Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 May 20;9:7587. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44123-4

Senescence-related deterioration of intercellular junctions in the peritoneal mesothelium promotes the transmesothelial invasion of ovarian cancer cells

Martyna Pakuła 1, Anna Witucka 1, Paweł Uruski 1, Artur Radziemski 1, Rafał Moszyński 2, Dariusz Szpurek 2, Konstantin Maksin 3,4, Aldona Woźniak 3, Stefan Sajdak 2, Andrzej Tykarski 1, Justyna Mikuła-Pietrasik 1,#, Krzysztof Książek 1,✉,#
PMCID: PMC6527686  PMID: 31110245

Abstract

Mechanisms of transmesothelial invasion of ovarian cancer are still poorly understood. Here we examined whether this phenomenon may be determined by an expression of intercellular junctions in peritoneal mesothelial cells (PMCs). Analysis of ovarian tumors showed that cancer cells are localized below an intact layer of PMCs. The PMCs located near the invaded cancer cells displayed low expression of connexin 43, E-cadherin, occludin, and desmoglein, as well as expressed SA-β-Gal, a marker of senescence. Experiments in vitro showed that senescent PMCs exhibited decreased levels of the four tested intercellular junctions, and that the invasion of ovarian cancer cells through the PMCs increased proportionally to the admixture of senescent cells. Intervention studies showed that the expression of connexin 43, E-cadherin, occludin, and desmoglein in senescent PMCs could be restored upon the blockade of p38 MAPK, NF-κB, AKT, JNK, HGF, and TGF-β1. When these molecules were neutralized, the efficiency of the transmesothelial cancer cell invasion was diminished. Collectively, our findings show that the integrity of the peritoneal mesothelium, which is determined by the expression of junctional proteins, is critical for the invasion of ovarian cancer. They also indicate a mechanism by which senescent PMCs may promote the invasive potential of cancer cells.

Subject terms: Ovarian cancer, Metastasis

Introduction

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains the most fatal malignancy of the female genital tract. The most devastating stage of the disease and, at the same time, a sign of poor prognosis is when the cancer progresses within the peritoneal cavity. Even after radical cytoreduction followed by treatment with platinum derivatives and/or taxanes, the disease tends to recur, often as a chemoresistant variant1–3.

The pathophysiology of the intraperitoneal spread of ovarian cancer is one of the most extensively studied aspects of the disease4. There is a consensus that the interaction between cancer cells that shed from the surface of the ovary, individually or in spheroids, and peritoneal mesothelial cells (PMCs) that cover, as a single layer, the visceral and abdominal surfaces of the peritoneum is the basis of tumor development. This cross-talk includes several individual processes, of which adhesion, migration, proliferation, and invasion are the most critical. They are accompanied by some supportive phenomena, such as the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of cancer cells and angiogenesis5. Additionally, a significant role is played by the malignant ascites, a fluid that accumulates within the peritoneum in a large number of patients with EOC6. The last decade also provided evidence that the cancer-promoting properties of PMCs are significantly reinforced when they become senescent. Senescent PMCs have been found to accumulate within the peritoneal cavity, and their supportive role in the development of an intraperitoneal metastatic niche has been observed in cell culture, laboratory animals, and tumors from EOC patients7.

Among the several steps of intraperitoneal ovarian cancer progression, the transmesothelial invasion of cancer cells towards the tissue stroma is the step whose molecular mechanism still needs to be clarified. In general, invasion refers to a process in which cancer cells actively move in response to chemotactic stimuli through the cellular and acellular (extracellular matrix) tissue compartments8. The study presented here stems from our observation of ovarian cancer cells lying beneath an intact layer of PMCs, suggesting that their invasion may be determined by expression of intercellular junctions in the PMCs. To verify this theory, we examined the expression of four junctional proteins that are constitutively expressed by PMCs: connexin 43 (gap junction), E-cadherin (adherens junction), occludin (tight junction), and desmoglein (desmosomes) in peritoneal ovarian tumors and in PMCs in vitro. Moreover, we showed that transmesothelial invasion of ovarian cancer cells is intensified by the presence and altered phenotype of senescent PMCs. The phenomenological aspects of the study were followed with mechanistic insights into the signaling pathways and molecules linked with cellular senescence that could be involved in the senescence-related deterioration of intercellular junctions, leading to intensified cancer cell invasiveness.

Results and Discussion

There is a theory that the PMCs serve as a mechanical barrier that protects the peritoneal cavity from the entrance of ovarian cancer cells9. In this view, the PMCs are actively cleared by cancer cells, plausibly via myosin-driven forces, which allows the latter to successfully implant within the peritoneal stroma, where they are encouraged by fibroblasts to multiply and form tumors10. We are skeptical of this theory because our analysis of several samples of peritoneal ovarian tumors that developed in patients and laboratory animals revealed that the layer of PMCs was consistently intact (the cells were visualized using the D2-40 antigen in11,12 and the Wt-1 antigen in13).

In our opinion, the microphotographs provided by Kenny et al.14, and showing the lack of PMCs in proximity to ovarian cancer cells that have been used to support the theory mentioned above have been misinterpreted. In fact, the PMCs were still present below the implanted cells but seem to have moved slightly downward. More importantly, the pictures show cancer cells that had not invaded the PMCs into the peritoneal stroma and that are only attached to the external side of the omentum14.

Recently, the view that PMCs are “the first line of defense” against tumors metastasizing into the peritoneum and that they inhibit some vital processes underlying peritoneal dissemination (e.g., adhesion)15 has shifted towards an appreciation of the PMCs as cells that support ovarian cancer spread16. The microphotographs of cancer cells that were still above the PMCs, far from the tissue stroma14, directed, however, our attention to the issue of the mechanism controlling the transmesothelial invasion of the cancer cells.

Our analysis of 32 peritoneal ovarian tumors from the perspective of the histological organization of the cancer cells showed that cancer cells are consistently localized below an intact layer of the PMCs. The integrity of the PMCs that were effectively invaded by cancer cells was confirmed by using four different markers of these cells, that is D2-40, Wt-1, HBME-1, and calretinin (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Representative pictures showing the presence of a uniform layer of PMCs in the biopsies in which ovarian cancer cells invaded the tissue stroma. The PMCs were identified according to brown staining of D2-40, Wt-1, HBME-1, and calretinin (magnification ×100). Ca – cancerous tissue. Analysis was performed using 32 tumors from patients with EOC.

The observation that cancer cells penetrated the PMCs without their retraction raised the question about the plausible mechanism of this process. In this context, our attention attracted an interesting proposal that suggested the role of intercellular junctions as the gates by which ovarian cancer cells can pass through the PMCs. The authors of that study used scanning electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry to show that ovarian cancer cells may disrupt the intercellular junctions within the PMCs17. Over the next few years, a plethora of data has accumulated that various types of intercellular junctions are important for the invasion of cancer cells18. To verify whether this relatively old observation could explain our current findings, we examined the expression of four arbitrarily selected junctional proteins that are constitutively expressed by PMCs, connexin 4319, E-cadherin20, occludin21, and desmoglein22. The proteins were analyzed in either samples of tumors, tumor-free zones of the peritoneum, or cultured PMCs.

The analysis of the junctional proteins in tumor specimens revealed that in the case of cancer cells that penetrated the PMCs and settled in the tissue stroma, the expression of the junctional proteins in the PMCs was almost undetectable. In contrast, fragments of the omentum that were free of cancer cells displayed very high expression of the tested junctional proteins (Fig. 2). This result may suggest that cancer cells may freely pass through the PMCs when the expression of the intercellular junctions in the PMCs markedly declines, which plausibly corresponds to their decreased structural integrity (recognized by some as their retraction10) and increased penetrability. At the same time, we can speculate that when the functionality of the junctions is preserved, cancer cells are, in turn, unable to go to the stromal compartment. Probably, they can still form tumors; however, those lesions are deprived of the stimuli generated by stromal cells, particularly fibroblasts23.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Representative pictures showing the expression of the intercellular junctions in the PMCs located near ovarian cancer cells that had invaded them and had reached the stroma and in the areas of the peritoneum free from cancer cells. (a) The arrows indicate a layer of PMCs (magnification ×100). Ca – cancerous tissue. Panel (b) shows a quantification of the junctional protein expression in the examined tissues. Analysis was performed using 32 tumors from patients with EOC. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 vs. cancer (−).

It has recently been shown that the expression of connexin 43 in PMCs located near cancer cells correlated with the presence of senescent PMCs12. There is also evidence that senescent PMCs accumulate in the peritoneum in vivo24. In the current study we extended those findings by showing that senescent, SA-β-Gal-positive cells are present in all of 32 tested peritoneal ovarian tumors, and that the fraction of these cells in the proximity to cancerous tissue ranges from 44 to 67%, and is significantly higher compared with tumor-free zones of the omentum (Fig. 3). This abundance of senescent PMCs within ovarian tumors strongly supports our previous in vitro and in vivo experiments, in which we demonstrated an explicit cancer-promoting activity of these cells. In fact, we were able to demonstrate that senescent PMCs support all vital elements of ovarian cancer progression, including adhesion, proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis11,25,26. Moreover, taking into account that the fraction of senescent PMCs in the omentum increases progressively during aging24, it is very plausible that these cells may significantly contribute to the age-dependent increase in ovarian cancer cell aggressiveness27.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The presence of senescent PMCs in proximity to the cancerous tissue. (a) The senescent cells were identified according to green staining of SA-β-Gal. Panel (b) shows a quantification of the SA-β-Gal-positive cells in the examined tissues. Analysis was performed using 32 tumors from patients with EOC. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. ***P < 0.001 vs. cancer (−).

The above-mentioned observations, connecting the decreased expression of connexin 43 with the presence of senescent PMCs and the submesothelial localization of ovarian cancer cells, prompted us to examine the effect of PMC senescence on the invasion of cancer cells. To this end, we analyzed whether replicative senescence of PMCs is associated with changes in expression of connexin 43 and three remaining junctional proteins. Results of our investigations, depicted on Fig. 4 revealed that the expression of the four tested intercellular junctions in the senescent PMCs is considerably lower than in their younger counterparts. Recently, a senescence-associated decline in connexin 43 levels has been found in senescent fibroblasts28 and endothelial cells29. Senescent endothelial cells were also characterized by the decreased expression of occludin and claudin-5, which caused the increased permeability of endothelial cell monolayers30. The senescence-related reduction in E-cadherin and desmoglein have never been described before.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Changes in the expression of intercellular junctions during the senescence of PMCs in vitro. The results of the quantitative examination of SA-β-Gal, connexin 43, E-cadherin, occludin, and desmoglein in young (Young) and senescent (Sen) PMCs. (a) Representative pictures showing the decreased expression of junctional proteins in the senescent PMCs. (b) Experiments were performed with 8 cultures of PMCs obtained from different donors. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 vs. Young. RFU – Relative Fluorescence Units (magnification ×200).

Taking into account above-mentioned observations on endothelial cells, we decided to find out experimentally whether disrupted cell-cell communication due to a reduction of the intercellular junctions in senescent PMCs may influence the invasiveness of cancer cells. To this end we employed an invasion assay in which monolayered PMCs containing different proportions of senescent cells were seeded on the extracellular matrix-mimicking BME substrate. Then, three stable (A2780, OVCAR-3, SKOV-3) and primary EOC cultures were allowed to move towards a chemotactic stimulus generated by a low concentration of serum. The results of this experiment, presented in Fig. 5, revealed that as the proportion of senescent cells increased, more transmesothelial invasion of cancer cells was observed. Interestingly, the stimulatory effect of the senescent cells on the invasion was cell line-specific. In the A2780 cells, invasion was stimulated by the inclusion of a total of 5% senescent cells within the admixture; in the OVCAR-3 cells, the stimulation was seen with a 75% senescent cell admixture; in SKOV-3 cells it was seen with a 1% senescent admixture; whereas in the case of the primary EOCs, the PMCs supported the invasion when the whole population of the PMCs was senescent. We can speculate that these differences may be associated to some extent with the slightly different morphologies of the cancer cells (e.g., the majority of the primary EOCs displayed a spindle-shaped appearance), and they may reflect to some extent the genetic variations among the cell lines, which may also affect the rate of their motility31.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Invasion of the established (a–c) and primary ovarian cancer cells (d) through a layer of PMCs containing an increasing fraction of senescent cells. Experiments were performed with 8 cultures of PMCs obtained from different donors. Cancer cells were used in hexaplicates. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 vs. 0%. EOCs – Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells; RFU – Relative Fluorescence Units.

Having established that the senescence of PMCs is associated with increased ovarian cancer cell invasion and the decreased expression of the intercellular junctions, we went on to analyze the signaling that links these two phenomena. To this end, we performed experiments in which the expression of the junctional proteins was quantified in pre-senescent PMCs upon their treatment with chemical inhibitors of the pathways recognized to be involved either in the development of the senescent phenotype or in the regulation of the functionality of junctional proteins. These pathways included p38 MAPK32, NF-κB33, AKT34, JNK35, SP-136, AP-136, TBX237, and Nkx2-537. Moreover, we aimed to verify whether the deterioration of the junctions could be evoked in an autocrine manner by proteins secreted by the senescent PMCs. In this case, the conditioned medium generated by senescent PMCs was treated with antibodies neutralizing three arbitrarily selected proteins, GRO-1, HGF, and TGF-β1, whose activity has previously been linked with the induction of the senescent phenotype in various cell types12,38,39. The idea that the secretome of senescent PMCs may be causatively linked to the down-regulation of the expression of junctional proteins stems from a previous report that demonstrated the capacity of the conditioned medium to support invasion40.

Our experiments showed that the senescence-associated decrease in the four tested junctional proteins could be effectively reversed to levels that are characteristic of young cells upon the neutralization of p38 MAPK, NF-κB, AKT, and JNK (Fig. 6). As for the soluble proteins that were released by the senescent cells that could down-regulate the intercellular junctions, HGF and TGF-β1 appeared to play a role (Fig. 7). The significance of these molecules was confirmed by functional tests in which the blockade of the identified signaling and mediatory agents caused a noticeable reduction of the effectiveness of the transmesothelial invasion of ovarian cancer cells (Fig. 8). These findings are in line with observations by other authors who found that p38 MAPK and TGF-β1 contribute to the PMC-dependent exacerbation of the invasive capabilities of ovarian cancer41. The findings also agree with another study that showed that TGF-β1 has the capacity to increase ovarian cancer cell invasion via the reduction of E-cadherin levels, due to the elevated activity of transcriptional repressors of this junctional protein, such as Snail, Slug, Twist and ZEB142. NF-κB has also been recognized as being involved in the ovarian cancer metastasis-promoting activity of PMCs43. Finally, two papers revealed the role of PAI-1, whose proteolytic activity may be vital for the digestion of the extracellular matrix during cancer cell invasion. This is intriguing because the increased production of PAI-1 by senescent PMCs has also been observed44. Another report that is consistent with our results demonstrated the stimulation of ovarian cancer invasion by HGF, which exerted its activity through the down-regulation of thrombospondin-145. Additionally, the roles of AKT and JNK in the regulation of the invasive properties of ovarian cancer have already been demonstrated46,47.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

A representation of various pathways involved in the deterioration of junctional proteins in senescent PMCs. Experiments were performed with 6 cultures of PMCs obtained from different donors. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 vs. Young; RFU – Relative Fluorescence Units.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

A representation of potential soluble mediators of the deterioration of junctional proteins in senescent PMCs. Experiments were performed with 6 cultures of PMCs obtained from different donors. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 vs. Young; RFU – Relative Fluorescence Units.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Invasion of the established (a–c) and primary ovarian cancer cells (d) through young (Y) and senescent (S) PMCs, as well as through PMCs in which certain signaling pathways and autocrine mediators, recognized to contribute to a senescence-associated decline in the level of junctional protein, were neutralized. Experiments were performed with 8 cultures of PMCs obtained from different donors. Cancer cells were used in hexaplicates. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs. Young. EOCs – Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells; RFU – Relative Fluorescence Units.

Conclusions

Collectively, our study demonstrated that the presence of senescent PMCs in the peritoneal cavity may contribute to the increased invasiveness of ovarian cancer cells towards the tissue stroma. We showed phenomenologically and mechanistically that this increased invasion might be caused by a senescence-associated decline in several intercellular junction proteins within PMCs. At the same time, we would like to emphasize that our observations, especially those originating from the analysis of ovarian tumor in vivo, should be treated with caution as our imagination of cellular events that occurred during various stages of the intraperitoneal tumor formation. For this reason, the usefulness of the in vivo results is to some extent limited and their interpretation difficult. Some doubts may be associated, e.g., with the fact that we assumed that ovarian cancer cells did truly invade the mesothelium during very initial phases of cancer cell implantation. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that these mesothelial cells approached there after the tumor formation. To finally solve this important issue, further in vivo experiments with laboratory animals should be performed in which much more precise, cell-tracing methods will be employed.

Material and Methods

Chemicals

Unless otherwise stated, all chemicals and plastics were from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Signaling pathway inhibitors: MG132 (NF-κB), API-1 (AKT), SP600125 (JNK), and 3-Aminobenzamide (AP-1) were from Tocris Bioscience (Ellisville, MO); SB202190 (p38 MAPK) was from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA); mithramycin A (SP-1) was from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI); and peptides blocking TBX2 and Nkx2-5 were from MyBioSource (San Diego, CA). Antibodies neutralizing GRO-1, HGF, and TGF-β1, as well as the control IgY (AB-101-C) were from R&D Systems (Abingdon, UK).

Tumors from patients with peritoneal ovarian cancer

Tumors excised from the peritoneal cavity of 32 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (stage III and IV) as well as fragments of tumor-free peritoneum from the same patients were included in the study. The age of patients ranged from 42 to 60 years. The tissues were fixed in 4% formalin and were then processed as described in11. The cancer tissue was identified using standard H + E staining. Peritoneal mesothelium located near the cancer cells was identified based on positive stainings of the D2-40, Wt-1, HBME-1, and calretinin with specific antibodies (Dako, Santa Clara, CA). Antigen visualization was performed using an Envision Flex (Dako).

Cell culture

Primary peritoneal mesothelial cells (PMCs) were isolated by enzymatic disaggregation of the omentum obtained from 8 patients undergoing abdominal surgery (24–30 years old). The cells were propagated as described in48 and were identified according to positive staining for the HBME-1 antigen. Senescence of the PMCs was induced by serial passaging until exhaustion of their replicative capacity. The cells were considered senescent when they failed to divide within 4 weeks, and >90% expressed senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal). In some tests, conditioned medium (CM) from the PMCs was collected12.

The ovarian cancer cell lines A2780 and SKOV-3 were purchased from the ECCC (Porton Down, UK), and the OVCAR-3 line was obtained from ATCC (Rockville, MD). The cancer cells were maintained as described in25. Primary EOCs were isolated from the tumors removed during cytoreductive surgery from the 8 patients with serous ovarian cancer (stage IV). The detailed procedure of the isolation, identification, and culture of these cells was described in22.

Ethical issues

The procedures involving human subjects (the isolation of tumors, PMCs, and primary EOCs) were in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975. The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee at the Poznan University of Medical Sciences (consent number 299/17), and all the patients gave their informed consent. The methods were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Invasion assay

Cancer cell invasion was measured with a Cultrex 96 Well BME Cell Invasion Assay (Trevigen Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). Briefly, PMCs (1 × 105 cells/well) were seeded on the basement membrane extract (BME) to form a monolayer. Then, ovarian cancer cells were added into the upper part of the system (1 × 104 cells/well) on top of the PMCs. The invasion of the cancer cells towards a chemotactic gradient generated by 1% FBS was monitored for 24 h. The fluorescence emitted by the cancer cells was recorded using a SynergyTM 2 plate reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT) at the 435 nm excitation and 535 nm emission wavelengths.

In some experiments, cancer cell invasion was examined in the presence of an increasing fraction of senescent PMCs. To this end, special co-cultures were prepared in which young PMCs were mixed with senescent cells from the same donor to get desirable percentages of senescent cells in the monolayer.

Analysis of junctional proteins in cell culture and ovarian tumors

The expression of junctional proteins in cell culture was tested with immunofluorescence using antibodies against connexin 43 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, 1:100), E-cadherin (Abcam, 1:100), occludin (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, 1:100), and desmoglein (Abcam, 1:10), as described in22. As for paraffin sections, immunohistochemistry was performed using antibodies against connexin 43 (Proteintech, Wuhan, China, 1:200), E-cadherin (Dako, 1:200), occludin (Origene, Rockville, MD, 1:150), and desmoglein (Proteintech, 1:500). The staining was visualized using a Novolink Polymer Detection System (Novocastra Reagents, Wetzlar, Germany). Representative pictures were taken using an Axio Vert. A1 microscope (Carl-Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The intensity of the staining was quantified using ImageJ v1.52a (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). In brief, 20 microphotographs of randomly selected areas of a tumor were taken and analyzed. During the analysis, the area of PMCs was precisely outlined and cells displaying positive color reaction were marked. Then, the area corresponding to positive cells was quantified and expressed as % of the total area of PMCs.

Detection of senescent cells in vivo and in vitro

The presence of senescent PMCs was visualized using the cytochemical staining of senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal), precisely according to the method described by Dimri and colleagues49.

Intervention studies

In some experiments, the expression of junctional proteins in PMCs and the invasion of cancer cells were analyzed in the presence of chemical inhibitors of p38 MAPK (10 µM), NF-κB (10 µM), AKT (50 µM), JNK (10 µM), SP-1 (10 nM), AP-1 (50 µM), TBX-2 (0.165 μg/ml), and Nkx2-5 (0.165 μg/ml), as well as neutralizing antibodies against GRO-1 (800 ng/ml), HGF (1 µg/ml), and TGF-β1 (400 ng/ml). In the case of signaling pathway blockade, pre-senescent PMCs were pretreated with the chemical inhibitors for 4 h, whereas in the case of the neutralization of soluble proteins, the antibodies were added to CM from senescent PMCs 72 h before the study. The specificity and effectiveness of the inhibition/neutralization were verified in the preliminary studies, during which either the concentrations or times of exposure were optimized.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism™ 5.00 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). The means were compared with the Wilcoxon test. The results were expressed as the mean ± SEM. Differences with a P-value < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the grants from the National Science Centre, Poland (2014/15/B/NZ3/00421 and 2017/25/B/NZ3/00122).

Author Contributions

M.P., J.M.-P., K.K. – conceptualization; K.K. – funding acquisition; M.P., A.W., P.U., A.R., K.M., J.M.-P. – investigation; R.M., D.S., A. Wo, S.S. – resources; A.T. – supervision; M.P., K.K. – writing original draft; A.T., K.K. – writing – review & editing.

Data Availability

All data analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Justyna Mikuła-Pietrasik and Krzysztof Książek contributed equally.

References

  • 1.Doubeni CA, Doubeni AR, Myers AE. Diagnosis and Management of Ovarian Cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93:937–944. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fagotti A, et al. Peritoneal carcinosis of ovarian origin. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2010;2:102–108. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v2.i2.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jelovac D, Armstrong DK. Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2011;61:183–203. doi: 10.3322/caac.20113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lengyel E. Ovarian cancer development and metastasis. Am. J. Pathol. 2010;177:1053–1064. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mikula-Pietrasik J, Uruski P, Tykarski A, Ksiazek K. The peritoneal “soil” for a cancerous “seed”: a comprehensive review of the pathogenesis of intraperitoneal cancer metastases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75:509–525. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2663-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Steinkamp MP, et al. Ovarian tumor attachment, invasion, and vascularization reflect unique microenvironments in the peritoneum: insights from xenograft and mathematical models. Front Oncol. 2013;3:97. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mikula-Pietrasik J, Stryczynski L, Uruski P, Tykarski A, Ksiazek K. Procancerogenic activity of senescent cells: a case of the peritoneal mesothelium. Ageing Res Rev. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2018.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Krakhmal NV, Zavyalova MV, Denisov EV, Vtorushin SV, Perelmuter VM. Cancer Invasion: Patterns and Mechanisms. Acta Naturae. 2015;7:17–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stadlmann S, et al. Interactions of human peritoneal mesothelial cells with serous ovarian cancer cell spheroids–evidence for a mechanical and paracrine barrier function of the peritoneal mesothelium. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2014;24:192–200. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Iwanicki MP, et al. Ovarian cancer spheroids use myosin-generated force to clear the mesothelium. Cancer Discov. 2011;1:144–157. doi: 10.1158/2159-8274.CD-11-0010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mikula-Pietrasik J, et al. Senescent peritoneal mesothelium creates a niche for ovarian cancer metastases. Cell Death. Dis. 2016;7:e2565. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mikula-Pietrasik J, et al. Oxidative stress contributes to hepatocyte growth factor-dependent pro-senescence activity of ovarian cancer cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017;110:270–279. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mikula-Pietrasik J, et al. Peritoneal mesothelium promotes the progression of ovarian cancer cells in vitro and in a mice xenograft model in vivo. Cancer Lett. 2014;355:310–315. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.09.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kenny HA, Nieman KM, Mitra AK, Lengyel E. The first line of intra-abdominal metastatic attack: breaching the mesothelial cell layer. Cancer Discov. 2011;1:100–102. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kenny HA, Krausz T, Yamada SD, Lengyel E. Use of a novel 3D culture model to elucidate the role of mesothelial cells, fibroblasts and extra-cellular matrices on adhesion and invasion of ovarian cancer cells to the omentum. Int. J. Cancer. 2007;121:1463–1472. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kenny HA, et al. Mesothelial cells promote early ovarian cancer metastasis through fibronectin secretion. J. Clin Invest. 2014;124:4614–4628. doi: 10.1172/JCI74778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Niedbala MJ, Crickard K, Bernacki RJ. Interactions of human ovarian tumor cells with human mesothelial cells grown on extracellular matrix. An in vitro model system for studying tumor cell adhesion and invasion. Exp. Cell Res. 1985;160:499–513. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(85)90197-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Defamie N, Chepied A, Mesnil M. Connexins, gap junctions and tissue invasion. FEBS Lett. 2014;588:1331–1338. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ogawa T, Hayashi T, Yorioka N, Kyoizumi S, Trosko JE. Hexamethylene bisacetamide protects peritoneal mesothelial cells from glucose. Kidney Int. 2001;60:996–1008. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.060003996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chang TI, et al. The effect of statin on epithelial-mesenchymal transition in peritoneal mesothelial cells. PLoS One. 2014;9:e109628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Retana C, et al. Alterations of intercellular junctions in peritoneal mesothelial cells from patients undergoing dialysis: effect of retinoic Acid. Perit Dial Int. 2015;35:275–287. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2012.00323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mikula-Pietrasik J, et al. Malignant ascites determine the transmesothelial invasion of ovarian cancer cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2017;92:6–13. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2017.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cai J, et al. Fibroblasts in omentum activated by tumor cells promote ovarian cancer growth, adhesion and invasiveness. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:20–29. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sosinska P, Mikula-Pietrasik J, Ryzek M, Naumowicz E, Ksiazek K. Specificity of cytochemical and fluorescence methods of senescence-associated beta-galactosidase detection for ageing driven by replication and time. Biogerontology. 2014;15:407–413. doi: 10.1007/s10522-014-9505-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ksiazek K, et al. Senescent peritoneal mesothelial cells promote ovarian cancer cell adhesion: the role of oxidative stress-induced fibronectin. Am. J. Pathol. 2009;174:1230–1240. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mikula-Pietrasik J, et al. Senescent peritoneal mesothelium induces a pro-angiogenic phenotype in ovarian cancer cells in vitro and in a mouse xenograft model in vivo. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2016;33:15–27. doi: 10.1007/s10585-015-9753-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lukanova A, Kaaks R. Endogenous hormones and ovarian cancer: epidemiology and current hypotheses. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:98–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Statuto M, Bianchi C, Perego R, Del MU. Drop of connexin 43 in replicative senescence of human fibroblasts HEL-299 as a possible biomarker of senescence. Exp Gerontol. 2002;37:1113–1120. doi: 10.1016/S0531-5565(02)00089-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xie HQ, Hu VW. Modulation of gap junctions in senescent endothelial cells. Exp. Cell Res. 1994;214:172–176. doi: 10.1006/excr.1994.1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Krouwer VJ, Hekking LH, Langelaar-Makkinje M, Regan-Klapisz E, Post JA. Endothelial cell senescence is associated with disrupted cell-cell junctions and increased monolayer permeability. Vasc. Cell. 2012;4:12. doi: 10.1186/2045-824X-4-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Domcke S, Sinha R, Levine DA, Sander C, Schultz N. Evaluating cell lines as tumour models by comparison of genomic profiles. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:2126. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Taniguchi Ishikawa E, et al. Connexin-43 prevents hematopoietic stem cell senescence through transfer of reactive oxygen species to bone marrow stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:9071–9076. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120358109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jing H, Lee S. NF-kappaB in cellular senescence and cancer treatment. Mol Cells. 2014;37:189–195. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2014.2353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Batra N, et al. Direct regulation of osteocytic connexin 43 hemichannels through AKT kinase activated by mechanical stimulation. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:10582–10591. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.550608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Petrich BG, et al. c-Jun N-terminal kinase activation mediates downregulation of connexin43 in cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2002;91:640–647. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000035854.11082.01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Villares GJ, et al. Overexpression of protease-activated receptor-1 contributes to melanoma metastasis via regulation of connexin 43. Cancer Res. 2009;69:6730–6737. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Oyamada M, Takebe K, Oyamada Y. Regulation of connexin expression by transcription factors and epigenetic mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1828:118–133. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yang G, et al. The chemokine growth-regulated oncogene 1 (Gro-1) links RAS signaling to the senescence of stromal fibroblasts and ovarian tumorigenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:16472–16477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605752103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fu RG, et al. Premature senescence and cellular phenotype transformation of mesangial cells induced by TGF-B1. Ren Fail. 2013;35:1142–1145. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2013.817279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rieppi M, et al. Mesothelial cells induce the motility of human ovarian carcinoma cells. Int. J. Cancer. 1999;80:303–307. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990118)80:2&#x0003c;303::AID-IJC21&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hirashima Y, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta1 produced by ovarian cancer cell line HRA stimulates attachment and invasion through an up-regulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 in human peritoneal mesothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:26793–26802. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212187200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cheng JC, Auersperg N, Leung PC. TGF-beta induces serous borderline ovarian tumor cell invasion by activating EMT but triggers apoptosis in low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Peng Y, et al. PAI-1 secreted from metastatic ovarian cancer cells triggers the tumor-promoting role of the mesothelium in a feedback loop to accelerate peritoneal dissemination. Cancer Lett. 2018;442:181–192. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mikula-Pietrasik J, et al. Bystander senescence in human peritoneal mesothelium and fibroblasts is related to thrombospondin-1-dependent activation of transforming growth factor-beta1. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2013;45:2087–2096. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wei W, Kong B, Yang Q, Qu X. Hepatocyte growth factor enhances ovarian cancer cell invasion through downregulation of thrombospondin-1. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2010;9:79–87. doi: 10.4161/cbt.9.2.10280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chang MC, et al. Mesothelin enhances invasion of ovarian cancer by inducing MMP-7 through MAPK/ERK and JNK pathways. Biochem J. 2012;442:293–302. doi: 10.1042/BJ20110282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yousif NG. Fibronectin promotes migration and invasion of ovarian cancer cells through up-regulation of FAK-PI3K/Akt pathway. Cell Biol Int. 2014;38:85–91. doi: 10.1002/cbin.10184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mikula-Pietrasik J, et al. Colorectal cancer-promoting activity of the senescent peritoneal mesothelium. Oncotarget. 2015;6:29178–29195. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dimri GP, et al. A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:9363–9367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES