Abstract
Squalene monooxygenase (SM) is a rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol synthesis. The region comprising the first 100 amino acids, termed SM N100, represents the shortest cholesterol-responsive degron and enables SM to sense excess cholesterol in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. Cholesterol accelerates the ubiquitination of SM by membrane-associated ring-CH type finger 6 (MARCH6), a key E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in ER-associated degradation. However, the ubiquitination site required for cholesterol regulation of SM N100 is unknown. Here, we used SM N100 fused to GFP as a model degron to recapitulate cholesterol-mediated SM degradation and show that neither SM lysine residues nor the N terminus impart instability. Instead, we discovered four serines (Ser-59, Ser-61, Ser-83, and Ser-87) that are critical for cholesterol-accelerated degradation, with MS analysis confirming Ser-83 as a ubiquitination site. Notably, these two clusters of closely spaced serine residues are located in disordered domains flanking a 12-amino acid-long amphipathic helix (residues Gln-62–Leu-73) that together confer cholesterol responsiveness. In summary, our findings reveal the degron architecture of SM N100, introducing the role of non-canonical ubiquitination sites and deepening our molecular understanding of how SM is degraded in response to cholesterol.
Keywords: cholesterol, cholesterol regulation, ubiquitin, protein degradation, endoplasmic-reticulum-associated protein degradation (ERAD), degron, lipid homeostasis, membrane-associated ring-CH-type finger 6 (MARCH6), SQLE, squalene monooxygenase
Introduction
Cholesterol synthesis is an important metabolic pathway implicated in many diseases. Dysregulation of cholesterol synthesis is a feature of numerous cancers (1, 2) and neurological disorders (3–5). Statins are used to lower cholesterol levels by inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, the first rate-limiting enzyme in this pathway (6, 7). The enzymes in cholesterol biosynthesis are regulated transcriptionally by the master transcription factor sterol regulatory element-binding protein-2 (8). Cells also utilize post-translational mechanisms to regulate de novo cholesterol biosynthesis, with sterols accelerating the degradation of at least three enzymes (9–12).
Squalene monooxygenase (SM)4 is the second rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol synthesis (10). Earlier research investigated SM as a pharmacological target for reducing cholesterol levels (13, 14). More recently, SQLE, the gene encoding SM, has gained attention as an oncogene. Its altered gene expression is associated with perturbed cholesterol homeostasis and tumor progression, prompting investigation of the therapeutic potential of SM in certain cancers (15–18). Given its biological significance in cholesterol homeostasis and disease, there is an increasing need to understand the regulatory mechanisms controlling SM. It is known that SM is degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system in response to excess cholesterol, and that the first 100 amino acids of SM (termed SM N100) are necessary for this to occur (10). When SM N100 is fused to GFP (SM N100-GFP), it confers the ability of normally stable GFP to be degraded by cholesterol, making this the shortest known transferrable cholesterol-regulated degron. SM N100 is anchored to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane via a re-entrant loop, which along with a 12-amino acid-long amphipathic helix (residues Gln-62–Leu-73) is needed to sense changes in cholesterol content of the ER (19–21).
The cholesterol-accelerated degradation of SM is part of a protein quality control process known as endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) (22). Efforts to dissect ERAD mechanisms often use model substrates such as the mammalian ERAD substrate, the T-cell receptor α-chain (TCRα) (23–25). However, the regulation of many ERAD substrates is perplexing given the diverse requirements of each substrate within the ERAD landscape (26). To add to the complexity, lysine ubiquitination is not always the main signal for degradation, with non-canonical ubiquitination on alternative residues being reported (27–31). This has been exemplified in a number of ERAD substrates (24, 32–34).
SM remains degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system under excess cholesterol conditions even when all lysine residues in the SM N100 degron are mutated (10). The only reported SM N100 ubiquitination site is Lys-90 (35–41). As lysine residues do not mediate degradation of SM, it seems likely that alternative non-lysine sites are ubiquitinated, such as the α-NH2 group at the N terminus (31) or on the side chains of serine, cysteine, or threonine residues (30).
Here, we uncovered four key serine residues required for the cholesterol-accelerated degradation of SM N100. These serine sites are also essential for degradation by membrane-associated ring-CH-type finger 6 (MARCH6), the E3 ubiquitin ligase for SM N100. Furthermore, the degradation of SM N100 requires Ube2J2, an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme reported to facilitate serine and threonine ubiquitination through hydroxyester linkage (42). Using MS, we identified a new ubiquitination site on Ser-83. Our current findings identify SM N100 as a cholesterol-regulated ERAD substrate, which is ubiquitinated on accessible serine residues situated on either side of the amphipathic helix of SM N100.
Results
The N terminus and lysine residues are dispensable for SM N100 cholesterol-accelerated degradation
We have previously shown that SM N100 is degraded via the ubiquitin-proteasome system when excess cholesterol is present, even when all five lysine residues (Lys-15, Lys-16, Lys-82, Lys-90, and Lys-100) have been substituted with arginine (10). Here, we confirm our findings with this lysine-less construct (Fig. 1A, left) but importantly include quantification (Fig. 1, B and C).
Figure 1.
Lysine residues and the N terminus are not key ubiquitination sites in the cholesterol-accelerated degradation of SM N100. A, lysine (K) residues were mutated to arginine (R), with the amino acid position numbers of SM N100 indicated in the lysine-less (K-less) construct (left). A bulky mCherry protein was cloned onto the N terminus of SM N100 (right). B and D, CHO-7 cells transiently expressing SM N100 constructs were tested for cholesterol regulation as described under “Experimental procedures” (n = 3–4). C and E, densitometric quantification of the Western blots in B and D. Graphs show mean ± S.E. (n = 3–4), *, p < 0.05, or **, p < 0.01.
Because lysine sites are not crucial for cholesterol-accelerated degradation of SM N100, we hypothesized that SM N100 undergoes non-canonical ubiquitination. Non-canonical residues that can be ubiquitinated include serine, threonine, cysteine, and the free α-NH2 group at the N terminus (30, 31). We generated a construct where mCherry was introduced to sterically hinder the N terminus of SM N100 (Fig. 1A, right), thus impairing potential N-terminal ubiquitination. Introducing this bulky tag resulted in slight blunting (24%) of cholesterol regulation of SM N100 but no change in protein expression when comparing untreated conditions (Fig. 1, D and E). We therefore concluded that the internal lysine residues and the N terminus are not major ubiquitination sites necessary for cholesterol to accelerate degradation of SM N100.
SM N100 cholesterol-accelerated degradation requires serine residues located in the second half
Aside from the N terminus, the only other known non-canonical ubiquitination sites are serine, threonine, and cysteine residues (Fig. 2A). We hypothesized that it is likely that SM N100 is ubiquitinated at more than one non-canonical site, as observed in other ERAD substrates (24, 32, 34). To test this, we mutated clusters of serines, threonines, or cysteines to alanine. We first generated five main cluster mutants (T3A/T9A/T11A, S43A/C46A, S59A/S61A, S67A/S71A, and S83A/S87A) (Fig. 2A). Residues Thr-22 and Cys-31 were not included in the mutations given they are embedded in the ER membrane (20) and hence likely to be inaccessible for ubiquitination. SM N100 mutants of the initial five clusters (Fig. 2A, T3A/T9A/T11A, S43A/C46A, S59A/S61A, S67A/S71A, and S83A/S87A, construct 1–5) showed no change in cholesterol regulation (Fig. 2, B and C). We next combined mutations of multiple clusters and observed eight mutants of SM N100 showed loss of cholesterol regulation to varying degrees (Fig. 2, B and C, construct 7–9 and 11–15). Five mutants also displayed increased protein expression (Fig. 2, B and C, construct 7 and 12–15).
Figure 2.
Serine residues in SM 100 are required for the cholesterol-accelerated degradation of SM N100. A, schematic of the SM N100 degron topology in the ER membrane. SM N100 possesses numerous potential ubiquitination sites including five lysine (K) residues, three threonine (T) residues, seven serine (S) residues, one cysteine (C) residue, and the free N terminus. The site-directed mutagenesis mutants generated are listed in the table (right) and are given a construct number. The initial five clusters are numbered from 1 to 5 (left), before then combined to generate more mutations (right). A schematic of blue (indicating native unmutated residue cluster residues) and yellow (mutated cluster residues to alanine) is presented for identifying which clusters are mutated in the constructs used. B, CHO-7 cells transiently expressing SM N100 constructs were tested for cholesterol regulation as described under “Experimental procedures” (n = 3–7). The five boxes below each of the construct correspond to the scheme in A. C, densitometric quantification of the Western blots in B. Graphs show mean ± S.E. (n = 3–7), *, p < 0.05, or **, p < 0.01. The blue and yellow schematic is the same as in A and B. D, data for cholesterol regulation from C was analyzed and represented as residue effects on cholesterol regulation. On the x axis, clusters were removed one at a time to observe what effect it has on cholesterol regulation. Losing residues Ser-59 and Ser-61 (S59/S61), for example, has the greatest effect on cholesterol regulation. The numbers on the bars represent the number of independent experiments (see “Experimental procedures” for a more detailed description of data presentation).
Next, we pooled the data to deduce the contribution of these five clusters to cholesterol regulation. Overall, losing residues Ser-59 and Ser-61 from any construct resulted in the greatest loss of cholesterol regulation (Fig. 2D, −S59/S61). Ser-67, Ser-71, Ser-83, and Ser-87 also contributed to cholesterol regulation although to a lesser extent than that of Ser-59 and Ser-61 (Fig. 2D). Here, our observations reveal serine residues in the second half of SM N100 are necessary for the cholesterol-accelerated degradation of SM N100.
MARCH6 degradation of SM N100 is impeded by loss of serine residues
MARCH6 is the E3 ubiquitin ligase that degrades SM and SM N100-GFP, indicating that MARCH6 must ubiquitinate the SM N100 degron (22). We next determined if the SM N100 serine mutants are still regulated by MARCH6. If the identified serine residues required for cholesterol-accelerated degradation of SM N100 (Fig. 2) are indeed ubiquitination sites, MARCH6 may target these serine residues. We initially investigated three main constructs. We compared a mutant containing serine, threonine, and cysteine point mutations in the first half of SM N100 (Fig. 3A, construct 6) with a mutant having serine to alanine point mutations in the second half (Fig. 3A, construct 12). We also included an SM N100 mutant with all 11 potential non-canonical ubiquitination sites replaced with alanine (Fig. 3A, construct 15). This allowed us to discriminate whether functional non-canonical ubiquitination sites existed in the first half, second half, or in the entire SM N100 degron.
Figure 3.
Serine to alanine mutations in the second half of SM N100 blunt MARCH6-dependent degradation. A and B, CHO-7 cells transiently expressing SM N100 constructs were tested for MARCH6 regulation as described under “Experimental procedures” (n = 3–5). Densitometric quantification of the Western blots are presented as mean ± S.E. (n = 3–5), *, p < 0.05, or **, p < 0.01. The five boxes below each of the construct correspond to the color scheme in Fig. 2A.
To this end, we co-transfected SM N100 mutants with siRNA targeting MARCH6. When MARCH6 is knocked down, this increases SM N100 WT protein levels, indicating rescue. When all potential non-canonical ubiquitination sites were mutated to alanine within the first half of SM N100, MARCH6 knockdown still increased SM N100 protein levels, indicated by the unchanged MARCH6 response (Fig. 3A, construct 6). Serine to alanine replacement in the second half of SM N100 resulted in a minimal increase in protein levels when MARCH6 was knocked down, as demonstrated by reduction of the MARCH6 response (Fig. 3A, construct 12). When all serine, threonine, and cysteine residues were mutated to alanine, the MARCH6 response was also reduced (Fig. 3A, construct 15).
The serine residues in the second half disrupts MARCH6 regulation (Fig. 3A), suggesting that the ubiquitination sites are more likely to be in the second half of SM N100, rather than the first half. We have shown there are other SM N100 mutants lacking cholesterol regulation and hypothesized these mutants may also exhibit perturbed MARCH6 regulation. We tested three such mutants, which are L42A, F35A/S37A/L65A/I69A, and the amphipathic helix deletion (ΔGln-62–Leu-73) (21). When MARCH6 is knocked down, these mutants showed a blunted response (Fig. 3B). These findings suggest that these mutated sites (Fig. 3, A and B) impede MARCH6 degradation of SM N100 and may have functional roles in regulating distinct steps of degradation, including ubiquitination.
Distinct serine requirement of full-length SM and SM N80
To further narrow down which serine residues in the second half of SM N100 are critical for cholesterol-accelerated degradation, we utilized SM N80 (encoding the first 80 amino acids of SM) fused to GFP, which remains responsive to cholesterol (21) (Fig. 4A). SM N80 excludes residues 81 to 100 of SM N100, therefore missing Ser-83, Ser-87, and Lys-90. Lys-90 is a reported ubiquitination site (35–41) that is not needed for the cholesterol-accelerated degradation of SM or SM N100 (10, 21). Using this construct, we have a minimal protein that is still degraded in response to excess cholesterol, further ruling out a role for the Lys-90 ubiquitination site.
Figure 4.
SM N80 and SM cholesterol-accelerated degradation rely on different sets of serine residues. A, in the cholesterol responsive (left) section are constructs known to retain cholesterol regulation. In the unknown cholesterol response (right) section are sites of interests where alanine mutations are introduced. B and D, CHO-7 cells transiently expressing SM N80 and SM constructs were tested for cholesterol regulation as described under “Experimental procedures” (n = 3–5). C and E, densitometric quantification of the Western blots in B and D are presented as mean ± S.E. (n = 3–5), *, p < 0.05, or **, p < 0.01.
Here, we investigated how mutating the remaining available serine residues, Ser-59, Ser-61, Ser-67, and Ser-71, to alanine would affect cholesterol regulation (Fig. 4A). Introducing S67A/S71A (construct 4) mutations alone did not affect SM N80 cholesterol regulation (Fig. 4, B and C). In contrast, SM N80 S59A/S61A (construct 3) displayed blunted cholesterol regulation and SM N80 S59A/S61A/S67A/S71A (construct 9) showed a similar loss of cholesterol regulation, suggesting S59A/S61A are the key residues (Fig. 4, B and C). Unlike the SM N80 S59A/S61A mutant (construct 3), when Ser-59/Ser-61/Ser-83/Ser-87 (construct 11) were mutated to alanine in SM N100, the SM N100 S59A/S61A/S83A/87A mutant showed less blunting of cholesterol regulation and an increase in protein expression (Fig. 2, B and C, construct 11). Collectively, our data from SM N100 and SM N80 narrow down our search for potential ubiquitination sites to four serine residues, Ser-59, Ser-61, Ser-83, and Ser-87.
We next asked whether the effects from the stabilizing mutations identified from SM N100 and SM N80 could be transferred to full-length SM. We introduced mutations S59A/S61A/S83A/S87A into full-length SM, but the protein expression and cholesterol regulation remained unchanged (data not shown). However, replacing all the threonine, cysteine, and serine residues to alanine (Fig. 4A) in the first 100 amino acids of full-length SM (except Thr-22 and Cys-31, which are buried in the ER membrane) significantly blunted cholesterol regulation without any change in protein expression (Fig. 4, D and E). In conclusion, full-length SM requires more than the four critical serine residues identified in SM N100 for cholesterol-accelerated degradation. Seven additional residues in the N-terminal domain (Thr-3, Thr-9, Thr-11, Ser-43, Cys-46, Ser-67, and Ser-71) may also be needed.
Evidence of serine ubiquitination from destabilizing effects of Ube2J2 and MS
In yeast, the E3 ubiquitin ligase Doa10 cooperates with two E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, Ubc6 and Ubc7, to ubiquitinate ERAD substrates (43–45). MARCH6 is the human ortholog of yeast Doa10 (46), whereas Ube2J2 and Ube2G2 are the human orthologs of yeast Ubc6 and Ubc7, respectively (47, 48). During this study, two independent groups showed that Ube2J2 is needed to degrade endogenous full-length SM (49, 50). Given that both human Ube2J2 and yeast Ubc6 have been shown to attach ubiquitin on serine residues (42, 51), we hypothesized Ube2J2 regulates SM by targeting the SM N100 degron through serine ubiquitination.
We co-transfected Ube2J2 constructs with SM N100-GFP-V5 and assessed how these impact SM N100 (Fig. 5A). Upon overexpression of the catalytically inactive Ube2J2 C94S mutant (52), SM N100 levels increased. We also performed immunoprecipitation of cells stably overexpressing SM N100 after cholesterol treatment and analyzed the products using MS. We identified a tryptic peptide where Ser-83 was modified with a diglycine remnant, confirming our hypothesis of ester-linked ubiquitin to serine residues (Fig. 5B). Taken together, we demonstrate that serine ubiquitination occurs on SM N100, with Ube2J2 being the likely E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme mediating this process.
Figure 5.
SM N100 is regulated by Ube2J2 and serine ubiquitination. A, CHO-7 cells were transfected for 24 h with the indicated constructs. The asterisk (*) denotes a nonspecific band from the anti-FLAG antibody and the black triangle is pointed at the band of interest. Densitometric quantification of the Western blotting is presented as mean ± S.E. (n = 3), *, p < 0.05. B, when subjected to higher-energy collisional dissociation, dissociation of the doubly charged diglycine-modified tryptic peptide S(GlyGly)PPESENKEQLEAR, observed at m/z 864.4136, and identified with a Mascot ion score of 55 and expectation value of 1.2 × 10−4 (above), matches that of the doubly charged unmodified tryptic peptide SPPESENKEQLEAR, observed at m/z 807.3921 and identified with a Mascot ion score of 99 and expectation value of 4.1 × 10−9 (below). Precursor ions and product ions with m/z values matching those of theoretical b and y ions (±40 ppm) are annotated in each spectrum.
Human SM N100 serine residues confer instability to chicken SM N100
We previously investigated the conservation of SM N100 in other species including chicken, zebrafish, and lamprey (21). We reported chicken SM N100 is not cholesterol regulated and showed high protein expression (21). We were interested to see if the serine residues in human SM N100 were conserved in chicken SM N100, particularly those influencing protein levels and cholesterol regulation (Figs. 2 and 4). Focusing on the second half of SM N100, the human residues Ser-59, Ser-61, Ser-83, and Ser-87 are Gln-58, Pro-60, Pro-82, and Ser-87 in the corresponding chicken SM N100 sequence (Fig. 6A). Because Ser-59, Ser-61, Ser-83, and Ser-87 are required for cholesterol regulation in human SM N100 (Fig. 4B), we questioned if chicken SM N100 was not regulated due to the lack of three of these four critical serine residues.
Figure 6.
Serine residues in human SM N100 confer instability to chicken SM N100. A, first 100 amino acids of human and chicken were aligned with Geneious 9.1.5 using default settings. Black shades indicate identical residues and gray shades indicate similarity as determined by Blosum62 score matrix with a threshold of 1. The red asterisks indicate the four residues of interest that were identified as critical in human SM N100. B, CHO-7 cells transiently expressing SM N100 constructs were tested for cholesterol regulation as described under “Experimental procedures” (n = 7–14). C, densitometric quantification of the Western blotting in B is presented as mean ± S.E. (n = 3–5), *, p < 0.05, or **, p < 0.01. D, helical wheel representations of amphipathic helices generated from HeliQuest. The arrows indicate the magnitude and direction of the hydrophobic moment. The hydrophobicity (H) and hydrophobic moment (μH) from HeliQuest are also shown. E, heat map shows frequency of each residue in SM N100 being assigned as part of a disordered region. More yellow refers to the higher frequency the residue has been assigned as disordered, whereas black refers to lower frequency. Red arrows point to residues Ser-59, Ser-61, Ser-83, and Ser-87, the four critical residues identified in this study. The heat map in the lower part is a closer view of residues 50 to 100, compared with the upper part, which is a view of the entire SM N100.
A recurring theme in degrons is that the degradation properties should be transferable (53). We therefore mutated chicken SM N100 residues Gln-58, Pro-60, and Pro-82 to serine residues. Interestingly, there was a stepwise reduction of protein levels in the serine mutants of chicken SM N100 (Fig. 6, B and C). However, these new serine sites were not sufficient to enable cholesterol regulation of chicken SM N100 to the same extent as that of human SM N100 WT. Therefore, our findings show the serine residues confer instability to chicken SM N100, which normally exhibits a 3–4–fold increase in protein levels relative to human SM N100.
Given residues Gln-62–Leu-73 form an amphipathic helix essential for cholesterol regulation in our human SM N100 model (21), we reasoned the lack of cholesterol regulation in chicken SM N100 may be due to differences in this region. A closer examination revealed the hydrophobicity and hydrophobic moment of this region does not differ greatly between the two species (Fig. 6D). If chicken SM N100 also forms an amphipathic helix in this region, we postulate that the lack of cholesterol regulation in chicken SM N100 may be a result of sequence differences when comparing the helices between two species.
Of note, serine clusters Ser-59, Ser-61, Ser-83, and Ser-87 are situated near the amphipathic helix. Disordered regions are considered important structural elements in degrons (54–57). We next examined SM N100 using 13 disordered predictors and presented the data as the number of times a residue was predicted to be present in a disordered region. The second half of SM N100 was more frequently identified as being disordered than the first half. Our residues of interest, Ser-59, Ser-61, Ser-83, and Ser-87, were also found to be disordered, based on 5 to 9 different predictors depending on the serine (Fig. 6E). Taken together, we have identified four regulatory serine residues, Ser-59, Ser-61, Ser-83, and Ser-87, which are part of a disordered region, with Ser-83 being a confirmed ubiquitination site.
Discussion
In this study, we sought to understand the ubiquitination events occurring during the cholesterol-accelerated degradation of SM. Our earlier work provided considerable insights (20, 21) into how cholesterol regulates conformational changes in SM N100 leading to proteasomal degradation, but the essential ubiquitination residues have eluded us until now.
The most striking discovery in this study is that the cholesterol-accelerated degradation of SM N100 depends on non-lysine residues, specifically serines. We identified four serines in the second half of SM N100 (Ser-59, Ser-61, Ser-83, and Ser-87) that are important for cholesterol regulation. These residues are situated in disordered regions on either side of the amphipathic helix (Gln-62–Leu-73) of SM N100 (Fig. 6E). Because disordered regions are implicated in proteasomal degradation (54–57) and serines are disorder-promoting residues (58), these serines may also contribute to the degron through increasing disorder.
Direct evidence for serine ubiquitination using MS is scarce in the literature. Although indirect, mutagenesis has proved useful in identifying non-canonical ubiquitination in several ERAD substrates (24, 30, 32–34), yet none of these include components of the complex cholesterol homeostatic machinery that resides in the ER. Using MS, we identified ubiquitination at Ser-83 (Fig. 5B), making SM the first reported protein in the cholesterol homeostatic machinery to undergo serine ubiquitination. Our MS experiments revealed Ser-83 ubiquitination was sub-stochiometric. Although we were unable to obtain mass spectrometric evidence for ubiquitination of Ser-59, Ser-61, and Ser-87, ubiquitination of these residues certainly cannot be ruled out. Sensitivity is one issue but also of note, the tryptic peptides covering Ser-59 and Ser-61 are too long (26 amino acids) to be identified using conventional proteomic approaches.
The regulatory serine residues (Ser-59, Ser-61, Ser-83, and Ser-87) are conserved in mammalian SM N100 (10), but only one is conserved in chicken SM N100 (Fig. 6A), which lacks cholesterol regulation (21). Introducing serine residues into chicken SM N100 progressively decreases protein levels but does not affect cholesterol regulation (Fig. 6, B and C), implying that the nature of the amphipathic helix is also important. Perhaps the gain of serine residues in SM N100 during evolution has allowed the emergence of more exquisite regulated protein degradation to help fine-tune cholesterol homeostasis.
The degradation machinery regulating yeast and mammalian SM is evolutionarily conserved. Ube2J2 and MARCH6 are needed for degradation of SM (22, 49, 50). The yeast orthologs of Ube2J2 and MARCH6 are Ubc6 (47) and Doa10 (43, 46), which are required for degrading yeast SM (commonly known as Erg1) (45). However, there are differences in the degron architecture. Yeast SM lacks the N100 region of mammalian SM (10). The proposed ubiquitinated residue, Lys-311, essential for ERAD of yeast SM (45), is not conserved as it corresponds to His-384 in human SM. Mutating conserved lysine residues into arginine in human full-length SM does not prevent SM cholesterol-accelerated degradation (10). Although the degradation machinery is conserved, adaptations were possibly required to deal with the more sophisticated substrate in mammals with its additional regulatory domain (SM N100).
If the identified serine residues (Ser-59, Ser-61, Ser-83, and Ser-87) can each be ubiquitinated by MARCH6, how is site selectivity achieved? Different E3 ubiquitin ligases have distinct mechanisms to select residues for ubiquitination (59–62). With 14 predicted transmembrane domains (63), MARCH6 is likely to have substantial contact with membrane-bound SM N100, allowing multiple ubiquitination events on the closely gathered critical serine residues. As E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes are essential binding partners of the E3 ubiquitin ligases (64, 65), interaction between MARCH6 and Ube2J2 may influence site selectivity for ubiquitination. Further biochemical and structural studies are needed, and these may reveal general mechanistic features applicable to other substrates in ERAD.
Considering that we lack direct evidence for ubiquitination of Ser-59, Ser-61, and Ser-87, could these residues perhaps play another role in facilitating degradation? For example, serine residues can be phosphorylated and in the case of phosphodegrons can cross-talk with ubiquitination to regulate substrate degradation (66–68). In silico predictions revealed Ser-59 and Ser-83 are putative phosphorylation sites for four kinases, protein kinase A, CaMKII, AMP-activated protein kinase, and glycogen synthase kinase 3β. Preliminary experiments revealed that inhibiting these kinases individually does not affect SM N100-GFP-V5 protein levels or cholesterol-accelerated degradation (data not shown). The catalytic activity of some cholesterol synthesis enzymes is regulated by phosphorylation (69–71), although it is not immediately obvious how phosphorylation on the SM N100 regulatory domain would affect SM catalytic activity.
The newly identified regulatory serine residues are unlikely to have major effects on the interaction between MARCH6 and SM N100. A construct expressing the second half of SM N100 (SM N100 Δ48) cannot be rescued with MARCH6 knockdown (data not shown), indicating MARCH6-binding sites may be present in the first half of SM N100. This suggests our serine residues in the second half are unlikely to be critical for MARCH6 binding beyond ubiquitination.
SM N100 requires four critical serine residues for cholesterol-accelerated degradation (Fig. 2), whereas full-length SM seems to require more residues (Fig. 4, D and E). Substituting the catalytic domain of SM with GFP may have placed SM N100 in a slightly different context for ubiquitination. However, both SM N100 and full-length SM are degraded by MARCH6 during cholesterol excess (22). Perhaps SM N100-GFP is more readily ubiquitinated than full-length SM, suggesting the catalytic domain may hinder ubiquitination to some extent.
It is unlikely that Ser-59, Ser-61, Ser-67, Ser-71, Ser-83, and Ser-87 bind to cholesterol directly as these residues are in the cytosol (20). Ser-67 and Ser-71 are located in the amphipathic helix, but like most amphipathic helices, it probably does not bury itself deeply enough to strongly bind to cholesterol (72–74). Structural insights of SM N100 would reveal if the re-entrant loop and amphipathic helix form favorable cholesterol contacts, or if cholesterol binding could even occur outside the ER membrane. In addition, use of a cholesterol probe and MS (75, 76) may reveal the cholesterol-binding sites in SM N100.
In conclusion, we identified key serine residues, Ser-59, Ser-61, Ser-83, and Ser-87, which are likely to act as serine ubiquitination sites governing the cholesterol-accelerated degradation of SM, a rate-limiting enzyme important in disease (77–79) and biotechnology (80, 81). This work advances our understanding of degron architecture and provides a model whereby excess cholesterol deforms the SM N100 amphipathic helix, adding to the disorder of the flanking regions where the key serines reside, allowing these residues to be ubiquitinated by MARCH6 (Fig. 7). We have built on our previous findings (20, 21) to enrich our understanding of how cells respond to excess cholesterol, introducing a role for serine ubiquitination in the interplay between membrane cholesterol sensing and regulated protein degradation.
Figure 7.
Current model of cholesterol-accelerated degradation of SM N100. SM N100 senses cholesterol levels in the ER membrane via a re-entrant loop and an amphipathic helix. With excess cholesterol, the amphipathic helix is pushed out of the ER membrane, exposing a hydrophobic patch contributing to increased disorder. The lengthened disordered region includes residues Ser-59, Ser-61, Ser-83, and Ser-87 (in yellow stars), which may all serve as ubiquitination sites, although Ser-83 was the only non-canonical ubiquitination site formally identified in this work. The MARCH6 E3 ubiquitin ligase most likely ubiquitinates Ser-83, and perhaps also Ser-59, Ser-61, and Ser-87, to mediate the cholesterol-accelerated degradation of the SM N100 degron.
Experimental procedures
Cell culture
Cells were maintained as monolayers at 37 °C in 5% CO2. CHO-7 cells were cultured and maintained in DMEM/Ham's F-12 medium supplemented with 5% (v/v) lipoprotein-deficient serum, penicillin (100 units/ml), and streptomycin (100 μg/ml). HEK-293 Flp-InTM T-RExTM cells stably expressing SM N100-GFP-V5 (HEK-SM N100-GFP-V5) (22) were cultured and maintained in DMEM (high-glucose) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum, 200 μg/ml of hygromycin B, and penicillin (100 units/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml).
Cholesterol and MARCH6 regulation
For plasmid transfections in 6-well plates, cells were transfected for 24 h with 0.75 μg of pTK-empty vector plasmid DNA and 0.25 μg of expression plasmid DNA using 1.5 μl of Lipofectamine 3000 and 2 μl of P3000 reagent. For siRNA and plasmid co-transfections in 6-well plates, cells were transfected for 24 h with 0.75 μg of pTK-empty vector DNA, 0.25 μg of expression plasmid DNA, and 25 nm siRNA using 4.5 μl of Lipofectamine 2000. All transfection components in 12-well plates are the same as 6-well plates except the amount for each component was reduced by 2.5 times. All transfections were performed in maintenance media lacking penicillin and streptomycin. After 24 h transfection, CHO-7 cells were pre-treated in maintenance media containing compactin (5 μm) and mevalonate (50 μm) overnight to reduce basal cholesterol status. Cells were then treated with cholesterol complexed with methyl-β-cyclodextrin (CD) (20 μg of cholesterol/ml) for 8 h before harvesting cell lysates. The complexing process was performed as described previously (82). Cells were then harvested as described under “Western blotting.”
Ube2J2 overexpression
For plasmid transfections in 6-well plates, cells were transfected for 24 h with 0.10 μg of pTK-empty vector plasmid DNA, 0.15 μg of Ube2J2-FLAG plasmids (a kind gift from Dr. John V (Eoin) Fleming, University College Cork, Ireland), and 0.75 μg of pTK-SM N100-GFP-V5 plasmid, using 1.5 μl of Lipofectamine 3000 and 2 μl of P3000 reagent. After 24 h transfection, cells were then harvested as described under “Western blotting.”
Western blotting
Lysates from transiently transfected cells were harvested by scraping in 2% SDS lysis buffer (2% (w/v) SDS, 10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 100 mm NaCl) supplemented with protease inhibitors. Cells were passed 20 times through a 21-gauge needle and then vortexed for 20 min at room temperature. Protein concentration was quantified using the bicinchoninic acid assay (Thermo Fisher) and normalized. Lysates were equally loaded for SDS-PAGE separation and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5% (w/v) skim milk/PBST and probed with mouse anti-V5 (1:5,000 dilution in 5% (w/v) skim milk/PBST; Life Technologies, Inc., catalog number R960-25), mouse anti-FLAG (1:10,000 dilution in 5% (w/v) BSA/PBST; Merck, catalog number F3165), and rabbit anti-β-tubulin (1:2,500 dilution in 5% (w/v) BSA/PBST; Abcam, ab6046). After incubations with primary antibodies, blots were incubated with IRDye® 680RD donkey anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000 dilution in 5% (w/v) skim milk/PBST; LI-COR, product number 925-68073) and IRDye® 800CW donkey anti-mouse IgG (1:10,000 dilution in 5% (w/v) skim milk/PBST; LI-COR, product number 926-32212). Membranes were then visualized using the Odyssey CLx (LI-COR). Western blots were quantified by densitometry using Image Studio Lite (version 5.2.5). Locations of molecular mass standards are indicated on the blots.
Immunoprecipitation for ubiquitination site determination via MS
HEK-SM N100-GFP-V5 cells were pre-treated in DMEM (high-glucose) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf lipoprotein–deficient serum, penicillin (100 units/ml), and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) containing compactin (5 μm) and mevalonate (50 μm) overnight to reduce basal cholesterol status. Cells were then treated with cholesterol complexed with CD (20 μg of cholesterol/ml) and 10 μm MG132 for 8 h before harvesting cell lysates. Cells were scraped in cold PBS and pelleted by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Pellets were lysed in RIPA buffer (20 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.1% (w/v) SDS, 1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mm NaCl, 5 mm EDTA, and 1 mm sodium orthovanadate) containing 10 mm N-ethylmaleimide, 10 μm MG132, and cOmpleteTM ULTRA Protease Inhibitor Mixture Tablets (1 tablet per 10 ml of RIPA buffer). Lysates were passed 40 times through a 22-gauge needle, then centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. Supernatant protein concentration was quantified using the bicinchoninic acid assay. Normalized supernatant was immunoprecipitated for 16–18 h at 4 °C with anti-V5 conjugated to magnetic Dynabeads Protein G. Beads were washed 3 times with RIPA buffer by rotating at 4 °C. Bound proteins were eluted by boiling beads at 95 °C for 10 min in elution buffer (1 × Laemmli sample buffer, 0.4 × RIPA buffer, 4% (w/v) SDS). Eluted proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by staining with EZ-RunTM Protein Gel Staining Solution to visualize bands prior to proteolytic peptide sample preparation.
Proteolytic peptide sample preparation
Gel lanes were excised into 6 slices according to protein mass, which were destained, reduced, and alkylated following standard procedures (83) with the following alteration: alkylation was performed using 50 mm chloroacetamide instead of iodoacetamide, thereby avoiding the generation of lysine adducts that mimic diglycine ubiquitin remnants (84). In-gel tryptic digestions and peptide extractions were performed following procedures described previously (85). Peptide extraction solutions were dried in a SpeedVacTM (Thermo Scientific) and reconstituted in 20 μl of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid.
Mass spectrometry
Proteolytic peptide samples were subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis on a Tribrid Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) interfaced with an UltiMate 3000 HPLC and autosampler system (Dionex, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Proteolytic peptides were separated by nano-LC following conditions as described previously (86), and eluting peptides were ionized using positive ion mode nano-ESI as described previously (87).
Survey scans m/z 350–1500 (MS AGC, = 4 × 105, maximum injection time = 50 ms) were recorded in the orbitrap (resolution = 120,000 at m/z 200). Peptide ions (>2.5 × 104 counts, charge states +2 to +5) were sequentially selected for MS/MS using an inclusion list employed with open retention time windows (discussed below) followed by data-dependent acquisition, with the total number of dependent scans maximized within 2-s cycle times. Product ions were generated via higher energy collision energy and mass analyzed in the orbitrap using the following parameters: higher energy collision energy = 30; maximum injection time = 250 ms; orbitrap resolution = 30,000 at m/z 200; MSn AGC = 5 × 104; inject ions for all available parallelizable time enabled; 1 microscan collected per scan; and monoisotopic precursor selection placed in peptide mode. Dynamic exclusion was enabled and set to: n times = 1, exclusion duration 20 s, ±10 ppm. To enhance signal-to-noise ratios in MS/MS spectra collected from targeted ions, additional experiments were performed as above with the following alterations: peptide ions were selected for MS/MS using an inclusion list only and 2 microscans were collected per MS/MS scan.
To preferentially target peptides with potential diglycine mass shifts for MS/MS, inclusion lists were generated with the aid of the MS-Digest utility (University of California, San Francisco). Theoretical m/z values were calculated for singly charged tryptic SM N100 peptide ions (with up to 2 missed cleavages), from which all possible combinations of diglycine mass shifts (+114.0429 Da) on serine, lysine, cysteine, and threonine residues were added. For these modified peptide ions, theoretical m/z values for ions of charge states +2 to +4 were calculated. Values falling in the range m/z 350–1500 were incorporated into the inclusion lists used in the LC-MS/MS experiments described above.
Sequence database searches
Sequence database searches were performed using the Proteome Discoverer mass informatics platform (version 1.4, Thermo Scientific), using the search program Mascot (versions 2.5, Matrix Science). Peak lists derived from LC-MS/MS were searched using the following parameters: instrument type was ESI-TRAP; precursor ion and peptide fragment mass tolerances were ±5 ppm and ±0.02 Da, respectively; variable modifications included in each search were GlyGly (S) and GlyGly (K); additional variable modifications included in separate searches were carbamidomethyl (C), oxidation (M), GlyGly (C), and GlyGly (T); enzyme specificity was trypsin with up to 2 missed cleavages; and the UniProt database (September 2018 release, 558,125 sequence entries) was searched using human sequences only.
Bioinformatics predictions and sequence alignments
Sequence alignments were generated using Geneious 9.1.5 with default settings (88). Helical wheel diagrams were generated using HeliQuest (89). To identify disordered regions, a total of 13 predictors obtained from DisEMBL (90), DISOPRED3 (91), DisProt (92), GlobPlot2.3 (58), IUPred (93), PONDR (94–96), and PrDOS (97) were used to analyze the SM N100-GFP sequence.
Data presentation and statistical analysis
Relative protein levels for all SM N100, full-length SM, and chicken SM N100 constructs were determined by normalizing to WT (human SM N100 or human full-length SM), which was set to 1. So, for instance, a value of 2 would indicate the construct had double the protein level of WT (human SM N100 or human full-length SM).
Cholesterol regulation was given as the proportion of protein degraded for each construct, normalized to the proportion of protein degraded for WT, which was set to 1. Values approaching 0 on the cholesterol regulation scale indicate little or no cholesterol regulation, which means no degradation in the presence of excess cholesterol. A value closer to 1 would indicate similar levels of degradation in the presence of excess cholesterol when compared with WT (human SM N100 or human full-length SM).
For contribution of residues to cholesterol regulation (Fig. 2D), these data were generated using data collected to produce cholesterol regulation comparisons (Fig. 2C). The values are presented in an opposite manner, in that the data are presented as 1 minus cholesterol regulation values (Fig. 2C). In this scale (Fig. 2D), higher values mean the protein is not degraded effectively in the presence of excess cholesterol. Lower values approaching 0 mean more degradation in the presence of excess cholesterol. On the x axis, the pooled data refers to cholesterol regulation data containing one of the initial five alanine cluster mutations generated (T3A/T9A/T11A, cluster 1; S43A/C46A, cluster 2; S59A/S61A, cluster 3; S67A/S71A, cluster 4; S83A/S87A, cluster 5). For instance, Thr-3/Thr-9/Thr-11 (black bar) in the pooled section represents cholesterol regulation data from constructs whereby Thr-3/Thr-9/Thr-11 have been changed to alanine. These are those from constructs 1, 6, 7, 13, and 15. Similarly, Ser-59/Ser-61 (red bar) in the pooled section refers to cholesterol regulation data from constructs where Ser-59/Ser-61 have been changed to alanine. The number on top of each bar refers to the number of independent experimental data points available. For the minus sections on the x axis, this is the pooled data minus constructs harboring mutations of one of the initial five clusters generated. For instance, minus Thr-3/Thr-9/Thr-11 means data from constructs where Thr-3/Thr-9/Thr-11 have been changed to alanine (constructs 1, 6, 7, 13, and 15) are excluded. Thus, all data obtained from Thr-3/Thr-9/Thr-11 containing alanine mutations is omitted from the cholesterol regulation data contributed by Ser-43/Cys-46 (cluster 2), Ser-59/Ser-61 (cluster 3), Ser-67/Ser-71 (cluster 4), and Ser-83/Ser-87 (cluster 5). As a result, by observing a drop closer to 0, which reflects more effective degradation, this will show which of the initial five clusters (Thr-3/Thr-9/Thr-11, cluster 1; Ser-43/Cys-46, cluster 2; Ser-59/Ser-61, cluster 3; Ser-67/Ser-71, cluster 4; Ser-83/Ser-87, cluster 5) contributes more to cholesterol regulation.
The relative MARCH6 response (Fig. 3, A and B) was determined similarly to the cholesterol regulation. After densitometric analyses, the fold-increase for each construct after MARCH6 siRNA knockdown was normalized to the fold-increase for WT, which was set to 1. Values approaching 0 on the MARCH6 response scale indicate less of a rescue compared with WT when MARCH6 was knocked down. A value closer to 1 would indicate the MARCH6 knockdown rescue effect on SM N100 mutants is similar to that of WT.
For the heat map of disordered region frequency (Fig. 6E), numbers on the scale refer to the number of times a residue was recognized as being part of a disordered region. The lowest value 0 would mean that the residue was never recognized as being part of an observed disordered region in any of the 13 predictors, whereas a value of 13 would mean the residue was part of a disordered region in all 13 predictors.
All Western blots are representative of at least three independent experiments with the number (n) of independent experiments presented in the figure legend. Densitometry data from at least three independent experiments are presented as bar graphs. Densitometry data in bar graphs are presented as mean ± S.E. Statistical differences were determined by the Student's paired t test (two-tailed), where p values of p < 0.05 (*) and p < 0.01 (**) were considered statistically significant.
Author contributions
N. K. C. and A. J. B. conceptualization; N. K. C. and G. H.-S. formal analysis; N. K. C. validation; N. K. C. and G. H.-S. investigation; N. K. C., G. H.-S., and A. J. B. visualization; N. K. C., G. H.-S., and A. J. B. methodology; N. K. C., G. H.-S., and A. J. B. writing-original draft; N. K. C., G. H.-S., and A. J. B. writing-review and editing; A. J. B. resources; A. J. B. supervision; A. J. B. funding acquisition; A. J. B. project administration.
Acknowledgments
We thank members of the Brown laboratory for critically reviewing this manuscript.
This work was supported by National Health and Medical Research Council Grant 1060515, Australian Research Council Grant DP170101178, and a Gold Star award from University of New South Wales Sydney (to A. J. B). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
- SM
- squalene monooxygenase
- GFP
- green fluorescent protein
- SM N100
- first 100 amino acids of SM
- ER
- endoplasmic reticulum
- ERAD
- endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation
- MARCH6
- membrane-associated ring-CH-type finger 6
- CD
- methyl-β-cyclodextrin
- DMEM
- Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
- CHO
- Chinese hamster ovary
- ESI
- electrospray ionization.
References
- 1. Mullen P. J., Yu R., Longo J., Archer M. C., and Penn L. Z. (2016) The interplay between cell signalling and the mevalonate pathway in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 718–731 10.1038/nrc.2016.76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kuzu O. F., Noory M. A., and Robertson G. P. (2016) The role of cholesterol in cancer. Cancer Res. 76, 2063–2070 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Wood W. G., Li L., Müller W. E., and Eckert G. P. (2014) Cholesterol as a causative factor in Alzheimer's disease: a debatable hypothesis. J. Neurochem. 129, 559–572 10.1111/jnc.12637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Porter F. D., and Herman G. E. (2011) Malformation syndromes caused by disorders of cholesterol synthesis. J. Lipid Res. 52, 6–34 10.1194/jlr.R009548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Valenza M. (2005) Dysfunction of the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway in Huntington's disease. J. Neurosci. 43, 9932–9939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Brown M. S., and Goldstein J. L. (1980) Multivalent feedback regulation of HMG CoA reductase, a control mechanism coordinating isoprenoid synthesis and cell growth. J. Lipid Res. 21, 505–517 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Endo A., Kuroda M., and Tanzawa K. (1976) Competitive inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase by ML-236A and ML-236B fungal metabolites, having hypocholesterolemic activity. FEBS Lett. 72, 323–326 10.1016/0014-5793(76)80996-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Horton J. D., Shah N. A., Warrington J. A., Anderson N. N., Park S. W., Brown M. S., and Goldstein J. L. (2003) Combined analysis of oligonucleotide microarray data from transgenic and knockout mice identifies direct SREBP target genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 12027–12032 10.1073/pnas.1534923100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Prabhu A. V., Sharpe L. J., and Brown A. J. (2014) The sterol-based transcriptional control of human 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase (DHCR7): evidence of a cooperative regulatory program in cholesterol synthesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1842, 1431–1439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gill S., Stevenson J., Kristiana I., and Brown A. J. (2011) Cholesterol-dependent degradation of squalene monooxygenase, a control point in cholesterol synthesis beyond HMG-CoA reductase. Cell Metab. 13, 260–273 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Goldstein J. L., and Brown M. S. (1990) Regulation of the mevalonate pathway. Nature 343, 425–430 10.1038/343425a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. DeBose-Boyd R. A. (2008) Feedback regulation of cholesterol synthesis: sterol-accelerated ubiquitination and degradation of HMG CoA reductase. Cell Res. 18, 609–621 10.1038/cr.2008.61 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Hidaka Y., Hotta H., Nagata Y., Iwasawa Y., Horie M., and Kamei T. (1991) Effect of a novel squalene epoxidase inhibitor, NB-598, on the regulation of cholesterol metabolism in HepG2 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 13171–13177 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Belter A., Skupinska M., Giel-Pietraszuk M., Grabarkiewicz T., Rychlewski L., and Barciszewski J. (2011) Squalene monooxygenase: a target for hypercholesterolemic therapy. Biol. Chem. 392, 1053–1075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Stopsack K. H., Gerke T. A., Sinnott J. A., Penney K. L., Tyekucheva S., Sesso H. D., Andersson S. O., Andrén O., Cerhan J. R., Giovannucci E. L., Mucci L. A., and Rider J. R. (2016) Cholesterol metabolism and prostate cancer lethality. Cancer Res. 76, 4785–4790 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Liu D., Wong C. C., Fu L., Chen H., Zhao L., Li C., Zhou Y., Zhang Y., Xu W., Yang Y., Wu B., Cheng G., Lai P. B., Wong N., Sung J. J., and Yu J. (2018) Squalene epoxidase drives NAFLD-induced hepatocellular carcinoma and is a direct pharmaceutical target. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaap9840 10.1126/scitranslmed.aap9840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Mahoney C. E., Pirman D., Chubukov V., Sleger T., Hayes S., Fan Z. P., Allen E. L., Chen Y., Huang L., Liu M., Zhang Y., McDonald G., Narayanaswamy R., Choe S., Chen Y., et al. (2019) A chemical biology screen identifies a vulnerability of neuroendocrine cancer cells to SQLE inhibition. Nat. Commun. 10, 96 10.1038/s41467-018-07959-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Garcia-Bermudez J., Baudrier L., Bayraktar E. C., Shen Y., La K., Guarecuco R., Yucel B., Fiore D., Tavora B., Freinkman E., Chan S. H., Lewis C., Min W., Inghirami G., Sabatini D. M., and Birsoy K. (2019) Squalene accumulation in cholesterol auxotrophic lymphomas prevents oxidative cell death. Nature 567, 118–122 10.1038/s41586-019-0945-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kristiana I., Luu W., Stevenson J., Cartland S., Jessup W., Belani J. D., Rychnovsky S. D., and Brown A. J. (2012) Cholesterol through the looking glass: ability of its enantiomer to elicit homeostatic responses. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 33897–33904 10.1074/jbc.M112.360537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Howe V., Chua N. K., Stevenson J., and Brown A. J. (2015) The regulatory domain of squalene monooxygenase contains a re-entrant loop and senses cholesterol via a conformational change. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 27533–27544 10.1074/jbc.M115.675181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Chua N. K., Howe V., Jatana N., Thukral L., and Brown A. J. (2017) A conserved degron containing an amphipathic helix regulates the cholesterol-mediated turnover of human squalene monooxygenase, a rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 19959–19973 10.1074/jbc.M117.794230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zelcer N., Sharpe L. J., Loregger A., Kristiana I., Cook E. C., Phan L., Stevenson J., and Brown A. J. (2014) The E3 ubiquitin ligase MARCH6 degrades squalene monooxygenase and affects 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase and the cholesterol synthesis pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 34, 1262–1270 10.1128/MCB.01140-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Yu H., Kaung G., Kobayashi S., and Kopito R. R. (1997) Cytosolic degradation of T-cell receptor α-chains by the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20800–20804 10.1074/jbc.272.33.20800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ishikura S., Weissman A. M., and Bonifacino J. S. (2010) Serine residues in the cytosolic tail of the T-cell antigen receptor α-chain mediate ubiquitination and endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of the unassembled protein. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 23916–23924 10.1074/jbc.M110.127936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Liu Y., Soetandyo N., Lee J. G., Liu L., Xu Y., Clemons W. M. Jr., and Ye Y. (2014) USP13 antagonizes gp78 to maintain functionality of a chaperone in ER-associated degradation. Elife 3, e01369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Christianson J. C., Olzmann J. A., Shaler T. A., Sowa M. E., Bennett E. J., Richter C. M., Tyler R. E., Greenblatt E. J., Harper J. W., and Kopito R. R. (2011) Defining human ERAD networks through an integrative mapping strategy. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 93–105 10.1038/ncb2383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Pao K.-C., Wood N. T., Knebel A., Rafie K., Stanley M., Mabbitt P. D., Sundaramoorthy R., Hofmann K., van Aalten D. M. F., and Virdee S. (2018) Activity-based E3 ligase profiling uncovers an E3 ligase with esterification activity. Nature 556, 381–385 10.1038/s41586-018-0026-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Okumoto K., Misono S., Miyata N., Matsumoto Y., Mukai S., and Fujiki Y. (2011) Cysteine ubiquitination of PTS1 receptor Pex5p regulates Pex5p recycling. Traffic 12, 1067–1083 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01217.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Wang Y.-J., Bian Y., Luo J., Lu M., Xiong Y., Guo S.-Y., Yin H.-Y., Lin X., Li Q., Chang C. C. Y., Chang T.-Y., Li B.-L., and Song B.-L. (2017) Cholesterol and fatty acids regulate cysteine ubiquitylation of ACAT2 through competitive oxidation. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 808–819 10.1038/ncb3551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. McDowell G. S., and Philpott A. (2013) Non-canonical ubiquitylation: mechanisms and consequences. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 45, 1833–1842 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.05.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Ciechanover A., and Ben-Saadon R. (2004) N-terminal ubiquitination: more protein substrates join in. Trends Cell Biol. 14, 103–106 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Shimizu Y., Okuda-Shimizu Y., and Hendershot L. M. (2010) Ubiquitylation of an ERAD substrate occurs on multiple types of amino acids. Mol. Cell. 40, 917–926 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Boban M., Ljungdahl P. O., and Foisner R. (2015) Atypical ubiquitylation in yeast targets lysine-less Asi2 for proteasomal degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 2489–2495 10.1074/jbc.M114.600593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Wang X., Herr R. A., Chua W. J., Lybarger L., Wiertz E. J., and Hansen T. H. (2007) Ubiquitination of serine, threonine, or lysine residues on the cytoplasmic tail can induce ERAD of MHC-I by viral E3 ligase mK3. J. Cell Biol. 177, 613–624 10.1083/jcb.200611063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Boeing S., Williamson L., Encheva V., Gori I., Saunders R. E., Instrell R., Aygün O., Rodriguez-Martinez M., Weems J. C., Kelly G. P., Conaway J. W., Conaway R. C., Stewart A., Howell M., Snijders A. P., and Svejstrup J. Q. (2016) Multiomic analysis of the UV-induced DNA damage response. Cell Rep. 15, 1597–1610 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Mertins P., Qiao J. W., Patel J., Udeshi N. D., Clauser K. R., Mani D. R., Burgess M. W., Gillette M. A., Jaffe J. D., and Carr S. A. (2013) Integrated proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications by serial enrichment. Nat. Methods 10, 634–637 10.1038/nmeth.2518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Udeshi N. D., Mertins P., Svinkina T., and Carr S. A. (2013) Large-scale identification of ubiquitination sites by mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1950–1960 10.1038/nprot.2013.120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Wu Q., Cheng Z., Zhu J., Xu W., Peng X., Chen C., Li W., Wang F., Cao L., Yi X., Wu Z., Li J., and Fan P. (2015) Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid treatment reveals crosstalks among proteome, ubiquitylome and acetylome in non-small cell lung cancer A549 cell line. Sci. Rep. 5, 9520 10.1038/srep09520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Hornbeck P. V., Zhang B., Murray B., Kornhauser J. M., Latham V., and Skrzypek E. (2015) PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D512–D520 10.1093/nar/gku1267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Akimov V., Barrio-Hernandez I., Hansen S. V. F., Hallenborg P., Pedersen A.-K., Bekker-Jensen D. B., Puglia M., Christensen S. D. K., Vanselow J. T., Nielsen M. M., Kratchmarova I., Kelstrup C. D., Olsen J. V., and Blagoev B. (2018) UbiSite approach for comprehensive mapping of lysine and N-terminal ubiquitination sites. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 631–640 10.1038/s41594-018-0084-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Lumpkin R. J., Gu H., Zhu Y., Leonard M., Ahmad A. S., Clauser K. R., Meyer J. G., Bennett E. J., and Komives E. A. (2017) Site-specific identification and quantitation of endogenous SUMO modifications under native conditions. Nat. Commun. 8, 1171 10.1038/s41467-017-01271-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Wang X., Herr R. A., Rabelink M., Hoeben R. C., Wiertz E. J., and Hansen T. H. (2009) Ube2j2 ubiquitinates hydroxylated amino acids on ER-associated degradation substrates. J. Cell Biol. 187, 655–668 10.1083/jcb.200908036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Swanson R., Locher M., and Hochstrasser M. (2001) A conserved ubiquitin ligase of the nuclear envelope/endoplasmic reticulum that functions in both ER-associated and Matα2 repressor degradation. Genes Dev. 15, 2660–2674 10.1101/gad.933301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Chen P., Johnson P., Sommer T., Jentsch S., and Hochstrasser M. (1993) Multiple ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes participate in the in vivo degradation of the yeast MATα2 repressor. Cell 74, 357–369 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90426-Q [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Foresti O., Ruggiano A., Hannibal-Bach H. K., Ejsing C. S., and Carvalho P. (2013) Sterol homeostasis requires regulated degradation of squalene monooxygenase by the ubiquitin ligase Doa10/Teb4. Elife 2, e00953 10.7554/eLife.00953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Hassink G., Kikkert M., van Voorden S., Lee S.-J., Spaapen R., van Laar T., Coleman C. S., Bartee E., Uh K. F., Chau V., and Wiertz E. (2005) TEB4 is a C4HC3 RING finger-containing ubiquitin ligase of the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochem. J. 388, 647–655 10.1042/BJ20041241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Lenk U., Yu H., Walter J., Gelman M. S., Hartmann E., Kopito R. R., and Sommer T. (2002) A role for mammalian Ubc6 homologues in ER-associated protein degradation. J. Cell Sci. 115, 3007–3014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Kostova Z., Tsai Y. C., and Weissman A. M. (2007) Ubiquitin ligases, critical mediators of endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 18, 770–779 10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.09.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Stefanovic-Barrett S., Dickson A. S., Burr S. P., Williamson J. C., Lobb I. T., van den Boomen D. J., Lehner P. J., and Nathan J. A. (2018) MARCH6 and TRC8 facilitate the quality control of cytosolic and tail-anchored proteins. EMBO Rep. 19, e45603 10.15252/embr.201745603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Tan J. M. E., Cook E. C. L., van den Berg M., Scheij S., Zelcer N., and Loregger A. (2019) Differential use of E2 ubiquitin conjugating enzymes for regulated degradation of the rate-limiting enzymes HMGCR and SQLE in cholesterol biosynthesis. Atherosclerosis 281, 137–142 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Weber A., Cohen I., Popp O., Dittmar G., Reiss Y., Sommer T., Ravid T., and Jarosch E. (2016) Sequential poly-ubiquitylation by specialized conjugating enzymes expands the versatility of a quality control ubiquitin ligase. Mol. Cell. 63, 827–839 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Lam S. Y., Murphy C., Foley L. A., Ross S. A., Wang T. C., and Fleming J. (2014) The human ubiquitin conjugating enzyme UBE2J2 (Ubc6) is a substrate for proteasomal degradation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 451, 361–366 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Ravid T., and Hochstrasser M. (2008) Diversity of degradation signals in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 679–690 10.1038/nrm2468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Guharoy M., Bhowmick P., and Tompa P. (2016) Design principles involving protein disorder facilitate specific substrate selection and degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 6723–6731 10.1074/jbc.R115.692665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Fishbain S., Inobe T., Israeli E., Chavali S., Yu H., Kago G., Babu M. M., and Matouschek A. (2015) Sequence composition of disordered regions fine-tunes protein half-life. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 214–221 10.1038/nsmb.2958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Melo S. P., Barbour K. W., and Berger F. G. (2011) Cooperation between an intrinsically disordered region and a helical segment is required for ubiquitin-independent degradation by the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 36559–36567 10.1074/jbc.M111.274258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Aufderheide A., Unverdorben P., Baumeister W., and Förster F. (2015) Structural disorder and its role in proteasomal degradation. FEBS Lett. 589, 2552–2560 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.07.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Linding R., Russell R. B., Neduva V., and Gibson T. J. (2003) GlobPlot: exploring protein sequences for globularity and disorder. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3701–3708 10.1093/nar/gkg519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Mattiroli F., and Sixma T. K. (2014) Lysine-targeting specificity in ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modification pathways. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 308–316 10.1038/nsmb.2792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Wu G., Xu G., Schulman B. A., Jeffrey P. D., Harper J. W., and Pavletich N. P. (2003) Structure of a β-TrCP1-Skp1-β-catenin complex: destruction motif binding and lysine specificity of the SCFβ-TrCP1 ubiquitin ligase. Mol. Cell 11, 1445–1456 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00234-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Brown N. G., VanderLinden R., Watson E. R., Weissmann F., Ordureau A., Wu K.-P., Zhang W., Yu S., Mercredi P. Y., Harrison J. S., Davidson I. F., Qiao R., Lu Y., Dube P., Brunner M. R., et al. (2016) Dual RING E3 architectures regulate multiubiquitination and ubiquitin chain elongation by APC/C. Cell 165, 1440–1453 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Fischer E. S., Scrima A., Böhm K., Matsumoto S., Lingaraju G. M., Faty M., Yasuda T., Cavadini S., Wakasugi M., Hanaoka F., Iwai S., Gut H., Sugasawa K., and Thomä N. H. (2011) The molecular basis of CRL4DDB2/CSA ubiquitin ligase architecture, targeting, and activation. Cell 147, 1024–1039 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Kreft S. G., Wang L., and Hochstrasser M. (2006) Membrane topology of the yeast endoplasmic reticulum-localized ubiquitin ligase Doa10 and comparison with its human ortholog TEB4 (MARCH-VI). J. Biol. Chem. 281, 4646–4653 10.1074/jbc.M512215200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Stewart M. D., Ritterhoff T., Klevit R. E., and Brzovic P. S. (2016) E2 enzymes: more than just middle men. Cell Res. 26, 423–440 10.1038/cr.2016.35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Ye Y., and Rape M. (2009) Building ubiquitin chains: E2 enzymes at work. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 755–764 10.1038/nrm2780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Hunter T. (2007) The age of crosstalk: phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and beyond. Mol. Cell. 28, 730–738 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Swaney D. L., Beltrao P., Starita L., Guo A., Rush J., Fields S., Krogan N. J., and Villén J. (2013) Global analysis of phosphorylation and ubiquitylation cross-talk in protein degradation. Nat. Methods 10, 676–682 10.1038/nmeth.2519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Skowyra D., Craig K. L., Tyers M., Elledge S. J., and Harper J. W. (1997) F-box proteins are receptors that recruit phosphorylated substrates to the SCF ubiquitin-ligase complex. Cell 91, 209–219 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80403-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Prabhu A. V., Luu W., Sharpe L. J., and Brown A. J. (2017) Phosphorylation regulates activity of 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase (DHCR7), a terminal enzyme of cholesterol synthesis. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 165, 363–368 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Clarke P. R., and Hardie D. G. (1990) Regulation of HMG-CoA reductase: identification of the site phosphorylated by the AMP-activated protein kinase in vitro and in intact rat liver. EMBO J. 9, 2439–2446 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07420.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Luu W., Zerenturk E. J., Kristiana I., Bucknall M. P., Sharpe L. J., and Brown A. J. (2014) Signaling regulates activity of DHCR24, the final enzyme in cholesterol synthesis. J. Lipid Res. 55, 410–420 10.1194/jlr.M043257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Prinz W. A. (2017) A cholesterol-sensing mechanism unfolds. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 19974–19975 10.1074/jbc.H117.794230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Giménez-Andrés M., Čopič A., and Antonny B. (2018) The many faces of amphipathic helices. Biomolecules 8, 45 10.3390/biom8030045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Gallop J. L., Jao C. C., Kent H. M., Butler P. J., Evans P. R., Langen R., and McMahon H. T. (2006) Mechanism of endophilin N-BAR domain-mediated membrane curvature. EMBO J. 25, 2898–2910 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Xiao X., Tang J. J., Peng C., Wang Y., Fu L., Qiu Z. P., Xiong Y., Yang L. F., Cui H. W., He X. L., Yin L., Qi W., Wong C. C. L., Zhao Y., Li B. L., Qiu W. W., and Song B. L. (2017) Cholesterol modification of Smoothened is required for Hedgehog signaling. Mol. Cell. 66, 154–162.e10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Hulce J. J., Cognetta A. B., Niphakis M. J., Tully S. E., and Cravatt B. F. (2013) Proteome-wide mapping of cholesterol-interacting proteins in mammalian cells. Nat. Methods 10, 259–264 10.1038/nmeth.2368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Chugh A., Ray A., and Gupta J. B. (2003) Squalene epoxidase as hypocholesterolemic drug target revisited. Prog. Lipid Res. 42, 37–50 10.1016/S0163-7827(02)00029-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Cirmena G., Franceschelli P., Isnaldi E., Ferrando L., De Mariano M., Ballestrero A., and Zoppoli G. (2018) Squalene epoxidase as a promising metabolic target in cancer treatment. Cancer Lett. 425, 13–20 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.03.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Buchovecky C. M., Turley S. D., Brown H. M., Kyle S. M., McDonald J. G., Liu B., Pieper A. A., Huang W., Katz D. M., Russell D. W., Shendure J., and Justice M. J. (2013) A suppressor screen in Mecp2 mutant mice implicates cholesterol metabolism in Rett syndrome. Nat. Genet. 45, 1013–1020 10.1038/ng.2714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Garaiová M., Zambojová V., Simová Z., Griač P., Hapala I., Garaiová M., Zambojová V., Šimová Z., Griač P., and Hapala I. (2014) Squalene epoxidase as a target for manipulation of squalene levels in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 14, 310–323 10.1111/1567-1364.12107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Dai Z., Liu Y., Zhang X., Shi M., Wang B., Wang D., Huang L., and Zhang X. (2013) Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of ginsenosides. Metab. Eng. 20, 146–156 10.1016/j.ymben.2013.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Brown A. J., Sun L., Feramisco J. D., Brown M. S., and Goldstein J. L. (2002) Cholesterol addition to ER membranes alters conformation of SCAP, the SREBP escort protein that regulates cholesterol metabolism. Mol. Cell. 10, 237–245 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00591-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Shevchenko A., Wilm M., Vorm O., and Mann M. (1996) Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins from silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Chem. 68, 850–858 10.1021/ac950914h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Nielsen M. L., Vermeulen M., Bonaldi T., Cox J., Moroder L., and Mann M. (2008) Iodoacetamide-induced artifact mimics ubiquitination in mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 5, 459–460 10.1038/nmeth0608-459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Hart-Smith G., Chia S. Z., Low J. K., McKay M. J., Molloy M. P., and Wilkins M. R. (2014) Stoichiometry of Saccharomyces cerevisiae lysine methylation: insights into non-histone protein lysine methyltransferase activity. J. Proteome Res. 13, 1744–1756 10.1021/pr401251k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Smith D. L., Götze M., Bartolec T. K., Hart-Smith G., and Wilkins M. R. (2018) Characterization of the interaction between arginine methyltransferase Hmt1 and its substrate Npl3: use of multiple cross-linkers, mass spectrometric approaches, and software platforms. Anal. Chem. 90, 9101–9108 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Hart-Smith G., and Raftery M. J. (2012) Detection and characterization of low abundance glycopeptides via higher-energy c-trap dissociation and orbitrap mass analysis. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 23, 124–140 10.1007/s13361-011-0273-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Kearse M., Moir R., Wilson A., Stones-Havas S., Cheung M., Sturrock S., Buxton S., Cooper A., Markowitz S., Duran C., Thierer T., Ashton B., Meintjes P., and Drummond A. (2012) Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 1647–1649 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Gautier R., Douguet D., Antonny B., and Drin G. (2008) HELIQUEST: a web server to screen sequences with specific α-helical properties. Bioinformatics 24, 2101–2102 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Linding R., Jensen L. J., Diella F., Bork P., Gibson T. J., and Russell R. B. (2003) Protein disorder prediction: implications for structural proteomics. Structure 11, 1453–1459 10.1016/j.str.2003.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Jones D. T., and Cozzetto D. (2015) DISOPRED3: Precise disordered region predictions with annotated protein-binding activity. Bioinformatics 31, 857–863 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Peng K., Vucetic S., Radivojac P., Brown C. J., Dunker A. K., and Obradovic Z. (2005) Optimizing long intrinsic disorder predictors with protein evolutionary information. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 3, 35–60 10.1142/S0219720005000886 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Dosztányi Z., Csizmok V., Tompa P., and Simon I. (2005) IUPred: Web server for the prediction of intrinsically unstructured regions of proteins based on estimated energy content. Bioinformatics 21, 3433–3434 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Romero P., Obradovic Z., and Dunker K. (1997) Sequence data analysis for long disordered regions prediction in the calcineurin family. Genome Inform. Ser. Workshop Genome Inform. 8, 110–124 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Li X., Romero P., Rani M., Dunker A. K., and Obradovic Z. (1999) Predicting protein disorder for N-, C-, and internal regions. Genome Inform. Ser. Workshop Genome Inform. 10, 30–40 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Garner E., Romero P., Dunker A. K., Brown C., and Obradovic Z. (1999) Predicting binding regions within disordered proteins. Genome Inform. Ser. Workshop Genome Inform. 10, 41–50 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Ishida T., and Kinoshita K. (2007) PrDOS: Prediction of disordered protein regions from amino acid sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W460–W464 10.1093/nar/gkm363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]