Abstract
A direct decarboxylative strategy for the generation of aza-o-quinone methides (aza-o-QMs) by N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) catalysis has been discovered and explored. This process requires no stoichiometric additives in contrast with current approaches. Aza-o-QMs react with trifluoromethyl ketones via a formal [4+2] manifold to access highly enantioenriched dihydrobenzoxazin-4-one products, which can be converted to dihydroquinolones via an interesting stereoretentive aza-Petasis-Ferrier rearrangement sequence. Complementary dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT) studies provided an accurate prediction of the reaction enantioselectivity, and lend further insight to the origins of stereocontrol. Additionally, a computed potential energy surface around the major transition structure suggests a concerted asynchronous mechanism for the formal annulation.
Keywords: annulation, asymmetric synthesis, N-heterocyclic carbene, organocatalysis, homogeneous catalysis
Graphical Abstract

A direct decarboxylative strategy for the generation of aza-o-quinone methides (aza-o-QMs) by N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) catalysis has been discovered and explored. Aza-o-QMs react with trifluoromethyl ketones via a formal [4+2] manifold to access highly enantioenriched dihydrobenzoxazin-4-one products. Complementary dispersion-corrected DFT studies provided insight to the origins of stereocontrol and suggested a concerted asynchronous mechanism for the formal
Dihydrobenzoxazinones are an important class of N-heterocyclic compounds widely found in pharmaceutical molecules and natural products.[1] The dihydrobenzoxazinone structural motif is also commonly used as an intermediate for the construction of many other heterocyclic compounds.[2] Consequently, new synthetic methods for the preparation of enantioenriched dihydrobenzoxazinones could fuel further studies on this versatile compound class. To date, the majority of asymmetric methods for dihydrobenzoxazinone synthesis has focused on the dihydrobenzoxazin-2-one substructure, using a variety of methods including formal [4+2] cycloaddition of o-benzoquinone imides with ketenes,[3] Rh-catalyzed conjugate addition,[4] Ir-catalyzed hydrogenation,[5] and Brønsted acid-catalyzed transfer hydrogenation.[6] The isomeric dihydrobenzoxazin-4-one substructure is also prevalent in both natural products and drug candidates. Although several straightforward racemic syntheses of dihydrobenzoxazin-4-ones have been reported, enantioselective methods for their construction remain underdeveloped to date.[7]
N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) catalysis has emerged as a powerful strategy for the construction of carbo- and heterocyclic compounds over the past decade.[8] NHC-catalyzed Umpolung reactions employing enals has provided access to numerous divergent nucleophilic species, including acyl anion, enolate, and homoenolate equivalents. In 2011, Ye demonstrated that NHC catalysis could also access dienolate equivalents.[9] Following Ye’s preliminary disclosure, several reports of reactions employing “azolium dienolates” generated from various carbonyl precursors have emerged.[10] Particularly, the NHC-catalyzed γ-functionalization of aromatic substrates[11] has received attention due to the innovative deployment of unconventional o-quinodimethanes (o-QDMs) as substrates (Scheme 1a).[12]
Scheme 1.

Generation of NHC-bound o-QDMs and o-QMs.
In 2013, Chi and co-workers initially reported NHC-bound o-QDM intermediates could be generated from o-methyl heteroaryl aldehydes[11a] and o-methyl heteroaryl esters.[11b] Following these studies, several approaches to extend this reactivity to carbocyclic aromatic systems have emerged, notably, Glorius[11c] and Rovis[11d] found that NHCs could displace an appropriate benzylic leaving group to access the corresponding NHC-bound o-QDMs (Scheme 1a). There have been significantly fewer developments employing o-quinone methides (o-QMs) or aza-o-quinone methides (aza-o-QMs) as nucleophiles in NHC catalysis. A notable recent advance by Chi employed salicylaldehydes in the presence of stoichiometric oxidant and base to generate an NHC-bound o-QM, which participated in an annulation with trifluoromethyl ketone electrophiles (Scheme 1b).[13] These contributions have expanded the scope of carbene catalysis, while simultaneously presenting opportunities to develop new and complementary methods employing NHC-bound o-QDM-like nucleophiles. Herein, we report a decarboxylative transformation proceeding via an NHC-bound aza-o-QM intermediate to access enantioenriched dihydrobenzoxazin-4-ones (Scheme 1c). This advance generates CO2 as the byproduct and does not require external oxidants or stoichiometric bases, and represents the first use of NHC-bound aza-o-QMs as nucleophilic partners in asymmetric catalysis.
We initiated our studies on the decarboxylative cycloaddition using N-methylisatoic anhydride substrate 1a with trifluoromethyl ketone 2a (Scheme 2). An achiral triazolium catalyst with the strong, and non-nucleophilic base KHMDS provided the desired dihydrobenzoxazinone 3a in moderate isolated yield at 30 °C (see SI). After evaluating triazolium catalysts A−D, we found that catalyst D bearing a mesityl substituent gave the product 3a in 19% yield and 98:2 er, while less nucleophilic NHCs (B and C) did not provide desired reactivity with 1a.[15]We thus investigated the reaction using catalyst E[16]and obtained 3a in 72% yield and 97:3 er at 50 °C. With the optimal catalyst system identified, we moved to explore the reaction scope of these new NHC-catalyzed decarboxylative cycloadditions.
Scheme 2.

NHC screening for [4+2] cycloaddition. Conditions: 0.1 mmol 1a, 0.11 mmol 2a, 20 μmol NHC, 30 μmol KHMDS, 50 mg 4Å MS, 0.1 M in toluene. Absolute configuration of 3a was determined based on X-ray crystal analysis of 3n.[14]
A survey of different N-methyl isatoic anhydrides and trifluoromethyl ketones is summarized in Table 1. Trifluoromethyl ketones (2) with para and meta substituents of varying electronic and steric parameters were all suitable substrates for the reaction. Ketones 2a–h reacted with 1a in the presence of catalyst E generating the desired products 3b–h in moderate to good yields (49–91%) and with high stereoselectivity in all cases (95:5–98:2 er). The reactions of 3,5-substituted ketones also provided the desired products 3i and 3j in moderate yields and high stereoselectivity (56%, 97:3 er and 77%, 95:5 er, respectively). We next investigated the reaction scope of a variety of isatoic anhydrides (1). The reactions of anhydride substrates possessing electron-withdrawing halogen substituents provided products 3l–p with good yields (66–78%) and high stereoselectivity (95:5–96:4 er), although we found that for these substrates reducing the reaction temperature to 35 °C was necessary to observe high stereoselectivity. When anhydrides with electron-donating substituents such as methyl and methoxy groups were reacted with the trifluoromethyl ketone 2a, products 3q–s were also obtained in moderate to good yields (47–80%) and high stereoselectivity (96:4–97:3 er). Reactions attempted using ortho-substituted aryl trifluoromethyl ketones,[17] alkyl-trifluoromethyl ketones,[18] or ⊠-keto esters gave the desired products with diminished yields, whereas isatins did not react under the current conditions (Table 1, bottom, and SI). In addition, different N-substituted isatoic anhydrides showed poor reactivity under current conditions (see the SI).
Table 1.
Substrate Scope.[a]
![]() |
Reaction scale 0.2 mmol. See the SI for reaction details. Yields reported for compounds isolated. Er determined by chiral-phase SFC analysis.
Performed at 35 °C.
Potential catalytic pathways for the annulation are summarized in Scheme 3. The addition of catalyst E to anhydride 1a and subsequent release of CO2 generates NHC-bound aza-o-QM intermediate I. Notably, we observed a mass correlating to intermediate I by high-resolution mass spectrometry (see SI), which was somewhat surprising as aza-o-QMs are perceived to be highly reactive and transient species.[19] This key intermediate I can undergo a concerted [4+2] pathway or a stepwise Michael addition/acylation. In the [4+2] pathway, concerted addition of trifluoromethyl ketone 2 and the intermediate I via II affords the product 3. In the Michael addition/acylation pathway, a carbon-nitrogen bond is formed via III to generate intermediate IV, which undergoes O-acylation to regenerate the NHC E
Scheme 3.

Proposed reaction pathways.
To first gain insight into the origins of stereocontrol, we analyzed the cycloaddition transition structures involving catalyst E, anhydride 1a and trifluoromethyl ketone 2a with the ωB97XD /6–31G(d)/SMD(Toluene) level of theory at 323 K to match experimental conditions (Figure 1).[20] The transition structure (TS) leading to the (S)-product ((S)-II) was predicted to be 3.5 kcal/mol more stable than that leading to the (R)-product ((R)-II). After these predictions were made, experiments indeed validated these predictions (%ee = 94; ∆G‡exp = 2.2 kcal/mol)
Figure 1.

Dispersion-corrected DFT major and minor [4+2] cycloaddition transition structures. Distances in Å and energies in kcal/mol.
Distortion-interaction analyses of the two TSs were performed to elucidate the origins of selectivity (see the SI).[21] Gas-phase electronic energies of the TS fragments were compared to their corresponding ground-state structures.[22] Three important observations resulted: (1) The NHC-bound aza-o-QM complexes in both TSs were similarly distorted (∆∆E = 1.0 kcal/mol). (2) The trifluoromethyl ketone in the Major-TS, (S)-II was also similarly distorted compared to the Minor-TS, (R)-II by 1.8 kcal/mol. (3) Most importantly, the Major-TS, (S)-II was significantly more stabilized by the interaction energy than the Minor-TS, (R)-II (–33.6 kcal/mol versus –27.9 kcal/mol, respectively). We hypothesize this drastic difference in stabilizing interaction energy is due to a more favorable electrostatic interaction in the Major-TS, (S)-II over the Minor-TS, (R)-II. In (S)-II, the positively charged NHC-bound o-QM is stabilized by close proximity to the CF3–group, bearing a partial negative charge. In contrast, (R)-II exhibits a relatively weak C- H•••π interaction between the trifluoromethyl ketone phenyl group and the positively charged NHC complex (Figure 1, green lines).
To better understand if the NHC-catalyzed annulation was concerted or stepwise (Scheme 3), we next computed the potential energy surface around the Major-TS, (S)-II (see Figure 2). The energies were computed by fixing the distance between the nucleophilic nitrogen of the NHC-bound o-QM and the electrophilic carbon of trifluoromethyl ketone 2a (C–N bond) and varying distances corresponding to the second forming σ-bond. The surface shows that only one saddle point exists, suggesting a concerted process with no intervening intermediates.[23]
Figure 2.

Potential energy surface plot showing a concerted mechanism for the conversion of I and 2a (See SI).
Finally, the utility of these new enantioenriched dihydrobenzoxazinone products was explored (Scheme 4). The methylenation of 3a or 3n using the Tebbe reagent provided vinyl ether derivatives (4). A subsequent aza-Petasis-Ferrier rearrangement[24] gave the corresponding dihydroquinolone 5 with retention of chirality as determined by X-ray crystallography. This unprecedented sequence involving memory of chirality[25] presumably involves a Lewis acid-promoted ring opening to generate initially a single atropisomer of the Me2AlCl-enolate intermediate (A1) from 4. The interconversion of this iminium enolate to atropisomer A2 is apparently slow relative to a rapid intramolecular Mannich reaction affording dihydroquinolones (5) with a CF3-group at the C2 position. Trifluoromethyl groups are common in pharmaceutical molecules to improve metabolic stability, lipophilicity and permeability.[26] Therefore, we anticipate that these enantioenriched heterocycles with a CF3-bearing stereocenter can be leveraged to explore new bioactive dihydroquinolone scaffolds.[27]
Scheme 4.

Transformation of 3. Conditions: a) Tebbe reagent, toluene/THF, – 40 °C to 25 °C; (b) Me2AlCl, CH2Cl2, −78 °C.
An efficient asymmetric formal [4+2] cycloaddition of isatoic anhydride with trifluoromethyl ketones through NHC-mediated decarboxylative catalysis has been developed. This process generates an NHC-bound aza-o-QM as a key intermediate through liberation of carbon dioxide and avoids stoichiometric additives. Computations elucidated the origins of stereocontrol and revealed the concerted nature of the [4+2] process. This approach represents a highly versatile and selective transformation to provide enantioenriched dihydrobenzoxazin-4-ones with a CF3-bearing stereocenter. Investigations involving these new NHC-bound intermediates and a variety of electrophile classes are ongoing.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
Financial support for this work has been provided by NIGMS R01 GM073072. PHYC gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Bert and Emelyn Christensen and Vicki & Patrick F. Stone families. PHYC, ACB, and TF acknowledge the National Science Foundation (NSF, CHE-1352663). The authors thank Keegan Fitzpatrick (NU) for X-ray crystallographic assistance and Ada Kwong (NU) for assistance with mass spectrometry.
Footnotes
Supporting information for this article is given via a link at the end of the document.
Contributor Information
Ansoo Lee, Department of Chemistry, Center for Molecular Innovation and Drug Discovery, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208 (USA).
Joshua L. Zhu, Department of Chemistry, Center for Molecular Innovation and Drug Discovery, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208 (USA)
Taisiia Feoktistova, Department of Chemistry, Oregon State University, 153 Gilbert Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 (USA).
Alexander C. Brueckner, Department of Chemistry, Oregon State University, 153 Gilbert Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 (USA)
Paul H.-Y. Cheong, Department of Chemistry, Oregon State University, 153 Gilbert Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 (USA).
Karl A. Scheidt, Department of Chemistry, Center for Molecular Innovation and Drug Discovery, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208 (USA).
References
- [1].For selected reviews, see:; a) Powers JC, Asgian JL, Ekici ÖD, James KE, Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4639–4750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ilaš J, Anderluh PŠ, Dolenc MS, Kikelj D, Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 7325–7348 [Google Scholar]; c) Macías FA, Marín D, Oliveros-Bastidas A, Molinillo JMG, Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009, 26, 478–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Coppola GM, Heterocyclic J. Chem 1999, 36, 563–588. [Google Scholar]
- [3].Wolfer J, Bekele T, Abraham CJ, Dogo‐Isonagie C, Lectka T, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7398–7400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Zhang X, Xu B, Xu M-H, Org. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 944–948. [Google Scholar]
- [5].Núñez-Rico JL, Vidal-Ferran A, Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 2066–2069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].a) Rueping M, Antonchick AP, Theissmann T, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6751–6755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Lu L-Q, Li Y, Junge K, Beller M, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 2763–2768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].For selected examples on the synthesis of dihydrobenzoxazin-4-ones, see:; a) Wang X, Gallardo‐Donaire J, Martin R, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 11084–11087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Zhang N, Cheng R, Zhang-Negrerie D, Du Y, Zhao K, J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 10581–10587 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Patel K, Deshmukh SS, Bodkhe D, Mane M, Vanka K, Shinde D, Rajamohanan PR, Nandi S, Vaidhyanathan R, Chikkali SH, J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 4342–4351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Qi X, Li R, Li HP, Peng JB, Ying J, Wu XF, ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 3415–3418 [Google Scholar]; e) Kumar P, Gupta M, Bahadur V, Parmar VS, Singh BK, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 2018, 1552–1558. [Google Scholar]
- [8].For reviews on NHC catalysis, see:; a) Enders D, Niemeier O, Henseler A, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5606–5655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Bugaut X, Glorius F, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3511–3522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Vora HU, Wheeler P, Rovis T, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 1617–1639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Izquierdo J, Hutson GE, Cohen DT, Scheidt KA, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 11686–11698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Cohen DT, Scheidt KA, Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 53–57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Mahatthananchai J, Bode JW, Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 696–707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Hopkinson MN, Richter C, Schedler M, Glorius F, Nature 2014, 510, 485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Menon RS, Biju AT, Nair V, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 5040–5052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Flanigan DM, Romanov-Michailidis F, White NA, Rovis T, Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 9307–9387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j) Wang MH, Scheidt KA, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 14912–14922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Shen LT, Shao PL, Ye S, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 1943–1948. [Google Scholar]
- [10].For a recent review on the transformations via azolium dienolate, see:; Chen XY, Liu Q, Chauhan P, Enders D, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 3862–3873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].a) Chen X, Yang S, Song BA, Chi YR, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 11134–11137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Xu J, Yuan S, Miao M, Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 3822–3825 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Janssen-Müller D, Singha S, Olyschläger T, Daniliuc CG, Glorius F, Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 4444–4447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Chen D-F, Rovis T, Synthesis 2017, 49, 293–298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Cheng J, Sun J, Yan J, Yang S, Zheng P, Jin Z, Chi YR, J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 13342–13347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Wang H, Chen X, Li Y, Wang J, Wu S, Xue W, Yang S, Chi YR, Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 333–336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Hu Y, Pan D, Cong L, Yao Y, Yu C, Li T, Yao C, ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 1708–1712. [Google Scholar]
- [12].For selected reviews on the o-QDMs, see:; a) Segura JL, Martín N, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 3199–3246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Hiroto Y, Joji O, Atsutaka K, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2010, 83, 199–219. [Google Scholar]
- [13].Chen X, Wang H, Doitomi K, Ooi CY, Zheng P, Liu W, Guo H, Yang S, Song B-A, Hirao H, Chi YR, Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].CCDC 1876027 (3n) and CCDC 1888653 (5n) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. This data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystalographic Data Centre.
- [15].Levens A, An F, Breugst M, Mayr H, Lupton DW, Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 3566–3569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].a) Wurz NE, Daniliuc CG, Glorius F, Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 16297–16301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Liu F, Bugaut X, Schedler M, Fröhlich R, Glorius F, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 12626–12630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Ortho-subsitution presumably disfavors formation of intermediate II through steric effects as has been described before, for recent examples see:; a) Borrego LG, Recio R, Alcarranza M, Khiar N, Fernández I, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 1273–1279 [Google Scholar]; b) Trost BM, Mata G, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12333–12337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Zheng Y, Tan Y, Harms K, Marsch M, Riedel R, Zhang L, Meggers E, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 4322–4325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Alkyl-trifluoromethyl ketones are not compatible under our reaction conditions, presumably due to keto/enol tautomerism as has been described previously (see ref 11d and 17).
- [19].For selected reviews on the (aza-)o-QMs, see:; a) Jaworski AA, Scheidt KA, J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 10145–10153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Yang B, Gao S, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 7926–7953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].The original work was done using ωB97X/6-311++G(2df,p)//PBE/6-31G(d)/SMD(Toluene). However, the ground state and transition state structures were recomputed at the ωB97XD/6-31G(d)/SMD(Toluene) to account for dispersion interactions present in this system. For computational methodology, see:; a) Chai J, Head-Gordon M, J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 6615–6620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Hehre WJ, Ditchfield R and Pople JA, J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 56, 2257–2261 [Google Scholar]; c) Marenich AV, Cramer CJ and Truhlar DG, J. Phys. Chem. 2009, 113, 6378–6396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Bickelhaupt FM, Houk KN, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 10070–10086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Chen S, Zheng Y, Cui T, Meggers E, Houk KN, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 5146–5152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Ess DH, Wheeler SE, Iafe RG, Xu L, Çelebi‐Ölçüm N, Houk KN, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7592–7601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].For selected reviews on the (aza)-Petasis-Ferrier rearrangement, see: a); a) Smith AB, Fox RJ, Razler TM, Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 675–687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Minbiole EC, Minbiole KPC, J. Antibiot. 2016, 69, 213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; For selected examples on the (aza)-Petasis-Ferrier rearrangement, see. [Google Scholar]; c) Smith AB, Minbiole KP, Verhoest PR, Schelhaas M, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10942–10953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Terada M, Toda Y, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6354–6355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Terada M, Komuro T, Toda Y, Korenaga T, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7044–7057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].For reviews on the memory of chirality, see:; a) Fuji K, Kawabata T, Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 373–376 [Google Scholar]; b) Kawabata T, Fuji K, In Topics in Stereochemistry, Vol. 23; Denmark SE, Ed.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: New York, 2003, 175–205 [Google Scholar]; c) Zhao H, Hsu DC, Carlier PR, Synthesis 2005, 1–16 [Google Scholar]; For seminal examples on the memory of chirality, see. [Google Scholar]; d) Seebach D, Wasmuth D, Angew. Chem Int. Ed. Engl. 1981, 20, 971–971 [Google Scholar]; e) Kawabata T, Yahiro K, Fuji K, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9694–9696 [Google Scholar]; f) Fuji K, Kawabata T, Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 373–376. [Google Scholar]
- [26].For selected reviews on the CF3-containing drugs, see:; a) Wang J, Sánchez-Roselló M, Aceña JL, del Pozo C, Sorochinsky AE, Fustero S, Soloshonok VA, Liu H, Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 2432–2506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Zhu W, Wang J, Wang S, Gu Z, Aceña JL, Izawa K, Liu H, Soloshonok VA, J. Fluorine Chem. 2014, 167, 37–54 [Google Scholar]; c) Zhou Y, Wang J, Gu Z, Wang S, Zhu W, Aceña JL, Soloshonok VA, Izawa K, Liu H, Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 422–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].For selected reviews and examples on the synthesis of dihydroquinolones, see:; a) Katritzky AR, Rachwal S, Rachwal B, Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 15031–15070 [Google Scholar]; b) Xia Y, Yang Z-Y, Xia P, Bastow KF, Tachibana Y, Kuo S-C, Hamel E, Hackl T, Lee K-H, J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 1155–1162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Tamura SY, Goldman EA, Bergum PW, Semple JE, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 2573–2578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Oshiro Y, Sakurai Y, Sato S, Kurahashi N, Tanaka T, Kikuchi T, Tottori K, Uwahodo Y, Miwa T, Nishi T, J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 177–189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Zhao H, Thurkauf A, Braun J, Brodbeck R, Kieltyka A, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 2119–2122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Nammalwar B, Bunce RA, Molecules 2014, 19, 204–232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

