|
#
|
Description
|
|
1
|
Was the aim of video clearly stated and was it explained in the first quarter of the video?
|
|
2
|
Did the title or name of the video match the aim of the video?
|
|
3
|
Were the design and the content of the video suitable for a targeted educational aim?
|
|
4
|
Were the skills and the technique of the procedure explained using a standard, comparable and “step by step” method?
|
|
5
|
Was the information given in the video useful for viewers to develop/enhance their skill base?
|
|
6
|
Was the content of the video appropriate for the health and safety of both the patient and the practitioner?
|
|
7
|
Was the quality of picture regarding colors and clarity acceptable?
|
|
8
|
Was the quality of video sound acceptable? (No sound should be scored as zero)
|
|
9
|
Was the length of the video in balance with the content of the video?
|
|
10
|
Was the information on the date of production or release, producers and the references clearly explained?
|
|
11
|
Were objectives, learning tasks and terminology clearly stated in the video enabling viewers to address those tasks?
|
|
12
|
Did the video have stop-and-discuss points, additional aids such as scripts and/or summarized information on procedure?
|
|
13
|
Was any information given on a way to evaluate the effectiveness and reproducibility of the video?
|
|
14
|
Did the content of the video stimulate viewers to make the transition from passive viewer to active practitioner in the application of the technique?
|
