Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2018 Oct 25;59(49):4311–4314. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2018.10.050

Parallel Strategies for the Synthesis of Annulated Pyrido[3,4-b]indoles via Rh(I)- and Pd(0)-Catalyzed Cyclotrimerization

Bianca M Saliba 1, Satyam Khanal 1, Michael A O’Donnell 1, Kathryn E Queenan 1, Junho Song 1, Matthew R Gentile 1, Seann P Mulcahy 1,*
PMCID: PMC6519955  NIHMSID: NIHMS1511095  PMID: 31105351

Abstract

Two different pathways for the synthesis of annulated pyrido[3,4-b]indoles are reported using metal-catalyzed cyclotrimerization reactions. A stepwise process using Rh(I)-catalysis in the final step of the synthesis and a multicomponent, tandem catalytic approach using Pd(0)-catalysis both lead to complex nitrogen-containing heterocycles in good yields. Substituent effects are investigated for both pathways, demonstrating that the Pd(0)-catalyzed approach is more sensitive to electron- withdrawing groups.

Keywords: Pyridoindole, Cyclotrimerization, Tandem catalysis, Multicomponent

Graphical Abstract:

graphic file with name nihms-1511095-f0004.jpg


Transition metal catalysis is a fundamental tool in organic synthesis that enables chemists to construct molecules with ever increasing complexity. Nearly every organic functional group has some affinity for one or more of the transition metals, and the resulting complexes often change the reactivity of the functional group. This can be exploited for synthetic purposes, whereby transformations that are expensive, wasteful, or difficult using traditional methods can be performed under mild conditions in the presence of a transition metal.1 The use of transition metals for the synthesis of complex nitrogen-containing heterocycles is especially important given their prevalence in small molecule drug discovery efforts.2 We recently reported the synthesis of pyrido[3,4- b]indoles, also known as p-carbolines, using a strategy that employs transition metal catalysis to fuse additional rings to the core pyridine scaffold.3 While annulations to pyridoindole heterocycles do not appear frequently in the chemical literature, some notable examples have potent biological effects, including the inhibition of ion channels,4 binding to neurochemical receptors and DNA,56 and cytotoxic and cytostatic activity.79 New methods to rapidly synthesize these molecules would enable an even wider study of their biological activity. Furthermore, understanding the mechanism and generality of these transition metal-catalyzed reactions would facilitate the construction of new heterocycles with increasingly complex architectures. In this Letter, we report two parallel strategies for the synthesis of annulated pyrido[3,4-b]indoles: 1) a stepwise Rh(I)-catalyzed sequence, and 2) a one-pot tandem catalytic sequence using Pd(0).

Our synthesis of annulated pyrido[3,4-b]indoles used the retrosynthetic strategy outlined in Figure 1, which made use of a late-stage cyclotrimerization1018 to build the core heterocyclic framework and a Sonogashira reaction19 to create a diynylnitrile substrate from simpler starting materials. Our initial investigations using this strategy focused on the annulation of different sized rings to the pyrido[3,4-b]i ndole by exchanging the alkynylnitrile tether.3 In this study, we investigated the effects of substitution pattern on the starting substrates to determine the electronic requirements for this sequence.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Retrosynthetic analysis for annulated pyrido[3,4-b]indoles

The synthesis of differentially substituted pyrido[3,4-b]indoles is outlined in Scheme 1. We began by following a two-step literature procedure20 to prepare the requisite W-(trimethylsilyl)ethynyl-2-iodoanilines 4a-g in good yield from substituted 2- iodoanilines. A palladium-catalyzed Sonogashira reaction using a nitrile-tethered alkyne 5 resulted in the preparation of substrates 6a-g. After removal of the trimethylsilyl group with TBAF, a rhodium(I)-catalyzed intramolecular cyclotrimerization14 reaction afforded the desired annulated pyrido[3,4-b]indoles 8a-g.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Synthesis of annulated pyrido[3,4-b]indoles via Rh(I)-catalysis

Table 1 shows the yields for each step of this sequence for six different substrates containing a diversity of functional groups. Both electron-withdrawing and electron-donating groups resulted in moderate to good isolated yields for each step in the synthesis using optimized conditions. The W-alkynylation reaction using the hypervalent iodine intermediate 321 nearly always resulted in some recovered starting material despite extensive optimization of the reaction conditions. In some cases, loss of the p-toluenesulfonyl protecting group was even observed. Thus, the moderate yields (ie. 4e, 4f) for this step can be attributed to a combination of incomplete deprotonation, instability of the products to strongly basic conditions, and some insolubility of 3 in toluene. It should also be noted that the Sonogashira reaction had to be closely monitored by TLC and worked up immediately after the starting material was completely consumed to avoid lower yields. Removal of the trimethylsilyl protecting group proceeded smoothly to give terminal alkynamides 7a-g in good yields. These substrates were sensitive to hydrolysis, resulting in the formation of acetamide side products, so the reaction needed to be performed at lower temperatures. Finally, the intramolecular cyclotrimerization reaction proceeded smoothly in all cases to give the desired targets 8a-g, with the best yields occurring for electron-rich systems. More moderate yields were observed for substrates with an electron-withdrawing group. With the exception of the 8a (rt, CH2Cl2), all diynylnitrile substrates required refluxing conditions in CHCl3 as solvent and close monitoring by TLC.

Table 1.

Stepwise synthesis of annulated pyrido[3,4-b]indoles

Entry R1 = R2 = Yield of 2 (%) Yield of 4 Yield of 6 Yield of 7 Yield of 8
a H H 78 83 68 89 84b,c
b Cl H 83 60 72 74 96
c H Cl 71 74 81 64 65
d H OMe 81 87 63 88 93
e H Me 80 48 82 83 91
f H CO2Me 99a 38 67 90 78
g H F 61 88 53 79 64
a

TsCl, DMAP, CHCl3;

b

rt, CH2Cl2;

c

ref. 3

A frustrating problem in the synthesis of annulated pyrido[3,4-b]indoles via this stepwise approach was the consistently moderate yields for the Sonogashira reaction for some substrates. Upon closer inspection, much of mass balance came not from decomposition but rather from the formation of 8a-g (Scheme 2). This led us to believe that palladium itself could catalyze the intramolecular cyclotrimerization step,2227 obviating the need for isolation of two additional intermediates. This result was quite surprising, since it implied that a single palladium precursor could multitask within the same reaction flask by participating in more than one mechanistically unique catalytic cycle.2834 We previously reported a mechanistic study of this transformation for a single substrate (8a).35 Since the reaction was run overnight, had high catalyst loading, and suffered from some loss of catalytic activity over time, we searched for an improved experimental procedure that would have broader utility.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

One-pot synthesis of annulated pyrido[3,4-b]indoles via Pd(0)-catalysis

We elected to use microwave acceleration to solve the limitations in our initial synthesis of 8a. Using substrate 4a as our model system again, we investigated the effect of temperature, time, and the source of palladium, as shown in Table 2. The results of this optimization indicate that moderate yields for this reaction could be achieved. In each case, the most significant byproduct in this reaction was intermediate 6a. Higher temperatures resulted in a higher yield of the derived product 8a, presumably by accelerating the cyclotrimerization (entries 1–3). Extending the reaction time did not result in better yields (entries 4–5), nor did adding fresh catalyst (entry 6) or using Pd(OAc)2 (entry 7). Optimized conditions were found that employed Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 as catalyst precursor while being irradiated at 90 °C for 1 h (entry 8).

Table 2.

Optimization of the one-pot synthesis of annulated pyrido[3,4-b]indole 8a

Entry Catalyst (5
mol%)
Temperature
(°C)
Time (h) Isolated yield
(%)
1 Pd(PPh3)4 80 1 31
2 Pd(PPh3)4 90 1 36
3 Pd(PPh3)4 100 1 43
4 Pd(PPh3)4 80 2 44
5 Pd(PPh3)4 80 3 36
6a 2 x Pd(PPh3)4 80 2 35
7 Pd(OAc)2 90 1 39
8 Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 90 1 53
a

An additional 5% of Pd(PPh3)4 was added after 1 hour, then irradiated again

We can now report that the tandem catalytic sequence shown in Scheme 2 is compatible with a selection of substrates (Table 3). Treating N-(trimethylsilyl)ethynyl-2- iodoanilines 4b-g with the alkynylnitrile 5 in the presence of Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 and CuI under microwave irradiation at 90 °C for 1 h resulted in formation of 8b-e in acceptable yields. Unfortunately, very little product was formed for substrates with a strong electron withdrawing group (8f-g). Significant decomposition products were observed in the synthesis of 8f, which is consistent with the lower yield observed in the Rh(I)-catalyzed protocol. Homodimerization occurred during the synthesis of 8g, which suggests that Glaser coupling is faster than intramolecular cyclization. Attempts to avoid homodimerization by using only two equivalents of Et3N did not result in any product formation.

Table 3.

Substrate scope of one-pot synthesis of annulated pyrido[3,4-b]indoles

Entry R1 = R2 = Yield of 8 (%)
a H H 53
b Cl H 51
c H Cl 57
d H OMe 43
e H Me 47
f H CO2Me 9
g H F 0 (98)a
a

Yield of homodimer

While these yields are indeed modest, our method could be attractive for certain substrates as a multicomponent coupling. First, the reaction conditions are an improvement upon our initial disclosure,35 since half as much catalyst is used and the reaction time is significantly shorter due to microwave acceleration. Second, this reaction is unique since a single palladium complex can form multiple bonds and multiple rings in a single reaction flask, thereby enabling the synthesis of annulated pyrido[3,4-b]indoles in as few as three steps from easily accessible starting materials. Finally, the yields for the one-pot synthesis of 8a-e using Pd(II)-catalysis (Scheme 2 and Table 3) are on par with the stepwise method using Rh(I)-catalysis (Scheme 1 and Table 1), indicating that both pathways are viable depending on the desired substitution pattern.

In conclusion, we have described parallel pathways for the synthesis of annulated pyrido[3,4-b]indoles bearing a range of functional groups. A stepwise sequence that employs a Rh(I)-catalyzed cyclotrimerization in the last step is high yielding and modular. Likewise, a one-pot Pd(0)-catalyzed tandem Sonogashira— desilylation-cyclotrimerization strategy affords the same products in reasonable yields. Coupled with our recent report of the ability to expand the size of the annulation, these two transition metal catalyzed pathways provide additional synthetic tools to construct complex pyrido[3,4-b]indoles in a less time- and resource-intensive manner.

Supplementary Material

1

Highlights:

  • Two parallel strategies for the synthesis of pyrido[3,4-b]indoles are described

  • A stepwise sequence involving a Rh(I)-catalyzed cyclotrimerization is general across all substrates

  • A multicomponent, tandem catalytic approach using Pd(0)-catalysis affords products with electron-donating groups

  • Both strategies demonstrate the versatility and convenience of synthesis of these molecules in similar overall yields

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation Facilitating Research at Undergraduate Institutions program (#1565987). Acknowledgement is also made to the Donors of the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund for partial support of this research. Research reported in this publication was also supported in part by the Institutional Development Award (IDeA) Network for Biomedical Research Excellence from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant number P20GM103430. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Tun-Li Shen at Brown University for HR-MS measurements.

Footnotes

Supplementary data

Supplementary data associated with this article, including all experimental details and the full characterization of all new compounds, can be found in the online version.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Hegedus LS; Soderberg BCG, Transition Metals in the Synthesis of Complex Organic Molecules. 3rd ed; University Science Books: Sausalito, CA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vitaku E; Smith DT; Njardarson JT, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2014, 57 (24), 10257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Varelas JG; Khanal S; O’Donnell MA; Mulcahy SP, Organic Letters, 2015, 17 (21), 5512–5514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kopanitsa MV; Krishtal OA; Komissarov IV, Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, 2003, 27 (12), 46–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dorey G; Dubois L; Prodo de Carvalho LP; Potier P; Dodd RH, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1995, 38 (1), 189–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Madle E; Obe G; Hansen J; Ristow H, Mutation Research, 1981, 90, 433–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Laronze M; Boisbrun M; Leonce S; Pfeiffer B; Renard P; Lozach O; Meijer L; Lansiaux A; Bailly C; Sapi J; Laronze JY, Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, 2005, 13 (6), 2263–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moquin P,C.; Guyot M, Tetrahedron, 1989, 45 (11), 3445–3450. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hingane DG; Kusurkar RS, Tetrahedron Letters, 2011, 52 (28), 3686–3688. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chopade PR; Louie J, Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2006, 348 (16–17), 2307–2327. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Varela JA; Saa C, Chemical Reviews, 2003, 103, 3787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dominguez G; Perez-Castells J, Chemical Society Reviews, 2011, 40, (7), 3430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Varela JA; Saa C, Synlett, 2008, 17, 2571–2578. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tanaka K; Shirasaka K, Organic Letters, 2003, 5 (24), 4697–4699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Naiman A; Vollhardt KPC, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 1977, 16,708. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yamamoto Y; Ogawa R; Itoh K, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2001, 123, 6189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moretto AF; Zhang HC; Maryanoff BE, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2002, 124, 6792. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Heller B; Sundermann B; Fischer C; You JS; Chen WQ; Drexler HJ; Knochel P; Bonrath B; Gutnov A, Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2003, 68, 9221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sonogashira K; Tohda Y; Hagihara N, Tetrahedron Letters, 1975, 16 (50), 4467–4470. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Witulski B; Alayrac C, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2002, 41 (17), 3281–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bachi MD; Bar-ner N; Crittell CM; Stang PJ; Williamson BL, Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1991, 56 (12), 3912–3915. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pena D; Escudero S; Perez D; Guitian E; Castedo L, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 1998, 37 (19), 2659–2661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sato Y; Nishimata T; Mori M, Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1994, 59, 6133–6135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hsieh JC; Cheng CH, Chemical Communications, 2008, 26, 2992–2994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.D’Souza B; Lane T; Louie J, Organic Letters, 2011, 13 (11), 2936–2939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Richard V; Ipouck M; Merel DS; Gaillaid S; Whitby RJ; Witulski B; Renaud J-L, Chemical Communications, 2014, 50, 593–595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang C; Li X; Wu F; Wan B, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2011, 50, 7162–7166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fogg DE; dos Santos EN, Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2004, 248 (21–24), 2365–2379. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mueller TJJ, Metal Catalyzed Cascade Reactions. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2006; p 339. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tietze LF, Chemical Reviews, 1996, 96 (1), 115–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wasilke J-C; Obrey SJ; Baker RT; Bazan GC, Chemical Reviews, 2005, 105, 1001–1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lee JM; Na Y; Han H; Chang S, Chemical Society Reviews, 2004, 33 (5), 302–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nicolaou KC; Chen JS, Chemical Society Reviews, 2009, 38 (11), 2993–3009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ramachary DB; Jain S, Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2011, 9 (5), 1277–1300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mulcahy SP; Varelas JG, Tetrahedron Letters, 2013, 54 (48), 6599–6601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES