Abstract
Rad21/Scc1 is a subunit of the cohesin complex implicated in gene regulation as well as sister chromatid cohesion. The level of Rad21/Scc1 must be controlled for proper mitosis and gene expression during development. Here, we identify the PP2A catalytic subunit encoded by microtubule star (mts) as a regulator of Drosophila Rad21/Verthandi (Vtd). Mutations in mts and vtd cause synergistic mitotic defects, including abnormal spindles and loss of nuclei during nuclear division in early embryo. Depletion of Mts and Vtd in developing wing synergistically reduces the Cut protein level, causing severe defects in wing growth. Mts and PP2A subunit Twins (Tws) interact with Vtd protein. Loss of Mts or Tws reduces Vtd protein level. Reduced proteasome function suppresses mitotic defects caused by mutations in mts and vtd. Taken together, this work provides evidence that PP2A is required for mitosis and wing growth by regulating the Vtd level through the proteasomal pathway.
Subject terms: Developmental biology, Organogenesis
Introduction
Phosphorylation is a key posttranslational mechanism for the regulation of cell signaling pathways. Increasing evidence indicates that dephosphorylation also plays pivotal roles to control diverse developmental processes, including cell growth, proliferation and cell polarity1–5. Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is one of the major evolutionarily conserved serine/threonine phosphatases in eukaryotes6,7 that functions as a heterotrimeric complex composed of three subunits: catalytic (C), structural (A) and regulatory (B) subunits1. In Drosophila, the C subunit of PP2A was identified as an essential factor for mitosis. The C subunit was named Microtubule star (Mts) because mts mutant embryos show abnormal pattern of microtubule spindles emanating in all directions from centrosomes during mitosis8.
With respect to the function of Mts in mitosis, it is noteworthy that a cohesin subunit Verthadi (Vtd) was isolated as an interacting partner of Mts from a two-hybrid screen described in this study. Vtd is an ortholog of the Rad21/Scc1 subunit in the cohesin complex that controls separation and cohesion of sister chromatids during mitosis9–11. Cohesin is an evolutionarily conserved complex consisting of four subunits, Rad21/Scc1, Stromalin (SA) and Structural Maintenance of Chromosome 1 and 3 (SMC1 and SMC3)12–14. Cohesin forms a ring-like structure that holds sister chromatids after DNA replication15,16. Rad21/Scc1 is phosphorylated by Polo kinase and cleaved by separase, leading to the release of sister chromatids during anaphase in yeast9,17. However, Polo-dependent regulation of Rad21 has not yet been confirmed in Drosophila.
Although the core components of a cohesin ring are conserved in eukaryotes, mechanisms underlying cohesin regulation are complicated with many variations18. In yeasts, cohesin is released in one step along the chromosome lengths during the metaphase/anaphase transition. In metazoan mitosis, however, cohesin is released in two steps. Firstly, cohesin is released from the arms of sister chromatids during prophase and prometaphase by phosphorylation of the SA2 cohesin subunit. During this step, centromeric cohesin is protected from cleavage by Shugosin (Sgo) and PP2A. In the second step, centromeric cohesin is released by cleavage of the Rad21/Scc1 subunit during the metaphase/anaphase transition19,20. In addition to the traditional view of the cohesin function on sister chromatids, cohesin also functions at spindle poles and centrosomes11,21–24.
In Drosophila S2 cells, depletion of Vtd results in abnormal chromosome and spindle morphology with premature sister chromatid separation10, consistent with the role of Rad21/Scc1 for stabilizing the cohesin complex. Vtd is not required for sister chromatid cohesion in meiosis25,26, suggesting that Vtd is specifically involved in mitotic segregation of sister chromatids. A systematic RNAi screen in cultured S2 Drosophila cells has found the roles of multiple protein phosphatases including PP2A in mitosis27. S2 cells depleted in Mts or other PP2A subunits show aberrant arrays of microtubules as seen in mts mutant embryos. Widerborst (Wdb) (Drosophila B56 subunit) forms a protein complex with MEI-S332 (Drosophila homolog of Sgo) at the centromeres as in human and yeast cells. Whereas Sgo recruits PP2A in yeasts, Wdb is required for the localization of MEI-S332 but not vice versa as in mammalian cells. Although Sgo is crucial for protecting cohesion during meiosis in all eukaryotes tested, MEI-S322 is not essential for mitosis in Drosophila28. Based on these differences between organisms, it is important to identify specific function of PP2A and Vtd/Rad21 in Drosophila to understand their functional relationship19,29–33. A recent study has shown that the Dalmatian (Dmt), a Drosophila ortholog of the vertebrate cohesin-interacting Sororin, is required for recruiting PP2A to the pericentric heterochromatin in S2 cell. Interestingly, Dmt can restore mitotic defects of Sgo1-depleted human cells, indicating that Dmt has cohesin protection activity34. However, it is unknown whether Dmt and/or PP2A are required for the cohesin function in developing fly tissues and whether these proteins are involved in regulating the stability and the level of Cohesin complex proteins.
It has been suggested that a major role of Mts in early Drosophila embryo is to link spindle microtubules to kinetochore since loss of Mts leads to spindle microtubules formed in random directions from centrosomes without association with chromosomes. Another intriguing phenotype of mts loss-of-function mutations involves frequent loss of mitotic nuclei, resulting in free centrosomes separated from nuclei8. Similar phenotypes were also found in early embryos of abnormal anaphase resolution (aar) mutants, which are allelic to twins (tws), the B subunit of PP2A35. It is unknown whether cohesin subunit mutants also show similar defects in Drosophila embryos.
In addition to the function in mitosis, cohesin has additional roles in transcriptional gene regulation. Nipped-B is a Drosophila adherin that is required for loading cohesin onto chromosomes. Mutations in Nipped-B affect gene expression resulting in developmental and neurological defects that might model the Cornelia de Lange Syndrome caused by mutations in NIPBL, the human homolog of Nipped-B36. Nipped-B and cohesin are involved in regulating the expression of the cut gene that is essential for wing outgrowth37,38. Along with these findings, it has been shown that Vtd belongs to the trithorax group proteins that facilitate transcription for gene regulation39,40. Mitosis and organ growth must be regulated for normal development. Despite the importance of Vtd in these events, it is unknown how the level of Vtd protein is regulated in developing animals.
In this study, we analyze molecular and functional relationships between Mts and Vtd in Drosophila. Mutations or knockdown of mts and vtd cause synergistic spindle defects and nuclear loss during nuclear division in early embryo. mts and vtd also show strong genetic interaction in developing wing. We demonstrate physical interaction between Mts and Vtd. Further, we provide evidence that PP2A is required for the maintenance of Vtd protein level by a proteasome-dependent pathway. Hence, we propose that Mts is required for Vtd stability to control mitosis and wing growth.
Results
Vtd is a direct interacting partner for Mts
To isolate protein partners that interact with Mts, we screened a yeast two-hybrid library for Drosophila using a C-terminal Mts region (amino acid 243~309, MtsC67) that showed a low level of autoactivation. From this screen, we obtained three interacting partners for Mts; Verthandi (Vtd) (Fig. 1a), Replication Protein A 70 (RPA70), and CG3262. Among these proteins, we further characterized the interaction between Mts and Vtd because both proteins play roles in mitosis8,10,11,17,27,39,41. Vtd/Rad21 was also in a PP2A-interacting network from a Drosophila proteomic analysis by mass-spectrometry, although it was not determined whether Vtd directly binds to PP2A42.
First, we confirmed the physical interaction between Mts and Vtd. In vitro GST (Glutathione-S-transferase) pull down assay using MBP (Maltose binding protein)-tagged full-length Mts and GST-tagged full-length Vtd showed that Mts directly binds to Vtd protein (Fig. 1b). This interaction was verified by co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) using S2 cells transfected with 2xFLAG-tagged-Mts and V5-tagged-Vtd (Fig. 1c). In reciprocal co-IP experiments using FLAG or V5 antibody, Mts protein formed a protein complex with Vtd in S2 cells. Next, we tested whether Mts and Vtd interact in physiological conditions in vivo. We performed co-immunoprecipitaion (co-IP) using extracts from vtd mutant embryos expressing transgenic vtd wild-type gene (Genotype: w*; vtdex3, tub::vtdWT-myc10). VtdWT-myc10 expressed by tubulin promoter rescues vtdex3 mutant phenotypes43. This co-IP assay showed that Myc-tagged-Vtd proteins form a protein complex in vivo with endogenous Mts (Fig. 1d).
Since three separate regions of Vtd are conserved in eukayotic Rad21 family proteins, we tested whether Mts interacts with these conserved domains of Vtd. We used the Eukaryotic Linear Motif (ELM) resource (http://elm.eu.org/) to identify distinct structural domains of Vtd. According to the ELM analysis, Vtd can be divided into five domains (Supplementary Fig. S1a). Vtd1~152, Vtd273~530 and Vtd625~715 are globluar domains that show strong homology to Rad21/Scc1 (Supplementary Fig. S1a,b). The remaining two regions (153–272 and 531–624) are not conserved and their functions are unknown. We performed co-IP assays with 2xFLAG-tagged full-length Mts and truncated Vtd fragments tagged with V5 expressed in S2 cells. Co-IP results indicated that three Vtd regions (Vtd1~152, Vtd273~530, Vtd625~715) can form a complex with full-length Mts (Supplementary Fig. S1c). These data confirm that Vtd is a binding partner of Mts, and Mts interacts with the conserved domains of Vtd.
Mutations in mts and vtd synergistically result in mitotic defects
To determine whether Mts and Vtd are functionally related in mitosis, we examined nuclear division cycles during early embryogenesis. Nuclear divisions in syncytial embryos are mainly regulated by maternal gene products. Therefore, we analyzed embryos obtained from crosses between mts/+ and/or vtd/+ heterozygous mutant females and wild-type males. To eliminate any effects of balancer chromosomes, mts/+ and vtd/+ females were generated from crosses between mts/CyO and vtd/TM6b heterozygotes and wild-type flies, respectively. During metaphase of the nuclear division cycles 9–13, embryos from mts heterozygous females (mts02496/+ or mtsXE-2258/+) showed nearly normal pattern of mitosis. However, there were occasional abnormalities such as branched spindles or chromosome-free centrosomes at low frequencies (about 5% for both mts alleles), implying that these mutations have weak dominant effects in heterozygotes (Fig. 2b–b”’,c–c”’,g). Embryos from vtd heterozygous mutant females (vtdex3/+) showed the normal pattern of mitosis without detectable dominant phenotypes (Fig. 2d–d”’,g).
In contrast with mts/+ or vtd/+ heterozygote, embryos from double heterozygous mutants for mts and vtd genes (mts02496/+; vtdex3/+ or mtsXE-2258/+; vtdex3/+ without balancers) exhibited severe mitotic defects in about 17 and 20% of the nuclei scored, respectively (Fig. 2e–e””,f–f””). The term ‘nuclei’ is used to score defective mitosis in embryo even though most nuclear membranes are lost during mitosis, albeit not entirely44. For each genotype, about 1700 mitotic nuclei from 10 embryos were scored for quantification of different phenotypes (Fig. 2g). Most common defects in double heterozygotes for vtdex3 and two different mts alleles were centrosomes without chromosomes and abnormally fused or branched spindle microtubules. Embryos from mtsXE-2258/+; vtdex3/+ heterozygotes showed higher frequency of monopolar spindles and free centrosomes with star-shaped spindles than mts02496/+; vtdex3/+ heterozygotes. Such centrosomes with star-shaped spindles were similar to the “microtubule-star” phenotype seen in mts mutant embryos8. These genetic interactions between mts and vtd heterozygotes suggest that Mts and Vtd cooperate in the process of mitosis.
In early embryogenesis, nuclei undergo mitotic divisions without cytokinesis to generate syncytium, a multinucleate single cell embryo. After 14th nuclear division cycle, syncytial embryo undergoes cellularization45. We examined whether vtd and mts also show mitotic defects in cellularized embryo. We induced mts RNAi and/or vtd RNAi ubiquitously in cellularized embryos by armadillo (arm)-GAL4 (labelled as arm > mts RNAi or arm > vtd RNAi). Approximately 4h-old embryos were stained for tubulin and phosphohistone H3 (PH3), and examined for the pattern of mitosis in the region anterior to the cephalic furrow. The pattern of chromosome alignment and segregation was normal in arm > + control embryos. PH3-stained chromosomes were aligned at the equator in metaphase while segregating anaphase chromosomes were detected near the poles. Knockdown of mts (Fig. 3c–c”’,d–d”’,i) or vtd (Fig. 3e–e”’,f–f”’,i) using arm-Gal4 resulted in similar defects in patterns of chromosomes and PH3 staining. In contrast, arm > mts RNAi, vtd RNAi double knockdown embryos showed severe mitotic defects, including abnormal spindle morphology and irregular distribution of PH3-labelled chromosomes (Fig. 3g–g”’,h–h”’,i). These data suggest that reduction of Mts and Vtd synergistically impairs chromosome alignment during metaphase possibly due to abnormal spindles and that genetic interaction between mts and vtd is important for cell division in cellularized embryos as well as in syncytial embryos.
Reduced Mts and Vtd leads to loss of Cut expression and wing defects
The Cohesin complex is also known to regulate gene expression. Cohesin binds to a region between a remote wing margin enhancer and the promoter of the cut locus38. The cut gene encodes a homeodomain protein expressed along the boundary between dorsal and ventral compartments in wing disc. It has been proposed that cohesin inhibits cut expression based on the fact that wing notching phenotype caused by a cut mutant allele ctk is partially suppressed by Rad21 RNAi38. To see whether mts and vtd show genetic interaction in Cut expression, we examined both wing discs and adult wings. mts knockdown in the DV boundary region by vg-Gal4 (vg > GFP, mts RNAi) resulted in large notches in the wing margin (Fig. 4b,y). Because the DV boundary of wing disc develops to the margin of an adult wing, this notching phenotype suggests a role of Mts in wing margin growth. Unexpectedly, however, Vtd depletion in the wing DV boundary (vg > GFP, vtd RNAi) also caused wing notching, although the phenotype was milder than that of vg > mts RNAi (Fig. 4c,y). Two independent vtd RNAi lines showed notching phenotypes in adult wings. Strikingly, double knockdown of mts and vtd (vg > GFP, mts RNAi, vtd RNAi) showed severe growth defect, leading to a loss of nearly 90% of wing tissue (Fig. 4d,y). Since vtd RNAi has only weak effects on wing development, the strong wing phenotype by double knockdown are likely due to a synergistic genetic interaction between mts and vtd.
Expression of the cut gene at the DV boundary is essential for wing margin development46. We checked the Cut level in 3rd instar wing disc (Fig. 4e~h) and found partial loss of Cut in vg > GFP, mts RNAi wing disc (Fig. 4f). Cut expression was also reduced in wing discs from vg > GFP, vtd RNAi (Fig. 4g), consistent with the result that vtd RNAi causes mild notching in adult wings (Fig. 4c). Wing discs with double knockdown of mts and vtd showed stronger reduction in the Cut level than mts or vtd single knockdown (Fig. 4h). We also checked the pattern of GFP expression in the DV boundary region driven by vg-GAL4. In all genotypes tested, GFP was expressed similarly along the DV boundary (Fig. 4i~l). Therefore, loss of Cut resulting from the knockdown of mts and/or vtd was not due to cell death at this larval stage.
In addition to vtd RNAi, we tested whether vtd mutation can enhance the wing phenotype caused by mts RNAi knockdown. Homozygous vtdex3 mutant die during embryogenesis43, but vtd heterozygous mutation (vtdex3/+) did not affect wing development (Fig. 4s,z). However, vtdex3 heterozygotes enhanced the moderate wing phenotype of vg > mts RNAi, resulting in a stronger reduction of the wing size (Fig. 4t,z). Likewise, vtd heterozygote (vtdex3/+) showed normal Cut level in wing disc (Fig. 4w) but strongly enhanced the partial loss of Cut expression caused by mts RNAi (Fig. 4x). These results suggest that genetic interaction between Mts and Vtd is required for normal Cut expression and wing development. Because mts RNAi phenotype was enhanced by reducing Vtd, we examined whether Vtd overexpression may be sufficient to suppress the effects of mts RNAi. However, Vtd overexpression, which was confirmed by immunostaining (Supplementary Fig. S2e–e”’), could not affect the mts RNAi phenotype (Supplementary Fig. S2a–d).
Taken together, Mts and Vtd are essential for development of wing imaginal discs and show genetic interaction, as in mitosis during embryogenesis.
Loss of Mts or Tws causes reduction of Vtd level
Our data thus far suggest that Mts and Vtd are functionally related. Since mts RNAi phenotype in the wing is enhanced by reducing the Vtd level but cannot be rescued by Vtd overexpression, we hypothesized that Mts might be necessary for the Vtd function. To test this possibility, we knocked down Mts in S2 cells using mts dsRNA and examined the level of Vtd (Fig. 5a). Western blot analysis showed that Mts level begins to decrease from Day 2 after mts dsRNA treatment and is significantly reduced from Day 4. Interestingly, Vtd level was also reduced from Day 4 (Fig. 5a), indicating that Mts is required to maintain the level of Vtd protein. To confirm this result in vivo, we examined the effects of depleting Mts in wing discs. We generated clones of cells expressing mts RNAi by using the flip-out method in Ay-Gal4 (Act5C > y+ > GAL4) wing discs (Fig. 5b–b”’). mts RNAi clones were induced by heatshock flippase (hs-FLP). As shown in Fig. 5b–b”’, mts RNAi clones marked by GFP expression showed significant reduction in the Vtd level.
To support the role of Mts for the regulation of Vtd level, we tried to examine mts loss-of-function mutant clones in wing discs using the FLP-FRT system47. However, mts mutant clones were not formed due to cell lethality or were too small to analyze the mutant effects (data not shown). As an alternative approach, we utilized a mutation in twins that encodes a regulatory subunit of PP2A. Unlike mts mutant clones, large tws60 mutant clones were recovered in wing discs using hs-FLP (Fig. 5c–c”’). Consistent with the results from mts RNAi clones, the level of Vtd expression was strongly reduced in tws60 mutant clones. We also measured the effects of tws60 mutation by western blot analysis of cell extracts from wing discs. Levels of Vtd in tws60 mutant wing discs were reduced to about 50% compared with the wild-type discs (Fig. 5d), while there was no change in the level of control proteins like actin and histone H3. To determine whether Mts affects vtd transcription, we checked vtd mRNA level in tws60 homozygous wing discs (Supplementary Fig. S3). Quantitative PCR results showed that the relative amount of vtd mRNA was not significantly changed in tws60 homozygous wing discs. These data indicate that PP2A is required mainly to maintain the level of Vtd protein but not vtd mRNA expression.
Based on the effects of tws60 allele on the Vtd level (Fig. 5c–c”’), it was possible that Tws might also form a complex with Vtd. Indeed, 2xMyc-tagged-Vtd and V5-tagged-Tws showed co-immunoprecipitation (Supplementary Fig. S4a). Furthermore, when both V5-tagged Vtd and V5-tagged Tws were transfected to S2 cells with 2xFLAG-tagged Mts, FLAG-Mts coimmunoprecipitated with V5-Tws and V5-Vtd (Supplementary Fig. S4b). These results suggest that Mts interacts with Tws and Vtd.
Vtd stability is regulated by PP2A through proteasomal degradation pathway
The results from mts knockdown in S2 cells and clonal analysis in wing discs strongly suggest that PP2A regulates Vtd stability. Since mts knockdown reduces the Vtd level, we tested whether Vtd stability is regulated by a protein degradation pathway. When S2 cells were treated with okadaic acid to inhibit PP2A activity48 (Fig. 6a,b), Vtd level was significantly decreased. This result supports that PP2A activity is required to regulate Vtd stability. There are two major protein degradation pathways in eukaryotic cells, that is, the ubiquitin-proteasomal pathway and the lysosomal degradation pathway49–51. To distinguish these possibilities, we treated S2 cells with chloroquine (500 µM, inhibitor of lysosome) and/or MG132 (100 µM, inhibitor of proteasome) in the presence or absence of okadaic acid (Fig. 6a,b). The reduction of Vtd level by okadaic acid was not recovered by chloroquine. On the contrary, the effect of okadaic acid on the Vtd level was significantly recovered in S2 cells co-treated with MG132. These data support that PP2A regulates Vtd stability through the proteasomal degradation pathway.
To confirm that Vtd stability is regulated in vivo by the proteasomal degradation pathway, we checked whether proteasome inhibition can rescue the mitotic defects in embryos laid from mts/+; vtd/+ double heterozygous mutants (Fig. 2e–e”’’,f–f”’’, 6d,e,i, Supplementary Fig. S5b–b”’,c–c”’). We used prosβ61 allele52,53, a dominant mutation in the Prosβ6 subunit of proteasome. Early embryos from mts/+; vtd/+ double heterozygous mutants showed severe mitotic defects (Fig. 6d,e,i, Supplementary Fig. S5b–b”’,c–c”’), but the prosβ61/+ heterozygote condition partially reduced mitotic defects by approximately two-fold in these embryos from mts/+; vtd/+ mothers (Fig. 6g,h,i, Supplementary Fig. S5e–e”’,f–f”’). The effects of the prosβ61 mutation were similar for two double heterozygotes with different mts alleles (mts02496/+; vtdex3/+ or mtsXE-2258/+; vtdex3/+). These results suggest that Vtd stability is regulated by PP2A through the proteasomal degradation pathway.
Discussion
We have shown that Mts and Vtd are required for normal mitosis during embryogenesis and Cut regulation during wing development. Cohesin is necessary for sister chromatid cohesion, but it is also involved in the organization of spindle poles and microtubules in the division process, although the underlying mechanism is not well understood21. It has been shown that centrosomes in mts mutant embryos can nucleate microtubules but the growing microtubules are rarely associated with chromosomes8. Similarly, embryos double heterozygous for mts and vtd mutations show chromosome-free centrosomes with abnormal spindles (Fig. 2). It is possible that defects in spindle formation or its connection to the chromosomes might lead to falling of associated chromosomes into the interior of embryo, resulting in free centrosomes. It has been shown that human cells depleted in Rad21 show defects in centrosome integrity54. Hence, it is plausible that free centrosome phenotypes might also be related to abnormalities in centrosomes.
We have also shown that Mts and Vtd are required for the maintenance of Cut level in wing disc for normal wing development. Importantly, knockdown of mts and vtd in wing discs results in synergistic effects to disrupt wing development. It has been reported that cohesin acts as an insulator to prevent the long-range communication between promoter and enhancer of the cut gene, thereby inhibiting Cut expression37,38. This idea is based on the findings that knockdown of SA or Rad21 cohesin subunit partially suppresses the wing notching phenotype caused by ctk mutation. ctk is a gypsy transposon insertion allele that partially inhibits an enhancer-promoter interaction for cut expression. The Scc2 homolog Nipped-B interacts with the cohesin complex to regulate gene expression as well as sister chromatid cohesion. Nipped-B is an adherin that loads the cohesin complex onto chromosomes. Cohesin is loaded from the later stage of anaphase till prophase, and therefore it is a structural component of interphase chromosomes where gene expression occurs38. In contrast to SA, Nipped-B acts to promote cut expression. Our data show that vtd knockdown causes reduction of Cut level at the DV boundary in wing disc, resulting in notched wings. This result is in contrast to the earlier findings that Rad21 functions as a negative regulator of cut expression.
Although the basis for this discrepancy is not understood, it is worth noting that there are several experimental differences between the previous studies37,38 and this study. In the previous studies, the relationship between Rad21 and Cut expression was determined by examining whether wing notching phenotype of ctk mutant can be modified by Rad21 RNAi. Since this assay is based on the modification of ctk phenotype rather than the level of cut expression per se, it is unknown whether this phenotypic modification is correlated with the changes in the cut expression. In contrast, our approach in this study was to directly examine the effects of vtd RNAi on the Cut protein level along the DV boundary and on wing notching. In addition, previous studies induced RNAi using the Sym-pUAS vector to generate dsRNA by bidirectional mRNA synthesis whereas we used a TRiP line which expresses short hairpin (sh)RNA instead of long dsRNA55. Use of different RNAi methods may not significantly affect vtd knockdown effects. However, differences in the Gal4 drivers used to express Rad21 RNAi might be important. Previous studies used heatshock70 (hsp70)-Gal4, thus inducing Rad21 RNAi ubiquitously while vtd RNAi in this work was targeted more specifically to the DV boundary of wing disc by vg-Gal4. Interestingly, it was observed in the previous studies that Rad21 RNAi increases SA mRNA and Rad21 mRNA in some cases. Thus, potential cross-regulation interactions between cohesin subunit mRNA levels might also influence the effects of Rad21 RNAi in the ctk background. Nonetheless, our direct observation of the reduced Cut expression in the DV boundary of wing disc and wing notching by vtd RNAi is in accord with the positive role of Vtd in cut regulation, which is also consistent with the Nipped-B requirement for cut expression. Since reduced Mts strongly enhances the notching phenotype of vtd mutation or RNAi, Mts appears to be critical for promoting the Vtd function in cut gene activation. This is supported from the reduced Cut expression at the DV boundary by double knockdown of mts and vtd.
As a mechanism underlying the relationship between Mts and Vtd, we provided evidence that mts knockdown or PP2A inhibition by okadaic acid causes a reduction in the Vtd protein level in S2 cells. In addition, mts RNAi or loss of Tws in mutant clones in wing discs significantly reduced the level of Vtd in vivo. Furthermore, our data indicate that Mts is required for preventing the proteasome-dependent degradation of Vtd in vivo. Thus, we propose that phosphorylation of Vtd causes its downregulation by the proteasome pathway. In this process, PP2A is critical to maintain the level of Vtd by antagonizing Vtd phosphorylation. The role of PP2A in the regulation of Vtd stability is required in both embryonic mitosis and wing development based on (i) the reduction of Vtd by depleting Mts or Tws in wing discs and (ii) the suppression of mitotic defects from mts/vtd double knockdown by reducing the proteasome function in embryos.
Our biochemical data show that the C-terminal domain of Mts binds to Vtd, suggesting that PP2A might be involved in dephosphorylation of Vtd. Since Mts physically interacts with Vtd, Vtd might be a direct substrate for the PP2A activity. However, we do not exclude the possibility that PP2A dephosphorylates other factors to regulate Vtd stability. Rad21 in yeast is phosphorylated by Polo kinase during mitosis16,17. Despite the similarities in protein sequences of Vtd and Rad21, Polo phosphorylation sites of Rad21 are not conserved in Vtd. This raises a possibility that cleavage of Vtd might be triggered by a different protein kinase(s) or through an unidentified mechanism. In S2 cells, phosphorylation of the SA subunit has been detected. A histone chaperone NAP1 involved in sister chromatid resolution is known to antagonize PP2A to prevent SA dephosphorylation42. Thus, it is possible that Mts-Vtd binding might affect the Mts-SA interaction. Identification of in vivo substrates for PP2A and new factors associated with the Mts-Vtd complex will help to reveal the mechanism of Vtd regulation. It has been reported that Twins (Tws), a regulatory subunit of PP2A, is required for Wingless (Wg)/Wnt signaling by stabilizing Arm during wing development56. However, it is unknown whether the control of Arm stability by Tws is related to the PP2A-dependent Vtd regulation. PP2A and cohesin complexes are evolutionarily conserved in their structures. It would be interesting to see whether the catalytic subunit of PP2A is also involved in stabilizing the Rad21/Scc1 subunit for mitosis and gene regulation in mammalian systems.
Materials and Methods
Fly stocks and genetics
All Drosophila strains were grown and maintained at room temperature. w1118 flies were used as the wild-type. vg-GAL4 was a gift from Masayuki Miura. arm-GAL4-arm-GAL4::UAS-a-Cat:eGFP/arm-GAL4::UAS-a-Cat:eGFP;UAS-Dcr2T10/UASDcr2T10 was from Ingrid Lohmann. yw, hs-Flp; act5c > CD2 > GAL4, UAS-GFP/TM6b was from Daniela Grifoni. tws60 was provided by Tadashi Uemura. UAS-vtdWT-myc10 (This study). The following stocks were from the Bloomington Stock Center (Bloomington, USA), Vienna Drosophila Stock Center (Vienna, Austria): UAS-mts RNAi (Bloomington 27723, VDRC 41924), UAS-vtd RNAi (Bloomington 36786, VDRC 13669), vtdex3 (Bloomington 27609), mts02496 (Bloomington 11193), mtsXE-2258 (Bloomington 5684), prosβ61 (Bloomington 6182), vtdex3,tub::VtdWT-myc10 (Bloomington 27615).
Yeast two-hybrid screen
A cDNA fragment encoding the C-terminal Mts bait (67aa) was cloned into EcoRI/BamHI sites of pGBKT vector. This pGBKT-Mts-C-terminal vector was used for transformation of Y2H Gold yeast strain for bait. Mate & Plate™ Library - Universal Drosophila (Normalized) (Cat. No. 630485, Clontech, CA) was used for cDNA library. Yeast two hybrid screening and confirmation of positive interaction was performed according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
Generation of anti-Vtd antibody
An antibody against Vtd was raised in rabbits with His-Vtd452~674 (His tagged amino acids 453–674) expressed in Escherichia coli by isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside induction, and the antibody was affinity-purified with GST-Vtd452~674 (GST tagged amino acids 453–674). Antibody production and purification were carried out by Younginfrontier (Seoul, Korea). Purified Vtd antibody was used for immunoblotting (1:5000) and for immunohistochemistry (1:500).
Immunohistochemistry
Embryo fixation was performed according to standard methods. Embryos were fixed by a solution containing heptane (Sigma, St Louis, MO) and methanol57,58. Wing discs were fixed in PLP fixative (2% paraformaldehyde, 75 mM lysine, and 35 mM phosphate buffer, pH7.4) for 15–30 min at room temperature.
Antibodies used for immunohistochemistry were as follows: mouse anti-Cut (1:200, 2B10, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB), Iowa City, Iowa), guinea pig anti-Centrosomin (1:1000, from Jordan Raff), Rat anti-α-Tubulin (1:200, MAB1864, Millipore, Burlington, Massachusetts), rabbit anti-PH3 (1:200, 06–570, Millipore), Rabbit anti-Vtd (1:500, this study), rabbit anti-Myc (1:100, ab9106, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Secondary antibodies conjugated with Rhodamine Red™-X (RRX), Alexa Fluor® 647 or fluorescein isothiocyanate (1:200, 715-095-151, 715-295-151, 715-605-151, 711-095-152, 711-295-152, 711-605-152, 706-095-148, 706-295-148, 706-605-148, 712-095-153, 712-295-153, 712-605-153) were from Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc. Vectashield with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (H-1200, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) was used for mounting. Fluorescent images were acquired using Carl Zeiss LSM710 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
In vitro GST-pull down assay
For GST pull-down, R2 cells (BL21 derivative) were transformed with plasmids for MBP–MtsWT and GST–VtdWT. Pull-down buffer (PDB) contained 20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mM dithiothreitol and protease inhibitor cocktail. Five micrograms of MBP fusion proteins and GST fusion proteins were used as prey and baits, respectively. For western blotting, Mouse anti-MBP (1:20000, E8032S, NEB, Ipswich, Massachusetts), Mouse anti-GST (1:4000, sc-138, Santa Cruz, Dallas, Texas), and secondary antibody with HRP (1:20000, 715-035-151, 711-035-152, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) were used.
Cell culture and transfection
Drosophila S2 cells were cultured in M3 media (Sigma, Saint Louis, Missouri) with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (Thermo, Waltham, MA). S2 cells were transfected using Effectene (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) or X-tremeGENE HP DNA transfection reagent (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s manual. pAc5.1 empty vector was used to transfect with an equal amount of plasmids. A total of 1–3 μg DNA was used for each transfection. For co-IP, transfected S2 cells were incubated during 2~3 day for producing proteins from transfected DNA.
Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) and Western blotting
For co-IP, cell extracts were obtained from S2 cells or embryos. Embryos were collected at different stages as indicated. 20 wing discs were used for checking Vtd level by Western blotting. S2 cells, embryos and wing discs were lysed on ice in cold IP buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 0.2 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 5% glycerol, 80 mM KCl, 0.2% NP-40, 1x proteinase inhibitor cocktail and 1x phostop (Roche)). Protein complexes were immunoprecipitated with 1~2 µg antibody at 4 °C for 2 h. Antibody-protein complexes were immunoprecipitated by protein G agarose beads (Roche) or SureBeads™ Protein G Magnetic Beads (Biorad, Hercules, California). The samples were boiled in protein loading buffer at 94 °C for 5 min and loaded for SDS-PAGE and western blotting.
The following antibodies were used for IP: Mouse anti-V5 (R960-25, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA), Rabbit anti-FLAG (V8137, Sigma) and Mouse anti-FLAG (F1804, Sigma), Rabbit anti-Myc (ab9106, Abcam), Rabbit IgG (I-1000, Vector); Antibody for western blotting: Mouse anti-V5 (1:5000, R960-25, Invitrogen), Rabbit anti-FLAG (1:2500, V8137, Sigma), Mouse anti-FLAG (1:2000, F1804, Sigma), Rabbit anti-Vtd (1:5000, this study), Mouse anti-β-Tubulin (1:10000, E7, DSHB), Mouse anti-Mts (1:5000, 610555, BD Transduction Laboratories™, San Jose, CA), Rabbit anti-Histone H3 (1:10000, 05–928, Millipore), Mouse anti-Actin (1:10000, ab8224, Abcam), Secondary antibodies (1:20000, 715-035-151, 711-035-152, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories).
Double-stranded RNA-mediated interference
One microgram of PCR products with T7 promoter sequence (pSK(−), mts) was used for production of double-stranded RNA using MEGAscript kit (Invitrogen). The bathing way was used for dsRNA treatment59. For knockdown of mts, S2 cells were treated with 30 µg of double-stranded RNA for target gene.
Primer sets for dsRNA
pSK(−) dsRNA Forward: taa tac gac tca cta tag g atc gat aag ctt gat atc gaa ttc
pSK(−) dsRNA Reverse: taa tac gac tca cta tag g gca ccg cct aca tac ctc gct
mts dsRNA Forward: taa tac gac tca cta tag g atg gag gat aaa gca aca aca aaa
mts dsRNA Reverse: taa tac gac tca cta tag g gta cac ctg tgt gat ctg gc
Quantitative PCR (QPCR)
Wing discs from tws60 homozygous samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until use. Total RNA from wing discs was prepared with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Total RNA (2 µg) was reverse-transcribed using the QuantiTect reverse transcription Kit (Qiagen). QPCR was performed using SYBR Green master mix on CFX96 Real-Time PCR System (BioRad) with standard cycling parameters (1 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of 20 sec at 95 °C, 20 sec at 58 °C, and 45 sec at 72 °C). CT values for detected mRNA levels of each gene were normalized to those of rp49. Mean expression levels were calculated from the values of three independent experiments, and were indicated as fold-changes.
Primer sets used for QPCR
rp49 Forward: aga tcg tga aga agc gca cca ag
rp49 Reverse: cac cag gaa ctt ctt gaa tcc gg
vtd Forward: cag aaa aca ggc ggc aca aa
vtd Reverse: ggg ttt tcg aac gtt ggt cc
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Drs William Warren, Masayuki Miura, Ingrid Lohmann, Daniela Grifoni, Tadashi Uemura, Jordan. Raff, Claudio E. Sunkel for kindly providing reagents. We acknowledge the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center, the Drosophila Genomics Resource Center, and the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for reagents and fly stocks. We also thank Kyung-Ok Cho for commenting on the manuscript. This research was supported by NRF-2014K1A1A2042982, NRF-2017R1A2B3007516 (to K.-W.C.) and NRF-2016 R1D1A1B03932039 (to S.-T.H.) through the National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by the Korean, Ministry of Education, Science & Technology.
Author Contributions
L.-H.K., S.-T.H. and K.-W.C. designed the study. L.-H.K. performed experiments. L.-H.K. and K.-W.C. wrote the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-44027-3.
References
- 1.Janssens V, Goris J. Protein phosphatase 2A: a highly regulated family of serine/threonine phosphatases implicated in cell growth and signalling. Biochem. J. 2001;353:417–439. doi: 10.1042/bj3530417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Moorhead GB, Trinkle-Mulcahy L, Ulke-Lemee A. Emerging roles of nuclear protein phosphatases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007;8:234–244. doi: 10.1038/nrm2126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shi Y. Serine/threonine phosphatases: mechanism through structure. Cell. 2009;139:468–484. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wurzenberger C, Gerlich DW. Phosphatases: providing safe passage through mitotic exit. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011;12:469–482. doi: 10.1038/nrm3149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Foley EA, Maldonado M, Kapoor TM. Formation of stable attachments between kinetochores and microtubules depends on the B56-PP2A phosphatase. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:1265–1271. doi: 10.1038/ncb2327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cohen P. The structure and regulation of protein phosphatases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1989;58:453–508. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.58.070189.002321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mumby MC, Walter G. Protein serine/threonine phosphatases: structure, regulation, and functions in cell growth. Physiol. Rev. 1993;73:673–699. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1993.73.4.673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Snaith HA, Armstrong CG, Guo Y, Kaiser K, Cohen PT. Deficiency of protein phosphatase 2A uncouples the nuclear and centrosome cycles and prevents attachment of microtubules to the kinetochore in Drosophila microtubule star (mts) embryos. J. Cell Sci. 1996;109(Pt 13):3001–3012. doi: 10.1242/jcs.109.13.3001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nasmyth K, Haering CH. The structure and function of SMC and kleisin complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2005;74:595–648. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vass S, et al. Depletion of Drad21/Scc1 in Drosophila cells leads to instability of the cohesin complex and disruption of mitotic progression. Curr. Biol. 2003;13:208–218. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00047-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Warren WD, et al. The Drosophila RAD21 cohesin persists at the centromere region in mitosis. Curr. Biol. 2000;10:1463–1466. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00806-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jessberger R. The many functions of SMC proteins in chromosome dynamics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;3:767–778. doi: 10.1038/nrm930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Uhlmann F. Chromosome cohesion and separation: from men and molecules. Curr. Biol. 2003;13:R104–114. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00039-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nasmyth K, Haering CH. Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009;43:525–558. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gruber S, Haering CH, Nasmyth K. Chromosomal cohesin forms a ring. Cell. 2003;112:765–777. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00162-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Haering CH, Lowe J, Hochwagen A, Nasmyth K. Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. Mol. Cell. 2002;9:773–788. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00515-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Alexandru G, Uhlmann F, Mechtler K, Poupart MA, Nasmyth K. Phosphorylation of the cohesin subunit Scc1 by Polo/Cdc5 kinase regulates sister chromatid separation in yeast. Cell. 2001;105:459–472. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00362-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Losada A, Hirano T. Dynamic molecular linkers of the genome: the first decade of SMC proteins. Genes Dev. 2005;19:1269–1287. doi: 10.1101/gad.1320505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kitajima TS, et al. Shugoshin collaborates with protein phosphatase 2A to protect cohesin. Nature. 2006;441:46–52. doi: 10.1038/nature04663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tang Z, et al. PP2A is required for centromeric localization of Sgo1 and proper chromosome segregation. Dev. Cell. 2006;10:575–585. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wong RW. An update on cohesin function as a ‘molecular glue’ on chromosomes and spindles. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:1754–1758. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.9.11806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Arumugam P, Nishino T, Haering CH, Gruber S, Nasmyth K. Cohesin’s ATPase activity is stimulated by the C-terminal Winged-Helix domain of its kleisin subunit. Curr. Biol. 2006;16:1998–2008. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kong X, et al. Cohesin associates with spindle poles in a mitosis-specific manner and functions in spindle assembly in vertebrate cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2009;20:1289–1301. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e08-04-0419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Guan J, Ekwurtzel E, Kvist U, Yuan L. Cohesin protein SMC1 is a centrosomal protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008;372:761–764. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.05.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Urban E, Nagarkar-Jaiswal S, Lehner CF, Heidmann SK. The cohesin subunit Rad21 is required for synaptonemal complex maintenance, but not sister chromatid cohesion, during Drosophila female meiosis. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Heidmann D, et al. The Drosophila meiotic kleisin C(2)M functions before the meiotic divisions. Chromosoma. 2004;113:177–187. doi: 10.1007/s00412-004-0305-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen F, et al. Multiple protein phosphatases are required for mitosis in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 2007;17:293–303. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee JY, Dej KJ, Lopez JM, Orr-Weaver TL. Control of centromere localization of the MEI-S332 cohesion protection protein. Curr. Biol. 2004;14:1277–1283. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hertz EPT, Nilsson J. Localization of PP2A-B56 to centromeres in Drosophila. Cell Cycle. 2017;16:1385–1386. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1337986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Katis VL, Galova M, Rabitsch KP, Gregan J, Nasmyth K. Maintenance of cohesin at centromeres after meiosis I in budding yeast requires a kinetochore-associated protein related to MEI-S332. Curr. Biol. 2004;14:560–572. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Revenkova E, Jessberger R. Keeping sister chromatids together: cohesins in meiosis. Reproduction. 2005;130:783–790. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Riedel CG, et al. Protein phosphatase 2A protects centromeric sister chromatid cohesion during meiosis I. Nature. 2006;441:53–61. doi: 10.1038/nature04664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Watanabe Y. Sister chromatid cohesion along arms and at centromeres. Trends. Genet. 2005;21:405–412. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2005.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yamada T, Tahara E, Kanke M, Kuwata K, Nishiyama T. Drosophila Dalmatian combines sororin and shugoshin roles in establishment and protection of cohesion. EMBO J. 2017;36:1513–1527. doi: 10.15252/embj.201695607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang P, Pinson X, Archambault V. PP2A-twins is antagonized by greatwall and collaborates with polo for cell cycle progression and centrosome attachment to nuclei in drosophila embryos. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wu Y, et al. Drosophila Nipped-B Mutants Model Cornelia de Lange Syndrome in Growth and Behavior. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rollins RA, Korom M, Aulner N, Martens A, Dorsett D. Drosophila nipped-B protein supports sister chromatid cohesion and opposes the stromalin/Scc3 cohesion factor to facilitate long-range activation of the cut gene. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004;24:3100–3111. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.8.3100-3111.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dorsett D, et al. Effects of sister chromatid cohesion proteins on cut gene expression during wing development in Drosophila. Development. 2005;132:4743–4753. doi: 10.1242/dev.02064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hallson G, et al. The Drosophila cohesin subunit Rad21 is a trithorax group (trxG) protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008;105:12405–12410. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801698105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kennison JA, Tamkun JW. Dosage-dependent modifiers of polycomb and antennapedia mutations in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1988;85:8136–8140. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.21.8136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Warren WD, Lin E, Nheu TV, Hime GR, McKay MJ. Drad21, a Drosophila rad21 homologue expressed in S-phase cells. Gene. 2000;250:77–84. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00166-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Moshkin YM, et al. Histone chaperone NAP1 mediates sister chromatid resolution by counteracting protein phosphatase 2A. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pauli A, et al. Cell-type-specific TEV protease cleavage reveals cohesin functions in Drosophila neurons. Dev. Cell. 2008;14:239–251. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Stafstrom JP, Staehelin LA. Dynamics of the nuclear envelope and of nuclear pore complexes during mitosis in the Drosophila embryo. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1984;34:179–189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Foe VE. Mitotic domains reveal early commitment of cells in Drosophila embryos. Development. 1989;107:1–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Neumann CJ, Cohen SM. A hierarchy of cross-regulation involving Notch, wingless, vestigial and cut organizes the dorsal/ventral axis of the Drosophila wing. Development. 1996;122:3477–3485. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.11.3477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Xu T, Rubin GM. Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult Drosophila tissues. Development. 1993;117:1223–1237. doi: 10.1242/dev.117.4.1223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Nowak SJ, Pai CY, Corces VG. Protein phosphatase 2A activity affects histone H3 phosphorylation and transcription in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003;23:6129–6138. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.17.6129-6138.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cohen-Kaplan V, Livneh I, Avni N, Cohen-Rosenzweig C, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy: Coordinated and independent activities. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2016;79:403–418. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2016.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Glickman MH, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol. Rev. 2002;82:373–428. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00027.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ding WX, Yin XM. Sorting, recognition and activation of the misfolded protein degradation pathways through macroautophagy and the proteasome. Autophagy. 2008;4:141–150. doi: 10.4161/auto.5190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Smyth KA, Belote JM. The dominant temperature-sensitive lethal DTS7 of Drosophila melanogaster encodes an altered 20S proteasome beta-type subunit. Genetics. 1999;151:211–220. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.1.211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Schweisguth F. Dominant-negative mutation in the beta2 and beta6 proteasome subunit genes affect alternative cell fate decisions in the Drosophila sense organ lineage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1999;96:11382–11386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Beauchene NA, et al. Rad21 is required for centrosome integrity in human cells independently of its role in chromosome cohesion. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:1774–1780. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.9.11524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Perkins LA, et al. The Transgenic RNAi Project at Harvard Medical School: Resources and Validation. Genetics. 2015;201:843–852. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.180208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bajpai R, Makhijani K, Rao PR, Shashidhara LS. Drosophila Twins regulates Armadillo levels in response to Wg/Wnt signal. Development. 2004;131:1007–1016. doi: 10.1242/dev.00980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Li X, Urwyler O, Suter B. Drosophila Xpd regulates Cdk7 localization, mitotic kinase activity, spindle dynamics, and chromosome segregation. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1000876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yeom E, Hong ST, Choi KW. Crumbs interacts with Xpd for nuclear division control in Drosophila. Oncogene. 2015;34:2777–2789. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kao LR, Megraw TL. RNAi in cultured Drosophila cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2004;247:443–457. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-665-7:443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.