Skip to main content
Journal of Oral Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Oral Microbiology
. 2019 May 8;11(1):1609839. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2019.1609839

β-Hemolytic Streptococcus anginosus subsp. anginosus causes streptolysin S-dependent cytotoxicity to human cell culture lines in vitro

Atsushi Tabata a,b, Takuya Yamada b, Hiromi Ohtani b, Kazuto Ohkura c, Toshifumi Tomoyasu a,b, Hideaki Nagamune a,b,
PMCID: PMC6508071  PMID: 31105901

ABSTRACT

Background: Streptococcus anginosus subsp. anginosus (SAA) is one of the opportunistic pathogens in humans that inhabits the oral cavity. The type strain of SAA, NCTC10713T, showed clear β-hemolysis on blood agar plates, and the sole β-hemolytic factor revealed two streptolysin S (SLS) molecules. SLS is well known as the peptide hemolysin produced from the human pathogen S. pyogenes and shows not only hemolytic activity on erythrocytes but also cytotoxic activity in cell culture lines in vitro and in vivo, such as in a mouse infection model. However, no cytotoxic activity of SLS produced from β-hemolytic SAA (β-SAA) has been reported so far. Objective and Design: In this study, the SLS-dependent cytotoxicity of the β-SAA strains including the genetically modified strains was investigated in vitro. Results: The SLS-producing β-SAA showed cytotoxicity in human cell culture lines under the co-cultivation condition and it was found that this cytotoxicity was caused by the SLS secreted into the extracellular milieu. Conclusion: The results from this study suggest that the SLS produced from β-SAA might indicate the cytotoxic potential similar to that of the SLS from S. pyogenes and the SLS-producing β-SAA would be recognized as “a wolf in sheep’s clothing” More attention will be paid to the pathogenicity of β-hemolytic Anginosus group streptococci.

KEYWORDS: Streptococcus anginosus, Anginosus group streptococci, streptolysin S, SLS, β-hemolysis, cytotoxicity


The Anginosus group of streptococci (AGS) is a group of streptococcal strains that inhabit the oral cavity in humans. AGS is composed of three species including five sub-species: Streptococcus anginosus subsp. anginosus (SAA) and subsp. whileyi, S. constellatus subsp. constellatus, subsp. pharyngis, and subsp. viborgensis, and S. intermedius [1]. More recently, the new subspecies of S. anginosus (S. anginosus genomosubsp. vellorensis) was tentatively advocated from multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA), and the type strain of SAA (NCTC10713T = SK52) was clustered within the S. anginosus gssp. vellorensis [2]. So, the reconsideration of the type strains of S. anginosus subspecies might be done in the near future. AGS is recognized as an opportunistic pathogen in humans, and their pathogenicity has been thought to be low compared to that of the typical human pathogens of Group A streptococcus (S. pyogenes, GAS), Group B streptococcus (S. agalactiae, GBS), and pneumococcus (S. pneumoniae). However, in recent years, studies have shown the pathogenic potential of AGS in humans, such as abscess formation and infectious endocarditis [38]. These reports highlight the need for us to re-consider the pathogenic potential of AGS against human.

The pathogenic streptococcal strains produce various virulence factors. One of the representatives is hemolysin. Among the strains belonging to AGS, there are strains that show clear β-hemolysis on blood-agar plate culture. Based on the results from our laboratory and those of other research groups, two kinds of β-hemolytic factors were reported for AGS. One is the intermedilysin, a protein hemolysin belonging to the family of cholesterol-dependent cytolysins (CDCs) secreted by S. intermedius [9], and the other is the streptolysin S (SLS), a peptide hemolysin produced by β-hemolytic AGS except S. intermedius [1012]. SLS has been a long-established peptide hemolysin secreted from a human pathogen strain of S. pyogenes [13,14], and is reported to be produced as a post-translationally modified product from the precursor encoded by the sag operon on the AGS genome. Typical sag operons such as S. pyogenes are composed of nine genes. However, the sag operon in the genome of β-hemolytic SAA (β-SAA) is composed of 10 genes including two SLS-propeptide precursors encoding genes, sagA1 and sagA2 [10]. According to our previous report, each of the transcriptional products from sagA1 and sagA2 functions as a hemolysin and are secreted into their extracellular milieu during growth [10].

In S. pyogenes, the SLS produced is known to be a virulence factor similar to the pore-forming protein hemolysin streptolysin O, and much research was reported on this topic in the middle of the 1960’s and from the late 1970’s to the early 1980’s. However, possibly due to the questionable molecular properties of SLS (e.g., low or no antigenicity and difficulty in purification), the research on SLS temporarily stagnated in the 1990’s. After the year 2000, the situation improved due to the discovery of the genes for the biosynthesis of SLS and their secretion [15]. As a result, many investigations were conducted and SLS was recognized as the virulence factor of S. pyogenes. For example, the functions of SLS identified include the inhibition of neutrophil recruitment during the early stages of infection [16,17], translocation across the epithelial barrier [18], contribution of GAS evasion from immune cell killing, local tissue damage, and mortality of mouse [19], promotion of programmed cell death and enhancement of inflammatory signaling in epithelial keratinocytes [20], inhibition of neutrophil recruitment and systemic infection [21], and direct activation of nociceptor neurons and production of pain [22]. In addition, by contribution from the dramatic evolution of next-generation sequencing, the presence of the genes encoding SLS-related peptides in the Gram-positive bacteria besides S. pyogenes was also reported. These include the SLS-related peptide hemolysin secreted from Streptococcus iniae [23], perfringolysin S secreted from Clostridium perfringens [24], and listeriolysin S produced from Listeria monocytogenes [25].

For the SLS secreted from the β-hemolytic AGS strains, their function as the hemolytic factor was reported for β-SAA and other β-hemolytic AGS strains [1012]. However, the cytotoxic potential of the SLS from β-SAA is still inconclusive. The absence of SLS-dependent cytotoxicity of β-SAA against the human cell culture line THP-1 and human granulocytes was reported [26]. However, we had reported previously that the culture supernatant of the β-hemolytic S. constellatus subsp. constellatus strain W277 showed cytotoxicity to the human hepatocellular carcinoma cell culture line HepG2 [12]. Moreover, in our investigation on the SLS from β-hemolytic AGS strains, we had not ruled out the cytotoxic potential of the SLS secreted from these strains.

Based on the investigation on the SLS produced from β-SAA, we had confirmed the SLS-dependent cytotoxicity of β-SAA in human cell culture lines in vitro. In this study, in order to investigate the mechanism of the SLS-dependent cytotoxicity of β-SAA, we used the β-hemolysis and non-hemolysis strains of SAA, NCTC10713T and NCTC11169, respectively. In addition, the genetically modified strains derived from NCTC10713T such as a non-hemolytic NCTC10713T derivative strain lacking both the sagA1 and sagA2 genes (ΔsagAs), and its sagA1 gene-complemented strain (psagA1) were constructed for the assay. Using these strains, the evaluation of SLS-dependent cytotoxicity in human cell culture lines was carried out.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and culture condition

In this study, the type strain of SAA, NCTC10713T, showing SLS-dependent β-hemolysis, and a non-hemolytic SAA strain, NCTC11169, were used. In addition to these strains, we tested certain genetically modified strains derived from NCTC10713T, an erythromycin (erm) resistant strain carrying the inserted erm cassette near the upstream region of the intact sag operon, a non-hemolytic erm resistant strain lacking both the sagA1 and sagA2 genes (ΔsagAs), and a sagA1-gene trans-complemented strain of ΔsagAs (psagA1). The tested strains were inoculated into BHI broth (Becton Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and incubated at 37°C overnight under 5% CO2. The human oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line HSC-2 (RCB1945, RIKEN BRC, Ibaraki, Japan) and Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM, FUJIFILM Wako, Osaka, Japan) containing 10% (v/v) of heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10% (v/v) of BHI, and 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) were used for the co-cultivation. The human acute monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1 (RCB1189, RIKEN BRC), and RPMI1640 (FUJIFILM Wako) containing 10% (v/v) of heat-inactivated FBS, 10% (v/v) of BHI, and 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) were also used for the co-cultivation.

Construction of genetically modified strains derived from S. anginosus subsp. anginosus

The genetically modified strains derived from SAA strain NCTC10713T were generated by the homologous recombination method in the presence of competence-stimulating peptide (CSP) [10]. For the preparation of the genetic fragments for recombination, specific PCR enzymes (PrimeSTAR MAX DNA polymerase, PrimeSTAR HS DNA polymerase, and ExTaq; TaKaRa Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) were selected and used according to the manual. The genetically modified strains were constructed as follows: An erm resistant strain was primary generated. To prepare the genetic fragment for homologous recombination, the primer pair of SAA_up_C3-Fw and PstI_SAA_up_C3-Bw (Table 1) was used to amplify the upstream region of the sag operon, and the primer pair of BamHI_SAA_dw_C3-Fw and SAA_dw_C3-Bw (Table 1) was used to amplify the upstream region of sagA1, using a purified genomic DNA of NCTC10713T as the template. The fragment carrying the erm cassette was also amplified using the primer pair of erm_Fw(BamHI) and erm_Bw(PstI) (Table 1), and the purified genomic DNA from the strain possessing the erm cassette [10] as template. As per requirement, the amplified fragments were digested using the restriction enzyme(s), BamHI and/or PstI, and purified using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The purified fragments were ligated using the DNA Ligation Kit (TaKaRa Bio Inc.), and the genetic fragment for transformation was further amplified by PCR using the primer pair of SAA_up_C3-Fw and SAA_dw_C3-Bw (Table 1) with the ligation mixture as template. The transformation of NCTC10713T was conducted under the presence of the amplified fragment and CSP, and selected on the erythromycin containing agar plates [10].

Table 1.

Primers used in this study.

No. Name Sequence (5ʹ-3ʹ)* Purpose
1 SAA_up_C3-Fw CTTTTCAAGATCGGAAGAGC Construction of erm resistant strain
2 PstI_SAA_up_C3-Bw AAACTGCAGAGCAAACAATCCATGAGAGTCG Construction of erm resistant strain
3 BamHI_SAA_dw_C3-Fw GGGGATCCAGGGATAAATTTCTTACAGG Construction of erm resistant strain
4 SAA_dw_C3-Bw CCTATTTCACAAATATAACC Construction of erm resistant strain
5 erm_Fw(BamHI) AATGGATCCCCCGATAGCTTCCGCTATTG Construction of erm resistant strain
6 erm_Bw(PstI) GTACTGCAGCTAATAATTTATCTACATTCC Construction of erm resistant strain
7 dd1_erm_up_IF Bw TGAAAAAAATGACATAGTTTGTCCTCCTTATAAAATG Construction of ΔsagAs strain
8 sagB-Fw ATGAGAATGCTAACGAATTACTAC Construction of ΔsagAs strain
9 SA_sagB_inverse-Bw3 AGTCCTTCAACCTGTCTGGC Construction of ΔsagAs strain
10 Seq_erm cassette-Fw CTTTCTCTCACTCTGAATGG Sequencing
11 SA_sagB probe-Bw GCTTGCGGCAATGCTATGAC Sequencing
12 sagA1-Bw TTATTTTGTAGGTGCTACGG Sequencing
13 In Fusion_sagB-Bw CAGCTAATTAAGCTTTTAAAACTCCTTATTTCCAAC Sequencing

*The restriction sites are underlined.

For the generation of the non-hemolytic ΔsagAs strain, the fragment for homologous recombination was prepared as follows: each component was amplified by PCR using the primer pair of SAA_up_C3-Fw and dd1_erm_up_IF Bw (Table 1) to amplify the upstream region of the sag operon, and the primer pair of sagB-Fw and SA_sagB_inverse-Bw3 (Table 1) was used to amplify the sagB using the purified genomic DNA of the erm resistant strain as template. To prepare the fragment for transformation, fusion PCR was performed using the primer pair of SAA_up_C3-Fw and SA_sagB_inverse-Bw3 (Table 1). The transformation and the selection were conducted as described above.

To confirm the construction of the genetically modified strains, the genomic DNA of the candidate clone was purified by the method reported previously [27] or using DNAiso Reagent (TaKaRa Bio Inc.). The fragment for Sanger-sequencing was amplified using high-fidelity PCR enzyme (PrimeSTAR series, TaKaRa Bio Inc.), and the primer pair of Seq_erm cassette-Fw and SA_sagB probe-Bw (Table 1). The primers used for sequencing were as follows: Seq_erm cassette-Fw, SA_sagB probe-Bw, and sagA1-Bw (Table 1) for the erm resistant strain; and Seq_erm cassette-Fw, In Fusion_sagB-Bw, and SA_sagB_inverse-Bw3 (Table 1) for the ΔsagAs strain. The sequencing was outsourced to Eurofins Genomics K.K. (Tokyo, Japan).

Construction of the trans-complemented strain

The sagA1 gene trans-complemented strain was constructed based on the ΔsagAs strain using the Streptococcus-Escherichia coli shuttle vector pMX2 [28]. Briefly, the fragment from the promoter region of the sag operon to the end of the sagA1 gene was digested from the vector constructed previously [10] using EcoRI and PstI, and then inserted into the pMX2 cut with the same restriction enzymes. The competent cell of E. coli MC1061 was transformed with the vector and selected. Subsequently, the vector was purified using NucleoSpin Plasmid EasyPure (TaKaRa Bio Inc.). After confirmation of the sequence, the vector constructed for the sagA1-gene trans-complementation was introduced into the ΔsagAs strain in the presence of CSP as described previously [10], and incubated on the horse-blood agar plates containing 4 μg/mL of chloramphenicol, and selected by the recovery of the β-hemolytic character.

Viability assay of HSC-2 co-cultivated with S. anginosus subsp. anginosus

HSC-2 was incubated in the standard cell-culture medium for HSC-2 [EMEM containing 10% (v/v) of heat-inactivated FBS and antibiotics (penicillin G and streptomycin)] and inoculated with 1–2 × 104 cells/well/100 μL in a 96-well plate, and then incubated for 1–2 d until the cells in each well reached to almost full-confluence. The pre-cultured SAA strains were diluted to OD600 = 0.1, 0.01, and 0.001 with the co-cultivation medium without antibiotics, and 100 μL of each suspension was added to HSC-2, then incubated for 4–5 h at 37°C under 5% CO2 atmosphere.

After co-cultivation, the supernatant was removed and the HSC-2 cells were washed three times using EMEM; then the microscopic observation was conducted using the IX71 inverted microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). In addition, the viability of the co-cultivated cells was evaluated using CCK-8 (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) according to the manual provided by manufacturer. At the end of the co-cultivation, 0.1 N HCl was added to the cells without co-cultivation and incubated for a few minutes to prepare the dead cells to be used as background control. After washing with standard cell-culture medium, CCK-8 was added and incubated; then the absorbance at 450 nm (reference wavelength at 600 nm) was measured by the plate reader Infinite M200 (TECAN, Männedorf, Switzerland).

The SLS-dependent cytotoxicity of HSC-2 under the condition of co-cultivation with the SAA strains was also evaluated using the Transwell (Corning Inc., Corning, NY). Briefly, HSC-2 was inoculated in the bottom at 1.25 × 105 cells/well in 24-well plate and incubated at 37°C under 5% CO2 atmosphere for 2 d. A suspension of the tested strain prepared by the co-cultivation medium at OD600 = 0.01 was inoculated onto the upper layer of the system and incubated for 18 h. After incubation, the upper layer was discarded and the HSC-2 cells were stained with calcein-AM (Dojindo), propidium iodide (Dojindo), and Hoechst 33342 (Dojindo), and then observed using IN Cell Analyser 6000 (GE healthcare, Chicago, IL).

SLS-dependent membrane disruption of THP-1

The SLS-dependent membrane disruption of THP-1 was also evaluated. THP-1 was re-suspended in the co-cultivation medium for THP-1 and inoculated at 2 × 104 cells/well/50 μL in the clear-bottom-type 96-well black plate (Greiner, Kremsmunster, Austria). Fifty microliters of the tested strain suspension with OD600 = 0.02, prepared by the co-cultivation medium for THP-1, was added to the THP-1 and incubated for 4–5 h at 37°C under 5% CO2 atmosphere. The evaluation was conducted using the CellToxTM Green Cytotoxicity Assay (Promega, Madison, WI) as described above.

Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of culture supernatants from β-hemolytic SAA strains against HSC-2

For evaluation, HSC-2 cells were cultured as described above, and the culture supernatants of the tested strains were obtained from the log-phase culture in the co-cultivation medium. The hemolytic activity of SLS produced in the culture supernatant was confirmed before use for this evaluation. The HSC-2 cells were incubated with the culture supernatant for 1 h or 24 h at 37°C under 5% CO2 atmosphere. After incubation, the culture supernatants were discarded and 100 μL of fresh standard cell culture medium was added to each well; then, the viability of the cells were determined using CCK-8 (Dojindo) as mentioned above.

Time-course investigation of the membrane disruption of culture cells by SLS

The damage to the cytoplasmic membrane of HSC-2 was evaluated using both the kits CellToxTM Green Cytotoxicity Assay (Promega) and CytoTox-ONETM Homogeneous Membrane Integrity Assay (Promega).

The evaluation using CellToxTM Green Cytotoxicity Assay (Promega) was conducted according to the manual of the kit. The co-cultivation of HSC-2 with the tested strains was carried out according to the method described above except for the use of the clear-bottom-type 96-well black plate (Greiner) for fluorescence measurement instead of the ordinary clear plate. At the end of the co-cultivation, Lysis Solution equipped in the kit was added to prepare the dead-cell control. After the addition of 2 × CellTox Green Dye mix and subsequent incubation, the fluorescence of each sample was measured in a fluorescent plate reader Infinite M200 (TECAN) at the excitation wavelength 490 nm and emission wavelength 525 nm.

Another evaluation was also conducted using the CytoTox-ONETM Homogeneous Membrane Integrity Assay (Promega) according to the manual of the kit. At the end of the co-cultivation, the dead-cell control was prepared according to the manual. The culture supernatant from each well (three wells per assay condition) was collected and mixed, and then centrifuged (15,400 × g, 5 min). Fifty microliters of the supernatant (triplicate per assay condition) was dispensed into 96-well black plate (Corning Inc., Corning, NY). Then, the CytoTox-ONE Reagent was added to each well and the plate was incubated for the time indicated in the manual. After addition of the Stop Solution, the fluorescence of each well was measured in a fluorescent plate reader Infinite M200 (TECAN) at the excitation wavelength 560 nm and emission wavelength 590 nm.

Statistical analyses

Significance of the difference between two mean values was evaluated by Student’s t-test or Welch’s t-test after F-test using the software R for Mac OS X (version 3.5.1; https://cran.r-project.org/bin/macosx/). The normality of the data was also evaluated by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test using the same software described above.

Results

Co-cultivation with β-hemolytic S. anginosus subsp. anginosus causes cytotoxicity in HSC-2 in vitro

The type strain of SAA, NCTC10713T, exhibits β-hemolysis by the production of two SLS molecules with separate amino acid sequences [9]. In order to investigate the SLS-dependent cytotoxicity of β-SAA, the human oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line HSC-2 was co-cultivated with a β-hemolytic strain NCTC10713T or a non-hemolytic strain NCTC11169. The co-cultivation with β-hemolytic NCTC10713T induced obvious morphological changes, such as a flattened morphology probably due to the leakage of the cellular contents (Figure 1(a,b)) and bleb formation probably due to the damage of the cytoplasmic membrane (Figure 1(c,d)) as observed. Contrary to the co-cultivation with β-hemolytic NCTC10713T, HSC-2 co-cultivated with NCTC11169 did not show any serious morphological changes and had intact morphology similar to the case without co-cultivation (Figure 1(e,f)). In the viability assay using CCK-8, the HSC-2 co-cultivated with NCTC10713T [OD600 = 0.01 or more; multiplicity of infection (MOI) was about 150 or more in this condition] showed a significant (p < 0.01) decrease in viability (Figure 1(g)) compared to the HSC-2 without co-cultivation (designated as “w/o”). In the case of non-hemolytic NCTC11169, the slight but significant (p < 0.05) cytotoxicity was observed by the co-cultivation with a higher concentration of bacteria [OD600 = 0.1; MOI was about 890 in this condition]. However, its cytotoxicity against HSC-2 was clearly lower compared to that of the same amount of β-hemolytic NCTC10713T.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

SLS-dependent cytotoxicity of S. anginosus subsp. anginosus against human oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line HSC-2 under co-cultivation condition. HSC-2 was co-cultivated with higher cell-density (OD600 = 0.1) (a), the magnified picture of white square is shown as (b); and moderate cell-density (OD600 = 0.01) (c), the magnified picture of white square is shown as (d) of β-hemolytic S. anginosus subsp. anginosus (SAA) strain NCTC10713T. HSC-2 was also co-cultivated with higher cell-density (OD600 = 0.1) of non-hemolytic SAA strain NCTC11169 (e). Image (f) shows the intact HSC-2 without the co-cultivation with bacteria. The morphological observation was carried out using the inverted microscope IX71 (Olympus) equipped with DP72 (Olympus) after removal of the bacterial cells. The scale bar shows 50 μm. The viability of the HSC-2 cells was also evaluated using CCK-8 (g). The results are shown as the percentage of viability with standard deviation (SD) to 100% viable control of HSC-2 without co-cultivation with bacteria (n = 3). The significance of the differences in the results from the cultivation without bacteria (w/o) was evaluated by Student’s t-test or Welch’s t-test after F-test using the software R (**p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, and “ns“ indicates ”not significant”).

In order to investigate the contribution of SLS produced from β-SAA to the cytotoxicity of HSC-2, the viability of HSC-2 co-cultivated with the ΔsagAs strain, the non-hemolytic isogenic mutant strain of NCTC10713T, was also investigated. Consequently, the co-cultivation with the ΔsagAs strain showed no cytotoxicity, in contrast to both the β-hemolytic strains, NCTC10713T, and the erm resistant strain (Figure 2(a)). Similar to the HSC-2 co-cultivated with non-hemolytic NCTC11169 (Figure 1(e)), HSC-2 co-cultivated with the ΔsagAs strain also did not show any morphological changes with intact morphology of HSC-2 (Figure S1). The SLS-dependent cytotoxicity was further investigated by the sagA1-gene trans-complemented strain psagA1. From the results, psagA1 also showed significant cytotoxicity similarly to the NCTC10713T and erm resistant strains (Figure 2(b)). The SLS-dependent cytotoxicity was also investigated for the human acute monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1. In the assay using the CellTox Green Cytotoxicity Assay system (Promega), the SLS-dependent cytotoxicity was also observed in THP-1 similarly to that in the HSC-2 cells (Figure 3). These results indicated that the SLS produced from β-SAA functioned as a factor inducing cytotoxicity.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The viability of HSC-2 after co-cultivation with the tested strains. The cytotoxicity of the tested strains (ΔsagAs, sagA1 and sagA2 double deletion strain of NCTC10713T; 10713T, β-hemolytic S. anginosus subsp. anginosus NCTC10713T; erm, erythromycin-resistant strain of NCTC10713T possessing erm cassette on the genome) against HSC-2 was evaluated using CCK-8 (a). The viability of HSC-2 was also evaluated for the sagA1-gene trans-complemented strain of ΔsagAs, designated as psagA1(b). The results are shown as the percentage of viability with standard deviation (SD) to 100% viable control of the HSC-2 without the co-cultivation with bacteria (n = 3). The significance of the differences to the result of ΔsagAs was evaluated by Student’s t-test or Welch’s t-test after F-test using the software R (**p < 0.01).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

SLS-dependent cytotoxicity of THP-1 after co-cultivation with the tested strain. THP-1 was co-cultivated with S. anginosus subsp. anginosus strains (10713T, β-hemolytic S. anginosus subsp. anginosus NCTC10713T; ΔsagAs, sagA1 and sagA2 double deletion strain of NCTC10713T; erm, erythromycin-resistant strain of NCTC10713T possessing erm cassette on the genome; 11169, non-hemolytic S. anginosus subsp. anginosus NCTC11169) for 4 h. Subsequently, the cytotoxicity was evaluated by CellTox Green Cytotoxicity Assay. The 100% live-cell control of THP-1 without the co-cultivation with bacteria as the background was also prepared. The dead-cell control of THP-1 cultured with no bacteria was treated with ‘Lysis solution’ just before the end of the incubation. The results are shown as the percentage of cytotoxicity with standard deviation (SD) to 0% viable control of the THP-1 (n = 3). The significance of differences to the result of the non-hemolytic strain (ΔsagAs) was evaluated by Welch’s t-test after F-test using the software R (**p < 0.01).

Culture supernatant of β-hemolytic S. anginosus subsp. anginosus is not sufficient to cause acute cytotoxicity in HSC-2

Subsequently, the cytotoxicity of the culture supernatant of β-SAA was investigated. HSC-2 was incubated in the presence of the culture supernatant from a β-hemolytic strain with sufficient hemolytic activity. After 1 h incubation, no significant acute cytotoxicity was observed (Figure 4(a)). However, the prolonged (24 h) incubation induced sub-acute cytotoxicity in HSC-2 (Figure 4(b)).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The viability of HSC-2 incubated with the culture supernatant of the tested strains. HSC-2 cells were incubated with the culture supernatant of the tested strains (ΔsagAs, sagA1 and sagA2 double deletion strain of NCTC10713T; 10713T, β-hemolytic S. anginosus subsp. anginosus NCTC10713T; erm, erythromycin-resistant strain of NCTC10713T possessing erm cassette on the genome; psagA1, sagA1-gene trans-complemented strain of ΔsagAs; 11169, non-hemolytic S. anginosus subsp. anginosus NCTC11169) as described in “Materials and methods“ and incubated for 1 h (a) or 24 h (b), then the viability was evaluated using CCK-8. The results are shown as the percentage of viability with standard deviation (SD) to 100% of the viable control of the HSC-2 with no treatment with bacterial culture supernatant (n = 3). The significance of differences to the result of the non-hemolytic strain (ΔsagAs) was evaluated by Student’s t-test or Welch’s t-test after F-test using the software R (**p < 0.01 and “ns” indicates ”not significant”).

To evaluate further the sub-acute cytotoxicity of the culture supernatant from β-SAA, the time course of the culture supernatant-mediated sub-acute cytotoxicity was also investigated. Consequently, the decrease of viability of HSC-2 was observed by the 24 h incubation with the culture supernatant of β-SAA with high hemolytic activity, i.e., the culture supernatants prepared from both 4 h and 6 h culture of NCTC10713T (Figure S2a). No decrease in viability of HSC-2 was observed by the incubation with the culture supernatant of non-hemolytic ΔsagAs strain at the same incubation time (Figure S2b). Because the growth property of both NCTC10713T and ΔsagAs in the co-cultivation medium was almost the same (Figure S2c), the decreased viability of HSC-2 incubated with the culture supernatant of NCTC10713T was thought to be caused by the secreted SLS.

Cytotoxicity of β-hemolytic S. anginosus subsp. anginosus was caused by the secreted SLS

In order to confirm whether the cytotoxicity against HSC-2 was due to the “secreted” SLS from β-SAA, the Transwell assay was conducted. Almost all of the cells showed positive staining with propidium iodide (PI) and almost negative staining with calcein-AM after co-cultivation with the β-hemolytic strain, either NCTC10713T or sagA1-complemented strain of ΔsagAs, psagA1 (Figure 5). However, a contrasting result was observed after the co-cultivation with the ΔsagAs strain, that is, a negative staining with PI and a positive staining with calcein-AM (Figure 5). These results showed that the cytotoxicity of HSC-2 observed in the co-cultivation with the β-hemolytic strains was evidently caused by the secreted SLS.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

The secreted SLS from β-hemolytic S. anginosus subsp. anginosus expressed cytotoxicity against HSC-2. HSC-2 was cultured in the bottom of Transwell and each tested strain was cultured in the upper layer of Transwell for 18 h at 37°C under 5% CO2 . After co-cultivation, the cells were stained with calcein-AM, propidium iodide, and Hoechst 33342, and then observed using IN Cell Analyser 6000. 10713T, β-hemolytic S. anginosus subsp. anginosus NCTC10713T; ΔsagAs, sagA1 and sagA2 double deletion strain of NCTC10713T; psagA1, sagA1-gene trans-complemented strain of ΔsagAs; w/o SAA, HSC-2 without co-cultivation. The scale bar shows 30 μm.

Time-course investigation of the SLS-dependent membrane disruption in HSC-2

The time-course observation of SLS-dependent cytotoxicity of β-SAA was further investigated with a focus on the disruption to the cytoplasmic membrane. For this purpose, two kinds of evaluation systems were adopted: one is CytoTox-ONE Homogeneous Membrane Integrity Assay to assess the release of the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and the other is CellTox Green Cytotoxicity Assay to assess the internalization of the small chemical compound by the disruption to the cytoplasmic membrane. Consequently, time-dependent disruption to the cytoplasmic membrane was observed by co-cultivation with the SLS-producing strain NCTC10713T (Figure 6(a)). The cytotoxicity evaluated by the CellTox Green Cytotoxicity Assay was observed at a relatively early stage of investigation, and obvious cytotoxicity (90% or more cell death) was observed after 5 h or longer co-cultivation (Figure 6(a), light-gray bar). Contrary to this, the faint-level of cytotoxicity observed until 4 h co-cultivation with NCTC10713T and lower cytotoxicity began to be observed after 5 h or longer co-cultivation as evaluated by the CytoTox-ONE Homogeneous Membrane Integrity Assay (Figure 6(a), dark-gray bar). No obvious cytotoxicity was observed after the co-cultivation with the non-hemolytic ΔsagAs strain even when evaluated in both assay systems (Figure 6(b)). The difference in the detectability between the two assay systems is due to the detection principle for each assay system: CellTox Green Cytotoxicity Assay is based on the detection of the disruption to the cytoplasmic membrane with high sensitivity by the infiltration of small molecules across the disrupted membrane. With the LDH release-based CytoTox-ONE Homogeneous Membrane Integrity Assay it is difficult to detect such SLS-dependent disruption to the cytoplasmic membrane without large-scale pore or breakdown.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

The time-dependent cytotoxicity of the SLS from β-hemolytic SAA against HSC-2. HSC-2 was co-cultivated with β-hemolytic S. anginosus subsp. anginosus NCTC10713T(a) or the non-hemolytic sagA1 and sagA2 double deletion strain of NCTC10713TsagAs) (b). The time-dependent cytotoxicity was evaluated using the CellToxTM green cytotoxicity assay (light-gray bar) and CytoTox-ONETM homogeneous membrane integrity assay (dark-gray bar) from 3 h to 6 h co-cultivation. The results are shown as the percentage of cytotoxicity with standard deviation (SD) to 0% viable control (n = 3).

Discussion

We have been investigating the pathogenic potential of β-hemolytic AGS, and had revealed that SLS is the sole hemolytic factor of the β-hemolytic AGS, except in S. intermedius that secretes the protein hemolysin intermedilysin [10,12]. In addition, we had revealed that the β-hemolytic S. constellatus subsp. constellatus strain W277 showed the SLS-dependent cytotoxicity in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell HepG2 [12]. However, another group reported that the SLS produced from SAA could not induce the cytotoxicity in the human acute monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1 and human granulocytes [26]. According to another report on the function of LLS, a homolog of SLS secreted from L. monocytogenes, LLS does not contribute to tissue injury and virulence in the host organs of L. monocytogenes [29]. Thus, in order to clarify the virulence potential of the ambiguous SLS, particularly from β-hemolytic S. anginosus subsp. anginosus (β-SAA), we tried to reveal the nature of SLS from β-SAA by evaluating its contribution to the cytotoxicity against human cell lines.

In this study, the bacterial cell number-dependent cytotoxicity in human oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line HSC-2 was observed under the co-cultivation with β-SAA strains (Figure 1(g)). From the microscopic observation, some blebs and the obvious morphological changes, probably due to the leakage of cellular contents by the secreted SLS, were observed by co-cultivation with β-SAA (Figure 1(a-d)). Although weak cytotoxicity was detected by the co-cultivation with a higher amount of the non-hemolytic SAA strain NCTC11169 (Figure 1(g)), no bleb was observed (Figure 1(e)). It appears that the weak cytotoxicity of non-hemolytic NCTC11169 may be due to some products such as the metabolites produced during the bacterial growth. Such SLS-dependent cytotoxicity was also observed with the genetically modified strains, ΔsagAs and psagA1 (Figure 2, Figure S1). Moreover, the investigation of the complementation of the ΔsagAs strain should be done using the strain complemented with both the sagA1 and sagA2 genes. However, the strain complemented with both sagA1 and sagA2 showed slightly impaired growth and hemolytic activity, compared to the parent strain NCTC10713T and other genetically modified strains (Figure S3). Due to these observations, we adopted the sagA1-gene complemented strain psagA1 for the subsequent assays. Because even the psagA1 strain that produces only SagA1 (one of the SLS precursors encoded by the sagA1 gene) showed the obvious cytotoxicity in HSC-2 (Figure 2(b)), it suggested that NCTC10713T causes SLS-dependent cytotoxicity by the mature product derived from SagA1 under the co-cultivation condition. The reason for the growth deficiency observed in the sagA1 and sagA2 gene-complemented strain is under investigation.

Though the culture supernatant of β-SAA could not induce the acute cytotoxicity in HSC-2, a sub-acute effect was observed (Figure 4, Figure S2). Hence, the difference between the cytotoxicity against erythrocytes and culture cells may be due to the membrane repair mechanism equipped in the nucleated culture cells, which is absent in the erythrocytes. In addition, according to the Transwell assay (Figure 5), it was confirmed that the SLS secreted from β-SAA acted on the culture cells and induced the cytotoxicity in an SLS-dependent manner. These results showed that the SLS secreted from β-SAA functions as a cytotoxic factor at least in vitro. However, a recent report described that no difference could be observed between the hemolytic wild-type SAA and the non-hemolytic sagB mutant, at any MOI or time point by the LDH leakage assay for THP-1 and human granulocytes; and hence, concluded that the S. anginosus SLS is a broad-range hemolysin without cytolytic activity [26]. The difference in the experimental design between this previous report and ours were as follows: Firstly, the composition of the co-cultivation medium is different. In our study, 10% (v/v) of BHI broth was added to support the growth of the tested strain in the host cell culture conditions. In the condition using this co-cultivation medium, SLS is effectively produced in a growth-dependent manner for the tested strains (Figure S3). Hence, this condition is suitable for monitoring of SLS-dependent cytotoxicity to the cells in vitro. In addition, it is thought that some cellular contents leaked from the damaged cells help the growth of the tested strains; thus, the production of SLS is accelerated and the cytotoxicity to the cells is enhanced. Secondly, the method for the cytotoxicity assay is also different. The previous report evaluated the cytotoxicity using the LDH leakage method [26]. By this method, the cytotoxicity is detected at a relatively later stage of the cytoplasmic membrane disruption, which enables the leak of the cytoplasmic protein LDH (about 35 kDa of monomer, and the functional tetramer is about 140 kDa). However, it is difficult to assume that the critical cytoplasmic membrane disruption enabled to leak LDH which is induced at the early stage of co-cultivation with β-SAA, because of the cytotoxic character of SLS thought not to be rapid and drastic as shown in hemolysis by SLS. This idea is also supported by our results that the secreted SLS did not show an acute but a sub-acute effect (Figure 4). We adopted the CellTox-Green assay system for the cytotoxicity assay. This system enables to investigate the cytoplasmic membrane disruption by the infiltration of small molecules into cells through the damaged membrane. Using this system, the SLS-dependent cytotoxicity was successfully detected at a relatively early stage of co-cultivation with β-SAA, and an obvious time-lag in the detection of cytotoxicity was observed (Figure 6). Because the SLS-dependent cytotoxicity of β-SAA was also observed on THP-1 using the CellTox Green assay system (Figure 3), it was shown that the cytotoxicity of β-SAA by SLS is not limited to HSC-2. Based on these results, it is suggested that the SLS-dependent cytotoxicity can be established in vivo in the conditions that are suitable for the growth of β-SAA and the SLS secretion at their infected sites.

In S. pyogenes, it was reported that the cre sequence existed in the promoter region of the sag operon and it was suggested that the carbon catabolite repression contributed to the process of SLS production [30]. Recently, it has been reported that the SLS production from β-SAA is also regulated by the catabolite control protein CcpA [31]. These results suggest that the conditions for SLS production will be strongly affected by the environment in their habitats or infected sites. In addition, because our result showed that the SLS-dependent cytotoxicity of β-SAA is not high and is caused by a continuous action of secreted SLS (Figure 4), it is suggested that the cytotoxicity of β-SAA could be established by the continuous production of SLS at the infection sites of β-SAA. The AGS species including SAA is thought to be one of the opportunistic pathogens against humans and often escape from the human normal immune system to cause infection in vivo. Therefore, SLS may be a risk factor for infection caused not only by pyogenic streptococci such as S. pyogenes but also by the SLS-producing β-hemolytic sub-group of AGS. This prediction also suggests that suppression of SLS production or inactivation of SLS would help us to prevent the infective diseases caused by the SLS-producing AGS strains.

Our present investigation on the cytotoxicity of SLS produced from β-SAA was conducted in vitro. However, to reveal the mechanism of SLS-dependent cytotoxicity and virulence of β-SAA, further investigations in vivo would be required. In fact, it was reported that the contribution of SLS to the bacterial survival, neutrophil infiltration, and diffuse tissue necrosis is observed for the β-hemolytic group G streptococcus [32], and the contribution of SLS and streptolysin O to the early stages of infection and induction of necrotic lesions in mice is also observed for S. pyogenes [33]. In addition, it is also reported that the virulence factor of S. pyogenes is detected in some strains of S. anginosus [2]. Based on these accumulated recent findings on SLS and AGS, the underestimation in virulence of AGS, including SAA, as an opportunistic pathogen may increase the risk of misdiagnosis, prevention, and treatment of the infectious diseases caused by such a pathogenic sub-group of AGS producing the virulence factor(s) including the cytotoxic factor(s) such as SLS. In order to reveal and recognize the original pathogenicity of the β-hemolytic sub-group of AGS, further investigation is currently in progress.

Funding Statement

This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP15K20361 of Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) and Grant Numbers JP15K11012, JP17K11615, JP18K06764, JP18K09552 of Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Daisuke Takamatsu, Division of Bacterial and Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, for the kind gift of pMX2. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplemental materials.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Supplemental Material
ZJOM_A_1609839_SM2264.pdf (458.2KB, pdf)

References

  • [1].Jensen A, Hoshino T, Kilian M.. Taxonomy of the anginosus group of the genus Streptococcus and description of Streptococcus anginosus subsp. whileyi subsp. nov. and Streptococcus constellatus subsp. viborgensis subsp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:2506–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Babbar A, Kumar VN, Bergmann R, et al. Members of a new subgroup of Streptococcus anginosus harbor virulence related genes previously observed in Streptococcus pyogenes. Int J Med Microbiol. 2017;307:174–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Finn T, Schattner A, Dubin I, et al. Streptococcus anginosus endocarditis and multiple liver abscesses in a splenectomised patient. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018:224266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Morii K, Fujiwara S, Nakamura S, et al. Streptococcus anginosus group-associated pyogenic liver abscess. Intern Med. 2018;57:2271–2272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Cervera-Hernandez ME, Pohl D. Splenic abscess caused by Streptococcus anginosus following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case report of a rare complication of bariatric surgery. J Surg Case Rep. 2017;2017:rjx072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Esplin N, Stelzer JW, All S, et al. A case of Streptococcus anginosus brain abscess caused by contiguous spread from sinusitis in an immunocompetent patient. Cureus. 2017;9:e1745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Ganju SA, Gautam N, Sharma G. Pyogenic liver abscess associated with oral flora bacterium, Streptococcus anginosus in a patient with underlying tuberculosis. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2017;60:587–589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Rawla P, Vellipuram AR, Bandaru SS, et al. Colon carcinoma presenting as Streptococcus anginosus bacteremia and liver abscess. Gastroenterology Res. 2017;10:376–379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Nagamune H, Ohnishi C, Katsuura A, et al. Intermedilysin, a novel cytotoxin specific for human cells secreted by Streptococcus intermedius UNS46 isolated from a human liver abscess. Infect Immun. 1996;64:3093–3100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Tabata A, Nakano K, Ohkura K, et al. Novel twin streptolysin S-like peptides encoded in the sag operon homologue of beta-hemolytic Streptococcus anginosus. J Bacteriol. 2013;195:1090–1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Asam D, Mauerer S, Walheim E, et al. Identification of β-haemolysin-encoding genes in Streptococcus anginosus. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2013;28:302–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Tabata A, Sato Y, Maya K, et al. A streptolysin S homologue is essential for β-haemolytic Streptococcus constellatus subsp. constellatus cytotoxicity. Microbiology. 2014;160:980–991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Nizet V. Streptococcal beta-hemolysins: genetics and role in disease pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol. 2002;10:575–580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Molloy EM, Cotter PD, Hill C, et al. Streptolysin S-like virulence factors: the continuing sagA. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9:670–681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Nizet V, Beall B, Bast DJ, et al. Genetic locus for streptolysin S production by group A streptococcus. Infect Immun. 2000;68:4245–4254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Lin A, Loughman JA, Zinselmeyer BH, et al. Streptolysin S inhibits neutrophil recruitment during the early stages of Streptococcus pyogenes infection. Infect Immun. 2009;77:5190–5201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Takamatsu D, Koyanagi M, et al. Cytocidal effect of Streptococcus pyogenes on mouse neutrophils in vivo and the critical role of streptolysin S. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:107–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Sumitomo T, Nakata M, Higashino M, et al. Streptolysin S contributes to group A streptococcal translocation across an epithelial barrier. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:2750–2761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Hung CH, Tsao N, Zeng YF, et al. Synergistic effects of streptolysin S and streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin B on the mouse model of group A streptococcal infection. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2012;201:357–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Flaherty RA, Puricelli JM, Higashi DL, et al. Streptolysin S promotes programmed cell death and enhances inflammatory signaling in epithelial keratinocytes during group A streptococcus infection. Infect Immun. 2015;83:4118–4133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Feng W, Minor D, Liu M, et al. Requirement and synergistic contribution of platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase Sse and streptolysin S to inhibition of neutrophil recruitment and systemic infection by hypervirulent emm3 group A streptococcus in subcutaneous infection of mice. Infect Immun. 2017;85:e00530–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Pinho-Ribeiro FA, Baddal B, Haarsma R, et al. Blocking neuronal signaling to immune cells treats streptococcal invasive infection. Cell. 2018;173:1083–1097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Fuller JD, Camus AC, Duncan CL, et al. Identification of a streptolysin S-associated gene cluster and its role in the pathogenesis of Streptococcus iniae disease. Infect Immun. 2002;70:5730–5739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Gonzalez DJ, Lee SW, Hensler ME, et al. Clostridiolysin S, a post-translationally modified biotoxin from Clostridium botulinum. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:28220–28228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Cotter PD, Draper LA, Lawton EM, et al. Listeriolysin S, a novel peptide haemolysin associated with a subset of lineage I Listeria monocytogenes. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Asam D, Mauerer S, Spellerberg B. Streptolysin S of Streptococcus anginosus exhibits broad-range hemolytic activity. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2015;204:227–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Goto T, Nagamune H, Miyazaki A, et al. Rapid identification of Streptococcus intermedius by PCR with the ily gene as a species marker gene. J Med Microbiol. 2002;51:178–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Takamatsu D, Arai R, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, et al. Identification of mutations involved in the requirement of potassium for growth of typical Melissococcus plutonius strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:3882–3886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Quereda JJ, Nahori MA, Meza-Torres J, et al. Listeriolysin S is a streptolysin S-like virulence factor that targets exclusively prokaryotic cells in vivo. MBio. 2017;8:e00259–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Kinkel TL, McIver KS. CcpA-mediated repression of streptolysin S expression and virulence in the group A streptococcus. Infect Immun. 2008;76:3451–3463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Bauer R, Mauerer S, Spellerberg B. Regulation of the β-hemolysin gene cluster of Streptococcus anginosus by CcpA. Sci Rep. 2018;8:9028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Humar D, Datta V, Bast DJ, et al. Streptolysin S and necrotising infections produced by group G streptococcus. Lancet. 2002;359:124–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Fontaine MC, Lee JJ, Kehoe MA. Combined contributions of streptolysin O and streptolysin S to virulence of serotype M5 Streptococcus pyogenes strain Manfredo. Infect Immun. 2003;71:3857–3865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material
ZJOM_A_1609839_SM2264.pdf (458.2KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplemental materials.


Articles from Journal of Oral Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES