Small-Area Radiofrequency-Energy-Harvesting Integrated Circuits for Powering Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract

This study presents a radiofrequency (RF)-energy-harvesting integrated circuit (IC) for powering wireless sensor networks with a wireless transmitter with an industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) of 915 MHz. The proposed IC comprises an RF-direct current (DC) rectifier, an over-voltage protection circuit, a low-power low-dropout (LDO) voltage regulator, and a charger control circuit. In the RF-DC rectifier circuit, a six-stage Dickson voltage multiplier circuit is used to improve the received RF signal to a DC voltage by using native MOS with a small threshold voltage. The over-voltage protection circuit is used to prevent a high-voltage breakdown phenomenon from the RF front-end circuit, particularly for near-field communication. A low-power LDO regulator is designed to provide stable voltage by using zero frequency compensation and a voltage-trimming feedback. Charging current is amplified N times by using a current mirror to rapidly and stably charge a battery in the proposed charger control circuit. The obtained results revealed that the maximum power conversion efficiency of the proposed RF-energy-harvesting IC was 40.56% at an input power of −6 dBm, an output voltage of 1.5 V, and a load of 30 kΩ. A chip area of the RF-energy-harvesting IC was 0.58 × 0.49 mm², including input/output pads, and power consumption was 42 μW.

1. Introduction

Energy harvesting for supplying power to low-power electronic devices has recently become mainstream research. The lifetime of a battery can be extended using a developed self-sustainable power supply. Bito et al. designed a flexible wearable radiofrequency (RF) energy harvester for off-the-shelf two-way talk radios of 2 W using inkjet printing technology, and E- and H-field energy harvesters were verified using a light-emitting diode and microcontroller communication module [1]. Tian et al. presents an integrated solution for a flexible direct current (DC)–DC converter by embedding a flexible polyimide printed circuit board and an inductor made of flexible ferrite-polymer composite in a wire [2]. A wearable RF-energy-harvesting device, which comprises a U-shaped dipole antenna, matching network, RF-DC converter, and DC–DC converter, was presented in [3] for supplying power to smart jewelry. This design converts a 915-MHz RF signal into a constant DC output voltage of 3.1 V at an input power of −6 dBm, which is suitable for supplying power to a fitness monitor pendant under standby mode. An experimental comparison in [3] shows that the Dickson topology has high efficiency at a high input power.

A commercial power supply or battery can be used as a stable power source for providing power to wireless sensor networks (WSNs). However, these power supplies have a finite lifetime, have a large size, incur high maintenance cost, and cause environmental pollution. RF energy harvesting was introduced because of potentially long lifespan, low-power consumption, and small size [4]. In this process, ambient energy is emitted from various sources, such as television (TV), radio, wireless Internet, satellite communication, and base stations, which is converted into feasible DC voltages. WSN devices powered by RF energy can be used in several applications, such as telemetry systems, RF tags, home automation, equipment monitoring, access control, and prolongation of lifespan of powered devices [5,6]. In [7], a five-stage orthogonally switching charge pump rectifier with a voltage boosting network was used for an RF energy harvester. The rectifier provides a DC voltage and power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 1.3 V and 33.72%, respectively, with a load of 100 kΩ from an RF source of −13 dBm at an ISM frequency.

The WSNs are fabricated using low-power circuits, particularly by integrating with an antenna and a voltage multiplier for a stable power supply [8,9]. A combination of a two-stage Villard multiplier with a three-stage Dickson voltage multiplier was proposed to increase output voltage and power efficiency [10]. A Villard–Dickson power harvester circuit can produce an output voltage of 4 V with an efficiency of 3.9% and an output voltage of 8.8 V with an efficiency of 14.6% without and with a matching circuit, respectively, at an input signal of 4.1 dBm from a TV station [10]. A microstrip matching circuit and zero-biased diode were used to improve the performance of the designed energy-harvesting device.

The Internet of Things (IoT) is a well-known platform, wherein each physical object is connected to the Internet without requiring human interaction. Few people check for regular supply of power to IoT, excluding WSNs. To supply power to these communication devices for a long duration, a self-sustainable power system is required for complex networks [11]. A feasible technique is to harvest RF energy from external environmental sources, which could be used as an auxiliary power supply for increasing the battery life [12,13]. In general, RF energy-harvesting bands from ISM (900–928 MHz) and WLAN (2.4/5 GHz) have received considerable attention because they can cover cities and countries due to their continuous emission as commercial bands [14,15,16]. In [17], RF energy harvesting employed a Wi-Fi band at a frequency of 2.4 GHz by using the P21XXCSR-EVB evaluation board from Powercast. Four types of antennas and an RF-energy-harvesting evaluation board are included in this research. Experiments have shown that power losses in air and antennas have a stronger effect on the total efficiency of the system than the losses in the RF energy harvester. The RF-energy-harvesting system can be improved using antenna arrays, particularly for supplying power to low-power sensors and IoT devices.

Most previous studies have used an individual energy-harvesting source to supply power to low-power sensors and IoT devices. However, the available environmental energies affect the input power of the RF transmitter (Powercast Corporation) at a frequency of 2.4 GHz. Sensors and IoT devices are always installed on the ceiling of a room. For uniform RF transmission and increasing communication distance, this study employed a TX91501 RF transmitter from Powercast Corporation [18], which provides an output power of 3 W at an ISM band of 915 MHz, with a maximum transmission distance of 12–15 m. Moreover, a 1-dBi bipolar antenna was used as a receiving antenna to design an RF-energy-harvesting chip. Figure 1 shows the proposed RF-energy-harvesting system, which includes a Powercast transmitter, receiving antenna, RF-energy-harvesting IC, and power source.

Figure 1.

Proposed RF-energy-harvesting system.

The following section elucidates the circuit topology of the designed RF-energy-harvesting IC. Section 3 and Section 4 present the simulated and measured results and conclusions, respectively.

2. Circuit Topology of RF-Energy-Harvesting Integrated Circuit

Figure 2 shows a functional diagram of the RF-energy-harvesting IC, which receives RF energy from the receiving antenna, and this energy charges energy storage devices. Thus, the proposed IC is used as a backup stable power source. An off-chip matching network from MuRata Manufacturing Co. Ltd. was used to guarantee maximum power transfer. The RF-DC rectifier received the transferred RF energy from a matching network and converted this energy into DC voltage. An over-voltage protection circuit was then designed to protect the RF-DC rectifier when the output voltage of the designed rectifier was higher than the breakdown voltage [19]. A stable voltage of 1.5 V is passed through the low-power LDO circuit and sent to the charging control circuit for charging storage devices such as a battery.

Figure 2.

Functional diagram of RF-energy-harvesting IC.

2.1. Matching Network

Because of an antenna impedance of 50 Ω, the input impedance of the matching network must be matched to 50 Ω. This matching circuit is used to not only guarantee maximum power transfer but also obtain maximum conversion efficiency. If the matching network includes capacitor C and inductor L, maximum power transformation is obtained from an antenna to a load. Source impedance R_amust be equal to the conjugate input impedance Z_in of the matching network [20]. The maximum output power P_L,max can be expressed as follows:

$$P_{L,\max }=\left|I_a^2\right|\times \Re e[Z_{in}]=\frac{V_a^2}{4R_a}$$ (1)

where V_a is the peak voltage of the antenna. I_a and Z_in are the input current and input impedance of the matching network, respectively.

In this study, the impedance of the antenna and the input impedance of the RF-DC rectifier were 50 Ω and 240.4 – j473.9 Ω, respectively. The impedance of the matching network must be equal to 50 Ω [21]. Simulations were performed with ADS software and component datasheet provided from MuRata Company, and inductor L, labeled as LQG15HS_02, and capacitor C, labeled as GRM15, were used to complete the matching network. Moreover, authors paid more attention toward self-resonant frequencies (SRFs) for selecting a suitable inductor. The operating frequency of the matching network must be lower than the SRF of the selected inductor. The larger the inductor is, the smaller the SRF is. For example, the minimum SRFs were 1000 and 800 MHz for L ≤ 47 μH and L ≥ 56 μH, respectively. If input power was set to −10 dBm at an operating frequency of 915 MHz, a suitable inductor lower than 47 μH was selected.

2.2. RF-DC Rectifier

For an N-stage rectifier, a pair of a metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor [MOSFET (M_P)] and capacitor (C_P) can be considered as a rectifier with a small ripple voltage across C_p. An averaged output voltage of the (p + 1)^th stage can be expressed as follows:

$$V_{O\left(p+1\right)}\left(V\right)=V_{O\left(p\right)}\left(V\right)+V_{boost}\left(V\right),$$ (2)

where V_O(p), V_O(p+1), and V_boost are the output voltage of the p^th stage (present voltage), output voltage of the (p + 1)^th stage (next voltage), and incremental voltage of each stage [22], respectively. Approximation in charge computation was used to provide the incremental voltage V_boost as follows:

$$V_{boost}\left(V\right)=V_{in}^{\prime }-V_{tn}-{\left(\frac{15\pi }{8}\times \frac{I_{Oeff}^{\prime }\sqrt{2V_{in}^{\prime }}}{{\mu }_n{C}_{ox}\left(W/L\right)}\right)}^{2/5},$$ (3)

where V’_in, V_tn, I’_Oeff, μ_n, and C_ox are an effective voltage amplitude, the threshold voltage of an NMOS transistor, effective loading current, electron mobility, and a gate oxide capacitor, respectively. W and L are the width and length of the MOSFET, respectively. I’_Oeff and V’_in can be given as follows:

$$I_{Oeff}^{\prime }=I_0+\frac{I_{S0}}{\pi }\left(\frac{W}{L}\right)\left(1-e^{-V_{in}^{\prime }/V_T}\right)\left(1+{\lambda }_{sub}{V}_{in}^{\prime }\right),$$ (4)

$$V_{in}^{\prime }=\frac{C_t}{C_t+C_{par}}$$ (5)

where I₀, I_S0, V_T, λ_sub, C_t, C_par, and V_in are the initial loading current, saturation current, thermal voltage, channel length modulation coefficient, total capacitance value of all capacitors, parasitic capacitance at each stage, and peak amplitude of an input signal of a voltage rectifier, respectively.

If the body effect is ignored, the output voltage of the N-stage rectifier is as follows:

$$V_{ON}\left(V\right)=N\times V_{boost}\left(V\right)=N\times \left(V_{in}^{\prime }-V_{tn}-{\left(\frac{15\pi }{8}\times \frac{I_{Oeff}^{\prime }\sqrt{2V_{in}^{\prime }}}{{\mu }_n{C}_{ox}\left(W/L\right)}\right)}^{2/5}\right),$$ (6)

According to the simulation results, many rectifiers are used for achieving the maximum efficiency. For example, 2-, 4-, 6-, 8-, 10-, and 16-stages are designed with respect to different loading currents or peak voltages [22]. For a rapid charging mechanism and stable power source at an operating frequency of 917 MHz, this study adopted a 6-stage voltage rectifier with a small threshold voltage of 0.45 V.

Figure 3 shows a single-ended 6-stage Dickson voltage multiplier, which was published in [22]. It includes 6 diode-connected MOSFETs (M₁–M₆) and 6 capacitors (C₁–C₅ and C_L). All transistors and capacitors are identical. A bottom plate, which is marked using a bold line, exhibited a large parasitic capacitance. It is grounded to reduce loss or is connected to the input terminal RF_in, which is fed from the matching network.

Figure 3.

Six-stage Dickson voltage multiplier circuit.

If the input signal of the voltage rectifier was sinusoidal with RF_in = V_incos 2πft, where V_in and f are respectively the peak amplitude and operating frequency, the DC output voltage V_dc could be obtained for a charge transfer with a load capacitor C_L. The capacitor is sufficiently large to store the transferred charge and to reduce the output ripple voltage [22].

If the voltage multiplier was in a steady state, RF_in was greater than or equal to zero for 0 ≤ t ≤ π/4 and 3π/4 ≤ t ≤ π, and RF_in was less than or equal to zero for π/4 ≤ t ≤ 3π/4 in the first time cycle T (= 1/f). RF_in charged the capacitor C₁ through the MOSFET M₁ for RF_in ≤ 0, and a steady voltage of V_in − V_TH was then stored in C₁ by reducing a threshold voltage V_TH. Voltage was subsequently changed to V_in + (V_in − V_TH) across the capacitor C₁ for RF_in ≥ 0. M₂ was the conducting MOSFET, and the voltage of C₂ was charged to 2 × (V_in − V_TH) by reducing a threshold voltage V_TH of M₂. In the second time cycle (2T), RF_in charged the capacitor C₂ to V_in + 2 × (V_in − V_TH) for RF_in ≤ 0, and a steady voltage of 3 × (V_in − V_TH) was passed through M₃ and stored in C₃. For RF_in ≥ 0, the voltage of C₃ was abruptly changed to V_in + 3 × (V_in − V_TH), and M4 was the conducting MOSFET. A steady voltage of 4 × (V_in − V_TH) was generated across the capacitor C₄. After the third time cycle (3T) was completed, a steady voltage of 6 × (V_in − V_TH) was generated without a body effect across the load capacitor C_L. The ideal output DC voltage Vdc could be expressed as follows:

$$V_{dc}\left(V\right)=6\times \left(V_{in}-V_{TH}\right),$$ (7)

Equation (7) indicates that the larger the threshold voltage V_TH is, the smaller the DC output voltage V_dc is. Threshold voltage V_TH is highly correlational to a semiconductor process. A conventional CMOS has an inherent threshold voltage of approximately 0.45 V for the standard TSMC 0.18 process, whereas a low threshold voltage of 28 mV was obtained using a conventional MOS. The conventional MOS was used to not only develop a new RF-DC rectifier but also to enhance power efficiency, particularly for an ultra-low input power of less than −10 dBm.

2.3. Over-Voltage Protection Circuit

Figure 4 presents an over-voltage protection circuit used to prevent the occurrence of a high-voltage breakdown phenomenon during NFC [19]. The output DC voltage V_dc of the RF-DC rectifier was connected to the proposed protection circuit, and two PMOSs (M₁ – M₂) and two NMOSs (M₈ – M₉) were diode-connected. Two bias voltages V_A and V_B could be expressed as follows:

$$V_A=V_{dc}-\left(\left|V_{OD1}\right|+\left|V_{tp1}\right|\right)-\left(\left|V_{OD2}\right|+\left|V_{tp2}\right|\right),$$ (8)

$$V_B=V_{OD9}+V_{tn9},$$ (9)

where V_ODi, V_tpi, and V_tni are the overdrive voltage of the i^th MOSFET, threshold voltage of the i^th PMOS, and threshold voltage of the i^th NMOS. Under a common-mode operation, the two bias voltages were identical (i.e., V_A = V_B). The DC output voltage of the RF-DC rectifier can be expressed as follows:

$$V_{dc}=\left(\left|V_{OD1}\right|+\left|V_{tp1}\right|\right)-\left(\left|V_{OD2}\right|+\left|V_{tp2}\right|\right)+\left(V_{OD9}+V_{tn9}\right),$$ (10)

Figure 4.

Proposed over-voltage protection circuit.

Furthermore, the two bias voltages V_A and V_B could be derived from resistors (R₁ − R₂, R_ds1 − R_ds2, and R_ds8 − R_ds9). Thus, the following can be derived:

$$V_A=\frac{R_1}{R_{ds1}+R_{ds2}+R_1}\times V_{dc},$$ (11)

$$V_B=\frac{R_{ds9}}{R_2+R_{ds8}+R_{ds9}}\times V_{dc},$$ (12)

where R_dsi was the conduction impedance of the i^th diode-connected MOSFET, which is expressed as (g_mi + g_mbi)⁻¹ with the transistor transconductance g_mi and body effect transconductance g_mbi. R₁ and R₂ are constant resistors. The larger the bias current I_Ri of the i^th resistor is, the larger the transconductance g_mi is and the smaller the conduction resistor R_dsi is.

If the output DC voltage V_dc of the RF-DC rectifier was higher than the aforementioned voltage [Equation (11)], the bias voltage V_A was larger than the bias voltage V_B because of the reduced conduction impedance R_dsi with the large resistor current I_Ri. The difference between V_A and V_B was amplified, and the differential output voltage V_O was used to control the conduction current I_O of the output transistor M_O. The larger the dc voltage V_dc is, the larger the conduction current I_O is. Thus, a stable DC output voltage ranged from 1.69 V to 1.76 V with an input power (P_in) ranging from −14 dBm to +10 dBm. Please note that the voltage variations of two biased voltages, V_A and V_B, will be suppressed in the PVT (process, supply voltage, and temperature) variation. For example, if the resistor R₁ is reduced with PVT variation, the bias current I_R1 is enlarged. Then both conduction resistors, R_ds1 and R_ds2, are decreased by the large bias current I_R1. As a result, three resistors, R_ds1, R_ds2 and R₁, are reduced simultaneously to suppress the impact of PVT variation.

2.4. Low-Voltage Low-Dropout Regulator

Because of an input voltage with inference and input power limitation, a low-voltage and low-power LDO regulator is required for supplying a stable and clean voltage to the next stage. The designed LDO regulator was used for regulating the output variation in the over-voltage protection circuit and for providing a stable voltage V_dd of 1.5 V to the charger control circuit. Figure 5 shows the proposed low-voltage LDO regulator, which includes a reference voltage, a current source, an error amplifier, a pass transistor, a feedback network, frequency compensation, and a load. A CMOS reference voltage V_ref was generated and inputted to the positive terminal (+) of an error amplifier (EA). The negative terminal (−) of the EA was connected to the feedback network. A comparison between the reference voltage V_ref and a feedback value indicates that the voltage difference between the positive and negative terminals was amplified as an output voltage of the EA, which was connected to a pass transistor for providing a stable supply voltage V_dd by controlling the load current flow through the pass transistor [23].

Figure 5.

Proposed low-voltage LDO regulator with a reference voltage, a current source, an error amplifier, a pass transistor, a feedback network, frequency compensation, and a load.

Figure 6 shows the complete circuit of the adopted CMOS reference voltage [24]. The supplied voltage V_dc could be maintained at a possible voltage of 0.7 V when all transistors operated in the subthreshold region. A compensation capacitor C_C was added between the drain of M_N1 and ground (GND) to improve circuit stability by increasing the phase margin. Assume that I₂ = 100 × I₁, W_MP2 = 100 × W_MP1, and W_MN2 = 100 × W_MN1. The voltage of node X was equal to that of node Y (i.e., V_X = V_Y). Thus, the drain–source voltage of M_P2 (V_DS,MP2) was equal to that of M_P3 (V_DS,MP3). Two bias currents (I₂ and I₃) were identical without channel length modulations of M_P2 and M_P3. If two NMOSFETs operated in the subthreshold region, the voltage difference across the resistor R₁ is given as follows:

$$V_{R1}=V_{GS,MN2}-V_{GS,MN3}=n{V}_T\times \ln \frac{{\left(W/L\right)}_{MN3}}{{\left(W/L\right)}_{MN2}},$$ (13)

where n and V_T are the subthreshold region swing parameter and thermal voltage, respectively. The n is a constant and V_T is a parameter independent of the process. Thus, process variations do not influence V_R1. V_{GS, MNi} and (W/L)_MNi are the gate–source voltage and the ratio of width to length for the transistor M_Ni, respectively. Equation (13) indicates that a temperature coefficient (TC) is positive for the resistor’s voltage V_R1.

Figure 6.

Complete circuit of the adopted CMOS reference voltage.

Voltage reference V_ref can be written as follows:

$$V_{ref}=V_{R2}+V_{GS,MN2}=2.01\times \frac{R_2}{R_1}\times V_{R1}+V_{GS,MN2},$$ (14)

where V_R1 and V_R2 are voltage differences across resistors R₁ and R₂, respectively, and V_GS,MN2 is the gate–source voltage of the transistor M_N2 with a negative TC. A positive TC was combined with a negative TC in an integrated circuit to obtain the desired reference voltage V_ref with zero temperature dependence [24]. The simulation result shows that the reference voltage V_ref varied from 499.035 mV to 502. 855 mV with respect to the supplied voltage V_dc from 1.7 V to 2.0 V at a quiescent current of 34 nA.

Figure 7 shows the complete circuit of a low-voltage LDO regulator. The EA was a CMOS two-stage amplifier, which was designed to regulate the supplied output voltage V_dc of the low-voltage LDO regulator by controlling the gate voltage of the pass transistor V_err. The first stage had a p-channel differential input pair with an n-channel current mirror active load for a high gain A_V1. The second stage is generally configured as a simple common source stage to allow maximum output swings with gain A_V2 [25]. Bias currents were copied through the current source by controlling the resistor R₃. The voltage swing at V_err was equal to V_dc − |V_OD,MP6| − V_OD,MN6 with overdrive voltages, V_OD,MP6 and V_OD,MN6, of MP6 and MN6, respectively. The overall voltage gain A_V can be derived as follows:

$$\{\begin{array}{c}{A}_{v1}=-g_{m,MP7}\left(r_{ds,MP8}\left|\right|r_{ds,MN5}\right)\\ A_{v2}=-g_{m,MN6}\left(r_{ds,MP6}\left|\right|r_{ds,MN6}\right)\\ A_v=A_{v1}\times A_{v2}\end{array}$$ (15)

where g_m,MPi and r_ds,MPi are the transconductance and conduction resistance of the i^th PMOS, respectively. g_m,MNi and r_ds,MNi are the transconductance and conduction resistance of the i^th NMOS, respectively.

Figure 7.

Complete circuit of the low-voltage LDO regulator.

Zero frequency ω_z can be modified by placing a resistor R_z in series with the compensation capacitor C_Z [26]. If R_z ≥ (g_m,MN6)⁻¹, then ω_z ≤ 0. Zero may be moved into the left-half plane for cancelling the first nondominant pole ω_p2. The compensation resistance R_Z is then given as follows:

$$R_z=\frac{1}{g_{m,MN6}}\left(1+\frac{C_1+C_2}{C_Z}\right),$$ (16)

where C₁ and C₂ are total capacitances at node E before C_Z was added and that at node V_err, respectively. Moreover, the increasing C_Z moves the dominant pole to a lower frequency without affecting the second pole. This effect ensures that the designed amplifier is more stable [25]. The simulated results indicate that DC gain, phase margin, and unit-gain bandwidth were 50 dB, 60°, and 1.57 MHz, respectively, at a supplied voltage of 1.7 V and quiescent current of 223.22 nA.

The feedback network was a voltage-trimming network and comprised four diode-connected PMOSs (M_P10–M_P13) and an adjustable voltage, V_A, which is generally connected to a voltage of 1.4 V. Three PMOSs were designed to complete coarse adjustment, whereas the NMOS M_P10 was used to perform fine-tuning by controlling the adjustable voltage V_A. To stabilize the LDO regulator, phase characteristics were adjusted such that a phase shift was less than 180° at gain crossover. Frequency compensation is completed by connecting a resistor R_F in series with a filter capacitor C_F. The loop gain was zero at s_z = −(R_FC_F)⁻¹.

2.5. Charge Control Circuit

Figure 8 presents the charge control circuit, which was used to control the charge in the battery by using the supplied output voltage V_dd of the LDO regulator. The control circuit comprised a differential pair (Q₁–Q₃), current mirror (Q₄–Q₅), and comparator (Comp) to prevent the overcharging of the battery. Channel length modulation and body effect were assumed negligible, and the differential pair operated in a saturation region. The battery was charged using a constant current, which was generated using Q₁ and Q₂ with two bias voltages (V_B1 and V_B2). When the battery voltage V_bat was lower than the reference voltage V_ref, the output voltage of the comparator increased to a high level (1) and Q₃ was turned off. Two constant currents of Q₁ and Q₄ simultaneously flowed into Q₂. The conduction current of Q₅ was amplified N times with (W/L)₅ = N×(W/L)₄ when it was passed through the current mirror Q₄–Q_5. This large current rapidly charged the battery. If V_bat was higher than V_ref, the output voltage of the comparator was low (0) and Q₃ was turned off. Two constant currents of Q₁ and Q₃ simultaneously flowed into Q₂. Moreover, Q₄ and Q₅ were turned off, and the battery was not further charged.

Figure 8.

Complete circuit of charge control circuit.

3. Simulated and Measured Results

Figure 9 presents the simulated output voltage of the RF-DC rectifier by using a signal analyzer (EXA N9010A) at a distance of 10.0 cm between the antenna and rectifier. The operating frequency was 915 MHz, and the equivalent load was 1 MΩ. The simulation results revealed a minimum output voltage of 0.746 V at an input power P_in of −20 dBm, and a maximum output voltage of 21.693 V at P_in = +20 dBm. The proposed RF-energy-harvesting chip requires the over-voltage protection circuit to prevent the breakdown phenomenon, which is generated by high output voltages, particularly for NFC. Figure 10 shows the simulated DC output voltages of the RF-DC rectifier with over-voltage protection, which were limited from 1.773 V to 1.809 V with respect to the input power P_in from −13 dBm to +20 dBm. Figure 11 presents the simulated PCE of the RF-DC rectifier with over-voltage protection, which is termed the rectifier PCE. It was approximately 43.601% at an input power of −7 dBm. PCE is defined as that in [26]:

$$PCE(\%)=\frac{P_{dc}}{P_{in}}\times 100\%=\frac{I_{dc}\times V_{dc}}{P_{in}}\times 100\%$$ (17)

Figure 9.

Simulated output voltage of the RF-DC rectifier with respect to the input power from −20 dBm to +20 dBm.

Figure 10.

Simulated DC output voltages of the RF-DC rectifier with over-voltage protection.

Figure 11.

Simulated PCE of the RF-DC rectifier with over-voltage protection (rectifier PCE), whose PCE was approximately 43.6% at the input power of −7 dBm.

The proposed LDO regulator provides a stable output voltage of 1.5 V and a load current of 30 μA to the next stage-charge control circuit. When the input voltage varied from 1.7 V to 2.0 V and the reference voltage was 1.4 V, the LDO regulator performed with a quiescent current of 317 nA, and a maximum power efficiency of 84.835% was obtained at an input power P_in of −10 dBm. Figure 12 shows the simulated line regulation of the proposed LDO regulator. When the input voltage was varied from 1.7 V to 2.0 V, the output voltage changed from 1.5 V to 1.5108 V, and a line regulation of 36 mV/V was obtained. Figure 13 presents the simulated load regulation of the proposed LDO regulator. As the output current varied from 0.0 μA to 10.0 μA, the output voltage changed from 1.499952 V to 1.499968 V. A load regulation of 1.6 mV/mA was then obtained [27].

Figure 12.

Simulated line regulation of the proposed LDO regulator.

Figure 13.

Simulated load regulation of the proposed LDO regulator.

The charge control circuit was inputted with a pulse waveform, which is gradually ramped up from 1.2 V to 1.5 V, to charge the battery with the charging current of 16 μA. When the battery voltage was charged to 1.4 V at 2.002 ms, the charging current decreased sharply, thereby reducing the charging speed. Finally, the voltage of the battery increased to 1.50 V with zero charging current. Figure 14 shows the simulated battery voltage and charging current of the charger control circuit. The maximum power efficiency of the charge control circuit was 84.835% at an input power P_in of +20 dBm.

Figure 14.

Simulated battery voltage and charging current of the charger control circuit.

When all functional blocks were verified, the RF-energy-harvesting chip could be implemented using the standard TSMC 0.18 μm 1P6M CMOS process. Figure 15 shows the layout of the proposed RF-energy-harvesting IC, which comprised the RF-DC rectifier, over-voltage protection circuit, CMOS voltage reference, LDO regulator, and charge control circuit. The over-voltage protection circuit, low-voltage LDO regulator, and charge control circuit of the RF-DC rectifier required 33 μW, 5 μW, and 4 μW, respectively, to charge the battery to 24 μW. The simulation results revealed that charging current was 16 μA at N = 55, and the over-voltage protection mechanism was started at 2.002 by setting the output voltage of the over-voltage protection circuit, output voltage of the charger control circuit, and reference voltage at 1.7 V, 1.5 V, and 1.4 V, respectively. Figure 16 shows the simulated total power conversion efficiency of the proposed RF-energy-harvesting IC, which was termed the system PCE. The maximum system PCE was 29.873% at an input power P_in of −12 dBm. The maximum rectifier PCE was reduced to the same value at P_in = −12 dBm by integrating all designed circuits into a single chip (Figure 11). Table 1 summarizes the performance and compares it with that of other RF-DC rectifiers. The simulated maximum rectifier PCE in this study was superior to the PCEs of previously published RF-DC rectifiers. Table 2 presents the simulated specifications of the proposed RF-energy-harvesting IC.

Figure 15.

Layout of the proposed RF-energy-harvesting IC.

Figure 16.

Simulated total PCE of the proposed RF-energy-harvesting IC.

Table 1.

Summary of performance and its comparison with those of previous RF-DC rectifiers.

Reference (year)	[19] 2013	[28] (2014)	[29] (2017)	This Work
Process	0.18 μm	0.18 μm	65 nm	0.18 μm
Input power	−7 dBm	−21.2 dBm	−17.7 dBm	−7 dBm
RF frequency	5.2 GHz	925 MHz	900 MHz	915 MHz
Rectifier stages	5	7	5	6
Matching circuit	On-chip	Off-chip	Off-chip	Off-chip
Maximum PCE	42%	43%	36.5%	43.6%

Table 2.

Simulated specifications of the proposed RF-energy-harvesting IC.

Parameters	Designed Specifications
Technology process	TSMC 0.18 μm 1P6M CMOS process
RF frequency (fin)	915 MHz
Input power range (Pin)	−13 ~ +20 dBm
Output dc voltage (Vdc)	1.773 ~ 1.809 V
Maximum PCE of rectifier	43.603%
LDO output voltage (Vdd)	1.50 V
Charging current (Ibat)	16 μA
Maximum PCE of RF IC	29.873%
Chip area (include pads)	0.58 × 0.49 mm2

The matching network was completed with off-chip components to have an input impedance of approximately 50 Ω. Figure 17 shows the matching network, which was designed to obtain not only maximum power transfer but also maximum conversion efficiency. The E5071C network analyzer was used to measure the input impedance against various input powers. Moreover, multiple sets of matching circuits were designed to ensure that each set of the matching circuit exhibited an input return loss (S₁₁) of less than −25 dB. For example, an input impedance of 51.464 – j × 1.3071 could be achieved with an input return loss (S₁₁) of −34.271 dB by putting a parallel inductance (L) of 7.5 nH and a series capacitance (c) of 22 pF on a printed circuit board (PCB). Figure 18 shows the measured input return loss in the Z-smith chart at an input power and RF frequency of 0 dBm and 915.0000 MHz, respectively.

Figure 17.

Matching network used to obtain an input impedance of approximately 50 Ω.

Figure 18.

Measured results in the Z-smith chart at an input power of 0 dBm and RF of 915.0000 MHz.

Figure 19 shows the measurement platform of the designed RF-energy-harvesting IC with capacitor, which includes the PCB (15.576 × 7.906 cm²), network analyzer (Agilent E5071C), RF-IC (0.58 × 0.49 mm²), Powercast transmitter (TX91501), and multimeter (CNN 38). By connecting the receiving antenna to the matching network on the measured PCB, the multimeter measures the output voltage of approximately 1.702 V by setting a distance of 2.45 m between the Powercast transmitter and PCB, with an input power of 0.0 dBm. Figure 20 shows the measured setup of the proposed RF-energy-harvesting IC.

Figure 19.

Measurement platform of the designed RF-energy-harvesting IC with capacitor.

Figure 20.

Measured setup of the proposed RF-energy-harvesting IC.

Table 3 summarizes the results for the designed RF-DC rectifier with the over-voltage protection circuit. Because the distance between the Powercast transmitter and test PCB was provided, the input power P_in (dBm), input return loss S₁₁ (dB), and DC output voltage V_dc (V) were measured after the input impedance Z_in (Ω) and its corresponding matching circuits [L (nH) and C (pF)] were completed. The results showed that the DC output voltage V_dc varied from 0.291 V to 1.725 V with respect to the distance from 5.45 m to 0.55 m. The measured output voltages were lower than the simulated results. A stable charging voltage V_dd can be obtained through the LDO regulator. Figure 21 shows the measured DC output voltage Vdc of the designed RF-DC rectifier with the over-voltage protection circuit with respect to the input power P_in from −20 dBm to +10 dBm. Please note that the measured DC output voltages were limited from 1.682 V to 1.725 V with respect to the input power from −2 dBm to +10 dBm in Figure 21.

Table 3.

Measured input power P_in (dBm), input return loss S₁₁ (dB), and output DC voltage V_dc (V) with respect to distance (m) between the transmitter and test PCB, input impedance Z_in (Ω) and its corresponding matching circuits [L (nH) and C (pF)] for the RF-DC rectifier with the over-voltage protection circuit.

Distance (m)	Zin (Ω)	Matching Circuits		Pin (dBm)	S11 (dB)	Vdc (V)
		Parallel (L)	Series (C)
5.45	50.548 − j × 2.294	2.4 nH	38 pF	−20	−28.1	0.291
5.12	52.043 − j × 2.893	3.6 nH	32 pF	−17	−28.4	0.535
4.66	53.916 − j × 1.260	6.8 nH	29 pF	−14	−32.6	0.792
4.25	51.784 − j × 2.789	8.6 nH	26 pF	−11	−29.8	1.019
3.93	52.784 − j × 2.699	6.6 nH	24 pF	−8	−28.4	1.223
3.60	48.561 − j × 6.422	5.6 nH	22 pF	−5	−33.0	1.450
3.30	52.109 + j × 3.382	5.6 nH	22 pF	−4	−28.3	1.509
3.15	53.942 − j × 1.324	6.2 nH	22 pF	−3	−28.0	1.623
2.90	54.226 + j × 2.072	6.2 nH	22 pF	−2	−26.9	1.682
2.70	53.369 − j × 11.324	6.8 nH	22 pF	−1	−29.0	1.700
2.45	51.464 − j × 1.307	7.5 nH	22 pF	0	−34.3	1.702
2.25	51.581 + j × 7.158	10 nH	10 pF	1	−35.4	1.706
1.68	49.710 − j × 4.909	10 nH	10 pF	2	−26.1	1.712
1.50	53.573 + j × 1.835	12 nH	10 pF	3	−28.2	1.714
1.00	54.669 − j × 1.756	22 nH	10 pF	6	−26.4	1.716
0.68	53.350 − j × 2.136	68 nH	10 pF	9	−28.3	1.723
0.55	50.655 − j × 4.093	100 nH	10 pF	10	−27.7	1.725

Figure 21.

Measured DC output voltages of the RF-DC rectifier with over-voltage protection with respect to the input power.

Finally, the simulated rectifier PCE was 43.601% at an input power P_in of −7 dBm, and the simulated system PCE was 29.873% at an input power P_in and a load resistor of −12 dBm and 1 MΩ, respectively. The limitation of system integration is the reduction of the PCE from 43.601% to 29.873%. The improvement of the system PCE is a crucial concern. This study focused on increasing the system PCE by changing the load resistor from 20 kΩ to 38 kΩ. Figure 22 exhibits the measured system PCE with respect to the input power P_in (dBm) and load resistor. The larger the load resistor is, the smaller the input power is. A large load resistor reduces load current, whereas it increases charging current I_bat for the abrupt charging of the battery. This phenomenon provides the maximum system PCE at a low input power. A trade-off was observed between the load resistor and the maximum system PCE. Moreover, the results indicate that the largest system PCE of 40.556% was observed at a load resistor of 30 kΩ and an input power P_in of −6 dBm.

Figure 22.

Measured PCE of the proposed RF-energy-harvesting IC (system PCE) with respect to the input power (dBm) and load resistor (Ω).

Table 4 shows the measured electrical characterizations of the proposed RF-energy-harvesting IC, which includes the power consumption, power delivery, and other electrical characterization facts. Table 5 summarizes the performance and compares the performance with that of other RF-DC rectifiers and RF-energy-harvesting ICs. The maximum rectifier PCE obtained in this study was superior to that in [30], and the maximum PCE of the RF-energy-harvesting IC was superior to that in [31]. Several RF-DC rectifiers have been studied in the past few years; however, studies on system integration, such as RF-energy-harvesting ICs, have been rare. Furthermore, the IC proposed in this study exhibited low power consumption and a small chip area. It is possible to decrease the labor cost significantly by eliminating the future maintenance efforts to replace batteries. At close range, this proposed IC can be used to trickle charge for low power devices including GPS, tracking tags, wearable sensors, and consumer electronics. At long range, this transmitted power can be used for battery-based or battery-free remote sensors for factory automation, structural health monitoring, and industrial control. In future work, the power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of the rectifier and RF-energy harvesting chip can be improved by reducing the energy consumption of each proposed circuit.

Table 4.

Measured electrical characterizations of the proposed RF-energy-harvesting IC.

Parameters (unit)	Values
RF frequency (MHz)	915
Input impedance (Ω)	51.464 − j × 1.3071
Input power (dBm)	0
Distance between Powercastand PCB (m)	2.45
Matching components	L=7.5 nH and C=22 pF
Load resistor (kΩ)	30
Measured PCB (cm2)	15.576 × 7.906
Maximum PCE	40.566% @Pin = −6 dBm
Output voltage (V)	1.50
Power consumption (μW)	42
Chip area (mm2)	0.58 × 0.49

Table 5.

Summary of performance and its comparison with those of other RF-DC rectifiers and RF-energy-harvesting ICs.

Reference (year)	[30] (2018)	[31] (2018)	[32] (2016)	[33] (2017)	This Work
Process (μm)	0.13	0.18	0.18	0.13	0.18
RF frequency (MHz)	915	900	900	2000	915
Matching circuits	Off-chip	Off-chip	Off-chip	Off-chip	Off-chip
Input power range (dBm)	−35 ~ −15	−30 ~ +0	−26 ~ −8	−35 ~ +5	−20 ~ +10
Stages (Rectifier)	10	5	2	3	6
Maximum PCE (Rectifier)	42.8%@ Pin = −16 dBm	—	78.2%@ Pin = −12 dBm	73.9%@ Pin = 4.34 dBm	43.6%@ Pin = −7 dBm
Output voltage (V) (Rectifier)	2.32	—	1.0	3.5	1.725
Maximum PCE (RF harvesting IC)	—	32.8%@ Pin = −2 dBm	—	—	40.56%@ Pin = −6 dBm
Output voltage (V)(RF harvesting IC)	—	1.77	—	—	1.50
Load resistor (kΩ)	500	500	—	2	30
Chip area (mm2)	0.0296	16.56	—	0.954	0.2842
Power (μW)	—	—	—	—	42

4. Conclusions

This study proposed an auxiliary power integrated chip (IC) to supply power to the WSN with a Power cast transmitter of ISM 915 MHz. The RF-energy-harvesting IC was designed and fabricated using the standard TSMC 0.18 μm 1P6M CMOS process. The externally matched capacitors and inductors were manufactured in the matching network by MuRata Company. On integrating the externally matched components with the designed RF-energy-harvesting IC, the simulated results showed that the maximum PCEs of the rectifier and harvesting IC were 43.6% and 29.873%, respectively, at an ISM band of 915 MHz, an input power of −7 dBm, and a load of 1 MΩ. The output voltage of the RF-DC rectifier with the over-voltage protection circuit was limited from 1.773 V to 1.809 V with the varying input power from −10 dBm to +20 dBm. A stable voltage of 1.5 V was supplied to the charge control circuit passing through the LDO circuit. Measurements validated that the designed RF-energy-harvesting IC works successfully. The output voltage V_dc varied from 0.291 V to 1.725 V with respect to the distance from 5.45 m to 0.55 m. The large load resistor reduced load current; however, it sharply increased the charging current to charge the battery abruptly. This phenomenon provided the maximum system PCE at low input power. A trade-off was observed between the load resistor and the maximum system PCE. Furthermore, the maximum rectifier PCE of this study was superior to that in [30], and the maximum PCE of the RF-energy-harvesting IC was superior to that in [31]. Measurements indicate that the IC used in this study exhibited low power consumption and a small chip area. The proposed energy harvesting IC can be used in both ambient source and dedicated source [34]. Another possibility offered by the use of microelectronic substrates is on-chip photovoltaic generation with integrated photodiodes [35,36].

Author Contributions

This study was completed by four authors. Y.-J.L. and J.-Y.S. designed and implemented the proposed chip; C.-K.C. completed the system integration and measurements; and G.-M.S. analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.