Abstract
Previously, we reported N-2-aryl triazoles (NAT) exhibited good fluorocent activity in UV/blue light range. In the effort to achieve biocompetitive NAT fluorofores with green/yellow emission, a new class of 4-keto-2-(4’-N,N-dipheyl)-phenyl triazoles were designed and synthesized. Herein, we present our study of these novel fluorophores which demonstrated excellent luminencent emission both in solution (Φ up to 96%) and in solid state (Φ up to 43%). Furthermore, these new compounds showed aggregation-induced emission (AIE) properties as well as reversible mechanochromic luminescence properties, which suggested their potential applications in chemical and material science.
Fluorescence active small organic molecules are important class of compounds in chemical1, biological2 and material3 research. In general, many factors including high luminescence efficiency, high thermal stability, good accessibility and easy modification are assessed for organic phosphor’s applications.4
In the past decade, our efforts on triazole derivative synthesis5 have led to the discovery of N-2-aryl-1,2,3-triazoles as good fluorescence emission compounds, while the N-1 isomers (1,4-disubstituted-triazole) showed almost no emission.6 As shown in Scheme 1A, changing different aryl substitutions on both N-2 and C-4 position can only cause a small emission wavelength shift. Although fluorophores with UV/blue light emission are important for certain applications7, those with emission at lower energy (green/yellow/red light region) is preferred for applications in biological systems.8 Herein, we have devoted many efforts to developing NAT-derivatives with longer emission wavelength. By simultaneously incorporating electron-rich substitutions on the N-2 phenyl position and electron-deficient substitutions on the C-4 position, a series of yellow emitting NAT fluorophores (λem up to 550 nm) with high quantum yields both in solution and in solid state were obtained. Moreover, these compounds showed aggregation induced emission (AIE) properties and interesting mechanochromic luminance, suggesting a promising strategy to construct solid fluorophores from simple 1,2,3-triazole derivatives (Scheme 1B).
Scheme 1.

Developing yellow emitting NAT fluorophores.
As a general design principle, extending conjugation system of the fluorophore will lead to red-shift of the emission wavelength due to the reduced energy gap between its highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO).9 Considering that 1,2,3-triazole is a highly electron deficient functional group, incorporation of electron-donating groups (EDG) should bring the emission to red-shift. However, even with strong EDG like N, N-dimethyl (1c), limited red-shift was observed with λem at 427 nm. (Figure 1A, see detailed syntheses of all compounds and their optical dates in SI). Notably, 1,2,3-triazole is a very stable aromatic structure. Thus, it often forms poor conjugation between N-2 aryl due to energy penalty for breaking aromaticity. As a result, EDG substituted NAT at best could only form resonance structure A, bearing triazole (TA) stabilized anion, which leads to the limited emission change.
Figure 1.

General strategy to achieve NAT red-shift.
To access extended conjugation, an accessible TA resonance structure B is necessary, which requires the overall electron density delocalized from the three adjacent nitrogens to the carbon. With this consideration in mind, we postulated that introducing electron withdrawing group (EWG) on triazole carbon with help the electron delocalization, favoring the resonance structure B. Thus, we proposed that the combination of EDG on N-2 aryl and EWG on carbon will build the extended conjugation, giving the desired red-shift NAT as shown in intermediate C (Figure 1B). To verify this hypothesis, we prepared triazole analogues 2a-2d with varied EWGs on triazole C-4 position. Their PL data are summarized in Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Significant red-shift with EDG/EWG substituted TPA-NAT.
As proposed, introducing EWG (cyan or carbonyl group) on C-4 position gave the expected red-shift while maintaining excellent fluorescence emission. Notably, with 4-phenylcarbonyl substitution (2c), a very dramatic red-shift (105 nm) was observed. Compared with blue-emitting compounds 2a and 2b, quantum yield for 2c was lower, which is common for long wavelength emission fluorophore. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations based on single crystal structures were also conducted (Table S13). Compared with 2a/2b, 2c possesses a smaller energy gap (5.83 eV), thus giving a longer wavelength of fluorescence emission. Encouraged by this result, a series of EDG/EWG modified NAT compounds were prepared and their optical properties in THF solution are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Optical properties of EDG/EWG modified NAT compounds in THF solution[a]
![]() | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comp | λex (nm) | λem (nm) | Life time τavg(ns) | Φ (%) | Comp | λex (nm) | λem (nm) | Life time τavg(ns) | Φ (%) |
| 3a | 330 | 366 | 3.099 | 0.37 | 3h | 368 | 470 | 3.199 | 0.18 |
| 3b | 297 | 377 | - | 0.62 | 3i | 364 | 537 | 2.116 | 18 |
| 3c | 335 | 550 | 6.309 | 4.1 | 3j | 369 | 533 | 1.464 | 52 |
| 3d | 341 | 473 | 1.707 | 1.3 | 3k | 368 | 530 | 2.556 | 36 |
| 3e | 365 | 524 | 3.182 | 25 | 3l | 362 | 537 | 1.918 | 4.3 |
| 3f | 357 | 540 | 2.224 | 12 | 3m | 369 | 520 | 3.494 | 5.7 |
| 3g | 365 | 542 | 1.576 | 11 | 3n | 370 | 505 | 1.467 | 7.8 |
Fluorescence emission of compound 3a-3l. Concentration: 20 μmol/L in THF.
First, for all the C-4 phenylcarbonyl substituted triazole (3b–3d), EDGs at N-2 aryl gave rise to the obvious redshift. Interestingly, structurally rigid carbozole substituted NAT 3d gave less red-shift, which was likely caused by the poor conjugation between nitrogen and N-2 phenyl due to their steric repulsion. Evaluation of the arylcarbonyl group on C-4 position confirmed that electron deficient aryl substitutcents could enhance the overall emission. NATs with 4-F, 4-Br and 4-Cl benzene and naphthenyl substitution all resulted in red-shifts with strong emission. In contrast, the penta-fluoro benzene substituted NAT 3h gave less red-shift (λmax=470 nm) and very low quantum yield in solution. This can be explained by the strong electronic repulsion between F and triazole N, which were confirmed by the crystal structures showing longer distance between F-N (2.908 Å) in 3h over the H-N distance (2.760 Å) in 3e. (see crystal structures in Figure S85). Similarly, the 2-fluoro phenyl and 2,6-difluoro phenyl substitution NAT 3m and 3n also exhibited low fluorescence quantum yield in solution, which further supported the above conclusion.
In addition, different substituents on triazole C-5 position were evaluated. Besides phenyl (2c), NATs with other functional groups were prepared, including trimethylsilyl (3j), hydrogen (3k) and electron-donating 4-(N,N-diphenyl)phenyl (3l). Although red-shift caused by C-5 substitution with either trimethylsilyl or hydrogen was trivial (about 10 nm), the overall emissions remained in the green-yellow light region. Importantly, significant enhancement of emission quantum yields was achieved, which was likely caused by the improved conjugation with less steric hindrance on C-5 position. Interestingly, incorporation of another EDG on the C-5 position 3l did not result in efficient emission, which might be ascribed for the lack of effective electronic conjugations. Therefore, by screening NAT of various substitutions, we developed an effective strategy to achieve NAT green/yellow fluorophore via tuning the combination of EDG/EWG on NAT.
As motioned above, while electron deficient arylcarbonyl NATs (such as 3f-3g) generally gave red-shift emissions with high efficiency, it is worth noticing that the pentafluorophenyl substituted NAT 3h resulted in poor emission with quantum yield <1%. To understand the cause of these results, single crystal structures of nine NATs have been successfully obtained (see details in Figure S78–86). Structures of compounds 2c and 3h are shown in Figure 3. For compound 2c, the dihedral angle between triazole and carbonyl (C=O) is 37.2 ° and TA vs Ph is 54.1°, not even close to coplanar conformation. Moreover, while compounds 2c and 3h clearly gave different PL property in solution, the solid-state X-ray crystals showed very similar geometry. Their twisted conformation aroused our interest to know whether this type of NAT would show different luminescence properties in solid state and exhibit aggregation-induced emission (AIE).
Figure 3.

Crystal structures revealing large dihedral angle.
In 2001, Tang’s group first introduced the concept of aggregation-induced emission (AIE) into the community.10 Since then, a great number of organic molecules have been reported with AIE properties and applied in a wide range of material research and industrial applications.11 To explore the potential aggregation induced emission of these new type of fluorophores, we first measured their solid-state luminescence property. The data of some representative compounds are summarized in Table 2 (see detailed data in Figure S19–24).
Table 2.
Solid state Optical properties of EDG/EWG modified NATs
| Comp | λex (nm) | λem (nm) | Life time τavg(ns) | Φ (%) | ΦPL(solid)/ΦPL(solution) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | 319 | 362 | 2.320 | 7.5 | - |
| 1b | 275 | 372 | 5.426 | 7.5 | - |
| 1c | 373 | 417 | 7.127 | 7.7 | - |
| 1d | 363 | 423 | 1.707 | 30 | 0.38 |
| 2a | 275 | 461 | 3.182 | 44 | 0.51 |
| 2b | 273 | 457 | 2.224 | 38 | 0.41 |
| 2c | 275 | 457 | 1.576 | 21 | 1.2 |
| 2d | 274 | 439 | 2.000 | 51 | 0.53 |
| 3a | 392 | 485 | - | 0.79 | - |
| 3b | 390 | 468 | 2.116 | 9.1 | 15 |
| 3c | 370 | 504 | 1.464 | 5.0 | 1.2 |
| 3d | 417 | 458 | - | 0.73 | - |
| 3e | 275 | 464 | 1.918 | 43 | 1.7 |
| 3f | 368 | 513 | 4.490 | 13 | 1.1 |
| 3g | 360 | 478 | 2.166 | 21 | 2.0 |
| 3h | 366 | 481 | 4.507 | 29 | 161 |
| 3i | 369 | 506 | 4.607 | 10 | 0.56 |
| 3j | 370 | 502 | 2.662 | 18 | 0.35 |
| 3k | 368 | 488 | 3.696 | 15 | 0.42 |
| 3l | 368 | 506 | 2.848 | 8.5 | 2.0 |
| 3m | 370 | 461 | 3.128 | 29 | 5.1 |
| 3n | 370 | 509 | 5.005 | 7.4 | 0.95 |
Most of the EDG/EWG modified NATs exhibited solid-state emission with different wavelengths. Detailed spectroscopic data along with CIE 1931 chromaticity diagram are provided in supporting information (Figure S25). Importantly, N, N-diphenyl substitutions on N-2 aryl position is crucial for high solid-state luminance emission (such as 1d, 2a-2c, 3e-3n) with quantum yields up to 40%. To understand this phenomenon, fluorescence lifetime (τ) of these NATs were measured both in solution and in the solid state. Based on those dates, radiative transition rate constants kr and nonradiative transition rate constants knr were calculated. For compound 3h, in THF solution, transition rate constants are kr=5.627x105 s−1 and knr=3.128x108 s−1. In solid state, these rate constants are kr=6.392x107 s−1 and knr=1.579x108 s−1. Thus, it is clear that for compound 3h, the nonradiative decay is the key factors for the low ΦPL in THF solution.12 This also lead to the observed 160 times increase of quantum yield in solid state.
By comparing the fluorescence quantum yields of these compounds in solution and solid state, we estimated that many of these new NATs might show effective AIE property, especially for those compounds with ΦPL(solid)/ΦPL(solution)>1, including 2c, 3b, 3c, 3e–3h, 3l and 3m. In fact, the fluorescence intensity of many of these compounds decreased gradually with the increase of water content up to 70% (Figure 4A). This may be due to the influence of the polarity of solvent on the TICT state.13 Further increase of the water fraction led to the significant increase of fluorescence intensity, reflecting typical AIE phenomenon. The titration spectra of compound 3h are shown in Figure 4. (see others in Fig. S26–46). Changing the NAT sample measuring temperature from 0 to 50 °C gives a slight blue-shift in most cases, suggesting temperature has a small influence on the TICT state (Figure S13–18). Interestingly, in most of cases, addition of water (AIE test) gave unusual hypochromic shift. This may be ascribed for different emission modes of these compounds (eg. local emission vs ICT emission). This was supported by the case of 3c where two emission bands were observed (Fig. S35). One band at short wavelength may come from the local emission while the another band is related to ICT emission. The observed hypochromic shift may be ascribed to one of these specific emission modes.
Figure 4.

(A) PL spectra of 3h (10 μM) in acetone and THF/water mixtures with different water fractions (fw). (B) Plots of emission intensity of 3h versus the water mixtures.
During the exploration of NAT solid-state emissions, we found that some the NATs showed the mechanochromic property. Upon grinding of solid powder, some NATs showed clear red-shift emission. The emission shifts of these compounds are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3.
NAT mechanochromic emission [a]
| λem-solution (nm) | λem-solid (nm) | λem grinding (nm) | ∆λem (nm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2c | 524 | 457 | 492 | 35 |
| 3c | 550 | 504 | 514 | 10 |
| 3e | 524 | 464 | 487 | 23 |
| 3g | 542 | 478 | 499 | 21 |
| 3m | 520 | 461 | 494 | 33 |
Here we discuss compounds whose fluorescence emission peaks change more than 10 nm before and after grinding.
It is known that grinding could cause the collapse of crystal lattice, converting crystalline material into amorphous material.14 This has been confirmed by the power diffraction XRD (Figure S68–72). Breaking the packing can disrupt the intermolecular interaction, which would force the NATs to adopt a more planar conformation and contribute to the observed mechanochromic luminescence.15 This emission shift is fully reversible: heating the solid sample to 170 °C for 1 minute gave the initial emission profile with no change. This process has been repeated multiple cycles as shown in Figure 5. Compounds with twisted conformation (2c, 3c, 3e and 3g) demonstrated reasonable emission change after grinding. For 3j which have a coplanar conformation, emission in solid state did not change after grinding, suggesting that the twisted conformation between triazole (TA) and 4-arylcarbonyl may be vital to this mechanochromic luminescence. Compound 3f and 3h, both having twisted conformation in single crystal form (see Figure S78–86), did not show mechanochromic property. This is likely associated with the stronger steric hindrance, causing the higher energy barrier to adopt coplanar conformation. The absorption spectra of these NATs under heating and ground conditions were also measured, and there was no significant changes observed (Figure S73–77). Further mechanism studies on those phenomena are currently undergoing in our lab.
Figure 5.

(A) PL spectra of unground and ground 2c. (B) Reversible switching of the emission of 2c through repeated grinding/heating cycles.
In summary, we reported the successful development of EDG/EWG modified NATs as a new class of organic solid fluorophores with tunable emission from blue to yellow light region. With the conformations confirmed by single crystal structures, we systematically investigated the relationship between their optical properties and their structures. Notably, the use of C-4-phenylcarbonyl group and C-5-Phenyl in triazole ring successfully led to twisted conformation which is crucial for good emission efficiency of those in solid state. What’s more, some NATs revealed AIE properties and reversible mechanochromic luminescence properties, suggesting promising future for employing this strategy to prepare new organic solid fluorescent materials.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the NSF (CHE-1619590), NIH (1R01GM120240-01), NSFC (21228204), Jilin Province (20170307024YY, 20190201080JC) for financial support.
Footnotes
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: See DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Notes and references
- 1.(a) Ai X, Chen Y, Feng Y and Li F, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 2018, 57, 2869–2873; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Xu S, Liu T, Mu Y, Wang YF, Chi Z, Lo CC, Liu S, Zhang Y, Lien A and Xu J, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 2015, 54, 874–878; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Furue R, Nishimoto T, Park IS, Lee J and Yasuda T, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 2016, 55, 7171–7175.; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Li B, Lan J, Wu D and You J, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 2015, 54, 14008–14012; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Wang H, Chen P, Wu Z, Zhao J, Sun J and Lu R, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 2017, 56, 9463–9467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Qi J, Sun C, Zebibula A, Zhang H, Kwok RTK, Zhao X, Xi W, Lam JWY, Qian J and Tang BZ, Adv. Mater, 2018, 30, e1706856; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Shi J, Li Y, Li Q and Li Z, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10, 12278–12294; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Mei J, Huang Y and Tian H, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10, 12217–12261; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Qian J and Tang BZ, Chem, 2017, 3, 56–91. [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Yu L, Wu Z, Xie G, Zeng W, Ma D and Yang C, Chem. Sci, 2018, 9, 1385–1391; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Gao M, Su H, Lin Y, Ling X, Li S, Qin A and Tang BZ, Chem. Sci, 2017, 8, 1763–1768; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Yu T, Ou D, Yang Z, Huang Q, Mao Z, Chen J, Zhang Y, Liu S, Xu J, Bryce MR and Chi Z, Chem. Sci, 2017, 8, 1163–1168; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Dalapati S, Jin E, Addicoat M, Heine T and Jiang D, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2016, 138, 5797–5800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Zhang JN, Kang H, Li N, Zhou SM, Sun HM, Yin SW, Zhao N and Tang BZ, Chem. Sci, 2017, 8, 577–582; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Anthony SP, Chem. Plus. Chem, 2012, 77, 518–531. [Google Scholar]
- 5.(a) Zhang YW, Ye XH, Petersen JL, Li MY and Shi XD, J. Org. Chem, 2015, 80, 3664–3669; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Sengupta S, Duan HF, Lu WB, Petersen JL and Shi XD, Org. Lett, 2008, 10, 1493–1496; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Chen YF, Liu YX, Petersen JL and Shi XD, Chem. Commun, 2008, 3254–3256; [DOI] [PubMed]; (d) Liu YX, Yan WM, Chen YF, Petersen JL and Shi XD, Org. Lett, 2008, 10, 5389–5392; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Wang DW, Ye XH and Shi XD, Org. Lett, 2010, 12, 2088–2091; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Cai R, Ye XH, Sun Q, He QQ, He Y, Ma SQ and Shi XD, Acs Catalysis, 2017, 7, 1087–1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yan WM, Wang QY, Lin Q, Li MY, Petersen JL and Shi XD, Chem. Eur. J, 2011, 17, 5011–5018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dang D, Qiu Z, Han T, Liu Y, Chen M, Kwok RTK, Lam JWY and Tang BZ, Adv. Funct. Mater, 2018, 28, 1707210. [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Chen Y, Zhang W, Cai Y, Kwok RTK, Hu Y, Lam JWY, Gu X, He Z, Zhao Z, Zheng X, Chen B, Gui C and Tang BZ, Chem. Sci, 2017, 8, 2047–2055; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Li Z, Wang YF, Zeng C, Hu L and Liang XJ, Anal Chem, 2018, 90, 3666–3669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jabłoński A, Nature, 1933, 131, 839–840. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hong Y, Lam JWY and Tang BZ, Chem. Soc. Rev, 2011, 40, 5361–5388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.(a) Lee MH, Sharma A, Chang MJ, Lee J, Son S, Sessler JL, Kang C and Kim JS, Chem. Soc. Rev, 2018, 47, 28–52; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ruan Z, Shan Y, Gong Y, Wang C, Ye F, Qiu Y, Liang Z and Li Z, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2018, 6, 773–780; [Google Scholar]; (c) Kwok RT, Leung CW, Lam JW and Tang BZ, Chem. Soc. Rev, 2015, 44, 4228–4238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.(a) Feng HT, Yuan YX, Xiong JB, Zheng YS and Tang BZ, Chem. Soc. Rev, 2018, 47, 7452–7476.; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Xiong JB, Yuan YX, Wang L, Sun JP, Qiao WG, Zhang HC, Duan M, Han H, Zhang S and Zheng YS, Org. Lett, 2018, 20, 373–376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.(a) Jiang M, Gu X, Lam JWY, Zhang Y, Kwok RTK, Wong KS and Tang BZ, Chem. Sci, 2017, 8, 5440–5446; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Sun H, Tang X-X, Miao B-X, Yang Y and Ni Z, Sensor. Actuat. B Chem, 2018, 267, 448–456. [Google Scholar]
- 14.(a) Lei Y, Zhou Y, Qian L, Wang Y, Liu M, Huang X, Wu G, Wu H, Ding J and Cheng Y, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2017, 5, 5183–5192; [Google Scholar]; (b) Kim HJ, Whang DR, Gierschner J, Lee CH and Park SY, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 2015, 54, 4330–4333; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Sagara Y, Lavrenova A, Crochet A, Simon YC, Fromm KM and Weder C, Chemistry, 2016, 22, 4374–4378; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Xie Z, Yu T, Chen J, Ubba E, Wang L, Mao Z, Su T, Zhang Y, Aldred MP and Chi Z, Chem. Sci, 2018, 9, 5787–5794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yuan WZ, Tan Y, Gong Y, Lu P, Lam JW, Shen XY, Feng C, Sung HH, Lu Y, Williams ID, Sun JZ, Zhang Y and Tang BZ, Adv. Mater, 2013, 25, 2837–2843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

