Abstract
Inflammation and implant loosening are major concerns when using titanium implants for hard tissue engineering applications. Surface modification is one of the promising tools to enhance tissue-material integration in metallic implants. Here, we used anodization technique to modify the surface of commercially pure titanium (CP-Ti) and titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) samples. Our results show that electrolyte composition, anodization time and voltage dictated the formation of well-organized nanotubes. Although electrolyte containing HF in water resulted in nanotube formation on Ti, the presence of NH4F and ethylene glycol was necessary for successful nanotube formation on Ti-6Al-4V. Upon examination of the interaction of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) with the modified samples, we found that Ti-6Al-4V without nanotubes induced cell proliferation and cluster of differentiation 40 ligand (CD40L) expression which facilitates B-cell activation to promote early bone healing. However, the expression of glioma associated protein 2 (GLI2), which regulates CD40L, was reduced in Ti-6Al-4V and the presence of nanotubes further reduced its expression. The inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) expression was reduced by nanotube presence on Ti. These results suggest that Ti-6Al-4V with nanotubes may be suitable implants because they have no effect on BMSC growth and inflammation.
Introduction
Commercially pure titanium (CP-Ti) and titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) are widely used as dental and orthopedic implants due to their biocompatibility, excellent corrosion resistance and desired mechanical properties. This includes properties such as low Young’s modulus, low density and fatigue resistance [1–3]. However, the formation of a fibrous capsule around titanium implants and the resultant implant loosening can cause severe pain for patients, which often requires revision surgery [4]. Surface modification techniques such as applying an osteoconductive coating, alkali treatment, acidic treatment, and electrochemical anodization are promising tools to enhance osseointegration of Ti implants [5]. Among the various techniques, introducing TiO2 nanotubes on the surface of Ti through anodization has gained attention as it is a simple, cost efficient and well controlled methodology. However, parameters such as electrolyte composition, voltage and the duration of anodization have been shown to alter the morphology of the surface [6,7]. In the current study, we used five different conditions to investigate and compare the effects of substrate composition and anodization parameters on successful formation of nanotubes on both CP-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V [8,9]. We hypothesized that different conditions are needed to achieve well-formed nanotubes on CP-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V.
Several studies reported the efficiency of TiO2 nanotubular layer on in vitro cell adhesion and proliferation, protein adsorption, and on in vivo osseointegration [10–13]. The presence of nanotubes not only enhances the surface roughness and hydrophilicity, but also activates angiogenic factors [12]. In addition, nanotube incorporation increases in vivo collagen and osteocalcin expression, and bone-implant interfacial strength which further improves osseointegration [13]. However, the interaction between nanotubes and bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) is less understood and the resultant inflammatory response has not been reported. BMSCs play an important role in blood and stem cell development and differentiation [14,15]. These cells can also differentiate into osteoblasts or adipocytes under the proper cell culture conditions [16], or depending on the type of biomaterial they are cultured on [17]. Therefore, understanding the nature of the interaction between BMSCs and titanium as a function of composition and surface roughness is necessary to predict blood cell development and bone healing.
In this study, we investigated the effects of substrate composition, electrolyte, voltage and anodization time on successful nanotube arrangement and studied the effects of titanium composition and nanotube presence on their interaction with human BMSCs. Nanotube microstructures were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and well-formed structures were used to investigate early proliferation of BMSCs and their inflammatory responses.
Materials and methods
Sample preparation
Grade 2 CP-Ti sheets were purchased from President Titanium, MA, USA. Ti-6Al-4V cylinders were formed using an additive manufacturing technique (LENS) with laser power of 645 W and travel speed of 60 inch/min. These cylinders were then machined and cut into Ti-6Al-4V discs. CP-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V substrates with a diameter of 11 mm and a thickness of 2 mm were grinded using silicon carbide papers from 320 to 800 grit, followed by polishing using a MasterTex polishing cloth. Samples were then cleaned in DI water and acetone, and then air dried. The titanium anode and a platinum foil cathode (Alfa Aesar, Tewksbury, MA,USA) were connected to a DC power supply (Agilent E3612A) and suspended in a beaker containing the electrolyte with different compositions as indicated in Table 1. After anodization, the samples were rinsed with DI water and then air dried. The conditions outlined below were selected as previously described [8,9].
Table 1. Anodization process conditions.
Condition | Electrolyte | Voltage (V) | Time (min) |
---|---|---|---|
A | 1 vol. % HF in DI water | 20 | 45 |
B | 1 vol. % HF in DI water | 20 | 60 |
C | 1 vol. % HF in DI water | 30 | 60 |
D | 1 vol. % HF, 0.5 wt. % NH4F, 10 vol. % DI water in Ethylene Glycol medium | 40 | 60 |
E | 0.25 wt. % NH4F, 2 vol. % DI Water in Ethylene Glycol Medium | 30 | 180 |
Characterization
Surface morphology was evaluated using field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM; Hitachi S-4500, NY, USA) and elemental analysis was carried out using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, Oxford Instruments, MA, USA). The surface roughness was performed on an 840.6 μm X 840.6 μm area using an optical profiler (Nexview, Zygo Corporation, Middlefield, Connecticut, USA). The contact angle measurements were performed by sessile drop method using a contact angle measurement system (VCA optima, AST Products, Inc., MA, USA). A 2 μl distilled water droplet was used for the test and the contact angle between the droplet and the substrate surface was calculated. The mean and SDs were calculated for both surface roughness and contact angle.
Cell culture
The human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell (BMSC) line Saka-T (referred to as Saka cells) was generously provided by Dr. David Roodman (University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Cells were cultured in MEM-α supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics/antimycotics (anti-anti) as previously published [18]. Cells were used for experiments when they reached approximately 80–90% confluency.
Proliferation assay, cellular morphology and quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR)
Cells were seeded at density of 25x103 and 1x106 to each Ti disc in triplicate wells in 24-well plate for proliferation assay and qRT-PCR, respectively. Cells were allowed to adhere for approximately 30 minutes and 400 μl of media were carefully added from the side of each well followed by incubation at 37°C. After 3 days, cell culture media was removed and 700 μl of DPBS (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were used to carefully wash cells without disturbing cells. Ti discs were then placed into a new 24-well plate and 400 μl of DPBS were added to each well followed by 100 μl of XTT working solution (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 3 hours, followed by data acquisition on an Epoch plate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA).
For qRT-PCR, 1x106 cells were used for each Ti disc in triplicate wells in 24-well plate as indicated above. After 24 hours, cell culture media was aspirated, and cells were lysed using 1 ml TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). Total RNA was isolated following manufacturer’s protocol. Reverse transcription reactions were conducted using Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV) reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and qRT-PCR was performed using SYBR Green methodologies a ViiA7 real-time PCR instrument (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). To quantify gene expression, GAPDH was used as a housekeeping gene and the following primers were used: GAPDH, 5’-CTCGACTTCAACAGCGACA- 3’ (forward) and 5’-GTAGCCAAATTCGTTGTCATACC-3’ (reverse); IL-6, 5’-TCCAAAGATGTAGCCGCCC-3’ (forward) and 5’-CAGTGCCTCTTTGCTGCTTTC-3’ (reverse); GLI2, 5’-CTCCGAGAAGCAAGAAGCCA- 3’ (forward) and 5’-GATGCTGCGGCACTCCTT- 3’ (reverse), CD40L, 5’-AACATCTGTGTTACAGTGGGCT- 3’ (forward) and 5’-AACGGTCAGCTGTTTCCCAT- 3’ (reverse); alkaline phosphatase-1 (ALP-1), 5’-CCTACCAGCTCATGCATAACA-3’ (forward) and 5’-GGCTTTCTCGTCACTCTCATAC-3’ (reverse); collagen A-1 (COLA-1), 5’-CGATGGATTCCAGTTCGAGTATG-3’ (forward) and 5’-CGATGGATTCCAGTTCGAGTATG-3’ (reverse); and osteocalcin (OCN), 5’-CAGGCGCTACCTGTATCAAT-3’ (forward) and 5’-CGATGTGGTCAGCCAACT-3’ (reverse).
Cell morphology was examined using FESEM. After 3 days of culture, samples were removed from culture and fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde/2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer overnight at 4 °C. Samples were rinsed with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (three times, followed by fixation with 2% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) for 2 h at room temperature. Samples were then rinsed again with 0.1 M phosphate buffer three times and dehydrated in ethanol series (30, 50, 70, 95, and 100% (three times for 100% ethanol), followed by dehydration using hexamethyldisilane (HDMS; Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Statistical analysis
A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze data. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software (San Diego, CA, USA).
Results
Anodization and sample characterization
Surface morphology of the anodized CP-Ti samples is presented in Fig 1a–1e. Uniform nanotubes with a diameter of ~100 ± 10 nm were generated by using the HF in aqueous electrolyte for 45 min (Fig 1a) and as shown in Fig 1b, increasing the time to 60 min did not affect the morphology. Increasing the voltage to 30 V resulted in formation of random porous structures (Fig 1c). Furthermore, nanotubes with broken structures were formed by having a mixture of NH4F and HF in as an electrolyte (Fig 1d). Interestingly, as shown in Fig 1e, changing the electrolyte and having NH4F as the only fluoride ion source in ethylene glycol medium resulted in formation of nanograss-like tubular structures. Nanograss are close-packed clusters of nanotubes on top of nanotubes [9]. Similar anodization parameters were used to investigate the role of time, voltage and electrolyte composition on morphology of samples. As illustrated in Fig 1f and 1g, nanotubes were not completely formed in aqueous electrolytes. While nanotubes had a non-uniform structure at lower voltage and anodization time, a randomly porous structure was obtained by increasing time and voltage (Fig 1h). However, uniform nanotubes on Ti-6Al-4V samples with diameter of ~100 ± 15 nm were achieved using a combination of HF and NH4F in ethylene glycol (Fig 1i). As shown in Fig 1j, the absence of HF and extended duration time resulted in the formation of nanograss. Taken together, these results indicate that a successful anodization process and uniform nanotube formation depend not only on the anodization parameters, but also on the composition of the Ti substrate.
The optimized anodization conditions that result in well-formed nanotubes on CP-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V were conditions A and D, respectively (referred to as Ti-NT and Ti-6Al-4V -NT, respectively from now on). The surface composition of Ti-NT and Ti-6Al-4V -NT was determined using an EDS detector and the obtained spectrum and elemental analysis are shown in Fig 2. The surface roughness parameters of Ti, Ti-NT, Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-4V–NT are presented in Table 2 and Fig 3. We found that Ti-NT have a higher surface roughness compared to Ti while no significant change was observed between Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-4V-NT. Contact angles of samples with water are shown in Fig 4. The contact angles of Ti and Ti-6Al-4V were 44.1°±4 and 48.9°±2, respectively. Formation of nanotubes reduced the contact angles to 20.73°±5 and 14.85°±5 for Ti-NT and Ti-6Al-4V-NT, respectively which suggests enhanced hydrophilicity after anodization.
Table 2. Surface roughness parameters of the Ti substrates.
Sample | Sa (nm) | Sq (nm) | Sz (nm) |
---|---|---|---|
Ti | 32±2 | 39.75±2 | 342.25±87 |
Ti-NT | 196±18 | 255.9±28 | 2605.25±113 |
Ti-6Al-4V | 36.25±2 | 46.5±3 | 419±72 |
Ti-6Al-4V-NT | 40.25±6 | 50.5±8 | 633±83 |
Adhesion of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) on Ti substrates
The effects of Ti substrate composition and the presence of nanotubes on BMSC attachment and cellular morphology after 3 days of culture were investigated by SEM and the results are shown in Fig 5A. Regardless of composition and surface morphology, BMSCs attached to Ti and Ti-6Al-4V samples and demonstrated well-spread morphologies. We also investigated BMSC adhesion to Ti substrates at earlier times (6 hours following seeding) and assed cell adhesion by XTT assay. We found no differences in cell adhesion between the different substrates compared to adhesion of BMSCs on CP-Ti (p = 0.6056)(Fig 5B).
Assessment of cell growth, differentiation and inflammatory gene expression on Ti substrates
The effect of composition and surface treatment on cell proliferation was investigated using XTT assay and results are presented in Fig 6. As compared to Ti, BMSC proliferation was significantly higher on Ti-6Al-4V (p = 0.0203). However, the incorporation of nanotubes to Ti-6Al-4V (Ti-6Al-4V -NT) reduced the proliferation of BMSC compared with Ti-6Al-4V, suggesting that the incorporation of nanotubes may provide therapeutic efficacy by promoting bone formation [19] but not BMSC growth. We have previously reported that the glioma-associated protein 2 (GLI2) is expressed by BMSCs and modulates inflammatory genes [18,20,21]. Therefore, we examined the expression of GLI2 in BMSCs grown on Ti and Ti-6Al-4V in the presence or absence of nanotubes. We found a decrease in GLI2 expression by BMSCs grown on Ti-NT compared with CP-Ti (Fig 6b) suggesting that downstream inflammatory genes may be reduced. Although Ti-6Al-4V induced BMSC growth, it resulted in a reduction in GLI2 expression (Fig 6b). Furthermore, Ti-6Al-4V-NT had significantly lower GLI2 expression compared with Ti alone. We have previously reported that GLI2 can regulate the expression of CD40 ligand (CD40L) in BMSCs [18]. CD40L expression was increased in BMSCs grown on Ti-6Al-4V but not Ti-6Al-4V -NT (Fig 6c). This pattern of CD40L expression is consistent with the pattern of cell proliferation shown in Fig 6a. We further examined the expression of the pleiotropic cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6), which is regulated, in part, by GLI2 [20]. Although Ti-6Al-4V induced BMSC proliferation, this did not increase IL-6 expression (Fig 6d). Additionally, Ti-NT, but not Ti-6Al-4V-NT, reduced IL-6 expression. Taken together, these results suggest that the incorporation of NT on Ti-6Al-4V may be therapeutically beneficial by promoting osteoblast attachment as previously reported [22], without inducing BMSC growth, while not altering the inflammatory response required to facilitate healing. Interestingly, BMSCs cultured on CP-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V did not express osteoblast differentiation markers alkaline phosphatase-1 (ALP-1), collagen A-1 (COLA-1) or osteocalcin (OCN) suggesting that the different Ti substrates and the presence of nanotubes did not affect BMSC differentiation (Fig 6e).
Discussion
TiO2 nanotubes are of great interest due to their excellent physical, mechanical and biological properties. Previous studies have reported that nanotubes enhance the protein adsorption and osteoblast cell attachment which improves bioactivity [23,24]. In this study, we fabricated nanotubes on the surface of both CP-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V using experimental different conditions. These conditions were selected based on previous work for different types of titanium alloys [8,9]. We found that formation of nanotubes depends on both anodization parameters and substrate composition. This is in line with the literature where formation of nanotubes was confirmed on IMI834 titanium alloy using H3PO4+HF electrolyte, whereas no nanotube was found on CP-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V substrates using the same anodization conditions, showing the dependency of the successful anodization on phase composition of Ti and its alloys [6]. Nanotubes formed by anodization are usually referred to as TiO2 nanotubes. However, pure TiO2 nanotubes are formed only on CP-Ti while the presence of Al and V in Ti-6Al-4V results in formation of Ti-Al-V-O nanotubes. High amounts of Al decrease the dissolution rate, while the presence of V increases the dissolution rate which affect nanotube formation [25]. Similar to Al and V, increase in Zr content in Ti-alloy increases interspace between TiO2 nanotubes [26]. However, regardless of Ti composition, the presence of fluoride ions appears crucial for the growth of TiO2 nanotubes, as F- helps in the chemical dissolution of the oxide layer. In addition to F-, water content and the viscosity of ethylene glycol (EG) alter nanotube formation as they alter the rate of oxidation and diffusion of ions in the electrolyte, respectively [27,28].
The EDS results confirm the presence of oxygen on both Ti-NT and Ti-6Al-4V -NT which was 23.30 and 26.57 wt% respectively while no fluorine was detected (Fig 2). They also confirm the presence of Al and V on Ti-6Al-4V -NT with a percentage of 4.01% and 3.46% respectively (Fig 2). Surface roughness and wettability are the most important factors that influence cell attachment [29,30]. It was reported that the presence nanotubes increases the surface roughness which further improves osseointegration [31]. Our results (Fig 3) are in agreement with the studies with one exception. The presence of nanotubes on Ti increased the surface roughness while no significant change was observed in surface roughness of Ti-6Al-4V with and without nanotubes (Fig 3). This might be due to the presence of porosity in LENS processed Ti-6Al-4V. On the other hand, the results of wettability are in line with the studies reporting the presence of nanotubes reduces the contact angle and increases the hydrophilicity of the surface [32]. Both Ti-NT and Ti-6Al-4V-NT showed improved surface hydrophilicity (Fig 4). Highly hydrophilic surfaces increase cell attachment and improve bioactivity due to enhanced interaction between cells and material [33–35].
We report that in the presence of nanotubes, BMSCs showed well-spread cellular morphology (Fig 5) which may be related to enhanced hydrophilicity in the presence of nanotubes [12]. In addition to morphology, SEM images show the ability of BMSCs to attach and spread on both CP-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V in the presence and absence of nanotubes (Fig 5). Our results also show that the presence of nanotubes reduced proliferation of BMSC which suggests that nanotubes may provide therapeutic efficacy by promoting bone formation as described in earlier in vivo studies [19] but not BMSC growth or their differentiation into osteoblasts (Fig 6). Furthermore, when we investigated inflammatory gene expression, we found a reduction in GLI2 expression with Ti-NT and Ti-6Al-4V-NT compared to Ti and Ti-6Al-4V suggesting that downstream inflammatory genes that are regulated by this protein may also be reduced. We previously showed that GLI2 can regulate the expression of CD40 ligand (CD40L) in BMSCs [18]. CD40L is a protein that is expressed on the surface of various cells including stromal cells [18] and plays a role in B-cell activation. Recruitment of B-cells and other immune cells has been shown to promote early bone healing [36]. These results suggest that formation of well-organized nanotubes depend on titanium composition and anodization parameters and Ti-6Al-4V -NT may provide a benefit by maintaining IL-6 expression to allow an initial inflammatory response to mediate healing while not inducing prolonged activation of other immune cells.
Conclusion
In this study, we investigated the effects of substrate composition, electrolyte, voltage and anodization time on successful nanotube arrangement on Ti substrate and found both substrate composition and anodization parameters effect the formation of nanotubes. We also studied the effects of titanium composition and nanotube presence on their interaction with human BMSCs. For bone tissue engineering applications, the incorporation of NT on Ti-6Al-4V may be therapeutically beneficial due to the ease of manufacturing. Furthermore, this will promote osteoblast attachment [22], without inducing BMSC growth, or altering the inflammatory response required to facilitate healing.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Benyamin Salehi Najafabadi, Dr. Michael HajiSheikh, and Mr. Gregg Westberg (Microelectronics Research and Development Lab) at Northern Illinois University and Nancy Cherim at the University of New Hampshire. This work utilized Northwestern University Micro/Nano Fabrication Facility (NUFAB), which is partially supported by Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource (NSF ECCS-1542205), the Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (NSF DMR-1720139), the State of Illinois, and Northwestern University.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.Schiff N, Grosgogeat B, Lissac M, Dalard F. Influence of fluoride content and pH on the corrosion resistance of titanium and its alloys. Biomaterials. 2002;23: 1995–2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Geetha M, Singh AK, Asokamani R, Gogia AK. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants–A review. Prog Mater Sci. 2009;54: 397–425. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bortolan C, Campanelli L, Bolfarini C, Oliveira N. Fatigue strength of Ti-6A1-4V alloy with surface modified by TiO2 nanotubes formation. Mater Lett. 2016;177: 46–49. 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.04.188 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Suska F, Emanuelsson L, Johansson A, Tengvall P, Thomsen P. Fibrous capsule formation around titanium and copper. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;85: 888–896. 10.1002/jbm.a.31575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu X, Chu PK, Ding C. Surface modification of titanium, titanium alloys, and related materials for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2004;47: 49–121. 10.1016/j.mser.2004.11.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yashwanth IVS, Gurrappa I. The effect of titanium alloy composition in synthesis of Titania nanotubes. Mater Lett. 2015;142: 328–331. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.12.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Luo B, Yang H, Liu S, Fu W, Sun P, Yuan M, et al. Fabrication and characterization of self-organized mixed oxide nanotube arrays by electrochemical anodization of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Mater Lett. 2008;62: 4512–4515. 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.08.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shivaram A, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A. Thermal degradation of TiO2 nanotubes on titanium. Appl Surf Sci. 2014;317: 573–580. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.107 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang J, Li H, Sun Y, Bai B, Zhang Y, Fan Y. Anodization of Highly Ordered TiO2 Nanotube Arrays Using Orthogonal Design and Its Wettability. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2016;11: 15. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Das K, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A. TiO2 nanotubes on Ti: Influence of nanoscale morphology on bone cell–materials interaction. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;90A: 225–237. 10.1002/jbm.a.32088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yao C, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ. Enhanced osteoblast functions on anodized titanium with nanotube-like structures. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;85A: 157–166. 10.1002/jbm.a.31551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Beltrán-Partida E, Valdéz-Salas B, Moreno-Ulloa A, Escamilla A, Curiel MA, Rosales-Ibáñez R, et al. Improved in vitro angiogenic behavior on anodized titanium dioxide nanotubes. J Nanobiotechnology. 2017;15 10.1186/s12951-017-0247-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Xia L, Feng B, Wang P, Ding S, Liu Z, Zhou J, et al. In vitro and in vivo studies of surface-structured implants for bone formation. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7: 4873–4881. 10.2147/IJN.S29496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Krebsbach PH, Kuznetsov SA, Bianco P, Gehron Robey P. Bone Marrow Stromal Cells: Characterization and Clinical Application. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1999;10: 165–181. 10.1177/10454411990100020401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Abbuehl J-P, Tatarova Z, Held W, Huelsken J. Long-Term Engraftment of Primary Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Repairs Niche Damage and Improves Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21: 241–255.e6. 10.1016/j.stem.2017.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pozio A, Palmieri A, Girardi A, Cura F, Carinci F. Titanium nanotubes stimulate osteoblast differentiation of stem cells from pulp and adipose tissue. Dent Res J. 2012;9: S169–S174. 10.4103/1735-3327.109745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Deligianni DD. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes enhance human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells’ spreading but delay their proliferation in the direction of differentiation acceleration. Cell Adhes Migr. 2014;8: 558–562. 10.4161/cam.32124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Han W, Jackson DA, Matissek SJ, Misurelli JA, Neil MS, Sklavanitis B, et al. Novel Molecular Mechanism of Regulation of CD40 Ligand by the Transcription Factor GLI2. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950. 2017;198: 4481–4489. 10.4049/jimmunol.1601490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bandyopadhyay A, Shivaram A, Tarafder S, Sahasrabudhe H, Banerjee D, Bose S. In vivo response of laser processed porous titanium implants for load-bearing implants. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45: 249–260. 10.1007/s10439-016-1673-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Elsawa SF, Almada LL, Ziesmer SC, Novak AJ, Witzig TE, Ansell SM, et al. GLI2 transcription factor mediates cytokine cross-talk in the tumor microenvironment. J Biol Chem. 2011;286: 21524–21534. 10.1074/jbc.M111.234146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jackson DA, Smith TD, Amarsaikhan N, Han W, Neil MS, Boi SK, et al. Modulation of the IL-6 Receptor α Underlies GLI2-Mediated Regulation of Ig Secretion in Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Cells. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950. 2015;195: 2908–2916. 10.4049/jimmunol.1402974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ku C-H, Pioletti DP, Browne M, Gregson PJ. Effect of different Ti-6Al-4V surface treatments on osteoblasts behaviour. Biomaterials. 2002;23: 1447–1454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.El-wassefy NA, Hammouda IM, Habib ANEA, El-awady GY, Marzook HA. Assessment of anodized titanium implants bioactivity. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25: e1–9. 10.1111/clr.12031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lu R, Wang C, Wang X, Wang Y, Wang N, Chou J, et al. Effects of hydrogenated TiO2 nanotube arrays on protein adsorption and compatibility with osteoblast-like cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13: 2037–2049. 10.2147/IJN.S155532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li Y, Ding D, Ning C, Bai S, Huang L, Li M, et al. Thermal stability and in vitro bioactivity of Ti-Al-V-O nanostructures fabricated on Ti6Al4V alloy. Nanotechnology. 2009;20: 065708 10.1088/0957-4484/20/6/065708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kim W-G, Choe H-C, Ko Y-M, Brantley WA. Nanotube morphology changes for Ti–Zr alloys as Zr content increases. Thin Solid Films. 2009;517: 5033–5037. 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.165 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee B-G, Choi J-W, Lee S-E, Jeong Y-S, Oh H-J, Chi C-S. Formation behavior of anodic TiO2 nanotubes in fluoride containing electrolytes. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2009;19: 842–845. 10.1016/S1003-6326(08)60361-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Grimes CA, Mor GK. TiO2 Nanotube Arrays: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Oh S, Jin S. Titanium oxide nanotubes with controlled morphology for enhanced bone growth. Mater Sci Eng C. 2006;26: 1301–1306. 10.1016/j.msec.2005.08.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ercan B, Taylor E, Alpaslan E, Webster TJ. Diameter of titanium nanotubes influences anti-bacterial efficacy. Nanotechnology. 2011;22: 295102 10.1088/0957-4484/22/29/295102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zareidoost A, Yousefpour M, Ghaseme B, Amanzadeh A. The relationship of surface roughness and cell response of chemical surface modification of titanium. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23: 1479–1488. 10.1007/s10856-012-4611-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shin DH, Shokuhfar T, Choi CK, Lee S-H, Friedrich C. Wettability changes of TiO 2 nanotube surfaces. Nanotechnology. 2011;22: 315704 10.1088/0957-4484/22/31/315704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Brammer KS, Oh S, Cobb CJ, Bjursten LM, van der Heyde H, Jin S. Improved bone-forming functionality on diameter-controlled TiO2 nanotube surface. Acta Biomater. 2009;5: 3215–3223. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li BE, Li Y, Min Y, Hao JZ, Liang CY, Li HP, et al. Synergistic effects of hierarchical hybrid micro/nanostructures on the biological properties of titanium orthopaedic implants. RSC Adv. 2015;5: 49552–49558. 10.1039/C5RA05821J [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Indira K, Mudali UK, Rajendran N. In-vitro biocompatibility and corrosion resistance of strontium incorporated TiO2 nanotube arrays for orthopaedic applications. J Biomater Appl. 2014;29: 113–129. 10.1177/0885328213516821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Könnecke I, Serra A, Khassawna TE, Schlundt C, Schell H, Hauser A, et al. T and B cells participate in bone repair by infiltrating the fracture callus in a two-wave fashion. Bone. 2014;64: 155–165. 10.1016/j.bone.2014.03.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and Supporting Information files.