Abstract
The work is focused on the design of drugs that prevent and treat Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and its complications. A series of 3–(4-aminophenyl)-coumarin derivatives designed, synthesised, fully characterised and evaluated in vitro/vivo. The biological assay experiments showed that some compounds displayed a clearly selective inhibition for acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE). Among all compounds, compound 4m exhibited the highest AChE inhibition with an IC50 value of 0.091 ± 0.011 µM and compound 4k exhibited the highest BuChE inhibition with an IC50 value of 0.559 ± 0.017 µM. A zebrafish behaviour analyser (Zebrobox) was used to determine the behavioural effects of the active compound on the movement distance of the aluminium chloride-induced zebrafish. Compound 4m offered a potential drug design concept for the development of therapeutic or preventive agents for AD and its complications.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, 3–(4-aminophenyl)-coumarin, acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase, zebrafish
1. Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease is a degenerative disease of the central nervous system that is mainly characterised by progressive memory impairment1,2. AD has brought heavy burdens to society and family because of the characteristics of progressive memory loss and loss of acquired knowledge3. The main characteristic pathological changes in the brain of patients with AD are the appearance of senile plaques (SPs)4 with extracellular amyloid β-protein (Aβ) deposition, and intracellular Tau hyperphosphorylation, formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs)5, and loss of neurons6. Today there are 47 million people living with dementia worldwide. By 2050, this number will have increased above 135 million. Dementia affects 3.9 persons out of 1000 at the age ranging from 60 to 647.
Although some work has been done on the pathogenesis of AD, there is no comprehensive and substantial cognition. The pathological theory widely accepted in the world is the “cholinergic hypothesis”. Acetylcholine is the neurotransmitter in the brain. The cholinergic hypothesis proposes that AD is caused by reduced synthesis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine. ACh deficiency may cause learning loss and memory decline in patients. ACh levels and restoration of cholinergic nerve conduction can improve AD patients’ memory ability and cognitive level to reduce their symptoms. Therefore, increasing the ACh content in the brain of AD patients is a treatment for AD. AChE, a key enzyme in biological nerve conduction, can degrade ACh and terminate the excitatory effects of neurotransmitters on the postsynaptic membrane, which may be related to the formation of AD8. At present, there are no specific drugs for the treatment of AD. AChE inhibitors are currently the only ones that are universally recognised and have significant therapeutic effects in the world. They have a good effect on the treatment of mild-to-moderate AD. Among the mature AChE inhibitor drugs studied, there are mainly tacrine, donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine9 and so on. Coumarin compounds are natural compounds with benzopyran ring nucleus. Previous studies showed that Schiff bases derivatives containing a triazole ring, uracil derivatives, aryl methanesulfonate derivatives are potent AChE and BChE inhibitors10–12. In addition to AChE, BuChE is important in the regulation of cholinergic system and it is reported to efficiently catalyse the hydrolysis of acetylcholine13. BuChE, an enzyme that breaks down artificial butyrylcholine, is known to hydrolyse ACh and other ester derivatives in the body14. BuChE, which is a tetrameric serine esterase consisting of monomers of ∼90-kDa molecular mass, showed over 65% structural similarity to AChE15. BuChE is expressed in a distinct population of neurons, some of which contain AChE. The importance of BuChE is further supported by the observation that AChE-knockout mice survive to adulthood indicating that BuChE is able to compensate for the lack of AChE, allowing the continued regulation of cholinergic neurotransmission16.
The drug’s efficacy depends on the interactions between the ligand and the biological target. The type of interactions affects the molecular mechanism of ligands inhibition of ChE activity. The research of new ChE inhibitory compounds is nowadays urgently needed17. Piazzi et al. 18 constructed a series of benzylpiperidine-coumarin derivatives by linking a benzylpiperidine moiety and a coumarin scaffold through a benzene ring. Here, we focus on the synthesis of 3–(4-aminophenyl)-coumarin derivatives and preliminary study of their pharmacological activities. This work has designed and synthesised a series of compounds and carried out a series of active screening around the research of anti-AD.
2. Results and discussion
2.1. Chemistry
The synthetic route of the 3–(4-aminophenyl)-coumarin derivatives are summarised in (Scheme 1). Starting from substituted p-aminophenylacetic acids and substituted o-hydroxybenzaldehydes, 2a–2c was obtained by Perkin reaction, followed by acidification with hydrochloric acid to give 3–(4-aminophenyl)-coumarin 3a–3c. A series of substituted benzoyl chlorides were synthesised by reference methods and used in the next reaction19. The amide condensation of 3a–3c with an acid chloride in a mixed solution of pyridine and acetone gives compounds 4a–4s (Table 1). Details on the chemical and spectroscopic characterisations of compounds 4a–4s were described in the Supporting Information.
Scheme 1.
General synthetic route to 3–(4-aminophenyl)-coumarin 3a–3c and compounds 4a–4s. Reagents and conditions: a) acetic anhydride, Et3N, 115 °C; b) HCl ethanol; c) (COCl)2, DCM, reflux; d) 3–(4-aminophenyl)-coumarin 3a–3c, acetone, pyridine, and RT.
Table 1.
Compounds 4a–4s, 5a–5b, 6a–6b, and 7a–7d.
| Product | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4a | H | OH | H | F | H | H | H | 66 |
| 4b | H | OH | H | H | F | H | H | 70 |
| 4c | H | OH | H | H | CH3 | H | H | 58 |
| 4d | H | OH | H | H | CH2Cl | H | H | 77 |
| 4e | H | OH | H | CH3 | H | H | H | 85 |
| 4f | H | OH | H | Cl | H | H | H | 81 |
| 4g | H | OH | F | H | H | H | H | 72 |
| 4h | H | OH | H | H | Cl | H | H | 80 |
| 4i | H | OH | H | CH3 | H | CH3 | H | 72 |
| 4j | OCH3 | H | H | F | H | H | H | 75 |
| 4k | OCH3 | H | H | H | F | H | H | 78 |
| 4l | OCH3 | H | H | H | CF3 | H | H | 68 |
| 4m | OCH3 | H | H | H | CH2Cl | H | H | 70 |
| 4n | OCH3 | H | H | Cl | H | H | H | 81 |
| 4o | OCH3 | H | H | CH3 | H | H | H | 87 |
| 4p | OCH3 | H | F | H | H | H | H | 82 |
| 4q | OCH3 | H | OCH3 | H | H | H | H | 77 |
| 4r | OCH3 | H | Cl | Cl | H | H | H | 62 |
| 4s | OCH3 | OH | H | H | CH2Cl | H | H | 58 |
| 5a | H | OH | – | – | – | – | – | 70 |
| 5b | OCH3 | H | – | – | – | – | – | 75 |
| 6a | H | OH | – | – | – | – | – | 78 |
| 6b | OCH3 | H | – | – | – | – | – | 82 |
| 7a | H | OH | – | – | – | – | – | 65 |
| 7b | OCH3 | H | – | – | – | – | – | 72 |
| 7c | OCH3 | H | – | – | – | – | – | 65 |
| 7d | OCH3 | H | – | – | – | – | – | 72 |
The synthetic route of 3–(4-aminophenyl)-coumarin derivatives bearing heterocycles is summarised in Scheme 2. Hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt) and dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) was added into an anhydrous toluene solution containing compounds 1–6. Then, compound 3a or 3b was added to the reaction solution, respectively. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 8–16 h to give compounds 5a–5b, 6a–6b, and 7a–7d (Table 1). Details on the chemical and spectroscopic characterisations of compounds 5a–5b, 6a–6b, and 7a–7d were described in the Supporting Information.
Scheme 2.
General synthetic route to compounds 5a–5b, 6a–6b, and 7a–7d. Reagents and conditions: e) 3–(4-aminophenyl)-coumarin 3a–3b, DCC, HOBt, toluene, and RT.
2.2. Biological evaluation
2.2.1. In vitro cholinesterase inhibitory activity
AChE belongs to serine hydrolase family of enzymes catalysing the hydrolysis of neurotransmitter ACh into choline and acetic acid, consequently causing cessation of cholinergic neurotransmission20. AChE is widely distributed in conducting tissues like nerves and muscles, central and peripheral tissues, motor, and sensory fibres in addition to cholinergic and non-cholinergic fibres21. It is also present in plasma and blood cells22,23. As shown in Table 2, only eight compounds (m, 4f, 4j, 4 l, 4o, 5a, 7 b, and 7d) presented moderate to excellent AChE inhibitory activity. Notably, 4 m (IC50 = 0.091 ± 0.011 μM) had relatively strong activity, which was weaker than donepezil (IC50 = 0.012 ± 0.001 μM). The target compounds with an aromatic heterocyclic ring (such as compounds 5a, 7b, and 7d have a furan ring, a naphthalene ring, and a thiophene ring, respectively) obtained by the amide condensation reaction and exhibited a good AChE inhibitory activity. Compounds 4d, 4m, and 4s contain methyl chloride at the same position. However, compound 4m with methoxy at R1 position has much better AChE inhibitory activity than compound 4s with methoxy at R1 position and hydroxyl groups at R2 position. At the same time, the activity of compound 4m is better than that of the compound 4d contained hydroxyl groups at R2 position. Compounds 4a, 4b, 4c, 4e, 4g, 4h, and 4i contained a hydroxyl group at R2 position and contained methyl, fluorine or chlorine, and these compounds have no inhibitory activity against AChE. The results indicated that compounds containing a methoxy group at R1 position and a methyl group, a fluorine atom or a chlorine atom (such as compounds 4g, 4k, 4m, 4o, 4p, and 4q), have a certain AChE inhibitory activity.
Table 2.
Biological evaluation in vitro.
| IC50c (μM) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Compound | AChEa | BuChEb | SId |
| 4a | >50 | 3.885 ± 0.955 | <0.097 |
| 4b | >50 | 2.445 ± 0.035 | <0.050 |
| 4c | >50 | 15.65 ± 1.825 | <0.874 |
| 4d | 47.21 ± 3.566 | 8.905 ± 1.175 | 0.189 |
| 4e | >50 | 10.57 ± 0.132 | <0.211 |
| 4f | 1.944 ± 0.141 | 2.565 ± 0.275 | 1.319 |
| 4g | >50 | 24.45 ± 0.535 | <0.489 |
| 4h | >50 | 3.881 ± 0.191 | <0.078 |
| 4i | >50 | 2.265 ± 0.225 | <0.045 |
| 4j | 4.165 ± 0.161 | 0.905 ± 0.081 | 0.217 |
| 4k | 27.97 ± 2.560 | 0.559 ± 0.017 | 0.020 |
| 4l | 5.604 ± 0.132 | 4.325 ± 0.685 | 0.772 |
| 4m | 0.091 ± 0.011 | 41.19 ± 1.044 | 452.637 |
| 4n | >50 | 0.951 ± 0.159 | <0.020 |
| 4o | 8.259 ± 0.581 | >50 | >6.054 |
| 4p | 48.95 ± 2.325 | 15.96 ± 0.475 | 0.326 |
| 4q | 48.21 ± 3.125 | >50 | >1.037 |
| 4r | 19.68 ± 2.450 | 4.335 ± 0.125 | 0.220 |
| 4s | 48.21 ± 2.685 | >50 | >1.037 |
| 5a | 2.487 ± 0.151 | 9.555 ± 0.455 | 3.842 |
| 5b | 47.12 ± 1.589 | 4.615 ± 0.055 | 0.098 |
| 6a | 19.14 ± 0.981 | >50 | >2.612 |
| 6b | >50 | >50 | – |
| 7a | >50 | 2.065 ± 0.045 | <0.052 |
| 7b | 0.128 ± 0.011 | 43.76 ± 1.965 | 341.87 |
| 7c | 19.19 ± 1.640 | 3.381 ± 0.342 | 0.176 |
| 7d | 6.631 ± 0.120 | 4.645 ± 0.245 | 0.700 |
| Donepezil | 0.012 ± 0.001 | 2.665 ± 0.015 | 222.08 |
aAChE from Electrophorus electricus.
bBuChE from equine serum.
cEach value represents the mean ± SD (n= 3).
dSI: selectivity index (IC50 BuChE/IC50 AChE).
In the human brain, BuChE is found in neurons and glial cells as well as in neuritic plaques and tangles in AD patients24. It has been recently reported that dual inhibition of AChE and BuChE might reduce the symptoms of AD owing to the key role of BuChE in hydrolysis of ACh25. As shown in Table 2, most of the compounds exhibited moderate to excellent inhibitory activity against BuChE. It is noteworthy that compounds 4b, 4f, 4i, 4j, 4k, 4n, and 7a have relatively strong inhibitory activity, and their inhibitory activity is better than donepezil (IC50 = 2.665 ± 0.015 μM), especially compound 4k (IC50 = 0.559 ± 0.017 μM). Through comparing the compounds 4a, 4b, 4f, 4g, 4 h, 4j, 4k, 4p, and 4r, we find 3-arylcoumarins with an amino group can enhance its BuChE inhibitory activity by introducing halogen-containing benzene ring by the amide condensation reaction. We can find that the halogen-substituted compounds at the R4 and R5 positions are more active than the R3-substituted compounds by comparing their IC50 values. It can be seen that the halogen substitution position has a great influence on the inhibitory activity of BuChE.
According to in vitro AChE/BuChE inhibition test results, we decided to study the effects of compounds 4f, 4j, 4k, 4l, 4m, 4r, 5a, 7b, and 7d on the aluminium trichloride-induced behavioural inhibition model of zebrafish larvae.
2.2.2. Aluminium trichloride-induced behavioural inhibition model of zebrafish juveniles
AD causes the patient’s actions to become sluggish, and the zebrafish behavioural model can mimic AD from a motor perspective. AD model of zebrafish juveniles is produced by aluminium trichloride26,27. The zebrafish movement distance within 20 min was observed in a Zebrobox zebrafish behaviour analyser (Viewpoint, Lyon, France) by setting different concentrations of aluminium trichloride solution. The most suitable modelling concentrations were chosen, and then the effect of the compounds on the behaviour of the aluminium trichloride-induced zebrafish juveniles was explored. As shown in Table 3, we chose 5.0 mg/L aluminium trichloride as the best modelling concentration.
Table 3.
Zebrafish movement distance (cm) at different concentrations of AlCl3 at 72 hpe (hours post-exposure).
| Concentration (mg/L) | Control | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Movement distance (cm) | 290.2 ± 7.3 | 292.4 ± 6.7 | 236.8 ± 9.4* | 224.3 ± 10.8** | 181.3 ± 9.6** | 204.6 ± 12.8** |
Mean ± SE, n = 6, *p<.05, and **p<.01 compared to control.
The death and deformity of zebrafish were observed. As shown in Table 4, the blank group, 0.1, 0.5 mg/L group did not cause malformation and death of zebrafish for 3 days. Most of the fish in the 50.0 mg/L group were dead or malformed after 24 h administration; all fish died in the 50.0 mg/L group at 48 h, and malformed and dead zebrafish began in the 10.0 mg/L group; 5.0 mg/L groups of zebrafish have individual deaths and deformities after 72 h of administration.
Table 4.
Effect of different concentrations of AlCl3 on mortality, deformity, and mortality of zebrafish juveniles after 72 h of administration.
| Concentration (mg/L) | (Mortality rate (%) | Malformation rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 0.1 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 0.5 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 1.0 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 1.11 ± 0.17 |
| 5.0 | 1.11 ± 0.17 | 2.22 ± 0.17 |
| 10.0 | 11.11 ± 0.17** | 16.67 ± 0.29** |
| 50.0 | 100.00 ± 0.00** | 100.00 ± 0.00** |
Each value represents the mean ± SE, (n = 90), *p<.05, **p<.01 compared to control.
2.2.3. The effect of compounds on zebrafish model
Zebrafish motion retardation characteristics were used to simulate motion disorders in AD. The main purpose of this experiment was to calculate the total distance of zebrafish movement induced by aluminium trichloride in the corresponding time after administration. As shown in Table 5, compounds 4f, 4j, 4m, and 7d have certain therapeutic effects on the behavioural inhibition of zebrafish induced by aluminium trichloride. In particular, compounds 4f, 4j, 4m, and 7d had significant effects compared with the model group. In the whole experiment, compound 4m showed significant therapeutic effect at 50.0 and 100.0 μg/mL concentration, which could significantly increase the total distance of zebrafish juvenile movement induced by aluminium trichloride. With the increase of the concentration of compound 4j, the total distance of zebrafish juvenile motion induced by aluminium trichloride increased first and then decreased. The total distance of zebrafish juvenile motion at the maximum concentration (100.0 μg/mL) was decreased compared to the total distance of zebrafish juvenile motion at 50.0 μg/mL. The results showed that high doses of compounds might slow down the movement distance of juvenile zebrafish. A more intuitive comparison can be seen in Figure 1.
Table 5.
Effects of different compounds on the average total distance of zebrafish juveniles.
| Total movement distance (cm) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Model | 5 mg/L | 10 mg/L | 50 mg/L | 100 mg/L | |
| 4f | 316.4 ± 14.8 | 190.5 ± 9.3 | 205.7 ± 4.5** | 223.2 ± 16.4** | 236 ± 11.5**# | 244.8 ± 13.6**# |
| 4j | 316.4 ± 14.8 | 190.5 ± 9.3 | 208.8 ± 9.6** | 226 ± 10.7**# | 231.8 ± 13.2**# | 225.7 ± 13.4** |
| 4k | 316.4 ± 14.8 | 190.5 ± 9.3 | 194.9 ± 5.5** | 186.7 ± 7.7** | 181.8 ± 6.9** | 205.7 ± 9.5** |
| 4l | 316.4 ± 14.8 | 190.5 ± 9.3 | 179.9 ± 10.1** | 194.6 ± 13.6** | 211.5 ± 20.2** | 184.8 ± 11.5** |
| 4m | 316.4 ± 14.8 | 190.5 ± 9.3 | 198.3 ± 10.1** | 210.2 ± 6.0** | 230.8 ± 6.2**## | 247.1 ± 12.3**## |
| 4r | 316.4 ± 14.8 | 190.5 ± 9.3 | 178 ± 11.2** | 182.4 ± 4.6** | 196.4 ± 11.7** | 194.4 ± 9.4** |
| 5a | 316.4 ± 14.8 | 190.5 ± 9.3 | 194.2 ± 6.5** | 188.8 ± 14.7** | 215.5 ± 17.1** | 187.2 ± 6.2** |
| 7b | 316.4 ± 14.8 | 190.5 ± 9.3 | 272.7 ± 8.9** | 278.4 ± 11.4** | 227.4 ± 8.1** | 272.1 ± 10.4** |
| 7d | 316.4 ± 14.8 | 190.5 ± 9.3 | 202.9 ± 6.2** | 208.4 ± 9.7** | 224.2 ± 9.2**# | 235.4 ± 11.4**# |
Each value represents the mean ± SE, (n = 8), *p<.05, **p<.01 compared to control; #p<.05, ##p<.01 compared to the model group.
Figure 1.
Effect of different compounds on the average total distance of zebrafish juveniles. *p < 0.05, **p<.01 compared to control; #p<.05, ##p<.01 compared to the model group.
3. Conclusions
Twenty-seven 3–(4-aminophenyl)-coumarin derivatives were synthesised by Perkin reaction, amide condensation reaction and carboxylic acid condensation reaction. We then studied the pharmacological activity of the synthesised compounds. The biological evaluation showed that most of the novel compounds were good dual cholinesterase inhibitors in the micromolar range. In particular, compound 4m showed the highest effective AChE inhibitory activity (IC50 = 0.091 ± 0.011 μM), which was slightly weaker to the positive drug donepezil (IC50 = 0.012 ± 0.001 μM). The inhibitory activities of compounds 4b, 4f, 4i, 4j, 4k, 4n, and 7a on BuChE were higher than the positive drug donepezil (IC50 = 2.665 ± 0.015 μM). Especially, compound 4k showed the highest effective BuChE inhibitory activities (IC50 = 0.559 ± 0.017 μM), which 5-times more active than donepezil (IC50 = 2.665 ± 0.015 μM). Compounds 4 m, 4o, and 7b were highly selective for AChE and compounds 4a, 4 b, 4h, 4i, and 4k were highly selective for BuChE. We decided to study the effects of compounds 4f, 4j, 4k, 4l, 4m, 4r, 5a, 7b, and 7d on the aluminium trichloride-induced behavioural inhibition model of zebrafish larvae. The result showed that compounds 4f, 4j, 4m, and 7d could alleviate the behavioural inhibition symptoms of zebrafish juveniles induced by aluminium trichloride. In particular, compound 4m at 50.0 and 100.0 μg/mL concentration has significant effects compared with the model group. In conclusion, compound 4m represents an interesting lead for drug design for the development of therapeutic or preventive agents for AD.
4. Experimental
4.1. Synthesis
Melting points were determined using a Thiele tube and were uncorrected. The 1H-NMR and 13 C-NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker AM-600 spectrometer (Billerica, MA) with TMS as the internal standard. Chemical shifts were reported at room temperature on a scale (ppm) with DMSO-d6 as the solvents and J values are given in Hertz. Mass spectra were obtained with an Agilent Trap VL LC/MS spectrometer (Santa Clara, CA). The absorbance was recorded by a Hitachi U-3000 UV spectrophotometer (Tokyo, Japan). Unless otherwise noted, all solvents and reagents were commercially available and used without further purification.
4.1.1. General method for synthesis of compounds 3a–3c
Compound 1a (1.38 g, 10 mmol) and P-aminophenylacetic acid (1.51 g, 10 mmol) were added to triethylamine (5.56 g, 55 mmol) and acetic anhydride (6.12 g, 60 mmol) and then the mixture was heated at 115 °C for 6 h. The resulting mixture was quenched by the addition of water, and a large amount of solid precipitated. The filtrate was vacuum filtered and the resulting solid was washed three times with water. The obtained solid 2a was dissolved in 10 mL of absolute ethanol, and then reacted by adding hydrochloric acid (40 mL, 10%) at 80 °C for 6 h (TLC monitoring). The reaction solution was poured into 50 mL of ice water and stirred to precipitate a large amount of light green solid. After standing and filtration, the solid was washed with water until the pH of the wash solution was nearly neutral. The solid was recrystallised from ethanol/water to obtain compound 3a (1.78 g, 70.4% yield). Compounds 3b–3c were obtained using the same procedures.
4.1.2. General method for synthesis of compounds 4a–4s
The 3-fluorobenzoyl chloride was synthesised from 3-fluorobenzoic acid (0.28 g, 2 mmol) with excess oxalyl chloride (1.28 mL, 15 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) containing N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF) as a catalyst. The mixture was refluxed for about 2 h until the disappearance of the 3-fluorobenzoic acid monitoring by TLC, and then, the mixture was cooled to room temperature. The redundant oxalyl chloride was evaporated under vacuum. The crude benzoyl chloride was used in the following reaction without further purification. The 3-fluorobenzoyl chloride was dissolved in acetone (5 mL). Compound 3a (0.51 g, 2 mmol) was added to 20 mL of acetone, and then 15 mL of pyridine was added, and 3-fluorobenzoyl chloride was added dropwise at 0–5 °C. The reaction was carried out for 7 h. The reaction solution was poured into ice water to precipitate a solid which was vacuum filtered, washed with water 3 times, and the solid was dried. The solid was added to ethanol for reflux washing, allowed to stand at cold, then vacuum filtered and rinsed with cold ethanol to give 4a as a white solid (66% yield). Compounds 4 b–4s were obtained using the same procedure.
4.1.2.1. 3-[4-(3-fluoro-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-7-hydroxy-coumarin (4a)
White solid, yield: 66%, mp308.2–309.3 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.59 (s, 1H), 10.43 (s, 1H), 8.18 (s, 1H), 7.89–7.82 (m, 3H), 7.83–7.77 (m, 1H), 7.76–7.70 (m, 2H), 7.61 (q, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 7.51–7.41 (m, 1H), 6.83 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H). 13 C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.64, 163.22, 161.60, 160.59, 155.27, 140.83, 139.21, 137.61, 137.57, 131.12, 131.07, 130.94, 130.37, 129.00, 124.42, 124.40, 122.14, 120.39, 119.11, 118.97, 115.08, 114.93, 113.88, 112.56, 102.19.MS: m/z (%):397.8 [M + 23] +, 357.8.
4.1.2.2. 3-[4-(4-fluoro-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-7-hydroxy-coumarin (4b)
White solid, yield: 70%, mp321.4–323.1 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.59 (s, 1H), 10.38 (s, 1H), 8.17 (s, 1H), 8.12–8.03 (m, 2H), 7.88–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.76–7.70 (m, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.44–7.34 (m, 2H), 6.83 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.93, 163.77, 161.57, 160.60, 155.25, 140.77, 139.42, 131.74, 131.72, 130.96, 130.90, 130.76, 130.35, 128.98, 122.18, 120.33, 115.91, 115.77, 113.87, 112.56, 102.18. MS: m/z (%):375.9 [M + 1] +, 279.7, 357.8.
4.1.2.3. 3-[4-(4-methyl-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-7-hydroxy-coumarin (4c)
Light green solid, yield: 58%, mp307.5–308.9 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.59 (s, 1H), 10.28 (s, 1H), 8.17 (s, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.86 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.74–7.67 (m, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.83 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 2.40 (s, 3H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 167.82, 161.58, 160.62, 155.27, 140.75, 139.65, 135.11, 133.65, 130.76, 130.69, 130.36, 130.14, 129.11, 128.85, 127.54, 126.88, 126.03, 125.58, 125.53, 122.24, 119.83, 113.88, 112.57, 102.20. MS: m/z (%):372.1 [M + 1] +, 251.9, 279.9.
4.1.2.4. 3-[4-(4-chloromethyl-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-7-hydroxy-coumarin (4d)
Light yellow, yield: 77%, mp264.9–267.0 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.60 (s, 1H), 10.40 (s, 1H), 8.17 (s, 1H), 7.99 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.86 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 3H), 6.83 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H), 4.86 (s, 2H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.60, 161.58, 160.60, 155.25, 141.62, 140.77, 139.44, 135.15, 130.75, 130.35, 129.28, 128.98, 128.57, 122.18, 120.30, 113.87, 112.56, 102.18. MS: m/z (%):406.0 [M + 1] +, 351.8, 369.9, 387.9.
4.1.2.5. 3-[4-(3-methyl-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-7-hydroxy-coumarin (4e)
Light yellow solid, yield: 85%, mp265.2–266.7 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.59 (s, 1H), 10.33 (s, 1H), 8.17 (s, 1H), 7.86 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.80 (s, 1H), 7.77 (d, J= 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.72 (d, J= 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 6.83 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 2.42 (s, 3H).13CNMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 166.16, 161.56, 160.61, 155.24, 140.72, 139.57, 138.20, 135.32, 132.70,130.62, 130.34, 128.96, 128.79, 128.63, 125.34, 122.21, 120.26, 113.86, 112.57, 102.18, 56.50. MS: m/z (%):371.9 [M + 1] +, 251.8, 279.8.
4.1.2.6. 3-[4-(3-chloro-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-7-hydroxy-coumarin (4f)
Yellow solid, yield: 81%, mp304.9–306.0 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.60 (s, 1H), 10.47 (s, 1H), 8.18 (s, 1H), 8.04 (t, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.98–7.90 (m, 1H), 7.88–7.79 (m, 2H), 7.77–7.71 (m, 2H), 7.68 (ddd, J = 8.0, 2.1, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (dd, J = 15.8, 8.1 Hz, 2H), 6.83 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.55, 161.60, 160.59, 155.27, 140.83, 139.21, 137.26, 133.71, 131.96, 130.96, 130.92, 130.37, 129.01, 127.92, 127.02, 122.14, 120.39, 113.88, 112.56, 102.19. MS: m/z (%):413.9 [M + 23]+, 373.8.
4.1.2.7. 3-[4-(2-fluoro-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-7-hydroxy-coumarin (4g)
Light red, solid yield: 72%, mp268.9–372.4 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.59 (s, 1H), 10.54 (s, 1H), 8.16 (s, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.71 (dd, J = 17.1, 5.1 Hz, 3H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (dd, J = 10.0, 2.5 Hz, 2H), 6.83 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 163.29, 161.59, 160.59, 155.27, 140.80, 139.17, 130.90, 130.42, 130.40, 130.36, 129.13, 125.07, 125.05, 122.14, 119.73, 116.73, 116.59, 113.87, 112.55, 102.18. MS: m/z (%):376.0 [M + 1]+, 279.8, 357.9.
4.1.2.8. 3-[4-(4-chloro-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-7-hydroxy-coumarin (4h)
Light green solid, yield: 80%, mp313.2–315.0 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.59 (s, 1H), 10.43 (s, 1H), 8.17 (s, 1H), 8.08–7.98 (m, 2H), 7.89–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.78–7.69 (m, 2H), 7.67–7.57 (m, 3H), 6.83 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.93, 161.58, 160.59, 155.26, 140.80, 139.31, 136.96, 133.99, 130.86, 130.36, 130.15, 128.99, 128.97, 122.16, 120.36, 113.87, 112.56, 102.18. MS: m/z (%):391.9 [M + 1]+, 279.8, 373.8.
4.1.2.9. 3-[4-(3, 5-dimethyl-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-7-hydroxy-coumarin (4i)
White solid, yield: 72%, mp250.2–252.3 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.58 (s, 1H), 10.28 (s, 1H), 8.17 (s, 1H), 7.85 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.75–7.66 (m, 2H), 7.64–7.53 (m, 3H), 7.23 (s, 1H), 6.83 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (s, 6H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 166.27, 161.55, 160.61, 155.24, 140.70, 139.61, 138.05, 135.35, 133.39, 130.56, 130.34, 128.94, 125.86, 122.23, 120.23, 113.86, 112.57, 102.18, 56.50. MS: m/z (%):386.1 [M + 1]+, 251.9, 279.9.
4.1.2.10. 3-[4-(3-fluoro-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-8-methoxy-coumarin (4j)
White solid, yield: 75%, mp259.8–262.4 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.47 (s, 1H), 8.27 (s, 1H), 7.91–7.86 (m, 2H), 7.85 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (ddd, J = 11.3, 6.3, 2.1 Hz, 3H), 7.61 (td, J = 8.0, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 7.38–7.27 (m, 3H), 3.94 (s, 3H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.70, 161.60, 159.96, 146.72, 142.61, 140.40, 139.78, 137.56, 131.13, 131.08, 130.34, 129.32, 126.88, 125.02, 124.44, 124.42, 120.61, 120.36, 120.23, 115.10, 114.95, 114.25, 56.57. MS: m/z (%):390.1 [M + 1]+, 293.9, 372.0.
4.1.2.11. 3-[4-(4-fluoro-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-8-methoxy-coumarin (4k)
White solid, yield: 78%, mp296.5–297.8 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.42 (s, 1H), 8.26 (s, 1H), 8.07 (s, 2H), 7.88 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.36–7.26 (m, 3H), 3.94 (s, 3H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.00, 163.79, 159.97, 146.72, 142.60, 140.34, 139.99, 131.70, 130.99, 130.93, 130.16, 129.30, 126.91, 125.02, 120.62, 120.30, 120.23, 115.93, 115.79, 114.24, 56.58. MS: m/z (%):390.1 [M + 1]+, 293.9, 371.9.
4.1.2.12. 3-[4-(4-trifluoromethyl-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-8-methoxy-coumarin (4l)
White solid, yield: 68%, mp298.1–301.5 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.63 (s, 1H), 8.27 (s, 1H), 8.18 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.94 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.90 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.84–7.76 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.27 (m, 3H), 3.94 (s, 3H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.95, 159.95, 146.72, 142.62, 140.44, 139.71, 130.47, 129.36, 129.15, 126.86, 125.92, 125.89, 125.02, 120.61, 120.38, 120.24, 114.26, 56.57. MS: m/z (%):461.9 [M + 23]+, 419.9.
4.1.2.13. 3-[4-(4-chloromethyl-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-8-methoxy-coumarin (4m)
Yellow solid, yield: 70%, mp274.2–275.6 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.43 (s, 1H), 8.26 (s, 1H), 8.03–7.96 (m, 2H), 7.91–7.86 (m, 2H), 7.81–7.76 (m, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.37–7.29 (m, 3H), 4.86 (s, 2H), 3.94 (s, 3H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.66, 159.96, 146.72, 142.60, 141.66, 140.33, 140.01, 135.10, 130.15, 129.30, 128.59, 126.91, 125.02, 120.62, 120.27, 120.23, 114.23, 56.57. MS: m/z (%):419.9 [M + 1]+, 383.3.
4.1.2.14. 3-[4-(3-chloro-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-8-methoxy-coumarin (4n)
White solid, yield: 81%, mp265.3–266.7 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.50 (s, 1H), 8.27 (s, 1H), 8.04 (s, 1H), 7.95 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.79 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.69 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.41–7.24 (m, 3H), 3.94 (s, 3H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.63, 159.96, 146.73, 142.62, 140.41, 139.78, 137.22, 133.72, 132.01, 130.94, 130.36, 129.33, 129.31, 127.94, 127.05, 126.88, 125.03, 120.62, 120.36, 120.24, 114.27, 56.58. MS: m/z (%):428.0 [M + 23]+, 265.9, 293.9.
4.1.2.15. 3-[4-(3-methyl-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-8-methoxy-coumarin (4o)
Light yellow solid, yield: 87%, mp244.4–247.0 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.36 (s, 1H), 8.26 (s, 1H), 7.93–7.85 (m, 2H), 7.78 (dd, J = 14.6, 7.8 Hz, 4H), 7.48–7.39 (m, 2H), 7.36–7.27 (m, 3H), 3.94 (s, 3H), 2.42 (s, 3H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 166.23, 159.97, 146.72, 142.59, 140.28, 140.14, 138.21, 135.28, 132.74, 130.02, 129.27, 128.80, 128.65, 126.93, 125.36, 125.01, 120.63, 120.23, 114.21, 56.57. MS: m/z (%):386.2 [M + 1]+, 265.9, 293.9.
4.1.2.16. 3-[4-(2-fluoro-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-8-methoxy-coumarin (4p)
White solid, yield: 82%, mp243.1–245.2 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.58 (s, 1H), 8.25 (s, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.70 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.44–7.24 (m, 5H), 3.94 (s, 3H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 163.37, 159.95, 146.72, 142.61, 140.38, 139.72, 133.14, 130.43, 130.41, 130.32, 129.45, 126.87, 125.41, 125.31, 125.09, 125.07, 125.02, 120.60, 120.24, 119.71, 116.75, 116.60, 114.26, 56.57. MS: m/z (%):411.9 [M + 23]+, 293.9, 371.9.
4.1.2.17. 3-[4-(2-methoxy-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-8-methoxy-coumarin (4q)
Light yellow solid, yield: 77%, mp205.9–206.3 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.27 (s, 1H), 8.24 (s, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.76 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.66 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.58–7.48 (m, 1H), 7.34 (dd, J = 6.6, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (dd, J = 4.6, 3.0 Hz, 2H), 7.20 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (td, J = 7.5, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 3.94 (s, 3H), 3.92 (s, 3H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.13, 159.97, 156.98, 146.71, 142.59, 140.23, 139.94, 132.61, 130.16, 129.94, 129.38, 126.92, 125.34, 125.00, 120.99, 120.62, 120.22, 119.64, 114.21, 112.50, 56.57. MS: m/z (%):462.0 [M + 1]+, 134.9.
4.1.2.18. 3-[4-(2, 3-dichloro-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-8-methoxy-coumarin (4r)
White solid, yield: 62%, mp258.6–261.7 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.76 (s, 1H), 8.25 (s, 1H), 7.83–7.74 (m, 5H), 7.61 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.37–7.28 (m, 3H), 3.94 (s, 3H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.72, 159.95, 146.73, 142.63, 140.44, 139.54, 132.58, 131.91, 130.51, 129.54, 129.22, 128.62, 127.90, 126.86, 125.03, 120.59, 120.25, 119.59, 114.29, 56.58. MS: m/z (%):391.9 [M + 1]+, 293.9, 421.9.
4.1.2.19. 3-[4-(4-Chloromethyl-benzoylamino)-phenyl]-7, 8-dihydroxy-coumarin (4s)
Yellow solid, yield: 58%, mp285.3–286.7 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.40 (s, 1H), 10.13 (s, 1H), 9.41 (s, 1H), 8.13 (s, 1H), 7.99 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.86 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.11 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 6.84 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.86 (s, 2H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.59, 160.57, 149.94, 143.54, 141.61, 141.34, 139.39, 135.15, 132.28, 130.85, 129.28, 129.01, 128.57, 121.92, 120.29, 119.55, 113.35, 113.28. MS: m/z (%):422.0 [M + 1]+, 368.0, 385.9, 403.9.
4.1.3. General method for synthesis of compounds 5a–5b, 6a–6b, and 7a–7d
HOBt (2 mmol) and dicyclohexyl carbodiimide (DCC, 2 mmol) were added into an anhydrous toluene solution (10 mL) containing compounds 1–6 (2 mmol) at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 45 min. Then, compounds 3a–3b (2.2 mmol) were added to the reaction solution, respectively. There action mixture was stirred at room temperature for 8–16 h until compounds 1–6 disappeared. The reaction mixture was filtered and the toluene was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in 10% NaOH and filtered, and then 15% HCl was added to adjust pH of the solution to 3–4, followed by the production of precipitation. The precipitation washed with water 3 times, and the solid was dried. The solid was added to ethanol for reflux washing, allowed to stand at cold, then vacuum filtered and rinsed with cold ethanol to give compounds 5a–5b, 6a–6b, and 7a–7d.
4.1.3.1. 3-[4-(furan-2-formylamino)-phenyl]-7-hydroxy-coumarin (5a)
Light yellow solid, yield: 70%, mp242.6–244.3 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.59 (s, 1H), 10.30 (s, 1H), 8.18–8.15 (m, 1H), 7.96 (dd, J = 5.6, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.38–7.36 (m, 1H), 6.83 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.74–6.70 (m, 1H).13C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 161.57, 160.59, 156.69, 155.25, 147.92, 146.30, 140.78, 138.89, 130.76, 130.35, 129.00, 122.18, 120.31, 115.37, 113.87, 112.69, 112.56, 102.18. MS: m/z (%):347.9 [M + 1]+, 279.8, 347.8.
4.1.3.2. 3-[4-(furan-2-formylamino)-phenyl]-8-methoxy-coumarin (5b)
Yellow solid, yield: 75%, mp268.1–269.5 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.34 (s, 1H), 8.25 (s, 1H), 8.00–7.94 (m, 1H), 7.91–7.83 (m, 2H), 7.80–7.72 (m, 2H), 7.39–7.37 (m, 1H), 7.35–7.29 (m, 3H), 6.73 (dd, J = 3.5, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 3.94 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 3H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 159.96, 156.73, 147.88, 146.72, 146.36, 142.60, 140.34, 139.47, 130.16, 129.31, 126.90, 125.02, 120.61, 120.27, 120.22, 115.46, 114.24, 112.70. MS: m/z (%):362.0 [M + 1]+, 298.0.
4.1.3.3. 3-[4-(1-naphthoylamino)-phenyl]-7-hydroxy-coumarin (6a)
Light green solid, yield: 78%, mp287.5–289.3 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.70 (s, 1H), 10.60 (s, 1H), 8.21 (dd, J = 7.0, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 8.18 (s, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.06–8.00 (m, 1H), 7.89 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.79 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.65–7.58 (m, 4H), 6.84 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 167.82, 161.58, 160.62, 155.27, 140.75, 139.65, 135.11, 133.65, 130.76, 130.69, 130.36, 130.14, 129.11, 128.85, 127.54, 126.88, 126.03, 125.58, 125.53, 122.24, 119.83, 113.88, 112.57, 102.20. MS: m/z (%):408.1 [M + 1]+, 251.9, 279.9.
4.1.3.4. 3-[4-(1-naphthoylamino)-phenyl]-8-methoxy-coumarin (6b)
White solid, yield: 82%, mp275.4–277.3 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.75 (s, 1H), 8.26 (s, 1H), 8.25–8.18 (m, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.07–7.99 (m, 1H), 7.92 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.84–7.74 (m, 3H), 7.68–7.55 (m, 3H), 7.40–7.25 (m, 3H), 3.94 (s, 3H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 167.89, 159.98, 146.73, 142.62, 140.32, 140.20, 135.05, 133.65, 130.73, 130.17, 130.13, 129.43, 128.85, 127.56, 126.97, 126.89, 126.07, 125.57, 125.53, 125.03, 120.63, 120.24, 119.81, 114.25, 56.58. MS: m/z (%):422.2 [M + 1]+, 155.0, 266.0, 294.0.
4.1.3.5. 3-[4-(2-naphthoylamino)-phenyl]-7-hydroxy-coumarin (7a)
Light yellow solid, yield: 65%, mp305.6–307.2 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.60 (s, 1H), 10.56 (s, 1H), 8.62 (s, 1H), 8.19 (s, 1H), 8.13–8.10 (m, 1H), 8.09–8.01 (m, 3H), 7.92 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.78–7.72 (m, 2H), 7.64 (ddd, J = 17.6, 11.8, 5.0 Hz, 3H), 6.84 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 166.10, 161.57, 160.62, 155.26, 140.76, 139.60, 134.79, 132.62, 132.56, 130.71, 130.36, 129.46, 129.01, 128.53, 128.36, 128.17, 127.37, 124.94, 122.21, 120.32, 113.88, 112.58, 102.19, 56.50. MS: m/z (%):408.1 [M + 1]+, 251.9, 279.9.
4.1.3.6. 3-[4-(2-naphthoylamino)-phenyl]-8-methoxy-coumarin (7b)
Yellow solid, yield: 72%, mp242.1–243.5 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.60 (s, 1H), 8.63 (s, 1H), 8.28 (s, 1H), 8.07 (ddd, J = 24.6, 15.8, 7.5 Hz, 4H), 7.98–7.93 (m, 2H), 7.85–7.78 (m, 2H), 7.65 (td, J = 7.4, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (ddd, J = 7.8, 4.7, 2.6 Hz, 3H), 3.94 (s, 3H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 166.17, 159.98, 146.73, 142.60, 140.32, 140.17, 134.81, 132.58, 132.56, 130.11, 129.47, 129.33, 128.57, 128.54, 128.38, 128.18, 127.38, 126.93, 125.02, 124.94, 120.64, 120.29, 120.23, 114.23, 56.57. MS: m/z (%):422.1 [M + 1]+, 265.9, 293.9.
4.1.3.7. 3-[4-(6-chloro-N-nicotinamide)-phenyl]-8-methoxy-coumarin (7c)
Light yellow solid, yield:65%, mp310.9–313.2 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.64 (s, 1H), 8.98 (d, J= 2.3 Hz, 1H), 8.39 (dd, J = 8.3, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 8.27 (s, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.82–7.78 (m, 2H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.36–7.29 (m, 3H), 3.94 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, 3H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 163.50, 149.88, 149.86, 146.73, 140.50, 139.61, 129.41, 129.38, 125.05, 124.65, 120.61, 120.36, 120.33, 120.26, 114.30, 56.58. MS: m/z (%):429.0 [M + 23]+, 265.9, 293.9.
4.1.3.8. 3-[4-(thiophene-2-formylamino)-phenyl]-8-methoxy-coumarin (7d)
Yellow solid, yield: 72%, mp263.5–265.4 °C.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.38 (s, 1H), 8.26 (s, 1H), 8.07 (dd, J = 3.8, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (dd, J = 5.0, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.85 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.37–7.28 (m, 3H), 7.25 (dd, J = 4.9, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 3.94 (s, 3H).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 160.44, 159.95, 146.72, 142.60, 140.37, 140.35, 139.65, 132.61, 130.15, 129.80, 129.34, 128.61, 126.86, 125.02, 120.62, 120.25, 120.23, 114.23, 56.57. MS: m/z (%):399.9 [M + 23]+, 265.9, 293.9.
4.2. Biological activity
4.2.1. Preparation of main reagents
In the experiment, 0.05 mol/L phosphate buffered saline (PBS) of pH 8.0 was prepared first, and then the following solutions were prepared: 1.5 mmol/L Acetylthiocholine iodide (ATChI); 0.75 mmol/L 5, 5'-Dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO); 0.2 U/mL Acetylcholinesterase (AChE, from electric squid, Macklin); 0.5 U/mL Butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE, from equine serum, Aladdin, Shanghai, China); 1.5 mmol/L S-Butyrylthiocholine iodide (BTChI, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). 4% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) was prepared with secondary water. The test compounds and the positive control Donepezil (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were formulated with DMSO to a gradient of 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, 50.0, 100.0, 500.0, and 1000.0 μg/mL. The above reagents were all analytically pure, and the test water was all distilled water. All solutions were stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C.
4.2.2. In vitro AChE/BuChE inhibitory activity
The AChE/BuChE inhibitory activity of the 3–(4-aminophenyl)-coumarin derivatives was determined by the method of Ellaman28 with slight modifications. The experiment was divided into control group, sample blank group and sample group. Take a series of test tubes, the reagents were loaded in test tubes at the dose of Table 6. After incubation at 37 °C for 20 min, quickly add 1 mL of 4% SDS to stop the reaction. Measuring ultraviolet absorbance immediately at 412 nm. All experiments were run in triplicate. The absorbance was determined by UV spectrophotometer, and the inhibition rate of AChE and the IC50 value of each sample were calculated according to the formula.
where AC (no sample added) is the absorbance of control group; AS is the absorbance of sample group; ASB (add sample solution but no substrate ATChI added) is the absorbance of sample blank group.
Table 6.
The amount and order of each reactant of acetylcholinesterase inhibition test.
| Reagents | Volume (μL) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | Sample blank group | Sample group | |
| PBS | 2650 | 2650 | 2650 |
| AChE | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| DNTB | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Compounds | 0 | 100 | 100 |
| DMSO | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| Mix well and incubate at 37 °C for 5 min | |||
| ATChI | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| PBS | 0 | 100 | 0 |
| Mix well and react at 37 °C for 20 min | |||
| SDS | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 |
The method for determining BuChE is the same as the method for measuring AChE. The sample can be added with reference to Table 6, AChE is changed to BuChE, and the substrate ATChI is changed to substrate BTChI. The order of loading and the amount of loading are the same as Table 6. The absorbance was determined by UV spectrophotometer, and the inhibition rate of BuChE and the IC50 value of each sample were calculated according to the formula. The formula used is the same as AChE.
4.2.3. Behavioural experiment of zebrafish juveniles
4.2.3.1. Zebrafish juveniles
AB wild-type zebrafish is provided by the Key Laboratory of Drug Screening Technology of Shandong Academy of Sciences. The zebrafish culture was carried out in a light cycle of 14 h light and 10 h dark at a temperature of 28 °C. At 16:00 the day before the experiment, the healthy zebrafish were mated in a tank with a male to female ratio of 1:1 or 2:1. The next day at 8:30 to extract the separator, after 1–2 h, collect the fertilised eggs, wash the fertilised eggs with culture water for 3 times, disinfect the fertilised eggs with methylene blue solution, and then move into clean zebrafish culture water at about 28 °C culture in a light incubator (HPG-280BX).
4.2.3.2. Model of exercise retardation in Zebrafish juveniles made of aluminium trichloride
The 72 hpf zebrafish were placed in a petri dish, and the normal developing juveniles were selected under a microscope in a 12-well plate. The concentration of AlCl3 in the experiment was set to 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10.0, and 50.0 mg/L (prepared for aquaculture water), three replicate wells were set in each concentration group and then placed in a constant temperature incubator at 28 °C to continue the culture. The continuous drug solution was exposed for 3 days. The different concentrations of AlCl3 and the blank control group were placed in 48-well plates. Each well was juvenile fish developed to 72 h post-exposure (hpe) and added 0.5 mL of culture water and 8 juveniles were set in each experimental group. The well plate was placed in the dark box of the zebrafish behaviour analysis system. The fish was first adapted to 10 min at the beginning of the experiment. The trajectories of the juveniles in each group were collected using zeblab software for 10 min, recorded every 5 min, and exported by software. Then calculate the total distance of each group of zebrafish juveniles. The effects of different concentrations of aluminium trichloride on the death and teratogenicity of zebrafish juveniles were observed by microscopy.
4.2.3.3. Effects of compounds on the inhibition of movement ability of zebrafish caused by aluminium trichloride
The zebrafish with 72 hpf after fertilisation is placed in a petri dish. Under normal conditions, the normal developing juvenile fish are selected in a 12-well plate, and 15 juveniles per hole are set. Control group (0.5% DMSO), model group (5.0 mg/L AlCl3), 5.0 mg/L AlCl3 + test compound 5 μg/mL group, 5.0 mg/L AlCl3 + test compound 10 μg/mL group, 5.0 mg/L AlCl3 + test compound 50 μg/mL group, 5.0 mg/L AlCl3 + test compound 100 μg/mL group, three duplicate wells were set at each concentration. After the administration, the zebrafish was placed in a constant temperature incubator at 28 °C to continue the culture for 3 days. Changing the liquid (aquaculture water) every 24 h and removing dead young fish. Behavioural observations are consistent with AlCl3 modelling.
4.2.4. Statistical analysis
The experimental data were processed by the statistical software SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). All the experimental data were expressed by mean ± SD or mean ± SE. The statistical differences were analysed by ANOVA. The comparison between groups was performed by Tukey test. p < .05 was considered as significant difference. p < .01 was a very significant difference.
Supplementary Material
Funding Statement
The authors are grateful to support from the Science and Technology Research Program of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences (2017–16), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2018LH021], and the Innovation Project of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences.
Disclosure statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Camps P, El Achab R, Morral J, et al. New tacrine-huperzine a hybrids (huprines): highly potent tight-binding acetylcholinesterase inhibitors of interest for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. J Med Chem 2000;43:4657–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sippl W, Contreras JM, Parrot I, et al. Structure-based 3D QSAR and design of novel acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 2001;15:395–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lendon CL, Ashall F, Goate AM. Exploring the etiology of Alzheimer disease using molecular genetics. JAMA 1997;277:825–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Karran E, Mercken M, Strooper BD. The amyloid cascade hypothesis for Alzheimer’s disease: an appraisal for the development of therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2011;10:698–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.DE Calignon A, Polydoro M, Suárez-Calvet MS, et al. Propagation of Tau pathology in a model of early Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 2012;73:685–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lemmens MAM, Sierksma ASR, Rutten BPF, et al. Age-related changes of neuron numbers in the frontal cortex of a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Struct Funct 2011;216:227–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Czarnecka K, Girek M, Maciejewska K, et al. New cyclopentaquinoline hybrids with multifunctional capacities for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2018;33:158–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, et al. Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer’s disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol 1991;30:572–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pearson VE. Galantamine: a new Alzheimer drug with a past life. Ann Pharmacother 2001;35:1406–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Özil M, Balaydın HT, Şentürk M. Synthesis of 5-methyl-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-one’s aryl Schiff base derivatives and investigation of carbonic anhydrase and cholinesterase (AChE, BuChE) inhibitory properties. Bioorg Chem 2019;86:705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cavdar H, Senturk M, Guney M, et al. Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase with uracil derivatives: kinetic and computational studies. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2019;34:429–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kani Z, Nashia S, Murat G, et al. Effects of aryl methanesulfonate derivatives on acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase. J Biochem Mol Tox 2018;32:e22210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ali R, Sheikh IA, Jabir NR, et al. Comparative review of decade’s research on cholinesterase inhibition. Am J Neuroprot Neuroregen 2012;4:136–44. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nguyen VT, Zhao BT, Seong SH, et al. Inhibitory effects of serratene-type triterpenoids from Lycopodium complanatum on cholinesterases and β-secretase 1. Chem Biol Interact 2017;274:150–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huang YJ, Huang Y, Baldassarre H, et al. Recombinant human butyrylcholinesterase from milk of transgenic animals to protect against organophosphate poisoning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:13603–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li B, Stribley JA, Ticu A, et al. Abundant tissue butyrylcholinesterase and its possible function in the acetylcholinesterase knockout mouse. J Neurochem 2002;75:1320–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zatón AML, Ferrer JM, Gordoa J, et al. Binding of coumarins to site I of human serum albumin. Effect of the fatty acids. Chem Biol Interact 1995;97:169–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Piazzi L, Rampa A, Bisi A, et al. 3-(4-{[benzyl(methyl)amino]methyl}phenyl)-6,7-dimethoxy-2H-2-chromenone (AP2238) inhibits both Acetylcholinesterase and Acetylcholinesterase-induced β-amyloid aggregation: a dual function lead for Alzheimer’s disease therapy. J Med Chem 2003;46:2279–82. (https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jm0340602) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gao XH, Liu LB, Liu HR, et al. Structure-activity relationship investigation of benzamide and picolinamide derivatives containing dimethylamine side chain as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2018;33:110–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Massoulie J, Pezzementi L, Bon S, et al. Molecular and cellular biology of cholinesterases. Prog Neurobiol 1993;41:31–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Brimijoin S. Molecular forms of acetylcholinesterase in brain, nerve and muscle: nature, localization and dynamics. Prog Neurobiol 1983;21:291–322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Heller M, Hanahan DJ. Human erythrocyte membrane bound enzyme acetylcholinesterase. BBA Biomembranes 1972;17:251–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Szelenyi JG, Bartha E, Hollan SR. Acetylcholinesterase activity of lymphocytes: an enzyme characteristic of T-cells. Br J Haematol 1982;50:241–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Asadipour A, Alipour M, Jafari M, et al. Novel coumarin-3-carboxamides bearing N-benzylpiperidine moiety as potent acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem 2013;14:623–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Giacobini E. Cholinesterase inhibitors: new roles and therapeutic alternatives. Pharmacol Res 2004;50:433–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Senger MR, Seibt KJ, Ghisleni GC, et al. Aluminum exposure alters behavioral parameters and increases acetylcholinesterase activity in zebrafish (Danio rerio) brain. Cell Biol Toxicol 2011;27:199–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Newman M, Verdile G, Martins RN, et al. Zebrafish as a tool in Alzheimer’s disease research. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011;1812:346–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ellaman G. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol 1961;7:88–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



