Abstract
A long-held view in evolutionary biology is that character displacement generates divergent phenotypes in closely related coexisting species to avoid the costs of hybridization or ecological competition, whereas an alternative possibility is that signals of dominance or aggression may instead converge to facilitate coexistence among ecological competitors. Although this counterintuitive process—termed convergent agonistic character displacement—is supported by recent theoretical and empirical studies, the extent to which it drives spatial patterns of trait evolution at continental scales remains unclear. By modelling the variation in song structure of two ecologically similar species of Hypocnemis antbird across western Amazonia, we show that their territorial signals converge such that trait similarity peaks in the sympatric zone, where intense interspecific territoriality between these taxa has previously been demonstrated. We also use remote sensing data to show that signal convergence is not explained by environmental gradients and is thus unlikely to evolve by sensory drive (i.e. acoustic adaptation to the sound transmission properties of habitats). Our results suggest that agonistic character displacement driven by interspecific competition can generate spatial patterns opposite to those predicted by classic character displacement theory, and highlight the potential role of social selection in shaping geographical variation in signal phenotypes of ecological competitors.
Keywords: animal communication, Amazonia, interspecific competition, phenotypic evolution, signal convergence, social selection
1. Introduction
Classical evolutionary theory suggests that mating signals of closely related species diverge when populations interact in geographical contact (sympatry) to reduce the costs of maladaptive hybridization or reproductive interference [1–5]. This concept, widely referred to as reproductive character displacement (RCD) [2,5,6], is thought to explain patterns of divergence in both signals and signal recognition systems, particularly in anurans [6–8] and birds [9,10]. An alternative hypothesis, first suggested by West-Eberhard [11], is that agonistic signals functioning in social competition may also diverge to reduce the costs of misdirected interspecific aggression—a process now termed agonistic character displacement (ACD) [12–14]. Standard forms of both RCD and ACD predict signal divergence in sympatry, making them difficult to disentangle through observational studies [9,15,16] and thus, their relative contribution to patterns of trait evolution is often unclear [12–14].
RCD is by definition exclusively divergent, whereas a key discriminating feature of ACD is that, under certain conditions, social signals of competing species may theoretically converge to mediate interspecific territoriality and facilitate competitor recognition [13,14,17–19]. Evidence for convergent ACD has been accumulating over recent years. For example, theoretical studies have concluded that socially mediated signal convergence among ecological competitors is plausible [13,20], while empirical studies have reported community-wide or interspecific patterns consistent with this hypothesis [15,18,21,22]. Nonetheless, demonstrating that species interactions drive convergence in social signals remains challenging because similar effects can be produced by (i) hybridization, (ii) heterospecific copying of learned signals, and (iii) ecological adaptation to shared habitats [9,23–26], all of which can increase signal similarity between sympatric taxa [26]. One way of accounting for these factors is to assess whether convergence can reverse the classic spatial pattern associated with character displacement—i.e. a gradient of increasing trait similarity from allopatry to sympatry [27]—while controlling for underlying environmental variation [28]. However, few studies have adopted this approach, partly because it is difficult to map variation of signal traits in relation to habitat at continental scales [29].
To address this issue, we analysed the acoustic structure of song in two species of antbird—Peruvian warbling-antbird (Hypocnemis peruviana) and yellow-breasted warbling-antbird (H. subflava)—which appear to use convergent songs to defend interspecific territories where their ranges overlap in western Amazonia [16,17]. Despite their similar songs, these non-sister taxa are separated by 6.8% sequence divergence in mitochondrial DNA [30], and experiments in captivity have demonstrated that females can discriminate between individuals and species with high accuracy on the basis of song [31]. Accordingly, they rarely if ever hybridize [17]. Moreover, Hypocnemis antbirds are tracheophone suboscine passerines, a group for which a range of observational and experimental evidence suggests that songs are genetically determined (innate) [22,26,32–34]. Accordingly, the advantage of the Hypocnemis system is that song convergence is unlikely to be caused by either hybridization or heterospecific copying, two factors which may explain similar patterns of variation reported in oscine passerines (songbirds with learned songs) [13,18,35].
Previous work has shown that H. peruviana responds more aggressively to playback of H. subflava territorial song in sympatry than allopatry [17]. However, the extent to which this behaviour reflects spatial convergence in song was not clear because the findings were based on observations from just three sites, one in sympatry and one for each species in allopatry, reporting no consistent pattern of divergence or convergence in acoustic traits [17]. In addition, previous comparisons between sympatry and allopatry did not take into account the role of environmental factors such as vegetation density, which can influence song evolution by acoustic adaptation to the sound transmission properties of the signalling environment [23,24,26].
We conducted field surveys and compiled sound files from public and private archives to estimate song variation over the entire range of H. peruviana and H. subflava, sampling widely within both sympatric and allopatric zones. This approach included all known subspecies, some of which are allopatric and others partially sympatric. We first compared songs of the different subspecies to assess whether patterns of signal variation were predicted by geographical contact between taxa. We then focused on the taxon with the widest range and deepest sampling (H. peruviana) to assess whether its song converges from allopatry towards the contact zone, where it interacts with H. subflava. Finally, to control for patterns of convergence attributable to acoustic adaptation, we incorporated environmental data from remote sensing into spatial models of signal variation.
2. Material and methods
(a). Study system
All Hypocnemis antbirds inhabit dense forest in the Amazon basin and foothills of the Andes [30,36]. The ranges of H. peruviana and H. subflava overlap in Southwest Peru, West Brazil, and North Bolivia, with the region of sympatry spanning approximately 1100 km at its widest point and covering over 150 000 km2 [17]. They sing at similar heights above ground, and occupy similar foraging niches, including near-identical foraging techniques, diet, and biometric traits [17,30]. Both species compete for territories in ecotonal or successional vegetation, although otherwise they are partially segregated into two core habitats—H. peruviana mainly in terra firme forest; H. subflava mainly in Guadua bamboo [17]—which are distributed in a complex mosaic throughout the contact zone [37].
Hypocnemis peruviana and H. subflava are highly divergent in terms of plumage signals [17], but some of their acoustic signals are very similar (figure 1). In particular, both species use a multi-note sex-specific song that mediates mate choice and territorial defence in both sexes and is given either as solos or male-led duets [17,32]. We focus on the male song because females sing less frequently, and often by overlapping male songs [39], making it difficult to collate a large sample of unmasked high-quality sound files for analysis.
Figure 1.
Songs of sympatric H. p. peruviana and H. s. collinsi (grey) are more similar in peak frequency and pace than predicted from their genetic distance (% mtDNA sequence divergence). Songs of H. s. collinsi are broadly similar to those of H. p. peruviana (sympatric), but differ significantly in both peak frequency and pace from conspecific H. s. subflava (allopatric). Levels of significance following false discovery rates (FDR) correction: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, n.s., not significant. Spectrograms show representative songs of (left to right) H. p. saturata, H. p. peruviana, H. s. collinsi, and H. s. subflava. Songs of H. p. peruviana and H. s. collinsi were both recorded in the contact zone. Illustrations are reproduced with the permission of Lynx Edicions [38].
(b). Song sampling and analysis
We obtained song recordings of all four subspecies (H. p. peruviana, H. p. saturata, H. s. subflava, H. s. collinsi) from a total of 86 different localities distributed throughout their geographical ranges (30 sympatric sites; 58 allopatric sites). We recorded 193 individuals during fieldwork in Brazil, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru between 2001 and 2011. Field recordings were made using a Marantz PMD 661 or Sound Devices 722 portable recorder with a Sennheiser microphone (MKH 8050 or ME67-K3U). Additional recordings were compiled from global sound archives, including xeno-canto (http://xeno-canto.org; 2 recordings) and Macaulay Library (http://macaulaylibrary.org; 18 recordings), as well as private collections (141 recordings; see electronic supplementary material for a discussion of sampling methods and limitations, and a complete list of recording localities; electronic supplementary material, table S1). All files were saved as 44.1 kHz wav files.
We measured song structure using Raven Pro 1.4 (Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA), sampling at least six high-quality songs per individual where possible. The final dataset contained approximately 40 000 measurements from 1661 songs of 355 individuals, with a mean (±s.d.) of 4.8 ± 2.2 songs sampled per individual, and 4.1 ± 5.5 individuals sampled per site. We processed these songs using the MatLab signal processing toolbox (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA), automatically extracting a total of 22 spectral and temporal acoustic measures for analysis (electronic supplementary material, table S3; see electronic supplementary material for a full description of song analyses). In addition to analyses performed using all 22 acoustic measures, we followed previous studies of species with similar songs [9,22,40] by performing separate analyses on two of those measures, mean note peak frequency (hereafter, peak frequency) and overall song pace (hereafter, pace). The peak frequency was generated by calculating peak frequencies for each note of the song, and then taking the average across the entire song. Pace was calculated by dividing the number of notes minus 1, by the song duration minus mean note duration (see [9]; electronic supplementary material, table S3).
(c). Quantifying environmental gradients
Previous studies based on a geographic information systems (GIS) approach have shown that remotely sensed environmental data can predict both Amazonian tree species composition and song structure in rainforest understorey birds [23,41,42]. This makes sense because GIS vegetation indices relate to canopy structure, which is known to regulate illumination, and thus vegetation growth and leaf density, in the understorey [43]. In accordance with the sensory drive hypothesis, the vegetation structure and density of the understorey has been shown to affect signal transmission in Amazonian birds [26].
We used an established set of GIS methods [23,41,42] to quantify environmental variation across the geographical ranges of our study taxa. Specifically, we estimated elevation using Global Multi-resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 (https://topotools.cr.usgs.gov/gmted_viewer/), at a spatial resolution of 30 arcsec (root mean square error range: 24–42 m), and estimated climate using bioclimatic variables (annual mean temperature [BIO01] and annual precipitation [BIO12]) from the WorldClim Database [44]. Both elevation and climate data were obtained at a 1 km2 resolution. To estimate habitat structure, we extracted two variables remotely sensed from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS; http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov) at a resolution of 250 m: (i) Vegetation Continuous Field (VCF) [45] for 2010 and (ii) Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) collected in August–September 2011. These time periods were chosen because of their relevance to the time of greatest fieldwork effort (see electronic supplementary material for further details and vegetation rasters; electronic supplementary material, figures S1 and S2). The VCF product (https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/dataprod/mod44.php) represents per cent tree cover, a relevant environmental variable in terms of signal transmission because it is theoretically related to habitat density, and has previously been shown to predict variation in song pitch of tropical forest birds [23,41]. EVI is a composite property of leaf area, chlorophyll, and canopy structure, considered more sensitive, at least in high biomass regions such as rainforest, to variation in canopy structure [46], which is typically saturated in MODIS' other vegetation index, the normalized difference vegetation index [47]. To address cloud contamination—a problem with most remotely sensed data [48]—we substituted in the mean 5 × 5 grid values for 125 points for the EVI and VCF measures.
As we are interested in song convergence towards the contact zone, and the extent to which isolation-by-distance [49] explains patterns of variation in allopatry, we correlated song variation to a linear measure of distance from the contact zone. This linear measurement is appropriate for our study because of the reasonably continuous nature of Amazonian rainforest within the global distribution of H. peruviana. We predicted that songs would show a gradual pattern of divergence or convergence from the zone of sympatry because of the effects of gene flow and isolation-by-distance [17]. We calculated the distance of H. peruviana recording localities from the closest edge of the contact zone using the near table function in ArcGIS 10.1 (Environmental Systems Research Institute 2011, Redlands, CA, USA); all sympatric sites were given a zero value.
(d). Spatial mapping of song structure
We plotted GPS coordinates of all recording sites, and categorized each site as either allopatric or sympatric with reference to published maps of the contact zone [17,36]. We then mapped the structure of H. peruviana song in relation to the structure of H. subflava songs in the contact zone. Specifically, we used the Inverse Distance Weighting function in ArcGIS 10.1 to map values for peak frequency and pace across the entire range of H. peruviana in western Amazonia (see electronic supplementary material for further details).
(e). Statistical analyses
We conducted a principal components analysis (PCA) with varimax rotation on the correlation matrices of individual mean values (log-transformed) of the 22 acoustic traits extracted from song. This reduced the dimensionality of the song dataset and allowed us to quantify how the overall structure of songs varied within and between species and subspecies. The PCA generated seven principal components (PCs) with eigenvalues greater than 1, which accounted for 85% of the variance in the song data. For factor loadings, see electronic supplementary material, table S4.
We compared song differences between the four subspecies using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's HSD post hoc tests on PC scores extracted from song features using STATA 11 (StataCorp 2009). Our aim was to test whether Hypocnemis subspecies had more similar songs when they overlapped in geographical range (H. p. peruviana versus H. s. collinsi) in comparison with non-overlapping ranges (H. p. saturata versus H. s. subflava). Although the geographical ranges of H. p. peruviana and H. s. collinsi only partially overlap, we are focusing on innate acoustic signalling traits, and thus, we expect that unimpeded gene flow from sympatry to allopatry obscures the classic stepped pattern of variation associated with character displacement [17].
To examine this effect, and to determine the effect of sympatry with H. subflava on the song of H. peruviana, we ran generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) with Gaussian distribution and identity link function implemented in the lme4 [50] R Package. In these models, the dependent variable was one of nine aspects of song structure (averaged for each of the 198 individuals of H. peruviana included in the analysis; electronic supplementary material, table S3). To control for environmental gradients, we included five geographical, climatic, and habitat variables (see above) along with distance to contact zone as fixed factors in the GLMM (all variables log-transformed). We also included recording site as a random effect to account for variation in sampling across sites. To account for multiple comparisons on seven PCs and further analyses of peak frequency and pace, we calculated FDR based on those nine comparisons [51,52]. The best models were selected based on the lowest corrected Akaike information criterion score.
3. Results
The overall taxonomic pattern of song variation was consistent with convergent character displacement, with the acoustic structure of H. peruviana and H. subflava songs being more similar in sympatric taxa than in allopatric taxa (figure 1; electronic supplementary material, figures S3–S5).
Specifically, we found that sympatric lineages H. p. peruviana and H. s. collinsi differed significantly in only two of seven PCs extracted from song features, as well as in pace (p = 0.012), while allopatric lineages H. p. saturata and H. s. subflava differed in six out of seven PCs and pace (p < 0.0001). Strikingly, within one species, songs of H. s. collinsi were much more similar to songs of a heterospecific lineage in sympatry (H. p. peruviana) than to a conspecific lineage in allopatry (H. s. subflava), from which it also differed in six out of seven PCs, and both peak frequency (p = 0.0005) and pace (p < 0.0001). Song differences between H. p. peruviana and H. p. saturata are smaller than within H. subflava (also differing in two out of seven PCs, and in peak frequency; p = 0.0005), consistent with their shallower genetic divergence (table 1 and figure 1; electronic supplementary material, figures S3–S5, ANOVA results: electronic supplementary material, table S5). Nevertheless, by modelling song structure in H. peruviana across its range, we found evidence that songs became gradually more similar to those of H. subflava in peak frequency (figure 2), as well as in some temporal features, towards the zone of sympatry.
Table 1.
Comparison of song structure in Hypocnemis lineages, showing greater signal similarity of sympatric taxa compared to allopatric taxa. Honest statistical difference (HSD) statistics and associated p-values from Tukey HSD post hoc tests (following ANOVA) on pairwise comparisons of subspecies' songs described by the seven PCs extracted from song features (electronic supplementary material, table S4). Seq. div., sequence divergence [30]. Italics denote significant differences at p < 0.05 after calculating FDR (see Material and methods). Sympatric H. p. peruviana and H. s. collinsi differ significantly in only two PCs, whereas allopatric H. p. saturata and H. s. subflava with the same genetic distance differ significantly in six PCs.
| subspecies comparison | seq. div. | geographic relationship | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H. p. saturata versus H. p. peruviana | 2.2% | allopatric | 1.29 n.s. |
5.28
0.002 |
5.03
0.003 |
1.49 n.s. |
0.22 n.s. |
3.65 0.05 |
3.39 0.08 |
| H. p. peruviana versus H. s. collinsi | 6.8% | sympatric | 0.30 n.s. |
2.72 n.s. |
2.69 n.s. |
5.06
0.003 |
2.22 n.s. |
5.78
0.0003 |
1.63 ns |
| H. s. collinsi versus H. s. subflava | 3.6% | allopatric |
5.52
0.0007 |
3.25 0.1 |
12.76
<0.0001 |
10.04
<0.0001 |
6.52
<0.0001 |
5.40
0.001 |
7.00
<0.0001 |
| H. p. saturata versus H. s. subflava | 6.8% | allopatric |
7.11
<0.0001 |
5.82
0.0003 |
10.43
<0.0001 |
13.62
<0.0001 |
4.52
0.009 |
4.03
0.024 |
1.98 ns |
Figure 2.
Spatial distribution of peak frequency of the songs of H. peruviana, revealing convergence towards the contact zone with H. subflava. Shown are the ranges of H. peruviana (purple outline) and H. subflava (green outline), and their extensive region of overlap. In the song frequency legend, red represents the frequency bandwidth that includes H. s. collinsi mean peak frequency of 2916 Hz (mean H. s. subflava frequency was 3112 Hz). Frequencies become more different from H. s. collinsi as colours diverge along a gradient from pink (lowest peak frequency) to dark blue (highest peak frequency) with greater distance from the contact zone. The most similar peak frequencies (red) are within the contact zone and immediately adjacent areas. The background image illustrates EVI for August 2011. Dots indicate recording localities for H. p. peruviana (cyan), H. p. saturata (blue), H. s. subflava (yellow), and H. s. collinsi (red).
We found a significant effect of distance from the contact zone on two PCs. Both of these showed a pattern of convergence: PC6 (GLMM: t = 2.65, p = 0.014) and PC7 (t 4.07, p = 0.0003; electronic supplementary material, table S6). PC6 is associated with the mean minimum and peak frequencies; PC7 is associated with the mean and variance in note peak time, a measure of the temporal patterning of notes [15]. In other words, the songs of H. peruviana became more similar to those of H. subflava in pitch and aspects of temporal structure as they approached the contact zone. The remaining PCs showed no pattern of convergence or divergence in H. peruviana song towards the contact zone (electronic supplementary material, table S6; all results after correcting for FDR [51–53]). Furthermore, we found a significant pattern of convergence towards the contact zone in peak frequency (figures 2 and 3a), but no significant effect on pace (figure 3b; electronic supplementary material, figure S6 and table S6).
Figure 3.

Convergence in song structure towards the contact zone between H. peruviana and H. s. collinsi. Shown is log mean peak frequency (a) and log mean pace (b) for each individual of H. peruviana (blue) and H. s. collinsi (red), plotted against distance from the contact zone, with sympatric individuals illustrated at zero distance.
Incorporating five environmental variables obtained from remote sensing data (electronic supplementary material, table S2) into GLMMs, and after correcting for FDR (electronic supplementary material, table S7), we only found weak relationships between environment and song, none of which remained significant following FDR correction. Our overall models include these effects, indicating that overall patterns of song convergence towards the contact zone are not explained by correlations with environmental variables linked to vegetation density. This result is consistent with direct observations at field sites, suggesting that vegetation structure of rainforest habitat occupied by H. peruviana is roughly similar across its geographical range in western Amazonia.
4. Discussion
Our spatial analyses show that key aspects of the territorial songs of two antbird species converge over large geographical scales from allopatry to sympatry, and also suggest that this pattern arises independently of underlying environmental gradients. In addition, the details of the Hypocnemis system allow us to reject two further hypotheses for spatial convergence: heterospecific song copying and hybridization in sympatry [17,33]. Evidence for spatial convergence is consistent with taxonomic patterns of vocal variation, particularly given that songs of H. s. collinsi are more similar to sympatric H. p. peruviana than they are to their own allopatric conspecifics (H. s. subflava). These findings contrast with the dominant view that song variation largely reflects phylogeny [40,54,55], and suggest that interspecific interactions have driven convergent signal evolution in both our study species. The observed patterns of song variation are opposite to the predictions of standard character displacement theory [5,27], but consistent with theoretical models of convergent ACD mediated by social competition [13,14,19].
One aspect of our results that deviates from the predictions of convergent ACD is that signal convergence appears to be asymmetric, with song characters in sympatry sometimes non-intermediate between the allopatric means (figure 1) or occasionally overshooting the respective mean trait in heterospecifics (figure 3). Only one trait (PC1) shows the symmetrical pattern of meeting in the middle when lineages interact. It is not clear why asymmetric convergence arises. It may be because of asymmetries in competitive ability, or simply because characters involved in social competition evolve rapidly [11] and at different rates across lineages. Signal design may also be shaped by interactions with further species, perhaps through signal partitioning to minimize interference [56]. However, previous community-wide analyses in the sympatric zone found no evidence of partitioning across 307 bird species [22]. Moreover, playback experiments in their contact zone indicate that neither H. p. peruviana nor H. s. collinsi respond to the (highly divergent) song of their closest sympatric relative (Drymophila devillei) [17]. Although minor asymmetries in trait variation remain unexplained in this system, key traits are nonetheless more similar in sympatry than allopatry, and thus, both spatial and taxonomic analyses provide more support for convergent ACD than divergent RCD.
Classic examples of song divergence in sympatry are widely reported [7,9,57] and intuitively plausible, given that divergent signals are thought to reduce the costs of competitive or reproductive interference [4]. Why might divergent selection be outweighed by convergence in Hypocnemis? Like most birdsongs [58], Hypocnemis songs function in both mate attraction and territory defence [16], yet interference costs appear to be circumvented in this case by secondary adaptations, including divergent visual signals and finely tuned receiver perception [17,31]. In particular, previous experiments have shown that females of both species can easily differentiate between conspecific and heterospecific male songs, suggesting that accurate mate recognition can accommodate convergent ACD in song characters [31]. It seems likely that selection for mate recognition targets particular components of song structure in Hypocnemis, perhaps explaining why some acoustic characters of H. peruviana and H. subflava appear divergent, or at least non-convergent, in sympatry.
In H. peruviana, our data reveal that convergence is gradual from allopatry towards the contact zone, rather than a rapid step in characters at the boundary between allopatry and sympatry. We suspect that patterns of gradual signal convergence extending beyond the contact zone may be commonplace for two reasons. First, geographical ranges fluctuate, and thus the boundary between sympatry and allopatry may shift over time, blurring any abrupt spatial step in signal traits or their underlying genes. Second, signal traits under selection in the contact zone may be transferred into allopatric populations in the absence of barriers to gene flow, producing a gradient of song characters.
A possible alternative explanation for spatial gradients in song is that they are driven by an underlying environmental gradient coupled with acoustic adaptation (e.g. [23–25,41]). Because we sampled songs from numerous localities, and often from digital sound archives, we were not able to directly estimate variation in sound transmission or vegetation density, both of which have been shown to shape acoustic signal structure [23,25,26,41,59]. Instead, we estimated environmental conditions using remote sensing data, representing variation in vegetation density, elevation, and climate. Although there are limitations to remote sensing data because of the relative coarseness of sampling, the variables we selected are widely used to control for environmental variation in studies of signal evolution [9,23,29,41]. Moreover, the levels of environmental variation we detected accurately reflect the fact that the global range of H. peruviana is almost entirely restricted to lowland tropical rainforest with little variation in topography or vegetation density [17,36]. Our analyses therefore suggest that convergence in song traits does not arise through ecological selection exerted by the signal transmission properties of the environment, but rather by a socially mediated mechanism such as ACD.
Convergent ACD may be more frequent in diverse communities, including tropical rainforests, where interspecific territoriality is widespread [60], and many species coexist with similar ecological and signalling traits [15,60]. Regardless of whether species in hyper-diverse communities have assembled through ecological sorting of existing phenotypes [61], or instead converged in ecological characters towards peaks in the adaptive landscape [20], their coexistence may be facilitated by competitor recognition [13,14]. From this perspective, convergent ACD may provide further insight into the mechanisms explaining patterns of species coexistence and the build-up of tropical diversity in vertebrate systems.
Divergent forms of character displacement, including both RCD and ACD, have traditionally been thought to play an important role in driving phenotypic divergence and explaining signal variation across geographical space [9,62,63]. While these patterns may indeed be widespread, the allopatry-to-sympatry gradients explored in this study provide new evidence that ACD can also shape signal phenotypes the opposite way by driving broad-scale convergence towards regions of coexistence between ecological competitors. Our results add weight to previous theoretical and local-scale evidence for convergent ACD [13,14,17,19], and highlight its role in shaping geographical variation of nimal signals at continental scales.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to numerous field ornithologists for contributing songs to this study, particularly M. and P. Isler and G. Budney (Macaulay Library, Cornell). We also thank A. Aleixo, H. Alvarez, R. Amable, M. Bianchini, V. Gamarra, D. Garcia-Olaechea, E. Guilherme, A. Jameson, A. Lees, P. Long, H. MacGregor, B. Nelson, E. Nishikawa, G. Olah, B. Poje, P. Pulgarin, D. Romo, T. Valqui, N. Yavit, plus the staff at ‘AIDER’ Amazon Conservation Association, Los Amigos Research Station (CICRA), Amazon Research Conservation Center, Corbidi, Ecuador's Ministerio del Ambiente, Heath River Wildlife Center, INRENA, RNTAMB, SERNANP, Tiputini Biodiversity Station, and Rainforest Expeditions for assistance with data collection, logistics, and analyses.
Data accessibility
Data accessibility. Data available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3qk289c [64].
Authors' contributions
J.A.T. and N.S. initially conceived the study and all authors designed the research; A.N.G.K., N.S., and J.A.T. collected data; A.N.G.K. analysed data; A.N.G.K. and J.A.T. wrote the manuscript.
Competing interests
We declare we have no competing interests.
Funding
This research was supported by an FP7 Marie Curie International Incoming Fellowship (ANGK), a Royal Society University Research Fellowship (NS), and a John Fell award (JAT).
References
- 1.Dobzhansky T. 1951. Genetics and the origin of species, 3rd edn New York, NY: Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Butlin R. 1987. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2, 8–13. ( 10.1016/0169-5347(87)90193-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Servedio MR, Noor MAF. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 339–364. ( 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132412) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Groning J, Hochkirch A. 2008. Reproductive interference between animal species. Q. Rev. Biol. 83, 257–282. ( 10.1086/590510) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pfennig KS, Pfennig DW. 2009. Character displacement: ecological and reproductive responses to a common evolutionary problem. Q. Rev. Biol. 84, 253–276. ( 10.1086/605079) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gerhardt HC. 1994. Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the gray treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Anim. Behav. 47, 959–969. ( 10.1006/anbe.1994.1127) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lemmon EM. 2009. Diversification of conspecific signals in sympatry: geographic overlap drives multidimensional reproductive character displacement in frogs. Evolution 63, 1155–1170. ( 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00650.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pfennig KS, Pfennig DW. 2005. Character displacement as the ‘best of a bad situation’: fitness trade-offs resulting from selection to minimize resource and mate competition. Evolution 59, 2200–2208. ( 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00928.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kirschel ANG, Blumstein DT, Smith TB. 2009. Character displacement of song and morphology in African tinkerbirds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8256–8261. ( 10.1073/pnas.0810124106) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Saetre GP, Moum T, Bures S, Kral M, Adamjan M, Moreno J. 1997. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387, 589–592. ( 10.1038/42451) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.West-Eberhard MJ. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58, 155–183. ( 10.1086/413215) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Grether GF, Anderson CN, Drury JP, Kirschel ANG, Losin N, Okamoto K, Peiman KS. 2013. The evolutionary consequences of interspecific aggression. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1289, 48–68. ( 10.1111/nyas.12082) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Grether GF, Losin N, Anderson CN, Okamoto K. 2009. The role of interspecific interference competition in character displacement and the evolution of competitor recognition. Biol. Rev. 84, 617–635. ( 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00089.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Grether GF, Peiman KS, Tobias JA, Robinson BW. 2017. Causes and consequences of behavioral interference between species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 760–772. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2017.07.004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tobias JA, Cornwallis CK, Derryberry EP, Claramunt S, Brumfield RT, Seddon N. 2014. Species coexistence and the dynamics of phenotypic evolution in adaptive radiation. Nature 506, 359–363. ( 10.1038/nature12874) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tobias JA, Gamarra-Toledo V, Garcia-Olaechea D, Pulgarin PC, Seddon N. 2011. Year-round resource defence and the evolution of male and female song in suboscine birds: social armaments are mutual ornaments. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 2118–2138. ( 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02345.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tobias JA, Seddon N. 2009. Signal design and perception in Hypocnemis antbirds: evidence for convergent evolution via social selection. Evolution 63, 3168–3189. ( 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00795.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Laiolo P. 2012. Interspecific interactions drive cultural co-evolution and acoustic convergence in syntopic species. J. Anim. Ecol. 81, 594–604. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01946.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cody ML. 1969. Convergent characteristics in sympatric species—a possible relation to interspecific competition and aggression. Condor 71, 223–239. ( 10.2307/1366300) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Scheffer M, van Nes EH.. 2006. Self-organized similarity, the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6230–6235. ( 10.1073/pnas.0508024103) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Leighton GM, Lees AC, Miller ET. 2018. The hairy–downy game revisited: an empirical test of the interspecific social dominance mimicry hypothesis. Anim. Behav. 137, 141–148. ( 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.01.012) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tobias JA, Planque R, Cram DL, Seddon N. 2014. Species interactions and the structure of complex communication networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1020–1025. ( 10.1073/pnas.1314337111) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kirschel ANG, Blumstein DT, Cohen RE, Buermann W, Smith TB, Slabbekoorn H. 2009. Birdsong tuned to the environment: green hylia song varies with elevation, tree cover, and noise. Behav. Ecol. 20, 1089–1095. ( 10.1093/beheco/arp101) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Seddon N. 2005. Ecological adaptation and species recognition drives vocal evolution in neotropical suboscine birds. Evolution 59, 200–215. ( 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00906.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Slabbekoorn H, Smith TB. 2002. Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: an analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals. Evolution 56, 1849–1858. ( 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00199.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tobias JA, Aben J, Brumfield RT, Derryberry EP, Halfwerk W, Slabbekoorn H, Seddon N. 2010. Song divergence by sensory drive in Amazonian birds. Evolution 64, 2820–2839. ( 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01067.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Servedio MR. 2004. The what and why of research on reinforcement. PLoS Biol. 2, 2032–2035. ( 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020420) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Goldberg EE, Lande R. 2006. Ecological and reproductive character displacement on an environmental gradient. Evolution 60, 1344–1357. ( 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01214.x). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Smith TB, Harrigan RJ, Kirschel ANG, Buermann W, Saatchi S, Blumstein DT, de Kort SR, Slabbekoorn H.. 2013. Predicting bird song from space. Evol. Appl. 6, 865–874. ( 10.1111/Eva.12072) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tobias JA, Bates JM, Hackett SJ, Seddon N. 2008. Comment on the latitudinal gradient in recent speciation and extinction rates of birds and mammals. Science 319, 901 ( 10.1126/science.1150568) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Seddon N, Tobias JA. 2010. Character displacement from the receiver's perspective: species and mate recognition despite convergent signals in suboscine birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 2475–2483. ( 10.1098/rspb.2010.0210) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Seddon N, Tobias JA. 2006. Duets defend mates in a suboscine passerine, the warbling antbird (Hypocnemis cantator). Behav. Ecol. 17, 73–83. ( 10.1093/Beheco/Ari096) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tobias JA, Brawn JD, Brumfield RT, Derryberry EP, Kirschel ANG, Seddon N. 2012. The importance of neotropical suboscine birds as study systems in ecology and evolution. Ornitol. Neotrop. 23, 259–272. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Touchton JM, Seddon N, Tobias JA. 2014. Captive rearing experiments confirm song development without learning in a tracheophone suboscine bird. PLoS ONE 9, e0095746 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0095746) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Reif J, Jiran M, Reifova R, Vokurkova J, Dolata PT, Petrusek A, Petruskova T. 2015. Interspecific territoriality in two songbird species: potential role of song convergence in male aggressive interactions. Anim. Behav. 104, 131–136. ( 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.03.016) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Isler ML, Isler PR, Whitney BM. 2007. Species limits in antbirds (Thamnophilidae): the Warbling Antbird (Hypocnemis cantator) complex. Auk 124, 11–28. ( 10.1642/0004-8038(2007)12411:SLIATT]2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Smith M, Nelson BW. 2011. Fire favours expansion of bamboo-dominated forests in the south-west Amazon. J. Trop. Ecol. 27, 59–64. ( 10.1017/S026646741000057X) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, Kirwan G. 2018. Handbook of the birds of the world alive. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tobias JA, Seddon N. 2009. Signal jamming mediates sexual conflict in a duetting bird. Curr. Biol. 19, 577–582. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.036) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nwankwo EC, Pallari CT, Hadjioannou L, Ioannou A, Mulwa RK, Kirschel ANG. 2018. Rapid song divergence leads to discordance between genetic distance and phenotypic characters important in reproductive isolation. Ecol. Evol. 8, 716–731. ( 10.1002/ece3.3673) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kirschel ANG, Slabbekoorn H, Blumstein DT, Cohen RE, de Kort SR, Buermann W, Smith TB. 2011. Testing alternative hypotheses for evolutionary diversification in an African songbird: rainforest refugia versus ecological gradients. Evolution 65, 3162–3174. ( 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01386.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Saatchi S, Buermann W, ter Steege H, Mori S, Smith TB. 2008. Modeling distribution of Amazonian tree species and diversity using remote sensing measurements. Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 2000–2017. ( 10.1016/j.rse.2008.01.008) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jennings SB, Brown ND, Sheil D. 1999. Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures. Forestry 72, 59–73. ( 10.1093/forestry/72.1.59) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978. ( 10.1002/Joc.1276) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hansen MC, DeFries RS, Townshend JRG, Sohlberg R, Dimiceli C, Carroll M. 2002. Towards an operational MODIS continuous field of percent tree cover algorithm: examples using AVHRR and MODIS data. Remote Sens. Environ. 83, 303–319. ( 10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00079-2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Huete A, Didan K, Miura T, Rodriguez EP, Gao X, Ferreira LG. 2002. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 83, 195–213. ( 10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00096-2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Phillips LB, Hansen AJ, Flather CH. 2008. Evaluating the species energy relationship with the newest measures of ecosystem energy: NDVI versus MODIS primary production. Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 3538–3549. ( 10.1016/j.rse.2008.04.012) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Thomassen HA, Cheviron ZA, Freedman AH, Harrigan RJ, Wayne RK, Smith TB. 2010. Spatial modelling and landscape-level approaches for visualizing intra-specific variation. Mol. Ecol. 19, 3532–3548. ( 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04737.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wright S. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28, 114–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48. ( 10.18637/jss.v067.i01). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Methodol. 57, 289–300. ( 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Verhoeven KJF, Simonsen KL, McIntyre LM. 2005. Implementing false discovery rate control: increasing your power. Oikos 108, 643–647. ( 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13727.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 2000. On the adaptive control of the false discovery fate in multiple testing with independent statistics. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 25, 60–83. ( 10.3102/10769986025001060) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Price JJ, Lanyon SM. 2002. Reconstructing the evolution of complex bird song in the oropendolas. Evolution 56, 1514–1529. ( 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01462.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Farnsworth A, Lovette IJ. 2008. Phylogenetic and ecological effects on interspecific variation in structurally simple avian vocalizations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 94, 155–173. ( 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.00973.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chek AA, Bogart JP, Lougheed SC. 2003. Mating signal partitioning in multi-species assemblages: a null model test using frogs. Ecol. Lett. 6, 235–247. ( 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00420.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Grant BR, Grant PR. 2010. Songs of Darwin's finches diverge when a new species enters the community. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20 156–20 163. ( 10.1073/pnas.1015115107) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Collins S. 2004. Vocal fighting and flirting: the functions of birdsong. In Nature's music (eds Marler PA, Slabbekoorn H), pp. 39–79. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wiley RH, Richards DG. 1982. Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In Acoustic communication in birds (eds Kroodsma DE, Miller EH), pp. 131–181. New York, NY: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Robinson SK, Terborgh J. 1995. Interspecific aggression and habitat selection by Amazonian birds. J. Anim. Ecol. 64, 1–11. ( 10.2307/5822) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pigot AL, Trisos CH, Tobias JA. 2016. Functional traits reveal the expansion and packing of ecological niche space underlying an elevational diversity gradient in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20152013 ( 10.1098/rspb.2015.2013) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Brown WL, Wilson EO. 1956. Character displacement. Syst. Zool. 5, 49–64. ( 10.2307/2411924) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Schluter D, Price TD, Grant PR. 1985. Ecological character displacement in Darwin's finches. Science 227, 1056–1059. ( 10.1126/science.227.4690.1056) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kirschel A, Seddon N, Tobias J. 2019. Data from: Range-wide spatial mapping reveals convergent character displacement of bird song Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.3qk289c) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- Kirschel A, Seddon N, Tobias J. 2019. Data from: Range-wide spatial mapping reveals convergent character displacement of bird song Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.3qk289c) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data accessibility. Data available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3qk289c [64].


