Skip to main content
Epidemiology and Infection logoLink to Epidemiology and Infection
. 2018 Nov 5;147:e35. doi: 10.1017/S0950268818002923

Prevalence of comorbidities in cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a retrospective study

FY Alqahtani 1,, FS Aleanizy 1, R Ali El Hadi Mohamed 2,3, M S Alanazi 4, N Mohamed 5,6, M M Alrasheed 7, N Abanmy 7, T Alhawassi 7
PMCID: PMC6518603  PMID: 30394248

Abstract

The Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is a life-threatening respiratory disease with a high case fatality rate; however, its risk factors remain unclear. We aimed to explore the influence of demographic factors, clinical manifestations and underlying comorbidities on mortality in MERS-CoV patients. Retrospective chart reviews were performed to identify all laboratory-confirmed cases of MERS-COV infection in Saudi Arabia that were reported to the Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia between 23 April 2014 and 7 June 2016. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess the effect of sex, age, clinical presentation and comorbidities on mortality from MERS-CoV. A total of 281 confirmed MERS-CoV cases were identified: 167 (59.4%) patients were male and 55 (20%) died. Mortality predominantly occurred among Saudi nationals and older patients and was significantly associated with respiratory failure and shortness of breath. Of the 281 confirmed cases, 160 (56.9%) involved comorbidities, wherein diabetes mellitus, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, end-stage renal disease and chronic kidney disease were significantly associated with mortality from MERS-CoV and two or three comorbidities significantly affected the fatality rates from MERS-CoV. The findings of this study show that old age and the existence of underlying comorbidities significantly increase mortality from MERS-CoV.

Key words: Comorbidities, middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus, mortality

Introduction

The first case of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) was reported in Saudi Arabia in 2012 and the novel causative virus, MERS-CoV, was identified [1, 2]. To date, 2040 laboratory-confirmed cases of MERS-CoV infection have been reported to the World Health Organization [3] from 27 countries [3]. Most reported cases were from countries in the Middle East, among which 82% occurred in Saudi Arabia; other cases were reported from North Africa, Europe, the USA and East Asia, with the latter cases involving individuals who had travelled to the Middle East [3]. Owing to the high mortality rate and the lack of antiviral treatment or a preventative vaccine, MERS-CoV remains a major public health concern.

Coronaviruses are enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses that belong to the subfamily Coronavirinae within the Nidovirales order, which are further subdivided into four genera: alpha, beta, gamma and delta. Human coronaviruses belong to the alpha and beta genera [4].

Phylogenetically, MERS-CoV belongs to the beta coronavirus lineage C, with a genotype that is very closely associated with bat coronaviruses from the same lineage, such as BtCoV-HKU4 and BtCoV-HKU5 [5]. MERS-CoV is considered as a zoonotic virus that can cause secondary infections in humans. While dromedary camels were recognized as the intermediate host of MERS-CoV, human-to-human transmission has been observed in community clusters [69], among hospital contacts [10, 11] and among healthcare workers [11], which raises concerns regarding its pandemic risk [11].

MERS-CoV is more prevalent in males [3, 10, 12, 13] and has a clinical spectrum ranging from asymptomatic to life-threatening, which includes acute respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, myocarditis and organ failure [10, 12, 13]. The case fatality rate of MERS-CoV ranges from 30% to 60% [1317], in which severe disease presentation is correlated with pre-existing medical conditions such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, renal failure, obesity and immunodeficiency [13, 18]. Thus, the present paper aims to investigate the effect of comorbidities on the mortality rate of confirmed MERS-CoV cases in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

Data collection

All laboratory-confirmed MERS-CoV cases reported by the Saudi Ministry of Health to WHO between 23 April 2014 and 7 June 2016 were identified. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic information, mortality, comorbidities and clinical presentation.

Case definition

A suspected case was defined as any instance of hospitalization for bilateral pneumonia and any one of the following clinical symptoms at admission: fever (>38 °C), cough, shortness of breath (SOB), sore throat, vomiting, diarrhoea, haemoptysis, chest pain and/or infection, respiratory failure, loss of consciousness, runny nose and any asymptomatic cases with a history of contact with confirmed symptomatic cases.

A confirmed case was a suspected case with a laboratory-confirmed MERS-CoV infection on the basis of positive real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results for MERS-CoV in swab samples collected by the Ministry of Health. Signed informed consent was obtained from patients or the legal guardians of minors for the use of their (coded) data for research purposes.

Asymptomatic cases were those with no reported symptoms at the time of a positive test recorded by a healthcare provider in the medical chart. However, these patients showed symptoms subsequently in the clinical course. In contrast, in symptomatic cases, patients reported their symptoms during hospital admission.

Molecular testing

All RT-PCR tests were performed at the Saudi Ministry of Health MERS-CoV regional laboratory in Riyadh. Respiratory samples were obtained from all patients and were submitted to the regional laboratory for testing using primers that amplify both the upstream E protein (upE) and ORF1a genes. Samples that tested positive for both upE and ORF1a gene targets were considered as confirmed cases. Each patient was tested at least twice and each test was conducted on a different day.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed for determining significant differences using t tests, the χ2 test and Fisher's exact test where appropriate. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained for each variable. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, version 21 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 281 confirmed MERS-CoV cases from Saudi Arabia were reported to the Saudi Ministry of Health from 23 April 2014 to 7 June 2016. Table 1 shows the distribution of the cases by sex, age, nationality, symptoms and fatality rates. The ratio of male to female cases was 1.45:1. Of the 281 confirmed cases, 55 (20%) died and the case fatality rate was higher in males than females, even though this difference was not statistically significant (67.3% vs. 32.7%; OR: 1.5, 95% CI 0.81–2.83; P = 0.221). Death predominantly occurred in Saudi citizens (P = 0.047) and in the group aged older than 60 years (P < 0.0001). The most prevalent clinical symptoms included fever (62%) and cough (54.1%), followed by SOB (41.3%; Table 2). Death among laboratory-confirmed cases of MERS-COV infection was significantly associated with a SOB and respiratory failure (P < 0.001 and P < 0.007, respectively; Table 2).

Table 1.

Mortality in Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus confirmed cases in Saudi Arabia between 23 April 2014 and 7 June 2016

Survival OR (95% CI) P-value
Alive (n = 226)
(%)
Died (n = 55)
(%)
Total (n = 281)
(%)
Sex
Male 130 (57.5) 37 (67.3) 167 (59.4) 1.517 (0.815–2.827) 0.187
Female 96 (42.5) 18 (32.7) 114 (40.6)
Nationality
Saudi 127 (56.2) 39 (70.9) 166 (59.1)* 1.900 (1.004–3.598) 0.047
Non-Saudi 99 (43.8) 16 (29.1) 115 (40.9)
Symptoms
Yes 187 (82.7) 51 (92.7) 238 (84.7) 2.6591 (0.907–7.788) 0.065
No 39 (17.3) 4 (7.3) 43 (15.3)
Age group (year)
<20 9 (4.0) 0 (0) 9 (3.2) 0.206 (0.011–3.598) 0.279
21–40 92 (40.7) 13 (23.6) 105 (37.4) 0.450 (0.229–0.886) 0.02
41–60 85 (37.6) 16 (29.1) 101 (35.9) 0.680 (0.358–1.292) 0.239
>61 40 (17.7) 26 (47.3) 66 (23.5)** 4.169 (2.220–7.827) <0.0001

Data presented as n (%).

Table 2.

Symptoms of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in confirmed cases at presentation

Survival OR (95% CI) P-value
Alive (n = 226) (%) Died (n = 55)
(%)
Total (n = 281)
(%)
Cough 122 (54.0) 30 (54.5) 152 (54.1) 1.023 (0.566 −1.848) 0.940
Fever 139 (61.5) 35 (63.6) 174 (62) 1.095 (0.594–2.018) 0.770
Diarrhoea 22 (9.7) 1 (1.8) 23 (8.2) 0.171 (0.022–1.302) 0.083
Shortness of breath 82 (36.3) 34 (61.8) 116 (41.3) 2.843 (1.548–5.221) 0.001*
Sore throat 22 (9.7) 0 (0) 22 (8) 0.081 (0.004–1.371) 0.08
Vomiting 10 (4.4) 4 (7.3) 14 (5) 1.6941 (0.510–5.619) 0.284
Chest pain 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 1 (0.4) 1.354 (0.054–33.698) 0.804
Runny nose 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 1 (0.4) 1.354 (0.054–33.698) 0.804
Respiratory failure 0 (0) 3 (5.5) 3 (1.1) 30.200 (1.536–593.628) 0.02*
Asymptomatic 39 (17.7) 4 (7.3) 43 (15.3) 0.376 (0.128–1.101) 0.074

*Significant p value.

Among the 281 cases, 160 (56.9%) patients had underlying comorbid conditions (Table 3).

Table 3.

Number of comorbidities in relation to mortality from Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection

Survival OR (95% CI) P-value
Alive (n = 226) Died (n = 55)
Comorbidity
Yes 114 (50.4%) 46 (83.6%) 5.021 (2.347–10.742) <0.0001*
No 112 (49.6%) 9 (16.4%)
Total number of comorbidities
One 65 (28.8%) 17 (30.9%) 1.1081 (0.584–2.102) 0.7534
Two 32 (14.2%) 15 (27.3%) 5.833 (2.33–14.56) 0.0217*
Three 15 (6.6%) 13 (23.6%) 10.785 (1.930–9.818) 0.0004*
Four 2 (0.9%) 0 (0%) 0.809 (0.038–17.092) 0.8917
Five 0 (0%) 1 (1.8%) 12.4679 (0.501–310.273) 0.1239
Total number of comorbidities Mean ± s.d. 0.805 ± 0.974 1.655 ± 1.126

*Significant p value.

Patients with comorbidities had a higher mortality risk compared with those without (83.6% vs. 16.4%, P < 0.0001). The number of comorbidities in relation to mortality is shown in Table 4. Diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), cardiac diseases, renal disease and bronchial asthma were the most frequent comorbid disorders (Table 4). Among the comorbidities, DM, HTN, ischemic heart disease (IHD), congestive heart failure (CHF), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) showed significant associations with fatality from MERS-CoV (OR 2.6 (1.4–4.9), OR 3.7 (2.02–6.9), OR 6.1 (2.1–17.2), OR 12.9 (1.3–127.3), OR 5.8 (1.2–26.8) and OR 5.2 (4.1–6.7), respectively; Table 4). In this regard, the prevalence of death in diabetic and hypertensive patients was similar (28 (50.9%) and 29 (52.7%)), respectively. Further analysis of those patients who had these comorbidities including DM, HTN, IHD, CHF, ESRD and CKD that contributed significantly to mortality from MERS-CoV showed no significant difference in mortality (P > 0.05) between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups (data not shown). Moreover, only four cases of asymptomatic patients died representing 1% of total 281 cases, three of these four were elderly aged more than 66-years-old with comorbidities (HTN and/or dementia) and one case aged 55-years-old and had additional multiple comorbidities (DM, HTN, COPD). Taking as presented in Table 4, the presence of two or three comorbidities significantly increased the risk of death from MERS-CoV infection (P < 0.0001).

Table 4.

Comorbidities in confirmed cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome

Survival OR (95% CI) P-value
Alive (n = 226) (%) Died (n = 55)
(%)
Diabetes mellitus 63 (27.9) 28 (50.9) 2.683 (1.468–4.905) 0.001*
Hypertension 52 (23.0) 29 (52.7) 3.732 (2.021–6.892) <0.0001*
CVA 4 (1.8) 1 (1.8) 1.028 (0.113–9.382) 0.666
IHD 7 (3.1) 9 (16.4) 6.121 (2.169–17.277) 0.001*
HF 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 1.354 (0.0544–33.6980) 0.804
CHF 1 (0.4) 3 (5.5) 12.981 (1.324–127.313) 0.025*
Mitral + Aortic valve replacement 0 (0) 1 (1.8) 12.467 (0.5010–310.2738) 0.196
COPD 1 (0.4) 1 (1.8) 4.167 (0.257–67.680) 0.354
Lung cancer 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 1.354 (0.0544–33.6980) 0.804
Chronic Lung Disease 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 1.354 (0.0544–33.6980) 0.804
Pneumonia 4 (1.8) 1 (1.8) 1.028 (0.113–9.382) 0.666
B. Asthma 24 (10.6) 3 (5.5) 0.486 (0.141–1.675) 0.244
Myasthenia Gravis 0 (0) 1 (1.8) 12.467 (0.5010–310.2738) 0.196
Colon cancer 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 1.354 (0.0544–33.6980) 0.804
Renal failure 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 1.354 (0.0544–33.6980) 0.804
End-stage renal disease 3 (1.3) 4 (7.3) 5.830 (1.266–26.858) 0.029*
Chronic kidney disease 0 (0) 2 (3.6) 5.264 (4.131–6.707) 0.038*
Myeloma 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 1.354 (0.0544–33.6980) 0.804
Gout 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 1.354 (0.0544–33.6980) 0.804
Anaemia 0 (0) 1 (1.8) 12.467 (0.5010–310.2738) 0.196
Hodgkin's Lymphoma 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 1.354 (0.0544–33.6980) 0.804
Parkinsonism 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 1.354 (0.0544–33.6980) 0.804
Liver carcinoma 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 1.354 (0.0544–33.6980) 0.804
Liver Cirrhosis 1 (0.4) 2 (3.6) 8.491 (0.756–95.392) 0.099
Hypothyroidism 2 (0.9) 2 (3.6) 4.226 (0.5819–30.6946) 0.154
Sickle cell anaemia 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 1.354 (0.0544–33.6980) 0.804
Tuberculosis 2 (0.9) 0 (0) 1.246 (1.175–1.320) 0.646

*Significant p value.

Discussion

In the present study, the mortality rate was 20% among the 281 confirmed cases of MERS-CoV infection in Saudi Arabia between 23 April 2014 and 7 June 2016. Mortality was higher in male patients, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.45:1. The predominance of male cases is consistent with the findings reported in previous studies in Saudi Arabia and South Korea [19, 20], which may be associated with cultural or occupational behaviours in males that increase the risk of infection. Saudi citizens showed significantly higher mortality than non-Saudi citizens. The demographic features of the laboratory-confirmed cases of MERS-COV infection in the current study showed that only nine patients were aged <20 years; 73.2% were aged 21–60 years and 23.5% were aged >61 years. These findings are in agreement with those of previous studies reported in Saudi Arabia [14, 2123]. In addition, the higher mortality rate among elderly patients (>61 years) is consistent with the rate reported in a previous study [24]. A possible explanation for this may be age-associated immunosenescence, which results in a suboptimal immune response in these individuals following exposure to MERS-CoV [25] and the possible interference of underlying comorbidities in elderly patients cannot be ruled out. The clinical presentations of MERS-CoV cases observed in this study have similar symptomatology and frequency to those previously reported [10, 13, 18]. Remarkably, among the noted symptoms, SOB and respiratory failure were significantly associated with higher mortality.

In this study, chronic conditions such as DM, HTN, IHD, CHF and renal disease significantly influenced the severity of MERS-CoV. The observed increase in the mortality rate in MERS-CoV patients with underlying chronic conditions corroborates the findings of earlier studies in Saudi Arabia [13, 18]. This is also in line with the findings for other respiratory diseases such as influenza [26], influenza A H1N1 [27, 28] and SARS [29]. A recent study found that obesity, cardiovascular, hypertension and neuromuscular disease were strongly associated with severe pandemic influenza [26]. In SARS, comorbidities such as immunological, neurological, metabolic and dermatologic diseases were strongly associated with the disease [29]. These conditions are known to weaken the host's innate and humoral immune systems, thereby limiting their ability to counteract any new infection [30].

The present study has some limitations. First, although all confirmed MERS-CoV cases were notified to the Saudi Ministry of Health from different regions and hospitals in Saudi Arabia. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that some cases have gone undetected. Second, comorbidity data for admissions without MERS-CoV infection were unavailable.

In conclusion, the present study has shown that old age and the presence of comorbidities are associated with adverse outcomes in MERS-CoV patients, including increased mortality rates.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to Research Centre of the Science and Medical studies Departments at King Saud University for funding this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Zaki AM et al. (2012) Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. New England Journal of Medicine 367, 1814–1820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.de Groot RJ et al. (2013) Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): announcement of the coronavirus study group. Journal of Virology 87, 7790–7792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(WHO), W.H.O (2017) WHO MERS-CoV Global Summary and Assessment of Risk. Available at http://www.who.int/emergencies/mers-cov/risk-assessment-july-2017.pdf.
  • 4.Chan JF et al. (2015) Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: another zoonotic betacoronavirus causing SARS-like disease. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 28, 465–522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.van Boheemen S et al. (2012) Genomic characterization of a newly discovered coronavirus associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in humans. MBio 3, e00473–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cotten M et al. (2013) Transmission and evolution of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in Saudi Arabia: a descriptive genomic study. Lancet 382, 1993–2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Memish ZA et al. (2013) Family cluster of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infections. New England Journal of Medicine 368, 2487–2494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Omrani AS et al. (2013) A family cluster of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infections related to a likely unrecognized asymptomatic or mild case. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 17, e668–e672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Memish ZA et al. (2014) Community case clusters of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in Hafr Al-Batin, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a descriptive genomic study. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 23, 63–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Assiri A et al. (2013) Hospital outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. New England Journal of Medicine 369, 407–416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guery B et al. (2013) Clinical features and viral diagnosis of two cases of infection with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a report of nosocomial transmission. Lancet 381, 2265–2272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Arabi YM et al. (2014) Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Annals of Internal Medicine 160, 389–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Assiri A et al. (2013) Epidemiological, demographic, and clinical characteristics of 47 cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease from Saudi Arabia: a descriptive study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 13, 752–761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cauchemez S et al. (2014) Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: quantification of the extent of the epidemic, surveillance biases, and transmissibility. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 14, 50–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zumla A, Hui DS and Perlman S (2015) Middle East respiratory syndrome. Lancet 386, 995–1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Majumder MS et al. (2014) Estimation of MERS-Coronavirus reproductive number and case fatality rate for the spring 2014 Saudi Arabia outbreak: insights from publicly available data. PLoS Currents 18, 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rivers CM, Majumder MS and Lofgren ET (2016) Risks of death and severe disease in patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, 2012–2015. American Journal of Epidemiology 184, 460–464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Al-Tawfiq JA et al. (2014) Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a case-control study of hospitalized patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases 59, 160–165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen X et al. (2017) Comparative epidemiology of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in Saudi Arabia and South Korea. Emerging Microbes & Infections 6, e51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bermingham A et al. (2012) Severe respiratory illness caused by a novel coronavirus, in a patient transferred to the United Kingdom from the Middle East, September 2012. Eurosurveillance 17, 20290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cauchemez S et al. (2013) Transmission scenarios for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and how to tell them apart. Eurosurveillance 18, 1–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Oboho IK et al. (2015) 2014 MERS-CoV outbreak in Jeddah – a link to health care facilities. New England Journal of Medicine 372, 846–854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Aleanizy FS et al. (2017) Outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in Saudi Arabia: a retrospective study. BMC Infectious Diseases 17, 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Al-Shehri AM (2015) A lesson learned from Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) in Saudi Arabia. Medical Teacher 37, S88–S93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Aly M et al. (2017) Occurrence of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) across the gulf corporation council countries: four years update. PLoS ONE 12, e0183850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mertz D et al. (2013) Populations at risk for severe or complicated influenza illness: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 347, f5061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kusznierz G et al. (2013) Clinical features of the hospitalized patients with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in Santa Fe, Argentina. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 7, 410–417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Suryaprasad A et al. (2013) Severe acute respiratory infections caused by 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) among American Indians–southwestern United States, May 1-July 21, 2009. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 7, 1361–1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Moni MA and Lio P (2014) Network-based analysis of comorbidities risk during an infection: SARS and HIV case studies. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Park J et al. (2009) The impact of cellular networks on disease comorbidity. Molecular Systems Biology 5, 262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES