Skip to main content
The Neuroradiology Journal logoLink to The Neuroradiology Journal
letter
. 2019 Feb 22;32(3):225–226. doi: 10.1177/1971400919831463

Accuracy and safety of B-scan optic nerve ultrasonography to predict increased intracranial pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Nirmeen A Kishk 1, Asmaa M Ebraheim 1,
PMCID: PMC6512204  PMID: 30793656

The usefulness of sonographic estimation of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) as an indirect screening test, when raised intracranial pressure (ICP) is suspected and invasive ICP measurement has not been performed, has been proved in many studies.24 In addition, it can guide further diagnostic testing and monitor the response of the patient to therapy.5

In response to the points raised by De Bernardo et al.,1 we would like to clarify the following:

  • Regarding the accuracy of B-scan ultrasound, earlier clinical studies3,4 have described a good correlation between B-mode sonographic ONSD and invasive ICP measurements, which remains the gold standard. Raj et al.6 have stated that the ONSD measured by B-scan ultrasound was 88.5% sensitive (95% confidence interval (CI) 68% to 97%) and 90% specific (95% CI 55% to 99%) with computed tomography (CT) as the reference. Furthermore, compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) transorbital B-mode sonography has exhibited reliable measurement accuracy.7 In addition, the B-scan technique which was extensively used to assess the ONSD in the case of increased ICP was chosen by our team in order to compare our results with the previously obtained ONSD cut-off points (i.e. we had to perform the same methodology).

  • Regarding the safety issues, ocular sonography has been broadly and safely used for ocular evaluation for more than 20 years.8 Ophthalmic ultrasound is considered safe as long as Doppler frequency analysis is not used for a prolonged duration.9 B-mode ultrasound equipment is not capable of producing a harmful temperature rise.10 Nevertheless, in our study, the acoustic output of the ultrasound systems was adjusted according to the ALARA principle (‘as low as reasonably achievable’) in order to avoid any possible damage to the lens and retina.11

  • Another issue is the use of the probe with open eyelids; to the best of our knowledge B-scan is not routinely used with open eyelids. Alternatively, a thick layer of gel must be applied over the closed upper eyelid and the probe must be placed lightly on the gel in the temporal area of the eyelid (not on the eye itself) to prevent pressure being exerted on the eye.6,12 The patients in our study were asked to gaze foreword and the placement of the probe was adjusted to allow a suitable angle for displaying the transverse view of the globe and the structures in the retrobulbar area.

  • Regarding the statement ‘the optic nerve was visualized as a hypoechogenic structure beyond the retina surrounded by hyperechoic subarachnoid space and hypoechoic dura mater’, it is documented that the optic nerve appears as a sharply defined homogenous low-reflection band which extends posteriorly from the base of the bulb.12 The optic nerve sheath is demonstrated as a bilateral thin hypoechoic line which is lateral and parallel to the nerve.13 On the other hand, the subarachnoid space holds approximately 0.1 ml of cerebrospinal fluid and represents a complex structure which consists of trabeculae, septa and stout pillars arranged between the arachnoid and the pia layers of the meninges of the nerve. This structure renders the subarachnoid space a heterogeneous and multi-chambered tubular system which ends blindly behind the globe.14 These anatomical features might explain the hyperechogenicity of this space, and this was consistent with previous studies which identified the subarachnoid space as hyperechoic.15,16

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Finance

None.

References

  • 1.De Bernardo M, Vitiello L and Rosa N. Optic nerve ultrasonography to predict increased intracranial pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neuroradiology. Article at press. DOI: 10.1177/1971400919832001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Helmke H, Hansen HC. Fundamentals of transorbital sonographic evaluation of optic nerve sheath expansion under intracranial hypertension. I. Experimental study. Pediatr Radiol 1996; 26: 701–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kimberly HH, Shah S, marill k, et al. correlation of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter with Direct Measurement of Intracranial Pressure. Acad Emerg Med 2008; 15: 201–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Geeraerts T, Merceron S, Benhamou D, et al. Non-invasive assessment of intracranial pressure using ocular sonography in neurocritical care patients. Intens Care Med 2008; 34: 2062–2067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ebraheim AM, Mourad HS, Kishk NA, et al. Sonographic assessment of optic nerve and ophthalmic vessels in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurol Res. Epub ahead of print 25 May 2018. DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2018.1473097. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Raj G, Singh R, Deodhar M, et al. B-scan measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter as a marker of elevated intracranial pressure. Int J Res Med Sci 2017; 5: 2397–2400. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bäuerle J, Schuchardt F, Schroeder L, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter assessment using ultrasound compared to magnetic resonance imaging. BMC Neurol 2013; 13: 187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Munk PL, Vellet AD, Levin M, et al. Sonography of the eye. Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 1079–1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Williamson TH, Harris A. Color Doppler ultrasound imaging of the eye and orbit. Surv Ophthalmol 1996; 40: 255–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Barnett SB, Ter Haar GR, Ziskin MC, et al. International recommendations and guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound in medicine. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26: 355–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hlinomazová Z, Hrazdira I. ALARA – Principle and safety problems of diagnostic ultrasound. Scr Med (Brno) 2005; 78: 341–346. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hansen HC, Helmke K. Validation of the optic nerve sheath response to changing cerebrospinal fluid pressure: ultrasound findings during intrathecal infusion tests. J Neurosurg 1997; 87: 34–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Di Bernado C, Schachat A, Fekrat S. Ophthalmic ultrasound: A diagnostic atlas, New York: Thieme, 1998, pp. 109. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Killer HE, Laeng HR, Flammer J, et al. Architecture of arachnoid trabeculae, pillars, and septa in the subarachnoid space of the human optic nerve: anatomy and clinical considerations. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87: 777–781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fichtner J, Ulrich CT, Fung C, et al. Management of spontaneous intracranial hypotension – transorbital ultrasound as discriminator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016; 87: 650–655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu H1, Yang D1, Ma T1, et al. Measurement and associations of the optic nerve subarachnoid space in normal tension and primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 186: 128–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Neuroradiology Journal are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES