Abstract
Clostridium perfringens has emerged as an important cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD), particularly in the hospital environment. Here we investigated the prevalence and molecular epidemiology of C. perfringens isolated from 2280 fecal samples from Iranian diarrheal patients suspected of having AAD. Overall, AAD was diagnosed in 13.3% (303/2280) of patients and associated with advanced age (>50 years, P = 0.001). A total of 106 C. perfringens isolates were cultured from AAD (n = 68) and non-AAD (n = 38) groups, with toxinotypes A and F comprising 84% and 16% of isolates, respectively. Notably, 41.2% of type F strains were also cpb2-positive and enterotoxigenic cpe-positive strains were detected in 13.2% of the isolates from AAD patients. Genes associated with the VirR/VirS signal transduction (virR, virS) and accessory gene regulator (agrB, agrD) systems were detected in 56.6% and 67% of the isolates, respectively, and peptides of the quorum-sensing modulator, AgrD were highly conserved across all strains. The high prevalence of C. perfringens in Iranian AAD patients suggests that diagnostic laboratories in this region should consider screening for C. perfringens in cases of suspected AAD, especially if the specimen is negative for other pathogens and/or the patients are aged >50 years.
Subject terms: Bacteriology, Gastrointestinal diseases
Introduction
Antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) is a serious complication that remains a major healthcare problem, in both hospitalized patients and in the community1. Clostridioides difficile is a well-known etiologic cause of AAD, accounting for 10–33% of all cases2,3. However, other bacterial pathogens including Clostridium perfringens, Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella oxytoca have been implicated in the development of AAD2–4. C. perfringens is a ubiquitous Gram-positive spore-forming anaerobe, which can cause numerous diseases in humans including food poisoning, gas gangrene, enteritis necroticans, sudden death syndrome, and enterotoxemia5,6. In 1984 Borriello et al. was the first to report C. perfringens as a cause of AAD in patients with nosocomial diarrhea7, and many studies have suggested a crucial role for C. perfringens in diarrheic patients with a history of antibiotic usage8,9. It has been estimated that up to 15% of all AAD patients were infected with enterotoxigenic C. perfringens3,10. C. perfringens has historically been classified into five toxigenic types (A-E) depending upon its ability to produce four major exotoxins including α-, β-, ɛ-, and ɩ-toxin encoded by cpa, cpb, etx, and iap/ibp genes, respectively11,12. However, based on a recently introduced toxin-based typing system, C. perfringens is now reclassified into seven toxinotypes (A-G)13. Some strains also produce C. perfringens enterotoxin (CPE), a ~35 kDa protein responsible for diarrhea and most of the human food poisoning cases caused by this bacterium14,15. The cpe gene is located on either the chromosome or large conjugative plasmids and is more prevalent in C. perfringens toxinotype F, which is associated with human food poisoning and AAD13,14. CPE-positive strains of toxinotypes C and D are uncommon and, to date, there have been no reliable reports of CPE production by toxinotype B strains16. Additionally, all C. perfringens toxinotypes may also produce an accessory toxin known as β2-toxin encoded by the cpb2 gene11,17. β2-toxin is a pore-forming cytolysin which its role in C. perfringens associated enteric diseases still remains to be unraveled18–20. The expression of virulence-associated proteins, especially the production of various toxins in C. perfringens strains are tightly regulated by specific gene regulatory systems, including VirR/VirS two-component signal transduction system and accessory gene regulator (agr) system21,22. The agr system was first described in S. aureus and is comprised of four co-transcribed genes; agrB, agrD, agrC, and agrA23,24. Via a complex quorum-sensing mechanism, the agr system responds to changes in population density and synchronizes the expression of genes involved in virulence, sporulation, and toxin production25. The genome of C. perfringens encodes two orthologs of the S. aureus agr locus; agrB and agrD genes. The agrD gene encodes the precursor AgrD autoinducing peptide (AIP) which is processed to its active form by the integral membrane endoprotease AgrB. AgrD mediates the quorum sensing signal transduction cascade thus plays a critical role in regulating the production of several toxins, including β-toxin26–29.
Herein, we provide the first prevalence data of C. perfringens in Iranian hospitalized patients suffering from AAD. The molecular epidemiology of C. perfringens isolated from this population was characterised by toxinotyping and by PCR amplification of major toxin-encoding genes (cpa, cpb, cpb2, etx, iap, cpe, netB) and toxin regulatory genes (virR, virS, agrB and agrD). Finally, due to the critical role of AgrD in the regulation of toxin gene expression in C. perfringens, a PCR-based sequencing approach was used to investigate amino acid sequence diversity across all typed isolates.
Materials and Methods
Study population and fecal sample collection
A total of 2280 consecutive fecal specimens were collected from 2319 patients submitted for routine C. difficile testing, who were referred from 54 different hospitals and medical centers to the Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases (RIGLD) in Tehran, Iran, from August 2011 to October 2017. The freshly collected stool specimens were immediately delivered to the Anaerobic Laboratory for testing the presence of C. perfringens within 2 hours of collection. Indications for AAD were based on either clinical suspicion or daily production of ≥3 loose or watery stools for at least 2 consecutive days3. In addition, AAD was defined as onset of diarrhea after antibiotic therapy given concurrently or discontinued at a maximum of 4 weeks preceding diarrhea. A standardized questionnaire including demographic data, medication history, and underlying health condition was recorded for all patients. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of RIGLD at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (Project No. IR.SBMU.RIGLD.REC.1396.185). All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations recommended by the institution and informed consents were obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardians prior to sample collection.
Culture and isolation of C. perfringens
For each sample of feces, approximately 0.5 to 1 g was homogenized in 9 ml of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and heat treated in a 70 °C water bath for 20 minutes30. Subsequently, 100 μl of the suspension was inoculated onto egg yolk agar (Himedia, India) supplemented with 10% sheep blood and neomycin (0.008 mg/200 ml, Sigma, USA). Culture plates were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h under an anaerobic atmosphere (85% N2; 10% CO2 and 5% H2) generated by Anoxomat® Gas Exchange System (Mart Microbiology BV, Holland). A single bacterial colony from egg yolk agar was sub-cultured on tryptose sulphite cycloserine (TSC) agar supplemented with egg yolk and potassium tellurite and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h under the anaerobic conditions described above. Unusual colonies of C. perfringens were identified by growth morphology, Gram’s staining, motility test and biochemicals such as indole production, catalase, oxidase and stormy fermentation of milk. Molecular identification was also performed by PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene as previously described31.
Genomic and plasmid DNA preparation
Crude genomic DNA was extracted from the grown colonies on egg yolk agar plates using a boiling method as previously described32. Plasmid DNA was purified from the pure colonies after 48 hours of bacterial culture by using GeneJET Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lithuania) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of DNA samples was analyzed by electrophoresis on 0.8% (w/v) agarose gels, then stored at −20 °C until used for PCR experiments.
Toxinotyping of C. perfringens isolates
The presence of toxin genes cpa, cpb, cpb2, etx, iap, cpe and netB was examined by PCR using specific primer pairs and based on the conditions presented in Table 1 13,33. PCR was carried out in a final volume of 25 μl reaction mixture composed of 10 µl of Taq DNA Polymerase Master Mix (Ampliqon, Denmark), 0.5 µl of each primer (20 pmol), and 2 µl of template DNA (approximately 200 ng) using a thermocycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Subsequently, an aliquot of each PCR product was analyzed by electrophoresis in a 1.2% agarose gels, followed by ethidium bromide staining and visualization under a UV transilluminator, and then photographed using the gel imaging system (BioDoc-It System, UVP, USA). C. perfringens strain RIGLD-33 (accession number: MH997495) and a no-template reaction were used as positive and negative controls in all experiments, respectively.
Table 1.
Target gene | Primers | Oligonucleotide sequences (5′-3′) | PCR conditions | Product length (bp) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
cpa (α-toxin) | CPAlphaF | GCTAATGTTACTGCCGTTGA | 94 °C 5 min, 30 cycles(94 °C 1 min; 53 °C 1 min;72 °C 30 sec), 72 °C 5 min | 324 | 35 |
CPAlphaR | CCTCTGATACATCGTGTAAG | ||||
cpb (β-toxin) | CPBetaF3 | GCGAATATGCTGAATCATCTA | 94 °C 5 min, 30 cycles(94 °C 1 min; 55 °C 1 min;72 °C 30 sec), 72 °C 5 min | 195 | 35 |
CPBetaR3 | GCAGGAACATTAGTATATCTTC | ||||
cpb2 (β2-toxin) | CPBeta2totalF2 | AAATATGATCCTAACCAAMAA | 94 °C 5 min, 30 cycles(94 °C 1 min; 53 °C 1 min;72 °C 30 sec), 72 °C 5 min | 548 | 35 |
CPBeta2totalR | CCAAATACTYTAATYGATGC | ||||
etx (ɛ-toxin) | CPEpsilonF | TGGGAACTTCGATACAAGA | 94 °C 5 min, 30 cycles(94 °C 1 min; 53 °C 1 min;72 °C 30 sec), 72 °C 5 min | 376 | 35 |
CPEpsilonR2 | AACTGCACTATAATTTCCTTTTCC | ||||
iap (ɩ-toxin) | CPIotaF2 | AATGGTCCTTTAAATAATCC | 94 °C 5 min, 30 cycles(94 °C 1 min; 53 °C 1 min;72 °C 30 sec), 72 °C 5 min | 272 | 35 |
CpIotaR | TTAGCAAATGCACTCATATT | ||||
cpe (enterotoxin) | CPEnteroF | TTCAGTTGGATTTACTTCTG | 94 °C 5 min, 30 cycles(94 °C 1 min; 53 °C 1 min;72 °C 30 sec), 72 °C 5 min | 485 | 35 |
CPEnteroR | TGTCCAGTAGCTGTAATTGT | ||||
netB (pore-forming) | JRP6656 | CTTCTAGTGATACCGCTTCAC | 94 °C 5 min, 30 cycles(94 °C 1 min; 50 °C 1 min;72 °C 30 sec), 72 °C 5 min | 738 | 13 |
JRP6655 | CGTTATATTCACTTGTTGACGAAAG | ||||
virR | virR-F | ATAACTGCTTTATGGGATTATATTC | 94 °C 5 min, 30 cycles (94 °C 1 min; 47 °C 1 min; 72 °C 30 sec), 72 °C 5 min | 277 | This study |
virR-R | CTAGTTTATTCATACTCATCTTTAC | ||||
virS | virS-F | AAATATCTATAGGATGGAAACTATG | 94 °C 5 min, 30 cycles(94 °C 1 min; 47 °C 1 min;72 °C 30 sec), 72 °C 5 min | 428 | This study |
virS-R | TTCCTTCAATACAGGCTATGTG | ||||
agrB | agrBFwd | GATTGAGAATATATCGAAGTTAAT | 94 °C 5 min, 30 cycles(94 °C 1 min; 47 °C 1 min;72 °C 30 sec), 72 °C 5 min | 589 | 29 |
agrBRev | GTAGGTTAGAGTCATACATTGC | ||||
agrD | agrD-CpF | CATTTGACTTACCTTGATTAC | 94 °C 5 min, 30 cycles(94 °C 1 min; 52 °C 1 min;72 °C 30 sec), 72 °C 5 min | 292 | This study |
agrD-CpR | TTTGAGCACTTGTTGGTTGG |
M = A or C, Y = C or T.
Primer design and detection of toxin regulatory genes
The NCBI GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank) was searched for all available and complete C. perfringens virR, virS and agrD nucleotide sequences. Based on pairwise and multiple nucleotide sequence alignments for each target gene from several C. perfringens strains, specific primer pairs were designed from the conserved regions of corresponding genes using CLC Sequence Viewer 8 (https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com). The nucleotide sequences of virR, virS and agrD genes of C. perfringens strain JP838 (CP010994.1, toxinotype A) were used for primer designation. The selected primer target sites were aligned to all available and complete sequences of C. perfringens strains using BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). The presence of virR, virS and agrD was examined by PCR as previously mentioned using the designed primers presented in Table 1. agrB was also detected using the previously published primers27.
Sequence analysis of agrD
For DNA sequencing, PCR amplification was performed in a reaction mixture of 25 µl using primers agrD-CpF and agrD-CpR, yielding amplicons of approximately 292 bp in length. PCR products were purified using the Silica Bead DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Scientific, Fermentas, USA) followed by sequencing of both forward and reverse strands using an automated sequencer ABI 3730XL (Macrogen, Seoul, Korea). DNA sequences were edited using Chromas Lite v2.5.1 (Technelysium Pty Ltd, Australia) and BioEdit v7.2.534. All the complete agrD nucleotide and amino acid sequences were aligned to the agrD sequence of C. perfringens reference strain FORC_025 (CP013101.1, toxinotype A) as a scaffold sequence after in-frame translation. Single nucleotide variations and amino acid polymorphism of the translated sequences were examined using BioEdit v7.2.5.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
The complete nucleotide sequences of agrD genes from the 64 C. perfringens isolates characterized in this work were deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under accession numbers MH377337 to MH377400.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed by IBM SPSS Statistics version 21 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Clinical and molecular data were analyzed by the Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test. A P value less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
Results
Prevalence of C. perfringens in fecal samples
Overall, AAD was diagnosed in 13.3% (303/2280) of patients examined in this study. A total of 106 isolates of C. perfringens were cultured from 2208 fecal specimens (4.8%), with 56 (52.8%) female and 50 (47.2%) male, aged from <1 to 87 years with a mean age of 36.3 years. Of these C. perfringens-positive patients, 68 presented with AAD (AAD group) and 38 did not have AAD (non-AAD group). Demographic data on age, gender, duration of diarrhea and underlying diseases for the study groups are summarized in Table 2. A significant association was found between patients aged >50 years and AAD (P = 0.001). More than half of the AAD patients and about 60% of patients in the non-AAD group suffered from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), all of which had ulcerative colitis (UC), except for one patient having Crohn’s disease (CD) in AAD group. Approximately, one-third of AAD patients were receiving metronidazole treatment alone, while 10 (14.6%), 6 (8.8%), 1 (1.5%) and 1 (1.5%) were receiving metronidazole treatment plus either vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem or ceftriaxone, respectively. Moreover, 5 (7.3%) AAD patients were on the combination of vancomycin plus either ciprofloxacin, imipenem, meropenem or amphotericin B. The frequency of various patterns of the antibiotics used in C. perfringens-positive patients with AAD is presented in Table 3.
Table 2.
Patient characteristics | AAD group (n=68) | Non-AAD group (n=38) |
Total (%) (n=106) |
P value* |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | ||||
1–10 | 5 (7.4) | 8 (21) | 13 (12.3) | 0.001 |
11–20 | 2 (2.9) | 2 (5.2) | 4 (3.8) | |
21-30 | 18 (26.5) | 12 (31.7) | 30 (28.3) | |
31-40 | 9 (13.2) | 9 (23.7) | 18 (16.9) | |
41-50 | 9 (13.2) | 4 (10.5) | 13 (12.2) | |
>50 | 25 (36.8) | 3 (7.9) | 28 (26.5) | |
Gender | ||||
Female | 36 (53) | 20 (52.6) | 56 (52.8) | 1 |
Male | 32 (47) | 18 (47.4) | 50 (47.2) | |
Duration of diarrhea | ||||
2-3 days | 51 (75) | 25 (65.8) | 76 (71.7) | 0.37 |
>3 days | 17 (25) | 13 (32.2) | 30 (28.3) | |
Defecation (times/day) | ||||
3–5 | 45 (66.2) | 20 (53) | 65 (61.4) | 0.21 |
5–8 | 13 (19.1) | 14 (36.5) | 27 (25.4) | |
8–10 | 9 (13.2) | 4 (10.5) | 13 (12.3) | |
>10 | 1 (1.5) | 0 | 1 (0.9) | |
Underlying diseases | ||||
Cancer | 13 (19.1) | 4 (10.5) | 17 (16) | 0.59 |
Renal failure | 2 (2.9) | 0 | 2 (1.9) | |
Dementia | 2 (2.9) | 0 | 2 (1.9) | |
Immunodeficiency disorders | 2 (2.9) | 1 (2.7) | 3 (2.8) | |
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) | 37 (54.5) | 23 (60.5) | 60 (56.7) | |
Inflammatory bowel syndrome (IBS) | 1 (1.5) | 1 (2.6) | 2 (1.9) | |
Hospital wards | ||||
Internal | 9 (13.2) | 3 (7.9) | 12 (11.3) | 0.21 |
Gastroenterology | 31 (45.6) | 16 (42.1) | 47 (44.3) | |
Infectious | 2 (2.9) | 2 (5.2) | 4 (3.8) | |
Oncology | 10 (14.7) | 1 (2.7) | 11 (10.4) | |
Intensive care unit (ICU) | 1 (1.5) | 1 (2.7) | 2 (1.9) | |
Coronary care unit (CCU) | 1 (1.5) | 0 | 1 (0.9) | |
Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) | 2 (2.9) | 1 (2.7) | 3 (2.8) | |
Nephrology | 1 (1.5) | 1 (2.7) | 2 (1.9) | |
Orthopedic | 1 (1.5) | 0 | 1 (0.9) | |
Out-patient | 10 (14.7) | 13 (34.2) | 23 (21.8) |
AAD, antibiotic-associated diarrhea.
*Statistical analysis was performed by Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. The P value in bold indicates a significant association between AAD and patients’ age over 50 years.
Table 3.
Patterns of antibiotic use | AAD group (n = 68) |
---|---|
Ceftriaxone | 3 (4.4) |
Ciprofloxacin | 3 (4.4) |
Metronidazole | 23 (33.6) |
Meropenem | 2 (2.9) |
Chloramphenicol | 1 (1.5) |
Imipenem | 2 (2.9) |
Tinidazole | 1 (1.5) |
Metronidazole + Vancomycin | 10 (14.6) |
Metronidazole + Ciprofloxacin | 6 (8.8) |
Metronidazole + Imipenem | 1 (1.5) |
Metronidazole + Ceftriaxone | 1 (1.5) |
Ciprofloxacin + Amikacin | 1 (1.5) |
Ciprofloxacin + Ceftazidime | 1 (1.5) |
Ciprofloxacin + Ceftriaxone | 1 (1.5) |
Ciprofloxacin + Chloramphenicol | 1 (1.5) |
Ciprofloxacin + Ceftriaxone | 1 (1.5) |
Ciprofloxacin + Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole | 1 (1.5) |
Ciprofloxacin + Ceftazidime + Azithromycin | 1 (1.5) |
Ciprofloxacin + Meropenem + Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole | 1 (1.5) |
Vancomycin + Ciprofloxacin | 2 (2.9) |
Vancomycin + Imipenem | 1 (1.5) |
Vancomycin + Meropenem | 1 (1.5) |
Vancomycin + Amphotericin B | 1 (1.5) |
Azithromycin + Cefixime | 1 (1.5) |
Azithromycin + Cefixime + Metronidazole | 1 (1.5) |
AAD, antibiotic-associated diarrhea.
Prevalence of toxin genes of C. perfringens isolates
The prevalence of toxin-encoding genes and toxinotypes of C. perfringens isolates among AAD and non-AAD groups are shown in Table 4. In all 106 C. perfringens isolates, PCR revealed the presence of the cpa gene encoding the species-specific phospholipase C or α-toxin. None of the C. perfringens isolates harbored cpb, etx and iap genes which encode β-, ɛ-, and ɩ-toxins, respectively. The presence of cpb2 gene was identified in 14 (20.6%) isolates in the AAD group and in 10 (26.3%) isolates in the non-AAD group. The cpe gene was detected in 9 (13.2%) isolates in the AAD group and in 8 (21%) isolates in the non-AAD group. Additionally, none of the C. perfringens isolates carried the netB gene. No significant association was observed between the presence of any of these toxins and AAD (P > 0.05).
Table 4.
Toxin gene | AAD group (n = 68) | Non-AAD group (n = 38) | Total (%) (n = 106) | P value* |
---|---|---|---|---|
cpa | 68 (100) | 38 (100) | 106 (100) | |
cpb | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
cpb2 | 14 (20.6) | 10 (26.3) | 24 (22.6) | 0.66 |
etx | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
iap | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
cpe | 9 (13.2) | 8 (21) | 17 (16) | 0.44 |
netB | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Toxinotype | ||||
A | 59 (86.8) | 30 (78.9) | 89 (84) | 0.43 |
B | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
C | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
D | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
E | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
F | 9 (13.2) | 8 (21) | 17 (16) | 0.44 |
G | 0 | 0 | 0 |
AAD, antibiotic-associated diarrhea.
*Statistical analysis was performed by Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests.
Association of C. perfringens toxinotypes with AAD
C. perfringens type A (cpa-positive) was the most prevalent toxinotype, accounting for 84% (89/106) of isolates. New C. perfringens toxinotypes F (α-toxin positive, cpe-positive) was found in 16.0% (17/106) of all isolates. Interestingly, this toxinotype was almost equally prevalent in both AAD and non-AAD groups as shown in Table 4. C. perfringens types B, C, D, E and G were not identified. Additionally, 28.8% (17/59) of the C. perfringens type A strains were found to be cpb2-positive, while 41.2% (7/17) of the type F strains were seen to be cpb2-positive mostly in AAD group. There was no significant association between different toxinotypes of C. perfringens strains and AAD (P > 0.05).
Distribution of toxin regulatory genes in C. perfringens toxinotypes
Toxin regulatory genes virR and virS were simultaneously detected in 60 (56.6%) isolates of C. perfringens. Similarly, 71 (67%) isolates were found to harbor agrB and agrD genes. The virR/virS regulon was present in 52 (88.1%) type A isolates and 8 (47%) type F isolates. In addition, simultaneous presence of agrB and agrD was seen in 57 (96.6%) and 14 (82.3%) isolates with toxinotypes A and F, respectively.
AgrD sequence diversity of C. perfringens isolates
agrD PCR products from 64 C. perfringens strains isolated from patients in AAD (51 isolates) and non-AAD (13 isolates) groups were subjected to nucleotide sequencing. The obtained sequences were manually edited and trimmed, and 7 agrD sequences that did not meet the required quality to be incorporated into polymorphism analysis were removed from the study. Comparative analysis with sequences available in the NCBI GenBank database revealed all C. perfringens sequences from this study shared >97% sequence homology with the agrD gene of the C. perfringens strain FORC_025 (CP013101.1, toxinotype A).
Comparative analysis with the AgrD amino acid sequence of FORC_025 found all study AgrD peptides to be highly conserved, sharing 97 to 100% sequence identity (Supplementary Fig. 1). Notably, there was only one amino acid change at position 24 from alanine (A) to valine (V) in the N-terminal amphipathic region of AgrD peptide among all analyzed C. perfringens isolates. The putative amino acids predicted to form the thiolactone/lactone ring structure of the mature AIP were also conserved as CLWFT in all isolates, except for four isolates, three in AAD group and one in the non-AAD group, which presented CIWFT as the ring structure. A highly conserved proline (P) residue in the C-terminal charged region was found in all AgrD peptides of C. perfringens isolates. No significant difference was observed between AgrD peptide sequences of C. perfringens in the AAD and non-AAD groups (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Discussion
AAD is a complex and debilitating disorder, which results from dysbiosis of the protective gut microbiota. Disruption to the colonic microbiota is primarily due to exposure to antibiotic therapy, but other known risk factors for AAD include the use of proton pump inhibitors, exposure to pathogens in high-risk environments, medical procedures, senescence, comorbidity, IBD and immunosuppression35. C. perfringens forms part of the normal gut flora of healthy humans in small numbers up to 103 colony forming units (cfu) per gram. Ingestion of large numbers (>108 organisms) of enterotoxigenic C. perfringens followed by their multiplication and release of CPE enterotoxin in the small intestine can develop AAD if allowed to overgrow36. Each toxinotype of C. perfringens is associated with histotoxic and enterotoxic diseases in humans and animals, and in particular, C. perfringens CPE-positive toxinotype A (currently called C. perfringens type F strains) are considered an important causative agent in cases of AAD13,35,37.
This study investigated the prevalence and molecular epidemiology of C. perfringens isolated from Iranian hospitalized patients suffering from AAD. Overall, 13.3% of the test population presented with AAD, and a total of 106 (4.8%) C. perfringens strains were isolated from 2208 fecal samples collected over a 6 year period, in which 68 isolates were obtained from AAD patients and 38 from non-AAD. We believe this is the first report for the prevalence of C. perfringens among Iranian patients with diarrheal illnesses. Previous studies from Germany38 and India8 reported C. perfringens prevalence in stool of 4.1% and 8.6%, respectively. Recently, Young et al. detected the C. perfringens toxin in 14 of 135 (10.4%) fecal specimens of patients suspected of having AAD2. Interestingly, the prevalence of C. perfringens among AAD patients in our study was very high and found to be about 22.4%. This finding highlights the significance of a screening test for detection of this pathogen as an important alternative to C. difficile in the development of AAD.
We observed C. perfringens-infected patients that aged over 50 years were at higher risk to present AAD (P = 0.001) than in younger patients. In a previous study by Forward et al. higher levels of CPE toxin were found in patients aged over 60 years39. They suggested that testing for CPE would be of value in cases of diarrhea in patients aged over 60 years, regardless if the patient has a history of antibiotic treatment. In our study, more than half of the AAD patients positive for C. perfringens suffered from IBD, although this was not statistically significant. However, it has been suggested that clostridia other than C. difficile, especially enterotoxigenic C. perfringens, may play a significant role in the clinical course of IBD40. Notably, 61.5% of the AAD cases had received metronidazole alone or in combination with other antibacterial therapies, more frequently vancomycin. These data are in agreement with another study by Joshy et al. from India, where 48.6% of AAD patients had received metronidazole and/or vancomycin treatment8. In both AAD and non-AAD groups, nearly half of the patients positive for C. perfringens were located in gastroenterology wards. However, about 91% of the patients positive for C. perfringens from oncology wards had AAD. This finding is in agreement with the data from the study by Joshy et al., in which 100% of the enterotoxigenic C. perfringens isolates from AAD cases came from oncology medical wards8.
In this study, CPE-positive C. perfringens was detected in 16% of all patients. Notably, 13.2% of the patients in the AAD group were cpe-positive, although not statistically different when compared with the non-AAD group. Previous studies found CPE in 0.14%41, 3.3%3, 6.4%38 and 8%30 of cases with AAD by using either an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or more sensitive molecular methods. In comparison, other studies reported that the prevalence of CPE-positive C. perfringens was higher, ranging from 2.5 to 31%, in the cases of sporadic diarrhea (SD) than AAD39,42,43. In the above studies, CPE was detected using the ELISA, reversed passive latex agglutination (RPLA) and/or enzyme immunoassay (EIA) tests, thus the differences in CPE prevalence may be due to testing methodology or more likely, differing strain/toxinotype epidemiology in different geographical regions.
As anticipated, all isolates contained the cpa gene with toxinotype A accounting for 84% of isolates. Toxinotype A was detected with higher prevalence in AAD group (86.8%) than non-AAD group (78.9%). It has been reported that 1 to 5% of C. perfringens type A strains also produce CPE41. Previously, these CPE-positive strains of C. perfringens were referred to as type A. However, recently Rood et al. developed a new toxin-based typing scheme whereby C. perfringens is now classified into 7 toxinotypes, A to G13. Based on this new scheme, all CPE-positive strains of C. perfringens type A are now renamed as C. perfringens type F strains. In our study, C. perfringens type F strains were found in 16% of the isolates, and 13.2% of the patients in the AAD group carried this toxinotype. This provides some evidence for the importance of CPE-producing type F strains in the development of AAD.
As expected, C. perfringens type B, C, D and E strains were not detected in this population. Moreover, certain strains of C. perfringens that produce a plasmid-encoded pore-forming toxin called NetB have been reported to cause necrotic enteritis in poultry44. The infected chickens may present various clinical symptoms such as diarrhea, ruffled feathers, anorexia, depression and occasionally sudden death without any warning clinical signs45. As mentioned earlier, these netB-positive isolates have recently been described as toxinotype G strains. As expected, none of our human isolates of C. perfringens carried the netB gene.
Beta2-toxin (CPB2) is another plasmid-borne toxin of C. perfringens encoded by cpb2 gene, which has 15% amino acid sequence identity with CPB46. cpb2-positive C. perfringens strains have been identified from a variety of animals suffering from enteric diseases, including domestic and wild animals. Moreover, Fisher et al. detected the cpb2 gene in <15% of food poisoning isolates by PCR47. They also reported that >75% of AAD/SD isolates, which usually carry a plasmid-borne cpe gene, were also found to be positive for cpb2 gene and suggested that CPB2 may be involved in CPE-associated AAD/SD as an accessory toxin of C. perfringens. However, further experimental evidence is needed to support the role of CPB2 toxin in the pathogenesis of C. perfringens induced AAD. Notably, in our study, 41.2% of the C. perfringens type F strains that carry the cpe gene were also found to be cpb2-positive, and more common in the AAD group.
The two-component system (TCS) of pathogenic clostridia, which comprises the VirS membrane sensor histidine kinase and its cognate VirR response regulator, regulates the production of several toxins including CPB, as well as many extracellular enzymes21,48. The mutation or inactivation of either the virS or virR gene results in an altered toxin production compared to the wild-type strain of C. perfringens48,49. Although the VirS/VirR regulon is located on the chromosome, it can regulate genes carried on both the chromosome and the plasmid21. In addition, many bacteria regulate gene expression in response to their population or cell density in a QS based manner. The Agr-like QS system in C. perfringens functions as a cell-to-cell communication system and has been shown to be important for the regulation of virulence genes in this species21,29. Initial studies have shown that the QS system can regulate the production of a number of extracellular toxins in vitro, including CPA, PFO, CPB, ETX, CPB2, CPE, and NetB22,25,47,50. In C. perfringens, the AgrD is first processed to the active AIP by the AgrB membrane endoprotease and then released into the extracellular milieu. However, data obtained from a genome analysis showed that C. perfringens lacks the AgrA/AgrC as the TCS upstream or downstream of agrBD that responds to the AIP in S. aureus25. There is also some evidence, but not firmly proven, indicating that the VirS/VirR regulatory system may corresponds to AgrA/AgrC in C. perfringens21. In our study, we identified the virR/virS regulon in 56.6% of the isolates, while the agrB and agrD genes were detected in 67% of the C. perfringens isolates simultaneously. Moreover, because of the critical function of AgrD in the modification of gene expression in C. perfringens, we investigated its amino acid sequence variations among the studied isolates. This is the first study, however, to report the prevalence of agrD and its genetic diversity in C. perfringens strains. Our results showed that 67% of C. perfringens strains harbored agrD. Notably, the majority of agrD-positive strains (75%) were found in the AAD group. Moreover, the data obtained from the sequence analysis demonstrated very high conservation of AgrD in Iranian C. perfringens strains, irrespective of toxinotype, particularly in the thiolactone/lactone ring structure containing CLWFT motif. However, a few strains contained CIWFT in their mature AIP ring structure, mostly in the AAD group. Recently, bioinformatic analysis of the genome sequences of pathogenic clostridia and different agr types of S. aureus has revealed significant variations in the amino acid residues in the thiolactone/lactone ring structure of the putative AgrD peptides46. Further studies are needed to ascertain the functional consequences of these underlying variations in AgrD.
In summary, the high prevalence of C. perfringens in AAD patients suggests that it is a potentially important cause of infective AAD in the Iranian population, especially if the stool is negative for other pathogens such as C. difficile. In addition, enterotoxigenic toxinotype F isolates that produce CPE were detected in a large proportion of the study population. We acknowledge that this study focused solely on the prevalence of C. perfringens and its toxinotypes, as such we could not assess other bacterial agents that can cause AAD, such as C. difficile, S. aureus and K. oxytoca. Moreover, we also did not rule out the possibility of foodborne diarrhea caused by C. perfringens. However, our findings suggest that routine diagnostic laboratories in Iran should consider screening for C. perfringens in cases of suspected AAD, particularly in patients over 50 years. Our results also showed that the majority of patients with AAD carried agrD-positive C. perfringens, however, further studies are required to evaluate its clinical significance in the pathogenesis of AAD caused by C. perfringens. Finally, extended monitoring of the true burden of C. perfringens AAD in both hospital patients and in the community by surveillance and epidemiological studies could markedly improve the efficacy of infection prevention and control measures.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant (No. RIGLD 992) from Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Behehsti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. The authors would like to thank Professor Michel-Robert Popoff for his constructive criticism of the manuscript.
Author Contributions
M.A. collected the fecal samples, isolated the C. perfringens and performed the experiments. F.G. and S.S. contributed to performing the molecular and differential tests. A.Y. worked on concept and design of the study, data analysis and interpretation, and wrote the manuscript. D.R.K., H.A.A. and M.R.Z. critically revised the paper. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and the authorship list.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-44281-5.
References
- 1.Kyne L, Hamel MB, Polavaram R, Kelly CP. Health care costs and mortality associated with nosocomial diarrhea due to Clostridium difficile. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2002;34:346–353. doi: 10.1086/338260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kim YJ, et al. Prevalence of Clostridium perfringens toxin in patients suspected of having antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Anaerobe. 2017;48:34–36. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Asha N, Tompkins D, Wilcox M. Comparative analysis of prevalence, risk factors, and molecular epidemiology of antibiotic-associated diarrhea due to Clostridium difficile, Clostridium perfringens, and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006;44:2785–2791. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00165-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zollner-Schwetz I, et al. Role of Klebsiella oxytoca in antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008;47:e74–e78. doi: 10.1086/592074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Petit L, Gibert M, Popoff MR. Clostridium perfringens: toxinotype and genotype. Trends Microbiol. 1999;7:104–110. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(98)01430-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kiu R, Hall LJ. An update on the human and animal enteric pathogen Clostridium perfringens. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018;7:141. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0144-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Borriello S, et al. Enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens: a possible cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. The Lancet. 1984;323:305–307. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(84)90359-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Joshy L, Chaudhry R, Dhawan B, Kumar L, Das B. Incidence and characterization of Clostridium perfringens isolated from antibiotic-associated diarrhoeal patients: a prospective study in an Indian hospital. J. Hosp. Infect. 2006;63:323–329. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vaishnavi C, Kaur S, Singh K. Clostridium perfringens type A & antibiotic associated diarrhoea. Indian J. Med. Res. 2005;122:52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hancock P. Antibiotic-associated diarrhoea: Clostridium difficile or C. perfringens? Rev. Med. Microbiol. 1997;8:S69. doi: 10.1097/00013542-199712001-00038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li J, et al. Toxin plasmids of Clostridium perfringens. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013;77:208–233. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00062-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chukwu EE, Nwaokorie FO, Coker AO, Avila-Campos MJ, Ogunsola FT. Genetic variation among Clostridium perfringens isolated from food and faecal specimens in Lagos. Microb. Pathog. 2017;111:232–237. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rood JI, et al. Expansion of the Clostridium perfringens toxin-based typing scheme. Anaerobe. 2018;53:5–10. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Freedman, J. C., Shrestha, A. & McClane, B. A. Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin: action, genetics, and translational applications. Toxins. 8 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Kokai-Kun JF, Songer JG, Czeczulin JR, Chen F, McClane BA. Comparison of Western immunoblots and gene detection assays for identification of potentially enterotoxigenic isolates of Clostridium perfringens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1994;32:2533–2539. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.10.2533-2539.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li J, Miyamoto K, Sayeed S, McClane BA. Organization of the cpe locus in cpe-positive Clostridium perfringens type C and D isolates. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vilei EM, et al. Antibiotic‐induced expression of a cryptic cpb2 gene in equine β2‐toxigenic Clostridium perfringens. Mol. Microbiol. 2005;57:1570–1581. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04789.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Uzal F, Vidal J, McClane B, Gurjar A. Clostridium perfringens toxins involved in mammalian veterinary diseases. Open Toxinology J. 2010;2:24. doi: 10.2174/1875414701003020024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li J, Miyamoto K, McClane BA. Comparison of virulence plasmids among Clostridium perfringens type E isolates. Infect. Immun. 2007;75:1811–1819. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01981-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fisher DJ, et al. Dissecting the contributions of Clostridium perfringens type C toxins to lethality in the mouse intravenous injection model. Infect. Immun. 2006;74:5200–5210. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00534-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ohtani, K. & Shimizu, T. Regulation of toxin production in Clostridium perfringens. Toxin. 8 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 22.Yu, Q. et al. The Agr-Like Quorum sensing system is required for pathogenesis of necrotic enteritis caused by Clostridium perfringens in poultry. Infect. Immun. 85 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.Le KY, Otto M. Quorum-sensing regulation in staphylococci-an overview. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1174. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Peng H, Novick R, Kreiswirth B, Kornblum J, Schlievert P. Cloning, characterization, and sequencing of an accessory gene regulator (agr) in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 1988;170:4365–4372. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.9.4365-4372.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vidal JE, et al. Evidence that the Agr-like quorum sensing system regulates the toxin production, cytotoxicity and pathogenicity of Clostridium perfringens type C isolate CN3685. Mol. Microbiol. 2012;83:179–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07925.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ohtani K, et al. Virulence gene regulation by the agr system in Clostridium perfringens. J. Bacteriol. 2009;191:3919–3927. doi: 10.1128/JB.01455-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vidal JE, Chen J, Li J, McClane BA. Use of an EZ-Tn5-based random mutagenesis system to identify a novel toxin regulatory locus in Clostridium perfringens strain 13. PLoS One. 2009;4:e6232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ma M, Li J, McClane BA. Structure-function analysis of peptide signaling in the Clostridium perfringens Agr-like quorum sensing system. J. Bacteriol. 2015;197:1807–1818. doi: 10.1128/JB.02614-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ohtani K, Shimizu T. Regulation of toxin gene expression in Clostridium perfringens. Res. Microbiol. 2015;166:280-–289. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2014.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Asha NJ, Wilcox MH. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium perfringens antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. J. Med. Microbiol. 2002;51:891–894. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-51-10-891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wu J, et al. Detection and toxin typing of Clostridium perfringens in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009;47:807–810. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01324-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dashti AA, Jadaon MM, Abdulsamad AM, Dashti HM. Heat treatment of bacteria: a simple method of DNA extraction for molecular techniques. Kuwait Med. J. 2009;41:117–122. [Google Scholar]
- 33.van Asten AJ, van der Wiel CW, Nikolaou G, Houwers DJ, Gröne A. A multiplex PCR for toxin typing of Clostridium perfringens isolates. Vet. Microbiol. 2009;136:411–412. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hall, T. A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. c1979–c2000. Information Retrieval Ltd., London, pp. 95–98 (1999).
- 35.Larcombe S, Hutton ML, Lyras D. Involvement of bacteria other than Clostridium difficile in antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:463-–476. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Modi N, Wilcox MH. Evidence for antibiotic induced Clostridium perfringens diarrhoea. J. Clin. Pathol. 2001;54:748–751. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.10.748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gorkiewicz G. Nosocomial and antibiotic-associated diarrhoea caused by organisms other than Clostridium difficile. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2009;33(Suppl 1):S37–S41. doi: 10.1016/S0924-8579(09)70015-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Abrahao C, Carman RJ, Hahn H, Liesenfeld O. Similar frequency of detection of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin and Clostridium difficile toxins in patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2001;20:676–677. doi: 10.1007/s100960100571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Forward LJ, Tompkins DS, Brett MM. Detection of Clostridium difficile cytotoxin and Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin in cases of diarrhoea in the community. J. Med. Microbiol. 2003;52:753–757. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.05119-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Banaszkiewicz A, et al. Enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens infection and pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J. Crohns Colitis. 2014;8:276–281. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Heimesaat MM, Granzow K, Leidinger H, Liesenfeld O. Prevalence of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B and Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin A in stool samples of patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Infection. 2005;33:340–344. doi: 10.1007/s15010-005-5067-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mpamugo O, Donovan T, Brett MM. Enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens as a cause of sporadic cases of diarrhoea. J. Med. Microbiol. 1995;43:442–445. doi: 10.1099/00222615-43-6-442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Brett MM, Rodhouse JC, Donovan TJ, Tebbutt GM, Hutchinson DN. Detection of Clostridium perfringens and its enterotoxin in cases of sporadic diarrhoea. J. Clin. Pathol. 1992;45:609–611. doi: 10.1136/jcp.45.7.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fisher DJ, et al. Association of beta2 toxin production with Clostridium perfringens type A human gastrointestinal disease isolates carrying a plasmid enterotoxin gene. Mol. Microbiol. 2005;56:747–762. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04573.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Freedman JC, et al. Clostridium perfringens type A-E toxin plasmids. Res. Microbiol. 2015;166:264–279. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2014.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Carter GP, Cheung JK, Larcombe S, Lyras D. Regulation of toxin production in the pathogenic clostridia. Mol. Microbiol. 2014;91:221–231. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cheung JK, et al. The VirSR two-component signal transduction system regulates NetB toxin production in Clostridium perfringens. Infect. Immun. 2010;78:3064–3072. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00123-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chen, J., Rood, J. I. & McClane, B. A. Epsilon-toxin production by Clostridium perfringens type D strain CN3718 is dependent upon the agr operon but not the VirS/VirR two-component regulatory system. MBio. 2 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Retracted]
- 49.Li J, Chen J, Vidal JE, McClane BA. The Agr-like quorum-sensing system regulates sporulation and production of enterotoxin and beta2 toxin by Clostridium perfringens type A non-food-borne human gastrointestinal disease strain F5603. Infect. Immun. 2011;79:2451–2459. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00169-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chen J, McClane BA. Role of the Agr-like quorum-sensing system in regulating toxin production by Clostridium perfringens type B strains CN1793 and CN1795. Infect. Immun. 2012;80:3008–3017. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00438-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.