Skip to main content
Clinical Epidemiology logoLink to Clinical Epidemiology
. 2019 May 10;11:383–395. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S200454

Delay in surgery, risk of hospital-treated infections and the prognostic impact of comorbidity in hip fracture patients. A Danish nationwide cohort study, 2005–2016

Eva N Glassou 1,2,, Kaja KE Kjørholt 3, Torben B Hansen 1, Alma B Pedersen 3
PMCID: PMC6519337  PMID: 31191031

Abstract

Purpose: We examined the association between delay in surgery and hospital-treated infections in hip fracture patients with and without known comorbidities.

Patients and methods: All hip fracture patients aged ≥65 years registered in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry from 2005 to 2016 were included (n=72,520). Delay in surgery was defined as the time in hours from admission to surgery and was divided into 3 groups (12, 24 and 48 hrs). The outcomes were hospital-treated pneumonia, urinary tract infection and reoperation due to infection 0–30 days after surgery. As a measure of comorbidity, we used the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI): none (no registered comorbidities prior to the fracture), medium (1–2 points) and high (≥3 points).

Results: Overall, there was an association between a delay of 12 hrs and pneumonia. A delay of 12 hrs was associated with an increased risk of pneumonia in patients with no comorbidities (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.20, confidence interval (CI) 1.03–1.40) and a delay of 24 hrs was associated with an increased risk of pneumonia in patients with a medium level of comorbidity (HR 1.12, CI (1.02–1.23)). Overall, delay was associated with reoperation due to infection, particularly among patients with comorbidities, although the confidence intervals of some of the estimates were wide. A delay of 48 hrs was associated with an increased risk of reoperation due to infection in patients with a high level of comorbidity (HR 2.36, CI 1.19–4.69).

Conclusion: Delay in surgery was associated with an increased risk of hospital-treated pneumonia and reoperations due to infection within 30 days of surgery. The number of postoperative hospital-treated infections within 30 days may be reduced by continuously targeting pre-, per- and postoperative optimization not only for patients with high level of comorbidity but also for hip fracture patients without known comorbidities prior to surgery.

Keywords: hip fracture, delay in surgery, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, reoperation, surgical site infection

Introduction

Hip fractures, with an annual incidence rate in Denmark of approximately 4.2 per 1,000 person-years, are a leading cause of hospital admissions, disability and increased mortality risk in the elderly population.1 The typical hip fracture patient is often frail, elderly and multicomorbid; is in polypharmacy treatment; has underlying cognitive discords; and is dehydrated due to a significant time lapse from trauma to admission.2 Therefore, these patients are vulnerable to both trauma and subsequent surgery, as well to the potential complications that may occur in relation to surgery and immobilization.

In addition to the patients’ own medical state, a delay in surgery may be associated with an increased risk of complications such as pressure wounds, urinary tract infections (UTIs), pneumonia and mortality.311 However, a delay in surgery may be favorable in some hip fracture patients, allowing time for a beneficial stabilization of the patient’s medical condition and a proper discontinuation of anticoagulant drugs, commonly used in this patient group.4

The recommendation from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence is surgery on the day of admission, or the day after.12 Additionally, studies have shown that 24 hrs may represent a threshold in relation to mortality and complications.13 In Denmark, the national guidelines recommend that at least 75% of hip fracture patients receive surgery within 24 hrs,14 but this recommendation has recently become an object of debate. To reduce the mortality risk, which is associated with a delay in surgery, several argue for a further reduction in the delay in surgery. As hip fracture patients compete with other surgery patients for a limited amount of resources at the hospital, including clinical staff and operation rooms, better risk stratification of this patient group is needed. A potential association between delay in surgery and risk of infections may, in this context, be of importance. Therefore, our aim was to examine how delay in surgery affects the risk of an infection in hip fracture patients with and without known comorbidities.

Materials and methods

Study population

Through the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry (DMHFR) we included all first-time hip fracture patients 65 years or older who underwent primary hip replacement or open reduction and internal fixation between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016 (n=74,791). In total, 2,271 patients were excluded due to either missing follow-up (20 patients), missing information about delay (170 patients) or delay of more than 75 hrs (2,081 patients), which we interpreted as a result of registration errors. In total, 72,520 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analyses.

Data sources

Based on each resident’s unique 10-digit personal identification number encoding age, sex and date of birth, data were collected from four databases and linked to a final dataset on an individual level.

The DMHFR is a nationwide clinical quality database holding individual data on all patients ≥65 years old with femoral neck, per-trochanteric or sub-trochanteric fractures treated surgically since 2003 (see appendix 1 for codes according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), revision 10). Reporting in the DMHFR is mandatory, and data are collected prospectively during hospital admission using standardized registration forms in the electronic patient records.15,16 Detailed definitions of data elements are provided to ensure uniform registration of data across departments. Due to the registration method, the completeness is >95%.14 The DMHFR was used to identify the study population and obtain information about fracture type, time of hospitalization and surgery (and by that delay in surgery), type of surgery, body mass index (BMI) and marital status.

The Danish Civil Registration System was initiated in 1968 and contains records of all Danish residents, among other records of residence and date of death. The CRS is updated daily.17 The Danish Civil Registration System provided information about the date of death.

The Danish National Patient Register contains information on surgical procedures and primary discharge diagnoses and up to 20 secondary discharge diagnoses on all inpatient admissions and outpatient visits to Danish hospitals.18 Diagnoses are coded according to the ICD. The Danish National Patient Register provided information about infections during the index hospitalization or re-admission. Additionally, the register provided information about comorbidities at the time of surgery and 10 years prior to surgery, based on the ICD codes.

The Danish National Health Service Prescription Database contains complete data on all reimbursed prescriptions dispensed from community pharmacies and hospital-based outpatient pharmacies in Denmark since 2004.19 The drugs are coded according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. The database provided information about drug use prior to the hip fracture.

Exposure - delay in surgery

Delay in surgery was defined as time in hours from the hospital admission to the start of surgery. Patients are classified as those with delays in surgery within 12 hrs, 24 hrs or 48 hrs. We compared patients with and without delay within 12 hrs, as well as patients with and without delay within 24 hrs and 48 hrs. This approach is taken to reduce the potential for unmeasured confounding. Thus, prolonged waiting time for surgery may indicate medical rather than administrative reasons for delay and may introduce confounding factors. In addition, the time of admission during the day may be considered a confounder. Further, with this comparison, we can potentially define the threshold for delayed surgery in relation to infection risk.

Outcome - hospital treated infection

The outcome was the presence of any of the following 3 conditions: hospital-treated UTI, hospital-treated pneumonia and reoperation due to infection, all 3 between 0 (day of surgery) and 30 days after surgery. For all 3 infections, the first hospital-treated infection during either the index hospitalization or a re-admission or an outpatient clinic visit at a private or a public hospital forms the basis of the analyses. The follow-up period of 0–30 days was chosen to represent the early postoperative period and the first period after discharge. This period represents a clinically important and, from the patients’ point of view, a vulnerable period where the health-related effect of hip surgery may be maintained or lost.

Covariates

We measured the following covariates as of the surgery date: age (in categories; 65–74, 75–79, 80–84, 85–90 and 90+ years), sex, BMI (in categories; underweight: BMI <18.5 kg/m2, normal weight: BMI ≤18.5–24.9 kg/m2, overweight: BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m2 and obese: BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2), comorbidity level, marital status (married, not married), type of fracture (femoral neck and sub-/per-trochanteric fractures), type of surgery (osteosynthesis and hemi/total arthroplasty) and surgery year (biannual). Furthermore, we included the use of corticosteroids, anti-osteoporotic medicine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, oral anticoagulants, statins, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and antibiotics due to the potential association between these drugs and infection risk. Patients were categorized into nonusers (no redemption of a prescribed specific drug in the year prior to surgery), former users (redemption of at least one prescription drug 91–365 days prior to hip fracture surgery) and current users (at least one prescription drug ≤90 days prior to hip fracture surgery).

The comorbidity level was measured with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score. We defined three comorbidity levels; none, given to patients with no previous record of diseases included in the CCI; a medium level of comorbidity and a high level of comorbidity, given to patients with a record of diseases equaling CCI-index scores at 1 to 2 and 3 or more, respectively. All primary and secondary diagnoses included in the CCI (see appendix 1 for ICD, revision 10 codes) and registered in relation to hospitalizations and outpatient visits over a ten-year period before the hip fracture formed the basis of the CCI calculation. In addition to the CCI, we included the presence of an alcoholism-related disease as an individual comorbid condition.

All relevant ATC codes and ICD codes used to define the study population, infections and comorbidities are available in appendix 1. The distribution of diseases from the Charlson index according to delay in surgery is also available in appendix 1.

Statistics

Patient characteristics were tabulated as proportions by delay in surgery. We calculated the incidence rates (IRs) per 1,000 person-years with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each of the 3 infections. Using the Cox proportional hazards regression model censoring at death, we calculated crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% CIs to evaluate the impact of delay in surgery on the risk of infections within 0–30 days. HRs were adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity level, type of fracture and year of surgery. The impact of delay in surgery on the risk of infections was examined by stratifying for comorbidity level, leaving this covariate out of the adjustment. The proportional hazards assumptions were controlled graphically and by log-minus log plot, and found to be fulfilled.

All statistical analyses were performed using STATA Version 15.0 (Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX, USA).

Ethics

The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (Region of Central Denmark journal number 1–16-02–444-15).

Results

Patient characteristics according to delay in surgery are presented in Table 1. Patients who were delayed more than 24 or 48 hrs were slightly more comorbid, sustained a femoral neck fracture, were treated with a hemi- and total arthroplasty and were current users of oral anti-coagulation. The absolute difference in the proportion of these variables was less than 4%. In general, the proportion of patients with a delay of more than 24 hrs decreased during 2005–2016 with a turning point between 2010 and 2011. The presence of specific comorbidities at the time of surgery was not associated with surgery delay. Of the 19 disease topics included in the CCI, only congestive heart failure and cerebrovascular disease had a small impact on the delay in surgery. We observed only slightly (2–3%) more patients with congestive heart disease and cerebrovascular disease in patients with a delay in surgery of more than 24 hrs or 48 hrs compared to 12 hrs (Appendix 1).

Table 1.

Patient characteristics according to delay of surgery

Delay >12 hrs Delay >24 hrs Delay >48 hrs
No, ≤12 Yes, >12 No, ≤24 Yes, >24 No, ≤48 Yes, >48
N % N % N % N % N % N %
Total 14,616 20 57,904 80 45,152 62 27,368 38 67,291 93 5,229 7
Patient-related variables
Sex
Female 10,394 71 41,450 72 32,482 72 19,362 71 48,226 72 3,618 69
Male 4,222 29 16,454 28 12,670 28 8,006 29 19,065 28 1,611 31
Age, in years
65–74 2,918 20 10,988 19 8,827 20 5,079 19 12,940 19 966 18
74–79 2,329 16 9,442 16 7,224 16 4,547 17 10,828 16 943 18
80–84 3,114 21 12,920 22 9,824 22 6,210 23 14,867 22 1,167 22
85–89 3,347 23 13,633 24 10,441 23 6,539 24 15,741 23 1,239 24
90+ 2,908 20 10,921 19 8,836 620 4,993 18 12,915 19 914 17
Body Mass Index
<18.5 1,290 9 4,970 8 3,967 9 2,293 8 5,854 9 406 8
≥18.5–24.9 6,693 46 26,335 45 20,704 46 12,324 45 30,764 46 2,264 43
≥25.0–29.9 2,804 19 11,471 20 9,008 20 5,267 19 13,209 20 1,066 20
≥30 779 5 3,221 6 2,472 5 1,528 6 3,709 5 291 6
Unknown 3,050 21 11,907 21 9,001 20 5,956 22 13,755 20 1,202 23
Charlson Comorbidity Index
Low (0) 6,016 41 23,301 40 18,730 41 10,587 39 27,395 41 1,922 37
Medium (1–2) 5,787 40 23,550 41 18,056 40 11,281 41 27,110 40 2,227 42
High (3+) 2,813 19 11,053 19 8,366 19 5,500 20 12,786 19 1,080 21
Alcohol-related disease
None 14,079 96 55,897 79 43,574 97 26,402 96 64,899 96 5,077 97
1 or more 537 4 2,007 3 1,578 3 966 4 2,392 4 152 3
Marital status
Unmarried 10,196 70 40,959 71 31,842 71 19,313 71 47,506 71 3,649 70
Married 4,420 30 16,945 29 13,310 29 8,055 29 19,785 29 1,580 30
Fracture-related variables
Type of fracture
Femoral neck 7,272 50 30,947 53 23,202 51 15,017 55 35,209 52 3,010 58
Per-/subtrochanter 7,344 50 26,957 47 21,950 49 12,351 45 32,082 48 2,219 42
Type of surgery
Osteosynthesis 11,185 76 39,038 67 32,399 72 17,824 65 47,085 70 3,138 60
Hemi/total Arthroplasty 3,431 24 18,866 33 12,753 28 9,544 35 20,206 30 2,091 40
Year of surgery
2005–2006 2,363 16 9,528 16 6,772 15 5,119 19 10,785 16 1,106 21
2007–2008 2,342 16 10,346 18 7,189 16 5,499 20 11,558 17 1,130 22
2009–2010 2,178 15 10,136 18 7,239 16 5,075 19 11,263 17 1,051 20
2011–2012 2,516 17 9,849 17 7,886 18 4,479 16 11,567 17 798 15
2013–2014 2,652 18 9,435 16 8,312 18 3,775 14 11,479 17 608 12
2015–2016 2,565 18 8,610 15 7,754 17 3,421 12 10,639 16 536 10
Medication use before surgery
Corticosteriods
Non-users 13,054 89 51,919 90 40,548 90 24,425 89 60,322 90 4,651 89
Former users 615 4 2,485 4 1,888 4 1,212 4 2,875 4 225 4
Current users 947 7 3,500 6 2,716 6 1,731 6 4,094 6 353 7
Anti-osteoporotic medication
Non-users 13,046 89 52,216 90 40,553 90 24,709 90 60,501 90 4,761 91
Former users 393 3 1,492 3 1,223 3 662 3 1,764 3 121 2
Current users 1,177 8 4,196 7 3,376 7 1,997 7 5,026 7 347 7
Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
Non-users 11,499 79 45,197 78 35,461 79 21,235 78 52,646 78 4,050 77
Former users 1,479 10 6,002 10 4,633 10 2,848 10 6,928 10 553 11
Current users 1,638 11 6,705 12 5,058 11 3,285 12 7,717 12 626 12
Oral anti-coagulants
Non-users 7,933 54 29,546 51 24,288 54 13,191 48 35,146 52 2,333 45
Former users 1,403 10 5,719 10 4,287 9 2,835 10 6,538 10 584 11
Current users 5,280 36 22,639 39 16,577 37 11,342 42 25,607 38 2,312 44
Statins
Non-users 11,120 76 43,767 76 34,191 76 20,696 76 50,955 76 3,932 75
Former users 873 6 3,674 6 2,772 6 1,775 6 4,186 6 361 7
Current users 2,623 18 10,463 18 8,189 18 4,897 18 12,150 18 936 18
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
Non-users 11,095 76 44,351 77 34,446 76 21,000 77 51,448 76 3,998 76
Former users 608 4 2,321 4 1,865 4 1,064 4 2,727 4 202 4
Current users 2,913 20 11,232 19 8,841 20 5,304 19 13,116 20 1,029 20
Antibiotics
Non-users 7,554 52 30,521 53 23,664 52 14,411 53 35,296 53 2,779 53
Former users 3,487 24 13,972 24 10,807 24 6,652 24 16,220 24 1,239 24
Current users 3,575 24 13,411 23 10,681 24 6,305 23 15,775 23 1,211

Any hospital-treated (inpatient or outpatient) infections, collected from The Danish National Patient Register.

Infection ICD revision 10 diagnose codes
Miscellaneous bacterial infections A20-A38, A42-A44, A48-A49, A65-A79
Bacteremia A49.9, A39.4
Sepsis A40-A41,A32.7, A54.86, A02.1, A22.7, A26.7, A42.7, A28.2B
Abscess A54.1,, D73.3, E06.0A, E23.6A, E32.1, G06, G07, H00.0A, H05.0A, H44.0A, H60.0, J34.0A, J36, J38.3D, J38.7G, J39.0, J39.1, J39.8A, J85.1, J85.2, J85.3, K04.6, K04.7, K11.3, K12.2, K13.0A, K14.0A, K20.9A, K35.3A, K35.3B, K57.0, K57.2, K57.4, K57.8, K61, K63.0, K65.0, K75.0, K81.0A, K85.8A, L02, L05.0, L05.9, M60.8A, M86.8A, M86.9A, N15.1, N34.0, N41.2, N45.0, N48.2, N49.2A, N61.9A, N61.9B, N70.0A, N70.0B, N71.0A, N73.0A, N73.0B, N73.2A, N73.2B, N73.3A, N73.5A, N73.8A, N73.8C, N75.1, N76.4, N76.8A, Except: A54.1B, B43.0, B43.8, B43.9, K57.0B, K57.0C, K57.2B, K57.2C, K57.4A, K65.0M, K65.0N, K65.0O, K65.0P
Skin infections A46, H01.0, H03, H60.0, H60.1, H60.2, H60.3, H62, K12.2, K13.0, K61, M72.6, L01, L08.0, L08.1,
Cellulitis L03
Other skin infections J34.0, L00, L02, L04, L05, L06, L07, L30.3, L73.8
Eye infections H00, H01.0, H03.0, H03.1, H04.3, H05.0, H06.1, H10, H13.0, H13.1, H15.0, H19.1, H19.2, H22.0, H32.0, H44.0, H44.1
Ear infections H60, H61.0, H62.0, H62.1, H62.2, H62.3, H65, H66, H67.0, H67.1, H68, H70, H73.0, H75.0, H83.0, H94.0
Except: H60.4, H60.4A, H605, H60.5B, H60.8, H608.A, H65.2, H65.3, H65.4, H65.4C, H66.1, H66.2, H66.3, H68.1, H70.1, H70.8
Central Nervous System infections G00-07 (except meningococcal disease)
Meningitis G00, G01, G02, G03, A32.1, A39.0, A17.0, A20.3, A54.8D, A02.2C
Gastrointestinal infections: A00, A01, A02, A03, A04, A05, A09
Intra-abdominal infection K35, K37, K57.0, K57.2, K57.4, K57.8, K61, K63.0, K65.0, K65.9, K67, K75.0, K75.1, K80.0, K80.3, K80.4, K81.0, K81.9, K83.0, K85.9
Heart infections (acute rheumatic fever, infectious pericarditis or myocarditis, endocarditis): I00-I02, I30.1, I32.0, I33, I38, I40.0, I39.8, B37.6
Upper respiratory tract infection J00-J06, J36, J39.0, J39.1
Pneumonia J12, J13, J14, J15, J16.0, J17, J18
Other lower-respiratory tract infections: J20-J22, J44.0, J85.1, J86, J20-J22, J34.0, J35.0, J38.3C, J38.3D, J38.7B, J38.7F, J38.7G
Except: J34.0E, J34.0F, J34.0G, J34.0H
Urinary tract infections N10, N11, N12, N15.1, N15.9, N30, N33.0, N34, N39.0, N08.0, N13.6, N16.0, N28.8D, N28.8E, N28.8F, N29.0, N29.1
Except: N30.1, N30.2, N30.4
Sexually transmitted diseases A50-A64
Male genital infections N41, N45, N48.1, N48.2, N49, N51.1, N51.2
Female pelvic infections N70-77
Septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, myositis M00, M01, M86, M63.0, M63.2
Infectious complications of procedures, catheters etc. T80.2, T81.4, T82.6, T82.7, T83.5, T83.6, T84.5, T84.6, T84.7, T85.7, T88.0, T89.9
Other infections or sequelae B90-B99, K04.0, K05.2
Reoperation due to infection Procedures ICD revision 10 diagnose codes
NFW69: Do not require combination with ICD-10 codes but can be combined with ICD-10 code T84.5, T84.6, T84.7
NFS 0-99: In combination with ICD-10 code
NFU 0-99: In combination with ICD-10 code
NFC20-99: If NFB is primary operation type, in combination with ICD-10 code
Diagnoses included in Charlton comorbidity index Disease ICD revision 10 diagnose codes
Myocardial infarction I21;I22;I23
Congestive heart failure I50; I11.0; I13.0; I13.2
Peripheral vascular disease I70; I71; I72; I73; I74; I77
Cerebrovascular disease I60-I69; G45; G46
Dementia F00-F03; F05.1; G30
Chronic pulmonary disease J40-J47; J60-J67; J68.4; J70.1; J70.3; J84.1; J92.0; J96.1; J98.2; J98.3
Connective tissue disease M05; M06; M08; M09;M30;M31;M32; M33; M34; M35; M36; D86
Ulcer disease K22.1; K25-K28
Mild liver disease B18; K70.0-K70.3; K70.9; K71; K73; K74; K76.0
Diabetes, type1 and type2 E10.0, E10.1; E10.9; E11.0; E11.1; E11.9
Hemiplegia G81; G82
Moderate to severe renal disease I12; I13; N00-N05; N07; N11; N14; N17-N19; Q61
Diabetes with end organ damage E10.2-E10.8; E11.2-E11.8
Any tumor C00-C75
Leukemia C91-C95
Lymphoma C81-C85; C88; C90; C96
Moderate to severe liver disease B15.0; B16.0; B16.2; B19.0; K70.4; K72; K76.6; I85
Metastatic solid tumor C76-C80
AIDS B21-B24
Alcoholism-related disease Disease ICD revision 10 diagnose codes
Alcohol related disorder F10
Alcohol induced chronic pancreatitis K86.0
Finding of alcohol in blood R78.0
Toxic effect of alcohol T51
Alcoholic gastritis without bleeding K29.2
Alcoholic polyneuropathy G62.1
Alcoholic myopathy G72.1
Degeneration of nervous system due to alcohol G31.2
Alcoholic cardiomyopathy I42.6
Drug use prior to the hip fracture Drug Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system - ATC-codes
Systemically absorbed glucocorticoids H02BX
Statins C10AA01, C10AA02, C10AA03 C10AA04, C10AA05, C10AA06,
Anti-osteoporosis medicine Anti-osteoporosis medicine M05BA01, B05BB01, M05BA02, M05BA03, M05BA04, M05BB03, M05BB05, M05BA06, M05BA07, M05BB02, M05BB04, M05BX04, M05BX03, G03XC01, H05AA02
Non-steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs M01AH01, M01AH, M01AH03, M01AH05, M01AC05, M01AB05, M01ACO6, M0A1
Oral anti-coagulants B01AB, B01AX, A01AD, B01AA, B01AE07, B01AF01, B01AF02, B01AF03, B01AC, N02BA01, N02BA51
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors N06AB03, N0GAB04, N06AB05, N06AB06, N06AB08, N06AB10
Antibiotics J01X, J05X

Hospital treated infections

In total, 7,287 (10%) of the patients experienced a hospital-treated infection within 0–30 days after surgery. UTI accounted for 4,205 (45%) of all infections, pneumonia accounted for 3,805 (41%) and reoperations due to infection accounted for 253 (3%). The number of infections, incidence rates and hazard ratios for the hospital-treated infections are presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

Incidence rate and hazard ratios (HR with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the 3 specific hospital-treated infections within 0–30 days following hip fracture surgery. HRs were adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity burden (CCI), type of fracture and year of surgery. When stratifying for comorbidity, the CCI-variable was left out of the analysis

0-30 days
In total Stratified
Number of UTI Incidence
per 1000 person years (ci)
All CCI low CCI medium CCI high
HR (ci) HR (ci) HR (ci) HR (ci)
≤12 hours 830 2.11 (1.97 – 2.26) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
>12 hours 3,375 2.16 (2.09 – 2.24) 1.03 (0.95 – 1.11) 1.06 (0.93 – 1.20) 1.00 (0.89 – 1.13) 1.03 (0.87 – 1.21)
≤24 hours 2,597 2.13 (2.05 – 2.21) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
>24 hours 1,608 2.19 (2.09 – 2.30) 1.03 (0.97 – 1.10) 1.07 (0.96 – 1.18) 1.00 (0.91 – 1.10) 1.03 (0.90 – 1.17)
≤48 hours 3,915 2.16 (2.09 – 2.23)) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
>48 hours 290 2.06 (1.83 – 2.31) 0.96 (0.85 – 1.08) 1.04 (0.85 – 1.27) 0.95 (0.79 – 1.14) 0.89 (0.69 – 1.14)
0-30 days
In total Stratified
Number of pneumonia Incidence
per 1000 person years (ci)
All CCI low CCI medium CCI high
HR (ci) HR (ci) HR (ci) HR (ci)
≤12 hours 754 1.90 (1.77 – 2.04) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
>12 hours 3,051 1.93 (1.87 – 2.00) 1.04 (0.96 – 1.12) 1.20 (1.03 – 1.40) 0.92 (0.82 – 1.04) 1.09 (0.93 – 1.27)
≤24 hours 2,315 1.88 (1.80 – 1.95) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
>24 hours 1,490 2.01 (1.91 – 2.12) 1.09 (1.02 – 1.16) 1.11 (0.98 – 1.26) 1.12 (1.02 – 1.23) 1.02 (0.90 – 1.15)
≤48 hours 3,528 1.93 (1.86 – 1.99) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
>48 hours 277 1.95 (1.73 – 2.19) 1.03 (0.91 – 1.17) 1.06 (0.84 – 1.35) 1.00 (0.83 – 1.20) 1.05 (0.84 – 1.32)
0-30 days
In total Stratified
Number of reoperations due to infection Incidence
per 1000 person years (ci)
All CCI low CCI medium CCI high
HR (ci) HR (ci) HR (ci) HR (ci)
≤12 hours 38 0.09 (0.07 – 0.13) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
>12 hours 215 0.13 (0.12 – 0.15) 1.41 (1.00 – 1.99) 1.48 (0.84 – 2.60) 1.25 (0.73 – 2.14) 1.59 (0.76 – 3.36)
≤24 hours 148 0.12 (0.10 – 0.14) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
>24 hours 105 0.14 (0.11 – 0.17) 1.17 (0.91 – 1.50) 0.87 (0.57 – 1.34) 1.38 (0.92 – 2.05) 1.35 (0.81 – 2.25)
≤48 hours 226 0.12 (0.11 – 0.14) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
>48 hours 27 0.18 (0.13 – 0.27) 1.51 (1.01 – 2.26) 0.93 (0.41 – 2.14) 1.53 (0.82 – 2.88) 2.36 (1.19 – 4.69)

Abbreviations: DMHFR, Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry; h, hours; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; UTI, urinary tract infection; BMI, body mass index; NSAIDs, Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs); SSRI, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor.; ICD, International Classification of Diseases revision 10.

Delay in surgery was associated with hospital-treated pneumonia. Overall, a delay of >24 hrs resulted in an increased risk of hospital-treated pneumonia (HR 1.09, CI: 1.02–1.16). A similar association was observed between a delay of >24 hrs and patients with a medium comorbidity burden (HR 1.12, CI: 1.02–1.23). In addition, delays of >12 hrs and >24 hrs were associated with a HR of 1.20 (CI: 1.03–1.40) and a HR of 1.11 (CI: 0.98–1.26) for hospital-treated pneumonia in patients with no previous comorbidity.

Overall, a delay of more than 12 hrs was associated with an increased risk of reoperation due to infection within 30 days (HR 1.41, CI: 1.00–1.99). In addition, a delay of 48 hrs was associated with an increased risk of reoperation due to infection within 30 days (HR 1.51, CI: 1.01–2.26). Stratification on comorbidity suggests that delays of 12 hrs, 24 hrs and 48 hrs among patients with moderate and high comorbidity burden were associated with an increased risk of reoperation. However, due to the small sample size and number of outcomes, these estimates should be interpreted with caution.

UTI was the most frequent hospital-treated infection. The incidence rate was approximately 2.1 per 1,000 person-years regardless of delay in surgery. We found no associations between delay and UTI, either overall or in regard to the comorbidity burden.

Discussion

Delay in surgery was associated with an increased risk of hospital-treated pneumonia and reoperations due to infection. A delay of only 12 hrs increased the risk of pneumonia in patients with no known comorbidity prior to surgery. For patients with a medium level of comorbidity, a delay of 24 hrs increased the risk of pneumonia and for patients with a high level of comorbidity, a delay of 48 hrs increased the risk of reoperation due to infection.

The best design when evaluating the effect of delay in surgery would be a randomized controlled trial. However, this is not possible due to ethical and practical reasons, and a large cohort study with the advantages of prospectively and independently collected data is the second best design. This study is, to the best of our knowledge, the largest cohort study evaluating the effect of delay in surgery on the risk of specific hospital-treated infections.

A comparison of studies is in general difficult due to a great variability in both delay cut-offs and the definitions of postoperative complications. Delay cut-offs of more than 24 hrs are not comparable with Danish conditions as more than 60% of patients are treated within 24 hrs. Additionally, an outcome of only early in-hospital complications is not applicable, as we leave out the infections causing readmissions. Nevertheless, both Simunovic et al and Klestil et al concluded in their reviews that early surgery is associated with fewer peri- and postoperative complications including pneumonia.6,10 These findings are supported by Pincus et al who, in a large cohort study from Canada, showed that increased delay in surgery (>24 hrs) was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications (within 30 days of surgery) including pneumonia.13 As both the exposure and the outcome in Pincus et al are comparable to those in our study, our results add further evidence to the association between early surgery and reduced risk of postoperative pneumonia.

In relation to UTI, our findings support the general impression that delay in surgery does not affect the risk of early postoperative UTI.2022 Smektala et al found no effect of delay on the risk of UTI in a prospective cohort study of 2,916 hip fracture patients from Germany.22 Similar findings were made by Majumdar et al in a Canadian retrospective cohort study. Here, they found that a delay of 24 or 48 hrs had no effect on the risk of in-hospital UTI.21

We found that the association between delay of surgery and risk of postoperative pneumonia was most distinct for patients with no known comorbidities or a medium level of comorbidities at the time of the hip fracture. This is not intuitive and not identical to earlier findings. Klestil et al suggest in a recent review that patients with comorbidities often benefit from surgery within 24 hrs.10 Since patients with a number of comorbidities prior to the hip fracture are more susceptible to a longer hospital stay than are patients without known comorbidity prior to the hip fracture, it is possible that registration of hospital-treated infections during the index hospitalization is more likely underestimated among high vs low comorbidity patients. However, any underestimation of infection registration during index hospitalization, as well as any underestimation of infection during the follow-up period, will most likely be nondifferential, thus independent of the delay in surgery. On the other hand, if hip fracture in less comorbid patients is the first apparent proof of a medical deterioration, then the findings about an association between surgery delay and risk of infection in less comorbid patients is not that surprising. Here, further studies are needed.

As mentioned, the international recommendations regarding surgery after hip fracture are surgery on the day of admission, or the day after.12 Additionally, 24 hrs may represent a threshold defining complications.13 According to Kelly-Pettersson et al, there is no safe time frame, and additionally, the risk of serious adverse events may increase for every 10 hrs of delay of surgery.9 In view of this and our results, it seems reasonable to assume that the number of hospital-treated infections within 30 days can be reduced if one complies with the guidelines or even better ensures surgery within 12 hrs.

Limitations

Delay in surgery may be due to several reasons. Organizational reasons may delay surgery. This affects patients with femoral neck fractures and therefore patients in need of hemi- or total arthroplasties as these surgeries demand skilled surgeons who are not always on duty. Additionally, the patient’s medical condition may call for a physiological optimization after the fracture, thus delaying surgery. This affects patients with a high comorbidity burden and with current use of oral anti-coagulation. Hypothetically, poor use of the delay in the less vulnerable patients, compared to that in patients with a known high comorbidity level at the time of surgery, could lead to an association between delay in surgery and hospital-treated pneumonia in the less vulnerable patients. Unfortunately, we have no information about why surgery is delayed (medical or organizational reasons) and if the time is well spent. Therefore, we cannot rule out residual confounding. Inclusion of both pathological and nonpathological fractures may have biased our estimates. However, patients with longer surgery delays were not more likely to have a diagnosis of “any tumor” and “metastatic tumor” than patients with shorter surgery delays (Appendix 1). Therefore, we do not believe this would have had a strong impact on our findings. Additionally, we have no exact knowledge about how many patients with a high energy trauma hip fracture were included in our study population, but we expect it to be minimal.

Stratification for comorbidity burden is made with the CCI. The index has been developed to summarize complex medical histories, offering statistical efficiency and straightforward interpretation compared with the inclusion of individual comorbid diseases in statistical models or stratified analyses. The index is frequently used in studies based on register data. The limitation of the index is that it precludes the estimation of the effects of individual comorbid diseases. However, stratifying on the CCI rather than specific comorbid diseases provides an overall and crude effect of delay on infection risk in comorbid and healthy patients. Since the index does not take the severity of a disease into account, residual confounding may still be present. Additionally, since the CCI does not capture diseases treated only by general practitioners, we might have underestimated the number of hip fracture patients with a comorbidity burden. We lacked measurements of frailty and nutrition status, as well as other lifestyle factors, and socioeconomic factors that have previously been reported as risk factors for infection. These factors could also be related to surgery delay.

Conclusion

Delay in surgery was associated with an increased risk of hospital-treated pneumonia and reoperations due to infection. Delays in surgery of 12 hrs and 24 hrs increased the risk of hospital-treated pneumonia in patients with no known and medium levels of comorbidity prior to surgery. A delay of 48 hrs increased the risk of reoperation due to infection in patients with a high level of comorbidity prior to surgery.

However, the association was modest, and one can argue that time from hospitalization to surgery is used for beneficial stabilization of the patient’s medical condition. When held against the current national and international guidelines, the number of hospital-treated infections within 30 days may, however, be reduced if delay in surgery is shortened. Additionally, an increased focus on the less comorbid patients seems beneficial. These patients may, in fact, be patients with a hip fracture as the first apparent proof of a medical deterioration. To balance confounding, further studies looking at the association between delay of surgery and infection need to be conducted with prospective registration of the reason for the delay.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Appendix 1

The distribution of diseases from the Charlson index according to delay in surgery. All primary and secondary diagnoses included in the CCI and registered in relation to hospitalizations and outpatient visits over a ten-year period before the hip fracture form the basis for having (yes) og not having (no) a specific comorbid disease at the time of surgery.

Delay > 12 hours Delay >24 hours Delay >48 hours
No, ≤12 Yes, >12 No, ≤24 Yes, >24 No, ≤48 Yes, >48
Myocardial infarction
Yes 804 5 3,140 5 2,360 5 1,584 6 3,610 5 334 6
No 13,812 95 54,764 95 42,792 95 25,784 94 63,681 95 4,895 94
Congestive heart failure
Yes 1,227 8 5,382 9 3,712 8 2,897 11 5,970 9 639 12
No 13,389 92 52,522 91 41,440 92 24,471 89 61,321 91 4,590 88
Peripheral vascular disease
Yes 1,145 8 4,575 8 3,426 8 2,294 8 5,259 8 461 9
No 13,471 92 53,329 92 41,726 92 25,074 92 62,032 92 4,768 91
Cerebrovascular disease
Yes 2,558 18 10,732 19 8,010 18 5,280 19 12,201 18 1,089 21
No 12,058 82 47,172 81 37,142 82 22,088 81 55,090 82 4,140 79
Dementia
Yes 1,433 10 5,611 10 4,381 10 2,663 10 6,566 10 478 9
No 13,183 90 52,293 90 40,771 90 24,705 90 60,725 90 4,751 91
Chronic pulmonary disease
Yes 1,756 12 7,261 13 5,411 12 3,606 13 8,344 12 673 13
No 12,860 88 50,643 87 39,741 88 23,762 87 58,947 88 4,556 87
Connective tissue disease
Yes 666 5 2,754 5 2,087 5 1,333 5 3,146 5 274 5
No 13,950 95 55,150 95 43,065 95 26,035 95 64,145 95 4,955 95
Ulcer disease
Yes 837 6 3,271 6 2,512 6 1,596 6 3,771 6 337 6
No 13,779 94 54,633 94 42,640 94 25,772 94 63,520 94 4,892 94
Mild liver disease
Yes 162 1 635 1 478 1 319 1 738 1 59 1
No 14,454 99 57,269 99 44,674 99 27,049 99 66,553 99 5,170 99
Diabetes I and II
Yes 1,181 8 4,975 9 3,783 8 2,373 9 5,697 8 459 9
No 13,435 92 52,929 91 41,369 92 24,995 91 61,594 92 4,770 91
Hemiplegia
Yes 35 0 147 0 102 0 80 0 165 0 17 0
No 14,581 100 57,757 100 45,050 100 27,288 100 67,126 100 5,212 100
Moderate to severe renal disease
Yes 545 4 2,166 4 1,626 4 1,085 4 2,484 4 227 4
No 14,071 96 55,738 96 43,526 96 26,283 96 64,807 96 5,002 96
Diabetes with end organ damage
Yes 649 4 2,845 5 2,127 5 1,367 5 3,197 5 297 6
No 13,967 96 55,059 95 43,025 95 26,001 95 64,094 95 4,932 94
Any tumor
Yes 2,234 15 8,344 14 6,590 15 3,988 15 9,824 15 754 14
No 12,382 85 49,560 86 38,560 85 23,380 85 57,467 85 4,475 86
Leukemia
Yes 72 0 283 0 215 0 140 1 329 0 26 0
No 14,544 100 57,621 100 44,937 100 27,228 99 66,962 100 5,203 100
Lymphoma
Yes 123 1 489 1 371 1 241 1 571 1 41 1
No 14,493 99 57,415 99 44,781 99 27,127 99 66,720 99 5,188 99
Moderate to severe liver disease
Yes 74 1 231 0 198 0 116 0 277 0 28 1
No 14,542 99 57,673 100 44,963 100 27,252 100 67,014 100 5,201 99
Metastatic solid tumor
Yes 290 2 801 1 688 2 403 1 1,005 1 86 2
No 14,326 98 57,103 99 44,464 98 26,965 99 66286 99 5,143 98
AIDS
Yes 3 0 13 0 9 0 7 0 15 0 1 0
No 14,613 100 57,981 100 45,143 100 27,361 100 67,276 100 5,228 100

References

  • 1.Pedersen AB, Ehrenstein V, Szepligeti SK, et al. Thirty-five-year trends in first-time hospitalization for hip fracture, 1-year mortality, and the prognostic impact of comorbidity: a Danish nationwide cohort study, 1980-2014. Epidemiology. 2017;28(6):898–905. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pedersen AB, Ehrenstein V, Szepligeti SK, Sørensen HT. Hip fracture, comorbidity, and the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke: a Danish nationwide cohort study, 1995-2015. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(12):2339–2346. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rademakers LM, Vainas T, van Zutphen SW, Brink PR, van Helden SH. Pressure ulcers and prolonged hospital stay in hip fracture patients affected by time-to-surgery. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2007;33(3):238–244. doi: 10.1007/s00068-007-6212-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Khan SK, Kalra S, Khanna A, Thiruvengada MM, Parker MJ. Timing of surgery for hip fractures: a systematic review of 52 published studies involving 291,413 patients. Injury. 2009;40(7):692–697. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Garcia-Alvarez F, Al-Ghanem R, Garcia-Alvarez I, Lopez-Baisson A, Bernal M. Risk factors for postoperative infections in patients with hip fracture treated by means of Thompson arthroplasty. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;50(1):51–55. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2009.01.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S, et al. Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cmaj. 2010;182(15):1609–1616. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.092220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moja L, Piatti A, Pecoraro V, et al. Timing matters in hip fracture surgery: patients operated within 48 hrs have better outcomes. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of over 190,000 patients. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cordero J, Maldonado A, Iborra S. Surgical delay as a risk factor for wound infection after a hip fracture. Injury. 2016;47(Suppl 3):S56–S60. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30607-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kelly-Pettersson P, Samuelsson B, Muren O, et al. Waiting time to surgery is correlated with an increased risk of serious adverse events during hospital stay in patients with hip-fracture: a cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;69:91–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Klestil T, Roder C, Stotter C, et al. Impact of timing of surgery in elderly hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):13933 018-32098-7. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32098-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Byun SE, Shon HC, Kim JW, Kim HK, Sim Y. Risk factors and prognostic implications of aspiration pneumonia in older hip fracture patients: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019;19(2):119–123. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.National Institute for Healt and Clinical Excellence. NICE Quality Standard 16. Hip fracture in adults. 2017; Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs16. Accessed August01, 2018.
  • 13.Pincus D, Ravi B, Wasserstein D, et al. Association between wait time and 30-day mortality in adults undergoing hip fracture surgery. JAMA. 2017;318(20):1994–2003. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dansk Tværfaglig Register for Hoftenære Lårbensbrud. National årsrapport 2017. 2017; Available from: https://www.sundhed.dk/content/cms/62/4662_hofte-fraktur-%C3%A5rsrapport_2017.pdf. Accessed June13, 2018.
  • 15.Mainz J, Hansen AM, Palshof T, Bartels PD. National quality measurement using clinical indicators: the Danish National Indicator Project. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(8):500–504. doi: 10.1002/jso.21192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kristensen PK, Thillemann TM, Søballe K, Johnsen SP. Are process performance measures associated with clinical outcomes among patients with hip fractures? A population-based cohort study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(6):698–708. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish civil registration system as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29(8):541–549. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish national patient registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–490. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S91125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Johannesdottir SA, Horvath-Puho E, Ehrenstein V, Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: the Danish national database of reimbursed prescriptions. Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4:303–313. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S37587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moran CG, Wenn RT, Sikand M, Taylor AM. Early mortality after hip fracture: is delay before surgery important? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(3):483–489. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.01796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Majumdar SR, Beaupre LA, Johnston DW, Dick DA, Cinats JG, Jiang HX. Lack of association between mortality and timing of surgical fixation in elderly patients with hip fracture: results of a retrospective population-based cohort study. Med Care. 2006;44(6):552–559. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000215812.13720.2e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Smektala R, Endres HG, Dasch B, et al. The effect of time-to-surgery on outcome in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:171 2474-9-171. doi 10.1186/1471-2474-9-87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES