Mycoplasma pneumoniae causes respiratory infections, such as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), with epidemics recurring every 3 to 7 years. In 2010 and 2011, many countries experienced an extraordinary epidemic peak.
KEYWORDS: MLVA, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, P1 typing, molecular typing
ABSTRACT
Mycoplasma pneumoniae causes respiratory infections, such as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), with epidemics recurring every 3 to 7 years. In 2010 and 2011, many countries experienced an extraordinary epidemic peak. The cause of these recurring epidemics is not understood, but decreasing herd immunity and shifts in the strains’ antigenic properties have been suggested as contributing factors. M. pneumoniae PCR-positive samples were collected between 1996 and 2017 from four neighboring counties inhabited by 12% of Sweden’s population. A total of 578 isolates were characterized directly from 624 clinical samples using P1 typing by sequencing and multilocus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA). A fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-PCR approach was also used to detect mutations associated with macrolide resistance in the 23S rRNA gene. Through P1 typing, the strains were classified into type 1 and type 2, as well as variants 2a, 2b, 2c, and a new variant found in nine of the strains, denoted variant 2e. Twelve MLVA types were distinguished, and 3-5-6-2 (42.4%), 4-5-7-2 (37.4%), and 3-6-6-2 (14.9%) predominated. Several P1 and MLVA types cocirculated each year, but type 2/variant 2 strains and MLVA types 3-5-6-2 and 4-5-7-2 predominated during the epidemic period comprising the peak of 2010 and 2011. In 2016 and 2017, type 1 became more common, and MLVA type 4-5-7-2 predominated. We also found that 0.2% (1/578) of the strains carried a macrolide resistance-associated mutation, indicating a very low prevalence of macrolide resistance in this region of Sweden.
INTRODUCTION
Mycoplasma pneumoniae is among the smallest free-living bacteria. It has a genome size of 0.816 Mbp and is regarded a genetically stable microorganism (1–3). Humans are the only host, and it causes primarily respiratory infections that range from mild upper respiratory infections to serious lower respiratory infections. Furthermore, M. pneumoniae may cause extrapulmonary manifestations, such as encephalitis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, pericarditis, and hemolytic anemia (4).
M. pneumoniae does not have an ordinary cell wall; therefore, it is naturally resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics. Macrolides, tetracyclines, and fluoroquinolones are effective treatments for M. pneumoniae infections. Macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae was first reported in Japan in 2000 and has been found in several other countries since then (5). In Europe, the resistance level is low at 0 to 10%, but up to 80 to 90% of strains are resistant in China and Japan (6–13). The mechanism of resistance is coupled with point mutations in the peptidyl transferase loop of domain V in the 23S rRNA gene (5, 14).
Every 3 to 7 years, M. pneumoniae epidemics increase, and in 2010 and 2011 there was an extraordinary epidemic peak in several countries, including Sweden (Fig. 1) (15–20). M. pneumoniae is not a notifiable disease in Sweden, so minimal information regarding regional and local outbreaks is known. However, laboratory reports indicate that there was another epidemic peak in 2017 (Fig. 1). The cause of these fluctuations is not fully understood, but recurring epidemic periods suggest antigenic shifts in strains, decreased herd immunity of the population, or both of these factors (21, 22). Molecular typing and identifying virulence factors of M. pneumoniae are important to further understand the epidemiology.
Traditionally, M. pneumoniae typing has been based on sequence differences in the P1 gene, which codes for a cytadhesin protein that acts as an important immunogen of the bacteria (4). The strains can be divided into two distinct types (i.e., type 1 and type 2) and further categorized into variants (variant 1 and variants 2a, 2b, 2c, and 2d) (23–29). Eight and ten copy variants of the repetitive sequences exist for repMP4 and repMP2/3, respectively. These are denoted as repMP4 a to h and repMP2/3 a to j, respectively, and are dispersed throughout the genome, where one of the copy variants is an integral part of the P1 gene (1, 30). Variants of the P1 gene are thought to evolve from intragenomic recombination events between repetitive sequences within the P1 gene and copy versions outside the gene (30).
A multilocus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) typing method was developed by Degrange et al. (31). The original MLVA method included repetitive sequences at five loci in the genome, but one of the loci, Mpn1, was later excluded due to an instability problem (18, 32). P1 and MLVA typing methods are often used complementarily and can be performed directly on clinical specimens. Other methods used to type M. pneumoniae include multilocus sequence typing, SNaPShot minisequencing, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) (2, 3, 33, 34).
The aim of this study is to genetically characterize strains of M. pneumoniae that were collected over 21 years. P1 and MLVA typing methods, as well as a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-PCR-based method for detecting mutations causing macrolide resistance, were applied using 624 patient samples collected in 1996 to 2017 from four counties in Sweden.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patient samples and control strains.
A total of 624 respiratory samples collected at four county hospitals in Sweden from 1996 to 2017 are included in this study. The samples came from patients where respiratory infection caused by Chlamydia pneumoniae or M. pneumoniae was suspected. Information related to the health care setting was known, but no further information regarding the clinical background of the patient was provided. Only one sample from each patient was included and duplicate samples (n = 10) were excluded. A total of 423 (67.8%) samples were collected from 2010 to 2013, which includes the epidemic peak in 2011. All of the samples were previously identified as positive for M. pneumoniae with real-time PCR at the respective clinical microbiological laboratories in Falun, Gävle, Karlstad, and Uppsala, Sweden. A total of 439 (70.4%) samples were collected in Gävle, and 185 (29.6%) were collected from the other three counties in 2012 to 2013. More than 95% were oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swab samples, and fewer than 5% were lower respiratory samples. Information regarding the patient’s age and sex, the sampling year, the county, and whether the sample was collected in an outpatient or inpatient setting was recorded for each sample before anonymization. The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Board in Uppsala, Sweden (Dnr 2014/292).
M. pneumoniae reference stains ATCC 29342 (Strain M129) and ATCC 15492 (Strain Mac) were used as positive controls. Four characterized macrolide-resistant strains harboring the A2063C, A2063G, A2064G, and C2617G mutations provided by Cécile Bébéar at the University of Bordeaux in France were used as positive controls during the macrolide resistance screening. Sterile water was used as a negative control.
The samples and control strains were extracted and treated as previously described using a MagNA Pure 96 (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) DNA and viral NA small volume kit, the Pathogen Universal program, and a starting volume of 200 μl (7).
P1 typing.
P1 typing was performed by amplifying part of the repetitive sequence repMP2/3 within the P1 gene with a nested PCR and then sequencing as previously described by Dumke et al., with slight modifications (26). The first PCR, with a total volume of 50 μl, contained 10 μl of the DNA template, 0.5 μM concentrations (each) of the Mp5f and Mp16r primers (Eurogentec, Liège, Belgium), 200 nM concentrations of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP), 1× LongRange PCR buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and 2 U of LongRange PCR enzyme (Qiagen). Amplification was performed using the Rotorgene Q (Qiagen) and began with a heating step for 3 min at 93°C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 93°C, 30 s at 58°C, and 3 min at 68°C, followed by an extension step of 10 min at 72°C. In the nested PCR, 10 μl of the PCR product from the first PCR was used as a template. The same composition and concentrations of the PCR mix was used, except that Mp11f and Mp14r were used as primers. The reaction mix was heated for 3 min at 93°C, and the cycling program included 40 cycles of 15 s at 93°C, 30 s at 58°C, and 1 min at 68°C, with a final step of 10 min at 72°C. The PCR product was sequenced using a BigDye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) and an ABI3730XL DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). In order to discriminate between variants 2a and 2c, the strains where further analyzed with a nested PCR that targeted part of the repetitive sequence, repMP4, within the P1 gene (27). The composition of the PCR and cycling conditions were the same as those used to type the repMP2/3 sequence, except for the primers (unpublished sequences, kindly provided by Roger Dumke, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Dresden, Germany).
Multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis.
The method used for MLVA typing, which included five loci (i.e., Mpn1, Mpn13, Mpn14, Mpn15, and Mpn16), was performed as described previously by Degrange et al., with slight modifications (31). The amplifications were performed in two mixes: mix 1 contained 1× PCR buffer (Qiagen), 200 nM concentrations of each dNTP, 1 mM MgCl2; 0.5 μM concentrations (each) of primers Mpn1-F and Mpn1-R, 0.6 μM concentrations (each) of Mpn14-F, Mpn14-R, Mpn16-F, and Mp16-R, and 2.5 U of HotStarTaq enzyme (Qiagen). Mix 2 contained 1× PCR buffer, 200 nM concentrations of each dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.6 μM concentrations of each primer Mpn13-F, Mpn13-R, Mpn15-F, and Mpn15-R, and 2.5 U of HotStarTaq enzyme. The primers were obtained from Eurogentec (Liège, Belgium). The cycling conditions were as described with the exception that the number of cycles was extended to 40 (31).
The PCR products were mixed with GeneScan 500 Rox size standard (Applied Biosystems) and Hi-Di formamide (Applied Biosystems). Subsequent fragment size separation and a determination of the number of repeats at each locus were performed via capillary electrophoresis using an ABI3730XL DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The fragment analysis was performed using PeakScanner 2 (Applied Biosystems) software, following the guidelines proposed by Chalker et al. (32).
Macrolide resistance.
Macrolide resistance screening of the samples from 1996 to 2013 had been performed within a previous study (7). Screening of the additional 61 samples from 2016 and 2017 was performed using the same duplex FRET real-time PCR method targeting the 23S rRNA gene developed by Peuchant et al. (35). To verify the results, Sanger sequencing was performed on the PCR product from the control strains and a portion of the samples using a BigDye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Thermo Fisher) and an ABI3730XL DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems).
Data analyses.
The P1 gene sequences were aligned with the reference sequences that corresponded to the different types and variants of M. pneumoniae using ClustalW version v.1.4 in BioEdit v.7.2.5. The following reference strains and GenBank accession numbers were used during the alignment: strain M129 (type 1, M18639), strain Mac (type 2, AF290001.1), variant 1 (AF290000.1), variant 2a (AB024618.1), variant 2b (DQ383277.1), variant 2c (JN048895), and variant 2d (EF656612).
To visualize the MLVA typing results, the repeat numbers were recorded, and a minimum spanning tree analysis was performed using the default settings in Bionumerics v.7.6.2 (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). The results of the Mpn1 loci were omitted when analyzing the results, as proposed by the established guidelines (32).
The discriminatory powers for each typing method, P1 typing and MLVA were calculated using the Hunter-Gaston diversity index (HGDI) (36).
The strain frequencies of P1 and the MLVA types were compared over the epidemic periods. An epidemic period was defined as the year before the peak year until the beginning of the next peak (Fig. 1). Since very few strains were available during the first two epidemic periods, these were combined into one period (1996 to 2004). A Poisson probability test was calculated to determine whether a type or variant predominated significantly during an epidemic period, using the web-based program StatTools.
RESULTS
Patient samples.
The median age of the patients was 31 years (range, 1 to 91 years): 331 (53.0%) were women, and 293 (47.0%) were men. A total of 432 (69.2%) patients were from an outpatient setting, and 172 (27.6%) were collected in an inpatient setting. The clinical setting was unknown for 20 (3.2%) samples.
P1 typing and MLVA.
Of the 624 samples, 578 (92.6%) were successfully analyzed using both typing methods. Both P1 types cocirculated during all of the epidemic periods, but there was a higher prevalence of type 2/variant 2 strains during the epidemic period of 2010 to 2013 (62.0%, P = 0.0007) (Table 1 and Fig. 2a). After 2005, variants of type 2 strains were more common than type 2 strains, and variant 2a predominated during the epidemic period of 2005 to 2009 (39.6%, P = 0.0297), and variant 2c predominated during the epidemic periods of 2010 to 2013 (57.3%, P < 0.0001) and 2016 and 2017 (54.2%, P = 0.0014) (Table 1 and Fig. 2b). In 2016 and 2017, nine strains showed a new deletion of 12 nucleotides within a sequence that was homologous to variant 2b, which is the same deletion carried by the variant 2a strains at that position, leading to a loss of four amino acids (Fig. 3). Sequencing of the full repMP2/3 element within the P1 gene showed that the new variant, designated variant 2e, was homologous to variant 2b (DQ383277.1) except for the 12-nucleotide deletion. As seen in variants 2a and 2b, all nine variant 2e strains also displayed a repMP4 element that was homologous to type 2 (data not shown). No variant 1 strains were found, and because of that the variable regions that were distinctive for variant 2d were not covered in this typing method; these strains could not be detected among the 71 variant 2a strains.
TABLE 1.
Yr | No. of samples | P1 type or varianta
|
MLVA |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | T2 | V2a | V2b | V2c | V2eb | 3,5,6,2 | 3,6,6,2 | 4,5,7,2 | Other | ||
1996 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
1998 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 0 |
2001 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 1 |
2002 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
2004 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
2005 | 20 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
2006 | 35 | 21 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 20 | 1 |
2007 | 26 | 13 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 11 | 3 |
2008 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
2009 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
2010 | 29 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 17 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
2011 | 135 | 35 | 15 | 27 | 6 | 52 | 0 | 84 | 15 | 35 | 1 |
2012 | 178 | 89 | 9 | 15 | 10 | 55 | 0 | 73 | 16 | 82 | 7 |
2013 | 47 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 0 | 20 | 9 | 13 | 5 |
2016 | 28 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 14 | 1 |
2017 | 32 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 9 | 15 | 6 |
Total | 578 | 244 | 62 | 71 | 28 | 164 | 9 | 245 | 86 | 216 | 31 |
T, type; V, variant.
V2e is a new variant detected in this study.
Thirty-eight MLVA types were identified using five loci, including Mpn1 (data not shown). When the Mpn1 loci were excluded according to the new guidelines, 12 MLVA types remained, including, to our knowledge, two new types: 3-7-6-2 and 4-4-6-2 (Fig. 4). The MLVA results for the new types were confirmed through repeated testing, but unfortunately, not enough material was available for further verification via sequencing. The most common MLVA types were 3-5-6-2 (n = 245), 4-5-7-2 (n = 216), and 3–6-6-2 (n = 86), which comprised 94.6% of the strains (Table 1). Only 31 (5.4%) strains belonged to the other nine MLVA types, with only one or two strains at most of each type per year. During the epidemic period of 1996 to 2004 MLVA type 3-6-6-2 predominated (55.2%, P = 0.0381) (Fig. 2c). MLVA type 3-5-6-2 was first detected in 2005, which coincided with the introduction of the variant 2 strains. During the epidemic periods from 2005 to 2009 and 2010 to 2013, both MLVA types 3-5-6-2 and 4-5-7-2 predominated (38.0% [P = 0.0092] and 43.0% [P = 0.0007], respectively, 49.9% [P < 0.0001] and 34.4% [P = 0.0002]) (Fig. 2c). During the last epidemic period of 2016 to 2017, MLVA type 4-5-7-2 predominated (48.3%, P = 0.0009) (Fig. 2c). With a few exceptions, the MLVA types correlated to either P1 types 1 or 2 (Fig. 4). One variant 2a strain was of MLVA type 4-5-7-2, while one type 1 strain was of MLVA type 3-5-6-2. Moreover, two type 1 strains and one variant 2c strain had MLVA type 3-5-7-2. All of the new variant 2e stains were of MLVA type 3-6-6-2, as were most of the variant 2b strains.
The HGDI values calculated for these samples were 0.71 for the P1 typing and 0.66 for the MLVA method.
Macrolide resistance.
In the previous study, no macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae were detected in the 563 samples collected from 1996 to 2013 (7). When analyzing the additional 61 samples from 2016 and 2017, one sample showed a melting temperature (Tm) that was concordant with the control strains that harbored either the A2063C or A2063G mutation (Tm, 49°C). Sequencing verified that the strain had an A2063G mutation, which has been shown to provide a high level of macrolide resistance (14). The strain was determined to belong to P1 type 1 with the MLVA 4-5-7-3 profile and came from a 16-year-old male patient visiting an outpatient facility. A correlation of recorded melting temperature profiles of the control strains and patient-derived strains to target sequences showed sequences as expected.
Data availability.
The sequences of the novel repMP2/3 elements reported in this study are listed in the GenBank under accession numbers MK330954, MK330955, MK330956, MK330957, MK330958, MK330959, MK330960, MK330961, and MK330962.
DISCUSSION
This study characterized 578 M. pneumoniae strains collected in Sweden from 1996 to 2017 by applying molecular methods for P1 typing, MLVA, and the detection of macrolide resistance.
A polyclonal distribution of strains was observed, even during the years in which M. pneumoniae epidemics occurred, which are in agreement with previous typing studies (9, 13, 20, 37, 38). However, in our region, there was a higher prevalence of type 2/variant 2 strains during the epidemic period, including the extraordinary epidemic outbreak of 2010 and 2011. These results are consistent with research conducted in Slovenia but contradict findings in France, England, Japan, and China, where type 1 strains dominated during these epidemic years (6, 9, 13, 19, 39). Studies from Germany and the United States show an almost equal distribution of both types during the epidemic peak (20, 38). Therefore, it is clear that the type distribution pattern is not consistent over larger geographical areas. A shift in the predominance of variant 2 strains could be seen where variant 2a predominated from 2005 to 2009, and variant 2c predominated from 2010 to 2013 and in 2016 and 2017. In 2017, the proportion of M. pneumoniae-positive samples increased to about 10% in Sweden (Fig. 1), which implies a new epidemic peak. Interestingly, in 2016 and 2017, the proportion of type 1 strains increased from 38.0% in the previous period to 60.0%, and we recorded the emergence of a new genotype, denoted as variant 2e. In 2017, variant 2e was the second most prevalent genotype, comprising 8/32 (25.0%) of all strains and 8/11 (72.7%) of type 2/variant 2 strains. These findings may indicate a shift from variant 2c, which was the predominant type 2/variant 2 strain in the previous epidemic period, to variant 2e.
The repMP2/3 sequence was identical in all nine variant 2e strains and closely resembled the sequence of variant 2b, except for the deletion of 12 nucleotides, which led to the loss of four amino acids. The recurrence of this specific deletion within two P1 variants (i.e., variants 2a and 2e) may provide a selective advantage resulting in higher prevalence during epidemics. The sequence similarities between other repMP2/3 elements within the genome indicate that the new variant 2e is likely to be a product of rearrangement in which part of the repMP2/3-a element is inserted into the repMP2/3-d element, which is situated in the P1 gene (Fig. 5). The same mechanism behind the development of variants, such as 2a and 2b, has previously been suggested by Spuesens et al. (30).
Unfortunately, there is no information available regarding the severity of the infection or the treatment of patients infected with the strains described in this study. Interestingly, all of the patients infected with the new variant 2e were hospitalized, including two patients who were treated in an intensive care unit, which indicates that they were suffering from a more serious disease. Several studies have found no correlation between a particular genotype and disease severity (40, 41). However, other studies indicate that there could be differences in the virulence of the type 1 and type 2 strains. Rodman Berlot et al. showed that children infected with M. pneumoniae type 2 strains had a higher C-reactive protein level and were more often hospitalized, but extrapulmonary manifestations developed in equal proportions regardless of type (42). In proteome studies conducted by Lluch-Senar et al., type 2 strains expressed higher levels of the community-acquired respiratory distress syndrome toxin, which is one of the major virulence factors in M. pneumoniae (43). Simmons et al. showed that type 2 strains form a more robust biofilm that could give them increased resistance to antibiotic treatment and might allow them to evade the immune response (44).
A higher HGDI rate was calculated for the P1 typing method than for the four loci MLVA method. Removing the Mpn1 loci greatly reduced the discriminatory power of the method. Most of the strains belonged to MLVA types 3-5-6-2, 4-5-7-2, and 3-6-6-2, which seemed to be the most common types globally, except in China and Japan, where MLVA type 3-6-6-2 is rare but 4-5-7-3 is common (10, 11, 13, 19, 38, 45, 46). In order to improve the diversity index of the MLVA method, the inclusion of other loci should be considered. Recently, Zhang et al. have identified new loci with variable-number tandem repeats, which could be included in a future MLVA scheme to improve the discriminatory performance of the method (47).
In the previous study, 563 strains were screened for mutations associated with macrolide resistance, but no mutations were found (7). However, in the present study, one sample with the A2063G mutation was detected. Information on whether the patient had been treated previously with macrolides was not available. The sample was collected at an outpatient facility, and the patient had not been tested previously for M. pneumoniae; therefore, the sampling was assumed to have taken place before treatment was initiated. In Sweden, antibiotics, including macrolides, are used under strict indications, which is reflected in the lowest consumption of macrolides in Europe (48, 49). One case of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae after treatment with a macrolide has been described previously in Sweden (50). Thus, at this point, only sporadic cases of macrolide resistance in M. pneumoniae have been detected.
The lack of cultured strains makes the phenotypic detection of resistance impossible and complicates WGS typing. However, current WGS studies confirm that M. pneumoniae is a highly genetically stable species and the classification of strains into type 1 and type 2 is still valid, and they represent two separate lineages (2, 3, 43). Major variations in the genome can be seen in the P1 gene and ORF6, which also represents part of the adhesion complex, making the P1 gene a target for typing, although it has low discriminatory power, still useful. In our study, 92.6% of the samples could be analyzed using all three methods. Forty-six of the samples could not be fully analyzed, which was likely due to a small amount of DNA in the sample, repeated freeze-thaw cycles, and prolonged storage.
In conclusion, we detected the cocirculation of different M. pneumoniae types over a 21-year period and found that type 2/variant 2 strains predominated during the epidemic period from 2010 to 2013. The variant 2 strains replaced the type 2 strains after 2005, and there is a shift from variant 2a to variant 2c strains between 2005 to 2009 and 2010 to 2013. A new variant, denoted variant 2e, was detected in 2016 and 2017. Only one of the strains had a mutation associated with macrolide resistance, but surveillance must continue due to the global increase in antibiotic resistance. Aside from the postepidemic decrease in M. pneumoniae-specific immunity within the population, it is unclear whether the introduction of new variants with the potential to display an altered set of immunodominant epitopes could lead to a rise in epidemics.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Andreas Edberg, from the Department of Clinical Microbiology in Karlstad, Sweden, and Karin Elfving from the Department of Clinical Microbiology in Falun, Sweden, provided patient samples and statistics from their counties. Cécile Bébéar and Sabine Pereyre from the University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, shared control material and knowledge regarding the typing methods used in this study. Roger Dumke at the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene in Dresden, Germany, provided primer sequences and input regarding P1 typing. We thank Hoda Al-Ansari for providing technical support and the representatives of the Swedish laboratories for providing statistics. Hans Högberg provided valuable input on the statistical calculations.
This study was supported by the ALF funds at Uppsala University Hospital.
We declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Himmelreich R, Hilbert H, Plagens H, Pirkl E, Li BC, Herrmann R. 1996. Complete sequence analysis of the genome of the bacterium Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Nucleic Acids Res 24:4420–4449. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.22.4420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Xiao L, Ptacek T, Osborne JD, Crabb DM, Simmons WL, Lefkowitz EJ, Waites KB, Atkinson TP, Dybvig K. 2015. Comparative genome analysis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. BMC Genomics 16:610. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1801-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Diaz MH, Desai HP, Morrison SS, Benitez AJ, Wolff BJ, Caravas J, Read TD, Dean D, Winchell JM. 2017. Comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae genomes to investigate underlying population structure and type-specific determinants. PLoS One 12:e0174701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Waites KB, Xiao L, Liu Y, Balish MF, Atkinson TP. 2017. Mycoplasma pneumoniae from the respiratory tract and beyond. Clin Microbiol Rev 30:747–809. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00114-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Matsuoka M, Narita M, Okazaki N, Ohya H, Yamazaki T, Ouchi K, Suzuki I, Andoh T, Kenri T, Sasaki Y, Horino A, Shintani M, Arakawa Y, Sasaki T. 2004. Characterization and molecular analysis of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae clinical isolates obtained in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:4624–4630. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4624-4630.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yamazaki T, Kenri T. 2016. Epidemiology of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in Japan and therapeutic strategies for macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae. Front Microbiol 7:693. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gullsby K, Bondeson K. 2016. No detection of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae from Swedish patients, 1996-2013. Infect Ecol Epidemiol 6:31374. doi: 10.3402/iee.v6.31374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brown RJ, Macfarlane-Smith L, Phillips S, Chalker VJ. 2015. Detection of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in England, September 2014 to September 2015. Euro Surveill 20:30078. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.48.30078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pereyre S, Touati A, Petitjean-Lecherbonnier J, Charron A, Vabret A, Bébéar C. 2013. The increased incidence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in France in 2011 was polyclonal, mainly involving M. pneumoniae type. 1 strains. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:E212–E217. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dumke R, Schnee C, Pletz MW, Rupp J, Jacobs E, Sachse K, Rohde G, Capnetz Study G. 2015. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia spp. infection in community-acquired pneumonia, Germany. 2011–2012. Emerg Infect Dis 21:426–434. doi: 10.3201/eid2103.140927. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xue G, Li M, Wang N, Zhao J, Wang B, Ren Z, Yan C, Wu C, Liu Y, Sun H, Xu M, Sun H. 2018. Comparison of the molecular characteristics of Mycoplasma pneumoniae from children across different regions of China. PLoS One 13:e0198557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rasmussen JN, Voldstedlund M, Andersen RL, Ellermann-Eriksen S, Jensen TG, Johansen HK, Kolmos B, Molvadgaard M, Nielsen SS, Olsen E, Schonning K, Uldum SA. 2010. Increased incidence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections detected by laboratory-based surveillance in Denmark in 2010. Euro Surveill 15(45):pii=19708 https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/ese.15.45.19708-en#html. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kogoj R, Praprotnik M, Mrvic T, Korva M, Kese D. 2018. Genetic diversity and macrolide resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae isolates from two consecutive epidemics in Slovenia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37:99–107. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3106-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pereyre S, Goret J, Bebear C. 2016. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: current knowledge on macrolide resistance and treatment. Front Microbiol 7:974. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Linde A, Ternhag A, Torner A, Claesson B. 2012. Antibiotic prescriptions and laboratory-confirmed cases of Mycoplasma pneumoniae during the epidemic in Sweden in 2011. Euro Surveill 17(6):pii=20082 https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/ese.17.06.20082-en. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lenglet A, Herrador Z, Magiorakos AP, Leitmeyer K, Coulombier D. European Working Group on Mycoplasma pneumoniae s. 2012. Surveillance status and recent data for Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in the European Union and European Economic Area, January 2012. Euro Surveill 17. doi: 10.2807/ese.17.05.20075-en. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nir-Paz R, Abutbul A, Moses AE, Block C, Hidalgo-Grass C. 2012. Ongoing epidemic of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in Jerusalem, Israel, 2010 to 2012. Euro Surveill 17(8):pii=20095 https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/ese.17.08.20095-en. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sun H, Xue G, Yan C, Li S, Cao L, Yuan Y, Zhao H, Feng Y, Wang L, Fan Z. 2013. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae clinical specimens and proposal for amendment of MLVA nomenclature. PLoS One 8:e64607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Brown RJ, Nguipdop-Djomo P, Zhao H, Stanford E, Spiller OB, Chalker VJ. 2016. Mycoplasma pneumoniae epidemiology in England and Wales: a national perspective. Front Microbiol 7:157. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jacobs E, Ehrhardt I, Dumke R. 2015. New insights in the outbreak pattern of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Int J Med Microbiol 305:705–708. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2015.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kenri T, Okazaki N, Yamazaki T, Narita M, Izumikawa K, Matsuoka M, Suzuki S, Horino A, Sasaki T. 2008. Genotyping analysis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae clinical strains in Japan between 1995 and 2005: type shift phenomenon of M. pneumoniae clinical strains. J Med Microbiol 57:469–475. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47634-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dumke R, Catrein I, Herrmann R, Jacobs E. 2004. Preference, adaptation and survival of Mycoplasma pneumoniae subtypes in an animal model. Int J Med Microbiol 294:149–155. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2004.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Su CJ, Tryon VV, Baseman JB. 1987. Cloning and sequence analysis of cytadhesin P1 gene from Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Infect Immun 55:3023–3029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dorigo-Zetsma JW, Wilbrink B, Dankert J, Zaat SA. 2001. Mycoplasma pneumoniae P1 type 1- and type 2-specific sequences within the P1 cytadhesin gene of individual strains. Infect Immun 69:5612–5618. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.9.5612-5618.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kenri T, Taniguchi R, Sasaki Y, Okazaki N, Narita M, Izumikawa K, Umetsu M, Sasaki T. 1999. Identification of a new variable sequence in the P1 cytadhesin gene of Mycoplasma pneumoniae: evidence for the generation of antigenic variation by DNA recombination between repetitive sequences. Infect Immun 67:4557–4562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dumke R, Luck PC, Noppen C, Schaefer C, von Baum H, Marre R, Jacobs E. 2006. Culture-independent molecular subtyping of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 44:2567–2570. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00495-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhao F, Cao B, Li J, Song S, Tao X, Yin Y, He L, Zhang J. 2011. Sequence analysis of the p1 adhesin gene of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in clinical isolates collected in Beijing in 2008 to 2009. J Clin Microbiol 49:3000–3003. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00105-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pereyre S, Charron A, Renaudin H, Bebear C, Bebear CM. 2007. First report of macrolide-resistant strains and description of a novel nucleotide sequence variation in the P1 adhesin gene in Mycoplasma pneumoniae clinical strains isolated in France over 12 years. J Clin Microbiol 45:3534–3539. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01345-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xiao J, Liu Y, Wang M, Jiang C, You X, Zhu C. 2014. Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae P1 subtype variations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 78:24–28. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Spuesens EB, Oduber M, Hoogenboezem T, Sluijter M, Hartwig NG, van Rossum AM, Vink C. 2009. Sequence variations in RepMP2/3 and RepMP4 elements reveal intragenomic homologous DNA recombination events in Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Microbiology 155:2182–2196. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.028506-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Degrange S, Cazanave C, Charron A, Renaudin H, Bebear C, Bebear CM. 2009. Development of multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis for molecular typing of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol 47:914–923. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01935-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chalker VJ, Pereyre S, Dumke R, Winchell J, Khosla P, Sun H, Yan C, Vink C, Bebear C. 2015. International Mycoplasma pneumoniae typing study: interpretation of M. pneumoniae multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis. New Microbes New Infect 7:37–40. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2015.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Brown RJ, Holden MT, Spiller OB, Chalker VJ. 2015. Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for molecular typing of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol 53:3195–3203. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01301-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Touati A, Blouin Y, Sirand-Pugnet P, Renaudin H, Oishi T, Vergnaud G, Bébéar C, Pereyre S. 2015. Molecular epidemiology of Mycoplasma pneumoniae: genotyping using single nucleotide polymorphisms and SNaPshot technology. J Clin Microbiol 53:3182–3194. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01156-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Peuchant O, Menard A, Renaudin H, Morozumi M, Ubukata K, Bebear CM, Pereyre S. 2009. Increased macrolide resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in France directly detected in clinical specimens by real-time PCR and melting curve analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 64:52–58. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hunter PR, Gaston MA. 1988. Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson’s index of diversity. J Clin Microbiol 26:2465–2466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pereyre S, Charron A, Hidalgo-Grass C, Touati A, Moses AE, Nir-Paz R, Bébéar C. 2012. The spread of Mycoplasma pneumoniae is polyclonal in both an endemic setting in France and in an epidemic setting in Israel. PLoS One 7:e38585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Diaz MH, Benitez AJ, Winchell JM. 2015. Investigations of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in the United States: trends in molecular typing and macrolide resistance from 2006 to 2013. J Clin Microbiol 53:124–130. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02597-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhao F, Liu L, Tao X, He L, Meng F, Zhang J. 2015. Culture-independent detection and genotyping of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in clinical specimens from Beijing, China. PLoS One 10:e0141702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nilsson AC, Bjorkman P, Welinder-Olsson C, Widell A, Persson K. 2010. Clinical severity of Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) infection is associated with bacterial load in oropharyngeal secretions but not with MP genotype. BMC Infect Dis 10:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Spuesens EB, Brouwer RW, Mol KH, Hoogenboezem T, Kockx CE, Jansen R, Van IWF, Van Rossum AM, Vink C. 2016. Comparison of Mycoplasma pneumoniae genome sequences from strains isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Front Microbiol 7:1701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rodman Berlot J, Krivec U, Praprotnik M, Mrvič T, Kogoj R, Keše D. 2018. Clinical characteristics of infections caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae P1 genotypes in children. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37:1265–1272. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3243-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lluch-Senar M, Cozzuto L, Cano J, Delgado J, Llorens-Rico V, Pereyre S, Bebear C, Serrano L. 2015. Comparative “-omics” in Mycoplasma pneumoniae clinical isolates reveals key virulence factors. PLoS One 10:e0137354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Simmons WL, Daubenspeck JM, Osborne JD, Balish MF, Waites KB, Dybvig K. 2013. Type 1 and type 2 strains of Mycoplasma pneumoniae form different biofilms. Microbiology 159:737–747. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.064782-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Suzuki Y, Seto J, Shimotai Y, Itagaki T, Katsushima Y, Katsushima F, Ikeda T, Mizuta K, Hongo S, Matsuzaki Y. 2017. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae isolates between 2004 and 2014 in Yamagata, Japan: change in molecular characteristics during an 11-year period. Jpn J Infect Dis 70:642–646. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2017.276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Carrim M, Wolter N, Benitez AJ, Tempia S, Du Plessis M, Walaza S, Moosa F, Diaz MH, Wolff BJ, Treurnicht FK, Hellferscee O, Dawood H, Variava E, Cohen C, Winchell JM, von Gottberg A. 2018. Epidemiology and molecular identification and characterization of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, South Africa, 2012-2015. Emerg Infect Dis 24:506–513. doi: 10.3201/eid2403.162052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhang J, Song X, Ma MJ, Xiao L, Kenri T, Sun H, Ptacek T, Li S, Waites KB, Atkinson TP, Shibayama K, Dybvig K, Feng Y. 2017. Inter- and intra-strain variability of tandem repeats in Mycoplasma pneumoniae based on next-generation sequencing data. Future Microbiol 12:119–129. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2016-0111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2019. Antimicrobial consumption interactive database: ESAC-Net—antimicrobial consumption rates by country. ECDC, Solna, Sweden: https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/antimicrobial-consumption/database/rates-country/. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Läkemedelsverket. 2008. Farmakologisk behandling av nedre luftvägsinfektioner i öppen vård. Läkemedelsverket, Uppsala, Sweden: https://lakemedelsverket.se/upload/halso-och-sjukvard/behandlingsrekommendationer/Rev_NLI-rek_091202_bokm.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nilsson AC, Jensen JS, Bjorkman P, Persson K. 2014. Development of macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae-infected Swedish patients treated with macrolides. Scand J Infect Dis 46:315–319. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2013.866268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The sequences of the novel repMP2/3 elements reported in this study are listed in the GenBank under accession numbers MK330954, MK330955, MK330956, MK330957, MK330958, MK330959, MK330960, MK330961, and MK330962.