Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 May 7;9:7185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39023-6

Author Correction: Efficacy of alprostadil for preventing of contrast-induced nephropathy: A meta-analysis

Jing-Zhan Zhang 1,#, Xiao-Jing Kang 1,#, Ying Gao 2, Ying-Ying Zheng 3, Ting-Ting Wu 3, Long Li 3, Fen Liu 3, Yi-Ning Yang 3, Xiao-Mei Li 3, Yi-Tong Ma 3, Xiang Xie 3,
PMCID: PMC6502867  PMID: 31061464

Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-017-01160-1, published online 21 April 2017

This Article contains errors in the first column of Table 1, where the reference numbers are incorrect. All these articles are already referenced in the Article, and the Table with the corrected reference numbers is included below.

Table 1.

The characteristics of included studies. CHD Coronary heart disease; DM diabetes mellitus; CAG coronary angiography; PCI percutaneous coronary intervention; PAG peripheral angiography; PTA percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; CECT contrast-enhanced computerised tomography; M male; F female; NS normal saline; d day; h hour; min minute; iv intravenous injection.

First author Publication year Sample size Age (years) Object of study NO. of CIN (case/control) Observation index Experimental group treatment strategy(alprostadil) Jadad score
Case(M/F) Control(M/F) Case Control BUN CysC Scr
Franz RW[11] 2011 20(12/8) 21(17/4) 48–87 48–87 vascular surgery 0/1 oral 200 μg preoperative 4
Li B[24] 2011 34(34/0) 26(26/0) 69.4 ± 7.3 67.9 ± 6.8 CHD CAG/PCI 2/3 48 h 48 h 20 μg + NS 20 ml iv qd, 30 min preoperative, continue 3d postoperative 2
Li JZ[25] 2016 50(33/17) 53(34/19) 58.11 ± 9.7 56.84 ± 9.29 CHD PCI 1/6 24 h,72 h 10 μg + NS 100 ml iv drip qd, 1d preoperative, 3d postoperative 2
Liu H[26] 2013 30(16/14) 30(15/15) 55–74 55–75 DM PAG 0/0 24 h,48 h 24 h,48 h 10 μg + NS 10 ml iv qd, 3d preoperative 3
Liu Y[27] 2011 29(16/13) 29(19/10) 57.0 ± 7.5 59.4 ± 9.2 CHD CAG/PCI 4/13 48 h,72 h 48 h,72 h 10 μg + NS 50 ml iv pumping bid, 7d postoperative 2
Liu YY[28] 2011 82(51/31) 84(51/33) 60.8 ± 12.5 61.7 ± 12.8 CHD CAG/PCI 2/3 48 h 20 ng/kg/min, continue 6 h postoperative 2
Li XY[29] 2013 14(8/6) 15(11/4) 66 ± 12 66 ± 12 DM PAG or PTA 0/2 24 h,72 h 24 h,72 h 2 ng/kg/min, continue 6 h preoperative and 20 μg + NS 40 ml iv qd, the second day, 5d postoperative 3
Li YN[30] 2014 150(96/54) 150(54/96) 68.02 ± 7.03 68.49 ± 6.10 CHD CAG/PCI 4/13 72 h 72 h 10 μg + NS 100 ml iv drip qd, 0.5-1 h preoperative, 3d postoperative 3
Miao Y[31] 2013 154(120/34) 176(133/43) 79.08 ± 6.16 78.26 ± 6.61 CECT 14/39 24 h,48 h,72 h 24 h,48 h,72 h 0.4 μg/kg/day, 48 h preoperative, continue to 48 h postoperative 4
Su C[32] 2015 55(35/20) 51(33/18) 62.7 ± 10.8 63.5 ± 11.2 CHD PCI 2/7 72 h 72 h 10 μg + NS 100 ml iv drip qd, 1 day preoperative, 3d postoperative 2
Wang L[33] 2016 50(31/19) 50(32/18) 60.48 ± 4.51 60.5 ± 4.17 CHD CAG/PCI 2/8 72 h 72 h 20 μg + NS 40 ml iv drip qd, 30 min preoperative,0.5,1, 2d postoperative 2
Wang ZD[34] 2015 65(49/16) 63(48/15) 58.2 ± 10.8 59.1 ± 11.2 CHD CAG/PCI 7/17 24 h,48 h,72 h 24 h,48 h,72 h 10 μg + NS 20 ml iv qd preoperative, 7d postoperative 3
Xu R[35] 2012 30(13/17) 30(12/18) 60 ± 9 60 ± 11 CHD CAG/PCI 2/10 24 h,48 h 10 μg + NS 20 ml iv qd, preoperative, 7d postoperative 2
Yan HY[36] 2014 21(12/9) 19(11/8) 73.3 ± 6.3 75.1 ± 8.5 PAG 4/8 24 h,48 h,72 h 24 h,48 h,72 h 24 h,48 h,72 h 10 μg + NS 10 ml iv bid, 3d postoperative 2
Ye Y[37] 2006 28(25/3) 30(26/4) 70.28 ± 5.6 72.62 ± 9.15 PAG/CECT 6/14 48 h,72 h 48 h,72 h 20 μg + NS 20 ml iv, qd, 3d postoperative 2
Zhao HW[38] 2014 58(31/27) 58(39/19) 64 ± 9 65 ± 8 CHD DM PCI 2/9 72 h 72 h 10 μg + NS 100 ml iv drip qd, 1d preoperative, 4d postoperative 2
Zhong SG[39] 2014 50(38/12) 50(39/11) 63.9 ± 7.6 64.1 ± 8.0 CHD DM PCI 1/8 72 h 72 h 100 μg + NS 100 ml iv drip bid, 3d postoperative 2
Zhou DC[40] 2013 112(65) 103(61) 62.1 ± 11.1 63.2 ± 10.9 CHD CAG/PCI 8/19 10 μg + NS 10 ml iv bid, 1d postoperative, 7-10d postoperative 3
Zhu L[41] 2011 99(99/0) 98(98/0) 57 ± 15 57 ± 15 CHD CAG ± PCI 7/19 48 h 48 h 48 h 20 μg + NS 20 ml iv qd, 10d postoperative 2

In addition, Table 1 contains an error in the ‘Experimental group treatment strategy(alprostadil)’ for the study by Franz RW [11] where,

“oral 200 mg preoperative”

should read:

“oral 200 μg preoperative”


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES