Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 2019 Mar 11;101(5):363–372. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0013

Necrotising fasciitis in the North East of Scotland: a 10-year retrospective review

DW Neilly 1,, M Smith 1, A Woo 1, V Bateman 2, I Stevenson 1
PMCID: PMC6513372  PMID: 30855976

Abstract

Introduction

Necrotising fasciitis is a life-threatening rapidly progressing bacterial infection of the skin requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment. Optimum care warrants a combination of surgical debridement, antibiotics and intensive care support. All cases of necrotising fasciitis in 10 years in the North East of Scotland were reviewed to investigate and improve patient care.

Methods

Cases between August 2006 and February 2016 were reviewed using case notes and electronic hospital records. Data including mode of admission, clinical observations, investigations, operative interventions, microbiological and clinical outcomes was collected and reviewed. Analysis required multidisciplinary input including microbiology, infectious disease, trauma and orthopaedics, plastic surgery and intensive care teams.

Results

A total of 36 cases were identified. The mean laboratory risk indicator for necrotising fasciitis (LRINEC) score was 7 and 86% of patients fulfilled the criteria for necrotising fasciitis. Patients were commonly haemodynamically stable upon admission but deteriorated rapidly; 36% of patients had a temperature of over 37.5 degrees C on initial observations; 29/36 patients were discharged, 6 patients died acutely (acute mortality rate of 17%); 18/31 of cases were polymicrobial with Streptococcus pyogenes, the common organism. Six amputations or disarticulations were performed from a total of 82 operations in this group, with radical debridement the usual primary operation. The mean time to theatre was 3.54 hours. Highly elevated admission respiratory rate (50 breaths/minute) was associated with increased mortality.

Conclusions

Necrotising fasciitis presents subtly and carries significant morbidity and mortality. A high index of suspicion allows early diagnosis and intervention. We believe that a pan-specialty approach is the cornerstone for good outcomes.

Keywords: Necrotising fasciitis, Microbiology, Septicaemia, Critical care

Introduction

Necrotising fasciitis is an uncommon although not rare medical and surgical emergency. An estimated 500 cases present each year in the UK,1 with an incidence of 0.4 and 0.53 cases per 100,000 population.2 It is a rapidly progressing infection of the skin and, as the largest organ of the body, this can be life threatening without prompt diagnosis and surgical and medical intervention.

The modern definition and first use of the term ‘necrotising fasciitis’ was coined by Wilson in 1952,3 describing a rapidly progressing infection resulting in fascial necrosis. Wilson outlines the histopathological features of the disease, a necrotising infection involving the deep fascia and soft tissue. Historical descriptions however, date back to the fifth century.4 During the 18th and 19th centuries, British naval surgeons referred to necrotising fasciitis as hospital gangrene.5 During the American Civil war, Joseph Jones, a Confederate army surgeon published a detailed description of this condition.

Necrotising fasciitis can be monobacterial, polymicrobial or fungal,6 with a reported mortality ranging from 25% to 73%.1

We publish our experience treating necrotising fasciitis in a UK tertiary referral centre. A retrospective review of each of our cases was performed with the combined input of the microbiology, infectious disease and surgical specialties (trauma and orthopaedics, plastics and general surgery) and the intensive care teams.

Aetiology

Necrotising fasciitis can occur after compromise to skin integrity or via haematogenous spread. The most common anatomical areas associated with necrotising fasciitis are the extremities, abdomen and perineum.

Risk factors that have been identified as being associated with developing necrotising fasciitis include intravenous drug use, diabetes mellitus, age over 50 years, hypertension and both obesity and malnutrution.7 Trauma is also an important factor, and most of the historical literature describes necrotising fasciitis associated with battle wounds.4 Blunt trauma and seemingly innocuous injuries such as muscle strains have been identified to be associated with Streptococcus pyogenes (group A Streptococcus necrotising fasciitis in particular).8 Although the reasons for this remain unclear, it has been suggested that the underlying damaged muscle is predisposed to infection and that regenerating muscle cells may be susceptible to S. pyogenes via a binding protein.9

The diagnosis of necrotising fasciitis is difficult with the initial diagnosis of cellulitis commonly being made. In a collection of studies looking at clinical manifestations, including 304 patients and 309 limbs, Angoules et al found erythema to be the most common clinical sign at 73% followed by pain (63%) and oedema (49%).2 Others included indurance, fluctuance, bullae, skin necrosis, crepitus, jaundice and subcutaneous gas visible on x-ray.6

Necrotising fasciitis is characterised by rapidly progressing widespread necrosis of the subcutaneous tissues, superficial fascia and skin. Contaminating bacteria or fungi track along subcutaneous tissue planes producing endo- and exotoxins which can cause vascular thrombosis, tissue ischaemia liquefactive necrosis and often lead to systemic illness, multi organ failure and death.10 This is reflected in the histology analysis of tissues showing acute inflammation of subcutaneous fat and areas of tissue necrosis.

Morgan et al6 highlight the four types of necrotising fasciitis. Type 1 is the most common (70–80% cases) and is polymicrobial, usually with mixed aerobes and anaerobes often bowel flora derived. Type II (20–30% cases) is monomicrobial and the organism responsible is usually S. pyogenes but can include S. aureus. Type III is more common in Asia, with Gram negative often marine-related organisms. Type IV relates to fungal necrotising fasciitis. Candidal necrotising fasciitis is very rare and is associated with immunocompromised patients. Zygomyotic necrotising infections (Mucor and Rhizopus spp.) typically affect immunocompromised patients after severe trauma and burns.11

Characteristic surgical findings of ‘dishwater fluid’ is due to the lysis of polymorphs and serous discharge together with macroscopic fascial necrosis, myositis or myonecrosis. Exotoxin release produces hypotension, multi organ failure and disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Angoules et al2 also collected data from 355 patients from microbiological studies finding that S. aureus was the most commonly cultured pathogenic microorganism being grown in 67 patients (18.9%) followed by Streptococcus group A in 50 (13.7%), S. viridans in 36 (10.1%) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in 30 (8.5%.) Escherichia coli species were also isolated in 23 patients (6.5%.)

In particular, the incidence of S. pyogenes invasive infections has been rising in both the United States and Europe since the 1980s,12 and as a result both the World Health Organization and subsequently the European Union have started enhanced surveillance initiatives to investigate this incidence.13 The UK undertook enhanced population based surveillance in 2003–2004 and found 3775 confirmed cases of S. pyogenes overall, and showed a 34% seven-day mortality rate for type II necrotising fasciitis.

Group A streptococcus is traditionally typed by serological detection of cell-wall antigens using T and M antigen typing, however since the late 20th century S. pyogenes has been categorised using DNA sequencing by the emm gene family, which encodes M protein types.14 In the UK, emm type 1 is generally the most common strain.15 However, there has been a recent epidemic of highly invasive emm type 3 group A S. pyogenes, which has been linked to phage-carrying novel virulence genes.16 Furthermore, there has been a recent rise in a new emm type 89 variant in the UK, Europe and North America, which has been linked with recombination of core genomic regions.15

Owing to the lack of agreed early external clinical signs, a high index of suspicion is key to the early identification and thus treatment of this disease. Early surgical debridement and prompt antibiotic therapy initially covering against aerobic Gram-positive cocci, Gram-negative rods and a variety of anaerobes usually in the form of multidrug regimens can be lifesaving.17

A multidisciplinary approach is required in managing these complex patients who will require regular review, haemodynamic support and often repeated operations in theatre for further debridement, amputation or disarticulation and subsequent closure/deformity correction with both plastic surgical and orthopaedic input as appropriate.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients admitted to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, a regional tertiary referral centre, with clinically or microbiologically confirmed diagnosis of necrotising fasciitis between August 2006 and February 2016. These patients were identified using a combination of hospital coding from medical records and databases held in the intensive care unit, microbiology laboratory and trauma orthopaedic unit. During the study period, it was not routine practice to send tissue samples taken in theatre for histopathological analysis to confirm necrotising fasciitis on histology, and therefore histology as the gold standard for confirmation of diagnosis was not available. Although initially based on either clinical suspicion or microbiology findings, the diagnoses of necrotising fasciitis was confirmed by the surgical team at the time of their debridement or fasciotomy by the presence of necrotic tissue macroscopically.

Admission documentation, patient characteristics, investigations, operative interventions, blood tests and microbiological samples were assessed.

The mode of admission or referral pathway and admission to higher care was also noted. Infection site, causative organism and antibiotic administered were confirmed using case note review. Operative documentation was scrutinised, and patient outcomes were also recorded.

All samples for microbiology were processed in the Department of Medical Microbiology at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, with standard UK microbiology laboratory procedures for the processing of tissue samples and deep operative swabs. Significant isolates are identified and referred for antimicrobial sensitivity testing with isolates of S. pyogenes being sent to the reference laboratory at the Scottish Haemophilus, Legionella, Meningococcus and Pneumococcus Reference Laboratory, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary for confirmation and emm typing.

Results

A total of 36 patients with an identified clinical or microbiological diagnosis of necrotising fasciitis were admitted to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary between August 2006 and February 2016. There were 13 female and 23 male patients with mean age of 52 years (range 19–78 years). Table 1 shows a summary of the cases in our unit.

Table 1.

Summary of cases

No. Mode of admission Risk factors Initial temp. (°C) Initial heart rate (bpm) Initial blood pressure (mmHg) Initial respiratory rate (breaths/minute) LRINEC score qSOFA score Microbiology (category) Antibiotic treatment Anatomical region Definitive surgery Outcome
1 elective age > 50 years 37.7 75 138/92 16 3 0 no tissue samples gentamicin, metronidazole, co-trimoxazole, amoxicillin chest no surgery discharged
2 A&E none 35.9 88 95/54 20 7 1 Staphylococcus aureus (type II) flucloxacillin, gentamicin, benzylpenicillin, metronidazole lower limb debridement and fasciotomy discharged
3 A&E age > 50 years 34.9 128 102/74 22 10 2 S. pyogenes emm type 1.0 (type II) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, metronidazole, Tazocin® abdomen debridement died acutely
4 GP age > 50 years, alcohol dependence 40.5 100 105/62 15 8 0 S. aureus, Escherichia coli (type I) ceftriaxone, metronidazole abdomen debridement discharged
5 A&E alcohol dependence, type II diabetes mellitus 35.9 140 93/63 26 7 2 S. milleri, S. aureus, E. coli, S. agilacticae (type I) gentamicin, Tazocin® abdomen debridement discharged
6 hospital transfer age > 50 years, type II diabetes mellitus 38 100 133/72 not recorded (intubated) 8 2 Bacteroides fragilis (type I) gentamicin, vancomycin, metronidazole, ciprofloxacin pelvis and perineum debridement of Fournier’s gangrene. laparotomy and defunctioning colostomy discharged
7 GP intravenous drug abuse 36.5 100 101/57 16 9 0 Veillonella sp., Enterobacter cloacae, S. milleri (type I) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, metronidazole pelvis and perineum debridement discharged
8 elective age > 50 years 36.5 78 152/90 17 0 0 E. coli, Candida galbrata (type I) flucloxacillin, Tazocin® abdomen debridement, laparotomy and defunctioning colostomy died acutely
9 elective none 36 58 118/62 15 2 0 no tissue samples flucloxacillin chest debridement discharged
10 GP age > 50 years 35.7 105 125/68 17 7 0 mixed anaerobes, Candida sp., B. vulgatus (type I) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, gentamicin, metronidazole pelvis and perineum debridement, laparotomy and defunctioning colostomy discharged
11 A&E alcohol dependence 40.5 110 95/58 15 5 1 Peptoniphilus asaccharolytics, S. aureus (type I) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, co-amoxiclav head and neck debridement discharged
12 GP age > 50 years, alcohol dependence 36.3 80 126/76 12 4 0 S. aureus, (type II) flucloxacillin, teicoplanin lower limb debridement and fasciotomy discharged
13 GP age > 50 years, alcohol dependence 38.4 105 187/120 15 6 0 S. aureus, Proteus mirabilis, Providentia rettgeri (type I) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, gentamicin, metronidazole pelvis and perineum debridement of Fournier’s gangrene discharged
14 GP age > 50 years, alcohol dependence, obesity 38 119 107/68 36 7 1 B. fragilis, E. coli (type I) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, gentamicin abdomen debridement, laparotomy and defunctioning colostomy discharged
15 GP intravenous drug abuse 37.3 101 101/65 17 8 0 S. aureus, Prevotella bivia, B. melangiogenics, (type I) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, metronidazole, teicoplanin lower limb debridement and fasciotomy discharged
16 GP age > 50 years, type II diabetes mellitus 40 90 110/56 16 10 0 S. milleri, E. coli, mixed anaerobes (type I) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, gentamicin pelvis and perineum debridement discharged
17 GP intravenous drug abuse 38 100 80/50 18 10 1 mixed anaerobes (type I) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, gentamicin pelvis and perineum debridement discharged
18 A&E age > 50 years 38 120 120/70 20 6 1 S. pyogenes, emm type 3.1 (type II) flucloxacillin, gentamicin, Tazocin® upper limb debridement and fasciotomy discharged
19 A&E age > 50 years, alcohol dependence 36.4 124 69/54 14 10 1 S. pyogenes, emm type 76.0 (type II) flucloxacillin, clindamycin, ceftriaxone, metronidazole lower limb below knee amputation discharged
20 GP alcohol dependence, obesity 38.5 119 107/68 36 7 1 E. coli, B. fragilis (type I) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, gentamicin pelvis and perineum debridement. laparotomy and defunctioning colostomy discharged
21 A&E age > 50 years 36.5 112 109/80 55 6 2 S. pyogenes emm type 1 (type II) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, gentamicin upper limb arm amputation died acutely
22 GP age > 50 years 35.1 78 143/86 19 8 0 Klebsiella, citrobacter (type I) co-amoxiclav, temocillin and metronidazole lower limb debridement discharged
23 A&E intravenous drug abuse 36.5 95 118/79 15 8 0 no tissue samples clindamycin, meropenam pelvis and perineum debridement, discharged
24 GP age > 50 years 39.3 118 153/83 12 8 0 Enteroccocus, coliform (type I) flucloxacillin, clindamycin, metronidazole, gentamicin, Tazocin®, teicoplanin pelvis and perineum debridement discharged
25 GP age > 50 years, alcohol dependence 35.7 110 111/64 18 8 0 E. coli (type I) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, Tazocin® pelvis and perineum debridement, laparotomy and defunctioning colostomy discharged
26 GP age > 50 years 38.4 127 90/70 18 8 1 no tissue samples benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, gentamicin, metronidazole, Tazocin® upper limb debridement and fasciotomy discharged
27 A&E age > 50 years, alcohol dependence 36 78 99/51 14 6 1 Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, Prevotella disciens (type I) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, gentamicin lower limb hip disarticulation died within 1 year
28 A&E age > 50 years, alcohol dependence 37.2 121 146/86 22 6 1 S. sanguinis, mixed anaerobes (type I) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, gentamicin, Tazocin® head and neck debridement died acutely
29 A&E none 38.5 128 106/56 24 8 1 S. pyogenes emm type 1 (type II) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, gentamicin upper limb debridement and fasciotomy discharged
30 A&E age > 50 years 39.4 106 144/102 19 7 0 S. pyogenes, S. aureus, E. coli (type I) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, Tazocin®, linezolid upper limb debridement and fasciotomy discharged
31 GP age > 50 years 37.8 118 118/62 16 6 0 S. pyogenes (type II) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, gentamicin upper limb debridement and fasciotomy discharged
32 GP age > 50 years, intravenous drug abuse 37.0 80 110/65 12 9 0 S. aureus, Enterococcus faecalis (type I) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, gentamicin pelvis and perineum debridement discharged
33 A&E intravenous drug abuse, alcohol excess 36.5 95 100/40 not recorded 7 n/a Group C Streptococcus (type I) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, gentamicin pelvis and perineum hindquarter amputation discharged
34 GP intravenous drug abuse 35.7 76 110/78 12 9 0 no growth flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, gentamycin pelvis and perineum debridement discharged
35 A&E intravenous drug abuse 36 110 unrecordable 50 7 3 S. pyogenes, emm type 80 (type II) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, gentamicin, metronidazole upper limb arm amputation died acutely
36 A&E age > 50 years 36.5 130 75/50 55 6 3 S. pyogenes, emm type 1 (type II) flucloxacillin, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, gentamicin, metronidazole, ciprofloxacin upper limb shoulder disarticulation died acutely

A&E, accident and emergency department; GP, general practitioner;

Microbiology

Our local protocol requires deep tissue samples to be sent at the time of surgical intervention. In 32 of the 36 cases, appropriate samples were sent according to this standard. For three patients, no samples at all were received in the microbiology laboratory. In one case, a wound swab and blood culture bottle were sent. In one case, the samples received cultured no organism. The rate of recovery of organisms was therefore 96.9% (31/32).

Systemic bacteraemia was uncommon in this group with only four patients having positive blood cultures, each patient had a single organism isolated on culture. These organisms were E. coli, S. pyogenes, Bacteroides vulgatus and Veillonella sp.

In our case series, polymicrobial infection (type 1 necrotising fasciitis) was more common in the microbiologically confirmed cases 58% of cases (18/31). Six cases of polymicrobial infection included S. aureus. Drug resistance was not a predominant issue in our population with only 1 isolate of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobactericae and no isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus, vancomycin resistant Enterococci, or carbapenem producing Enterobactericiae. Candida sp. were only isolated in two cases as part of polymicrobial infection.

S. pyogenes was the most common isolate in monomicrobial (type 2 necrotising fasciitis) in 8 of 13 cases followed by S. aureus (two cases) and one case each of group C Streptococcus, E. coli and Bacteroides, which is also in keeping with the literature.18

Emm-typing was available for seven of nine isolates of S. pyogenes. This showed that four cases were emm-type 1, with one case each of emm types 3.1, 76 and 80. Upper-limb involvement was strongly associated with S. pyogenes infection (five of seven cases) in this cohort.

General results

Fourteen patients were admitted via referral from accident and emergency, 17 via direct referral from general practice. Three were elective admissions and diagnosis of necrotising fasciitis was made after admission, one patient was a tertiary centre transfer and in one case the mode of referral was unable to be identified. Presenting haemodynamic observations are shown in Table 1. Table 2 shows the medical comorbidities in the population.

Table 2.

Medical comorbidities in the patient population

Comorbidities Cases
(n) (%)
Alcohol dependence 10 28
Intravenous drug abuse 9 25
Psychiatric history 6 17
Hepatitis C 6 17
Cancer 5 14
Deep vein thrombosis 5 14
Type II diabetes mellitus 3 8
Chronic kidney disease 3 8
Cerebrovascular accident 2 6
Human immunodeficiency virus 1 3
Morbid obesity 1 3
Paraplegia 1 3
Peripheral vascular disease 1 3
Myocardial infarction 1 3
Rheumatoid arthritis 1) 3

Alcohol dependence and smoking were the most common documented medical comorbidity in 12 patients (33%). Previously published risk factors7 for necrotising fasciitis, such as diabetes mellitus, intravenous drug abuse, age greater than 50 years, hypertension and malnutrition/obesity are highlighted in Table 1. The mean LRINEC score for the 36 patients was 7.19

Twenty-nine patients were admitted to the intensive care unit with two patients admitted to the surgical high-dependency unit; 49% of patients presented within working hours (8am to 16pm) and 51% presented outside normal working hours. The average time to theatre from admission was 3.53 hours (range 45 minutes to 18 hours 35 minutes).

Our data show that, in our patient cohort, the pelvis and perineum was the most commonly affected site. Thirty patients required the use of three or more antibiotics in combination with flucloxacillin (28/36 cases), benzypenicillin (24/36 cases), clindamycin (23/36 cases), gentamycin (15/36 cases) and metronidazole (15/36 cases) being the most commonly used antibiotics. Pipericillin/tazobactam was also frequently used (9/36 cases). Our local protocol advises a combination of intravenous flucloxacillin 2 g six hourly, benzylpenicillin 2.4 g intravenous six hourly, intravenous clindamycin 1.2 g eight hourly and gentamicin 7 mg/kg and the prescribing reflects this protocol.

Outcomes

A total of 29 of the 36 patients were discharged, 6 patients died acutely and 1 died within a year of the necrotising fasciitis diagnosis, of unrelated disease. This acute mortality rate of 17% is in keeping with or better than other comparable published series mortality figures.20 In total, six amputations or disarticulations were performed from a total of 82 operations carried out with radical debridement being as expected the most common primary operation.

Discussion

Aberdeen Royal Infirmary appears to receive a relatively high number of cases of necrotising fasciitis. The expected presenting haemodynamic status of the patients reflect what is has been previously described of slight hypotension, normothermia, mildly elevated heart rate and respiratory rate. From our data, we can see that an admission respiratory rate which is grossly elevated. For example, above 26 breaths/minute ranging to 55 breaths/minute appears to be associated with increased mortality but due to the numbers involved in our study this cannot be statistically proven.

Aberdeen Royal Infirmary has relatively good outcomes with 81% of presenting patients being discharged from hospital and only 17% dying acutely in hospital; 14% of the patients required amputations or disarticulations, though of those requiring amputation or disarticulation, 50% died which most likely reflects the severity of the disease.

A significant proportion of our patients were immunocompromised secondarily due to other comorbidities such as diabetes, pre-existing cancer, chronic renal failure and rheumatoid arthritis. Twenty-five per cent of our patient cohort were intravenous drug abusers, with a 56% hepatitis C diagnosis in this subgroup. This information demonstrates the likelihood of underlying medical comorbidities predisposing to an increased risk of bacterial invasion.

One weakness of our study is that histological confirmation of necrotising fasciitis is not present for every patient reported. This is due to the fact that sending tissue samples to the pathology laboratory for confirmation of necrotising fasciitis was not routine practice in our unit before this study. Therefore, it could be possible that not all of these cases are true necrotising fasciitis, and this may explain our lower mortality rates than previously reported studies. However, a consultant surgeon from the relevant specialty was present and scrubbed during these procedures and tissue necrosis was reported macroscopically at the time of surgery. Combined with microbiological analysis and multidisciplinary clinical acumen before debridement, misdiagnosis is less likely. Although trauma is important risk factor in necrotising fasciitis, none of our patients had a history of trauma. None of these patients had battle injuries as our unit is not a designated military hospital in the UK.

The variety of bacteria affecting our patient cohort show the difficulty in initial management and treatment with targeted antibiotic therapy.

In our study population, type 1 necrotising fasciitis was more common than type 2, in keeping with other European studies.21 We found 21 cases of type I necrotising fasciitis and 10 cases of type II. There were no cases of type III (marine organisms) and no cases of purely type IV (fungal). Although in two cases Candida was cultured was in conjunction with multiple other organisms, so was classified as type I. The predominant isolate in type 2 necrotising fasciitis was S. pyogenes, which is common in UK based studies. The incidence of S. pyogenes increased over time in this study with the nine cases occurring between 2013 and 2016. This coincides with a general increase of notifications of invasive group A streptoccocal disease in the UK.22

Of the six patients who died acutely in our cohort, four of these patients had S. pyogenes identified on culture. S. pyogenes is known to be associated with mortality and this remains clear from our experience.8,13,18Emm typing has now become standard practice in UK microbiology laboratories and is particularly relevant for the identification of strains and to recognise ‘true’ outbreaks.23 Although emm types 1, 3 and 89 are common in the UK and associated with invasive disease.13,15,16,24

Emm type 1 S. pyogenes was the most common in our group and we did not identify any isolates of the more recently identified emm 89 type. The time to theatre average was 3.54 hours but there were significant range differences from 45 minutes to 18 hours and 35 minutes. The difficulty in diagnosis is highlighted by these figures.

The pelvis and perineum was as expected the most commonly affected site and required input from general, plastics and orthopaedic surgeons for operative treatment. Fournier’s gangrene (polymicrobial necrotising fasciitis of the perianal, perineal or genital areas)25 was only identified in two patients in our cohort. The majority of our patients required ongoing treatment in the intensive care unit requiring further medical support and subsequent rehabilitation.

Necrotising fasciitis is a surgical emergency with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. The data from the North East of Scotland have allowed further development of standard protocols for initial identification, treatment and surgical intervention. Our data show that this disease presents with initially slight clinical patient abnormality and therefore there is a need for a high index of suspicion to allow prompt intervention.

We found a wide range in time to theatre in our cohort, with a delay of up to over 18 hours for one patient. Although the reason for this are multifactorial, the main reason our delays were identification of necrotising fasciitis and the subsequent clinical decision to treat with debridement. Prompt recognition of necrotising fasciitis is the first step, and thereafter a clear plan initiated of multimodal antibiotic therapy and debridement in theatre. Most of our patients had underlying medical comorbidities and this should raise suspicion in the unwell adult for necrotising fasciitis with swelling, erythema and pain. The causative bacteria can be variable but initial therapy should cover polymicrobial necrotising fasciitis as per local regional antimicrobial guidelines. Until microbial aetiology and sensitivities are known, broad-spectrum antibiotics should be administered that cover the most common aetiologies for necrotising fasciitis. Until group A streptococcal involvement is excluded, antimicrobial agents that inhibit toxin productions such as clindamycin or linezolid should be included empirically.26 Classically necrotising fasciitis is a surgical emergency and expedient surgical treatment is also of paramount importance. In our centre we have a six-category alphabetised booking system for emergency theatres, with category ‘A’ booked patients aimed to be brought to theatre within 45 minutes. We are fortunate to have multiple emergency theatre teams on site and in our experience if a patient is booked as a high category, although there can be the occasional logistical delays transporting the patient within the hospital site, in general the criteria is honoured, and the patient reaches theatre on time. We found that delays in time to theatre were caused by a delay in diagnosis and clinical treatment planning. We have strived to decrease time to theatre by attempting to identify these patients with a ‘Think Nec Fasc’ educational programme and prompt posters in key clinical areas such as the emergency department resuscitation bay, the trauma and orthopaedic ward and the plastic surgery ward. This program is designed to decrease the time to diagnosis and time to theatre as an aid to decision making.

The quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score27 was introduced by the Sepsis-3 group in 2016 as an abbreviated version of the sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score often used in critical care help identify patients who are at risk of poor outcomes with infection. Although this scoring system did not exist prior to our cohort, we have scored each patient retrospectively based on their initial observations in hospital to identify if this scoring system may help in identifying necrotising fasciitis patients. The scoring system is out of 3, with a score of 2 or higher associated with an intensive care stay or death. One point is allocated for low blood pressure (systolic ≤ 100 mmHg), high respiratory rate (≥ 22 breaths/minute) or altered mental state (Glasgow Coma Score ≤ 14).27

Of the four patients with type II necrotising fasciitis who died acutely, all had a qSOFA score of 2 or more on initial observations. This is reflective of the aggressive nature of type II necrotising fasciitis. Of the remaining two patients in our cohort with type I necrotising fasciitis who died acutely they scored 0 and 1 on the qSOFA score on initial observations, highlighting that no scoring system is foolproof. LRINEC scores for all of our patient cohort are shown in Table 1. In clinical practice we have not found this system particularly useful in diagnosis or as an aid to decision making, as although a score of greater than 6 is associated with necrotising fasciitis, a score below 6 does not rule it out. Introduction of regular use of scoring systems including LRINEC and qSOFA are certainly useful adjuncts, but ultimately it remains a clinical diagnosis.

Before this study, a specific necrotising fasciitis care pathway did not exist in our hospital. Although we identified the requirement for a multi-disciplinary approach. One of the problems highlighted here was referral from both emergency department staff and general practitioners to multiple specialties (accident and emergency, general surgery, orthopaedics, plastics) but with no consensus as to which specialties and how many to involve. The ‘Think Nec Fasc’ programme highlights all suspected necrotising fasciitis patients to be referred to plastic surgery as a standard, but also subcategories the location to further specialties to ensure multidisciplinary involvement early on. For example, if there is limb involvement then refer to plastics and orthopaedics also, if there is abdominal involvement plastics and general surgery, and if there is evidence of vascular compromise refer to the vascular surgeons as an adjunct. In particular, those patients with a high qSOFA score should be considered for early surgical involvement.

Although hyperbaric oxygen has been reported to be of benefit in isolated cases28 we have not used this for the treatment of necrotising fasciitis in our unit. Logistically, treating acutely septic patients with hyperbaric oxygen is complicated and the hyperbaric department on our clinical campus is mainly used for diving related injuries and illness. Immunoglobulin therapy is an emerging field and has been successfully used to treat necrotising fasciitis in combination with tradition treatments.29 Although not used in this cohort, it could be considered in future cases, particularly in streptococcal toxic shock, although current evidence is conflicting regarding its efficacy.30

Conclusion

We recommend treating type II necrotising fasciitis more aggressively and paying particular attention to patients with a high qSOFA score on initial observations, as we have found this broadly to be associated with mortality. We also recommend a necrotising fasciitis care pathway with clear agreed hospital-wide guidelines for specialties to involve which will aid in timely decision making.

When treated efficiently and effectively, we have found that patients with this life-threatening disease can benefit from life-saving treatment. Even with the multidisciplinary approach and prompt clinical diagnosis and treatment, necrotising fasciitis carries significant mortality.

References

  • 1.Hasham S, Matteucci P, Stanley PR, Hart NB. Necrotising fasciitis. BMJ 2005; (7495): 830–833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Angoules AG, Kontakis G, Drakoulakis E et al. Necrotising fasciitis of upper and lower limb: a systematic review. Injury 2007; (Suppl 5): S19–S26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wilson B. Necrotizing fasciitis. Am Surg 1952; (4): 416–431. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lamb LE, Sriskandan S, Tan LK. Bromine, bear-claw scratch fasciotomies, and the Eagle effect: management of group A streptococcal necrotising fasciitis and its association with trauma. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; (1): 109–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Olsen RJ, Musser JM. Molecular pathogenesis of necrotizing fasciitis. Annu Rev Pathol 2010; : 1–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Morgan MS. Diagnosis and management of necrotising fasciitis: a multiparametric approach. J Hosp Infect 2010; (4): 249–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Francis KR, Lamaute HR, Davis JM, Pizzi WF. Implications of risk factors in necrotizing fasciitis. Am Surg 1993; (5): 304–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nuwayhid ZB, Aronoff DM, Mulla ZD. Blunt trauma as a risk factor for group A streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis. Ann Epidemiol 2007; (11): 878–881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bryant AE, Bayer CR, Huntington JD, Stevens DL. Group A streptococcal myonecrosis: increased vimentin expression after skeletal-muscle injury mediates the binding of Streptococcus pyogenes. J Infect Dis 2006; (12): 1,685–1,692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Anaya DA, McMahon K, Nathens A et al. Predictors of mortality and limb loss in necrotizing soft tissue infections. Arch Surg 2005; (2): 151–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jain D, Kumar Y, Vasishta R et al. Zygomycotic necrotizing fasciitis in immunocompetent patients: a series of 18 cases. Mod Pathol 2006; (9): 1,221–1,226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lamagni TL, Efstratiou A, Vuopio-Varkila J et al. Strep-EURO. The epidemiology of severe Streptococcus pyogenes associated disease in Europe. Euro Surveill 2005; (9): 179–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lamagni TL, Efstratiou A, Dennis J et al. Increase in invasive group A streptococcal infections in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 2008–9. Euro Surveill 20095; (5): pii: 19,110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Saunders NA, Hallas G, Gaworzewska ET et al. PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and sequencing as an alternative to serology for M-antigen typing of Streptococcus pyogenes. J Clin Microbiol 1997; (10): 2,689–2,691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Turner CE, Abbott J, Lamagni T et al. Emergence of a new highly successful acapsular group A Streptococcus clade of genotype emm89 in the United Kingdom. mBio 2015; (4): e00622-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Al-Shahib A, Underwood A, Afshar B et al. Emergence of a novel lineage containing a prophage in emm/M3 group A Streptococcus associated with upsurge in invasive disease in the UK. Microb Genom 2016; (6): e000059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Edlich RF, Cross CL, Dahlstrom JJ, Long W. 3rd. Modern concepts of the diagnosis and treatment of necrotizing fasciitis. J Emerg Med 2010; (2): 261–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Working Grou. on Severe Streptococcal Infections. Defining the group A streptococcal toxic shock syndrome: rationale and consensus definition. JAMA 1993; (3): 390–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wong CH, Khin LW, Heng K et al. The LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) score: a tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections. Crit Care Med 2004; (7): 1,535–1,541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wong CH, Chang HC, Pasupathy S et al. Necrotizing fasciitis: clinical presentation, microbiology, and determinants of mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; (8): 1,454–1,460. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Van Stigt SFL, de Vrie. J, Bijker JB et al. Review of 58 patients with necrotizing fasciitis in the Netherlands. World J Emerg Surg 2016; : 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Public Health England Group A streptococcal infections: fourth update on seasonal activity, 2015/16. 2016. Health Protection Rep 2016; (16): 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Turner CE, Bedford L, Brown N et al. Community outbreaks of group A Streptococcus revealed by genome sequencing. Sci Rep 2017; (1): 8,554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Johnson DR, Kaplan EL, VanGheem A et al. Characterization of group A streptococci (Streptococcus pyogenes): correlation of M-protein and emm-gene type with T-protein agglutination pattern and serum opacity factor. J Med Microbiol 2006; (Pt 2): 157–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mallikarjuna MN, Vijayakumar A, Patil VS, Shivswamy BS. Fournier’s gangrene: current practices. ISRN Surgery 2012; : 942,437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.BMJ Necrotising fasciitis. BMJ Best Practice. https://bestpractice.bmj.com/topics/en-gb/821 (cited February 2019).
  • 27.Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour C et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; (8): 801–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stevens DL. Streptococcal toxic-shock syndrome: spectrum of disease, pathogenesis, and new concepts in treatment. Emerg Infect Dis 1995; (3): 69–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Koch C, Hecker A, Grau V et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin in necrotizing fasciitis: a case report and review of recent literature. Ann Med Surg 2015; (3): 260–263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sartelli M, Malangoni MA, May A et al. World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines for management of skin and soft tissue infections. World J Emerg Surg 2014; (1): 57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES