elevated CeA activity following chronic ethanol exposure and withdrawal offers a potential mechanism for these observations (Roberto et al., 2004, George et al., 2012, Pleil et al., 2015). Specifically, a disinhibited state in CeA-projecting pyramidal neurons could precipitate elevated glutamatergic signaling to the CeA during acute withdrawal, thereby promoting negative affect and, ultimately, alcohol craving. Such a scenario is consistent with previous findings from our laboratory that showed elevations in the expression of anxiety-like behaviors in rats that underwent an alcohol exposure paradigm identical to the one employed in this study (Bohnsack et al., 2018). In addition, that study further showed that treatment with TSA prevented both the alcohol-induced changes in α1 subunit expression, replicated in the present study, as well as showing significant reductions in anxiety-like behavior during the acute withdrawal period investigated herein. In context with other observations demonstrating mPFC connectivity to additional limbic regions that contribute to dependence symptomology, the functional adaptations in GABAergic signaling described herein offer a tenable mechanistic link between cortical dysregulation and dependence-related symptoms (Vertes, 2004, Pleil et al., 2015, Vranjkovic et al., 2017). Further, the data offer a foundation for future studies to evaluate epigenetically-driven adaptations during various phases in the transition to, and recovery from, alcohol dependence that may yield new strategies to treat intractable alcohol use disorders.

Supplementary Material

Supp figS1
Supp figS2
Supp figS3
Supp legends

Acknowledgments

FUNDING

This research was supported by the NIAAA-AA11605 (ALM), T32-AA007573 (BAH), and the UNC Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies.

Footnotes

DISCLOSURES:

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References Cited

  1. BOHNSACK JP, CARLSON SL & MORROW AL 2016. Differential regulation of synaptic and extrasynaptic α4 GABAA receptor populations by protein kinase A and protein kinase C in cultured cortical neurons. Neuropharmacology, 105, 124–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BOHNSACK JP, HUGHES BA, O’BUCKLEY TK, EDOKPOLOR K, BESHEER J & MORROW AL 2018. Histone deacetylases mediate GABAA receptor expression, physiology, and behavioral maladaptations in rat models of alcohol dependence. Neuropsychopharmacology, 43, 1518–1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BOKURA H, YAMAGUCHI S & KOBAYASHI S 2001. Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clin Neurophysiol, 112, 2224–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CAGETTI E, LIANG J, SPIGELMAN I & OLSEN RW 2003. Withdrawal from chronic intermittent ethanol treatment changes subunit composition, reduces synaptic function, and decreases behavioral responses to positive allosteric modulators of GABAA receptors. Mol Pharmacol, 63, 53–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CENTANNI SW, BURNETT EJ, TRANTHAM-DAVIDSON H & CHANDLER LJ 2017. Loss of delta-GABAA receptor-mediated tonic currents in the adult prelimbic cortex following adolescent alcohol exposure. Addict Biol, 22, 616–628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DEHART WB & KAPLAN BA 2019. Applying mixed-effects modeling to single-subject designs: An introduction. J Exp Anal Behav [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. DEVAUD LL, FRITSCHY JM, SIEGHART W & MORROW AL 1997. Bidirectional alterations of GABAA receptor subunit peptide levels in rat cortex during chronic ethanol consumption and withdrawal. J Neurochem, 69, 126–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. GEORGE O, SANDERS C, FREILING J, GRIGORYAN E, VU S, ALLEN CD, CRAWFORD E, MANDYAM CD & KOOB GF 2012. Recruitment of medial prefrontal cortex neurons during alcohol withdrawal predicts cognitive impairment and excessive alcohol drinking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 18156–18161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GILPIN NW, HERMAN MA & ROBERTO M 2015. The central amygdala as an integrative hub for anxiety and alcohol use disorders. Biol Psychiatry, 77, 859–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. GLYKYS J & MODY I 2007. The main source of ambient GABA responsible for tonic inhibition in the mouse hippocampus. J Physiol, 582, 1163–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. GOLDSTEIN RZ & VOLKOW ND 2002. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry, 159, 1642–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. GONZALEZ MI & BROOKS-KAYAL A 2011. Altered GABA(A) receptor expression during epileptogenesis. Neurosci Lett, 497, 218–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. HATTORI R, KUCHIBHOTLA KV, FROEMKE RC & KOMIYAMA T 2017. Functions and dysfunctions of neocortical inhibitory neuron subtypes. Nat Neurosci, 20, 1199–1208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. HERMAN MA, GILLIS RA, VICINI S, DRETCHEN KL & SAHIBZADA N 2012. Tonic GABAA receptor conductance in medial subnucleus of the tractus solitarius neurons is inhibited by activation of mu-opioid receptors. J Neurophysiol, 107, 1022–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. HERMAN MA & ROBERTO M 2016. Cell-type-specific tonic GABA signaling in the rat central amygdala is selectively altered by acute and chronic ethanol. Addict Biol, 21, 72–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. HOLMGREN C, HARKANY T, SVENNENFORS B & ZILBERTER Y 2003. Pyramidal cell communication within local networks in layer 2/3 of rat neocortex. J Physiol, 551, 139–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. KAMARAJAN C, PORJESZ B, JONES KA, CHOI K, CHORLIAN DB, PADMANABHAPILLAI A, RANGASWAMY M, STIMUS AT & BEGLEITER H 2004. The role of brain oscillations as functional correlates of cognitive systems: a study of frontal inhibitory control in alcoholism. Int J Psychophysiol, 51, 155–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. KOOB GF 2013. Theoretical frameworks and mechanistic aspects of alcohol addiction: alcohol addiction as a reward deficit disorder. Curr Top Behav Neurosci, 13, 3–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. KRALIC JE, CRISWELL HE, OSTERMAN JL, O’BUCKLEY TK, WILKIE ME, MATTHEWS DB, HAMRE K, BREESE GR, HOMANICS GE & MORROW AL 2005. Genetic essential tremor in gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptor α1 subunit knockout mice. J Clin Invest, 115, 774–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. KRALIC JE, KORPI ER, O’BUCKLEY TK, HOMANICS GE & MORROW AL 2002. Molecular and pharmacological characterization of GABAA receptor α1 subunit knockout mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 302, 1037–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. KUBOTA Y, KONDO S, NOMURA M, HATADA S, YAMAGUCHI N, MOHAMED AA, KARUBE F, LUBKE J & KAWAGUCHI Y 2015. Functional effects of distinct innervation styles of pyramidal cells by fast spiking cortical interneurons. Elife, 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. KUMAR S, KRALIC JE, O’BUCKLEY TK, GROBIN AC & MORROW AL 2003. Chronic ethanol consumption enhances internalization of α1 subunit-containing GABAA receptors in cerebral cortex. J Neurochem, 86, 700–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. KUMAR S, SURYANARAYANAN A, BOYD KN, COMERFORD CE, LAI MA, REN Q & MORROW AL 2010. Ethanol reduces GABAA α1 subunit receptor surface expression by a protein kinase C gamma-dependent mechanism in cultured cerebral cortical neurons. Mol Pharmacol, 77, 793–803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. MACLEAN DM & BOWIE D 2011. Transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory protein regulation of competitive antagonism: a problem of interpretation. J Physiol, 589, 5383–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. MCGLINCHEY EM, JAMES MH, MAHLER SV, PANTAZIS C & ASTON-JONES G 2016. Prelimbic to Accumbens Core Pathway Is Recruited in a Dopamine-Dependent Manner to Drive Cued Reinstatement of Cocaine Seeking. J Neurosci, 36, 8700–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. MENUZ K, STROUD RM, NICOLL RA & HAYS FA 2007. TARP auxiliary subunits switch AMPA receptor antagonists into partial agonists. Science, 318, 815–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. OLSEN RW & LIANG J 2017. Role of GABAA receptors in alcohol use disorders suggested by chronic intermittent ethanol (CIE) rodent model. Mol Brain, 10, 45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. PANDEY SC, UGALE R, ZHANG H, TANG L & PRAKASH A 2008. Brain chromatin remodeling: a novel mechanism of alcoholism. J Neurosci, 28, 3729–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. PATTEN AR, FONTAINE CJ & CHRISTIE BR 2014. A comparison of the different animal models of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders and their use in studying complex behaviors. Front Pediatr, 2, 93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. PAXINOS G & WATSON C 1998. The Rat Brain, San Diego, Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  31. PLEIL KE, LOWERY-GIONTA EG, CROWLEY NA, LI C, MARCINKIEWCZ CA, ROSE JH, MCCALL NM, MALDONADO-DEVINCCI AM, MORROW AL, JONES SR & KASH TL 2015. Effects of chronic ethanol exposure on neuronal function in the prefrontal cortex and extended amygdala. Neuropharmacology, 99, 735–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. REHM J 2011. The risks associated with alcohol use and alcoholism. Alcohol Res Health, 34, 135–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. ROBERTO M, MADAMBA SG, STOUFFER DG, PARSONS LH & SIGGINS GR 2004. Increased GABA release in the central amygdala of ethanol-dependent rats. J Neurosci, 24, 10159–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. ROUX L & BUZSAKI G 2015. Tasks for inhibitory interneurons in intact brain circuits. Neuropharmacology, 88, 10–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. RUDY B, FISHELL G, LEE S & HJERLING-LEFFLER J 2011. Three groups of interneurons account for nearly 100% of neocortical GABAergic neurons. Dev Neurobiol, 71, 45–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. SAKHARKAR AJ, ZHANG H, TANG L, SHI G & PANDEY SC 2012. Histone deacetylases (HDAC)-induced histone modifications in the amygdala: a role in rapid tolerance to the anxiolytic effects of ethanol. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36, 61–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. SEO D, LACADIE CM, TUIT K, HONG KI, CONSTABLE RT & SINHA R 2013. Disrupted ventromedial prefrontal function, alcohol craving, and subsequent relapse risk. JAMA Psychiatry, 70, 727–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. TRANTHAM-DAVIDSON H, CENTANNI SW, GARR SC, NEW NN, MULHOLLAND PJ, GASS JT, GLOVER EJ, FLORESCO SB, CREWS FT, KRISHNAN HR, PANDEY SC & CHANDLER LJ 2017. Binge-Like Alcohol Exposure During Adolescence Disrupts Dopaminergic Neurotransmission in the Adult Prelimbic Cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology, 42, 1024–1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. UNTERRAINER JM & OWEN AM 2006. Planning and problem solving: from neuropsychology to functional neuroimaging. J Physiol Paris, 99, 308–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. WATERS J & HELMCHEN F 2006. Background synaptic activity is sparse in neocortex. J Neurosci, 26, 8267–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. WERNER DF, KUMAR S, CRISWELL HE, SURYANARAYANAN A, FETZER JA, COMERFORD CE & MORROW AL 2011. PKCgamma is required for ethanol-induced increases in GABAA receptor α4 subunit expression in cultured cerebral cortical neurons. Journal of Neurochemistry, 116, 554–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. WILLCOCKS AL & MCNALLY GP 2013. The role of medial prefrontal cortex in extinction and reinstatement of alcohol-seeking in rats. Eur J Neurosci, 37, 259–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2014. Web. 2014.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp figS1
Supp figS2
Supp figS3
Supp legends

RESOURCES