Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2019 Jul;35(2):265–276. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2019.02.007

Overgrowth Syndrome

Yahan Li 1, Callum G Donnelly 2; BVBio BVSc (Hons 1) DACT, Rocío Melissa Rivera 3
PMCID: PMC6527122  NIHMSID: NIHMS1527132  PMID: 31103180

Introduction

Overgrowth syndromes (OGS) refer to a heterogeneous group of conditions found in many species13, which show a common feature of excessive growth. According to the definitions used in human, OGS can be divided into two categories based on phenotypes, which are generalized OGS and localized/partial OGS1. Generalized OGS are often characterized by a 2–3 standard deviations increase in overall growth parameters including body weight, height, and head circumference4,5. On the other hand, localized/partial OGS results in overgrowth in to one or few organs or regions of the body6. OGS can also be characterized as congenital and/or postnatal according to the age when phenotypes present4,79. A greater risk of tumorigenesis is a shared feature of many OGS found in human1.

A generalized congenital OGS in bovine is known as large offspring syndrome (LOS2; Figure 1). LOS refers to a group of abnormal phenotypes occurring in bovine and ovine fetuses, placentas and newborns produced by assisted reproductive technologies (ART). There are many ART-induced LOS calf reports from experimental studies1014. Features of LOS include overgrowth, enlarged tongues, umbilical hernias, muscle and skeleton malformation, abnormal organ growth, allantois development defects, abnormal placental vasculature, and even increased early embryo or fetus death rates1518. LOS can affect the dam and cause death of the afflicted animal bringing financial loss to producers. Although there is a lack of published reports providing the incidence of LOS in ART-produced offspring, through personal communications (Rocio M Rivera), this incidence has been reported to being as high as 10%.

Figure 1. ART Produced LOS.

Figure 1.

Large bull calf produced by in-vitro procedures by RMR while at the University of Florida. The picture was taken when the calf was 2 days of age. The calf weighed 98 kg at birth and died at one week of age as a result of complications relating overgrowth, which included inability to stand up to suckle.

Clinical features of LOS

Macrosomia refers to increased body and limbs size, which is the most commonly identified feature of LOS2,17,18. This increased size of body and limbs can be two and five times greater than the average size at birth, respectively17, and the increased body size can be detected as early as the fifth week of gestation in cattle19. Increased skeletal lengths have been reported to be coupled with macrosomia14. However, calves with macrosomia at birth reach similar mature body weight as control animals20. Using the criteria for human, birthweight greater than two times of standard deviation above the mean is defined as macrosomia21. Since LOS was coined with overgrowth initially, it is easily taken for granted that macrosomia is a necessary feature. However, LOS is not always characterized by overgrowth, as thus is sometimes referred to as abnormal offspring syndrome (AOS)16.

Macroglossia (enlarged tongue) is a feature of LOS22. Severe macroglossia will cause feeding and breathing difficulties. Abdominal wall defects, including omphalocele and umbilical hernia, have also been observed in LOS fetuses22. An omphalocele is the outward protrusion of abdominal organs through the umbilical cord, which these organs are not covered by skin but by membranes (i.e. amnion, peritoneum, and Wharton’s jelly;23). Omphalocele is a severe defect present at birth and requires immediate corrective surgeries. An umbilical hernia is a bulge of abdominal organs at the umbilicus, which is caused by incomplete closure of umbilical ring and is covered by skin24.

Organomegaly, the abnormal enlargement of organs, have been observed in heart, liver, and kidney of LOS calve14,25. In addition, placentomegaly, an abnormally enlarged placenta, has been found in cow carrying IVF conceived fetuses18.

Other features including increased incidence of hydrallantois12,15, increased gestation length26, increased dystocia rate27, ataxia/paresis28,29, and abnormal limbs combined with abnormal spine15 have also been observed in LOS calves.

Assisted Reproductive Technologies and LOS

In the late 1980’s and 1990s clinical epidemiologist Professor David Barker suggested that the gestating maternal environment could have adverse consequences to the well-being of the offspring after birth30. The phenomenon which explains this permanent programming of the fetus was named “Fetal Origins of Adult Disease” or the “Barker Hypothesis”. The “Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) hypothesis”, as the phenomenon is now known, propositions that the inherent developmental (genetic) program of an individual can be influenced by its environment, especially during critical periods of development which can have significant long-term consequences for the wellbeing of the offspring during life. One artificial environment which has received much scientific attention for its potential to cause incorrect developmental programming to the resulting offspring in humans and livestock animals is assisted reproductive technologies (ART).

ART refers to a series of laboratory techniques and procedures used to conceive offspring. ART procedures include oocyte retrieval from ovaries, in vitro oocyte maturation, in vitro fertilization, embryo culture, and embryo transfer. ART is used in cattle to improve genetic merit of the offspring in a shorted length of time when compared to natural reproduction. Genetic merit is defined as the rank of an animal for its ability to produce superior offspring relative to other selection candidates (Purdue Extension - http://www.nsif.com/factsheets/nsif8.pdf). In addition, ART can be used to produce genetically-manipulated animals with improved production traits31.

Supplement of serum during in vitro embryo culture has been historically used to stimulate blastocyst formation32. Two experimental accounts suggest that serum can induce LOS in approximately 25% of ovine and bovine fetuses33,34. Adding fetal calf serum and bovine serum albumin during bovine embryo culture accelerate embryo development and improve blastocyst yield by day 6 but decrease embryo survival rate35,36. When comparing ovine embryos cultured with or without human serum supplements, bovine serum albumin and amino acid supplements, an increased body weight and gestation length in the human serum group was observed37. Co-culture of embryos with various types of cells have also been used to increase blastocyst yield38. Similar to what have been found with serum supplementation in sheep, overgrowth39,40 and increased gestation length39 have been reported for ovine embryos that were co-cultured with granulosa or oviduct epithelial cells. In addition, the size of the primary muscle fibers (which form during the first wave of myogenesis) and the ratio of secondary to primary fibers of the co-cultured fetuses were also greater than the controls, which indicates that hypertrophy of the primary fibers and hyperplasia of the secondary fibers are associated with the increased body weight observed in these fetuses40.

A similar OGS occurs in human

In humans, Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS, OMIM #130650), a human OGS, has phenotypical and molecular similarities to LOS. The most current report indicates an incidence of BWS in ~1/11,000 natural births41. BWS is a heterogeneous condition for which various phenotypic and (epi)genetic defects have been reported. Clinical features of BWS include macroglossia, abdominal wall defects (omphalocele/hernia/diastasis recti), lateralized overgrowth, childhood tumors (Wilms’ tumor and hepatoblastoma), neonatal hypoglycemia, macrosomia (large body size), ear malformations (creases/pits), facial nevus simplex (nevus flammeus, port-wine stain), and organomegaly21. The use of ART has been reported to increase the incidence of BWS by up to 10.7 times42,43.

Molecular findings of LOS and BWS

The main molecular defects of BWS occur on human chromosome 11p15 (bovine = chromosome 29) and include defects in DNA methylation, incorrect expression of imprinted genes, changes of chromosomal contents, and gene mutations8,4452. Among them, loss-of-imprinting caused by DNA methylation defects is the most frequently observed. DNA methylation (the addition of a methyl group [CH3] to DNA) is an epigenetic mark involved in the control of gene expression. Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon, which regulates parent-specific (i.e. chromosome specific) gene expression of approximately 150 genes (i.e. imprinted genes) in mammals5356. These genes control growth and development of the fetus and the placenta and their expression is tightly regulated by a discreet region of differential DNA methylation known as “imprinting center” (IC)57. One of these imprinting centers, namely, Imprinting Center 2 (IC2; also known as KvDMR1) is the most common genomic region affected by DNA methylation defects in BWS and LOS34. In the normal situation, the IC2 is methylated on the maternal chromosome and unmethylated on the paternally-inherited chromosome. This methylation state allows for the expression of the gene KCNQ1OT1 from the paternal allele, which by attracting epigenetic modifiers, silences various flanking imprinted genes including the cell cycle regulator CDKN1C5860. The methylated state of the maternal chromosome orchestrates the expression of several genes involved in fetal and placental growth5860. In LOS and BWS, imprinted gene expression of the IC2 loses control as a result of loss-of-methylation of the maternal KvDMR134,6163.

Alterations in Gene Expression

Alterations in imprinted and non-imprinted gene expression as a result of in vitro embryo production have been reported in numerous studies in bovine54,6473. Different culture media and supplementation with serum cause transcript abundance changes of several developmentally important genes involved in cell-cell junctions, transport, RNA processing, and stress in bovine embryos64,65. The upregulation of several developmentally important genes including the imprinted gene IGF1R have been suggested as early markers of LOS for bovine10. A two fold increase in expression of the imprinted fetal growth factor IGF2 transcript can be detected in liver of day 70 bovine fetuses cultured in medium containing estrus cow serum when compared with the serum restricted group74.

Spontaneous LOS

Although LOS cases in bovine have only been reported to be associated with ART, LOS can occur spontaneously. Spontaneous maternal-fetal disproportion is the predominant cause of dystocia in beef cattle75. A number of environmental and genetic factors cause this disparity and it is most commonly associated with first-calf heifers75,76. While calves in this scenario may be relatively large to the dam, they may not be oversized in absolute terms of population normals. In the human literature neonates that are large of for gestational age are typically above 97th percentile for birth weight at delivery, although the definition varies slightly by condition77. Mechanistically syndromes of overgrowth may be due to increased numbers of cells, hypertrophy, increases in the interstitium (such as fluid accumulation) or a combination of these conditions77. In humans there are two broad categories of fetal overgrowth syndromes. The first are those that are driven by the maternal environment such as gestational diabetes, occurring in around 5% of all pregnancies78. Conditions such as these predominantly result in symmetric hypertrophy of fetal tissue, particularly adipose tissue. The second category is neonates that are affected by either spontaneous or inherited genetic mutations, such as with BWS, Sotos Syndrome and Proteus syndrome to name a few. While these conditions are rare they are becoming increasing recognized, due to increased utilization of in vitro fertilization techniques79. Spontaneous fetal oversize syndromes have not been well recognized in food animal species outside of neonates generated by assisted reproductive therapies2. For the purposes of this review spontaneous large offspring syndrome can be categorized by conditions associated with prolonged gestation or those of normal gestational length.

Gestational length is relatively constant in cattle within breeds and environmental conditions ranging from 280 to 290 days80. Increasing gestational length within the normal range has been associated with larger birth weight76. Gestational length is moderately heritable and displays a sex bias with male calves generally having longer gestational lengths than females76. A definition for post-term for cattle has not been established, but is generally in excess of 300 days. Prolonged gestation has long been associated with a poor outcome for the resultant neonate81. A number of breeds including Ayrshire, Holstein-Friesian, Guernsey, Jersey, Swedish red & white, and Belgian Blue Cattle have been documented with pathologically prolonged gestation8284. Prolonged gestation in these cases is largely secondary a to a dysfunctional hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis with the calf failing to initiate parturition. These conditions have included adenohypohoseal hypolasaia/aplasia, cerebellar hypoplasia and adrenal hypoplasia. A genetic mutation have been suspected in many of these cases, with the mode of inheritance established, but putative genetic mutations not. Infectious cause such as Akabane virus, Bluetongue virus or Bovine Viral Diarrhea virus and toxic causes such ingestion Veratum californicum may also result in prolonged gestation due to dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis85. However, prolonged gestation alone does not always result in fetal oversize with this syndrome only identified in Holstein-Friesian, Swedish red and white and Ayrshire cattle2,76. Calves affected by overgrowth, commonly referred to as fetal giants, will have characteristically long teeth, hair coats and toes and otherwise appear to be normal. These calves have been reported to weigh between 59 to 98 kg. Typically these calves are delivered following induction of parturition and almost invariably necessitate caesarean section. The traits that produce prolonged gestation and fetal oversize are largely incompatible with post-natal life and these calves rarely survive for more than 24 hours.

Although rare, fetal giants have also been recognized in calves that are born at normal gestation lengths with the predominant abnormality being absolute oversize. No specific descriptions of these calves have been made, other than Roberts86 regarding any calf over 59 kg at birth to be a fetal giant. Despite being reported by clinicians and producers there are, to the author’s knowledge, no published descriptions of fetal giants or large offspring syndrome outside that of calves produced by in-vitro fertilization.

Spontaneous LOS: Case studies

Three cases of spontaneous LOS are illustrated in Figure 2. The first calf was a purebred male Holstein-Friesian calf that was delivered via caesarean section at 293 days of gestation. The calf weighed 83 kg at birth with the combined weight of the fetal membranes being 12.7 kg. The calf had an appropriate hair coat, erupted teeth and normal eponychium. The calf was proportionate with no obvious musculoskeletal defects. However, the calf did have an enlarged tongue (macroglossia) and large umbilical hernia (omphalocele). The calf was unable to nurse due to the enlarged tongue and was humanely euthanized. Imaging of the brain by MRI and detailed necropsy definitively ruled out a structural alteration of the hypothalamus, pituitary or adrenal glands. The second calf was a female purebred Brown Swiss calf that was delivered at 283 days of gestation. The dam was initially presented due to concern for a hydrops condition with perceived over-distension of the abdomen at approximately 278 days of gestation. Based on palpation and trans-abdominal ultrasound a hydrops condition was considered unlikely; however, the calf appeared to be very large. The calf was delivered by elective caesarean section following induction of parturition with cloprostanol and dexamethasone 40 hr prior to surgery. The viable calf weighed 63 kg at birth, with the fetal membranes unable to be weighed due to retention. The calf had small umbilical hernia and marked carpal contracture, but was otherwise vigorous and healthy. The calf’s legs were treated with splints and it was discharged at ten days of age.

Figure 2. Spontaneous LOS.

Figure 2.

Case 1 (top)– A post-term 86 Kg (normal birth at birth = 40 to 50 kg) Holstein bull calf was delivered by emergency C-section due to dystocia. The calf was macrosomic, had a marked omphalocoele and macroglossia (right picture). The calf was mentally inappropriate and was euthanized at 1 day of age. Immunohistochemistry of the anterior pituitary and hypothalamus could not demonstrate an aberration that could explain the macrosomia. Case 2 (middle) - A pre-term 63 Kg Brown Swiss heifer (normal weight at birth ~ 45 Kg) calf was delivered by planned C-section. The cow was referred for her large size approximately 2 weeks prior to being term. The calf was mentally appropriate at delivery and had an omphalocoelce and bilateral flexural deformities of the front metacarpo-phanalngeal joint. The ompahlocoele was corrected surgically (picture on the right) and the flexural deformities by splints and physical therapy. The calf was discharged in good health and is apparently still performing well. Case 3 (bottom) - One day old Holstein-Friesian calf showing typical signs associated with LOS including absolute macrosomia, omphalocele, and asymmetry of the pinna. The calf presented in respiratory distress and was later euthanized.

Whilst the definitive reason for fetal oversize has yet to be identified in these calves it is strongly suspected that these calves represent spontaneous large offspring syndrome. Following the identification of these two calves, other large for gestational age calves not generated by IVF have been investigated and have been shown to possess the same epi-mutation as IVF generated large offspring calves. This strongly emulates the analogous human condition BWS79.

Epigenetic conditions should be considered in cases of fetal gigantism where aberrations of gestational length have been excluded. At this time, risk factors have not been established and the occurrence of such calves is sporadic.

Concluding Remarks

The first ART calf was reported by Brackett and colleagues in 198287 while the fact that ART can induce the birth of abnormally large calves was first documented in the 1990s11. Even though many reports have been published and almost thirty years have passed since the first LOS report, we are not yet able to predict which embryos are molecularly programmed to suffer LOS, as the etiology of the syndrome is not known. Further, as Dr. John F. Hasler states in a recent review of the embryo transfer industry, “there is a lack of peer-reviewed published data describing the current status of LOS problems in the commercial ET-IVP industry”.88 Therefore, it is difficult to calculate what is the current incidence of LOS and how much are producers being affected. As mentioned above, off-the record conversations have stated that 10% LOS in some practices is not unusual. For obvious reasons, we do not believe that such numbers will ever be published but we hope to be able to provide information that may be used by ET companies and others using ART embryos in their practices to identify embryos molecularly programmed to suffer LOS prior to transfer.

Perinatal mortality, death occurring prior to, during or within 48 hours of calving, is a recognized problem in the cattle industry89. In developed countries, 25–46% of perinatal deaths in cattle are the result of dystocia and in the United State 32% of perinatal deaths are due to unknown causes. One of the main causes of dystocia is fetal-maternal size mismatch. Dystocia has a direct negative impact on calves89,90, dam survival and reproduction performance91 and milk production92. With our current research, we will determine if similar genetic and epigenetic misregulation is the culprit of spontaneous LOS, a previously uncharacterized syndrome in cattle, and will shed light upon the contribution of spontaneous LOS to the 25–46% rate of perinatal death in cattle resulting from unknown causes and dystocia.

Key Points:

  • Overgrowth syndromes (OGS) refer to a heterogeneous group of conditions found in many species and can be divided into two categories based on phenotypes, namely generalized OGS and localized/partial OGS.

  • Large offspring syndrome (also known as abnormal offspring syndrome) is a generalized congenital OGS in bovine most often observed in offspring conceived with the use of assisted reproductive technologies.

  • Features of LOS include overgrowth, enlarged tongues, umbilical hernias, muscle and skeleton malformation, abnormal organ growth, allantois development defects, abnormal placental vasculature, and increased embryo or fetus death rates.

  • Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome is a human congenital overgrowth conditions that emulates LOS. Both conditions are the result of epigenetic errors, and have been characterized as loss-of-imprinting conditions.

  • Fetal giants have been rarely recognized in naturally-conceived calves that are born at normal gestation lengths with the predominant abnormality being absolute oversize. We propose that these calves represent spontaneous large offspring syndrome.

Synopsis:

Large offspring syndrome (LOS; also known as abnormal offspring syndrome) is a generalized congenital overgrowth syndrome in bovine most often observed in offspring conceived with the use of assisted reproductive technologies. Features of LOS include overgrowth, enlarged tongues, umbilical hernias, muscle and skeleton malformation, abnormal organ growth, allantois development defects, abnormal placental vasculature, and increased embryo or fetus death rates. LOS can affect the dam and cause death of the afflicted animal bringing financial loss to producers. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome is a human congenital overgrowth conditions that emulates LOS. Both conditions have been characterized as loss-of-imprinting conditions. Fetal giants have been rarely recognized in naturally-conceived calves that are born at normal gestation lengths with the predominant abnormality being absolute oversize. We propose that these calves represent spontaneous large offspring syndrome. While the molecular etiology and incidence of spontaneous and ART-derived LOS are unknown, current work by the authors is designed to shed light into these questions.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Lapunzina P Risk of tumorigenesis in overgrowth syndromes: a comprehensive review. Paper presented at: American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Young LE, Sinclair KD, Wilmut I. Large offspring syndrome in cattle and sheep. Rev Reprod. September 1998;3(3):155–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sinclair K, Young L, Wilmut I, McEvoy T. In-utero overgrowth in ruminants following embryo culture: lessons from mice and a warning to men. Human Reproduction. 2000;15(suppl_5):68–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Opitz JM, Weaver DW, Reynolds JF. The syndromes of Sotos and Weaver: reports and review. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 1998;79(4):294–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Elliott M, Bayly R, Cole T, Temple IK, Maher ER. Clinical features and natural history of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: presentation of 74 new cases. Clinical genetics. August 1994;46(2):168–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wiedemann H-R, Burgio G, Aldenhoff P, Kunze J, Kaufmann H, Schirg E. The proteus syndrome. European journal of pediatrics. 1983;140(1):5–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Biesecker L The challenges of Proteus syndrome: diagnosis and management. European journal of human genetics. 2006;14(11):1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.DeBaun MR, Niemitz EL, Feinberg AP. Association of in vitro fertilization with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and epigenetic alterations of LIT1 and H19. Am J Hum Genet. January 2003;72(1):156–160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cole T, Hughes H. Sotos syndrome: a study of the diagnostic criteria and natural history. Journal of medical genetics. 1994;31(1):20–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lazzari G, Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, et al. Cellular and molecular deviations in bovine in vitro-produced embryos are related to the large offspring syndrome. Biology of reproduction. September 2002;67(3):767–775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Behboodi E, Anderson GB, BonDurant RH, et al. Birth of large calves that developed from in vitro-derived bovine embryos. Theriogenology. July 15 1995;44(2):227–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hasler J, Henderson W, Hurtgen P, et al. Production, freezing and transfer of bovine IVF embryos and subsequent calving results. Theriogenology. 1995;43(1):141–152. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw AM, Mullaart E, de Roos AP, et al. Effects of different reproduction techniques: AI MOET or IVP, on health and welfare of bovine offspring. Theriogenology. January 15 2000;53(2):575–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Farin PW, Farin CE. Transfer of bovine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro: survival and fetal development. Biology of reproduction. 1995;52(3):676–682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw AM, Aerts BJ, den Daas JH. Abnormal offspring following in vitro production of bovine preimplantation embryos: a field study. Theriogenology. April 1 1998;49(5):883–894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Farin PW, Piedrahita JA, Farin CE. Errors in development of fetuses and placentas from in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology. January 7 2006;65(1):178–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Walker S, Hartwich K, Seamark R. The production of unusually large offspring following embryo manipulation: concepts and challenges. Theriogenology. 1996;45(1):111–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Farin P, Crosier A, Farin C. Influence of in vitro systems on embryo survival and fetal development in cattle. Theriogenology. 2001;55(1):151–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hansen PJ, Dobbs KB, Denicol AC, Siqueira LG. Sex and the preimplantation embryo: implications of sexual dimorphism in the preimplantation period for maternal programming of embryonic development. Cell and tissue research. 2016;363(1):237–247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wilson J, Williams J, Bondioli K, Looney C, Westhusin M, McCalla D. Comparison of birth weight and growth characteristics of bovine calves produced by nuclear transfer (cloning), embryo transfer and natural mating. Animal reproduction science. 1995;38(1–2):73–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brioude F, Kalish JM, Mussa A, et al. Expert consensus document: Clinical and molecular diagnosis, screening and management of Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome: an international consensus statement. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen Z, Robbins KM, Wells KD, Rivera RM. Large offspring syndrome: a bovine model for the human loss-of-imprinting overgrowth syndrome Beckwith-Wiedemann. Epigenetics. June 2013;8(6):591–601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bair JH, Russ PD, Pretorius DH, Manchester D, Manco-Johnson ML. Fetal omphalocele and gastroschisis: a review of 24 cases. American journal of roentgenology. 1986;147(5):1047–1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jackson OJ, Moglen L. Umbilical hernia—a retrospective study. California medicine. 1970;113(4):8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McEvoy T, Sinclair K, Broadbent P, Goodhand K, Robinson J. Post-natal growth and development of Simmental calves derived from in vivo or in vitro embryos. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 1998;10(6):459–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sinclair K, Broadbent P, Dolman D. In vitro produced embryos as a means of achieving pregnancy and improving productivity in beef cows. Animal Science. 1995;60(1):55–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kruip TA, Den Daas J. In vitro produced and cloned embryos: effects on pregnancy, parturition and offspring. Theriogenology. 1997;47(1):43–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Reichenbach H, Liebrich J, Berg U, Brem G. Pregnancy rates and births after unilateral or bilateral transfer of bovine embryos produced in vitro. Journal of reproduction and fertility. 1992;95(2):363–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schmidt M, Greve T, Avery B, Beckers J-F, Sulon J, Hansen H. Pregnancies, calves and calf viability after transfer of in vitro produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology. 1996;46(3):527–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Barker DJ. The fetal and infant origins of disease. European journal of clinical investigation. July 1995;25(7):457–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.National Research Council. Methods and Mechanisms for Genetic Manipulation of Plants, Animals, and Microorganisms. 2004.
  • 32.Edwards R Maturation in vitro of mouse, sheep, cow, pig, rhesus monkey and human ovarian oocytes. Nature. 1965;208(5008):349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Young LE, Fernandes K, McEvoy TG, et al. Epigenetic change in IGF2R is associated with fetal overgrowth after sheep embryo culture. Nature genetics. 2001;27(2):153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chen Z, Hagen DE, Elsik CG, et al. Characterization of global loss of imprinting in fetal overgrowth syndrome induced by assisted reproduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. April 14 2015;112(15):4618–4623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Carolan C, Lonergan P, Van Langendonckt A, Mermillod P. Factors affecting bovine embryo development in synthetic oviduct fluid following oocyte maturation and fertilization in vitro. Theriogenology. 1995;43(6):1115–1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Thompson J, Allen N, McGowan L, Bell A, Lambert M, Tervit H. Effect of delayed supplementation of fetal calf serum to culture medium on bovine embryo development in vitro and following transfer. Theriogenology. 1998;49(6):1239–1249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Thompson JG, Gardner DK, Anne Pugh P, McMillan WH, Robin Tervit H. Lamb birth weight is affected by culture system utilized during in vitro pre-elongation development of ovine embryos. Biology of reproduction. 1995;53(6):1385–1391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gandolfi F, Moor R. Stimulation of early embryonic development in the sheep by co-culture with oviduct epithelial cells. Journal of reproduction and fertility. 1987;81(1):23–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Holm P, Walker SK, Seamark RF. Embryo viability, duration of gestation and birth weight in sheep after transfer of in vitro matured and in vitro fertilized zygotes cultured in vitro or in vivo. Journal of reproduction and fertility. 1996;107(2):175–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Maxfield E, Sinclair K, Dolman D, Staines M, Maltin C. In vitro culture of sheep embryos increases weight, primary fiber size and secondary to primary fiber ratio in fetal muscle at day 61 of gestation. Theriogenology. 1997;1(47):376. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mussa A, Russo S, De Crescenzo A, et al. Prevalence of Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome in north west of Italy. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 2013;161(10):2481–2486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vermeiden JP, Bernardus RE. Are imprinting disorders more prevalent after human in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection? Fertility and sterility. March 1 2013;99(3):642–651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mussa A, Molinatto C, Cerrato F, et al. Assisted Reproductive Techniques and Risk of Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome. Pediatrics. Jul 2017;140(1). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gicquel C, Gaston V, Mandelbaum J, Siffroi JP, Flahault A, Le Bouc Y. In vitro fertilization may increase the risk of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome related to the abnormal imprinting of the KCN1OT gene. Am J Hum Genet. May 2003;72(5):1338–1341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Reik W, Brown KW, Schneid H, Le Bouc Y, Bickmore W, Maher ER. Imprinting mutations in the Beckwith—Wiedemann syndrome suggested by an altered imprinting pattern in the IGF2–H19 domain. Human molecular genetics. 1995;4(12):2379–2385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Henry I, Bonaiti-Pellie C, Chehensse V, et al. Uniparental paternal disomy in a genetic cancer-predisposing syndrome. Nature. 1991;351(6328):665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Waziri M, Patil SR, Hanson JW, Bartley JA. Abnormality of chromosome 11 in patients withfeatures of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. The Journal of pediatrics. 1983;102(6):873–876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schmutz SM. Deletion of chromosome 11 (p11p13) in a patient with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Clinical genetics. 1986;30(3):154–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Beygo J, Joksic I, Strom TM, et al. A maternal deletion upstream of the imprint control region 2 in 11p15 causes loss of methylation and familial Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2016;24(9):1280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Okano Y, Osasa Y, Yamamoto H, Hase Y, Tsuruhara T, Fujita H. An infant with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and chromosomal duplication 11p13→ pter.: Correlation of symptoms between 11p trisomy and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Journal of Human Genetics. 1986;31(4):365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Turleau C, de Grouchy J, Chavin-Colin F, Martelli H, Voyer M, Charlas R. Trisomy 11p15 and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. A report of two cases. Human genetics. 1984;67(2):219–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hatada I, Ohashi H, Fukushima Y, et al. An imprinted gene p57KIP2 is mutated in Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome. Nature genetics. 1996;14(2):171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Blake A, Pickford K, Greenaway S, et al. MouseBook: an integrated portal of mouse resources. Nucleic Acids Res. January 2010;38(Database issue):D593–599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chen Z, Hagen DE, Wang J, et al. Global assessment of imprinted gene expression in the bovine conceptus by next generation sequencing. Epigenetics. July 2 2016;11(7):501–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tian XC. Genomic imprinting in farm animals. Annual review of animal biosciences. February 2014;2:23–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Morison IM, Paton CJ, Cleverley SD. The imprinted gene and parent-of-origin effect database. Nucleic Acids Res. January 1 2001;29(1):275–276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Reik W, Walter J. Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2001;2(1):21–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lee MP, DeBaun MR, Mitsuya K, et al. Loss of imprinting of a paternally expressed transcript, with antisense orientation to KVLQT1, occurs frequently in Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome and is independent of insulin-like growth factor II imprinting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1999;96(9):5203–5208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Smilinich NJ, Day CD, Fitzpatrick GV, et al. A maternally methylated CpG island in KvLQT1 is associated with an antisense paternal transcript and loss of imprinting in Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1999;96(14):8064–8069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Horike S-i, Mitsuya K, Meguro M, et al. Targeted disruption of the human LIT1 locus defines a putative imprinting control element playing an essential role in Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome. Human Molecular Genetics. 2000;9(14):2075–2083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Brioude F, Lacoste A, Netchine I, et al. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: growth pattern and tumor risk according to molecular mechanism, and guidelines for tumor surveillance. Hormone research in paediatrics. 2013;80(6):457–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ibrahim A, Kirby G, Hardy C, et al. Methylation analysis and diagnostics of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome in 1,000 subjects. Clinical epigenetics. 2014;6(1):11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mussa A, Russo S, De Crescenzo A, et al. (Epi) genotype–phenotype correlations in Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2016;24(2):183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Carnwath J, Niemann H. Alterations in the relative abundance of gene transcripts in preimplantation bovine embryos cultured in medium supplemented with either serum or PVA. Molecular reproduction and development. 1999;53(1):8–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Keskintepe L, et al. Effects of culture system and protein supplementation on mRNA expression in pre-implantation bovine embryos. Human Reproduction. 2001;16(5):893–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rizos D, Lonergan P, Boland M, et al. Analysis of differential messenger RNA expression between bovine blastocysts produced in different culture systems: implications for blastocyst quality. Biology of reproduction. 2002;66(3):589–595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Rizos D, Gutierrez-Adan A, Perez-Garnelo S, De La Fuente J, Boland M, Lonergan P. Bovine embryo culture in the presence or absence of serum: implications for blastocyst development, cryotolerance, and messenger RNA expression. Biology of reproduction. 2003;68(1):236-243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rizos D, Fair T, Moreira P, Pintado B, Boland M, Lonergan P. Effect of speed of development on mRNA expression pattern in early bovine embryos cultured in vivo or in vitro. Molecular reproduction and development. 2004;68(4):441–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Corcoran D, Fair T, Park S, et al. Suppressed expression of genes involved in transcription and translation in in vitro compared with in vivo cultured bovine embryos. Reproduction (Cambridge, England). 2006;131(4):651–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Fair T, Carter F, Park S, Evans A, Lonergan P. Global gene expression analysis during bovine oocyte in vitro maturation. Theriogenology. 2007;68:S91–S97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Smith SL, Everts RE, Sung LY, et al. Gene expression profiling of single bovine embryos uncovers significant effects of in vitro maturation, fertilization and culture. Molecular reproduction and development. 2009;76(1):38–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Driver AM, Peñagaricano F, Huang W, et al. RNA-Seq analysis uncovers transcriptomic variations between morphologically similar in vivo-and in vitro-derived bovine blastocysts. BMC genomics. 2012;13(1):118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Chen Z, Hagen DE, Ji T, Elsik CG, Rivera RM. Global misregulation of genes largely uncoupled to DNA methylome epimutations characterizes a congenital overgrowth syndrome. Scientific reports. 2017;7(1):12667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Blondin P, Farin PW, Crosier AE, Alexander JE, Farin CE. In vitro production of embryos alters levels of insulin-like growth factor-II messenger ribonucleic acid in bovine fetuses 63 days after transfer. Biology of reproduction. 2000;62(2):384–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zaborski D, Grzesiak W, Szatkowska I, Dybus A, Muszynska M, Jedrzejczak M. Factors affecting dystocia in cattle. Reproduction in domestic animals. 2009;44(3):540–551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Holland M, Odde K. Factors affecting calf birth weight: a review. Theriogenology. 1992;38(5):769–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kamien B, Ronan A, Poke G, et al. A clinical review of generalized overgrowth syndromes in the era of massively parallel sequencing. Molecular syndromology. 2018;9(2):70–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kampmann U, Madsen LR, Skajaa GO, Iversen DS, Moeller N, Ovesen P. Gestational diabetes: A clinical update. World journal of diabetes. 2015;6(8):1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Bianci D, Crombleholme T, Dalton M, Malone F. Fetology: diagnosis and management of the fetal patient 2nd edition: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Foote R Factors affecting gestation length in dairy cattle. Theriogenology. 1981;15(6):553–559. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Shibata S, Ishihara M. Studies on hereditary defects in Japanese native cattle. Japan. J. Zoötech. Sci 1949;19:63. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Graves TK, Hansel W, Krook L. Prolonged gestation in a Holstein cow: adenohypophyseal aplasia and skeletal pathology in the offspring. The Cornell veterinarian. 1991;81(3):277–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Buczinski S, Bélanger AM, Fecteau G, Roy JP. Prolonged gestation in two Holstein cows: Transabdominal ultrasonographic findings in late pregnancy and pathologic findings in the fetuses. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A. 2007;54(10):624–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Cornillie PVDB W; Simoens P Prolonged gestation in two Belgian blue cows due to inherited adenohypophyseal hypoplasia in the fetuses. The Veterinary Record. 2007;161:388–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Constable PD, Hinchcliff KW, Done SH, Grünberg W. Veterinary medicine : A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs, and goats (Edition 11): Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Roberts SJ. Veterinary obstetrics and genital diseases (theriogenology) (Edition 2). Published by the Author and distributed by Edwards Brothers Inc, Ann Arbor, Michigan: 1971. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Brackett BG, Bousquet D, Boice ML, Donawick WJ, Evans JF, Dressel MA. Normal development following in vitro fertilization in the cow. Biol Reprod. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Hasler JF. Forty years of embryo transfer in cattle: a review focusing on the journal Theriogenology, the growth of the industry in North America, and personal reminisces. Theriogenology. January 1 2014;81(1):152–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Mee JF. Why Do So Many Calves Die on Modern Dairy Farms and What Can We Do about Calf Welfare in the Future? Animals : an open access journal from MDPI. November 4 2013;3(4):1036–1057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Mee JF, Sanchez-Miguel C, Doherty M. Influence of modifiable risk factors on the incidence of stillbirth/perinatal mortality in dairy cattle. Vet J January 2014;199(1):19–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Bicalho RC, Galvao KN, Cheong SH, Gilbert RO, Warnick LD, Guard CL. Effect of stillbirths on dam survival and reproduction performance in Holstein dairy cows. Journal of dairy science. June 2007;90(6):2797–2803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Bicalho RC, Galvao KN, Warnick LD, Guard CL. Stillbirth parturition reduces milk production in Holstein cows. Preventive veterinary medicine. April 17 2008;84(1–2):112–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES