Abstract
Background and aims
There are numerous intrinsic and extrinsic factors associated with the pathophysiology of rosacea, including immune dysregulation. The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between rosacea and thyroid autoimmunity.
Methods
Seventy-two patients with rosacea and 62 rosacea-free control subjects were included in the study. Serum free triiodothyronine (fT3), free thyroxine (fT4), thyrotropin releasing hormone (TSH), antithyroidperoxidase antibody (ATPO), antithyroglobulin (anti-Tg), prolactin, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), basal cortisol, serum CRP concentrations and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were measured.
Results
The number of the cases with high levels of CRP, anti-M and prolactin in rosacea group were significantly higher than the controls (p<0.05), there was no significant difference according to other parameters in both groups (p>0.05). There was no significant difference according to the presence of a thyroid disease in both groups (p>0.05). The decrease in the CRP parameter in patients with the disease duration of 1-5 years was found to be statistically significant (βCRP=-0.251, pCRP<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference according to disease severity or disease duration (p>0.05).
Conclusions
Rosacea may be associated with high thyroid autoantibodies, prolactin and CRP levels, in which immune-endocrine interactions are important.
Keywords: rosacea, autoimmunity, thyroid, antimicrosomal antibody, antithyroglobulin antibody, prolactin, dihydroepiandrosteronsulphate
INTRODUCTION
Rosacea is a common skin disorder characterized by symmetric facial erythema, stinging sensation, inflammatory papules and pustules and telangiectasias. It is more common in women and individuals with skin type I and III (Fitzpatrick phenotypes) (1). The exact cause and pathogenesis of rosacea is still unknown. However, several potential etiologic agents and processes, which include vascular reactions, chronic inflammatory responses, emotional stress, environmental triggers, UV irradiation, foods and chemicals ingested, microorganisms and Demodex mites, either alone or in combination may be responsible in the pathogenesis of rosacea (2-4).
Dysregulation of the innate immune system may be important in promoting the clinical features of rosacea (5, 6). Demodex folliculorum and dermal infiltrates with a predominance of CD4+ T-helper (TH) cells over CD8+ T cells in pathologic sections support that cell-mediated immune responses have an important role in the pathogenesis of rosacea (7). Although autoimmunity may also play a role in the pathogenesis of rosacea, but there are conflicting results in the literature (8-10). Some risk loci pointing autoimmunity have been identified in the patients with rosacea. Some rosacea patients may have type 1 diabetes mellitus, celiac disease, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis (10).
Associations between autoimmune thyroid diseases and dermatologic diseases have been reported (11-13). However, there are some conflicting studies about thyroid diseases and rosacea. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between rosacea and thyroid autoimmunity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design
The study was a prospective, single-center case-control study of 72 patients with rosacea and 62 rosacea-free control subjects. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles originating from the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine Human Ethical Commitee. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Eligible patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of rosacea were free of systemic comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary disease, and previously diagnosed thyroid disease. Rosacea-free control subjects been diagnosed as dermatophytosis were included in the study. All subjects were recruited from the Dermatology clinic at Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine.
Standard criteria developed by the Expert Committee on the Classification and Staging of Rosacea were used for the diagnosis of rosacea. The disease severity was assessed according to the following parameters: erythema (transient and non-transient), telangiectasia, burning or stinging, plaques, dry appearance, edema, and a global assessment of subtypes by both the physician and the patient.
Scores of 0-3 (0, absent; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe) were assigned to each category, and patients were divided into mild (range, 0-9), moderate (10-18), and severe (19-27) groups (14, 15).
Data, including medical history, information on demographics, smoking and alcohol use were recorded.
Biochemical measurements
Blood samples were drawn from subjects in the morning between 07:30 and 09:00, after an overnight fast. A chemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche Cobas e-601, Indianapolis, USA) was used to determine serum free triiodothyronine (fT3) and free thyroxine (fT4), thyrotropin releasing-hormone (TSH), antithyroidperoxidase antibody (ATPO), antithyroglobulin (anti-Tg), prolactin, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), and basal cortisol levels and concentrations. Serum CRP concentrations were determined by nephelometry (Beckman Coulter, Image, USA). ESRs were determined by the Sistat ESR 100 (Ankara, Turkey) system based on the modified Westergren sedimentation technique.
The normal reference range for ATPO was 0-5.61 IU/mL, for anti-Tg was 0-4.11 IU/mL, for TSH was 0.35-4.94 μIU/mL, for fT4 was 0.7-1.48 ng/dL, for fT3 was 1.71-3.71 ng/dL, for DHEAS was 80-560 μg/dL, for prolactin was 2.5-17 ng/mL, for CRP was 0-8 mg/L, for cortisol was 5-25 μg/dL, for ESR was 0-15 mm/h for males and 0-20 mm/h for females. The presence of high TSH, low fT3 and fT4 and high antiTg antibodies was accepted as an autoimmune thyroiditis.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSSVersion 22). Data analyses methods included a Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, Spearman correlation analysis, and multinomial regression analysis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
The case group consisted of 56 female and 16 male patients. The control group consisted of 40 female and 22 male subjects. The mean ages in the patient and control groups were 41.2 years (SD=13.2) and 39.5 years (SD=14.1), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of age and gender (p>0.05).
Although the number of cases with high levels of CRP, anti-M, and prolactin was significantly higher in the patient group than the control group (p<0.05), there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of other parameters (p>0.05). There was also no significant difference between the groups regarding the presence of a thyroid disease (p>0.05) (Table 1). Table 2 shows the correlations between antibodies and hormones in the patient group.
Table 1.
The values of antimicrosomal antibody, antithyglobulin antibody, prolactin and CRP in both groups
| Study groups | Anti-M (IU/mL) | Anti-Tg (IU/mL) | Prolactin (ng/mL) | CRP (mg/L) | ||||
| Normal | High | Normal | High | Normal | High | Normal | High | |
| Rosacea | 49 | 23 | 47 | 25 | 52 | 20 | 58 | 14 |
| Control | 53 | 9 | 48 | 14 | 57 | 5 | 59 | 3 |
| p | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.01 | ||||
Table 2.
The relationship between autoimmunity and hormones in rosacea group
| Basal cortisol | Prolactin | DHEAS | Anti-M | Anti-TG | ||||||
| r* | p | r* | p | r* | p | r* | p | r* | p | |
| >Basal cortisol | 1.00 | - | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.01 | -0.30 | 0.01 | -0.22 | 0.05 |
| Prolactin | 0.32 | 0.00 | 1.00 | - | 0.22 | 0.06 | -0.06 | 0.59 | 0.03 | 0.75 |
| DHEAS | 0.29 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.06 | 1.00 | - | -0.013 | 0.29 | -0.05 | 0.69 |
| Anti-M | -0.30 | 0.01 | -0.06 | 0.59 | -0.13 | 0.29 | 1.00 | - | 0.54 | 0.00 |
| Anti-Tg | -0.22 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.75 | -0.05 | 0.69 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 1.00 | - |
Spearman rho.
A multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed using age, anti-M, anti-Tg, TSH, fT3, fT4, DHEAS, prolactin, CRP, ESR, and basal cortisol parameters according to disease severity. First, a collinearity analysis of these parameters was performed and age, TSH, anti-Tg, CRP, and ESR levels were included in the statistical analysis model. A group of mild rosacea cases was selected as the reference group and analyses were evaluated according to the parameters of the patients in this group. The Cox and Snell R2 was determined to be 0.551. No statistically significant parameter was found in the moderate and severe cases of rosacea in the parameter estimation table (p>0.05).
A multinomial logistic regression analysis was also performed using age, anti-T, TSH, fT4, fT3, DHEAS, prolactin, CRP, ESR, and basal cortisol parameters according to disease duration (< 1 year, 2-5 years, 6-10 years and >10 years). A collinearity analysis of these parameters was performed and age, fT3, anti-Tg, CRP and ESR levels were included in the statistical analysis model. A group of patients with a disease duration shorter than one year was selected as the reference group and the analyses were evaluated according to the parameters of the patients in this group. The Cox and Snell R2 was determined to be 0.586. No statistically significant parameter was found in the parameter estimation table in patients with disease durations of 5- 10 years or longer than 10 years (p>0.05). However, the decrease in the CRP parameter in patients with the disease duration of 1-5 years was found to be statistically significant (βCRP=- 0.251, pCRP<0.05).
DISCUSSION
Factors such as vascular hyperreactivity, genetic predisposition, innate and acquired immune reactions, and colonization with microorganisms such as Demodex folliculorum and Helicobacter pylori have been implicated in the pathogenesis of rosacea (16). Among these, abnormalities in the innate immune systems of rosacea patients have been primarily implicated. These abnormalities can increase the skin’s susceptibility to the external environment, a potentially influential factor in initiating or aggravating rosacea. Additionally, adaptive immunity in rosacea might contribute to further inflammatory responses (17). Furthermore, CD20+ B cells constitute 10-20% of inflammatory cells in rosacea, and infiltration with plasma cells as well as antibodies have been observed in rosacea. Elevated antinuclear antibody titers are frequent and important findings in rosacea patients. B cell responses reveal the importance of further research in this regard (10).
In our study, we found that anti-M, prolactin, and CRP levels were higher in rosacea patients than in rosacea-free control subjects. However, there was no relationship found between high levels of anti-M and prolactin and disease severity or duration. Prolactin (PRL) is a 23-kDa polypeptide hormone with pleomorphic effects. A variety of tissues in the human body, including the anterior pituitary gland and B and T cells, produce PRL. PRL facilitates the breakdown of immune tolerance by promoting the survival, maturation, and activation of autoreactive B and T cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages (18). Hyperprolactinemia has also been observed to contribute to the break of B cell tolerance, enhance the maturation of B cells, and increase levels of circulating autoantibodies and immunoglobulin deposition. Human B cells increase PRLR expression and PRL secretion following stimulation. The correlation between circulating PRL level and B and plasma cells in the patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been studied, though data on the association between PRL level and disease activity are inconsistent (19, 20). In our study, we found no significant correlation between anti-M antibodies and prolactin levels. Additionally, no significant relationship between PRL levels and disease activity or severity in rosacea patients was found.
One hormone important in the regulation of the immune system is DHEAS. DHEAS levels decrease in chronic inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, primary Sjögren’s syndrome, and polymyalgia rheumatica. DHEAS is a multifunctional adrenal hormone with immunomodulating properties (21). In our study, there was no statistically significant difference between DHEAS levels of the patients and healthy controls. Additionally, there was no observed relationship between DHEAS levels and disease duration in the rosacea patient group. This result suggests that the cellular immune response in rosacea pathogenesis is not promoted by DHEAS.
Both female gender and increasing age have been associated with a higher frequency of thyroid antibody positivity (22), as well as increasing DHEAS and sometimes, refractory acne (23). In our study group, the antibody levels, including anti-M and anti-Tg levels, were not affected by gender and age.
Data on basal cortisol levels in chronic diseases in the literature are controversial (24, 25). According to our results, although there is no observed relationship between basal cortisol levels and disease duration or disease severity, it is important to note that in rosacea patients, ATPO antibody levels are elevated when basal cortisol levels are low. Topical steroids could decrease basal cortisol levels and induce facial rosaceiform dermatitis (28).
In chronic diseases, thyroid hormones may be altered even without thyroid diseases. Several studies have shown that these alterations also occur in acute diseases and are associated with cytokine activation (27). In our study, there was no statistically significant difference between thyroid hormone levels of patients and healthy controls. There was no observed relationship between TSH levels and disease duration or disease severity.
There are a few limitations in our study. The most obvious limitation was that of a relatively small sample size, preventing the generalization of the findings in rosacea patients. The second limitation was the lack of laboratory analysis of antibodies evaluating autoimmunity, including antinuclear antibodies and rheumatoid factor. The third limitation was that we did not determine ACTH-stimulated cortisol levels.
In conclusion, rosacea may be accepted as a disease that interacts with autoimmune thyroid antibodies and in which immune-endocrine interactions are important.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Steinhoff M, Schmelz M, Schauber J. Facial erythema of rosacea - Aetiology, different pathophysiologies and treatment options. Acta Derm Venereol. 2016;96:579–586. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vemuri RC, Gundamaraju R, Sekaran SD, Manikam R. Major Pathophysiological Correlations of Rosacea: A Complete Clinical Appraisal. Int J Med Sci. 2015;12:387–396. doi: 10.7150/ijms.10608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Margalit A, Kowalczyk MJ, Zaba R, Kavanagh K. The role of altered cutaneous immune responses in the induction and persistence of rosacea. J Dermatol Sci. 2016;82:3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2015.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rainer B, Fischer AH, da Silva DLP, Kang S, Chien AL. Rosacea is associated with chronic systemic diseases in a skin severity–dependent manner: Results of a case-control study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73:604–608. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yamasaki K, Gallo R. Rosacea as a Disease of Cathelicidins and Skin Innate Immunity. J Invest Dermatol Sym Proceedings. 2011;15:12–15. doi: 10.1038/jidsymp.2011.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Two AM, Wu W, Gallo RL, Hata TR. Rosacea: Part I. Introduction, categorization, histology, pathogenesis, and risk factors. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72:749–758. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gerber PA, Buhren BA, Steinhoff M, Homey B. Rosacea: the Cytokine and Chemokine Network. J Invest Dermatol Sym Proceedings. 2011;15:40–47. doi: 10.1038/jidsymp.2011.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lazaridou E, Apalla Z, Sotiraki S, Ziakas NG, Fotiadou C, Ioannides D. Clinical and laboratory study of rosacea in northern Greece. JEADV. 2010;24:410–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03424.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wozniacka A, Salamon M, McCauliffe D, Sysa-Jędrzejowska A. Antinuclear antibodies in rosacea patients. Postep Derm Alergol. 2013;1:1–5. doi: 10.5114/pdia.2013.33372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Egeberg A, Hansen PR, Gislason GH, Thyssen JP. Clustering of autoimmune diseases in patients with rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:667–672. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Khan SR, Bano A, Wakkee M, Korevaar TIM, Franco OH, Nijsten TEC, Peeters RP, Chaker L. The association of autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) with psoriatic disease: a prospective cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;177:347–359. doi: 10.1530/EJE-17-0397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kolkhir P, Metz M, Altrichter S, Maurer M. Comorbidity of chronic spontaneous urticaria and autoimmune thyroid diseases: A systematic review. Allergy. 2017;72:1440–1460. doi: 10.1111/all.13182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bae JM, Lee JH, Yun JS, Han B, Han TY. Vitiligo and overt thyroid diseases: A nationwide population-based study in Korea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:871–878. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wilkin J, Dahl M, Detmar M, Drake L, Feinstein A, Odom R, Powell F. Standard classification of rosacea: Report of the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee on the Classification and Staging of Rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:584–589. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.120625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wilkin J, Dahl M, Detmar M, Drake L, Drake L, Liang MH, Odom R, Powell F, National Rosacea Society Expert Committee Standard grading system for rosacea: report of the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee on the classification and staging of rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50:907–912. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.01.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Egeberg A, Fowler JF, Jr, Gislason GH, Thyssen JP2. Rosacea and risk of cancer in Denmark. Cancer Epidemiol. 2017;47:76–80. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Woo YR, Lim JH, Cho DH, Park HJ. Rosacea: Molecular Mechanisms and Management of a Chronic Cutaneous Inflammatory Condition. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 15;17:1–23. doi: 10.3390/ijms17091562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang P, Lv TT, Guan SY, Li HM, Leng RX, Zou YF, Pan HF. Increased plasma/serum levels of prolactin in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Postgrad Med. 2017;129:126–132. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2017.1241130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Costanza M, Pedotti R. Prolactin: Friend or Foe in Central Nervous System Autoimmune Inflammation? Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:1–9. doi: 10.3390/ijms17122026. 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shelly S, Boaz M, Orbach H. Prolactin and autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;11:6–7. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jara LJ, Navarro C, Medina G, Vera-Lastra O, Blanco F. Immune-neuroendocrine interactions and autoimmune diseases. Clin Dev Immunol. 2006;13:109–123. doi: 10.1080/17402520600877059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Terzidis K, Panoutsopoulos A, Mantzou A, Tourli P, Papageorgiou G, Saltiki K, Mara C, Alevizaki M. Lower early morning plasma cortisol levels are associated with thyroid autoimmunity in the elderly. EJE. 2010;162:307–313. doi: 10.1530/EJE-09-0534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ianosi S, Ianosi G, Neagoe D, Ionescu O, Zlatian O, Docea AO, Badiu C, Sifaki M, Tsoukalas D, Tsatsakis AM, Spandidos DA, Calina D. Age-dependent endocrine disorders involved in the pathogenesis of refractory acne in women. Mol Med Rep. 2016;14(6):5501–5506. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2016.5924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Varghese R, Rajappa M, Chandrashekar L, Kattimani S, Archana M, Munisamy M, Revathy G, Thappa DM. Association among stress, hypocortisolism, systemic inflammation, and disease severity in chronic urticaria. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016;116:344–348. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cubała WJ, Landowski J. C-reactive protein and cortisol in drug-naïve patients with hortillness- duration first episode major depressive disorder: possible role of cortisol immunomodulatory action at early stage of the disease. J Affect Disord. 2014:534–537. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.004. 152-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tatu AL. Topical Steroid Induced Facial Rosaceiform Dermatitis. Acta Endocrinologica-Bucharest. 2016;12(2):232–233. doi: 10.4183/aeb.2016.232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schultheiss UT, Daya N, Grams ME, Seufert J, Steffes M, Coresh J, Selvin E, Köttgen A. Thyroid function, reduced kidney function and incident chronic kidney disease in a communitybased population: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;32:1874–1881. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
