Skip to main content
Frontiers in Oncology logoLink to Frontiers in Oncology
. 2019 May 3;9:356. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00356

Role of Exosomes in Crosstalk Between Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts and Cancer Cells

Xi Yang 1,2,, Yida Li 1,2,, Liqing Zou 1,2, Zhengfei Zhu 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC6510008  PMID: 31131261

Abstract

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are important cells of the tumor microenvironment that can communicate with tumor cells through various mechanisms. Recently, increasing studies have found that exosomes transmit biological information by carrying microRNAs, lncRNAs, proteins, metabolites, and other substances, and thus exert biological and therapeutic effects. CAF-secreted exosomes can also affect the tumor phenotype, while the exosomes released by tumor cells can activate CAFs. Here, we review the role of exosomes in the crosstalk between CAFs and tumor cells and elaborate its mechanism.

Keywords: cancer-associated fibroblasts, exosomes, microRNA, lncRNA, crosstalk

Introduction

Fibroblasts are common cells of the connective tissue and are very crucial in the wound healing process (1). In many cases, tumors are analogous to wounds that do not heal, the reconstruction process of stromal cells shares some similarities with the wound healing process. Activated fibroblasts also exist in cancer stroma and are commonly known as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) (2).

CAFs express specific markers distinct from normal fibroblasts (NFs) and participate in tumor microenvironment construction to promote tumor invasion, proliferation, and metastasis. They can produce a variety of proinflammatory factors and even recruit other types of stromal cells to the primary and the metastatic sites of cancer (3). The multiple signaling axes, including IL-6/STAT3, FGF-2/FGFR1, NF-κB, and TGF-β1/SMAD axes appear to be abnormally activated in CAFs compared to those of NFs. The exact origin of CAFs and the mechanism of how normal cells become CAFs is still unclear, but based on current evidence, it is reasonable to believe that a considerable number of CAFs originate from NFs surrounding cancer cells (4).

Exosomes are membrane-enclosed vesicles derived from the endosomal system during the formation of multivesicular bodies, with a diameter of ~30–100 nm (5). In carcinogenesis, exosomes participate in proliferation, angiogenesis, immunosuppression, and preparation of premetastatic niches in secondary organs (6). Exosomes have been widely reported to mediate local and systemic cell communication through the horizontal transfer of information via microRNAs, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), proteins, mRNAs, metabolites and other substances. Also, exosomes are considered to play an anti-tumor role by carrying and transporting various substances such as cisplatin (7, 8), paclitaxel (9), and RNA (10). However, the mechanisms of packaging and release of exosomes have not been completely characterized (11).

Recently, it has been reported that exosomes play an important role in the crosstalk between CAFs and cancer cells (12). Specific exosomes released from CAFs can be internalized by cancer cells and contribute to the progression and metastasis by transferring various types of substances (Figure 1). Correspondingly, the exosomes released by cancer cells can also promote the transformation of CAFs. In this review, we will discuss the role of exosomes in the crosstalk between CAFs and cancer cells.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Exosomes in crosstalk between CAFs and cancer cells. Specific exosomes released from CAFs can be internalized by cancer cells and regulate carcinogenesis by transferring ncRNA, proteins, and metabolites. Correspondingly, the exosomes released by cancer cells can also promote the transformation of CAFs from NFs and MSCs.

Role of CAF-Derived Exosomes in Carcinogenesis

In 2012, Luga et al. first proved that CAFs in breast cancer stroma can secrete CD81-positive exosomes, which promote breast cancer cell (BCC) motility, protrusive activity, and metastasis by activating Wnt-PCP autocrine signaling in BCCs. The published gene expression data of carcinoma-associated stroma indicated that in human CAFs, CD81 expression is upregulated and might be correlated with the disease stage (13). However, in different tumor microenvironments, exosomes from CAFs may differ significantly. Miki et al. reported that CD81 is unexpressed in exosomes released from gastric cancer CAFs, and only scirrhous-type gastric cancer cells can uptake CD9-positive exosomes released from CAFs, which can promote cancer cell migration and invasion by activating the MMP2 signaling pathway (14). Hence, exosomes can play specific roles in cancer cells and these roles might be related to exosome-specific membrane proteins. The carcinogenic ability of exosomes is attributed to non-coding RNAs (ncRNA), proteins, metabolites and other substances present within them.

Non-coding RNA (ncRNA)

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNA) are receiving considerable attention in exosome research and are modulators of recipient cells in most instances, thereby favoring tumor development (15). In many liquid biopsy sample types, large amount of miRNAs are packaged into exosomes (16). Certain types of circulating miRNAs are strongly correlated with the progression of different cancer types. Herrera et al. extracted RNA from exosomes of CAFs and NFs from colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues and normal mucosa tissues, resected from nine patients, respectively. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) results showed that the levels of 52 ncRNAs differed between exosomes derived from NFs and CAFs, and bioinformatic analysis revealed that CAF-derived exosomes can affect cancer cells and other cells in the tumor microenvironment, thereby promoting tumor progression (17).

Various miRNAs are enriched in CAF-derived exosomes and regulate cancer cells via multiple mechanisms. miR-21 has been shown to exhibit oncogenic effects across several tumor types, among which the best-described interactions are those with tumor suppressor genes, such as PTEN, p21, and PDCD4 (18). Yeung et al. by NGS analysis found that the expression of miR-21 was significantly higher in CAF-secreted exosomes than in exosomes from ovarian cancer cells. Functional studies revealed that miR-21 is exosomally transferred from CAFs to cancer cells, where it suppresses ovarian cancer cell apoptosis and increases paclitaxel resistance by binding to its novel, direct target APAF1(19). Similarly, Bhome et al. found that miR-21 is enriched and is present abundantly in CAF-derived exosomes. They used miR-21 overexpressing fibroblasts and CRC cells in orthotopic xenografts and observed increased liver metastasis compared to those established with control fibroblasts (20). Donnarumma et al. found that the expression levels of miR-21, miR-378e, and miR-143 were increased in exosomes from CAFs as compared to those from NFs in breast cancer patients. Transfection of BCCs with these three miRNAs promoted stemness and epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) in these cells (21).

Other miRNAs are also involved in cancer proliferation. Zhang et al. by miRNA sequencing found that miR-320a level was significantly reduced in exosomes than in matched para-cancer fibroblasts in patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). miR-320a can bind to PBX3, thereby suppressing proliferation, migration and metastasis of HCC cells. Xenograft experiments involving CAFs mixed with MHCC97-H cells showed that miR-320a overexpression in CAFs can suppress carcinogenesis (22). Besides, miR-34a-5p (23) and miR-148b (24) in CAF-derived exosomes regulate the EMT of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and endometrial cancer cells, respectively. miR-196a in CAF-derived exosomes binds to novel targets, such as CDKN1B and ING5, in head and neck cancer cells, resulting in cisplatin resistance (25). CAF-derived exosomes do not always lead to malignant phenotypes in cancer cells. Li et al. found that CAF-derived exosomes could inhibit the growth, invasion and metastasis of cholangiocarcinoma tumors by carrying miR-195 in vitro. This observation was also confirmed in a rat model of cholangiocarcinoma (26). CAFs might also have different biological effects in different tumor microenvironments. Estrogen receptor (ER) expression in ER-positive breast cancer cells was significantly decreased after co-culturing with conditioned media from CAFs derived from ER-negative breast cancer cells. Further, studies have found that this phenomenon might be due to the release of CAF-derived exosomes from ER-negative breast cancer cells containing miR-221/222. Since miR-221/222 knockdown rescued ER repression in ER-positive breast cancer cell lines (27). Using NFs and esophageal cancer cells, Nouraee et al. developed a co-culture system that mimicked the tumor microenvironment. They detected increased expression of miR-33a and miR-326 in exosomes from co-cultured conditioned media, which indicated that miRNAs secreted from CAFs could play a role in tumor microenvironment (28).

Recently, many studies have found that exosomes secreted by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can regulate the biological behavior of tumors by carrying lncRNA (29). LncRNA might also exist in CAF-derived exosomes in addition to miRNAs. Ren et al. found that CAFs expressed significantly higher levels of lncRNA-H19 than NFs. Exosomal H19 from CAFs could promote stemness and oxaliplatin resistance in CRC cells by activating the β-catenin pathway via acting on miR-141 through competitive endogenous RNA sponge mechanism (30).

Proteins

Proteins in CAF-derived exosomes are mostly associated with EMT in cancer cells. Chen et al. reported that p85α is an essential protein of stromal fibroblasts, and loss of p85α could stimulate fibroblasts to express and secrete additional Wnt10b, which is transported to adjacent epithelial cancer cells, thus activating the EMT pathway via Wnt/β-catenin signaling, thereby leading to BCC metastasis (31). Li et al. found that TGF-β is upregulated in CAF-derived exosomes compared to normal omentum fibroblasts in ovarian cancer patients. Further, in vitro experiments showed that CAF-derived exosomes were taken up by ovarian SKOV-3 and CAOV-3 cells, thereby activating the SMAD signaling pathway and enhancing the migration and invasion capacity and promoting EMT in ovarian cancer cells (32). Recently, Hu et al. found that exosomal Wnts released from CAFs induce de-differentiation of CRC cells into cancer stem cells (CSCs) and promote chemoresistance in vitro and in vivo (33).

Other Substances

In addition to ncRNAs and proteins, the presence of other substances inside CAF exosomes, including DNA and metabolites, have been reported. Nabet et al. showed that stimulation of stromal NOTCH-MYC by BCCs leads to high RN7SL1 levels driven by an endogenous RNA POL3, which is usually shielded by SRP9/14 RNA binding protein. The elevated RN7SL1 level alters its stoichiometry with SRP9/14 thus generating unshielded RN7SL1 in stromal exosomes. Upon its transfer to BCCs, unshielded RN7SL1 acts as an activator of PRR RIG-I, thereby promoting proliferation, metastasis and resistance to treatment. Combined with evidence from patient blood and tumor tissues, these results demonstrated that the regulation of RNA unshielding connects stromal activation with the use of RNA DAMPs that promotes carcinogenesis (34). Richards et al. found that gemcitabine-treated CAFs abundantly secrete exosomes that contain chemoresistance-promoting factors, such as miR-146a and snail mRNA, which are transferred to the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells and then promoted chemoresistance and proliferation. Finally, a reduction in exosome release reduces the chemoresistance-promoting abilities of CAF cells (35).

Zhao et al. found that CAF-derived exosomes could inhibit mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, thereby increasing glutamine-dependent reductive carboxylation and glycolysis in cancer cells. The 13C isotope-labeling experiments showed that exosomes can provide amino acids for nutrition-deficient cancer cells through a mechanism similar to that of macro-cytoplasmic cell proliferation. They performed GC-MS and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) experiments and confirmed that exosomes in both prostate and pancreatic CAFs contain complete metabolites, including amino acids such as glutamine, threonine, serine and valine; lipids such as palmitate and stearate; TCA cycle intermediates such as citrate, pyruvate, a-ketoglutarate, fumarate and malate, which are extensively used by cancer cells for carbon metabolism, in case of nutritional deficiency or nutritional stress thus promoting tumor growth (36).

Role of Exosomes in the Transition of CAFs

CAFs arise from neighboring NFs or other cells that undergo a differentiation process induced by tumor cells and develop invasive and migratory capacities. Increasing studies have revealed that CAFs originate from various cells through different mechanisms related to exosomes, and the most common origin are NFs and MSCs (4).

Normal Fibroblasts

Compared to NFs, CAFs overexpress markers such as α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), fibroblast activation protein (FAP), and galectin. Genetic heterogeneities have also been detected in CAFs (37). Array data of primary cultures of CAFs vs. paired NFs from resected breast cancer tissues identified 11 dysregulated miRNAs, and the predicted target genes were mainly related to migration, secretion, adhesion, and cell-cell interaction (38).

The abundant miRNAs in exosomes of tumor cells play an important role in reprogramming of NFs into CAFs. In breast cancer, when exosomes from cancer cells were co-cultured with NFs, an alteration of such “CAF phenotype” was observed. miR-9 was found to convert NFs into CAFs, and the overexpression of miR-9 also identified a signature of different genes related to cell motility and ECM organization such as MMP1, EFEMP1, and COL1A1 (39). In melanoma, exosomal miR-155 induces the proangiogenic switch of CAFs by inhibition of SOCS1 expression and then activates the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway (40). On the contrary, miR-211 in melanoma exosomes could block the switch of CAFs by activation of the IGF1R/MAPK signaling pathway (41). In addition, various novel miRNAs were investigated recently. For example, metastatic HCC cells secrete exosomal miR-1247-3p that targets B4GALT3, thereby activating β1-integrin via NF-κB signaling in fibroblasts (42). In OSCC cells, exosomes containing lncRNA-CAF released from cancer cells could increase its expression in stromal fibroblasts, which then upregulated IL-33 by blocking its degradation by p62-dependent autophagic activity, promoting the conversion of NFs into CAFs (43).

Proteins delivered by exosomes can also induce NF-CAF transition. Webber et al. found that exosomes could deliver TGF-β and promote NF differentiation into myofibroblasts (44). Exosomal TGF-β accounts for 53.4–86.3% of the total TGF-β present in the cancer cell supernatant, and exosomal TGF-β is localized inside exosomes (45). Moreover, exosomal TGF-β instead of cell-secreted TGF-β is involved in the activation of SMAD signaling, thereby inducing NF-CAF transition. Recently, Rai et al. performed proteomic profiling and functional dissection of colorectal cancer cell-derived exosomes. They found that these exosomes could activate normal quiescent fibroblasts into CAF-like fibroblasts. Interestingly, fibroblasts activated by exosomes derived from primary and metastatic cancer cells have distinct protein profiles and functions, and exhibit elevated expression of pro-angiogenic proteins (IL8, NDRG1, RAB10), pro-proliferative proteins (FFPS, SA1008) pro-invasive regulators of membrane protrusion proteins (MYO1B, PDLIM1), and matrix-remodeling proteins (MMP11, ADAM10, EMMPRIN) (46).

Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)

MSCs also give rise to CAFs. They are fibroblast-like cells which can be isolated from different kinds of tissues such as fresh umbilical cords and adipose tissue. In gastric cancer mouse models, at least 20% of CAFs originate from the bone marrow and are derived from MSCs (47). Recent studies have shown that tumor exosomes can interact with local and distant MSCs, both in transforming MSCs and setting a premetastatic niche (48, 49). Cho et al. demonstrated that exosomes from breast and ovarian cancer cells can induce a phenotype of tumor-supporting myofibroblasts on MSCs (50, 51). Different miRNAs, such as miR-21 and miR-146a, that are known as critical regulators of CAF induction, MSC proliferation, and angiogenic activities, are involved in this process (4, 52, 53). However, further investigations are needed to understand the specific underlying mechanism. Various proteins also take part in this process although some of them are limited in the exosomes. For example, tetraspanins can be delivered into MSCs by exosomes thereby promoting activation, growth, and motility which are recognized as the characteristics of CAFs (54). Interestingly, similar to NF-CAF transition, TGF-β pathway was investigated as well, and a study verified that the TGF-β/TGF-β R1 interaction mediates Smad2/3 activation and increases the expression of FAP and α-SMA in MSCs, which is always recognized as CAFs (55). However, since there is no established definition to distinguish CAFs from MSCs, more studies are needed to elucidate the role of exosomes in the transformation between MSCs and CAFs.

CAFs are also found to originate from other cells. Endothelial cells can be induced by TGF-β and converted into CAFs through endothelial to mesenchymal transition (56). Pericytes are identified as a reservoir for CAFs induced by tumor-derived exosomes in gastric cancer, and the transition of pericytes to CAFs is induced by exosome-mediated BMP transfer and activation of PI3K/AKT and MEK/ERK pathways (57). Besides, CAFs are also thought to originate from fat cells (58).

Prospect

Exosomes play an important role in the crosstalk between CAFs and cancer cells, thereby contributing to carcinogenesis and tumor microenvironment. With the increasing importance of tumor microenvironment in cancer treatment, the study of exosomes and its mechanism in crosstalk might be a promising direction in the future. However, the tumor microenvironment is extremely complex, and the relationship between CAFs and cancer cells is far from the simple interaction of cells in vitro. For example, acidic cancer environment will produce completely different biological effects compared to normal environment (59, 60). Some studies have found that both the quality and quantity of exosomes will change in an acidic environment (61, 62). These observations also indicate that the research aspects discussed in this review should be viewed in a broader context. In the future, more in-depth and innovative research is required to elucidate the role of exosomes in the crosstalk between CAFs and cancer cells.

Author Contributions

ZZ contributed to the conception and design of the review. XY and YL wrote the manuscript. LZ revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Funding. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81872461, 81703024).

References

  • 1.Kalluri R, Zeisberg M. Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. (2006) 6:392–401. 10.1038/nrc1877 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kalluri R. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. (2016) 16:582–98. 10.1038/nrc.2016.73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kuzet SE, Gaggioli C. Fibroblast activation in cancer: when seed fertilizes soil. Cell Tissue Res. (2016) 365:607–19. 10.1007/s00441-016-2467-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ji X, Zhu X, Lu X. Effect of cancer-associated fibroblasts on radiosensitivity of cancer cells. Future Oncol. (2017) 13:1537–50. 10.2217/fon-2017-0054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yang Y, Yang X, Yang Y, Zhu H, Chen X, Zhang H, et al. Exosomes: a promising factor involved in cancer hypoxic microenvironments. Curr Med Chem. (2015) 22:4189–95. 10.2174/0929867322666150825163318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ruivo CF, Adem B, Silva M, Melo SA. The biology of cancer exosomes: insights and new perspectives. Cancer Res. (2017) 77:6480–8. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Federici C, Petrucci F, Caimi S, Cesolini A, Logozzi M, Borghi M, et al. Exosome release and low pH belong to a framework of resistance of human melanoma cells to cisplatin. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e88193. 10.1371/journal.pone.0088193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang J, Yeung BZ, Cui M, Peer CJ, Lu Z, Figg WD, et al. Exosome is a mechanism of intercellular drug transfer: Application of quantitative pharmacology. J Control Release. (2017) 268:147–58. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.10.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pascucci L, Coccè V, Bonomi A, Ami D, Ceccarelli P, Ciusani E, et al. Paclitaxel is incorporated by mesenchymal stromal cells and released in exosomes that inhibit in vitro tumor growth: a new approach for drug delivery. J Control Release. (2014) 192:262–70. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.07.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cossetti C, Lugini L, Astrologo L, Saggio I, Fais S, Spadafora C. Soma-to-germline transmission of RNA in mice xenografted with human tumour cells: possible transport by exosomes. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e101629. 10.1371/journal.pone.0101629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kalluri RJ, The biology and function of exosomes in cancer Clin Invest. (2016) 126:1208–15. 10.1172/JCI81135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yang F, Ning Z, Ma L, Liu W, Shao C, Shu Y, et al. Exosomal miRNAs and miRNA dysregulation in cancer-associated fibroblasts. Mol Cancer. (2017) 16:148. 10.1186/s12943-017-0718-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Luga V, Wrana JL. Tumor-stroma interaction: revealing fibroblast-secreted exosomes as potent regulators of Wnt-planar cell polarity signaling in cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. (2013) 73:6843–7. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Miki Y, Yashiro M, Okuno T, Kitayama K, Masuda G, Hirakawa K, et al. CD9-positive exosomes from cancer-associated fibroblasts stimulate the migration ability of scirrhous-type gastric cancer cells. Br J Cancer. (2018) 118:867–77. 10.1038/bjc.2017.85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang H, Fu H, Xu W, Zhang X. Exosomal non-coding RNAs: a promising cancer biomarker. Clin Chem Lab Med. (2016) 54:1871–9. 10.1515/cclm-2016-0029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Valentino A, Reclusa P, Sirera R, Giallombardo M, Camps C, Pauwels P, et al. Exosomal microRNAs in liquid biopsies: future biomarkers for prostate cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. (2017) 19:651–7. 10.1007/s12094-016-1599-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Herrera M, Llorens C, Rodríguez M, Herrera A, Ramos R, Gil B, et al. Differential distribution and enrichment of non-coding RNAs in exosomes from normal and Cancer-associated fibroblasts in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer. (2018) 17:114. 10.1186/s12943-018-0863-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Feng YH, Tsao CJ. Emerging role of microRNA-21 in cancer. Biomed Rep. (2016) 5:395–402. 10.3892/br.2016.747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Au Yeung CL, Co NN, Tsuruga T, Yeung TL, Kwan SY, Leung CS, et al. Exosomal transfer of stroma-derived miR21 confers paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer cells through targeting APAF1. Nat Commun. (2016) 7:11150. 10.1038/ncomms11150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bhome R, Goh RW, Bullock MD, Pillar N, Thirdborough SM, Mellone M, et al. Exosomal microRNAs derived from colorectal cancer-associated fibroblasts: role in driving cancer progression. Aging. (2017) 9:2666–94. 10.18632/aging.101355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Donnarumma E, Fiore D, Nappa M, Roscigno G, Adamo A, Iaboni M, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts release exosomal microRNAs that dictate an aggressive phenotype in breast cancer. Oncotarget. (2017) 8:19592–608. 10.18632/oncotarget.14752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang Z, Li X, Sun W, Yue S, Yang J, Li J, et al. Loss of exosomal miR-320a from cancer-associated fibroblasts contributes to HCC proliferation and metastasis. Cancer Lett. (2017) 397:33–42. 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li YY, Tao YW, Gao S, Li P, Zheng JM, Zhang SE, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts contribute to oral cancer cells proliferation and metastasis via exosome-mediated paracrine miR-34a-5p. EBio Med. (2018) 36:209–20. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.09.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li BL, Lu W, Qu JJ, Ye L, Du GQ, Wan XP. Loss of exosomal miR-148b from cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes endometrial cancer cell invasion and cancer metastasis. J Cell Physiol. (2019) 234:2943–53. 10.1002/jcp.27111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Qin X, Guo H, Wang X, Zhu X, Yan M, Wang X, et al. Exosomal miR-196a derived from cancer-associated fibroblasts confers cisplatin resistance in head and neck cancer through targeting CDKN1B and ING5. Genome Biol. (2019) 20:12. 10.1186/s13059-018-1604-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li L, Piontek K, Ishida M, Fausther M, Dranoff JA, Fu R, et al. Extracellular vesicles carry microRNA-195 to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and improve survival in a rat model. Hepatology. (2017) 65:501–14. 10.1002/hep.28735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shah SH, Miller P, Garcia-Contreras M, Ao Z, Machlin L, Issa E, et al. Hierarchical paracrine interaction of breast cancer associated fibroblasts with cancer cells via hMAPK-microRNAs to drive ER-negative breast cancer phenotype. Cancer Biol Ther. (2015) 16:1671–81. 10.1080/15384047.2015.1071742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nouraee N, Khazaei S, Vasei M, Razavipour SF, Sadeghizadeh M, Mowla SJ. MicroRNAs contribution in tumor microenvironment of esophageal cancer. Cancer Biomark. (2016) 16:367–76. 10.3233/CBM-160575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen F, Wang N, Tan HY, Guo W, Zhang C, Feng Y. The functional roles of exosomes-derived long non-coding RNA in human cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. (2019) 11:1–10. 10.1080/15384047.2018.1564562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ren J, Ding L, Zhang D, Shi G, Xu Q, Shen S, et al. Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts promote the stemness and chemoresistance of colorectal cancer by transferring exosomal lncRNA H19. Theranostics. (2018) 8:3932–48. 10.7150/thno.25541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chen Y, Zeng C, Zhan Y, Wang H, Jiang X, Li W. Aberrant low expression of p85α in stromal fibroblasts promotes breast cancer cell metastasis through exosome-mediated paracrine Wnt10b. Oncogene. (2017) 36:4692–705. 10.1038/onc.2017.100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li W, Zhang X, Wang J, Li M, Cao C, Tan J, et al. TGFβ1 in fibroblasts-derived exosomes promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition of ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget. (2017) 8:96035–47. 10.18632/oncotarget.21635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hu YB, Yan C, Mu L, Mi YL, Zhao H, Hu H, et al. Exosomal Wnt-induced dedifferentiation of colorectal cancer cells contributes to chemotherapy resistance. Oncogene. (2019) 38:1951–65. 10.1038/s41388-018-0557-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nabet BY, Qiu Y, Shabason JE, Wu TJ, Yoon T, Kim BC, et la. Exosome RNA unshielding couples stromal activation to pattern recognition receptor signaling in cancer. Cell. (2017) 170:352–66.e13. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Richards KE, Zeleniak AE, Fishel ML, Wu J, Littlepage LE, Hill R. Cancer-associated fibroblast exosomes regulate survival and proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells. Oncogene. (2017) 36:1770–8. 10.1038/onc.2016.353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhao H, Yang L, Baddour J, Achreja A, Bernard V, Moss T, Tumor microenvironment derived exosomes pleiotropically modulate cancer cell metabolism Elife. (2016) 5:e10250 10.7554/eLife.10250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bauer M, Su G, Casper C, He R, Rehrauer W, Friedl A. Heterogeneity of gene expression in stromal fibroblasts of human breast carcinomas and normal breast. Oncogene. (2010) 29:1732–40. 10.1038/onc.2009.463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhao L, Sun Y, Hou Y, Peng Q, Wang L, Luo H, et al. MiRNA expression analysis of cancerassociated fibroblasts and normal fibroblasts in breast cancer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. (2012) 44:2051–9. 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Baroni S, Romero-Cordoba S, Plantamura I, Dugo M, D'Ippolito E, Cataldo A, et al. Exosome-mediated delivery of miR-9 induces cancer-associated fibroblast-like properties in human breast fibroblasts. Cell Death Dis. (2016) 7:e2312. 10.1038/cddis.2016.224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhou X, Yan T, Huang C, Xu Z, Wang L, Jiang E, et al. Melanoma cell-secreted exosomal miR-155-5p induce proangiogenic switch of cancer-associated fibroblasts via SOCS1/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2018) 37:242. 10.1186/s13046-018-0911-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dror S, Sander L, Schwartz H, Sheinboim D, Barzilai A, Dishon Y, et al. Melanoma miRNA trafficking controls tumour primary niche formation. Nat Cell Biol. (2016) 18:1006–17. 10.1038/ncb3399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fang T, Lv H, Lv G, Li T, Wang C, Han Q, et al. Tumor-derived exosomal miR-1247-3p induces cancer-associated fibroblast activation to foster lung metastasis of liver cancer. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:191. 10.1038/s41467-017-02583-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ding L, Ren J, Zhang D, Li Y, Huang X, Hu Q, et al. A novel stromal lncRNA signature reprograms fibroblasts to promote the growth of oral squamous cell carcinoma via LncRNA-CAF/interleukin-33. Carcinogenesis. (2018) 39:397–406. 10.1093/carcin/bgy006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Webber J, Steadman R, Mason MD, Tabi Z, Clayton A. Cancer exosomes trigger fibroblast to myofibroblast differentiation. Cancer Res. (2010) 70:9621–30. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ringuette Goulet C, Bernard G, Tremblay S, Chabaud S, Bolduc S, Pouliot F. Exosomes induce fibroblast differentiation into cancer-associated fibroblasts through TGFβ signaling. Mol Cancer Res. (2018) 16:1196–204. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0784 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rai A, Greening DW, Chen M, Xu R, Ji H, Simpson RJ. Exosomes derived from human primary and metastatic colorectal cancer cells contribute to functional heterogeneity of activated fibroblasts by reprogramming their proteome. Proteomics. (2018) 23:e1800148 10.1002/pmic.201800148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Quante M, Tu SP, Tomita H, Gonda T, Wang SS, Takashi S, et al. Bone marrowderived myofibroblasts contribute to the mesenchymal stem cell niche and promote tumor growth. Cancer Cell. (2011) 19:257–72. 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.01.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhao H, Achreja A, Iessi E, Logozzi M, Mizzoni D, Di Raimo R, et al. The key role of extracellular vesicles in the metastatic process. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. (2018) 1869:64–77. 10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lugini L, Valtieri M, Federici C, Cecchetti S, Meschini S, Condello M, et al. Exosomes from human colorectal cancer induce a tumor-like behavior in colonic mesenchymal stromal cells. Oncotarget. (2016) 7:50086–98. 10.18632/oncotarget.10574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cho JA, Park H, Lim EH, Lee KW, Exosomes from breast cancer cells can convert adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells into myofibroblast-like cells Int J Oncol. (2012) 40:130–8. 10.3892/ijo.2011.1193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cho JA, Park H, Lim EH, Kim KH, Choi JS, Lee JH, et al. Exosomes from ovarian cancer cells induce adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells to acquire the physical and functional characteristics of tumor-supporting myofibroblasts. Gynecol Oncol. (2011) 123:379–86. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kumarswamy R, Volkmann I, Jazbutyte V, Dangwal S, Park DH, Thum T. Transforming growth factor-b-inducedendothelial-tomesenchymal transition is partly mediated by microRNA-21. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2012) 32:361–9. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.234286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hsieh JY, Huang TS, Cheng SM, Lin WS, Tsai TN, Lee OK, et al. miR-146a-5p circuitry uncouples cell proliferation and migration, but not differentiation, in human mesenchymal stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. (2013) 41:9753–63. 10.1093/nar/gkt666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Barrena S, Almeida J, Yunta M, López A, Fernández-Mosteirín N, Giralt M, et al. Aberrant expression of tetraspanin molecules in B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders and its correlation with normal B-cell maturation. Leukemia. (2005) 19:1376–83. 10.1038/sj.leu.2403822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gu J, Qian H, Shen L, Zhang X, Zhu W, Huang L, et al. Gastric cancer exosomes trigger differentiation of umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells to carcinoma-associated fibroblasts through TGF-β/Smad pathway. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e52465. 10.1371/journal.pone.0052465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zeisberg EM, Potenta S, Xie L, Zeisberg M, Kalluri R. Discovery of endothelial to mesenchymal transition as a source for carcinoma-associated fibroblasts. Cancer Res. (2007) 67:10123–8. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-3127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ning X, Zhang H, Wang C, Song X. Exosomes released by gastric cancer cells induce transition of pericytes into cancer-associated fibroblasts. Med Sci Monit. (2018) 24:2350–9. 10.12659/MSM.906641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Jotzu C, Alt E, Welte G, Li J, Hennessy BT, Devarajan E, et al. Adipose tissue derived stem cells differentiate into carcinoma-associated fibroblast-like cells under the influence of tumor derived factors. Cell Oncol. (2011) 34:55–67 10.1007/s13402-011-0012-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Logozzi M, Mizzoni D, Angelini DF, Di Raimo R, Falchi M, Battistini L, et al. Microenvironmental pH and Exosome Levels Interplay in Human Cancer Cell Lines of Different Histotypes. Cancers. (2018) 10:E370. 10.3390/cancers10100370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gillies RJ, Pilot C, Marunaka Y, Fais S. Targeting acidity in cancer and diabetes. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. (2019) 1871:273–80. 10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Logozzi M, Spugnini E, Mizzoni D, Di Raimo R, Fais S. Extracellular acidity and increased exosome release as key phenotypes of malignant tumors. Cancer Metastasis Rev. (2019). 10.1007/s10555-019-09783-8. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Parolini I, Federici C, Raggi C, Lugini L, Palleschi S, De Milito A, et al. Microenvironmental pH is a key factor for exosome traffic in tumor cells. J Biol Chem. (2009) 284:34211–22. 10.1074/jbc.M109.041152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Oncology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES