Skip to main content
Channels logoLink to Channels
. 2019 Apr 22;13(1):124–135. doi: 10.1080/19336950.2019.1605813

A small viral potassium ion channel with an inherent inward rectification

Denise Eckert a, Tobias Schulze a, Julian Stahl a, Oliver Rauh a, James L Van Etten b, Brigitte Hertel a, Indra Schroeder a, Anna Moroni c, Gerhard Thiel a,
PMCID: PMC6527081  PMID: 31010373

ABSTRACT

Some algal viruses have coding sequences for proteins with structural and functional characteristics of pore modules of complex K+ channels. Here we exploit the structural diversity among these channel orthologs to discover new basic principles of structure/function correlates in K+ channels. The analysis of three similar K+ channels with ≤ 86 amino acids (AA) shows that one channel (Kmpv1) generates an ohmic conductance in HEK293 cells while the other two (KmpvSP1, KmpvPL1) exhibit typical features of canonical Kir channels. Like Kir channels, the rectification of the viral channels is a function of the K+ driving force. Reconstitution of KmpvSP1 and KmpvPL1 in planar lipid bilayers showed rapid channel fluctuations only at voltages negative of the K+ reversal voltage. This rectification was maintained in KCl buffer with 1 mM EDTA, which excludes blocking cations as the source of rectification. This means that rectification of the viral channels must be an inherent property of the channel. The structural basis for rectification was investigated by a chimera between rectifying and non-rectifying channels as well as point mutations making the rectifier similar to the ohmic conducting channel. The results of these experiments exclude the pore with pore helix and selectivity filter as playing a role in rectification. The insensitivity of the rectifier to point mutations suggests that tertiary or quaternary structural interactions between the transmembrane domains are responsible for this type of gating.

KEYWORDS: Ba2+ block, Viral K+ channel, inward rectification, Kir channels

Introduction

The key properties of K+ channels such as ion selectivity and gating are well understood based on high-resolution structures [16]. However, despite this progress many functional aspects and in particular the significance of individual amino acids (AA) for function cannot be easily obtained from static protein structures. Therefore, other approaches are still needed to understand structure/function correlates in K+ channels. In recent years “assumption free” genetic methods, which combine a selection and screening of randomly mutated channel libraries with high throughput functional assays were developed [7]. By using methods such as chemical mutagenesis, DNA shuffling or error-prone PCR large mutant libraries were generated for uncovering functional alterations in channels, which are caused by distinct mutational changes.

In this context also small K+ channel proteins from viruses turn out to be an interesting model system for understanding functional aspects in the pore module of K+ channels. From a structural and functional point of view the viral channels represent the “‘pore module’”, which is present in all known K+ channels [8]. Because of this common architecture any insights from the viral channels are probably relevant for the function of complex human K+ channels [9]. A further advantage of the viral channels as a model system is that they are the smallest proteins known to form a functional K+ channel. This combination of small size and robust function limits the complexity of the system to less than 100 AAs.

Previous experiments have established that the activity of some viral K+ channels is essential for infection of their hosts [10]. In the case of viruses, which infect unicellular Chlorella algae, it is for instance known that the channels are present in the membrane of the virion [11]. In an early step of infection this membrane fuses with the host plasma membrane [12]. This depolarizes the host [13] and causes a discharge of K+-salts and water from the algal cell [10]. As a result of these events the host cell looses its high internal turgor pressure, which otherwise prevents ejection of the virus DNA into the host. These data and the experimental finding that an efficient infection of the host cells can be inhibited by a specific block of the viral channels [10] implies that the viral genes are under evolutionary pressure and that their gene products need to form functional channels [14]. This assumption has been supported by experimental data, which have shown that the AA sequences of viral K+ channels are variable and that the gene products are still functional in different test systems [1517]. The sequence variability of viral K+ channels, which can be isolated from various environmental samples, results in a large library of variable K+ channel sequences with functional variability. We have exploited this structural diversity and have identified interesting functional differences, which are rooted in the sequence variability in these channels. The power of this unbiased approach is best illustrated by the fact that even very conservative AA exchanges caused significant functional differences. In the Kcv channel from chloroviruses; e.g. an exchange of Phe for Val or Leu for Iso in the first transmembrane (TM1) domain drastically altered the Cs+ sensitivity of the channel as well as its voltage dependency [15,16]. The results of these experiments underscored the importance of the outer TM domain for K+ channel function, which had largely been ignored. In the Kcv channel scaffold from SAG chloroviruses it was found that a mutation of Gly versus Ser in the inner transmembrane helix (TM2) affected the open probability of the channel. A closer investigation of these mutations uncovered a new type of gating mechanism, which is based on an intra-helical hydrogen bond between the critical Ser and an upstream partner AA in the alpha helix [17].

Here we further exploit the diversity of viral genes by screening viral K+ channels from a marine habitat. We have previously reported that some viruses, which infect unicellular marine algae, also encode genes with the hallmarks of K+ channels [18]. An initial functional testing of some of these proteins revealed that they have non-canonical architectures in their TM domains, but that they still form functional K+ channels [18]. Here we perform a comparative examination of K+ channels, which are similar in their structure but fundamentally different in their voltage dependency. While one channel generates an ohmic conductance the other two proteins exhibit a typical Kir-like inward rectification in which large inward currents occur only at membrane voltages negative to the K+ equilibrium potential. The data show that this rectification is an inherent property of the protein and does not require Mg2+ or polyamines as a blocker. By mutational studies we identify the TM domains as a crucial elements for an inherent inward rectification of this channel.

Materials and methods

The electrical properties of the putative viral channels in HEK293 cells were recorded as reported previously [18]. Constructs of Kmpv1 and KmpvSP1 were transiently expressed as fusion proteins with GFP on the C-terminus using the liposomal transfection reagent GeneJuice® (MERCK KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Measurements were performed at room temperature in a bath solution containing: 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2 and 5 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES, pH 7.4) and either 50 mM KCl or 50 mM NaCl; different concentrations of BaCl2 were added to the K+ containing media to block the channels. The pipette solution contained 130 mM potassium-D-gluconic acid, 10 mM NaCl, 5 mM HEPES, 0.1 mM guanosine triphosphate (Na salt), 0.1 µM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 5 mM phosphocreatine and 2 mM adenosine triphosphate (Na salt, pH 7.4). The osmolarity of all solutions was adjusted with mannitol to 330 mosmol/kg. For the standard solutions we used JPCal software [19] to calculate a liquid junction potential of 15 mV, which was subtracted from the clamp voltages.

Planar lipid bilayer experiments were done with a vertical bilayer set up (IonoVation, Osnabrück, Germany) as described previously [20]. A 1% hexadecane solution (MERCK KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) in n-hexane (Carl ROTH, Karlsruhe, Germany) was used for pretreating the Teflon foil (Goodfellow GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). The hexadecane solution (ca. 0.5 μl) was added in the hole (100 μm in diameter) in the Teflon foil with a bent Hamilton syringe (Hamilton Company, Reno, Nevada, USA). The experimental solution contained 100 mM KCl and was buffered to pH 7.0 with 10 mM HEPES/KOH. As a lipid we used 1,2-diphythanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPhPC) (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL, USA) at a concentration of 0.15–25 mg/ml in n-pentane (MERCK KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).

The KmpvPL1, KmpvSP1 and Kmpv1 proteins were synthetized cell–free according to the manufacturer’s instructions (MembraneMaxTM HN Protein Expression Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad (CA) USA) as reported previously [21]. In vivo synthesis occurred on a shaker with 1000 rpm at 37°C for 1.5 h in the presence of nanodiscs (ND) with 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC) lipids. The scaffold protein of the ND were His-tagged, which allowed purification of channel/ND-complexes via metal chelate affinity chromatography. The concentration His-tagged NDs in the reaction mixture was adjusted to 30 µM. For purification of the channel/ND-complexes, the crude reaction mixture was adjusted to 400 µL with equilibration buffer (10 mM imidazole, 300 mM KCl, 20 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.4 with KOH) and then loaded on an equilibrated 0.2 mL HisPur Nickel-Nitrilotriacetic acid Agarose (Ni-NTA) spin column (Thermo Scientific). For binding of the His-tagged NDs to the Ni-NTA resin the columns were incubated for 45 min at RT and 200 rpm on an orbital shaker. In the subsequent step the buffer was removed by centrifugation. To eliminate unspecific binders, the column was washed three times with 400 µL of a 20 mM imidazole solution. Finally, the His-tagged NDs were eluted in three fractions with 200 µL of a 250 mM imidazole solution. All centrifugation steps were performed at 700 x g for 2 minutes. After purification the elutions were stored at 4°C. For reconstitution of channel proteins into the lipid bilayer, a small amount (~2 µL) of the purified channel/ND-conjugates was added directly below the bilayer in the trans compartment.

Data are generally presented as mean ± standard deviation (sd) of n independent experiments. Statistical significances were evaluated by one-way ANOVA and student T-tests.

Results

Similar channels with different functional properties

We screened a library of small and structurally similar K+ channels from marine phycodnaviruses [18] for interesting functional differences. In this search we found three channels with similar lengths and high AA identity. Two of the channels, KmpvPL1 and KmpvSP1, are 75% identical; both channels differ from the third channel Kmpv1 in 29 AAs of which 16 are conservative or semi-conservative AA exchanges (Figure 1(a)). In spite of the structural similarities a comparative functional analysis of Kmpv1 and KmpvSP1 in HEK293 cells uncovered striking functional differences with respect to gating and Ba2+ sensitivity.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Similar channels with partially different functional properties. (a) Alignment of three channel proteins Kmpv1, KmpvPL1 and KmpvSP1. The identical filter domain is highlighted in grey. The amino acids in Kmpv1, which are different from the two other proteins, are indicated in yellow. The amino acids in which KmpvPL1 differs from KmpvSP1 are marked in green. The estimated transmembrane domains are underlined. A crucial AA 52 in KmpvSP1 is marked by an arrow. Representative current responses to voltage steps between +65 mV and −135 mV of mock transfected HEK293 cells in buffer with 50 mM K+ (b) and HEK293 cells expressing Kmpv1 in 50 mM K+ (c) or 50 mM Na+ (d). The corresponding steady state I/V relations on the right are shown in (e). Same experiments with cell expressing KmpvSP1 in 50 mM K+ (f) and 50 mM Na+ (g) plus corresponding I/V relations in (h). The currents for I/V relations were sampled at end of voltage pulses (marked by arrows). Symbols at current traces correspond to symbols in respective I/V curves. In both I/V relations open symbols report measurements in K+ and closed symbols report measurements in Na+. Note that Kmpv1 generates an ohmic conductance in K+ and KmpvSP1 exhibits a strong inward rectification. Asterisks (*) indicate conserved residues, colons (:) indicate residues with very similar properties, and periods (.) indicate residues with weakly similar properties.

The difference in gating becomes apparent when the two viral proteins are expressed in HEK293 cells (Figures 1 and 2). Both viral proteins generate in these cells currents, which are readily distinguished from the endogenous currents in HEK293 cells. The latter typically conduct under the prevailing conditions only small currents at negative voltages and a small outward rectifier at positive voltages (Figure 1(b), 18). The mean endogenous currents in 16 HEK293 cells at −115 mV (I−115) and +45 mV (I+60) were −58 ± 15 pA and +155 ± 33 pA respectively. The currents in HEK293 cells expressing the viral proteins were on average ca. 10 times larger (KmpvSP1: I−115 = −862 ± 70 pA; I+60: +133 ± 38 pA (n = 64); Kmpv1: I−115 = −555 ± 48 pA, I+60: 474 ± 64 pA (n = 55)).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Kmpv1 and KmpvSP1 exhibit a different sensitivity to extracellular Ba2+. Exemplar currents and corresponding I/V relations as in Figure 1 from HEK293 cells expressing Kmpv1 (a-c) or KmpvSP1 (d-f). Currents were recorded in bath solution with 50 mM K+ in absence (a,d) and presence of 1 mM BaCl2 (b,e). The corresponding I/V relations for Kmpv1 (c) and KmpvSP1 (f) show steady state currents in the absence (open symbols) and presence (closed symbols) of 1 mM Ba2+. The currents for I/V relations were sampled at end of voltage pulses (marked by arrows). Symbols at current traces correspond to symbols in respective I/V curves. (g) Relative block of KmpvSP1 (black) or Kmpv1 (red) at −115 mV as a function of extracellular Ba2+ concentration. Data (mean ± sd; n ≥ 4) were fitted with the Hill equation (Equation 1). The KD values for Ba2+ block of both channels from fits as in G are plotted as a function of voltage (h). The KD value increases ten fold per 114 mV (KmpvSP1, black) and 59 mV (Kmpv1, red) of negative voltage.

The most interesting finding is that Kmpv1 generates under these conditions an ohmic conductance in HEK293 cells (Figure 1(c,e)), while KmpvSP1 produces a strong inward rectification (Figure 1(f,h)). Even though both channels exhibit a similar selectivity for K+ over Na+ (Figure 1(b–h); Table 1) they differ in their sensitivity to the canonical K+ channel blocker Ba2+ (Figure 2). While the ohmic Kmpv1 channel is moderately sensitive to Ba2+ (Figure 2(a–c)) the inward rectifier KmpvSP1 exhibits a stronger voltage dependent block (Figure 2(d–f)). The dose dependency for a Ba2+ block of KmpvSP1 (Figure 2(g,h)) has at −115 mV a half maximal inhibition at 14 µM Ba2+; Kmpv1 requires a ca. 100-fold higher concentration for the same degree of inhibition.

Table 1.

Kmpv1 and KmpvSP1 are moderately selective for K+ over Na+.

Channel Vrev (K+) Vrev (Na+) PK+/PNa+
KmpvSP1 −22 ± 3 (55) −102 ± 4 (7) 24
Kmpv1 −23 ± 2 (13) −100 ± 7 (8) 21

Reversal voltages (Vrev, mean ± sd; number of experiments in brackets) were measured in HEK293 cells expressing either KmpvSP1 or Kmpv1 with 130 mM K+ and 10 mM Na+ in the pipette and either 50 mM K+ or 50 mM Na+ in the bath medium. The relative permeability ratio PK+/PNa+ was calculated with Goldman equation based on measured Vrev values (numbers in brackets denote number of independent recordings). For comparison the permeability ratio PK+/PNa+ ratio of Kir channel ROMK1 is > 100 [46].

The inward rectification is an inherent function of Kmpvsp1

The voltage dependency of KmpvSP1 (Figure 1(h), 2(f)) resembles the strongly inward rectifying Kir channels [22]. To test if the voltage dependency in KmpvSP1 is like Kir channels depending on the driving force for K+ ions, we recorded currents over a range of K+ concentrations in the bath. The representative current responses to voltage ramps show that the rectification shifts like in Kir channels with the K+ reversal voltage (Figure 3(a)). The channel shows no appreciable conductance at voltages positive of the K+ reversal voltage (VK+). These data suggest that KmpvSP1 functions similar to Kir channels.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Inward rectification of KmpvSP1 shifts with driving force for K+. (a) Exemplar current responses of one HEK293 cell expressing KmpvSP1 to voltage ramp between 50 and −160 mV with 5 mM (red) or 50 mM (black) K+ in the bath solution. Large currents occur negative of K+ reversal voltages, which are indicated by arrows for 5 and 50 mM K+. (b) Slope conductance of KmpvSP1 generated inward current between −95 and −135 mV as a function of the extracellular K+ concentration. Data from n = 4 measurements were normalized to conductance in 5 mM K+ and jointly fitted with eqn. 1 yielding a value of 0.46 for n.

A hallmark of many Kir channels is that the slope conductance of the inward current has a square root dependency on the extracellular K+ concentration [2325]. To determine the respective dependency for KmpvSP1 we measured the slope conductance of KmpvSP1 between −135 and −95 mV in solutions with K+ concentrations between 5 and 50 mM. The values from 4 measurements are shown in a double logarithmic plot (Figure 3(b)). The data can be jointly fitted with Equation (1)

g=gˉK+omMn (eqn. 1)

where g is the slope conductance, gˉ the reference slope conductance (5 mM external K+ and constant 130 mM internal K+). K+o gives the variable external K+-concentration and n is a constant. The best fit is obtained with a n value of 0.46 (Figure 3(b)), which indicates that the slope conductance is like in Kir channels approximately proportional to the square root of the external K+ concentration.

The data so far indicate that the viral channel shares the functional features of Kir channels. To examine the mechanism, which allows rectification, KmpvSP1 and KmpvPL1 were synthesized in vitro and reconstituted in planar lipid bilayers. For comparison the ohmic Kmpv1 channel was examined in the same manner.

The representative data in Figure 4(a,c) show that Kmpv1 generated current fluctuations with a small unitary conductance of ca. 6 pS and a high voltage independent open probability. The time averaged I/V relation, e.g. the product of unitary conductance and open probability, is largely linear over a voltage window of ±100 mV. This is consistent with the view that this channel is generating the ohmic I/V relation of Kmpv1 measured in HEK293 cells (Figure 1(c,e)). The causal relationship between the Kmpv1 protein and the small channel fluctuations is furthermore supported by control measurements. The respective channel fluctuations were not observed when nanodiscs, prepared as in Figure 4(a), but with no channel protein, were administered to the bilayer (Figure 4(b)).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Kmpv1 generates a voltage independent channel with small unitary conductance in planar lipid bilayers. (a) Exemplar current traces of Kmpv1 activity over a range of clamp voltages in symmetrical KCl (100 mM + 10 mM HEPES, pH 7). For sake of presentation the data were filtered with 100 Hz. The channel protein was translated in vitro into nanodiscs and recorded in a vertical planar DPhPC bilayer [21]. The channel exhibits a high open probability with only some longer-lasting closures. Individual closing events, which are marked on the traces, are enlarged on the right. (b) Representative current traces of experiments as in A but with nanodiscs, which contained no channel protein. (c) Mean unitary channel voltage relation (top), open probability voltage relation (middle) and time averaged I/V relation (bottom) from n = 2 to 5 recordings as in A. The latter were obtained by multiplying values from unitary I/V and Po/V relations.

The currents generated by KmpvSP1 are different from those of Kmpv1. The representative single channel recordings show that this protein exhibits a high flicker type activity at negative voltages with only some longer lasting resolvable closed times (Figure 5(a)). These fluctuations are only evident at negative but not at positive voltages resulting in a strong inward rectifying I/V relation of the mean current (Figure 5(b)). The I/V relation from the bilayer measurements is similar to that recorded in HEK293 cells under comparable ionic conditions (Figure 5(c)). In contrast to Kir channels, the viral inward rectifier does not require the PIP2 phospholipid for activity [26]. The data furthermore underscore that the flicker type channel fluctuations in the bilayer are indeed responsible for the KmpvSP1 currents in HEK293 cells. This assumption is further supported by the finding that 1 mM Ba2+ greatly reduced the flickering channel activity in bilayers at negative voltages (Figure 5(a,b)).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

KmpvSP1 has an inherent inward rectification. (a) Exemplar current traces of KmpvSP1 activity in bilayer recordings over a range of clamp voltages in symmetrical KCl (100 mM KCl + 10 mM HEPES, pH 7) in absence or presence of BaCl2 (+1 mM Ba2+). Clamp voltages are given (in mV) on the left of current traces. The channel protein was translated in vitro as in Figure 4(a). The channel exhibits a high open probability with flicker type fluctuations. Individual clear-cut closing events, which are marked on the traces, are enlarged on the right. (b) I/V relation of mean currents measured over clamp steps of 60 sec in absence (circles, mean ± sd; n = 9) and presence of Ba2+ (squares). (c) Normalized mean I/V relations of KmpvSP1 currents (mean ± sd; n ≥ 4) measured in bilayers (open circles) and in HEK293 cells as in Figure 1 but with 100 mM K+ in bath solution (closed circles). (d) Chord conductance (Gc)/voltage relation of mean current from b fitted with Boltzmann function (orange line) using z value of = 0.9. (e) I/V relation of KmpvSP1 channel from bilayer recordings as in B with 10 mM EDTA in cis and trans chamber (triangles) or after removing HEPES from the bath solution (open circles). For comparison the data from B are re-plotted (closed circles).

To estimate the steepness of the voltage dependency in the KmpvSP1 channel we plotted the relative chord conductance (Grel) of the mean current from Figure 5(d) as a function of voltage. The data were fitted to a Boltzmann function (dotted line) of the form G = (1 + ezF(V – V1/2)/RT) −1 where z is the effective charge (= charge * electrical distance), V1/2 the half activation voltage, F, R and T have their usual thermodynamic meaning. This yields values of −48 mV and 0.9 for V1/2 and z, respectively. The results of this analysis indicate that the inherent voltage dependency of the KmpvSP1 channel is more shallow than that induced by spermidine in canonical Kir channels but in the range of the voltage dependency generated by Mg2+ block in these channels [27,28,29].

While expression of KmpvPL1 generated no current in HEK293 cells it was successfully reconstituted in bilayers using the same procedure used for KmpvSP1. The data in Figure 1 supplement show that this protein generated the same inward rectifying I/V relation as the related KmpvSP1 protein. From these data we conclude that the amino acid differences between these two channels (Figure 1(a)) can be excluded as the origin of rectification.

In Kir channels inward rectification is generated by a voltage dependent block by cytosolic Mg2+ or polyamines [4,30]. The finding that KmpvSP1 rectifies in a bath solution with only KCl and HEPES in the same manner as in cells suggests that the channel may harbor an inherent mechanism of rectification. To exclude the possibility of HEPES [31] or any contamination of divalent cations in the bath solution as a source of rectification, we performed experiments as in Figure 5(a) in an un-buffered pure KCl solution. We also measured channel activity in a KCl/HEPES buffer plus 1 mM EDTA in the cis and trans chamber to chelate any possible divalent ion contaminant. In both cases KmpvSP1 generated the same inward rectifying I/V relation as in the standard recording condition (Figure 5(e)). In additional experiments channel activity was measured in a 100 mM KCl/HEPES buffer plus 1 mM EDTA (in the same buffer as before) for more than 0.5 h. We reasoned that the affinity of a binding site in the channel to a putative blocker might be very high and that it might take time to dissociate [32]. However, when we compared the I/V relations from measurements at the beginning of the experiments with those recorded 0.5 h later, we found no difference; such a long incubation time is sufficient to release blockers from the channel pore of canonical Kir channels [29] (Figure 2 supplement). Collectively these data suggest that KmpvSP1 has an inherent mechanism of gating, which generates a phenotype similar to that of Kir channels.

Structural basis of rectification

After finding functional similarities and differences between the viral inward rectifiers and canonical Kir channels we aligned KmpvSP1 with representatives (Kir1.1, Kir2.1, Kir3.1 and Kir6.1) of the four major functional groups of Kir channels [22]. The alignment in Figure 3 supplement shows that except for the selectivity filter, the viral channel has essentially no similarity with canonical Kir channels. Most importantly the viral channel contains none of the AAs, which are crucial for the function of canonical Kir channels, i.e. the AAs, which determine the steepness of rectification or polyamine sensitivity.

After discovering that inward rectification of the viral channel differs from Kir channels and that rectification is an inherent property of KmpvSP1, we created a chimera with Kmpv1 to identify domains that might be responsible for rectification. First, we addressed the question of whether the functional differences in gating could be caused by the minor AA variations in the selectivity filter. Notably the inward rectifying virus channels do not include any of the specific AAs, which are typical for the filter region of Kir channels (Figure 3 supplement). Neither the conserved disulfide bridge nor the pair of charged AAs, which are known to stabilize the filter of Kir channels [3335], are present in KmpvSP1.

To examine the role of the filter in rectification we substituted the domain between the end of TM1 and the beginning of TM2 in KmpvSP1, with the equivalent domain from Kmpv1 (ChA, Figure 6(a)). When this chimera was expressed in HEK293 cells it exhibited the inward rectification of the parental channel that donated the TM domains (Figure 6(b,d)).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

The filter domain of Kmpv1 is responsible for low Ba2+ sensitivity. (a) Chimera (ChA) comprising the pore domain of Kmpv1 (red) and the TM domains of KmpvSP1 (black). The selectivity filter sequence is highlighted in grey; the estimated transmembrane domains are underlined. Exemplar currents as in Figure 1 from HEK293 cells expressing ChA in bath solution with 50 mM K+ in the absence (b) and presence of 1 mM BaCl2 (c). The corresponding I/V relations (d) show steady state currents in the absence (open circles) and presence (closed circles) of 1 mM Ba2+. (e) Relative block of KmpvSP1 (black), Kmpv1 (red), chimera ChA (grey) and KmpvSP1 mutant S53F (blue) at −115 mV as a function of extracellular Ba2+ concentration. Data (mean ± sd; n ≥ 4) were fitted with the Hill equation. The KD values for the Ba2+ block of both channels obtained from fits as in E are plotted as a function of voltage (f). The KD value increases ten fold per 48 mV (KmpvSP1-S53F, blue) and 85 mV (ChA, grey) of negative voltage. For comparison the corresponding data of the wt channels are re-plotted.

To quantitatively compare the rectification properties of the wild type (wt) channel and the chimera we calculated the rectification index (R.I.) as the ratio of the chord conductance at +25 mV (G25) and −75 mV (G−75) according to Ozawa et al. [36],with Equation 2

R.I.=G25G75 (eqn 2)

A comparison of the R.I. value between wt channel and chimera ChA shows that both channels exhibit no apparent difference in their voltage dependency (Figure 7). This suggests that the filter domain is not the origin of rectification.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Rectification properties of Kmpv1, KmpvSP1, chimera and point mutants. Rectification index (R.I.) of Kmpv1 (V, red) KmpvSP1 (SP, black), chimera with Kmpv1 pore and KmpvSP1 TM domains (ChA, blue) as well as mutants of KmpvSP1 (grey). The latter comprise AAs in which Kmpv1 differs from the inward rectifiers KmpvPL1 and KmpvSP1 (see Figure 1). The relevant AAs were mutated individually in KmpvSP1 to match the sequence of the ohmic Kmpv1 channel. In the mutant dNSP1 three AAs (T2-I4) in the N-terminus of KmpvSP1 were deleted. All constructs were expressed in HEK293 cells as in Figures 1 and 2. For mutant channels, which conducted significantly more inward current than un-transfected cells, the rectification index R.I. was calculated. R.I. is the ratio of the chord conductance at +25 mV (G25) and −75 mV (G-75) (R.I. = G25/G-75). The mean R.I. values (± sd; number of recordings in brackets) are plotted. The R.I. value for Kmpv1 (V) is significantly (P < 0.001; ***) larger than that of all other constructs. a one way anova test showed that the r.i. values of kmpvsp1 (sp) and all mutants/chimera are not significantly different (p > 0.1); none of the mutations converted a rectifier into an ohmic conductor.

Further experiments showed that the chimera ChA maintained the low Ba2+ sensitivity of the parental filter domain (Figure 6(c–f)). A scrutiny of the sequence of the two channels highlights a single AA difference in the vicinity of the selectivity filters with a Ser in KmpvSP1 and a Phe in Kmpv1 (Figure 1(a)). To test if this Ser is crucial for the high Ba2+ sensitivity of KmpvSP1 it was mutated into a Phe. Functional testing of this mutant showed that the protein retained inward rectification but had lost its high sensitivity to Ba2+ (Figure 6(e,f)); the dose response curve became similar to that of Kmpv1. The results of these experiments show that Ba2+ sensitivity is a function of the selectivity filter domain and that this property is not causally related to the mechanism of inward rectification.

The results so far suggest that the TM segments rather than the filter region confer inward rectification. To test this hypothesis we identified the AAs, which are different in the N- and C-termini between the ohmic Kmpv1 channel on one side and the two rectifiers KmpvSP1 and KmpvPL1 on the other side (Figure 1). The relevant AAs in KmpvSP1 were mutated to those of Kmpv1 and the mutants expressed in HEK293 cells to search for a loss of inward rectification. All mutants except for F72I and L76A generated a functional channel in which the mean current significantly exceeded the mean current of untransfected cells; the R.I. values of all the functional mutants show that they all maintained an inward rectification (Figure 7). The results of these experiments suggest that inward rectification is not conferred by a singular AA. Instead it seems to require tertiary or quaternary structural interactions of the TM domains.

Discussion

The present study shows that small viral K+ channels from environmental samples provide a rich protein library, which promotes understanding of basic structure/function correlates in K+ channels. Because of high evolutionary pressure on viral genomes these proteins exhibit an unbiased structural and functional diversity [1518]. The main outcome of the present comparative analysis of three viral channel proteins is that one is a simple ohmic conductor while the other two represent inward rectifiers. The latter resemble the function of Kir-type channels [22]. Like their larger relatives from bacteria and animals they conduct no substantial outward current at membrane potentials positive to the K+ equilibrium voltage, they are highly selective for K+ and undergo a voltage-dependent block by Ba2+. In spite of their functional similarities to strong rectifying Kir channels the mechanisms of gating in the viral channels must be fundamentally different. Unlike Kir channels the viral channels exhibit strong inward rectification without contributions from any cytosolic domains; the latter are important determinants of rectification in Kir channels [30]. More importantly, while rectification in Kir channels is achieved by a voltage dependent block of the pore by cytosolic Mg2+ and polyamines, the viral channels rectify even in a pure KCl solution. Since the control experiments exclude contaminations in the solution as a source of channel blockers, we must assume that rectification is an inherent property of the viral channels. This interpretation is in line with previous reports, which had already shown that Kir mutants can acquire an intrinsic inward rectification. In the case of the ROMK1 channel it was found that the N171D mutation converted the channel into a strong inward rectifier even in the absence of Mg2+ [37]. This electrostatic effect however cannot explain the mechanism of rectification in the viral channels. The equivalent of an anionic AA equivalent to residue 171D in the ROMK1 mutant is not present in the viral channels (Figure 3 supplement). If we consider that the alignment between Kir channels and KmpvSP1 may not be correct the residue E74 of KmpvSP1 could be in the same position of D171 in the ROMK1 mutant. This however provides no explanation for rectification in the viral channels since this Glu is also conserved in the Ohmic conducting Kmpv1 channel (Figure 1).

A Kir channel with an intrinsic rectification was also found in response to the E224G mutant in Kir2.1 [38]. In this case it was proposed that charges around the cytoplasmic pore may generate a local electrostatic potential at the channel entry for rectification. Since this domain is not present in the viral K+ channels (Figure 3 supplement) it cannot account for their inherent rectification properties.

In the case of the intrinsic inward rectification of the viral channels we cannot explain the molecular mechanism of this voltage dependency. The finding that the pore loops of rectifying and non-rectifying channels can be swapped without any effect on rectification indicates that the pore domains with the selectivity filter architecture is not crucial for this voltage dependent phenomenon. This interpretation is supported by a mutation close to the selectivity filter, which alters the Ba2+ sensitivity of the inward rectifier. A reduction of Ba2+ sensitivity by nearly two orders of magnitude has in this case no impact on the rectifying properties of the channel. Hence the selectivity filter or the fine-tuning of the filter geometry seems to be irrelevant for an inherent inward rectification. This finding is unexpected considering the fact that inherent rectification is voltage and K+ sensitive and that the filter is the domain, which provides the selectivity [1] for the channel and where the majority of the voltage drop in a K+ channel occurs [39,40].

In the context of the differential Ba2+ sensitivity of the channels it is interesting to mention, that several previous structural and functional studies have identified the 4th binding site, S4, in the filter of K+ channels as the primary site of the Ba2+ block [4143]. The importance of S4 for the Ba2+ block was confirmed by experiments in which a Thr in this site, which is part of the consensus sequence of the filter, was mutated to a Ser. This mutation caused a drastic decrease in the sensitivity of another viral K+ channel but also in Kir channels to the Ba2+ block [42,44]. In the three channels studied here the corresponding AA is already a Ser, which does not prevent a Ba2+ block with µM affinity in KmpvSP1. Hence a Ser in this position is not solely responsible for a low Ba2+ affinity. As a main structural determinant of Ba2+ sensitivity the present data identify an AA in KmpvSP1, which is on the opposite side of the selectivity filter that is exposed to the external medium. A single point mutation S53F is sufficient to shift the high Ba2+ sensitivity of KmpvSP1 into that of Kmpv1. At this point we cannot answer the question of whether these data indicate an additional binding site on the extracellular side of the pore for Ba2+ or whether the mutation S53F affects the entry of Ba2+ into the filter and hence into its binding site deep in the electrical field. It is interesting to mention that an interplay of two residues on both sides of the selectivity filter is proposed for the Ba2+ block in the Kir2.1 channel [45].

While the experiments exclude the filter as an important structure for inherent inward rectification in viral channels, they underscore the importance of the TM domains. The data also indicate that the conversion between a rectifying and ohmic conductance is not a matter of a single AA. The effective switch in voltage dependency, which was achieved by the exchange of the TM domains could neither be mimicked by the deletion of the first 3 AAs, which are lacking in Kmpv1 nor by point mutations of the AAs, which are different between the respective channels. Taken together these data suggest that the fold of the TM is crucial for generating an inherent inward rectification in KmpvSP1. The question on how this is achieved and where the significant voltage dependency comes from remains unanswered.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by European Research Council (ERC) 2015 Advanced Grant 495 (AdG) n. 695078 noMAGIC (A.M., G.T.) the LOEWE initiative iNAPO (GT), Fondazione CARIPLO grant 2014-0796, by MIUR PRIN (Programmi di Ricerca di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale) 494 2015, (2015795S5W) to A.M and by the National Science Foundation grant no. 1736030 (JVE). This work was supported by the Directorate for Biological Sciences [1736030];European Research Council [Grant 495 (AdG) n. 695078];LOEWE [iNAPO].

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Fenja Siotto (Darmstadt) for initial cloning of the channel constructs and Prof. Adam Bertl (Darmstadt) for comments on the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Author Contributions

D.E, T.S and J.S. performed experiments, analyzed data and wrote parts of the paper; O.R. B.H. and I.S analyzed data. J.VE, A.M. and G.T. designed the work and wrote the paper.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Supplemental Material

References

  • [1].Doyle DA, Cabral JM, Pfuetzner RA, et al. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science. 1998;280:69–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Perozo E. New structural perspectives on K+ channel gating. Structure. 2002;10:1027–1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].MacKinnon R. Potassium channels. FEBS Lett. 2003;555:62–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Nichols CG, Lee SJ. Polyamines and potassium channels: a 25 year romance. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:18779–18788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Kuang Q, Purhonen P, Hebert H. Structure of potassium channels. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72:3677–3693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Roux B. Ion channel and ion selectivity. Essays Biochem. 2017;61:201–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Minor DL. Searching for interesting channels: pairing selection and molecular evolution methods to study ion channel structure and function. Mol Biosyst. 2009;5:802–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Thiel G, Baumeister D, Schroeder I, et al. Minimal art: or why small viral K+ channels are good tools for understanding basic structure and function relations. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1808:580–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Gazzarrini S., Severino M, Lombardi M, et al. The viral potassium channel Kcv: structural and functional features. FEBS Lett. 2003;552:12–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Thiel G, Moroni A, Dunigan D, et al. Initial events associated with virus PBCV-1 infection of Chlorella NC64A. Prog Bot. 2010;71:169–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Romani G, Piotrowski A, Hilmer S, et al. Viral encoded potassium ion channel is a structural protein in the Chlorovirus Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus-1 (PBCV-1) virion. J Gen Virol. 2013;94:2549–2556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Milrot E, Shimoni E, Dadosh T, et al. Structural studies demonstrating a bacteriophage-like replication cycle of the eukaryote-infecting Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus-1. PloSPathog. 2017;13:e1006562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Lee SW, Lee HH, Thiel G, et al. Noninvasive measurement of a single viral infection in a cell. ACS Nano. 2016;10:5123–5130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Hamacher K, Greiner T, Van Etten JL, et al. Phycodnavirus potassium ion channel proteins question the virus molecular piracy hypothesis. PLoSOne. 2012;7:e38826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Gazzarrini S., Kang M, Van Etten JL, et al. Long distance interactions within the potassium channel pore are revealed by molecular diversity of viral proteins. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:28443–28449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Kang M, Moroni A, Gazzarrini S, et al. Small potassium ion channel proteins encoded by chlorella viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:5318–5324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Rauh O, Urban M, Henkes LM, et al. Identification of intrahelical bifurcated H-bonds as a new type of gate in K+ channels. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:7494–7503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Siotto F, Martin C, Rauh O, et al. Viruses infecting marine picoplancton encode functional potassium ion channels. Virology. 2014;466–467:103–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Barry PH. JPCalc, a software package for calculating liquid junction potential corrections in patch-clamp, intracellular, epithelial and bilayer measurements and for correcting junction potential measurements. J Neurosci Meth. 1994;51:107–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Braun C, Baer T, Moroni A, et al. Pseudo painting/air bubble technique for planar lipid bilayers. J Neurosci Meth. 2014;233:13–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Winterstein L-M, Kukovetz K, Rauh O, et al. Reconstitution and functional characterization of ion channels from nanodiscs in lipid bilayers. J Gen Physiol. 2018;150:637–646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Hibino H, Inanobe A, Furutani K, et al. Inwardly rectifying potassium channels: their structure, function, and physiological roles. Physiol Rev. 2010;90:291–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Périer F, Radeke CM, Vandenberg CA. Primary structure and characterization of a small-conductance inwardly rectifying potassium channel from human hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:6240–6244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Makhina EN, Kelly AJ, Lopatin AN, et al. Cloning and expression of a novel human brain inward rectifier potassium channel. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:20468–20474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Lopatin AN, Nichols CG. K+ dependence of open-channel conductance in cloned inward rectifier potassium channels (IRK1, Kir2.1). Biophys J. 1996;71:682–694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Huang CL, Feng S, Hilgemann DW. Direct activation of inward rectifier potassium channels by PIP2 and its stabilization by Gβγ. Nature. 1998;391:803–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Kurata HT, Phillips LR, Rose T, et al. Molecular basis of inward rectification: polyamine interaction sites located by combined channel and ligand mutagenesis. J Gen Physiol. 2004;124:541–554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Lu Z. Mechanism of rectification in inward-rectifying K+ channels. Annu Rev Physiol. 2004;66:103–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Lopatin AN, Makhina EN, Nichols CG. Potassium channel block by cytoplasmic polyamines as the mechanism of intrinsic rectification. Nature. 1994;372:366–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Baronas VA, Kurata HT. Inward rectifiers and their regulation by endogenous polyamines. Front Physiol. 2014;5:325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Guo D, Lu Z. IRK1 inward rectifier K+ channels exhibit no intrinsic rectification. J Gen Physiol. 2002;120:539–551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Kurata HT, Cheng WWL, Nichols CG. Polyamine block of inwardly rectifying potassium channels. Meth Mol Biol. 2011;720:113–126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Leyland ML, Dart C, Spencer P, et al. The possible role of a disulphide bond in forming functional Kir2.1 potassium channels. Pflügers Arch- Eur J Physiol. 1999;438:778–781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Yang J, Yu M, Jan YN, et al. Stabilization of ion selectivity filter by pore loop ion pairs in an inwardly rectifying potassium channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:1568–1572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Cho HC, Tsushima RG, Nguyen TT, et al. Two critical cysteine residues implicated in disulfide bond formation and proper folding of Kir2.1. Biochem. 2000;39:4649–4657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Ozawa S, Iino M, Tsuzuki K. Two types of kainate response in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1991;66:2–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Lu Z, MacKinnon R. Electrostatic tuning of Mg2+ affinity in an inward-rectifying K+ channel. Nature. 1994;371:243–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Chang H-K, Yeh S-H, Shieh R-C. Charges in the cytoplasmic pore control intrinsic inward rectification and single-channel properties in Kir1.1 and Kir2.1 channels. J Membr Biol. 2007;215:181–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Contreras J. E., Chen J, Lau AY, et al. Voltage profile along the permeation pathway of an open channel. Biophys J. 2010;99:2863–2869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Andersson AEV, Kasimova MA, Delemotte L. Exploring the viral channel Kcv PBCV-1 function via computation. J Membr Biol. 2018;251:419–430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Guo R, Zeng W, Cui H, et al. Ionic interactions of Ba2+ blockades in the MthK K+ channel. J Gen Physiol. 2014;144:193–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Chatelain FC, Alagem N, Xu Q, et al. The pore helix dipole has a minor mole in inward rectifier channel function. Neuron. 2005;47:833–843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Piasta K. N., Theobald DL, Miller C, et al. Potassium-selective block of barium permeation through single KcsA channels. J Gen Physiol. 2011;138:421–436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Chatelain FC, Gazzarrini S, Fujiwara Y, et al. Selection of inhibitor-resistant viral potassium channels identifies a selectivity filter site that affects barium and amantadine block. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Alagem N, Dvir M, Reuveny E. Mechanism of Ba2+-block of a mouse inwardly rectifying K+ channel: differential contribution by two discrete residues. J Physiol. 2001;534:381–393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Spassova M, Lu Z. Tuning the voltage dependence of tetraethylammonium block with permeant ions in an inward-rectifier K+ channel. J Gen Physiol. 1999;114:415–426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material

Articles from Channels are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES