Abstract
Elderly patients with diabetes are at increased risk of frailty and disability in activities of daily living (ADL). Recent evidence has shown that oxidative stress is associated with these conditions. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to assess whether serum level of bilirubin, a strong endogenous antioxidant, can predict ADL disability in elderly patients with diabetes. Forty elderly patients aged 70 years and older with diabetes and ADL disability and 158 elderly patients with diabetes and without ADL disability were continuously recruited. Multivariate logistic regression models showed that serum bilirubin level was a significant predictor for ADL disability. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of serum bilirubin level alone for ADL disability was 0.887 (95% CI 0.837–0.936, P < 0.001) and the cut-off value was 0.4 mg/dL (sensitivity = 88.0% and specificity = 65.0%). The predictive ability was further increased by the addition of age (AUC = 0.921) or addition of age, body mass index, red blood cell count, cerebrovascular disease and chronic renal failure (AUC = 0.953). In conclusion, low serum bilirubin level is a strong predictive biomarker for ADL disability in elderly patients with diabetes, and its clinical utility is suggested.
Subject terms: Predictive markers, Geriatrics
Introduction
Over the last few decades, life expectancy has gradually increased, along with an increase in the incidence of age-related disabilities in activities of daily living (ADL). In addition, diabetes and related complications are significant healthcare problems in the growing elderly population. Recent evidence has indicated that elderly people with diabetes are at increased risk of frailty and ADL disability1–4. The identification of potentially treatable risk factors and predictable markers for ADL disability is critical for preventing the onset of frailty and ADL disability in the elderly population, especially in those with diabetes.
ADL disability is an adverse outcome of frailty. Recently, oxidative stress has gained attention as one of the important causative factors of frailty, and increased levels of oxidative stress and proinflammatory biomarkers were observed in physically frail and prefrail subjects5–7.
Bilirubin is a tetrapyrrolic compound. The superfamily of tetrapyrrolic compounds are highly conserved and originally serve as light harvesting and energy generating pigments in a photosynthetic process in algae and plants. In human, bilirubin has been recognized as a strong endogenous antioxidant8 and thus increasing attention has been recently paid to its protective effects against oxidative stress-induced damage9,10. Bilirubin is almost 20 times more effective at preventing low density lipoprotein oxidation compared with vitamin E analogue9. More importantly, serum bilirubin plays a main role in the antioxidant capacity in blood10. Accumulating clinical evidence has shown the inverse association of serum bilirubin level with the onset and development of oxidative stress-related diseases including diabetes, diabetic vascular complications, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and atherosclerotic diseases11–16. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the predictive value of serum bilirubin level for ADL disability in elderly patients with diabetes aged 70 years and older.
Results
Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. In patients with ADL disability, age and prevalence of chronic renal failure, cerebrovascular disease and proliferative retinopathy were significantly higher, while serum bilirubin level, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, body mass index (BMI), red blood cell (RBC) count and prevalence of hyperlipidaemia were significantly lower than in those without ADL disability (Table 1). Multivariate logistic regression analyses using various models were performed to assess the predictive value of serum bilirubin level for ADL disability. As shown in Table 2, Model 1 using serum bilirubin level only showed that it was a significant predictive factor for ADL disability (OR 0.293, 95% CI 0.197–0.435, P < 0.001). Model 2 using serum bilirubin level and age showed that both variables were significant predictive factors for ADL disability (OR 0.254, 95% C 0.158–0.409, P < 0.001 and OR 1.203, 95% CI 1.093–1.323, P < 0.001, respectively). Model 3 showed that serum bilirubin level, age, BMI and chronic renal failure were significant predictive factors for ADL disability (OR 0.383, 95% CI 0.226–0.652, P < 0.001; OR 1.194, 95% CI 1.066–1.338, P = 0.002; OR 0.861, 95% CI 0.755–0.983, P = 0.027; and OR 7.931, 95% CI 1.904–33.040, P = 0.005, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was subsequently performed to evaluate the relative ability of each model to predict ADL disability. As shown in Fig. 1, the area under the curve (AUC) in Model 1 was 0.887 (95% CI 0.837–0.936, sensitivity = 88.0%, specificity = 65.0%), and the cut-off value of serum bilirubin level for ADL disability was 0.4 mg/dL. AUC in Model 2 was 0.921 (95% CI 0.884–0.959, sensitivity = 89.2%, specificity = 60.0%, P < 0.001 vs. Model 1), and AUC in Model 3 was 0.953 (95% CI 0.926–0.980, sensitivity = 94.9%, specificity = 70.0%, P < 0.001 vs. Model 2). We also examined the AUC of various variables individually (Table 3). Bilirubin alone had high predictive ability for ADL disability compared with the other variables, although its predictive ability was further increased by the addition of age or factors including age, BMI, RBC count, cerebrovascular disease and chronic renal failure. There was no gender difference in the significant correlation between bilirubin level and disability.
Table 1.
Characteristic | Disability+ n = 40 | Disability− n = 158 | P Value |
---|---|---|---|
Sex | |||
M (%) | 11 (27.5) | 68 (43.0) | 0.073a |
F (%) | 29 (72.5) | 90 (57.0) | |
Age, median (IQR), yrs | 83.0 (78.8–86.0) | 76.5 (74.0–81.0) | <0.001b |
Body mass index, mean (SD) | 20.7 (4.8) | 23.8 (3.6) | <0.001c |
HbA1c, median (IQR), % | 6.0 (5.6–7.0) | 6.9 (6.4–7.5) | 0.005b |
Bilirubin, median (IQR), mg/dL | 0.3 (0.2–0.4) | 0.5 (0.4–0.7) | <0.001b |
RBC count (x1012/L) (SD) | 3.54 (0.65) | 4.28 (0.52) | <0.001c |
Hypertension | |||
− (%) | 7 (17.5) | (31.6) | 0.078a |
+ (%) | 33 (82.5) | 141 (68.4) | |
Hyperlipidemia | |||
− (%) | 18 (45.0) | 56 (35.4) | <0.001a |
+ (%) | 22 (55.0) | 102 (64.6) | |
Coronary artery disease | |||
− (%) | 27 (67.5) | (74.7) | 0.238a |
+ (%) | 13 (32.5) | 50 (25.3) | |
Cerebrovascular disease | |||
− (%) | 28 (30.0) | (91.8) | <0.001a |
+ (%) | 12 (70.0) | 13 (8.2) | |
Retinopathy | |||
− (%) | 7 (21.2) | 101 (76.4) | <0.001a |
Simple (%) | 2 (6.1) | 13 (10.6) | 0.2177a |
Proliferative (%) | 24 (72.7) | 16 (13.0) | <0.001a |
Nephropathy | |||
− (%) | 18 (45.0) | 132 (83.5) | <0.001a |
Proteinuria (%) | 1 (2.5) | 17 (10.8) | 0.052a |
Chronic renal failure (%) | 21 (52.5) | 9 (5.7) | <0.001a |
aCalculated using the chi-squared test. bCalculated using the Mann–Whitney U test.
cCalculated using the t test. Disability+, patients with ADL disability; Disability−, patients without ADL disability.
Table 2.
Variables | Mode1 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR 95% CI | P value | OR 95% CI | P value | OR 95% CI | P value | |
Serum bilirubin level | 0.293 | <0.001 | 0.254 | <0.001 | 0.383 | <0.001 |
(0.1 mg/dL) | 0.197–0.435 | 0.158–0.409 | 0.226–0.652 | |||
Age (years) | 1.203 | <0.001 | 1.194 | 0.002 | ||
1.093−1.323 | 1.066–1.338 | |||||
Body mass index | 0.861 | 0.027 | ||||
(m/kg2) | 0.755–0.983 | |||||
Red blood cell count | 0.993 | 0.212 | ||||
(x1012/L) | 0.983–1.004 | |||||
Cerebrovascular | 1.699 | 0.446 | ||||
disease | 0.435–6.641 | |||||
Chronic | 7.931 | 0.005 | ||||
renal failure | 1.904–33.040 |
Data are presented as OR and 95% CI. OR represents the increase in odds of ADL disability for every unit increase in the dependent continuous variable or the presence of an independent categorical variable. Model 1: serum bilirubin alone. Model 2: serum bilirubin and age. Model 3: serum bilirubin level, age, body mass index, red blood cell count, cerebrovascular disease and chronic renal failure.
Table 3.
Variables | AUC |
---|---|
Age | 0.743 |
Sex | 0.577 |
Body mass index | 0.731 |
HbA1c | 0.649 |
Red blood cell count | 0.807 |
Hypertension | 0.571 |
Hyperlipidemia | 0.598 |
Coronary artery disease | 0.545 |
Cerebrovascular disease | 0.609 |
Proliferative retinopathy | 0.799 |
Chronic renal failure | 0.734 |
Serum bilirubin level | 0.887 |
Serum bilirubin level plus age | 0.921 |
Serum bilirubin level plus 4 variables* | 0.953 |
*Variables include age, body mass index, cerebrovascular disease and nephropathy (chronic renal failure). AUC, area under the curve.
In turn, multivariate regression analysis using stepwise methods showed that ADL disability, chronic renal failure, age and coronary artery disease were significant determinant factors for serum bilirubin level (P = 0.007, P = 0.020, P = 0.043 and P = 0.05, respectively), with standardized partial regression coefficients of −0.236 (95% CI −0.239–0.039), −0.198 (95% CI −0.233–0.020), −0.152 (95% CI −0.013–0.000) and −0.136 (95% CI −0.150–0.000), respectively (Table 4). These results suggest that the presence of ADL disability was most strongly associated with serum bilirubin level.
Table 4.
Variables | Partial regression coefficient | S.E. | Standardized partial regression coefficient | 95% CI Lower Upper | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADL disability | −0.139 | 0.051 | −0.236 | −0.239 −0.039 |
0.007 |
Age | −0.007 | 0.003 | −0.152 | −0.013 −0.000 |
0.043 |
Red blood cell count | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.155 | +0.001 +0.006 |
0.063 |
Coronary artery disease | −0.075 | 0.038 | −0.136 | −0.150 −0.000 |
0.050 |
Chronic renal failure |
−0.127 | 0.054 | −0.198 | −0.233 −0.020 |
0.020 |
Data are presented as partial regression coefficient and 95% CI.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first report to show that serum bilirubin level may be a significant predictor for ADL disability in elderly patients with diabetes aged 70 years and older. The cut-off value of serum bilirubin level for ADL disability was 0.4 mg/dL as evaluated by ROC curve. Serum bilirubin level alone had a strong predictive ability for ADL disability with AUC = 0.887 (sensitivity = 88.0%, specificity = 65.0%), although its predictive ability was further increased by the addition of age (AUC = 0.921) or by the addition of factors including age, BMI, RBC count, cerebrovascular disease and chronic renal failure (AUC = 0.953). Notably, previous report showed that serum bilirubin level is inversely associated with functional dependence including ADL in the elderly subjects aged 60 years and older17. Since elderly subjects with diabetes are at increased risk of frailty and ADL disability1–4, it is clinically important to evaluate the predictive value of serum bilirubin level on ADL disability in those subjects. The present findings further suggested that low serum bilirubin level is a strong biomarker to predict ADL disability in elderly subjects with diabetes.
Bilirubin is a strong endogenous antioxidant8. Accumulating clinical and experimental evidence has indicated that bilirubin has a protective effect on various oxidative stress-related diseases including diabetes, diabetic vascular complications, CKD and atherosclerotic diseases11–16. We showed for the first time a lower prevalence of vascular complications as well as decreased markers of oxidative stress and inflammation in diabetic patients with Gilbert syndrome, a congenital hyperbilirubinemia11. This finding suggests that sustained hyperbilirubinemia may protect against oxidative stress and inflammation, and thus prevent the development of diabetic vascular complications. The beneficial effect of bilirubin has been supported by an a growing body of both clinical and experimental studies12,13,18. A recent report showed that serum bilirubin levels were inversely associated with progression of nephropathy in a post hoc analysis of the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) trial12. These results were independently confirmed in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial12. A meta-analysis including a total of 132,240 subjects from 27 studies has also shown a significantly negative association between serum bilirubin level and risk of diabetic complications13. In rodents, we showed that bilirubin and biliverdin protected against the development of albuminuria and renal mesangial expansion in diabetes, along with inhibition of oxidative stress markers and increased expression of NAD(P)H oxidase18. Taken together, these findings suggest that low serum bilirubin level may cause decreased antioxidant activity, subsequently leading to various oxidative stress-related diseases such as diabetic vascular complications. Conversely, recent studies have implicated increased levels of oxidative stress and proinflammatory biomarkers in physically frail and prefrail subjects5–7. Sarcopenia is the main domain of these conditions. Although multiple factors are involved in sarcopenia, skeletal muscles consume large quantities of oxygen and generate substantial concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS), whose accumulation is thought to cause loss of muscle quantity and quality through several mechanisms19. The age-induced decline in Type II muscle fibres may be at least partially attributable to oxidative injury and apoptosis20. Increased ROS production may activate the ubiquitin-proteasome system and muscle proteases (caspases, calpains), leading to protein degradation21, and also may be associated with intracellular functional changes in fibre activation21. Thus, the association between low serum bilirubin level and ADL disability may be due to decreased antioxidative activity or increased oxidative stress. However, this hypothesis should be verified in future studies.
There are several limitations associated with this study. Firstly, this study was not carried out at multiple institutes and the sample size was small. Therefore, we could not completely exclude selection bias of participants, although participants were continuously selected during a fixed period of time. Secondly, the lack of data on antioxidant capacity or oxidative stress markers in serum or the lack of data for unconjugated and conjugated bilirubin level raises the possibility of unmeasured confounders and weakened the results of this study. Thirdly, the most important limitation was that this study was cross-sectional.
In conclusion, the present study showed for the first time that low serum bilirubin level is a strong predictive biomarker for ADL disability in elderly patients with diabetes, and its cut-off value is 0.4 mg/dL. The clinical utility of serum bilirubin level is suggested. The underlying mechanism remains to be clarified in future studies, and prospective and large-scale studies should be carried out to confirm the predictive value of serum bilirubin level.
Methods
Participants
Forty elderly patients aged 70 years and older with diabetes and ADL disability under medical care at Yukuhashi Central Hospital from November 2017 to February 2018 were recruited, and 158 elderly patients with diabetes and without ADL disability were continuously recruited. Patients who suffered from hepatobiliary diseases with abnormal levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase or alkaline phosphatase and haemolytic anaemia were excluded. All patients classified as having ADL disability in this study had a “Certification of Needed Long-Term Care” by the municipal government. In addition, ADL was evaluated by self-report regarding physical ability in basic self-care tasks (e.g. mobility, bathing, dressing, eating and using the toilet), which was ascertained in an interview by expert nurses. Mobility includes the ability to move one’s own body, such as walking, standing up, turning over in bed and climbing stairs. ADL disability in this study was defined as having disability in two or more tasks.
Clinical variables and definition
In this study, peripheral venous blood samples were collected after overnight fasting. Serum bilirubin level was measured by the vanadate oxidation method. Total cholesterol, triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were measured using standard methods. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level was calculated using the Friedewald formula. The haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) value was determined using a standard high-performance liquid chromatography method. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg, or the current use of any antihypertensive medication. Hyperlipidaemia was defined as serum concentration of LDL cholesterol >120 mg/dL and triglyceride >150 mg/dL according to the Japan Diabetes Society criteria, or the current use of lipid-lowering agents. Proteinuria was defined as a urinary albumin to creatinine ratio of >300 mg/g creatinine or a level of + or more using the Albustix (Ames Co., USA) method. Chronic renal failure was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or receiving haemodialysis. Retinopathy was assessed by a fundus examination by independent ophthalmologists. Coronary artery disease was defined as a history of acute myocardial infarction or angina pectoris confirmed by clinically significant obstruction on coronary angiography or revascularization with angioplasty or coronary artery bypass. Cerebrovascular disease was defined as a history of symptomatic stroke confirmed by brain computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
Statistical analysis
A two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for variables with normal distribution and as median (interquartile range) for variables with non-normal distribution. The significance of differences was determined by the chi-squared test for categorical variables and the unpaired t test or the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis using various variables was performed to evaluate the predictive value of serum bilirubin level for ADL disability. In this study, we selected serum bilirubin alone for Model 1 and serum bilirubin level and age for Model 2. For Model 3, we selected serum bilirubin level, age, BMI, RBC count and presence of cerebrovascular disease and chronic renal failure because these valuables were significantly correlated with ADL disability in univariate analyses and thought to be clinically important. Proliferative nephropathy was strongly correlated with chronic nephropathy, thus, we selected only the latter. Other variables would not appreciably improve prediction and consequently were not included in the model. Then, we plotted the ROC curve and calculated the AUC, sensitivity and specificity in each model. The optimal cut-off value of bilirubin level for ADL disability was obtained from the Youden index [maximum = sensitivity + specificity − 1]. In turn, to evaluate which variables were significant determinants for serum bilirubin level, multivariate regression analysis was performed. In this analysis, we included all variables in the model and used stepwise methods. We used the Power and Sample Size calculation software version 3.1.2 (biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/wiki/Main/PowerSampleSize) to calculate sample size. We had a power of at least 90% with a two-sided α level of 0.05, assuming that the ratio of the number of patients with ADL disability to those without it is 1:4. Statistical analysis was performed using BellCurve for Excel version 2.15 (Tokyo, Japan).
Ethical approval
All procedures were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all participants or their legal guardian. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Yukuhashi Central Hospital (No. 20181126003).
Acknowledgements
We thank nurses at Yukuhashi Central Hospital for assistance with the acquisition of detailed data regarding patients’ physical abilities in basic self-care tasks. We also thank Christina Croney, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac), for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Author Contributions
T.I. acquired, analysed, and interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. S.F. acquired data, edited the manuscript, and contributed to the discussion. M.Y. edited the manuscript and contributed to the discussion. M.N. performed statistical analyses and contributed to the discussion. T.E., M.M. and S.S. acquired data. U.F. contributed to the discussion. T.Y. acquired data and contributed to the discussion. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Ottenbacher KJ, et al. Mexican American and frailty; Findings from the Hispanic established populations epidemiologic studies of the elderly. Am. J. Public Health. 2009;99:673–679. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.143958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hubbard RE, Andrew MK, Fallah N, Rockwood K. Comparison of the prognostic importance of diagnosed diabetes, co-morbidity and frailty in older people. Diabet. Med. 2010;27:603–606. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02977.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kim TN, et al. Prevalence and determinant factors of sarcopenia in patients with type 2 diabetes. The Korean Sarcopenic Obesity Study (KSOS) Diabetes care. 2010;33:1497–1499. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cacciatore F, et al. Clinical frailty and long-term mortality in elderly subjects with diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2013;50:251–260. doi: 10.1007/s00592-012-0413-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu CK, et al. Biomarkers of oxidative stress are associated with frailty: the Framingham Offspring Study. Age (Dordr) 2016;38:1. doi: 10.1007/s11357-015-9864-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Saum K-U, et al. Association between oxidative stress and frailty in an elderly German population: results from the ESTHER cohort study. Gerontology. 2015;61:407–415. doi: 10.1159/000380881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Soysal P, et al. Oxidative stress and frailty: a systematic review and synthesis of the best evidence. Maturitas. 2017;99:66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stocker R, Yamamoto Y, McDonagh AF, Glazer AN, Ames BN. Bilirubin is an antioxidant of possible physiological importance. Science. 1987;235:1043–1046. doi: 10.1126/science.3029864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wu TW, Fung KP, Yang CC. Unconjugated bilirubin inhibits the oxidation of human low density lipoprotein better than Trolox. Life Sci. 1994;54:477–481. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(94)90140-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Frei B, Stocker R, Ames BN. Antioxidant defenses and lipid peroxidation in human blood plasma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1988;85:9748–9752. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.24.9748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Inoguchi T, Sasaki S, Kobayashi K, Takayanagi R, Yamada T. Relationship between Gilbert syndrome and prevalence of vascular complications in patients with diabetes. JAMA. 2007;298:1398–400. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.12.1398-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Riphagen IJ, et al. Bilirubin and progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of RENNAL with independent replication in IDNT. Diabetes. 2014;63:2845–2853. doi: 10.2337/db13-1652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Abbasi A, et al. Bilirubin as a potential causal factor in type 2 diabetes risk: a Mendelian randomization study. Diabetes. 2015;64:1459–69. doi: 10.2337/db14-0228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lin JP, et al. Association between the UGT1A1*28 alle, bilirubin levels, and coronary heart disease in the Framingham Study. Circulation. 2006;114:1476–1481. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.633206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhu B, Wu X, Bi Y, Yang Y. Effect of bilirubin concentration on the risk of diabetic complications: A meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:41681. doi: 10.1038/srep41681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vitek L. Bilirubin and atherosclerotic diseases. Physiol. Res. 2017;66:S11–S20. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.933581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kao TW, et al. Associations between serum total bilirubin levels and functional dependence in the elderly. Intern Med J. 2012;42:1199–1207. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02620.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fujii M, et al. Bilirubin and biliverdin protect rodents against diabetic nephropathy by downregulating NAD(P)H oxidase. Kidney Int. 2010;48:905–919. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gomes MJ, et al. Skeletal muscle aging: influence of oxidative stress and physical exercise. Oncotarget. 2017;8:20428–20440. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fulle S, et al. The contribution of reactive oxygen species to sarcopenia and muscle ageing. Exp. Gerontol. 2004;39:17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2003.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bamann CW, Kwak D, Liu H, Thompson LV. Age-induced oxidative stress: How does it influence skeletal muscle quantity and quality? J. Appl. Physiol. 2016;121:1047–1052. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00321.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.