Abstract
Introduction:
Father's involvement is essential for the successful immunization of the child, as man is the head of the family and he takes responsibility for all decisions including health and financial issues. This study aimed to assess the knowledge of fathers, uptake of routine immunization (RI), and its associated factors in a rural community of North West Nigeria.
Materials and Methods:
The study was a community-based cross-sectional study conducted among the male heads of households residing in a rural community of Sokoto state. Systematic sampling was used to recruit 276 respondents. Data were obtained using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. Data obtained was entered into the IBM Software package and subsequently analyzed. Level of significance was set at 5%.
Results:
Only 2.5% and 1.4% of the respondents knew the age measles and yellow fever vaccines were given, respectively. Majority (75.4%) of the respondents' last-born child did not receive bacillus Calmette-Guérin at birth. Only (7.6%) of their last-born child were completely immunized for age. Majority of the respondents that had poor knowledge of RI had no formal education (P = 0.043).
Conclusion:
The study reported the knowledge of RI among fathers was poor. Having formal education and perception that children should be allowed to receive RI were correlates of good knowledge and uptake of RI. Parents, fathers, in particular, should be educated on the schedule of RI.
Keywords: Fathers, knowledge, routine immunization, uptake, pères, connaissances, la vaccination de routine, Uptake
Résumé
Introduction:
L’implication du père est essentielle à la réussite de la vaccination de l’enfant que l’homme est le chef de famille et il assume la responsabilité de toutes les décisions, y compris les questions de santé et financiers. Cette étude visait à évaluer les connaissances des pères, l’absorption de la vaccination de routine et de ses facteurs associés dans une communauté rurale du nord-ouest du Nigeria.
matériaux et méthodes:
L’étude était une communauté étude transversale basée menée entre les chefs de famille résidant dans une communauté rurale de l’Etat de Sokoto. L’échantillonnage systématique a été utilisé pour recruter 276 répondants. Les données ont été obtenues à l’aide d’un enquêteur structuré questionnaires. Les données obtenues ont été saisies dans progiciel IBM et ensuite analysés. Le niveau de signification a été fixé à 5%.
Résultats:
Seulement 2,5% et 1,4% des personnes interrogées connaissaient la rougeole d’âge et les vaccins contre la fièvre jaune ont reçu respectivement. La majorité (75,4%) des répondants de l’enfant dernier-né n’a pas reçu le BCG à la naissance. Seulement (7,6%) de leur dernier enfant ont été complètement vaccinés pour l’âge. La majorité des répondants qui avaient une mauvaise connaissance du RI avait pas d’éducation formelle (p = 0,043).
Conclusion:
L’étude des connaissances déclarée de vaccination de routine chez les pères était pauvre. Avoir l’éducation formelle et de la perception que les enfants devraient être autorisés à recevoir RI étaient corrélats de la bonne connaissance et l’absorption de la vaccination systématique. Les parents, les pères en particulier, doivent être éduqués sur le calendrier du RI.
INTRODUCTION
Immunization is globally recognized as one of the most powerful, safe, and cost-effective measures for the prevention/control of some childhood diseases.[1,2,3,4] Each year, vaccination averts an estimated 2–3 million deaths from diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and measles, all life-threatening diseases that disproportionately affect children, approximately 17% of deaths in children under-fives being vaccine preventable.[4] The United Nations General Assembly Special Session sets a goal for full immunization of children who <1-year old at minimum coverage of 90% nationally and 80% in every district or equivalent administrative unit by 2010.[5] Despite this, global vaccine coverage has stalled over the past few years, in 2016 an estimated 19.5 million infants worldwide were not reached with routine immunization (RI) services, about 60% of these children live in 10 countries with Nigeria being one of them.[6] The 2016 Multiple Indicators Cluster Survey/National Immunization Survey Coverage revealed that 77% of children 12–23 months in Nigeria have not received all the RI as recommended in the country's RI Schedule, whereas 40% of children in this age group did not receive any immunization.[6] Some studies have identified deficit human resources, poor health worker attitude, poor community participation,[7] and mothers knowledge and attitude[8] toward RI as some of the reasons for low RI coverage. Factors such as caregiver's knowledge, attitude, and practices are also known to contribute to success or failure of the immunization.[2] Studies have assessed the knowledge[7,9,10,11] and attitude[7,9,11] of mothers on immunization, however, few studies have assessed that of men. Studies have found fathers involvement essential for the successful immunization of the child[9,12] as this is consistent with the belief in traditional African society where the interplay of culture, tradition, and religion admits that man is the head of the family and that he takes responsibility for all decisions including health and financial issues.[12] Fathers having good knowledge of RI are likely to encourage their children to assess immunization services. This study thus aimed at assessing the knowledge of fathers, uptake of RI and its associated factors in a rural community of North West Nigeria. The result of this study will provide data on the level of knowledge and acceptance of RI among men, which can subsequently be used by policymakers for the improvement of acceptance of RI services.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was conducted in Kwalkwalawa community of Dundaye ward in Wamakko Local Government area (LGA) of Sokoto state. The study population consisted of all male heads of households residing in the community. Heads of households with children <12 months were excluded from the study. The study design was cross-sectional in nature. Systematic sampling technique was used to recruit 286 respondents following sample size estimation and adjusting for nonresponse. Houses in the community were mapped out, and the house numbering was carried out. A total of 603 houses were enumerated, a sampling interval of 1:2 was arrived out, and the systematic sampling was carried out. The instrument of data collection was administered to the head of households in these houses in the local language (Hausa). The instrument of data collection was a structured questionnaire and had four sections which sought information of respondents' socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge, and uptake of RI. The male head of household was asked questions on the utilization of RI services, assumption made here was that the head of household gives permission to the mother to take the child for RI services. The questionnaire was pretested and necessary adjustments made to it before the commencement of data collection. Temporal stability was assessed by administering the questionnaire to the male head of household in Sokoto south LGA of Sokoto state; the questions were readministered 2 weeks later. This was done to ascertain the correlation between initial response and the second set of responses. Informed verbal consent was obtained from each respondent, permission to conduct this study was obtained from the Research and Ethics Committee of the Sokoto State Ministry of Health. Administered questionnaires were sorted out and entered into the IBM statistical software (International Business Machines, New York, USA) package. Data editing and cleaning were carried out after the data were ascertained clean data analysis commenced. Data were summarized using mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables and frequency and percentages for qualitative variables. Inferential statistics (Chi-square test) were conducted to determine the association between the categorical variables. Informed verbal consent was obtained from each respondent, permission to conduct this study was obtained from the Research and Ethics Committee of the Sokoto State Ministry of Health.
RESULTS
A total of 286 respondents out were recruited for this study, 10 respondents refused to participate, giving response rate of 96.5%. Over one–third of the respondents, 95 (34.4%) were within the age group of 40–49 years. Majority of the respondents 167 (60.5%) had only qur'anic education, whereas only 24 (8.7%) respondents had tertiary education. Majority of the respondents 208 (75.4%) were farmers, and barely half of them 119 (43.1%) had 1–5 number of children, whereas 61 (22.1%) of them had over 10 children. Half of the respondents 138 (50.0%) were in a polygamous relationship [Table 1].
Table 1.
Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
| Variables | n (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age group (years) | 21-30 | 42 (15.2) |
| 31-40 | 71 (25.7) | |
| 41-50 | 100 (36.2) | |
| 51-60 | 43 (15.6) | |
| 61-70 | 17 (6.2) | |
| 71-80 | 3 (1.1) | |
| Educational status | None | 6 (2.2) |
| Quranic | 167 (60.5) | |
| Primary | 16 (5.8) | |
| Secondary | 63 (22.8) | |
| Tertiary | 24 (8.7) | |
| Number of children | 1-5 | 119 (43.1) |
| 6-10 | 96 (34.8) | |
| >10 | 61 (22.1) | |
| Occupation | Civil Servant | 12 (4.3) |
| Farmer | 208 (75.4) | |
| Trader | 56 (20.3) | |
| Nature of family | Polygamous | 138 (50) |
| Monogamous | 138 (50) |
Majority of the respondents knew that child RI prevents children from the infectious diseases 221 (80.1%); multi-doses of the same vaccine given at intervals were important for the child immunity 207 (75.0%); more than one vaccine can be given to a child at same time 201 (72.8%); it is important to vaccinate children during immunization campaign 229 (83.0%), and it is important to comply to child's RI schedule 223 (80.8%). However, majority of the respondents did not know when the first dose of a child's immunization is given 222 (80.4%) or the schedule of RI as only 37 (13.4%) knew when the first dose of hepatitis B vaccine is given; 32 (11.6%) knew the number of times a child is given oral polio vaccine during RI; and only a paltry 7 (2.5%) and 4 (1.4%) knew the age measles and yellow fever vaccines were given, respectively [Table 2].
Table 2.
Respondents knowledge of Routine Immunization
| Variables | Correct responses | In-correct responses |
|---|---|---|
| Does child routine immunization prevent children from infectious diseases | 221 (80.1) | 65 (19.9) |
| When is the first dose of child routine immunization given | 54 (19.6) | 222 (80.4) |
| Most diseases against which children are vaccinated occur during the first year of life | 131 (47.5) | 145 (52.5) |
| Multi doses of same vaccine given at intervals are important for child immunity | 207 (75.0) | 69 (25.0) |
| Can more than one vaccine be given to a child at same time | 201 (72.8) | 75 (27.2) |
| Is it important to vaccinate children during immunization campaign | 229 (83.0) | 47 (17.0) |
| Should a child with mild illness be immunized | 182 (65.9) | 94 (34.1) |
| Is compliance to child routine immunization schedule important | 223 (80.8) | 53 (19.2) |
| First dose of Oral polio vaccine is given at birth | 124 (44.9) | 152 (55.1) |
| First dose of Hepatitis b vaccine should be given at birth | 37 (13.4) | 239 (86.6) |
| BCG vaccine is given at birth | 71 (25.7) | 205 (74.3) |
| How many times should a child be given oral polio vaccine during routine immunization | 32 (11.6) | 244 (88.4) |
| How many times should a receive BCG vaccine | 76 (27.5) | 200 (72.5) |
| How many times should a child receive Yellow Fever vaccine | 66 (23.9) | 210 (76.1) |
| How many times should a child receive Measles vaccine | 71 (25.7) | 205 (74.3) |
| At what age is Measles vaccine administered | 7 (2.5) | 269 (97.5) |
| At what age is Yellow Fever vaccine administered | 4 (1.4) | 272 (98.6) |
| Overall knowledge of Routine immunization | 131 (47.5) | 145 (52.5) |
Majority of the respondents allowed their children received RI 220 (79.7%) and they have indeed taken their children to receive RI 200 (72.5%). However, majority of the respondents' last-born child did not receive OPV 189 (68.5%), bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) 208 (75.4%) at birth, and only 21 (7.6%) of their last-born child were completely immunized for age. Almost all respondents 250 (90.6%) received health education and counseling from the health-care providers before immunizing their children [Table 3].
Table 3.
Uptake of Routine Immunization
| Variables | Yes n (%) | No n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Do you allow your children receive Routine Immunization? | 220 (79.7) | 56 (20.3) |
| Have you or your wife ever taken your child to receive Routine Immunization? | 200 (72.5) | 76 (27.5) |
| Did your last born child receive Oral Polio vaccine at birth? | 87 (31.5) | 189 (68.5) |
| Did your last born child receive BCG vaccine at birth? | 68 (24.6) | 208 (75.4) |
| Is your last born child completely immunized for age? | 21 (7.6) | 255 (92.4) |
| Do the Health provide health education and counselling before immunizing the children? | 250 (90.6) | 26 (9.4) |
Majority of the respondents that had poor knowledge of RI had no– formal education (P = 0.043) and were farmers (P = 0.013). Almost all the respondents that had good knowledge of RI felt children should be allowed to receive RI (P < 0.001). All the respondents that had good knowledge of RI knew that RI is beneficial to the health of children (P < 0.001) and believed that children who received RI will be protected against some diseases (P < 0.001) and these were statistically significant [Table 4].
Table 4.
Factors associated with Respondents’ knowledge of Routine Immunization
| Variables | Knowledge score |
Test statistics & P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good n (%) | Poor n (%) | |||
| Educational status | No- formal | 74 (56.5) | 99 (68.3) | χ2=4.088, P=0.043 |
| Formal | 57 (43.5) | 46 (31.7) | ||
| Occupation | Civil servant | 9 (6.9) | 3 (2.1) | χ2=8.424, P=0.013 |
| Farmer | 89 (67.9) | 119 (82.1) | ||
| Trader | 33 (25.2) | 23 (15.9) | ||
| Nature of family | Polygamous | 67 (51.5) | 71 (49.0) | χ2=0.131, P=0.718 |
| Monogamous | 64 (49.8) | 74 (51.0) | ||
| Children should be allowed to receive RI | Yes | 120 (91.6) | 95 (65.5) | χ2=55.166, P=0.000 |
| No | 11 (8.4) | 50 (34.5) | ||
| RI Is beneficial to health of children | Yes | 131 (100) | 104 (71.7) | χ2=43.504, P=0.000 |
| No | 0 | 41 (28.3) | ||
| Do you believe that children who receive RI will be protected against some diseases | Yes | 131 (100) | 98 (67.6) | χ2=51.177, P=0.000 |
| No | 0 | 47 (32.4) | ||
Majority of the respondents that will not permit RI had no formal education (P < 0.001). Almost all respondents that permitted RI felt children should be allowed to receive RI (P < 0.001), knew that RI is beneficial to the health of children (P < 0.001), and believed that children who received RI will be protected against some diseases (P < 0.001) [Table 5].
Table 5.
Factors associated with Respondents uptake of Routine Immunization
| Variables | Permit routine immunization |
Test statistics & P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes n (%) | No n (%) | |||
| Educational status | No- formal | 123 (55.9) | 50 (89.3) | χ2=21.258, P=0.000 |
| Formal | 97 (44.1) | 6 (10.7) | ||
| Occupation | Civil servant | 12 (5.5) | 0 | χ2=4.355, P=0.113 |
| Farmer | 161 (73.2) | 47 (83.9) | ||
| Trader | 47 (21.4) | 9 (16.1) | ||
| Nature of family | Polygamous | 112 (50.9) | 26 (46.4) | χ2=0.358, P=0.549 |
| Monogamous | 108 (49.1) | 30 (53.6) | ||
| Children should be allowed to receive RI | Yes | 217 (98.6) | 9 (16.1) | χ2=205.132, P=0.000 |
| No | 3 (1.4) | 47 (83.9) | ||
| RI Is beneficial to health of children | Yes | 214 (97.3) | 21 (37.5) | χ2=125, P=0.000 |
| No | 6 (2.7) | 35 (62.5) | ||
| Do you believe that children who receive RI will be protected against some diseases | Yes | 217 (98.6) | 12 (21.4) | χ2=188.33, P=0.000 |
| No | 3 (1.4) | 44 (76.8) | ||
DISCUSSION
This study assessed the knowledge of fathers, uptake of RI and its associated factors in Sokoto, North-western Nigeria. The overall knowledge of RI among fathers was poor, with variations in their responses. Majority of them knew that child RI prevents children from infectious diseases. Radio and television stations in Sokoto often transmit programs to enlighten residents on the importance of RI, this may have contributed to their knowledge. Abubaker et al.[13] in Saudi Arabia and Bernsen et al. in the United Arab Emirates[14] also reported that over 85% of the participants knew the role of childhood vaccination in the prevention of life-threatening diseases. However, only one-fifth of the respondents knew when the first dose of child RI is administered, not knowing when RI is commenced may cause a delay in initiation of RI and delay in initiating RI is a cause of concern. For instance, BCG, oral polio, and hepatitis vaccines should be administered at birth or within the first 2 weeks of life if one wants to get the best result.[15] Most of the fathers knew that it is important to comply with child RI schedule. However, less than one-fourth of them knew the RI schedule. Not knowing the immunization schedule may leads to reduced access to immunization services, reduced immunization coverage, and child immunization dropout.
Majority of the fathers knew that more than one vaccine can be safely administered to a child at the same time. For instance, at 9 months of age, both yellow fever and measles vaccines are administered to a child at the same time. There is no scientific evidence that supports parents' fears about combined vaccines causing immune overload.[16] In contrast, a study by Gellin in 2000, revealed that a quarter of the parents believed that their child's immune system could become weakened as a result of too many immunizations.[17]
Almost all the respondents knew it is important to vaccinate children during the immunization campaign. A large number of children can be reached during immunization campaign that for a variety of reasons never get to be vaccinated during RI or are unable to complete the recommended immunization schedule. This also helps to boost the herd immunity of children against childhood diseases. However, Asiimwe et al. in Uganda, reported that parents/caretakers perceived vaccines used during mass immunization not to be safe either because they are expired or are deliberately contaminated with harmful agents intended to harm their children.[18]
Despite the knowledge gap in the immunization schedule, majority of the fathers allowed their children to receive RI and have indeed taken them to receive it. This is a commendable practice and it will go a long way in not only improving the health-care utilization of their wives and children but also improve the immune status and wellness of their children and family at large. The study also reported that only 7.6% of their last-born children were completely immunized for age. This is very low and implies that the community may not have herd immunity, and as such they may be prone to outbreaks of these vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs).
Factors found to significantly influence the knowledge of fathers on RI were educational status, occupation, and their perception that children should be allowed to receive RI; RI is beneficial, and the believe that children who receive RI will be protected against those specific diseases. Majority of fathers with poor knowledge of RI had no– formal education and were farmers. Educated parents will better understand the educational messages given to them. Moreover, such parents are more likely to comprehend educational messages they receive from various media (radio, television, billboards, and posters). Educational status is also related to the occupation of the people. Those with formal education are more likely to be employed (civil servant, etc.,) living those with no formal education in the informal sectors like subsistence farming. This finding is consistent with previous studies.[19,20]
Almost all fathers with good knowledge of RI felt their children should be allowed to receive RI. They could have acquired this knowledge from several media and could have also observed that children vaccinated were immune to various childhood diseases and also have a better quality of life.
All fathers with good knowledge of RI perceived RI to be beneficial to children's health and believe that children who receive it will be protected against some diseases. Successful immunization of children depends highly on parents' existing knowledge and positive attitude. These ranged from individual cognitions to family, social, and system factors. Individuals perceived the benefits of vaccines differently. Nevertheless, these benefits outweigh the risks. These positive perceptions were supported by beliefs about infectious disease threats which can be prevented by vaccinating children, the social and political will to provide potent vaccines for the prevention of childhood diseases in the community.[21]
This study also revealed the factors that significantly influence the permission of children to RI to be the educational status of fathers, the perception that children should be allowed to receive RI, perceived benefits of RI to the health of children, and belief that children who receive RI will be protected against some diseases. Almost all the fathers that did not permit their children to receive RI had no formal education. Education of parents, mothers' in particular, has been found to be associated with the knowledge of when to start immunizations, the frequency of visits and the diseases prevented by each vaccine.[22] This is consistent with that observed by Tadesse et al. in 2009[23] and Jani et al. in 2008 and other researchers that reported that mother's education was a significant predictor of completeness of immunization because the highly educated mother will be more aware of the importance of immunization.[24,25,26]
Education is related to the parents' perception that children should be allowed to receive RI because of its immense benefits– the belief that children who receive RI will be protected against some diseases called VPD. A study by Rasheed Kola in Lagos, South-western Nigeria, reported that willingness of parents to present their children for immunization is significantly affected by the level of education of such parents (P < 0.05). Parents with better or higher education were likely to be willing to present their children for immunization. The study further reported that the opinion about the benefit of immunization is also found to be significantly affected by the respondents' level of education (P < 0.05).[27]
CONCLUSION
The study reported knowledge of RI among fathers was poor, with variations in their responses. Most of them were not aware of the immunization schedule of children, and only a paltry 7.6% of their last children were completely vaccinated. Having formal education, the perception that children should be allowed to receive RI, perceived benefits of RI to the health of children, and believe that children who receive RI will be protected against VPD were correlates of good knowledge and uptake of RI. Parents, fathers, in particular, should be educated on the schedule of RI and the need to ensure children receive all vaccines as and when due.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Angadi MM, Jose AP, Udgiri R, Masali KA, Sorganvi V. A study of knowledge, attitude and practices on immunization of children in urban slums of Bijapur city, Karnataka, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:2803–6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6565.3763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Qidwai W, Ali SS, Ayub S, Ayub S. Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding immunization among family practice patients. J Dow Univ Health Sci. 2007;1:15–9. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Oche MO, Umar AS, Ibrahim MT, Sabitu K. An assessment of the impact of health education on maternal knowledge and practice of childhood immunization in Kware, Sokoto state. J Public Health Epidemiol. 2011;3:440–7. [Google Scholar]
- 4.United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF) [Last accessed on 2018 Jul];Immunization Facts and Figures Nov 2015 Update 2015. Available from: http://www.unicef.org . [Google Scholar]
- 5.Adeleye OA, Mokogwu N. Determinants of full vaccination status in a rural community with accessible vaccination services in South-South Nigeria. J Community Med Prim Health Care. 2016;28:1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 6.World Health Organization. Seventy Seven Percent (77%) of Children 12-23 Months in Nigeria did not Receive all Routine Immunization-Survey Findings. 2017. [Last accessed on 2018 Jul]. Available from: http://www.afro.who.int .
- 7.Kapoor R, Vyas S. Awareness and knowledge of mothers of under five children regarding immunization in Ahmedabad. Healthline. 2010;1:12–5. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tagbo BN, Eke CB, Omotowo BI, Onwuasigwe CN, Onyeka EB, Mildred UO. Vaccination coverage and its determinants in children aged 11-23 months in an urban district of Nigeria. World J Vaccin. 2014;4:175–83. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mapatano MA, Kayembe K, Piripiri L. Immunisation-related knowledge, attitudes and practices of mothers in Kinshasa, democratic republic of the Congo. SA Fam Pract. 2008;50:60–6. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Odusanya OO, Alufohai EF, Meurice FP, Ahonkhai VI. Determinants of vaccination coverage in rural Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:381. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Abidoye AO, Odeyemi KA. Knowledge, attitude and practice of mothers to childhood immunization in Kosofe local government area of Lagos state Nigeria. Int J Basic Appil Innov Res. 2013;2:66–72. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Agboola SM, Busari OA, Segun-Agboola BT, Olajide TJ, Shabi OM, Elegbede OT. Knowledge, attitude, perceptions of adult males towards childhood immunizations in Southwest Nigeria. Am J Health Res. 2015;3:8–12. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Abubaker IE, Yousif MA, Ahmed AA, Mustafa AA. Knowledge and attitude on childhood vaccination a survey among Saudi parents in Taif region, Saudi Arabia. Int J Pharm Pract Drug Res. 2014;4:92–7. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bernsen RM, Al-Zahmi FR, Al-Ali NA, Hamoudi RO, Ali NA, Al-Mutawa J, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards immunizations among mothers in a traditional city in the United Arab Emirates. J Med Sci. 2011;4:114–21. [Google Scholar]
- 15.National Primary Healthcare Development Agency. Basic Guide on Routine Immunization for Service Providers, Nigeria. 2017 [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hilton S, Petticrew M, Hunt K. 'Combined vaccines are like a sudden onslaught to the body's immune system': Parental concerns about vaccine 'overload' and 'immune-vulnerability'. Vaccine. 2006;24:4321–7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gellin BG, Maibach EW, Marcuse EK. Do parents understand immunizations? A national telephone survey. Pediatrics. 2000;106:1097–102. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.5.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Asiimwe D, Kibombo R, Matsiko J. Vaccine Safety Perceptions Among Parents in Developing Countries and Influence of Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) on Their Decisions to Vaccinate Children. 2013 [Google Scholar]
- 19.Borràs E, Domínguez A, Fuentes M, Batalla J, Cardeñosa N, Plasencia A, et al. Parental knowledge of paediatric vaccination. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:154. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Papazoglou A, Giamaiou K, Poulopoulou S, Pavlopoulou I, Tsoumakas K. The national vaccination programme in Greece, factors affecting parents knowledge. Glob J Med Res Interdiscip. 2013;13:3:1–42. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Briss PA, Rodewald LE, Hinman AR, Shefer AM, Strikas RA, Bernier RR, et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, and adults. The task force on community preventive services. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:97–140. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00118-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.The United States Agency for International Development. Immunization Essentials. A Practical Field Guide. Google Scholar. 2003 [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tadesse H, Deribew A, Woldie M. Predictors of defaulting from completion of child immunization in south Ethiopia, May 2008: A case control study. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jani JV, De Schacht C, Jani IV, Bjune G. Risk factors for incomplete vaccination and missed opportunity for immunization in rural mozambique. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:161. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.World Health Organization. Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals. 10 Facts on Immunization. World Health Organization; 2012 [Google Scholar]
- 26.Onyiriuka AN. Vaccination default rates among children attending a static immunization clinic in Benin City, Nigeria. J Med Biomed Res. 2005;4:71–7. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ojikutu RK. Beliefs, knowledge and perception of parents to peadeatric vaccination in Lagos State, Nigeria. J Manag Sustain. 2012;2:227–35. [Google Scholar]