Abstract
An acetyl-protected aminoethyl phenyl thioether has been developed to promote C(sp3)–H activation. Significant ligand enhancement is demonstrated by the realization of the first Pd(II)-catalyzed olefination of C(sp3)–H bonds of free carboxylic acids without using an auxiliary. Subsequent lactonization of the olefinated product via 1,4 addition provided exclusively mono-selectivity in the presence of multiple β-C–H bonds. The product γ-lactone can be readily opened to give either the highly valuable β-olefinated or γ-hydroxylated aliphatic acids. Considering the challenges in developing Heck couplings using alkyl halides, this reaction offers a useful alternative.
Graphical Abstract

Carboxylic acids are readily available and highly versatile starting materials in organic synthesis. In the past decade, a number of directed C(sp3)–H activation reactions of aliphatic acids using various directing groups have provided unprecedented synthetic disconnections.1 For example, Pd-catalyzed C(sp3)–H iodination1a, oxygenation,1b arylation,1c alkylation,1d–f and fluorination1g, 1h have been developed using various directing auxiliaries. However, carboxyl-directed C(sp3)–H activation reactions are rare. K2PtCl4-catalyzed or mediated carboxyl-directed lactonization of aromatic and aliphatic acids has been demonstrated, albeit in poor yields.2 The use of COOK salts led to the discovery of Pd-catalyzed C(sp3)–H arylation of free carboxylic acids3 and was further improved by ligand acceleration (eq 1).4, 5 However, further development of carboxyl-directed C(sp3)–H functionalization reactions have only been successful using exogenous auxiliaries. In particular, the development of a C(sp3)–H olefination reaction protocol would be synthetically useful considering the challenges of developing Heck couplings with alkyl halides due to premature β-hydride elimination.6 To date, only three precedents using auxiliaries have been reported.7 These reactions suffer from the undesired subsequent cyclization reaction with the nitrogen containing auxiliary, preventing further synthetic elaborations.

Herein we report the first example of β-C(sp3)–H olefination of free carboxylic acids enabled by an acetyl-protected aminoethyl phenyl thioether ligand (eq 2). Carboxylic acids containing α-hydrogens are also compatible with this catalyst. The γ-lactone products formed by C(sp3)–H olefination and subsequent 1,4-addition can be found in many bioactive compounds (Figure 1).8 The hydrolytic opening of the lactones provides synthetically useful β-olefinated aliphatic acids or 1,4-dihydroxy compounds (eq 2).
Figure 1.
Bioactive Compounds Containing γ-Lactone and Derivatives
Our initial investigation into carboxyl-directed β-C(sp3)–H olefination employed 2,2-dimethylbutyric acid 1b as a model substrate and benzyl acrylate 2a as an olefin coupling partner. We have previously established that countercations, such as Na+ or K+, promote Pd(II) insertion into ortho- or β-C–H in carboxylic acid substrates by engaging К2 coordination with the carboxylate.5 We were pleased to observe that using Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol%) in the presence of Na2HPO4·7H2O as the base and Ag2CO3 as the oxidant provided olefination product 3b in 16% yield (Table 1). We next tested representative pyridine- or quinoline-based ligands (L1–L4) developed in our laboratory to exploite ligand acceleration. To our delight, the yield was improved to 57% by using the simple monodentate 2,6-lutidine ligand L2. Further screening of pyridone ligands (L5–L7) which were identified to enable meta-C(sp2)–H arylation of phenyl acetic acids5e only gave inferior yields. After extensive screening of different bases and external oxidants, the product 3b could be isolated in 70% when we used K2HPO4 as the base and AgOAc as the oxidant in the presence of 2,6-lutidine L2 (15 mol%). However, use of this ligand is limited to carboxylic acids α-containing quaternary centers.
Table 1.
![]() |
Conditions A: 1b (0.1 mmol), 2a (2.0 eq), Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol%), ligand (10 mol% for bidentate ligands (L8-L15) or 20 mol% for monodentate ligands (L1-L7)), Na2HPO4·7H2O (1.0 eq), Ag2CO3 (1.0 eq), HFIP, 90 oC, 12 h.
The yields were determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude product using CH2Br2 as the internal standard.
Conditions B: 1b (0.1 mmol), 2a (2.0 eq), Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol%), L2 (15 mol%), K2HPO4 (2.0 eq), Ag2CO3 (2.0 eq), HFIP, 100 oC, 24 h. Isolated yield.
Conditions C: 1b (0.1 mmol), 2a (2.0 eq), Pd(TFA)2 (10 mol%), L14 (10 mol%), Na2HPO4·7H2O (1.0 eq), Ag2CO3 (1.0 eq), HFIP, 120 oC, 12 h. Isolated yield.
To overcome this limitation, we turned our attention to the bidentate ligands that were recently developed to accelerate C(sp3)–H activation in our laboratory. Guided by ligand-accelerated ortho-C(sp2)–H olefination of phenyl acetic acids5c and β-C(sp3)–H arylation of α-branched carboxylic acids,4d, 4e we tested mono-N-protected amino acid (MPAA) ligands. However, this type of ligand gave poor yields. Other bidentate ligands (L11–L13), previously found to promote enantioselective intermolecular C(sp3)–H activation,4a, 4b gave moderate yield with substrate 1b, but displayed no reactivity with α-hydrogen containing carboxylic acids. The essential role played by the NHAc group in the bidentate ligands (L8–L13) prompted us to replace the quinoline and oxazoline by sulfur as a soft σ-donor.9 We prepared acetyl-protected aminoethyl phenyl thioether ligand L14 in two steps from commercial available 2-aminoethyl bromide. Ligand L14 afforded a dramatic increase in reactivity providing a 90% yield. The product could be isolated in nearly quantitative yield (96%) by increasing the temperature and using Pd(TFA)2. L14, a bench-stable and odorless solid, was easily recycled after the reaction, demonstrating its stability in the presence of a mild oxidant (Ag salt in this case). Efforts to introduce substitution on the ligand backbone (L15) did not enhance the reactivity. It is worth-noting that the formation of the γ-lactone via the intramolecular conjugate addition secured the exclusive mono-selectivity which has not been possible in other C–H functionalizations in the presence of multiple β-C–H bonds.
With the optimal ligand and reaction conditions in hand, the scope of aliphatic carboxylic acid substrates was evaluated (Table 2). For aliphatic acids bearing α-quaternary centers, both 2,6-lutidine L2 and the thioether ligand L14 are effective with the latter being superior (3a–3h). Various α-dialkyl substituted propionic acids were olefinated to give the desired γ-lactones in good to excellent yields (3a-3d). Phenyl groups at the β- or γ-positions of the carboxyl group were well tolerated (3e, 3f, and 3m) and remained intact despite the potentially reactive ortho-C(sp2)–H bonds. Substrates containing a coordinative heteroatom such as oxygen (1g, 1h, 1s, and 1x) or nitrogen (1p) were also compatible with the β-C(sp3)–H olefination conditions. Gemfibrozil (1g), which is an oral drug used to lower lipid levels,10 was converted to the corresponding γ-lactone 3g in 81% yield. The use of the newly developed ligand L14 has rendered a broad range of α-hydrogen containing carboxylic acids (1i–1q) reactive under the standard conditions. These substrates are typically challenging due to the lack of a favorable Thorpe-Ingold effect as well as the interfering acidic α-C–H bond. The olefination of N-phthaloyl alanine substrate 1p is particularly interesting considering the importance of α-amino lactones. This protocol was also successfully extended to the olefination of cyclopropyl and cyclobutyl C–H bonds (3q-3x), affording highly strained fused bicyclic lactones. The presence of hydroxyl (3s) and halogen (3t) groups in those lactones offers a synthetic handle for further elaboration.
Table 2.
![]() |
Conditions A: 1 (0.1 mmol), 2a (2.0 eq), Pd(TFA)2 (10 mol%), L14 (10 mol%), Na2HPO4·7H2O (1.0 eq), Ag2CO3 (1.0 eq), HFIP, 120 oC, 12 h.
Isolated yields.
Conditions B: 1 (0.1 mmol), 2a (2.0 eq), Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol%), L2 (15 mol%), K2HPO4 (2.0 eq), Ag2CO3 (2.0 eq), HFIP, 100 oC, 24 h.
Conditions C: 1p (0.1 mmol), 2a (2.0 eq), Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol%), L12 (10 mol%), CsOAc (1.0 eq), Ag2CO3 (1.0 eq), HFIP, 100 oC, 24 h.
We next evaluated the scope of the olefin coupling partners by using pivalic acid 1a as the pilot acid substrate (Table 3). The olefination with various acrylate derivatives proceeded in excellent yields (4a–4c). Other electron-withdrawing groups attached to the olefins including amide (2d), ketone (2e), nitrile (2f), sulfone (2g), and phosphonate (2h), were all compatible with the olefination conditions, providing the desired γ-lactones in excellent yields. N-aryl or alkyl maleimides (2i–2k) were also found to be suitable coupling partners under the optimized conditions, providing diverse spirocyclic pyrrolidines in moderate to excellent yields.
Table 3.
![]() |
Conditions A: 1a (0.1 mmol), 2 (2.0 eq), Pd(TFA)2 (10 mol%), L14 (10 mol%), Na2HPO4·7H2O (1.0 eq), Ag2CO3 (1.0 eq), HFIP, 120 oC, 12 h.
Isolated yields.
Conditions B: 1a (0.1 mmol), 2 (2.0 eq), Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol%), L14 (10 mol%), Ag2CO3 (1.0 eq), HFIP, 120 oC, 12 h.
Coupling of an alkyl fragment with an olefin is highly valuable due to the lack of success of analogous Heck couplings. To demonstrate the synthetic utility of these C(sp3)–H olefination products, we performed the olefination of pivalic acid 1a with benzyl acrylate 2a on gram scale to obtain the γ-lactone 3a in 93% isolated yield (Scheme 1). The γ-lactone was then successfully transformed into three structurally distinct synthons: (1) selective hydrolysis of the ester under the acidic conditions gave the γ-lactone 5a which can be further elaborated to other compounds by decarboxylative coupling;11 (2) hydrolysis in the presence of sodium hydroxide generated adipic acid derivative 5b which is widely used in the polymer chemistry industry; (3) reduction of the lactone and ester afforded the 1,4,6-triol 5c.
Scheme 1. Gram-Scale Experiment and Synthetic Application.
a Conditions A: 1a (12.0 mmol), 2a (2.0 eq), Pd(TFA)2 (10 mol%), L14 (10 mol%), Na2HPO4.7H2O (1.0 eq), Ag2CO3 (1.0 eq), HFIP, 120 oC, 12 h.
b Conditions B: 3a (0.2 mmol), 6N HCl, 80 oC, overnight.
c Conditions C: 3a (1.0 mmol), NaOH (4.0 eq), EtOH/H2O, reflux.
d Conditions D: 3a (0.2 mmol), LAH (4.0 eq), THF, rt.
In conclusion, we have developed a new thioether based bidentate ligand L14 that effectively promotes β-C(sp3)–H olefination of a broad range of free carboxylic acids. The unique synthetic utility of olefination is demonstrated by the synthesis of γ-lactones, β-vinylated acids, and γ-hydroxylated acids, which has not been possible using an auxiliary approach. This transformation provides a highly desirable synthetic disconnection considering the challenges in developing analogous Heck couplings due to premature β-hydride elimination.
Acknowledgements.
We gratefully acknowledge The Scripps Research Institute and Bristol-Myers Squibb for financial support. This work was supported by NIH (NIGMS, 2R01 GM084019).
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and spectral data for all new compounds (PDF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- (1).(a) Giri R; Chen X; Yu J-Q Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2005, 44, 2112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Giri R; Liang J; Lei J-G; Li J-J; Wang D-H; Chen X; Naggar IC; Guo C; Foxman BM; Yu J-Q Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2005, 44, 7420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zaitsev VG; Shabashov D; Daugulis O J. Am. Chem. Soc 2005, 127, 13154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Zhu R-Y; He J; Yu J-Q J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 13194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Tran LD; Daugulis O Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2012, 51, 5188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Zhang S-Y; Li Q; He G; Nack WA; Chen G J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 12135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Zhu R-Y; Tanaka K; Li G-C; He J; Fu H-Y; Li S-H; Yu J-Q J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 7067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Zhang Q; Yin X-S; Chen K; Zhang S-Q; Shi B-F J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 8219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2).(a) Kao L-C; Sen A J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun 1991, 1242. [Google Scholar]; (b) Dangel BD; Johnson JA; Sames D J. Am. Chem. Soc 2001, 123, 8149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3).Giri R; Maugel N; Li J-J; Wang D-H; Breazzano SP; Saunder LB; Yu J-QJ Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 3510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Chen G; Gong W; Zhuang Z; Andra MS; Chen Y-Q; Hong X; Yang Y-F; Liu T; Houk KN; Yu J-Q Science 2016, 353, 1023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wu Q-F; Shen P-X; He J; Wang X-B; Zhang F; Shao Q; Zhu R-Y; Mapelli C; Qiao JX; Poss MA; Yu J-Q Science 2017, 355, 499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Chen G; Zhuang Z; Li G-C; Saint-Denis TG; Hsiao Y; Joe CL; Yu J-Q Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2017, 56, 1506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Zhu Y; Chen X; Yuan C; Li G; Zhang J; Zhao Y Nat. Commun 2017, 8, 14904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Ghosh KK; van Gemmeren M Chem. -Eur. J 2017, 23, 17697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.(a) For COONa or COOK directed diverse C(sp2)–H activation reactions, see: Mei T-S; Giri R; Maugel N; Yu J-Q Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2008, 47, 5215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Giri R; Yu J-Q J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 14082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Wang D-H; Engle KM; Shi B-F; Yu J-Q Science 2010, 327, 315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Cheng G; Li T-J; Yu J-Q J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 10950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Li G-C; Wang P; Farmer ME; Yu J-Q Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2017, 56, 6874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) For rare examples of Heck-type coupling of alkyl iodides and alkenes, see: Firmansjah L; Fu GC J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 11340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) McMahon CM; Alexanian EJ Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2014, 53, 5974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zou Y; Zhou JS Chem. Commun 2014, 50, 3725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Wang G-Z; Shang R; Cheng W-M; Fu Y J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 18307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.(a) Wasa M; Engle KM; Yu J-Q J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 3680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Stowers KJ; Fortner KC; Sanford MS J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 6541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) He J; Li S; Deng Y; Fu H; Laforteza BN; Spangler JE; Homs A; Yu J-Q Science 2014, 343, 1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Li S; Chen G; Feng C-G; Gong W; Yu J-Q J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 5267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Jiang H; He J; Liu T; Yu J-Q J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 2055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Yang W; Ye S; Schmidt Y; Stamos D; Yu J-Q Chem. -Eur. J 2016, 22, 7059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Ito C; Itoigawa M; Katsuno S; Omura M; Tokuda H; Nishino H; Furukawa H J. Nat. Prod 2000, 63, 1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Koiso Y; Natori M; Iwasaki S Tetrahedron Lett 1992, 33, 4157. [Google Scholar]
- 9.(a) For allylic acetoxylation using sulfoxide ligands, see: Chen MS; White MC J. Am. Chem. Soc 2004, 126, 1346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) For C–H olefination of electron-rich arenes using simple thioether ligands: Gorsline BJ; Wang L; Ren P; Carrow BP J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 9605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10).Pueyo Palazón C; Alfón J; Gaffney P; Berrozpe M; Royo T; Badimon L Atherosclerosis 1998, 136, 333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.(a) Cornella J; Edwards JT; Qin T; Kawamura S; Wang J; Pan C-M; Gianatassio R; Schmidt M; Eastgate MD; Baran PS J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 2174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Qin T; Cornella J; Li C; Malins LR; Edwards JT; Kawamura S; Maxwell BD; Eastgate MD; Baran PS Science 2016,352, 801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





