In modern medicine, physicians are frequently forced to balance immune suppression against immune stimulation to treat patients such as those undergoing transplants and chemotherapy. More-targeted therapies designed to preserve immunity and prevent opportunistic fungal infection in these patients could be informed by an understanding of how fungi interact with professional and nonprofessional immune cells in mucosal candidiasis. In this study, we intravitally imaged these host-pathogen dynamics during Candida infection in a transparent vertebrate model host, the zebrafish. Single-cell imaging revealed an unexpected partitioning of the inflammatory response between phagocytes and epithelial cells. Surprisingly, we found that in vivo cytokine profiles more closely match in vitro responses of epithelial cells rather than phagocytes. Furthermore, we identified a disconnect between canonical inflammatory cytokine production and phagocyte recruitment to the site of infection, implicating noncytokine chemoattractants. Our study contributes to a new appreciation for the specialization and cross talk among cell types during mucosal infection.
KEYWORDS: Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis, cytokine, epithelial cells, innate immunity, intravital imaging, mucosal immunity, phagocyte
ABSTRACT
Candida yeasts are common commensals that can cause mucosal disease and life-threatening systemic infections. While many of the components required for defense against Candida albicans infection are well established, questions remain about how various host cells at mucosal sites assess threats and coordinate defenses to prevent normally commensal organisms from becoming pathogenic. Using two Candida species, C. albicans and C. parapsilosis, which differ in their abilities to damage epithelial tissues, we used traditional methods (pathogen CFU, host survival, and host cytokine expression) combined with high-resolution intravital imaging of transparent zebrafish larvae to illuminate host-pathogen interactions at the cellular level in the complex environment of a mucosal infection. In zebrafish, C. albicans grows as both yeast and epithelium-damaging filaments, activates the NF-κB pathway, evokes proinflammatory cytokines, and causes the recruitment of phagocytic immune cells. On the other hand, C. parapsilosis remains in yeast morphology and elicits the recruitment of phagocytes without inducing inflammation. High-resolution mapping of phagocyte-Candida interactions at the infection site revealed that neutrophils and macrophages attack both Candida species, regardless of the cytokine environment. Time-lapse monitoring of single-cell gene expression in transgenic reporter zebrafish revealed a partitioning of the immune response during C. albicans infection: the transcription factor NF-κB is activated largely in cells of the swimbladder epithelium, while the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is expressed in motile cells, mainly macrophages. Our results point to different host strategies for combatting pathogenic Candida species and separate signaling roles for host cell types.
INTRODUCTION
Fungal species of the genus Candida are commensals on mucosal surfaces in healthy human hosts but cause both invasive and mucosal candidiasis when immune defenses are compromised (1, 2). While Candida albicans is the species most commonly isolated from patients, infections due to C. parapsilosis are increasing, especially in neonates born prematurely (3–5). In healthy hosts, Candida is maintained as a commensal through the defenses of professional immune cells and the barrier functions of the mucosal epithelium. When these defenses are compromised, mucosal candidiasis ensues (1, 6). Understanding how host cells at mucosal surfaces interact with fungal cells and how they coordinate their antifungal defenses will inform our attempts to prevent both systemic and mucosal disease (7, 8).
The mucosal epithelium is a complex environment, and protection from mucosal candidiasis requires the combined actions of several cell types. In addition to their barrier functions, epithelial cells respond to Candida by inhibiting Candida growth with antimicrobial peptides and recruiting immune effector cells with alarmins and proinflammatory cytokines (9–12). Among immune cells, neutrophils play key roles in defense at mucosal surfaces and in preventing dissemination of C. albicans (13, 14). In vitro, neutrophil/epithelial cross talk provides protection from C. albicans (15–17). However, neutrophil activity must be tightly controlled, as evidenced by its role in worsening symptoms of vulvovaginal candidiasis (18–20). Monocytes/macrophages are essential for establishing protective immunity to disseminated infection, but their role in mucosal infection is not completely clear (21–25). Evidence from mouse and zebrafish models points to the redundancy of macrophages in mucosal C. albicans infections (26, 27). However, macrophages have been shown to protect against other fungi in mucosal infection (28–31). C. parapsilosis is known to interact with macrophages and monocytes in vitro, but the roles of phagocytes in controlling C. parapsilosis infection have not yet been explored in any live vertebrate infection model.
Epithelial cells and patrolling phagocytes are the first host cells to detect pathogens and signal to coordinate defenses against mucosal candidiasis (6, 32, 33). In vitro experiments with single cell types have shown that epithelial cells and phagocytes differ with respect to inflammatory signaling during challenge by C. albicans and C. parapsilosis. Epithelial cells from oral and intestinal sources (the oral cell lines SCC15 and TR146 and the primary human enterocyte cell line H4) respond in vitro to C. albicans by producing proinflammatory cytokines but produce little cytokine response to C. parapsilosis (15, 34, 35). On the other hand, professional innate immune cells, including human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, murine peritoneal macrophages, and the murine macrophage cell line J774.2, produce proinflammatory cytokines in response to both heat-killed C. albicans and C. parapsilosis (36–38). These contradictory results make it difficult to predict how the different cell types in mucosal tissues coordinate defense against these opportunistic fungal pathogens, so we sought to measure immune responses in a tractable vertebrate mucosal infection model.
In vitro experiments are limited to a few host cell types, and in vivo imaging in mammalian models is technically difficult (39–41). Complex signaling interactions between different host cell populations during mucosal Candida albicans infection were hinted at in studies using in vitro models with two or more host cell types (16, 17) and have been further elucidated using fluorescence-activated cell sorting of infected mouse tissue (9, 42, 43). Although these studies have shed light on the signaling roles and interactions of various host cell types with C. albicans, there remain significant gaps in our knowledge about the dynamics and cell type specificity of immune responses in the host, especially with respect to infections with other clinically important Candida species, such as C. parapsilosis. To further explore these in vitro and in vivo findings using intravital imaging, we turned to the zebrafish swimbladder mucosal model, which mimics many aspects of mammalian infection (27, 44). The swimbladder is a natural site of fungal infection initiation in the fish that shares functional, anatomical, ontological, and transcriptional similarities to the lung (45–54). We compared the mucosal immune responses to two clinically relevant Candida species in an environment containing multiple host cell types, measuring several aspects of the immune response, including pathway activation, cytokine production, and innate immune recruitment. While C. albicans activated nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling and elicited a strong proinflammatory cytokine response at this mucosal site, the host inflammatory response to C. parapsilosis was muted, similar to what has been found in vitro for epithelial cells. Live single-cell imaging suggests that NF-κB activation and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) upregulation occur in different cellular subsets. Interestingly, the inflammatory cytokine response was not predictive of phagocyte behavior, as neutrophils and macrophages were recruited to and attacked both Candida species. Nevertheless, neutrophils were essential for protection from only C. albicans and not C. parapsilosis, confirming their known role in attacking hyphae. The differential immune responses to the two species reveal a disconnection between chemokine production and phagocyte recruitment. Single-cell intravital imaging further suggests that there is tissue-specific activation of NF-κB and TNF-α expression in mucosal candidiasis.
RESULTS
C. albicans causes lethal infection, but C. parapsilosis does not.
C. parapsilosis and C. albicans are opportunistic pathogens that live commensally on mucosal surfaces of healthy humans and elicit different reactions from immune and epithelial cells in vitro (34, 35). To explore the relative virulence of these two fungal species in the mucosal setting in a live vertebrate host, we modified the zebrafish swimbladder infection model previously developed in our laboratory (27, 44, 55). We performed infection with a larger inoculum of 50 to 100 yeast cells to promote morbidity without immunocompromising the host (Fig. 1A). Both Candida species grew readily in the swimbladder, with C. albicans covering about twice as much area as C. parapsilosis by 24 h postinfection (hpi) (Fig. 1B). In the high-inoculum infection of immunocompetent fish used in this study, the swimbladder remained fully inflated and appeared healthy in the first hours after infection (Fig. 1C). However, within 24 hpi, signs of disease were apparent, with swimbladders becoming partially (Fig. 1D) or completely (Fig. 1E) deflated. Over time, the swimbladder could become greatly distended (Fig. 1F), and in C. albicans infections, hyphae sometimes breached the swimbladder epithelium, a factor predictive of fish death (27, 56). C. parapsilosis infection caused no mortality within 4 days postinfection (dpi), while C. albicans-infected animals began to perish at 2 dpi and reached 20% mortality by 4 dpi (Fig. 1G). Thus, in these high-inoculum infections, only C. albicans caused patterns of disease leading to mortality that were similar to those previously seen in immunocompromised fish and in a mixed fungal-bacterial infection (27, 56).
Zebrafish infected with C. albicans produce higher levels of inflammatory cytokines than C. parapsilosis-infected fish.
Because we saw differences in the severity of the infections, we expected to find different inflammatory responses to the two Candida species. We measured changes in the expression of six inflammation-associated cytokines at 24 hpi (Fig. 2). In C. albicans infection, expression was significantly elevated above control levels for all 6 cytokines and higher than that observed in C. parapsilosis infection for 4 of 6 cytokines. In contrast, in C. parapsilosis-infected fish, the median levels of cytokine expression were not significantly elevated above controls. Thus, C. albicans evokes a stronger whole-fish cytokine response than C. parapsilosis during in vivo mucosal infection, demonstrating that there are important differences in the immune response at this early time point, hours before mortality is observed.
The local inflammatory signaling pattern mirrors whole-fish cytokine levels.
The whole-fish quantitative PCR (qPCR) data showed overall cytokine responses but did not give us any spatial information about inflammatory signaling or indicate the cell types involved. In the zebrafish, local immune activation and cytokine signaling by epithelial tissue and innate immune cells can be imaged in real time in the live host. Two key signaling components activated by Candida are NF-κB and TNF-α (44, 57–61). TNF-α expression is activated downstream of NF-κB and other signaling pathways and is implicated in protective cross talk between polymorphonuclear cells and the oral epithelium (17, 62).
To detect activation of NF-κB at the infection site, we used a transgenic zebrafish line, Tg(NF-κB:EGFP), that reports on pathway activity in multiple cell types and is activated in the swimbladder upon oral infection (44, 63). [The current zebrafish genetic nomenclature uses colons to indicate the following organization for transgenic fish lines: Tg(regulatory sequence:coding sequence).] Imaging of infected fish at 24 hpi revealed significant induction of NF-κB in C. albicans-infected fish but only basal levels of activity in C. parapsilosis-infected fish (Fig. 3A to D). As expected, we found green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression in several tissues, but not the swimbladder, under homeostatic conditions (63). To visualize local cytokine expression, we used TgBAC(tnfa:GFP) reporter fish (64). Again, we saw significant activation of tnfa:GFP in only C. albicans and not C. parapsilosis infections (Fig. 3E to G).
Intriguingly, despite the well-characterized connections between NF-κB and TNF-α, our in vivo imaging revealed differences in the spatial patterns of NF-κB activation and expression of TNF-α during C. albicans infection. NF-κB:EGFP fluorescence was more diffuse (Fig. 3C), while tnfa:GFP expression was more punctate and visible mainly near C. albicans yeast and hyphae (Fig. 3H). These patterns of activity were especially interesting because previous work has shown that, in addition to the resident phagocytes present without infection, recruited phagocytes are present within the epithelium-lined swimbladder at this time postinfection (27, 44, 56) (see below).
Signaling patterns differ in macrophages and epithelial tissue.
While live imaging of transgenic fish at low resolution narrowed the location of signaling to the infection site, it did not allow us to identify which cell types were activated and contributing to swimbladder fluorescence. Because of the differences in NF-κB and TNF-α patterns, we reasoned that the two signaling components might be activated in different cell types. To examine cellular expression at high resolution and distinguish between fluorescence within the swimbladder and fluorescence in overlying tissue, we dissected swimbladders from C. albicans-infected zebrafish using a method previously developed in our laboratory (55). Imaging of Tg(NF-κB:EGFP) zebrafish swimbladders immediately after dissection revealed GFP-positive (GFP+) cells of the epithelial layer both near and distant from the area at the back of the swimbladder containing fungi (Fig. 4A and B). This is also illustrated in a single representative slice by outlining fluorescent cells and adding tissue landmarks (Fig. 4B). In TgBAC(tnfa:GFP) zebrafish, GFP-positive cells were not seen in the epithelial layer, but many GFP-positive cells were intermingled with yeast and hyphae (Fig. 4C and D). This is again illustrated in a representative z-slice (Fig. 4D). The morphology and location of these cells are consistent with those of phagocytes.
To further characterize these cells displaying immune activation, we assessed their motility by crossing Tg(NF-κB:EGFP) or TgBAC(tnfa:GFP) fish with mpeg1:dTomato (red macrophage [65]) reporter fish and using time-lapse imaging to view the shape, behavior, and identity of GFP-fluorescing cells in infected fish. We found in time-lapse experiments that mpeg1:dTomato+ macrophages were occasionally doubly positive for NF-κB:EGFP or tnfa:GFP (6/43 for NF-κB:EGFP and 7/35 for tnfa:GFP) (Fig. 4E and F; see also Movies S1 and S2 in the supplemental material). Cells that are GFP+ are outlined and were monitored for more than 16 min (Fig. 4Ei to Eiii and Fig. 4Fi to Fiii). In TgBAC(tnfa:GFP) fish, all GFP+ cells (7/7) were also dTomato+, indicating that they are macrophages, while this was the case for only a minority of GFP+ cells in Tg(NF-κB:EGFP) fish (5/57) (Fig. 4Eii and Fig. 4Fii). Many GFP+ cells were motile in tnfa:GFP transgenic fish (5/7), but only a few were motile in NF-κB:EGFP transgenic fish (3/57) (Fig. 4Eiii and Fig. 4Fiii). This indicates that while TNF-α expression in the swimbladder is limited to macrophages, NF-κB signaling is activated in both macrophages and other cells likely to be epithelial.
Large, nonmotile cells in Tg(NF-κB:EGFP) fish, such as cell 2 (Fig. 4Eiii, yellow dotted outline), were enhanced green fluorescent protein positive (EGFP+) but dTomato negative (dTomato−), suggesting that they are not macrophages. In fact, the position and behavior of such cells suggest that they reside in the swimbladder epithelial layer, consistent with what is observed in dissected swimbladders (Fig. 4A and B). In TgBAC(tnfa:GFP) fish, some stationary cells, such as cell 4 in the time-lapse image (Fig. 4Fiii, yellow dotted outline), were interacting with Candida and were identified as macrophages based on their mpeg1:dTomato expression. These time-lapse data thus indicate that TNF-α-expressing cells are more likely to be motile macrophages, while NF-κB is most frequently activated in nonmotile cells with epithelial morphology.
Neutrophils are recruited to infection and attack both C. albicans and C. parapsilosis.
The activation of NF-κB and expression of TNF-α at the infection site in C. albicans-infected fish, combined with the qPCR data showing that the chemokines CXCL8 and CCL2 were upregulated only in C. albicans infection, suggested that phagocytes might be recruited only to C. albicans infections. We measured neutrophil recruitment using the Tg(mpx:mCherry)uwm7Tg fish line, which has been characterized to express red fluorescence almost exclusively in neutrophils (66). To our surprise, we found increased neutrophil recruitment compared to mock infections (11 neutrophils/fish) for both C. parapsilosis (25/fish) and C. albicans (50/fish) infections (Fig. 5A to D).
Because of the different cytokine milieus elicited by the two fungal species, we reasoned that there might be differential interactions of neutrophils with each fungal species at the infection site. We examined z-stack images slice-by-slice and catalogued interactions between neutrophils and Candida (Fig. 5E to G). In C. albicans infection, significantly more neutrophils per fish were involved in interactions with the fungus, although this is not surprising considering their greater numbers in C. albicans-infected swimbladders (Fig. 5H). Interactions in which neutrophils had ingested C. parapsilosis (Fig. 5E, blue arrows) or C. albicans (Fig. 5G, blue arrows) yeast cells or were wrapped around C. albicans hyphae (“frustrated phagocytosis”) (Fig. 5F, yellow arrows) were counted as phagocytosis. When all neutrophils interacting with Candida were considered together, similar percentages were engaged in phagocytosis in C. parapsilosis (∼65%) and C. albicans (∼72%) infections (Fig. 5I). Thus, despite the lower numbers of neutrophils in C. parapsilosis infection and the differing cytokine environment, neutrophils had similar levels of activity against each fungal species.
Dimorphic switching of C. albicans is considered an important virulence trait, although little is known about how different morphotypes interact with immune cells in vivo. In the swimbladder, C. albicans injected as yeast switches rapidly to hyphal growth within the first 3 hpi (55, 56), and here we found that C. parapsilosis remains in the yeast form throughout the infection period. Neutrophils were found interacting more often with C. albicans hyphae than with yeast, which could be due to the large number of hyphal segments present (Fig. 5J). Overall, these data are consistent with the known activities of neutrophils against C. albicans hyphae and yeast in vitro (67–70). In summary, neutrophils are recruited to and actively interact with fungal cells of both Candida species, despite the nearly undetectable levels of inflammatory cytokine production in C. parapsilosis infection.
Macrophages are recruited to infections with both Candida species.
Although patrolling macrophages play an important role in the initiation of inflammation through the production of cytokines and are essential for controlling invasive candidiasis, they are thought to play a redundant role in mucosal Candida infection (23, 26, 27, 71–74). Nevertheless, we observed a significant C. albicans-specific induction of ccl2, which suggested that macrophages would be recruited only upon C. albicans infection. To our surprise, we found increased numbers of macrophages in the swimbladders of both C. parapsilosis-infected and C. albicans-infected fish (medians of 3 macrophages for mock-infected fish, 6 for C. parapsilosis-infected fish, and 9 for C. albicans-infected fish) (Fig. 6A to D).
Patterns of macrophage interaction with Candida cells were remarkably similar to those of neutrophils. We found more macrophages interacting with the pathogen in C. albicans infections (median of 5 macrophages per fish) than in C. parapsilosis infections (median of 2 per fish) (Fig. 6E). As was the case for neutrophils, similar percentages (around 60%) of macrophages interacting with the two pathogens were engaged in phagocytosing them (Fig. 6F). Macrophages, like neutrophils, were found interacting with C. albicans hyphae more often than with yeast (Fig. 6G). Thus, macrophages are recruited to infections with both Candida species, and although they are found in lower numbers than neutrophils, they interact with and phagocytose both species.
Functional neutrophils are required for protection from C. albicans but not C. parapsilosis infection.
High levels of neutrophil engagement suggested to us that these cells play an important role in the immune response to both Candida species in the swimbladder model. We were interested to see if neutrophilic inflammation is protective, as in the murine oral infection models, or damaging, as in human vulvovaginal infection (18, 75). To block neutrophil function, we employed the transgenic fish line Tg(mpx:mCherry-2A-Rac2D57N) (D57N), a model of leukocyte adhesion deficiency in which neutrophils are present but defective in extravasation and phagocytosis (76–79). In the low-dose swimbladder infection model, neutrophils in D57N zebrafish fail to migrate into the C. albicans-infected swimbladder, and this makes the fish susceptible to invasive disease (27). When infected with higher doses of C. albicans, D57N zebrafish exhibited nearly 100% mortality by 4 dpi, compared to only 50% mortality in their wild-type (WT) siblings (Fig. 7A). Surprisingly, survival rates for D57N fish infected with C. parapsilosis were not significantly different from the nearly 100% survival found in their WT siblings, despite the lack of neutrophil recruitment that was expected in this fish line (Fig. 7A and Movie S3). C. albicans-infected D57N fish had more-severe infections than their WT siblings, with extensive growth of filaments that often breached the swimbladder epithelium.
We reasoned that inactivation of neutrophils could alter cytokine signaling through opposing mechanisms: greater damage to epithelial and other tissues could release damage-associated molecular patterns and provoke higher expression levels of inflammatory cytokines, or, alternatively, the absence of neutrophils at the site of infection could eliminate their contribution to amplification of the inflammatory response (80). Surprisingly, we found that D57N fish had nearly identical levels of tnfa and cxcl8 (Fig. 7B) as well as saa, il-10, and il-1β (Fig. S1) expression compared to their WT siblings when infected with C. albicans. Levels of these cytokines were also similar in both WT and D57N infections with C. parapsilosis. These data suggest that neutrophil inactivation does not have a strong overall net effect on inflammatory signaling.
DISCUSSION
Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis are opportunistic yeast pathogens that live as commensals of healthy people but breach epithelial barriers to cause serious illness in immunocompromised patients. To understand how fungi breach this barrier, it is important to study the interactions between Candida cells and host defenses at mucosal surfaces in the intact host. By modeling mucosal Candida infection in the transparent larval zebrafish, we were able to visualize interactions between host immune cells, epithelial cells, and fungal pathogens in four dimensions (4D) in the live host. We discovered that mucosal infection by C. albicans, but not C. parapsilosis, caused significant mortality, activated NF-κB signaling, and evoked a strong local proinflammatory response. Despite the differential abilities of the two species to activate inflammatory pathways, infections with both species stimulated the recruitment of neutrophils and macrophages that actively attacked the fungi. Overall, our findings suggest that the contrasting immune responses to the two species of Candida in the swimbladder more closely resemble in vitro epithelial cell responses than in vitro mononuclear phagocyte responses, suggesting an important role for the epithelium in the overall inflammatory response.
The lack of C. parapsilosis virulence in the zebrafish is consistent with what has been seen in other infection models. This is the case for disseminated and mucosal disease in mice (81) as well as in vitro challenges with epithelial cells (34, 35, 82). Although C. parapsilosis is a common commensal fungus (5, 83), its virulence is usually associated with the hospital setting, and it is thought that predisposing conditions, such as epithelial damage or barrier breach by medical interventions, lead to disseminated infection (14, 83). In zebrafish models of C. albicans infection, penetrating hyphae are closely associated with mortality, and yeast-locked strains have limited virulence (27, 56, 84). Hyphal growth has also been clearly implicated in epithelial destruction in vitro and in mouse disease models (85–88). Thus, while the inability of C. parapsilosis to cause mortality in the absence of neutrophil function may be due to any number of differences between the two species, the lack of filamentous growth and expression of genes coregulated with the hyphal switch (such as candidalysin) are likely to be major determinants of differential virulence (89, 90).
Infection with C. albicans, but not with C. parapsilosis, elicited strong proinflammatory responses, as measured by whole-fish cytokine expression and local activation of NF-κB signaling and TNF-α expression. This differential response is similar to what has been seen in epithelial cells in vitro, where many fungi activate NF-κB but only a challenge with C. albicans leads to further activation of inflammatory pathways and production of cytokines (16, 34, 35). Our results contrast with what is seen in phagocytes, which respond strongly ex vivo to both Candida species by producing proinflammatory cytokines (36, 38). One caveat to the work here, however, is that only single isolates of each species were tested in the zebrafish, and there are known isolate-specific differences in immune recognition and activation (90–96). It is intriguing that, in spite of the presence of phagocytes in both C. albicans and C. parapsilosis swimbladder infections, the signaling response in vivo to these mucosal infections is more similar to that for simplified Candida-human epithelium challenges than to that for ex vivo Candida-phagocyte challenges. C. parapsilosis supernatants have been shown to have an inhibitory effect on C. albicans-mediated invasion and damage to epithelial cells in coculture with C. albicans and on virulence in swimbladder infection; this may explain the lack of immune signaling in response to C. parapsilosis in vivo seen here (97). Our results are consistent with the idea that epithelial cells have a prominent role in regulating the overall inflammatory response to Candida at mucosal surfaces, in addition to acting as a physical barrier and initiating immune responses (98–101).
Using transgenic reporter zebrafish, we found differential patterns for the activation of NF-κB and expression of TNF-α in the swimbladder during C. albicans infection. NF-κB activation alone was seen in the epithelial layer surrounding the swimbladder, although both NF-κB activation and TNF-α expression were observed in cells that were not part of the epithelial layer, including macrophages. This may mean that the activation of immune pathways results in different responses in different cell types; for example, in epithelial cells in vitro, NF-κB is activated but does not lead to cytokine production (102). Alternatively, these differences may result from the different receptors mediating C. albicans recognition in epithelial cells and phagocytes (8, 103, 104) or from cross talk among cell types as the infection progresses (9, 42). It is unlikely that this differential expression pattern is due to reporter line differences, as many cell types, including epithelial cells and innate immune cells, are capable of activating NF-κB and expressing TNF-α in these fish lines (44, 63, 64, 105–109). Nonetheless, because no reporter gene completely recapitulates the activity of the native locus, these results should be extended through experiments using complementary reporters and reagents to test native expression patterns. Work with transgenic reporters for other signaling components, such as interleukin-1 (IL-1) (110), could contribute to deciphering this puzzle.
Phagocyte recruitment and activation are often associated with proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine production, but we observed recruitment and active engagement of both macrophages and neutrophils without significant cytokine elicitation in C. parapsilosis infection (111–113). Several noncytokine chemoattractants, such as reactive oxygen species, lipids, and secreted fungal molecules, are associated with fungal infection in mouse and zebrafish infection models (12, 75, 114–120). Thus, phagocyte recruitment in C. parapsilosis infection may be the result of noncytokine signals, underlining the potential importance of these alternative chemoattractants.
Although C. albicans and C. parapsilosis are two of the most common causes of systemic fungal infections, the risk factors for the two species differ. In humans, neutropenia is a major risk factor for disseminated C. albicans infection, but only a small percentage of C. parapsilosis cases involve neutrophil depletion (5, 83). Likewise, immunosuppressed mice are highly susceptible to C. albicans but not C. parapsilosis disseminated infection (121, 122). These differences are reflected in the experiments presented here, which show that neutrophils are not required for immunity to C. parapsilosis infection, in contrast to the previous finding that neutrophils are essential for protection from C. albicans mucosal infection (27). This difference may indicate that neutrophils are important in controlling hyphal growth of C. albicans but redundant for managing C. parapsilosis, whose yeast-only morphology may be contained by the remaining phagocytes (27, 123). Indeed, in the zebrafish, neutrophils and macrophages interacted with both hyphae and yeast of C. albicans, consistent with results from in vitro neutrophil and macrophage challenges (124–126). C. parapsilosis yeast and pseudohyphae are readily engulfed and killed by phagocytes in vitro, while engulfment of C. albicans requires longer times that vary with hyphal size and orientation (127–132). Although macrophages are known to provide protection from disseminated candidiasis, our recent work and that of others indicate that macrophages are redundant with respect to protection from mucosal C. albicans infection (23, 26, 27). In our higher-dose model, macrophages were recruited in significant numbers, activated NF-κB, expressed TNF-α, and interacted with both Candida species. It is intriguing that macrophages upregulate TNF-α upon C. albicans but not C. parapsilosis infection, suggesting that epithelium-macrophage cross talk or damage-induced signaling regulates cytokine production.
Overall, our work points to the unique characteristics of the zebrafish model (ease of live imaging and availability of transgenic lines) for discovery of previously unattainable information about host-pathogen interactions in vivo. Our comparison of host responses to two Candida species indicates that, unlike C. albicans, C. parapsilosis does not cause strong inflammatory responses or invasive disease at this mucosal site. We found a disconnect between inflammatory responses and phagocyte recruitment/activity that emphasizes the need for further study of signaling molecules that act on innate immune cells. Finally, imaging of single-cell patterns of gene activation paints a more complex picture of cell type-specific signaling during mucosal candidiasis. In sum, the tissue-specific aspects of the host response against Candida species are important and understudied aspects of disease that will benefit from future studies in zebrafish, mammalian hosts, and more complex in vitro challenge systems with more cell types.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Candida strains and growth conditions.
Candida strains used in this study are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Candida was maintained in YPD medium (20 g/liter peptone, 10 g/liter yeast extract; Difco) containing 2% glucose and glycerol (30%) at −80°C and then grown on YPD agar plates at 30°C. Single colonies were picked into 5 ml YPD liquid and grown at 30°C overnight on a rotator wheel (New Brunswick Scientific). Prior to injection into zebrafish swimbladders, Candida cultures were washed three times in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), counted on a hemocytometer, and resuspended in 5% polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS at a concentration of 5 × 107 cells/ml.
Animal care and maintenance.
Adult zebrafish were held in recirculating systems (Aquatic Habitats) at the University of Maine Zebrafish Facility, under a 14-h/10-h light/dark cycle and a water temperature of 28°C; they were fed Hikari micropellets (catalogue number HK40; Pentair Aquatic Ecosystems). Zebrafish strains used in this study are described in Table S2. Spawned eggs were collected and reared to 4 days postfertilization (dpf) at 33°C in E3 (5 mM sodium chloride, 0.174 mM potassium chloride, 0.33 mM calcium chloride, 0.332 mM magnesium sulfate, and 2 mM HEPES in Nanopure water [pH 7]) supplemented with 0.02 mg/ml of 1-phenyl-2-thiourea (PTU) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to prevent pigmentation. A temperature of 33°C was chosen as an intermediate temperature between the typical laboratory environment for zebrafish (28°C) and temperatures found in mouse and human (30°C on skin to 37°C core [133, 134]). We note that although temperature is a cue used by C. albicans to control morphology, other in vivo signals drive strong hyphal growth in the zebrafish, even at 28°C (84). When using D57N zebrafish, heterozygous transgenic fish were crossed with opposite-sex AB fish, and progeny were sorted for the presence of mCherry in neutrophils (D57N) or its absence (WT siblings). To obtain heterozygous offspring with consistent fluorescence levels, Tg(NF-κB:EGFP) or TgBAC(tnfa:GFP) fish were crossed with opposite-sex AB fish, and embryos were screened on a Zeiss AxioVision VivaTome microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, LLC) for basal GFP expression before injection. mpeg1:GAL4/UAS:nfsB-mCherry embryos were obtained by crossing Tg(mpeg1:GAL4):gl24Tg (65) fish with opposite-sex Tg(UAS-E1b:NTR-mCherry):c264Tg (66) fish.
Zebrafish infections.
Zebrafish infections were carried out by glass needle injection into the swimbladder as previously described (55). Briefly, zebrafish at 4 dpf were anaesthetized with Tris-buffered tricaine methane sulfonate (160 μg/ml) (Tricaine; Western Chemicals, Inc., Ferndale, WA) and injected with 4 nl PVP alone or PVP containing 5 × 107 yeast cells/ml of C. albicans or C. parapsilosis. Infected fish were placed in individual wells of a 96-well glass-bottom imaging dish (Greiner Bio-One, Monroe, NC) and screened for an inoculum of 50 to 100 yeast cells on a Zeiss AxioVision VivaTome microscope. For survival curves, injected fish that passed screening were held for 4 days postinjection and monitored daily for survival.
Fluorescence microscopy.
For imaging, fish were anaesthetized with Tricaine, immobilized in 0.5% low-melting-point agarose (Lonza, Switzerland) in E3 containing Tricaine, and arranged in a 96-well glass-bottom imaging plate. Images were made on an Olympus IX-81 inverted microscope with an FV-1000 laser scanning confocal system (Olympus, Waltham, MA), using a 20×/0.7-numerical-aperture (NA) or a 10×/0.4-NA lens objective. EGFP, dTomato/mCherry, and infrared fluorescent proteins were detected by laser/optical filters for excitation/emission at 488 nm/505 to 525 nm, 543 nm/560 to 620 nm, and 635 nm/655 to 755 nm, respectively. Images were collected with FluoView (Olympus) software.
Dissected swimbladders.
After live imaging, chosen zebrafish were euthanized with a Tricaine overdose at 25 to 27 hpi, and swimbladders were removed with fine forceps as described previously (55). Swimbladders were transferred to 0.4% low-melting-point agarose in PBS on a 25- by 75- by 1.0-mm microscope slide and covered with an 18- by 18-mm no. 1.5 coverslip. Preapplied dabs of high-vacuum grease (Dow Corning, Midland, MI) at the corners of the coverslip prevented crushing and deflation of the swimbladder. The slides were imaged within 15 min on an Olympus IX-81 inverted confocal microscope using a 20×/0.7-NA lens objective as described above.
Quantitative real-time PCR.
Total RNA was extracted by homogenizing groups of 10 to 14 whole, euthanized larvae in TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Cleanup was achieved using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, with the addition of an on-column DNase step (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA). RNA was eluted in 20 μl of nuclease-free water and stored at −80°C. cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of RNA per sample using iScript reverse transcription (RT) supermix for RT-qPCR (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and a no-RT reaction was performed for each sample. qPCR was carried out using SsoAdvanced universal SYBR green supermix (Bio-Rad), in 10-μl reaction mixtures, using 1 μl cDNA per reaction and a 0.3 μM primer concentration, on a CFX96 thermocycler (Bio-Rad). Threshold cycle (CT) values and dissociation curves were analyzed with Bio-Rad CFX Manager software. The change in gene expression was normalized to the gapdh level (ΔCT) and then compared to the value for vehicle-injected controls (ΔΔCT) using the 2−ΔΔCT method (135). Primers (Integrated DNA Technologies) are listed in Table S3.
Image analysis.
The percentage of the swimbladder covered by Candida at 24 hpi was determined using Fiji software (ImageJ environment [136]) applied to maximum-projection images from stacks of 15 to 25 z-slices. Images were taken with identical acquisition settings to ensure comparability. The swimbladder area was delineated, and the percent coverage of Candida fluorescence above a set threshold (corresponding to background fluorescence) was calculated. Images of the swimbladder areas of Tg(NF-κB:EGFP) and TgBAC(tnfa:GFP) fish were analyzed using Fiji software. Images covered the swimbladder from midline to skin in 5-μm z-slices. The number of slices per image ranged from 12 to 22, depending on the size of the fish. Time-lapse images were processed in Fiji using descriptor-based registration (137). Neutrophils and macrophages were outlined and counted in FluoView (Olympus), from images taken at 24 hpi.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism 7 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). All significant differences are indicated in the figures. When data failed to pass the D’Agostino-Pearson test for normal distribution of data, or when the number of samples was too small to determine normality, nonparametric statistics were used (Fig. 1B, Fig. 2, Fig. 3D and E, Fig. 5H, Fig. 6D and E, and Fig. 7B). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were subjected to a log rank (Mantel-Cox) test, and Bonferroni correction was then used to determine statistical differences between pairs of treatments (Fig. 1G and Fig. 7A). NF-κB activation, TNF-α expression, macrophage recruitment, and qPCR results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test by ranks and Dunn’s test for multiple comparisons (Fig. 2, Fig. 3D and E, Fig. 6D, and Fig. 7B). Neutrophil recruitment data were normally distributed, so analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons was used (Fig. 5D). To compare Candida burdens and phagocyte interactions, we used the Mann-Whitney test (Fig. 1B, Fig. 5H, and Fig. 6E). Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the neutrophils and macrophages engaged in phagocytosis of the two Candida species (Fig. 5I and Fig. 6F). Paired t tests were used to compare interactions of phagocytes with C. albicans hyphae and yeast (Fig. 5J and Fig. 6G).
Ethics statement.
All zebrafish studies were carried out in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health (138). All animals were treated in a humane manner and euthanized with Tricaine overdose according to guidelines of the University of Maine IACUC, as detailed in protocol number A2015-11-03.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the Tobin, Huttenlocher, Bagnat, Rawls, and Lieschke laboratories for sharing fish lines and are grateful for the exceptional fish husbandry provided by Mark Nilan at the UMaine Zebrafish Facility. We thank members of the Wheeler Lab and Clarissa Henry and Reeta Rao for their contributions along the way and comments on the manuscript, especially Remi Gratacap.
R.T.W. is a Burroughs Wellcome Fund investigator in the pathogenesis of infectious disease, L.S.A. is Janet Waldron fellow at UMaine, and this work was funded by NIH grants R15AI094406 and R15AI133415 and by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project number ME0-21821, through the Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station.
Footnotes
This article is Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station publication number 3661.
Citation Archambault LS, Trzilova D, Gonia S, Gale C, Wheeler RT. 2019. Intravital imaging reveals divergent cytokine and cellular immune responses to Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis. mBio 10:e00266-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00266-19.
Contributor Information
Attila Gacser, University of Szeged.
Bernhard Hube, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology-Hans Knoell Institute Jena (HKI).
REFERENCES
- 1.Brown GD, Denning DW, Gow NA, Levitz SM, Netea MG, White TC. 2012. Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Sci Transl Med 4:165rv13. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pfaller MA, Andes DR, Diekema DJ, Horn DL, Reboli AC, Rotstein C, Franks B, Azie NE. 2014. Epidemiology and outcomes of invasive candidiasis due to non-albicans species of Candida in 2,496 patients: data from the Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH) registry 2004-2008. PLoS One 9:e101510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bliss JM. 2015. Candida parapsilosis: an emerging pathogen developing its own identity. Virulence 6:109–111. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2015.1008897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pammi M, Holland L, Butler G, Gacser A, Bliss JM. 2013. Candida parapsilosis is a significant neonatal pathogen: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 32:e206–e216. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182863a1c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Trofa D, Gacser A, Nosanchuk JD. 2008. Candida parapsilosis, an emerging fungal pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 21:606–625. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00013-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Verma A, Gaffen SL, Swidergall M. 2017. Innate immunity to mucosal Candida infections. J Fungi (Basel) 3:E60. doi: 10.3390/jof3040060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Koh AY. 2016. Identifying host immune effectors critical for protection against Candida albicans infections. Virulence 7:745–747. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1205177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Swidergall M, Filler SG. 2017. Oropharyngeal candidiasis: fungal invasion and epithelial cell responses. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006056. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Altmeier S, Toska A, Sparber F, Teijeira A, Halin C, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2016. IL-1 coordinates the neutrophil response to C. albicans in the oral mucosa. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005882. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Naglik JR, Konig A, Hube B, Gaffen SL. 2017. Candida albicans-epithelial interactions and induction of mucosal innate immunity. Curr Opin Microbiol 40:104–112. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.10.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Swidergall M, Ernst JF. 2014. Interplay between Candida albicans and the antimicrobial peptide armory. Eukaryot Cell 13:950–957. doi: 10.1128/EC.00093-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yano J, Palmer GE, Eberle KE, Peters BM, Vogl T, McKenzie AN, Fidel PL Jr.. 2014. Vaginal epithelial cell-derived S100 alarmins induced by Candida albicans via pattern recognition receptor interactions are sufficient but not necessary for the acute neutrophil response during experimental vaginal candidiasis. Infect Immun 82:783–792. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00861-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Trautwein-Weidner K, Gladiator A, Nur S, Diethelm P, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2015. IL-17-mediated antifungal defense in the oral mucosa is independent of neutrophils. Mucosal Immunol 8:221–231. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Whibley N, Gaffen SL. 2015. Beyond Candida albicans: mechanisms of immunity to non-albicans Candida species. Cytokine 76:42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2015.07.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dongari-Bagtzoglou A, Villar CC, Kashleva H. 2005. Candida albicans-infected oral epithelial cells augment the anti-fungal activity of human neutrophils in vitro. Med Mycol 43:545–549. doi: 10.1080/13693780500064557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schaller M, Boeld U, Oberbauer S, Hamm G, Hube B, Korting HC. 2004. Polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) induce protective Th1-type cytokine epithelial responses in an in vitro model of oral candidosis. Microbiology 150:2807–2813. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27169-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Weindl G, Naglik JR, Kaesler S, Biedermann T, Hube B, Korting HC, Schaller M. 2007. Human epithelial cells establish direct antifungal defense through TLR4-mediated signaling. J Clin Invest 117:3664–3672. doi: 10.1172/JCI28115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jabra-Rizk MA, Kong EF, Tsui C, Nguyen MH, Clancy CJ, Fidel PL Jr, Noverr M. 2016. Candida albicans pathogenesis: fitting within the host-microbe damage response framework. Infect Immun 84:2724–2739. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00469-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Peters BM, Yano J, Noverr MC, Fidel PL Jr.. 2014. Candida vaginitis: when opportunism knocks, the host responds. PLoS Pathog 10:e1003965. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yano J, Peters BM, Noverr MC, Fidel PL Jr.. 2018. Novel mechanism behind the immunopathogenesis of vulvovaginal candidiasis: “neutrophil anergy.” Infect Immun 86:e00684-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00684-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Duggan S, Leonhardt I, Hunniger K, Kurzai O. 2015. Host response to Candida albicans bloodstream infection and sepsis. Virulence 6:316–326. doi: 10.4161/21505594.2014.988096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lionakis MS, Lim JK, Lee CC, Murphy PM. 2011. Organ-specific innate immune responses in a mouse model of invasive candidiasis. J Innate Immun 3:180–199. doi: 10.1159/000321157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lionakis MS, Swamydas M, Fischer BG, Plantinga TS, Johnson MD, Jaeger M, Green NM, Masedunskas A, Weigert R, Mikelis C, Wan W, Lee CC, Lim JK, Rivollier A, Yang JC, Laird GM, Wheeler RT, Alexander BD, Perfect JR, Gao JL, Kullberg BJ, Netea MG, Murphy PM. 2013. CX3CR1-dependent renal macrophage survival promotes Candida control and host survival. J Clin Invest 123:5035–5051. doi: 10.1172/JCI71307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ngo LY, Kasahara S, Kumasaka DK, Knoblaugh SE, Jhingran A, Hohl TM. 2014. Inflammatory monocytes mediate early and organ-specific innate defense during systemic candidiasis. J Infect Dis 209:109–119. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Qian Q, Jutila MA, Van Rooijen N, Cutler JE. 1994. Elimination of mouse splenic macrophages correlates with increased susceptibility to experimental disseminated candidiasis. J Immunol 152:5000–5008. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Break TJ, Jaeger M, Solis NV, Filler SG, Rodriguez CA, Lim JK, Lee CC, Sobel JD, Netea MG, Lionakis MS. 2015. CX3CR1 is dispensable for control of mucosal Candida albicans infections in mice and humans. Infect Immun 83:958–965. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02604-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gratacap RL, Scherer AK, Seman BG, Wheeler RT. 2017. Control of mucosal candidiasis in the zebrafish swimbladder depends on neutrophils that block filament invasion and drive extracellular trap production. Infect Immun 85:e00276-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00276-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Brunel SF, Bain JM, King J, Heung LJ, Kasahara S, Hohl TM, Warris A. 2017. Live imaging of antifungal activity by human primary neutrophils and monocytes in response to A. fumigatus. J Vis Exp 2017:e55444. doi: 10.3791/55444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Espinosa V, Jhingran A, Dutta O, Kasahara S, Donnelly R, Du P, Rosenfeld J, Leiner I, Chen CC, Ron Y, Hohl TM, Rivera A. 2014. Inflammatory monocytes orchestrate innate antifungal immunity in the lung. PLoS Pathog 10:e1003940. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Garth JM, Steele C. 2017. Innate lung defense during invasive aspergillosis: new mechanisms. J Innate Immun 9:271–280. doi: 10.1159/000455125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xu S, Shinohara ML. 2017. Tissue-resident macrophages in fungal infections. Front Immunol 8:1798. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sparber F, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2015. Interleukin 17-mediated host defense against Candida albicans. Pathogens 4:606–619. doi: 10.3390/pathogens4030606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Villar CC, Dongari-Bagtzoglou A. 2008. Immune defence mechanisms and immunoenhancement strategies in oropharyngeal candidiasis. Expert Rev Mol Med 10:e29. doi: 10.1017/S1462399408000835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Falgier C, Kegley S, Podgorski H, Heisel T, Storey K, Bendel CM, Gale CA. 2011. Candida species differ in their interactions with immature human gastrointestinal epithelial cells. Pediatr Res 69:384–389. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31821269d5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Moyes DL, Murciano C, Runglall M, Kohli A, Islam A, Naglik JR. 2012. Activation of MAPK/c-Fos induced responses in oral epithelial cells is specific to Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis hyphae. Med Microbiol Immunol 201:93–101. doi: 10.1007/s00430-011-0209-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Estrada-Mata E, Navarro-Arias MJ, Pérez-García LA, Mellado-Mojica E, López MG, Csonka K, Gacser A, Mora-Montes HM. 2015. Members of the Candida parapsilosis complex and Candida albicans are differentially recognized by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Front Microbiol 6:1527. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nemeth T, Toth A, Hamari Z, Falus A, Eder K, Vagvolgyi C, Guimaraes AJ, Nosanchuk JD, Gacser A. 2014. Transcriptome profile of the murine macrophage cell response to Candida parapsilosis. Fungal Genet Biol 65:48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2014.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Toth A, Csonka K, Jacobs C, Vagvolgyi C, Nosanchuk JD, Netea MG, Gacser A. 2013. Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis induce different T-cell responses in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Infect Dis 208:690–698. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jain R, Tikoo S, Weninger W. 2016. Recent advances in microscopic techniques for visualizing leukocytes in vivo. F1000Res 5(F1000 Faculty Rev):915. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8127.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kreisel D, Nava RG, Li W, Zinselmeyer BH, Wang B, Lai J, Pless R, Gelman AE, Krupnick AS, Miller MJ. 2010. In vivo two-photon imaging reveals monocyte-dependent neutrophil extravasation during pulmonary inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:18073–18078. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008737107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Weindl G, Wagener J, Schaller M. 2011. Interaction of the mucosal barrier with accessory immune cells during fungal infection. Int J Med Microbiol 301:431–435. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2011.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gladiator A, Wangler N, Trautwein-Weidner K, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2013. Cutting edge: IL-17-secreting innate lymphoid cells are essential for host defense against fungal infection. J Immunol 190:521–525. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sparber F, Dolowschiak T, Mertens S, Lauener L, Clausen BE, Joller N, Stoitzner P, Tussiwand R, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2018. Langerin+ DCs regulate innate IL-17 production in the oral mucosa during Candida albicans-mediated infection. PLoS Pathog 14:e1007069. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gratacap RL, Rawls JF, Wheeler RT. 2013. Mucosal candidiasis elicits NF-kappaB activation, proinflammatory gene expression and localized neutrophilia in zebrafish. Dis Model Mech 6:1260–1270. doi: 10.1242/dmm.012039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Field HA, Ober EA, Roeser T, Stainier DY. 2003. Formation of the digestive system in zebrafish. I. Liver morphogenesis. Dev Biol 253:279–290. doi: 10.1016/S0012-1606(02)00017-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Galuppi R, Fioravanti M, Delgado M, Quaglio F, Caffara M, Tampieri M. 2001. Segnalazione di due casi do micosi della vescica natatoria in Sparus aurata e Carrassius auratus. Boll Soc Ital Patol Ittica 32:26–34. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hatai K, Fujimaki Y, Egusa S, Jo Y. 1986. A visceral mycosis in ayu fry, Plecoglossus altivelis Temminck & Schlegel, caused by a species of Phoma. J Fish Dis 9:111–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.1986.tb00989.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lapennas G, Schmidt-Nielsen K. 1977. Swimbladder permeability to oxygen. J Exp Biol 67:175–196. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Oehlers SH, Flores MV, Chen T, Hall CJ, Crosier KE, Crosier PS. 2011. Topographical distribution of antimicrobial genes in the zebrafish intestine. Dev Comp Immunol 35:385–391. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2010.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Robertson GN, McGee CA, Dumbarton TC, Croll RP, Smith FM. 2007. Development of the swimbladder and its innervation in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. J Morphol 268:967–985. doi: 10.1002/jmor.10558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ross AJ, Yasutake WT, Leek S. 1975. Phoma herbarum, a fungal plant saprophyte, as a fish pathogen. J Fish Res Board Can 32:1648–1652. doi: 10.1139/f75-193. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sullivan LC, Daniels CB, Phillips ID, Orgeig S, Whitsett JA. 1998. Conservation of surfactant protein A: evidence for a single origin for vertebrate pulmonary surfactant. J Mol Evol 46:131–138. doi: 10.1007/PL00006287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Winata CL, Korzh S, Kondrychyn I, Zheng W, Korzh V, Gong Z. 2009. Development of zebrafish swimbladder: the requirement of Hedgehog signaling in specification and organization of the three tissue layers. Dev Biol 331:222–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.04.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zheng W, Wang Z, Collins JE, Andrews RM, Stemple D, Gong Z. 2011. Comparative transcriptome analyses indicate molecular homology of zebrafish swimbladder and mammalian lung. PLoS One 6:e24019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gratacap RL, Bergeron AC, Wheeler RT. 2014. Modeling mucosal candidiasis in larval zebrafish by swimbladder injection. J Vis Exp 2014:e52182. doi: 10.3791/52182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bergeron AC, Seman BG, Hammond JH, Archambault LS, Hogan DA, Wheeler RT. 2017. Candida and Pseudomonas interact to enhance virulence of mucosal infection in transparent zebrafish. Infect Immun 85:e00475-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00475-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Dev A, Iyer S, Razani B, Cheng G. 2011. NF-kappaB and innate immunity. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 349:115–143. doi: 10.1007/82_2010_102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Moyes DL, Runglall M, Murciano C, Shen C, Nayar D, Thavaraj S, Kohli A, Islam A, Mora-Montes H, Challacombe SJ, Naglik JR. 2010. A biphasic innate immune MAPK response discriminates between the yeast and hyphal forms of Candida albicans in epithelial cells. Cell Host Microbe 8:225–235. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Netea MG, Joosten LA, van der Meer JW, Kullberg BJ, van de Veerdonk FL. 2015. Immune defence against Candida fungal infections. Nat Rev Immunol 15:630–642. doi: 10.1038/nri3897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Roeder A, Kirschning CJ, Schaller M, Weindl G, Wagner H, Korting HC, Rupec RA. 2004. Induction of nuclear factor-kappa B and c-Jun/activator protein-1 via Toll-like receptor 2 in macrophages by antimycotic-treated Candida albicans. J Infect Dis 190:1318–1326. doi: 10.1086/423854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zelova H, Hosek J. 2013. TNF-alpha signalling and inflammation: interactions between old acquaintances. Inflamm Res 62:641–651. doi: 10.1007/s00011-013-0633-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Steele C, Fidel PL Jr.. 2002. Cytokine and chemokine production by human oral and vaginal epithelial cells in response to Candida albicans. Infect Immun 70:577–583. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.2.577-583.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kanther M, Sun X, Muhlbauer M, Mackey LC, Flynn EJ III, Bagnat M, Jobin C, Rawls JF. 2011. Microbial colonization induces dynamic temporal and spatial patterns of NF-kappaB activation in the zebrafish digestive tract. Gastroenterology 141:197–207. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.03.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Marjoram L, Alvers A, Deerhake ME, Bagwell J, Mankiewicz J, Cocchiaro JL, Beerman RW, Willer J, Sumigray KD, Katsanis N, Tobin DM, Rawls JF, Goll MG, Bagnat M. 2015. Epigenetic control of intestinal barrier function and inflammation in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:2770–2775. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1424089112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ellett F, Pase L, Hayman JW, Andrianopoulos A, Lieschke GJ. 2011. mpeg1 promoter transgenes direct macrophage-lineage expression in zebrafish. Blood 117:e49–e56. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-10-314120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Yoo SK, Deng Q, Cavnar PJ, Wu YI, Hahn KM, Huttenlocher A. 2010. Differential regulation of protrusion and polarity by PI3K during neutrophil motility in live zebrafish. Dev Cell 18:226–236. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Branzk N, Lubojemska A, Hardison SE, Wang Q, Gutierrez MG, Brown GD, Papayannopoulos V. 2014. Neutrophils sense microbe size and selectively release neutrophil extracellular traps in response to large pathogens. Nat Immunol 15:1017–1025. doi: 10.1038/ni.2987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Gazendam RP, van de Geer A, Roos D, van den Berg TK, Kuijpers TW. 2016. How neutrophils kill fungi. Immunol Rev 273:299–311. doi: 10.1111/imr.12454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kenno S, Perito S, Mosci P, Vecchiarelli A, Monari C. 2016. Autophagy and reactive oxygen species are involved in neutrophil extracellular traps release induced by C. albicans morphotypes. Front Microbiol 7:879. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Warnatsch A, Tsourouktsoglou TD, Branzk N, Wang Q, Reincke S, Herbst S, Gutierrez M, Papayannopoulos V. 2017. Reactive oxygen species localization programs inflammation to clear microbes of different size. Immunity 46:421–432. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Davies LC, Taylor PR. 2015. Tissue-resident macrophages: then and now. Immunology 144:541–548. doi: 10.1111/imm.12451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Murray PJ, Wynn TA. 2011. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol 11:723–737. doi: 10.1038/nri3073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Vazquez-Torres A, Balish E. 1997. Macrophages in resistance to candidiasis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:170–192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zhang L, Wang CC. 2014. Inflammatory response of macrophages in infection. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 13:138–152. doi: 10.1016/S1499-3872(14)60024-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Yano J, Kolls JK, Happel KI, Wormley F, Wozniak KL, Fidel PL Jr.. 2012. The acute neutrophil response mediated by S100 alarmins during vaginal Candida infections is independent of the Th17-pathway. PLoS One 7:e46311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ambruso DR, Knall C, Abell AN, Panepinto J, Kurkchubasche A, Thurman G, Gonzalez-Aller C, Hiester A, deBoer M, Harbeck RJ, Oyer R, Johnson GL, Roos D. 2000. Human neutrophil immunodeficiency syndrome is associated with an inhibitory Rac2 mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:4654–4659. doi: 10.1073/pnas.080074897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Deng Q, Yoo SK, Cavnar PJ, Green JM, Huttenlocher A. 2011. Dual roles for Rac2 in neutrophil motility and active retention in zebrafish hematopoietic tissue. Dev Cell 21:735–745. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Troeger A, Williams DA. 2013. Hematopoietic-specific Rho GTPases Rac2 and RhoH and human blood disorders. Exp Cell Res 319:2375–2383. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Williams DA, Tao W, Yang F, Kim C, Gu Y, Mansfield P, Levine JE, Petryniak B, Derrow CW, Harris C, Jia B, Zheng Y, Ambruso DR, Lowe JB, Atkinson SJ, Dinauer MC, Boxer L. 2000. Dominant negative mutation of the hematopoietic-specific Rho GTPase, Rac2, is associated with a human phagocyte immunodeficiency. Blood 96:1646–1654. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.de Oliveira S, Rosowski EE, Huttenlocher A. 2016. Neutrophil migration in infection and wound repair: going forward in reverse. Nat Rev Immunol 16:378–391. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Arendrup M, Horn T, Frimodt-Møller N. 2002. In vivo pathogenicity of eight medically relevant Candida species in an animal model. Infection 30:286–291. doi: 10.1007/s15010-002-2131-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Silva S, Henriques M, Oliveira R, Azeredo J, Malic S, Hooper SJ, Williams DW. 2009. Characterization of Candida parapsilosis infection of an in vitro reconstituted human oral epithelium. Eur J Oral Sci 117:669–675. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00677.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.van Asbeck EC, Clemons KV, Stevens DA. 2009. Candida parapsilosis: a review of its epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical aspects, typing and antimicrobial susceptibility. Crit Rev Microbiol 35:283–309. doi: 10.3109/10408410903213393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Seman BG, Moore JL, Scherer AK, Blair BA, Manandhar S, Jones JM, Wheeler RT. 2018. Yeast and filaments have specialized, independent activities in a zebrafish model of Candida albicans infection. Infect Immun 86:e00415-18. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00415-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Dalle F, Wachtler B, L’Ollivier C, Holland G, Bannert N, Wilson D, Labruere C, Bonnin A, Hube B. 2010. Cellular interactions of Candida albicans with human oral epithelial cells and enterocytes. Cell Microbiol 12:248–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01394.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Felk A, Kretschmar M, Albrecht A, Schaller M, Beinhauer S, Nichterlein T, Sanglard D, Korting HC, Schafer W, Hube B. 2002. Candida albicans hyphal formation and the expression of the Efg1-regulated proteinases Sap4 to Sap6 are required for the invasion of parenchymal organs. Infect Immun 70:3689–3700. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.7.3689-3700.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Lo HJ, Kohler JR, DiDomenico B, Loebenberg D, Cacciapuoti A, Fink GR. 1997. Nonfilamentous C. albicans mutants are avirulent. Cell 90:939–949. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80358-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Saville SP, Lazzell AL, Monteagudo C, Lopez-Ribot JL. 2003. Engineered control of cell morphology in vivo reveals distinct roles for yeast and filamentous forms of Candida albicans during infection. Eukaryot Cell 2:1053–1060. doi: 10.1128/EC.2.5.1053-1060.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Moyes DL, Wilson D, Richardson JP, Mogavero S, Tang SX, Wernecke J, Hofs S, Gratacap RL, Robbins J, Runglall M, Murciano C, Blagojevic M, Thavaraj S, Forster TM, Hebecker B, Kasper L, Vizcay G, Iancu SI, Kichik N, Hader A, Kurzai O, Luo T, Kruger T, Kniemeyer O, Cota E, Bader O, Wheeler RT, Gutsmann T, Hube B, Naglik JR. 2016. Candidalysin is a fungal peptide toxin critical for mucosal infection. Nature 532:64–68. doi: 10.1038/nature17625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Toth R, Nosek J, Mora-Montes HM, Gabaldon T, Bliss JM, Nosanchuk JD, Turner SA, Butler G, Vagvolgyi C, Gacser A. 2019. Candida parapsilosis: from genes to the bedside. Clin Microbiol Rev 32:e00111-18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00111-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Cassone A, De Bernardis F, Pontieri E, Carruba G, Girmenia C, Martino P, Fernández-Rodríguez M, Quindós G, Pontón J. 1995. Biotype diversity of Candida parapsilosis and its relationship to the clinical source and experimental pathogenicity. J Infect Dis 171:967–975. doi: 10.1093/infdis/171.4.967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.MacCallum DM, Castillo L, Nather K, Munro CA, Brown AJ, Gow NA, Odds FC. 2009. Property differences among the four major Candida albicans strain clades. Eukaryot Cell 8:373–387. doi: 10.1128/EC.00387-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Marakalala MJ, Vautier S, Potrykus J, Walker LA, Shepardson KM, Hopke A, Mora-Montes HM, Kerrigan A, Netea MG, Murray GI, MacCallum DM, Wheeler R, Munro CA, Gow NA, Cramer RA, Brown AJ, Brown GD. 2013. Differential adaptation of Candida albicans in vivo modulates immune recognition by dectin-1. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003315. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Schonherr FA, Sparber F, Kirchner FR, Guiducci E, Trautwein-Weidner K, Gladiator A, Sertour N, Hetzel U, Le GTT, Pavelka N, d’Enfert C, Bougnoux ME, Corti CF, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2017. The intraspecies diversity of C. albicans triggers qualitatively and temporally distinct host responses that determine the balance between commensalism and pathogenicity. Mucosal Immunol 10:1335–1350. doi: 10.1038/mi.2017.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Toth R, Alonso MF, Bain JM, Vagvolgyi C, Erwig LP, Gacser A. 2015. Different Candida parapsilosis clinical isolates and lipase deficient strain trigger an altered cellular immune response. Front Microbiol 6:1102. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Trevino-Rangel RDJ, Rodriguez-Sanchez IP, Elizondo-Zertuche M, Martinez-Fierro ML, Garza-Veloz I, Romero-Diaz VJ, Gonzalez JG, Gonzalez GM. 2014. Evaluation of in vivo pathogenicity of Candida parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis with different enzymatic profiles in a murine model of disseminated candidiasis. Med Mycol 52:240–245. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myt019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Gonia S, Archambault L, Shevik M, Altendahl M, Fellows E, Bliss JM, Wheeler RT, Gale CA. 2017. Candida parapsilosis protects premature intestinal epithelial cells from invasion and damage by Candida albicans. Front Pediatr 5:54. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Peterson LW, Artis D. 2014. Intestinal epithelial cells: regulators of barrier function and immune homeostasis. Nat Rev Immunol 14:141–153. doi: 10.1038/nri3608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Weitnauer M, Mijosek V, Dalpke AH. 2016. Control of local immunity by airway epithelial cells. Mucosal Immunol 9:287–298. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Whitsett JA, Alenghat T. 2015. Respiratory epithelial cells orchestrate pulmonary innate immunity. Nat Immunol 16:27–35. doi: 10.1038/ni.3045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Yano J, Noverr MC, Fidel PL Jr.. 2017. Vaginal heparan sulfate linked to neutrophil dysfunction in the acute inflammatory response associated with experimental vulvovaginal candidiasis. mBio 8:e00211-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00211-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Moyes DL, Murciano C, Runglall M, Islam A, Thavaraj S, Naglik JR. 2011. Candida albicans yeast and hyphae are discriminated by MAPK signaling in vaginal epithelial cells. PLoS One 6:e26580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Dambuza IM, Brown GD. 2018. Sensing fungi at the oral epithelium. Nat Microbiol 3:4–5. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0086-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Netea MG, Marodi L. 2010. Innate immune mechanisms for recognition and uptake of Candida species. Trends Immunol 31:346–353. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2010.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Cronan MR, Beerman RW, Rosenberg AF, Saelens JW, Johnson MG, Oehlers SH, Sisk DM, Jurcic Smith KL, Medvitz NA, Miller SE, Trinh LA, Fraser SE, Madden JF, Turner J, Stout JE, Lee S, Tobin DM. 2016. Macrophage epithelial reprogramming underlies mycobacterial granuloma formation and promotes infection. Immunity 45:861–876. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Espin-Palazon R, Stachura DL, Campbell CA, Garcia-Moreno D, Del Cid N, Kim AD, Candel S, Meseguer J, Mulero V, Traver D. 2014. Proinflammatory signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell emergence. Cell 159:1070–1085. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Progatzky F, Cook HT, Lamb JR, Bugeon L, Dallman MJ. 2016. Mucosal inflammation at the respiratory interface: a zebrafish model. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 310:L551–L561. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00323.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Smith CJ, Wheeler MA, Marjoram L, Bagnat M, Deppmann CD, Kucenas S. 2017. TNFa/TNFR2 signaling is required for glial ensheathment at the dorsal root entry zone. PLoS Genet 13:e1006712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Vincent WJB, Harvie EA, Sauer JD, Huttenlocher A. 2017. Neutrophil derived LTB4 induces macrophage aggregation in response to encapsulated Streptococcus iniae infection. PLoS One 12:e0179574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Nguyen-Chi M, Phan QT, Gonzalez C, Dubremetz JF, Levraud JP, Lutfalla G. 2014. Transient infection of the zebrafish notochord with E. coli induces chronic inflammation. Dis Model Mech 7:871–882. doi: 10.1242/dmm.014498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Lammermann T. 2016. In the eye of the neutrophil swarm—navigation signals that bring neutrophils together in inflamed and infected tissues. J Leukoc Biol 100:55–63. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1MR0915-403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Rot A, von Andrian UH. 2004. Chemokines in innate and adaptive host defense: basic chemokinese grammar for immune cells. Annu Rev Immunol 22:891–928. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Sarris M, Masson JB, Maurin D, Van der Aa LM, Boudinot P, Lortat-Jacob H, Herbomel P. 2012. Inflammatory chemokines direct and restrict leukocyte migration within live tissues as glycan-bound gradients. Curr Biol 22:2375–2382. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Brothers KM, Gratacap RL, Barker SE, Newman ZR, Norum A, Wheeler RT. 2013. NADPH oxidase-driven phagocyte recruitment controls Candida albicans filamentous growth and prevents mortality. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003634. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Caffrey-Carr AK, Hilmer KM, Kowalski CH, Shepardson KM, Temple RM, Cramer RA, Obar JJ. 2017. Host-derived leukotriene B4 is critical for resistance against invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Front Immunol 8:1984. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Edens HA, Parkos CA, Liang TW, Jesaitis AJ, Cutler JE, Miettinen HM. 1999. Non-serum-dependent chemotactic factors produced by Candida albicans stimulate chemotaxis by binding to the formyl peptide receptor on neutrophils and to an unknown receptor on macrophages. Infect Immun 67:1063–1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Gabrielli E, Sabbatini S, Roselletti E, Kasper L, Perito S, Hube B, Cassone A, Vecchiarelli A, Pericolini E. 2016. In vivo induction of neutrophil chemotaxis by secretory aspartyl proteinases of Candida albicans. Virulence 7:819–825. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1184385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Geiger J, Wessels D, Lockhart SR, Soll DR. 2004. Release of a potent polymorphonuclear leukocyte chemoattractant is regulated by white-opaque switching in Candida albicans. Infect Immun 72:667–677. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.2.667-677.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Hargarten JC, Moore TC, Petro TM, Nickerson KW, Atkin AL. 2015. Candida albicans quorum sensing molecules stimulate mouse macrophage migration. Infect Immun 83:3857–3864. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00886-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Hogan D, Wheeler RT. 2014. The complex roles of NADPH oxidases in fungal infection. Cell Microbiol 16:1156–1167. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Bistoni F, Vecchiarelli A, Cenci E, Sbaraglia G, Perito S, Cassone A. 1984. A comparison of experimental pathogenicity of Candida species in cyclophosphamide-immunodepressed mice. Sabouraudia 22:409–418. doi: 10.1080/00362178485380661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Mellado E, Cuenca-Estrella M, Regadera J, González M, Díaz-Guerra TM, Rodríguez-Tudela JL. 2000. Sustained gastrointestinal colonization and systemic dissemination by Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis and Candida parapsilosis in adult mice. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 38:21–28. doi: 10.1016/S0732-8893(00)00165-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Hopke A, Nicke N, Hidu EE, Degani G, Popolo L, Wheeler RT. 2016. Neutrophil attack triggers extracellular trap-dependent Candida cell wall remodeling and altered immune recognition. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005644. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Keppler-Ross S, Douglas L, Konopka JB, Dean N. 2010. Recognition of yeast by murine macrophages requires mannan but not glucan. Eukaryot Cell 9:1776–1787. doi: 10.1128/EC.00156-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Linden JR, Kunkel D, Laforce-Nesbitt SS, Bliss JM. 2013. The role of galectin-3 in phagocytosis of Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis by human neutrophils. Cell Microbiol 15:1127–1142. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Rudkin FM, Bain JM, Walls C, Lewis LE, Gow NA, Erwig LP. 2013. Altered dynamics of Candida albicans phagocytosis by macrophages and PMNs when both phagocyte subsets are present. mBio 4:e00810-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00810-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Lehrer RI. 1972. Functional aspects of a second mechanism of candidacidal activity by human neutrophils. J Clin Invest 51:2566–2572. doi: 10.1172/JCI107073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Lewis LE, Bain JM, Lowes C, Gillespie C, Rudkin FM, Gow NA, Erwig LP. 2012. Stage specific assessment of Candida albicans phagocytosis by macrophages identifies cell wall composition and morphogenesis as key determinants. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002578. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Linden JR, De Paepe ME, Laforce-Nesbitt SS, Bliss JM. 2013. Galectin-3 plays an important role in protection against disseminated candidiasis. Med Mycol 51:641–651. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2013.770607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Linden JR, Maccani MA, Laforce-Nesbitt SS, Bliss JM. 2010. High efficiency opsonin-independent phagocytosis of Candida parapsilosis by human neutrophils. Med Mycol 48:355–364. doi: 10.1080/13693780903164566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Sheth CC, Hall R, Lewis L, Brown AJ, Odds FC, Erwig LP, Gow NA. 2011. Glycosylation status of the C. albicans cell wall affects the efficiency of neutrophil phagocytosis and killing but not cytokine signaling. Med Mycol 49:513–524. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2010.551425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Toth R, Toth A, Papp C, Jankovics F, Vagvolgyi C, Alonso MF, Bain JM, Erwig LP, Gacser A. 2014. Kinetic studies of Candida parapsilosis phagocytosis by macrophages and detection of intracellular survival mechanisms. Front Microbiol 5:633. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Bast DJ, Yue M, Chen X, Bell D, Dresser L, Saskin R, Mandell LA, Low DE, de Azavedo JC. 2004. Novel murine model of pneumococcal pneumonia: use of temperature as a measure of disease severity to compare the efficacies of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:3343–3348. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.9.3343-3348.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.McFadden ER Jr, Pichurko BM, Bowman HF, Ingenito E, Burns S, Dowling N, Solway J. 1985. Thermal mapping of the airways in humans. J Appl Physiol 58:564–570. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1985.58.2.564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. 2008. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 3:1101–1108. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Preibisch S, Saalfeld S, Schindelin J, Tomancak P. 2010. Software for bead-based registration of selective plane illumination microscopy data. Nat Methods 7:418–419. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0610-418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.National Research Council. 2011. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, 8th ed National Academies Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.