Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2019 May 13;12(5):e228647. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-228647

Schwannoma of the extracranial portion of the accessory nerve presenting as spinal adenopathy

Mohamed Mehdi El Fakiri 1,2, Meryem Lahjaouj 2, Mohammed Roubal 2, Mohammed Mahtar 2
PMCID: PMC6536194  PMID: 31088815

Abstract

Schwannomas are benign tumours arising from Schwann cells in the peripheral nerve. The schwannoma of the accessory nerve is a very rare entity. We report a case of Schwannoma of the extracranial accessory nerve. A 22-year-old man presented with a slow-growing mass, located on the right upper neck. The patient did not have any neurological deficit. CT scan showed a hypodense mass behind sternocleidomastoid muscle. The suspected diagnosis was an adenopathy of the accessory spinal chain. Surgery was done via transcervical approach. The histopathological analysis concluded with a diagnosis of schwannoma. No recurrence was noted at the follow-up examination 29 months after surgery.

Keywords: cranial nerves; ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology

Background

Schwannomas are benign tumours arising from Schwann cells in the peripheral nerve. At the head and neck area, they have a predilection for the origin of the vagus nerve in the neck and the cervical sympathetic chain.1 2 The schwannoma of the accessory nerve is a very rare entity. When arising from the accessory nerve, the schwannoma is usually found in the intracranial and spinal portions.3 We report a case of a swelling in the right upper neck, which highlights an atypical presentation of this tumour. We discuss clinical presentation, radiographic finding, surgical management and long-term outcome.

Case presentation

A 22-year-old man was observed a swelling mass in the right upper lateral neck, which has been growing for 5 years painlessly and slowly. There was no history of cervical paresis. Physical examination revealed a 4×4 cm mass behind the right sternocleidomastoid muscle. It was firm and immobile. There was no associated palpable cervical lymphadenopathy. Cranial nerve examination was normal. The cutaneous examination of the cephalic area and the nasofibroscopic exploration were both normal.

Investigations

CT scan showed an oval mass on the right side of his neck. It was behind sternocleidomastoid muscle. The lesion was hypodense and 4.3 cm in size with necrotic areas and calcification tissues (figures 1 and 2). Zeihl Neelsen staining of sputum samples and chest X-ray were normal. The diameter of induration after tuberculin skin test was 8 mm.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Axial CT scan of the patient showing a mass in the upper right neck.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Sagittal CT scan of the patient showing a mass in the upper neck (black arrow).

Differential diagnosis

The differential diagnosis was an adenopathy of the accessory spinal chain, especially cervical node tuberculosis or cervical node metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Treatment

Prior to the operation, the patient was informed about the surgery and its possible complications. Surgery was done by transcervical approach under general anaesthesia. Complete enucleation with preservation of the involved accessory nerve was performed. The histopathological analysis concluded of schwannoma (figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Histopathological section showing Verocay bodies with nuclear palisading (H&E stain, ×200).

Outcome and follow-up

The postoperative course was uneventful except for neck pain and oedema. These symptoms disappeared within 2 weeks. No recurrence was noted at the follow-up examination 29 months after surgery.

Discussion

Schwannomas are usually solitary and slow growing tumours. They are composed of Schwann cells that make up the myelin sheath. The myelin sheath covers the periphery of the nerve. Schwannomas do not invade the nerve fibbers but push them back. Schwannomas are equally distributed between the genders. In terms of age, the greatest incidence is between the second and fifth decades.4 The symptomatology is dominated by the tumour syndrome. There are few neurological signs.1 History and clinical examination of Schwannomas are non-specific so they usually represent a diagnostic challenge. The unilateral asymptomatic neck mass is often diagnosed clinically incorrectly as an enlarged lymph node.5 Our country has endemic tuberculosis and high prevalence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. That is why we performed diagnosis tests for tuberculosis and nasofibroscopy.

Cervical CT is the appropriate test for diagnosis and localisation of the tumour. Schwannomas appear hypodense, well limited and cause a displacement of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and the vascular sheath forward. CT scan assists in differential diagnosis like congenital cyst or a paraganglioma of the X nerve. MRI is not essential but allows to better show the nerve from which the schwannoma originated.4 6 According to Kang et al,5 imaging evokes diagnosis in 73% of cases. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of a cervical schwannoma is not very contributive to the diagnosis. The specificity is about 20%–25%.2 3 7

The most commonly used therapeutic management is surgery. However, it is important to study the benefit/risk ratio with the informed consent of the patient.3 Extracapsular complete excision is the only guarantee of non-recurrence but with the risk of nerve damage.7 In our case, the risk was paralysis of the sternocleidomastoid and the trapezius muscle. Nerve function can be preserved by intracapsular dissection.7

Learning points.

  • The schwannoma of the accessory nerve is a benign and rare tumour.

  • The differential diagnosis is challenging particularly with diseases in endemic areas like tuberculosis or nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

  • Surgical treatment should be adapted to avoid invalidating postoperative complications.

Footnotes

Contributors: MMEF diagnosed and treated patient. MMEF, the corresponding author, wrote majority of manuscript. ML contributed to case report writing and iconography. EFMM obtained consent. MR and MM critically reviewed manuscript.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: None declared.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Patient consent for publication: Obtained.

References

  • 1. Kohli R, Singh S, Gupta SK, et al. Schwannoma of the spinal accessory nerve: a case report. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:1732–4. 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5109.3270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Chakravarti A, Garg S, Bhargava R. Paediatric Extracranial Spinal Accessory Nerve Schwannoma: An Extremely Rare Case Report. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:MD01–MD02. 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19373.8171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Yasumatsu R, Nakashima T, Miyazaki R, et al. Diagnosis and management of extracranial head and neck schwannomas: a review of 27 cases. Int J Otolaryngol 2013;2013:1–5. 10.1155/2013/973045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Shrikrishna BH, Jyothi AC, Kulkarni NH, et al. Extracranial Head and Neck Schwannomas: Our Experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;68:241–7. 10.1007/s12070-015-0925-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kang GC, Soo KC, Lim DT, Dth L. Extracranial non-vestibular head and neck schwannomas: a ten-year experience. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2007;36:233–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Tomita T, Ozawa H, Sakamoto K, et al. Diagnosis and management of cervical sympathetic chain schwannoma: a review of 9 cases. Acta Otolaryngol 2009;129:324–9. 10.1080/00016480802179735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Liu HL, Yu SY, Li GK, et al. Extracranial head and neck Schwannomas: a study of the nerve of origin. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268:1343–7. 10.1007/s00405-011-1491-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES