Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2019 May 16;85(11):e03130-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03130-18

Composition and Origin of the Fermentation Microbiota of Mahewu, a Zimbabwean Fermented Cereal Beverage

Felicitas Pswarayi a, Michael G Gänzle a,b,
Editor: Edward G Dudleyc
PMCID: PMC6532028  PMID: 30902861

This study provides insight into the composition and origin of the microbiota of mahewu and the composition of millet malt microbiota. Fermentation microbiota are often hypothesized to be derived from the environment, but the evidence remains inconclusive. Our findings confirm that millet malt is the major source of mahewu microbiota. By complementing culture methods with high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons and strain-specific quantitative PCR, this study provides evidence about the source of mahewu microbiota, which can inform the development of starter cultures for mahewu production. The study also documents the fate of Enterobacteriaceae during the fermentation of mahewu. There are concerns regarding the safety of traditionally prepared mahewu, and this requires in-depth knowledge of the fermentation process. Therefore, this study elucidated millet malt microbiota and identified cultures that are able to control the high numbers of Enterobacteriaceae that are initially present in mahewu fermentations.

KEYWORDS: Cronobacter sakazakii, L. plantarum, Lactobacillus fermentum, millet malt microbiota, cereal fermentation

ABSTRACT

Mahewu is a fermented cereal beverage produced in Zimbabwe. This study determined the composition and origin of mahewu microbiota. The microbiota of mahewu samples consisted of 3 to 7 dominant strains of lactobacilli and two strains of yeasts. Enterobacteriaceae were not detected. Candida glabrata was present in high cell counts from samples collected in summer but not from samples collected in winter. Millet malt is the only raw ingredient used in the production of mahewu and is a likely source of fermentation microbiota; therefore, malt microbiota was also analyzed by culture-dependent and high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing methodologies. Millet malt contained 8 to 19 strains of Enterobacteriaceae, lactobacilli, bacilli, and very few yeasts. Strain-specific quantitative PCR assays were established on the basis of the genome sequences of Lactobacillus fermentum FUA3588 and FUA3589 and Lactobacillus plantarum FUA3590 to obtain a direct assessment of the identity of strains from malt and mahewu. L. fermentum FUA3588 and FUA3589 were detected in millet malt, demonstrating that millet malt is a main source of mahewu microbiota. Strains which were detected in summer were not detected in samples produced at the same site in winter. Model mahewu fermentations conducted with a 5-strain inoculum consisting of lactobacilli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Cronobacter sakazakii demonstrated that lactobacilli outcompete Enterobacteriaceae, which sharply decreased in the first 24 h. In conclusion, mahewu microbiota is mainly derived from millet malt microbiota, but minor components of malt microbiota rapidly outcompete Enterobacteriaceae and Bacillus species during fermentation.

IMPORTANCE This study provides insight into the composition and origin of the microbiota of mahewu and the composition of millet malt microbiota. Fermentation microbiota are often hypothesized to be derived from the environment, but the evidence remains inconclusive. Our findings confirm that millet malt is the major source of mahewu microbiota. By complementing culture methods with high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons and strain-specific quantitative PCR, this study provides evidence about the source of mahewu microbiota, which can inform the development of starter cultures for mahewu production. The study also documents the fate of Enterobacteriaceae during the fermentation of mahewu. There are concerns regarding the safety of traditionally prepared mahewu, and this requires in-depth knowledge of the fermentation process. Therefore, this study elucidated millet malt microbiota and identified cultures that are able to control the high numbers of Enterobacteriaceae that are initially present in mahewu fermentations.

INTRODUCTION

Mahewu is a lactic fermented nonalcoholic cereal beverage produced in Zimbabwe. It is a refreshing drink and is also used as a complementary food for infants. Mahewu is prepared by fermenting cooked maize porridge with addition of millet or sorghum malt at the household level (1, 2) (Fig. 1). Mahewu is produced by spontaneous fermentation without control of microbiota by back-slopping or the addition of starter cultures (35). Cooking of the maize porridge inactivates microbiota from maize flour or water; however, millet or sorghum malt is used without a heating step to inactivate malt-associated microbiota (Fig. 1).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Traditional process for producing mahewu, a fermented maize beverage.

The microbiota of fermented cereal foods and nonalcoholic beverages generally consist of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts. Previous studies on mahewu enumerated lactic acid bacteria and yeasts in model fermentations but did not characterize fermentation microorganisms at the genus or species level (1, 2, 6). Data on the composition of fermentation microbiota is available for togwa, bushera, and obiolor, fermented cereal gruels or beverages that are produced in Tanzania, Uganda, and Nigeria, respectively, which are produced in a manner similar to that for mahewu from cooked maize or sorghum porridge with the addition of sorghum or millet malt (7, 8). The microbiota of togwa and bushera samples was composed predominantly of Lactobacillus plantarum as the most abundant organisms, along with L. brevis, L. fermentum, Weissella confuse, and Pediococcus pentosaceus. The thermophilic Issatchenkia orientalis was the most frequently isolated yeast in togwa (7).

Lactic acid bacteria identified in togwa are typical representatives of spontaneous cereal fermentations that are also present in other African cereal foods, such as ben-saalga from Burkina Faso and ogi and kunu-zaki from Nigeria; these are all prepared with spontaneously fermented millet or millet malt that is cooked into a thin porridge, gruel, and beverage, respectively (913). A comparable composition of microbiota is also observed in spontaneous wheat and rye sourdough fermentations (14). The assembly of microbiota in spontaneous fermentations is limited by dispersal (15). Spontaneously fermented cereals typically contain lactic acid bacteria with a nomadic or environmental lifestyle, particularly L. plantarum, L. fermentum, and Weissella spp. (1618). Back-slopping eliminates dispersal limitation (15) and leads to dominance of host-adapted lactobacilli, including L. sanfranciscensis in type I sourdoughs or L. pontis, L. amylovorus, and L. reuteri in type II sourdoughs (14, 15).

Because mahewu is consumed without further heat treatment after fermentation, malt microbiota not only serves as inoculum for the lactic acid fermentation but also may transfer endophytic microbiota (18). Plant endophytes include the opportunistic pathogens Enterobacter spp. and Cronobacter spp. (19, 20); endophytic Enterobacter spp. were reported to protect finger millet against Fusarium infection (21). Low cell counts of Enterobacteriaceae were detected in weaning foods prepared from sorghum and millet (22), but the fate of these organisms during fermentation of malt-based cereal beverages is not documented.

The metabolic activity of mahewu microbiota in combination with the enzymatic activity of the millet malt determines product quality (23) and safety; therefore, attaining mahewu with consistent quality and safety attributes requires control of the composition and activity of fermentation microbiota (15). Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine composition and origin of mahewu fermentation microbiota, and to establish the overlap between the mahewu and millet malt microbiota, by using strain-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR).

RESULTS

Microbial and biochemical characterization of mahewu.

Microbial counts were obtained from five samples of mahewu that were obtained in summer and in winter from 3 production sites. All samples were prepared at the household level with traditional methods. Bacterial counts ranged from 2.6 × 108 to 1.1 × 109 CFU/ml (Table 1). Bacterial isolates were all identified as lactic acid bacteria (Table 2). Yeast cell counts ranged from 1.7 × 107 to 9.9 × 107 CFU/ml. The cell counts for fecal coliforms were below the detection limit of 10 CFU/ml in all samples. Cell counts on violet red bile glucose (VRBG) agar ranged from 9.0 × 101 to 1.0 × 107 CFU/ml; microscopic observation, however, demonstrated that all colonies on VRBG agar represented thermophilic yeasts. The pH of mahewu samples ranged between 3.0 and 3.4 (Table 1). Lactic and acetic acids, glycerol, and ethanol were identified as the major fermentation products (Table 1), indicating that microbial metabolism was mainly attributable to lactic acid bacteria and yeasts.

TABLE 1.

Microbiological and biochemical characteristics of mahewu fermentations

Parameter Site C
Site D
Site M, May 2016b
Feb 2016a May 2016b Feb 2016a May 2016b
Fermentation vessel Clay pot Clay pot Plastic bucket Plastic bucket Clay pot
pH 2.96 3.38 3.10 3.37 3.29
MRS5 agar and cycloheximide (CFU/ml) 9.9 × 108 7.7 × 108 1.1 × 109 4.7 × 108 2.6 × 108
MRS5 agar, erythromycin, and chloramphenicol (CFU/ml) 3.4 × 107 6.2 × 107 1.7 × 107 9.9 × 107 5.2 × 107
VRBG agarc (CFU/ml) 7.2 × 105 9.0 × 101 1.0 × 107 8.0 × 102 6.9 × 102
VRB agard (CFU/ml) <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Quantification of mahewu metabolitese (mM)
    Lactic acid 48.5 ± 1.59 34.8 ± 0.66 43.1 ± 1.27 28.7 ± 0.60 31.8 ± 0.36
    Glycerol 25.7 ± 0.27 14.1 ± 0.36 11.1 ± 1.93 11.6 ± 0.27 11.3 ± 0.23
    Acetic acid 18.8 ± 0.64 11.4 ± 0.28 15.5 ± 0.52 4.15 ± 0.10 6.65 ± 0.13
    Ethanol 308 ± 4.14 286 ± 1.83 148 ± 27.5 336 ± 1.68 280 ± 0.32
a

Fermentation time of 16 to 24 h.

b

Fermentation time of 36 to 48 h.

c

Only Candida glabrata grew on violet red bile glucose (VRBG) agar.

d

Cell counts on violet red bile (VRB) agar (fecal coliforms) were less than 10 CFU/ml in all samples.

e

Means ± standard deviations of duplicate analyses are shown.

TABLE 2.

Identification and strain-specific quantification of isolates from mahewu

Strain ID and sample collection/analysis date Speciesa Cell count (CFU/ml)
Feb 2016
    Site C
        FUA3588 L. fermentum 9.9 × 107
  FUA3589 L. fermentumd 9.9 × 107
        FUA3590 L. plantarumb,c 7.9 × 108
        FUA3568 P. pentosaceusc
        FUA4041 S. cerevisiae 2.4 × 107
        FUA4042 C. glabrata 1.0 × 107
        FUA4043 C. glabrata 7.2 × 105
    Site D
  FUA3573 L. fermentum 9.4 × 108
        FUA3574 Weissella spp. 5.5 × 107
        FUA3575 Weissella confusa 1.1 × 108
        FUA4046 S. cerevisiae 8.5 × 106
        FUA4047 C. glabrata 8.5 × 106
        FUA4048 C. glabrata 1.0 × 107
May 2016
    Site C
        FUA3569 L. fermentum 5.4 × 108
        FUA3570 L. fermentum 3.9 × 107
        FUA3571 E. hermanniensisc 1.5 × 108
        FUA3572 E. lactisc
        FUA4044 S. cerevisiae 6.2 × 107
        FUA4045 C. glabrata 9 × 101
    Site D
        FUA3576 Weissella cibariac 4.7 × 106
        FUA3577 P. pentosaceusc
        FUA3578 Leuconostoc holzapfelii 1.9 × 108
        FUA3579 Lact. lactis 1.9 × 108
        FUA3580 Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroidesc 8.9 × 107
        FUA3581 W. confusac
        FUA4049 S. cerevisiae 9.9 × 107
        FUA4050 C. glabrata 8.0 × 102
    Site M
  FUA3582 L. fermentum 1.0 × 108
        FUA3583 L. rossiae 1.0 × 108
        FUA3584 L. plantarumb 2.6 × 107
        FUA3585 Weissella cibaria 2.6 × 107
        FUA3586 L. plantarumb 7.8 × 106
        FUA4051 S. cerevisiae 5.2 × 107
        FUA4052 C. glabrata 6.9 × 102
a

All isolates were identified with the sequence match tool of the ribosomal database project with >98% nucleotide identity of partial 16S rRNA (1,300 to 1,455 bp) to bacterial type strain or >98% nucleotide identify of more than 700 bp of the 28S rRNA genes.

b

Differentiation of L. plantarum from L. paraplantarum and L. pentosus was carried out using a multiplex PCR assay using recA gene-based primers.

c

Cell counts of two strains that could not be differentiated on the basis of their colony morphologies.

d

PCR specific for L. fermentum FUA3589-generated amplicons with all strains printed in boldface.

Microbial analysis of mahewu.

The taxonomic identification of bacterial isolates was based on the elimination of clonal isolates by random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) typing, followed by sequencing of 16S rRNA genes (Table 2). Identification of isolates as L. plantarum additionally employed a recA-based multiplex PCR assay (24). Yeasts were identified by the sequencing of 28S rRNA genes. The microbiota of the mahewu samples typically consisted of 3 to 7 dominant strains of lactobacilli and two strains of yeasts (Table 2). Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida glabrata were present in all samples (Table 2). C. glabrata cell counts ranged from 105 to 107 CFU/g in samples from sites C and D obtained in summer (February 2016), but viable cell counts of the same species were below 103 CFU/ml in samples that were obtained in winter (May 2016). S. cerevisiae was the most abundant yeast in samples collected in winter. The microbiota of samples from the same site differed between sampling times (Table 2).

Microbiota of millet malt.

In addition to the microbiota associated with the production environment, millet malt is a source of mahewu microbiota. We therefore determined cell counts of four millet malt samples and identified representative isolates at the species level. The viable bacterial cell counts of the 4 millet malt samples ranged from 2.2 × 106 to 7.7 × 107 CFU/g (Table 3); fecal coliforms accounted for more than 20% of total cell counts in all samples (Table 3). The taxonomic identification of millet malt isolates was based on the procedure outlined above for mahewu microbiota. The microbiota of the millet malt samples typically consisted of 8 to 19 strains of plant-associated Enterobacteriaceae, lactic acid bacteria, bacilli, and a few yeasts (Table 4). Only the most abundant isolates could be quantified by differential enumeration on the basis of colony morphology. Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus spp. were the most abundant organisms in the sample from site C in February 2016 and May 2016, respectively. Cronobacter sakazakii was the most abundant microorganism in both millet malt samples from site D.

TABLE 3.

Microbial characterization of millet malt

Malt sample and sampling date Cell counts (CFU/g)
Bacteriaa Yeastb Enterobacteriaceaec Fecal coliformsd
C
    February 2016 7.7 × 107 <103 1.0 × 107 5.3 × 107
    May 2016 1.3 × 107 <103 2.3 × 106 3.7 × 107
D
    February 2016 1.3 × 107 <103 2.7 × 106 3.0 × 106
    May 2016 1.7 × 107 <103 4.7 × 106 1.9 × 107
a

MRS5 agar and cycloheximide.

b

Yeast cell counts were detected on MRS5 agar with addition of erythromycin and chloramphenicol. Plates inoculated with the lowest dilution (10−1) were overgrown with molds; thus, the detection limit was 103 CFU/g for yeasts.

c

Detected on violet red bile glucose (VRBG) agar.

d

Detected on violet red bile agar with incubation at 44.5°C.

TABLE 4.

Comparison of the relative abundance of bacterial genera in millet malta

Genus % of 16S rRNA amplicons % of isolates Species isolated
Proteobacteria 38.06 ± 5.04
 Aureimonas 0.34 ± 0.00 ND
 Rhizobium 2.16 ± 0.00 ND
 Sphingomonas 1.97 ± 0.01 ND
 Roseomonas 0.11 ± 0.00 ND
 Burkholderia-Paraburkholderia 0.22 ± 0.00 ND
 Massilia 2.06 ± 0.01 ND
    [F: Comamonadaceae] 1.90 ± 0.01 ND
 Aquitalea 2.21 ± 0.02 ND
 Vogesella 0.32 ± 0.00 ND
 Cronobacter 35.2 ± 0.12 23.27 ± 8.51 sakazakii, dubliniensis, malonaticus
 Citrobacter 0.18 ± 0.00 2.94 ± 4.16 fameri, amalonaticus, koseri
 Enterobacter ND 8.26 ± 7.25 asburiae, freundii, xiangifangensis, ludwigii
 Klebsiella ND 11.3 ± 5.99 pneumoniae, variicola
 Kosakonia ND 7.28 ± 6.01 cowanii
 Trabulsiella ND 0.98 ± 1.39 odontotermitis
 Acinetobacter 2.13 ± 0.01 ND
 Pseudomonas 2.29 ± 0.01 ND
 Xanthomonas 2.89 ± 0.00 ND
Firmicutes 25.5 ± 3.31
 Bacillus 3.68 ± 0.05 19.05 ± 22.08 subtilis, ginsengihumi
 Paenibacillus 2.04 ± 0.00 ND
 Saccharibacillus 1.34 ± 0.24 ND
 Enterococcus 3.77 ± 0.02 13.3 ± 6.37 durans, lactis, camelliae, italicus, casseliflavus, pallens
 Lactobacillus 0.22 ± 0.00 2.58 ± 1.84 fermentum, plantarum
 Pediococcus 0.38 ± 0.00 4.13 ± 3.62 pentosaceus
 Leuconostoc 0.15 ± 0.00 ND
 Weissella 8.58 ± 1.86 3.57 ± 5.05 beninensis, cibaria, confusa, paramesenteroides
 Lactococcus 2.51 ± 0.01 2.17 ± 1.56 lactis, taiwanensis
    [F: Peptostreptococcaceae] 0.13 ± 0.00 ND
 Clostridium sensu stricto 1 1.46 ± 0.01 ND
 Clostridium sensu stricto 5 0.12 ± 0.00 ND
 Ruminococcaceae UCG-010 0.82 ± 0.01 ND
Bacteroidetes 17.7 ± 5.77
 Siphonobacter 0.70 ± 0.00 ND
 Chryseobacterium 3.35 ± 2.40 ND
 Sphingobacterium 1.33 ± 0.01 ND
 Mucilaginibacter 0.31 ± 0.00 ND
 Pedobacter 0.23 ± 0.00 ND
Actinobacteria 5.42 ± 3.07
 Cellulomonas 1.31 ± 0.00 ND
Saccharibacteria 0.66 ± 0.47
    [P: Saccharibacteria] 0.14 ± 0.00 ND
Planctomycetes 0.53 ± 0.75 ND
Marinimicrobia (SAR406 clade) 0.61 ± 0.86 ND
Fusobacteria 0.31 ± 0.43 ND
Verrucomicrobia 0.31 ± 0.43 ND
Chloroflexi 0.89 ± 0.66 ND
Cyanobacteria 1.50 ± 0.32 ND
Unassigned 5.13 ± 2.53 ND
Total 100 ± 0.00 100 ± 0.00
a

The comparison of the relative abundance was determined by Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons and 16S rRNA gene sequencing of bacterial isolates. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations from 3 millet malt samples. Unassigned genera are presented with upper-level family (F) or phylum (P) in brackets. Unassigned means a good hit to a particular sequence, but that sequence is rare and is not bacterial 16S rRNA. ND, not detected. OTUs of ≤0.1% are not shown but are included in the total.

Characterization of millet malt microbiota by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons was used to determine the relative abundance of bacterial genera in 3 millet malt samples. The millet malt microbiota was characterized by the analysis of the relative abundance of bacterial taxa at the phylum and genus levels (Table 4) and by matching to the most closely related species (see Table S1S in the supplemental material). Of the total 135 operational taxonomic units (OTUs), 96 were classified to the genus level (Table 4). Proteobacteria was the most abundant phylum (32.1 to 44.4%), with Cronobacter (26.4 to 52.8%) as the most abundant genus in all 3 millet malt samples, followed by Firmicutes (22.6 to 30.2%), with Weissella (6.35 to 10.9%) as the most abundant genus. A comparison of the culture-dependent and sequencing results revealed that the major members of malt microbiota were detected by both methods. However, 4 genera of Enterobacteriaceae representing a total of 28% of isolates were not identified by sequencing. Furthermore, sequencing provided a lower relative abundance of Bacillus spp., 3.68% compared to 19.1%, as determined by culture-dependent analysis (Table 4).

Sequencing also revealed the presence of DNA from Rhizobium, a root symbiont, Massilia spp. and Pseudomonas spp., strict aerobic water- and soil-associated organisms, Xanthomonas, a plant pathogen, and Bacteroidetes, strict anaerobic members of intestinal microbiota. With the exception of Bacteroidetes, these taxa grow readily on the media that were employed for culture-dependent analysis of malt samples (Table 4). Short sequences of bacterial rRNA genes can be amplified more than 60 days after cell death (25), and the presence of rRNA genes from these taxa is unlikely to represent the presence of viable and metabolically active bacterial cells.

Determination of the origin of mahewu microbiota.

RAPD patterns and the observation of the colony morphology of isolates suggested that different samples contained similar strains of L. fermentum. To obtain a more direct assessment of strain identity, a strain-specific quantitative PCR assay was established on the basis of the genome sequences of L. fermentum FUA3588 and FUA3589 and L. plantarum FUA3590. Genomes of L. fermentum FUA3588 and FUA3589 and L. plantarum were aligned against 20 reference genomes each of L. fermentum and L. plantarum, respectively. As an example, the genome alignment of L. fermentum FUA3588 against the most closely related genome-sequenced strain, L. fermentum NB-22 (NCBI accession no. GCA_000496435.1), is shown in Fig. 2 The primers CMA1F and CMA1R targeted a unique exopolysaccharide operon (EpsD gene cluster) with 3 hypothetical proteins and 4 glycosyltransferases only found on the L. fermentum FUA3588 genome (Fig. 2). The regions targeted by the CMB1F/CMB1R and CMC1F/CMC1R primers code for hypothetical proteins. Nucleotide BLAST on the NCBI database verified that the primer pairs do not bind to other sequences that were deposited in the NCBI database.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Genome alignment in MAUVE of L. fermentum FUA3588 against the most closely related genome-sequenced strain, L. fermentum NB-22 (NCBI accession no. GCA_000496435.1). Shown is a genomic region that is present in L. fermentum FUA3588 but absent from L. fermentum NB-22 (black box). The region encodes a putative exopolysaccharide synthesis cluster; BLAST analysis against the NCBI database revealed that the 7 genes at the 5ˊ end are unique to L. fermentum FUA3588 but absent from any other sequence in the NCBI database (red box). This region codes for 3 hypothetical proteins and 4 putative glycosyl transferases and was used for the design of strain-specific primers (Table 6).

Strain-specific qPCR determined the origin of the mahewu microbiota (Table 5). L. fermentum FUA3588 and FUA3589 were detected by strain-specific qPCR in community DNA isolated from the millet malt that was used to produce the sample. However, L. plantarum FUA3590, which is the most abundant lactic acid bacteria in mahewu, was not detected in the millet malt samples. Strain-specific primers were also used to determine whether isolates obtained from different samples are identical. Amplicons were obtained with primers targeting L. fermentum FUA3589 and template DNA isolated from L. fermentum FUA3573 and L. fermentum FUA3582 (Table 2). Primers targeting strain-specific regions in the genomes of L. fermentum FUA3588 and L. plantarum FUA3590 did not generate PCR amplicons in any other isolates, suggesting that these strains were present only in samples obtained from site C in summer.

TABLE 5.

Strain-specific qPCR detection of mahewu isolates in millet malt

Mahewu strain Relative abundance (%) in:
Malta Mahewub
L. fermentum FUA3588 0.07 ± 0.01 10
L. fermentum FUA3589 0.01 ± 0.01 10
L. plantarum FUA3590 Not detected 80
a

Means ± standard deviations of duplicate independent experiments are shown. Quantitative PCR analysis comparing site C mahewu strain isolates with site C millet malt isolates.

b

Relative abundance of 3 mahewu isolates in mahewu from site C.

Model mahewu fermentations.

To investigate the discrepancy between malt and mahewu microbiota, particularly with respect to Enterobacteriaceae, and to determine the fate of Enterobacteriaceae, including Cronobacter sakazakii, model mahewu fermentations were conducted. The simulated mahewu fermentation was inoculated with a 5-strain cocktail comprised of 2 mahewu isolates, L. fermentum FUA3588 and L. plantarum FUA3590, and 3 isolates from millet malt, C. sakazakii FUA10024, Enterococcus lactis FUA3587, and Klebsiella pneumoniae FUA10025. The 5 strains were chosen for their diverse and distinct colony morphologies to enable differential cell counts without the use of selective media (Fig. 3). Yeasts were not included in the model mahewu fermentations, because yeasts were not detected in millet malt microbiota and because the growth of yeasts in spontaneous cereal fermentations is typically observed only at late fermentation stages (14, 26). Fermentations were characterized by differential cell counts, pH, and metabolite concentrations (Fig. 4). Lactic acid and ethanol were the major bacterial metabolites in model mahewu fermentations. The concentrations of the metabolites were 82.0 ± 3.1 mmol liter−1 lactic acid, 42.2 ± 6.2 mmol liter−1 ethanol, 8.6 ± 1.2 mmol liter−1 acetic acid, and 5.9 ± 0.8 mmol liter−1 glycerol. The pH decreased to 4.5 after 8 h; the final pH of 3.3 was reached after 24 h (Fig. 4). All five strains grew in the initial phase of fermentation. Cell counts of C. sakazakii and K. pneumoniae increased up to 8 h and 16 h, respectively, and sharply decreased within 24 h. Cell counts of E. lactis increased up to 16 h and then decreased gradually. Growth of L. fermentum stopped after 16 h and decreased slightly, whereas growth of L. plantarum stopped after 48 h, and cell counts were maintained over the remaining fermentation time (Fig. 4).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Strain isolated from model mahewu fermentations. Differential enumeration of 5 bacterial strains was determined on the basis of colony morphology. (A) LB agar plate after 8 h of incubation at 30°C. E. lactis FUA3587 (small white colonies), C. sakazakii FUA10024 (yellow colonies), and K. pneumoniae FUA10025 (gray large mucoid colonies) were used. (B) MRS5 agar plate after 72 h of incubation at 30°C. L. fermentum FUA3588 (large white mucoid colonies) and L. plantarum FUA3590 (off-white medium-sized colonies) were used.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Differential cell counts in model mahewu fermentations. Model mahewu fermentations were inoculated with 106 CFU/ml each of five bacterial strains and incubated at 30°C for 72 h. Differential enumeration of 5 bacterial strains was determined on the basis of colony morphology. Symbols indicate L. fermentum FUA3588 (□), L. plantarum FUA3590 (○), E. lactis FUA3587 (●), C. sakazakii FUA10024 (●), and K. pneumoniae FUA10025 (■). Results are shown as means ± standard deviations from triplicate independent experiments analyzed in duplicate. The asterisk indicates values below the detection limit because the LB agar plates were overgrown with lactic acid bacteria and bacilli. □ and ○, enumerated on MRS5 agar; ● and ■, enumerated on LB agar.

DISCUSSION

This study analyzed the composition and origin of mahewu microbiota to determine the overlap between the mahewu and millet malt microbiota and to evaluate the suitability of mahewu isolates to outcompete Enterobacteriaceae during fermentation.

Multiple studies in past decades consistently and unambiguously demonstrated that culture-dependent methodology on appropriate cultivation media identifies all relevant fermentation organisms in cereal fermentations, while DNA-based approaches, including amplified ribosomal DNA‐restriction analysis (ARDRA) (5), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (4, 26, 27), quantitative PCR (2830), and high-throughput sequencing of 16S RNA sequence tags (31), often fail to recover specific species and do not allow identification at the species level. In addition, the recovery of DNA from dead bacterial cells severely distorts the microbiota composition when assessed by sequence-based approaches, particularly in spontaneous plant fermentations that are characterized by a succession of fermentation microbiota (25, 26, 31). Sequence-based approaches thus achieve rapid monitoring of fermentation microbiota but are not suitable for an in-depth analysis of fermentation microbiota at the strain level, as was attempted in the present study.

Owing to the paucity of data on the composition of (millet) malt microbiota, malt samples were evaluated with culture-dependent methods and high-throughput amplicon sequencing. DNA- and culture-based methods were generally in agreement; however, sequencing results also indicated the presence of root symbionts, strict anaerobic intestinal microorganisms, and plant pathogens that are unlikely to remain viable after malting and dry storage. In addition, sequencing did not identify four genera of Enterobacteriaceae, likely because the close phylogenetic relationship of different genera in the Enterobacteriaceae makes even the genus-level identification with short rRNA gene sequences questionable (32).

Composition.

Mahewu microbiota consisted of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts. L. fermentum was the most frequent and the most abundant organism in mahewu samples; L. plantarum, L. rossiae, P. pentosaceus, Leuconostoc, and Weissella spp., as well as enterococci and lactococci, additionally were present. Thus, the composition of mahewu microbiota is comparable to that of the microbiota of other spontaneous cereal fermentations, which also typically include L. fermentum, L. plantarum, and P. pentosaceus (3, 9, 11, 13, 3337), species which are characterized by a nomadic or environmental lifestyle (17). The high abundance of L. plantarum at the late stages of spontaneous cereal fermentation (33) likely relates to its ability to acidify the fermentation substrate to a pH of 3.2, which is lethal to most other lactic acid bacteria (38).

Yeasts were identified as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida glabrata; these yeasts also occur in other cereal fermentations (39, 40). Cell counts of the yeast C. glabrata were high in summer but low in winter, suggesting that its presence depends on the fermentation temperature. The thermotolerance also contributes to its ability to cause opportunistic infections (41). C. glabrata infections have high mortality in immunocompromised, at-risk, and hospitalized patients (42), and its presence may thus be of concern in countries, such as Zimbabwe, with a high prevalence of HIV (43).

Origin.

The production environment and the raw material were related to the microbiota of spontaneous and back-slopped wheat sourdoughs (18, 30). Strain-specific qPCR was used to compare mahewu microbiota prepared in the same household between summer and winter. None of the three strains was identified at the same production site at two different sampling times. One of 3 strains, L. fermentum FUA3589, was identified in three different production sites in summer and in winter. This pattern suggests a common source of contamination rather than persistence of a single strain in the site of production. We subsequently characterized the microbiota of millet malt as a likely source of fermentation microbiota. Strain-specific qPCR demonstrated that the millet malt is a main source of mahewu microbiota. Strain-specific primers have previously been used for strain-specific quantification of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli in fecal samples (44, 45). Past studies on molecular source tracking of food microbiota used RAPD PCR or repetitive element sequence-based PCR to trace the origin of lactic acid bacterial strains in sourdoughs; however, the low specificity of these techniques did not provide conclusive evidence on strain identity (18, 46). In addition, the detection limit of strain-specific qPCR is lower than that of cultivation-based methods.

Millet malt microbiota consisted mainly of environmental Enterobacteriaceae, environmental lactic acid bacteria, bacilli, and a few yeasts. Barley malt microbiota also include Enterobacteriaceae and lactic acid bacteria as dominant representatives (47). Daqu is a spontaneously fermented saccharification starter prepared from sorghum and wheat or rice hull and includes a diverse microbial community, with bacilli, Enterobacteriaceae, lactic acid bacteria, and yeasts and molds as abundant representatives (27, 48, 49). C. sakazakii is ubiquitous in the environment and has been isolated from plant food, cereals, fruit and vegetables, herbs, and spices (50, 51). C. sakazakii has a high tolerance to desiccation (51, 52), which may contribute to its competitive advantage in millet malt. Cronobacter spp. were found to endophytically and epiphytically colonize tomato and maize roots, which suggests that plants are the natural habitat of Cronobacter spp. (19). The presence of C. sakazakii in millet malt may be a health risk, as the organism is linked with life-threatening infections in neonates and with urinary tract infections in persons over 80 years of age (5254). Cronobacter dublinensis, like C. sakazakii, has been recovered from the environment and food (55) and is also considered an opportunistic pathogen in neonates (56). Klebsiella pneumoniae is widely distributed in the environment, is a commensal bacteria in the mucosal surfaces of humans and animals, and is an opportunistic pathogen causing nosocomial infections (57). Bacillus subtilis has been isolated from diverse environments, particularly including soils and plants (58).

The model mahewu study was conducted to determine the fate of C. sakazakii, K. pneumoniae, and E. lactis during fermentation. The initial competition of lactic acid bacteria and plant-associated Enterobacteriaceae is common for many plant fermentations, including cereal fermentations, sauerkraut, kimchi, and carrot juice (25, 59, 60). Growth of Enterobacteriaceae in plant fermentations is inhibited by the low pH; extended fermentation at low pH reduced cell counts of Enterobacteriaceae in carrot juice, kimchi, and sorghum doughs (25, 37, 60). Plant-associated Enterobacteriaceae were detected in several spontaneously fermented cereal foods (39), suggesting that fermentation conditions or fermentation time does not always suffice to eliminate these organisms. The model mahewu fermentations showed a rapid decrease in Enterobacteriaceae as soon as the pH was reduced to less than 4.5.

In conclusion, this study describes the composition and origin of mahewu microbiota and elucidates the role of millet malt in the fermentation of mahewu. Mahewu is consumed by infants and immunocompromised individuals without inactivation of the fermentation microbiota. Thus, viable probiotic fermentation organisms and viable opportunistic pathogens may positively and negatively affect the health of consumers (61). While L. fermentum organisms were very minor components of millet malt microbiota and L. plantarum was not detectable in the raw material, they became dominant members of mahewu microbiota after 16 to 24 h of fermentation. Conversely, C. sakazakii, K. pneumoniae, and enterococci, which were abundant representatives of millet malt microbiota, were eliminated or reduced after 24 to 48 h of fermentation. Comparative genomic analyses of mahewu lactic acid bacterial isolates may further elucidate their role in product quality and safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling of mahewu and millet malt.

Five mahewu samples and four millet malt samples were collected from three different sites in Chekure village, Gutu, in Masvingo province of Zimbabwe in February and May 2016. The mahewu samples from three different sites are described as C, D, and M. Two samples from sites C and D were collected from the same households in February and May 2016, respectively, and one sample from site M was collected in May 2016. Prior to sample collection, the fermentation process of mahewu from sites C and D was observed. The maize and finger millet used in the production of mahewu were grown by the households; water was obtained from a well near the homesteads. No commercial ingredients were used. Mahewu samples from sites C and M were prepared in clay pots, whereas samples from site D were prepared in plastic buckets. The samples were collected aseptically into sterile 50-ml tubes, which were placed on ice in a cooler box and transported to the Department of Agriculture Food and Nutritional Science at the University of Alberta, AB, Canada. Samples were maintained between 0 and 20°C during transport, analyzed at 76 ± 2 h after collection in Zimbabwe with respect to pH and total cell counts, and stored at −20°C for subsequent biochemical analyses and DNA isolation. Time and temperature profile of transport match the storage life of mahewu.

Isolation and enumeration of microorganisms in mahewu and millet malt.

Total cell counts for bacteria and yeasts were determined by surface plating of 10-fold serial dilutions of mahewu samples in sterile peptone saline water (10 g/liter peptone, 9 g/liter NaCl) on MRS5 agar (4). The composition of MRS5 per liter contains 20 g bacteriological agar, 10 g tryptone, 5 g beef extract, 5 g yeast extract, 10 g maltose, 5 g fructose, 5 g glucose, 5 g sodium acetate, 3 g ammonium chloride, 2.6 g potassium phosphate dibasic, 4 g potassium phosphate monobasic, 0.5 g l-cysteine, 0.1 g magnesium sulfate, 0.05 g manganese sulfate, 1 ml Tween 80, and 0.1 ml vitamin mix (final pH 5.9). The vitamin mixture containing 250 mg cobalamin, 200 mg folic acid, 200 mg nicotinic acid, 250 mg pantothenic acid, 200 mg pyridoxal phosphate, and 200 mg thiamine in 100 ml was sterilized by filtration at 0.22 µm. For the enumeration and isolation of lactic acid bacteria, MRS5 containing 100 mg/liter of cycloheximide (Sigma, Oakville, Canada) was used, and the plates were incubated under modified conditions (10% CO2, 90% N2) at 30°C for 72 h. Yeasts were enumerated and isolated on MRS5 agar containing 100 mg/liter each of chloramphenicol and erythromycin (Sigma), and the plates were incubated aerobically at 30°C for 72 h. Fecal coliform bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae were enumerated and isolated on violet red bile agar (Difco) and violet red bile glucose agar (Oxoid), respectively, and plates were incubated aerobically at 44.5°C for 24 h and 72 h, respectively. The colony morphologies of the microorganisms were recorded, and three or four representative colonies of each morphotype, corresponding to at least 50 colonies per sample and more than 300 colonies in total, were purified by repetitive dilution streaks for further identification. Purified cultures were stored in 30% glycerol at –80°C. Cultivation of stock cultures for subsequent experiments was done on MRS5 agar at 30°C for 48 h, followed by overnight incubation in MRS5 broth at 30°C.

Identification of mahewu and millet malt isolates.

Genomic DNA was isolated from overnight cultures in 10 ml MRS5 broth using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis was performed as previously described (62) with the oligonucleotide primer M13V. PCR was performed with genomic DNA as the template in a reaction volume of 25 μl containing 1 μl genomic DNA, 2.5 μl 10× PCR buffer, 0.75 mM MgCl2, 200 nM each deoxynucleotide, 1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase, and 150 pmol primer M13V (5′-GTT TTC CCA GTC ACG AC-3′) (63) (all reagents were from Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The mixtures were subjected to 1 min of incubation at 96°C; 3 cycles of 3 min at 96°C, 5 min at 35°C, and 5 min at 75°C; and 32 cycles of 1 min at 96°C, 2 min at 55°C, 3 min at 75°C, and 2 min at 75°C. RAPD PCR products were separated on 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and were visualized by UV transillumination after staining with SYBR Safe. Isolates differing in their RAPD patterns were identified to species level based on the partial sequences of their 16S rRNA genes. The primers 27F and 1492R were used for the amplification of 16S rRNA genes (64). Amplification of the 28S rRNA genes of yeasts was performed using primers P1 and P2 (65). Details of the primers are given in Table 6. The PCR products were sequenced by Macrogen (Rockville, MD, USA) and analyzed by the Ribosomal Database Project (https://rdp.cme.msu.edu/).

TABLE 6.

Primer sequences used in the study

Target or primer Primer
Tma (°C) Amplicon length (bp) Reference or source
Name Sequence (5′–3′)
Bacteria 27F AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG 53.2 1,500 64
1492R TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT 54.6
16S rRNA 784F RGGATTAGATACCC 300 64
1064R CGACRRCCATGCANCACCT
Yeasts P1F ATCAATAAGCGGAGGAAAAG 50.2 700 65
P2R CTCTGGCTTCACCCTATTC 52.4
recA gene-based primers
 L. paraplantarum ParaF GTCACAGGCATTACGAAAAC 51.9 107 24
 L. pentosus PentF CAGTGGCGCGGTTGATATC 55.6 218 24
 L. plantarum planF CCGTTTATGCGGAACACCTA 55.0 318 24
pREV TCGGGATTACCAAACATCAC 52.5 24
Primers for HRM-qPCR
 Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Weissella, Oenococcus LabF AGCAGTAGGGAATCTTCCA 63 341 69
LabR CACCGCTACACATGGAG
Strain-specific primers for quantification of mahewu isolates in millet malt
 L. fermentum CMA1F CACTAACAGGCACCACTATCTT 62 119 This study
     CMA1R CGCAGTCTTATTCTCATGCTTTAC
 L. fermentum CMB1F AACGCCTAGCCTGATTTATCTC 62 103 This study
     CMB1R CAACAGGATCGTGCCATAGT
 L. plantarum CMC1F AGTTTGCCACATATTAGGAAGAGA 62 112 This study
CMC1R AGGCTCTAAGGGCTACCTATAC
a

Tm, melting temperature.

Differentiation of L. plantarum, L. pentosus, and L. paraplantarum was conducted with a multiplex PCR assay (24) targeting recA with the recA-based primers paraF (5ˊ-GTC ACA GGC ATT ACG AAA AC-3ˊ), pentF (5ˊ-CAG TGG CGC GGT TGA TAT C-3ˊ), planF (5ˊ-CCG TTT ATG CGG AAC ACC TA-3ˊ), and pREV (5ˊ-TCG GGA TTA CCA AAC ATC AC-3ˊ) (Table 6). The PCR mixture was composed of 1.5 mM MgCl2, the primers paraF, pentF, and pREV (0.25 µM each), 0.12 µM primer planF, 0.2 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates (0.05 mM each), 0.025 U of Taq DNA polymerase/µl (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1× PCR buffer (Invitrogen), and 5 µl of DNA template. PCR conditions were an initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C (30 s), annealing at 56°C (10 s), and elongation at 72°C (30 s), and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were separated on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by UV transillumination after staining with SYBR Safe.

Extraction of bacterial DNA from millet malt.

In brief, approximately 0.2 g of millet malt was weighed into a sterile 1.5-ml Eppendorf tube, followed by the addition of 1 ml sterile saline (0.85% NaCl) to the tube. This mixture was then homogenized at full-strength vortex for 10 min, followed by centrifuging at a slow speed of 500 rpm for 7 min. The supernatant was transferred into a new sterile 1.5-ml Eppendorf tube and centrifuged at 700 rpm for 7 min. Subsequently, the supernatant was transferred into a new sterile 1.5-ml Eppendorf tube. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, and DNA was extracted from harvested cells by using a DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). The quantity and quality of DNA was checked on a NanoDrop One spectrophotometer system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Wilmington, DE).

Characterization of millet malt microbiota by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

To determine the relative abundance of bacterial DNA in 3 millet malt samples, high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons using Illumina MiSeq producing 300-bp paired-end sequences was performed by the University of Minnesota Genomics Center (Minneapolis, MN, USA). The V5-V6 regions of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the primer pair 784F (5′-RGGATTAGATACCC-3′) and 1064R (5′-CGACRRCCATGCANCACCT-3′) (64). The total number of sequences generated was 112,992, corresponding to an average of 37,664 ± 5,406 sequences per sample. Subsequently, these sequences were analyzed with fewer OTU scripts (LotuS v. 1.565) in the pipeline, which includes a simultaneous demultiplexer and quality filter C++ program and a simple demultiplexer (sdm) to calculate denoised, chimera-checked, operational taxonomic units (66). Filtered sequences were clustered into OTUs with UPARSE (67), and taxonomic assignment was performed using BLAST against the SILVA v128 reference database (68). After processing and quality control, a total of 79,514 sequences corresponding to an average of 26,504 ± 4,149 sequences per sample was obtained. The relative abundance was calculated as the percentage of OTUs representing specific bacterial taxa relative to the total abundance of bacterial 16S rRNA genes.

Physicochemical analysis of traditionally prepared and laboratory-scale prepared mahewu.

The pH of the mahewu samples was measured with a glass electrode. For the determination of organic acids and alcohols, samples were prepared for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analyses by the removal of solids by centrifugation. The supernatant was mixed 1:1 with 7% perchloric acid. Proteins were precipitated overnight at 4°C and subsequently removed by centrifugation. Organic acids and alcohols were quantified by HPLC using an Aminex HPX-87H column (300 mm by 7.8 mm; Bio-Rad, Torrance, CA, USA) at a temperature of 70°C (62). The eluent, 5 mM H2SO4, was used at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. Quantification of the analytes was based on refractive index detection. Concentrations of lactate, acetate, glycerol, and ethanol were determined using external standards (all Sigma-Aldrich).

Genomic DNA isolation, genome sequencing, assembly, and annotation.

Genomic DNA for whole-genome sequencing was isolated from overnight cultures of L. fermentum FUA3588 and FUA3589 and L. plantarum FUA3590 grown in 10 ml of MRS5 broth. Genomic DNA was isolated using the Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) by following the manufacturer's guidelines. The quality and quantity of each sample was assessed using a NanoDrop One spectrophotometer system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA), gel electrophoresis, and high-resolution melting-qPCR (HRM-qPCR) as described previously (29), with primers targeting 16S rRNA genes of lactic acid bacteria (69).

Genomic DNA samples were sequenced by Macrogen (Rockville, MD, USA) using Illumina HiSeq2500 Rapid Mode with an insert size of 350 bp to generate 100-bp paired-end reads. Assemblies were obtained using ABySS 1.3.4 (Assembly By Short Sequence) (70) with the most optimal k-mer value for each genome. After assembly, the fasta files were compared to those for species in the NCBI genome database. The genomes assemblies of L. fermentum strains FUA3588 and FUA3589 were improved by resorting the contigs using L. fermentum SNUV175 (GenBank accession no. NZ_CP019030.1) as the reference genome. For L. plantarum FUA3590, the genome assembly was resorted using L. plantarum subsp. plantarum SRCM100434 (accession no. NZ_CP021528.1) as the reference genome. Genomes were annotated automatically by the RAST server (http://rast.nmpdr.org/rast.cgi).

Multiple-genome alignment and strain-specific primer design.

Strain-specific primer design was based on the unique nucleotide sequences of the target strains compared to sequences of other strains from the same species. Multiple-genome alignments were conducted to search for unique sequences in the genomes of L. fermentum FUA3588 and FUA3589 and L. plantarum FUA3590. Twenty of the most closely related genomes of L. fermentum FUA3588 and FUA3589 and 20 of the most closely related genomes of L. plantarum FUA3590 were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) FTP site and used as reference genomes. Progressive Mauve algorithm (the Darling laboratory at the University of Technology, Sydney, Australia) was used for the comparative sequence analysis. The alignment results were displayed as horizontal panels for all of the input genomes (Fig. 2). Strain-specific primers CMA1F and CMA1R, CMB1F and CMB1R, and CMC1F and CMC1R were designed from the unique sequences from the genomes of L. fermentum FUA3588 and FUA3589 and L. plantarum FUA3590 strains using the PrimerQuest tool (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA). Details of the strain-specific primers are given in Table 6.

To evaluate primer specificity in silico, the designed strain-specific primers were confirmed using nucleotide BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) of the nucleotide collection (nr/nt). Strain-specific primers were synthesized at Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA), tested in PCRs with the template DNA of L. fermentum FUA3588 and FUA3589 and L. plantarum FUA3590 for validation, and confirmed by gel electrophoresis. PCRs with strain-specific primers resulted in positive amplicons from the genomic DNA of the respective strains.

qPCR for quantification of mahewu strains in millet malt.

The presence of mahewu strains L. fermentum FUA3588 and FUA3589 and L. plantarum FUA3590 in the millet malt samples was detected by using the 7500 fast real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The qPCR reaction mixtures with a total volume of 25 µl contained 12.5 µl of QuantiFast SYBR green master mix (Applied Biosystems), 1 µM (each) the forward and reverse strain-specific primers, and 1 µl of DNA template. The annealing temperature for the universal primers 27F and 1492R used was 55°C. Negative controls contained no template DNA, and positive controls contained genomic DNA isolated from the respective bacterial cultures. The specificity of each primer pair (Table 6) was verified in qPCR reactions with template DNA from L. fermentum FUA3588 and FUA3589 and L. plantarum FUA3590, as well as with qPCR-generated melting curves (data not shown). The qPCR amplification program was operated with a predenaturation stage at 95°C for 5 min; 40 cycles of three steps of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 62°C for 30 s, and elongation at 75°C for 30 s; followed by a melting stage with default settings. Melting curves and agarose gel separation of amplicons were used to verify the specific amplification of target genes. Quantification of strain-specific amplicons relative to amplicons obtained with universal 16S rRNA primers was done with the following equation: relative abundance (%) = 100 × 2(CTuniversal primers – CTstrain-specific primers), where CT is threshold cycle.

Duplicate independent experiments with duplicate technical repeats were conducted for all qPCR reactions. Melting curves and agarose gel separation of amplicons were used to verify the specific amplification of target genes.

Model mahewu fermentations.

Five different strains with distinct colony morphologies isolated from mahewu and millet malt from site C were selected for model mahewu fermentation: Lactobacillus fermentum FUA3588, Lactobacillus plantarum FUA3590, Enterococcus lactis FUA3587, Cronobacter sakazakii FUA10024, and Klebsiella pneumoniae FUA10025. The inoculum was prepared by growing the strains on MRS5 agar at 30°C for 48 h, followed by overnight incubation in 10 ml MRS5 broth at 30°C. Cells were washed twice with sterile peptone saline and resuspended in 10 ml sterile tap water for use as the inoculum.

Two grams of maize meal (National Foods Limited, Harare, Zimbabwe) was mixed with 10 ml sterile water in a sterile conical flask and cooked into a thin porridge by boiling for 10 min. The porridge was then cooled with 19.85 ml sterile tap water and inoculated with each of the selected strains to obtain an initial concentration of 106 CFU/ml. Finger millet malt from site C (1 g) was then added to the flask and mixed. The flasks were sealed with sterile aluminum foil and incubated at 25°C. The slurry was sampled for analysis at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 48, and 72 h of fermentation to determine the microbial counts and pH. Microbial counts for L. plantarum FUA3590 and L. fermentum FUA3588 were enumerated on MRS5 agar, and those for E. lactis FUA3587, C. sakazakii FUA10024, and K. pneumoniae FUA10025 were enumerated on LB agar. The colony morphology of L. plantarum FUA3590 was off-white with smooth raised colonies. L. fermentum FUA3588 appeared as white, large, flat, and mucoid colonies on MRS5 agar. Colonies of K. pneumoniae FUA10025 were gray, round, shiny, and mucoid. C. sakazakii FUA10024 appeared as yellow colonies, and E. lactis FUA3587 appeared as small white colonies on LB agar. The colony morphologies of the 5-strain bacterial cocktail used are shown in Fig. 3. The experiment was performed in triplicate. The organic acid concentrations were determined in the 72-h model mahewu.

Data availability.

The genome sequence data for L. fermentum FUA3588 and FUA3589 and L. plantarum FUA3590 have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers SMZI00000000, SMZH00000000, and SMZG00000000, respectively. The 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained from 3 millet malt samples were deposited under BioSample accession no. SAMN11129559.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental file 1

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada for funding. F.P. acknowledges financial support from the Schlumberger Foundation’s Faculty for the Future Program and the Alberta Innovates Technology Futures Graduate Student Scholarship; M.G. acknowledges the Canada Research Chairs program for funding. We are grateful for support from Maud Muchweti, field work assistants Molly Gabaza, Mavis Dembedza, and Herbert Mtopamuchemwa, and field work participants for sharing their knowledge and techniques for the traditional production of mahewu. We are also grateful to Kirill Krivushin and Weilan Wang for providing technical assistance and advice on the bioinformatics analysis.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03130-18.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gadaga TH, Mutukumira AN, Narvhus JA, Feresu SB. 1999. A review of traditional fermented foods and beverages of Zimbabwe. Int J Food Microbiol 53:1–11. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(99)00154-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Simango C, Rukure G. 1992. Survival of bacterial enteric pathogens in traditional fermented foods. J Appl Bacteriol 73:37–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1992.tb04966.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sekwati-Monang B, Gänzle MG. 2011. Microbiological and chemical characterisation of ting, a sorghum-based sourdough product from Botswana. Int J Food Microbiol 150:115–121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Meroth CB, Walter J, Hertel C, Brandt MJ, Hammes WP. 2003. Monitoring the bacterial population dynamics in sourdough fermentation processes by using PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:475–482. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.475-482.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vogel RF, Knorr R, Müller MR, Steudel U, Gänzle MG, Ehrmann MA. 1999. Non-dairy lactic fermentations: the cereal world. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 76:403–411. doi: 10.1023/A:1002089515177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gabaza M, Joossens M, Cnockaert M, Muchuweti M, Raes K, Vandamme P. 2019. Lactococci dominate the bacterial communities of fermented maize, sorghum and millet slurries in Zimbabwe. Int J Food Microbiol 289:77–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mugula JK, Nnko SA, Narvhus JA, Sørhaug T. 2003. Microbiological and fermentation characteristics of togwa, a Tanzanian fermented food. Int J Food Microbiol 80:187–199. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00141-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Muyanja CM, Narvhus JA, Treimo J, Langsrud T. 2003. Isolation, characterisation and identification of lactic acid bacteria from bushera: a Ugandan traditional fermented beverage. Int J Food Microbiol 80:201–210. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00148-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nout MJ. 2009. Rich nutrition from the poorest—cereal fermentations in Africa and Asia. Food Microbiol 26:685–692. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2009.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gaffa T, Jideani IA, Nkama I. 2002. Traditional production, consumption and storage of Kunu—a non alcoholic cereal beverage. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 57:73–81. doi: 10.1023/A:1013129307086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Oguntoyinbo FA, Tourlomousis P, Gasson MJ, Narbad A. 2011. Analysis of bacterial communities of traditional fermented West African cereal foods using culture independent methods. Int J Food Microbiol 145:205–210. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Teniola OD, Holzapfel WH, Odunfa SA. 2005. Comparative assessment of fermentation techniques useful in the processing of ogi. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 21:39–43. doi: 10.1007/s11274-004-1549-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tou EH, Mouquet-Rivier C, Rochette I, Traoré AS, Trèche S, Guyot JP. 2007. Effect of different process combinations on the fermentation kinetics, microflora and energy density of ben-saalga, a fermented gruel from Burkina Faso. Food Chem 100:935–943. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.11.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gobbetti M, Minervini F, Pontonio E, Di Cagno R, De Angelis M. 2016. Drivers for the establishment and composition of the sourdough lactic acid bacteria biota. Int J Food Microbiol 239:3–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gänzle M, Ripari V. 2016. Composition and function of sourdough microbiota: from ecological theory to bread quality. Int J Food Microbiol 239:19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gänzle MG, Zheng J. 2018. Lifestyles of sourdough lactobacilli—do they matter for microbial ecology and bread quality? Int J Food Microbiol 2018:S0168-1605(18)30542-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Duar RM, Lin XB, Zheng J, Martino ME, Grenier T, Pérez-Muñoz ME, Leulier F, Gänzle M, Walter J. 2017. Lifestyles in transition: evolution and natural history of the genus Lactobacillus. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41:S27–S48. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Minervini F, Celano G, Lattanzi A, Tedone L, De Mastro G, Gobbetti M, De Angelis M. 2015. Lactic acid bacteria in durum wheat flour are endophytic components of the plant during its entire life cycle. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:6736–6748. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01852-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schmid M, Iversen C, Gontia I, Stephan R, Hofmann A, Hartmann A, Jha B, Eberl L, Riedel K, Lehner A. 2009. Evidence for a plant-associated natural habitat for Cronobacter spp. Res Microbiol 160:608–614. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2009.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Torres AR, Araújo WL, Cursino L, Hungria M, Plotegher F, Mostasso FL, Azevedo JL. 2008. Diversity of endophytic enterobacteria associated with different host plants. J Microbiol 46:373–379. doi: 10.1007/s12275-007-0165-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mousa WK, Shearer C, Limay-Rios V, Ettinger CL, Eisen JA, Raizada MN. 2016. Root-hair endophyte stacking in finger millet creates a physicochemical barrier to trap the fungal pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Nat Microbiol 1:16167. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Badau MH, Jideani IA, Nkama I. 2006. Production, acceptability and microbiological evaluation of weaning food formulations. J Trop Pediatr 52:166–172. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmi079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gänzle MG. 2014. Enzymatic and bacterial conversions during sourdough fermentation. Food Microbiol 37:2–10. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2013.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Torriani S, Felis GE, Dellaglio F. 2001. Differentiation of Lactobacillus plantarum, L. pentosus, and L. paraplantarum by recA gene sequence analysis and multiplex PCR assay with recA gene-derived primers. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:3450–3454. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.8.3450-3454.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wuyts S, Van Beeck W, Oerlemans EFM, Wittouck S, Claes IJJ, De Boeck I, Weckx S, Lievens B, De Vuyst L, Lebeer S. 2018. Carrot juice fermentations as man-made microbial ecosystems dominated by lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e00134-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00134-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Van der Meulen R, Scheirlinck I, Van Schoor A, Huys G, Vancanneyt M, Vandamme P, De Vuyst L. 2007. Population dynamics and metabolite target analysis of lactic acid bacteria during laboratory fermentations of wheat and spelt sourdoughs. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:4741–4750. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00315-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zheng XW, Yan Z, Han BZ, Zwietering MH, Samson RA, Boekhout T, Nout MJR. 2012. Complex microbiota of a Chinese “Fen” liquor fermentation starter (Fen-Daqu), revealed by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Food Microbiol 31:293–300. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sekwati-Monang B, Valcheva R, Gänzle MG. 2012. Microbial ecology of sorghum sourdoughs: effect of substrate supply and phenolic compounds on composition of fermentation microbiota. Int J Food Microbiol 159:240–246. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lin XB, Gänzle MG. 2014. Quantitative high-resolution melting PCR analysis for monitoring of fermentation microbiota in sourdough. Int J Food Microbiol 186:42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Scheirlinck I, Van der Meulen R, De Vuyst L, Vandamme P, Huys G. 2009. Molecular source tracking of predominant lactic acid bacteria in traditional Belgian sourdoughs and their production environments. J Appl Microbiol 106:1081–1092. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04094.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bessmeltseva M, Viiard E, Simm J, Paalme T, Sarand I. 2014. Evolution of bacterial consortia in spontaneously started rye sourdoughs during two months of daily propagation. PLoS One 9:e95449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Alnajar S, Gupta RS. 2017. Phylogenomics and comparative genomic studies delineate six main clades within the family Enterobacteriaceae and support the reclassification of several polyphyletic members of the family. Infect Genet Evol 54:108–127. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2017.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sanni A, Franz C, Schillinger U, Huch M, Guigas C, Holzapfel W. 2013. Characterization and technological properties of lactic acid bacteria in the production of “Sorghurt,” a cereal-based product. Food Biotechnol 27:178–198. doi: 10.1080/08905436.2013.781949. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Madoroba E, Steenkamp ET, Theron J, Scheirlinck I, Cloete TE, Huys G. 2011. Diversity and dynamics of bacterial populations during spontaneous sorghum fermentations used to produce ting, a South African food. Syst Appl Microbiol 34:227–234. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2010.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hounhouigan DJ, Nout MJ, Nago CM, Houben JH, Rombouts FM. 1994. Microbiological changes in mawè during natural fermentation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 10:410–413. doi: 10.1007/BF00144462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Moroni AV, Arendt EK, Dal Bello F. 2011. Biodiversity of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts in spontaneously-fermented buckwheat and teff sourdoughs. Food Microbiol 28:497–502. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2010.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hamad SH, Dieng MC, Ehrmann MA, Vogel RF. 1997. Characterization of the bacterial flora of Sudanese sorghum flour and sorghum sourdough. J Appl Microbiol 83:764–770. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00310.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.G-Alegría E, López I, Ruiz JI, Sáenz J, Fernández E, Zarazaga M, Dizy M, Torres C, Ruiz-Larrea F. 2004. High tolerance of wild Lactobacillus plantarum and Oenococcus oeni strains to lyophilisation and stress environmental conditions of acid pH and ethanol. FEMS Microbiol Lett 230:53–61. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00854-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Todorov SD, Holzapfel WH. 2015. Traditional cereal fermented foods as sources of functional microorganisms, p 123–153. In Holzapfel WH. (ed), Advances in fermented foods and beverages. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.De Vuyst L, Harth H, Van Kerrebroeck S, Leroy F. 2016. Yeast diversity of sourdoughs and associated metabolic properties and functionalities. Int J Food Microbiol 239:26–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chen YL, Konieczka JH, Springer DJ, Bowen SE, Zhang J, Silao FG, Bungay AA, Bigol UG, Nicolas MG, Abraham SN, Thompson DA, Regev A, Heitman J. 2012. Convergent evolution of calcineurin pathway roles in thermotolerance and virulence in Candida glabrata. G3 (Bethesda) 2:675–691. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.002279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fidel PL Jr, Vazquez JA, Sobel JD. 1999. Candida glabrata: review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical disease with comparison to C. albicans. Clin Microbiol Rev 12:80–96. doi: 10.1128/CMR.12.1.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mahomva A, Greby S, Dube S, Mugurungi O, Hargrove J, Rosen D, Dehne KL, Gregson S, St Louis M, Hader S. 2006. HIV prevalence and trends from data in Zimbabwe, 1997–2004. Sex Transm Infect 82:i42–i47. doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.019174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Maldonado-Gómez MX, Martínez I, Bottacini F, O’Callaghan A, Ventura M, van Sinderen D, Hillmann B, Vangay P, Knights D, Hutkins RW, Walter J. 2016. Stable engraftment of Bifidobacterium longum AH1206 in the human gut depends on individualized features of the resident microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 20:515–526. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhao X, Wang W, Blaine A, Kane S, Zijlstra R, Gänzle M. 2019. Impact of probiotic Lactobacillus spp. on autochthonous lactobacilli in weaned piglets. J Appl Microbiol 126:242–254. doi: 10.1111/jam.14119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Scheirlinck I, Van der Meulen R, Van Schoor A, Vancanneyt M, De Vuyst L, Vandamme P, Huys G. 2008. Taxonomic structure and stability of the bacterial community in Belgian sourdough ecosystems as assessed by culture and population fingerprinting. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2414–2423. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02771-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Noots I, Delcour JA, Michiels CW. 1999. From field barley to malt: detection and specification of microbial activity for quality aspects. Crit Rev Microbiol 25:121–153. doi: 10.1080/10408419991299257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Li P, Aflakpui FWK, Yu H, Luo L, Lin W. 2015. Characterization of activity and microbial diversity of typical types of Daqu for traditional Chinese vinegar. Ann Microbiol 65:2019–2027. doi: 10.1007/s13213-015-1040-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Xiao C, Lu ZM, Zhang XJ, Wang ST, Ao L, Shen CH, Shi JS, Xu ZH. 2017. Bio-heat is a key environmental driver shaping the microbial community of medium-temperature Daqu. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e01550-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01550-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Breeuwer P, Lardeau A, Peterz M, Joosten HM. 2003. Desiccation and heat tolerance of Enterobacter sakazakii. J Appl Microbiol 95:967–973. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02067.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Friedemann M. 2007. Enterobacter sakazakii in food and beverages (other than infant formula and milk powder). Int J Food Microbiol 116:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Beuchat LR, Kim H, Gurtler JB, Lin LC, Ryu JH, Richards GM. 2009. Cronobacter sakazakii in foods and factors affecting its survival, growth, and inactivation. Int J Food Microbiol 136:204–213. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lai KK. 2001. Enterobacter sakazakii infections among neonates, infants, children, and adults. Case reports and a review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore, MD) 80:113–122. doi: 10.1097/00005792-200103000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Patrick ME, Mahon BE, Greene SA, Rounds J, Cronquist A, Wymore K, Boothe E, Lathrop S, Palmer A, Bowen A. 2014. Incidence of Cronobacter spp. infections, United States, 2003–2009. Emerg Infect Dis 20:1520–1523. doi: 10.3201/eid2009.140545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Cruz A, Xicohtencatl-Cortes J, González-Pedrajo B, Bobadilla M, Eslava C, Rosas I. 2011. Virulence traits in Cronobacter species isolated from different sources. Can J Microbiol 57:735–744. doi: 10.1139/w11-063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kucerova E, Clifton SW, Xia XQ, Long F, Porwollik S, Fulton L, Fronick C, Minx P, Kyung K, Warren W, Fulton R, Feng D, Wollam A, Shah N, Bhonagiri V, Nash WE, Hallsworth-Pepin K, Wilson RK, McClelland M, Forsythe SJ. 2010. Genome sequence of Cronobacter sakazakii BAA-894 and comparative genomic hybridization analysis with other Cronobacter species. PLoS One 5:e9556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Podschun R, Ullmann U. 1998. Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors. Clin Microbiol Rev 11:589–603. doi: 10.1128/CMR.11.4.589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Earl AM, Losick R, Kolter R. 2008. Ecology and genomics of Bacillus subtilis. Trends Microbiol 16:269–275. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ercolini D, Pontonio E, De Filippis F, Minervini F, La Storia A, Gobbetti M, Di Cagno R. 2013. Microbial ecology dynamics during rye and wheat sourdough preparation. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:7827–7836. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02955-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lee JS, Heo GY, Lee JW, Oh YJ, Park JA, Park YH, Pyun YR, Ahn JS. 2005. Analysis of kimchi microflora using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Int J Food Microbiol 102:143–150. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Marco ML, Heeney D, Binda S, Cifelli CJ, Cotter PD, Foligné B, Gänzle M, Kort R, Pasin G, Pihlanto A, Smid EJ, Hutkins R. 2017. Health benefits of fermented foods: microbiota and beyond. Curr Opin Biotechnol 44:94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Dlusskaya E, Jänsch A, Schwab C, Gänzle MG. 2008. Microbial and chemical analysis of a kvass fermentation. Eur Food Res Technol 227:261–266. doi: 10.1007/s00217-007-0719-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Müller MRA, Wolfrum G, Stolz P, Ehrmann MA, Vogel RF. 2001. Monitoring the growth of Lactobacillus species during a rye flour fermentation. Food Microbiol 18:217–227. doi: 10.1006/fmic.2000.0394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 1991. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173:697–703. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sandhu GS, Kline BC, Stockman L, Roberts GD. 1995. Molecular probes for diagnosis of fungal infections. J Clin Microbiol 33:2913–2919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hildebrand F, Tadeo R, Voigt AY, Bork P, Raes J. 2014. LotuS: an efficient and user-friendly OTU processing pipeline. Microbiome 2:30. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Edgar RC. 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10:996–998. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. 2007. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res 35:7188–7196. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Walter J, Hertel C, Tannock GW, Lis CM, Munro K, Hammes WP. 2001. Detection of Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, and Weissella species in human feces by using group-specific PCR primers and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2578–2585. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2578-2585.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Simpson JT, Wong K, Jackman SD, Schein JE, Jones SJ, Birol I. 2009. ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res 19:1117–1123. doi: 10.1101/gr.089532.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence data for L. fermentum FUA3588 and FUA3589 and L. plantarum FUA3590 have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers SMZI00000000, SMZH00000000, and SMZG00000000, respectively. The 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained from 3 millet malt samples were deposited under BioSample accession no. SAMN11129559.


Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES