Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2018 Jul;40(5):387–390. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001188

Excessive treatment failures in patients with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma with reduced-dose cyclophosphamide and delayed radiotherapy.

JT Lucas Jr 1, AS Pappo 2, J Wu 3, DJ Indelicato 4, MJ Krasin 1
PMCID: PMC6520047  NIHMSID: NIHMS1020474  PMID: 29683960

Abstract

Pediatric patients with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma and high risk features are recommended to receive radiotherapy at initiation of protocol therapy due to concerns about the increased risk of local and leptomeningeal failure from treatment delay. We report our early experience on a multi-institutional prospective trial incorporating delayed primary site radiation and reduced dose cyclophosphamide in all patients with parameningeal tumors. We observed an excessive number of loco-regional treatment failures following this approach and have subsequently amended our trial to move radiation therapy upfront for those patients with high risk features. We suggest that investigators should be vigilant for treatment failure given our early prospective experience with delayed radiotherapy and reduced dose cyclophosphamide.

Keywords: rhabdomyosarcoma, parameningeal tumors, cyclophosphamide, radiotherapy

Introduction

Pediatric patients with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma with high risk features (intracranial extension, cranial nerve palsies, etc.) are recommended to undergo radiotherapy at initiation of protocol therapy due to concerns about the increased risk of failure from treatment delay 1,2. Several smaller studies have successfully delayed radiotherapy with the use of more intensive chemotherapy 3,4. The most recent Children’s Oncology Group trial for intermediate risk disease (ARST 1431) also now employs delayed radiation therapy for all patients with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma, regardless of risk features, in conjunction with standard Vincristine, Actinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (1.2 grams/m2) / Vincristine, Irinotecan chemotherapy. The current Children’s Oncology Group trial, ARST 1431, employs both reduced dose cyclophosphamide and delayed radiotherapy in all intermediate risk patients regardless of primary site.

In 2013 we initiated a prospective multi-institutional study in children with newly diagnosed rhabdomyosarcoma evaluating the use of combination chemotherapy, proton beam radiation therapy, upfront or delayed primary surgical resection and maintenance anti-angiogenic therapy. The study incorporated delayed radiation therapy (week 12) for all patients requiring radiation including all patients with Parameningeal primary sites of disease in order to reduce the late effects associated with irradiation of large volumes of the head and neck region in young children 5 that have not had the benefit of chemo-reduction of their disease. During this study we identified an excessive risk of loco-regional failure (primary site recurrence or leptomeningeal spread) requiring a return to early initiation of radiation therapy in patients with parameningeal primary tumors and high risk features. We report these findings and outcomes for subsequent patients with PM primaries in this ongoing trial.

Methods and Materials

RMS13 is a risk adapted multimodality therapeutic trial which treats patients with newly diagnosed rhabdomyosarcoma according to their initial risk assignment. Initially low and intermediate risk patients were enrolled and receive 12 weeks of (Vincristine (1.5 mg/m2), Actinomycin (0.045mg/kg) and Cyclophosphamide (1.2 grams/m2) (VAC) chemotherapy followed by 12 weeks of VA chemotherapy (Low risk subset 1) or 42 weeks of VAC chemotherapy (low risk subset 2 and intermediate risk patients). High risk patients, added to the trial in 2015, receive 54 weeks of interval compressed chemotherapy (vincristine, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide, irinotecan, ifosfamide, etoposide, and doxorubicin). Intermediate and high risk patients receive additional maintenance therapy (anti-angiogenic chemotherapy incorporating bevacizumab, sorafenib and low-dose cyclophosphamide) after completion of cytotoxic chemotherapy.

At the initiation of the trial all patients, including all patients with parameningeal disease regardless of parameningeal features, received radiation therapy at week 13 for involved margins or an unresected primary tumor. The residual post chemotherapy gross disease is targeted with a 0.5cm margin and this volume, plus tissue that initially harbored gross disease (specifically bone or other “infiltrated” tissues) is treated to a dose of 36 CGE with proton beam. A “cone-down” is utilized to treat residual post chemotherapy gross disease to doses of 50.4 CGE (tumors ≤5cm at diagnosis) or 59.4 CGE (tumors >5cm at diagnosis).

Results

The characteristics and outcomes of all parameningeal patients currently enrolled are shown in Table 1. As of (October 2017) there are 13 patients with intermediate or high risk disease and PM primaries whose age ranged from 3 to 21 years. Four patients were treated prior to amending the study and changing the timing of radiation therapy and nine have been treated since the amendment (median follow-up on study of 9.9 mo. and 9.3 mo., respectively). The first three patients with PM primary sites of disease that were treated on this trial either progressed locally prior to RT or recurred with leptomeningeal disease following delayed RT at 1.6, 7.2 and 12.5 months from start of therapy. A fourth patient that was under treatment had RT moved earlier and received it at week 6 and is alive without recurrence. These 4 patients all had high risk features of parameningeal disease including large tumor size, cranial base and bone erosion or intracranial extension. Following this initial experience on this trial we amended the protocol to move radiation therapy upfront (day 21) for patients with parameningeal disease with high risk features 2 including any of the following: 1) intracranial extension or evidence of meningeal impingement, cranial nerve palsies or base of skull erosion, 2) tumor location in an unfavorable parameningeal site (infratemporal fossae, pterygopalatine fossae or paranasal sinuses), 3) primary tumor > 5 cm in one dimension, or 4) age < 1 year at diagnosis. Since that change in protocol therapy we have accrued an additional nine intermediate and high risk patients with parameningeal RMS, seven of which had high risk PM features necessitating RT upfront, and have documented 2 regional recurrences in the leptomeninges (2.9 and 6.4 months from initiation of therapy) and no local recurrences.

Table 1.

RMS13 Patients With Parameningeal Primary Tumors

Age
(yrs)
Location Pre /
Post
Amend
RT
Timing
Risk Group Primary
Tumor
Size
PM Risk Factors Progression /
Recurrence
Time to Progression /
Recurrence (mo.)
Current Status
2.3 Infratemporal Fossa Pre Delayed Intermediate Risk > 5 cm CN Palsy, CBBE Progression, Primary Site 1.6 Alive at 42.4 mo.
6.1 Nasopharynx Pre Delayed Intermediate Risk > 5 cm CN Palsy, CBBE, ICE Leptomeningeal Recurrence 7.2 Dead at 15 mo.
3.8 Infratemporal Fossa Pre Delayed Intermediate Risk > 5 cm CBBE NED - Alive at 36.3 mo.
14.1 Paranasal Sinus Pre Delayed Intermediate Risk > 5 cm CN Palsy, CBBE, ICE Leptomeningeal Recurrence 12.5 Dead at 25.8 mo.
3.4 Middle Ear Post Delayed Intermediate Risk ≤ 5 cm None NED - Alive at 20.1 mo.
10.7 Nasopharynx Post Delayed Intermediate Risk ≤ 5 cm None NED - Alive at 7.7 mo.
3 Nasopharynx Post Early Intermediate Risk > 5 cm None NED - Alive at 20.3 mo.
8.7 Infratemporal Fossa Post Early High Risk > 5 cm CBBE NED - Alive at 20.3 mo.
3.6 Middle Ear Post Early High Risk ≤ 5 cm CN Palsy, CBBE Leptomeningeal Recurrence 6.4 Dead at 6.4 mo.
9.8 Parapharyngeal Space Post Early Intermediate Risk > 5 cm CBBE NED - Alive at 13.3 mo.
5.5 Infratemporal Fossa Post Early High Risk > 5 cm CN Palsy, CBBE, ICE NED - Alive at 9.3 mo.
11.2 Paranasal Sinus Post Early Intermediate Risk > 5 cm CN Palsy, CBBE, ICE Leptomeningeal Recurrence 2.9 Alive with disease at 4.2 mo.
21.4 Parapharyngeal Space Post Early Intermediate Risk > 5 cm CBBE NED - Alive and 3.6 mo.

Pre = Pre-Ammendment, Post = Post-Ammendment, PM = Parameningeal, NED = No evidence of disease, mo = months, CN = Cranial nerve, CBBE = Cranial Base Bony Erosion, ICE = Intracranial Extension

Discussion

The vast majority of rhabdomyosarcoma trials that have been conducted by the Children’s Oncology Group have prescribed RT to the primary site by week 13 unless the patient had a PM primary tumor site with high risk features in which case RT would be initiated early. The criteria for selecting PM patients for early RT has mostly been based on criteria that adversely increase the risk of failure such as age < 1 year, CNP, CBBPE, ICE, size > 5 cm and unfavorable site.2,6,7 Others have proposed response to chemotherapy as a modifying factor for target volume reductions,8 although this strategy for altering radiotherapy timing is untested.9 Smaller studies have successfully delayed or omitted radiotherapy with adequate local control rates when patients received more intensive chemotherapies.3,4,10

Our findings suggest that local control rates may be compromised in selected patients with PM tumors when RT is delayed and given with lower doses of cyclophosphamide (1.2 g/m2). Reduced doses of cyclophosphamide have been recently implicated as a factor that contributes to higher local failure rates in children with Group III vaginal and orbital rhabdomyosarcoma 11,12 thought to play a role in the s been attributed to an increased risk of local failure in recent studies in lower risk subsets of rhabdomyosarcoma11. The contribution of limited radiotherapy target margins cannot be excluded8 but prior studies have demonstrated no decrement with reductions in target volume with leptomeningeal failure rate.1 By starting at a delayed time point, a larger proportion of the at risk tumor bed from diagnosis gets treated to a lower dose (36CGE) prior to cone down. Reduced dose primary site radiotherapy has not been shown to result in an increased failure rate following adequate chemotherapy response 13. While this could potentially contribute to an increased local failure rate in a parameningeal primary patient, it does not explain the observed increase in the risk for leptomeningeal failure8. Physicians employing a delayed radiotherapy approach in patients with Parameningeal primaries with high risk features should use caution as our observations raise the possibility that reduce cyclophosphamide and delayed RT may compromise local control in children with PM RMS.

Figure 1a. Pre-Treatment Disease Extent and Radiotherapy Plan.

Figure 1a.

T2 FLAIR post-contrast MRI at the time of planning demonstrating an expansive nasopharyngeal primary with intracranial extension.

Figure 1b. Failure MRI with Radiotherapy Plan Overlay.

Figure 1b.

T2 FLAIR post-contrast MRI with multiple areas of hyper-intense T2 signal corresponding to diffuse leptomeningeal disease.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Progression Free Survival

Acknowledgements:

This work was supported in part by the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital Cancer Center Grant P30CA021765

Footnotes

Presented at: N/A

Disclaimers: None

Works Cited

  • 1.Michalski JM, Meza J, Breneman JC, et al. : Influence of radiation therapy parameters on outcome in children treated with radiation therapy for localized parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma in Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group trials II through IV. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:1027–38, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Merks JH, De Salvo GL, Bergeron C, et al. : Parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma in pediatric age: results of a pooled analysis from North American and European cooperative groups. Ann Oncol 25:231–6, 2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Demian GA, Hussein H, Ebeid EN, et al. : Intensive alternating 6-drug chemotherapy for high-risk nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma in children and adolescents: Impact on survival. Journal of Clinical Oncology 30, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dharmarajan KV, Wexler LH, Wolden SL: Concurrent radiation with irinotecan and carboplatin in intermediate- and high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: a report on toxicity and efficacy from a prospective pilot phase II study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 60:242–7, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Risk-Adapted Focal Proton Beam Radiation and/or Surgery in Patients With Low, Intermediate and High Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma Receiving Standard or Intensified Chemotherapy
  • 6.Spalding AC, Hawkins DS, Donaldson SS, et al. : The effect of radiation timing on patients with high-risk features of parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma: an analysis of IRS-IV and D9803. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87:512–6, 2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wolden SL, Lyden ER, Arndt CA, et al. : Local Control for Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma: Results From D9803 According to Histology, Group, Site, and Size: A Report From the Children’s Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 93:1071–6, 2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Eaton BR, McDonald MW, Kim S, et al. : Radiation therapy target volume reduction in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma: implications for patterns of disease recurrence and overall survival. Cancer 119:1578–85, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ladra MM, Mandeville HC, Niemierko A, et al. : Local failure in parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma correlates with poor response to induction chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 92:358–67, 2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Arndt CA, Nascimento AG, Schroeder G, et al. : Treatment of intermediate risk rhabdomyosarcoma and undifferentiated sarcoma with alternating cycles of vincristine/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and etoposide/ifosfamide. Eur J Cancer 34:1224–9, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Walterhouse DO, Meza JL, Breneman JC, et al. : Local control and outcome in children with localized vaginal rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma committee of the Children’s Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 57:76–83, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ermoian RP, Breneman J, Walterhouse DO, et al. : 45 Gy is not sufficient radiotherapy dose for Group III orbital embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma after less than complete response to 12 weeks of ARST0331 chemotherapy: A report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children’s Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 64, 2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rodeberg DA, Wharam MD, Lyden ER, et al. : Delayed primary excision with subsequent modification of radiotherapy dose for intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee. Int J Cancer 137:204–11, 2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES