Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2019 May 8;15(5):e1007754. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007754

The t-SNARE protein FgPep12, associated with FgVam7, is essential for ascospore discharge and plant infection by trafficking Ca2+ ATPase FgNeo1 between Golgi and endosome/vacuole in Fusarium graminearum

Bing Li 1,#, Xin Dong 1,#, Rui Zhao 2, Rongchuan Kou 2, Xiaobo Zheng 1, Haifeng Zhang 1,*
Editor: Jin-Rong Xu3
PMCID: PMC6527245  PMID: 31067272

Abstract

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment receptors (SNAREs) play a crucial role in the development and virulence through mediation of membrane fusion and vesicle trafficking in pathogens. Our previous studies reported that the SNARE protein FgVam7 and its binding proteins FgVps39/41 are involved in vesicle trafficking and are important for vegetative growth, asexual/sexual development, deoxynivalenol production and virulence in the Fusarium head blight fungus Fusarium graminearum. Here, we identified and characterized another FgVam7 binding protein in F. graminearum, FgPep12, an ortholog of yeast t-SNARE Pep12 with both the SNARE and TM domains being essential for its localization and function. Deletion of FgPep12 caused defects in vegetative growth, conidiogenesis, deoxynivalenol production and virulence. Cytological observation revealed that FgPep12 localizes to the Golgi apparatus, late endosomes and vacuoles, and is necessary for transport from the vacuole to prevacuolar compartment. Further investigation revealed that both FgPep12 and FgVam7 are essential for ascospore discharge through interaction with and trafficking of the Ca2+ ATPase FgNeo1 between the Golgi and endosomal/vacuolar system. FgNeo1 has similar biological roles to FgPep12 and is required for ascospore discharge in F. graminearum. Together, these results provide solid evidence to help unravel the mechanisms underlying the manipulation of ascospore discharge and plant infection by SNARE proteins in F. graminearum.

Author summary

SNARE proteins which mediate fusion of transport vesicles with the correct target membrane, are essential components of vesicle trafficking machinery. Together with the cognate effectors, SNAREs coordinate the dynamics of trafficking pathway and determines the cargo proteins destination. Here, we found that SNARE protein FgPep12 is important for fungal development and virulence through its involvement in vesicle trafficking between the Golgi and endosomal/vacuolar system. We further provide multiple lines of evidence showing that SNARE proteins modulate development and ascospore discharge in pathogenic fungi. FgPep12, associated with FgVam7, is required for the trafficking of the Ca2+ ATPase FgNeo1 between the Golgi and endosomal/vacuolar system, thus controlling growth, asexual development, ascospore discharge and plant infection in F. graminearum.

Introduction

In eukaryotic cells, directional transport among the organelles of the endomembrane system is mediated by vesicles that bud from a donor organelle and then fuse with an acceptor organelle [1]. Despite the diversity of these organelles in size and shape, the basic reactions of budding and fusion are mediated by multiprotein complexes consisting of protein families that have been conserved in eukaryotic organism [23]. One family of integral membrane proteins, called soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment receptor (SNARE) proteins, constitute the key machinery of these membrane fusion events [1] and have been studied extensively in budding yeast, mammals, plants, and phytopathogens [410]. Despite their differences in sizes and structures among organisms, SNAREs share a conserved SNARE motif of 60–70 amino acids (AAs) arranged in heptad repeats [4, 6, 1112]. SNAREs can be classified into vesicle (v)-SNAREs and target (t)-SNAREs based on their localization to either vesicle membranes or target membranes [13]. Over 20 SNARE proteins have been identified in various species, including humans, Drosophila melanogaster, Arabidopsis thaliana, Aspergillus oryzae, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae [78, 1416]. Similar to A. oryzae, 21 putative SNARE proteins have been identified in Fusarium graminearum [10]. In contrast, only a small number of SNARE proteins have been characterized in phytopathogens, including MoSec22, MoVam7, MoSyn8 and MoTlg2 in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae [4, 6, 9, 17], UmYup1 in the corn smut fungus Ustilago maydis and FgVam7 in F. graminearum play critical roles in development, virulence and sexual reproduction by mediating vesicle trafficking [10, 1819]. Additionally, t-SNARE MoSso1 is involved in virulence and is necessary for normal biotrophic interfacial complex development, as well as for secretion of cytoplasmic effectors during M. oryzae infection [20].

In some fungi of the phylum Ascomycota, ascospores formed within perithecia are forcibly discharged into the air, where they are believed to serve as the primary inoculum of the disease [2124]. Sexual development and ascospore discharge are important factors in propagule dispersal, survival, and disease spreading in ascomycetes. Forcible discharge of ascospores from asci is a common mechanism observed in many fungi, including F. graminearum (teleomorph: Gibberella zeae), one of the casual agents of Fusarium head blight (FHB) or head scab, which is a destructive disease of wheat and barley [5, 2526]. In F. graminearum and other fungal pathogens, ascospores are the primary inoculum, making sexual reproduction a critical step in the disease cycle. In addition to yield losses caused by FHB, mycotoxins such as deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEA) produced by F. graminearum in contaminated grains pose a serious threat to human and animal health [27].

Sexual reproduction in F. graminearum starts with the formation of small, coiled initials that eventually develop into perithecia filled with asci and ascospores that are the products of meiosis. Mature asci extend through the ostiole of the perithecia and discharge their ascospores [24, 28]. The main force driving discharge of ascospores is turgor pressure generated by ions and polyols in the asci [29]. In F. graminearum, potassium ion channel and L-type calcium channel blockers have been reported to inhibit ascospore discharge [22]. The accumulation of potassium and chloride ions generate the turgor pressure necessary for discharge [29]. Strains with defects in turgor pressure in the asci exhibited lower ion concentrations and failed to discharge ascospores [30]. Moreover, deletion of the calcium ion channel proteins Cch1 and Mid1 significantly reduced forcible ascospore discharge [3031]. Meanwhile, deletion of Fig 1, a transmembrane protein in the low-affinity calcium uptake system, leads to failure of production of mature perithecia [32]. These reports demonstrate that ion channels, especially calcium ion channels, play crucial roles in ascospore discharge in F. graminearum.

Fig 1. FgPep12 physically interacts with FgVam7.

Fig 1

(A) Yeast two-hybrid assays for the interaction between FgPep12 and FgVam7. The prey and bait constructs were assayed for growth on SD-Leu-Trp and SD-Leu-Trp-His plates. +, positive control; -, negative control. (B) Co-immunoprecipitation assays for the interaction between FgPep12 and FgVam7. Total proteins were isolated from transformants co-expressing GFP-FgPep12 and FgVam7-3×FLAG constructs, and proteins eluted from the anti-FLAG M2 beads (elution). Immunoblots were incubated with monoclonal anti-FLAG and anti-GFP antibody, respectively.

Although previous studies have shed light on the physiological and genetic bases of ascospore discharge, the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown, particularly how SNARE proteins modulate this process in F. graminearum. Here, we identified and characterized the t-SNARE FgPep12, and found that FgPep12 is important in development, DON production and virulence in F. graminearum. We further provide evidence that FgPep12 in association with another SNARE protein, FgVam7, is necessary for ascospore discharge based on trafficking of Ca2+ ATPase FgNeo1 between the Golgi apparatus and endosomal/vacuolar system.

Results

Identification and deletion of FgPep12 in F. graminearum

Our previous studies have shown that SNARE protein FgVam7 and its several binding proteins are involved in vesicle trafficking and play important roles in the development and virulence of F. graminearum [10]. Here, we identified another FgVam7 binding protein, FgPep12 (FGSG_01890: http://fungidb.org/fungidb/) by yeast two hybrid (Y2H) screening, which is an ortholog of the yeast t-SNARE Pep12 (S1 Fig). Y2H and co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) assays confirmed that FgPep12 physically interacts with FgVam7 in F. graminearum (Fig 1A and 1B). The FgPEP12 gene consists of 1,153 base pairs with two introns and encodes a 344-aa protein. Domain prediction revealed that FgPep12 possesses a SNARE domain (SNARE, 242–309 aas) and a transmembrane region (TM; 321–338 aas) at its carboxyl terminus (http://smart.emblheidelberg.de/). To explore the biological roles of FgPep12 in F. graminearum, we generated a gene replacement construct using a split marker strategy (S2A Fig). Southern blot analysis showed that FgPEP12 was successfully replaced with the hygromycin B phosphotransferase (Hph) cassette in the ΔFgpep12 mutant (S2B Fig). The complemented transformant ΔFgpep12/FgPEP12 was generated by re-introducing the full-length FgPEP12 sequence into the ΔFgpep12 mutant.

FgPep12 is important for vegetative growth, conidiogenesis, pathogenesis and DON production

We first examined vegetative growth of the ΔFgpep12 mutant on CM and V8 juice agar plates. After 3 days of incubation in the dark at 25°C, the ΔFgpep12 mutant exhibited a smaller colony size and altered pigmentation compared to the wild-type PH-1 and the complemented strain ΔFgpep12/FgPEP12. The colony diameter was reduced by 48.6% and 35.2% on CM and V8 plates, respectively (Fig 2A; Table 1). The ΔFgpep12 mutant produced very few conidia. Compared to the wild-type PH-1, conidiation was reduced over 90% (Table 1). Moreover, conidia produced by the ΔFgpep12 mutant were shorter in length and had fewer septa than those of PH-1 (Fig 2B; Table 1). These results indicate that FgPep12 plays important roles in vegetative growth and conidiogenesis in F. graminearum.

Fig 2. FgPep12 is important for vegetative growth, conidiogenesis, pathogenicity and DON production.

Fig 2

(A) The wild type PH-1, ΔFgpep12 mutant and the complemented transformant ΔFgpep12/FgPEP12 were cultured on CM- media at 25°C for 3 days in the dark, and photographed. (B) Conidia of the indicated strains were harvested from CMC medium, and stained with calcofluor white, and observed under a fluorescence microscope. Bar = 10 μm. (C) Infection assays on flowering wheat heads. Conidia suspensions (10 μl) of PH-1, ΔFgpep12 and ΔFgpep12/FgPEP12 were injected into the flowering wheat heads. Photographs were taken at 14 days post-inoculation (dpi). Inoculated site were pointed by white arrows. (D) Spikelets were inoculated with conidia from PH-1 and ΔFgpep12 strain expressing FgACTIN-RFP construct. Images were taken at 7 dpi. Inoculated spikelets were indicated by white arrows. (E) DON production in wheat kernels infested by the indicated strains for 20 days. (F) Relative transcription abundance of trichothecene synthase genes TRI5 and TRI6 in the indicated strains. Error bars represent the SD and asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.01).

Table 1. Phenotype analysis of the PH-1, ΔFgpep12, ΔFgpep12/FgPEP12 and domain deletion strains.

Strain Colony diameter (cm)a Conidiation Conidial morphology (%)c Conidial length (μm)d Number of perithecia (cm2)e
CM V8 (×106/ml)b ≥4 Septa ≤3 Septa
PH-1 7.4 ± 0.4 5.4 ± 0.1 12.6 ± 0.8 68.3 ± 2.1 31.7 ± 2.2 46.16 ± 3.20 69.6 ± 3.2
ΔFgpep12 3.8 ± 0.1* 3.5 ± 0.2* 0.6 ± 0.09* 43.2 ± 1.7* 56.8 ± 2.6* 27.18 ± 2.86* 66.9 ± 5.9
ΔSNARE 3.8 ± 0.1* NA 0.6 ± 0.08* 40.1 ± 2.3* 59.9 ± 1.4* 28.53 ± 3.48* NA
ΔTM 3.6 ± 0.3* NA 0.8 ± 0.03* 45.2 ± 3.8* 54.8 ± 3.1* 25.68 ± 1.86* NA
ΔFgpep12/FgPEP12 7.2 ± 0.2 5.5 ± 0.33 13.1 ± 0.4 66.9 ± 4.6 33.1 ± 2.5 47.23 ± 2.80 70.1 ± 1.2

a Colony diameter of the indicated strains on different media after 3 days incubation at 25°C.

b Quantification of the conidial production of the indicated strains from CMC cultures.

c Percentage of the abnormal conidia of the indicated strains.

d Measurement of the conidial length of the indicated strains.

e The number of perithecia of the indicated strains on carrot agar and then induced by 2.5% Tween-60 at 18°C.

±SD was calculated from three repeated experiments and asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.01).

NA: not assayed.

We subsequently investigated the involvement of FgPep12 in virulence, by inoculating conidial suspensions of PH-1, ΔFgpep12 and ΔFgpep12/FgPEP12 on flowering wheat heads, as described previously [10]. Two weeks after inoculation, the ΔFgpep12 mutant only caused necrotic symptoms in the inoculated and nearby spikelets, compared to infection of the entire wheat heads by the wild-type PH-1 and complemented strain (Fig 2C). To confirm this observation, flowering wheat heads were inoculated with the wild-type PH-1 and ΔFgpep12 mutant expressing the FgACTIN-RFP construct. The red fluorescent protein (RFP) signal was observed near the inoculation site of the mutant, whereas it spread from the inoculation site to the entire wheat head in samples inoculated with PH-1 (Fig 2D). DON is known to act as a virulence factor in F. graminearum [3335]. Therefore, we measured DON production of PH-1 and the ΔFgpep12 mutant as described previously [36], and found that DON production was significantly reduced in the mutant, with only 10% of the wild-type level (Fig 2E). The expression levels of two trichothecene biosynthesis genes, TRI5 and TRI6 [37], were notably reduced in the ΔFgpep12 mutant compared to PH-1 and complemented strain (Fig 2F). These findings suggest that FgPep12 is important for virulence and DON production in F. graminearum.

FgPep12 localizes to Golgi apparatus, late endosomes and vacuoles

To determine the function of FgPep12, we fused a green fluorescent protein (GFP) tag to the N-terminus of FgPep12 and examined its cellular localization. The GFP-FgPep12 signals were visible in punctate structures throughout the cell (Fig 3A). In yeast, Pep12 was known to act as a vesicular intermediate, traveling between Golgi apparatus and the vacuole [3]. Therefore, we co-expressed GFP-FgPep12 with the Golgi marker protein FgSft2, which is a homolog of yeast Sft2 [38], the late endosome marker protein FgRab7 [39], and the vacuole localization protein FgVam7 fused to RFP [10] in F. graminearum. In the resulting transformants, the GFP-FgPep12 signal overlapped well with RFP-FgSft2, RFP-FgRab7 and FgVam7-RFP in conidia and germ tubes (Fig 3B). These co-localization patterns were further evaluated through linescan graph analysis. The percentage of GFP-FgPep12 co-localization with RFP-FgSft2, RFP-FgRab7 and FgVam7-RFP was between 20.8 and 42.2% in conidia and germ tubes (Fig 3B). These results indicated that, similar to yeast Pep12, FgPep12 likely functions as a vesicular intermediate between the Golgi apparatus and vacuole in F. graminearum.

Fig 3. FgPep12 localizes to Golgi, late endosome and vacuole multiple organelles.

Fig 3

(A) Expression and localization of GFP-FgPep12 in F. graminearum. Conidia expressing GFP-FgPep12 were germinated in liquid CM medium for 0, 2, 4, 6 and 24 h, and examined under differential interference contrast (DIC) and epifluorescence microscope. (B) Conidia co-expressing GFP-FgPep12&RFP-FgSft2, GFP-FgPep12&RFP-FgRab7 or GFP-FgPep12&FgVam7-RFP constructs were germinated in liquid CM medium for 0, 2, 4, 6 and 24 h, and examined under a confocal microscope. Co-localization of the proteins was further evaluated by linescan graph analysis (grey panel, horizontal axis indicates the distance). The analyzed area was indicated in dashed box. The percentage of the localization signals was yielded by counted the merged dots in conidia (n = 30) or germ tubes (n = 30, per germ tube 10 μm). Bar = 10 μm.

The SNARE and TM domains of FgPep12 are required for its cellular localization and biological function

To explore the role of the SNARE and TM domains of FgPep12, the domain deletion constructs ΔSNARE and ΔTM were generated (Fig 4A) and transformed into the ΔFgpep12 mutant. The resulting transformants GFP-ΔSNARE and GFP-ΔTM were obtained and phenotypically analyzed. Compared to GFP-FgPep12, the localization patterns of both GFP-ΔSNARE and GFP-ΔTM were altered. GFP-ΔSNARE mainly localized to the cytoplasm outside of vacuoles, and GFP-ΔTM mainly to pre-vacuole structures near mature vacuoles (Fig 4B). When assayed for growth, conidiation and virulence, both GFP-ΔSNARE and GFP-ΔTM transformants had similar phenotypes to those of the ΔFgpep12 mutant (Fig 4C and 4D; Table 1). These findings suggested that the SNARE and TM domains are required for proper localization and normal function of FgPep12 in F. graminearum.

Fig 4. The TM and SNARE domains of FgPep12 are required for its cellular localization and biological function.

Fig 4

(A) Diagram of FgPep12 and domain deletion strategy. (B) Subcellular localization of domain deletion proteins. Bar = 10 μm. (C) Vegetative growth and colony morphology of the domain deletion transformants. (D) Infection assay of the domain deletion transformants. Wheat germs were drop-inoculated with conidial suspensions of the indicated strains. Lesion length (LL) was measured at 10 dpi and photographed. Relative fungal growth (RFG) was analyzed by quantification of F. graminearum 28s rDNA relative to wheat genomic TaACTIN DNA. ±SD was calculated from three independent experiments, and asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.01).

FgPep12 is required for vacuole to prevacuolar compartment (PVC) transport

Pep12 has been reported to play a role in retrograde transport out of the vacuole based on the unique properties of RS-ALP and (F/A)RS-ALP in yeast [4041]. RS-ALP contains the Golgi retrieval motif (FXFXD) fused to the cytosolic domain of ALP, which can be retrograde-transported to the Golgi via the PVC [40]. Meanwhile, both phenylalanine residues in the FXFXD retrieval motif of (F/A)RS-ALP were mutated to alanine, and thus would be trapped on the vacuolar membrane [42]. To investigate whether FgPep12 plays a similar role in F. graminearum, we generated yeast Alp-GFP, RS-Alp-GFP and (F/A)RS-Alp-GFP constructs and transformed them into the PH-1 and ΔFgpep12 mutants. The resulting transformants with green fluorescence were screened and selected for localization observation. Both Alp-GFP and (F/A)RS-Alp-GFP localized to vacuoles in the wild-type PH-1, while RS-Alp-GFP localized to Golgi organelles as in yeast (Fig 5). Similar to the results for the wild type, Alp-GFP and (F/A)RS-Alp-GFP localized to vacuoles in the ΔFgpep12 mutant, but RS-Alp-GFP was accumulated and localized in vacuoles in the mutant (Fig 5), indicating that FgPep12 plays a role in retrograde transport of RS-Alp-GFP from the vacuole to Golgi. To determine whether this transport occurs via the PVC pathway, we further obtained transformants expressing Alp-GFP, RS-Alp-GFP and (F/A)RS-Alp-GFP constructs in the ΔFgvps41 mutant. FgVps41 is a vacuolar sorting protein that mediates membrane fusion and PVC-to-vacuole trafficking in F. graminearum [43]. Microscopic observation revealed that GFP signals of Alp-GFP, RS-Alp-GFP and (F/A)RS-Alp-GFP accumulated and localized to vacuoles in the ΔFgvps41 mutant (Fig 5). The results suggest that FgPep12 is indispensable for retrograde transport of RS-Alp from the vacuole to the PVC.

Fig 5. FgPep12 is required for retrograde transport of RS-Alp from the vacuole to the PVC.

Fig 5

Conidia of transformants expressing Alp-GFP, RS-Alp-GFP and (F/A)RS-Alp-GFP in the wild type PH-1, ΔFgpep12 and ΔFgvps41 mutants were examined by DIC or fluorescence microscope. CMAC staining or expressing RFP-FgSft2 was performed to co-localize with target proteins. Bar = 10 μm.

FgPep12 and FgVam7 are required for ascospore discharge in F. graminearum

The perithecia and ascospores of F. graminearum play a critical role in its disease cycle [44]. Therefore, we assessed sexual reproduction of the ΔFgpep12 and ΔFgvam7 mutants on carrot agar plates. Ten days after inoculation, the ΔFgpep12 mutant produced a large number of mature perithecia and asci, similar to the wild-type PH-1 (Fig 6A), while the ΔFgvam7 mutant produced fewer perithecia, consistent with the results of our previous study [10]. When assayed for ascospore release, no ascospores were discharged from the perithecia of the ΔFgvam7 and ΔFgpep12 mutants, in contrast to the numerous ascospores discharged from the wild-type PH-1 (Fig 6A). These results suggested that FgVam7 and FgPep12 play indispensable roles in ascospore discharge in F. graminearum. Because the turgor pressure generated by different ions and polyols in the asci is responsible for ascospore discharge in F. graminearum [22, 24, 3032], we speculate that the defect of ascospore discharge in the ΔFgvam7 and ΔFgpep12 mutants is likely related to defects in turgor pressure generation. Therefore, we measured the concentrations of various ions and polyols in the asci of the ΔFgvam7 and ΔFgpep12 mutants. Compared to the wild-type PH-1 and complemented strains, the concentrations of ions (K+, Cl-, Ca2+ and Na+) and polyols (glycerol, arabitol, mannitol and glucose) were significantly lower in both mutants (Fig 6B and 6C), suggesting that the ΔFgvam7 and ΔFgpep12 mutants possessed low turgor pressure in the asci and therefore failed to discharge ascospores.

Fig 6. FgPep12 and FgVam7 are essential for ascospore discharge, and for maintaining the normal concentration of ions and polyols in asci.

Fig 6

(A) Perithecia, asci formation and ascospore discharge of the indicated strains on carrot agar plates, and photographed at 10 dpi. Bar = 1 mm. The concentration of ions (B) and polyols (C) in asci of the indicated strains was measured by spectrophotometrically, respectively. Error bars represent the SD and asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.01).

Ion channel impairment results in arrest of ascospore discharge in F. graminearum

Ion channels are involved in ion buildup, which drives the influx of water and causes turgor pressure, which stretches the asci [29]. To reveal the underlying role of ion channels in ascospore discharge in F. graminearum, perithecia of the wild-type PH-1 were treated with ion channel inhibitors and their ascospore discharge was evaluated. We found that blocking K+, Ca2+ and Cl- channels with inhibitors (K+: CsCl or glyburide; Ca2+: TMB8; Cl-: DIDS or 9-AC) significantly reduced ascospore discharge by F. graminearum. The reduction rate was 40–60% when K+ or Cl- channels were blocked, and over 99% when Ca2+ channels were blocked (Table 2), suggesting that ion channels indeed play an important role in ascospore discharge by F. graminearum. We further analyzed ascospore discharge in the ΔFgvam7 and ΔFgpep12 mutants through treatment with exogenous ions. The ascospore discharge defect of the ΔFgvam7 and ΔFgpep12 mutants was greatly rescued by treatment with K+, Na+, Cl- and Ca2+. The number of discharged ascospores increased to over 31% in ΔFgvam7 and over 45% in ΔFgpep12, as compared to the wild-type PH-1 (Table 3). Together, these results suggest that ion channel impairment results in arrest of ascospore discharge in F. graminearum.

Table 2. Inhibition rate of ascospore discharge of PH-1 under various ionic inhibitors treatment.

Inhibitor Compounda Concentration Inhibition Rate (%)
K+ inhibitor CsCl 5.0 mM 53.6 ± 2.3
Glyburide 0.5 mM 47.3 ± 3.8
Ca2+ inhibitor TMB8 0.5 mM 80.9 ± 2.8
1.0 mM 99.3 ± 3.0
Cl- inhibitor DIDS 50 μM 61.3 ± 1.6
9-AC 20 μM 52.1 ± 4.2
CK Ethanol 0.5 mM 0.3 ± 0.1
CK HCl 0.5 mM 1.2 ± 0.6

±SD was calculated from three independent experiments. CK: control (dissolvant).

Table 3. Ascospore discharge of the indicated strains under various ions treatment.

Strains Compounds
Water Agar NH4NO3 KNO3 NaNO3 KCl NaCl NH4Cl CaCl2
0.5 mM 1.0 mM 0.5 mM 1.0 mM 0.5 mM 1.0 mM 0.5 mM 1.0 mM 0.5 mM 1.0 mM 0.5 mM 1.0 mM 0.5 mM 1.0 mM
PH-1 139.6 ± 3.4 134.3± 0.6 140.6 ± 6.2 143.6 ± 3.6 137.3 ± 6.1 139.7 ± 2.1 136.7 ± 3.9 128.6 ± 5.4 135.6 ± 4.8 129.5 ± 6.5 137.5 ± 3.7 124.8 ± 6.7 136.6 ± 4.4 127.7 ± 1.3 141.7 ± 6.3
ΔFgpep12 0 0 0 67.3 ± 3.6* 82.1 ± 0.6* 63.6 ± 2.5* 79.6 ± 2.5* 74.6 ± 6.4* 92.1 ± 2.1* 69.6 ± 1.9* 87.8 ± 2.1* 56.1 ± 2.6* 76.1 ± 4.2* 70.8 ± 4.6* 93.8 ± 7.6*
ΔFgvam7 0 0 0 45.2 ± 2.8* 45.2 ± 2.8* 53.4 ± 1.7* 63.4 ± 1.7* 61.8 ± 3.1* 84.2 ± 1.5* 71.4 ± 3.7* 91.1 ± 0.2* 63.4 ± 6.2* 69.9 ± 6.1* 65.4 ± 2.1* 86.8 ± 3.4*
ΔFgpep12/ FgPEP12 131.8 ± 5.2 127.1± 4.6 138.2 ± 3.9 139.1 ± 7.2 143.7 ± 5.8 142.8 ± 4.2 138.7 ± 4.8 138.6 ± 7.4 127.6 ± 6.6 134.5 ± 4.9 141.9 ± 6.7 132.1 ± 4.1 124.1 ± 0.7 131.9 ± 0.7 139.2 ± 2.3
ΔFgvam7/ FgVAM7 143.1 ± 2.1 134.1± 4.6 136.8 ± 1.7 141.1 ± 3.8 133.1 ± 3.3 135.8 ± 6.2 129.8 ± 6.2 135.6 ± 4.1 137.6 ± 1.3 138.5 ± 5.5 130.5 ± 1.9 129.4 ± 7.1 135.2 ± 2.8 134.1 ± 3.1 146.7 ± 8.1

Each number indicates the ascospores discharged from 35 perithecia. ±SD was calculated from three independent experiments, and asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.01).

Both FgVam7 and FgPep12 physically interact with Ca2+ ATPase FgNeo1 in F. graminearum

Both FgVam7 and FgPep12 localized to intracellular compartments, and the Ca2+ channel is likely the most important ion channel for ascospore discharge based on the results described above. To determine the relationship between Ca2+ channel proteins and FgVam7 or FgPep12, eight intracellular calcium signaling-related proteins with predicted functions as Ca2+ pumps, Ca2+ exchangers and Ca2+ permeable channels were identified in F. graminearum based on the model of calcium signaling and transport pathways in the rice blast fungus [45]. We first analyzed the interactions between FgVam7, FgPep12 and these eight proteins using Y2H assays. Both FgVam7 and FgPep12 physically interact with the putative Ca2+ pump protein Ca2+ ATPase FgNeo1 (FGSG_05149), but not with the other seven proteins assessed in the Y2H assays (Fig 7A). The interactions among FgVam7, FgPep12 and FgNeo1 were confirmed by co-IP and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays (Fig 7B and 7C). Combined with the interaction observed between FgVam7 and FgPep12, we propose that FgNeo1, FgPep12 and FgVam7 interact with each other to form a complex in F. graminearum. In the FgPep12&FgNeo1 and FgVam7&FgNeo1 BiFC transformants, YFP signals were observed in punctate structures (Fig 7C). To identify these structures, we expressed RFP-FgSft2 and RFP-FgRab7 in the two BiFC transformants and obtained RFP transformants. Fluorescence observation revealed that interactions between FgPep12 and FgNeo1 mainly occurred in the Golgi apparatus (43.6%) and late endosomes (52.4%) (Fig 7D). Interactions between FgVam7 and FgNeo1 mainly occurred in late endosomes (72.5%) but also sometimes occurred in the Golgi apparatus (17.3%) (Fig 7E). Similar results were also observed in ascospores in these two BiFC transformants (S3A and S3B Fig). In addition, we found FgPep12&FgNeo1 and FgVam7&FgNeo1 displayed dynamic mobility and also merged with Golgi apparatus and late endosomes in hyphae (S1S4 Videos). These results indicate that FgPep12 and FgVam7 likely mediate FgNeo1 trafficking between the Golgi and endosomal/vacuolar system in F. graminearum.

Fig 7. FgPep12 and FgVam7 physically interact with Ca2+ ATPase FgNeo1 in F. graminearum.

Fig 7

(A) Y2H assays for the interactions between FgPep12, FgVam7 and the predicted intracellular calcium signaling-related proteins, respectively. +, positive control; -, negative control. (B) Co-IP assays for the interactions between FgPep12 and FgNeo1, FgVam7 and FgNeo1. Total proteins were isolated from transformants co-expressing GFP-FgNeo1 and FgVam7-3×FLAG or FgPep12-3×FLAG constructs, and proteins eluted from the anti-FLAG M2 beads (elution). Immunoblots were incubated with monoclonal anti-FLAG and anti-GFP antibody, respectively. (C) BiFC assays for the interactions between FgPep12 and FgNeo1, FgVam7 and FgNeo1, respectively. (D and E) Hyphae of transformants expressing RFP-FgSft2 or RFP-FgRab7 constructs in the FgPep12&FgNeo1 and FgVam7&FgNeo1 BiFC strains, were examined under a confocal microscope. Numbers indicate the merged rate of YFP and RFP proteins. Bar = 10μm.

FgNeo1 is involved in vegetative, asexual, and sexual development and virulence in F. graminearum

Because FgNeo1, FgPep12 and FgVam7 interact with each other, these three proteins may regulate similar biological processes. Sequence analysis revealed that FgNeo1 is a putative homolog of yeast Neo1, a phospholipid-translocating ATPase (Ca2+ATPase) that is essential in yeast [46]. Therefore, we adopted the conditional promoter replacement (CPR) approach for inducing (NaNO3: NO3-) or silencing (Glutamate: Glu) FgNEO1 under the control of pFgNIA1 [47] to characterize its function. Three CPR transformants (pFgNIA1-FgNEO1) were identified by PCR screening (S4A and S4B Fig) and verified by qRT-PCR analysis (Fig 8A). Compared to NO3- treatment, the relative reduction (RR; %) in colony diameter and the numbers of conidia and perithecia were significant lower in pFgNIA1-FgNEO1 transformant than in PH-1 under Glu treatment (Fig 8B and 8D). Meanwhile, formation of asci and ascospores showed no obvious differences between PH-1 and pFgNIA1-FgNEO1 transformant under NO3- or Glu treatment (Fig 8E). On the other hand, pFgNIA1-FgNEO1 transformant almost completely lost its virulence to wheat germs and wheat heads under Glu treatment (Fig 8F). These results suggest that FgNeo1 played important roles in the development and virulence of F. graminearum, similar to FgPep12 and FgVam7.

Fig 8. FgNeo1 is involved in vegetative growth, asexual/sexual development and virulence.

Fig 8

(A) Quantitative RT-PCR monitoring of FgNIA1 and FgNEO1 expression in the wild type PH-1 and transformant pFgNIA1-FgNEO1 under the control of pFgNIA1. The strains were cultured in MM+NO3- and MM+Glu, respectively. (B) Colony morphology of the indicated strains on different media, and statistical analysis of the percentage of relative reduction (RR) in growth. (C) Quantification and analysis of the percentage of relative reduction in conidial production. (D and E) Perithecia, asci formation and morphology of the indicated strains. Bar = 1 mm. (F) Conidial suspensions of the indicated strains with NO3- or Glu, were drop-inoculated onto wheat germs (WG) or injected into the flowering wheat heads (WH). Photographs were taken at 10 dpi and 14 dpi, respectively. Error bars represent the SD and asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.01).

FgNeo1 is essential for ascospore discharge in an ion-dependent manner in F. graminearum

Although ascus and ascospore formation were not affected by Glu treatment in pFgNIA1-FgNEO1 transformant, we further investigated whether FgNeo1 plays a role in ascospore discharge. The discharge assay was performed using perithecia from the PH-1 and pFgNIA1-FgNEO1 strains, treated with NO3- and Glu, respectively. No ascospores were discharged from pFgNIA1-FgNEO1 transformant treated with Glu. In contrast, numerous ascospores were visible from PH-1 treated with NO3- and Glu, or from pFgNIA1-FgNEO1 treated with NO3- (Fig 9A), suggesting that FgNeo1 plays an essential role in ascospore discharge in F. graminearum. To determine the reasons for this difference, we measured the concentrations of ions (Ca2+, Na+, K+ and Cl-) in asci, and found that the asci of pFgNIA1-FgNEO1 transformant treated with Glu exhibited lower concentrations of Ca2+, Na+ and K+, but not Cl-. In particular, the Ca2+ concentration was decreased sharply in comparison to PH-1 treated with NO3- and Glu or to pFgNIA1-FgNEO1 treated with NO3- (Fig 9B). To confirm whether the low ion concentrations cause the defect in ascospore discharge, exogenous ions (Ca2+, Na+, K+ and Cl-) were applied to the asci of PH-1 and pFgNIA1-FgNEO1 transformant treated with Glu. The capacity for ascospore discharge was restored by 43.5% with Na+, 42.4% with K+ and 70.1% with Ca2+, but not improved with Cl- treatment in pFgNIA1-FgNEO1 transformant (Fig 9C; Table 4). These results demonstrate that FgNeo1 plays an essential role in ascospore discharge in an ion (Ca2+, Na+, and K+)-dependent manner in F. graminearum.

Fig 9. FgNeo1 is essential for ascospore discharge in an ion-dependent manner.

Fig 9

(A) Ascospore discharge of perithecia harvested from PH-1 and pFgNIA1-FgNEO1 cultured on carrot agar plates with NO3- or Glu. (B) Measurement of the ion concentration in asci of the indicated strains by spectrophotometrically. Error bars represent the SD and asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.01). (C) Ascospore discharge of perithecia harvested from pFgNIA1-FgNEO1 cultured on carrot agar plates with Glu by adding exogenous ions.

Table 4. Ascospore discharge of the indicated strains under various ions treatment.

Strains Compounds
Water Agar 1 mM NH4Cl 1 mM NaCl 1 mM KCl 1 mM CaCl2
PH-1+Glu 146.4 ± 5.8 137.5 ± 3.7 138.7 ± 2.9 148.7 ± 4.2 143.7 ± 5.8
pFgNIA1-FgNEO1+Glu 0 0 60.4 ± 6.6* 63.1 ± 7.1* 100.7 ± 4.6*

Each number indicates the ascospores discharged from 35 perithecia. ±SD was calculated from three independent experiments, and asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.01).

FgNeo1 exhibits a late endosome/Golgi localization pattern modulated by FgPep12

To investigate how FgNeo1 functions in F. graminearum, we obtained the GFP-FgNeo1 fluorescence strain and examined its localization pattern in the hyphae. Green fluorescence signals were mainly observed in punctate structures throughout the cell (Fig 10A). In yeast, Neo1 reportedly localizes to the endosomes and Golgi apparatus [48]. Therefore, we co-expressed GFP-FgNeo1 with the Golgi marker protein FgSft2 and the early and late endosome marker proteins FgRab51 and FgRab7 fused to the RFP protein in F. graminearum. Fluorescence observation revealed that most GFP-FgNeo1 signals overlapped well with RFP-FgSft2 and RFP-FgRab7, but few were co-located with RFP-FgRab51. The percentage of punctate structures exhibiting GFP-FgNeo1 co-localization with RFP-FgSft2 was 40.3%, compared to 56.2% with RFP-FgRab7 and 8.4% with RFP-FgRab51 (Fig 10A), suggesting that GFP-FgNeo1 is mainly localized to the Golgi apparatus and late endosomes in F. graminearum. We also examined the localization pattern of GFP-FgNeo1 in the ΔFgvam7 and ΔFgpep12 mutants. Interestingly, GFP-FgNeo1 was mislocalized to the cytosol in the ΔFgpep12 mutant, but its localization pattern was not altered notably in the ΔFgvam7 mutant (Fig 10B). These findings indicate that FgNeo1 functions within the endomembrane/Golgi system and is closely related to FgPep12.

Fig 10. FgNeo1 localizes to late endosomes and Golgi apparatus that regulated by FgPep12.

Fig 10

(A) Expression and localization of GFP-FgNeo1 in F. graminearum. Hyphae of transformants co-expressing GFP-FgNeo1&FgSft2-RFP, GFP-FgNeo1&RFP-FgRab51 or GFP-FgNeo1&RFP-FgRab7 constructs were examined under a confocal microscope. Numbers indicate the merged rate of both proteins. Bar = 10 μm. (B) Hyphae of transformants expressing GFP-FgNeo1 in the wild type PH-1, ΔFgpep12 and ΔFgvam7 mutants were examined by DIC or fluorescence microscope. Bar = 10 μm.

Deletion of FgPep12 affects the trafficking of FgVam7&FgNeo1

To further clarify the biological significance of interactions among FgPep12, FgVam7 and FgNeo1, we obtained transformants expressing FgPep12-YFPN&FgNeo1-YFPC in the ΔFgvam7 mutant and FgVam7-YFPN&FgNeo1-YFPC in the ΔFgpep12 mutant. Microscopic observation revealed that strong yellow fluorescence signals remain visible in both mutants (Fig 11A and 11B), suggesting that deletion of either FgPep12 or FgVam7 does not change the interaction between the other protein and FgNeo1. However, the YFP signal distribution was markedly different in the ΔFgpep12 mutant, with a uniform distribution in the cytosol (tip hyphae) or cytosol aside from vacuoles (basal hyphae), in comparison to localization in punctate structures in the wild type and ΔFgvam7 mutant (Fig 11A and 11B). Similar results were also observed in ascospores in these two mutants (S5A and S5B Fig). Therefore, deletion of FgPep12 affects the normal transport of FgVam7 and FgNeo1 in F. graminearum.

Fig 11. Deletion of FgPep12 affects the localization pattern of FgVam7&FgNeo1.

Fig 11

(A) Hyphae of transformants expressing FgPep12-YFPN&FgNeo1-YFPC in the wild type PH-1 and ΔFgvam7 were examined by DIC or fluorescence microscope. (B) Hyphae of transformants expressing FgVam7-YFPN&FgNeo1-YFPC in PH-1 and ΔFgpep12 were examined by DIC or fluorescence microscope. Bar = 10 μm.

Discussion

In ascomycetous fungi, the most unique cell type in the life cycle is the ascus. Asci elongate in response to increased turgor pressure and eventually rupture at the tip to fire spores into the air [49]. Under optimal conditions, the asci of F. graminearum fire individually in succession approximately 45 s apart [29], indicating that some regulatory mechanism must coordinate ascospore discharge. Previous studies have reported that ion channel proteins are closely related to this biological process. Several mutants of ion channel proteins exhibited defects in ascus turgor pressure and failed to discharge ascospores [24, 3032]. In this study, we identified and characterized the SNARE protein FgPep12, which mediates vacuole-to-PVC transport and is important for the development and virulence of F. graminearum. Moreover, we unraveled the regulatory mechanisms by which the SNARE proteins FgPep12 and FgVam7 manipulate ascospore discharge in this important plant pathogenic fungus, based on genetic evidence and cytological examination. FgPep12 associated with FgVam7, modulates the trafficking of the Ca2+ ATPase FgNeo1 between the Golgi and endosomal/vacuolar system, thereby controlling the vegetative growth, asexual development, ascospore discharge and plant infection processes in F. graminearum (Fig 12).

Fig 12. A proposed model for FgPep12-Vam7-Neo1 during the development, plant infection and ascospore discharge in F. graminearum.

Fig 12

SNARE proteins are known to mediate membrane fusion events between transport vesicles and their target membranes in eukaryotic organisms [5051]. In several plant pathogens, SNARE and associated proteins have been reported to play crucial roles in development and virulence through their involvement in vesicle trafficking pathways. For example, the SNARE protein FgVam7 mediates endocytosis and vacuole membrane fusion, and is important for fungal development and infection [10]. FgVps41, a vacuolar sorting protein associated with FgVam7, mediates membrane fusion and PVC-to-vacuole trafficking. It is also involved in morphogenesis during infectious development [43]. These reports suggested that vesicle trafficking pathways and their components are indispensable for the normal development and virulence of F. graminearum. The findings of the present study regarding FgPep12 support this conclusion.

Membrane fusion along the secretory pathway requires the specific interaction of SNAREs that are localized to vesicles and target organelles [51]. In SNAREs, the SNARE domain acts as a protein-protein interaction module and is required for SNARE complex formation [52]; the TM domain is anchored to membranes by most SNAREs and has a direct role in fusion [5354], indicating SNARE and TM domains are important for SNARE functions and for complete fusion. In agree with this, deletion either SNARE or TM in FgPep12 altered its localization pattern and functions. In GFP-ΔSNARE, because of no SNARE domain, FgPep12 probably was unable to interact with other partners that localized to vesicles and target organelles, vacuole fusion might be blocked at an early stage, thus the GFP-ΔSNARE protein failed to accumulate in the vacuoles. In GFP-ΔTM, GFP signals mainly observed in pre-vacuole structures but not mature vacuoles. It seems the formation of SNARE complex was not obviously influenced in GFP-ΔTM, but vacuole fusion was blocked at a late stage because of no TM domain. These findings were also similar to that reported in yeast, in which TM domain performed important roles in the prevacuolar and vacuolar SNARE complexes [55]. In addition, alteration of the TM domain of the SNARE protein Vam3 in yeast affects the composition of the SNARE complex to promote vacuole fusion [54]. TM domain of the SNARE protein Syb2 in neurosecretory cells was reported to play a role in determining early fusion pore structure as well as fusion pore expansion [56]. We speculate that the TM domain of FgPep12 might also have similar functions, but the underlying fusion mechanism needs to be further investigated.

The PVC is a dynamic organelle that receives proteins from a variety of sources, including the biosynthetic and endocytic pathways, as well as the retrograde pathway from vacuoles [40, 57]. Pep12 is involved in all reported membrane fusion events of the PVC in S. cerevisiae [41]. In this study, we demonstrated that FgPep12 is required for retrograde transport from the vacuole to PVC, and this retrograde transport requires the activity of FgVps41 in F. graminearum. These results indicate that Pep12 mediates a conserved mechanism in different fungi. The intracellular trafficking systems and related organelles are known to play key roles in the development and pathogenicity of filamentous fungi [5, 39, 58]. For example, retrograde trafficking from the endosome to the trans-Golgi network mediated by the retromer is necessary for development and virulence in F. graminearum [39]; late endosomal compartments function as important anchors, integrating trafficking and signal transduction of G-proteins and cAMP synthesis during pathogenesis in M. oryzae [59]; long-distance retrograde motility of early endosomes is essential for U. maydis effector production and subsequent secretion during plant infection [60]. Combining these reports with our findings, we conclude that FgPep12 is involved in trafficking between the Golgi and endosomal/vacuolar system in F. graminearum, and may be responsible for protein recycling to maintain fungal development and pathogenesis.

In eukaryotic cells, the calcium ion (Ca2+) functions as a ubiquitous intracellular messenger regulating a myriad of biological processes, and the calcium homeostasis system includes tightly regulated metabolic pathways used by cells to maintain Ca2+ concentration within the optimal range in the cytosol and other organelles [6164]. Extracellular Ca2+ normally enters the cytosol of cells through various transporters, such as ion channel proteins [65]. In our study, we found that the ascospore discharge defect of ΔFgpep12 and ΔFgvam7 mutants was closely related to intracellular Ca2+ concentrations, indicating that FgVam7 and FgPep12 might have close relationships with calcium signaling and transport pathways. Furthermore, we identified the Ca2+ ATPase FgNeo1, which forms a complex with FgVam7 and FgPep12 and is also important for fungal development and ascospore discharge in an ion-dependent manner. Further characterization revealed that FgNeo1 is involved in protein trafficking between the Golgi and endosomal/vacuolar system, which is consistent with findings in yeast [48]. In addition, the localization pattern of FgNeo1 was affected in the ΔFgpep12 mutant but not the ΔFgvam7 mutant. The reason for this difference might be that FgPep12 showed a similar localization pattern to FgNeo1, and FgPep12 is likely one of most important transporters of FgNeo1 during its trafficking. This possibility was also supported by our BiFC data. FgPep12 and FgNeo1 co-localized in both the Golgi apparatus and late endosomes, while FgVam7 and FgNeo1 mainly co-occurred in late endosomes. In addition, we found that deletion of FgVam7 had no effect on the interaction and localization of FgPep12&FgNeo1, whereas deletion of FgPep12 affected the localization of FgVam7&FgNeo1. These findings indicate that FgPep12 probably plays a major role in the FgPep12-Neo1-Vam7 complex during its trafficking between the Golgi and endosomal/vacuolar system. Mutation of FgPep12 likely blocks the transportation of FgNeo1, thereby disrupting intracellular calcium homeostasis and subsequently affecting the development, plant infection and ascospore discharge processes of F. graminearum. In regard to FgVam7, PVC-to-vacuole trafficking is constitutively blocked in the ΔFgvam7 mutant, as it was defective in vacuole membrane fusion [10]. Thus, cytosolic Ca2+ could not be transported into large vacuoles, leading to a defect in calcium homeostasis in cells.

In summary, we identified and characterized the SNARE protein FgPep12 in F. graminearum and found that FgPep12 is important for fungal development and virulence through its involvement in vesicle trafficking between the Golgi and endosomal/vacuolar system. We further provide multiple lines of evidence showing that SNARE proteins modulate development and ascospore discharge in pathogenic fungi. FgPep12, associated with FgVam7, is required for the trafficking of the Ca2+ ATPase FgNeo1 between the Golgi and endosomal/vacuolar system, thus controlling growth, asexual development, ascospore discharge and plant infection in F. graminearum.

Materials and methods

Fungal strains and culture conditions

The F. graminearum wild type strain PH-1 [66] was used as parental strain for the transformation experiments to gain gene deletion mutants. All strains were cultured on V8 juice agar plates at 25°C in darkness. For vegetative growth assays, all strains were cultured on complete medium (CM) and V8 medium at 25°C for 3 days in darkness. For sporulation, all strains were cultured in liquid carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) medium and assayed as described previously [5, 10, 67]. Mycelia harvested from liquid CM medium were used for genomic DNA and total RNA extractions. Protoplast preparation and fungal transformation were used for PEG-mediated transformation as described previously [68].

Construction of the gene and domain deletion mutants, and the complemented strains

The FgPEP12 deletion construct was generated using the split-marker approach [10]. The PCR products were transformed into protoplasts of the wild type PH-1 as described [34, 69]. The resulting transformants were screened by PCR and further confirmed by southern blot analysis. For complementation, the fragment containing the entire FgPEP12 gene and GFP sequence under the control of RP27 constitutive promoter, was amplified with primers, and co-transformed with XhoI digested pYF11 (neomycin resistance) plasmid using the yeast gap repair approach [68]. The GFP-FgPEP12 complemented strains were screened by PCR and GFP signal observation. For FgPep12 domain deletion constructs generation, primers were designed according to Splicing Overlap Extension (SOE)-PCR. The PCR products were inserted into pYF11 plasmid and verified by sequencing analysis, and transformed into protoplasts of the ΔFgpep12 mutant. The resulting transformants were screened by GFP signals and the final strains were selected for phenotype analysis. The primers used in this section are listed in S1 Table.

Wheat infection and DON production assays

The infection assay on flowering wheat inflorescences was performed as described previously [5]. A floret of the flowering wheat head was inoculated with 10 μl of conidial suspensions (1×105 conidia/ml). Infected spikelets with typical head blight symptoms were analyzed at two weeks after inoculation. To evaluate the hyphal colonization on infected wheat spikelets, hyphae were examined with a Hitachi TM-1000 tabletop microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) at 7 days post-inoculation (dpi). For DON production determination, five mycelial plugs of each strain were inoculated with 50 g healthy and autoclaved wheat kernels [5, 36]. After incubation for 20 d at 25°C, DON was extracted according to a protocol described previously [70]. PuriTox SR DON colummTC-T200 (Trilogy an alytical laboratory) was used to purify the DON, and a HPLC system Waters 1525 (Waters Co., Massachusetts, USA) was used to determine the DON and fungal ergosterol of each sample. The experiment was repeated three times.

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA samples were extracted using a PureLink TM RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen) following the instructions. Approximately 1 μg RNA was used for reverse transcription into first strand cDNA using the oligo (dT) primer and M-MLV reverse transcription (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using an ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR system according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The tubulin beta chain gene (FGSG_09530) was used as the internal control. Relative transcript amount differences were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCT method in ABI 7500 System Sequence Detection Software. Three biological replicates were repeated. The primers used in this section are listed in S1 Table.

Staining assays

Hyphae were cultured in liquid CM medium for 24 h at 25°C before staining. For vacuole observation, a final concentration of 10 μM of CMAC (7-amino-4-chloromethylcoumarin, Sigma-Aldrich) was used to stain the hyphae or conidia for 30 min at 37°C as described [5, 58, 71]. For conidial septum staining, a final concentration of 10 μg/ml of calcofluor white (CFW) was used in the dark at room temperature for 1 min [72]. Images were taken under Zeiss LSM 710 confocal laser scanning microscope.

Yeast two hybrid (Y2H), co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays

For Y2H assays, the full length cDNA of FgPEP12, FgVAM7 and FgNEO1 was amplified by PCR with primers and cloned into pGBKT7or pGADT7 as bait or prey constructs. The pairs of prey and bait constructs were co-transformed into the yeast strain AH109 as previously described [73]. The pGBKT7-53 and pGADT7-T were served as positive control, and pGBKT7-Lam and pGADT7-T as negative control. The Trp+ and Leu+ transformants were isolated and assayed for growth on SD medium stripped of His, Leu and Trp medium. For co-IP assays, the FgPEP12 and FgVAM7 gene was cloned into pHZ126 to generate the 3×FLAG fusion constructs, the FgPEP12 and FgNEO1 gene was cloned into pYF11 to generate the GFP fusion constructs by yeast gap repair approach. The resulting constructs were verified by sequencing analysis and subsequently co-transformed into the protoplasts of PH-1. Transformants expressing both constructs were screened by GFP signals and confirmed by western blot with anti-FLAG antibody. Total proteins were extracted and incubated with anti-GFP beads as previously described [74]. Proteins eluted from beads were analyzed by western blot with monoclonal anti-FLAG and monoclonal anti-GFP antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), respectively. The primers used in this section are listed in S1 Table. For BiFC assays, the FgPEP12 and FgVAM7 gene was cloned into pHZ65 to generate the YFPN fusion constructs, and the FgNEO1 gene was cloned into pHZ68 to generate the YFPC fusion construct, by yeast gap repair approach. The resulting constructs were verified by sequencing analysis and co-transformed into the protoplasts of PH-1. The resulting transformants were screened by YFP signals under a fluorescence microscope.

Ascospore discharge assays

For ascospore discharge, agar blocks covered with perithecia were placed on the end of a glass slide and oriented, and the perithecia bearing surface was perpendicular to the surface of the slide. Then slides were placed on a platform in a transparent humidity chamber under 12 h darkness and 12 h light. Discharged spores were collected from the slides by washing each slide with 1 ml distilled water, and quantified using a hemocytometer.

Ion channel inhibition assays

Ascospore discharge assays were set up from cultures containing perithecia10 dpi with the following modifications: thickness of the agar blocks was reduced to approximately 2 mm and blocks were placed on a similarly sized 2% water agar block containing dissolved inhibitors. Spores were allowed to discharge from the stacked blocks for 24 h, and then collected and quantified as described above. The number of perithecia on each agar block was also recorded and data normalized to reflect numbers of ascospores discharged per perithecium.

Statistical analysis

Each result was presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three replicated measurements. The significant differences between treatments were statistically evaluated by SD and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS 2.0. The data between two specific different treatments were compared statistically by ANOVA, followed by F-test if the ANOVA result is significant at p< 0.01.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Yeast complementation assay.

FgPep12 could rescue the growth defect of ΔScpep12 mutant under high temperature. Serial dilutions of BY4741, ΔScpep12 and ΔScpep12 transformed with pYES2 or pYES2-FgPEP12 were grown on YPD plates at 25°C or 38°C for 2 days and then photographed.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Targeted gene replacement of FgPEP12 in F. graminearum.

(A) Schematic diagram of deletion strategy of FgPEP12. (B) Southern blot analysis of the mutant with gene probe and HPH probe, respectively.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. FgPep12&FgNeo1 and FgVam7&FgNeo1 mainly localize to Golgi organelles and late endosomes in ascospores.

(A and B) Ascospores of transformants expressing RFP-FgSft2 or RFP-FgRab7 constructs in the FgPep12&FgNeo1 and FgVam7&FgNeo1 BiFC strains, were examined under a confocal microscope. Bar = 10 μm.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Targeted replacement of the FgNEO1 promoter with pFgNIA1 in F. graminearum.

(A) Strategy for the construction of pFgNIA1-FgNEO1 CPR transformants. (B) Verification of the candidate CPR transformants (T1, T2, T3) by PCR. +, positive control; -, negative control; CK, using wild type genomic DNA as template.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Deletion of FgPep12 affects the localization of FgVam7&FgNeo1 in ascospores.

(A) Ascospores of transformants expressing FgPep12-YFPN&FgNeo1-YFPC in the wild type PH-1 and ΔFgvam7 were examined by DIC or fluorescence microscope. (B) Ascospores of transformants expressing FgVam7-YFPN&FgNeo1-YFPC in PH-1 and ΔFgpep12 were examined by DIC or fluorescence microscope. Bar = 10 μm.

(TIF)

S1 Video. Dynamics of FgPep12-YFPN&FgNeo1-YFPC and its co-localization with RFP-FgRab7.

(ZIP)

S2 Video. Dynamics of FgPep12-YFPN&FgNeo1-YFPC and its co-localization with RFP-FgSft2.

(ZIP)

S3 Video. Dynamics of FgVam7-YFPN&FgNeo1-YFPC and its co-localization with RFP-FgRab7.

(ZIP)

S4 Video. Dynamics of FgVam7-YFPN&FgNeo1-YFPC and its co-localization with RFP-FgSft2.

(ZIP)

S1 Table. Primers used in this study.

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Huaigu Chen of Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences for assistance with wheat head inoculation assays.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFD0300700/2016YFD0300706), the Outstanding Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20160074 to HZ), the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31671978 to HZ), and the Innovation Team Program for Jiangsu Universities (2017). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Kienle N, Kloepper TH, Fasshauer D. Phylogeny of the SNARE vesicle fusion machinery yields insights into the conservation of the secretory pathway in fungi. BMC Evol Biol. 2009; 9(1): 19 10.1186/1471-2148-9-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bonifacino JS, Glick BS. The mechanisms of vesicle budding and fusion. Cell. 2004; 116(2): 153–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jahn R, Scheller RH. SNAREs—engines for membrane fusion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio. 2006; 7(9): 631–43. 10.1038/nrm2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Qi ZQ, Liu MX, Dong YH, Zhu Q, Li LW, Li B, et al. The syntaxin protein (MoSyn8) mediates intracellular trafficking to regulate conidiogenesis and pathogenicity of rice blast fungus. New Phytol. 2016; 209(4): 1655–67. 10.1111/nph.13710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li B, Liu LP, Li Y, Dong X, Zhang HF, Chen HG, et al. The FgVps39-FgVam7-FgSso1 complex mediates vesicle trafficking and is important for the development and virulence of Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2017; 30(5): 410–22. 10.1094/MPMI-11-16-0242-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dou XY, Wang Q, Qi ZQ, Song WW, Wang W, Guo M, et al. MoVam7, a conserved SNARE involved in vacuole assembly, is required for growth, endocytosis, ROS accumulation, and pathogenesis of Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS One. 2011; 6(1): e16439 10.1371/journal.pone.0016439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Burri L, Lithgow T. A complete set of SNAREs in yeast. Traffic. 2004; 5(1): 45–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Burri L, Varlamov O, Doege CA, Hofmann K, Beilharz T, Rothman JE, et al. A SNARE required for retrograde transport to the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100(17): 9873–7. 10.1073/pnas.1734000100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Song WW, Dou XY, Qi ZQ, Wang Q, Zhang X, Zhang HF, et al. R-SNARE homolog MoSec22 is required for conidiogenesis, cell wall integrity, and pathogenesis of Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS One. 2010; 5(10): e13193 10.1371/journal.pone.0013193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang H, Li B, Fang Q, Li Y, Zheng X, Zhang Z. SNARE protein FgVam7 controls growth, asexual and sexual development, and plant infection in Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Pathol. 2016; 17(1): 108–19. 10.1111/mpp.12267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Misura KMS, Gonzalez LC, May AP, Scheller RH, Weis WI. Crystal structure and biophysical properties of a complex between the N-terminal SNARE region of SNAP25 and syntaxin 1a. J Bioll Chem. 2001; 276(44): 41301–9. 10.1074/jbc.M106853200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pratelli J, Sutter JU, Blatt MR. A new catch in the SNARE. Trends Plant Sci. 2004; 9(4): 187–95. 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sollner T, Whitehart SW, Brunner M, Erdjumentbromage H, Geromanos S, Tempst P, et al. Snap receptors implicated in vesicle targeting and fusion. Nature. 1993; 362(6418): 318–24. 10.1038/362318a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sanderfoot AA, Assaad FF, Raikhel NV. The Arabidopsis genome. An abundance of soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor adaptor protein receptors. Plant Physiol. 2000; 124(4): 1558–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pelham HRB. SNAREs and the secretory pathway—Lessons from yeast. Exp Cell Res. 1999; 247(1): 1–8. 10.1006/excr.1998.4356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kuratsu M, Taura A, Shoji J, Kikuchi S, Arioka M, Kitamoto K. Systematic analysis of SNARE localization in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Fungal Genet Biol. 2007; 44(12): 1310–23. 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.04.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zuo YS, Yang J, Wang DW, He D, Chu Y, Chen XL, et al. MoTlg2, a t-SNARE component is important for formation of the Spitzenkorper and polar deposition of chitin in Magnaporthe oryzae. Physiol Mol Plant P. 2014; 87: 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hong SY, So J, Lee J, Min K, Son H, Park C, et al. Functional analyses of two syntaxin-like SNARE genes, GzSYN1 and GzSYN2, in the ascomycete Gibberella zeae. Fungal Genet Biol. 2010; 47(4): 364–72. 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wedlich-Soldner R, Bolker M, Kahmann R, Steinberg G. A putative endosomal t-SNARE links exo- and endocytosis in the phytopathogenic fungus Ustilago maydis. EMBO J. 2000; 19(9): 1974–86. 10.1093/emboj/19.9.1974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Giraldo MC, Dagdas YF, Gupta YK, Mentlak TA, Yi M, Martinez-Rocha AL, et al. Two distinct secretion systems facilitate tissue invasion by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Nat Commun. 2013; 4: 1996 10.1038/ncomms2996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fernando WGD, Paulitz TC, Seaman WL, Dutilleul P, Miller JD. Head blight gradients caused by Gibberella zeae from area sources of inoculum in wheat field plots. Phytopathology. 1997; 87(4): 414–21. 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.4.414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Trail F, Xu HX, Loranger R, Gadoury D. Physiological and environmental aspects of ascospore discharge in Gibberella zeae (anamorph Fusarium graminearum). Mycologia. 2002; 94(2): 181–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Parry DW, Jenkinson P, Mcleod L. Fusarium ear blight (scab) in small-grain cereals-a Review. Plant Pathol. 1995; 44(2): 207–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Min K, Lee J, Kim JC, Kim SG, Kim YH, Vogel S, et al. A novel gene, ROA, is required for normal morphogenesis and discharge of ascospores in Gibberella zeae. Eukaryot Cell. 2010; 9(10): 1495–503. 10.1128/EC.00083-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bai GH, Shaner G. Management and resistance in wheat and barley to Fusarium head blight. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2004; 42: 135–61. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Goswami RS, Kistler HC. Heading for disaster: Fusarium graminearum on cereal crops. Mol Plant Pathol. 2004; 5(6): 515–25. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2004.00252.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pestka JJ, Smolinski AT. Deoxynivalenol: Toxicology and potential effects on humans. J Toxicol Env Heal B. 2005; 8(1): 39–69. 10.1080/10937400590889458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Trail F, Common R. Perithecial development by Gibberella zeae: a light microscopy study. Mycologia. 2000; 92(1): 130–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Trail F, Gaffoor I, Vogel S. Ejection mechanics and trajectory of the ascospores of Gibberella zeae (anamorph Fuarium graminearum). Fungal Genet Biol. 2005; 42(6): 528–33. 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cavinder B, Hamam A, Lew RR, Trail F. Mid1, a mechanosensitive calcium ion channel, affects growth, development, and ascospore discharge in the filamentous fungus Gibberella zeae. Eukaryot Cell. 2011; 10(6): 832–41. 10.1128/EC.00235-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hallen HE, Trail F. The L-type calcium ion channel Cch1 affects ascospore discharge and mycelial growth in the filamentous fungus Gibberella zeae (anamorph Fusarium graminearum). Eukaryot Cell. 2008; 7(2): 415–24. 10.1128/EC.00248-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cavinder B, Trail F. Role of Fig1, a component of the low-affinity calcium uptake system, in growth and sexual development of filamentous fungi. Eukaryot Cell. 2012; 11(8): 978–88. 10.1128/EC.00007-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Desjardins AE, Proctor RH, Bai GH, McCormick SP, Shaner G, Buechley G, et al. Reduced virulence of trichothecene-nonproducing mutants of Gibberella zeae in wheat field tests. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1996; 9(9): 775–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Proctor RH, Hohn TM, McCormick SP. Reduced virulence of Gibberella zeae caused by disruption of a trichothecene toxin biosynthetic gene. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1995; 8(4): 593–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zheng H, Zheng W, Wu C, Yang J, Xi Y, Xie Q, et al. Rab GTPases are essential for membrane trafficking-dependent growth and pathogenicity in Fusarium graminearum. Environ Microbiol. 2015; 17(11): 4580–99. 10.1111/1462-2920.12982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yun YZ, Liu ZY, Zhang JZ, Shim WB, Chen Y, Ma ZH. The MAPKK FgMkk1 of Fusarium graminearum regulates vegetative differentiation, multiple stress response, and virulence via the cell wall integrity and high-osmolarity glycerol signaling pathways. Environ Microbiol. 2014; 16(7): 2023–37. 10.1111/1462-2920.12334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Seong KY, Pasquali M, Zhou X, Song J, Hilburn K, McCormick S, et al. Global gene regulation by Fusarium transcription factors Tri6 and Tri10 reveals adaptations for toxin biosynthesis. Mol Microbiol. 2009; 72(2): 354–67. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06649.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liu YW, Huang CF, Huang KB, Lee FJS. Role for Gcs1p in regulation of Arl1p at trans-Golgi compartments. Mol Biol Cell. 2005; 16(9): 4024–33. 10.1091/mbc.E05-01-0023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zheng WH, Zheng HW, Zhao X, Zhang Y, Xie QR, Lin XL, et al. Retrograde trafficking from the endosome to the trans-Golgi network mediated by the retromer is required for fungal development and pathogenicity in Fusarium graminearum. New Phytol. 2016; 210(4): 1327–43. 10.1111/nph.13867 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bryant NJ, Piper RC, Weisman LS, Stevens TH. Retrograde traffic out of the yeast vacuole to the TGN occurs via the prevacuolar/endosomal compartment. J Cell Biol. 1998; 142(3): 651–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gerrard SR, Levi BP, Stevens TH. Pep12p is a multifunctional yeast syntaxin that controls entry of biosynthetic, endocytic and retrograde traffic into the prevacuolar compartment. Traffic. 2000; 1(3): 259–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bryant NJ, Stevens TH. Two separate signals act independently to localize a yeast late Golgi membrane protein through a combination of retrieval and retention. J Cell Biol. 1997; 136(2): 287–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Li B, Dong X, Li XR, Chen HG, Zhang HF, Zheng XB, et al. A subunit of the HOPS endocytic tethering complex, FgVps41, is important for fungal development and plant infection in Fusarium graminearum. Environ Microbiol. 2018; 20(4): 1436–51. 10.1111/1462-2920.14050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nothwehr SF, Roberts CJ, Stevens TH. Membrane-protein retention in the yeast Golgi-apparatus-dipeptidyl aminopeptidase-a is retained by a cytoplasmic signal containing aromatic residues. J Cell Biol. 1993; 121(6): 1197–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nguyen QB, Kadotani N, Kasahara S, Tosa Y, Mayama S, Nakayashiki H. Systematic functional analysis of calcium-signalling proteins in the genome of the rice-blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae, using a high-throughput RNA-silencing system. Mol Microbiol. 2008; 68(6): 1348–65. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06242.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hua Z, Graham TR. Requirement for neo1p in retrograde transport from the Golgi complex to the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Biol Cell. 2003; 14(12): 4971–83. 10.1091/mbc.E03-07-0463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Marchegiani E, Sidhu Y, Haynes K, Lebrun MH. Conditional gene expression and promoter replacement in Zymoseptoria tritici using fungal nitrate reductase promoters. Fungal Genet Biol. 2015; 79: 174–9. 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.04.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wicky S, Schwarz H, Singer-Kruger B. Molecular interactions of yeast Neo1p, an essential member of the Drs2 family of aminophospholipid translocases, and its role in membrane trafficking within the endomembrane system. Mol Cell Biol. 2004; 24(17): 7402–18. 10.1128/MCB.24.17.7402-7418.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Trail F. Fungal cannons: explosive spore discharge in the Ascomycota. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007; 276(1): 12–8. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00900.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ferro-Novick S, Jahn R. Vesicle fusion from yeast to man. Nature. 1994; 370(6486): 191–3. 10.1038/370191a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rothman JE. Mechanisms of intracellular protein transport. Nature. 1994; 372(6501): 55–63. 10.1038/372055a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Katz L, Hanson PI, Heuser JE, Brennwald P. Genetic and morphological analyses reveal a critical interaction between the C-termini of two SNARE proteins and a parallel four helical arrangement for the exocytic SNARE complex. EMBO J. 1998; 17(21): 6200–9. 10.1093/emboj/17.21.6200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Weimbs T, Low SH, Chapin SJ, Mostov KE, Bucher P, Hofmann K. A conserved domain is present in different families of vesicular fusion proteins: A new superfamily. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997; 94(7): 3046–51. 10.1073/pnas.94.7.3046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Rohde J, Dietrich L, Langosch D, Ungermann C. The transmembrane domain of Vam3 affects the composition of cis- and trans-SNARE complexes to promote homotypic vacuole fusion. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278(3): 1656–62. 10.1074/jbc.M209522200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gerrard SR, Mecklem AB, Stevens TH. The yeast endosomal t-SNARE, pep12p, functions in the absence of its transmembrane domain. Traffic. 2000; 1(1): 45–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Fang QH, Lindau M. How could SNARE proteins open a fusion pore? Physiology. 2014; 29(4): 278–85. 10.1152/physiol.00026.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bryant NJ, Stevens TH. Vacuole biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Protein transport pathways to the yeast vacuole. Microbiol Mol Biol R. 1998; 62(1): 230–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shoji JY, Arioka M, Kitamoto K. Vacuolar membrane dynamics in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Eukaryot cell. 2006; 5(2): 411–21. 10.1128/EC.5.2.411-421.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ramanujam R, Calvert ME, Selvaraj P, Naqvi NI. The late endosomal HOPS complex anchors active G-protein signaling essential for pathogenesis in Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS Pathog. 2013; 9(8): e1003527 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bielska E, Higuchi Y, Schuster M, Steinberg N, Kilaru S, Talbot NJ, et al. Long-distance endosome trafficking drives fungal effector production during plant infection. Nat Commu. 2014; 5: 5097 10.1038/ncomms6097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Berridge MJ, Lipp P, Bootman MD. The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio. 2000; 1(1): 11–21. 10.1038/35036035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Berridge MJ, Bootman MD, Roderick HL. Calcium signalling: Dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio. 2003;4(7):517–29. 10.1038/nrm1155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cui JJ, Kaandorp JA, Sloot PMA, Lloyd CM, Filatov MV. Calcium homeostasis and signaling in yeast cells and cardiac myocytes. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009; 9(8): 1137–47. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00552.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Netikova K, Sychrova H, Zimmermannova O. Potassium homeostasis and calcium signalling in yeast cells. FEBS Open Bio. 2018; 9(8): 374–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Locke EG, Bonilla M, Liang L, Takita Y, Cunningham KW. A homolog of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels stimulated by depletion of secretory Ca2+ in yeast. Mol Cell Biol. 2000; 20(18): 6686–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cuomo CA, Gueldener U, Xu JR, Trail F, Turgeon BG, Di Pietro A, et al. The Fusarium graminearum genome reveals a link between localized polymorphism and pathogen specialization. Science. 2007; 317(5843): 1400–2. 10.1126/science.1143708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zheng DW, Zhang SJ, Zhou XY, Wang CF, Xiang P, Zheng Q, et al. The FgHOG1 pathway regulates hyphal growth, stress responses, and plant infection in Fusarium graminearum. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11): e4949 10.1371/journal.pone.0049495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zhou X, Li G, Xu JR. Efficient approaches for generating GFP fusion and epitope-tagging constructs in filamentous fungi. Methods Mol Biol. 2011; 722: 199–212. 10.1007/978-1-61779-040-9_15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hou ZM, Xue CY, Peng YL, Katan T, Kistler HC, Xu JR. A mitogen-activated protein kinase gene (MGV1) in Fusarium graminearum is required for female fertility, heterokaryon formation, and plant infection. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2002; 15(11): 1119–27. 10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.11.1119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mirocha CJ, Kolaczkowski E, Xie WP, Yu H, Jelen H. Analysis of deoxynivalenol and its derivatives (batch and single kernel) using gas chromatography mass spectrometry. J Agr Food Chem. 1998; 46(4): 1414–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ohneda M, Arioka M, Nakajima H, Kitamoto K. Visualization of vacuoles in Aspergillus oryzae by expression of CPY-EGFP. Fungal Genet Biol. 2002; 37(1): 29–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Harris SD, Morrell JL, Hamer JE. Identification and characterization of Aspergillus nidulans mutants defective in cytokinesis. Genetics. 1994; 136(2): 517–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Schiestl RH, Gietz RD. High-efficiency transformation of intact yeast-cells using single stranded nucleic-acids as a carrier. Curr Genet. 1989; 16(5–6): 339–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Li LW, Chen XL, Zhang SP, Yang J, Chen D, Liu MX, et al. MoCAP proteins regulated by MoArk1-mediated phosphorylation coordinate endocytosis and actin dynamics to govern development and virulence of Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS Genet. 2017;13(5): e100681 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. Yeast complementation assay.

FgPep12 could rescue the growth defect of ΔScpep12 mutant under high temperature. Serial dilutions of BY4741, ΔScpep12 and ΔScpep12 transformed with pYES2 or pYES2-FgPEP12 were grown on YPD plates at 25°C or 38°C for 2 days and then photographed.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Targeted gene replacement of FgPEP12 in F. graminearum.

(A) Schematic diagram of deletion strategy of FgPEP12. (B) Southern blot analysis of the mutant with gene probe and HPH probe, respectively.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. FgPep12&FgNeo1 and FgVam7&FgNeo1 mainly localize to Golgi organelles and late endosomes in ascospores.

(A and B) Ascospores of transformants expressing RFP-FgSft2 or RFP-FgRab7 constructs in the FgPep12&FgNeo1 and FgVam7&FgNeo1 BiFC strains, were examined under a confocal microscope. Bar = 10 μm.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Targeted replacement of the FgNEO1 promoter with pFgNIA1 in F. graminearum.

(A) Strategy for the construction of pFgNIA1-FgNEO1 CPR transformants. (B) Verification of the candidate CPR transformants (T1, T2, T3) by PCR. +, positive control; -, negative control; CK, using wild type genomic DNA as template.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Deletion of FgPep12 affects the localization of FgVam7&FgNeo1 in ascospores.

(A) Ascospores of transformants expressing FgPep12-YFPN&FgNeo1-YFPC in the wild type PH-1 and ΔFgvam7 were examined by DIC or fluorescence microscope. (B) Ascospores of transformants expressing FgVam7-YFPN&FgNeo1-YFPC in PH-1 and ΔFgpep12 were examined by DIC or fluorescence microscope. Bar = 10 μm.

(TIF)

S1 Video. Dynamics of FgPep12-YFPN&FgNeo1-YFPC and its co-localization with RFP-FgRab7.

(ZIP)

S2 Video. Dynamics of FgPep12-YFPN&FgNeo1-YFPC and its co-localization with RFP-FgSft2.

(ZIP)

S3 Video. Dynamics of FgVam7-YFPN&FgNeo1-YFPC and its co-localization with RFP-FgRab7.

(ZIP)

S4 Video. Dynamics of FgVam7-YFPN&FgNeo1-YFPC and its co-localization with RFP-FgSft2.

(ZIP)

S1 Table. Primers used in this study.

(DOC)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES