Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 May 13;9:7292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43739-w

Immune regeneration in irradiated mice is not impaired by the absence of DPP9 enzymatic activity

Margaret G Gall 1,#, Hui Emma Zhang 1,#, Quintin Lee 1, Christopher J Jolly 2, Geoffrey W McCaughan 1, Adam Cook 1, Ben Roediger 1, Mark D Gorrell 1,
PMCID: PMC6513830  PMID: 31086209

Abstract

The ubiquitous intracellular protease dipeptidyl peptidase 9 (DPP9) has roles in antigen presentation and B cell signaling. To investigate the importance of DPP9 in immune regeneration, primary and secondary chimeric mice were created in irradiated recipients using fetal liver cells and adult bone marrow cells, respectively, using wild-type (WT) and DPP9 gene-knockin (DPP9S729A) enzyme-inactive mice. Immune cell reconstitution was assessed at 6 and 16 weeks post-transplant. Primary chimeric mice successfully regenerated neutrophils, natural killer, T and B cells, irrespective of donor cell genotype. There were no significant differences in total myeloid cell or neutrophil numbers between DPP9-WT and DPP9S729A-reconstituted mice. In secondary chimeric mice, cells of DPP9S729A-origin cells displayed enhanced engraftment compared to WT. However, we observed no differences in myeloid or lymphoid lineage reconstitution between WT and DPP9S729A donors, indicating that hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) engraftment and self-renewal is not diminished by the absence of DPP9 enzymatic activity. This is the first report on transplantation of bone marrow cells that lack DPP9 enzymatic activity.

Subject terms: Lymphopoiesis, Myelopoiesis, Innate immunity

Introduction

The ubiquitous intracellular post-proline serine protease dipeptidyl peptidase 9 (DPP9) belongs to the DPP4 gene family, which includes four atypical serine proteases: DPP4, fibroblast activation protein (FAP), DPP8 and DPP91,2. DPP9 plays roles in both innate and adaptive immunity. DPP9 is extensively expressed throughout immunological tissues in vivo3 and within individual leukocyte subpopulations1,49. DPP9 mRNA and protein is up-regulated in stimulated mouse splenocytes and in Jurkat T- and Raji B-cell lines6. Endogenous DPP9 limits the presentation of an antigenic peptide, RU134–42, through cleaving this peptide10. DPP9 causes Syk degradation and thus influences Syk signalling in B cells8. Activation and proliferation of innate and adaptive immune cells is diminished in the absence of DPP9 enzymatic activity4,9,11,12. Within monocytes and macrophages, basal DPP8 and DPP9 activity suppresses inflammasome activation through inhibition of pro-caspase-1 activation via NLRP-113,14. Thus, a variety of evidence supports multiple roles for DPP9 in the regulation of immune function.

We generated the first gene DPP9 knock-in (DPP9S729A) mouse that has a single serine-to-alanine point mutation at the enzyme active site (S729A)15. Unlike mice deficient in any other protease of this gene family, homozygote DPP9 deficiency is neonate lethal1517. DPP9 is closely related to the extracellular proteases DPP4 (CD26) and fibroblast activation protein (FAP)18. DPP4 is expressed by immune cells of both the myeloid and lymphoid lineages19,20. Genetic or pharmacologic ablation of DPP4 improves bone marrow engraftment21. We found that FAP expression does not influence the proportions of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells, dendritic cells and neutrophils in the thymus, lymph node or spleen in healthy adult mice22. Whether the absence of DPP9 enzymatic activity affects short-term and long-term repopulation of immune cells of the lymphoid or myeloid lineages is underexplored.

Hematopoiesis is critically dependent upon hematopoietic stem cells (HSC). HSC migrate into the fetal liver between embryonic day (ED) 11 and 12 whereupon their numbers expand substantially23,24. Between ED 13.5 and 14.5, the fetal liver contains large numbers of hematopoietic foci with erythropoiesis constituting a major part of their activity but also with capacity for myelopoiesis and lymphopoiesis25. A successful short-term primary engraftment (30 to 60 days) can provide confirmation that the progenitor cell pool is intact and that all myeloid and lymphoid cell types are present and, in the long term (4 months), whether the reconstituted HSC are functional2628. However, even successful long-term engraftment in a primary transplant recipient does not rule out defects in self-renewal or proliferation capability. Hence, a further serial transplant is often undertaken in chimera studies to demonstrate intact HSC engraftment and renewal27.

Post-transplant, identifying the progeny of the transplanted HSC is important to ascertain the effectiveness of the original graft and the properties of the regenerating immune system. The most commonly used method to achieve this is through the CD45 allelic model, where genetic differences in CD45 (CD45.1 and CD45.2) between donor and recipient mouse strains enable donor-derived cells to be traced by flow cytometry26,29. Neutrophils and macrophages are the first cell types to recover after combined myelo-ablative irradiation and fetal liver or adult bone marrow cell transplant. These cells appear in the first few days after transplant, followed closely by B cells. Platelets and red blood cell lineages are present in the peripheral circulation at one to two weeks post-irradiation27. A small proportion of host T cells resist the effects of irradiation and expand in the post-irradiated environment, and can be detected within three weeks of transplant, while donor T cells usually become detectable 4 to 5 weeks after transplantation29.

Very recently, an independent study found that ED 17.5 fetal liver-derived hematopoietic stem cells from a similar DPP9S729A mouse16,17 are able to fully reconstitute immune cell subsets 6 weeks after transplant in competitive mixed chimeras30. Here, we have explored the role of DPP9 enzyme activity in immune cell development through the creation of two sequential chimeras using ED 13.5 to 14.5 fetal liver cells and using adult bone marrow cells of WT and DPP9S729A origin. Both short-term (6 weeks) and long-term (4 months) hematopoietic regeneration were analyzed.

Results

Hematopoietic stem cells in the fetal liver are unaltered by DPP9 genotype

Fetal liver cells were used as donor cells for primary bone marrow reconstitution chimeras because DPP9S729A mice die within 24 h of birth1517, precluding the availability of an adult source of DPP9-defective HSC. Prior to chimera experiments, fetal liver cells deficient in DPP9 enzymatic activity were analyzed for viability and the phenotypic content of stem and progenitor cells, which are necessary for immune regeneration. At this developmental stage the majority of haematopoietic cells are committed to the erythroid lineage, as indicated by TER-119 reactivity31,32, while the remaining cells predominantly express the myeloid-associated marker CD11b33. Fetal liver cells were harvested at ED13.5–14.5 and stained with antibodies against TER-119 and CD11b to identify erythroid and myeloid cells, respectively. The expected predominance of TER-119 positive cells (80–90%) was observed. TER-119 and CD11b immunopositivity was comparable between DPP9-WT and DPP9S729A fetal liver cells (Fig. 1). This data analysis excluded red blood cells, but data analysis that included red blood cells generated similar outcomes (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Percentages of TER119+ and CD11b+ fetal liver cell populations prepared for inoculation of irradiated mice. Fetal liver cells from DPP9S729A and DPP9-WT (WT) embryos were stained with TER119-APC and CD11b-FITC antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry. TER119+ and CD11b+ cells were gated following red blood cell exclusion. No statistically significant difference was observed between the percentages of DPP9S729A and WT cells in the inoculum for either erythroid lineage or myeloid lineage. Stacked bars and error bars represent mean and SD. Black circle and square represent individual data of TER119+ and CD11b+ cells, respectively. n = 5 (DPP9-WT embryos) or n = 5 (DPP9S729A embryos).

DPP9S729A fetal liver cells reconstitute the immune system of irradiated mice

Primary chimeras were generated using fetal liver cells from DPP9-WT and DPP9S729A mice. Peripheral blood was taken at 6 and 16 weeks post-transplantation for flow cytometry analyses of peripheral blood leukocytes, representative of short-term and long-term immune compartment regeneration, respectively.

Donor cell survival and hematopoietic replenishment in primary chimeric mice

Mice transplanted with DPP9-WT or DPP9S729A fetal liver cells showed no significant differences in either mean weight or mean percentage weight change throughout the experimental period (Supplementary Fig. 2). The replenishment by donor-derived cells in peripheral blood was examined by distinguishing the CD45 alleles in the recipient mice. The proportion of residual recipient cells (CD45.1+) present at 6 weeks post-transplantation was less than 7% of total peripheral blood leukocytes (Fig. 2), indicating that the donor cells (CD45.2+) survived the engraftment procedure and that the fetal liver cell transplant conferred a sufficiently effective donor graft to ensure hematopoietic cell reconstitution. At 16 weeks post-transplantation, the residual recipient cells had fallen to ~2% (Fig. 2), suggesting effective long-term engraftment by the donor cells. No statistical difference was seen between DPP9-WT and DPP9S729A donor cells at either 6 or 16 weeks post-transplantation. Thus, fetal liver cells carrying the DPP9S729A mutant allele were not impaired in their ability to engraft in irradiated congenic hosts.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Proportions of donor and residual recipient cells of primary chimeric mice. Irradiated mice inoculated with DPP9S729A or DPP9-WT (WT) fetal liver cells were assessed for the percentage of donor cell-origin and residual recipient cell-origin leukocytes at 6 and 16 weeks post-transplantation. Both DPP9S729A and WT cell-origin groups displayed a small percentage of residual recipient cells at 6 weeks post-transplantation, and fewer at 16 weeks post-transplantation. Mean, SD and individual data. n = 9 (6 weeks) or n = 7 (16 weeks).

Identification of myeloid cell types in primary chimeric mice

To examine the development and repopulation of hematopoietic lineages, the major myeloid and lymphoid cell types were analyzed. Comparison was made between DPP9-WT-origin and DPP9S729A-origin chimeras as well as normal peripheral blood leukocytes data for C57BL/6 mice34. Here we assessed two major lineages: Ly6G+ neutrophils and CD3− CD19− NK1.1− Ly6G− CD11b+ myeloid cells (which are predominantly monocytes; data not shown). There were no significant differences observed between the WT and DPP9S729A cell-origin recipient mice for either time-point for either total myeloid cells or neutrophils (Fig. 3a), suggesting that carrying the mutant DPP9 allele does not significantly alter hematopoietic regeneration in primary chimeric mice.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Myeloid and lymphoid cell phenotypes in peripheral blood of primary chimeric mice. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood from primary chimeric mice, showing total myeloid cells and neutrophils (a) and the major lymphoid cell phenotypes (b) as percentages of total donor leucocytes at 6 and 16 weeks post-transplantation. The proportions of myeloid cells and neutrophils were similar in DPP9S729A-origin mice and WT-origin mice. Myeloid cells and neutrophils were decreased at 16 weeks compared with 6 weeks for both groups of mice. (a) The proportion of B cells at 6 weeks was perhaps less (p = 0.065) in DPP9S729A-origin mice compared to WT-origin mice at 6 weeks, and was less compared to DPP9S729A -origin mice at 16 weeks. (b) The proportion of T cells increased between 6 and 16 weeks in both DPP9S729A-origin mice and WT-origin mice. (b) Mean, SD and individual data. n = 9 (6 weeks), n = 7 a 16 weeks. Significance; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

There was a clear decrease in myeloid cells between 6 and 16 weeks post-transplantation (Fig. 3a). This decrease was similar in both genotype-origins, and is consistent with changes that are known to occur between short-term and long-term regeneration after irradiation and donor engraftment35. By 16 weeks, myeloid cell levels were comparable to those found in normal mouse peripheral blood34. Neutrophils normally represent the largest percentage of myeloid cells, at approximately 30% in mouse. Neutrophils of the primary chimera were ~21% at 6 weeks and decreased to ~14% at 16 weeks post-transplantation, with no significant difference between different genotype-origin groups (Fig. 3a).

Identification of lymphoid cell types in primary chimeric mice

In these analyses, we assessed the major lymphoid lineages, namely CD3+ T cells, CD19+ B cells, and NK1.1+ natural killer (NK) cells. NK cells, which contribute to the early detection of virus-infected and cancer cells, are important for defense against pathogens and regain normal cell numbers and function within a month of transplantation28,36,37. In the primary chimeric mice, no significant difference in NK cell numbers was observed between different genotype-origin groups or between 6 and 16 weeks post-transplantation (Fig. 3b). These data suggest that once re-established in the peripheral blood, NK cell numbers were stable.

As reappearance of B cells is an early event occurring in the first few days after engraftment, the percentage of total B cells amongst the total lymphoid donor cells was expected to have reached a stable level by 6 weeks post-transplantation. This was the case for peripheral blood leukocytes at 6 weeks, although recovery in B cell numbers in the DPP9S729A-origin cells might have been slower than WT-origin cells (p = 0.065, Fig. 3b). At 16 weeks post-transplantation, the B cell numbers for both genotype-origin groups of mice were similar (Fig. 3b) and consistent with normal peripheral blood B cell percentages34.

Residual T cells of recipient origin, which is the cell type most resistant to irradiation, can be readily detectable within the first three weeks. Donor-derived T cells become readily detectable 4 to 5 weeks post-transplant29. Since the primary chimeric mice received a lethal dose of myelo-ablative radiation, few residual recipient T cells were expected to survive. Concordantly, few donor T cells were detected 6 weeks post-transplantation (Fig. 3b). T cell numbers greatly increased over time, reaching ~10% of peripheral blood leukocytes at 16 weeks post-transplantation. As T cells comprise about 20% of peripheral blood leukocytes in normal mice34, full reconstitution of the T cell compartment was perhaps not attained at 16 weeks post-transplantation in any of the mice. No significant difference in T cell numbers was observed between the WT and DPP9S729A cell-origin recipient mice.

Secondary chimeric mice of DPP9S729A-origin displayed an enhanced engraftment ability and an unimpaired capacity for self-renewal and proliferation

Successful long-term engraftment in a primary cell transplant recipient does not rule out defects in self-renewal capability. Hence, further serial transplants are often undertaken in studies of chimeras, in order to detect defects in HSC self-renewal capacity and the capacity for proliferation26. Therefore, a second set of chimeric mice was generated, in which irradiated WT hosts received BM cells from primary chimeric mice along with BM cells from congenic PTPRCA mice as competitor cells. As the result of the secondary engraftment was unknown before commencement of the experiment, competing donor cells and sub-lethal recipient irradiation were used to ensure successful cellular engraftment, immune regeneration and survival of the recipient mice27.

Both mouse groups, which respectively received BM from the DPP9-WT-origin and DPP9S729A-origin primary chimeric mice, showed a similar pattern of weight loss and gain throughout 13 weeks of weight monitoring (Supplementary Fig. 3). Return to start weight after initial weight loss was achieved in a much shorter time frame (about 2 weeks post-transplantation) than for the primary chimeric mice (4–5 weeks post-transplantation). This is consistent with the sub-lethal irradiation dose administered to the secondary mice compared to the higher-dose, lethal myelo-ablative treatment of the primary mice.

Donor cell survival and replenishment in secondary chimeric mice

Irradiated mice were transplanted with DPP9S729A-origin and DPP9-WT-origin primary chimeric mouse BM cells along with PTPRCA adult BM cells in the ratio of 40:60 (donor:competitor). As both competitor cells and recipient cells carried the CD45.1 allele, it was not possible to differentiate between these two sources of cells. Donor cells, however, all carried the CD45.2 allele and so could be clearly identified.

At both 6 and 16 weeks post-transplantation, the ratio of donor cells to competitor cells in WT-origin mice was 20:80 where the 80% includes residual recipient cells that survived irradiation (Fig. 4a). This shows a dominance of competitor and residual recipient cells over donor cells, possibly due to increased numbers of residual recipient cells after sub-lethal irradiation. Interestingly, for the DPP9S729A-origin groups, at both time-points, the ratio of donor to competitor (with residual recipient) cells was more closely aligned to the original transplanted cell ratio (40:60, Fig. 4a), suggesting that the DPP9S729A-origin donor cells had an enhanced engraftment ability. The ratio of donor to competitor cells did not alter between 6 and 16 weeks post-transplantation. Proportions of individual cell populations are presented for each mouse at 6 weeks post-transplantation (Fig. 4b). Increased proportions of DPP9S729A-origin cells occurred across all lineages, suggesting better engraftment of HSC rather than improved competition by specific cell subsets.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Secondary chimeric mice: Proportions of donor and residual recipient cells. Irradiated mice were transplanted with DPP9S729A or DPP9-WT adult bone marrow cells along with CD45.1+ Ptprca adult BM cells at a ratio of 40:60 (donor:competitor). (a) The WT-origin group displayed a bias towards competitor cells over donor cells, whereas the DPP9S729A-origin group displayed no bias. All groups had a shortfall below 100% (dotted line), which represented outlier competitor cells and residual recipient cells that were gated out during analysis. Mean, SD and individual data. Significance; ****p < 0.0001. (b) Proportions of leukocyte subpopulations for each mouse. WT-origin n = 9, DPP9S729A-origin n = 10, at 6 weeks post-transplantation.

Identification of myeloid cell phenotypes in secondary chimeric mice

No differences in myeloid cell populations were observed between WT-origin and DPP9S729A-origin groups, at 6 or 16 weeks post-transplantation (Fig. 5a). In a similar pattern to that seen in the primary chimeric mice, myeloid cell percentages showed a significant reduction from 6 to 16 weeks post-transplantation (Fig. 5a). Myeloid cell percentages at 6 weeks were reduced in the secondary chimera (~23%) compared to the primary chimera (~40%). Perhaps associated with this, the reduction in myeloid cell percentages at 16 weeks was less pronounced in the secondary than in the primary chimera. Similar to the primary chimera, approximately 60% of myeloid cells in each genotype were neutrophils at 6-weeks post-transplantation (Fig. 5a). At 16 weeks, however, this proportion was approximately 50% for each genotype, and this difference was significant for DPP9S729A-origin cells. Perhaps at 16 weeks there was a less intense irradiation-induced inflammatory response in the secondary compared to the primary chimera, or a more rapid resolution of that response, such that at 16 weeks the myeloid cell compartment was normalised from a neutrophil-biased state to encompass other granulocyte cell types.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Secondary chimeric mice: Myeloid and lymphoid cell phenotypes in peripheral blood. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood measured the percentages of total myeloid and neutrophil leukocytes (a) and of lymphoid lineage leukocytes (b) at 6 weeks and 16 weeks post-transplantation. Mean, SD and individual data, WT-origin n = 9, DPP9S729A-origin n = 10. Significance; p < 0.05.

Identification of lymphoid cell phenotypes in secondary chimeric mice

In secondary chimeric mice, the main lymphoid lineage cell subsets were present and were not significantly different in abundance between genotypes (Fig. 5b). As with the primary chimera, the B cell percentages were consistent with those normally observed in mouse peripheral blood leukocytes34. In contrast to the primary chimeric mice, T cell percentages were approximately 11% at both 6 and 16 weeks post-transplantation in each chimera. This was less than the expected level of 20% T cells in peripheral blood leukocytes.

Considering the overall peripheral blood leukocytes of both myeloid and lymphoid lineage, the trend in the primary chimeric mice from 6 to 16-weeks post-transplant was towards a greater proportion of lymphoid cells (Fig. 6a). This is consistent with a change from unlimited self-renewal ability by HSC towards a limited self-renewal ability as the regenerating immune system changes from short term to long term reconstitution38. For the secondary chimeras, the peripheral blood leukocytes of both myeloid and lymphoid lineages were similar at 6 and 16 weeks post-transplant, with a strong bias towards the lymphoid lineages (Fig. 6b).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Enumeration of donor peripheral blood leukocytes of primary and secondary chimeric mice. Phenotypic analyses of total peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) of donor origin. Between 6 and 16 weeks after fetal liver cell transplant, both WT-origin and DPP9S729A-origin mice increased the proportion of lymphoid lineage cells in PBL (a). The proportions of lymphoid and myeloid lineage cells were comparable between 6 and 16 weeks after bone marrow cell transplant of WT-origin or DPP9S729A-origin cells (b).

Discussion

We created chimeric mice using fetal and adult donor cells with both normal and absent DPP9 enzymatic activity. We showed that a lack of DPP9 enzymatic activity in HSC does not impair their ability to engraft in irradiated mice or to repopulate all major immune cell types in the regenerated immune system in primary or secondary chimeras. Interestingly, secondary chimeric mice were efficiently engrafted by blood immune cell precursors lacking DPP9 enzymatic activity.

Fetal liver cells of DPP9-WT and DPP9S729A origin consisted of the same proportions of erythroid and non-erythroid lineage cells. This provided a common starting point for creation of the chimeric mice and for assessment and quantification of HSC numbers and functionality.

Our data broadly concord with data from an independently-derived DPP9S729A mouse30. That study examined only primary chimeras and only at 6 weeks and used ED 17.5 rather than ED 13.5 fetal liver. Importantly, the data from both that study and our study are consistent with current knowledge of normal engraftment by fetal liver cells34,35,37, and so equally suggest that lacking DPP9 does not impair engraftment.

The reconstitution of the primary chimeric mice was very high at both 6 and 16 weeks post-transplant, with only small percentages of residual recipient cells present. Taken together, there was no detectable impairment in the ability of DPP9S729A HSC to engraft in the primary chimera. For the secondary chimeric mice, with an original transplant ratio of 40:60 of donor to competitor + residual cells, the WT-origin group had a higher ratio (20: 80) whilst the DPP9S729A-origin group had a similar ratio to that of the original transplant. Thus, the DPP9S729A-origin donor cells may possess an enhanced engraftment ability in the secondary chimera. Ablation of the DPP9 – related enzyme DPP4 enhances HSC engraftment in irradiated mice21, so this might be a general property of inhibitors of this enzyme family.

Having confirmed effective engraftment of donor cells, we then determined the contribution of hematopoietic cell lineages to the development and repopulation of the reconstituting immune system. At 6 and 16 weeks post-transplantation, in both the primary and secondary chimeric mice, all myeloid and lymphoid cell types considered in this study were present in both genotype-origin groups. Therefore, the progenitor cell pool was intact and both the primary and secondary HSC showed no defect in self-renewal or proliferation capability with the absence of DPP9 enzymatic activity.

The total myeloid lineage cell numbers did not differ with genotype. NK cell numbers were stable regardless of genotype. T cell reconstitution showed no difference between genotypes.

B cells were present at comparable levels in the primary and secondary chimeras. However, in the primary chimeric mice, fewer B cells in the DPP9S729A-origin group were seen compared to the WT-origin group at 6 weeks but not at 16 weeks, which might reflect a delay in B cell re-establishment by cells lacking DPP9 enzyme activity. Taken together, these results indicate that the lack of DPP9 enzymatic activity in hematopoietic cell chimeras affect the generation of granulocyte subsets and B cells but not NK cells or T cells. DPP9 inhibition stabilizes Syk, thereby modulating Syk signaling in B cells8. Thus, DPP9 enzyme activity might have a role in B cell function that influences differentiation and/or proliferation in the absence of antigen stimulation.

In summary, this is the first report exploring the role of DPP9 enzyme activity in immune cell development through the creation of two sequential chimeras using both fetal liver cells and adult bone marrow cells that lack DPP9 enzymatic activity. This work contributes to the understanding of the DPP9 protease in biological systems.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

All animal handling and experimental procedures were approved by Sydney Local Health District Animal Welfare Committee under ethics protocol 2013/017 (K75/5-2012/3/5754), and conducted in accordance with all applicable laws and guidelines. A body scoring system was used recording details for each mouse of posture, activity and gait, breathing, hydration, the presence of abnormal excreta, body condition and body weight as compared to the baseline weight. A weight loss of greater than 15% compared to original weight triggered euthanasia of the mouse.

Mice

Mice were maintained in the Centenary Institute animal facility under specific pathogen free conditions and exposed to a 12 h light-dark cycle. C57BL/6J and PTPRCA mice were purchased from either Animal Resource Centre (Perth, WA, Australia) or Australian BioResources (Moss Vale, NSW, Australia). Mice were housed 4–6 mice per cage with ad libitum access to rodent chow (Specialty Feeds, Perth, Western Australia) and water and entered experiments more than one week after any transport. All the mice used for chimera experiments were at least 8 weeks old before irradiation.

The DPP9S729A mouse strain has been described15. All embryos required for fetal liver cells were obtained from pregnant females where pregnancy resulted from timed mating of DPP9 heterozygous intercrosses. For mating, single females were placed in the male home cage for 12 h then checked for the presence of a vaginal plug as an indicator of mating prior to separation from the male. The time of separation of female and male was designated ED 0.5. Females were weighed at ED 0.5 and weighed daily from ED 4.5 until ED 13. Pregnancy was suggested by weight gain greater than non-pregnant between ED 7.5 and ED 13.539.

Generation of fetal liver chimeras

Primary chimeras were generated using donor-derived fetal liver cells26. Liver cells from embryonic mouse livers at ED13.5 – ED14.5 from DPP9S729A and DPP9-wildtype (DPP9-WT) pups were excised and mashed through a 70 μm sieve into liver cell buffer (1% Glutamax, 2% Penistrep, 10% FCS in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium). The cell suspension was centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 min and the pellet resuspended in cell freezing solution (10% DMSO in FCS). It was necessary to store liver cells by freezing until genotyping results confirmed. When thawing, cell suspension was centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 7 min and the pellet resuspended in 10 mL liver cell buffer. After standing at room temperature for 30 min to release the maximum amount of DMSO, the cell suspension was centrifuged at 4 °C at 2000 rpm for 7 min and resuspended in 400 μL of Hank’s balance salt solution (HBSS) for injection. Eighteen 10 week-old male PTPRCA mice (carrying the CD45.1 allele) received two doses of a 600 rad exposure (at a dose rate of 110 rad per minute) of myelo-ablative radiation using a Gammacell® 40 Exactor Low Dose-Rate Research Irradiator (MDS Nordion Inc. Ontario, Canada) administered 4 h apart as previously described40. For fetal liver cell transplant, 2 × 106 cells at a volume of 200 μL per recipient mouse was injected via the lateral tail vein into recipient mice 3–4 h after irradiation. Post-transplantation, mice were provided with antibiotic in water for 14 days and monitored daily.

Generation of bone marrow chimeras

Bone marrow (BM) was prepared and transplanted as previously40. Secondary chimeras were produced by transferring regenerated BM donor cells from adult primary chimeric mice into new irradiated recipient mice. Nineteen 10 week-old male PTPRCA mice received one dose of a 750 rad exposure of myelo-ablative radiation as described above. The donors were two healthy DPP9S729A-origin primary chimeric mice and two DPP9-WT-origin primary chimeric mice (all carrying the CD45.2 allele). Each pair of selected donor mice had shared a cage but the chimerism in each mouse was produced with a different batch of fetal liver cells. BM cells from these four mice, along with two control male PTPRCA mice, were harvested. BM were released from the femur, tibia and fibula, rinsed and filtered through a 70 μm and then a 40 μm filter. Cell suspension was centrifuged at 300 × g for 5 min at 4 °C and the pellet re-suspended in HBSS. For bone marrow transplant, 6.7 × 106 primary chimera bone marrow cells and 10 × 106 competitor bone marrow cells (carrying the CD45.1 allele) from PTPRCA mice (ratio of donor: competitor = 40%: 60%) at a volume of 200 μL per recipient mouse were injected via the lateral tail vein into recipient mice 3–4 h after irradiation. Post-transplantation, mice were provided with antibiotic water for 14 days and monitored daily.

Flow cytometry

For analysis of fetal liver cells, cell aliquots were thawed and red blood cells were lysed (8.26 g ammonium chloride, 1 g potassium bicarbonate and 0.037 g EDTA dissolved in 1 L of dH2O). After centrifugation and washing, cell pellet was resuspended in 200 μL of FACS wash. Then 100 μL of stain cocktail containing TER-119-APC and CD11b-FITC antibodies (Table 1) was added and incubated on ice for 1 h. For analysis of peripheral blood, 5–6 drops of blood from tail vein were collected into an Eppendorf containing 50 μL 0.1 M EDTA. After red blood cell lysis, cells were pelleted and re-suspended in 200 μL FACS wash. Then 100 μL of stain cocktail containing a number of antibodies to identify immune cell populations represented in a reconstituted immune system (Table 1) was added and incubated on ice for 1 h. Just prior to flow analysis, cells were filtered and DAPI was added (100 ng/mL). Flow cytometry data were acquired using a BD LSR Fortessa cytometer (BD Biosciences) and subsequently analyzed with FlowJo 10 software (Treestar Inc., Ashland, OR, USA). Gating strategies are shown in Supplementary Figs 1 and 4. Data were then analyzed by non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad v. 9.9, San Diego, CA, USA).

Table 1.

Antibodies and their target cell types.

Fluorochrome-Antibody Synonym/clone Target cell Dilution used Source: catalog #
APC TER-119 TER-119 Leukocytes of erythroid lineage 1:250 BD Biosciences, #557909
BUV395 CD19 1D3 B cells 1:200 BD Biosciences #563557
BV421 CD3e 145-2C11 T cells, NK cells 1:250 BD Biosciences #562600
V500 CD45.2 104 Leukocytes 1:250 BD Biosciences #562129
FITC CD11b M1/70 Myeloid cells 1:250 BD Biosciences #557396
PerCP-Cy5.5 CD45.1 A20 Leukocytes 1:250 eBioscience
#45-0453
PE NK1.1 PK136 NK cells 1:250 BD Biosciences #557391
AF647 Ly6G 1A8 Neutrophils 1:250 Biolegend
#127610
APC.Cy7 CD8a 53–6.7 T cells 1:250 BD Biosciences #557654

Supplementary information

Supplementary figures (2.4MB, docx)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Project Grant 512282 (MDG) and Program Grant 571408 (GWM), The Rebecca L. Cooper Medical Research Foundation, a University of Sydney Equipment Grant, Sydney Medical School Foundation/Francis M. Hooper Scholarship for Medical Research through the University of Sydney (MGG), and an Australian Postgraduate Award (HEZ). The authors thank Jeff Crosbie for mice irradiation. The authors acknowledge the animal facility and the flow cytometry facility at the Centenary Institute for the scientific and technical assistance.

Author Contributions

M.G.G. performed the majority of experiments and data analyses. A.C. designed experiments and contributed to some experiments. H.Z., Q.L., M.D.G., B.R., C.J. and G.M. contributed to data interpretation, data presentation and manuscript writing. M.D.G. and C.J. oversaw the laboratories in which these studies occurred.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Margaret G. Gall and Hui Emma Zhang contributed equally.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-43739-w.

References

  • 1.Abbott CA, et al. Cloning, expression and chromosomal localization of a novel human dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP) IV homolog, DPP8. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000;267:6140–6150. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01617.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ajami K, Abbott CA, McCaughan GW, Gorrell MD. Dipeptidyl peptidase 9 has two forms, a broad tissue distribution, cytoplasmic localization and DPIV-like peptidase activity. BBA - Gene Structure Expression. 2004;1679:18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.bbaexp.2004.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yu DMT, et al. The in vivo expression of dipeptidyl peptidases 8 and 9. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2009;57:1025–1040. doi: 10.1369/jhc.2009.953760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lankas G, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibition for the treatment of type 2 diabetes - Potential importance of selectivity over dipeptidyl peptidases 8 and 9. Diabetes. 2005;54:2988–2994. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.10.2988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maes M-B, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase 8/9-like activity in human leukocytes. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2007;81:1252–1257. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0906546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chowdhury S, et al. Regulation of dipeptidyl peptidase 8 and 9 expression in activated lymphocytes and injured liver. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013;19:2883–2893. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i19.2883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang H, Chen Y, Keane FM, Gorrell MD. Advances in understanding the expression and function of dipeptidyl peptidase 8 and 9. Mol. Cancer Res. 2013;11:1487–1496. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-13-0272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Justa-Schuch D, et al. DPP9 is a novel component of the N-end rule pathway targeting the tyrosine kinase Syk. eLife. 2016;5:e16370. doi: 10.7554/eLife.16370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Waumans Y, et al. The dipeptidyl peptidases 4, 8, and 9 in mouse monocytes and macrophages: DPP8/9 inhibition attenuates M1 macrophage activation in mice. Inflammation. 2016;39:413–424. doi: 10.1007/s10753-015-0263-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Geiss-Friedlander R, et al. The cytoplasmic peptidase DPP9 Is rate-limiting for degradation of proline-containing peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:27211–27219. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.041871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Reinhold D, et al. Role of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPIV)-like enzymes in T lymphocyte activation: investigations in DPIV/CD26 knockout mice. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2009;47:268–274. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2009.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Waumans Y, Baerts L, Kehoe K, Lambeir A-M, De Meester I. The dipeptidyl peptidase family, prolyl oligopeptidase and prolyl carboxypeptidase in the immune system and inflammatory disease, including atherosclerosis. Front. Immunol. 2015;6:387–405. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Okondo MC, et al. DPP8 and DPP9 inhibition induces pro-caspase-1-dependent monocyte and macrophage pyroptosis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017;13:46–53. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Okondo MC, et al. Inhibition of DPP8/9 activates the NLRP1b inflammasome. Cell Chem. Biol. 2018;25:262–267. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gall MG, et al. Targeted inactivation of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 9 enzyme activity causes mouse neonate lethality. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e0078378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim M, et al. DPP9 enzyme activity controls survival of mouse migratory tongue muscle progenitors and its absence leads to neonatal lethality due to suckling defect. Dev. Biol. 2017;431:297–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhang HE, Gall MG, Gorrell MD. Letter to Editor. Dev. Biol. 2018;439:1. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ross B, et al. Structures and mechanism of dipeptidyl peptidases 8 and 9, important players in cellular homeostasis and cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E1437–E1445. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717565115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cook S, et al. Differential chemokine receptor expression and usage by pre-cDC1 and pre-cDC2. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2018;96:1131–1139. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Klemann C, Wagner L, Stephan M, von Hörsten S. Cut to the chase: a review of CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase-4’s (DPP4) entanglement in the immune syste. m. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2016;185:1–21. doi: 10.1111/cei.12781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Broxmeyer HE, et al. Dipeptidylpeptidase 4 negatively regulates colony-stimulating factor activity and stress hematopoiesis. Nat. Med. 2012;18:1786–1796. doi: 10.1038/nm.2991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tan S-Y, Chowdhury S, Polak N, Gorrell MD, Weninger W. Fibroblast activation protein is dispensable in the anti-influenza immune response in mice. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0171194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ema H, Nakauchi H. Expansion of hematopoietic stem cells in the developing liver of a mouse embryo. Hematopoiesis. 2000;95:2284–2288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mikkola HK, Orkin SH. The journey of developing hematopoietic stem cells. Development. 2006;133:3733–3744. doi: 10.1242/dev.02568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Traver D, et al. Fetal liver myelopoiesis occurs through distinct, prospectively isolatable progenitor subsets. Blood. 2001;98:627–635. doi: 10.1182/blood.V98.3.627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gudmundsson, K. O., Stull, S. W. & Keller, J. R. In Somatic Stem Cells: Methods and Protocols (ed. Ram Shree Singh) 123–133 (Humana Press, 2012).
  • 27.Duran-Struuck R, Dysko RC. Principles of bone marrow transplantation (BMT): Providing optimal veterinary and husbandry care to irradiated mice in BMT studies. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 2009;48:11–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Auletta JJ, Devecchio JL, Ferrara JLM, Heinzel FP. Distinct phases in recovery of reconstituted innate cellular-mediated immunity after murine syngeneic bone marrow transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004;10:834–847. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2004.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Spangrude, G. J. In Curr. Protoc. Immunol. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001).
  • 30.Kim M, et al. DPP9 enzymatic activity in hematopoietic cells is dispensable for mouse hematopoiesis. Immunol Lett. 2018;198:60–65. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2018.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kina T, et al. The monoclonal antibody TER-119 recognizes a molecule associated with glycophorin A and specifically marks the late stages of murine erythroid lineage. Br. J. Haematol. 2000;109:280–287. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.02037.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kim I, He S, Yilmaz ÖH, Kiel MJ, Morrison SJ. Enhanced purification of fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells using SLAM family receptors. Blood. 2006;108:737–744. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-4135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Babovic S, Eaves CJ. Hierarchical organization of fetal and adult hematopoietic stem cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2014;329:185–191. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chen J, Harrison DE. Quantitative trait loci regulating relative lymphocyte proportions in mouse peripheral blood. Blood. 2002;99:561–566. doi: 10.1182/blood.V99.2.561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bowie MB, et al. Identification of a new intrinsically timed developmental checkpoint that reprograms key hematopoietic stem cell properties. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:5878–5882. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700460104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Awwad, H. K. In Radiation Oncology: Radiobiological and Physiological Perspectives: The boundary-zone between clinical radiotherapy and fundamental radiobiology and physiology Vol. 60 Developments in Oncology Ch. III.5, 247–290 (Springer Science + Business Media, 1990).
  • 37.Sungur CM, Murphy WJ. Positive and negative regulation by NK cells in cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 2014;19:57–66. doi: 10.1615/CritRevOncog.2014010805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kent DG, et al. Prospective isolation and molecular characterization of hematopoietic stem cells with durable self-renewal potential. Blood. 2009;113:6342–6350. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-192054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mader SL, Libal NL, Pritchett-Corning K, Yang R, Murphy SJ. Refining timed pregnancies in two strains of genetically engineered mice. Lab animal. 2009;38:305–310. doi: 10.1038/laban0909-305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shklovskaya E, et al. Langerhans cells are precommitted to immune tolerance induction . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:18049–18054. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110076108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary figures (2.4MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES